Hubbry Logo
WorkaroundWorkaroundMain
Open search
Workaround
Community hub
Workaround
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Workaround
Workaround
Workaround
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of the Miles Glacier Bridge, with a temporary repair after a March 1964 earthquake and was not permanently repaired until July 2004
Barriers installed to slow down cyclists have been bypassed by creating a desire path so that they do not have to brake, thus showing a literal example of a workaround and the path of least resistance

A workaround is a bypass of a recognized problem or limitation in a system or policy.[1] A workaround is typically a temporary fix[2][3] that implies that a genuine solution to the problem is needed. But workarounds are frequently as creative as true solutions, involving outside the box thinking[4][5] in their creation.

Typically they are considered brittle[6] in that they will not respond well to further pressure from a system beyond the original design. In implementing a workaround it is important to flag the change so as to later implement a proper solution.[7]

Placing pressure on a workaround may result in later system failures. For example, in computer programming workarounds are often used to address a problem or anti-pattern in a library, such as an incorrect return value. When the library is changed, the workaround may break the overall program functionality, effectively becoming an anti-pattern, since it may expect the older, wrong behaviour from the library.

Workarounds can also be a useful source of ideas for improvement of products or services.[8]

[edit]

When the legal system places an obstacle in the form of a restriction or requirement, the law may provide a possible workaround. Laws intended to tap into what may seem to be deep pockets may lead to what are at least temporary solutions such as:

  • Since "most French workplace laws affect businesses with 50 or more employees... many French companies opt to employ only 49 people in avoidance of crippling legislations."[9]
  • An injunction against Microsoft regarding XML features and an easy technical workaround, a patent attorney suggested having two versions of MS Word, one with and one without the feature.[10]

Acronyms

[edit]

Some well-known acronyms were created to work around bureaucratic or contracting restrictions:

  • PDP - The term was used to describe a computer by another name, due to contracting complications for purchasing or leasing computers. The term PDP (Programmed Data Processor or Programmable Data Processor) was a workaround.[11][12][13][14] The name "PDP" intentionally avoids the use of the term "computer".[15][16] PDPs were aimed at a market that could not afford larger computers.
  • GNU - GNU's Not UNIX. As AT&T's prices for academic licensing and use of UNIX increased,[17] new restrictions on maximum number of concurrent users and limitations on types of use[17][18] created a motivation for an alternative: a work-alike workaround. Among the better known ones are:
  • PSAP. By contrast with hearing aids, the sale of which is more regulated[19][20] and more expensive,[21] a Personal Sound Amplification Product (PSAP) is lower in price albeit more limited in capability.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Workaround

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A workaround is a method or technique designed to circumvent or bypass a recognized problem, limitation, or defect in a , , , or software without eliminating its root cause. Often implemented as a temporary fix, it enables continued operation or functionality in the face of obstacles, such as bugs in programming or unexpected disruptions in projects. Workarounds are prevalent across domains including , where they address defects like incompatible APIs or unpatched vulnerabilities; , for handling unforeseen delays; and even healthcare or , to maintain workflows amid equipment failures. Their defining characteristics include resourcefulness and expediency, allowing practitioners to sustain productivity without halting operations entirely. However, reliance on workarounds can mask systemic flaws, leading to accumulated inefficiencies known as , heightened long-term costs, and risks such as compounded errors or safety hazards if the underlying issues persist unaddressed. In contexts, poorly managed workarounds may devolve into s—inelegant, makeshift assemblies that prioritize short-term viability over robust . Despite these drawbacks, workarounds underscore human adaptability, fostering while highlighting the need for eventual root-cause remediation to avoid perpetuating suboptimal practices.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition

A workaround is a technique, method, or procedure designed to bypass or circumvent a recognized problem, limitation, defect, or in a , , , or procedure without resolving or eliminating its cause. This approach enables continued operation or functionality despite the issue, often serving as a pragmatic interim measure when a comprehensive fix is unavailable, impractical, or delayed. The term originated in the late , with first recorded uses around 1970 and broader adoption by 1987, initially in contexts to describe software patches or procedural deviations. Workarounds differ from permanent solutions by prioritizing expediency over optimality; they may involve , such as altering inputs, rerouting workflows, or employing auxiliary tools, but risk compounding inefficiencies, introducing new vulnerabilities, or perpetuating suboptimal practices if relied upon indefinitely. In essence, a workaround acknowledges a barrier's while navigating around it, reflecting constraints or trade-offs rather than of the problem itself.

Key Attributes and Distinctions

A workaround is fundamentally temporary, designed to circumvent a limitation or problem in a , , or policy without eliminating its root cause, thereby enabling interim functionality or progress. This attribute distinguishes it from permanent solutions, such as engineered redesigns or software patches, which modify the underlying structure to resolve the issue definitively; in contrast, workarounds accept the flaw's persistence while restoring service or expediting tasks. Central to workarounds is their improvisational quality, often involving deviations from standard procedures, alterations to inputs, or use of auxiliary methods in response to unforeseen obstacles, particularly in resource-constrained environments like or healthcare systems. Unlike hacks, which emphasize clever but potentially permanent shortcuts regardless of elegance, or s, which connote clumsy, inefficient assemblages that compound complexity over time, workarounds prioritize pragmatic bypasses that maintain operational flow without committing to long-term alterations. In engineering contexts, for instance, a workaround might involve manual overrides or redundant pathways to bridge gaps in faulty infrastructure, as seen in historical cases of structural repairs using reinforcements until full reconstruction. Workarounds also exhibit contextual adaptability, emerging as goal-driven responses to systemic rigidities or time pressures, such as in where they serve as unplanned countermeasures to unidentified , necessitating to track their provisional status. This sets them apart from make-work activities, which artificially inflate effort without addressing deficiencies, or shadow processes that evade oversight entirely; instead, workarounds are typically acknowledged deviations aimed at immediate , though they risk entrenching inefficiencies if not phased out. Their hinges on balancing short-term gains against potential for deferred costs, underscoring a core distinction from optimized designs that preempt such improvisations through upfront rigor.

Historical Development

Origins in Computing and Engineering

The term "workaround" first appeared in technical literature within the U.S. sector in , denoting improvised methods to circumvent limitations or failures in complex mechanical and electronic systems during testing and operations. These early applications addressed causal mismatches between designed specifications and real-world performance, such as hardware malfunctions or procedural bottlenecks, prioritizing operational continuity over permanent redesigns in resource-constrained environments like and development programs. In more broadly, workarounds manifested as kludges—clumsy, temporary fixes to bridge gaps in system reliability—evident in structural repairs and ad-hoc modifications predating the term's formalization, though empirical records from the mid-20th century highlight their prevalence in civil and mechanical projects facing material shortages or design flaws. For instance, post-damage reinforcements on bridges, such as kludged supports on the in 1984 following seismic stress, exemplified causal adaptations that restored functionality without full reconstruction, relying on available materials to exploit paths of structural least resistance.[float-right] The adoption of workarounds in computing originated in the 1980s through studies of engineering workstations, where Leslie Gasser's 1984 PhD thesis at the documented users bypassing software constraints in CAD/CAM systems via manual overrides, data manipulations, or auxiliary tools to achieve intended outputs despite algorithmic errors or interface rigidities. Gasser's analysis, building on observations from 1981–1984 fieldwork, revealed workarounds as empirically driven responses to undesignated uses, with engineering analysts routinely altering inputs or avoiding faulty modules based on experiential knowledge of system inaccuracies. This formalized the concept in software contexts, distinguishing it from outright errors by emphasizing bypasses that preserved core functionality amid limitations in early computational tools. Subsequent computing practices inherited these engineering roots, with integral to from its inception as temporary resolutions to defects or environmental mismatches, such as patching incorrect return values without altering underlying codebases. By the late , Gasser formalized definitions in peer-reviewed work, attributing workarounds to mismatches between system affordances and user goals, a verified across mainframe and deployments where full fixes were deferred for efficiency. These origins underscore workarounds' role in causal realism, enabling empirical adaptation in nascent digital systems prone to unforeseen interactions.

Expansion to Other Domains

The application of workarounds extended beyond and into organizational and socio-technical s during the late and , as rigid technologies permeated processes and bureaucracies. Early conceptualizations, building on Gasser's foundational work in system modifications, highlighted how in service organizations deviated from prescribed procedures to meet goals amid structural constraints, such as mismatched incentives or inefficient workflows. This shift was driven by the widespread implementation of , where users improvised to reconcile software limitations with practical needs, often perpetuating inefficiencies rather than resolving them. In healthcare, workarounds proliferated with the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and barcode medication administration systems in the early 2000s, as clinicians bypassed protocols to maintain care delivery amid flaws. For example, nurses frequently overrode safety alerts or manually documented data outside systems to expedite tasks, with systematic documentation emerging around through studies revealing these practices as responses to time pressures and interface rigidities. Such adaptations, while enabling short-term resilience, often masked deeper systemic misalignments, including understaffing and poor integration, contributing to error risks in high-stakes environments. Legal and regulatory domains adopted the term later, particularly from the , to describe maneuvers that technically comply with statutes while circumventing their intended constraints, as seen in analyses of administrative loopholes. Scholars have characterized these as "workarounds" in contexts like evasion or jurisdictional , where entities exploit formal rule ambiguities without outright violation, reflecting broader tensions between rule rigidity and adaptive . This expansion underscores workarounds' role in complex, rule-bound fields, where they facilitate continuity but risk undermining long-term and efficacy.

Applications Across Fields

In Software Development and IT

In software development, workarounds manifest as provisional code alterations or procedural adjustments to evade defects, incompatibilities, or constraints in applications, frameworks, or , deferring root-cause remediation to maintain operational continuity. These interventions, such as inserting runtime checks to suppress exceptions from unhandled edge cases, enable rapid progression in development cycles where immediate delivery outweighs perfection. For example, in resource-constrained environments, developers may implement ad-hoc data transformations via scripts to interface mismatched APIs, circumventing the need for extensive refactoring. In IT , workarounds frequently address hardware-software mismatches or legacy integrations, including custom to bridge outdated databases with modern tools or manual overrides in configuration files to bypass validation failures. A documented instance occurred in defense mission systems, where operators reduced concurrent application loads to prevent performance degradation, sustaining functionality pending upgrades. Such tactics prove essential in high-stakes settings like enterprise networks, where incurs substantial costs—estimated at $5,600 per minute for large organizations in 2023—prioritizing over elegance. While offering short-term resilience, workarounds accrue as , imposing future remediation burdens through code complexity and fragility; the Software Engineering Institute's analysis of field cases revealed that accumulations of such expedients, absent , multiplied vulnerabilities by orders of magnitude, complicating audits and exacerbating failure propagation. In one empirical study of development projects, workarounds correlated with architecture erosion and elevated introduction rates, as provisional logic obscured underlying flaws, demanding disproportionate testing efforts. Persistent reliance, as in practices, heightens security exposures, with unvetted scripts potentially introducing exploits amid unpatched limitations.

In Engineering and Systems Design

In engineering and , workarounds entail improvised modifications or bypasses to address immediate functional deficits in hardware, structures, or integrated systems, typically when comprehensive redesign or replacement exceeds available time, budget, or logistical feasibility. These measures, often termed s, prioritize expediency and minimal disruption over elegance or permanence, enabling continued operation amid constraints such as material shortages, environmental hazards, or emergent failures. A quintessential case arose during the mission on April 13-17, 1970, following an oxygen tank explosion that crippled the command module's primary systems. The crew transferred to the for survival, but its square lithium hydroxide canisters for scrubbing were incompatible with the command module's round interfaces. Mission Control engineers, under Ed Smylie's direction, fabricated an adapter from non-flight items including plastic bags, , cardboard from checklists, and a spacesuit , successfully integrating the canisters and preventing CO2 toxicity that could have doomed the astronauts. This improvisation, executed in under 15 minutes by the crew from ground instructions, underscored workarounds' role in high-stakes systems design, where causal chains of failure demand rapid causal interventions. In , the Million Dollar Bridge spanning the Copper River at Miles Glacier in illustrates a prolonged structural workaround. Completed in 1910 as part of the Copper River and Northwestern Railway, the multi-span Pennsylvania bridge endured the 9.2-magnitude Good Friday Earthquake on March 27, 1964, which sheared its northernmost span from its concrete pier, dropping it into the river and rendering the structure unusable for heavy loads. Ad-hoc repairs, involving temporary bracing and partial reconstruction, restored limited rail and pedestrian access, sustaining utility for approximately 40 years until a full in the early 2000s addressed vulnerabilities like inadequate pier foundations and fatigue. Mechanical engineering examples include ' "rope-drive" in the 1961-1963 , a chain-based system linking the front-mounted to a rear to achieve a flat floor without a driveshaft . This reduced production costs and vehicle height but introduced operational drawbacks such as chain stretch requiring frequent adjustments, elevated , and challenges, ultimately contributing to the design's discontinuation after 1963. While workarounds facilitate resilience—evident in their integration into risk protocols to balance trade-offs—they risk entrenching inefficiencies or hazards by deferring root-cause remediation, potentially amplifying systemic failures through unaddressed causal factors like material degradation or design oversights. Empirical analyses in emphasize documenting such interventions to inform iterative improvements, avoiding perpetuation as pseudo-solutions. In legal and regulatory contexts, workarounds involve strategies to achieve objectives by navigating around statutory or administrative barriers without direct violation, often leveraging interpretive ambiguities, jurisdictional variances, or alternative compliance paths. These approaches exploit gaps in regulatory design, such as differences in across borders or between regulated entities and unregulated alternatives, enabling entities to minimize compliance costs or operational constraints. A prominent form is regulatory arbitrage, where firms structure activities to fall under less stringent rules. For instance, financial institutions have historically shifted transactions offshore to evade domestic capital requirements, as seen in pre-2008 practices where U.S. banks used structured vehicles in jurisdictions like the to hold assets outside strict oversight, reducing reported leverage ratios. Similarly, ride-sharing platforms like classified drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, avoiding obligations under labor laws such as and benefits mandates in multiple jurisdictions starting around 2010, thereby accelerating market entry while prompting subsequent legal challenges and reclassifications in places like via Proposition 22 in 2020. In administration, workarounds address bureaucratic hurdles, such as agencies proposing interpretive rules to bypass congressional gridlock on appropriations; one example includes the U.S. Agency's use of citizen suit provisions under the Clean Air Act in the 2010s to enforce standards without full legislative funding. Cross-jurisdictional tactics also prevail in banking, where European firms post-2008 crisis exploited variances in capital rules between the and U.K. to relocate trading desks, as noted in supervisory analyses estimating billions in shifted activities to optimize regulatory burdens. These methods persist because regulations often lag , but they risk eroding if perceived as undermining policy intent, leading to efforts like the EU's post-Brexit equivalence rules.

In Organizational and Healthcare Processes

In organizational processes, workarounds emerge as employee-driven deviations from formalized procedures when rigid systems hinder goal attainment, such as through improvised adaptations that bypass inefficiencies in or . These practices are goal-oriented responses to temporary obstacles, enabling continued operations amid misalignments between enterprise-level objectives and subunit-specific needs. Empirical analyses reveal workarounds as ubiquitous in rule-bound settings, where participants alter aspects of —like process sequences or —to sustain , often prioritizing local over strict compliance. Such adaptations yield immediate efficiency gains by resolving acute barriers, yet they risk entrenching suboptimal habits that obscure root causes, potentially amplifying long-term mismatches and resource waste. Research on underscores that unaddressed workarounds signal underlying design flaws, prompting calls for systematic detection to inform redesign rather than mere tolerance. In contexts like information systems deployment, workarounds correlate with perceived opportunities for , influencing individual but challenging organizational control. In healthcare processes, workarounds are prevalent among nurses and physicians navigating environments, particularly to surmount hindrances in (EHR) systems or staffing protocols, defined as circumventions that temporarily resolve disruptions for achievement. A 2013 scoping review of 50 empirical studies across 14 countries found these behaviors—such as overriding safeguards or manual data duplication—ubiquitous in practice, driven by time pressures and system rigidity, with documented impacts on care delivery timelines. While enabling frontline resiliency and immediate interventions amid constraints like understaffing or outdated protocols, healthcare workarounds carry dual implications for : they facilitate adaptive care in resource-scarce settings but heighten error risks through skipped verifications or fragmented , as evidenced in analyses of EHR usage where such practices persisted post-implementation. Studies from 2017 to 2022 highlight that although workarounds avert delays in critical tasks, they often compromise and protocol adherence, contributing to adverse events in up to 20-30% of observed instances in high-volume wards, underscoring the need for sociotechnical evaluations to balance efficiency against systemic vulnerabilities.

Advantages

Short-Term Efficiency Gains

Workarounds provide short-term efficiency gains by allowing practitioners to bypass impediments rapidly, avoiding the delays associated with comprehensive resolutions and thereby sustaining operational momentum. In projects, these improvisations enable quicker technical issue resolutions and accelerated product releases to satisfy time-to-market demands, with managers favoring them for their immediate boosts despite deferred costs. Empirical observations from two software firms illustrate how such decisions prioritize short-term deadlines, permitting teams to deliver functional outputs without exhaustive redesigns. In healthcare, workarounds similarly expedite task completion amid recurrent system or failures, ensuring patient care proceeds without interruption. Nurses, for instance, confront roughly one operational per hour, dedicating approximately 33 minutes of a 7.5-hour shift to mitigations; workarounds in these scenarios prevent halts and facilitate the prompt administration of treatments. Over 50% of nurses resort to them for barcode scanning discrepancies during processes, preserving efficiency under pressing time limits and enabling the fulfillment of care protocols that might otherwise be deferred. Across domains, these gains stem from the reduced resource outlay required for provisional fixes compared to root-cause overhauls, yielding measurable throughput improvements in constrained timelines. In contexts, temporary structural reinforcements or procedural deviations have historically minimized during critical repairs, as seen in infrastructure where full reconstructions would extend outages by weeks or months. Such applications underscore workarounds' role in upholding short-term output levels, though their persistence demands for sustained viability.

Enabling Continuity and Adaptation

Workarounds enable operational continuity by offering immediate, albeit temporary, solutions that prevent full system halts during disruptions, such as technology failures or resource shortages. In business continuity management, manual processes like paper-based forms or alternative communication methods serve as workarounds to sustain core functions when primary systems outage. These measures minimize downtime, with organizations reporting that effective workarounds can reduce recovery times from days to hours in crisis scenarios. By facilitating quick pivots, workarounds support to evolving challenges, embedding flexibility into routine operations and enhancing overall resilience. For instance, in operational resilience frameworks, predefined workarounds allow firms to maintain service delivery amid unexpected events, preserving competitive positioning without awaiting permanent resolutions. In software contexts, developers and users deploy workarounds to circumvent limitations or defects, enabling continued and goal attainment despite design flaws. This is particularly evident in dynamic environments, where workarounds bridge gaps until more robust fixes emerge, as seen in engineering kludges that extend infrastructure lifespan post-damage. Such mechanisms underscore workarounds' role in short-term survival strategies, where the priority shifts from ideal efficiency to pragmatic persistence, allowing organizations to iterate and refine processes incrementally. Empirical observations from project analyses indicate that managerial decisions favoring workarounds prioritize immediate continuity over long-term optimality, yielding tangible benefits in fast-paced sectors.

Disadvantages and Risks

Masking Root Causes

Workarounds frequently obscure underlying systemic or design flaws by circumventing immediate obstacles, thereby preventing identification and resolution of root causes. In healthcare settings, for instance, nurses and clinicians often employ workarounds to bypass dysfunctional (EHR) systems or workflow inefficiencies, which masks deficiencies in technology implementation or process rather than prompting corrective action. This approach subverts safety protocols designed to highlight errors, allowing latent problems—such as inadequate training or equipment shortages—to persist unchecked and contribute to adverse events over time. In , applying quick patches or temporary code fixes to address bugs without conducting root cause analysis (RCA) similarly conceals deeper issues like flawed , poor testing coverage, or gaps. For example, developers might override alerts or hardcode exceptions to maintain functionality, which hides recurring defect patterns stemming from coding errors or insufficient collaboration, leading to accumulated and vulnerability proliferation. Such practices exacerbate long-term instability, as evidenced by studies showing that unaddressed root causes in software defects result in higher failure rates and maintenance costs, with up to 80% of defects traceable to systemic process failures rather than isolated incidents. RCA methodologies emphasize that workarounds merely treat symptoms, failing to eliminate causal factors like latent human errors or inadequate design validation. Engineering contexts illustrate this risk through makeshift repairs or "kludges" that tolerate structural weaknesses, such as using ad-hoc reinforcements on aging without overhauling material degradation or load assessments. In network troubleshooting, for instance, temporary adjustments can mask protocol failures due to hardware misconfigurations, perpetuating instability until catastrophic occurs. Overall, this masking dynamic fosters a false of stability, deferring investments in fundamental improvements and amplifying hazards when compounded issues surface, as causes evolve unchecked amid evolving operational demands.

Long-Term Inefficiencies and Safety Hazards

Workarounds, by circumventing rather than resolving underlying system flaws, often result in the accumulation of , where short-term fixes impose escalating future costs in maintenance, refactoring, and scalability efforts. This debt manifests as increased complexity, with layers of provisional solutions compounding over time and reducing overall system efficiency; for instance, in , repeated workarounds can lead to unpredictable failures and higher operational disruptions as the codebase becomes brittle. Empirical studies indicate that such practices, when normalized, transform temporary measures into entrenched inefficiencies, elevating long-term expenses by up to several times the initial savings. In contexts, prolonged reliance on workarounds exacerbates inefficiencies by masking deficiencies, leading to diminished and ; stacked workarounds, in particular, amplify these issues by creating interdependent vulnerabilities that hinder adaptability to new demands. When these become standard, they erode productivity and , as seen in systems where provisional bypasses evolve into permanent fixtures without rigorous evaluation. Safety hazards arise when workarounds introduce unmitigated risks, particularly in high-stakes domains like , where they contribute directly to accidents by bypassing safety protocols and exposing workers to unforeseen perils. In such environments, deviations from engineered safeguards, often justified as pragmatic fixes, correlate with elevated injury rates due to the persistence of latent hazards. Healthcare settings illustrate acute safety risks from workarounds, such as those in electronic health records or medication administration, which have led to documented patient injuries; for example, nurses bypassing scanning protocols to expedite processes have administered incorrect doses, resulting in adverse events. These practices not only heighten error probabilities through improvised or skipped verifications but also foster distress among providers while perpetuating systemic vulnerabilities that compromise patient outcomes over time.

Debates and Perspectives

Views on Innovation vs. Sloppiness

Proponents argue that workarounds embody resourceful , serving as precursors to genuine by exposing design flaws and prompting adaptive refinements. In organizational routines, frequent workarounds can restructure processes and IT artifacts, evolving into bottom-up innovations that enhance efficiency, as demonstrated in a 2023 multiple-case study of HR, auditing, and scheduling systems where nine workarounds led to formal adaptations resolving misfits between routines and technology. Similarly, design scholar Donald Norman characterized workarounds and hacks as the "leading edge of ," positing that they arise from users' creative deviations that reveal unmet needs and inspire iterative improvements in products and systems. Critics, however, maintain that workarounds often reflect sloppiness in initial design or execution, fostering a culture of expediency over rigor and accumulating unresolved issues like . In process management, such as administrative workflows, workarounds have masked persistent flaws—such as outdated signature requirements—for over two decades, incurring thousands of wasted hours and financial costs without addressing root causes, thereby excusing inadequate system design. This perspective aligns with observations where hasty workarounds, akin to "" fixes, stem from poor practices and exacerbate long-term maintenance burdens, contrasting with deliberate trade-offs in intentional . The tension hinges on context and scale: isolated workarounds may spark in resource-constrained environments, yet systemic reliance signals foundational weaknesses, potentially prioritizing short-term hacks over principles. Empirical studies underscore this duality, noting workarounds' potential for efficiency gains alongside risks of non-compliance and inferior outcomes if not governed.

Ethical Considerations in Professional Contexts

In professional settings, workarounds—temporary deviations from established protocols or systems to address immediate obstacles—present ethical tensions between operational and duties to , , and long-term reliability. Professionals must balance the potential for short-term against risks of normalizing suboptimal practices, which can erode and mask systemic failures. Ethical frameworks emphasize that while workarounds may be justifiable in acute crises if they avert greater immediate danger, their routine use without root-cause remediation contravenes principles of competence and public welfare enshrined in codes like those of and bodies. In healthcare, workarounds are prevalent among nurses navigating (EHR) limitations or workflow bottlenecks, often involving skipped steps or improvised data entry to expedite care. Such practices, documented in studies from onward, introduce ethical dilemmas as they prioritize efficiency over protocol adherence, potentially compromising through errors like incomplete documentation or oversights. For instance, a analysis of clinical practices revealed that nurses experience moral distress from these deviations, viewing them as necessary for timely interventions yet ethically fraught due to heightened error risks and violations of evidence-based standards. Professional , as articulated in codes requiring and harm minimization, demand transparency and escalation of underlying issues rather than perpetuating "" fixes, which can foster a culture of unshared risks. Beyond healthcare, and contexts highlight workarounds' ethical pitfalls in safety-critical domains, where temporary kludges—ad hoc patches bypassing design flaws—can precipitate failures if not rectified. The National Society of Professional Engineers' mandates engineers to prioritize public safety and report conditions endangering life or , implying that endorsing persistent workarounds over permanent solutions constitutes a breach of competence and diligence. A theoretical model of workarounds posits they range from ethically neutral expedients to questionable or fraudulent acts, depending on intent and outcomes, underscoring the need for professionals to evaluate and moral implications before implementation. In business operations, analogous issues arise in compliance-heavy environments, where bypassing regulatory processes for efficiency may invite liability, as seen in cases where undocumented fixes obscure trails and inflate systemic vulnerabilities. Addressing these concerns requires institutional mechanisms for ethical oversight, such as approaches that encourage reporting workarounds without punitive reprisal, enabling analysis and redesign. Empirical evidence from patient safety advisories indicates that unaddressed workarounds correlate with adverse events, reinforcing professionals' to for systemic improvements over habitual circumvention. Ultimately, ethical practice demands discerning application: workarounds as bridges to resolution, not evasions of responsibility, aligned with causal to prevent cascading inefficiencies or harms.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/work-around
  2. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/workaround
  3. https://www.stakeholdermap.com/project-dictionary/workaround-meaning-and-definition.html
  4. https://testmatick.com/glossary/workaround/
  5. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9286099/
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281857116_The_Benefits_and_Consequences_of_Workarounds_in_Software_Development_Projects
  7. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/07/17/workarounds-when-the-problem-solving-strategy-becomes-the-problem/
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235281775_Costs_and_Benefits_of_the_Workaround_Inventive_Solution_or_Costly_Alternative
  9. https://psychotricks.com/workaround-effect/
  10. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/workaround
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3799168/
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/workaround
  13. https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/essays/koopman03_workarounds.pdf
  14. https://www.dau.edu/library/damag/january-february2022/workaround
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262563960_Theory_of_Workarounds
  16. https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/k/kludge.htm
  17. https://www.projectmanagement.com/deliverables/262742/workarounds
  18. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12435
  19. https://boxesandarrows.com/understanding-the-value-of-workarounds/
  20. https://www.bcs.org/media/10568/workarounds-mwhite-200423.pdf
  21. ./assets/Miles_Glacier_Bridge%252C_damage_and_kludge%252C_1984.jpg
  22. https://sheffield.pressbooks.pub/workarounds/chapter/definition/
  23. https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=at
  24. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3324884.3418910
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9539462/
  26. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/workarounds-and-resiliency-front-lines-health-care
  27. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6963-13-175
  28. https://texaslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Farber.Printer.pdf
  29. https://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/lee/SLee_WorkplaceEnforcementWorkarounds.pdf
  30. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/technical-debt
  31. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/breaking-technical-debts-vicious-cycle-to-modernize-your-business
  32. https://www.sei.cmu.edu/blog/managing-the-consequences-of-technical-debt-5-stories-from-the-field/
  33. https://sheffield.pressbooks.pub/workarounds/chapter/workarounds-in-it-system-and-software-development/
  34. https://spacecenter.org/apollo-13-infographic-how-did-they-make-that-co2-scrubber/
  35. https://www.nasa.gov/history/afj/ap13fj/15day4-mailbox.html
  36. https://www.collectspace.com/news/news-042725a-apollo-13-engineer-ed-smylie-carbon-dioxide-scrubber-mailbox-obituary.html
  37. https://www.adn.com/features/article/alaska-engineering-marvel-copper-river-railroad-and-million-dollar-bridge/2012/01/16/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045794902004200
  39. https://ateupwithmotor.com/model-histories/compact-economy-cars/magnificent-kludge-the-rope-drive-1961-1963-pontiac-tempest/
  40. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230011449/downloads/SystemsEngineeringRisk%2520Management%252020230801.pdf
  41. https://texaslawreview.org/workarounds-in-american-public-law/
  42. https://ww3.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/ILJ/upload/Riles-final.pdf
  43. https://news.law.fordham.edu/jcfl/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/11/Nabilou.pdf
  44. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/regulatory-arbitrage-financial-markets-critical-analysis-ip5vc
  45. https://www.thecoinzone.com/regulation/what-is-regulatory-arbitrage
  46. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2567/
  47. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/speeches/date/2017/html/ssm.sp170915.en.html
  48. https://hls.harvard.edu/bibliography/workarounds-in-american-public-law/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7266449/
  50. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/omis/11/
  51. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/4/are-workarounds-an-excuse-to-accept-bad-process-design
  52. https://d-nb.info/1235757730/34
  53. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1752&context=bise
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3663687/
  55. https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2017/4/e27
  56. https://www.jmir.org/2022/3/e33046/
  57. https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-021-01548-0
  58. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-19593-3_1
  59. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318240a854
  60. https://propeltech.co.uk/insight/software-bugs-short-term-cost-savings-can-lead-to-long-term-issues/
  61. https://www.protechtgroup.com/en-us/blog/comprehensive-guide-to-business-continuity-management-strategies-best-practices
  62. https://calitgroup.com/sample-business-continuity-plan-bcp-free-template-expert-guide/
  63. https://mha-it.com/blog/workarounds
  64. https://continuity2.com/blog/operational-resilience-vs-business-continuity
  65. https://www.thebci.org/news/business-continuity-vs-operational-resilience.html
  66. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17624v2
  67. https://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/201709_Workarounds.aspx
  68. https://www.elastic.co/what-is/root-cause-analysis
  69. https://www.browserstack.com/guide/root-causes-for-software-defects-and-its-solutions
  70. https://www.techtarget.com/searchsoftwarequality/tip/How-to-handle-root-cause-analysis-of-software-defects
  71. https://refactoring.guru/refactoring/technical-debt
  72. https://www.okoone.com/spark/technology-innovation/the-real-reason-your-software-is-a-tangled-mess/
  73. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cost-workarounds-rethinking-operations-environment-alex-almeida-9r2jf
  74. https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/18975/how-to-deal-with-necessary-workarounds-in-software
  75. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17624v1
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395319667_The_connection_between_workarounds_and_safety_hazards_on_construction_sites
  77. https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2025/05/matecconf_eppm-zec2024_03002.pdf
  78. https://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/fulltext/2023/09000/nurse_using_barcode_workaround_leads_to_patient.22.aspx
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647365/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283618/
  81. https://www.gregerwikstrand.com/tech-debt-duct-tape/
  82. https://er.[educause](/page/Educause).edu/articles//4/are-workarounds-an-excuse-to-accept-bad-process-design
  83. https://www.nursingcenter.com/journalarticle?Article_ID=4346217&Journal_ID=54030&Issue_ID=4346085
  84. https://www.nspe.org/career-growth/ethics/code-ethics
  85. https://www.hpso.com/Resources/Managing-a-Business/Workarounds-6-ways-to-reduce-their-risks
  86. https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/34/5/317
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.