Hubbry Logo
Kim DotcomKim DotcomMain
Open search
Kim Dotcom
Community hub
Kim Dotcom
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kim Dotcom
Kim Dotcom
Kim Dotcom
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Kim Dotcom (né Schmitz;[3] born 21 January 1974), also known as Kimble[4] and Kim Tim Jim Vestor,[5] is a German-Finnish Internet entrepreneur and political activist who lives in Glenorchy, New Zealand.[6]

Key Information

Dotcom rose to fame in Germany in the 1990s as a hacker and an Internet entrepreneur.[7] He was arrested in 1994 for trafficking in stolen phone calling card numbers. He was convicted on eleven charges of computer fraud, ten charges of data espionage, and various other charges in 1998 for which he served a two-year suspended sentence.[7] In 2003, he was deported from Thailand to Germany, where he pleaded guilty to embezzlement in November 2003 and after five months in jail awaiting trial he received another 20 months suspended sentence.[8]

Dotcom is the founder and former CEO of the defunct file-hosting service Megaupload (2005–2012).[9][10] In 2012, the United States Department of Justice seized its website and pressed charges against Dotcom, including criminal copyright infringement, money laundering, racketeering and wire fraud.[11] Dotcom was residing in New Zealand at the time; at the request of US authorities, New Zealand police raided his home in 2012 and arrested him. Dotcom was granted bail and initiated legal proceedings to challenge his arrest and the police's search and seizure of evidence, a process that has stretched over a decade without resolution as of 2025.

In 2017, a New Zealand court ruled that Dotcom could be extradited to the US on fraud charges related to Megaupload. Dotcom denied any wrongdoing and has accused US authorities of pursuing a vendetta against him on behalf of politically influential Hollywood studios.[12] In 2018, the New Zealand Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's ruling. Dotcom appealed to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, which ruled in 2020 that Dotcom could be extradited to the United States, but that he could challenge the decision through judicial review.[13] His extradition order was eventually signed on 15 August 2024.[14] Dotcom has remained free in New Zealand while continuing to pursue judicial review of his extradition order.[15]

In 2013, Dotcom launched another cloud storage service called Mega, although he severed all ties with the service in 2015. He also started and funded the Internet Party.[16] The party contested the 2014 New Zealand general election under an electoral alliance with the Mana Movement and contested the 2017 general election independently, but failed to win any seats at either election.[17]

Early life

[edit]
Kim Schmitz in 1996

Dotcom was born as Kim Schmitz in 1974 in Kiel in the northern part of West Germany.[18] His mother was Finnish,[19] from Turku,[20] so he holds a Finnish passport and has siblings in Finland.[21] His father was German. He legally changed his surname to Dotcom in 2005.[22][23]

Prior to his arrest in New Zealand, he enjoyed a luxurious life. In 2001, his main source of income was a company called Kimvestor,[24] and he was known for spending his money on expensive cars and boats. During the 2000 Monaco Formula One Grand Prix, Dotcom chartered a 240-foot (73 m) yacht and used it to host parties for guests such as Prince Rainier of Monaco.[25]

He was granted permanent residence in New Zealand on 29 November 2010.[26] While his residency was under consideration, Dotcom was planning a fireworks show in Auckland at a cost of NZ$600,000.[27] He leased a mansion in Coatesville, a rural community near Auckland, owned by entrepreneurs Richard and Ruth Bradley, and considered one of the most expensive homes in the country. He wanted to buy the mansion when the lease expired.[28]

Before his arrest in New Zealand, he was the world's number-one-ranked Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 player for having the highest cumulative score in free for all mode out of more than 15 million online players.[29]

Personal life

[edit]

In 2007, Dotcom met Mona Verga and married her on 10 July 2009.[30] Dotcom had one child from a previous relationship, who was born in September 2007.[31][32][33] Dotcom and Verga had four children together, all using IVF treatment.[34] The couple's first child together was born in 2009.[31][35] Their second child together was born in 2010.[36] Verga gave birth to twin girls in Auckland in March 2012, a month after Dotcom was released on bail from Mt Eden prison.[37][38][39][40][41] On 17 May 2014, Dotcom announced on Twitter that he and Verga were separated and filing for divorce.[42][43] Four days earlier, Verga left her directorship positions in the Dotcom family's companies.[44]

In March 2014, Dotcom was criticised by The Times of Israel and the New Zealand Jewish Council for his purchase of a rare signed copy of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, with Council president Stephen Goodman saying it was "morally unacceptable".[45] Dotcom said the book was a financial investment and that he was the victim of a "disgusting smear campaign".[45]

In November 2017, Dotcom announced he would marry his fiancée, Elizabeth Donnelly, on 20 January 2018; the anniversary of the raid during which he was arrested.[46] They had been dating for two years and in 2017 moved to Queenstown to live.[47] Their first child together was born in November 2022.[48] This was Dotcom's sixth child, also conceived using IVF.[49]

In 2024, Dotcom announced that he suffered a "serious stroke".[50] In 2025, he moved to Dunedin where he is receiving medical treatment.[51]

[edit]

Germany

[edit]

As a teenager, Schmitz acquired a reputation in Germany after saying that he had bypassed the security of NASA, the Pentagon and Citibank under the name of Kimble, derived from Richard Kimble, a character in the 1963 TV series The Fugitive.[9] Some of these hacks are disputed.[7] He also stated that he had hacked corporate PBX systems in the United States and said he was selling the access codes.[52]

Schmitz operated a bulletin board system called "House of Coolness" where users would trade pirated software; around 1993, Schmitz was reportedly targeted by German anti-piracy lawyer Günter von Gravenreuth [de], and had become a paid informant.[53] Schmitz was arrested in March 1994 for selling stolen phone numbers and held in custody for a month. He was arrested again in 1998 on more hacking charges and convicted of 11 counts of computer fraud and 10 counts of data espionage.[7] He was given a two-year suspended sentence;[52] the judge of the case described Schmitz's actions as "youthful foolishness".[54]

In 2001, Schmitz bought €375,000 worth of shares of the nearly bankrupt company Letsbuyit.com [de] and subsequently announced his intention to invest €50 million in the company.[55] The announcement caused the share value of Letsbuyit.com to jump,[56] resulting in a €1.5 million profit for Schmitz.[7][52]

Thailand

[edit]

Dotcom moved to Thailand to avoid investigation,[9] but was arrested there at the request of the German embassy. In response, he allegedly pretended to kill himself online and declared through his website that he wished to be known as "His Royal Highness King Kimble the First, Ruler of the Kimpire".[54][57] He was deported back to Germany where he pleaded guilty to embezzlement in November 2003 and, after five months in jail awaiting trial, again received a suspended sentence, this time of 20 months.[8] After avoiding a prison sentence for a second time, he left Germany and moved to Hong Kong in late 2003.[9]

Hong Kong

[edit]

Dotcom registered Kimpire Limited in December 2003, soon after moving there. He set up a network of interlinked companies, including Trendax, which he said was an artificial intelligence-driven hedge fund.[22] However, Trendax was never registered with Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission and the company was not legally allowed to accept investments or to conduct trades.[22] After moving to New Zealand, Dotcom did not disclose his investment activity to the Securities and Futures Commission and was fined HK$8,000.[27]

Move to New Zealand

[edit]

Dotcom visited New Zealand for 10 days in December 2008 and again for two months in 2009.[58] He applied for residency and received it in November 2010. Immigration New Zealand made its decision on his application, despite his foreign convictions and despite his persona non grata status in Thailand, after officials used a special direction to waive "good character" requirements.[citation needed] Warwick Tuck, head of Immigration New Zealand, said that Dotcom had been granted residency as an "investor plus", or someone who invested $10 million in New Zealand.[59]

Despite granting him residency, Immigration New Zealand expressed concern that their decision might attract criticism that they had allowed Dotcom to buy his way into the country and attempted to keep it secret.[58] Dotcom's residency status subsequently became the subject of intense media speculation when it came to light that Auckland mayor John Banks had become involved and that New Zealand's intelligence services had spied on him—an act made illegal by Dotcom's possession of residency in New Zealand. Immigration New Zealand officers judged Dotcom's convictions in Hong Kong to be too minor to consider deporting him.[27]

On his residency application of 3 June 2010, Dotcom erroneously denied having been convicted of dangerous driving; he had pled guilty to dangerous driving north of Auckland in September 2009. The media speculated at the time that this could provide grounds for deportation.[60]

Involvement with Auckland mayor John Banks

[edit]

John Banks met Dotcom when Banks was Mayor of Auckland City. He asked Dotcom for help putting on a fireworks display in the city's harbour. Banks later attended a New Year's Eve party thrown by Dotcom at the city centre apartment of now bankrupt property developer David Henderson. He said it provided a great view of the fireworks display detonated over the Waitematā Harbour. Banks said he had advised Dotcom on how to obtain permission from the Overseas Investment Office to buy the Coatesville mansion.[61]

On 28 April 2012, Dotcom said he had donated $50,000 to John Banks' mayoral campaign in 2010 and that Banks had asked him to split the donation in two, allowing the Banks campaign to claim them as anonymous by falling within the anonymous limit of $25,000. In 2014, Banks was found guilty of filing a false electoral return, with evidence from Dotcom playing a major part in the case. This conviction was subsequently overturned on appeal following the discovery of new evidence, and a planned retrial was later cancelled and a verdict of acquittal entered.[62]

Among Dotcom's revelations was a phone call from Banks, thanking him for the contribution.[63] Dotcom subsequently recorded a song titled Amnesia, which mocks John Banks and the controversy of Dotcom's donation to him.[64] A poll in October 2012 found the New Zealand public had a more favourable view of Kim Dotcom than of Banks.[65]

Megaupload arrest and extradition proceedings

[edit]
Megaupload.com's logo
Main article: Megaupload
See also: Megaupload legal case

In February 2003, Dotcom set up Data Protect Limited, but changed the name to Megaupload in 2005.[22] He was the chief executive officer.[66] Megaupload was an online file-hosting and sharing service in which users could share links to files for viewing or editing, much of it pirated.[67] Eventually it had over 150 employees,[68] US$175 million revenues,[69] and 50 million daily visitors. At its peak Megaupload was estimated to be the 13th-most popular site on the Internet and responsible for 4% of all Internet traffic.[70]

On 5 January 2012,[71] indictments were filed in Virginia in the United States against Dotcom and other company executives with crimes including racketeering, conspiring to commit copyright infringement, and conspiring to commit money laundering.[72] Two weeks later on 20 January, Dotcom, Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk[citation needed] were arrested in Coatesville, New Zealand by the New Zealand Police, in an armed raid on Dotcom's house involving 76 officers and two helicopters.[73] Seized assets included eighteen luxury cars, large TVs, works of art and US$175 million in cash. Dotcom's bank accounts were frozen, denying him access to 64 bank accounts world-wide, including BNZ and Kiwibank accounts in New Zealand, government bonds and money from numerous PayPal accounts.[74]

Dotcom was remanded to Mt Eden Prison and alleged poor treatment by the authorities.[75] On 22 February, North Shore District Court Judge Nevin Dawson overturned previous rulings and released Dotcom on bail, reasoning that Dotcom had neither the ability nor desire to flee the country.[76]

High Court

[edit]

On 28 June 2012, High Court of New Zealand Justice Helen Winkelmann found that the warrants used to seize Dotcom's property were illegal because they were too broad.[77] The Crown later admitted that it was aware that it was using the wrong order while the raid was in progress and that Dotcom should have been given the chance to challenge the seizure.[78] It also admitted to giving seized hard drives to the FBI, who made copies of them in New Zealand and then sent them back to the US.[78] Justice Winkelmann ruled that the handing of hard drives seized by New Zealand police in the raid to the FBI, and the copying of data on them by the FBI, was illegal.[77]

As a result of those rulings, Justice Judith Potter allowed Dotcom to withdraw approximately NZ$6 million (US$4.8 million) on 28 August 2012 of his seized assets, and to sell nine of his cars. The amount released was to cover $2.6 million in existing legal bills, $1 million in future costs, and another $1 million in rent on his New Zealand mansion.[79]

Court of Appeal

[edit]

In May 2012, a district court judge ruled that the FBI should hand over all its evidence against Dotcom relating to the extradition bid. The Crown appealed, but the ruling was upheld by the High Court. The Crown appealed again and in March 2013, the Court of Appeal quashed the previous court decisions. Crown lawyer John Pike, on behalf of the US Government, argued that the district court had no power to make disclosure decisions in an extradition case and that "disclosure was extensive and could involve billions of emails". The Court of Appeal agreed stating that extradition hearings were not trials and the full protections and procedures for criminal trials did not apply. Dotcom's lawyer, Paul Davison, QC, appealed to the Supreme Court. In May 2013, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, so it will make the final decision on whether Dotcom should receive all the FBI investigation files before the extradition hearing.[80]

A series of subsequent court decisions delayed every attempt to hold a hearing focused on extradition. In March 2013, Dotcom won a Court of Appeal ruling allowing him to sue the New Zealand Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB),[81][82] rejecting the attorney's-general appeal against a ruling in December 2012.[83][84] A month later, Dotcom appeared in court again, seeking compensation from police over the raid on his house, which earlier had been deemed illegal.[85]

Confidential settlement with police

[edit]

In November 2017, Dotcom and his former wife Mona accepted a confidential settlement from the police over the raid. The settlement came after a damages claim was filed with the High Court over the "unreasonable" use of force when the anti-terrorism Special Tactics Group raided his mansion in January 2012. Settlements have already[when?] been reached between police and Bram van der Kolk and Mathias Ortmann, who were also arrested. The New Zealand Herald reported that their settlements were six-figure sums and "it is likely Dotcom would seek more as the main target in the raid". Commenting on the settlement, Dotcom said: "We were shocked at the uncharacteristic handling of my arrest for a non-violent Internet copyright infringement charge brought by the United States, which is not even a crime in New Zealand".[86]

Supreme Court

[edit]

In February 2014, the New Zealand Court of Appeal deemed the raids on Kim Dotcom to be legal but not the FBI's taking of information.[87] Dotcom appealed this decision to the Supreme Court. In December four of the five judges agreed with the Court of Appeal that the raid was legal and ordered Dotcom to pay $35,000 costs. Chief Justice Sian Elias dissented, saying there had been a miscarriage of justice as the search warrant was too broad.[88]

A month before the Supreme Court decision, Dotcom's legal team quit after he had spent $10 million on his defence, financed the Internet Party, then run out of money. When the US tried to have his bail revoked, a new lawyer, Ron Mansfield, helped keep him out of prison.[89] In December 2014, events took another turn when the High Court in Hong Kong ruled that the United States "did not have a clear path to serve a legal summons on Dotcom's filesharing company" and he could take a case to get back $60 million seized by authorities there. In making this decision, Judge Tallentire said, "No one can say when that process of extradition will be completed given the appeal paths open to the various accused. Indeed, no one can say if it will ever be completed".[90]

Political fallout

[edit]

After his arrest by the New Zealand police in January 2012, Dotcom had an ongoing dispute with Prime Minister John Key about when Key had first become aware of Dotcom. Dotcom argued that Key had been involved in a plan to allow him into New Zealand so that he could then be extradited to the US to face copyright charges. Key had consistently said he had never heard of Dotcom until the day before the New Zealand police raid on his mansion in Coatesville.[91]

Apology for illegal spying on Dotcom

[edit]

On 24 September 2012, Key revealed that, at the request of the police, the New Zealand GCSB had spied on Dotcom to help police locate him and monitor his communications in the weeks prior to the raid on his house.[92] The GCSB are not allowed to spy on New Zealand citizens or permanent residents; Dotcom, though not a citizen, had been granted permanent residency. Three days later, Key apologised for the illegal spying.[93]

Application for damages

[edit]

In December 2012, Chief High Court judge Helen Winkelmann ordered the GCSB to "confirm all entities" to which it gave information. This also allowed Dotcom to sue the Crown for damages.[94] The Crown appealed Justice Winkelmann's decision, but in March 2013, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision.[95][96] Dotcom was unable to access the information, but Stuart Grieve QC, who was appointed as a Special Advocate, was given access. Dotcom argued in the Court of Appeal that there had been judicial miscarriage, but the court ruled in favour of the GCSB. Dotcom next sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court but in February 2020, it rejected his appeal and ordered him to pay the GCSB NZ$2,500.[97]

Media reaction

[edit]

The mistakes by authorities attracted widespread media coverage and Key's handling of the affair was criticised by opposition parties in Parliament. Political commentator Bryce Edwards criticised the GCSB's involvement and described the prosecution of Dotcom as "the stuff of farce".[98] The Sunday Star-Times commentator Richard Boock compared the Dotcom saga to Watergate and suggested it might eventually 'bring down' John Key.[99] The story made headlines overseas, including in The Wall Street Journal,[100] The New York Times,[101] The Guardian[102] and the Hollywood Reporter[103] which specialises in legal and entertainment issues.[104]

On US involvement in his arrest

[edit]

Dotcom claimed to be a legitimate businessman who has been persecuted by the United States government and industry trade groups such as the RIAA and Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).[105] He blames former US President Barack Obama for colluding with Hollywood to orchestrate his arrest[64] and has spoken out against his negative portrayal in the media. In regard to the illegal spying conducted by GCSB, Dotcom said they were not spying to find out where he was.[106] In May 2013, Dotcom released a 39-page white paper alleging that the US government persecuted him at the behest of Hollywood, in exchange for support for Obama.[107]

Speculation about Hollywood's role in Dotcom's arrest grew when, in September 2012, Key made a four-day visit to meet top studio executives.[108] Key said the trip was intended to promote New Zealand as a good country to produce films,[citation needed] but he was planning to meet with the MPAA, which had described Dotcom as "a career criminal".[108]

In November 2013, The New Zealand Herald journalist David Fisher published The Secret Life of Kim Dotcom: Spies, Lies and the War for the Internet.[109]

Internet Party

[edit]
Dotcom at a political rally held by the Internet Party and Mana Movement

In September 2013, Dotcom revealed he aspired to enter New Zealand politics.[110] On 27 March 2014, Dotcom founded the Internet Party.[111][112] In May 2014, it was announced that the Internet Party would form a political alliance with the Mana Party,[113] led by local activist and sitting Member of Parliament Hone Harawira. The deal was brokered to serve the Mana Party financially, with the combined structure's political campaign in the 2014 general election being primarily funded by Dotcom. In contrast, the fledgling Internet Party was to benefit from the possibility of seats in parliament in the event that the combined structure were to achieve a greater percentage of the country's vote, helped along by the Mana Party's existing seat. Due to his citizenship status, Dotcom was ineligible to become a member of parliament,[114] and Laila Harré, a veteran of left-wing politics and trade unions, was chosen as leader of the Internet Party.[115]

The Moment of Truth

[edit]
Kim Dotcom and others at a press conference after The Moment of Truth
Problems playing this file? See media help.

On 16 September 2014, Dotcom held an event in the Auckland Town Hall five days before the election in which he promised to provide "absolute proof" that Prime Minister John Key knew about him long before he was arrested.[116] The event was billed as the "Moment of Truth" and included the release of what was claimed to be an email, dated 27 October 2010 from Kevin Tsujihara, the chief executive of Warner Bros. to a senior executive at the Motion Picture Association of America – the lobby group for the Hollywood studios. The New Zealand Herald, which broke the story, contacted Warner Bros., who said the email was a fake.[117]

In the 2014 general election, the joint Internet Party and Mana Movement gained 1.42% of the nationwide party vote but failed to win any seats. Dotcom, who was not a candidate because he is not a New Zealand citizen,[118] sank NZ$3.5 million into the Internet Party, the largest personal contribution to a political party on record in New Zealand, according to the national Electoral Commission.[119] "I take full responsibility for this loss tonight", Dotcom told reporters as election results became clear, "because the brand—the brand Kim Dotcom—was poison for what we were trying to achieve".[120] The Serious Fraud Office investigated the email and determined that it was a forgery.[121]

The media criticised Dotcom for "failing to deliver" at the Moment of Truth after saying for three years that he could prove John Key had lied in relation to his copyright case.[122][123] After the election, in which the Internet Mana alliance failed to win a seat, public support for Dotcom seemed to dissipate. Dotcom said in January 2015 he had become such "a pariah" in New Zealand that he might as well leave the country.[124]

2017 general election

[edit]

The party remained leaderless until 8 February 2017, when Suzie Dawson was appointed as its new leader for the 2017 general election. The Mana connection was dropped and the party contended as the single entity the Internet Party.[125] The Internet Party ran 8 party list candidates.[126] The party won only 499 votes (0.0%) and failed to win any seats in the New Zealand House of Representatives.[127]

The Internet Party was deregistered on 12 June 2018 because its membership had dropped below the 500 required for registration.[128]

Extradition

[edit]

District court

[edit]

After three years' legal wrangling, involving two Supreme Court cases and ten separate delays, extradition proceedings finally got underway in an Auckland court on 21 September 2015.[129]

The wrangling continued at the hearing with Dotcom and his colleagues saying that they were unable to present a proper defence because the US had threatened to seize any funds they try to spend on international experts in Internet copyright issues.[130] Dotcom's American lawyer, Ira Rothken, said they would need about US$500,000 to get evidence from the appropriate experts.[131] Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig, an international expert in copyright and fair use, provided his written opinion for free. He said there were no legal grounds to extradite Dotcom and the allegations and evidence made public by the US Department of Justice "do not meet the requirements necessary to support a prima facie case that would be recognised by United States federal law".[132]

Once the hearing finally got under way, Crown prosecutor Christine Gordon, on behalf of the US Government, called it a "simple scheme of fraud".[133] Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield's 300-page submission began with the argument that the case should be thrown out because the United States Supreme Court ruled in a parallel case in 1982 that copyright infringement was a civil matter and could not be prosecuted as criminal fraud.[134]

The Crown also made numerous references to intercepted Skype conversations between Dotcom and his co-defendants. Gordon said one message written by Dotcom, when translated from German, read: "At some point a judge will be convinced about how evil we are and then we are in trouble." Mansfield said this sentence was used repeatedly by Gordon during her submission "with the knowledge that it would make international media headlines". Mansfield had the passage translated by three independent academics who said it had a very different meaning and should read: "At some stage a judge will be talked into how bad we allegedly are and then it will be a mess."[135]

On 23 December 2015, North Shore District Court Judge Nevin Dawson announced that Dotcom and the three other Megaupload co-founders were eligible for extradition. He said the US had a "large body of evidence" which supported a prima facie case.[specify][136] An immediate appeal was lodged by Dotcom's lawyer.[137][138]

High Court

[edit]

In February 2017, the New Zealand High Court upheld the earlier decision of the district court that Dotcom and his three co-accused could be extradited to the United States. However, Justice Murray Gilbert accepted the argument made by Dotcom's legal team that he and his former Megaupload colleagues cannot be extradited because of copyright infringement. The judge said he made this decision because "online communication of copyright protected works to the public is not a criminal offence in New Zealand". However, Justice Gilbert said there were "general criminal law fraud provisions" in New Zealand law which covered the actions of the accused and they could be extradited on that basis.[139]

Dotcom saw this decision as a major victory saying: "The major part of this litigation has been won by this judgement—that copyright is not extraditable." The ruling opened the door to further appeals because the warrant which was served on him when he was arrested on 20 January 2012, stated he was being charged specifically with "copyright" offences. Both sides are expected to challenge aspects of the ruling before the New Zealand Court of Appeal and eventually the Supreme Court.[140]

Court of Appeal

[edit]

On 5 July 2018, the New Zealand Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision that Dotcom and the three co-accused could be extradited to the United States. In particular, the Court, disagreeing with Justice Gilbert, found that, even during the time of Megaupload's operations, it was a criminal offence in New Zealand to possess digital copyrighted works with an intention to disseminate them. Accordingly, Dotcom and his co-accused could be extradited on the basis of copyright infringement to stand trial in the United States.[141] Dotcom's lawyer said that he would appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.[142] In June 2019, Dotcom began "a final appeal to halt his extradition from New Zealand to the US".[143]

Supreme Court

[edit]

On 4 November 2020, the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that Dotcom could be extradited to the United States to face 12 criminal copyright-related charges. However, the Supreme Court also ruled that he and three other co-defendants could challenge the decision through judicial review. In addition, the Supreme Court ruled that the High Court and Court of Appeal had been wrong not to consider their application for judicial review of the original district court decision in 2015 that had first ruled in favour of extradition. Dotcom's lawyer Ron Mansfield described the judgment as a "mixed bag", stating that the Supreme Court had accepted there were "serious procedural issues" while warning that the Court's rejection of Megaupload's "safe harbour" defence would have "an immediate and chilling impact" on the Internet.[13][144]

The two executives charged for operating Megaupload along with Dotcom, namely Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, agreed to a plea bargain with New Zealand and US prosecutors that June,[145][146] and were sentenced to two years seven months and two years six months in a New Zealand prison respectively on 15 June 2023,[147] leaving Dotcom as the only party still defending his innocence in the case.[146]

On 15 August 2024, the new Minister of Justice, Paul Goldsmith signed Dotcom's extradition order.[14] Barrister Clive Elliott KC commented that Dotcom cannot appeal the decision, but can seek judicial review of the process.[148]

Promotion of conspiracy theories

[edit]

Seth Rich conspiracy theory

[edit]
Main article: Murder of Seth Rich

In late May 2017, Dotcom posted statements on Twitter and his website claiming he worked with Seth Rich on the Internet Party and had proof that Rich was the source of the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak. In tweets, Dotcom claimed to be involved with Seth Rich as WikiLeaks' source.[149][150][151] Dotcom said he was willing to provide written testimony to the US Congress and that he was willing to provide evidence to US special counsel Robert Mueller if his safe passage from New Zealand to the United States was guaranteed.[149][152][153] Seth Rich's family issued a statement calling Dotcom's statements "ridiculous, manipulative, and non-credible" and their spokesman Brad Bauman tweeted to Dotcom that "you have an agenda or are a sociopath".[151][152]

Dotcom tweeted an alleged FBI file about Seth Rich, warning that it might be fake. He later agreed it was fake, but said there was no need to delete the tweet since he had issued a warning soon after posting it that the file could be fake.[154]

Seth Rich's Gmail account received an emailed invitation from Mega, a file sharing service started by Dotcom following the seizure of Megaupload, but for which he had not worked for years. According to experts and Rich's family, the emailed invitation from welcome@mega.nz appeared to be an attempt to access Rich's email. David Weigel of The Washington Post wrote that Rich's family "worried that Dotcom, or someone eager to prove him right, may have been willing to create a fake archive of emails from Rich, or crack a password to see whether Rich had passed on documents with a Mega account".[155]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

During the Russo-Ukrainian War, Dotcom has repeatedly spread anti-American and anti-Ukrainian falsehoods, and Russian government propaganda.[156][157] Critics accuse him of spreading Russian Federation propaganda such as: claims of Nazism in Ukraine, Ukrainian attacks on Russian-speaking minority, claims of American "biolaboratories" in Ukraine,[156][158][159] and accusing the US of causing the Russian Federation's invasion of Ukraine.[160]

Antisemitic remarks

[edit]

In January 2015, Dotcom criticised Hollywood for what he considered its role in his prosecution by the US government. He tweeted, "What the US Govt is doing reminds me of what I learned in school about Nazi Germany. Ironic, Hollywood is run by mostly Jewish entrepreneurs".[161] New Zealand Jewish Council president Stephen Goodman stated that this was an offensive and inaccurate antisemitic trope.[161]

In an August 2024 Twitter post, Dotcom quoted passages from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a discredited antisemitic text purporting to prove the existence of a Jewish conspiracy for world domination.[162]

Other activities

[edit]

Following the September 11 attacks in the United States, Dotcom launched a group called Young Intelligent Hackers Against Terrorism (YIHAT).[163] He said that he had hacked Sudanese bank accounts belonging to Osama bin Laden and offered a $10 million reward for information leading to bin Laden's capture on his now-defunct kimble.org site.[22]

Dotcom participated in a mock funeral procession for public broadcaster TVNZ 7 in downtown Auckland on the day of its final broadcast. He had warmed to one of its more notable shows, Media7, for its championing of internet freedom and had been interviewed on the show at least once.[164]

In June 2012, Dotcom announced the upcoming launch of Megabox, a music streaming service.[165] That October, he said that Megabox would launch on 19 January 2013, the first anniversary of Megaupload's shutdown.[166]

In August 2012, Dotcom teased an upcoming album with the release of a song titled "Party Amplifier".[167] Dotcom was already in the process of recording the album with friend and producer, Printz Board (who wrote "Yes We Can" for Barack Obama's 2008 election campaign), when he was arrested. Printz and Dotcom recorded more than 20 songs at Neil Finn's Roundhead Studios in Newton, Auckland—one of which is called "Mr President"—an electronica protest song against Barack Obama.[64]

On 2 November, Dotcom announced a new file storage service, similar to Megaupload, using the domain name me.ga. It was to be launched 19 January 2013, but the African state of Gabon, which controls the .ga domain, cancelled the me.ga name on 6 November 2012. The site has since registered the names mega.co.nz and mega.net.nz. The new file hosting service offers file encryption to enhance user privacy and security.[168] As a result of this encryption, Dotcom and mega.co.nz will be unable to determine the content of the uploaded data, allowing for a claim of plausible deniability to be made should new charges arise. In January 2013, Dotcom offered a $13,500 reward to anyone able to defeat the site's security system.[169]

On 4 September 2013, Dotcom stepped down as director of Mega and announced he was working on a music streaming service called Baboom.[170] Dotcom claimed that it would be more advanced than Megabox.[171][better source needed] Baboom folded in 2015, less than a year after it was founded.

On 25 December 2014, Dotcom helped stop[172] the Christmas DDoS attacks on Xbox Live and PlayStation Network by giving Lizard Squad 3,000 $99 one-year Mega accounts which would then be converted to lifetime accounts worth approximately $300,000.

In 2017, the biographical documentary Kim Dotcom: Caught in the Web, directed by Annie Goldson, premiered at the New Zealand International Film Festival.[173]

In November 2019, Dotcom planned to launch his own cryptocurrency,[174] but due to regulatory uncertainty, the offer was cancelled.[175]

Discography

[edit]

Albums

[edit]
Year Title Details Peak chart
positions
NZ[176]
2014 Good Times
  • Released: 20 January 2014
  • Label: Kimpire Music
 8
"—" denotes a recording that did not chart or was not released in that territory.

Singles

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Kim Dotcom

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Kim Dotcom (born Kim Schmitz; January 21, 1974) is a German-Finnish entrepreneur and political activist best known as the founder of , a that attracted around 50 million daily visitors and accounted for about 4% of global at its peak before U.S. authorities shut it down in January 2012, charging Dotcom and associates with , , and in a scheme purportedly generating over $500 million in damages to holders and $175 million in illicit gains. Born in , , Dotcom acquired Finnish citizenship through his mother's heritage and relocated to in 2010, where he was arrested in a high-profile raid later that month at the behest of U.S. prosecutors seeking his . The ensuing legal saga has spanned over a decade, with New Zealand courts repeatedly affirming the extradition order, most recently in September 2025 when the High Court rejected Dotcom's challenge; as of February 2026, the extradition remains approved by New Zealand authorities but has not been executed, with Dotcom continuing to reside in New Zealand amid his health recovery from a . Dotcom has maintained that operated lawfully under provisions shielding service providers from user-uploaded content liability, framing the prosecution as politically motivated overreach against digital innovation, while critics, including the U.S. Department of Justice, assert deliberate facilitation of piracy for profit. Beyond business, he co-founded New Zealand's Internet Party in 2014 to promote online privacy and reform, and has pursued ventures in music production and advocacy.

Early Career and Background

Childhood and Entry into Computing

Kim Schmitz, later known as Kim Dotcom, was born on January 21, 1974, in , a northern coastal city in , to a German father and a Finnish mother from . His family background was modest, marked by an alcoholic father whose absence fostered early independence in Schmitz. Growing up in this environment, he displayed self-reliance, which later characterized his unconventional path in technology. Schmitz's introduction to occurred during the through access and personal experimentation with early personal computers, a period when home computing was emerging in . Without formal training, he rapidly developed programming skills by his early teens, demonstrating an innate aptitude for digital systems amid West Germany's growing tech scene. This self-directed learning bypassed traditional education, allowing him to explore hardware and software independently. By the early 1990s, as a teenager, Schmitz engaged with , online networks predating the that facilitated file exchanges and community interactions via dial-up modems. He established his own BBS, known as the "House of Coolness," which served as an early platform for sharing digital content and honing his understanding of networked communication. These activities underscored his precocious grasp of decentralized digital ecosystems, laying groundwork for future ventures in data distribution without reliance on institutional resources.

Hacking Incidents and Early Convictions

In the early 1990s, Kim Schmitz, using the alias Kimble, participated in phone phreaking activities that involved obtaining and distributing stolen telephone calling card codes for fraudulent use. These operations exploited vulnerabilities in early systems, a practice that was widespread among technically adept individuals exploring nascent digital networks amid limited regulatory oversight. On March 7, 1994, Schmitz was arrested in for trafficking stolen phone calling card numbers, leading to convictions on eleven counts of related to these activities. He received a two-year suspended sentence, reflecting the relatively lenient penalties typical for such offenses in the pre-internet regulatory vacuum. In 1998, Schmitz faced further charges stemming from unauthorized access and manipulation of computer systems, resulting in convictions for eleven counts of and ten counts of data espionage. These incidents involved illicit data handling and system intrusions, demonstrating his proficiency in early hacking techniques, for which he again received a two-year . Such cases highlighted the exploratory nature of digital boundary-testing in an era of minimal cybersecurity standards and enforcement. Schmitz's early convictions were confined to modest-scale operations that yielded limited financial returns compared to his later ventures, underscoring initial technical experimentation rather than organized large-scale crime. No evidence indicates involvement in beyond the phone-related schemes, and enforcement inconsistencies of the time often resulted in non-custodial outcomes for similar adolescent offenders.

Relocation and Pre-Megaupload Ventures

Following his 2003 guilty plea to embezzlement charges in —stemming from the manipulation of shares in the failing firm LetsBuyIt.com—Kim Schmitz (later Dotcom) relocated to later that year, drawn by the territory's favorable tax regime and status as a hub for , while distancing himself from ongoing European legal entanglements. This move followed a brief, tumultuous stint in in early 2002, where Schmitz had fled amid German probes into the LetsBuyIt affair; Thai authorities arrested him at 's behest, leading to his , a conviction for , and a after five months' . The episode exemplified Schmitz's strategy of jurisdictional mobility to mitigate scrutiny, though it resolved without prolonged incarceration or significant financial penalties beyond asset forfeitures tied to the German case. In , Schmitz registered entities like Kimpire Ltd. as early as 2002, laying groundwork for tech-oriented operations amid the dot-com recovery. He pivoted toward legitimate enterprises, including security consulting through firms like Data Protect, where he marketed his hacking background for ethical applications in data and network vulnerability assessments—fields where his prior technical exploits provided credible expertise, though early efforts drew ironic criticism for inadvertently highlighting client weaknesses. These ventures yielded initial financial gains via consulting fees and minor investments, stabilizing his position without reliance on illicit activities, though verifiable revenue figures from this period remain limited to self-reported claims of multimillion-euro by late 2001, predating the full Asian shift. No major probes materialized in prior to 2005, allowing focus on building offshore structures that later supported broader services. Schmitz's Asian phase underscored a transition from European notoriety to entrepreneurial reinvention, with Hong Kong's laxer regulatory environment enabling experimentation in digital security and media-related sites, though free of the music label investments sometimes attributed anecdotally. Minor residual inquiries in and —unrelated to core operations and dismissed without charges—reinforced perceptions of opportunistic relocation, yet lacked the substance of prior German convictions. This period's low-profile legitimacy contrasted his flamboyant persona, prioritizing causal business incentives over evasion alone.

Megaupload Era

Founding and Operational Model

Megaupload Ltd. was established in 2005 by Kim Dotcom in as an online , commonly classified as a cyberlocker, designed to allow users to , store, and distribute digital files via shareable . The platform targeted individuals and businesses needing to transfer large files, such as videos, software, and documents, at a time when was expanding but consumer options remained limited. Free accounts provided basic storage and download capabilities with speed and size restrictions, while premium subscriptions—priced starting around $10 monthly—offered unlimited storage, higher transfer speeds, and ad-free access, incentivizing upgrades for heavy users. By early 2012, had grown to serve approximately 150 million registered users worldwide, generating around 50 million daily visits and accounting for about 4% of global . Its relied on a combination of display integrated into pages—which captured income from the vast majority of free traffic—and premium account fees, with studies indicating that such cyberlockers derived 70% or more of earnings from subscriptions in high-traffic scenarios. Additionally, pursued promotional deals with content industry players; for instance, internal documents revealed was negotiating a just days before the site's disruption, suggesting efforts to align with legitimate holders for mutual promotion. This approach subsidized free access, effectively broadening file-sharing capabilities before dominant cloud providers like scaled consumer markets. On the technical side, Megaupload's emphasized for petabyte-scale storage across distributed servers, enabling rapid uploads and downloads without built-in , as files were stored in accessible formats to facilitate user linking. The service implemented a DMCA-compliant takedown system, designating an agent to receive and act on notices, which it claimed processed substantial volumes to remove unauthorized content proactively. These measures supported arguments that the platform served diverse legitimate uses—ranging from media backups to —beyond illicit sharing, fostering a user that paralleled emerging paradigms while operating under a structure that prioritized accessibility over proprietary control.

Growth, Revenue, and Innovations

experienced rapid expansion following its launch in 2005, attracting over 50 million daily visitors and accounting for approximately 4% of global at its peak. The platform amassed more than 150 million registered users, with financial records indicating revenues exceeding $175 million between 2006 and 2011, primarily from premium subscriptions offering enhanced storage and speeds, supplemented by income. This growth reflected the platform's appeal for diverse file-sharing needs, including backups and distribution by independent creators, as evidenced by user cases where individuals stored personal media libraries and professional assets without infringement intent. Key innovations included an affiliate program that rewarded uploaders for popular content links, incentivizing user-generated promotion and scaling the service's reach through network effects. Megaupload also integrated MegaVideo, an early video hosting and streaming feature that predated mainstream platforms by enabling on-demand playback of user-uploaded clips, demonstrating scalable content delivery before widespread adoption of similar technologies. These elements contributed to efficiencies in file hosting, arguably accelerating competition in by highlighting demand for accessible, high-capacity sharing; services like , launched in 2007, later emphasized similar ease-of-use and synchronization features in response to the proven market viability of such models. The venture's success enabled Kim Dotcom's relocation to in 2010, where he acquired a luxury mansion in Coatesville as a base for operations, underscoring the tangible rewards of entrepreneurial value creation in digital infrastructure. By providing reliable tools for and collaboration, filled a gap for users seeking alternatives to limited local storage, fostering broader innovation in online file management despite operating in a nascent sector. The U.S. Department of Justice indicted Megaupload and its executives, including Kim Dotcom, on , , charging them with , criminal , and as part of the "Mega Conspiracy." Prosecutors alleged the sites generated over $175 million in criminal proceeds while causing more than $500 million in losses to holders through the facilitation of pirated , , and software. Central to the case was the claim of inducement, evidenced by Megaupload's "uploader rewards" program, which paid users up to 60% of ad revenue from popular downloads, purportedly encouraging the upload of infringing content known to drive traffic. Internal communications cited in the suggested executives were aware of the sites' heavy reliance on pirated material, with analyses of sampled files indicating that 31% were confirmed infringing and only 4.3% clearly legitimate, implying a potential infringement rate exceeding 90%. Megaupload's defenses centered on its operation as a passive , arguing it qualified for DMCA safe harbor protections by not actively hosting, encoding, or promoting specific content and by responding to over 5 million notices from rights holders. Dotcom maintained that revenue derived from general premium accounts and advertising, not tied to individual infringing files, and that the platform enabled lawful uses like backups and sharing, with no direct for . Critics of the prosecution's infringement statistics highlighted methodological flaws, such as reliance on industry-influenced sampling that assumed unidentified files were infringing, potentially inflating figures to justify aggressive amid biases in holder-funded research. The disputes revealed divergent perspectives: content industries, including the , endorsed the shutdown as essential to deter large-scale piracy that undermined creative incentives. In contrast, groups decried it as overreach against intermediary liability, arguing that applying statutes to user-generated platforms stretched secondary liability doctrines beyond their intent and exposed how rigid regimes, lagging behind advancements, risk stifling neutral innovations without clear evidence of primary infringement causation. Empirical tensions persisted, as Megaupload's rewards incentivized viral content—often copyrighted—yet lacked granular tracking to causally link specific uploads to illicit gains, complicating safe harbor claims under doctrines requiring actual knowledge of infringement.

Shutdown, Arrest, and Immediate Aftermath

On January 19, 2012, the United States Department of Justice announced the seizure of Megaupload.com and affiliated domains, shutting down the file-hosting service as part of a criminal indictment against its founder Kim Dotcom (born Kim Schmitz) and six co-defendants. The charges centered on conspiracy to commit copyright infringement, racketeering, and money laundering, with prosecutors alleging the site facilitated over $500 million in losses to copyright holders through willful infringement of music, films, and other content. Federal authorities executed warrants in eight countries, seizing $50 million in cash and other assets, along with servers containing user data, while freezing additional bank accounts and properties linked to the operation. The next day, January 20, 2012, raided Dotcom's Coatesville mansion at the request of U.S. authorities, deploying over 70 special tactics officers armed with assault rifles, supported by helicopters and a perimeter team, to Dotcom and three other Megaupload executives. The operation, dubbed "Operation Debut," involved breaching the property amid reports of Dotcom retreating to a , from which he was extracted after officers used a metal coat hanger to unlock the door. Critics noted the raid's militarized scale as disproportionate to the non-violent economic charges, involving tactics more akin to high-risk armed confrontations than standard white-collar s. Dotcom was charged under New Zealand's extradition treaty with the U.S. and initially denied on January 25, 2012, with the court citing his possession of multiple passports, vast financial resources exceeding $200 million in frozen assets, and international ties as indicators of flight risk. He remained in custody at Auckland's Mt. Eden Prison until was granted on February 22, 2012, under strict conditions including electronic monitoring and residence restrictions. In immediate public statements, Dotcom denied orchestrating , asserting Megaupload's compliance with the U.S. through takedown notices and evidence of partnerships with content labels, including paid licensing deals. Initial reactions included retaliatory cyberattacks by the hacker group Anonymous, which launched distributed denial-of-service assaults on U.S. Department of Justice websites and industry targets like the RIAA, framing the shutdown as an overreach against users. Segments of the tech community expressed concerns over the action's implications, questioning the U.S. government's extraterritorial against a Hong Kong-based service operating legally in and the potential on innovation.

2012 Raid and Initial Detention

On January 20, 2012, executed a high-profile raid on Kim Dotcom's Coatesville mansion near , arresting him and three associates at the request of authorities seeking under the US- for alleged criminal tied to . The operation involved approximately 76 armed officers, helicopters for aerial support, and specialized equipment, resulting in Dotcom's tasing during restraint after he barricaded himself in a . This followed the US Department of Justice's shutdown of servers on January 19, 2012, amid heightened tensions over proposed anti-piracy legislation like SOPA, which Dotcom publicly opposed as a threat to . Pre-raid surveillance raised concerns of procedural overreach, as the (GCSB) provided assistance to police despite Dotcom's status as a resident, rendering the intelligence gathering unlawful under domestic law restricting GCSB to foreign targets. A September 2012 report by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Paul Neazor confirmed the GCSB's actions violated regulations, as police had requested monitoring without verifying Dotcom's residency, leading to an official apology from John Key's government. Dotcom later attributed the raid's intensity to coordination influenced by Hollywood interests, claiming studios had previously partnered with for content distribution before shifting to enforcement amid SOPA advocacy, though officials framed it as a standard criminal probe. During initial detention at Auckland's Prison, Dotcom faced flight risk allegations from prosecutors citing his wealth and international ties, but a North Shore District Court granted on February 22, 2012, after determining his frozen assets neutralized escape incentives. Conditions included electronic monitoring, residence restrictions, and an internet ban. The raid also prompted seizure of personal assets exceeding $17 million in value, encompassing luxury vehicles like Cadillacs, jet skis, artwork, cash bundles, and high-end electronics, executed under warrants tied to forfeiture demands but later contested for inadequate notice. These elements fueled Dotcom's assertions of politically motivated excess, linking the timing to his vocal resistance against -driven content controls.

Extradition Proceedings Overview

In December 2015, New Zealand's District Court ruled that Kim Dotcom was eligible for extradition to the on charges including , , and related to . This initial determination followed lower court proceedings initiated after Dotcom's 2012 arrest, during which his political donations to New Zealand parties—exceeding NZ$600,000 to entities like the Mana Party—faced scrutiny for potential influence on domestic politics amid the ongoing case. Dotcom appealed the eligibility ruling, leading to delays through multiple levels of courts from 2015 to 2020, including a confidential settlement with police over investigative misconduct that further complicated proceedings. In November 2020, the dismissed his final appeal, affirming eligibility while allowing challenges to the substantive surrender decision. On August 8, 2024, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith determined Dotcom should be surrendered to the , with the order formalized shortly thereafter. Dotcom promptly sought , citing factors including potential sentencing disparities compared to co-defendants who received reduced terms after pleading guilty. On September 10, 2025, the rejected the review, upholding the surrender as lawful and dismissing arguments on sentencing inequities. As of February 2026, Kim Dotcom's extradition to the United States remains approved by New Zealand authorities but has not been executed. Legal proceedings and appeals have concluded in favor of extradition, but he continues to reside in New Zealand.

High Court and Appeal Rulings

In January 2016, the High Court dismissed Dotcom's appeal against the District Court's determination of extradition eligibility, ruling that the unlawful actions of the (GCSB) in spying on Dotcom did not preclude extradition under the with the , as the core requirements of dual criminality and sufficient in the record of the case were met. The court held that challenges to evidence admissibility, including from invalid search warrants, were not determinative at the extradition stage, where the focus is on whether the offenses are extraditable rather than a full merits review akin to a trial. This decision aligned with 's extradition framework, which prioritizes and treaty obligations over ancillary procedural irregularities unless they undermine the entire proceeding. The Court of Appeal, in a December 2015 judgment later upheld in subsequent reviews, affirmed the High Court's stance, emphasizing that New Zealand's extradition treaty with the mandates surrender for offenses like , , and where conduct satisfies the "double criminality" test, irrespective of claims related to potential trial fairness in the U.S. Dotcom's arguments centered on the risk of a disproportionately harsh U.S. sentence—potentially exceeding 20 years due to enhanced penalties under federal statutes for organized criminal activity—compared to New Zealand's maximum of five years for analogous offenses under the Copyright Act 1994. The appellate court rejected these disparities as grounds for refusal, noting that extradition assessments do not weigh comparative sentencing regimes, consistent with New Zealand's practice of rarely denying U.S. requests, with historical compliance rates exceeding 90% in bilateral cases. Proponents of extradition, including U.S. authorities, viewed the rulings as essential for enforcing accountability in cross-border cybercrimes, arguing that Megaupload's operations facilitated massive unauthorized distribution with a U.S. nexus via server access and streams. Dotcom's defense countered that the U.S. engaged in "prosecutorial ," prosecuting overseas acts in a offering draconian penalties unavailable locally, potentially violating principles of and under the International Covenant on , though the courts deemed such claims premature absent evidence of actual prejudice. These mid-level decisions underscored tensions between national and international cooperation but deferred deeper scrutiny to later stages.

Supreme Court Decisions and Settlements

In November 2020, the ruled in a consolidated appeal that Kim Dotcom was eligible for to the on 12 charges, including to commit , , and , affirming that these offenses satisfied the dual criminality requirement under New Zealand's law despite lacking direct equivalents in domestic statutes. The decision rejected arguments that the charges were merely civil in nature or insufficiently specified criminal conduct, paving the way for ministerial consideration of surrender while dismissing broader challenges to the process. On May 4, 2021, the Supreme Court issued NZSC 36 in Kim Dotcom v United States of America, resolving ancillary matters from the extradition appeals, including costs awards against the United States in favor of the appellants totaling $15,000 plus disbursements. This followed the 2020 eligibility determination and declined further leave to appeal on substantive grounds, effectively concluding judicial review of extradition eligibility after over eight years of litigation. In parallel civil proceedings, Dotcom and his former wife Mona reached a confidential settlement on November 2, 2017, with over flaws in the execution of the January 2012 raid on their Coatesville property, which involved excessive force and procedural irregularities acknowledged by authorities. Separately, the admitted in 2013 that its surveillance of Dotcom and associates during the same operation was unlawful under the Act 1990, as it targeted residents without warrants. Dotcom's subsequent damages claim for this breach reached the , which on February 3, 2020, dismissed his appeal seeking multimillion-dollar compensation, upholding lower courts' assessment of nominal or limited remedies and ordering him to pay $2,500 in costs to the GCSB. These outcomes and settlements underscored evidentiary challenges from initial actions, contributing to a delay exceeding 12 years in resolving and imposing millions in legal costs on taxpayers, while revealing gaps in integrating unlawfully obtained intelligence into extradition evidence without fatally tainting proceedings.

Claims of Official Misconduct

In September 2012, Prime Minister issued a public apology after an independent inquiry by Justice Paul Neazor concluded that the (GCSB) had unlawfully intercepted communications involving Kim Dotcom, as the agency was statutorily limited to foreign intelligence gathering and Dotcom held residency status. The report identified administrative errors in vetting Dotcom's residency, leading to the illegal surveillance conducted in support of the 2012 . authorities defended the GCSB's involvement as an inadvertent breach during legitimate assistance to U.S. on intellectual property enforcement, emphasizing that no intentional misconduct occurred and that safeguards were subsequently strengthened. Dotcom pursued damages against the GCSB for the privacy violations, with a March 2013 ruling permitting the lawsuit to proceed despite government objections on grounds. In March 2018, the Review Tribunal partially granted his claim, awarding NZ$30,000 for loss of liberty and benefit, plus NZ$60,000 for injury to dignity and feelings, acknowledging the unlawful nature of the spying but rejecting broader compensation demands exceeding NZ$10 million. Critics, including Dotcom, argued the awards undervalued the harm from extended illegal monitoring—later confirmed to have persisted into 2012 beyond initial reports—while the government maintained the actions aligned with international obligations and posed no systemic threat to security. Allegations of U.S. orchestration extended to claims of overreach in the FBI-led shutdown of , including pre-trial civil of approximately US$67 million in funds held overseas, which a 2015 U.S. federal court upheld by deeming Dotcom a ineligible to contest the without facing charges. Documents released by Dotcom highlighted close inter-agency coordination, such as FBI directives to on raid execution and data handling, prompting accusations of extraterritorial pressure bypassing . U.S. and New Zealand officials countered that such cooperation was standard for transnational investigations, justified by evidence of willful generating over US$175 million in illicit revenue, and not indicative of but rather effective against economic harm to rights holders. Further claims focused on media leaks by authorities that allegedly prejudiced prior to trial, including details of Dotcom's personal assets and raid footage released shortly after the 2012 operation, which Dotcom described as orchestrated to justify disproportionate . Government responses attributed leaks to operational necessities for transparency in high-profile cases involving international partners, while courts have generally upheld the underlying actions as proportionate to the scale of alleged criminality, dismissing broader narratives.

Political Engagement

Launch of the Internet Party

Kim Dotcom announced the formation of the Internet Party on March 27, 2014, in , , positioning it as a advocating for , rights, and amid his ongoing battle with the . The party was self-funded by Dotcom, who pledged financial support despite his legal constraints preventing him from standing as a , with initial commitments including NZ$500,000 for party operations and an additional NZ$3 million for election activities if thresholds were met. Its core platform emphasized opposition to , including calls to repeal the GCSB Act amendments enabling broader intelligence gathering, and resistance to the Agreement (TPPA) due to provisions perceived as threatening digital sovereignty and user . The party's manifesto outlined policies for enhanced online anonymity, net neutrality to prevent discriminatory internet access, faster and cheaper broadband infrastructure, and job creation in high-tech sectors, framing these as essential defenses against government overreach and corporate control of digital spaces. Dotcom described the initiative as targeting non-voters, youth, and the "internet electorate," aiming to activate disenfranchised groups through digital engagement strategies like online membership drives that rapidly attracted over 12,000 sign-ups in the first week. In May 2014, the Internet Party formed an with the , a Māori-focused leftist party led by , merging into the Internet Mana coalition to pool resources and voter bases ahead of the September general election; this pact required Mana members to approve continued talks following Dotcom's address at their April AGM, despite internal dissent leading to resignations over ideological concerns. The merger highlighted tensions between the parties' focus and Mana's priorities, yet it amplified advocacy against laws, contributing to heightened public debate on the GCSB Bill passed in 2013. Critics, including former Mana affiliates, dismissed the venture as a personal vanity project driven by Dotcom's self-interest rather than broad political reform, arguing it prioritized his legal defenses over substantive policy and risked diluting Mana's indigenous advocacy through opportunistic alliances. Nonetheless, the launch elevated awareness of erosion under New Zealand's framework, influencing discourse on reforms to limit state access to private communications.

Key Events and Alliances

On September 15, 2014, Kim Dotcom organized the "Moment of Truth" event at Auckland Town Hall, featuring journalist Glenn Greenwald in person and video appearances by Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, to highlight alleged mass surveillance by New Zealand's Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) and claims of U.S. influence on the country's extradition processes. Snowden accused Prime Minister John Key of misleading the public about the scope of New Zealand's intelligence activities within the Five Eyes alliance, while Greenwald detailed GCSB collection of metadata on citizens, shared internationally. Dotcom presented documents purportedly showing U.S. pressure on New Zealand officials regarding his case, framing the gathering as a defense of free speech against government overreach and suppression of dissent. The Internet Party, under Dotcom's backing, formed a with the Mana Movement in June 2014, creating the Internet MANA coalition to contest the election under New Zealand's mixed-member proportional system. Laila Harré, appointed party leader on May 29, 2014, brought experience from , while Mana's contributed focus on Māori rights and anti-establishment appeals, aiming to merge digital privacy advocacy with priorities. Tensions arose over Dotcom's multimillion-dollar funding—publicly estimated at $3 million—which sparked debates on donor influence, though Harré described it as enabling progressive mobilization rather than undue control. These developments amplified the party's media profile, drawing international scrutiny to issues and attracting youth interest in , but revelations of unverified claims, such as a fabricated from Key's presented at the event, contributed to perceptions of that distanced moderate voters. Polls following the event showed no sustained support gain for Internet MANA, with one September 19 survey indicating the coalition would secure no additional parliamentary seats under projections.

Electoral Performance and Dissolution

The Internet Mana alliance, comprising the Internet Party and , contested the on September 20, receiving 1.42% of the party vote. Under New Zealand's system, this fell below the 5% threshold for list seats, and with no electorate victories, the alliance won zero seats in the 51st . The party ran independently in the 2017 general election on September 23, garnering a vote share below 0.5%, insufficient for any representation. Contributing to the underwhelming results were internal disarray, campaign missteps such as controversies, and voter reservations tied to founder Kim Dotcom's high-profile battles and associated reputational issues. The post-2014 dissolution of the alliance with Mana further fragmented support among left-leaning and voters. Certain observers have pointed to unfavorable media portrayals emphasizing the party's unconventional tactics and Dotcom's legal entanglements as amplifying these challenges. These electoral shortcomings prompted a leadership transition in late 2014 and progressive operational curtailment, culminating in the party's effective dissolution by 2018. Though unsuccessful at the polls, the Internet Party elevated discussions on , including opposition to expansive practices, thereby contributing to broader awareness of concerns amid New Zealand's evolving policy landscape.

Public Statements and Alternative Perspectives

Critiques of Mainstream Narratives

Following the 2012 raid on his residence, Kim Dotcom critiqued the surveillance practices of government agencies, asserting that collaborations between 's (GCSB) and U.S. authorities exemplified an overreaching apparatus that violated privacy norms under the guise of . An official revealed 85 instances of unlawful GCSB targeting Dotcom prior to his arrest, prompting Prime Minister to issue a public apology on September 27, 2012, for the agency's failure to obtain proper warrants. Dotcom highlighted these events on platforms, including , to argue that such incidents reflected broader systemic expansions of state monitoring capabilities, akin to disclosures by whistleblowers like . Dotcom further contended that enforcement mechanisms were frequently deployed as instruments by corporations and governments to suppress disruptive online services, citing the U.S. Department of Justice's shutdown of —which handled over 50 million DMCA-compliant notices annually and shared revenues with rights holders—as a politically motivated action influenced by Hollywood rather than proportionate legal recourse. In a 2014 , he described the case as emblematic of how IP regimes prioritized entrenched industry interests over user-driven innovation and principles. These critiques gained traction on platforms like , where reduced content moderation post-2022 allowed dissemination of perspectives challenging dominant regulatory narratives on digital content distribution. Amid the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Dotcom questioned prevailing Western accounts of NATO's non-provocative stance, posting on Twitter that NATO expansion and arms provisions escalated tensions, and that draft peace agreements from early 2022—including Ukrainian neutrality commitments—were viable but derailed by U.S. and allied rejection of negotiations. He invoked empirical metrics such as U.S. intelligence estimates of over 750,000 combined Russian and Ukrainian military casualties by March 2025, Ukraine's $524 billion in direct losses from 2022 to 2024, and $407 billion in total international aid funneled primarily to sustain conflict rather than resolution, to advocate prioritizing diplomacy over open-ended proxy engagements. Dotcom's amplification of these arguments on Twitter helped surface suppressed calls for de-escalation, though outlets like Voice of America have labeled his outputs as selective, accusing him of echoing unverified Russian claims while underemphasizing evidence of unprovoked aggression and civilian targeting by invading forces.

Specific Theories Promoted

In May 2017, Dotcom publicly asserted that Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee staffer killed in a July 2016 robbery in Washington, D.C., served as the internal source for WikiLeaks' publication of over 20,000 DNC emails, countering U.S. intelligence agencies' attribution of the breach to Russian military hackers from GRU Unit 74455. He claimed direct knowledge of evidence, including forensic analysis indicating no Russian fingerprints on the files transferred to WikiLeaks—such as upload speeds consistent with local rather than remote hacking—and referenced Rich's alleged outreach to him about launching an "Internet Party" in the U.S., mirroring Dotcom's New Zealand venture, as a potential motive for leaking to expose DNC bias against Bernie Sanders. Dotcom offered to provide proof to congressional investigators if granted immunity, responding to Fox News host Sean Hannity's inquiries with statements like "I'm the evidence!!" but declined to release details publicly without legal protections, citing risks amid his own U.S. extradition battles. These assertions drew on ' own reward offer for information on Rich's murder and independent analyses questioning the report relied upon by the FBI, which Mueller's 2019 investigation upheld as evidence of Russian involvement without independent forensic access granted to skeptics. Rich's family rejected Dotcom's claims as baseless, stating no contact occurred and emphasizing the unsolved case as a botched robbery with no political ties, while mainstream outlets like retracted related reporting amid lawsuits for lack of corroboration. Supporters of the theory, including some cybersecurity experts, highlight inconsistencies in official timelines and suppressed early discussions, viewing it as part of a pattern where alternative explanations challenge narratives from intelligence communities prone to politicization; critics, however, dismiss it as unsubstantiated speculation amplifying grief for ideological ends, noting Mueller's detailed tracing of GRU operations via signatures and IP logs. Dotcom has also promoted skepticism toward natural-origin theories for , stating in January 2023 that the virus represented an intentional release rather than an accidental lab leak from the , citing circumstantial evidence like funding and early cover-ups by Chinese authorities. This stance predated and exceeded U.S. Energy Department and FBI assessments with moderate-to-low confidence in a lab origin, which shifted from initial dismissals in outlets like —later critiqued for conflicts involving proponents of the research. He referenced affidavits from whistleblowers and data anomalies, such as furin cleavage sites unnatural in zoonotic coronaviruses, to argue against wet-market spillover models lacking intermediate host identification after years of searches. Detractors classify this as conspiratorial overreach absent direct proof of intent, pointing to genomic evidence favoring natural evolution; proponents counter that predictive elements, like the lab-leak hypothesis's rehabilitation despite early academic and against it, underscore systemic reluctance to scrutinize state-linked institutions. On election integrity, Dotcom has echoed concerns over vulnerabilities in systems and potential foreign interference, drawing from his advocacy for verifiable paper trails and alternatives, though specific claims tie more to New Zealand's 2014 polls—where he alleged GCSB spying influenced outcomes—than U.S. 2020 events, supported by declassified documents revealing unauthorized . He has cited affidavits from poll watchers and statistical anomalies in broader critiques, positioning them as patterns of elite manipulation akin to his case, but without producing novel empirical datasets himself. While labeled fringe by establishment analyses emphasizing decentralized safeguards, such views gain traction among those noting post-2020 audits uncovering procedural lapses in states like Georgia, highlighting causal risks in un auditable digital processes over first-principles trust in institutional self-reporting.

Responses and Accusations of Bias

In October 2024, Kim Dotcom posted an open letter on X criticizing Israel's military actions in Gaza as genocidal and invoking historical references to elite control in media and finance, prompting accusations of antisemitism from Jewish advocacy groups and commentators who interpreted the content as echoing The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Dotcom rejected the label, asserting his remarks targeted corrupt power structures rather than Jewish ethnicity per se, and drew parallels to uncondemned critiques of oligarchic influence when leveled against non-Jewish elites. He contextualized the backlash as a tactic to discredit broader anti-establishment views, similar to prior instances where his ownership of a signed copy of Mein Kampf—admitted but defended as non-endorsing—was leveraged to imply Nazi sympathies amid his legal battles. Mainstream media and advocacy responses amplified smears, including de facto social media restrictions and public rebukes framing Dotcom's statements as , while defenders invoked free speech principles, noting uneven enforcement: figures like U.S. Representative faced temporary criticism for similar claims of Jewish lobbying dominance in 2019 but retained platforms and party support, unlike right-leaning dissidents subjected to sustained cancellation. This disparity aligns with documented patterns of selective outrage, where left-leaning institutions exhibit tolerance for analogous rhetoric against Western or capitalist elites but heightened sensitivity to critiques implicating progressive-allied power centers. Empirically, Dotcom's history of validated claims bolsters arguments against bias-driven dismissal; New Zealand's admitted in 2012 to unlawfully spying on him as a resident, with further confirmations in 2017 revealing extended illegal interceptions known since 2013, corroborating his pre-Snowden warnings on overreach. Such outcomes suggest accusations often serve to marginalize verifiable dissenters, particularly those challenging state-corporate alliances, amid a cultural intolerance in elite circles for narratives diverging from sanctioned views.

Other Ventures and Personal Matters

Music Production and Releases

Kim Dotcom began releasing music in the early 2010s, primarily in the dance-pop and electropop genres with rap elements, often self-produced and distributed digitally through platforms like Spotify and Apple Music. His output included promotional singles tied to Megaupload events, such as the "Megaupload Song" released in 2011, which featured celebratory themes aligned with the site's branding. Subsequent singles like "Mr. President" in 2012 addressed political figures with satirical lyrics, while tracks such as "Amazing" (featuring Laughton Kora) and "Little Bit of Me" (featuring Tiki Taane) appeared in 2014. His sole full-length album, , was released on January 20, 2014, via his independent label Kimpire Music, comprising 17 tracks with production emphasizing upbeat electronic beats and guest vocalists including Ilati. The album's digital-first distribution model highlighted an ironic contrast to Dotcom's file-sharing background, as it relied on licensed streaming services for accessibility and revenue, self-funded without major label backing. No further albums have been released, though sporadic singles and collaborations, such as a 2018 "Fortnite Rap Battle Royale," extended his catalog into novelty rap territory. Reception focused on its niche appeal among Dotcom's supporters, with critics dismissing it as a vanity project lacking artistic depth; a 2025 retrospective described it as "a " of "generic Eurotrash beats and choruses," out of step with contemporary trends. User aggregates rated it poorly, averaging around 1.0 out of 5, citing amateurish production despite the independence enabling uncompromised . Reviewers urged Dotcom to prioritize entrepreneurship over music, underscoring its limited commercial viability beyond self-promotion. Streams remain modest, confined to platforms hosting the digital files, reflecting constrained broader impact.

Lifestyle and Family

Kim Dotcom, born Kim Schmitz, has been married twice. His first marriage was to Mona Verga in 2009, with whom he had twin daughters, marking his fourth and fifth children; the couple divorced in 2014. He married , 22 years his junior, and they welcomed their first child together, son Kash Dotcom, in late 2022, bringing his total known children to at least six from prior relationships. In public statements, Dotcom has described his family as a source of stability, emphasizing Donnelly's role in raising their son amid personal challenges. In 2010, Dotcom relocated his family to , securing investor residency under a program for high-net-worth individuals, citing the country's safety, natural environment, and political stability as ideal for raising children away from European media scrutiny and prior business entanglements. This move preceded the legal raid on his property but aligned with his stated intent to provide a secure upbringing for his growing family, including educational opportunities in a low-crime setting. Dotcom's lifestyle reflected the success of his file-sharing ventures, featuring a 22-hectare near , renovated at multimillion-dollar cost with features like a pool sourced from imported European spring water and a custom $15,000 bed. He owned a collection of luxury vehicles, including 18 high-end cars such as a 1959 pink and a rare AMG Cabriolet, often customized with personalized plates evoking his entrepreneurial persona. These elements, including hosted parties with industry figures, underscored a style tied to his self-made wealth rather than restraint, though he maintained a relatively private rural existence in .

Health and Recent Developments

In November 2024, Dotcom suffered a serious stroke while his extradition case remained unresolved. He publicly announced the health event on X (formerly Twitter), stating he was under care from top medical professionals and aimed to resume activities soon. By July 2025, Dotcom provided an update indicating steady recovery progress: he could walk short distances, manage personal hygiene tasks like using the toilet and shower, though speech difficulties and memory issues persisted. In December 2024, he shared his first post-stroke photo on social media, marking initial visible recovery amid the ongoing legal pressures. On September 10, 2025, New Zealand's dismissed Dotcom's application challenging the August 2024 surrender order, ruling the Justice Minister's decision lawful and rejecting claims of political motivation or sentencing disparities. In mid-October 2025, a luxury five-bedroom mansion near Queenstown, owned by a controlled by Dotcom's wife and valued at approximately $15 million, appeared briefly on the market before the listing was withdrawn, prompting speculation but no confirmed sale. As of October 2025, Dotcom remains on bail in , where he has resided since 2012; the extradition order stands but has not been enforced, leaving U.S. charges related to inactive pending further appeals or execution.

References

  1. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-charges-leaders-megaupload-widespread-online-copyright-infringement
  2. https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/ceos/kim-dotcom-aka-kim-schmitz-net-worth/
  3. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kim-dotcom-us-extradition-megaupload-charges-appeal-denied/
  4. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4656841/
  5. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2025/2025-NZHC-2634.pdf
  6. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland/kim-dotcom-shares-recovery-update-after-stroke-amid-extradition-battle/ZI4VONZS3NCGFDFI23EEP3TTDA/
  7. https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-21119109
  8. https://mabumbe.com/people/kim-dotcom-age-net-worth-career-highlights-family-life/
  9. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/kim-dotcom-megaupload-piracy-steve-jobs-kanye-west-kim-kardashian-318376/
  10. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna46531527
  11. https://www.leonardoenglish.com/podcasts/kim-dotcom
  12. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jan/25/kim-dotcom-jetset-image-megaupload-fortune
  13. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/9039036/Kim-Dotcom-from-hacker-to-Megaupload.com-tycoon.html
  14. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/04/17/where-kim-dotcom-got-his-start-the-house-of-coolness/
  15. https://www.digitalwelt.org/en/digital-subcultures/kim-dotcom-story
  16. https://www.wired.com/2012/01/kim-dotcom/
  17. https://cybersecurityventures.com/phone-phreaking-hacking-before-the-internet/
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/technology/founder-of-shuttered-file-sharing-site-sought-limelight.html
  19. https://www.nbr.co.nz/kim-dotcom-the-ultimate-timeline/
  20. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna46076072
  21. https://thenextweb.com/news/the-life-and-times-of-kim-dotcom
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/22/business/worldbusiness/IHT-how-crime-led-to-a-wealthy-lifestyle-for-german.html
  23. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1198134/hong-kong-gave-inspiration-not-protection
  24. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/04/17/inside-mega-the-second-coming-of-kim-dotcom/
  25. https://www.wired.com/2012/10/ff-kim-dotcom/
  26. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y363lw204o
  27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUCTDO-0WiQ
  28. https://cse.engineering.nyu.edu/~ross/papers/Cyberlockers.pdf
  29. https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/feds-shut-down-megaupload-file-sharing-website/
  30. https://www.videoproc.com/resource/what-happened-to-megaupload.htm
  31. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2015/08/18/universal-music-planned-on-partnering-with-megaupload-just-two-days-before-the-raid/
  32. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/03/isp-storing-25-petabytes-of-megaupload-data-costs-us-9000-a-day/
  33. https://blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu/i205f12/2012/11/13/secondary-copyright-liability-and-the-end-of-megaupload/
  34. https://www.wired.com/2012/10/megaupload-mega/
  35. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/podcasts/ip-matters/transcripts/ip-matters-04
  36. https://nypost.com/2013/01/19/hes-at-it-again-internet-pirate-behind-megaupload-to-launch-new-file-sharing-site/
  37. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-edva/legacy/2013/12/20/Mega%2520Evidence.pdf
  38. https://www.theverge.com/2013/12/21/5233706/justice-department-reveals-evidence-against-kim-dotcom-and-megaupload
  39. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/once-again-megaupload-user-asks-court-his-files-back
  40. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-16642369
  41. https://www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/how-megaupload-differs-dropbox-and-why-it-matters-12791115
  42. https://thespinoff.co.nz/internet/16-08-2024/pirated-movies-police-raids-and-politics-a-timeline-of-the-kim-dotcom-saga
  43. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna46129325
  44. https://www.channelfutures.com/cloud/megaupload-shutdown-raises-important-cloud-storage-questions
  45. https://www.wired.com/2012/01/megaupload-indicted-shuttered/
  46. https://thetrichordist.com/2013/10/23/new-study-shows-up-to-96-of-megaupload-files-could-be-infringing/
  47. https://fortune.com/2012/07/11/megaupload-and-the-twilight-of-copyright/
  48. https://www.techdirt.com/2012/05/01/law-professor-megaupload-prosecution-depressing-display-abuse-government-authority/
  49. https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-megaupload-piracy-idUSTRE80J08420120120
  50. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jan/19/us-government-megaupload-piracy-indictment
  51. https://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/19/business/megaupload-shutdown
  52. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/untoc20/truecrimestories/kimdotcom.html
  53. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-01-21/details-of-dotcom-kingpin27s-dramatic-arrest-revealed/3786170
  54. https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/708/461
  55. https://www.wired.com/2012/01/bail-kim-dotcom/
  56. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-17122866
  57. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/megaupload-suspect-kim-dotcom-denies-internet-piracy-money-laundering-flna84745
  58. https://techcrunch.com/2012/01/19/anonymous-megaupload-department-of-justice/
  59. https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/daily-report-fallout-from-a-file-sharing-sites-shutdown/
  60. https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/justice-department-charges-leaders-of-megaupload-with-widespread-online-copyright-infringement
  61. https://www.reuters.com/article/internet-piracy-megaupload/kim-dotcom-wins-bail-in-fight-against-u-s-extradition-idINDEE81K0L020120222/
  62. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/megaupload-kim-dotcom-arrest-sopa-283768/
  63. https://www.wired.com/story/mega/
  64. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19741343
  65. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/new-zealand-admits-illegally-spying-megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-flna6132612
  66. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/03/dotcom-says-hollywood-studios-once-courted-megaupload/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/feb/22/kim-dotcom-granted-bail-megaupload
  68. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27067102
  69. https://www.cnet.com/culture/paperwork-goof-may-mean-kim-dotcom-can-reclaim-assets/
  70. https://www.foxnews.com/world/timeline-of-events-surrounding-kim-dotcom-extradition-fight
  71. https://www.cybereason.com/blog/malicious-life-podcast-king-kimble-kim-dotcom
  72. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/525340/kim-dotcom-timeline-an-extradition-13-years-in-the-making
  73. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/572689/decision-to-extradite-kim-dotcom-ruled-legal-by-high-court
  74. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360819916/decision-extradite-kim-dotcom-ruled-legal-high-court
  75. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35166113
  76. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/kim-dotcom-v-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-district-court-at-north-shore
  77. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2020/2020-NZSC-1.pdf
  78. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/the-courts/supreme-court/judgments-supreme?CaseNum=&Search=dotcom&Year=all&action_search=Search
  79. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/11/kim-dotcom-settles-case-he-filed-against-nz-police-over-military-style-raid/
  80. https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/megaupload-founder-can-sue-new-zealand-spy-agency-court-idUSBRE926043/
  81. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/119254850/kim-dotcom-fails-in-supreme-court-appeal-ordered-to-pay-25k-to-gcsb
  82. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/9/27/new-zealand-pm-apologises-for-dotcom-spying
  83. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-23769206
  84. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/megaupload-founder-wins-battle-in-ongoing-fight-against-us-extradition-idUSKBN1H20CT/
  85. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/extra-spying-on-dotcom-confirmed-and-police-have-known-since-2013/SXO37IU4ESNLWZRQ7ECRCYQ4BU/
  86. https://www.courthousenews.com/kim-dotcom-cant-fight-67m-asset-forfeiture/
  87. https://www.techdirt.com/2015/03/27/how-us-government-legally-stole-millions-kim-dotcom/
  88. https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/download/708/461/1363
  89. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/03/kim-dotcom-new-zealand-spying-nsa
  90. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1177083X.2014.992791
  91. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/27/kim-dotcom-launches-new-zealand-political-party
  92. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2014/3/28/kim-dotcom-launches-political-party
  93. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/kim-dotcom-launches-internet-party-691617/
  94. https://www.wired.com/story/kim-dotcom-internet-party/
  95. https://www.nbr.co.nz/dotcom-a-neoliberal-millionaire-who-sounds-like-john-key-manas-sue-bradford/
  96. https://time.com/39801/megaupload-kim-dotcom-launches-political-party-in-new-zealand/
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/14/kim-dotcom-launch-mega-political-party
  98. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/pm/internet-party-launches-election-campaign-in-nz/5350416
  99. https://www.nbr.co.nz/internet-party-mana-merge/
  100. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/245538/members-leave-mana-over-alliance
  101. https://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/60051287/dotcoms-internet-party-policies-target-gcsb
  102. https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1407/S00035/privacy-digital-economy-at-risk-from-spy-agency-dysfunction.htm
  103. https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/15/world/asia/new-zealand-dotcom-snowden-key
  104. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/15/moment-truth-greenwald-dotcom-snowden-assange-new-zealand-john-key
  105. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/kim-dotcom-pushing-his-internet-732853/
  106. https://socialism.com/fso-article/mana-and-internet-party-merger-left-opportunism-and-the-nz-general-election/
  107. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/245736/%27game-changer%27-picked-to-lead-party
  108. https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/queenstown-lakes/dotcom-trying-buy-influence
  109. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/election-2014-internet-mana-fatal-gamble/IM5325IESMOT7YQSSF4WWJ464M/
  110. https://www.odt.co.nz/news/politics/moment-truth-gives-nats-lift
  111. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1329878X211006215
  112. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/20/new-zealand-election-john-key-kim-dotcom-landslide
  113. https://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2017/
  114. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/01/31/ipma-j31.html
  115. https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/nzs-internet-party-may-disband-leader/news-story/0f769c8a55777ab692b4ccc33ad831cc
  116. https://tane.harre.nz/fulfilling-the-internet-party-new-zealand-objectives/
  117. https://www.truthdig.com/articles/internet-party-of-new-zealand-hosts-antispybill-campaign-event/
  118. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19699196
  119. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/kim-dotcom-new-zealand-prime-minister-apologizes-374724/
  120. https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-new-yorker-festival-the-virtual-interview-kim-dotcom
  121. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/01/why-the-feds-smashed-megaupload/
  122. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/aug/17/kim-dotcom-megaupload-new-zealand-interview
  123. https://www.wired.com/2012/09/illegal-spying-on-kim-dotcom/
  124. https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1720804956708671495
  125. https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1512486639687581696
  126. https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-sept-24-2025
  127. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/projected-cost-russian-aggression
  128. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine
  129. https://www.voanews.com/a/fact-check-pro-russian-falsehoods-kim-dotcom/6743375.html
  130. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40021373
  131. https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/the-life-and-death-of-the-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory/2017/05/23/aba640c4-3ff3-11e7-adba-394ee67a7582_story.html
  132. https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/27/15697786/kim-dotcom-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory-breakdown
  133. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/09/seth-rich-book-a-death-on-w-street-by-andy-kroll.html
  134. https://www.fitsnews.com/2017/05/23/seth-rich-saga-kim-dotcom-issues-statement/
  135. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/19/18507848/seth-rich-conspiracy-theory-mueller-report
  136. https://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-kim-dotcom-murder-wikileaks-fox-news-sean-hannity-russia-hillary-614307
  137. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/seth-rich-fox-news-sean-hannity-wikileaks-donald-trump-1040830/
  138. https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1620305880502915073
  139. https://www.heritage.org/public-health/commentary/the-lie-the-century-the-origin-covid-19
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040609/
  141. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57268111
  142. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350619675/edward-snowden-alleges-cover-up-over-mass-surveillance-in-new-zealand
  143. https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1116294338726612992
  144. https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1848914542203703764
  145. https://twitter.com/tabletmag/status/1849099128799727697
  146. https://x.com/Shayan86/status/1825894238438998248
  147. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/controversy-over-signed-copy-of-mein-kampf
  148. https://www.npr.org/2021/08/02/1023819435/antisemitic-posts-are-rarely-removed-by-social-media-companies-a-study-finds
  149. https://open.spotify.com/album/54zzCQBxqAMkMaYm2Libla
  150. https://music.apple.com/us/album/good-times/793458710
  151. https://music.apple.com/us/artist/kim-dotcom/548359838
  152. https://www.discogs.com/master/653841-Kim-Dotcom-Good-Times
  153. https://genius.com/artists/Kim-dotcom
  154. https://thespinoff.co.nz/pop-culture/22-03-2025/ten-years-ago-kim-dotcom-made-an-album-it-was-a-disaster
  155. https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/kim-dotcom/good-times/
  156. https://www.elsewhere.co.nz/music/6088/kim-dotcom-good-times-kimdotcom/
  157. https://www.last.fm/music/Kim%2BDotcom
  158. https://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/300728389/kim-dotcom-welcomes-his-sixth-baby-kash-dotcom
  159. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/kim-dotcom-set-to-father-sixth-child-first-with-new-wife-liz/ZNVMUMTMOQVYVCPZ5EFO3HWPOI/
  160. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/mrs-dotcom-speaks-on-life-love-and-babies-with-kim-dotcom/XCTTNHDPGSSY3R2EON5I3267FU/
  161. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/flamboyant-online-tycoon-kept-low-profile-in-rural-nz-idUSLNE80N014/
  162. https://www.yahoo.com/news/kim-dotcoms-money-won-him-zealand-residency-065956386.html
  163. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/dotcoms-lavish-life-of-parties-and-luxury/MD7LT4KCEZWBZ2IJUIFS5JH7XE/
  164. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/2012/01/raid-dotcoms-compound-odd-details/332666/
  165. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/kim-dotcoms-rare-mercedes-benz-up-at-webbs-auction-house-after-getting-seized-during-coatsville-mansion-raid/V7EGZOWLDVHVZPMEE3K3LD2RYI/
  166. https://www.thenextweb.com/news/kim-dotcom-5-outrageous-moments-from-the-internet-folk-legend
  167. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534833/kim-dotcom-says-he-is-recovering-from-serious-stroke-as-extradition-fight-continues
  168. https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1860944312873468127
  169. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360771561/kim-dotcom-says-he-can-walk-bit-after-stroke-last-year
  170. https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/07/27/kim-dotcom-making-good-progress-after-stroke-last-year/
  171. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/kim-dotcom-shares-first-photo-since-life-threatening-stroke-wishes-followers-merry-christmas/C22RPUE3CREXDJDB2HZSVPBQPM/
  172. https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/mystery-as-kim-dotcoms-15m-queenstown-mansion-briefly-listed-for-sale-48396
  173. https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/queenstown/dotcom-luxury-property-valued-1563m-sale
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.