Hubbry Logo
IntrogressionIntrogressionMain
Open search
Introgression
Community hub
Introgression
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Introgression
Introgression
Introgression
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Introgressive phylogenetic clade
A phylogenetic model of introgressive hybridization; the hybrid zone of the two species' lineages is shown in blue, with each horizontal line representing an individual introgressive event.

Introgression, also known as introgressive hybridization, in genetics is the transfer of genetic material from one species into the gene pool of another by the repeated backcrossing of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parent species. Introgression is a long-term process, even when artificial; it may take many hybrid generations before significant backcrossing occurs. This process is distinct from most forms of gene flow in that it occurs between two populations of different species, rather than two populations of the same species.

Introgression also differs from simple hybridization. Simple hybridization results in a relatively even mixture; gene and allele frequencies in the first generation will be a uniform mix of two parental species, such as that observed in mules. Introgression, on the other hand, results in a complex, highly variable mixture of genes, and may only involve a minimal percentage of the donor genome.

Definition

[edit]

Introgression or introgressive hybridization is the incorporation (usually via hybridization and backcrossing) of novel genes or alleles from one taxon into the gene pool of a second, distinct taxon.[1][2][3][4] This introgression is considered 'adaptive' if the genetic transfer results in an overall increase in the recipient taxon's fitness.[5]

Ancient introgression events can leave traces of extinct species in present-day genomes, a phenomenon known as ghost introgression.[6]

Source of variation

[edit]

Introgression is an important source of genetic variation in natural populations and may contribute to adaptation and even adaptive radiation.[7] It can occur across hybrid zones due to chance, selection or hybrid zone movement.[8] There is evidence that introgression is a ubiquitous phenomenon in plants and animals,[9][10] including humans,[11] in which it may have introduced the microcephalin D allele.[12]

It has been proposed that, historically, introgression with wild animals is a large contributor to the wide range of diversity found in domestic animals, rather than multiple independent domestication events.[13]

Introgressive hybridization has also been shown to be important in the evolution of domesticated crop species, possibly providing genes that help in their expansion into different environments. A genomic study from New York University Abu Dhabi Center for Genomics and Systems Biology showed that domesticated date palm varieties from North Africa show introgressive hybridization of between 5–18% of its genome from the wild Cretan palm Phoenix theophrasti into Middle East date palms P. dactylifera. This process is also similar to the evolution of apples by hybridization of Central Asian apples with the European crabapple.[14] It has also been shown that indica rice arose when Chinese japonica rice arrived in India about ~4,500 years ago and hybridized with an undomesticated proto-indica or wild O. nivara, and transferred key domestication genes from japonica to indica.[15]

Examples

[edit]

Humans

[edit]
Main article: Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans

There is strong evidence for the introgression of Neanderthal genes[16] and Denisovan genes[17] into parts of the modern human gene pool.

Birds

[edit]

The Mallard duck is possibly the world's most capable bird to hybridise with other duck species, often to the point of the loss of genetic identity of these species. For example, feral mallard populations have significantly reduced wild populations of the Pacific black duck in New Zealand and Australia through cross-breeding.[citation needed]

Butterflies

[edit]

One important example of introgression has been observed in studies of mimicry in the butterfly genus Heliconius.[18] This genus includes 43 species and many races with different color patterns. Congeners exhibiting overlapping distributions show similar color patterns. The subspecies H. melpomene amaryllis and H. melpomene timareta ssp. nov. overlap in distribution.

Using the ABBA/BABA test, some researchers have observed that there is about 2% to 5% introgression between the pair of subspecies. Importantly, the introgression is not random. The researchers saw significant introgression in chromosomes 15 and 18, where important mimicry loci are found (loci B/D and N/Yb). They compared both subspecies with H. melpomene agalope, which is a subspecies near H. melpomene amaryllis in entire genome trees. The result of the analysis was that there is no relation between those two species and H. melpomene agalope in the loci B/D and N/Yb. Moreover, they performed the same analysis with two other species with overlapping distributions, H. timareta florencia and H. melpomene agalope. They demonstrated introgression between the two taxa, especially in the loci B/D and N/Yb.

Finally, they concluded their experiments with sliding-window phylogenetic analyses, estimating different phylogenetic trees depending on the different regions of the loci. When a locus is important in the color pattern expression, there is a close phylogenetic relationship between the species. When the locus is not important in the color pattern expression, the two species are phylogenetically distant because there is no introgression at such loci.

Domestic species

[edit]

Introgression can have a significant impact between wild and domestic populations of animals. This includes household pets, as seen in cats[19] or in dogs.[20]

Plants

[edit]
Main article: Introgressive hybridization in plants

Introgression has been observed in several plant species. For instance, a species of iris from southern Louisiana has been studied by Arnold and Bennett (1993) regarding the increased fitness of hybrid variants.[21][22]

Fish

[edit]

Espinasa et al. found that introgression between surface-dwelling members of Astroblepus and a troglomorphic species, Astroblepus pholeter, resulted in the development of previously lost traits in offspring, such as distinct eyes and optic nerves.[23]

Introgression line

[edit]

An introgression line (IL) is a crop species that contains genetic material artificially derived from a wild relative population through repeated backcrossing. An example of a collection of ILs (called an IL-Library) is the use of chromosome segments from Solanum pennellii (a wild species of tomato) that was introgressed into Solanum lycopersicum (the cultivated tomato). The lines of an IL-library usually cover the complete genome of the donor. Introgression lines allow the study of quantitative trait loci, but also the creation of new varieties by introducing exotic traits.[24]

Lineage fusion

[edit]
Lineage fusion between two species to form a hybrid lineage.
Lineage fusion on a phylogenetic tree; individual introgression events within the hybrid zone (blue) are shown as horizontal lines. Hybrids are produced before the lineages fuse, but rejoin one of the two lineages. Neither species A nor B remains extant in the area of interest.

Lineage fusion is an extreme variant of introgression that results from the merging of two distinct species or populations. This eventually results in a single population that displaces or replaces the parental species in the region.[25] Some lineage fusion occurs soon after two taxa diverge or speciate, especially if there are few reproductive barriers between lineages.[26] It is not strictly necessary for the two lineages to be closely related, but rather have the ability to produce viable offspring.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Introgression

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Introgression is the stable integration of genetic material from one into the of another through repeated of interspecific hybrids, allowing for the transfer of specific alleles across species boundaries. This process typically follows initial hybridization events, where individuals from divergent lineages produce viable that then mate with parental populations, gradually incorporating foreign genes into the recipient genome. Unlike simple admixture or incomplete lineage sorting, introgression involves ongoing that can persist over generations, often resulting in genomes where segments from different species are interspersed. Hybridization, which can lead to introgression, is a widespread in , occurring in approximately 10% of animal species and 25% of plant species, though not all hybridizations lead to successful gene transfer. At the genomic level, it can cause chromosomal rearrangements, expansions—such as a 50% increase observed in certain sunflower hybrids—and alterations in , frequently influenced by transposable elements. Barriers to introgression often vary across the genome; for instance, typically show reduced due to Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, while autosomal regions may permit more extensive exchange. The evolutionary consequences of introgression are multifaceted, including both adaptive benefits and potential risks to species integrity. It can facilitate adaptive introgression, where beneficial alleles from one species enhance fitness in another, such as genes potentially aiding cold adaptation introgressed from polar bears into brown bear populations (including grizzlies). In plants, introgression has contributed to hybrid speciation, as seen in Helianthus sunflowers, where novel gene combinations from parental species enable colonization of extreme habitats like sand dunes. Conversely, it poses threats like genetic swamping, where rampant gene flow from a common species erodes the distinct identity of rarer ones, potentially increasing extinction risk through loss of local adaptations. Overall, introgression underscores the semipermeable nature of species boundaries, influencing biodiversity patterns and evolutionary trajectories across taxa.

Fundamentals

Definition

Introgression is the infiltration of genetic material, or , from one into the of another through repeated of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parental , leading to the incorporation of specific alleles without forming a stable hybrid lineage. This process enables the gradual transfer of genes across species boundaries, often resulting in portions of the donor species' being integrated into the recipient's . The key components of introgression include an initial interspecific hybridization event, where individuals from distinct mate to produce fertile hybrid capable of . This is followed by multiple generations of , in which the hybrids or their descendants mate repeatedly with the parental , progressively diluting the proportion of the foreign while allowing certain alleles—often those conferring adaptive advantages—to be retained through . Selective retention occurs as beneficial alleles from the donor provide fitness advantages in the recipient's environment, counteracting the loss of less advantageous genetic material during . The term "introgression," also known as introgressive hybridization, was coined by botanist Edgar Anderson in his 1938 paper on hybridization in the genus Tradescantia, where he described it as a mechanism of gene flow between species. Anderson later expanded on the concept in his 1949 monograph Introgressive Hybridization, emphasizing its role in plant systematics and evolution. Introgression presupposes foundational processes such as gene flow, defined as the transfer of genetic variants from one population to another via migration and interbreeding, and hybridization, the reproductive crossing between genetically divergent groups that yields offspring of mixed ancestry. These elements provide the opportunity for genetic exchange across species barriers, setting the stage for the selective integration characteristic of introgression. Introgression is often conflated with related evolutionary processes such as hybridization, , and admixture, but it is distinguished by its specific mechanism involving interspecific gene transfer through . Hybridization refers to the initial mating between individuals of distinct or populations, producing hybrid offspring that may exhibit intermediate traits, but it does not inherently involve the long-term incorporation of genes into parental lineages. In contrast, introgression requires subsequent of these hybrids to one parental , allowing select alleles to permeate the recipient while the hybrid form itself does not persist as a stable population. Gene flow encompasses the broader transfer of genetic material between populations, which can occur within species (intraspecific) or between species (interspecific) through mechanisms like migration or dispersal, without necessitating hybridization. Introgression, however, is strictly interspecific and represents a subset of gene flow that specifically arises from hybridization followed by backcrossing, often resulting in discrete pulses of genetic exchange rather than continuous movement. Admixture, frequently discussed in the context of human population genetics, describes the genome-wide mixing of ancestry from multiple distinct sources, which can be symmetric and does not emphasize backcrossing; introgression, by comparison, is typically asymmetric, with genes flowing predominantly from a donor species into a recipient one, leading to partial rather than complete genomic replacement. The key differentiator of introgression lies in the role of , which filters and integrates foreign alleles into the host species' , often adapting beneficial traits without forming fully mixed hybrid lineages. This contrasts with the stable hybrid populations produced by hybridization or the bidirectional blending in admixture events.
ProcessDefinition SummaryKey FeaturesRelation to Introgression
HybridizationInitial interbreeding between distinct species, yielding F1 hybrids.Does not require backcrossing; may produce stable hybrids or polyploids.Precedes introgression but insufficient alone; lacks gene incorporation into parentals.
Transfer of alleles between populations via migration or reproduction.Broader; includes intraspecific exchanges; continuous or episodic.Encompasses introgression as an interspecific subset involving hybridization and backcrossing.
AdmixtureGenome-wide ancestry mixing from multiple sources.Often symmetric; common in population formation; no backcrossing emphasis.Differs in symmetry and scope; introgression is asymmetric and backcross-driven.
A common misconception is that introgression is primarily a in , stemming from early studies focused on botanical hybrid zones; however, genomic evidence now confirms its prevalence across diverse taxa, including animals such as mammals and , where it contributes to adaptive . This outdated view overlooks the interspecific backcrossing documented in non-plant systems since seminal works in the mid-20th century.

Mechanisms

Process of Introgression

Introgression begins with the formation of an through interspecific mating between two divergent , resulting in offspring that carry a roughly equal mixture of genetic material from both parental genomes. This initial hybridization event produces heterozygotes at most loci, setting the stage for if the hybrid is viable and fertile. The process continues with , where the mates with individuals from one of the parental , typically the recipient or host . This first backcross generation (BC1) yields progeny with approximately 75% from the host parent and 25% from the donor , as half of the F1's donor-derived alleles are transmitted via Mendelian segregation. Subsequent generations of backcrossing (BC2, BC3, etc.) further dilute the donor while allowing segments carrying beneficial alleles to persist, particularly if selection favors them. Over multiple backcross generations, the host genome is progressively recovered through repeated recombination and segregation, breaking down (LD) between donor and host . Recombination rates play a critical role here, as higher recombination in certain genomic regions facilitates the independent assortment of , enabling the introgression of small, unlinked donor segments without dragging along incompatible genetic background. Meanwhile, allele surfing can occur stochastically during this process, where rare donor increase in frequency due to in small hybrid populations or at the expanding fronts of hybrid zones, potentially accelerating the spread of adaptive variants. The proportion of the donor genome remaining after nn backcross generations approximates 12n+1\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, derived from the halving of the donor contribution with each generation under random : starting from the F1 (50% donor), the BC1 transmits 25% on average, BC2 transmits 12.5%, and so on, yielding the geometric series sum. For instance, after six backcrosses, less than 1% of the is typically donor-derived, concentrating introgressed material in targeted regions. The success of this process hinges on the of hybrid individuals, as reduced hybrid viability or sterility can limit opportunities and halt before significant introgression occurs.

Barriers and Drivers

Intrinsic barriers to introgression primarily arise from genetic incompatibilities that prevent successful hybridization and between . Pre-zygotic barriers, such as isolation and preferences, reduce the likelihood of initial encounters or successful between divergent taxa. These mechanisms act before fertilization, limiting hybrid formation through ecological separation or behavioral differences. Post-zygotic barriers, in contrast, manifest after fertilization and include hybrid inviability and sterility, often driven by Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities—epistatic interactions between diverged loci that disrupt development or in hybrids. Such incompatibilities accumulate with , strengthening and impeding the transfer of genetic material during . Extrinsic drivers facilitate introgression by altering opportunities for hybridization in natural environments. Ecological overlap between species ranges promotes contact and exchange, particularly in dynamic habitats where hybrid zones form. Anthropogenic influences, including , often expand hybrid zones by forcing previously isolated populations into proximity, as seen in altered landscapes that increase interspecific encounters. further drives introgression by shifting species ranges, leading to novel and elevated hybridization rates; for instance, warming has been linked to hybrid zone movements in , enhancing . These environmental factors can override intrinsic barriers under rapid global changes. Selective drivers influence the success and extent of introgression by favoring certain genetic exchanges. Positive selection promotes the incorporation of adaptive traits from one species into another, such as alleles conferring resistance to environmental stresses, thereby accelerating beneficial . Hybrid vigor, or , can enhance fitness in specific ecological contexts, allowing introgressed segments to persist and spread under selection pressures like divergent habitats. In small populations, neutral drift facilitates the fixation of introgressed neutral alleles by chance, particularly when effective population sizes are low, contributing to background without adaptive advantage. Recent genomic studies from the 2020s have highlighted cytonuclear incompatibilities as critical barriers to introgression, involving mismatches between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes that reduce hybrid viability. These incompatibilities, often epistatic and lineage-specific, explain patterns of discordance in introgressed regions and have been documented in diverse taxa, underscoring their role beyond classical nuclear barriers. Such findings, enabled by high-throughput sequencing, reveal how cytonuclear co-evolution constrains in hybridizing systems.

Evolutionary Implications

Genetic Variation

Introgression introduces novel alleles from donor populations or species into recipient genomes through hybridization and , serving as a key source of that supplements and standing variation. This process can elevate heterozygosity in recipient populations by incorporating foreign genetic material, thereby broadening the allelic repertoire available for evolutionary processes. Unlike de novo mutations, which arise slowly, or standing variation, which is limited to pre-existing diversity within a lineage, introgressed alleles provide immediate access to potentially adaptive genetic elements that have evolved in divergent contexts. The variation transferred via introgression encompasses both adaptive and neutral components. Adaptive introgression transfers alleles that enhance fitness, such as those conferring resistance to environmental stresses or pathogens, enabling recipient populations to exploit new ecological opportunities. Neutral introgression, by contrast, contributes to baseline without immediate selective advantages but supports long-term evolutionary flexibility. A prominent example of adaptive transfer involves quantitative trait loci (QTL), which govern polygenic traits like growth or yield; their introgression can shift phenotypic distributions and facilitate fine-tuned to local conditions. Evolutionary models frame introgression as a conduit for gene flow within hybrid zones, where migration-selection balance governs the persistence and spread of transferred variation. In these models, the change in allele frequency (Δp) in the recipient population results from opposing forces of migration introducing foreign alleles and selection acting on their fitness effects. For a simple island model with low migration rate m (fraction of immigrants from the donor, where donor allele frequency p* = 1) and selection against the allele (coefficient s, assuming semi-dominance h = 0.5), the migration-induced change is approximately Δp_m = m(1 - p), while the selection-induced change is Δp_s ≈ -s p (1 - p). Combining these, the net change is Δp ≈ m(1 - p) - s p (1 - p). At equilibrium (\hat{p}), setting Δp = 0 yields \hat{p} \approx \frac{m}{m + s} for small p and strong selection, illustrating how weak barriers (low s) allow greater introgression of variation, while strong selection limits it to neutral or advantageous alleles. For adaptive alleles (s < 0), positive selection can drive rapid fixation, amplifying the influx of beneficial diversity. These derivations stem from foundational population genetics principles applied to hybrid zones. Contemporary research from the and underscores adaptive introgression's role in bolstering resilience to , particularly climate-driven shifts, by supplying alleles that enhance tolerance to novel conditions like or temperature extremes. Such transfers enable faster evolutionary responses than mutation alone, potentially mitigating extinction risks in fragmented or stressed populations.

Lineage Fusion

Lineage fusion represents a profound outcome of extensive introgression, where bidirectional between previously isolated evolutionary lineages progressively erodes boundaries, leading to the complete merging of distinct populations into a single panmictic entity or the formation of genomes that blend ancestries from multiple sources. This process typically unfolds through repeated hybridization followed by , allowing alleles to spread across the hybridizing groups and homogenize over time. Unlike limited introgression that introduces isolated beneficial alleles, fusion entails genome-wide integration, often transforming hybrid zones into zones of complete admixture. For lineage fusion to occur, specific conditions must be met, including high hybridization rates that exceed the strength of any reproductive barriers, coupled with weak or incomplete isolation mechanisms such as pre- or post-zygotic incompatibilities. This is most feasible in recently diverged taxa with low , facilitating unrestricted during secondary contact without the accumulation of strong isolating barriers. In such scenarios, the lag time between divergence and renewed contact plays a critical role; shorter lags increase fusion likelihood by limiting independent evolution. Phylogenetically, lineage fusion complicates inference from tree-based models, as reticulate generates conflicting signals across loci due to , rendering bifurcating trees inadequate for representing history. Instead, phylogenetic networks provide a framework to visualize hybridization and introgression as reticulation events, incorporating probabilities (γ) for admixed lineages and extending models to account for both incomplete lineage sorting and . Statistics like the D-statistic (ABBA-BABA test), F*, and R² are employed to detect fusion signatures by quantifying admixture imbalance, though they can mimic signals of population bottlenecks under certain conditions. Lineage fusion exemplifies reverse speciation, where evolutionary divergence is undone through sustained introgression, potentially driving the extinction of parental forms or creating novel unified lineages. Models such as isolation-with-migration (IM) simulations illustrate this by estimating fusion probabilities based on gene flow rates and divergence times; for instance, moderate ongoing migration can lead to complete genomic homogenization within thousands of generations in recently split populations. Recent 2020s analyses of ancient DNA have illuminated these dynamics in human evolution, revealing recurrent Neanderthal introgression pulses spanning approximately 200,000 years, with a major event around 44,000–51,000 years ago that produced mosaic modern human genomes with 1–2% Neanderthal ancestry, reflecting partial fusion during secondary contacts in Eurasia while Neanderthals persisted as a distinct lineage.

Methods and Tools

Introgression Lines

Introgression lines (ILs) are specialized near-isogenic lines developed to incorporate defined chromosomal segments from a donor into the uniform genetic background of a recurrent , typically achieved through to maintain and fix these segments while eliminating extraneous donor DNA. This approach ensures that each IL carries a unique, non-overlapping introgression, collectively providing genome-wide coverage of the donor's genetic material in a controlled manner. The construction of ILs begins with an initial interspecific cross between the recurrent parent and the donor species, followed by repeated to the recurrent parent—often six to eight generations—to recover the elite background while retaining selected donor segments. is employed throughout to identify and preserve the introgressed regions, with the goal of generating a set of lines each harboring a single chromosomal introgression. The expected length of these introgressed segments decreases with each backcross generation due to recombination; it can be approximated by the formula expected length=L2n\text{expected length} = \frac{L}{2^n} where LL is the total length of the chromosome or genome, and nn is the number of backcross generations, allowing breeders to predict and minimize linkage drag around target loci. ILs serve as powerful tools for quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping and functional genomics by enabling the precise dissection of donor alleles' effects on phenotypes in a stable genetic context. For instance, variations in traits across the IL population can pinpoint QTLs influencing agronomic characteristics like yield or stress resistance, facilitating their fine-mapping and validation. Their primary advantages include providing replicable experimental systems that isolate introgressed effects with minimal genetic background noise, supporting both basic research and applied breeding programs. In the 2020s, advancements in technology have enabled the creation of precise, synthetic introgression lines through targeted , bypassing lengthy by directly inserting or modifying donor segments in the recurrent background for accelerated trait introgression. This approach enhances efficiency in generating marker-free lines with specific edits, complementing traditional ILs in modern breeding pipelines.

Detection Techniques

Genomic approaches to detecting introgression primarily rely on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and (SNP) arrays, which generate dense variant data to infer admixture proportions and identify regions of foreign ancestry. Tools such as ADMIXTURE employ to model ancestries as mixtures of ancestral , enabling the quantification of introgressed segments based on patterns across genomes. Similarly, f4-statistics measure correlations in frequencies among multiple to test for admixture, providing a robust signal of introgression by comparing expected and observed sharing of derived alleles under a null model of no . These methods have become standard due to their scalability with high-throughput sequencing data, allowing detection of introgression at both and levels. Statistical tests further refine introgression detection by examining phylogenetic incongruences and population structure. The ABBA-BABA test, also known as the D-statistic, assesses directionality of by quantifying asymmetries in sharing (ABBA versus BABA patterns) between a test population and an outgroup relative to two reference populations, where significant deviations from zero indicate introgression. (LD) patterns offer complementary evidence, as introgressed tracts initially exhibit elevated LD that decays over time due to recombination, allowing estimation of introgression timing through tract length distributions. These tests are particularly effective in sliding-window analyses across genomes to localize introgressed regions. Advanced methods integrate additional data types for more precise historical inference. (aDNA) sequencing facilitates the direct comparison of modern against archaic or historical samples, enhancing detection by anchoring admixture events in time and revealing low-frequency introgressions obscured in contemporary data. approaches, such as convolutional neural networks developed post-2020, predict origins by training on simulated genomic landscapes, outperforming traditional statistics in complex scenarios involving selection or variable recombination rates. In the , long-read sequencing technologies like PacBio and Oxford Nanopore have improved resolution of structural variants and repetitive regions, aiding the identification of complex introgressions that short-read methods miss, while references—multiple aligned assemblies—enable better variant calling and detection of species-specific introgressed haplotypes by reducing reference bias. A key challenge in introgression detection is distinguishing it from incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), where ancestral polymorphisms persist across diverging lineages and mimic signals in gene trees. Methods like ABBA-BABA and f4-statistics are designed to mitigate this by focusing on population quartet topologies, but simulations and coalescent models are often required to set significance thresholds under ILS expectations. Introgression lines, as controlled experimental resources, can aid validation of natural detection inferences by providing known admixture benchmarks.

Examples

In Humans

Introgression from archaic hominins has significantly influenced the genomes of modern populations, particularly non-Africans, through admixture events with s and s. Genomic analyses indicate that individuals of non-African ancestry carry approximately 1-2% Neanderthal DNA on average, resulting from interbreeding events roughly 47,000 to 65,000 years ago during the early migration . Denisovan introgression contributes an additional 0.1-0.2% to East Asians and up to 4-6% in some Oceanian populations, stemming from separate admixture pulses around 40,000 to 50,000 years ago. These proportions reflect the retention of archaic segments after purged deleterious variants, leaving a of introgressed haplotypes across the . Specific adaptive alleles from these archaic sources have provided benefits in novel environments. For instance, Neanderthal-derived variants in the HLA region enhance immune diversity and pathogen resistance, contributing to the multiallelic complexity observed in modern human genes. In Tibetans, a Denisovan haplotype in the EPAS1 gene regulates hemoglobin levels, conferring protection against hypoxia at high altitudes and demonstrating positive selection post-introgression. Detection of these events relied on 2010s advancements in sequencing and computational methods like the D-statistic, which identified archaic ancestry by comparing allele sharing patterns across populations. The demographic context of these admixture events shows patterns of asymmetry and sex bias. was predominantly unidirectional, with modern human females more likely to mate with males, as evidenced by the marked depletion of Neanderthal ancestry on the compared to autosomes (roughly half the autosomal level). This bias likely arose from social or behavioral factors during brief contact periods in . Recent 2020s studies have uncovered additional "ghost" archaic introgression in African populations, estimating 2-19% archaic ancestry from unknown hominins that diverged before Neanderthals, detected via site frequency spectrum analyses in diverse West African genomes. While beneficial for , archaic introgression carries health implications, including elevated risks for autoimmune disorders. Neanderthal alleles associated with immune function increase susceptibility to conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus, , and , reflecting a where enhanced defense heightens inflammatory responses in modern environments. These findings underscore the dual role of introgression in shaping human phenotypic variation and disease predisposition.

In Animals

Introgression in non-human animals often facilitates adaptive evolution by introducing beneficial alleles that enhance survival in changing environments, such as through mimicry for predator avoidance or morphological traits for resource exploitation. In the genus Heliconius, neotropical butterflies, introgression has been instrumental in the spread of wing pattern alleles that enable Müllerian mimicry, where co-mimics share warning coloration to collectively deter predators. Genomic analyses reveal extensive exchange of mimicry loci across species boundaries, with regions controlling red and yellow patterns showing high introgression rates due to positive selection for shared protective signals. This process has accelerated adaptive radiation in Heliconius, allowing rapid convergence on similar wing phenotypes despite independent evolutionary origins. In birds, introgression contributes to morphological and behavioral diversity, particularly in s. Among in the Galápagos, hybridization between species like Geospiza fortis and Geospiza scandens has increased beak size variation, enabling better exploitation of available seeds during environmental shifts such as droughts. Long-term field studies demonstrate that introgressed alleles from larger-beaked species enhance population resilience by boosting overall , thus promoting evolutionary flexibility in this iconic . Similarly, in manakins (Lepidothrix genus), sequential introgression of a carotenoid-processing has driven diversification of male plumage ornaments, such as crown color, which influences and without causing . This has spread adaptive traits unidirectionally across hybrid zones, underscoring introgression's role in avian sexual trait evolution. Among mammals, introgression between gray wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) in exemplifies how can confer adaptive advantages in expanding populations. Northeastern coyotes, historically smaller, have incorporated wolf-derived alleles that promote larger body size, facilitating colonization of novel habitats like eastern forests by improving hunting efficiency for larger prey. Whole-genome sequencing confirms that this hybridization, occurring since the amid , has introduced adaptive variation without homogenizing the species, allowing coyotes to thrive in human-altered landscapes. Such interspecific exchange highlights introgression's ecological impact on canid distribution and foraging strategies. Recent studies from the have illuminated introgression's role in pest adaptation, particularly to anthropogenic pressures like pesticides. In the corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea), a major crop pest in the , interspecific from the invasive old world bollworm (H. armigera) has rapidly spread alleles conferring resistance to insecticides, enabling outbreaks in agricultural fields. Genomic scans of North American populations reveal hotspots of introgressed segments around genes, selected for their fitness benefits in toxin-exposed environments, thus accelerating pest and challenging control efforts. These findings emphasize how introgression amplifies adaptive potential in invasive , with implications for global .

In Plants and Domestic Species

Introgression plays a significant role in the adaptation of wild plants to environmental stresses, as exemplified by hybrid zones in sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). In these zones, gene flow between species such as H. annuus and H. petiolaris has facilitated the transfer of adaptive alleles, enabling rapid evolution in response to climatic shifts like drought. Experimental studies demonstrate that hybrid lineages exhibit enhanced growth and survival under water-limited conditions compared to parental lines, with introgressed genomic regions contributing to traits such as reduced stomatal density and improved water-use efficiency. In domesticated species, introgression from wild relatives has been harnessed to improve agronomic traits in crops and livestock. For instance, in (Triticum aestivum), genes conferring resistance to (Puccinia graminis) have been successfully introgressed from wild emmer (T. dicoccoides) and other relatives, enhancing disease tolerance without compromising yield. Similarly, in (Bos taurus), ancient introgression from wild (B. primigenius) has contributed to alleles associated with increased yield, particularly in East Asian populations where sustained improved dairying efficiency in indigenous herds. Breeding programs utilize wide hybridization followed by repeated to incorporate beneficial wild alleles into elite cultivars, minimizing linkage drag from undesirable traits. This approach has been refined in the 2020s with genomic tools, such as advanced backcross quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis and , accelerating the identification and fixation of target introgressions. Emerging gene editing techniques, including CRISPR/Cas9, further enhance precision by facilitating targeted modifications that mimic natural introgression, as seen in efforts to boost stress tolerance in crops without transgenes. Despite these advances, crop-wild introgression poses challenges, including the risk of unintended leading to increased weediness in populations. For example, escaped crop alleles in hybrid sunflowers can enhance fitness in weedy relatives, potentially creating persistent invasive types that outcompete native . Recent GMO-free successes in the 2020s include synthetic hexaploid wheats derived from wild relatives, which have boosted yields by up to 20% in Chinese cultivars through conventional introgression, demonstrating sustainable trait enhancement.

In Fish

Introgression plays a significant role in the evolutionary dynamics of species, particularly in aquatic environments where hybridization zones are common due to overlapping distributions and limited reproductive barriers. In African lake cichlids, ancient hybridization between Congolese and Upper lineages has fueled adaptive radiations by introducing for key traits. For instance, in the Region Superflock, introgressed alleles from these lineages contribute to variation in male nuptial coloration via long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) haplotypes, influencing and adaptation to different light environments such as shallow clear waters versus deep turbid ones. Similarly, trophic traits, including adaptations for scraping versus detritivory, show enrichment of introgressed alleles at ecologically relevant loci, facilitating and diversification in lakes like Victoria, , and Tanganyika. In salmonids, introgressive hybridization is prevalent in hybrid zones, especially between native (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) and introduced (O. mykiss) across Rocky Mountain streams. Genomic analyses of over 13,000 individuals reveal higher introgression levels (up to 23.4% pure ancestry) within the historical range of rainbow trout, such as the Salmon and Clearwater River basins, compared to introduced areas (13.7%), driven by factors like warmer stream temperatures and proximity to source populations. These hybrid zones demonstrate ongoing that can alter local adaptations, with climate projections indicating potential habitat loss for non-introgressed cutthroat trout under warming scenarios. Aquaculture practices exacerbate introgression risks in fish, notably with escaped farmed (Salmo salar) interbreeding with wild populations, leading to genetic swamping where farmed alleles dominate and erode wild genetic integrity. In Norwegian rivers, genomic surveys show widespread introgression, with farmed ancestry exceeding 10% in 72% of populations and over 20% in 37%, particularly in southern rivers closest to farms; this has resulted in the loss of pure wild genotypes in many systems, reducing overall and adaptive potential. Such introgression affects the full wild salmon life cycle, accelerating growth by 6% at sea, reducing smolt age by 0.34 years, and decreasing age at maturity by up to 0.43 years, potentially compromising long-term population fitness despite short-term size benefits. Adaptive introgression has enabled invasive fish species to acquire beneficial alleles for environmental challenges, such as cold tolerance. In westslope cutthroat trout, parallel introgression of rainbow trout alleles across multiple hybrid zones confers fitness advantages in varied stream environments, including enhanced tolerance to fluctuating temperatures; selected introgressed regions show signatures of positive selection, suggesting adaptation to local conditions like colder high-elevation streams. Recent genomic surveys in the 2020s have uncovered cryptic introgression in marine fish, revealing hidden gene flow patterns that maintain subtle population structure despite high dispersal. For example, in Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), spatial gradients of introgressed ancestry from distant populations indicate cryptic connectivity over thousands of kilometers, influencing neutral and adaptive genomic variation in this high-gene-flow species. Similarly, in northeast Pacific rockfishes (Sebastes spp.), phylogenetically diverse introgressed segments drive fine-scale differentiation, highlighting pervasive hybridization in marine ecosystems.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2173880/
  2. https://openpress.wheatoncollege.edu/molecularecologyv1/chapter/hybridization-introgression/
  3. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5242144
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959437X17300357
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581619/
  6. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0688
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/gene-flow
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/natural-hybridization
  9. https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/105/S1/795/2961884
  10. https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article/220/2/iyab173/6425633
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123847195002021
  12. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2205785119
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy2013102
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1450430/
  15. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.18767
  16. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/73/9/1821/6727436
  17. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0533
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025556412000491
  19. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-021-01749-1
  20. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.00147/full
  21. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1714950115
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-08410-3
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12181397/
  24. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919086117
  25. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-genet-021821-020805
  26. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/70/5/908/6067419
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897607/
  28. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/39/2/msac008/6505222
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4412771/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8045713/
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-022-01585-1
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7166132/
  33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10725
  34. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2410934122
  35. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq3010
  36. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adi1768
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8582620/
  38. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2015.00432/full
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbr.12329
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90783-6
  41. https://thericejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12284-021-00472-1
  42. https://academic.oup.com/hr/article/doi/10.1093/hr/uhac070/6552739
  43. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/75/5/1347/7441058
  44. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11041
  46. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adj9201
  47. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1913534116
  48. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107434118
  49. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adn8339
  50. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1501714
  51. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/41/7/msae129/7701045
  52. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/9/2568/5827004
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332796811_Hybridization_speeds_adaptive_evolution_in_an_eight-year_field_experiment
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3070511/
  55. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.00252/full
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10441390/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11794820/
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32622199/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29396919/
  60. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14363
  61. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163563
  62. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/73/10/2488/2647116
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8694624/
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343938550_Spatial_gradients_of_introgressed_ancestry_reveal_cryptic_connectivity_patterns_in_a_high_gene_flow_marine_fish
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.