Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lechmere station
View on Wikipedia
Lechmere station (/ˈliːtʃmɪr/ LEECH-meer) is a Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Green Line light rail station in Lechmere Square in East Cambridge, Massachusetts. It is located on the east side of Monsignor O'Brien Highway near First Street, adjacent to the NorthPoint development. The accessible elevated station has a single island platform, with headhouses at both ends. It opened on March 21, 2022, as part of the Green Line Extension (GLX). Lechmere station is served by Green Line D branch and E branch service.
Key Information
The first transit in East Cambridge was a station on the Boston and Lowell Railroad, which served the neighborhood from the mid-19th century to 1927. Horsecar service through Lechmere Square began around 1861, using the Craigie Bridge to reach Boston, and was electrified in the 1890s. The Lechmere Viaduct was opened in 1912 with an incline to Lechmere Square, allowing streetcars from lines on Cambridge Street and Bridge Street to reach the Tremont Street subway.
In 1922, the Boston Elevated Railway opened a prepayment transfer station at Lechmere, separating the surface streetcars from the subway routes. This surface station had a loop for subway cars, with cross-platform transfers to the surface routes, and a small yard inside the loop. The surface streetcars were replaced by trolleybuses and later diesel buses in the 1930s to 1960s, while the subway routes became the Green Line in 1965.
Lechmere was the northern terminus of subway service for a century. Extensions northwest from Lechmere station were proposed in the 1920s, though planning did not begin until the early 21st century. A new elevated Lechmere station was to be built as part of the NorthPoint development, but it was instead added to GLX planning in 2007. The MBTA agreed in 2012 to open the station by 2017, and a construction contract was awarded in 2013. Cost increases triggered a wholesale reevaluation of the GLX project in 2015. A scaled-down station design was released in 2016, with a design and construction contract issued in 2017. The surface station was closed on May 24, 2020, for Green Line Extension construction; the busways at the old station remained open as a transfer point between MBTA bus routes and Lechmere–North Station shuttle buses until the new station opened.
Station design
[edit]Lechmere station is located on the east side of O'Brien Highway at Lechmere Square, adjacent to the North Point development. The two-track Green Line viaduct runs approximately southeast–northwest through the station area. The station has a single curved island platform, 355 feet (108 m) long and 32–35 feet (9.8–10.7 m) wide, located over the block between East Street and North First Street.[2]
The platform is 8 inches (200 mm) high for accessible boarding on current light rail vehicles (LRVs) and can be raised to 14 inches (360 mm) for level boarding with Type 9 and future Type 10 LRVs. While the other GLX stations have 225-foot (69 m)-long platforms with provisions for extension, the platform at Lechmere was built to its maximum length because it would be more difficult to extend in the future.[3]: 12.1-5 A canopy covers the full length of the platform; it is two spans wide, rather than the single span used on the narrower platforms at the other GLX stations.[2][4]: 29
Headhouses are located north of North First Street and south of East Street. The north headhouse has two elevators and stairs to the platform; the south headhouse has one elevator and stairs.[2] A bus loop for MBTA bus routes 69, 80, 87, and 88 is located off Water Street north of the north headhouse. A bike station between the headhouses has space for 182 bicycles; racks for 72 additional bicycles are located next to the north headhouse.[2] Public artwork at the station includes Field Notes by Randall Thurston – a set of panels on the elevator shafts depicting birds and vines. Some panels on station signs have artwork of poetry overlaid with images of birds; others have historical images and interpretive text.[5]
History
[edit]East Cambridge station
[edit]The Boston and Lowell Railroad (B&L) opened between its namesake cities in 1835. Passenger service initially ran express between the two cities, but local stops were soon added.[6] One of the first was East Cambridge[a] which was located near the Prison Point Bridge by 1846.[8][9][10][7] By 1865, it was moved north to the foot of Third Street, closer to development on Dog Island (East Cambridge).[11][9] The station was popular with employees from Somerville commuting to the factories of East Cambridge; among its more famous users was Benjamin Butler.[9] In 1870, the Lexington Branch was routed over the B&L east of Somerville Junction, increasing service to Somerville Junction, Winter Hill, Milk Row, and East Cambridge stations. The Central Massachusetts Railroad began operations in 1881 with the Lexington Branch and B&L as its Boston entry.[12][13] The Fitchburg Railroad also had an East Cambridge station (primarily served by Lexington Branch trains) located at Linwood Street, just over the Somerville border, in the mid-19th century.[14][15][16]
In 1926, the Boston and Maine Railroad (B&M), which had acquired the B&L in 1887, began work on North Station plus an expansion of its freight yards. The B&M proposed to abandon East Cambridge station in order to realign the ex-B&L into the new station.[17] Although most inner stations were largely replaced by streetcars and automobiles at this time, East Cambridge was still used by both industrial workers and by those headed to the Middlesex County Courthouse, and the proposed closure was locally opposed.[18][19] The Public Utilities Commission approved the closure of East Cambridge and nearby Prospect Hill in March 1927; one train was rescheduled for ten minutes earlier to accommodate court attendees.[20] The stations closed at some point between then and May 17, when trains were rerouted over the new alignment.[21] The former alignment remained in use for freight for decades thereafter. A portion of the abandoned embankment near the former station location dates from between 1855 and 1868.[22]
Surface station
[edit]Early streetcar service
[edit]
The Cambridge Railroad was granted permission in 1860 to run horsecar tracks over the Craigie Bridge from East Cambridge to Boston.[23][24][25]: 14 Service began from Harvard Square along Cambridge Street to Lechmere Square around 1861, and from Lechmere Square over the bridge into Boston by 1862.[25]: 14 [26]: 202 [27] In 1864, the company built a line from Union Square in Somerville along Somerville Avenue and Bridge Street to the existing tracks at Lechmere Square, allowing through service from Elm Street (now Davis Square) to Boston.[26]: 205 The Cambridge Street line was converted to electric streetcar service by Cambridge Railroad successor West End Street Railway in 1891; the Somerville Avenue line and an 1888-built line to Davis Square via Highland Avenue were electrified and extended to Clarendon Hill in 1893–1895.[26]: 202, 205
The West End was leased to the Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) in 1897.[28]: 35 The three streetcar lines running through Lechmere Square began running into the Tremont Street subway via the Canal Street incline upon its September 3, 1898, opening.[25]: 3 The trip from Lechmere Point over the bridge was slow and prone to delays, causing congestion in the subway.[25]: 5 Construction of the Lechmere Viaduct and Causeway Street Elevated began in 1907 to provide the streetcar routes a more direct route into the subway. The BERy considered building a station at Lechmere Square at the north end of the viaduct but rejected the idea in 1911.[25]: 6 The viaduct opened on June 1, 1912, though some local streetcar lines continued to use the Charles River Dam Bridge.[29][25]: 7 [30] The incline at the north end of the viaduct, which connected to the surface streetcar tracks, occupied half the block between Lechmere Square and Second Street.[31]
Lechmere station
[edit]
Although it substantially reduced travel times between Lechmere and North Station, the Lechmere Viaduct and Causeway Street Elevated soon became insufficient for the service the BERy needed. Unlike the Commonwealth Avenue, Beacon Street, and Huntington Avenue lines, the Cambridge Street and Bridge Street lines did not have dedicated medians, so automobile traffic caused delays on the surface lines, which in turn propagated into the subway. Additional capacity in the subway was also needed – more than could be provided by small streetcars suitable for operation in mixed traffic.[25]: 5
In 1917, transit consultant John A. Beeler was hired by the Massachusetts Public Service Commission to analyze the struggling BERy. Among Beeler's recommendations was for the Tremont Street Subway to be converted to a third rail rapid transit service, with surface lines terminating at transfer stations (as had been done with the Main Line El and Cambridge–Dorchester line). He proposed that the northern transfer station be at Lechmere Square, with elevated rapid transit platforms and surface loops for streetcars.[25]: 6 [32]
In September 1921, the BERy applied to the Massachusetts Public Utilities Commission (PUC), successor to the Public Service Commission, for authority to build transfer stations at Lechmere Square and Braves Field.[b] The Lechmere Square proposal included taking 73,000 square feet (6,800 m2) of land by eminent domain.[34] The city of Cambridge objected to the design, particularly the construction of a loop track on Third Street.[35] The PUC approved the proposal in November 1921, but the city sought an injunction to prevent construction of the Third Street track.[36][37] The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld the BERy's position, allowing construction of the track, in May 1922 – by which time the construction of the rest of the terminal was already well underway.[38][39]

The station occupied the triangular parcel bounded by Cambridge Street, Bridge Street, and Second Street. It had a balloon loop for subway trains (which were still made of streetcars, rather than true rapid transit cars), with cross-platform transfers between streetcars and subway trains. Terminating streetcars used a pair of tracks off Cambridge Street, with a covered platform for passengers to then wait for subway trains. Streetcars then looped under the viaduct at Lechmere Square and picked up passengers using two tracks off Bridge Street, where a waiting room was located on the platform. Harvard-bound streetcars ran on a single track on Gore Street and Third Street to reach Cambridge Street; streetcars arriving from Somerville used the same Third Street track to reach Lechmere station. A second loop and several storage tracks were located inside the main subway train loop.[40][25]: 6 Unlike the Boston portion of the subway system, which was funded by the cities and built by contractors, Lechmere station was funded and built entirely by the BERy at a cost of $100,000 (equivalent to $1,500,000 in 2024).[28]: 44 [41]
Lechmere station opened on July 10, 1922.[29][40] The new terminal was expected to be used by 24,000 passengers daily in each direction and to increase daily seated capacity through the subway by 8,754 passengers.[33][42] Initial subway service to Lechmere was a shuttle service to Pleasant Street, which was intended as a temporary terminal until a more suitable western terminal could be found.[40] Service ran with three-car trains every three minutes at peak and two-car trains every four minutes at other times.[40] The forced transfer was unpopular with some riders who formerly had a one-seat ride to downtown Boston.[43]
Modifications and service changes
[edit]On January 2, 1923, some off-peak trips were extended through the Boylston Street Subway to the surface station at Kenmore; all-day service began on October 10.[44][45] Most trips were extended along the Beacon Street line to Washington Square on December 14, 1929.[46] The Washington Street service was cut back to Kenmore in June 1930 but resumed that September.[47][48] On February 7, 1931, all regular Commonwealth Avenue and Beacon Street service was extended from Park Street to Lechmere, and the existing shuttle services to Lechmere were replaced with Kenmore–Park Street shuttles.[49][50]

In 1923, the BERy constructed a brick-and-steel canopy over the northbound (outbound) surface tracks.[51][25]: 6 On October 18, 1924, a prepayment entrance was added to the north end of this shelter. This allowed passengers boarding streetcars (who had not come from the subway) to wait in the station rather than at the next stop.[52][25]: 14 The final streetcars still using the Charles River Dam were night cars, which were routed onto the viaduct on July 26, 1924.[25]: 7 Bridge Street was widened into the Northern Artery in 1928. The widening was on the south side of the street – except at Lechmere Square, where it was diverted to the north to avoid the streetcar shelter. A track on Bridge Street next to the station, not used for revenue service since the night car diversion in 1924, was kept in service to store extra streetcars during events at the new Boston Garden.[25]: 7
Bus service to Lechmere station began on May 9, 1932.[25]: 7 [26]: 55 [c] The first route ran to Lafayette Square via Cambridge and Columbia streets, with a supplemental short turn route on Cambridge Street to Webster Street operated during peak hours. The outbound surface track used by Cambridge Street cars was rebuilt and set in concrete paving to accommodate buses.[56][57] A Lechmere–Arlington Center bus route was established on July 9, 1932.[26]: 55 [58] The Central Square route and its short turn variant were discontinued on October 14, 1933.[26]: 55 By that time, the Cambridge Street side of Lechmere station had also been paved, with one of the surface car tracks removed.[59]

The Harvard–Lechmere streetcar line was converted to trackless trolley (trolleybus) on April 11, 1936 – the first route in what would become an extensive trackless trolley system.[26]: 202 [60] However, the tracks on Cambridge Street were kept for non-revenue use, as Commonwealth Avenue streetcars were stored at Bennett Street Carhouse.[61]: 104 In 1937, part of the inbound shelter was bricked in as a waiting room.[62] The remaining portion of the Charles River Dam tracks was removed in the late 1930s.[63][61]: 104 Commonwealth Avenue line streetcars were transferred to the expanded Reservoir Carhouse on May 6, 1940, and the Cambridge Street tracks were abandoned.[61]: 115 Most overnight storage of streetcars in the Lechmere yard also ended at that time, though it resumed from September 14, 1942, to late 1953.[25]: 7
In 1940–41, the BERy reassigned its public-facing route numbers.[61]: 27 The Harvard–Lechmere route was designated as route 77 (later route 69), Arlington Center–Lechmere as route 80, and the Clarendon Hill–Lechmere routes as 87 (via Somerville Avenue) and 88 (via Highland Avenue).[64] On September 3, 1941, the BERy began paving around the remaining surface car tracks at Lechmere station. This allowed for the conversion of routes 87 and 88 to trackless trolley on November 8, 1941.[61]: 137 The surface tracks at Lechmere station were abandoned, leaving just the loop and yard tracks for subway service.[61]: 104 The BERy opened a 325-space parking lot on the south side of Cambridge Street on April 23, 1941; it was enlarged to 358 spaces in 1950.[65][66]

The Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) replaced the BERy in 1947.[61]: 17 Although MTA management generally favored buses over trackless trolley, bus route 80 was converted to trackless trolley on September 12, 1953.[25]: 8 The MTA began charging for parking at its stations, including Lechmere, on November 2, 1953.[67][68] On November 3, 1961, midday service to Lechmere was replaced with a Haymarket–Lechmere shuttle, with the Commonwealth Avenue and Beacon Street lines cut back to Park Street and North Station while the shuttle was running.[69] The Riverside Line (opened in 1959) was extended from Park Street to Lechmere on November 25, 1961; the Commonwealth Avenue and Beacon Street lines were cut back at all times, while the shuttle was discontinued.[29][70]
On May 25, 1962, the MTA abandoned non-revenue tracks that connected the Canal Street Inline with Everett Shops (the agency's heavy maintenance facility) and Charlestown Neck Carhouse (where many maintenance railcars were stored). A ramp was built inside Lechmere Yard so that streetcars could be loaded onto trucks for transfer to Everett. Some work cars were also stored in Lechmere Yard.[25]: 8 Routes 77, 80, 87, and 88 were all converted from trackless trolley to diesel bus on March 31, 1963.[26]: 201 [25]: 8 In early 1964, the north end of the yard was paved. This allowed buses on routes 80, 87, and 88 to reach the inbound busway directly from Bridge Street, eliminating the jog on Third and Cambridge streets.[25]: 8
MBTA era
[edit]The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) replaced the MTA in August 1964. On August 26, 1965, the MBTA assigned color names to the rapid transit lines, with the Tremont Street Subway-based streetcar lines becoming the Green Line. The western branches were assigned letters A through E in 1967. The Commonwealth Avenue line became the B branch, the Beacon Street line the C branch, and the Riverside Line the D branch.[29] After the 1964 opening of a loop at Government Center, which gave the MBTA four downtown terminals for Green Line branches, the MBTA more frequently switched which lines ran to which downtown terminals to match passenger demands and other operational needs. The C branch was extended to Lechmere on March 25, 1967, joining the D branch. On March 25, 1974, the B branch was extended back to Lechmere and the D branch cut to North Station; for the next decade, the B, C, and D branches frequently were switched between Lechmere and other termini.[29]
The practice of routing inbound buses through Lechmere Yard was ended in the late 1970s, likely when the Boeing LRVs (which were larger and heavier than previous streetcars) began operating on the Green Line.[25]: 8 Around 1980, a new parking lot was opened on the north side of Bridge Street to allow for redevelopment of the old lot.[71] On January 2, 1983, for the first time in the station's history, trains from Huntington Avenue (the E branch) began serving Lechmere. They were extended from Park Street to Lechmere during rush hours and midday, with the D branch cut back to Government Center at those hours.[29] On February 11, 1983, the E branch was shut down by snow for several days; a Government Center–Lechmere shuttle ran in its stead, joined by some D branch service on March 26.[29]
On January 20, 1984, a fire destroyed the wooden approach trestles to the North Station drawbridges. A temporary terminal for the Fitchburg Line and Lowell Line[d] – with a large tent erected next to the tracks as a waiting room – was set up just north of the bridges.[74][e] Riders were bused between the temporary terminal and Lechmere station, with free fares for inbound passengers at Lechmere.[75] All peak Lechmere service was operated as Government Center–Lechmere shuttles to handle the load.[29] North Station reopened on April 20, 1985, with no change to Green Line service.[29][76]
Revenue equipment was stored in Lechmere Yard beginning in December 1984. The ramp, largely disused after heavy maintenance shops at Riverside opened in 1976, was removed in the late 1980s to make room for additional storage tracks.[25]: 8 From December 28, 1985, to July 25, 1986, additional shuttle service ran between Lechmere and Kenmore. (This provided the first direct peak service between Lechmere and much of the subway since January 1984.) Most E branch service resumed to Lechmere on July 26, 1986. The remaining Lechmere–Government Center shuttles were replaced with an extension of D branch service to Lechmere on June 21, 1997.[29] Around 2000, portable lifts were added at Lechmere as a temporary accessibility measure, along with a wooden mini-high platform on the inbound side.[77]
On June 25, 2004, service between Lechmere and North Station was suspended as the Causeway Street Elevated was removed, and the surface and elevated platforms at North Station were consolidated into a new underground "superstation". A Government Center–Lechmere shuttle bus was operated.[29] Unlike during previous bus substitutions, which took place largely during evenings and weekends, bus operations at Lechmere were modified to accommodate the number of shuttle buses needed. The shuttle buses used the inbound busway, while regular bus service used only the outbound busway, with those buses operating in the reverse of the usual direction.[25]: 10 Green Line E branch service to Lechmere resumed on November 12, 2005, with buses returned to their previous routing at the station.[29][78]
Service past North Station was replaced with North Station–Lechmere buses from April 30 to November 4, 2011, as Science Park was rebuilt.[29][79][80] The same bus routings as the 2004–05 closure were used. However, after the station reopened, buses continued to use only the outbound busway. This routing was deemed safer by the MBTA due to the fewer turns, though it was "extremely inconvenient to inbound passengers".[25]: 10

Green Line Extension and new station
[edit]Early proposals
[edit]In June 1922, several weeks before Lechmere station opened, the BERy proposed three new radial subways. One was to run northwest from Lechmere through Somerville and South Medford.[81] In 1924, the BERy indicated that Lechmere was "not fitted to be a permanent transfer station, and while being used as such must fail to satisfy", recommending an extension to a larger transfer station.[82] The Report on Improved Transportation Facilities, published by the Boston Division of Metropolitan Planning in 1926, recommended conversion of the Tremont Street subway to Maverick Square–Warren Street, Brighton and Lechmere Square–Brigham Circle, Roxbury rapid transit routes. Among the secondary priorities was an extension from Lechmere to North Cambridge, with several possible branches; it would have run in a dedicated median in the Northern Artery from Lechmere to Winter Hill, alongside the B&M Southern Division tracks to Somerville Junction, then followed the Fitchburg Cutoff to North Cambridge.[83][84] Variations on this plan were proposed several times during the 1930s, including subway extensions from Haymarket or Bowdoin to replace the Lechmere Viaduct.[85][86]
In 1943, the state legislature appointed a commission headed by Arthur W. Coolidge to plan for the future of transit in the Boston region. The 1945 and 1947 reports from the Coolidge Commission recommended nine suburban rapid transit extensions – most similar to the 1926 plan – along existing railroad lines.[61]: 16 [87][88] The proposed extension from Lechmere to Woburn followed the same alignment as the 1926 plan, albeit using an extended elevated structure rather than a subway north of Lechmere.[87][89] The 1962 North Terminal Area Study, claiming that the 1959 Highland Branch conversion showed that PCC streetcars were inadequate for suburban rapid transit service, recommended that the elevated Lechmere–North Station segment be abandoned. The Main Line (now the Orange Line) was to be relocated along the B&M Western Route with branches to Woburn or Arlington via the Southern Division.[90][f]
The 1966 Program for Mass Transportation, the MBTA's first long-range plan, listed an approximately 1-mile (1.6 km) extension from Lechmere to Washington Street as an immediate priority. A second phase of the project would extend Green Line service from Washington Street to Mystic Valley Parkway (Route 16) or West Medford.[94][83] An extension from Lechmere to Somerville or Medford was listed as low priority in several 1970s and early 1980s due to the addition of Davis station to the Red Line Northwest Extension, which opened in 1984.[83] Plans in 1978 for redevelopment of the Lechmere Canal area called for a new elevated station on the east side of the O'Brien Highway. It was to have a 200-foot (61 m)-wide deck, which included a busway loop for cross-platform transfers to Green Line trains.[95]

In 1980, the MBTA began a study of the "Green Line Northwest Corridor" (from Haymarket to Medford) with three area of focus: replacement of the Causeway Street elevated, replacement of Lechmere station, and extension beyond Lechmere.[96]: 293 An evaluation report for the extension was published in 1981 and updated in 1984. Alternatives recommended for further evaluation included a Green Line extension to Tufts, a Green Line extension to Union Square, and a busway to Tufts and Davis.[97][96]: 308 Later in the 1980s, the MBTA made plans to relocate Lechmere station as a precursor to an extension. A new elevated station would be located at the same site as the 1970s plans, with a new vehicle storage yard and maintenance facility to the north.[96]: 301 The project was not pursued due to lack of available funding.[98]
Planning
[edit]In 1991, the state agreed to build a set of transit projects as part of an agreement with the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF), which had threatened a lawsuit over auto emissions from the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Big Dig). Among these projects was a "Green Line Extension To Ball Square/Tufts University", to be complete by the end of 2011.[99][100][101] In 1999, Guilford Transportation Industries (GTI) proposed to develop 50 acres (20 ha) of disused railroad yards on the east side of Lechmere Square. GTI and the MBTA reached an agreement under which GTI would construct a new Lechmere station and maintenance facility – similar to the late 1980s proposal – as a precursor to the extension project. In return, GTI would receive rights to redevelop the site of the surface station.[102] The deal between the MBTA and GTI was criticized by Cambridge officials for its secrecy, while existing residents were concerned that the relocated station would require a difficult crossing of O'Brien Highway for pedestrians from East Cambridge.[102][103]
After a 2005 lawsuit by the city of Somerville and the CLF, the state began planning of the Green Line Extension (GLX), including a second branch from Lechmere to Union Square.[104] By 2006, plans for the development (NorthPoint) called for a $70 million Lechmere station to open in 2010. The elevated station was to have a half-cylinder glass canopy, with an office building constructed over its northern end. It would initially be named "Lechmere at NorthPoint", though the developer hoped to rename it simply "NorthPoint".[105][106] In 2007, the development stalled due to disagreements between the two firms involved.[107] With the relocated station in jeopardy, the state took over station planning and incorporated it into GLX planning.[108]: 62
Lechmere was a proposed stop on the Urban Ring – a circumferential bus rapid transit line designed to connect the existing radial MBTA rail lines to reduce overcrowding in the downtown stations.[109] Under draft plans released in 2008, the Urban Ring would have approached Lechmere Square from the north on a dedicated bridge over the MBTA Commuter Rail Maintenance Facility, continuing on Morgan Avenue and First Street. Platforms would have been located near Water Street under the relocated Green Line station.[110] The project was cancelled in 2010.[111]
The draft environmental impact report (DEIR) was released in October 2009. Preliminary plans in the DEIR kept the location and arched canopy of the previous design, though without the building above. The main headhouse would be located north of First Street at the north end of the platform, with only secondary egress at the southern end. A one-way southbound busway would run from Water Street to First Street, and two parking lots would replace the existing lot.[108]: 47 [112] The final environmental impact report was released in July 2010. Changes from the DEIR included a redesigned headhouse, a reduction in the platform length from 450 feet (140 m) to 225 feet (69 m), fewer parking spaces, and realignment of the busway into a loop accessed from Water Street.[113]
In July 2010, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) announced that the project was delayed to October 2015.[114] In November 2010, the MBTA reached an agreement with Pan Am Railways (formerly GTI) and the NorthPoint developers under which the MBTA would receive property on the east side of O'Brien Highway needed for the new Lechmere station; in return, Pan Am would receive the existing Lechmere station site for redevelopment. The agreement, which also included MBTA trackage rights on the Worcester Branch and in New Hampshire, was amended in January 2011 and finalized that March.[115][116] By June 2011, the planned arched canopy over the platform and tracks had been replaced with a simpler canopy over the platform.[117] Wind shields on the platform were added to the design later that year.[118] An additional delay, with service beginning between late 2018 and 2020, was announced in August 2011.[119]
The City of Somerville, MassDOT, and the MBTA reached an agreement in August 2012 to open the Union Square Branch and Lechmere station by early 2017, with construction to begin in 2014.[120][121] In September 2013, MassDOT awarded a $393 million (equivalent to $520 million in 2024), 51-month contract for the construction of Phase 2/2A – Lechmere station, the Union Square Branch, and the first segment of the Medford Branch to Washington Street station – with the stations to open in early 2017.[122][123] Updated plans presented in June 2013 replaced the secondary egress with a second headhouse south of East Street. The platform was extended back to 450 feet, and the parking was moved to the north to allow development adjacent to the station.[124][125] Design of the station was completed in late 2014.[126]
Redesign
[edit]In August 2015, the MBTA disclosed that project costs had increased substantially, with Phase 2A rising from $387 million to $898 million.[127] This triggered a wholesale re-evaluation of the GLX project. In December 2015, the MBTA ended its contracts with four firms. Construction work in progress continued, but no new contracts were awarded.[128] At that time, cancellation of the project was considered possible, as were elimination of the Union Square Branch and other cost reduction measures.[129][130] In May 2016, the MassDOT and MBTA boards approved a modified project that had undergone value engineering to reduce its cost. Stations were simplified to resemble D branch surface stations rather than full rapid transit stations, with canopies, faregates, escalators, and some elevators removed. Lechmere station retained its redundant elevators due to the elevation of the platform, but escalators were removed. The platform canopy was replaced with four bus-stop-style shelters.[131][132]
In December 2016, the MBTA announced a new planned opening date of 2021 for the extension.[133] A design-build contract for the GLX was awarded in November 2017.[134] The winning proposal included six additive options – elements removed during value engineering – including full-length canopies at all stations, as well as a second elevator in the north headhouse at Lechmere.[135][4][136] Station design advanced from 10% in March 2018 to 76% that December and to 100% in October 2019.[137][2] The 100% design added a second entrance to the north headhouse, providing direct access both from the busway and North First Street.[138][2][139] The platform length was set at 355 feet (108 m), between the previous planned lengths. Unlike the pre-2015 designs, no parking lot was included.[2]
Construction and opening
[edit]
Early GLX work included the demolition of a disused MBTA facility at 21 Water Street to make room for the new Lechmere station. Notice to proceed for the early work was issued to Barletta Heavy Division on January 31, 2013, and construction started in March.[140][141] The 21 Water Street facility was demolished in August 2014.[142] The 369-space parking lot at Lechmere was closed on June 22, 2017, for construction preparation.[143][144]
A groundbreaking ceremony for the main GLX construction phase was held on June 25, 2018.[145] Construction began in mid-2019.[2] Work at Lechmere station started by September 2019; the concrete pillars for the viaduct were poured later that year, while installation of the beams supporting the trackways and platform began in January 2020.[146][147][148] Installation of the beams through the station was completed in April 2020.[149]
The project required a temporary service suspension while the elevated structure to the old station was replaced with the new viaduct. The final day of service to the old station was May 23, 2020, with the final revenue trip leaving early in the morning of the 24th. Demolition of the old elevated structure began within hours.[25]: 13 A bus shuttle between Lechmere and North Station – with dedicated bus lanes on the Charles River Dam Bridge – began on May 24, 2020. (The bus shuttle used the west busway at the former station, while local bus routes continued to use the east busway.) At that time, service was expected to resume in April 2021.[150] After removal of the tracks, the former yard area was repurposed for construction employee parking.[25]: 13
Station construction was "well underway" by early August 2020, with the headhouse shells partially built; the platform was poured around August 10.[151] The elevator towers for the north headhouse were erected in October 2020, followed by the tower for the south headhouse in November.[152] Steelwork for the canopy, the artwork on the elevator shafts, and a signal instrument house were installed in March and April 2021.[153][154] The bus loop was under construction by June 2021, with the plaza under the station nearly complete, and the canopy roof was installed that month.[155][156] Train testing between for Lechmere and the Union Square Branch began in December 2021.[157]
By March 2021, the station was expected to open in October 2021.[158] This was delayed in June 2021 to a December 2021 opening, then again in October 2021 to a March 2022 opening.[159][160] On February 24, 2022, the MBTA announced that Lechmere and the Union Square Branch would open on March 21, 2022, while the Medford Branch would open in "late summer". Initial Union Square service was operated by the E branch.[161] In August 2022, the MBTA indicated that the Medford Branch opening was delayed to November 2022. The Green Line between Union Square and Government Center was closed from August 22 to September 18, 2022; the closure allowed for final integration of the Medford Branch, elimination of a speed restriction on the Lechmere Viaduct, and other work.[162] At the conclusion of the closure, the D branch was extended to Union Square, replacing the E. Medford Branch service began on December 12, 2022.[163]
-
Demolition of 21 Water Street in August 2014
-
Steel work in February 2020
-
Station construction in May 2020
-
Shuttle buses at Lechmere in August 2021
-
Station construction in September 2021
References
[edit]- ^ "A Guide to Ridership Data". MassDOT/MBTA Office of Performance Management and Innovation. June 22, 2020. p. 9.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Public meeting boards". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 19, 2019.
- ^ "Execution Version: Volume 2: Technical Provisions" (PDF). MBTA Contract No. E22CN07: Green Line Extension Design Build Project. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 11, 2017.
- ^ a b "GLX Program Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 20, 2017.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group Monthly Meeting #39". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. February 2, 2021.
- ^ a b Harlow, Alvin Fay (1946). Steelways of New England. Creative Age Press. pp. 92–93.
- ^ a b Knight, Ellen (2021). "The Evolution of Winchester's Four Railroad Depots". Town of Winchester.
- ^ Dickinson, S.N. (1847). The Boston almanac for the year 1847. B.B. Mussey and Thomas Groom. p. 134 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b c "Judges, Lawyers, Criminals Have Tramped in and Out of This Station". Boston Daily Globe. April 30, 1905. p. 60 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Walling, Henry Francis (1854). "Map of the city of Cambridge, Middlesex County, Massachusetts". George L. Dix.
- ^ Chase, J.G. (1865). "Map of the City of Cambridge for 1865". John Henry Bufford.
- ^ Humphrey, Thomas J.; Clark, Norton D. (1985). Boston's Commuter Rail: The First 150 Years. Boston Street Railway Association. p. 55. ISBN 9780685412947.
- ^ Karr, Ronald Dale (2017). The Rail Lines of Southern New England (2 ed.). Branch Line Press. p. 278. ISBN 9780942147124.
- ^ McIntyre, Henry (1852), Map of the city of Boston and immediate neighborhood : from original surveys – via Wikimedia Commons
- ^ Chase, J.G. (1865). "Map of the City of Cambridge for 1865". John Henry Bufford – via Ward Maps.
- ^ ABC Pathfinder Railway Guide. New England Railway Publishing Company. 1858. p. 16 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Protest Giving Up Three Stations". Boston Daily Globe. November 10, 1926. p. 14 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Oppose B. & M. Abandonment". Boston Daily Globe. January 11, 1927. p. 10 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Oppose Closing East Cambridge Station". The Boston Globe. January 12, 1927. p. 8 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Five B. & M. Stations Will Be Abandoned". Boston Daily Globe. March 16, 1927 – via Newspapers.com. (second page)
- ^ "New Boston & Maine Line to be Used Sunday". Boston Globe. May 17, 1927. p. 8 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Daly, John J. "Boston and Lowell Railroad Retaining Wall". Massachusetts Historical Commission – via Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System.
- ^ "[Untitled]". Boston Evening Transcript. August 3, 1860. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Cambridge Horse Railroad". Boston Evening Transcript. August 11, 1860. p. 2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Clarke, Bradley H. (May 2020). "Lechmere Station – The End of the End". Rollsign. Vol. 57, no. 5/6. Boston Street Railway Association.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Humphrey, Thomas J. (August 2020). "Origin and Development of the Fixed-Route Local Bus Transportation Network in the Cities and Towns of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority District as of December 31, 1973: Revised Edition" (PDF). NETransit.
- ^ Russell, Benjamin B. (May 1862). Russell's horse railroad guide for Boston and vicinity. [Boston] Benj. B. Russell. pp. 9, 10 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ a b c Clarke, Bradley H.; Cummings, O.R. (1997). Tremont Street Subway: A Century of Public Service. Boston Street Railway Association. ISBN 0938315048 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Belcher, Jonathan. "Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district" (PDF). Boston Street Railway Association.
- ^ "New Line to Marine Park". Boston Globe. June 12, 1914. p. 15 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Bromley, George W.; Bromley, Walter S. (1916). "Plate 11". Atlas of the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts : from actual surveys and official plans. G.W. Bromley & Co.
- ^ Beeler, John A. (November 1917). Report on the Methods and Practices of the Boston Elevated Railway Company, Boston, Massachusetts, to the Public Service Commission, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. p. 87. hdl:2027/hvd.hb0kzy.
- ^ a b "Dana Outlines New Elevated Plan". Boston Globe. June 26, 1922. p. 10 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "For Braves Field and Lechmere Sq". Boston Globe. September 2, 1921. p. 16 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Hearing on Proposed "L" Station at Lechmere Sq". Boston Globe. September 27, 1921. p. 7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Cambridge to Seek to Enjoin Elevated". Boston Globe. November 16, 1921. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ ""L" Wins Fight on Lechmere Station". Boston Globe. November 4, 1921. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Elevated Officials at the New Lechmere-Sq Terminal". Boston Globe. April 14, 1922. p. 23 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Elevated Given Two Streets". Boston Globe. May 20, 1922. p. 8 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b c d "New Lechmere Sq Transfer Station, Open for L Traffic". Boston Globe. July 10, 1922. p. 9 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "How Boston Will Spend Her Four Million". Electric Railway Journal. Vol. 59, no. 13. April 1, 1922. p. 583.
- ^ "More Rapid Transit". Co-operation. Vol. 1, no. 6. Boston Elevated Railway. June 1922.
- ^ "Somerville". Boston Globe. March 30, 1923. p. 8 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Large Gains Shown by Elevated Road". Boston Globe. December 17, 1922. p. 7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Lechmere-Kenmore Train Service All Day". Boston Globe. October 5, 1923. p. 10 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Added "L" Service on Beacon-St Line". Boston Globe. December 13, 1929. p. 19 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Several Changes in "L" Service Effective Today". Boston Globe. June 7, 1930. p. 9 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Crash of Trolleys Blocks Governor Sq". Boston Globe. July 25, 1930. p. 8 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Chasson, George Jr. (1987). Lonto, Arthur J. (ed.). "Boston's Main Line El: The Formative Years 1879-1908". Headlights. 49. Electric Railroader's Association: 25–26.
- ^ "Lake St, Reservoir, to Lechmere trains". Boston Globe. February 5, 1931. p. 7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Annual Report of the Public Trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway for the Year Ending December 31, 1923. Boston Elevated Railway. 1924. p. 10 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Annual Report of the Public Trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway for the Year Ending December 31, 1924. Boston Elevated Railway. 1925. p. 10 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ ""L" Asks for Right to Rawding Lines". Boston Globe. April 25, 1930. p. 2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "New Nightly Car–Bus Service to Brighton". Boston Globe. May 3, 1930. p. 7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "A Decade of the Bus on the "El": Part II: Bus Routes of the Last Five Years". Co-operation. Vol. 11, no. 8. Boston Elevated Railway. August 1932. p. 124.
- ^ "Busway Through Lechmere Square". Co-operation. Vol. 11, no. 6. Boston Elevated Railway. June 1932. p. 85.
- ^ Fourteenth Annual Report of the Public Trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway for the Year Ended December 31, 1932. Boston Elevated Railway. 1933. pp. 13, 17 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ "A Long Bus Route". Co-operation. Vol. 11, no. 7. Boston Elevated Railway. July 1932. pp. 103–104.
- ^ "A Decade of the Bus on the "El": Part VI: Facilities for Passenger Interchange Between Motor Coaches and Rail Lines". Co-operation. Vol. 12, no. 3. Boston Elevated Railway. July 1933. p. 37.
- ^ "El Tries Out New Trolleys". Boston Globe. April 11, 1936. p. 9 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Clarke, Bradley H. (2003). Streetcar Lines of the Hub - The 1940s. Boston Street Railway Association. ISBN 0938315056.
- ^ Architectural Preservation Associates (April 1984). "Form F – Structure". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – via Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System.
- ^ "Sheet 16". Boston Elevated Railway Track Lengths of Surface Lines and Subway. Boston Elevated Railway. December 31, 1936 – via Boston in Transit.
- ^ Lufkin, Richard F. (1942), Boston Elevated Railway System Route Map, Boston Elevated Railway – via Wikimedia Commons
- ^ Twenty-third Annual Report of the Public Trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway: Year Ended December 31, 1941. Boston Elevated Railway. 1942. p. 24.
- ^ Fourth Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Transit Authority. Metropolitan Transit Authority. 1950. p. 10.
- ^ "Parks Fill M.T.A. Lots Despite Fee". The Boston Globe. November 2, 1953. pp. 1, 7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Seventh Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Transit Authority. Metropolitan Transit Authority. 1954. pp. 5, 6.
- ^ "M.T.A. Shuttle To Lechmere". Boston Globe. November 7, 1961. p. 12 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "M.T.A. to Change Service on 4 Lines". Boston Globe. November 16, 1961. p. 50 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Annual Report 1981. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 1981. p. 28.
- ^ Chinlund, Chris (January 27, 1984). "MBTA revising commuting pattern for passengers from north of Boston". Boston Globe. pp. 17, 19 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "MBTA reroutes commuters". Boston Globe. February 16, 1984. p. 39 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Under the Big Top". Boston Globe. January 25, 1984. p. 56 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Langner, Paul (January 23, 1984). "What's in store for B&M riders". Boston Globe. pp. 17, 18 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Crocket, Douglas S. (April 21, 1985). "T rail service resumes at North Station". Boston Globe. pp. 29, 30 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Executive Summary" (PDF). Program of Mass Transportation. Boston Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization. January 2004. p. 2-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 20, 2012.
- ^ "Effective Saturday, November 12th, Green Line Service To Lechmere and Science Park Stations To Resume" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 4, 2005.
- ^ "Science Park/West End Improvement Project". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Archived from the original on January 5, 2012.
- ^ "Trolley service to resume as project ends". Boston Globe. November 3, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2022.
- ^ "Three New Subways Planned". Boston Globe. June 25, 1922. p. 71 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Annual Report of the Public Trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway for the Year ending December 31, 1923. Boston Elevated Railway. 1924. p. 14.
- ^ a b c Central Transportation Planning Staff (November 15, 1993). "The Transportation Plan for the Boston Region - Volume 2". National Transportation Library. Archived from the original on May 5, 2001.
- ^ Report on Improved Transportation Facilities in Boston. Division of Metropolitan Planning. December 1926. pp. 6, 7, 34, 35. hdl:2027/mdp.39015049422689.
- ^ "Rapid Transit Project Urged". Boston Globe. February 27, 1935. p. 28 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Rapid Transit Line Proposed from Boston to Arlington". Boston Globe. December 29, 1938. p. 5 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b Boston Elevated Railway; Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (April 1945), Air View: Present Rapid Transit System – Boston Elevated Railway and Proposed Extensions of Rapid Transit into Suburban Boston – via Wikimedia Commons
- ^ Lyons, Louis M. (April 29, 1945). "El on Railroad Lines Unified Transit Plan". Boston Globe. pp. 1, 14 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Metropolitan Transit Recess Commission (April 1, 1947). Report of the Metropolitan Transit Recess Commission. Commonwealth of Massachusetts – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Barton-Aschman Associates (August 1962). North Terminal Area Study. pp. 51, 59–61 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ "New Bus Routes Asked by MTA in E. Cambridge". Boston Globe. April 20, 1962. p. 2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "At the State House: House Votes to Bar MTA Lechmere Cut". Boston Globe. April 19, 1962. p. 35 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Lechmere Station Closing Deferred". Boston Globe. May 29, 1962. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ A Comprehensive Development Program for Public Transportation in the Massachusetts Bay Area. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 1966. pp. V-20 – V-23 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ City of Cambridge, Community Development Department (1979). Environmental Impact Statement/Report: Lechmere Canal and Triangle Area Development Project. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. p. 43.
- ^ a b c McCarthy, James D. (1988). "Boston's Light Rail Transit Prepares for the Next Hundred Years" (PDF). Special Report 221: Light Rail Transit: New System Successes at Affordable Prices. Transportation Research Board: 286–308. ISSN 0360-859X.
- ^ "Beyond Lechmere Northwest Corridor Project Project History" (PDF). Somerville Transportation Equity Partnership. June 3, 2004.
- ^ Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc (August 2005). "Introduction" (PDF). Beyond Lechmere Northwest Corridor Study: Major Investment Study/Alternatives Analysis. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ United States Environmental Protection Agency (October 4, 1994). "Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Massachusetts—Amendment to Massachusetts' SIP (for Ozone and for Carbon Monoxide) for Transit Systems Improvements and High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District)". Federal Register. 59 FR 50498.
- ^ Palmer, Thomas C. Jr. (September 13, 1994). "Commitments to foes raise Artery price tag". The Boston Globe. pp. 1, 6 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Howe, Peter J. (January 9, 1991). "Agency: Artery pact will cost $4b". The Boston Globe. p. 18 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b Howe, Peter J. (August 3, 1999). "Lechmere development plan drawing fire". Boston Globe. p. 39 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Flint, Anthony (November 18, 2001). "Cambridge neighbors cool to $1.2b building plan". Boston Globe. pp. B1, B7 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Daniel, Mac (May 19, 2005). "$770m transit plans announced". Boston Globe. pp. B1, B4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Public Transportation". NorthPoint. Spaulding & Slye. 2006. Archived from the original on June 23, 2006.
- ^ Palmer, Thomas C. Jr. (October 23, 2006). "The train comes to NorthPoint". Boston Globe. pp. E1, E4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Palmer, Thomas C. Jr. (July 25, 2007). "Feuding owners aim to sell NorthPoint". Boston Globe. pp. D1, D4 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b "Chapter 3: Alternatives" (PDF). Green Line Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement. Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works; Federal Transit Administration. October 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ "Urban Ring Phase 2 Fact Sheet" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. January 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 8, 2011.
- ^ "The Urban Ring Phase 2: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement" (PDF). Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation. November 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 14, 2017.
- ^ Mullan, Jeffery B. (January 22, 2010). "Re: Urban Ring Phase 2, EOEEA #12565" (PDF). Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs.
- ^ "Chapter 3: Alternatives" (PDF). Green Line Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement. Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works; Federal Transit Administration. October 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016. Figures 3.7-2, 3.7-3, 3.7-4, and 3.7-5.
- ^ "Chapter 5: Lechmere Station" (PDF). Green Line Extension Project Final Environmental Impact Report. Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works; Federal Transit Administration. June 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016. See also Figure 5.1
- ^ Moskowitz, Eric (July 11, 2010). "Starts and Stops: Long-awaited Green Line extension to Somerville, Medford delayed again". Boston Globe. p. B2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Amended and Restated Development and Land Exchange Agreement" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. January 4, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ "New Lechmere Station Spurs Development" (Press release). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. March 3, 2011. Archived from the original on October 20, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2022.
- ^ "Station Design Workshop: Lechmere Station" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. June 29, 2011. p. 23. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ Arpino-Shaffer, Karen; Johnson, Beverly (December 20, 2011). "Lechmere Station Meeting – Kennedy/Longfellow School, Somerville, 158 Spring Street, Cambridge, MA – December 14, 2011" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ Byrne, Matt (August 2, 2011). "Green Line extension put off until 2018". Boston Globe. p. B2 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "City, MassDOT, MBTA Sign Pact on Green Line Station Development for Union Square" (Press release). City of Somerville. August 9, 2012.
- ^ Byrne, Matt (August 9, 2012). "Union Square site for T station". Boston Globe. p. NO3 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Orchard, Chris (September 25, 2013). "$393 Million Approved to Bring Green Line to Union Square, Washington Street". Somerville Patch. Retrieved September 26, 2013.
- ^ "State approves $393m for three new stations on Green Line". The Boston Globe. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013.
- ^ "Lechmere Station" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. June 18, 2013. pp. 21, 24. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ "Public Meeting – Summary Minutes" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. June 18, 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ "Lechmere Station" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. October 28, 2014. p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ Metzger, Andy (August 24, 2015). "Ballooning Cost Throws Future Of Green Line Extension Into Question". WBUR.
- ^ Conway, Abby Elizabeth (December 10, 2015). "MBTA Ending Several Contracts Associated With Green Line Extension Project". WBUR.
- ^ Conway, Abby Elizabeth (December 9, 2015). "Axing Green Line Extension Still On The Table, Pollack Says". WBUR.
- ^ Arup (December 9, 2015). "Cost Reduction Opportunities" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Agency.
- ^ Interim Project Management Team Report: Green Line Extension Project (PDF). MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board and the MassDOT Board of Directors. May 9, 2016. pp. 5, 44.
- ^ Dungca, Nicole (May 10, 2016). "State OK's a cut-down Green Line extension". Boston Globe. pp. A1, A9 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Dungca, Nicole (December 7, 2016). "New Green Line stations are delayed until 2021". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 9, 2016.
- ^ Vaccaro, Adam (November 20, 2017). "Green Line extension contract officially approved". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on January 24, 2018.
- ^ Jessen, Klark (November 17, 2017). "Green Line Extension Project Design-Build Team Firm Selected" (Press release). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022.
- ^ Response to the Request for Proposal for the Green Line Extension Design Build Project (PDF). GLX Constructors. September 2017. (Volume 2)
- ^ "GLX Project Open House". Massachusetts Department of Transportation. January 30, 2019. p. 14.
- ^ "Lechmere Station Information and Design". Massachusetts Department of Transportation. January 30, 2019.
- ^ "November 5, 2019 Community Working Group Meeting – Summary Minutes". Massachusetts Department of Transportation. November 5, 2019. p. 1.
- ^ "Green Line Extension Phase 1 Early Bridge & Demolition Public Meeting" (PDF). Massachusetts Department of Transportation. March 5, 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 5, 2016.
- ^ "MBTA gets set to lay tracks". The Somerville News. March 20, 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2013.
- ^ MassDOT (August 25, 2014). "2014_08_25 MBTA Building at 21 Water St in Cambridge Demolition_2". Massachusetts Department of Transportation – via Flickr.
- ^ Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority [@MBTA] (June 19, 2017). "Parking Lot at Lechmere will permanently close at ~6p this Thurs. 6/22 due to the #GreenLine Extension Project http://bit.ly/1uLsT2A #MBTA" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ Hicks, Ryan (December 17, 2020). "2017–18 Inventory of Park-and-Ride Lots at MBTA Facilities" (PDF). Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. p. 5.
- ^ "Officials Break Ground On Green Line Extension". WBUR. June 25, 2018. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. September 3, 2019. p. 15.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 5, 2019. p. 38.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. January 7, 2020. p. 12.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. May 5, 2020. p. 9.
- ^ "GLX Update: MBTA Announced Dedicated Bus Lanes Slated for Charles River Dam Road" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. April 15, 2020.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group Monthly Meeting: August 4, 2020". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. August 4, 2020.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting #36". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. November 3, 2020. p. 16.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting #41". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. April 6, 2021. pp. 19, 21.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting #42". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. May 4, 2021. pp. 11–13.
- ^ Wagner, Jeff (June 1, 2021). "GLXC Construction Update". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 25.
- ^ "GLX Community Working Group: Monthly Meeting #44". Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. July 6, 2021. p. 13.
- ^ "Test Trains Now Running on the Green Line Extension" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. December 23, 2021.
- ^ "Report from the General Manager" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. March 29, 2021. p. 20.
- ^ DeCosta-Klipa, Nik (October 21, 2021). "The opening of the first Green Line Extension branch has been delayed — again". Boston Globe.
- ^ Dalton, John (June 21, 2021). "Green Line Extension Update" (PDF). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. p. 19.
- ^ Lisinski, Chris (February 24, 2022). "Green Line Extension service to begin March 21". WBUR. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
- ^ "Building A Better T: GLX Medford Branch to Open in Late November 2022; Shuttle Buses to Replace Green Line Service for Four Weeks between Government Center and Union Square beginning August 22" (Press release). Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. August 5, 2022.
- ^ Lisinski, Chris (November 17, 2022). "Final stretch of Green Line Extension will open Dec. 12". WBUR. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
Notes
[edit]- ^ Also originally called East Cambridge Gates.[7] "Gates", which was a suffix for several B&L stations, denoted the crossing gates at the grade crossing of the Prison Point Bridge.[6]
- ^ By 1922, the western terminal proposal had been relocated to Linden Street in Allston.[33] It was never built due to public objection.[28]: 59
- ^ A night bus route between Central Square and Scollay Square via Lechmere Square began on May 4, 1930.[53][54] The route ran on Cambridge Street and did not enter Lechmere station.[55]
- ^ The Ipswich/Rockport Line originally used this terminal as well. However, it switched to a platform at Sullivan Square station on the Orange Line several weeks later to ease congestion on the Green Line.[72] The Merrimack Valley Line initially terminated at Malden Center, then at Oak Grove after February 15, and never used the temporary terminal.[73]
- ^ The Lynch Family Skatepark now occupies this site.
- ^ The MTA proposed to close Lechmere on weekends beginning June 23, 1962, but this was cancelled after opposition from the state legislature.[91][92][93]
External links
[edit]Lechmere station
View on GrokipediaStation Design and Features
Architectural and Structural Elements
The new Lechmere station consists of an elevated island platform supported by a modern concrete viaduct spanning O'Brien Highway (Massachusetts Route 28).[6] This viaduct structure transitions southward to connect with the historic Lechmere Viaduct, facilitating the extension of Green Line service.[6] The platform features a full-length canopy constructed from simple grey structural elements, providing overhead protection along most of its extent but excluding the end areas adjacent to entrances.[6] Access to the elevated platform is achieved via dedicated headhouses and concourse areas, which incorporate a unified design language to integrate with the surrounding urban environment and connect to nearby vehicular bridges.[7] The northern headhouse provides entry through a staircase and two elevators to First Street, with gated access points and proximity to an integrated bus loop on Water Street.[6] The southern entrance includes a single staircase and elevator on the south side of East Street, accompanied by a bicycle parking facility designated as Pedal and Park.[6] Supporting infrastructure enhancements include carbon fiber wrapping applied to reinforce the 12 spans of the connected viaduct, enhancing structural integrity to accommodate increased loads and train frequencies while preserving original aesthetics.[8] Artistic integrations, such as laminated glass panels displaying "Field Notes" by artist Randal Thurston on elevator shafts and platform surfaces, add visual elements to the concrete and steel framework.[6]Platform and Accessibility Improvements
The relocated Lechmere station, opened on March 21, 2022, features a single elevated island platform serving inbound and outbound Green Line trains, elevated on a viaduct over O'Brien Highway. This configuration supports level boarding with low-floor vehicles, reducing the step gap to approximately 3 inches and improving efficiency for all passengers.[2][9] Accessibility enhancements include elevators within north and south headhouses connecting street level to the platform, ensuring compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for vertical circulation. Ramps, tactile edge strips, and high-contrast paving further aid navigation for visually impaired users and those with mobility challenges.[2][9] These improvements addressed limitations of the prior ground-level station, which depended on portable lifts added around 2000 and lacked full ADA accessibility. The elevated design integrates with the Green Line Extension's goal of providing six fully accessible stations, enhancing equitable transit access in the North Point area.[2][10]Integration with Surrounding Infrastructure
The relocated Lechmere station occupies an elevated structure east of Monsignor O'Brien Highway (Massachusetts Route 28) near the intersection with First Street, positioned adjacent to the NorthPoint mixed-use development in East Cambridge.[11] This placement facilitates direct access from surrounding residential, commercial, and industrial areas, with the station's design incorporating three ground-level headhouses at 19 Water Street, 1 North First Street, and 1 East Street to connect pedestrians from key approach roads.[11] Integration with bus services centers on a dedicated loop north of the Water Street headhouse, allowing transfers to MBTA routes such as the 69, 80, 87, and 88, which provide local connectivity to neighborhoods in Cambridge, Somerville, and Arlington.[11] During construction and transitional periods, temporary shuttle buses utilized exclusive lanes on Route 28 to maintain service links to North Station.[11] Pedestrian safety enhancements include signalized crossings with audible pedestrian signals and median refuges at Water Street, North First Street, and East Street, bridging O'Brien Highway to improved street connections like the reconstructed Cambridge Street linkage opened on June 12, 2023.[11] Bicycle infrastructure ties into the Somerville Community Path extension, a shared-use trail operational since June 10, 2023, that links the station to North Point, Cambridge Crossing, and broader networks extending toward Bedford, promoting multimodal access while reducing reliance on adjacent roadways.[11][2] The station also features an on-site bike facility between headhouses to support commuter cycling.[12]Historical Development
Origins as East Cambridge Station
The origins of what became Lechmere station lie in the East Cambridge station, an early stop on the Boston and Lowell Railroad (B&L) that provided passenger rail service to the East Cambridge neighborhood. The B&L completed construction of its 26-mile line from Boston to Lowell and initiated passenger operations on June 24, 1835, marking the first rail access to the area along the route through East Cambridge near the Millers River banks.[13][14] This line facilitated transport of passengers and freight, supporting industrial growth in East Cambridge by connecting it to Boston and beyond.[15] East Cambridge station emerged as one of the intermediate stops on the B&L mainline, with evidence of its infrastructure documented by at least the early 1900s. A 1905 photograph shows a two-story wooden depot typical of period commuter rail facilities, underscoring its role in local commuting before the dominance of street railways. Timetables from 1906 confirm regular service, with the station handling arrivals and departures amid the B&L's integration into the Boston and Maine Railroad (B&M) system by the late 19th century.[16] The station's operations reflected the era's rail-centric transport, but faced pressures from competing streetcar lines and urban expansion. Passenger service at East Cambridge ended with its closure in early 1927, as part of B&M efforts to rationalize stops and reduce unprofitable facilities, amid local opposition reported in contemporary accounts. This closure preceded the opening of the nearby Lechmere Square transfer station in July 1922 for streetcar and elevated services, shifting the site's transit focus from commuter rail to urban rapid transit. The original rail alignment influenced subsequent developments, including the Lechmere Viaduct opened in 1912 to link East Cambridge across the Charles River.Establishment of Surface Operations (1922)
The Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) opened the Lechmere Square transfer station on July 10, 1922, establishing surface operations as a dedicated prepayment terminal in East Cambridge to separate local streetcar services from subway routes entering the Tremont Street tunnel.[17] This configuration addressed chronic scheduling disruptions where delays on surface lines propagated into the rapid transit system, enabling passengers to prepay fares and transfer efficiently without impeding tunnel operations.[18] The facility spanned approximately two acres at a construction cost of about $1,000,000, reflecting BERy's modernization efforts amid growing ridership demands in the early 20th century.[19] Surface operations centered on a loop track layout for streetcars originating from the elevated structure, facilitating cross-platform transfers to terminating lines from northwest routes such as Harvard Square and Clarendon Hill.[20] Local streetcars from Cambridge and surrounding areas ended at dedicated platforms, while subway-bound vehicles bypassed these to maintain schedule adherence, with a large gong signaling departures on the inaugural day.[21] Wooden canopies provided shelter over tracks, and the design prioritized pedestrian flow across multiple streetcar lines under BERy management.[22] This terminal served as the endpoint for what would become the Green Line's northern extension, handling peak-hour volumes that underscored the shift toward integrated urban transit hubs.[23]Mid-Century Modifications and Service Shifts
During the mid-20th century, Lechmere station saw primarily service-oriented adjustments rather than extensive structural overhauls, reflecting broader transitions in Boston's transit system from the Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) to the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) in 1947 and then to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) in 1964, which rebranded the light rail network as the Green Line.[24] The terminal continued to function as a key transfer point for streetcars terminating via the Lechmere Viaduct, with PCC cars forming the backbone of Green Line operations through the 1950s and into the 1960s, alongside trackless trolleys on feeder routes until their phase-out.[25] A significant infrastructural addition impacting service flow occurred in August 1955 with the opening of Science Park station on the viaduct between North Station and Lechmere, introducing an intermediate stop that facilitated access to the Massachusetts General Hospital complex and slightly redistributed passenger loads at the terminal.[25] This did not alter Lechmere's core layout but enhanced connectivity along the corridor. Service shifts emphasized conversions from electric to diesel vehicles on connecting routes, reducing reliance on overhead wiring at the station. Route 69 saw weekend service switched to buses in June 1958, with full conversion by March 1963; Route 80 followed in March 1962; and trackless trolley operations on Routes 81, 87, and 89 ended in March 1963, all terminating or transferring at Lechmere.[25] These changes streamlined bus integrations but diminished the multimodal electric character of the terminal, as captured in period imagery showing PCC streetcars and trackless trolleys coexisting in 1960. Additionally, the June 1960 discontinuation of the Haymarket-Central Square owl bus via Lechmere marked the end of late-night supplemental service.[25] Green Line branch routings to Lechmere also evolved amid systemwide pressures. In November 1961, Cleveland Circle and Boston College lines (precursors to modern B branch configurations) were temporarily cut back from Lechmere extensions, reflecting operational efficiencies or disruptions.[25] By December 1966, the Riverside line was redesignated as the D branch serving Lechmere, formalized in 1968, solidifying its role as a primary terminus while other branches adjusted frequencies or endpoints.[25] These shifts prioritized reliability over expansive terminal operations, aligning with the MTA/MBTA's focus on core rapid transit amid declining streetcar patronage elsewhere in the region.MBTA Era and Pre-Extension Upgrades
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) assumed operational control of the regional transit system, including Lechmere station, on August 3, 1964, succeeding the Metropolitan Transit Authority which had managed the facility since acquiring the Boston Elevated Railway's assets in 1947. Under MBTA oversight, Lechmere continued as the surface-level terminus for Green Line light rail service, primarily serving the E branch to Heath Street in Boston's Jamaica Plain neighborhood, with inbound and outbound operations utilizing the existing loop tracks and platforms established in 1922.[25] Service patterns evolved with systemwide shifts, including the phase-out of PCC streetcars by the late 1950s (predating full MBTA control) and introduction of Boeing Vertical Intermediate Capacity Transit Vehicles (Type 5 LRVs) in the 1970s, followed by Type 7 and Type 8 cars for improved reliability on the branch.[25] Routine maintenance addressed wear on the aging infrastructure, but the station saw limited structural modifications through the late 20th century, maintaining its role as a key transfer point for local bus routes amid growing ridership in East Cambridge's industrial and residential areas. By the 2000s, as planning for the Green Line Extension advanced, focus shifted to preparatory enhancements rather than overhauls of the terminal itself, which remained incompatible with modern accessibility standards and extension alignments. Busway facilities were expanded incrementally to accommodate transfers, supporting integration with routes like the 69 Harvard-Lechmere and others extended through the station.[25] A significant pre-extension upgrade targeted the Lechmere Viaduct, the elevated structure spanning the Charles River and approaching the station from Science Park. Contracted in December 2019 with a $87.4 million budget, the rehabilitation reinforced all 12 spans using carbon fiber wrapping for enhanced structural integrity, renewed over 3,500 feet of track and 70,000 feet of signaling, replaced the overhead catenary system, and incorporated accessibility improvements to accommodate heavier loads and higher train frequencies required for the extension.[8] The project reached substantial completion on March 16, 2022, enabling seamless integration with the relocated station.[26] These works extended the viaduct's service life, originally dating to 1912, while preparing the corridor for expanded operations without disrupting ongoing planning for the station's relocation.[27] In advance of Green Line Extension construction, rail service at Lechmere ceased on May 24, 2020, with shuttle buses substituting for trains between the station and North Station to minimize impacts during viaduct and track works. Bus transfer areas at the existing terminal persisted as a hub for replacement service and local routes until the extension's partial opening.[28]Green Line Extension Project
Early Proposals and Planning Phase
Proposals to extend the MBTA Green Line northward from Lechmere station emerged in the 1970s, driven by planners' recognition of the line's asymmetrical configuration, which terminated at Lechmere while other branches reached further into suburban areas.[29] In the late 1980s, the MBTA's Program for Mass Transportation, a series of 10-year investment plans, incorporated extensions from Lechmere to locations such as Ball Square in Arlington, emphasizing integration with existing commuter rail rights-of-way.[29] The project gained momentum in 1990 when state officials announced the Boston 2020 mass-transit plan, which included the Green Line extension as a mitigation measure for environmental impacts from the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Big Dig).[30][31] However, funding shortfalls from Big Dig cost overruns led to the initiative's suspension in the mid-1990s, delaying substantive progress until the mid-2000s.[31] Planning resumed around 2005, with formal environmental review and stakeholder engagement intensifying by 2007 through the establishment of the Green Line Extension Advisory Group, comprising civic organizations, advocates, and local representatives to refine alignment options and station placements, including the relocation of Lechmere to an elevated structure north of its original site to facilitate connectivity to new branches.[32][33] This phase focused on alternatives analysis, securing federal funding commitments under the Federal Transit Administration's New Starts program, and addressing community concerns over routing along the Lowell and Fitchburg commuter rail corridors.[34]Design Evolution and Redesigns
Early proposals for relocating Lechmere station as a precursor to Green Line northward extension date to the late 1970s, with 1978 plans envisioning an elevated structure featuring a peanut-shaped loop track configuration and an integrated wide deck for a busway with a ground-level ramp.[35] These concepts aimed to support multimodal transit integration amid urban redevelopment of the Lechmere Canal area but were not implemented at the time.[34] By the mid-2000s, as part of the Green Line Extension (GLX) planning, initial designs for the relocated Lechmere station emphasized basic open-air platforms at an estimated $535,000 per station, positioning it as the new northern terminus with elevated infrastructure east of the original surface-level site on North First Street.[34] However, subsequent iterations around 2010 introduced more elaborate elements, including headhouses, escalators, and additional elevators, contributing to scope creep and escalating costs from an initial $1.12 billion project estimate in 2012 to projections nearing $3 billion by 2015.[34] This overrun prompted a project suspension and comprehensive reevaluation, driven by factors such as overly ambitious station amenities and ancillary features like the Community Path viaduct, initially budgeted at $100 million for Lechmere integration.[34] The 2016 redesign simplified the station configurations across GLX, including Lechmere, by reverting to spartan open-air designs with uniform materials, signage, and lighting, eliminating headhouses and redundant elevators to slash station-related costs from $409.5 million to $121.2 million—a 70% reduction—while cutting total square footage by 91%.[34] For Lechmere specifically, the Community Path viaduct was realigned and shortened from 3,000 to 2,150 meters, reducing its cost to $20 million, and soil instability issues led to abandoning mechanically stabilized earth walls in favor of a traditional raised viaduct using pre-fabricated steel beams.[34][4] These changes coincided with a shift to a design-build delivery model under GLX Constructors, achieving a 25% cost reduction and enabling construction to proceed with tight urban tolerances, such as quarter-inch precision at the Lechmere viaduct junction amid curving geometries and minimal pier clearances.[4] The final elevated station features level boarding platforms integrated with the extended line, opening in March 2022 after the old surface facility closed in May 2020.[2]Construction Timeline and Execution
The design-build contract for the Green Line Extension, including the relocation and reconstruction of Lechmere station, was awarded in November 2017 to a joint venture led by GLX Constructors.[2] Site preparation and initial construction activities in the Lechmere area commenced in March 2018, focusing on utility relocations, track realignments, and groundwork extending from the existing station toward Union Square.[36] The original surface-level Lechmere station closed to Green Line service on May 22, 2020, enabling full-scale demolition of its platforms and associated structures, which was substantially completed by late 2020 to clear the site for the new elevated configuration.[8] Concurrently, the Lechmere Viaduct—critical for accessing the relocated station—was rehabilitated under a separate December 2019 contract, involving structural reinforcements, deck replacements, and seismic upgrades, with work accelerating after the May 2020 closure and concluding in March 2022.[8] This phase included temporary shuttle bus operations at the site to maintain connectivity.[8] Major station execution followed, encompassing erection of steel frameworks for the elevated viaduct extension, installation of two island platforms with canopies, and integration of a dedicated busway beneath the structure to support transfers.[2] Track laying, signaling systems, and accessibility features such as elevators and tactile paving were installed progressively from mid-2020 through 2021, with testing phases overlapping viaduct completion.[2] The new Lechmere station, positioned approximately 500 feet north of the original site along O'Brien Highway, opened to revenue service on March 21, 2022, alongside the Union Square Branch, marking the end of primary construction execution for this segment.[2]Opening and Transition from Old Station
The new Lechmere station opened to revenue service on March 21, 2022, marking the start of Phase 1 of the Green Line Extension, which included the Union Square Branch.[37] This elevated facility, positioned approximately 700 feet north of the original surface-level station across the McGrath Highway (now Monsignor O'Brien Highway), became the northern terminus for Green Line E branch trains extending to Union Square in Somerville.[3] The opening followed nearly two years of rail service suspension at the site, with inbound trains from downtown Boston now routing directly onto the new viaduct and into the relocated station.[38] The preceding surface station, operational since 1922, had closed on May 24, 2020, to enable demolition of its infrastructure and rehabilitation of the Lechmere Viaduct as part of the extension project.[39] During the closure period, the MBTA provided replacement shuttle bus service from Science Park station to the old Lechmere busways, which remained active as a temporary transfer point for bus routes despite the absence of rail platforms.[40] These bus facilities supported interim connectivity to local routes, including the 87 and 88 buses, until rail resumption at the new site.[11] Transition to the new station involved a seamless shift for rail passengers, as the elevated structure connected directly to the upgraded viaduct, eliminating the need for continued shuttles to the old location.[8] Green Line D and E branch service patterns adjusted to incorporate the extension, with the new Lechmere serving as a key interchange for the initial phase. Post-opening, the old station's busways and remaining structures were transferred to developer DivcoWest in June 2022 for demolition and potential redevelopment, fully severing operational ties to the historic site.[11] Initial service on opening day featured regular headways, though the full extension to Medford via the Community College Branch did not commence until December 12, 2022.[41]Project Challenges and Controversies
Cost Overruns and Fiscal Mismanagement
The Green Line Extension (GLX) project, encompassing the relocation of Lechmere station northward to a new elevated configuration, experienced substantial cost overruns stemming from initial planning and execution flaws under the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). Originally budgeted at approximately $1.12 billion in 2012 for the full extension including six stations, the estimate escalated to nearly $2 billion by 2015, with projections reaching as high as $3 billion before construction was paused.[34][42] These overruns, totaling around $1 billion beyond early forecasts, were attributed to scope creep—such as added community paths and more elaborate station designs—and inadequate contingency planning during the early design phases.[34][43] Fiscal mismanagement was evident in the MBTA's understaffed project team and ineffective implementation of the Construction Manager at Risk (CM/RC) delivery method, which failed to provide timely cost controls or open-book accounting for subcontractors.[34] For Lechmere specifically, the station's redesign to an elevated structure with integrated busways and viaducts contributed disproportionately to escalations, as initial low-cost surface concepts ballooned due to late-stage modifications for accessibility and urban integration, pushing station-related expenditures from under $1 million per unit to hundreds of millions across the project.[44][34] Critics, including independent analyses, highlighted a lack of expertise in managing large-scale transit procurements and excessive deference to community input processes that inflated scopes without corresponding budget adjustments.[45][46] In response to these issues, Governor Charlie Baker's administration imposed a construction halt in late 2015, appointing a Fiscal and Management Control Board to oversee reforms, which shifted to a design-build model and scaled back the initial phase to the Union Square branch—including the new Lechmere—reducing projected costs by about $800 million through simplified stations and tighter contractor oversight.[47][45] The revised $2.3 billion budget for this phase was ultimately met without further major escalations, enabling partial reimbursement of $75 million in local contributions from Cambridge and Somerville, though the total taxpayer burden remained far above original commitments.[48] This episode underscored systemic challenges in MBTA project governance, including deferred maintenance backlogs exceeding $7 billion that strained resources and amplified overrun risks.[34]Delays Due to Contractor and Regulatory Issues
The Green Line Extension project, including the relocation of Lechmere station to a new elevated structure, faced initial delays from contractor terminations in December 2015, when the MBTA ended agreements with four firms—including general contractor White-Skanska-Traylor—over escalating costs and inadequate progress controls, effectively halting fieldwork until a restructured design-build contract was awarded to GLX Constructors in August 2017.[49] This restart added roughly two years to the timeline, as the new joint venture (comprising Fluor Enterprises, The Middlesex Corporation, and Herzog Contracting) required time to mobilize and redesign elements to address prior deficiencies.[50] Regulatory requirements compounded these setbacks, with the project navigating Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) processes that included an Environmental Impact Report filed in 2012 and subsequent Notices of Project Change, such as one approved in November 2017 for modifications to the Medford branch, which prolonged environmental certifications and permit acquisitions from agencies like the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection for wetlands, waterways, and stormwater management.[51][52] Federal oversight added further scrutiny, as the Federal Transit Administration withheld full funding grant authorization until April 2017 following revisions to scope and budget, delaying full-scale construction commencement.[53] Ongoing contractor execution issues under GLX Constructors contributed to slippage during the core construction phase from 2018 onward, including coordination challenges with utility relocations and freight rail operator CSX over shared trackage, which a 2022 state legislative review identified as key engineering uncertainties exacerbating schedule risks for the 4.7-mile extension, including Lechmere's viaduct and platform buildout.[54] These factors pushed the closure of the original Lechmere station from late 2019 to May 2020 and deferred the new station's operational debut until March 2022, despite the design-build model's intent to accelerate delivery.[55] Post-substantial completion, contractor accountability persisted as deficiencies in track installation—such as improper gauging—necessitated remediation, prompting the MBTA to grant GLX Constructors a minimum seven-day extension in December 2023 for corrective re-gauging along the extension, including segments tied to Lechmere approaches, while directing accelerated resource deployment to mitigate service disruptions.[56][57] Such warranty-period interventions underscored persistent execution gaps, though the MBTA reported no alterations to the core project agreement for the primary construction delays.[55]Community and Environmental Disputes
The relocation of Lechmere station prompted an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act, culminating in an Environmental Assessment published in October 2011 and a Finding of No Significant Impact from the Federal Transit Administration in July 2012.[58] This process evaluated impacts on air quality, water resources, historic structures including the adjacent Lechmere Viaduct, and noise levels, determining that mitigation measures—such as dust control and erosion prevention—would suffice without substantial adverse effects.[33] Project proponents highlighted long-term environmental gains, projecting approximately 45,000 fewer daily vehicle trips and corresponding reductions in greenhouse gas emissions upon completion.[59] No major environmental litigation specific to the Lechmere segment emerged, unlike challenges to the broader extension in Medford.[60] Community opposition centered on construction disruptions and transit interruptions in East Cambridge. Residents reported severe quality-of-life issues, including persistent noise, vibration, dust, and traffic congestion from viaduct demolition and site preparation starting in 2020, which transformed the neighborhood into what locals termed a "construction site."[61] The full closure of the original Lechmere station on May 24, 2020, for viaduct removal and replacement with shuttle service until the new station's opening in March 2022, amplified these grievances by forcing reliance on buses prone to delays and overcrowding.[62] Cambridge City Councillor Timothy Toomey introduced a policy order in February 2014 urging opposition to any premature shutdown without the replacement operational, citing risks to commuter access and local businesses dependent on the station.[63] Additional concerns involved the new station's integration with Lechmere Square, where redesigns drew criticism for inadequate pedestrian crossings and bike access amid growing tech-sector development, potentially exacerbating displacement pressures.[64] Gentrification fears, while more pronounced along the extension's Somerville segments, extended to Lechmere's vicinity, with advocates warning that improved transit could accelerate housing costs and displace lower-income residents without sufficient affordability safeguards.[65] These issues prompted community petitions and calls for enhanced mitigation, though they did not halt the project.[66]Post-Opening Technical and Operational Problems
The new Lechmere station and the initial phase of the Green Line Extension faced persistent speed restrictions due to track alignment, signal, and infrastructure defects identified post-opening. By September 2023, the extension had accumulated over a dozen slow zones, with trains compelled to reduce speeds to as low as walking pace in affected segments to mitigate safety risks from construction-related flaws such as uneven track geometry and inadequate clearance.[67] These restrictions, which emerged within months of service commencement on March 21, 2022, increased travel times and contributed to operational inefficiencies, prompting the MBTA to open 33 new restrictions while closing only 19 between late August and late September 2023 alone.[67] The agency attributed many to hasty post-construction inspections and quality control lapses by contractors, leading to expedited repairs involving track resurfacing and signal recalibrations. All speed restrictions on the Green Line Extension, including those impacting Lechmere approaches, were eliminated by October 11, 2023, following intensive track and signal upgrades that restored full operational speeds.[68] This resolution came after temporary nightly closures and focused interventions, reducing end-to-end delays on the Union Square branch by several minutes.[69] However, isolated equipment failures persisted, such as a pantograph malfunction on October 20, 2023, that disabled a train near Lechmere station around 3:30 p.m., halting extension service until the vehicle was cleared.[70] A significant operational incident occurred on October 1, 2024, when an eastbound Green Line train (consist 3874-3718) derailed its leading railcar less than a minute after departing Lechmere station during the evening rush hour, injuring seven of the approximately 50 passengers and two crew members on board.[71] Preliminary National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) findings indicated the operator exceeded the 25 mph speed limit by reaching 36 mph in the curve immediately east of the station, with no evidence of track or rail defects contributing to the derailment; the incident prompted a temporary suspension of extension service for investigation and re-railing.[71][72] Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey emphasized that the derailment was not attributable to infrastructure failures, aligning with NTSB data pointing to human factors over systemic technical shortcomings.[73] Service resumed after assessments, but the event highlighted ongoing training and enforcement needs for speed compliance at the relocated station's egress points.[74] Signal disruptions have occasionally affected Lechmere operations, including a March 29, 2024, failure that suspended service between Union Square and Lechmere after a train overran a stop, potentially damaging equipment and requiring repairs until late afternoon.[75] Similar issues recurred in April 2024, underscoring vulnerabilities in the extension's newer signaling systems despite pre-opening testing.[76] These incidents, while not unique to Lechmere, have amplified rider complaints about reliability on the viaduct and terminal approaches, prompting MBTA commitments to broader signal modernization under the Green Line Train Protection program.[77]Operations and Usage
Current Service Patterns and Connections
Lechmere station serves as an intermediate stop on the MBTA Green Line E branch, which operates bidirectional service between Heath Street in Jamaica Plain and Medford/Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts.[78] Inbound trains from Medford/Tufts proceed through Lechmere toward downtown Boston via the main Green Line trunk, while outbound trains from Park Street continue north to the extension branches.[79] Service operates daily from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM, with headways of 6–8 minutes during peak periods and 7–12 minutes off-peak, subject to scheduled maintenance and disruptions.[78] The station connects to multiple MBTA bus routes via an adjacent busway, enabling transfers for local and express services in Cambridge and surrounding areas. Key routes include 69 to Harvard Square, 80 to Alewife station via North Cambridge, 87 to Arlington Center, and 88 to Clarendon Hill via Winter Hill.[1] These buses provide feeder service to residential neighborhoods and link to other MBTA lines at terminals like Alewife and Harvard.[80] No direct rail connections exist at Lechmere, though North Station is accessible via a roughly 0.6-mile walk or continuing inbound on the Green Line.[79]Ridership Trends and Data
Prior to its closure in 2021, the original Lechmere station on the MBTA Green Line recorded an average of 6,421 weekday boardings, positioning it as a moderate-volume surface stop compared to downtown trunk stations.[81] The relocated Lechmere station, integrated into the Green Line Extension (GLX) opened in March 2022 for Phase 1 (to Union Square) and December 2022 for Phase 2 (to Medford/Tufts), was projected to contribute to extension-wide ridership exceeding 45,000 daily one-way trips, with overall GLX usage anticipated at 50,000–52,000 weekday boardings including transfers and new origins.[82][12] Post-opening data indicate subdued performance relative to forecasts, attributable in part to the project's launch during lingering COVID-19 effects on transit demand, including sustained remote work reducing peak-hour loads. MBTA rail ridership datasets, such as the Fall 2023 counts covering August–December, provide granular boardings and alightings by Green Line branch and stop (including Lechmere), revealing patterns of lower-than-pre-pandemic volumes amid system-wide light rail recovery to approximately 70–80% of 2019 benchmarks by 2024.[83]| Period | Key Metric | Source Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-2021 (original station) | 6,421 average weekday boardings | Surface Green Line data; excludes alightings |
| GLX Projection (full operations) | >45,000 daily trips extension-wide | MBTA estimates for 2030 horizon, factoring induced demand |
| 2023 (post-opening) | Below projections; station-level averages available via SDP-period breakdowns | Fall dataset shows directional flows, with Lechmere as inbound terminus for E branch |
Maintenance and Recent Rehabilitation Efforts
The Lechmere Viaduct, providing essential access to the station as part of the MBTA Green Line, underwent a $62 million rehabilitation project initiated in conjunction with the Green Line Extension to address deterioration in the 110-year-old structure. Completed elements by 2024 strengthened the viaduct to support heavier loads from modern light rail vehicles and increased service frequency, while extending its operational lifespan and lowering long-term maintenance expenses without altering its historic appearance.[8][84] The work, managed by contractors including SPS New England, involved reinforcing concrete and steel components to accommodate extension-related demands, preserving structural integrity amid prior deferred upkeep on the aging infrastructure.[27][85] Post-opening of the relocated elevated Lechmere station in March 2022, maintenance efforts have focused on integration with the extension, including a 42-day service suspension from July 18 to August 28, 2023, between Lechmere and Union Square branches for signal and switch upgrades essential to reliable operations.[86] These interventions addressed post-construction adjustments rather than major defects, aligning with broader MBTA initiatives to mitigate slow zones and enhance safety on newly extended trackage. Routine viaduct inspections and minor repairs continue under the rehabilitation's extended monitoring, ensuring compatibility with daily Green Line E branch service patterns.[8] No large-scale station-specific rehabilitations have been reported as of 2025, reflecting the relative newness of the facility amid ongoing system-wide maintenance challenges.[87]Economic and Social Impacts
Projected vs. Actual Development Benefits
Proponents of the Green Line Extension (GLX), which relocated and upgraded Lechmere station as its Cambridge terminus, projected substantial transit-oriented development (TOD) benefits, including over 10 million square feet of new offices, laboratories, housing, and retail within a quarter-mile radius of the new stations to stimulate economic growth in underserved areas like East Cambridge and Somerville.[88] These forecasts emphasized improved access to jobs, reduced vehicle dependency, and spurred private investment, with planning documents from the early 2010s anticipating the extension would transform industrial zones into vibrant mixed-use hubs by leveraging enhanced connectivity to downtown Boston.[47] In practice, large-scale developments have materialized in adjacent areas, notably Union Square in Somerville, where the $2 billion USQ project—a 20-acre redevelopment including 3.8 million square feet of office, lab, residential, and retail space—advanced through groundbreaking in 2021 and continued post-GLX opening in March 2022, aligning with pre-extension planning commitments that tied contributions to transit improvements.[89] [90] However, around the new Lechmere station itself, outcomes have diverged from projections for immediate local revitalization; small business owners in East Cambridge reported in 2023 that anticipated surges in foot traffic and patronage failed to materialize, attributing shortfalls to prolonged construction disruptions, high post-pandemic operating costs, and broader economic headwinds rather than transit enhancements alone.[88] Broader assessments indicate mixed realization of TOD goals by 2025, with institutional investments in lab and office space proceeding amid Boston's biotech boom—evident in ongoing North Point-area projects near Lechmere—but residential and retail components lagging due to affordability pressures and market saturation, underscoring that while infrastructure enables development, causal factors like zoning, financing, and regional demand exert stronger influence than transit alone.[91] No comprehensive post-opening economic impact study specific to Lechmere has quantified net benefits against projections, though ridership data indirectly supports usage without confirming induced growth.[2]Fiscal Implications for Taxpayers
The Green Line Extension project, which included the relocation and reconstruction of Lechmere station, had a total capital cost of approximately $2.3 billion upon completion in 2022.[58] Of this, federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Transit Administration covered about $996 million, or roughly 43 percent, leaving the remainder—over $1.3 billion—to be financed by Massachusetts state funds through bonds issued by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT).[58] These state obligations are ultimately borne by taxpayers via the Commonwealth's transportation financing mechanisms, including the gas tax, sales tax allocations, and general obligation bonds repaid from state revenues.[31] Cost overruns significantly amplified the taxpayer burden, with initial estimates around $1.9 billion in 2014 escalating due to design changes, contractor disputes, and management issues, at one point threatening to exceed $3 billion before interventions stabilized the figure at $2.3 billion.[92] State lawmakers and oversight bodies, including the Fiscal Management and Control Board, approved additional funding to cover these excesses, drawing from taxpayer-supported reserves and borrowing that increased long-term debt service costs estimated in the hundreds of millions over the bonds' lifespan.[93] Critics, such as the Pioneer Institute, have attributed much of the overrun—up to 50 percent beyond contracted guarantees—to flawed procurement models like guaranteed maximum price contracts that failed to control subcontractor bids, effectively transferring risk to public coffers.[93] Beyond capital expenditures, the new Lechmere station and extended line impose ongoing fiscal strain through elevated operating subsidies. The MBTA's financial projections indicate that the Green Line Extension contributes to an annual operating deficit of about $49 million starting in fiscal year 2023, necessitating subsidies from the state operating budget funded by taxpayer revenues, which could pressure future fare hikes or budget reallocations amid the agency's broader $700 million structural shortfall.[94] While ridership growth has partially offset costs, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation has warned that persistent underfunding and rising deficits from expansions like GLX exacerbate the MBTA's reliance on general tax appropriations, projecting gaps that could reach $500 million by fiscal year 2026 without reforms.[95] Local contributions, such as the $75 million pledged by Cambridge and Somerville, were ultimately reimbursed by the MBTA in 2021 using project savings, shifting the full non-federal burden back to statewide taxpayers.[96]Criticisms of Efficacy and Alternatives
Critics have argued that the relocation and extension of Lechmere station as part of the Green Line Extension (GLX) failed to deliver proportional benefits relative to its escalated costs, which rose from an initial estimate of approximately $814 million in 2012 to over $2.28 billion by completion in 2022.[97][34] Transit analyst Alon Levy contended that the project's per-km cost exceeded $400 million, far above international benchmarks for light rail, due to factors like excessive station designs and procurement inefficiencies, rendering it a poor value despite improved connectivity to areas like Union Square.[45] Value engineering during construction compromised features such as full accessibility at some points and integrated fare payment systems, leaving the line incomplete upon opening in March 2022 and contributing to operational inefficiencies.[45] Proponents of alternatives, particularly bus rapid transit (BRT), have highlighted that enhanced bus services could achieve comparable travel time reductions—up to 45% in select Boston corridors— at a fraction of the capital outlay required for light rail.[98] A 2016 Barr Foundation analysis of Greater Boston transit options found BRT more cost-effective than rail expansions like GLX for medium-demand routes, citing lower construction expenses and flexibility for dedicated lanes without the need for extensive trackwork or elevated structures.[98] Earlier evaluations, such as the 1990s Beyond Lechmere study, considered busways and combined light rail-bus hybrids but ultimately favored rail; however, retrospective critiques note that BRT's scalability and quicker implementation could have addressed Lechmere-area congestion sooner, avoiding GLX's decade-long delays and taxpayer burden exceeding $2 billion for roughly 4.7 km of extension.[99][34] These criticisms underscore broader concerns with U.S. transit megaprojects, where institutional factors like fragmented oversight and union work rules inflate costs without commensurate ridership or economic gains, as evidenced by GLX's station expenses ballooning to over 100 times initial per-station projections in some analyses.[33] While the new Lechmere station enhanced terminal operations by eliminating the tight loop at the old surface-level site, detractors argue that simpler upgrades, such as bus integration or partial grade separation, would have sufficed for the corridor's demand, preserving funds for higher-impact investments elsewhere in the MBTA network.[100]References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1978_Lechmere_relocation_plans.jpg
