Hubbry Logo
LeasebackLeasebackMain
Open search
Leaseback
Community hub
Leaseback
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Leaseback
Leaseback
Leaseback
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Leaseback, short for "sale-and-leaseback", is a financial transaction in which one sells an asset and leases it back for the long term; therefore, one continues to be able to use the asset but no longer owns it. The transaction is generally done for fixed assets, notably real estate, as well as for durable and capital goods such as airplanes and trains. The concept can also be applied by national governments to territorial assets; prior to the Falklands War, the government of the United Kingdom proposed a leaseback arrangement whereby the Falklands Islands would be transferred to Argentina, with a 99-year leaseback period,[1] and a similar arrangement, also for 99 years, had been in place prior to the handover of Hong Kong to mainland China. Leaseback arrangements are usually employed because they confer financing, accounting or taxation benefits.

Leaseback arrangements

[edit]

After purchasing an asset, the owner enters a long-term agreement by which the property is leased back to the seller at an agreed rate. One reason for a leaseback is to transfer ownership to a holding company while keeping proper track of the ongoing worth and profitability of the asset. Another reason is for the seller to raise money by offloading a valuable asset to a buyer who is presumably interested in making a long-term secured investment. Leaseback arrangements are common in the REIT industry.

Possible solution to toxic banking assets

[edit]

According to Robert Peston, one-time Business Editor for the BBC, one option being considered for dealing with the subprime mortgage crisis is a sale-and-leaseback of toxic assets. Peston says "a sale-and-leaseback between the banks and the state has two supreme advantages: there's no need to value the poisonous assets; and losses on those stinky assets would be absorbed by the banks in manageable chunks over about 10 years."[2]

Real estate

[edit]

Leaseback arrangements are popular in France, the United States, United Kingdom, and throughout Australia and Asia, including, more recently, in India.

France

[edit]

Leaseback of residential property has been popular in France for more than 30 years, and there are significant tax advantages. Under the scheme, the purchaser may use the property usually between 1 and 8 weeks per year (with a maximum of 6 months per year). The French government encourages the development of leaseback schemes in touristic areas to alleviate shortages in rental accommodation. The government rebates the local VAT (which is 19.6%), when the property is purchased off plan.

The scheme works by purchasing a freehold property. You become the legal owner. The property is then leased back to the developer or a management company. Under the leaseback scheme the government also refunds to you the VAT normally charged on a new build properties (currently 19.6%).

The owner is then guaranteed a rental income throughout the period of the lease. The net return to the owner varies between developments but is typically between 4% and 6%. This compares very favourably with a typical 20 year fixed rate mortgage of around 3.75%, and variable rate mortgages which are lower. It can be seen how the rental income can be used in respect of the mortgage payments. Loans of between 75% and 85% are available depending upon circumstances. The rental yield is also index linked annually to construction costs, which means the rental income currently increases by approximately 2.5%.

As in the UK there are tax allowances in respect of mortgage payments which can be offset against income. The lease typically lasts for between 9 and 11 years, after which the management company has the option to either renew, or the property can be sold, or rented out and held privately by the owner.

The purchaser/owner can also enjoy periods of usage free of charge through the year, depending upon the terms of the lease. These terms normally allows for between 4 and 6 weeks free usage each year. The management company is responsible for the maintenance of the property including the maintenance of furnishings which are often included in the purchase price. The developer is also responsible for insuring the building and its contents. It also pays for some of the property taxes and all the utility costs.

United Kingdom

[edit]

In the United Kingdom, a form of leaseback known as sale and rent back was the subject of a 2014 Supreme Court case that found many such arrangements had been perpetrated fraudulently.[3]

United States

[edit]

A "sale/leaseback" or "sale and leaseback" is a transaction in which the owner of a property sells an asset, typically real estate,[4] and then leases it back from the buyer. In this way the transaction functions as a loan, with payments taking the form of rent. Due to the lack of financing available in today's market, many American businesses are increasingly turning to sale-and-leasebacks to provide quick capital.[5] For example, developers of master-planned communities will often sell the model home to a buyer before the community is sold out, leasing it back from the buyer for a period of up to two years.[6] In some arrangements, the current lessee will give the option to buy the asset back at the end of the lease. Typically, if the original owner were to buy back the asset, it would take place at the end of the tax year, in case any party were to be audited by the IRS.[7]

Other countries

[edit]

The leaseback concept has spread to other European countries, including Spain and Switzerland. Typical property available are studios, apartments, and villas. They are situated near ski areas, beach resorts, or golf courses.

Commercial real estate

[edit]

A sale-and-leaseback is typically a commercial real estate transaction in which one party, often a corporation, sells its corporate real estate assets to another party, such as an institutional investor, or a real estate investment trust (REIT), and then leases the property back at a rental rate and lease term that is acceptable to the new investor/landlord. The lease term and rental rate are based on the new investor/landlord's financing costs, the lessee's credit rating, and a market rate of return, based on the initial cash investment by the new investor/landlord.

The reasons and advantages for a seller/lessee are varied, but the most common are:

  • Help finance expansion of the existing business, purchase new plant equipment, or invest in new business opportunities. A sale leaseback enables a corporation to access more capital than traditional financing methods. When the real estate is sold to an outside investor, the corporation receives 100% of the value of the property. Traditional financing is limited to a loan-to-value ratio or debt-coverage-ratio.
  • Help pay down debt and improve the company's balance sheet.
  • Help reduce the seller/lessee's business income tax liability caused by the appreciation in value (land only) of its corporate real estate assets. In addition, the seller/lessee as a tenant can deduct all rent payments as a legitimate business expense on its annual tax returns.
  • Helps limit risks associated with owning real estate such as cyclical market variations.[8]

The advantages for an investor/landlord are:

  • Fair return on the investment in the form of rent during the lease term, and ownership of a depreciable asset already occupied by a reliable tenant.
  • Long-term, fully leased asset with a guaranteed income stream.
  • For income-tax purposes, the investor/landlord can take an expense deduction for an investment in a depreciable property to allow for the recovery of the cost of the investment.
  • Ability to invest in real estate with a tenant who is already familiar with the property.[citation needed]

Aviation

[edit]

Leaseback is also commonly used in general aviation, with buyers using the scheme to let flight schools and other FBOs use their aircraft.

Leaseback is very often used in commercial aviation to essentially take back the cash invested in assets. Airlines, for example, sell aircraft and engines to lessors, banks or other financial institutions who, in turn, lease the assets back to them. Due to the high price of aircraft and engines, especially new, the cash from such a leaseback is used by airlines to improve their financial performance.

Industrial equipment

[edit]

The leaseback concept has also spread to industry, mostly for industrial equipment. A long-standing example is the railroad industry, in which locomotives and other rolling stock are purchased on behalf of the railroad by an 'equipment trust' set up by a bank, financing the original purchase cost with the lease payments. A company sells some of its equipment to a lessor, such as a bank or another financial institution, which leases the equipment back to the company. Thus the company is no longer the owner of the equipment but keeps the use of it. This commercial transaction allows two companies to have at their immediate disposal the cash to make investments in new business opportunities.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Leaseback

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A sale-leaseback transaction is a financial in which a seller transfers of an asset, typically or equipment, to a buyer-lessor and simultaneously enters into a agreement to retain use of the asset for an agreed period, thereby converting illiquid assets into immediate while maintaining operational continuity. This mechanism operates through two linked contracts: the initial sale, which provides upfront capital to the seller-lessee, and the subsequent , often structured as an operating or depending on terms like duration and purchase options. Commonly utilized by corporations facing constraints or seeking optimization, sale-leasebacks allow firms to unlock value from underutilized without incurring traditional , appealing in sectors such as , retail, and where assets are capital-intensive. Key advantages include enhanced financial flexibility, potential deductions on payments, and improved ratios, though drawbacks encompass long-term costs that may exceed sale proceeds over time and forfeiture of future asset appreciation or control rights. Under contemporary standards like ASC 842 in the U.S. and internationally, the transaction qualifies as a true sale only if the buyer obtains substantive control, with failed sales reclassified as financing to curb historical practices of masking liabilities . While empirically effective for capital release during economic pressures—as evidenced by increased usage post-2020—sale-leasebacks demand rigorous evaluation of terms to avoid overcommitment to escalating rents or restrictive covenants.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Concept and Mechanics

A sale-leaseback transaction involves a seller-lessee conveying of an asset, such as or , to a buyer-lessor in exchange for cash consideration, while simultaneously entering into a agreement to retain possession and use of the asset for a specified period. This structure transfers legal title to the buyer-lessor but preserves the seller-lessee's operational control through rental payments, effectively converting illiquid asset equity into liquid capital without immediate disruption to activities. The core rationale rests on the asset's prior by the seller-lessee, enabling the lease terms to reflect intimate of the asset's condition and usage needs. Mechanically, the transaction unfolds in sequential stages: first, the parties negotiate and appraise the asset at to determine the sale price; second, the sale executes via transfer of , delivering proceeds to the seller-lessee; third, the leaseback contract activates, outlining duration (typically long-term, such as 15-20 years), payment schedules, and obligations like maintenance under structures such as triple-net leases where the lessee assumes taxes, insurance, and upkeep. For accounting recognition as a valid sale under standards like U.S. (ASC 842), the arrangement must transfer control without repurchase options or terms that encumber the buyer-lessor's rights, preventing reclassification as financing; otherwise, it may be treated as a failed sale with continued capitalization of the asset. Leasebacks apply to various assets, including commercial properties, , or facilities, where the seller-lessee's ongoing need justifies the lease's alignment with the asset's remaining economic life. The buyer-lessor assumes ownership risks, such as market fluctuations, in return for steady rental income, while the seller-lessee shifts from to operational leasing costs.

Types of Leaseback Arrangements

Sale-leaseback transactions represent the predominant form of leaseback arrangement, wherein an entity transfers of an owned asset—such as , , or vehicles—to a buyer-lessor in exchange for immediate proceeds, while simultaneously entering into a agreement to retain operational control and use of the asset for a specified term. This structure functions as an alternative to traditional debt financing, enabling the seller-lessee to monetize the asset's value without disrupting business operations, though the lease payments effectively service the implicit financing cost. Within sale-leasebacks, the underlying can be classified as either an operating lease, where the seller-lessee does not assume substantially all risks and rewards of (allowing the transaction to qualify as a true sale under standards like ASC 842), or a , in which the lessee retains de facto control, often disqualifying the sale recognition and treating the arrangement akin to secured borrowing. Lease-leaseback arrangements differ structurally, commonly employed in public-private partnerships or development projects, where the original property owner (often a or ) leases unimproved or underutilized to a developer-lessor; the developer then constructs or improves the asset and leases the completed facility back to the original owner under long-term terms. This variant facilitates capital infusion for without immediate transfer, with the developer retaining during the build phase to secure financing, though it introduces complexities in allocation for construction delays or cost overruns. Variations within these core types may include partial leasebacks, where only a portion of the asset (e.g., specific or segments) is subject to the arrangement, allowing phased liquidity extraction, or those incorporating repurchase options, enabling the lessee to potentially reacquire the asset at a predetermined after the term. Sale-leasebacks are frequently tailored to specific , such as commercial (often structured as net leases with tenant responsibility for and taxes) or specialized like , where long-term operating leases predominate to match asset cycles. In all cases, the arrangement's viability hinges on market conditions, with buyer-lessors typically seeking stable, creditworthy lessees to ensure rental income streams.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Adoption

Sale-leaseback transactions trace their origins to the mid-19th century, when American railroads began employing them as a legal for limitations in conditional sales contracts. In the , state laws often failed to recognize a seller's retention of against creditors unaware of such arrangements, prompting railroads to sell assets outright—transferring legal —while simultaneously leasing them back to retain possession and operational use. This structure provided a form of that conditional sales could not reliably offer, enabling continued control amid financing and expansion pressures in the burgeoning rail industry. Although early applications were niche and driven by legal rather than purely financial motives, sale-leasebacks gained traction as a corporate financing mechanism in the mid-20th century, particularly for real estate and equipment-heavy sectors. Retail chains pioneered broader adoption, with Stores emerging as a key example by systematically selling and leasing back properties to free capital for expansion while preserving site control. By the early , had executed this strategy across its approximately 2,166 stores, reducing real estate's burden and highlighting leasebacks' potential for generation without disrupting operations. This period marked the transition to viewing sale-leasebacks as a strategic tool for capital reallocation, setting precedents for later industrial and commercial uses.

Post-2008 Financial Crisis Evolution

Following the , sale-leaseback activity initially froze in 2009 amid the , which curtailed financing options and corporate enthusiasm for transactions. This downturn contrasted with the robust volumes of 2005–2007, when such deals were prevalent, and even the residual activity lingering into early 2008. The scarcity of bank lending and higher costs for alternatives like mezzanine debt (with returns of 18–22%) pushed middle-market companies—those with revenues under $25 million—to explore sale-leasebacks as a viable substitute for or once markets began thawing. By 2010, transaction volumes re-emerged, exemplified by California's $2.3 billion sale of an 11-property portfolio totaling 7.3 million square feet to institutional investors led by Hines. Sustained low benchmark interest rates and compressed cap rates fueled this recovery, enabling companies to monetize assets for liquidity while retaining operational use through long-term leases. Deal volumes accelerated thereafter, reaching approximately $10 billion in —surpassing the pre-crisis peak of $8 billion in —and climbing to $11.6 billion in 2015, according to Real Capital Analytics data. This growth reflected heightened investor demand for yield in a low-rate environment and firms' strategies to separate asset value from operational needs, avoiding equity dilution and restrictive financial covenants associated with traditional . Post-crisis evolution emphasized sale-leasebacks as a tool for optimization, particularly for non-core holdings in sectors like and retail, where limited access to persisted into the early recovery phase. The structure's appeal lay in its implied lower financing costs via cap rates, compared to options, allowing sellers to redirect proceeds toward reduction or expansion without immediate operational disruption. However, proposed changes during this period introduced uncertainty, as they threatened to limit treatment, though activity rebounded on favorable economic fundamentals. Following the , sale-leaseback activity rebounded in the early 2010s as companies sought short-term liquidity amid constrained credit markets, with notable deals involving investment-grade tenants. By 2014, U.S. transaction volume reached approximately $10 billion, reflecting sustained interest despite a slight slowdown from peak recovery levels, driven by corporate optimization and monetization. Volumes remained in the multibillion-dollar range annually through the mid-2010s, supported by low interest rates that favored alternative financing over traditional debt. The market experienced a significant contraction in 2020, with retail sale-leaseback deals declining 55% year-over-year due to reduced (M&A) activity and pandemic-related disruptions, outpacing the 38% drop across all sectors. This slowdown persisted into the early 2020s, exacerbated by elevated uncertainty and a shift toward asset retention strategies amid volatile economic conditions. Transaction volumes hit a post-crisis low of $11.7 billion in 2024 across 669 deals, reflecting two years of subdued activity influenced by high interest rates and geopolitical factors. Activity surged in late 2024 and into 2025, with fourth-quarter 2024 volume reaching $4.2 billion—a 71% increase from the prior quarter—signaling renewed momentum tied to M&A recovery and opportunities between rising yields and stable net lease cap rates. First-quarter 2025 volumes more than doubled year-over-year to $3.82 billion, including six deals exceeding $100 million, as firms pursued sale-leasebacks for capital access without equity dilution or operational disruption. Analysts project modest growth for 2025 overall, fueled by involvement in portfolio and integration of sale-leasebacks into M&A structures, though volumes may moderate if interest rates stabilize or M&A falters. This resurgence underscores sale-leasebacks' role as a resilient financing tool in choppy credit environments, particularly for industrial and corporate assets.

Economic Rationale and Benefits

Financial Advantages

Sale-leaseback transactions provide companies with immediate access to liquidity by converting illiquid or other assets into cash at , often achieving 100% of the asset's worth compared to approximately 80% or less from traditional financing. This influx of capital can fund growth initiatives, acquisitions, or reduction without disrupting operations, as the seller-lessee retains use of the asset under a lease agreement. Empirical studies indicate that announcements of such deals often yield positive abnormal returns, averaging around 1.62% on the announcement date, signaling market approval of the value extraction. From a perspective, sale-leasebacks can enhance key financial ratios by replacing fixed assets with cash, potentially improving (ROA) and reducing leverage if the qualifies as operating under legacy standards, though post-2019 rules like and ASC 842 require most to appear as right-of-use assets and liabilities, mitigating some off-balance-sheet benefits. The structure avoids debt covenants associated with loans, offering greater flexibility and sometimes a lower effective , as investors in the purchased asset can leverage to negotiate favorable terms. Tax-wise, lessees benefit from deducting full lease payments as operating expenses, which can exceed the deductions available from asset and on equivalent , particularly for firms with high marginal rates; evidence supports taxation as a primary motive for these arrangements. However, the initial sale may trigger capital gains taxes, offset in some cases by installment sales or like-kind exchanges where applicable, though outcomes depend on jurisdiction-specific rules. Overall, these financial upsides have driven adoption, with studies showing positive impacts on firm value post-transaction.

Strategic and Operational Gains

Sale-leaseback transactions allow companies to relinquish of underutilized or non-core assets, such as or , while securing continued access through leases tailored to operational needs. This enables firms to redirect managerial focus toward primary revenue-generating activities, avoiding the distractions of asset including , upkeep, and disposal decisions. Firms without specialized expertise in benefit particularly, as lessors—often institutional investors—assume responsibilities, potentially introducing efficiencies from scale or professional oversight. Strategically, these arrangements facilitate rapid capital redeployment for expansion, acquisitions, or without diluting equity or amplifying loads, preserving operational agility amid market volatility. For example, in , sale-leasebacks can optimize post-deal capital structures by converting fixed assets into liquid funds, enhancing competitiveness in dynamic sectors like retail or . This approach has supported private equity-backed growth by providing non-dilutive financing for scaling operations during credit-constrained periods. Operationally, sale-leasebacks ensure seamless continuity of asset utilization, with leases structured to align with existing workflows and avoid disruptions to production or customer-facing activities. Long-term lease terms often incorporate fixed payments, aiding forecasting and budgeting while mitigating exposure to ownership-related variables like repair costs or for the asset itself. In practice, retailers have employed these to fund expansion or store upgrades without halting operations, as demonstrated by chains converting owned into leased spaces to support geographic growth.

Risks, Drawbacks, and Criticisms

Financial and Ownership Losses

In sale-leaseback transactions, the seller-lessee permanently transfers legal ownership of the asset to the buyer-lessor, forfeiting residual rights such as future resale value or unencumbered modifications to the property. This loss of title eliminates the seller-lessee's ability to capitalize on asset appreciation, which can be substantial in sectors like real estate where property values have historically outpaced inflation; for instance, commercial properties in growing markets may double in value over a decade, gains realized solely by the lessor post-lease. Upon lease expiration, the seller-lessee faces relocation risks or unfavorable renegotiation terms, potentially incurring moving costs estimated at 10-20% of annual rent for large operations, without recourse to ownership equity. Financially, lease payments impose recurring outflows without corresponding equity buildup, often exceeding equivalent servicing costs over the lease term due to the lessor's embedded , typically 5-10% above fair market rent. Total undiscounted lease obligations can surpass the initial sale proceeds; in a hypothetical $10 million asset sale with a 20-year lease at 7% yield, cumulative payments might reach $14 million, netting a de facto loss when adjusted for foregone benefits. Variable lease clauses, such as those tied to or revenue, amplify volatility, increasing default compared to fixed financing. drawbacks include forfeited deductions post-sale and potential recapture on gains, reducing net benefits; under U.S. IRC Section 467, deferred rent may trigger immediate . Failed sale-leaseback transactions, where control indicators persist (e.g., purchase options at below-market prices), prevent asset derecognition under ASC 842 or , reclassifying the arrangement as financing with ongoing liability and interest expense recognition, eroding reported financial flexibility. In such cases, the seller-lessee retains economic exposure to asset impairment without sale proceeds, as seen in transactions invalidated for repurchase guarantees, leading to restated financials and covenant breaches. Opportunity costs compound losses if reinvested sale proceeds underperform; empirical analyses show sale-leaseback firms often face higher post-transaction due to reduced collateral. These dynamics underscore leasebacks' unsuitability for assets with strong intrinsic growth potential, where ownership retention preserves long-term value accrual.

Operational and Market Risks

In sale-leaseback transactions, operational risks stem from the seller-lessee's retention of substantial day-to-day responsibilities for the asset despite transferring . Under common net lease provisions, the lessee bears costs for , taxes, , and repairs, effectively replicating burdens without accruing equity benefits or control over major modifications. This arrangement heightens operating leverage, as fixed lease payments combined with of right-of-use assets under standards magnify the effects of volatility on . For example, in structures with variable payments tied to or usage, such as those employed by International Hotels Group where obligations fell from $58 million in 2019 to $7 million in 2020 amid disruptions, lessees gain short-term flexibility but face reporting inconsistencies that obscure true operational exposure. Long-term lease commitments, often spanning 15-20 years with renewal options extending to 40 years, further constrain operational adaptability, particularly for strategically vital facilities where relocation or upgrades become impractical without lessor consent. Real-world failures underscore these vulnerabilities; Zips Car Wash's 2025 filing, amid $279 million in , highlighted how aggressive sale-leasebacks imposed escalating rental loads that overwhelmed operations during and shifting consumer patterns, rendering profitability unattainable despite initial capital influx. Market risks in sale-leasebacks expose participants to fluctuations in asset values, interest rates, and economic cycles that indirectly pressure sustainability. Upon expiration, lessees encounter renewal rents benchmarked to current market conditions, where compressed rates (e.g., 12x-16x multiples) could inflate costs beyond original terms if demand surges. Functional over extended terms diminishes asset utility for or repurchase, shifting residual value erosion to the lessee while the buyer-lessor captures upfront valuations untethered from future declines. Downturns amplify default probabilities, as rigid payment streams divert cash flows from core operations, elevating risks for bondholders and stakeholders by prioritizing lessor claims over reinvestment. Specialized assets, such as manufacturing plants, command higher lease premiums due to re-leasing challenges in niche markets, compounding exposure to sector-specific volatility.

Accounting, Tax, and Regulatory Framework

Accounting Standards Evolution (e.g., Impact)

Prior to the adoption of , which became effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, sale-leaseback transactions under IAS 17 allowed seller-lessees to classify leasebacks as operating leases, often resulting in treatment for the leased-back asset and immediate recognition of any profit or loss on the sale, provided the transaction met specific criteria such as the leaseback not covering substantially all of the asset's life or . Under U.S. GAAP's predecessor standard, ASC 840, sale-leaseback accounting was more restrictive, particularly for real estate, where transactions frequently failed to qualify as sales if the leaseback was deemed a "minor" or "more than minor" portion of the property, leading to continued capitalization of the asset and deferral of gains. IFRS 16 fundamentally altered lessee accounting by eliminating the operating-finance distinction for lessees, requiring recognition of a right-of-use (ROU) asset and corresponding liability for nearly all exceeding 12 months, thereby bringing previously operating onto the statement of financial position. For sale-, requires assessing whether the transfer qualifies as a sale under criteria (i.e., transfer of control to the buyer-lessor); if it does, the seller-lessee derecognizes the underlying asset, recognizes the ROU asset and liability proportionate to the rights retained, and any gain is limited to the portion of the asset not retained via the , preventing full immediate profit recognition even in qualifying sales. If the transaction fails the sale criteria—often due to repurchase options, variable payments linked to asset value, or terms indicating retained control—it is treated as a financing arrangement, with no sale recorded and the proceeds treated as a secured by the asset. The shift under IFRS 16 diminished the appeal of sale-leasebacks as an off-balance-sheet financing mechanism, as the leaseback obligations now mirror those of direct financing leases, increasing reported liabilities and affecting key financial ratios such as debt-to-equity and return on assets; the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) anticipated a reduction in such transactions due to this diminished structuring flexibility. Similarly, U.S. GAAP's ASC 842, effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, aligned sale-leaseback evaluation with ASC 606's control-based sale criteria, removing prior real estate-specific prohibitions but prohibiting sale accounting if the leaseback is a finance lease or includes a repurchase option at other than fair value, resulting in more consistent but principle-driven assessments compared to ASC 840's bright-line tests. Subsequent refinements include 2022 amendments to , effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024, which clarify subsequent measurement of lease liabilities in sale-leasebacks involving variable payments not dependent on an index or rate; the seller-lessee must now proportionately adjust the lease liability and ROU asset for changes in variable payments that affect the "right of use," addressing implementation ambiguities where prior guidance could lead to mismatched recognition of gains or losses. These changes, issued by the IASB in response to post-implementation feedback, aim to better reflect the economics of variable payment structures common in property sale-leasebacks, though they do not alter the initial sale determination process. Overall, the evolution toward on-balance-sheet recognition under both and ASC 842 has promoted greater transparency in lessee obligations but imposed stricter conditions for achieving sale treatment, influencing transaction structuring and financial reporting incentives.

Tax Considerations and Incentives

In sale-leaseback transactions, U.S. federal income tax treatment hinges on whether the transfer qualifies as a genuine sale under principles, requiring the buyer-lessor to assume the benefits and burdens of , such as risks of loss, obligations, and economic upside from appreciation. Courts and the IRS evaluate factors including the transaction's intent, economic substance, lease term relative to asset life, purchase options, and guarantees; failure to meet these may recharacterize the deal as financing, disallowing sale recognition and treating payments as nondeductible principal repayments rather than deductible rent. For qualifying transactions, the seller-lessee recognizes gain or loss on the sale—often taxed at preferential rates under IRC Section 1231 for depreciable realty held over one year—and deducts subsequent payments as ordinary business expenses if classified as an operating under IRC Section 162, subject to limitations like capitalization rules or adjustments. The buyer-lessor, conversely, claims deductions under IRC Section 168 (e.g., modified accelerated cost recovery system over 39 years for nonresidential ) and any applicable credits, enhancing after-tax yields especially for tax-indifferent or high-tax-bracket investors. Tax incentives often arise from reallocating depreciable basis and credits; for example, in projects, developers use sale-leasebacks to transfer assets to tax-equity investors who monetize accelerated and production or investment tax credits under IRC Section 48, providing up to 100% financing while the original lessee retains operational control via a fixed lease. Similar structures apply in historic rehabilitation (IRC Section 47 credits) or qualified improvement property, where the lessor captures bonus phases (e.g., 100% through 2022 under the , phasing down thereafter). Provisions like net operating loss carrybacks reinstated by the 2020 enabled sellers to accelerate refunds on pre-sale , amplifying gains from the upfront sale proceeds. Internationally, tax outcomes vary; in the UK, HMRC applies similar substance-over-form tests, allowing lessees to deduct rents while lessors depreciate under , with incentives like enhanced allowances for energy-efficient buildings. Jurisdictions may impose withholding taxes on cross-border payments or deny deductions for related-party deals lacking arm's-length terms, underscoring the need for advance rulings to mitigate recharacterization risks.

Jurisdictional Regulations

, sale-leaseback transactions face no federal prohibitions but must comply with state laws and federal securities regulations for public entities, emphasizing the need for a genuine transfer of risks and rewards to avoid recharacterization as secured financing. Negotiated provisions in purchase agreements often address representations on , environmental compliance, and post-sale use restrictions to align with principles of enforceability. In the , regulations under the Land Tax framework provide targeted reliefs for sale-leaseback arrangements where the leaseback consideration does not exceed 90% of the sale price, but anti-avoidance rules counteract schemes designed to inflate asset values or defer taxes, such as those involving linked transactions. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 grants certain security of tenure rights to lessees in commercial properties, potentially complicating lease terms unless explicitly excluded via agreements. Residential sale-and-rent-back schemes are overseen by the to protect consumers from exploitative practices. Across the , national implementations diverge, with no bloc-wide restrictions but harmonized influences from VAT directives; Spain's National High Court has clarified that sale-leasebacks often constitute unitary financing operations exempt from VAT on the deemed lease element, rather than discrete taxable supplies. France imposes structured requirements for real estate leasebacks in tourism sectors, mandating 9- to 20-year leases managed by certified operators for VAT recovery eligibility, while permitting resale subject to buyer assumption of remaining lease obligations and tapered capital gains taxation starting at 28.1% within the first 15 years. In , the leasing industry faces curbs on sale-leasebacks for non-core equipment assets to prioritize substantive leasing over financing circumventions, with real estate developers explicitly barred from bundling leaseback promises in initial sales contracts to mitigate property speculation. Financial leasing companies must adhere to tolerance thresholds for such deals, as outlined in 2023 regulatory updates from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission.

Applications by Sector

Real Estate Sector

In the real estate sector, sale-leaseback transactions enable owners of commercial properties—such as retail stores, buildings, and industrial facilities—to sell assets to investors while securing long-term leases to continue occupancy and operations. In residential transactions, a leaseback addendum attached to the purchase contract permits sellers temporary post-closing occupancy for a specified short-term period, often up to 60 days, which may be rent-free; terms typically require sellers to cover utilities, services, HOA fees, and maintenance, with the property under the buyer's insurance, a possible security deposit held in escrow, holdover penalties for failing to vacate, and no alterations without buyer consent. This approach is particularly common in sectors like retail and quick-service restaurants, where companies convert equity into for expansion, reduction, or investments without disrupting site-specific activities. Annual transaction volumes in the U.S. commercial market reached an estimated $24 billion in 2023, reflecting a rise from $20 billion in 2020 amid tightening credit conditions and the need for alternative financing. These deals often involve single-tenant net leases with terms of 15 to 20 years, including renewal options that can extend to 40 years, providing sellers with near-100% of the property's appraised value—far exceeding typical mortgage proceeds of 65-75%. Retailers have been prominent users; for instance, companies like and have executed sale-leasebacks on portfolios of stores to improve during market pressures. Convenience stores, car washes, and quick-service restaurant chains also frequently pursue these transactions, as they yield higher returns when capital is redeployed into operations rather than illiquid property holdings. Recent activity underscores sustained demand: in the first quarter of 2025, sale-leaseback volumes exceeded $2 billion, encompassing six deals surpassing $100 million each, driven by corporate needs for financing amid elevated rates. One example includes a $16 million sale-leaseback of an industrial facility in , Georgia, brokered to facilitate the seller's strategic repositioning. Such arrangements appeal to investors seeking predictable cash flows from creditworthy tenants, though they transfer ownership risks like future appreciation to buyers while exposing original owners to escalating lease obligations over time.

Aviation and Transportation

Sale-leaseback transactions in aviation enable airlines to monetize assets owned outright, converting them into immediate while securing continued possession and use via agreements, typically operating leases that avoid ownership transfer risks. This approach is particularly prevalent among carriers seeking to bolster balance sheets amid high capital demands for fleet expansion, maintenance, or economic downturns, as it preserves operational continuity without grounding planes. For example, completed a sale-leaseback in April 2020 that unlocked $1 billion in cash, aiding during the initial disruptions. Similarly, pursued comparable deals yielding $266 million in proceeds during the same period. Recent instances underscore ongoing reliance on this mechanism. In late December 2024, Southwest Airlines finalized a sale-leaseback for 35 Boeing 737-800 aircraft, generating $871 million in proceeds from lessor Babcock & Brown Aircraft Management, with the deal encompassing 36 jets overall. Spirit Airlines executed transactions for 25 aircraft as of January 2024, per regulatory filings. Porter Airlines secured a sale-leaseback for four Embraer E195-E2 jets slated for 2025 delivery in July 2025, arranged through specialized financiers. These deals often involve sales to specialized lessors like AerCap, which in December 2024 agreed to a sale-leaseback for a new Boeing 787-9 with TAAG Angola Airlines, highlighting applicability to both legacy and newer fleets. In broader transportation sectors like rail, sale-leasebacks apply to such as railcars, allowing operators to sell assets to investors or specialized firms and lease them back, thereby shedding ownership-related liabilities—including burdens and risks—while retaining usage rights under rental payments. Firms like Modern Rail these for freight shippers, facilitating sales of surplus or active railcars followed by net or full-service s that support ongoing without capital outlay interruptions. Apex Rail similarly offers sale-leaseback advisory, emphasizing defined-period rentals post-sale to optimize fleet financing. Trucking and fleet operations employ purchase lease-backs, where equipment like trucks is sold to a financier and immediately leased back, providing cash infusion for reinvestment or debt reduction while minimizing downtime. This variant, distinct yet akin to models, structures payments to align with operational cash flows, as seen in strategies that treat the transaction as an alternative to outright loans or equity raises. Rail leasing more broadly categorizes into operating leases—favoring lessees for flexibility over capital leases that resemble —for assets like boxcars, cars, and hoppers. In the automotive sector, Nissan executed a sale-leaseback of its Yokohama global headquarters in 2025, selling to a consortium led by Minth Group and involving KKR-managed funds for approximately $643 million and leasing it back for 20 years to generate liquidity amid financial pressures.

Industrial Equipment and Manufacturing

In the industrial and sector, sale-leaseback transactions typically involve the sale of owned machinery, production tools, vehicles, and specialized —such as centers, lines, or assembly systems—to financial institutions or equipment lessors, followed by a leaseback agreement allowing continued operational use. This mechanism frees up capital embedded in depreciating assets, enabling manufacturers to redirect funds toward expansion, , or needs without disrupting production continuity. Such deals are common in capital-intensive subsectors like , medical devices, and heavy fabrication, where often constitutes 20-40% of total assets, providing a non-dilutive financing alternative to equity issuance or high-interest . A notable example occurred in the second quarter of 2018, when a global manufacturer and distributor of medical devices completed a $15 million sale-leaseback of its core manufacturing equipment, injecting liquidity to support scaling operations and market growth while retaining asset utilization under structured lease terms. Similarly, a leading aerospace firm executed a sale-leaseback of production equipment in 2023, generating $170 million in cash within 30 days to fund strategic initiatives, with lease durations spanning 36 to 96 months tailored to equipment lifecycle and cash flow projections. These transactions highlight how sale-leasebacks facilitate rapid capital access for manufacturers facing competitive pressures, such as upgrading to automation or acquiring complementary technologies, often yielding internal rates of return exceeding traditional financing options. Manufacturers benefit from preserved operational control and tax-deductible lease payments, which can offset the upfront from the sale, though long-term lease costs may exceed outright ownership if not negotiated with flexible renewal or purchase options. In practice, lessors specialize in appraising value based on residual worth and market , ensuring transactions align with industry-specific risks like technological in sectors such as assembly or chemical . Despite these advantages, adoption remains selective, often limited to firms with high-equity assets and strong credit profiles to mitigate lessor concerns over in event of default.

Financial and Other Assets

Sale-leaseback arrangements for intangible assets, such as (IP), involve transferring ownership of assets like patents, trademarks, or copyrights to a buyer while simultaneously licensing back the rights to use them, often through royalty payments structured as lease equivalents. This structure provides immediate equivalent to the asset's appraised value without relinquishing operational control, differing from traditional physical asset leasebacks by relying on licensing agreements rather than physical possession.17/CHAP9/FINAL/en/pdf) Such transactions are particularly viable for IP-intensive industries where assets generate predictable revenue streams, enabling financiers to assess value based on future royalties discounted to . In the sector, IP sale-leasebacks allow early-stage firms to monetize portfolios for without equity dilution; a sells patents to a specialized and licenses them back, with lease payments tied to development milestones or shares. For instance, this approach has been employed to bridge gaps in , where IP valuation can exceed $100 million for promising portfolios, providing up to 70-100% of appraised value in upfront capital. Similar structures apply to software and domain names, where owners sell and lease back usage for nominal or revenue-based fees; in 2011, eGames Inc. executed a domain sale-leaseback, transferring while leasing it back for $1 during the financing term to support operations. Applications to pure financial assets, such as securities or , are rare under standard sale-leaseback frameworks, as these typically fall outside accounting scopes like ASC 842 or , which emphasize identifiable underlying assets with substantive transfer of control. Instead, analogous mechanisms like repurchase agreements serve liquidity needs for financial instruments without formal leaseback designation. In financial institutions, sale-leasebacks more commonly target ancillary intangibles or IT-related assets, such as platforms, to optimize balance sheets amid regulatory capital pressures; midsize banks have used such deals post-2023 to unlock value from non-core IP amid rising interest rates. However, these transactions require rigorous valuation to avoid recharacterization as financing rather than true , with buyer-lessor control assessed via risks and rewards. Risks in these arrangements include potential IP enforceability challenges and higher effective costs from royalty escalations, which can exceed 10-15% annualized returns to investors, compared to lower rates for physical assets. Empirical data from structured IP financings indicate success hinges on independent appraisals and clear separation of legal title, with failures often stemming from overvaluation during economic downturns. Overall, while less prevalent than in or equipment sectors, IP-focused sale-leasebacks have grown since the , facilitating over $1 billion in annual deals for tech and sciences firms seeking alternative capital.

Global Variations and Case Studies

United States Practices

In the , sale-leaseback transactions are widely utilized by corporations to convert illiquid assets into cash for reinvestment, debt reduction, or operational needs while maintaining operational control through leasing arrangements, particularly in sectors facing capital constraints such as and . These deals must satisfy rigorous criteria under (IRS) guidelines to be treated as genuine sales rather than disguised financing, with the IRS evaluating whether the benefits and burdens of —such as risk of loss, maintenance obligations, and economic upside—have substantively transferred to the buyer-lessor based on all facts and circumstances. Failure to meet this standard results in recharacterization as a , disallowing the seller-lessee from recognizing a sale for purposes and potentially triggering recapture of prior deductions. Under (FASB) (ASC) 842, effective for public companies since December 15, 2018, and private entities since December 15, 2021, a sale-leaseback qualifies as a sale only if the buyer-lessor obtains control of the underlying asset per ASC 606 principles, excluding transactions with repurchase options that preclude sale accounting unless at with market-rate options. If qualified, the seller-lessee derecognizes the asset, recognizes any gain or loss (limited to the proportional leaseback portion if below ), and accounts for the leaseback as an operating or based on classification tests like of payments exceeding 90% of or lease term covering a major part of economic life. Failed sales are treated as financings, with the seller-lessee retaining the asset on and recording proceeds as a liability. In aviation, sale-leasebacks surged during the COVID-19 downturn to provide liquidity; for instance, Southwest Airlines executed deals in 2020 for 10 Boeing 737-800 and 10 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, selling to lessors and leasing back to fund operations amid grounded fleets. Similarly, real estate sale-leasebacks enable retailers and manufacturers to monetize properties at or above fair market value—often 100% or more—while deducting lease payments as operating expenses, though IRS scrutiny intensifies for below-market leases signaling retained equity-like interests. In manufacturing, these transactions apply to equipment financing, where lessees may claim deductions for rent but face sales tax on original purchases paid to vendors, with structures avoiding IRS recharacterization through arm's-length terms. Overall, U.S. practices emphasize multiparty structures with unrelated buyers to enhance legitimacy and tax efficiency, contrasting with riskier single-party or related-party deals prone to challenge.

European Contexts (UK, France)

In the , sale and leaseback transactions enable companies to monetize assets for while maintaining use via long-term leases, often 5 to 35 years in duration. These arrangements trigger land tax (SDLT) considerations, with reliefs available if the leaseback qualifies as for the sale, though exemptions do not apply to arrangements solely for . Corporation tax anti-avoidance provisions restrict deductions for lease payments exceeding market rates in certain property sales, treating excess as non-deductible to reflect economic substance over legal form. applies to the disposal element, with the retained lease interest valued at market rate. VAT treatment follows HMRC policy, clarified post-2021 rulings, typically exempting the sale if the leaseback is a new grant. Prominent UK cases illustrate strategic use amid financial pressures. In September 2024, Wm Morrison Supermarkets sold 76 stores for £331 million to an undisclosed buyer, leasing them back to address £8.6 billion in debt from a 2021 acquisition. Similarly, in 2022, executed a £220 million portfolio sale and leaseback. Iron Mountain's 2021 $178 million deal covered multiple UK data centers, enhancing flexibility. In , sale and leaseback often integrates with incentives, particularly for residences where buyers acquire freehold properties and lease them back to operators for 9 to 20 years, yielding guaranteed rents of 3-5% annually. benefits include a 20% VAT rebate on new-build purchases, recoverable if leased commercially, plus depreciation over 20-30 years that can shelter up to 80% of asset value from . Early termination or resale within 20 years may claw back VAT or impose at up to 28.1%, with tapered relief thereafter. Corporate variants focus on operational assets, subject to standard civil code rules without unique anti-avoidance beyond general . Key French transactions highlight sector-specific applications. In 2022, Barings acquired four Cora hypermarkets in a sale and leaseback, securing 12-year leases from the retailer. WDP's September 2025 €41 million deal involved a new logistics center in Loudéac, leased back long-term. LeadCrest Capital Partners' 2025 sale and leaseback of 13 healthcare facilities underscored growing activity in that sector. Earlier, HSBC France's 2009 transaction covered headquarters buildings leased back for nine years with break options.

Emerging Markets and Other Regions

In emerging markets, sale-leaseback transactions often address capital constraints by converting illiquid assets into cash while preserving operational continuity, though they face challenges from underdeveloped legal frameworks and market opacity. A 2021 empirical study of 31 transactions in found that sale-leaseback capitalization rates averaged 1.5-2.5 percentage points below market rates, driven by factors including seller bargaining power, information asymmetries, and limited transparency in property valuations. These dynamics reflect institutional weaknesses common in developing economies, where enforcement of lease terms can be inconsistent, elevating risks for lessors. In , sale-leasebacks have gained traction in and amid high growth sectors' funding needs. executed a sale-leaseback of engines with Willis Lease Finance Corporation on September 22, 2022, unlocking liquidity post-privatization. The has adopted the model for resort developments, exemplified by Ananta Udaipur's sale-leaseback of luxury villas to finance expansion while maintaining management control. Accounting follows Ind AS 116, which aligns with amendments requiring measurement of lease liabilities at below-market terms in certain cases, as clarified in illustrative examples from 2024. Brazil's retail and energy sectors demonstrate robust use of sale-leasebacks for . Carrefour Brazil initiated exclusive talks on May 12, 2023, for the sale-leaseback of five distribution centers and five stores to Barzel Properties, yielding immediate capital for reinvestment. This was followed by GIC and Barzel's R$1.2 billion acquisition of nine assets in August 2023, supported by long-term leases with creditworthy tenants. In October 2024, Brasil sold 15 Atacadão properties to a fund for 725 million reais ($127.4 million), enhancing flexibility amid economic volatility. entered a $2 billion sale-leaseback with ICBC Leasing for two deep-water oil platforms, structured as a 10-year financial lease to fund operations without asset disruption. In , sale-leasebacks support and industrial financing, with regulatory clarifications aiding foreign-invested developers. State Administration of Taxation rules from July 2007 specified treatments, allowing deductions for payments while taxing gains on , which facilitated transactions in commercial properties. Chengtong Financial Leasing executed a 2023 deal purchasing assets from a co-lessee and leasing them back over three years, targeting infrastructure efficiency. Across African markets, adoption remains nascent due to fragmented regulations and financing preferences for , but shows increasing utilization for cash generation. Leaseback sales enable sellers to realize property values—often at premiums—while securing 15-20 year tenures, as analyzed in Nigerian appraisals emphasizing merits like funding. In , transactions are uncommon, with rare cases like the Stanbank sale highlighting potential for urban liquidity. firms leverage them for non-core assets, providing upfront proceeds exceeding traditional loans while retaining occupancy. World Bank assessments note leasing's broader role in development across , though sale-leasebacks require stronger collateral enforcement to mitigate default risks.

References

  1. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/leases/leases__4_US/chapter_6_sale_and_l_US/62_sale_and_leasebac_US.html
  2. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/leaseback.asp
  3. https://finquery.com/blog/sale-leaseback-transactions-and-accounting-under-asc-842-explained/
  4. https://www.clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/publication-listing/sale-leasebacks-a-tool-for-the-times
  5. https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/sale-leaseback/
  6. https://www.berrydunn.com/news-detail/is-a-sale-leaseback-transaction-right-for-you
  7. https://www.eisneramper.com/insights/real-estate/sale-leaseback-standards-0822/
  8. https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2023/sale-leaseback-ifrs-accounting-standards-us-gaap.html
  9. https://www.chuhak.com/leveraging-sale-and-lease-back-transactions-in-todays-economic-environment/
  10. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2020/jul/accounting-for-sale-and-leaseback-transactions/
  11. https://www.debtbook.com/learn/blog/what-is-a-lease-leaseback
  12. https://www.exprealty.com/guides/leaseback-agreement-what-is-it-and-how-much-rent-should-you-charge
  13. https://www.financestrategists.com/wealth-management/real-estate-investing/leaseback/
  14. https://ilj.law.indiana.edu/articles/61/61_4_Hodge.pdf
  15. https://time.com/archive/6868023/retail-trade-customers-man/
  16. https://www.greenbergglusker.com/content/uploads/2018/03/LurieEconomistsViewAnotherEconomicCrisis.pdf
  17. https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/sale-leaseback-transactions-financing-alternative-middle-market-companies
  18. https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/sj17-sale-leaseback-transactions
  19. https://search.library.dartmouth.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757457889&context=PC&vid=01DCL_INST:01DCL&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and%2520adaptor=Primo%2520Central&tab=All&query=creator%252Cexact%252CSlade%2520Barrett%2520A%2520%252CAND&mode=advanced&offset=10
  20. https://www.icsc.com/news-and-views/icsc-exchange/sluggish-ma-meant-fewer-retail-sale-leasebacks-in-2020-and-more-news-of-the
  21. https://www.perenews.com/sale-leasebacks-remain-a-focus-as-companies-seek-alternative-financing/
  22. https://slbcapitaladvisors.com/news/sale-leaseback-activity-soars-in-4q-to-4-2bln-annual-volume-drops/
  23. https://slbcapitaladvisors.com/news/sale-leaseback-activity-jumps-in-q125-to-3-8bn/
  24. https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/optimism-for-2025-sale-leaseback-market-slb-capital-advisors-says-93CH-3825326
  25. https://irei.com/publications/article/sale-leaseback-drivers-ma-activity-monetization-pressure-and-arbitrage-to-boost-sale-leaseback-volume-over-the-next-18-months/
  26. https://www.avisonyoung.us/national-sale-leaseback-spotlight
  27. https://www.wpcarey.com/blog/five-benefits-sale-leasebacks-over-traditional-debt-financing
  28. https://appalachian.scholasticahq.com/article/67904-sale-leaseback-transactions-solutions-to-liquidity-and-returns
  29. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:491087/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  30. https://www.lee-associates.com/easternpa/2020/04/21/5-benefits-of-a-sale-leaseback/
  31. https://kanboapp.com/en/flexible-work/5-common-challenges-and-6-key-benefits-of-sale-leaseback-for-enhanced-business-liquidity/
  32. https://brileyfin.com/capabilities/real-estate-solutions/sales-and-dispositions/sale-leaseback-transactions
  33. https://www.wealthmanagement.com/wealth-management-industry-trends/the-sale-leaseback-king-of-off-balance-sheet-financing-
  34. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2119197
  35. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=716126
  36. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/9872/41560888-MIT.pdf
  37. https://frostbrowntodd.com/integrating-sale-leaseback-transactions-with-mergers-and-acquisitions-a-value-maximization-strategy/
  38. https://bridgepointconsulting.com/insights/sale-leaseback-support-pe-success-growth-benefits-tips-examples/
  39. https://www.alphare.com/case-studies/top-10-benefits-of-a-sale-leaseback-for-commercial-real-estate-tenants-operators
  40. https://ecapital.com/blog/unlocking-capital-the-power-of-sale-leaseback-agreements/
  41. https://www.robertdmitchell.com/article/sale-leaseback-commercial-real-estate/
  42. https://aragard.com/2024/10/11/leaseback-agreements-the-pros-and-cons/
  43. https://butterflymx.com/blog/sale-leaseback-real-estate/
  44. https://www.truehold.com/post/sale-and-leaseback-advantages-and-disadvantages-what-every-homeowner-should-know
  45. https://www.frettens.co.uk/site/blog/commercial/sale-and-leaseback-the-pros-cons-and-your-options
  46. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/sale-leaseback
  47. https://www.footnotesanalyst.com/sale-and-leaseback-operating-risks-and-reporting-anomalies/
  48. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/leases/leases__4_US/chapter_6_sale_and_l_US/65_transaction_is_no_US.html
  49. https://blackowlsystems.com/asc-842-sale-leaseback-accounting-guide/
  50. https://www.bonadio.com/article/how-to-avoid-a-failed-sale-and-leaseback/
  51. https://www.hinckleyallen.com/publications/how-businesses-can-convert-real-estate-into-cash-and-continue-to-operate-at-the-property/
  52. https://slbcapitaladvisors.com/insights/key-sale-leaseback-questions-and-considerations/
  53. https://carwashmag.com/a-cautionary-tale-lessons-from-zips-failed-sale-leaseback-approach/
  54. https://business.purdue.edu/faculty/mcconnell/publications/sale-and-leaseback-agreements-and-enterprise-valuation.pdf
  55. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/ifrg/2024/isg-handbook-sale-and-leaseback.pdf.coredownload.pdf
  56. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/leases/leases__4_US/chapter_1_introducti__2_US/13_comparison_of_asc_US.html
  57. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ifrs-16-leases/
  58. https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/ifrs-16/ifrs-16---sale-and-leaseback-accounting/
  59. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/ifrg/2024/ifrs-handbook-sale-and-leaseback-ifrs16.html
  60. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/leases/ifrs/published-documents/ifrs16-effects-analysis.pdf
  61. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/gx/en/pwc/in_depths/in_depths_INT/in_depths_INT/lease-liability--joined.html
  62. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/iasb-amends-ifrs-16-for-lease-liabilities-in-a-sale-and-leaseback-transactions
  63. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0217024.pdf
  64. https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/irs-private-rulings/letter-rulings-technical-advice/tax-treatment-of-sale-leaseback-depends-on-passage-of-ownership/1h7nz
  65. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=lib_student
  66. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p544
  67. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/07/f2/DOE-IE_Professional_ProjectDevelopment_AdvancedFinancingStructures.pdf
  68. https://www.novoco.com/periodicals/articles/clean-energy-tax-incentives-expand-transaction-structure-decisions-are-more-crucial
  69. https://www.duanemorris.com/articles/cares_act_reanimates_sale_leaseback_tax_benefits_0720.html
  70. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/jm/pdf/KPMG%2520Bulletin%2520on%2520the%2520Tax%2520Treatment%2520of%2520Leases.pdf
  71. https://frostbrowntodd.com/commonly-negotiated-provisions-in-a-sale-leaseback-purchase-and-sale-agreement/
  72. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm16040
  73. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/tolley/tax/guidance/sale-and-leaseback
  74. https://sprintlaw.co.uk/articles/sale-and-leaseback-agreements-legal-considerations-for-business-owners-in-the-uk/
  75. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/mortgage-problems/sale-and-rent-back-schemes/
  76. https://www.dlapiper.com/en-us/insights/publications/indirect-tax-monthly-alert-series/2025/monthly-indirect-tax-alert-january-2025/vat-treatment-of-sale-and-lease-back-transactions-clarified
  77. https://www.ptireturns.com/blog/your-taxes-on-leaseback-rental-property-in-france/
  78. https://esalesinternational.com/2025/05/15/how-to-sell-a-leaseback-in-france/
  79. https://law.asia/recent-regulatory-policies-transforming-leasing-industry/
  80. https://www.ifec.org.hk/web/en/blog/2022/12/buy-and-leaseback.page
  81. https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/rent-back-agreement
  82. https://www.nrn.com/restaurant-finance/restaurateurs-turn-to-sale-leaseback-deals-to-convert-assets-into-capital-for-expansion
  83. https://pointacquisitions.com/commercial-real-estate-sale-leaseback/
  84. https://slbcapitaladvisors.com/insights/sale-leaseback-misnomers/
  85. https://royaloakrealtytrust.com/real-estate-sale-leaseback/
  86. https://brevitas.com/blog/the-big-list-of-nnn-franchises-by-sector-and-investment-tier
  87. https://www.icsc.com/news-and-views/icsc-exchange/sale-leasebacks-generate-cash-and-right-now-retailers-need-it
  88. https://irei.com/news/sale-leaseback-transactions-exceeded-2b-in-q1-2025/
  89. https://www.northmarq.com/insights/sale-leaseback
  90. https://accaviation.com/aircraft-sale-and-leaseback-during-covid-19/
  91. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/southwest-airlines-enters-sale-leaseback-deal-36-jets-2025-01-07/
  92. https://www.aviationbusinessnews.com/low-cost/spirit-enters-in-to-sale-leaseback-transaction-for-25-aircraft/
  93. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250715453565/en/Porter-Airlines-Finalizes-Sale-and-Leaseback-Agreement-for-Four-Embraer-E195-E2-Aircraft
  94. https://www.aercap.com/news-media/press-releases/detail/588/aercap-signs-sale-and-leaseback-agreement-for-one-new
  95. https://www.mrc-rail.com/sale-leaseback/
  96. https://apex-rail.com/services/financial-advisory/sale-and-leaseback-transaction
  97. https://www.truckinginfo.com/320418/purchase-lease-back-gives-fleets-another-financing-option
  98. https://www.commtrex.com/resources/knowledge-center/railcar-leasing-financing-101/lesson-3-types-of-railcar-leases
  99. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/nissan-sells-yokohama-headquarters-643-million-part-restructuring-2025-11-06/
  100. https://yellowironlender.com/equipment-sale-leaseback/
  101. https://www.excedr.com/blog/what-is-a-sale-leaseback
  102. https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/X18TF46G000000/finance-overview-equipment-sale-leaseback-practice-points
  103. https://keystonenational.net/private-credit/equipment-leasing/1/manufacturing-equipment-leasing-case-study-keystone
  104. https://www.chainams.com/casestudies/sale-lease-back-for-leading-aerospace-company
  105. https://equipmentleases.com/financing-programs/equipment-sale-leaseback/
  106. https://www.chetwode.fr/en/whats-new/sale-and-leaseback-using-your-production-equipment-as-a-tool-for-growth/
  107. https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/crouzet/html/papers/WIPO_final.pdf
  108. https://leewardcapitalmgt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/intagible-asset-finance-leeward-march-2019.pdf
  109. https://avonriverventures.com/ip-backed-financing-strategies-for-biotech-companies/
  110. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/the-patent-powered-pitch-a-founders-guide-to-securing-biotech-funding/
  111. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/948703/000119312511300007/d244335dex107.htm
  112. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/leases/leases__4_US/chapter_6_sale_and_l_US/63_determining_wheth_US.html
  113. https://www.credaily.com/briefs/sale-leasebacks-drive-capital-strategy-for-midsize-banks/
  114. https://www.clearygottlieb.com/-/media/files/sale-leasebacks-a-tool-for-the-times-refj.pdf
  115. https://snz.co.za/articles/structured-finance/ip-sale-and-leaseback-transactions/
  116. https://metispartners.com/thought-leadership/sale-and-leaseback-a-model-for-increasing-trust-in-ip-assets/
  117. https://caldwelllaw.com/news/realizing-the-value-of-intellectual-property-through-intellectual-property-financing/
  118. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/aircraft-sale-leasebacks-in-a-disrupted-53086/
  119. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/1027045.pdf
  120. https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/leases/leases__4_US/chapter_6_sale_and_l_US/64_when_the_transact_US.html
  121. https://www.crowe.com/insights/take-into-account/accounting-treatment-for-sale-and-leaseback-transactions
  122. https://rsmus.com/content/dam/rsm/insights/financial-reporting/1pdf/leases-overview-of-asc-842.pdf
  123. https://appalachian.scholasticahq.com/article/67904
  124. https://www.faef.com/thought-leadership/tax-implications
  125. https://www.taxnotes.com/lr/resolve/tax-notes-today-international/u-s-irs-discusses-strategies-for-attacking-sale-leaseback/1c85f
  126. https://harperjames.co.uk/article/sale-and-leaseback/
  127. https://www.tolley.co.uk/tax/guidance/sale-and-leaseback
  128. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/capital-gains-manual/cg70774
  129. https://www.crowe.com/uk/insights/vat-policy-on-sale-and-leasebacks
  130. https://www.the-independent.com/news/business/morrisons-strikes-ps331-million-property-deal-amid-significant-debts-b2619213.html
  131. https://www.jll.com/en-uk/newsroom/corporates-raised-over-billion-from-real-estate-sales-in-emea-in-2022
  132. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/iron-mountain-enters-178-million-sale-leaseback-deal-of-uk-sites/
  133. https://clefrance.co.uk/blog/buying-with-a-leaseback-scheme
  134. https://ernalowproperty.com/a-guide-to-french-leaseback-properties/
  135. https://www.investorsinproperty.com/buyers-info/france/what-are-the-benefits-of-buying-a-leaseback-property
  136. https://worldwideproperty.co/buyers-guide/french-property-guides/para-hotelier/
  137. https://www.barings.com/en-us/individual/contact/media/news/barings-acquires-portfolio-of-cora-hypermarkets-in-sale-and-leaseback
  138. https://www.cremediaeurope.com/news/wdp-completes-41m-sale-and-leaseback-deal-in-france~cxee0YDd/
  139. https://www.reedsmith.com/en/news/2025/09/reed-smith-leadcrest-capital-partners-leaseback-transaction-13-healthcare
  140. https://www.hsbc.com/-/files/hsbc/investors/results-and-announcements/stock-exchange-announcements/2009/December/sea-091221-hsbc-france.pdf
  141. https://www.emerald.com/jpif/article/40/2/220/231423/Sale-and-leaseback-to-market-cap-rate-ratio-in
  142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354323456_Sale_and_leaseback_to_market_cap_rate_ratio_in_emerging_markets_-_an_empirical_study_in_Vietnam
  143. https://www.academia.edu/87972556/The_implications_of_sale_and_leaseback_in_a_developing_country_an_institutional_perspective
  144. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/air-india-signs-engine-sale-lease-back-agreement-with-willis-lease/articleshow/94375425.cms
  145. https://spectrahospitality.com/sale-leaseback-model-a-new-funding-solution-for-hotel-industry/
  146. https://www.srbatliboi.in/article/an-overview-of-amendments-to-ind-as-116-impacting-sale-and-leaseback-accounting
  147. https://www.carrefour.com/en/news/2023/carrefour-brazil-has-entered-exclusive-negotiations-barzel-sale-and-leaseback-5
  148. https://www.gic.com.sg/newsroom/all/gic-and-barzel-properties-complete-r1-2-billion-acquisition-of-nine-carrefour-brazil-group-assets/
  149. https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/brazils-carrefour-sells-off-15-atacadao-sites-127-million-2024-10-22/
  150. https://china.aiddata.org/projects/72679/
  151. https://www.taxnotes.com/lr/resolve/tax-notes-today-global/china-clarifies-tax-treatment-of-sale-leaseback-transactions-by-foreign-invested-real-estate-developers/19m7y
  152. https://www.webull.com/news/13418919545955328
  153. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257748447_AN_APPRAISAL_OF_SALE-LEASEBACK_TRANSACTION_IN_NIGERIA
  154. https://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstreams/945671ed-524b-4899-a5f4-0e7675360aa2/download
  155. https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/567/154216.html
  156. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/998901468326962267/pdf/516730WP0Box341inDevelopment1Manual.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.