Hubbry Logo
Intramural sportsIntramural sportsMain
Open search
Intramural sports
Community hub
Intramural sports
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Intramural sports
Intramural sports
Intramural sports
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Intramural sports, also known as interhall sports, hall sports, or (in collegiate universities, particularly in the UK) inter-collegiate sport or college sport, are recreational sports organized within a particular institution, usually an educational institution, for the purpose of fun and exercise. The term is chiefly North American,[1] although the concept originates from the United Kingdom and the term has been adopted there (normally as intramural sport in the singular). It is contrasted with extramural, varsity or intercollegiate (US) sports, which are played between teams from different educational institutions.[2][3] The word intermural, which means "between institutions",[4] is a common error for "intramural".[3][5]

Etymology

[edit]

The word intramural, derived from the Latin words intra muros meaning "within walls", dates from the 1840s in the general sense of "being or occurring within the limits usually of a community, organization, or institution", used in terms such as intramural burials,[6] and eventually came to refer to sports matches and contests that took place among teams from "within the walls" of an institution or area.[7][8] The use of intramural in the sense of sports has been attributed to A. S. Whitney, a Latin professor at the University of Michigan.[9]

History

[edit]
Two college eights, thought to be Brasenose and Jesus, pictured racing at the University of Oxford in 1822

The earliest reference to medieval football being played by students at Oxford University in England dates back to the 14th century.[10][11] Sport became established within British universities in the 19th century.[12][13][14] The oldest competitive intramural sport is inter-collegiate rowing at Oxford University, where the first known competition was in 1815 with Brasenose College winning and Jesus College being possibly their only competitor.[15] Inter-collegiate rowing spread to Cambridge in 1827 and to Durham in 1850.[16][17] The colleges of Oxford, Cambridge and Durham provided a natural focus for sporting activity, and by the end of the 19th century inter-collegiate sports competitions (including many of the cuppers at Oxford and Cambridge) were well established at all three universities.[18][19][20] In the early 20th century, the inclusion of Durham's Armstrong College in Newcastle in the inter-collegiate competitions led to a rule that only matriculated students could compete, excluding the large non-matriculated membership of the college and preserving the middle-class, amateur nature of the events.[21][22]

Outside of the collegiate universities, there is a record of a football match (of some form) between the English and Scottish students at the University of Edinburgh in 1851.[23] However, the English university colleges, associated with the University of London and the Victoria University, faced challenges in sport from a lack of facilities – often having to rent playing fields – and due to being non-residential institutions whose sporting students were often attached to local clubs rather than the university. Despite this, sports clubs formed at many of these during the 1880s and 1890s and participated in local fixtures, but no mention is made of intramural matches.[24]

Athletic competition among students at Harvard University in the United States began in 1780 when a group of sophomore students challenged freshmen students a wrestling match. In 1827, the first reference to an annual “football” contest between freshmen and sophomore student was published.[25] Intramural sport was also played at other US universities in the 19th century, such as the baseball match between freshmen and sophomores at Princeton in 1857.[26] This division by graduating class was followed at other US universities. By the 1880s, Yale had a college rowing championship, contested by class crews, and a class baseball championship.[27] At Harvard, at around the same time, it was complained that "Each class has its own crew ... But the class nine and the class elevens exist only in name."[28] Mitchell would later note that intramural sports grew in the 1860s, with clubs established "in somewhat the same manner that sport is carried on in English universities", but declined as the sports clubs concentrated on inter-varsity competition.[29]

Elmer D. Mitchell, University of Michigan Director of Intramural Athletics, 1919

In Australia, inter-faculty matches between arts and medicine were established at the University of Sydney by the mid 1890s.[30] In 1906, Harry Rawson, the Governor of New South Wales, presented the university with the Rawson Cup for men's intercollegiate sports, which is competed for annually between the university's colleges.[31]

A second stage in the development of intramural sport in the US was the setting up of inter-class competitions, originally between first year and second year students but then expanding to take in all four undergraduate years. Slightly later, inter-fraternity sports were organized at some universities. The pressure put on sports facilities by the growing demand led to the institutions formalizing the organization of intramural sports.[32] The first intramural sports departments in the United States were thus established at Ohio State University and the University of Michigan in 1913.[9][33] Elmer Mitchell, a graduate student, at the time, was named the first Director of Intramural Sports at the University of Michigan in 1919. The first sports facility in the country dedicated to recreational sports opened at the University of Michigan in 1928.[34] Mitchell went on to write Intramural Athletics (1925)[35] and Intramural Sports (1939),[36] and became known as "the father of intramural sports".[37] One of Mitchell's students in 1946 was William Wasson, who founded the National Intramural Association (later the National Intramural and Recreational Sports Association; NIRSA) at a meeting of intramural directors from 11 Historically Black Colleges and Universities in 1950.[38]

In the 1930s, the establishment of houses at Harvard and colleges at Yale meant the introduction of inter-college and inter-house competitions to the US, replacing the previous intramural organization at Harvard and inter-class competitions at Yale.[39][40]

By country

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

Colleges at the University of Adelaide compete across multiple sports for the High Table Cup, also known as the Douglas-Irving Cup.[41] Intercollegiate sports are also played between the colleges of the University of Sydney for the Rosebowl (women) and the Rawson Cup (men).[42] Other universities with intercollegiate sports programs include the University of Melbourne,[43] the University of New England,[44] the University of New South Wales[45] and the University of Western Australia.[46]

Canada

[edit]

The Canadian Intramural Recreation Association was established in 1977 to share information and facilitate professional development in secondary and tertiary institutions in Canada, but became inactive in the 1990s. The Western Canadian Campus Recreation Association was established in 2009 and became the Canadian Campus Recreation Association in 2012. In 2013, they opened discussions with the US NIRSA about establishing a Canadian chapter within NIRSA, and in 2017 NIRSA established a Canada region.[47][48]

The Ontario Intramural Recreation Association was established in 1969. After the formation of CIRA, this became CIRA Ontario in 1989.[48] It remains active as a charity promoting intramural and recreational sports in Ontario.[49]

At many Canadian universities, intramural sports competitions are for teams formed by students.[50][51][52][53] There are inter-college sports at York University, where the colleges compete for the "York Torch",[54] although students can also form their own teams in open intramural competitions.[55] At the University of Toronto, the upper divisions of the intramural leagues are restricted to teams representing colleges, faculties or residences, while the lower divisions are open to student-formed teams.[56]

United Kingdom

[edit]
Churchill College Boat Club competing in an intercollegiate bumps race at the University of Cambridge

Just under three quarters of universities in the United Kingdom offer recreational sports within the university.[57] At the collegiate universities of Cambridge, Durham, Oxford, Lancaster and York, recreational sport takes place between colleges and is known as college sport, inter-college sport, or inter-collegiate sport.[58][59][60][61][62] More generally, recreational sport within a university in the United Kingdom is often called intramural sport, and teams may represent halls of residence, academic departments, university sports clubs from other sports, other societies or simply groups of friends.[63][64][65][66][67] Recreational sport exists alongside varsity matches with rival universities and inter-university competitions organized by British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS).[68][69] In terms of participation, Durham University's college sports is the largest intramural program in the UK and one of the largest the world, with over 75% of students (i.e., over 16,000 students based on the 2023–24 student population of 21,750)[70] taking part in sports and more than 550 college teams across 18 sports.[71] Collingwood College Association Football Club is said to be the largest amateur football club in the UK.[72] The largest program in Scotland is at the University of Edinburgh.[73]

Matches between representative intramural teams at different universities are sometimes arranged, such as the intramural varsities between Loughborough intramural sports teams and Durham college teams and between Loughborough intramural sports teams and Nottingham intramural sports teams,[74] and the college varsity between college teams from Durham and York.[75] College teams also participate in the Roses Tournament between York and Lancaster[76] In the past, a men's and women's intercollegiate boat race was part of the Henley Boat Races between Oxford and Cambridge. College boat clubs from Oxford, Cambridge and Durham often compete in external events such as the Head of the River Race.[77]

The Macadam Cup being awarded in 2008

One particular form of intramural competition is between medical schools and the rest of the university. This is found at places like Imperial College London, where Imperial Medics play the rest of Imperial College in the Imperial Varsity,[78] and King's College London, where Guy’s, King’s College and St Thomas medical school play the rest of King's for the Macadam Cup.[79]

Research by British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS) in association with the Complete University Guide has found that institutions with a higher BUCS rank (for inter-university sport) are more likely to provide intramural sport. In 2022–23, all of the top-20 ranked institutions had intramural programs, falling to 79% for institutions ranked 21 to 60, 71% for institutions ranked 61 to 100, and only 39% for institutions outside of the top 100. Overall, 73% of institutions had intramural sports, with the most commonly offered sport for men being association football (in 72% of institutions) and for women being netball (also in 72% of institutions). The average number of intramural teams per institution was 87 in 2022–23, up from 79 the year before but still down on the pre-pandemic average of 113 teams in 2018–19 and 2019–20. Membership of sports clubs and societies was around 12% of the student population in 2022–23, down from around 14% in 2019–20; in top-20 institutions it was just over 20%, down from around 23% pre-pandemic.[57] An earlier report also found that the average number of intramural sports offered had dropped from 6.7 before the pandemic to 5.9 in 2021–22.[80]

While most intramural sport is played at university facilities, the colleges of collegiate universities sometimes have their own facilities, often funded by college alumni. In Oxford, the Christ Church Ground hosted 37 first-class cricket matches played by the university between 1878 and 1961[81] and the New College Ground also hosted three first-class matches for the university, in 1906, 1907 and 1927.[82] Some Cambridge colleges also have extensive supporting facilities.[83] In Durham, Collingwood College's new multi-purpose pitch was opened by then-Newcastle United manager Rafa Benítez in 2017.[84][85]

United States

[edit]
See also: College athletics in the United States and Collegiate club sports in the United States

NIRSA provides a national network of nearly 4,500 highly trained professionals, students and associate members in field of recreational sports.[86]

As in the UK, intramural sports at universities where all students belong to a residential college may be organized along college lines, e.g., at Harvard and Yale.[87][88] At others, such as Rice University, there is a distinction between college sports and intramural sports more generally.[89] A third option, such as at the University of California, San Diego, is that intramural sports are separate from the residential college organization.[90] Some residential universities, such as Notre Dame, run specific interhall competitions alongside open intramural competitions.[91] At some universities, such as Missouri State University and Georgia Southern University, there are inter-fraternity or fraternity and sorority life sports competitions between the fraternities and sororities at the university.[92][93]

A house–college rowing race was held between Harvard houses and Yale colleges from 1932 to at least 1958.[94] The champions of the Yale colleges intramural competition and the Harvard houses intramural competition have competed annually for the Harkness Cup since 1935,[40] The jubilee competition in 1985 was reported on in The New York Times.[95]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Intramural sports

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Intramural sports are recreational and competitive athletic programs organized within an institution, such as a , , or , designed to provide structured opportunities for participants to engage in physical activities at various skill levels without the intensity of varsity or competition. The origins of intramural sports trace back to the early , particularly within higher education institutions, where they evolved as a means to broaden access to athletics beyond elite intercollegiate teams. Formal programs began emerging around 1916, with the University of Texas establishing one of the earliest structured initiatives under director Berry M. Whitaker. That same year, Elmer D. Mitchell published the seminal textbook Intramurals, which laid foundational principles for these programs and influenced their widespread adoption in colleges. By the , intramurals had expanded to include and leagues, featuring sports like touch football, , and wrestling. Today, intramural sports encompass a diverse array of activities, including team-based leagues in , soccer, , and , as well as individual competitions and tournaments, often governed by rules from organizations like the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA). Eligibility typically extends to students, faculty, staff, and sometimes or community members, emphasizing inclusivity across genders, abilities, and experience levels. These programs prioritize , health benefits, and , offering participants exercise, stress relief, social connections, and opportunities for in a low-stakes environment.

Definition and Terminology

Definition

Intramural sports are recreational or competitive athletic activities organized and participated in exclusively by members of a single , such as a , , , or group, without involving opponents from outside that . These programs typically feature leagues, tournaments, and events held on the institution's premises, focusing on internal rivalries to promote among participants. A defining feature of intramural sports is their voluntary nature, allowing individuals to join at their discretion without mandatory involvement or tryouts, which contrasts with more structured varsity or athletics. Participation emphasizes fun, social bonding, and personal skill-building over high-stakes or elite performance, creating an accessible environment for participants of varying abilities. This inclusivity ensures that teams or individuals from within the same compete against one another, fostering camaraderie and broad involvement regardless of athletic background. Common settings for intramural sports include universities, where student-led teams face off in campus leagues; K-12 schools, often pitting classes or grades against each other in after-school events; and corporate workplaces, with department-based teams competing to enhance and morale. The term itself originates from the Latin "intra," meaning "within," and "muralis," relating to "wall," evoking the idea of activities confined within an institution's boundaries.

Etymology

The term "intramural" originates from Latin roots, with "intra-" meaning "within" or "inside" and "muralis" derived from "murus," signifying "." Thus, "intramural" literally translates to "within the walls," originally denoting activities confined to the physical boundaries of a , such as a building or . This etymological sense underscores the concept's emphasis on internal, self-contained participation rather than external competition. In the context of sports, the term "intramural" was first applied in 1913 at the , marking the establishment of the first formal intramural departments there and at to organize internal athletic programs for students. Prior to this, the adjective appeared in general usage as early as 1846 to describe events occurring within defined limits, and by 1871, it extended to college activities, including , at institutions like . The coinage in educational settings reflected a growing interest in recreational accessible to all students, contrasting with elite varsity competitions. "Intramural sports" is distinguished from "extramural sports," where "extra-" (Latin for "outside") indicates competitions between different institutions or external entities, such as intercollegiate events. Synonyms like "interhall sports" or "recreational sports" have been used interchangeably in specific institutional contexts, particularly for campus-based programs involving dormitories or halls. By the mid-20th century, the terminology evolved from its primary focus on formal university programs to broader applications, encompassing similar internal athletic initiatives in workplaces and community organizations, as recreational sports gained popularity beyond academia.

History

Origins

The concept of intramural sports, involving internal competitions within an institution, traces its modern roots to mid-19th century American colleges, where informal games between student classes served as early forms of recreational athletics. The first documented intramural activity occurred in 1857 with a match between freshmen and sophomores at , marking the beginning of organized student-led contests aimed at fostering and without intercollegiate pressure. Similar class-based competitions, such as and at around the same period, highlighted the growing role of sports in campus life amid the post-Civil War emphasis on to promote student health and moral development. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, these informal activities evolved into more structured programs in U.S. colleges and high schools, driven by the Progressive Era's focus on and the limitations of varsity sports, which excluded most students due to their competitive and selective nature. Intramural initiatives sought to extend athletic opportunities to non-elite participants, emphasizing inclusivity, , and lifelong fitness habits rather than professional-level performance. This shift was influenced by European models of physical training and the American belief in sports as a tool for character building and among diverse student bodies. The establishment of the first formal intramural departments occurred around 1913 at the and , where dedicated administrative structures were created to oversee campus-wide recreational sports programs. In 1916, the University of Texas established one of the earliest structured initiatives under director Berry M. Whitaker. At the , this marked the introduction of the term "intramural" to describe these internal activities, distinguishing them from intercollegiate varsity events and gaining widespread adoption in educational settings thereafter. These programs initially featured sports like , track, and , designed to accommodate broad participation and address the health needs of sedentary student populations in an era of rapid . A pivotal figure in solidifying the intramural model was Elmer D. Mitchell, often called the "father of intramural sports," who joined the in 1912 as a instructor and became the first Director of Intramural Athletics in 1919. Under his leadership, the program expanded significantly post-World War I, adopting the motto "Athletics for All" to underscore its goal of universal access and for students, faculty, and staff. Mitchell's 1925 textbook, Intramural Athletics, further codified the principles and practices, influencing the standardization of programs nationwide.

20th Century Development

The development of intramural sports in the was profoundly shaped by reformers, particularly Elmer D. Mitchell, often regarded as the "father of intramurals," who established the first dedicated intramural program at the in 1919 and authored the seminal text Intramural Athletics in 1925, emphasizing broad participation over elite competition. This foundational work influenced the institutionalization of programs across U.S. colleges, promoting sports like , , and track as tools for student health and social development. By the , similar models began appearing in Canadian universities, such as the , where intramural activities were integrated into campus life, drawing directly from American innovations to foster recreational athletics among students. A pivotal milestone came in 1950 with the formation of the National Intramural Association (NIA) at in New Orleans, founded by William N. Wasson and 19 other directors from to professionalize and share best practices in recreational sports programming. The NIA, later evolving into the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA) in 1985, facilitated national conferences and standards that spurred program growth amid rising university enrollments in the 1950s, driven by the and demographics, which increased student bodies by over 50% in many institutions and necessitated expanded recreational facilities. Post-World War II, intramurals were integrated into school curricula as part of broader fitness initiatives, with the U.S. government promoting physical education to address perceived national health deficiencies revealed by military draft rejections, leading to widespread adoption in K-12 schools by the late 1940s. Similarly, military bases formalized intramural leagues during and after the war, incorporating sports like flag football and softball into recreation programs to boost morale and physical readiness, influencing civilian adaptations. Innovations in the mid-to-late century diversified intramural offerings beyond traditional team sports, introducing co-recreational (co-rec) leagues in the and that paired men and women in activities such as and to encourage mixed participation and social interaction. This shift aligned with growing emphasis on inclusivity, culminating in the 1972 passage of , which prohibited sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs, dramatically increasing women's involvement in intramurals and prompting equitable program designs across U.S. institutions.

Modern Era

In the , intramural sports programs have increasingly emphasized holistic wellness, incorporating support alongside to address the stresses of modern campus life. This shift, evident since the early , aligns with broader higher education trends prioritizing student , where participation in recreational sports correlates with reduced anxiety and improved emotional . For instance, campus recreation departments have integrated sessions and stress-relief activities into intramural events, fostering a more comprehensive approach to participant . The from 2020 to 2022 accelerated innovations in intramural formats, particularly the rise of e-sports and virtual leagues to maintain engagement amid restrictions. Universities like and Santa Clara adapted by launching online competitions in games such as and , enabling remote participation and preserving community ties. E-sports integration, supported by organizations like NIRSA, has since become a staple, enhancing social wellbeing and for tech-savvy students. Additionally, registration processes have modernized through campus life apps like IMLeagues and Fusion Play, allowing seamless online sign-ups, team management, and scheduling to boost convenience and participation. Advancements in inclusivity have marked the 2010s onward, with programs expanding to serve diverse populations, including adaptive sports for students with disabilities and dedicated leagues welcoming LGBTQ+ participants. Multi-institutional reviews highlight the growth of adapted intramurals, such as modified and soccer, to accommodate physical impairments and promote equitable access on campuses. Similarly, initiatives like those from Stonewall Sports, founded in 2010, have influenced campus programs to create safe, affirming spaces for LGBTQ+ athletes through inclusive recreational leagues. These efforts reflect a commitment to diversity, with NIRSA advocating for policies that reduce barriers for underrepresented groups. Participation in U.S. intramurals has shown steady growth, with NIRSA estimating that recreational sports programs, including intramurals, engage over 5.5 million students annually by the , representing a significant portion of the roughly 19 million postsecondary enrollees. This expansion extends globally through international student exchanges, where intramurals facilitate cultural integration and cross-border participation, as seen in programs at institutions hosting diverse cohorts. To address contemporary challenges, programs have adopted measures, such as eco-friendly events with reduced waste and energy-efficient facilities, aligning with NIRSA's green initiatives. Furthermore, data analytics tools are increasingly used to track metrics, optimize scheduling, and tailor offerings, enhancing overall program effectiveness.

Organization and Formats

Administrative Structures

Intramural sports programs are generally administered under the oversight of recreation departments or divisions within universities, which provide the primary institutional framework for coordination and . In many cases, these departments report to higher-level university administrators, such as vice presidents for , ensuring alignment with broader educational goals. Student-led intramural councils or committees often support this hierarchy by contributing to event planning and participant feedback, fostering a model that enhances program relevance and engagement. Key roles within these structures include program coordinators, who manage scheduling, registration, and officiating logistics to ensure smooth operations across seasons. Volunteers, frequently drawn from program participants or student staff, commonly serve as referees and scorekeepers, reducing costs while building community involvement; for instance, universities like the rely on trained student supervisors for on-site game management. Budgets for these programs are typically allocated from institutional funds, including student fees and university appropriations, with NIRSA resources emphasizing strategic planning to balance operational needs like equipment and staffing. In school settings, departments assume similar oversight, integrating intramurals into curricular activities under the guidance of instructors. Policies governing intramural sports prioritize participant eligibility, often requiring full-time enrollment for students and payment of associated fees, while limiting participation from varsity or club athletes to maintain competitive balance. protocols include mandatory equipment inspections, assumption-of-risk agreements, and immediate response measures for injuries, such as blood-borne policies that remove affected players from play until resolved. Programs must also comply with anti-discrimination laws, with organizations like NIRSA promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion through guidelines that ensure accessible participation regardless of or other protected characteristics. Prominent governing bodies include the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA), which sets national standards and provides for programs, with nearly 4,500 members, including professionals, students, institutions, and businesses, as of 2025. At the local level, intramural associations or committees enforce these standards, while in K-12 schools, ties to departments and regional education boards ensure programmatic integrity.

Program Formats

Intramural sports programs are typically structured around three primary formats: leagues, tournaments, and open play sessions. Leagues consist of a regular season of scheduled games, often in a round-robin style, culminating in such as single-elimination brackets where all qualifying teams advance based on and participation criteria. Tournaments, by contrast, are shorter events that may employ single-elimination, double-elimination, or pool play formats, spanning one evening or multiple days to determine a winner efficiently. Open play, also known as drop-in or scrimmage sessions, allows informal participation without formal teams or standings, primarily serving as practice opportunities or staff training without impacting eligibility. Seasonal variations in intramural programs often align activities with academic calendars and facility availability, emphasizing indoor formats during fall and winter semesters while shifting to outdoor options in spring and summer. Divisions commonly include co-recreational (co-rec) setups requiring mixed-gender teams with specified ratios, alongside single-gender options for men's and women's groups, and open divisions accommodating any gender composition to promote inclusivity. Most league seasons last 6-8 weeks, including regular games and playoffs, to fit within semester timelines and accommodate participant schedules. Team sizes generally range from 5 to 15 players per roster, calculated as twice the on-field minimum plus two additional spots for flexibility, ensuring adequate depth without excessive overlap. Registration occurs through online portals like IMLeagues, where captains create teams, submit rosters, and select time preferences by deadlines, often requiring a quiz on rules and eligibility verification via student IDs. Programs adapt formats to diverse skill levels and interests, offering no-contact or modified divisions for recreational participants alongside competitive tiers like gold or blue levels. Themed events, such as charity tournaments or casual "classics" with random team assignments, enhance engagement by focusing on fun and rather than strict .

Types of Intramural Activities

Team Sports

Team sports form a cornerstone of intramural programs, offering participants opportunities to engage in collaborative, competitive activities within recreational settings such as universities and workplaces. These sports typically involve teams of 7 to 12 players, adapting standard rules to prioritize , inclusivity, and enjoyment over elite-level . Common adaptations include shortened game durations, reduced field sizes, and modified contact rules to accommodate varying skill levels and minimize injury risks. Basketball is one of the most prevalent intramural team sports, often played in full-court 5-on-5 formats with rules derived from the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS), but adapted for recreational play. To enhance participation, games feature shorter halves of 20 to 25 minutes with running clocks that only stop for timeouts or specific fouls, reducing overall match time to 40 minutes or less. Safety modifications include restrictions on aggressive contact, such as limiting hard fouls and emphasizing no-contact defense in co-recreational leagues, while team formation guidelines prohibit "stacking" highly skilled players on one roster to ensure balanced competition. Soccer, frequently organized as small-sided games like 5v5 or 7v7 outdoor variants, appeals to intramural participants due to its accessibility on compact fields. Rules adapt standards by shortening halves to 20-25 minutes and eliminating offside calls in some formats to encourage continuous play and reduce complexity for non-professionals. Emphasis on participation is evident in lenient penalty interpretations, where minor infractions result in indirect free kicks rather than cards, fostering a focus on skill-building over strict enforcement. Volleyball variants, including 6v6 indoor and sand court play, utilize rules with adjustments for intramural settings, such as rally scoring to first to 25 points per set and a cap at 30 to expedite matches. Outdoor sand versions reduce team sizes slightly for mobility on uneven surfaces and incorporate no-contact net rules to prevent injuries, while co-ed leagues mandate gender ratios like 3 men and 3 women per side. These adaptations make the sport suitable for diverse groups, with games lasting 45-60 minutes total. Flag football serves as a non-contact alternative to traditional tackle football, often played in formats such as 7v7 or 8v8 with rules prohibiting any physical tackling in favor of flag-pulling to end plays. Adaptations include screen blocking without body contact—using arms extended but not extended elbows—and two 20-minute halves (or equivalent in quarters) with a running clock to maintain high energy without fatigue. Team guidelines limit rosters to 12-15 players and ban varsity athletes from similar sports, ensuring recreational equity. Other variations, such as ultimate frisbee and softball, further diversify intramural offerings with internal league adaptations. Ultimate frisbee employs non-contact passing rules on a 70x40 yard field with 7 players per side, shortening games to 25-minute halves and self-officiating to promote sportsmanship. Softball, often slow-pitch, modifies MLB rules by using 10-player teams, underhand pitching, and 7-inning games or 50 minutes, whichever comes first, with no sliding to bases for safety. The popularity of these team sports in intramural programs stems from their ability to foster camaraderie through shared strategies and , particularly in environments where facilities like gyms and fields are readily available. Suitable for teams of 7-12, they encourage social bonding among students, with participation rates high due to low and emphasis on over professional outcomes.

Individual Sports

Intramural individual sports emphasize personal performance and often involve solo or paired competitions, making them highly accessible for participants seeking low-commitment within educational institutions. These programs typically feature racket sports, aquatic events, and other solo-oriented activities that allow individuals to compete without relying on larger . Common examples include in singles or doubles formats, where players engage in matches that highlight agility and strategy, as offered by universities such as Missouri University of Science and Technology. and similarly provide fast-paced, one-on-one or paired encounters, with programs at the same institution structuring tournaments for up to 32 participants to ensure broad involvement. events, structured around individual heats rather than full team relays, enable swimmers to compete in distances like the 50-yard freestyle, with each participant limited to three events to promote fairness, as seen in the University of Texas at Austin's intramural swim meet. scrambles, often adapted for individual or small-group participation, involve scoring based on the best shots per hole, with events like Cedarville University's four-person scramble allowing solo entrants to join ad hoc teams for casual competition. To accommodate varying skill levels and participation rates, intramural individual sports incorporate rule adaptations that enhance engagement and equity. Ladder systems are widely used for ranking progression, where players challenge opponents within a few positions on a standings list to climb the , as implemented in tennis programs at the at Presque Isle and table tennis ladders at . Round-robin scheduling ensures multiple matches for all entrants, rotating opponents in a cycle to guarantee equitable playtime, a format applied in and tournaments at Missouri S&T. Institutions often provide essential equipment to reduce financial barriers, such as balls and paddles for or shuttles for , while participants may supply personal items like racquets, according to guidelines from the Amherst's recreation services. The appeal of these sports lies in their flexibility and inclusivity, catering to busy schedules through online registration and weekend or evening sessions that align with academic demands, as facilitated by platforms like IMLeagues used across multiple university programs. Skill progression is tracked via rankings or tournament brackets, allowing participants to monitor improvements over time, while the entry-level friendly nature welcomes beginners with modified rules and no prior experience required, as emphasized in Canisius University's intramural offerings for all abilities. Niche activities further expand options, such as challenges scored on pose duration or sequence completion, with Del Mar College hosting video-guided sessions for competitive tracking. tournaments, adapted for intramural settings with co-recreational scoring based on target accuracy, promote precision and appeal to diverse participants, as noted in program analyses from the University of at Omaha.

Benefits and Challenges

Health and Social Benefits

Participation in intramural sports offers significant physical health benefits, including improved cardiovascular health, enhanced strength, and greater flexibility. Research on collegiate recreational sports, which encompasses intramurals, indicates that 90% of participants report better fitness levels, 89% note increased , and overall, 91% attribute improvements to such activities. These outcomes contribute to reduced risks of chronic conditions like and , with studies showing lower disease prevalence among participants compared to non-participants. Additionally, intramural involvement helps mitigate risks, such as the "freshman fifteen" weight gain, by promoting consistent that counters sedentary campus lifestyles. Mentally, intramural sports participation leads to stress reduction through endorphin release and other physiological mechanisms, with 86% of participants reporting improved . Achievements in these low-stakes competitive environments boost , as evidenced by 83% of respondents experiencing greater self-confidence. Furthermore, involvement correlates with lower symptoms of depression and anxiety, particularly among college students, where team-based activities provide protective effects against mental ill-being into young adulthood. These gains extend to enhanced concentration (75% of participants) and overall psychological well-being (91%). Socially, intramural sports foster friendships and networking opportunities, with 66% of participants developing stronger abilities to form relationships and 68% reporting an increased sense of belonging. These programs enhance skills through collaborative play, as 60% note improvements in group cooperation. In diverse university settings, they build by encouraging interactions across backgrounds, promoting pro-social behaviors, , and social connectedness. Such relational advantages are particularly pronounced in team formats, which outperform individual activities in cultivating these outcomes. Evidence from the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA) underscores these benefits, linking intramural participation to higher university retention rates; for instance, one study found first-year intramural participants had retention rates 10.5% higher than non-participants, while 74% of students overall cite recreational sports as influencing their decision to stay enrolled. NIRSA research consistently demonstrates that such programs elevate activity levels and wellness, contributing to long-term habits and institutional loyalty.

Organizational Challenges

Intramural sports programs often face shortages, particularly as budgets tighten and programs increasingly rely on participant fees to cover operational costs. According to the 2023 NIRSA survey, numerous respondents highlighted budget shortfalls as a , exacerbated by declining enrollment and competition from off-campus opportunities that offer higher pay for staff. Low participation rates during off-seasons further strain resources, with programs reporting reduced engagement due to students' academic commitments and post-pandemic shifts in priorities. Facility overcrowding compounds these issues, as shared campus spaces lead to scheduling conflicts and limited access for intramural activities. Inclusivity barriers persist in accommodating participants with varying skill levels, where mismatched teams can discourage engagement and lead to uneven competition. Programs also struggle to support individuals with disabilities, often due to inadequate adaptive equipment or modified rules. Gender imbalances in sign-ups remain common, with lower and co-ed participation reported in many surveys, limiting diverse team formations. Management hurdles include volunteer shortages for officiating, as national declines in sports officials impact intramural leagues and force reliance on undertrained student volunteers. Liability risks from injuries pose another challenge, necessitating comprehensive waivers to mitigate legal exposure for organizers. To address these obstacles, programs have formed partnerships with donors to secure supplemental funding through targeted engagement initiatives. Marketing campaigns via have proven effective in boosting awareness and participation by highlighting program benefits and success stories. Post-2020, hybrid online-offline models have emerged as a to enhance flexibility, combining virtual registrations with in-person events to accommodate busy schedules.

Regional Variations

United States

Intramural sports are highly prevalent in the , particularly within higher education institutions, where they form a core component of campus programs. The National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association (NIRSA), the leading professional organization for collegiate , reported as of 2004 that its member institutions—encompassing the majority of U.S. colleges and universities—serve approximately 5.5 million students annually through recreational sports, including intramurals. In K-12 settings, intramurals are often integrated into curricula to promote and development, with organizations like SHAPE America recommending their inclusion for students in grades 3-12 as a means to extend PE beyond class time. Corporate environments also support intramural-style leagues as part of wellness initiatives, with companies participating in organized recreational sports through networks like the Sport and Social Club, which offers leagues tailored for corporate teams. A distinctive feature of U.S. intramural sports is their alignment with of the , which mandates gender equity in federally funded educational programs, including athletics. This legislation has significantly expanded opportunities for women in intramurals and club sports, contributing to a rise in female high school athletic participation from about 5% in 1971 to 41% by 2005-2006, with similar proportional growth in college settings from 15% to 43% over the same period. Institutions must ensure equitable access through mechanisms like substantial proportionality to enrollment or demonstrated program expansion for the underrepresented gender, often resulting in balanced league offerings and facilities for intramurals; for example, allocates intramural playing slots to maintain near-proportional gender representation. Annual participation in U.S. intramurals exceeds millions, driven largely by collegiate programs, while unique events such as intramural bowling championships and tournaments—often styled as "bowl games" at campuses like —foster competitive yet recreational engagement. As of 2025, over 2 million college students participate in club or intramural sports combined. NIRSA plays a central role in governing intramural sports by establishing standardized rules and safety protocols that many programs adopt nationwide. For instance, as of 2008, 65% of intramural flag football programs followed NIRSA's official rules, which emphasize risk management practices like equipment checks and no-contact modifications to prevent injuries. These standards guide programming for safety and inclusivity, including guidelines against profanity, bullying, and unsafe behaviors during events. State-level variations exist, with California programs often emphasizing outdoor activities due to favorable climate, such as ultimate frisbee, outdoor soccer, and flag football at institutions like the University of California, Irvine, and Stanford University. Following the disruptions of the in 2020, which led to widespread suspensions of in-person activities, U.S. intramural programs resumed operations by 2023, though challenges such as declining participation in women's and co-rec offerings persisted according to NIRSA surveys.

Canada

Intramural sports in are primarily managed by recreation departments at postsecondary institutions, with robust programs at universities affiliated with U Sports, the national governing body for university sport that indirectly supports campus recreational activities through its member schools. These programs emphasize accessible, non-varsity competition, often coordinated at the institutional level to foster student engagement and wellness. For instance, the University of Toronto's intramural league stands out as one of the largest in the country. Federal and provincial sport policies, overseen by entities like Sport Canada, provide broader support for recreational initiatives, including funding and guidelines that encourage intramural participation as part of national strategies. Unique to Canada, intramural programs in Quebec frequently incorporate bilingual elements to reflect the province's linguistic diversity, with institutions like offering English-dominant leagues while accommodating French-speaking participants through inclusive registration and communication. Winter sports hold a prominent place due to the country's climate, featuring variants like , , and in many university schedules; for example, the University of Calgary's intramural offerings include tiered leagues tailored to different competitive levels. Beyond postsecondary settings, community centers and municipal recreation facilities extend intramural-style leagues to non-school adult groups, such as co-ed and soccer circuits organized by groups like Urban Rec in , promoting community cohesion outside academic environments. Participation rates are notably high in urban centers, exemplified by Toronto's extensive intramural networks that integrate diverse demographics into team-based activities. Programs increasingly incorporate integration with Indigenous communities, leveraging campus recreation to enhance engagement and retention among Indigenous students; research highlights how inclusive intramurals at universities like the support cultural reconnection and social belonging for Indigenous participants. Following the 2010 Vancouver Winter Paralympics, adaptive intramural options have expanded significantly, influenced by heightened national focus on para sport inclusion, with universities like developing disability-specific leagues in sports such as and wheelchair basketball to broaden accessibility.

United Kingdom

In the , intramural sports are predominantly organized within universities and colleges, often referred to simply as "intramural" programs or internal leagues, distinguishing them from inter-university competitions governed by British Universities & Colleges Sport (BUCS). These programs emphasize participation among students, typically structured around residence halls or student teams competing in weekly fixtures across various sports, fostering a social and inclusive environment for all skill levels. At the university level, intramural activities often complement varsity matches by providing internal pathways for talent development, with an emphasis on popular team sports such as football (soccer), rugby variants like touch or sevens, , and . In schools, intramural sports integrate into the (PE) curriculum through inter-house competitions, where pupils from different year groups or houses vie in events like , football, and to promote and without external pressure. BUCS provides overarching oversight for higher education sport, supporting intramural initiatives through resources and funding ties, such as collaborations with to enhance internal football offerings. Regional variations influence intramural formats, with showing a stronger focus on outdoor activities due to its extensive network of outdoor facilities—over 80% of sports infrastructure supported such pursuits as of 2006—leading to more emphasis on hill walking, , and in university and school programs compared to the indoor-heavy approaches in . By the 2020s, there has been a notable rise in e-sports intramurals within universities, with organizations like British Esports hosting student championships in titles such as and , integrating digital competitions into traditional intramural calendars. Overall, these programs exhibit lower corporate involvement than , prioritizing student-led recreation over commercial sponsorships.

Australia

In Australia, intramural sports in higher education are primarily coordinated by UniSport Australia, a national body that facilitates competitions and programs across universities to promote student participation in recreational athletics. Individual institutions, such as the , implement intramural championships that enable students in residential colleges to compete in team-based events, fostering community and skill development without external pressures. In secondary schools, intramural equivalents manifest through structured sports carnivals, including inter-house competitions in athletics, swimming, and cross-country, which encourage broad student involvement and house loyalty. These school events, often held annually, prioritize participation over elite performance, aligning with educational goals of physical literacy. A distinctive aspect of Australian intramural sports is their strong emphasis on outdoor activities, capitalizing on the nation's favorable and cultural affinity for open-air ; popular offerings include social formats and leagues played on fields or courts. Inclusivity is a core feature, particularly through programs tailored for Indigenous students, such as UniSport's annual Indigenous Nationals, a that unites more than 500 participants from over 30 universities to celebrate alongside athletic competition. Workplace intramurals extend this framework via fitness centers and corporate wellness leagues, where employees join casual teams in sports like or to enhance and . Participation rates remain high in secondary schools, where inter-house competitions draw widespread engagement, with students earning points for their groups in events that build camaraderie and physical confidence. At the university level, Orientation Week (O-Week) serves as a key entry point, featuring free sports clinics, fitness sessions, and club demonstrations that integrate new students into intramural circuits from the outset of their academic year. These initiatives, such as those at the Australian National University, often include giveaways and pop-up events to lower barriers to involvement. Since 2000, intramural sports have experienced growth driven by national health initiatives, including the framework, which uses surveys and recommendations to promote recreational and has correlated with sustained increases in adult and engagement post-Sydney Olympics. This emphasis on accessible, community-based programs has reinforced intramurals as a vital component of strategies, with evidence of heightened participation intentions following major events like the Olympics.

References

  1. https://recreation.gsu.edu/programs/intramurals/
  2. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sports-and-leisure/intramural-sports
  3. https://www.mondoworldwide.com/na/en/spaziomondo/doyouknow/the-rise-of-intramural-and-recreational-sports/
  4. https://www.utrecsports.org/about/history
  5. https://www.naturalspublishing.com/download.asp?ArtcID=3543
  6. https://news.dasa.ncsu.edu/100-years-of-intramural-sports/
  7. https://www.etamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Intramural-Sports-Participant-Guide-24-25.pdf
  8. https://www.csuci.edu/recreation/intramural-sports-guidebook.pdf
  9. https://www.slu.edu/life-at-slu/campus-recreation-wellness/-pdf/intramuralsportmanual.pdf
  10. https://www.liberty.edu/campusrec/2021/09/16/the-benefits-of-intramural-sports/
  11. https://www.ycp.edu/news/club-sports-vs-intramural-sports-whats-the-difference
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intramural
  13. https://recsports.msu.edu/im-sports
  14. https://www.gocsucougars.com/sports/2013/8/9/_0809133036.aspx
  15. https://campusrec.fsu.edu/sports/im-principles/
  16. https://talentculture.com/blog/deciding-on-an-intramural-program-for-your-business/
  17. https://www.etymonline.com/word/intramural
  18. https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1850/College-Athletics-INTRAMURAL-ATHLETICS-IN-U-S-COLLEGES-UNIVERSITIES.html
  19. https://grammarist.com/words/intermural-intramural-and-extramural/
  20. https://www.jnj.com/our-heritage/how-women-at-johnson-johnson-pioneered-company-basketball
  21. https://nirsa.net/about/history/
  22. https://nirsa.net/2024/01/18/celebrate-the-rich-history-of-university-of-michigan-rec-sports/
  23. https://findingaids.lib.umich.edu/catalog/umich-bhl-9649
  24. https://mgoblue.com/honors/university-of-michigan-hall-of-honor/elmer-d-mitchell/146
  25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED120136.pdf
  26. https://books.google.com/books/about/Intramural_Athletics.html?id=csYiAAAAMAAJ
  27. https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/z603r299n
  28. https://nirsa.net/about/history/timeline/
  29. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Yarbrough_uncg_8710681.PDF
  30. https://www.militaryonesource.mil/leaders-service-providers/morale-welfare-and-recreation/history-of-military-recreation-programs/
  31. https://campusrecmag.com/emerging-trends-in-competitive-sports/
  32. https://dc.etsu.edu/secfr-conf/2020/schedule/24/
  33. https://www.hdrinc.com/insights/5-transformative-impacts-sports-and-wellness-programs-campus-life
  34. https://biomedicalodyssey.blogs.hopkinsmedicine.org/2021/04/intramural-e-sports-during-covid-19/
  35. https://magazine.scu.edu/magazines/fall-2020/intramurals-go-virtual/
  36. https://nirsa.net/2021/08/19/enriching-student-social-wellbeing-through-esports/
  37. https://www.imleagues.com/integrations.aspx
  38. https://www.fusionfamily.com/fusionplay
  39. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1558866120952093
  40. https://stonewallsports.org/
  41. https://nirsa.net/strategic-values/sustainability/
  42. https://nirsa.net/portfolio-items/value-of-recreational-sports-in-higher-education/
  43. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4816&context=open_access_etds
  44. https://nirsa.net/cal/data-driven-recreation-aligning-collection-with-department-goals-for-early-career-professionals/
  45. https://www.nyu.edu/about/leadership-university-administration/office-of-the-president/university-life/athletics-intramurals-and-recreation.html
  46. https://nou.edu.ng/coursewarecontent/KHE105%20Organization%20and%20Administration%20of%20Intramural%20Sports.pdf
  47. https://www.evansville.edu/fitnesscenter/downloads/ue-intramural-handbook.pdf
  48. https://nirsa.net/portfolio-items/campus-recreation-essentials-intramural-sports/
  49. https://nirsa.net/leadership/equity-diversity-inclusion-commission/
  50. https://nirsa.net/about/
  51. https://s3.amazonaws.com/file.imleagues/Images/Schools/Uploaded/202108/20218684040.pdf
  52. https://stevensonvillager.com/18040/sports/intramural-sports-grow-on-campus/
  53. https://recreation.rutgers.edu/sports
  54. https://www.sacredheart.edu/sacred-heart-life/fitness-recreation--sports/intramural-sports/
  55. https://www.uc.edu/campus-life/campus-rec/things-to-do/intramural-sports/intramural-sports-rules/5-on-5-basketball-rules.html
  56. https://community.pepperdine.edu/campusrecreation/intramurals/basketball/bballrules.htm
  57. https://www.niu.edu/recreation/_files/intramurals/basketball-rulebook.pdf
  58. https://www.bcsoccer.net/media/xjvj1g3q/bcsa-small-sided-rules-of-the-game.pdf
  59. https://cuwebstoragelibrary.blob.core.windows.net/documents-prod/docs/default-source/media/files/pdf/campus-recreation/rules/volleyball.pdf?la=en&hash=9119B95E5F5885F6B926BE359E9237046C518067
  60. https://www.uc.edu/campus-life/campus-rec/things-to-do/intramural-sports/intramural-sports-rules/6-on-6-volleyball-rules.html
  61. https://recsports.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2023/09/Flag-Football-Rules.pdf
  62. https://urec.uark.edu/_resources/pdf/intramural_sports/sport_rules/flag_football.pdf
  63. https://www.uc.edu/campus-life/campus-rec/things-to-do/intramural-sports/intramural-sports-rules/8-on-8-football-rules.html
  64. https://www.carleton.edu/intramural-sports/rules/sport-rules/ultimate/
  65. https://campusrec.princeton.edu/document/1451
  66. https://recreation.dartmouth.edu/intramurals/rules/softball-rules
  67. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1472&context=honorsprojects
  68. https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/?rankings=everyone-plays-intramural-sports
  69. https://www.intelligent.com/best-colleges-for-intramural-sports/
  70. https://rfc.wayne.edu/mort-harris/forrester_2014-report.pdf
  71. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-023-02264-8
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332331824_Retention_and_Academic_Success_of_First-Year_Student-Athletes_and_Intramural_Sports_Participants
  73. https://nirsa.net/research-assessment/benefits-of-collegiate-recreation/
  74. https://campusrec.fsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/NIRSA-2023-Survey-Notes-Comments.pdf
  75. https://nirsa.net/2022/09/13/making-intramural-and-sport-club-programs-more-inclusive/
  76. https://campusrecmag.com/addressing-the-shortage-of-officials-in-intramural-programs/
  77. https://www.sportrisk.com/liability-waivers-101/
  78. https://chicagosocial.com/corporate-wellness/
  79. https://www.nacua.org/docs/default-source/jcul-articles/volume33/33_jcul_521.pdf?sfvrsn=6d8489bf_12
  80. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gk08H6ojSk
  81. https://ilovetowatchyouplay.com/2025/04/30/college-club-sports-the-best-kept-secret-in-youth-sports/
  82. https://soar.suny.edu/bitstreams/0075d3b9-7d9c-43bf-8a5d-ef86feeeabf9/download
  83. https://play.nirsa.net/nirsa-championship-series/guidelines/
  84. https://sites.uci.edu/graduateinterconnect/2022/07/22/exercise-and-outdoor-activities-4/
  85. https://rec.stanford.edu/play/intramural-sports
  86. https://kpe.utoronto.ca/sport-recreationcompetitive-sports-and-clubs/u-t-intramurals
  87. https://active-living.ucalgary.ca/programs/sports-programs/intramuralsrec-sports
  88. https://vancouver.urbanrec.ca/
  89. https://www.viurrspace.ca/bitstreams/18add325-4337-49d0-aac8-c21ae6b60483/download
  90. https://www.cbc.ca/sports/paralympics/para-athlete-erica-gavel-university-inclusion-1.6771912
  91. https://rec.mrucougars.com/news/2024/10/9/general-creating-an-inclusive-indigenous-recreation-experience.aspx
  92. https://www.eusu.ed.ac.uk/intramural/
  93. https://www.ncl.ac.uk/sport/sport-and-fitness/intramural/
  94. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sport/get-active/intramural-sports-leagues.aspx
  95. https://www.susu.org/activities/interest/intramural-sports
  96. https://www.bristolsu.org.uk/student-groups/intramural-sport
  97. https://www.stpaulsschool.org.uk/beyond-the-classroom/clubs/
  98. https://www.bucs.org.uk/
  99. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B74xGF5M7ZM
  100. https://audit.scot/docs/central/2008/nr_080429_sport_overview.pdf
  101. https://britishesports.org/student-champs/
  102. https://www.nse.gg/news/2022-gaming-and-esports-society-directory/
  103. https://www.unisport.com.au/
  104. https://www.sydney.edu.au/students/intramural-championship.html
  105. https://www.education.sa.gov.au/schools-and-educators/programs-students/school-sport-sa/competitions/day-carnivals/term-3-secondary-school-day-carnivals
  106. https://brisbanebaysidesc.eq.edu.au/co-curricular/sports/interhouse-carnivals
  107. https://play.cricket.com.au/play/social-cricket
  108. https://netball.com.au/play-netball
  109. https://www.unisport.com.au/indigenous-nationals/
  110. https://www.vu.edu.au/about-vu/news-events/events/unisport-indigenous-nationals
  111. https://www.utas.edu.au/about/news-and-stories/articles/2025/student-athletes-shine-at-2025-indigenous-nationals-in-perth
  112. https://sport.unimelb.edu.au/about-us/welcome-to-mu-sport
  113. https://ayrshs.eq.edu.au/extra-curricular/sports/interhouse-sport-sports-awards-competitions-and-awards
  114. https://anu-sport.com.au/Pages/190
  115. https://orientation.anu.edu.au/o-week-events/anu-sport-club-pop
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2525635/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.