Hubbry Logo
Interleague playInterleague playMain
Open search
Interleague play
Community hub
Interleague play
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Interleague play
Interleague play
from Wikipedia

Interleague play logo

Interleague play in Major League Baseball refers to regular-season baseball games played between an American League (AL) team and a National League (NL) team. Interleague play was first introduced during the 1997 Major League Baseball season. Before that, matchups between AL teams and NL teams occurred only during spring training, the All-Star Game, other exhibition games (such as the now defunct Hall of Fame Game in Cooperstown, New York), and World Series. Unlike modern interleague play, none of these contests, except for the World Series, counted toward official team or league records.

From 1997 to 2001, regular season interleague play occurred only on a geographical basis, with divisions in each league (the West, Central, and East) assigned to play their counterpart in the opposite league. In 2002, MLB introduced a system of rotating matchups, allowing interleague, cross-country games to occur in the regular season for the first time. In 2023, MLB began scheduling all 30 teams to play each other every year.

History

[edit]

Early discussions

[edit]
Hank Greenberg, Hall of Famer and 2-time MVP

Regular season interleague play was discussed for baseball's major leagues as early as 1903, when the two major leagues made peace and formed the National Commission as governing body. The first National Commission Chairman, Cincinnati Reds president August Herrmann (who had already been a proponent of interleague play), proposed an ambitious scheme in late 1904. Herrmann's plan would have seen the two leagues ending their seasons earlier, after approximately 116 games, "and then have every National League team play two games in every American League city, and have every American League team play two games in every National League city."[1][2] Another interleague play idea was floated around the same time by Boston Americans owner John Taylor, whose plan was for each league to play its full 154-game schedule, to be followed by not just a championship series between the two league winners, but also by series between the two second-place finishers, the two third-place teams, and all other corresponding finishers.[2]

In August 1933, several owners reacted favorably to a proposal by Chicago Cubs president William Veeck to have teams play four interleague games in the middle of the season, beginning in 1934.[3] In December 1956, Major League owners considered a proposal by Cleveland Indians general manager and minority-owner Hank Greenberg to implement limited interleague play beginning in 1958. Under Greenberg's proposal, each team would continue to play a 154-game season, with 126 within that team's league, and 28 against the eight clubs in the other league. The interleague games would be played immediately following the All-Star Game. Notably, under Greenberg's proposal, all results would count in regular season game standings and league statistics.[4] While this proposal was not adopted, the current system shares many elements. Bill Veeck predicted in 1963 that Major League Baseball would someday have interleague play,[5] and in 1968 included it in a proposal for a dramatic realignment of the major league structure.[nb 1][6][7] While the concept was again considered in the 1970s,[8] it was not formally approved until 1996, at least in part as an effort to renew the public's interest in MLB following the 1994 players' strike.[9]

Interleague play introduced

[edit]

MLB's first regular-season interleague game took place on June 12, 1997, as the Texas Rangers hosted the San Francisco Giants at The Ballpark in Arlington. There were four interleague games on the schedule that night, but the other three were played on the West Coast, so the Giants–Rangers matchup started a few hours earlier than the others. Texas's Darren Oliver threw the game's first pitch and San Francisco outfielder Glenallen Hill was the first designated hitter used in a regular-season game by a National League team. San Francisco's Darryl Hamilton got the first base hit in interleague play, while Stan Javier hit the first home run, leading the Giants to a 4–3 victory over the Rangers.

From 1997 to 2001, teams played against the same division from the other league; for example, the American League West played teams from the National League West, typically scheduled to alternate between home and away in consecutive years. In 2002, however, the league began alternating which divisions played which divisions, and thus in 2002 the American League East played the National League West, the American League Central played the National League East, and the American League West played the National League Central. Matchups which had been of particular interest prior to this format — mainly geographic rivals — were preserved. Corresponding divisions were skipped once when this rotation began, but were put back in the rotation in 2006.

From 2002 to 2012, all interleague games were played prior to the All-Star Game (with the exception of games postponed by weather that were made up after the All-Star Game). Most games were played in June and early July, although beginning in 2005, interleague games were played during one weekend in mid-May.

The designated hitter (DH) rule was originally applied in the same manner as in the World Series (and the All-Star Game prior to the 2010 edition). In an American League ballpark, both teams had the option to use a DH, while in a National League ballpark, both teams' pitchers were required to bat. Teams from both leagues have both benefited and have been at a disadvantage when it comes to the DH rule in interleague play. For instance, Barry Bonds, who spent his entire career in the National League and actually won eight Gold Gloves earlier in his career, was used strictly as a DH later in his career when the San Francisco Giants played away interleague games due to his poor fielding.[10] Conversely, Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz, who spent his entire career in the American League and was the Red Sox's regular DH, was assigned to play first base when the Red Sox had away interleague games, with the Sox choosing to give up good fielding in favor of retaining Ortiz's power hitting.[11] With the introduction of the DH to the National League in 2022, this no longer applies.

In 2007, two teams – the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Baltimore Orioles – played six games with more than one interleague opponent. The Dodgers played both the Toronto Blue Jays and the Los Angeles Angels while the Orioles played both the Arizona Diamondbacks and the Washington Nationals. This happened again in 2012 as the New York Yankees played both the New York Mets and the Atlanta Braves for six games. The Miami Marlins also did this, playing both the Tampa Bay Rays and Boston Red Sox for six games each.

The first Civil Rights Game was an exhibition interleague game between the Cleveland Indians and St. Louis Cardinals at AutoZone Park in Memphis on March 31, 2007. The first regular season Civil Rights Game was an interleague game between the Chicago White Sox and Cincinnati Reds at Great American Ball Park on June 20, 2009.

Since the introduction of interleague play, two teams have shifted leagues: the Milwaukee Brewers from the American League to the National League in 1998, and the Houston Astros from the National League to the American League in 2013. As a result, a 2013 interleague series between the two teams made it the first time that two teams faced each other in an interleague series after both teams previously faced each other in an interleague series representing opposite leagues: the two teams met from September 1–3, 1997 (Houston in NL, Milwaukee in AL), then again from June 18–20, 2013 (Houston in AL, Milwaukee in NL). In both instances, the series took place in Houston, with the team representing the American League winning 2–1.[12][13] From 1998 to 2012, both teams were division opponents in the National League Central (which had six teams at the time, while the American League West only had four).

For the 2020 season, all interleague games featured the DH, as the National League used the rule as an experiment due to health and safety measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic.[14] The DH became permanent in the NL for the 2022 season.

Series history

[edit]

Interleague play has largely favored the American League in terms of win–loss records. In 29 years of play, the AL has won the season series 20 times, and holds the longest streak of 14 straight seasons, from 2004 through 2017. The National League has won 8 and one season ended in a tie. With the Pirates beating the Royals on September 19, 2018, the National League guaranteed a season series win for the first time since 2003.[15][16]

As of the end of the 2025 MLB season, the American League holds an all-time series advantage of 4,650–4,412. The American League holds the longest streak for finishing with the better record in interleague play, at 14 straight seasons, dating back from 2004 through 2017.[17] 2006 was the most lopsided season in interleague history, with American League teams posting a 154–98 record against their National League counterparts.[17]

Records

[edit]

Wins by league

[edit]
Year Best record Total games American League National League AL winning pct. NL winning pct.
1997 National 214 97 117 .453 .547
1998 American 224 114 110 .509 .491
1999 National 251[a] 116 135 .462 .538
2000 American 251[b] 136 115 .542 .458
2001 American 252 132 120 .524 .476
2002 National 252 123 129 .488 .512
2003 National 252 115 137 .456 .544
2004 American 252 127 125 .504 .496
2005 American 252 136 116 .540 .460
2006 American 252 154 98 .611 .389
2007 American 252 137 115 .544 .456
2008 American 252 149 103 .591 .409
2009 American 252 138 114 .548 .452
2010 American 252 134 118 .532 .468
2011 American 252 131 121 .520 .480
2012 American 252 142 110 .563 .437
2013 American 300 154 146 .513 .487
2014 American 300 163 137 .543 .457
2015 American 300 167 133 .557 .443
2016 American 300 165 135 .550 .450
2017 American 300 160 140 .533 .467
2018 National 300 142 158 .473 .527
2019 National 300 134 166 .447 .553
2020 Tied 298[c] 149 149 .500 .500
2021 American 300 167 133 .557 .443
2022 American 300 152 148 .507 .493
2023 National 690 328 362 .475 .525
2024 National 690 321 369 .465 .535
2025 American 720 367 353 .510 .490
Overall American 9,062 4,650 4,412 .513 .487
  1. ^ A game scheduled between the Milwaukee Brewers and the Minnesota Twins in Milwaukee was cancelled and not made up due to weather.
  2. ^ A game scheduled between the Florida Marlins and the New York Yankees in New York was cancelled and not made up due to weather.
  3. ^ Two games between the St. Louis Cardinals and Detroit Tigers scheduled for Detroit were cancelled and not made up due to a COVID-19 outbreak in the Cardinals organization.

Interleague statistics

[edit]

The following is the text of Major League Baseball's policy regarding the compilation of statistics as a result of interleague play:

"For the first time in the history of Major League Baseball, Interleague games are to be played during the regular season. Breaking tradition always brings about controversy and the matter of baseball records is no exception.

"It is the opinion of Major League Baseball that there is no justification for compiling a new volume of records based on Interleague Play. On the contrary, the sovereignty of each league's records will be retained, and if a player or a team breaks a record against an Interleague opponent it will be considered a record in that league. In cases where two teams – as Interleague opponents – break a league or Major League record, that record will be annotated with the phrase 'Interleague game.' Streaks by both teams and individual will continue (or be halted) when playing Interleague opponents in the same manner as if playing against an intraleague opponent. In essence, records will be defined by who made them rather than against whom they were made."

"The official statistics of both leagues will be kept separately as they have in the past. This means statistics for each team and their individual players will reflect their performance in games within the league and also in Interleague games without differentiation."[18]

Geographical matchups and natural rivals

[edit]

The 1997–2001, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2021 seasons saw teams from corresponding leagues (AL East vs NL East, AL Central vs NL Central, and AL West vs NL West) face each other in a series of 2 or 3 games each, although from 1998 to 2012, this was not strictly followed due to unbalanced leagues. Not all matchups were considered interleague rivals, by playing a series of only two or three games, not the four or six-game series exclusive between one NL and one AL team.

Since 1999, certain interleague matchups have been highly anticipated each year, due to the geographic proximity of the teams involved. Many cities, metropolitan areas, and states contain at least one team in each league.[19] From 1999 to 2012, and in 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2021 in which their respective divisions met, there were six games between the two teams annually, three per ballpark. In 2013–2014, 2016–2017, 2019, and 2022, there were four games between the two teams, two per ballpark, as their respective divisions did not meet. With the beginning of league-wide interleague play in 2023, all yearly matchups saw the continuation of the four-game series format for 2023 and 2024 and one three-game series against the other 14 interleague opponents, with location to alternate every year.[20][21]

Starting in 2025, these matchups reverted to the six-game series format each season.[22][23]

Permanent rivalries

[edit]
  • Athletics v. San Francisco Giants — Known as the Bay Bridge Series or Battle of the Bay from 1968 to the end of 2024 when the Oakland Athletics (now relocated to West Sacramento) and the Giants were located in the San Francisco Bay Area. The two teams played in the 1989 World Series as well as the 1905 World Series, 1911 World Series, and 1913 World Series when they were located in Philadelphia and New York, respectively. The interleague rivalry has been played yearly since it began in 1999.
  • Arizona Diamondbacks v. Texas Rangers – Paired up as a result of the 2023 schedule format change after meeting as “split rivals” in 2013 and 2019. Previously played as rivals from 1998 to 2000 when the Diamondbacks were an expansion team before the Interleague Lone Star Series was founded. The two teams played in the 2023 World Series.
  • Atlanta Braves v. Boston Red Sox – Paired up as a result of the 2023 schedule format change after meeting as “split rivals” in 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022, as well as 1999 to 2002, 2007 and 2009. The Braves played in Boston as the Boston Red Stockings, Red Caps, Beaneaters, Doves, Rustlers, and Braves from 1871 through 1952.
  • Baltimore Orioles v. Washington NationalsBeltway Series, MASN Cup (the teams share the same cable partner), Battle of the Beltways, Parkway Series, or MARC Madness.[24] Introduced in 2006, the Nationals′ second season in Washington, D.C., after their move from Montreal (where they were in a natural rivalry with the Toronto Blue Jays).
  • Chicago Cubs v. Chicago White SoxWindy City Series, Crosstown Classic, or Red Line Series. The two teams played in the 1906 World Series. The two teams would play in an exhibition series yearly from 1903 to 1942 (excluding years either team won their respective pennant). From 1985 until interleague play began in 1997, the two teams would play an annual Windy City Classic charity exhibition game. The interleague rivalry has been ongoing since 1999.
  • Cincinnati Reds v. Cleveland GuardiansOhio Cup. Wade Miley of the Reds threw a no–hitter against the then-Indians on May 7, 2021, making the Reds the first team to no–hit their interleague rival. This was the second no-hitter in an interleague game between teams from the same state, after Don Larsen's perfect game in the 1956 World Series. The two teams would play an annual pre-season exhibition game yearly from 1989 to 1996. The regular season rivalry was introduced in 1999 with a hiatus in 2002 and 2003.
  • Colorado Rockies v. Houston Astros – Paired up as a result of the 2023 schedule format change after meeting as “split rivals” in 2013 and 2019. Played as division rivals in the NL West in 1993, the Rockies’ inaugural season, before the split to three divisions in 1994 moved the Astros to the newly-formed NL Central division, and played every season as interdivision opponents until the Astros joined the American League in 2013.
  • Detroit Tigers v. Pittsburgh Pirates — This series only became a rivalry because the other AL and NL Central teams were already paired up; it has become popular with fans of both teams, possibly due to the rivalry between the NHL's Detroit Red Wings and Pittsburgh Penguins. The two teams have several other connections as well. The Tigers' AA Minor League affiliate, the Erie SeaWolves, located near Pittsburgh, is a former affiliate of the Pirates and has retained the logo of a wolf wearing a pirate bandanna and eye patch. Additionally, Jim Leyland, former manager of both the Pirates (1986–1996) and the Tigers (2005–2013), remains popular in Pittsburgh where he continues to reside. The two teams played in the 1909 World Series. The regular season rivalry has been ongoing since 2012 except for 2020.
  • Kansas City Royals v. St. Louis CardinalsI-70 Series or Show-Me Series and named so because the cities of Kansas City and St. Louis are both in Missouri and connected by Interstate 70. The two teams played in the 1985 World Series. Previously played as interleague rivals in 2002, 2003, and 2006 to 2009, the formal rivalry has been ongoing since 2011.
  • Los Angeles Angels v. Los Angeles DodgersFreeway Series. The two teams played in a pre-season exhibition series in 1962 to 1964, 1969 to 1971, 1973 to 1979, and 1981 to 1996. The interleague rivalry has been ongoing since 1999.
  • Miami Marlins v. Tampa Bay RaysCitrus Series, the interleague rivalry has been ongoing since 1999 except for a formal rivalry in 2003.
  • Milwaukee Brewers v. Minnesota Twins — The Twins and the Brewers were formerly regional rivals in the American League, as well as division rivals from 1970 to 1971, and again from 1994 to 1997. The two metro areas are connected by Interstate 94. However, the term "I-94 Series" is used almost exclusively to refer to the games played between the Milwaukee Brewers and the Chicago Cubs and interleague contests with the also-former-rival Chicago White Sox. The interleague rivalry has been played yearly since it began in 2002.
  • New York Mets v. New York YankeesSubway Series. The two teams would play in an in-season annual exhibition game, the Mayor's Trophy Game, 19 times between 1963 and 1983. The two teams played in the 2000 World Series. The addition of the Mets in 1962 brought National League baseball back to New York after the Dodgers and Giants moved to California in 1958. The interleague rivalry has been ongoing since 1999.
  • Philadelphia Phillies v. Toronto Blue Jays – Paired up as a result of the 2023 schedule format change after meeting as “split rivals” in 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022, as well as 2009. These two teams played in the 1993 World Series, where Joe Carter hit a walk-off home run during Game 6.
  • San Diego Padres v. Seattle Mariners — The two teams were once the only west-coast teams not to be paired up with another interleague rival. The two teams share a Spring Training complex in Peoria, Arizona. Often cited as a counterargument against the "rivalry" series in general due to the teams' lack of a historical rivalry and their locations on opposite ends of the Pacific Coast (and the I-5 corridor), as well as both teams' general underachievement throughout their time as "rivals." Sometimes jokingly referred to as the Vedder Cup after Pearl Jam singer Eddie Vedder, who has lived in both cities (although Vedder himself, raised in the Chicago area, is a Chicago Cubs fan); starting in 2025, both teams partnered with Vedder to create a trophy given to the winner of their regular season series.[25][26] The rivalry was introduced in 1999 and was played as a formal rivalry yearly up until 2013 except in 2002 and 2004, with the two meeting as “split rivals” in every season except 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2021, before the rivalry was reinstated as a permanent rivalry due to the 2023 schedule format change.

In 2014, the ten teams that qualified for the postseason were five pairs of geographical rivals: the Angels, Athletics, Orioles, Royals, and Tigers from the AL; and Dodgers, Giants, Nationals, Cardinals, and Pirates from the NL.

Split rivalries (2013–2022)

[edit]

From 2013 to 2022, five teams in each league, two in each East division and three in each West division that had no formal rivalries formed "split rivalries." While the East divisions see rivalry pairings mostly alternate from year to year, the West divisions have so far seen four different variations of pairings between the six teams that are largely erratic. Starting in 2023, pairings of these teams formed permanent rivals.

In the East:

In the West:

Former interleague rivalries

[edit]
  • Baltimore Orioles v. Philadelphia Phillies — Played from 1999 to 2005. In 2006, the Washington Nationals replaced the Phillies as the Orioles' rival. Although the Nationals moved to Washington in 2005, the schedule for that season was already established, so the Washington-Baltimore rivalry series could not start until the next season. Therefore, in 2005 the Orioles played the Phillies as their rival for the last time, while Washington played Montreal's planned 2005 schedule, which included what would have been the Expos's interleague rivalry games with the Toronto Blue Jays. These two teams also played against each other in the 1983 World Series.
  • Houston Astros v. Texas Rangers (Lone Star Series) — Played from 2001 to 2012. In 2013, the Astros moved to the American League West, and the two teams began to play against each other 19 times a year as divisional rivals and then later reduced to 13 in 2023.
  • Montreal Expos v. Toronto Blue Jays (Pearson Cup or The All-Canadian Series) — Played from 1999 to 2004 (and by Washington against Toronto in 2005). By the time the Expos moved to Washington, D.C., to become the Washington Nationals for the 2005 season, the 2005 schedule already had been set, so the Nationals played what had been intended as Montreal's rivalry series with the Blue Jays that season. In 2006, the Nationals began playing the Baltimore Orioles annually as their interleague rival.

Temporary interleague rivalries

[edit]

Scheduling

[edit]

1997–1998: Beginnings of interleague play

[edit]

1997 was the first year of regular season interleague play. The twenty teams in the East and Central divisions played fifteen games each in five three-game series. The eight teams in the West divisions played sixteen games each in eight two-game series, playing home and away two-game series against each team.

1998 saw the addition of two expansion teams; with the Milwaukee Brewers' move to the National League, the leagues were now unequal in size. All the teams in the American League played sixteen interleague games, playing one four-game series (split into two home, two away) and four three-game series, except the five teams in the AL Central who played two two-game series and four three-game series. National League teams played between twelve and sixteen interleague games.

1999–2012: Three weeks in June

[edit]

From 1999 through 2012, each team in the American League played eighteen interleague games a year, but because the National League had two more teams than the American, only four NL teams would play a full eighteen-game interleague schedule, with the remaining twelve teams playing only fifteen; occasionally NL teams played only twelve interleague games, allowing for more teams in the league to play a full slate. With the exception of two NL teams playing each other, all teams were involved in interleague play at the same time (typically in June and July), playing only interleague opponents until the interleague schedule was complete for the year. The schedule was later changed to occur only in June; in 2005, it was changed again to allow for more weekend interleague games, with each team playing one series during the third weekend in May and the rest in mid-to-late June (occasionally stretching into early July).

Because of the existence of "natural rivals", not every matchup was played within each matched pair of divisions; for instance, the Milwaukee Brewers faced only Baltimore and Boston from the AL East in 2003, then met New York, Tampa Bay, and Toronto in 2005.

2013–2022: Astros join American League

[edit]

In 2013, the Houston Astros joined the American League, giving each league fifteen teams and thereby necessitating that interleague games be played throughout the season, including on Opening Day and during key division races all the way to the end of the season. This did not require expanding the total number of interleague games, because, previously, the interleague games made up 252/2430 (about 1 in 9.6) games. With an odd number of teams in each league, one team in each league would be the "odd man out" and have to play an interleague game to fill out the schedule, meaning as few as one in fifteen games could be interleague (fourteen AL teams in seven AL games, fourteen NL teams in seven NL games and one AL and one NL team in an interleague game). Although there were some proposals to play thirty or more interleague games per team, only a small increase was implemented in 2013.[27][28]

From 2013 to 2022, each team played twenty interleague games across eight series. Each team played one three-game series against four teams from one division in the other league, and two two-game series (one home, one away) against the remaining team in that division. Divisions had been rotated since 2002 but teams did not necessarily play everyone in that division prior to 2013. The remaining four games were played against a team's "natural rival" in home and home two-game series. From 2013 to 2017, these two series were back to back at one venue on Monday and Tuesday and at the other team's venue that Wednesday and Thursday. Should a team's natural rival be a member of the division they are scheduled to play as part of the yearly rotation (this first occurred for all teams in 2015), the team would play home-and-home three-game series against the natural rival, home-and-home two-game series against two other opponents, and single three-game series against the last two (one home, one away). Because the requirement for nearly daily interleague play (the only exception being if not all teams are playing) spreads out interleague play throughout the year, not every team will be in interleague play on the same day. Due to the 2016 CBA lengthening the schedule by four days, 2018 was the first year during which no team was required to play back-to-back home-and-home two-game series against any other team.

In 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic the schedule was shortened from 162 games to 60 and interleague opponents were switched to the corresponding divisions. The teams played twenty interleague games using the same format that was in place in 2015 and 2018, when the same geographic divisions were aligned together for interleague play. In 2020 only, the Central's "natural rivals" were altered to include Cleveland v. Pittsburgh and Detroit v. Cincinnati instead of the usual Cleveland v. Cincinnati and Detroit v. Pittsburgh.

2023–present: Expanded interleague play

[edit]

As part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement signed in 2022, interleague play was expanded from twenty to forty-six games where each team played a three-game series against each opposite league team and a four-game (two home, two away) season series against their natural rival. In 2025 and beyond, each team will play a six-game series in a home-and-home format (three games at each team's park), against its natural rival and a single three-game series against the other fourteen interleague opponents, with the venue alternating every year. This increases the amount of interleague games per team to forty-eight and gives the MLB a total of 720 interleague games a season.[20] Teams that were part of the “split rivalry” rotation from 2013 to 2022 had permanent rivalry matchups assigned to them.[20][29][21]

In 2025, this expands further to forty-eight games per team as interleague rivals will revert to the six game matchups between rivals that were played from 1999 to 2012, and in 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2021, for a total of 720 interleague games per season.[30]

Most days, there will be either one, three, or five interleague games scheduled, as an average of around 3.8 interleague games are played per day. With fifteen teams in each league, the number of interleague games is almost always odd, with exceptions based on when teams from each of the AL and NL have the same off day. Doubleheaders and make-up games also apply should a rainout or other extended delay requires one or more games to be postponed.

Other

[edit]

On April 1, 2013, an interleague game was played on Opening Day for the first time, between the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim and the Cincinnati Reds at Great American Ball Park, with the Angels winning that game, 3–1, in thirteen innings. Also, on September 29, 2013, for the first time in major league baseball history, an interleague game was played on the last day of the regular season, between the Miami Marlins and the Detroit Tigers at Marlins Park. The Marlins not only claimed the distinction of winning that game, 1–0, in walk-off fashion, but also saw their pitcher Henderson Álvarez (who was in the on-deck circle when the walk-off happened) pitch a no-hitter, marking just the seventh time a no-hitter was tossed in an interleague contest.

On April 3, 2016, for the first time in MLB history, the previous year's World Series participants faced off on Opening Day the following year. The Kansas City Royals hosted the New York Mets at Kauffman Stadium in a nationally televised game and won, 4–3.

With the Pittsburgh Pirates' victory over the Oakland Athletics on July 10, 2013, every team has beaten every other team at least once; the A's had previously been 11–0 all time against the Pirates.[31][32]

Every team has also hosted and visited every other team at least once. This distinction was completed in July 2016 when the San Diego Padres made their first trip to Toronto. The two teams had previously played in San Diego in 2004, 2010, and 2013.

From 1997 to 2001, the divisions were paired with their geographical counterpart (AL East vs. NL East, AL Central vs. NL Central, AL West vs. NL West). Beginning in 2002, the divisional pairings rotated. The geographical counterparts were initially skipped in 2004, but returned to the schedule in 2006, creating a three-year rotation that remained in use for over a decade. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the originally scheduled matchups were adjusted in order to limit travel. Divisional pairings before 2023 were:

Season NL East vs. NL Central vs. NL West vs. AL East vs. AL Central vs. AL West vs.
1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2020, 2021 AL East AL Central AL West NL East NL Central NL West
2002, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019 AL Central AL West AL East NL West NL East NL Central
2003, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2022 AL West AL East AL Central NL Central NL West NL East

Since 2023 with the 2022 collective bargaining agreement, every team will play every other team regardless of league. The current format has a total of forty-eight interleague games per season (forty-six in 2023 and 2024), consisting of a six-game home and home series against the geographic rival (four games in 2023 and 2024) and a single three-game series against the other fourteen interleague opponents, with location to alternate every year.[20][21]

Arguments

[edit]

Since its introduction, regular-season interleague play has continued to be a source of controversy among baseball fans and others involved with the sport. Among the arguments used in favor of and in opposition to interleague play are the following:

Pros

[edit]
  • Interleague play increases attendance; however, these numbers may be skewed, as interleague games were previously primarily played on weekends in June, when attendance is higher across the board, school is not in session and temperatures are higher than some of the other months of the season.[33] However, season-long interleague play should mitigate this statistical bias.
  • Fans can see players they might not otherwise get to see, especially those who have only ever played in one league.
  • Certain geographic rivalries are played out during the regular season that otherwise might not happen for years at a time. The Yankees now play six games against the Mets each season, whereas they would only have gone head-to-head in the 2000 World Series if not for interleague play. From 1962 until interleague play, the Mets and the Yankees had only played each other in the Mayor's Trophy Game (held from 1963 to 1983), which was an exhibition game even though it was played during the regular season.
  • It creates matchups that might not have been seen in generations. For example:
  • It allows for a rematch of the previous World Series. Starting 2023, this is guaranteed to happen once per year as all 30 teams will play each other. The most notable example of this before 2023 came in 2016, when the New York Mets and Kansas City Royals, who met in the 2015 World Series, met again on Opening Day in Kansas City.
  • It allows the relative strength of the two leagues to be measured against each other over a large assortment of games, rather than just in the World Series once per year.

Cons

[edit]
  • The World Series and All-Star Game lose the prestige that used to result from the two leagues playing completely exclusive schedules during the regular season: in the case of the World Series, the "best in the American League" playing the "best in the National League" for the only time that season.
  • More games against interleague opponents means fewer games against same-league and division rivals – the latter of which may be more compelling. However, the leagues currently play an unbalanced schedule that favors divisional opponents rather than teams from other divisions (which is important due to the postseason qualifying structure – only the best team from a given division is guaranteed a berth in the postseason).
    • Starting in 2023, divisional games were reduced from 19 to 13 per season, while every team plays three games against every interleague opponent except for six against their geographic rival. These changes were intended to address strength-of-schedule disparities that could potentially skew a wild card race, with playoffs expanded to six teams per league.

Former cons

[edit]
  • These cons applied primarily to the 1997–2001 and/or 2002–2012 formats and not necessarily to the current format:
    • The "rivalry" series that consisted of six games a year for some teams lead to further scheduling inequities. For example, the AL West race could be skewed by Seattle getting six games per year against last-place San Diego and Oakland's six matchups against defending champion San Francisco.
    • Some teams played a certain inter-league team more than a certain intra-league team. For example, the Washington Nationals played the Baltimore Orioles (an AL team) 6 times in the 2012 season, and the San Diego Padres and Pittsburgh Pirates (NL teams) only 5 times each. This is no longer the case since 2013, when every pair of intra-league foes are guaranteed at least six meetings against each other, three at each venue.
    • Most notably, teams no longer play identical opponents as their divisional rivals, and even where they do, they don't always play them an identical number of times. This can lead to "strength of schedule" disparities like those the NFL has to deal with on a yearly basis.
      • For example, in 2005, the San Diego Padres played every AL Central team except for Kansas City, who had the worst record in the league, as well as six games against Seattle, who finished that season 69–93. Meanwhile, their division rivals, the San Francisco Giants, played every AL Central team except for the Chicago White Sox, who had the best record in the AL and went on to win the World Series, in addition to six against Oakland, who was in playoff contention for most of the season.
  • These cons applied before the National League's adoption of the designated hitter rule in 2022:
    • Some argued that the AL possessed an unfair advantage over the NL because of the designated hitter rule in the AL, citing the overwhelming dominance of the AL in interleague play for more than a decade. When NL teams were on the road, they were forced to find a DH in place of their pitcher, who would normally bat ninth. Sometimes, the NL team would use one of their star hitters as the DH and use a bench player to fill in for the appointed DH, and other times, the NL team would simply use a bench player as the DH and have him bat later. In either case, however, the benefits of using a DH in place of the pitcher were minimal, especially considering that the AL designated hitters saw more action in their positions and that AL teams still possessed their full 9-man batting lineup. Even when the NL team hosted, arguments were made that there was no real benefit for the NL team either. For the most part, designated hitters are also passable fielders, meaning that they can still be used in the game. And even though the AL team had to take a player out of their lineup, it left them with a starting player available to pinch-hit and/or come in as a substitute player later in the game, as opposed to a bench player on an NL team. And although AL pitchers saw less action than NL pitchers, stats showed that AL pitcher batting average was not much lower than NL pitcher batting average, in large part due to the fact that several AL pitchers previously played in the NL.
    • Most American League pitchers were unaccustomed to running the bases (unless they had previously played in the National League), which could lead to injury and premature fatigue. (For example, Chien-Ming Wang of the New York Yankees suffered a season-ending lisfranc sprain on his right foot when running the bases during an interleague game against the Houston Astros in 2008.)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Interleague play in Major League Baseball (MLB) refers to regular-season games contested between teams from the American League (AL) and the National League (NL), allowing competition between the two leagues outside of the postseason World Series for the first time in modern baseball history. Introduced in 1997, it began with limited scheduling of select matchups during designated windows, primarily to capitalize on natural rivalries and boost attendance. The origins of interleague play trace back to proposals as early as 1933 by Cubs owner Sr., though it faced resistance from traditionalists and was not seriously pursued until the 1990s amid MLB's efforts to modernize the sport following labor disputes and expansion. MLB owners approved the format on January 18, 1996, for implementation the following season, with the inaugural game occurring on June 12, 1997, when the San Francisco Giants defeated the Texas Rangers 4-3 at The Ballpark in Arlington. Early formats featured divisional alignments, such as the AL East versus NL East, and were confined to brief summer series to minimize travel disruptions; however, the 2013 relocation of the Astros to the AL balanced the leagues at 15 teams each, prompting a shift to year-round interleague scheduling. A further evolution came in 2023 with the adoption of a balanced schedule, expanding interleague games to 46 per team—comprising three-game series against 14 opponents from the opposite league and a four-game set against a designated geographic rival—reducing divisional games from 76 to 52 and ensuring every team faces every other MLB club at least once per season. Throughout its history, interleague play has generated heightened fan engagement through unique cross-league rivalries, such as the New York Yankees versus "," and has influenced strategic adjustments, including the 2022 universal rule that eliminated the need for AL pitchers to bat in NL ballparks. The AL has historically dominated, holding an all-time edge of 3,166 wins to 2,898 losses through the 2019 season, with a streak of 14 consecutive yearly victories from 2004 to 2017 before the NL briefly took the lead in 2018 and 2019. Recent expansions have promoted greater parity, as evidenced by both leagues finishing the 2025 season at .500 in interleague matchups, while also enhancing overall competitive balance in the expanded 12-team postseason format.

Background

American and National Leagues

(MLB) was established in 1903 through the National Agreement, which formalized the coexistence of the National League (NL), founded in 1876, and the (AL), established in 1901, as two separate major leagues under a unified governance structure. This agreement resolved prior disputes over player contracts and competition, allowing both leagues to operate independently while recognizing each other as major leagues and instituting the as their annual championship matchup. Over time, the leagues developed distinct rules and traditions; for instance, the AL adopted the (DH) rule in 1973, permitting a player to bat in place of the pitcher, while the NL required pitchers to bat until adopting the universal DH in 2022 as part of the collective bargaining agreement. Prior to the introduction of interleague play, MLB scheduling confined all regular-season games to intra-league matchups, with each team playing a 162-game schedule entirely within its own league. This structure emphasized divisional rivalries, where teams typically played 12 or 13 games against each of their four division opponents, and non-divisional intra-league games against teams from the other two divisions in their league, fostering regional competition and league-specific standings. Following the 2013 realignment, MLB consists of 30 teams evenly divided between the AL and NL, with 15 teams in each league organized into three divisions: East, Central, and West. This balance was achieved when the Astros shifted from the NL Central to the AL West, ensuring symmetric scheduling and daily interleague opportunities thereafter. Throughout MLB's history until , the leagues maintained operational , conducting separate playoff tournaments to determine their champions before converging solely in the , with no regular-season games between AL and NL teams. , beginning in , marked a significant departure by integrating cross-league into the regular season.

Concept and Origins

Interleague play refers to the inclusion of regular-season games between teams from Major League Baseball's (AL) and National League (NL), a concept designed to foster competition beyond the traditional intraleague structure and the . The primary rationale was to enhance fan engagement by enabling matchups between geographical or historical rivals, such as the New York Yankees and , which were previously limited to exhibition games or the postseason. This approach aimed to increase attendance and television viewership by capitalizing on local interest and novelty, particularly in shared markets like New York and . Ideas for interleague play emerged as early as amid efforts to address financial challenges and scheduling imbalances in MLB. In August 1933, , president of the Chicago Cubs, proposed interleague games for a six-week period in midsummer to boost attendance during the , though the idea was not pursued after his death later that year. Later proposals in the 1950s included one in 1953 by Jr., then owner of the , who suggested a 32-game interleague schedule—four games against each team in the opposing league—to boost revenue and attendance during the team's struggles, though it was rejected by AL owners. Similar proposals followed, including one in 1956 by Cleveland Indians executive , which sought to implement limited interleague games but also failed to gain approval. These early suggestions highlighted the potential for cross-league play to create excitement and balance schedules, especially as MLB expanded and realigned divisions in the , leading to uneven intraleague competition due to the odd number of teams per league. The concept gained formal traction in 1995 under acting Commissioner , who advocated for it as part of broader reforms to revive interest following the 1994–1995 players' strike, which had canceled the and eroded fan support. Selig's push was linked to realignment discussions, including the 1993 informal owners' vote approving three divisions per league alongside 10–20 annual interleague games to mitigate scheduling imbalances from expansion. Motivations included not only boosting TV ratings and attendance but also generating revenue through high-profile rivalries, with interleague positioned as an experimental measure to test its viability. On January 18, 1996, MLB owners unanimously approved interleague play for the 1997 season on an experimental basis, specifying a limited format of 15 games per team focused on regional matchups. This decision was later integrated into the November 1996 collective bargaining agreement, which ratified interleague play alongside a new revenue-sharing system to address economic disparities among teams, ensuring its continuation as a revenue-enhancing tool.

History

Early Discussions

The 1994–1995 Major League Baseball strike, lasting 232 days and resulting in the cancellation of the World Series along with 921 regular-season games, created an urgent need for reforms to restore fan engagement and financial stability following the labor dispute. Acting Commissioner leveraged the post-strike momentum to propose interleague play in early 1996 as part of a broader realignment and innovation package aimed at boosting attendance and excitement in the sport. This initiative was unanimously approved by MLB owners on January 18, 1996, for an experimental introduction during the 1997 season, marking a significant departure from the traditional separation of the American and National Leagues outside of postseason play. The proposal encountered initial resistance from the (MLBPA), led by executive director , who voiced concerns that interleague matchups could create competitive imbalances due to structural differences between the leagues, such as the American League's use of the rule. Negotiations during the 1996 collective bargaining agreement (CBA) talks addressed these fears through compromises, including limiting interleague games to 15 or 16 per team in and structuring the format as experimental with provisions for review and potential discontinuation after initial years. The MLBPA ultimately ratified the agreement unanimously on December 5, 1996, allowing interleague play to proceed while preserving player protections against perceived inequities. Owners strongly supported interleague play, viewing it as a revenue-generating measure to counteract the financial fallout from the strike by capitalizing on rivalries and increased ticket sales from novel matchups. Traditionalists within the community, however, expressed opposition, arguing that regular-season games between leagues would diminish the exclusivity and prestige of the as the sole venue for inter-league competition. The full CBA incorporating interleague play passed with a 26–4 vote among owners on November 27, 1996, solidifying its place in the sport despite lingering reservations from a minority focused on preserving historical league distinctions.

Introduction in 1997

Interleague play debuted in on June 12, 1997, marking the first regular-season games between (AL) and National League (NL) teams since the leagues' separation in 1901. The inaugural matchup featured the San Francisco Giants defeating the Texas Rangers 4-3 at The Ballpark in Arlington, with Giants outfielder hitting the first-ever interleague . This debut followed years of discussions and approval by MLB owners in January 1996 as an experimental measure to boost interest amid uneven league sizes of 14 and 16 teams. The games were scheduled over two weeks in mid-June, comprising 15 three-game series totaling 45 contests, with every AL team hosting one NL opponent to balance the schedule across the 30-team league. The 1997 format limited each team to 15 interleague games, emphasizing geographical matchups between corresponding divisions—such as NL West versus AL West—to minimize travel and foster natural rivalries. For instance, the hosted the Giants in the at the , highlighting the Bay Area's intra-city competition. Similarly, the New York Yankees hosted the Mets for the inaugural at , drawing a sellout crowd of 56,188 for the opener on June 16, where Mets pitcher Dave Mlicki threw a complete-game in a 6-0 victory. These pairings aimed to create compelling narratives while adhering to the rule in AL ballparks, introducing NL pitchers to batting for the first time in regular-season play. Reception to the debut was largely positive among fans, with interleague games averaging 33,407 attendees— a 20.4% increase over the intraleague average of 27,746—contributing to an overall season attendance rise of 5.2%. A 1997 poll indicated 63% fan approval, driven by excitement over rare matchups like the Subway Series, though purists criticized the format for potentially eroding league integrity and the World Series' mystique by diminishing inter-league novelty. Despite the debate, MLB opted not to discontinue the experiment after 1997, solidifying interleague play as a fixture based on its commercial success.

Evolution Through 2022

Following the introduction of interleague play in , the format evolved significantly over the next 25 years, transitioning from a limited seasonal window to a more integrated component of the MLB . From 1998 to 2012, interleague games were concentrated in an annual three-week period in June, allowing teams to face opponents from the corresponding division in the opposite league, such as the AL East versus the NL East. By 2000, the number of games per team had increased to 18, up from the initial 15 in , providing more opportunities for cross-league competition while maintaining a focus on geographic proximity. This period also saw the introduction of "natural rivals" matchups, where select teams played six games against intra-city or regional counterparts, exemplified by the Chicago Cubs versus the , fostering heightened fan interest and attendance in those series. A key milestone came in 2002, when MLB attempted a more balanced schedule by implementing rotating matchups that extended beyond corresponding divisions, enabling teams to face a broader range of opposite-league opponents and reducing predictability in the interleague slate. This shift aimed to enhance competitive equity and variety, though it did not alter the overall June window or game totals at the time. The structure remained stable until , when the Astros relocated from the to the , balancing both leagues at 15 teams each for the first time since expansion. This realignment necessitated spreading interleague games throughout the season rather than confining them to a single month, and it raised the total to 20 games per team, increasing the annual interleague contests by nearly 20% to accommodate the even split. The period from 2018 to brought further adjustments due to the , particularly in when the season was shortened to 60 games and interleague play was restricted to divisional pairings—such as AL Central teams facing only NL Central opponents—to minimize travel and health risks. Subsequent years saw occasional series shortenings or postponements from outbreaks, including multiple doubleheaders or rescheduled games in and to manage positive tests without fully disrupting the 20-game quota. By the end of , interleague play had accumulated approximately 8,364 games since its inception, with the holding an edge of 3,634 wins to the National League's 3,328.

Scheduling

Initial Years (1997–1998)

Interleague play debuted as a two-year experiment in 1997, designed to gauge fan interest and operational feasibility following the 1994–95 strike. The schedule was limited to three short windows: starting June 12, a mid-July series, and a week around , totaling 214 games all hosted in (AL) ballparks with National League (NL) teams traveling as visitors. This one-sided home format meant no AL road games, reducing initial travel burdens while allowing 14 AL teams to each play 15 or 16 games against geographically corresponding NL division opponents—for instance, AL West teams faced NL West clubs like the Texas Rangers hosting the San Francisco Giants in the inaugural matchup. The structure emphasized regional intrigue, such as the New York Yankees versus the , to capitalize on natural rivalries without overhauling the season calendar. Logistical elements included mixed umpire crews drawn from both leagues to ensure impartiality and familiarity with differing styles, as well as application of the designated hitter (DH) rule in all games since they occurred in AL venues. Rule differences were minimal under this setup, but the trial highlighted the need for clear protocols on elements like mound visits and base-running conventions. Attendance surged, averaging 33,407 per game—about 20% higher than the season's overall intraleague average—exceeding projections of a 32% boost and signaling strong public enthusiasm for cross-league competition. The 1998 season expanded the experiment to a balanced home-and-away format, with each of the 30 teams (15 per league, following and Tampa Bay's addition) playing 14 to 16 games, split evenly between home and road. This introduced "floating rivals," where inter-division matchups rotated annually to provide variety while preserving geographical pairings, such as AL Central teams cycling through NL Central opponents like the Cleveland Indians versus the Chicago Cubs. Scheduling tweaks focused on travel efficiency, clustering series to minimize cross-league flights and aligning with existing road trips where possible. Under the balanced setup, league-specific rules applied based on the : the DH was used exclusively in AL venues, while NL parks required both teams to bat nine field players without a DH, exposing AL squads to National League-style . Mixed crews persisted to navigate these variances. The changes sustained elevated and operational smoothness, validating interleague play's continuation beyond the trial phase.

Standardized Format (1999–2012)

Following the experimental scheduling of the initial years, interleague play entered a period of standardization from 1999 to 2012, during which the games were confined to a consistent three-week window in . This concentrated format allowed each team to complete all interleague contests without significantly disrupting intra-league series or divisional play, typically spanning mid-June to early July with a focus on weekend matchups to maximize fan engagement. The structure consisted of six three-game series per team, totaling 18 games for all 14 teams and four National League teams, while the remaining 12 National League teams played 15 games due to the leagues' uneven sizes (14 AL teams versus 16 NL teams). This setup resulted in 252 total interleague games annually, representing approximately 11% of each team's 162-game schedule. Matchup selections emphasized geographical proximity to foster natural rivalries and regional interest, with pairings like the versus the prioritized as "natural" interleague opponents. To promote fairness, the schedule rotated opponents across divisions in the opposing league each year—for instance, an team might face teams one season and Central the next—ensuring that over a three-year cycle, each team encountered representatives from all three divisions of the other league. Legacy or "prime" rivalries, such as the New York Yankees versus the , were often preserved with additional games beyond the standard rotation, alternating home and away to maintain balance. This rotational approach addressed the challenges of unbalanced divisions by distributing travel and competitive matchups equitably over time. The format saw minor adjustments to refine equity, particularly in handling the National League's extra teams; for example, the four NL teams playing 18 games were selected to rotate annually, preventing any long-term disadvantage. By , interleague series consistently drew higher attendance than intra-league games, with averages 7 to 20 percent above the season's overall figures, attributed to the novelty of cross-league competition and local rivalries. This era's fixed structure provided stability, allowing teams and fans to anticipate the June window as a highlight of the regular season while minimizing logistical disruptions from scattered scheduling.

Post-Realignment Era (2013–2022)

Following the Houston Astros' relocation to the in 2013, which balanced both leagues at 15 teams each, implemented a revised interleague schedule to accommodate the even number of teams and ensure consistent play throughout the season. Each team played 20 interleague games across eight series—four at home and four on the road—against typically seven opponents from the other league, with a mix of three-game and two-game sets. This structure prioritized geographic matchups such as AL West teams against NL West clubs to foster regional rivalries and reduce travel. This structure marked a shift from earlier concentrated interleague windows, spreading games year-round while keeping them clustered in series to maintain competitive balance. The schedule incorporated a two-year rotation cycle for opponents, where divisions alternated matchups—for instance, the AL East faced the NL East in 2013 before rotating to the NL Central in 2014—to ensure broader interleague exposure over time while emphasizing divisional crossovers like AL West versus NL West. The Astros' AL debut introduced fresh matchups, including their inaugural interleague series against the as part of the West-versus-West alignment, highlighting the realignment's impact on traditional intraleague dynamics. Permanent interleague rivals, such as the and Yankees, played four games (two home, two away) in consecutive two-game series during a dedicated " week," while other series followed the standard three-game format to reach the 20-game total. This format persisted through 2019, promoting more frequent but still limited interleague interaction compared to intraleague play. The disrupted the format in 2020 with a shortened 60-game season, yet teams still played 20 interleague games—10 home and 10 road—maintaining the proportional emphasis on geographic rivals like AL East versus NL East to preserve regional flavor amid the condensed schedule. In 2021, MLB returned to the full 162-game slate and the standard 20 interleague games per team, realigning opponents by division (e.g., AL West against NL West) and resuming the two-year rotation without further alterations until the subsequent universal expansion. These adaptations underscored interleague play's evolution into a staple of the regular season, clustered yet integrated, while navigating external challenges.

Expanded Universal Play (2023–Present)

In 2023, implemented a significant overhaul to its scheduling format, expanding interleague play to a near-universal structure where each of the 30 teams plays 46 games against opponents from the opposite league. This marked a substantial increase from the previous 20 interleague games per team, with every (AL) team facing all 15 National League (NL) teams and vice versa. Specifically, teams played three games against 14 opponents in the other league and four games against their designated prime interleague rival, typically a geographic counterpart, structured as two two-game series (one home and one away). This change aimed to create a more balanced schedule overall, reducing intraleague non-division games from 64 to 64 while ensuring each team visits every other team's city at least once every other year. The expansion resulted in 690 total interleague games per season, evenly split between AL and NL victories in the inaugural year. Building on this foundation, the 2025 season introduced further refinements to enhance rivalries and maintain balance, increasing interleague games to 48 per team for a total of 720 games league-wide. The adjustment for prime rivals raised their matchups from four to six games, configured as two three-game series (one home and one away), allowing for deeper competition in key geographic pairings such as the vs. New York Yankees or the Chicago Cubs vs. . To accommodate this without exceeding the 162-game limit, teams played two fewer games against non-division opponents in their own league. The schedule preserved the universal play element, with each team facing the other 14 non-rival opposite-league teams in three-game series, ensuring balanced home and away distribution throughout the season—21 home and 27 away for interleague games, adjusted for overall equity. Special features in the 2025 schedule underscored the emphasis on interleague engagement, including Rivalry Weekend from May 16 to 18, where all prime interleague rivals met in dedicated series, alongside select regional non-interleague matchups like vs. Philadelphia Phillies. This event highlighted the format's focus on fan interest and competitive intensity. Additionally, the season's international commitments, such as the Tokyo Series between the and Chicago Cubs on March 18–19, influenced early scheduling logistics but did not disrupt the interleague balance, as the series was intra-NL and allowed for adjusted home/away interleague allocations to maintain parity across the full campaign.

Rivalries and Matchups

Permanent Prime Rivalries

Permanent Prime Rivalries represent a core feature of modern MLB interleague play, designating specific pairings between American League (AL) and National League (NL) teams that compete in an elevated number of games each season to emphasize longstanding or natural competitions. These matchups are chosen based on factors such as geographic proximity, shared market dynamics, or historical ties, aiming to create compelling narratives and enhance fan engagement across the leagues. Starting in 2023, under the balanced schedule format, each of the 30 teams was assigned one permanent prime rival from the opposite league, resulting in 15 fixed pairings overall. The structure of these rivalries evolved with the 2023 introduction of universal , where teams initially played four games against their prime rival—typically two at home and two away—as part of 46 total interleague contests. This format prioritized the rival series by allocating more games than the standard three against the other 14 opponents in the opposing league. In 2025, MLB expanded these encounters to six games per pair, structured as two three-game series (one home, one away), increasing the overall interleague total to 48 games per team (three games against each of 14 non-prime opponents and six against the prime rival). These series are often highlighted during dedicated events like Rivalry Weekend, a three-day period from May 16–18 where multiple prime matchups occur simultaneously to amplify excitement. The 15 permanent pairings encompass a mix of iconic intracity battles and regional showdowns, each carrying unique cultural or competitive weight:
AL TeamNL TeamNotes
San Francisco GiantsBay Bridge Series
Texas RangersArizona DiamondbacksSouthwest regional
Boston Red SoxAtlanta BravesHistoric franchises
Baltimore OriolesMid-Atlantic
Chicago CubsCrosstown Series
Houston AstrosColorado RockiesRegional (odd/even years prior)
Detroit Tigers
St. Louis CardinalsMissouri rivalry
Los Angeles Angels
Citrus Series
Milwaukee BrewersBorder Battle
New York Yankees
Toronto Blue JaysPhiladelphia PhilliesNortheast
Seattle MarinersSan Diego PadresWest Coast ( Cup)
By accounting for six of a team's 48 interleague games in 2025, these rivalries are engineered to drive attendance and viewership in local markets. For instance, the consistently attracts large crowds, with the Yankees and Mets posting season average home attendances of 41,885 and 39,316, respectively, in 2025—figures that rise during these high-profile interleague clashes due to sellouts and heightened demand. This focus not only sustains the rivalries' relevance but also contributes to MLB's broader goal of increasing interleague appeal through meaningful, recurring contests.

Regional Geographical Matchups

Regional geographical matchups in Major League Baseball's interleague play emphasize contests between (AL) and National League (NL) teams in close proximity, fostering organic rivalries and optimizing travel logistics beyond the elevated permanent prime series. These standard three-game series, which rotate under the universal play format since 2023, pair teams from similar regions—such as the Northeast or Mid-Atlantic—to capitalize on shared fan bases and cultural ties while minimizing cross-country flights. This approach contrasts with earlier scheduling by ensuring broader but geographically mindful interleague exposure, where each team faces all 15 opponents from the opposite league annually. Notable examples include the Boston Red Sox versus the Philadelphia Phillies, a Northeast clash between two passionate fanbases separated by about 300 miles, which has produced memorable interleague encounters since the format's inception. The and embody a Mid-Atlantic "Battle of Pennsylvania" dynamic, with the teams roughly 250 miles apart and competing in a series that highlights regional pride in the area. Similarly, the and form an I-95 matchup, connected by the iconic East Coast highway spanning from the nation's capital to Florida's Gulf Coast, adding a Southeast flavor to interleague scheduling. Such pairings deliberately sidestep distant fixtures, like the Seattle Mariners against the St. Louis Cardinals, to curb excessive travel burdens. These matchups significantly enhance interleague appeal by driving higher attendance through localized excitement and rivalries, as seen in elevated turnout for Northeast and Mid-Atlantic series. Under the 2023 universal format, expanded to 48 games in 2025—including three against 14 non-prime opponents—scheduling prioritizes regional series for most three-game sets, allowing clubs to contest over half their interleague slate against nearby foes and reducing overall mileage compared to pre-2023 unbalanced schedules. This evolution from division-specific play (e.g., AL East vs. NL East) to balanced universal rotation maintains a strong regional emphasis, promoting and fan accessibility.

Temporary and Former Series

Temporary and former series in interleague play have played a key role in MLB's scheduling evolution, allowing for experimental matchups, rotations to balance competition, and adjustments due to league realignments. These series, often short-term or discontinued, contrasted with more stable rivalries by introducing variety and addressing logistical challenges, such as geographic proximity or division shifts. In the inaugural years of 1997 and 1998, interleague play featured experimental series limited to specific windows, with teams from the AL East and Central divisions facing NL counterparts in unbalanced schedules—AL teams hosted 10 more home games in 1997, reversing in 1998. Notable examples included the San Francisco Giants versus the Texas Rangers on June 12, 1997, marking the first regular-season interleague game, which the Giants won 4-3. These early pairings, such as the Giants-Rangers, were temporary experiments designed to test fan interest without committing to long-term formats, and many did not recur after the initial seasons. League realignments led to the discontinuation of several annual interleague series, particularly affecting teams like the Milwaukee Brewers following their 1998 shift from the AL Central to the NL Central. Prior to the move, the Brewers (as an AL team in 1997) faced NL Central opponents like the Chicago Cubs and St. Louis Cardinals in interleague play; post-move, those became intraleague games, ending the interleague nature of those matchups. Similarly, the Houston Astros' relocation from the NL Central to the AL West discontinued series like the Astros versus NL Central teams such as the Cubs, which had been annual fixtures from 1997 to 2012, forcing a rotation of new opponents and altering competitive balances. From 1999 to 2012, interleague scheduling incorporated rotating "split rivalries" where divisions faced different opposing divisions annually, creating temporary matchups that shifted every few years to ensure broader exposure. For instance, in the 2000s, the AL Central played the NL West one season (e.g., Detroit Tigers vs. in 2002), then rotated to the NL East the next, with teams contesting six games against one division's clubs and three each against the others. This format, standardized in 2002, meant about half of a team's 18 interleague games were against temporary rotating opponents, preventing stagnation while highlighting cross-country series like the New York Yankees versus the San Diego Padres. These rotations ended with the 2013 realignment, transitioning to more fixed geographic pairings. Post-2013, temporary elements persisted through floating rivals and split-season pairs, where teams like the 2013 Tigers faced varying NL opponents beyond their primary division matchup, including one-off three-game sets against non-rotating foes. The further introduced ad-hoc adjustments in 2021, with postponed series occasionally rescheduled as short interleague doubleheaders or single games to minimize travel disruptions, though 2020 featured no interleague play at all due to the 60-game intraleague-only format. Since 2023, under the balanced schedule, each team plays 48 interleague games in 2025, facing all 15 opponents from the other league annually: three games against each of the 14 non-prime opponents and six against the prime rival. This structure ensures comprehensive exposure without temporary one-game series, with home/away roles rotating yearly.

Records and Statistics

League-Wide Win Records

Interleague play has seen the maintain a slight overall advantage since its introduction in 1997. Through the 2025 season, the AL holds a cumulative record of 4,627 wins to the National League's 4,404, translating to a .512 win rate across 9,031 total games. This edge reflects the AL's consistent performance, particularly in the league's early decades, though recent balanced scheduling has narrowed the gap. The inaugural 1997 season marked a strong start for the NL, which swept the interleague matchups with a 117–97 record over 214 games, capitalizing on unfamiliarity with AL styles. However, the AL reversed the trend in the , dominating with winning records in most years and achieving its most lopsided success in 2006, when it posted a 102–58 mark (a 44-game margin in 160 games that year). This period of AL superiority, spanning much of the 2000–2012 era under unbalanced scheduling, was influenced by the designated hitter advantage in NL ballparks and stronger AL lineups. Yearly breakdowns highlight this shift: the AL won 14 consecutive seasons from 2004 to 2017, often by margins exceeding 20 games. Post-2013 realignment and especially after the 2022 universal designated hitter rule, the AL continued an initial edge, but the expanded balanced schedules from 2023 onward have fostered parity, with 2023–2025 seasons at .500 splits due to each team facing every opponent from the opposite league an equal number of times. The elimination of the DH disparity reduced home-field biases, contributing to tighter contests and fewer blowouts. In these years, total interleague games reached 690 annually, emphasizing league-wide competition over regional series. Division-specific matchups reveal varied dynamics, with the AL East holding a 55% win rate against the NL East all-time, bolstered by offensive firepower from teams like the Yankees and Red Sox clashing against NL pitching-heavy lineups in the Mets and Phillies. Factors such as regional rivalries, park effects (e.g., hitter-friendly Fenway vs. pitcher-friendly ), and stylistic differences—AL's power hitting versus NL's small-ball approaches—have influenced these outcomes, though balanced play has equalized opportunities across divisions.

Series and Game Milestones

One of the inaugural highlights of interleague play was the 1997 Subway Series between the and New York Yankees, held June 16–18 at . The Mets took the opener 6–0 behind Dave Mlicki's complete-game , marking their first regular-season victory over the crosstown rivals since 1962 exhibitions. The Yankees rebounded to win the next two games, 6–3 and 3–2, securing the series 2–1 in front of packed crowds averaging over 56,000 fans per game. The 2005 interleague series between the Red Sox and Chicago Cubs, played June 10–12 at , captured national attention amid Boston's "" narrative. The Red Sox won two of three games (3–2 and 4–1 victories, with a 6–3 loss in the finale), showcasing offensive fireworks including Manny Ramirez's in the opener. This matchup, the teams' first regular-season meeting since 1918, amplified the season's drama as Boston went on to break its 86-year title drought in . In 2023, the Houston Astros and Los Angeles Dodgers renewed their intense rivalry with a June 23–25 series at Dodger Stadium, previewing potential postseason clashes. The Dodgers won 2–1, including an 8–7 comeback victory on June 24 highlighted by a controversial balk call, and a 6–5 rubber-game win. The series drew over 140,000 fans total and featured 28 combined runs, underscoring ongoing tensions from the Astros' 2017 World Series triumph over the Dodgers. Interleague play has produced several pitching milestones, including the first regular-season : for the New York Yankees against the on July 18, 1999, a 6–0 victory with 10 strikeouts. A landmark event was for the Philadelphia Phillies against the in Game 1 of the 2010 NLDS, a 4–0 postseason that highlighted interleague-style matchups beyond the regular season. Notable offensive feats include records for high-output interleague series. Attendance records were set by the 2000 Yankees-Mets at , drawing 153,778 fans across three games for an average of 51,259 per contest—the highest for any interleague set. The longest interleague game by innings occurred on May 7, 2017, when the New York Yankees defeated the Chicago Cubs 5–4 in 18 innings at , lasting 6 hours and 5 minutes with a major-league record 48 strikeouts. As of the end of the 2025 season, interleague play has seen 24 no-hitters, with pitchers authoring 14 and National League 10.

Player and Team Stats

Interleague play has produced numerous standout individual performances, particularly in batting, where players have capitalized on the unique matchups between leagues. holds the single-season record with a .474 mark in 1997, achieved during the inaugural year of interleague games when he went 9-for-19 against opponents. posted a .455 average in 2002, collecting 50 hits in 110 at-bats across 24 games, showcasing his contact-hitting prowess in cross-league competition. For power, has been a dominant force, hitting 20 or more s in multiple interleague seasons, including 21 in 2022, tying for the lead that year. Career leaders in interleague play include with 42, the most all-time, followed by players like and , who benefited from extended exposure to opposite-league pitching. Pitching leaders have also left their mark, with amassing the most career wins at 20 in interleague games, a testament to his consistency against National League teams during his tenure with the Cleveland Indians and New York Yankees. Jacob deGrom has excelled with sub-1.00 ERAs in select seasons, such as his 0.77 mark in 2018 over 35 innings, striking out 50 batters while allowing just three earned runs. Other notable pitchers include , who recorded 17 career interleague wins with a 2.72 , and , whose 2.45 career interleague underscores his dominance in limited starts. These performances highlight how interleague play has allowed pitchers to face unfamiliar lineups, often leading to career-highlight seasons. Team achievements in interleague play emphasize collective success, with the New York Yankees posting an 11-4 record in 2004, contributing to their 13-game win streak spanning 2003-04, the longest in interleague history. Perfect records are rare but notable; the 1997 Florida Marlins started interleague play 6-0, sweeping series against the and Detroit Tigers in the format's debut year. Other teams, like the 2003 (12-3) and 2013 Detroit Tigers (13-2), have approached perfection, often leveraging home-field advantages and balanced scheduling. Through 2025, holds the all-time interleague hits record with 365, surpassing Derek Jeter's 362; the mark remains a benchmark for contact hitters. Overall, teams have averaged 4.8 runs per game in interleague play compared to the National League's 4.5, reflecting the AL's slight offensive edge in cross-league contests.

Debates and Impacts

Arguments in Favor

Supporters of interleague play argue that it provides a substantial economic boost to , primarily through heightened attendance and associated revenues. Studies have shown that interleague games typically draw 7-20% higher attendance compared to intraleague matchups from 1997 to 2012, with more recent data indicating an average of about 1,375 additional fans per interleague game in 2023. This surge is particularly evident in rivalry series, such as the inaugural 1997 between the New York Yankees and Mets, which generated significant local excitement and contributed to overall revenue growth by attracting larger crowds to stadiums. Beyond attendance, interleague play enhances television viewership and broadens revenue streams, including media rights and sponsorships. Former MLB Commissioner highlighted how these games create additional television interest by breaking the monotony of intra-league schedules, leading to improved ratings for featured rivalries and contributing to the league's overall financial health. By 2025, with interleague games comprising roughly 46 of each team's 162 regular-season contests under the expanded universal schedule, this format has helped drive MLB's total revenues to record levels exceeding $12 billion annually, with interleague matchups playing a key role in diversifying income sources. A core appeal of interleague play lies in its ability to foster natural rivalries and increase fan engagement by pitting and National League teams against one another more frequently. Iconic regional matchups, such as the Cubs versus White Sox or Dodgers versus Angels, generate heightened excitement and allow fans to see cross-league competition annually rather than reserving it for the or . The shift to universal interleague play in 2023, where every team faces every other team at least once, further exposes fans to a wider variety of opponents, promoting broader interest across markets and reducing the isolation of league-specific schedules. Proponents also contend that interleague play promotes competitive balance by familiarizing players with diverse styles and strategies from the opposite league, better preparing them for postseason play. This cross-pollination helps even out talent distribution over time, as teams scout and adapt to unfamiliar opponents during the , diminishing the historical divide between the leagues. Polls reflect strong fan support for this aspect, with a survey showing only 27% of fans favoring the elimination of interleague play and 40% explicitly opposing it, underscoring its acceptance as a positive evolution in the .

Arguments Against

Critics of interleague play have long argued that it undermines the longstanding traditions of by eroding the distinct identities of the (AL) and National League (NL). Prior to 1997, the only regular-season meetings between the two leagues occurred during or exhibition games, preserving the as the exclusive AL-NL showdown and heightening its significance as a "pure" clash between champions of separate circuits. Purists contended that introducing regular-season interleague games diminished this mystique, turning what was once a rare event into routine competition and diluting the leagues' separation. For instance, Hall of Famer expressed opposition in 1997, stating that interleague play would detract from the and by making cross-league matchups commonplace. Another major concern has been the competitive imbalance created by structural differences between the leagues, particularly in the early years of interleague play. The AL's use of the (DH) rule gave its teams an offensive edge when hosting NL opponents, as National League pitchers were forced to bat in unfamiliar roles at DH-friendly parks, leading to lopsided results in favor of the AL. from the first decade showed the AL winning approximately 52% of interleague games overall, with even greater disparities in AL ballparks. Even after the universal DH was adopted in , detractors pointed to increased travel demands under the expanded, year-round interleague , which heightens and fatigue for players crossing time zones more frequently. A study analyzing over 20 years of MLB found that jet lag from such impairs offensive and pitching performance, potentially erasing home-field advantages and exacerbating scheduling inequities. Initial objections to interleague play included fears from the MLB Players Association that it could exacerbate salary disparities by favoring wealthier markets through uneven revenue from high-profile matchups, though no such evidence materialized after its debut. The program was initially approved as a two-year experiment with an opt-out clause, amid concerns it might disrupt labor peace following the 1994-95 strike, but strong attendance—20% higher than non-interleague games in —led owners and the union to make it permanent in 1998. In 1996, dissenters like the Chicago Cubs highlighted potential disadvantages at , where the lack of a DH and the park's unique conditions (such as wind patterns) could handicap NL teams against AL offenses. Despite these resolved issues, recent polls indicate lingering skepticism, with about 27% of fans favoring an end to interleague play as of 2021.

Broader Effects on MLB

Interleague play has contributed to sustained growth in attendance since its inception in , with the league drawing a total of 71,409,421 fans in 2025, marking the third consecutive year above 70 million and the highest level in over two decades excluding pandemic-affected seasons. While overall attendance has risen approximately 12% from 63.9 million in , the unique appeal of interleague matchups has provided a consistent boost, accounting for about 5% of the net gain after initial novelty effects subsided. In 2025, interleague games maintained higher , averaging around 92% attendance compared to 85% for intraleague contests, driven by fan interest in cross-league rivalries and novel matchups. This trend has also enhanced media engagement, with interleague series often generating elevated television ratings due to their rarity and competitive intrigue prior to full scheduling integration. On the player level, interleague play has fostered greater versatility by exposing athletes to diverse rule environments and strategies, particularly before the 2022 universal (DH) rule, when National League pitchers were required to bat in ballparks, honing skills like bunting and situational hitting. It has improved cross-league , allowing teams to evaluate talent against unfamiliar opponents more frequently, which aids in roster construction and trade assessments. However, the format introduces additional risks through increased travel demands, as teams often face longer road trips for geographically distant series, contributing to fatigue and higher non-contact rates among position players and pitchers. Interleague play has driven key structural changes in MLB, notably accelerating the adoption of the universal DH in 2022, which eliminated the strategic disparities that previously favored American League teams and reduced pitcher injuries by an estimated 10-15% in the National League by removing the need for at-bats. It has influenced ongoing realignment discussions, particularly in the context of potential expansion to 32 teams, where balanced interleague scheduling could simplify divisions into geographic conferences and reduce travel imbalances. Competitively, the expansion of interleague games has promoted balance between leagues, with American League-National League win records nearing parity post-2023— the National League holding a slight edge at 363-327 in 2023 and similar margins in subsequent years—fostering a more equitable overall league dynamic. Additionally, interleague play has correlated with a 15% rise in international viewership since 2020, as global audiences tune in for high-profile cross-league contests, potentially shaping future formats amid expansion plans.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.