Hubbry Logo
Benjamin ButlerBenjamin ButlerMain
Open search
Benjamin Butler
Community hub
Benjamin Butler
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Benjamin Butler
Benjamin Butler
from Wikipedia

Benjamin Franklin Butler (November 5, 1818 – January 11, 1893) was an American major general of the Union Army, politician, lawyer, and businessman from Massachusetts. Born in New Hampshire and raised in Lowell, Massachusetts, Butler was a political major general of the Union Army during the American Civil War and had a leadership role in the impeachment of U.S. president Andrew Johnson. He was a colorful and often controversial figure on the national stage and on the Massachusetts political scene, serving five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and running several campaigns for governor before his election to that office in 1882.

Key Information

Butler, a successful trial lawyer, served in the Massachusetts legislature as an antiwar Democrat and as an officer in the state militia. Early in the Civil War he joined the Union Army, where he first gained renown when he refused to return escaped slaves, designating them as contraband of war,[1] an idea that the Lincoln administration endorsed and that played a role in making emancipation an official war goal. Later in the war, he was noted for his questionable military skills and his controversial command of New Orleans, which made him widely disliked in the South and earned him the "Beast" epithet. His commands were marred by financial and logistical dealings across enemy lines, some of which may have taken place with his knowledge and to his financial benefit.

At the request of General-in-Chief Ulysses S. Grant, President Abraham Lincoln relieved Butler from the posts he held in the Union Army after his failure in the First Battle of Fort Fisher, but he soon won election to the United States House of Representatives from Massachusetts. As a Radical Republican he considered President Johnson's Reconstruction agenda to be too weak, and he advocated harsher punishments of former Confederate leadership and stronger stances on civil rights reform. He was also an early proponent of impeaching Johnson. After Johnson was impeached in early 1868, Butler served as the lead prosecutor among the House-appointed impeachment managers in the Senate impeachment trial proceedings. Additionally, as Chairman of the House Committee on Reconstruction, Butler authored the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 and coauthored the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1875.

In Massachusetts, Butler was often at odds with more conservative members of the political establishment over matters of both style and substance. Feuds with Republican politicians led to his being denied several nominations for the governorship between 1858 and 1880. Returning to the Democratic fold, he won the governorship in the 1882 election with Democratic and Greenback Party support. He ran for president on the Greenback Party and the Anti-Monopoly Party tickets in 1884, having unsuccessfully sought the Democratic nomination as well.

Early years

[edit]

Benjamin Franklin Butler was born in Deerfield, New Hampshire, the sixth and youngest child of John Butler and Charlotte Ellison Butler. His father served under General Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812 and later became a privateer, dying of yellow fever in the West Indies not long after Benjamin was born.[2] He was named after Founding Father Benjamin Franklin. His elder brother, Andrew Jackson Butler (1815–1864), served as a colonel in the Union Army during the Civil War and joined him in New Orleans.[3] Butler's mother was a devout Baptist who encouraged him to read the Bible and prepare for the ministry.[2] In 1827, at the age of nine, Butler was awarded a scholarship to Phillips Exeter Academy, where he spent one term. He was described by a schoolmate as "a reckless, impetuous, headstrong boy", and regularly got into fights.[4]

Butler's mother moved the family in 1828 to Lowell, Massachusetts, where she operated a boarding house for workers at the textile mills. He attended the public schools there, from which he was almost expelled for fighting, the principal describing him as a boy who "might be led, but could not be driven."[5] He attended Waterville (now Colby) College in pursuit of his mother's wish that he prepare for the ministry, but eventually rebelled against the idea. In 1836, Butler sought permission to go instead to West Point for a military education, but he did not receive one of the few places available. He continued his studies at Waterville, where he sharpened his rhetorical skills in theological discussions and began to adopt Democratic Party political views. He graduated in August 1838.[6] Butler returned to Lowell, where he clerked and read law as an apprentice with a local lawyer. He was admitted to the Massachusetts bar in 1840 and opened a practice in Lowell.[7]

After an extended courtship, Butler married Sarah Hildreth, a stage actress and daughter of Dr. Israel Hildreth of Lowell, on May 16, 1844. They had four children: Paul (1845–1850), Blanche (1847–1939), Paul (1852–1918) and Ben-Israel (1855–1881).[8] Butler's business partners included Sarah's brother Fisher and her brother-in-law, W. P. Webster.[9]

In 1844, Butler was elected a member of the American Philosophical Society.[10]

Law and early business dealings

[edit]

Butler quickly gained a reputation as a dogged criminal defense lawyer who seized on every misstep of his opposition to gain victories for his clients, and also became a specialist in bankruptcy law.[7] His trial work was so successful that it received regular press coverage, and he was able to expand his practice into Boston.[11] George Riley worked at his Boston law office.[12]

Butler's success as a lawyer enabled him to purchase shares in Lowell's Middlesex Mill Company when they were cheap.[13] Although he generally represented workers in legal actions, he also sometimes represented mill owners. When he became more politically active, he advocated the passage of a law establishing a ten-hour day for laborers,[14] but he also opposed labor strikes over the matter. He instituted a ten-hour work day at the Middlesex Mills.[15]

Pre-Civil War political career

[edit]
Portrait of Butler with his dog c. 1845–1847

During the debates over the ten-hour day a Whig-supporting Lowell newspaper published a verse suggesting that Butler's father had been hanged for piracy. Butler sued the paper's editor and publisher for that and other allegations that had been printed about himself. The editor was convicted and fined $50, but the publisher was acquitted on a technicality. Butler blamed the Whig judge, Ebenezer Rockwood Hoar, for the acquittal, inaugurating a feud between the two that would last for decades and significantly color Butler's reputation in the state.[16]

Butler, as a Democrat, supported the Compromise of 1850 and regularly spoke out against the abolition of slavery. At the state level, he supported the coalition of Democrats and Free Soilers that elected George S. Boutwell governor in 1851. This garnered him enough support to win election to the state legislature in 1852.[15] His support for Franklin Pierce as president, however, cost him the seat the next year. He was elected a delegate to the 1853 state constitutional convention with strong Catholic support, and was elected to the state senate in 1858, a year dominated by Republican victories in the state.[17] Butler was nominated for governor in 1859 and ran on a pro-slavery, pro-tariff platform. He lost to incumbent Republican Nathaniel Prentice Banks.[13][18]

In the 1860 Democratic National Convention at Charleston, South Carolina, Butler initially supported John C. Breckinridge for president but then shifted his support to Jefferson Davis, believing that only a moderate Southerner could keep the Democratic party from dividing. A conversation he had with Davis prior to the convention convinced him that Davis might be such a man, and he gave him his support before the convention split over slavery.[19] Butler ended up supporting Breckinridge over Douglas against state party instructions, ruining his standing with the state party apparatus. He was nominated for governor in the 1860 election by a Breckinridge splinter of the state party, but trailed far behind other candidates.[20]

Civil War

[edit]

Although he sympathized with the South, Butler stated, "I was always a friend of southern rights but an enemy of southern wrongs" and sought to serve in the Union Army.[21] His military career before the Civil War began as a private in the Lowell militia in 1840.[22] Butler eventually rose to become colonel of a regiment of primarily Irish American men. In 1855, the nativist Know Nothing governor Henry J. Gardner disbanded Butler's militia, but Butler was elected brigadier general after the militia was reorganized. In 1857 Secretary of War Jefferson Davis appointed him to the Board of Visitors of West Point.[23] These positions did not give him any significant military experience.[24]

1860

[edit]

After Abraham Lincoln was elected president in November 1860, Butler traveled to Washington, D.C. When a secessionist South Carolina delegation arrived there he recommended to lameduck President James Buchanan that they be arrested and charged with treason. Buchanan rejected the idea. Butler also met with Jefferson Davis and learned that he was not the Union man that Butler had thought he was. Butler then returned to Massachusetts,[25] where he warned Governor John A. Andrew that hostilities were likely and that the state militia should be readied. He took advantage of the mobilization to secure a contract with the state for his mill to supply heavy cloth to the militia. Military contracts would constitute a significant source of profits for Butler's mill throughout the war.[26]

Petitioning for military leadership appointment

[edit]

Butler also worked to secure a leadership position should the militia be deployed. He first offered his services to Governor Andrew in March 1861.[26] When the call for militia finally arrived in April, Massachusetts was asked for only three regiments, but Butler managed to have the request expanded to include a brigadier general. He telegraphed Secretary of War Simon Cameron, with whom he was acquainted, suggesting that Cameron issue a request for a brigadier and general staff from Massachusetts, which soon afterward appeared on Governor Andrew's desk. He then used banking contacts to ensure that loans that would be needed to fund the militia operations would be conditioned on his appointment. Despite Andrew's desire to assign the brigadier position to Ebenezer Peirce, the bank insisted on Butler, and he was sent south to ensure the security of transportation routes to Washington.[27][28] The nation's capital was threatened with isolation from free states because it was unclear whether Maryland, a slave state, would also secede.[29]

1861: Baltimore and Virginia operations

[edit]
Engraving depicting the Baltimore riot of 1861

The two regiments Massachusetts sent to Maryland were the 6th and 8th Volunteer Militia. The 6th departed first and was caught up in a secessionist riot in Baltimore, Maryland on April 19. Butler traveled with the 8th, which left Philadelphia the next day amid news that railroad connections around Baltimore were being severed.[30] Butler and the 8th traveled by rail and ferry to Maryland's capital, Annapolis, where Governor Thomas H. Hicks attempted to dissuade them from landing.[31] Butler landed his troops (who needed food and water), occupying the Naval Academy. When Hicks informed Butler that no one would sell provisions to his force, Butler pointed out that armed men did not necessarily have to pay for needed provisions, and he would use all measures necessary to ensure order.[32]

After being joined by the 7th New York Militia, Butler directed his men to restore rail service between Annapolis and Washington via Annapolis Junction,[33] which was accomplished by April 27. He also threatened Maryland legislators with arrest if they voted in favor of secession, and he seized the Great Seal of Maryland, "without which no legislation could become law."[34] Butler's prompt actions in securing Annapolis were received with approval by the US Army's top general, Winfield Scott, and he was given formal orders to maintain the security of the transit links in Maryland.[35] In early May, Scott ordered Butler to lead the operations that occupied Baltimore. On May 13 he entered Baltimore on a train with 1000 men and artillery, with no opposition.[36] That was done in contravention of Butler's orders from Scott, which had been to organize four columns to approach the city by land and sea. General Scott criticized Butler for his strategy (despite its success) as well as his heavy-handed assumption of control of much of the civil government, and he recalled him to Washington.[37] Butler shortly after received one of the early appointments as major general of the volunteer forces.[29] His exploits in Maryland also brought nationwide press attention, including significant negative press in the South, which concocted stories about him that were conflations of biographical details involving not just Butler but also a namesake from New York and others.[38]

Fort Monroe, Virginia

[edit]
Map of Fort Monroe, 1862

When two Massachusetts regiments had been sent overland to Maryland, two more were dispatched by sea under Butler's command to secure Fort Monroe at the mouth of the James River.[29] After being dressed down by Scott for overstepping his authority, Butler was next assigned command of Fort Monroe and of the Department of Virginia.[39] On May 27, Butler sent a force 8 miles (13 km) north to occupy the lightly defended adjacent town of Newport News, Virginia at Newport News Point, an excellent anchorage for the Union Navy. The force established and significantly fortified Camp Butler and a battery at Newport News Point that could cover the entrance to the James River ship canal and the mouth of the Nansemond River. Butler also expanded Camp Hamilton, established in the adjacent town of Hampton, Virginia, just beyond the confines of the fort and within the range of its guns.[40]

The Union occupation of Fort Monroe was considered a threat to Richmond by Confederate General Robert E. Lee, and he began organizing the defense of the Virginia Peninsula in response.[41] Confederate General John B. Magruder, seeking to buy time while awaiting men and supplies, established well-defended forward outposts near Big and Little Bethel, only 8 miles (13 km) from Butler's camp at Newport News as a lure to draw his opponent into a premature action.[42] Butler took the bait, and suffered an embarrassing defeat at the Battle of Big Bethel on June 10. Butler devised a plan for a night march and operation against the positions but chose not to lead the force in person, for which he was criticized.[43] The plan proved too complex for his inadequately trained subordinates and troops to carry out, especially at night, and was further marred by the failure of staff to communicate passwords and precautions. A friendly fire incident during the night gave away the Union position, further harming the advance, which was attempted without knowledge of the layout or the strength of the Confederate positions.[44] Massachusetts militia general Ebenezer W. Peirce, who commanded in the field, received the most criticism for the failed operation.[45] With the withdrawal of many of his men for use elsewhere, Butler was unable to maintain the camp at Hampton, although his forces retained the camp at Newport News.[46] Butler's commission, which required approval from Congress, was vigorously debated after Big Bethel, with critical comment raised about his lack of military experience. But his commission was narrowly approved on July 21, the day of the First Battle of Bull Run, the war's first large-scale battle.[47] The battle's poor outcome for the Union was used as cover by General Scott to reduce Butler's force to one incapable of substantive offense, and it was implicit in Scott's orders that the troops were needed nearer to Washington.[48]

Contemporary drawing of military movements in the Battle of Big Bethel, by Alfred Waud

In August, Butler commanded an expeditionary force that, in conjunction with the United States Navy, took Forts Hatteras and Clark in North Carolina. That move, the first significant Union victory after First Bull Run, was lauded in Washington and won Butler accolades from President Lincoln. Butler was sent back to Massachusetts to raise new forces.[49] That thrust Butler into a power struggle with Governor Andrew, who insisted on maintaining his authority to appoint regimental officers, refusing to commission (among others) Butler's brother Andrew and several of the general's close associates. The spat instigated a recruiting war between Butler and the state militia organization.[50] The dispute delayed Butler's return to Virginia, and in November he was assigned to command ground troops in Louisiana.[51]

While in command at Fort Monroe, Butler had declined to return to their owners fugitive slaves who had come within his lines. He argued that Virginians considered them to be chattel property, and that they could not appeal to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 because of Virginia's secession. "I am under no constitutional obligations to a foreign country," he said, "which Virginia now claims to be."[52] Furthermore, slaves used as laborers for building fortifications and other military activities could be considered contraband of war.[53][54] "Lincoln and his Cabinet discussed the issue on May 30 and decided to support Butler's stance".[55][56] It was later made standard Union Army policy to not return fugitive slaves.[57] This policy was soon extended to the Union Navy.[58]

New Orleans

[edit]

Butler directed the first Union expedition to Ship Island, off the Mississippi Gulf Coast, in December 1861,[59] and in May 1862 commanded the force that conducted the capture of New Orleans after its occupation by the Navy following the Battle of Forts Jackson and St. Philip. In the administration of that city he showed great firmness and political subtlety. He devised a plan for relief of the poor, demanded oaths of allegiance from anyone who sought any privilege from government, and confiscated weapons.[21]

However, Butler's subtlety seemed to fail him as the military governor of New Orleans when it came to dealing with its Jewish population, about which the general, referring to local smugglers, infamously wrote, in October 1862: "They are Jews who betrayed their Savior, & also have betrayed us."[60]

Public health management

[edit]

In an ordinary year, it was not unusual for as much as 10 percent of the city's population to die of yellow fever. In preparation, Butler imposed strict quarantines and introduced a rigid program of garbage disposal. As a result, in 1862, only two cases were reported.[61]

Civil administration difficulties

[edit]
Portrait by Mathew Brady c. 1861–1865

Some of his acts were highly unpopular. Most notorious was Butler's General Order No. 28 of May 15, 1862, that if any woman should insult or show contempt for any officer or soldier of the United States, she may be treated similarly to a "woman of the town plying her avocation," i.e., a prostitute.[62] This was in response to various acts of verbal and physical abuse inappropriate for "respectable" women, including mocking the funeral cortège of a fallen soldier, spitting in the faces of U.S. officers, pouring chamber pots full of human excrement on patrolling U.S. soldiers, and, in one notorious case, pouring urine on Union Navy commander Admiral David Farragut.[63]

"Butler's 'Woman Order' was immediately effective. Insults by word, look or gesture abruptly ceased.... Throughout the South, however, the Woman Order evoked a universal shout of execration".[64] Butler's insistence on prosecuting the woman as any other person "aiding the Confederacy" provoked angry jeers from white residents of New Orleans, who amplified a narrative that he used his power to engage in the petty looting of New Orleanians.[21] "[F]or years after the Civil War steamships plying the lower Mississippi were furnished with chamber pots bearing the likeness of 'Beast Butler'".[65]

He was nicknamed "Butler the Beast" by Confederate General P. G. T. Beauregard (despite Beauregard's leaving his wife under Butler's personal care) or alternatively "Spoons Butler", the latter nickname deriving primarily from an incident in which Butler seized a 38-piece set of silverware from a New Orleans woman who attempted to cross Union lines[66] while using a pass that permitted her to carry nothing more than the clothing on her person.

Cotton seizures

[edit]

Shortly after the Confiscation Act of 1862 became effective in September, Butler increasingly relied upon it as a means of grabbing cotton. Since the Act permitted confiscation of property owned by anyone "aiding the Confederacy," Butler reversed his earlier policy of encouraging trade by refusing to confiscate cotton brought into New Orleans for sale. First, he conducted a census in which 4,000 respondents failing to pledge loyalty to the Union were banished. Their property was seized and sold at low auction prices in which his brother Andrew was often the prime buyer. Next, the general sent expeditions into the countryside with no military purpose other than to confiscate cotton from residents who were assumed to be disloyal. Once brought into New Orleans, the cotton would be similarly sold in rigged auctions. To maintain correct appearances, auction proceeds were dutifully held for the benefit of "just claimants", but the Butler consortium still ended up owning the cotton at bargain prices. Always inventive of new terminology to achieve his ends, Butler sequestered, or made vulnerable to confiscation, such "properties" in all of Louisiana beyond parishes surrounding New Orleans.[67]

Censorship of newspapers

[edit]

Butler censored New Orleans newspapers. When William Seymour, the editor of the New-Orleans Commercial Bulletin, asked Butler what would happen if the newspaper ignored his censorship, an angry Butler reportedly stated, "I am the military governor of this state — the supreme power — you cannot disregard my order, Sir. By God, he that sins against me, sins against the Holy Ghost." When Seymour published a favorable obituary of his father, who had been killed serving in the Confederate army in Virginia, Butler confiscated the newspaper and imprisoned Seymour for three months.[21]

Execution of William Mumford

[edit]

On June 7, 1862, Butler ordered the execution of William B. Mumford for tearing down a United States flag placed by Admiral Farragut on the United States Mint in New Orleans. In his memoirs, Butler maintained that "[a] party headed by Mumford had torn down the flag, dragged it through the streets and spit on it, and trampled on it until it was torn to pieces. It was then distributed among the rabble, and each one thought it a high honor to get a piece of it and wear it." Butler added that these actions were "against the laws of war and his country."[68]

Before Mumford was executed, Butler permitted him to make a speech for as long as he wished, and Mumford defended his actions by claiming that he was acting out of a high sense of patriotism.[69] Most, including Mumford and his family, expected Butler to pardon him. The general refused to do so,[70] but promised to care for his family if necessary. (After the war, Butler fulfilled his promise by paying off a mortgage on Mumford's widow's house and helping her find government employment.) For the execution and General Order No. 28, he was denounced (December 1862) by Confederate President Jefferson Davis in General Order 111 as a felon deserving capital punishment, who, if captured, should be "reserved for execution".[71]

Recall

[edit]

Although Butler's governance of New Orleans was popular in the North, where it was seen as a successful stand against recalcitrant secessionists, some of his actions, notably those against the foreign consuls, concerned Lincoln, who authorized his recall in December 1862.[72] Butler was replaced by Nathaniel P. Banks.[73] The necessity of taking sometimes radical actions and the support he received in Radical Republican circles drove Butler to change political allegiance, and he joined the Republican Party. He also sought revenge against the more moderate Secretary of State Seward, whom he believed to be responsible for his eventual recall.[74]

Butler continues to be a disliked and controversial figure in New Orleans and the rest of the South.[75]

Louisiana Native Guard

[edit]

On September 27, 1862, Butler formed the first African-American regiment in the US Army, the 1st Louisiana Native Guard, and commissioned 30 officers to command it at the company level. This was highly unusual, as most USCT regiments were commanded by white officers only. "Better soldiers never shouldered a musket," Butler wrote, "I observed a very remarkable trait about them. They learned to handle arms and to march more easily than intelligent white men. My drillmaster could teach a regiment of Negroes that much of the art of war sooner than he could have taught the same number of students from Harvard or Yale." The regiment would serve Butler effectively during the Siege of Port Hudson.[76] Butler organized three regiments totaling 3,122 soldiers and officers.[77]

Army of the James

[edit]

Butler's popularity with the Radicals meant that Lincoln could not readily deny him a new posting. Lincoln considered sending him to a position in the Mississippi River area in early 1863, and categorically refused to send him back to New Orleans.[78] In November 1863, he finally gave Butler command of the Department of Virginia and North Carolina based in Norfolk, Virginia. In January 1864, Butler played a pivotal role in the creation of six regiments of U.S. Volunteers recruited from among Confederate prisoners of war ("Galvanized Yankees") for duty on the western frontier.[79] In May, the forces under his command were designated the Army of the James. On November 4, 1864, Butler arrived in New York City with 3,500 troops of the Army of the James. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton had "requested that Grant send troops to New York City to help oversee the election there. Stanton's concern arose from the city's perennial political and racial divisions, which had erupted during the 1863 draft riots,"[80][81] and because of fear of Confederates coming from Canada to burn the city on Election Day. Grant selected Butler for the assignment. "Even though he knew nothing about the plot [to burn the city] and did nothing to prevent it, Butler's mere presence with his 3,500 troops" demoralized the leaders of the conspiracy, who postponed it until November 25, when it failed.[82]

General Butler after the battle of September 29, 1864, sketched by William Waud (Harper's Weekly, October 22, 1864)

The Army of the James also included several regiments of United States Colored Troops. These troops saw combat in the Bermuda Hundred campaign (see below). At the Battle of Chaffin's Farm (sometimes also called the Battle of New Market Heights), the USCT troops performed extremely well. The 38th USCT defeated a more powerful force despite intense fire, heavy casualties, and terrain obstacles. Butler awarded the Medal of Honor to several men of the 38th USCT. He also ordered a special medal designed and struck, which was awarded to 200 African-American soldiers who had served with distinction in the engagement. This was later called the Butler Medal.

Bermuda Hundred campaign

[edit]

In the spring of 1864, the Army of the James was directed to land at Bermuda Hundred on the James River, south of Richmond, and from there attack Petersburg. This would sever the rail links supplying Richmond, and force the Confederates to abandon the city. In spite of Grant's low opinion of Butler's military skills, he was given command of the operation.

Butler's force landed on May 5, when Petersburg was almost undefended, but Butler became unnerved by the presence of a handful of Confederate militia and home guards. While he dithered, the Confederates assembled a substantial force under General P. G. T. Beauregard. On 13 May, Butler's advance toward Richmond was repulsed. On May 16, the Confederates drove Butler's force back to Bermuda Hundred, bottling up the Union troops in a loop of the James River. Both sides entrenched; the Union troops were safe but impotent, and Beauregard sent most of his troops as reinforcements to Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. Had Butler been more aggressive in early May, he might have taken Petersburg or even Richmond itself and ended the war a year early, although his two West Pointer corps commanders Maj. Gen "Baldly" Smith and Quincy Gilmore also did not perform well or make up for Butler's limitations as a general.

Despite this fiasco, Butler remained in command of the Army of the James.

Fort Fisher and final recall

[edit]

Although Grant had largely been successful in removing incompetent political generals from service, Butler could not be easily gotten rid of.[83] As a prominent Radical Republican, Butler was a potential replacement for Lincoln as the party's presidential nominee.[84] Lincoln had even asked Butler to be the 1864 nominee for vice president,[83] as did Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who sought to replace Lincoln as president.[85] In reply to Lincoln's offer, Butler said, "Tell him ... I would not quit the field [resign as major general] to be Vice-President, even with himself as President, unless he will give me bond with sureties ... that he will die or resign within three months after his inauguration. Ask him what he thinks I have done to deserve the punishment ... of being made to sit as presiding officer over the Senate, to listen for four years to debates more or less stupid, in which I can take no part or say a word...."[86]

There was no good place to put Butler; sending him to Missouri or Kentucky would likely end in disaster, so it was considered safer to leave him where he was in Virginia. More worrying was that Butler was one of the highest ranking volunteer major generals in the Union army; next to Grant himself, he was the ranking field officer in the Eastern theater, and command of the Army of the Potomac would default to him in Grant's absence. For that reason, Grant remained with the army as much as possible and only made trips away from the front when it was absolutely necessary.

In December, troops from the Army of the James were sent to attack Fort Fisher in North Carolina with Butler in command. Butler devised a scheme to breach the defenses with a boat loaded with gunpowder, which failed completely. He then declared that Fort Fisher was impregnable and withdrew his troops without authorization. However, Admiral David Dixon Porter (commander of the naval element of the expedition) informed Grant that it could be taken easily if anyone competent were put in charge.

This mismanagement finally led to his recall by Grant in early 1865. As Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton was not in Washington at the time,[83] Grant appealed directly to Lincoln for permission to terminate Butler, noting "there is a lack of confidence felt in [Butler's] military ability". Grant also voiced his suspicions about corruption going on in Butler's department, including smuggling of supplies to Lee's army, and that Butler arbitrarily arrested anyone who noticed what was going on, although, due to Butler's formidable political connections, nothing came of Grant's complaints.[87] By this point, the presidential election was over, so the administration no longer had to be concerned about Butler's running for president, and, in General Order Number 1, Lincoln relieved him from command of the Department of North Carolina and Virginia and ordered him to report to Lowell, Massachusetts.[83] Grant informed Butler of his recall on January 8, 1865, and named Major General Edward O. C. Ord to replace him as commander of the Army of the James.[83] "Embarrassed and outraged, Butler broke off all relations with Grant and set out to destroy him."[88] In 1867, when it seemed that Grant might run for president, Butler "employed detectives in an effort to prove that Grant was "a drunkard, after fast horses, women and whores." Grant, he announced, was "a man without a head or a heart, indifferent to human suffering and impotent to govern."[88]

Rather than report to Lowell, Butler went to Washington, where he used his considerable political connections to get a hearing before the Joint Congressional Committee on the Conduct of the War in mid-January. At his hearing Butler focused his defense on his actions at Fort Fisher. He produced charts and duplicates of reports by subordinates to prove he had been right to call off his attack of Fort Fisher, despite orders from General Grant to the contrary. Butler claimed the fort was impregnable. To his embarrassment, a follow-up expedition led by Maj. Gen. Alfred H. Terry and Brig. Gen. Adelbert Ames (Butler's future son-in-law) captured the fort on January 15, and news of this victory arrived during the committee hearing; Butler's military career was over.[83] He was formally retained until November 1865 with the idea that he might act as military prosecutor of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.[89]

Colonization

[edit]

General Butler claimed that Lincoln approached him in 1865, a few days before his assassination, to talk about reviving colonization in Panama.[90] Since the mid-twentieth century, historians have debated the validity of Butler's account, as Butler wrote it years after the fact and was prone to exaggerating his prowess as a general.[91] Recently discovered documents prove that Butler and Lincoln did indeed meet on April 11, 1865, though whether and to what extent they talked about colonization is not recorded except in Butler's account.[92]

Financial dealings

[edit]

Negative perceptions of Butler were compounded by his questionable financial dealings in several of his commands, as well as the activities of his brother Andrew, who acted as Butler's financial proxy and was given "almost free rein" to engage in exploitative business deals and other "questionable activities" in New Orleans.[21] Upon arriving in the city, Butler immediately began attempts to participate in the lucrative inter-belligerent trade. He used a Federal warship to send $60,000 in sugar to Boston where he expected to sell it for $160,000. However, his use of the government ship was reported to the military authorities, and Butler was chastised. Instead of earning a profit, military authorities permitted him to recover only his $60,000 plus expenses. Thereafter, his brother Andrew officially represented the family in such activities. Everyone in New Orleans believed that Andrew accumulated a profit of $1–$2 million while in Louisiana. Upon inquiry from Treasury Secretary Chase in October 1862, the general responded that his brother actually cleared less than $200,000 (~$4.88 million in 2024).[93] When Butler was replaced in New Orleans by Major General Nathaniel Banks, Andrew Butler unsuccessfully tried to bribe Banks with $100,000 if Banks would permit Andrew's "commercial program" to be carried out "as previous to [Banks's] arrival."[94]

Butler's administration of the Norfolk district was also tainted by financial scandal and cross-lines business dealings. Historian Ludwell Johnson concluded that during that period: "... there can be no doubt that a very extensive trade with the Confederacy was carried on in [Butler's Norfolk] Department.... This trade was extremely profitable for Northern merchants ... and was a significant help to the Confederacy.... It was conducted with Butler's help and a considerable part of it was in the hands of his relatives and supporters."[95]

Shortly after arriving in Norfolk, Butler became surrounded by such men. Foremost among them was Brigadier General George Shepley, who had been military governor of Louisiana. Butler invited Shepley to join him and "take care of Norfolk." After his arrival, Shepley was empowered to issue military permits allowing goods to be transported through the lines. He designated subordinate George Johnston to manage the task. In fall 1864, Johnston was charged with corruption. However, instead of being prosecuted, he was allowed to resign after saying he could show "that General Butler was a partner in all [the controversial] transactions," along with the general's brother-in-law Fisher Hildreth. Shortly thereafter, Johnston managed a thriving between-the-lines trade depot in eastern North Carolina. There is no doubt that Butler was aware of Shepley's trading activities. His own chief of staff complained about them and spoke of businessmen who "owned" Shepley. Butler took no action.[96]

Much of the Butler-managed Norfolk trade was via the Dismal Swamp Canal to six northeastern counties in North Carolina separated from the rest of the state by Albemarle Sound and the Chowan River. Although cotton was not a major crop, area farmers purchased bales from the Confederate government and took them through the lines where they would be traded for "family supplies." Generally, the Southerners returned with salt, sugar, cash, and miscellaneous supplies. They used the salt to preserve butchered pork, which they sold to the Confederate commissary. After Atlantic-blockaded ports such as Charleston and Wilmington were captured, this route supplied about ten thousand pounds of bacon, sugar, coffee, and codfish daily to Lee's army. Ironically, Grant was trying to cut off Lee's supplies from the Confederacy when Lee's provender was almost entirely furnished from Yankee sources through Butler-controlled Norfolk.[97] Grant wrote of the issue, "Whilst the army was holding Lee in Richmond and Petersburg, I found ... [Lee] ... was receiving supplies, either through the inefficiency or permission of [an] officer selected by General Butler ... from Norfolk through the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal."[98]

Butler's replacement, Major General George H. Gordon, was appalled at the nature of the ongoing trade. Reports were circulating that $100,000 in goods daily left Norfolk for Rebel armies. Grant instructed Gordon to investigate the prior trading practices at Norfolk, after which Gordon released a sixty-page indictment of Butler and his cohorts. It concluded that Butler associates, such as Hildreth and Shepley, were responsible for supplies from Butler's district pouring "directly into the departments of the Rebel Commissary and Quartermaster." Some Butler associates sold permits for cross-line trafficking for a fee.[99] Gordon's report received little publicity, because of the end of the war and Lincoln's assassination.[100]

Postbellum business and charitable dealings

[edit]

Butler greatly expanded his business interests during and after the Civil War, and was extremely wealthy when he died, with an estimated net worth of $7 million ($240 million today). Historian Chester Hearn believed "The source of his fortune has remained a mystery, but much of it came from New Orleans...."[101] However, Butler's mills in Lowell, which produced woolen goods and were not hampered by cotton shortages, were economically successful during the war, supplying clothing and blankets to the Union Army, and regularly paying high dividends.[102] Successful postwar investments included a granite company on Cape Ann and a barge freight operation on the Merrimack River. After learning that no domestic manufacturer produced bunting, he invested in another Lowell mill to produce it, and convinced the federal government to enact legislation requiring domestic sources for material used on government buildings. Less successful ventures included investments in real estate in Virginia, Colorado, and the Baja Peninsula of western Mexico, and a fraudulent gold mining operation in North Carolina.[103] He also founded the Wamesit Power Company and the United States Cartridge Company,[104] and was one of several high-profile investors who were deceived by Philip Arnold in the famous Diamond hoax of 1872.

Butler put some of his money into more charitable enterprises. He purchased confiscated farms in the Norfolk, Virginia area during the war and turned them over to cooperative ventures managed by local African Americans, and sponsored a scholarship for African-Americans at Phillips Andover Academy.[105] He also served for fifteen years in executive positions of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, including as its president from 1866 through 1879.[106]

His law firm also expanded significantly after the war, adding offices in New York City and Washington. High-profile cases he took included the representation of Admiral David Farragut in his quest to be paid by the government for prizes taken by the Navy during the war, and the defense of former Secretary of War Simon Cameron against an attempted extortion in a salacious case that gained much public notice.[107]

Butler built a mansion immediately across the street from the United States Capitol in 1873–1874, known as the Butler Building.[108][109][110] One unit of the building was constructed to be fireproof so that it could be rented as storage for valuable and irreplaceable survey records, maps, and engraving plates of the United States Coast Survey (renamed the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1878), whose headquarters in the Richards Building was directly next door.[110][111] The building was used by President Chester A. Arthur while the White House was being refurnished.[109][112] On April 10, 1891, the Department of the Treasury purchased the building from Butler for $275,000, (~$8.65 million in 2024) and it became the headquarters of the U.S. Marine Hospital Service, with its Hygienic Laboratory (the predecessor of the National Institutes of Health) occupying its top floor.[110][113]

Early postbellum political activities

[edit]

At the urging of his wife, Butler actively sought another political position in the Lincoln administration, but this effort came to an end with Lincoln's assassination in April 1865.[114] Soon after he became president, however, Andrew Johnson sought Butler's legal advice as to whether he could prosecute Robert E. Lee for treason, even though General Grant had granted Lee parole at Appomattox. "On April 25, 1865, Butler wrote a lengthy memorandum to Johnson explaining why the parole Lee received from Grant did not protect him from being prosecuted for treason.... Butler argued that parole was merely a military arrangement that allowed a prisoner 'the privilege of partial liberty instead of close confinement.... Indeed the Lieutenant General [Grant] had not authority to grant amnesty or pardon even if he had undertaken to do so.'"[115]

In March 1866, Butler argued in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the United States in Ex parte Milligan, in which the Court held, against the United States, that military commission trials could not replace civilian trials when courts were open and where there was no war.[116]

United States House of Representatives (1867–75 and 1877–79)

[edit]

Popular from his reputation as a general,[117] Butler turned his eyes to Congress and was elected in 1866 on a platform of civil rights and opposition to President Andrew Johnson's weak Reconstruction policies. He supported a variety of populist and social reform positions, including women's suffrage, an eight-hour workday for federal employees, and the issuance of greenback currency.[118] In his stump speeches, Butler not only denounced Johnson, but also regularly called for his removal from office.[117]

Butler served four terms (1867–75) before failing to be reelected (after hostile Republicans led by Ebenezer Rockwood Hoar succeeded in denying him renomination for his congressional seat in 1874).[119] He was then elected in 1876 and served a single additional term. As a former Democrat, he was initially opposed by the state Republican establishment, which was particularly unhappy with his support of women's suffrage and greenbacks. The more conservative party organization closed ranks against him to reject his two attempts (in 1871 and 1873) to gain the Republican nomination for Governor of Massachusetts.[120]

Impeachment of Andrew Johnson

[edit]

Butler was an early and fierce supporter of impeaching President Johnson.

As a congressional candidate, by October 1866 Butler was traveling to multiple cities across the United States delivering speeches in which he promoted the prospect of impeaching Johnson.[121][122] He detailed six specific charges that Johnson should be impeached for.[121] These were:

By the end of November 1866, Congressman-elect Butler was promoting the idea of impeaching Johnson on the basis of eight articles.[123] The articles that he proposed charged Johnson with:

  • "Degrading and debasing...the station and dignity of the office of Vice-President and that of president" by being publicly drunk at "official and public occasions"[123]
  • "Officially and publicly making declarations and inflammatory harangues, indecent and unbecoming in derogation of his high office, dangerous to the permanency of our republican form of government, and in design to excite the ridicule, fear, hatred, and contempt of the people against the legislative and judicial departments therof"[123]
  • "Wickedly, tyrannically, and unconstitutionally...usurping the lawful rights and powers of the Congress"[123]
  • "Wickedly and corruptly using and abusing" the constitutional power of the President by making recess appointments with the "design to undermine, overthrow and evade the power" of the Congress to advice and consent on such appointments[123]
  • "Improperly, wickedly, and corruptly abusing the constitutional power of pardons" with his pardons for ex-Confederates; "knowingly and willfully violating the constitutionally enacted laws of the United States by appointing disloyal men to office and illegally and without right giving to them emoluments of such office from the Treasury, well knowing the appointees to be ineligible to office"[123]
  • "Knowingly and willfully neglecting and refusing to carry out the constitutional laws of Congress" in the former Confederate states "in order to encourage men lately into rebellion and in arms against the United States to the oppression and injury of the loyal true citizens of such States"[123]
  • "Unlawfully, corruptly, and wickedly confederating and conspiring with one John T. Monroe...and other evil disposed persons, traitors, and Rebels" in the New Orleans massacre of 1866.[123]

In March 1867, Butler unsuccessfully lobbied to be appointed to the House Committee on the Judiciary, which was overseeing the first impeachment inquiry against Andrew Johnson. John Bingham, who had worked to combat many of the early efforts to impeach Johnson,[124] strongly opposed the prospect of Butler's being appointed to that committee.[125]

Although Butler was not included on the select committee appointed to draft the articles of impeachment for Johnson after he was impeached in February 1868, he independently wrote his own article of impeachment. He did so at the urging of Thaddeus Stevens, a member of the select committee who felt that Radical Republicans on the select committee were conceding too much to moderates in limiting the scope of the violations of law that the articles of impeachment the committee was drafting would charge Johnson with.[126] The article Butler wrote cited no clear violation of law, but instead charged Johnson with attempting, "to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt, and reproach the Congress of the United States."[126] The article was seen as having been written in response to speeches that Johnson had made during his "Swing Around the Circle".[127] Butler's article was initially rejected by a 48–74 vote on March 2, 1868. However, it was subsequently adopted as the tenth article of impeachment by a 88–45 vote after it was reintroduced by the impeachment managers the following day.[126][128][129] It was the only article of impeachment that any Republican congressman voted against.[130][129][131][132]

Johnson impeachment managers
Seated L-R: Butler, Thaddeus Stevens, Thomas Williams, John Bingham;
Standing L-R: James F. Wilson, George S. Boutwell, John A. Logan
Illustration of Butler (left) delivering the opening remarks of the prosecution during the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson

Butler was elected by the House serve as be one of the managers (prosecutors) for the impeachment trial of Johnson before the Senate.[133][134][128] Although Thaddeus Stevens was the principal guiding force behind the impeachment effort, he was aging and ill at the time, and Butler stepped in to become the main organizing force in the prosecution. The case was focused primarily on Johnson's removal of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act, and was weak because the constitutionality of the law had not been decided. The trial was a somewhat uncomfortable affair, in part because the weather was hot and humid, and the chamber was packed. The prosecution's case was a humdrum recitation of facts already widely known, and it was attacked by the defense's William Evarts, who drowned the proceedings by repeatedly objecting to Butler's questions, often necessitating a vote by the Senate on whether to allow the question. Johnson's defense focused on the point that his removal of Stanton fell within the bounds of the Tenure of Office Act. Despite some missteps by the defense and Butler's vigorous cross-examination of defense witnesses, the impeachment failed by a single vote. In the interval between the trial and the Senate vote, Butler searched without success for substantive evidence that Johnson operatives were working to bribe undecided Senators.[135] After acquittal on May 16, 1868, of the first article voted on,[136] Senate Republicans voted to adjourn for ten days, seeking time to possibly change the outcome on the remaining articles.[137]

Later on May 16, 1868, The House enabled an investigation by the impeachment managers into alleged "improper or corrupt means used to influence the determination of the Senate". Butler led this investigation, approving summons for several eyewitnesses the same day that the investigation was authorized.[138] Butler looked into the possibility that four of the seven Republican senators who voted for acquittal had been improperly influenced in their votes. He uncovered some evidence that promises of patronage had been made and that money may have changed hands but was unable to decisively link these actions to any specific senator.[139]

On May 26, 1868, Johnson was acquitted on the second and third articles voted on, and the trial was adjourned. On August 3, 1868, Johnson wrote that Butler was "the most daring and unscrupulous demagogue I have ever known."[137] Butler's performance as a prosecutor has been regarded as subpar, and this has been cited as a factor that contributed to Johnson's acquittal.[140] After the trial resulted in an acquittal, Butler continued the impeachment managers' investigation into possible corrupt influence on the trial, conducting hearings on reports that Republican senators had been bribed to vote for Johnson's acquittal.[141] He published the final report of the investigation on July 3, 1868, having failed to prove the alleged corruption that had been investigated.[142]

Civil Rights Act of 1871

[edit]
Harper's Weekly illustration by Thomas Nast in 1874 with helpless baby "Boston"

Butler wrote the initial version of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act). After his bill was defeated, Representative Samuel Shellabarger of Ohio drafted another bill, only slightly less sweeping than Butler's, that successfully passed both houses and became law upon Grant's signature on April 20.[134][143] Along with Republican senator Charles Sumner, Butler proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1875, a seminal and far-reaching law banning racial discrimination in public accommodations.[144] The Supreme Court of the United States declared the law unconstitutional in the 1883 Civil Rights Cases.[145]

Relationship with President Ulysses S. Grant

[edit]

Butler managed to rehabilitate his relationship with Ulysses Grant after the latter became president, to the point where he was seen as generally speaking for the president in the House. He annoyed Massachusetts old-guard Republicans by convincing Grant to nominate one of his protégés to be collector of the Port of Boston, an important patronage position, and secured an exception for an ally, John B. Sanborn, in legislation regulating the use of contractors by the Internal Revenue Service for the collection of tax debts. In 1874, Sanborn would be involved in the Sanborn Contract scandal, in which he was paid over $200,000 (~$4.99 million in 2024) for collecting debts that would likely have been paid without his intervention.[146]

Other actions

[edit]

In 1871, Butler sponsored an appearance by suffragette Victoria Woodhull before a congressional committee. In her testimony, Woodhull argued that the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States implicitly grant women the right to vote. During his tenure in Congress, Butler served for some time as the chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary.[147] During the 41st Congress, Butler served as the chairman of the House Select Committee on Reconstruction.[148]

In a campaign speech in 1871, Butler spoke out in support of the Paris Commune. He described the working-class insurrection as "possibly overshadowing the great act of emancipation by which this country liberated four millions of people." Butler's speech provided a rare example of a U.S. politician offering solidarity to the Communards.[149]

Governor of Massachusetts (1883–84)

[edit]

Unsuccessful bids

[edit]

Butler made four unsuccessful attempts at being elected governor of Massachusetts between the years 1871 and 1879.

In 1871 and 1874, he attempted to receive the Republican nomination, but the more conservative party organization closed ranks against him to deny him the nomination.[120]

Butler again ran unsuccessfully for governor of Massachusetts in 1878, this time as an independent with Greenback Party support. He had unsuccessfully also sought the Democratic nomination. He was denied the Democratic nomination by the party's leadership, which refused to admit him into the party. Despite this, Butler did receive the nomination of a populist rump group of Democrats that disrupted the main convention, forcing it to adjourn to another location.[150] He was renominated by the populist Democrats in similar fashion in 1879. In both years, Republicans won against the divided Democrats.[151]

Because Butler sought the governorship in part as a stepping stone to the presidency, he opted not to run for it again until 1882.[151]

Term in office

[edit]

In 1882, Butler successfully litigated Juilliard v. Greenman before the Supreme Court. In what was seen as a victory for Greenback supporters, the case confirmed that the government had the right to issue paper currency for public and private debts.[152]

In 1882, Butler again ran for governor of Massachusetts, this time being elected by a 14,000-vote margin after winning nomination by both Greenbacks and an undivided Democratic Party.[153] As governor, Butler was active in promoting reform and competence in administration, in spite of a hostile Republican legislature and Governor's Council.[154] He appointed the state's first Irish-American judge, its first African American judge, George Lewis Ruffin,[120] and appointed the first woman to executive office, Clara Barton, to head the Massachusetts Reformatory for Women. He also graphically exposed the mismanagement of the state's Tewksbury Almshouse under a succession of Republican governors.[155] Butler was somewhat notoriously snubbed by Harvard University, which traditionally granted honorary degrees to the state's governors. Butler's honorarium was denied because the Board of Overseers, headed by Ebenezer Hoar, voted against it.[156]

Butler's bid for reelection in 1883 was one of the most contentious campaigns of his career. His presidential ambitions were well known, and the state's Republican establishment, led by Ebenezer and George Frisbie Hoar, poured money into the campaign against him. Running against Congressman George D. Robinson (whose campaign manager was a young Henry Cabot Lodge), Butler was defeated by 10,000 votes, out of more than 300,000 cast.[155] Butler is credited with beginning the tradition of the "lone walk", the ceremonial exit from the office of Governor of Massachusetts, after finishing his term in 1884.[157]

1884 presidential campaign

[edit]

Butler parlayed his victory in the Juilliard v. Greenman decision into a run for president in 1884. Butler was nominated by the Greenback and Anti-Monopoly parties,[158] but was unsuccessful in getting the Democratic nomination, which went to Grover Cleveland.[159] Cleveland refused to adopt parts of Butler's platform in exchange for his political support, prompting Butler to run in the general election rather than withdrawing in deference to Cleveland.[160] He sought to gain electoral votes by engaging in fusion efforts with Democrats in some states and Republicans in others,[161] in which he took what were perceived in the contemporary press as bribes $25,000 from the campaign of Republican James G. Blaine.[162] The effort was in vain: Butler polled 175,000 out of 10 million votes cast in the election, which Cleveland won.[163]

Later years and death

[edit]
Butler's memorial at the Hildreth family cemetery in Lowell, Massachusetts

In his later years Butler reduced his activity level, working on his memoir, Butler's Book, which was published in 1892.[164] Butler's Book has 1,037 pages plus a 94-page appendix consisting of letters. In it, "Butler focused by far the majority of his attention on the war years, vigorously defending his often-maligned record." He arranged "with his longtime friend and ally James Parton [author of General Butler in New Orleans] that Parton would finish the book if Butler died before it was done. (As it happens, Parton died first, in October 1891)."[165] Butler's biographer Richard S. West, Jr. writes, "The autobiography may be said to be generally true without being meticulously accurate".[166]

Butler died on January 11, 1893, of complications from a bronchial infection, two days after arguing a case before the Supreme Court.[167] He is buried in his wife's family cemetery, behind the main Hildreth Cemetery in Lowell.[168] The inscription on Butler's monument reads, "the true touchstone of civil liberty is not that all men are equal but that every man has the right to be the equal of every other man—if he can."[169]

His daughter Blanche married Adelbert Ames, a Mississippi governor and senator who had served as a general in the Union Army during the war. Butler's descendants include the scientist Adelbert Ames Jr., suffragist and artist Blanche Ames Ames, Butler Ames, Hope Butler, and George Plimpton.

Legacy

[edit]

According to biographer Hans L. Trefousse:

Butler was one of the most controversial 19th-century American politicians. Demagogue, speculator, military bungler, and sharp legal practitioner—he was all of these; and he also was a fearless advocate of justice for the downtrodden, a resourceful military administrator, and an astonishing innovator. He was passionately hated and equally strongly admired, and if the South called him "Beast," his constituents in Massachusetts were fascinated by him.... As a leading advocate of radical Reconstruction, Butler played an important role in the conflict between president and Congress. His effectiveness was marred by the frequency with which engaged in personal altercations, and his conduct as one of the principal managers of the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson was dubious. Nevertheless he deserves recognition as a persistent critic of southern terrorism and is one of the chief authors of the Civil Rights Act of 1875.[170]

Black newspapers eulogized him "consistently as a 'friend of the colored race,' 'a staunch and enthusiastic advocate' of Black progress, and 'one of the few American statesmen who have stood as a wall of defense in favor of equal rights for all American citizens.' ...[171] The New England Torchlight put it simply: 'The white South hated him. The black South loved him.'"[172]

Ideology ("Butlerism")

[edit]
Butlerism
LeaderBenjamin Butler
IdeologyRadical Republicanism
Irish nationalism
Women's suffrage
Monetary inflation
• Pro-spoils system
Political positionPopulist
National affiliation

Butlerism was a political term in the United States during the Gilded Age applied as a pejorative by its opponents[173][174] that referred to the political causes of Butler. A populist movement, it was criticized for its "spirit of the European mob," and appealed to support for women's suffrage, Irish nationalism, an eight-hour work day, monetary inflation, and the usage of greenbacks to pay off the national debt.[175]

The ideology and political themes of Butlerism, which opposed civil service reform, advocated inflationary monetary policy, and assailed capitalism as exploiting workmen, clashed with the aims of liberal reformers in the Gilded Age.[175] Its left-wing stances on monetary policy came at odds with the considerably more conservative members of the Republican Party, including Ulysses S. Grant and James G. Blaine. When Butler and Democratic congressman George H. Pendleton led a bipartisan wing of inflationists advocating the continued usage of greenbacks, Blaine emerged as the first member of Congress antagonizing the repudiation theory.[176] After President Grant in 1874 vetoed Butler's "inflation bill,"[177] Harper's Weekly published a cartoon by Thomas Nast depicting Grant, a supporter of sound money, as having "bottled up" Butlerism.[178]

In spite of Butlerism's radical elements during its time, Butler during the presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes was closely aligned with the politics of the conservative Stalwart faction in his support for Ulysses S. Grant, due to their shared concern for civil rights, tendency to "wave the bloody shirt," and antipathy towards the hardline civil service reform efforts.[179] These aims were in turn harshly lamented by reformers, including Charles Francis Adams Jr., and Carl Schurz.

Opponents of Butler derided the ideology as involving "no principle which is elevating, it inspires no sentiment which is ennobling."[173] In turn, defenders of Butlerism retorted:

There is one thing that this unholy alliance cannot efface, that General Butler has pluck and brains, and they will find that the more people believe in men of that make-up. The country today needs more "Butlerism" and less "toadyism."

Attacks on Butlerism included one by Kentucky Democrat John Y. Brown in February 1874, who complained: "If I wished to describe all that was pusillanimous in war, inhuman in peace, forbidden in morals, and infamous in politics, I should call it 'Butlerism.'"[174] Brown subsequently faced a censure for his remarks, and bickering on the House floor soon followed.

Electoral history

[edit]

Gubernatorial

[edit]
1859 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[180]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Nathaniel Prentiss Banks (incumbent) 58,804 54.02
Democratic Benjamin Franklin Butler 35,326 32.45
Know Nothing George Nixon Briggs 14,365 13.20
Total votes 108,140 100
1860 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[180]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John Albion Andrew 104,527 61.63
Democratic Erasmus Beach 35,191 20.75
Constitutional Union Amos Adams Lawrence 23,816 14.04
Southern Democratic Benjamin Franklin Butler 6,000 3.54
Total votes 169,534 100
1872 Massachusetts Republican Convention gubernatorial nomination vote[181]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican William B. Washburn (incumbent) 563 67.10
Republican Benjamin Butler 259 30.87
Republican Scattering 17 2.03
Total votes 839 100
1878 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[182]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Thomas Talbot 134,725 52.56
Democratic Benjamin Butler
Greenback Benjamin Butler
Total Benjamin Butler 109,435 42.69
Ind. Democrat Josiah Gardner Abbott 10,162 3.96
Prohibition Alonzo Ames Miner 1,913 0.75
Write-in 97 0.04
1879 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[183]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John Davis Long 122,751 50.38
Democratic Benjamin Butler 109,149 44.80
Independent Democrat John Quincy Adams II 9,989 4.10
Prohibition D.C. Eddy 1,645 0.68
Others Others 108 0.04
1882 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[184]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Benjamin Franklin Butler 133,946 52.27
Republican Robert R. Bishop 119,997 46.82
Prohibition Charles Almy 2,137 0.83
Others Others 198 0.08
1883 Massachusetts gubernatorial election[185]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican George D. Robinson 160,092 51.25
Democratic Benjamin Franklin Butler (incumbent) 150,228 48.10
Prohibition Charles Almy 1,881 0.60
Others Others 156 0.05

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Benjamin Franklin Butler (November 5, 1818 – January 11, 1893) was an American lawyer and Democratic politician from Massachusetts who attained the rank of major general in the Union Army during the American Civil War.
As commander at Fort Monroe, Virginia, in 1861, Butler devised the "contraband of war" policy, refusing to return escaped enslaved people to Confederate owners and thereby initiating a legal basis for their retention by Union forces, which contributed to the erosion of slavery in occupied areas. His subsequent occupation of New Orleans in 1862 provoked widespread Confederate outrage through strict enforcement measures, including General Order No. 28, which threatened women who insulted Union soldiers with treatment as prostitutes, earning him the moniker "Beast Butler" from critics. Militarily, Butler's Bermuda Hundred Campaign in 1864 failed to capitalize on opportunities against Confederate forces, leading to his removal from command by Ulysses S. Grant due to perceived incompetence.
Postwar, Butler shifted politically, serving as a Radical Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1867 to 1875 and again in 1877–1879, where he acted as a manager in the impeachment proceedings against President Andrew Johnson. He advocated for labor rights, women's suffrage, and African American civil rights, though his opportunism drew accusations of inconsistency. Elected governor of Massachusetts as a Democrat in 1882, he served one term focused on reformist policies before running unsuccessfully for president on the Greenback Party ticket in 1884.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Benjamin Franklin Butler was born on November 5, 1818, in , to John Butler, a captain who had served under during the , and Charlotte Ellison Butler. His father died shortly after his birth, leaving the family in reduced circumstances and prompting his mother to relocate with her children to , by 1828. In Lowell, a burgeoning industrial center known for its textile mills, Charlotte supported the household by operating a boardinghouse that catered primarily to mill workers. Butler grew up as the youngest of his parents' children in this modest, working-class environment, sharing adolescence with at least one older brother, Andrew Jackson Butler (1815–1864), amid the disciplined routine of his mother's establishment. The family's reliance on Charlotte's enterprise instilled in the young Butler an awareness of economic , though his childhood was marked by the challenges of widowhood and industrial urban life rather than privilege. Despite these constraints, Butler displayed early ambition, though his aspirations for a military were unrealized at the time. Butler attended and graduated from (now ) in , in 1838. Following graduation, he returned to , where he apprenticed with a local , reading law through traditional clerkship rather than formal schooling, a common path for at the time. In 1840, Butler was admitted to the Massachusetts bar and opened a law practice in Lowell, initially focusing on local cases that provided practical experience in the city's police and municipal courts. He rapidly developed a reputation for skillful advocacy, particularly in criminal defense matters, which helped establish a lucrative clientele among Lowell's working-class population and mill owners. By 1845, his growing prominence led to admission before the Supreme Court, enabling him to handle appellate work and broadening his professional scope. Butler's emphasized work over abstract theory, leveraging his oratorical abilities and knowledge of industrial disputes in textile-heavy Lowell to secure favorable outcomes for defendants and business interests alike. This period solidified his and local influence, setting the stage for later political involvement, though he avoided partisan entanglements until the .

Pre-War Professional and Political Activities

Business Dealings and Financial Interests

Butler began his legal career in , after admission to the state bar in 1840, quickly establishing a reputation as a bold and effective trial lawyer in the industrial hub's textile sector. His practice often involved labor disputes, where he represented "factory girls" blacklisted by mill owners in the 1840s, yet he also advocated for industrial interests, reflecting pragmatic alignments with local economic powers. This duality enabled substantial earnings, which he channeled into direct business investments amid Lowell's booming mills and nascent financial institutions. By the late 1840s and early 1850s, Butler had accumulated sufficient wealth to acquire interests in manufacturing, notably purchasing shares in the Middlesex Corporation—Lowell's pioneering woolen mill—during periods of financial distress when assets were undervalued. He expanded into and other commercial ventures, including service on boards of , which bolstered his financial position in an era of rapid industrialization. These holdings underscored his transition from legal advocate to stakeholder in the very enterprises he sometimes litigated against, amassing a fortune that funded his prominent Lowell residence by 1850. Butler's pre-war financial strategy emphasized opportunistic investments in undervalued industrial assets, aligning with Democrats' pro-business leanings while navigating worker-employer tensions. No evidence indicates involvement in railroads prior to 1861, though his legal acumen positioned him to represent transportation and banking clients amid regional growth. This portfolio laid the groundwork for postwar expansions, but contemporaries noted his astute, if occasionally self-interested, approach to wealth-building in Lowell's competitive economy.

Entry into Massachusetts Politics

Butler, having built a prosperous legal career in Lowell, Massachusetts, as a trial attorney specializing in cases involving railroads and mills, entered state politics in the early as a member of the Democratic Party. His entry was facilitated by his local prominence and connections within the party's northern wing, which sought to balance industrial interests with national compromises on . In November 1852, Butler won election to the , assuming office for the 1853 legislative session. During his tenure, he focused on legislation benefiting urban laborers, particularly Irish immigrants who comprised a significant portion of Lowell's textile workforce, and opposed nativist policies targeting Catholic newcomers amid the rise of the Know-Nothing movement. As a "" Democrat sympathetic to southern concerns, Butler defended the , including its Fugitive Slave Act provisions, arguing they preserved constitutional balances essential to union stability. Beyond the legislature, Butler advanced in the state militia, rising to by 1860, which bolstered his political profile through military patronage networks. His legislative service ended after the 1853 term, but he maintained party influence, serving as a delegate to Democratic national conventions and securing election to the State Senate in 1858 for the 1859 session. These roles positioned him as a pragmatic operator in a state dominated by Whigs and emerging Republicans, leveraging oratory and legal acumen to champion economic protections for northern manufacturers while avoiding overt .

Stance on Secession and Slavery

Butler, a Democrat aligned with pro-Southern "" politicians, defended the constitutional rights of slaveholders and opposed Northern abolitionist agitation against 's expansion. He supported enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and rejected immediate , viewing as a protected institution under the federal compact where legally established. In the 1860 presidential election, Butler defied Massachusetts Democratic instructions by endorsing John C. Breckinridge, the Southern Democratic nominee whose platform explicitly called for federal legislation safeguarding in the territories, including a slave code to override territorial restrictions. This stance reflected his belief in and slaveholder property rights, positioning him against Stephen A. Douglas's more moderate Northern Democratic candidacy. Regarding , Butler maintained that the Southern states' withdrawal violated the Constitution's guarantee of a , rendering ordinances of secession null and void. Initially favoring to avoid coercion, he shifted after the firing on in April 1861, organizing Massachusetts militia units and advocating military defense of the Union to suppress rebellion, thereby prioritizing national integrity over compromise with disunionists.

Civil War Military Service

Appointment as Major General and Initial Operations (1861)

Butler, a in the state prior to the war, assumed command of the 8th Massachusetts Volunteer Militia Regiment following President Abraham Lincoln's , 1861, call for 75,000 volunteers after the Confederate attack on . The regiment, numbering approximately 900 men, departed , and initially planned to travel by rail through but rerouted by sea to , arriving on April 21, 1861, amid disruptions from the April 19 Baltimore riot that had attacked the 6th Massachusetts Regiment and halted rail access to . On April 25, 1861, Union Army General-in-Chief Winfield Scott appointed Butler to command the newly created Department of Annapolis, tasking him with securing the port as a staging area to reinforce the national capital while avoiding hostile Baltimore. Butler rapidly organized operations from Annapolis, commandeering vessels to transport over 3,000 Union troops— including elements of the 7th New York Infantry—safely to Washington by early May, thereby restoring supply lines without further reliance on Baltimore's railroads. He also declared martial law in Baltimore to deter secessionist interference, though this exceeded his initial orders. By May 13, 1861, Butler advanced approximately 1,000 troops into via rail, occupying Federal Hill—a strategic elevation overlooking the city—and positioning to enforce Union control, an action taken without Scott's prior approval but which pacified secessionist elements and secured the rail hub. This maneuver, involving no major combat but effective show of force, prevented Maryland's potential and protected Washington's northern approaches. In recognition of these efforts to safeguard the capital, Lincoln commissioned as a major general of volunteers on May 16, 1861, making him the first such appointee in the Union Army and elevating him to federal command authority. Shortly thereafter, on May 22, 1861, transferred to command the Department of , headquartered at , marking the transition from his initial Eastern Seaboard stabilization operations.

Fort Monroe Command and Contraband Policy

Benjamin Butler assumed command of and the Department of Virginia on May 22, 1861, shortly after 's , positioning the fort as a key Union stronghold at to secure supply lines and probe Confederate defenses. On May 23, he dispatched troops to nearby Hampton to disrupt local secessionist activities, including voting on Virginia's , signaling Union intent to maintain control in the region despite limited forces. These early actions set the stage for Butler's pragmatic approach to local challenges, including the arrival of enslaved individuals fleeing Confederate lines. On May 24, 1861, three enslaved men—Frank Baker, James Townsend, and Shepard Mallory—escaped from Confederate fortifications at , where they had been compelled to labor on batteries opposing , and sought refuge within Union lines. refused their owner's demand for return under the Fugitive Slave Act, instead classifying them as "contraband of war"—property destined for enemy use that the Union could seize and deny to rebels, circumventing constitutional obligations since Virginia's rendered slaveholders enemies rather than citizens. In a May 27 dispatch to Lt. Gen. , elaborated that such runaways, valued collectively at over $60,000, represented a to weaken Confederate logistics, though he expressed uncertainty on broader treatment, proposing to employ able-bodied men while supporting dependents. The policy rapidly expanded as news spread, drawing dozens more fugitives by late May and swelling to approximately 900–1,000 by mid-summer, overwhelming Fort Monroe's capacity and prompting Butler to organize labor details for fortification work and establish camps like Camp Hamilton. The War Department endorsed the approach on May 30 but restricted it to slaves directly aiding Confederate military efforts, while President Lincoln permitted its continuation despite initial reservations over provoking border states. Following Confederate forces' burning of Hampton on August 7, 1861, to deny Union use amid advancing threats, Butler resettled contrabands in the ruins, fostering the Grand Contraband Camp—known as "Slabtown"—the first self-contained freed Black community in the South, where residents built homes from debris and contributed to Union efforts. codified the policy in the First Confiscation Act of August 6, 1861, marking an early shift toward by treating slaves as forfeitable rebel assets.

Capture and Administration of New Orleans (1862)

The Union Navy, under Flag Officer David G. Farragut, captured New Orleans on April 25, 1862, after his fleet of 24 gunboats and 19 mortar vessels ran past Confederate Forts Jackson and St. Philip on the lower Mississippi River during the night of April 24–25, suffering minimal losses despite heavy bombardment. The city's defenses collapsed without significant resistance, as Confederate forces evacuated key positions, leaving New Orleans—the Confederacy's largest port and economic hub—vulnerable to Union control. Major General Benjamin F. Butler arrived by sea on May 1, 1862, with approximately 5,000 Union troops from Ship Island, Mississippi, and assumed military command of the occupied city without opposition, establishing federal authority over its 168,000 residents amid widespread Confederate sympathy. Butler's administration, lasting until December 16, 1862, imposed to restore order, including bans on public assemblies and of pro-Confederate newspapers, while confiscating —estimated at over 300,000 bales—as a war resource to fund Union efforts and stimulate Northern mills, reversing initial trade allowances for owners who refused loyalty oaths. He organized economic revival by employing freed slaves and local laborers at Union wages for projects, such as repairs and cleaning, which generated revenue through exports under federal supervision. measures addressed the city's chronic sanitation issues and risks; Butler enforced quarantines, mandated garbage collection, and drained stagnant waters, drastically reducing disease mortality from thousands annually pre-war to near zero during his tenure. Civilian policies provoked intense backlash, exemplified by General Order No. 28 issued on May 15, 1862, which decreed that women showing contempt for Union officers—such as by dumping chamber pots or spitting on troops—would be regarded as prostitutes and subject to , a response to documented of federal personnel that aimed to deter but fueled accusations of tyranny. Confederate President responded by declaring Butler an outlaw on May 27, exempt from prisoner-of-war protections, while locals dubbed him "Beast Butler" for perceived humiliations. Butler authorized the execution of William B. Mumford on June 7, 1862, for after Mumford tore down a U.S. flag from a federal mint in April, prior to occupation but viewed by Butler as defiance warranting under . On racial matters, Butler extended his earlier "" policy by employing emancipated slaves in labor roles, paying them wages, and authorizing the recruitment of African American troops; on September 27, 1862, he mustered the 1st Native Guard as the first official Union black regiment, including commissioned black officers, predating broader and challenging prevailing prejudices against arming freedmen. These actions stabilized occupation amid resource shortages but alienated white elites, contributing to Butler's relief by General , whose less stringent approach allowed renewed Confederate intrigue. Despite controversies, Butler's governance secured New Orleans as a Union base, preventing its recapture and yielding logistical advantages for campaigns.

Public Health and Infrastructure Measures

Butler assumed command of New Orleans on May 1, 1862, inheriting a city plagued by unsanitary conditions exacerbated by Confederate evacuation and wartime neglect, which threatened outbreaks of , , and typhoid. To address these risks, he mobilized thousands of laborers—including unemployed residents and Union troops—for a comprehensive cleanup, directing the flushing of gutters, sweeping of debris, and scouring of sewers, canals, streets, and public markets that had become disease vectors. inspectors enforced resident compliance by requiring households and yards to be cleared to standards aimed at and waste removal, while a system was established to isolate potential carriers. These initiatives were complemented by repairs to restore functionality and support economic recovery. launched a program that rebuilt wharves destroyed by retreating Confederates and reinforced deteriorating levees along the , preventing flooding and enabling resumed commerce critical to the city's revival as a Union administrative hub. By December 1862, when relieved of command, these measures had notably reduced disease incidence and stabilized basic services, though sustained improvements required ongoing federal investment.

Economic Management and Cotton Confiscations

Butler assumed formal command of New Orleans on May 1, 1862, inheriting a city facing acute shortages after Confederate forces evacuated key assets, including burning much of the stockpile. To avert among the of approximately 150,000, he promptly authorized limited resumption, issuing permits for Northern vessels to foodstuffs and necessities while enforcing strict inspections to curb and disease risks. These measures, though criticized for elevated prices controlled by military oversight, successfully stabilized supply chains and prevented widespread starvation, with food imports arriving via the despite ongoing blockades. Butler addressed currency instability by issuing General Order No. 30 in early June 1862, which deprecated Confederate notes and mandated their exchange for U.S. greenbacks at a fixed rate, compelling local banks and merchants to accept federal currency under penalty of seizure. This policy restored confidence in transactions, enabling banks to reopen and facilitating economic activity, though it initially sparked resistance from institutions holding Confederate bonds. Central to his economic strategy were cotton confiscations, as New Orleans warehouses held substantial pre-war stockpiles amid the South's dominant export commodity. On May 4, 1862, General Order No. 22 declared all and in the —estimated in tens of thousands of bales post-Confederate fires—to be Union property unless owners petitioned within ten days and swore loyalty oaths proving non-rebellious intent. Confiscated holdings from disloyal parties or abandoned Confederate assets were auctioned publicly, with proceeds remitted to the U.S. Treasury to fund occupation costs and war efforts; Butler reported turning over revenues exceeding $400,000 from such sales by mid-1862, though total exported under his lax permit system reached around 300,000 bales, blending legal with seizures. These policies generated controversy, with Southern critics and later congressional probes alleging rigged auctions, permit favoritism toward Butler's brother Andrew, and personal enrichment via "prizes of war" declarations that bypassed Treasury claims. Butler defended the actions as lawful under military necessity and international prize law, arguing they deprived the Confederacy of resources while sustaining Union finances, though investigations found evidence of speculative abuses without direct proof of his complicity.

Civilian Policies and Controversies

Butler imposed upon capturing New Orleans on May 1, 1862, declaring that all inhabitants would be held accountable for aiding the Confederacy and prohibiting public assemblies without permission to maintain order among Union troops facing civilian hostility. This policy extended to suppressing overt acts of defiance, such as the removal of Union flags, which Butler viewed as treasonous under President Lincoln's May 1861 authorizing execution for such offenses committed after that date. A central controversy arose from General Order No. 28, issued on May 15, 1862, in response to repeated insults directed at Union soldiers by local women, including dumping chamber pots from balconies and . The order stipulated: "As the officers and soldiers of the have been subject to repeated insults from the women (calling themselves ladies) of New Orleans... when any female shall, by word, gesture, or movement, insult or show contempt for any officer or soldier of the , she shall be regarded and held liable to be treated as a woman of the town plying her ." Butler intended this to deter by invoking —treating offenders as prostitutes subject to and confinement by —rather than authorizing physical , leveraging Southern norms of female honor to enforce compliance without widespread violence. The decree provoked intense backlash, with Confederate sympathizers decrying it as an on Southern womanhood; it drew diplomatic protests from Britain and , who viewed it as condoning indecency, and contributed to Butler's eventual removal by President Lincoln on December 16, 1862. Despite claims of license for , historical accounts indicate no documented instances of such under the order, and it reportedly reduced overt civilian antagonism in the city. Another flashpoint was the execution of William B. Mumford on June 7, 1862, the only civilian hanged for by the U.S. government during the Civil War. Mumford, a local gambler, had torn down and trampled a U.S. displayed at the U.S. Mint on April 24, 1862, prior to the formal occupation but after Lincoln's . Butler ordered a military commission trial, convicted Mumford of inciting rebellion, and hanged him publicly at the Mint site, stating it served as a deterrent and warning to secessionists. Confederate elevated Mumford to status, amplifying perceptions of Butler's rule as despotic, though Union defenders argued the act upheld federal authority in a captured city rife with sabotage risks. Butler's policies also included exiling prominent secessionists, such as Eugenia Phillips, a socialite arrested in June 1862 for mocking Union officers and ridiculing a report of Confederate deaths; she was banished to Ship Island under guard. These measures, while effective in quelling organized resistance—evidenced by stabilized municipal functions and reduced guerrilla activity—fueled enduring resentment among New Orleanians, who nicknamed Butler "Beast" for prioritizing military discipline over conciliatory governance. Critics, including Confederate officials, charged him with arbitrary seizures and humiliations, though primary records show such actions targeted active disloyalty rather than indiscriminate punishment.

Army of the James and Bermuda Hundred Campaign (1864)

In May 1864, as part of Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant's coordinated offensive against Confederate forces in Virginia, Major General Benjamin F. Butler received command of the Army of the James, comprising the X Corps under Major General Quincy A. Gillmore and the XVIII Corps under Major General William F. Smith, with a total strength of approximately 33,000 men. Butler's orders directed him to transport the army up the James River, land at Bermuda Hundred—a peninsula formed by the James and Appomattox rivers—and advance westward to sever the Richmond and Petersburg Railroad, thereby isolating Richmond from the south and threatening the Confederate capital directly. The operation aimed to divert Confederate attention and resources from Grant's Army of the Potomac, which was engaging General Robert E. Lee in the Overland Campaign. On May 5, 1864, Butler's troops disembarked unopposed at Bermuda Hundred and began probing advances toward key objectives, including the rail lines at Petersburg, about 15 miles southwest. Initial movements included skirmishes at Port Walthall Junction on May 6–7, where Union forces under Gillmore repelled Confederate counterattacks but failed to destroy the railroad due to inadequate support and coordination. Butler then shifted focus northward toward Drewry's Bluff, Confederate fortifications guarding the approaches to Richmond, but his advance stalled amid swampy terrain, supply issues, and internal command frictions—Smith and Gillmore, both West Point graduates, resented serving under the politically appointed Butler. By May 12, General , commanding fewer than 20,000 Confederate troops scraped together from regional garrisons, had concentrated forces to block Butler's path, exploiting the Union's hesitation to entrench along the Bermuda Hundred neck. The campaign's decisive actions unfolded between May 16 and 20, 1864, during the Battles of Drewry's Bluff and Ware Bottom Church. On May 16, Butler launched an assault on Beauregard's lines at Drewry's Bluff (also known as Proctor's Creek), but heavy rains, fortified positions, and Confederate reinforcements under Major General halted the Union attack, inflicting about 2,900 casualties on Butler's forces compared to 2,500 for the Confederates. Four days later, on May 20, Beauregard counterattacked at Ware Bottom Church with eight brigades, aiming to dislodge Butler from his entrenchments; the assault failed against prepared Union defenses, resulting in roughly 1,100 Confederate losses to 700 Union, but it solidified the containment of Butler's army within the Hundred bottleneck. These engagements, marked by Butler's reluctance to press aggressive maneuvers despite numerical superiority, allowed Beauregard to "bottle up" the , preventing it from achieving Grant's strategic objectives or linking with the . By late May 1864, Butler's command had dug in defensively, conducting only limited raids and demonstrations while immobilized by the narrow peninsula's geography and ongoing Confederate pressure; this inaction tied down Union troops without disrupting Lee's supply lines, contributing to Grant's decision in June to redirect Butler's forces southward for the Petersburg Campaign. The thus exemplified Butler's operational shortcomings—cautious tactics, poor inter-corps coordination, and failure to exploit early landings—despite the army's potential to alter the Overland Campaign's dynamics, as later military analyses have noted based on terrain feasibility and troop dispositions. Overall, the operation inflicted minimal lasting damage on Confederate logistics, with Union casualties exceeding 4,000 across the month's actions, while failing to capture Petersburg or Richmond. Later that year, in November 1864, Butler arrived in New York City with approximately 4,000 troops from the Army of the James on orders from Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton to maintain order during the presidential election on November 8, amid concerns of potential violence similar to the 1863 Draft Riots. The presence of these forces helped ensure the election proceeded without major disturbances.

Fort Fisher Expedition and Relief from Command (1865)

In December 1864, Union Major General Benjamin F. Butler assumed personal command of a joint Army-Navy expedition targeting , the earthwork stronghold guarding the Confederate port of , with the objective of eliminating the last major blockade-running hub supplying the Confederacy. The force comprised approximately 6,500 Army troops transported by Rear Admiral David D. Porter's North Atlantic Blockading Squadron, which included over 60 vessels. Butler's plan incorporated an experimental tactic: detonating a "powder ship," the USS Louisiana—loaded with 215 tons of —as a massive explosive to breach the fort's defenses, executed on December 24, 1864; the blast produced a visible column of water and debris but inflicted no measurable structural damage or casualties on the Confederate garrison of about 1,400–1,700 men under Colonel William Lamb. Porter's fleet followed with an intense bombardment starting December 24 and continuing into December 25, firing 20,271 projectiles—the war's heaviest naval concentration—which damaged only four Confederate guns and killed or wounded 23 defenders, leaving the fort's palisades, traverses, and primary batteries largely intact as shells largely overshot the targets, as evidenced by the more effective bombardment in the subsequent attack under similar fort conditions. On December 25, Butler's troops under Godfrey Weitzel landed unopposed north of the fort amid rough surf that sank several vessels, advancing to within 700 yards of the works; a small party advanced to within 50 yards of the land face, encountering little return fire as Confederate defenders remained suppressed in bombproofs by the ongoing naval bombardment, prompting Weitzel—based primarily on visual assessment of the fort's intact and formidable defenses—to report the position as untenable without massive reinforcements. Faced with reports of potential Confederate reinforcements from Wilmington—later assessed as minimal—and deteriorating weather, Butler ordered re-embarkation on December 27 without a full assault, declaring Fort Fisher "one of the strongest fortifications on this continent" and beyond capture by available forces. The expedition returned to , , having suffered minimal casualties from weather, re-embarkation challenges, and minor skirmishes, while achieving no strategic gains. The aborted operation drew sharp rebuke from Lieutenant General , who viewed Butler's withdrawal as premature and reflective of prior hesitancy in campaigns like Bermuda Hundred, telegraphing on January 6, 1865, that the effort represented a "gross failure" unfit for further . On January 8, 1865, Grant formally relieved Butler of all field and departmental commands, citing the fiasco alongside earlier shortcomings, and reassigned him to administrative duties at ; Butler protested the decision as politically motivated but offered no resignation, ending his active combat role. A subsequent expedition under Alfred H. Terry captured on January 15, 1865, validating Grant's assessment that the fort was assailable with determined land assault coordinated with naval fire.

Military Record: Strategic Decisions, Failures, and Defenses

Butler’s early strategic initiative at in aimed to dislodge Confederate forces threatening Union positions on the by coordinating advances from Hampton and Newport News against Little and Big Bethel Churches. On , approximately 3,500 Union troops under subordinates Pierce and Duryée advanced but suffered confusion from similar uniforms, resulting in that killed several soldiers, including Major Theodore Winthrop, and prompted a disorganized retreat after light skirmishing, with 79 Union casualties to 18 Confederate. The plan's complexity overwhelmed inexperienced volunteers, and Butler's absence from the field exacerbated coordination failures, earning criticism for overambition without adequate preparation. In his memoirs, Butler defended the operation as essential to preempt Confederate raids and secure supply lines, arguing that success would have neutralized Magruder's outpost and that subordinate errors, not strategic flaws, caused the setback. The of May 1864 represented Butler's most significant independent command, with his 30,000-man landing unopposed on May 6 to threaten Richmond from the south and divert Beauregard's 18,000 Confederates from Grant's . Despite initial gains, Butler hesitated to exploit momentum, failing to cut key railroads or advance beyond Swift Creek by May 16, allowing Beauregard to entrench at Drewry's Bluff and trap Butler's forces in a 6-by-10-mile pocket, rendering them ineffective for three weeks. This inaction, dubbed the "Bermuda Hundred Folly," drew sharp rebuke from Grant for timidity amid favorable odds, as Butler prioritized entrenching over aggressive maneuvers despite numerical superiority. Butler countered in Butler's Book that dense swamps, rapid Confederate reinforcements, and unreliable subordinates like Baldy Smith necessitated caution to avoid encirclement, claiming his position still tied down Beauregard and prevented reinforcements to Lee, though military historians largely view this as self-justification amid evident hesitation. Butler's final major operation, the December 1864 expedition against , incorporated his proposal for a 400-ton ship on to shatter the Confederate stronghold guarding Wilmington, but the caused negligible damage, followed by a landing of 6,500 troops that reconnaissance deemed the fort too formidable for without excessive risk. Withdrawing on December 25 after minimal probing, the failure prompted Grant to relieve , citing incompetence in forgoing a concerted attack despite naval superiority from Porter. A Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War partially vindicated , concluding the fort's revetted walls and of 1,400 rendered an infantry untenable based on observed conditions. In Butler's Book, elaborated that incomplete naval bombardment and the ship's inadequacy—due to insufficient explosive yield—precluded success, emphasizing his prudent avoidance of futile casualties over rash aggression. Across these engagements, Butler's record reflects politically motivated appointments yielding strategic intent—such as pinning Confederate forces or capturing key ports—but undermined by tactical deficiencies, including overreliance on untested innovations and aversion to decisive against entrenched foes. While contemporaries like Grant dismissed him as unfit, Butler's defenses, rooted in post-hoc rationales of , , and , highlight causal factors like his background and command of raw recruits, though empirical outcomes affirm persistent underperformance in execution.

Reconstruction and Post-War Political Involvement

Advocacy for Harsher Southern Policies

Butler entered the U.S. House of Representatives in December 1866 as a Radical Republican, immediately aligning against President Andrew Johnson's lenient Reconstruction approach, which had facilitated the rapid reorganization of Southern state governments with minimal safeguards for freedmen and former Confederate elites retaining power. He viewed Johnson's pardons and restoration policies as failing to exact sufficient accountability from secessionists, arguing that the South's provisional governments perpetuated rebellion through black codes and exclusion of African Americans from political participation. In alignment with Radical leaders like , Butler advocated delaying the readmission of Southern states until they met stringent congressional conditions, including ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and adoption of constitutions guaranteeing black male . He endorsed the of March 1867, which imposed military governance over the former Confederacy by dividing it into five districts commanded by Union generals, overriding Johnson's state restorations and enforcing federal oversight to suppress insurgent elements and secure civil rights. This framework reflected Butler's insistence on punitive restructuring to dismantle oligarchic rebel influence, prioritizing loyalty oaths, disenfranchisement of high-ranking Confederates under the Fourteenth Amendment's third section, and protection against violence targeting Unionists and freedmen. Butler's congressional rhetoric emphasized retribution against "rebel" leadership to prevent resurgence of disloyalty, supporting measures like expanded authority and the to nullify discriminatory Southern laws, even as he acknowledged practical limits on land confiscation for redistribution. These positions stemmed from his wartime experiences with Southern resistance, where he had witnessed evasion of Union authority, leading him to favor sustained federal intervention over as the causal mechanism for lasting pacification and republican governance.

Role in Impeachment of Andrew Johnson

Benjamin Butler was appointed as one of seven managers by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 1868, to prosecute the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson following the House's approval of eleven articles of impeachment on February 24, 1868. The managers included Thaddeus Stevens, John A. Bingham, George S. Boutwell, James F. Wilson, Thomas Williams, and John A. Logan, with Stevens serving as chairman despite his failing health. Butler, a Radical Republican aligned with efforts to enforce strict Reconstruction policies, had earlier proposed an impeachment article on February 22, 1868, accusing Johnson of committing a high misdemeanor through "intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues" in public speeches that allegedly incited disloyalty and obstructed congressional reconstruction acts. Although this specific article influenced debate, the adopted articles primarily focused on Johnson's removal of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act of 1867. On March 5, 1868, Butler delivered the opening argument for the prosecution before the sitting as a of impeachment, framing Johnson's actions as a deliberate usurpation of legislative authority and a breach of his constitutional oath. In his address, Butler contended that Johnson's defiance of demonstrated "purposeful violation" of law, likening it to monarchical overreach and arguing that the president's speeches and appointments revealed intent to undermine Reconstruction. With Stevens too ill to lead effectively, Butler assumed a prominent prosecutorial role, coordinating arguments among managers and responding to defense challenges, including rebuttals to claims that the Tenure of Office Act was unconstitutional. His presentation, while rhetorically forceful, drew criticism from Johnson's counsel, such as Benjamin Curtis, who targeted perceived weaknesses in the legal framing of . Throughout the trial, which spanned from March 5 to May 26, 1868, Butler participated in examining witnesses and presenting evidence on Johnson's alleged obstructions, though the prosecution struggled with partisan divisions in the Senate. The effort culminated in acquittals on the key articles by single-vote margins—35-19 on May 16 for Article XI (though not Butler's proposed speech article directly) and 35-19 on May 26 for Article III—falling short of the required two-thirds majority. Butler's involvement underscored Radical Republican determination to remove Johnson for his lenient Southern policies, but the failure highlighted limits of impeachment as a partisan tool absent broader consensus.

Support for Civil Rights Legislation

During his tenure in the U.S. as a Radical Republican, Benjamin F. Butler championed federal legislation to secure civil rights for newly freed amid widespread Southern resistance. As chairman of the House Committee on Reconstruction from 1869, he drafted the Enforcement Act of 1871, commonly known as the , which authorized the president to suspend , deploy federal troops, and prosecute conspiracies depriving citizens of constitutional rights, targeting vigilante violence against Black voters and citizens. The act passed on April 20, 1871, and enabled hundreds of prosecutions, though enforcement waned after the 1876 election. Butler actively supported the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, which guaranteed equal protection under the law, and the Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, which prohibited in voting; he viewed these as essential to counter state-level disenfranchisement and pressed for their vigorous implementation during Reconstruction debates. His advocacy extended to earlier of 1870 and 1871, which he helped shape to protect through federal oversight of elections and penalties for intimidation. In the 42nd Congress, Butler co-authored the Civil Rights Act of 1875 with Senator , prohibiting exclusion from public accommodations, transportation, schools, and juries based on race or prior servitude; the bill passed the House on May 21, 1874, and Senate on February 27, 1875, before being signed into law on March 1, 1875. During floor debates, Butler argued that national authority was required for "practical freedom," citing his own shift from pre-war views to endorsing federal intervention after witnessing slavery's effects, though the struck down key provisions in 1883's as exceeding congressional power under the Fourteenth Amendment. These efforts reflected Butler's commitment to overriding local prejudices through statutes, even as they drew opposition from conservatives decrying federal overreach.

Congressional Career

Elections and Terms in the House (1867–1875, 1877–1879)

Butler secured election to the in November 1866 as a Republican representing , capitalizing on his military reputation and advocacy for civil rights measures amid opposition to President Andrew Johnson's policies. He assumed office on March 4, 1867, for the 40th Congress (1867–1869), succeeding John B. Alley. Butler won re-election in 1868 and 1870, continuing to represent the 5th district through the 41st (1869–1871) and 42nd (1871–1873). Following after the 1870 census, he successfully ran in 1872 for the newly configured 6th district, serving in the 43rd (1873–1875). His consistent victories reflected strong support in industrial areas like Lowell and Essex County, where his Radical Republican stance on Reconstruction resonated with voters. In the 1874 election, Butler lost his bid for another term in the 6th district amid a broader national Republican backlash triggered by economic downturns and scandals associated with the Grant administration. This defeat interrupted his congressional service, as Democrats gained seats across and the country in that year's off-year elections. Butler reclaimed a House seat in November 1876, winning election to represent the 7th district in the 45th Congress (1877–1879), further demonstrating his enduring regional appeal despite intraparty tensions within the Republican ranks. His platform emphasized continued commitment to Republican principles, though his independent streak soon led to conflicts with party leadership under President . He did not seek re-election in 1878, concluding this phase of his legislative career.

Key Legislative Actions and Conflicts

During his tenure in the U.S. , Benjamin F. Butler focused on legislation enforcing Reconstruction policies, particularly measures to safeguard the of freedmen against and in the . As chairman of the House Committee on Reconstruction, he championed federal intervention to counter resistance from former Confederates, authoring bills that expanded the scope of national authority over civil protections. In February 1871, Butler introduced an initial bill targeting the and similar paramilitary groups terrorizing Black voters and Republicans, which authorized the suspension of and deployment of federal forces to suppress conspiracies depriving citizens of constitutional rights. Although his version faced initial defeat amid debates over federal overreach, a revised form sponsored by Representative Samuel Shellabarger passed as the Enforcement Act of 1871 () on April 20, 1871, empowering the president to use military power against such organizations and leading to hundreds of arrests in the following years. Butler defended the measure vigorously in floor debates, arguing it was essential to prevent anarchy in Southern states where local authorities colluded with terrorists. Butler also served as the chief House sponsor for the , co-authored with Senator , which prohibited in public accommodations, transportation, schools, and , aiming to guarantee equal civil under the 14th Amendment. The bill passed the House on February 4, 1875, and the full act on March 1, 1875, despite fierce opposition from Democrats decrying it as an infringement on and . These efforts drew Butler into protracted conflicts with Southern representatives and conservative Republicans, who accused him of exacerbating sectional tensions; his combative rhetoric, including references to ongoing lynchings and election fraud, intensified partisan clashes but underscored his commitment to "practical freedom" for . The act's provisions were largely invalidated by the in the of 1883, highlighting the limits of Butler's legislative push amid waning national support for Reconstruction.

Relationship with Ulysses S. Grant and Republican Factions

Butler commanded the under Lieutenant General 's overall direction starting in May 1864, when Grant reorganized Union forces for the Overland Campaign and assigned Butler to operate against Richmond from the east via the . Grant retained Butler in this role despite his earlier failure at the in June 1861, viewing him as politically useful amid Radical Republican influence in Washington, though Grant privately doubted Butler's tactical competence and relied more on subordinates like Quincy Gillmore and Godfrey Weitzel. Tensions escalated after Butler's failed joint expedition against on December 24–25, 1864; Grant, frustrated by the aborted assault and Admiral David D. Porter's criticism, relieved Butler of command on January 8, 1865, via a terse order stating the operation's failure rendered repairs impossible and that Butler's successor was already appointed, effectively ending Butler's field command without . The relief order humiliated Butler, who argued it ignored hydrographic challenges and Porter's premature report of clear channels, fostering personal animosity that Butler later described as Grant's "unjust" dismissal motivated by professional jealousy rather than strategic necessity. Despite this rift, Butler, as a Radical Republican, aligned politically with Grant during the presidential campaign, exerting influence as a House spokesman for the administration on Reconstruction enforcement and viewing Grant's military record as a bulwark against Democratic resurgence, though he campaigned for his own congressional re-election that year without fully endorsing Grant amid lingering resentment. Within Republican factions, Butler embodied Radical hardliners pushing aggressive Southern policies, contrasting with more pragmatic enforcement of congressional Reconstruction acts, yet he collaborated with the administration against President Andrew Johnson's moderates and the emerging Liberal Republican splinter in , which criticized perceived corruption and Reconstruction overreach. Butler's independent maneuvers, such as advocating labor-friendly tariffs and clashing with party regulars over patronage, strained ties with Stalwart machine politicians loyal to Grant, positioning him as a factional bridge between Radicals and reformers until economic pressures like the amplified his critiques of fiscal inaction. By second term, Butler's influence waned as scandals tarnished the administration, though no direct evidence links him to graft beyond unproven suspicions in cases like the Sanborn incident.

Gubernatorial Term and Presidential Ambitions

Massachusetts Governorship (1883–1884)

Benjamin Franklin Butler was elected governor of Massachusetts on November 7, 1882, running as the nominee of both the Democratic Party and the National Greenback Labor Party, defeating Republican Robert R. Bishop in a contest marked by Butler's appeal to working-class voters disillusioned with Republican dominance. He assumed office on January 4, 1883, for a one-year term under the state's annual election system at the time. Butler's victory represented a rare break from Republican control of the governorship, which had persisted since the Civil War, and reflected his shift toward advocating for paper money expansion and labor protections as antidotes to perceived economic inequities favoring industrial elites. Throughout his tenure, Butler prioritized investigations into state institutions, most notably exposing severe abuses at the Tewksbury State and , where inmates suffered from , , and inadequate care under prior administrations. On July 15, 1883, Butler delivered a detailed argument before the Tewksbury Investigation Committee, citing firsthand evidence of mismanagement and calling for reforms to prevent such systemic failures in public welfare facilities. He also scrutinized other charitable organizations for potential misuse of funds, though these probes yielded no major prosecutions or structural changes. Pro-labor in orientation, Butler supported measures aligned with Greenback principles, such as opposing vetoes on worker-friendly legislation to maintain support from his base, while clashing with the Republican-controlled legislature over fiscal policies. His administration emphasized administrative oversight and populist economic views, but critics decried his methods as sensationalist and disruptive to established governance norms. Butler's term ended amid escalating controversies, including accusations of demagoguery and failure to deliver promised reforms, culminating in his unexpected defeat for reelection on November 6, 1883, to Republican George D. Robinson, who capitalized on voter fatigue with Butler's combative style. The loss highlighted the limits of Butler's radical coalition in a state wary of his audacious tactics, despite his successes in spotlighting institutional corruption, and paved the way for his subsequent national ambitions with the .

Policy Initiatives and Challenges

During his single term as , Butler prioritized labor protections, advocating for legislation to enforce a ten-hour workday for industrial workers amid growing public pressure against exploitative fourteen-hour shifts in Massachusetts mills. Although a formal ten-hour bill failed in legislative committee, Butler's campaign amplified labor agitation, prompting some corporations to voluntarily reduce hours to avert unrest, marking an indirect policy success aligned with his long-standing support for workers' rights. Butler aggressively targeted institutional corruption, most notably by vetoing an for the Tewksbury State on grounds of documented mismanagement, extravagance, and abuse under prior Republican administrations, which compelled the Republican-dominated to launch a formal investigation revealing , inmate mistreatment, and unauthorized body sales for medical . The probe, initiated in 1883, exposed conflicts of interest among trustees and systemic neglect, leading to reforms in oversight but highlighting Butler's reliance on confrontational tactics against entrenched state boards. In a nod to inclusive governance, Butler appointed George Lewis Ruffin as the first African American to a judgeship on the Municipal Court and Edward J. Donovan as the first Irish American to the state's Board of Health, Lunacy, and Charity, actions that advanced representation for marginalized groups but drew ire from nativist and elite factions wary of his populist alliances. These initiatives faced substantial hurdles from a hostile Republican legislature, which controlled both chambers and frequently blocked or diluted Butler's proposals, including selective vetoes of labor bills he deemed insufficiently protective, as he balanced worker demands against fiscal prudence. His abrasive style exacerbated feuds with conservative business interests and the establishment, contributing to legislative gridlock and his decisive defeat in the 1883 reelection bid against Republican George D. Robinson, who capitalized on perceptions of Butler's radicalism. The one-year term limited sustained implementation, underscoring the challenges of governing as an backed by labor and Greenback elements in a polarized political landscape.

Controversies and Public Reception

Butler encountered significant opposition during his single term as governor from Republican-dominated institutions and elites, who viewed his reforms as partisan assaults on established practices. In his January 8, 1883, inaugural address, he publicly charged the Tewksbury with gross mismanagement, financial malfeasance, and abuses including the unauthorized sale of deceased paupers' bodies for medical dissection under prior Republican administrations; he followed this by vetoing an for the facility, escalating the into a major political that highlighted systemic neglect of the poor and indigent but was criticized as opportunistic electioneering ahead of his presidential ambitions. Similarly, Butler sought to eliminate the Sherborn women's reformatory in a veto message, citing inefficiencies, though the legislature overrode this; he later reformed it by appointing as superintendent on March 27, 1883, marking the first such female-led institution in the U.S. and aiming to improve conditions for female inmates, yet drawing ire from conservatives wary of his interventionist style. Legislative clashes further fueled disputes, as Butler vetoed measures like a request to adjourn the legislature to August 1883, insisting on ongoing oversight, which prolonged sessions and heightened tensions with Republican majorities who accused him of . His pro-labor stance, including advocacy for working-class interests aligned with Greenback principles, alienated business leaders, while his dramatic public persona—described contemporaneously as marked by "ridiculous love of display and sensation"—amplified perceptions of him as audacious and unfit for sober governance. Public reception polarized along class and partisan lines: Butler retained strong support from Irish immigrants, laborers, and reformers who praised his exposures of institutional corruption and defense of the vulnerable, positioning him as a champion against elite complacency. However, establishment Republicans and lambasted him as a , with accusations peaking during the 1883 gubernatorial campaign where he alleged Republican importation of out-of-state "repeaters" to sway votes, prompting him to deploy the 9th to monitor polls—a move decried as militarizing elections. This divisiveness culminated in his narrow defeat for reelection on November 6, 1883, to Republican George D. Robinson by about 10,000 votes out of over 200,000 cast, reflecting a backlash from interests and moderates weary of his confrontational tactics despite his initial 1882 victory as an .

1884 Greenback Presidential Campaign

Benjamin Franklin Butler secured the presidential nomination of the Greenback Labor Party at its national convention held in , , on May 29–30, 1884, where delegates from 28 states endorsed him over other contenders amid internal debates on fusion with major parties. The party's platform emphasized the expansion of paper currency as a vindication against recent rulings limiting greenbacks, repeal of the Specie Resumption Act of 1875 to prevent deflationary pressures on debtors, protection of labor through shorter workdays and anti-monopoly measures targeting railroads and banks, and safeguards for including opposition to Chinese immigration. These positions reflected the Greenbackers' core advocacy for to aid farmers and workers burdened by post-Civil War debt and industrial consolidation, though the platform's length and specificity drew criticism for diluting focus. Butler, recently defeated for reelection as governor, launched an active campaign on , 1884, conducting extensive stump speeches in the Midwest, New York, and through Election Day on November 4, emphasizing economic reform over personal ambition. He personally financed much of the effort, expending an estimated $200,000, supplemented by Republican donations reportedly totaling $5,000 weekly to position him as a spoiler against Democrat Grover in key states like New York. Democrats, in turn, proposed cabinet posts such as to induce his withdrawal, which Butler rejected, citing with Cleveland's gold-standard sympathies; he pursued fusion arrangements with local parties for but secured none yielding electoral votes. The campaign suffered from the Greenback organization's disarray, including impractical demands from allies and limited mobilization beyond urban labor centers. In the election, Butler and running mate Absalom Y. Gilleland garnered 134,982 popular votes, or 1.33% of the total, with strongest showings in industrial states like (4.5%) and (2.5%), but zero electoral votes as defeated Republican 219–182. New York yielded only 17,004 votes for Butler, insufficient to tip the state's slim margin to Blaine despite Republican hopes. The meager outcome stemmed from the party's fractured infrastructure, voter fatigue with third-party bids amid the Blaine-Cleveland scandal-driven contest, and Butler's polarizing reputation as a former Radical Republican, which alienated potential agrarian allies while failing to consolidate urban support. The Greenback vote declined sharply from James B. Weaver's 3.4% in 1880, signaling the movement's wane as shifted toward the nascent People's Party.

Later Years, Ideology, and Death

Shift to Greenback Labor Party and Economic Views

By the late 1870s, Butler had broken with the Republican Party, primarily over opposition to currency contraction under President , favoring instead the continued issuance of greenbacks—fiat paper money introduced during the Civil War—to inflate the money supply, ease debt burdens on farmers and workers, and stimulate economic activity. This stance reflected his broader critique of hard-money policies, which he argued disproportionately benefited creditors and speculators at the expense of producers and laborers. In the 1878 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, Butler campaigned explicitly on a Greenback platform advocating "honest " via expanded fiat to counteract deflationary pressures, running as an independent but receiving Democratic endorsement that propelled him to victory with 50.8% of the vote. His economic positions evolved into a populist framework prioritizing government-issued over specie resumption, as evidenced in congressional addresses where he defended greenbacks as a proven instrument for funding Union victory and postwar recovery, rejecting convertible as restrictive to industrial growth. Butler consistently supported labor-oriented reforms, including the eight-hour workday for federal employees and restrictions on excessive work hours in , drawing from his early Lowell experiences representing mill workers. He expressed hostility toward national banks, aligning with Greenback-Labor calls to abolish them in favor of direct Treasury-issued greenbacks, viewing as a mechanism for elite control that undermined public over credit and commerce. This ideological alignment deepened through the early 1880s, leading to his reelection as via a Greenback-Democratic fusion ticket emphasizing measures and worker protections. The shift peaked with his nomination as the Greenback-Labor Party's presidential candidate at the convention on May 28–29, 1884, paired with Absolom M. West; his platform targeted trusts, demanded national regulation of interstate commerce, and reiterated expansion, yet yielded only about 133,000 popular votes (roughly 1.3% of the total) with no electoral votes.

Personal Finances, Charity, and Allegations of Corruption

Butler accumulated substantial wealth through his pre-war legal practice in , where he built a successful firm handling criminal and civil cases, and from ownership of textile mills that generated significant profits during the industrial boom. By the time of his death in 1893, his estate was valued at approximately $7 million, equivalent to over $200 million in contemporary terms, derived primarily from these business interests rather than wartime activities, though the exact origins drew scrutiny due to opaque dealings in occupied territories. Allegations of corruption shadowed Butler's military administration, particularly during his 1862 occupation of New Orleans, where he confiscated gold and silver specie from banks and foreign consulates—estimated at $800,000—to prevent its use by Confederate sympathizers, but critics claimed these funds were diverted for personal gain or illicit trade with blockade runners. Similar charges arose in his , command, involving financial improprieties and cross-enemy-line commerce, yet investigations, including congressional inquiries, found no direct evidence of personal enrichment, attributing issues to subordinates' graft and wartime exigencies. During his 1882–1883 governorship, opponents alleged favoritism in state contracts and railroad dealings, but these too lacked substantiation in formal probes, reflecting partisan attacks on his reformist policies rather than proven malfeasance. In parallel, Butler directed portions of seized assets toward charitable ends, allocating New Orleans confiscations to feed the destitute, support orphanages, and fund hospitals amid wartime shortages, which sustained vulnerable populations including freed slaves and Union loyalists. Post-war, he acquired confiscated farms near and transferred them to former enslaved people for self-sustaining colonies, embodying his advocacy for labor and emancipation without expectation of repayment. His pro-working-class ideology manifested in donations to ' relief funds and support for veterans' pensions, though these were often framed by contemporaries as politically motivated populism rather than disinterested philanthropy.

Death and Immediate Assessments

Benjamin Franklin Butler died on January 11, 1893, at his residence in , from precipitated by , which developed from a cold contracted the previous Monday; he had argued a case before the just days earlier. His remains were transported by train to , where a drew thousands, including Union veterans and local dignitaries, before interment at Hildreth . Contemporary assessments reflected Butler's polarizing reputation, with supporters lauding his advocacy for and Radical Reconstruction policies, while critics decried him as a and opportunist. The New York Times obituary dismissed his career as morally deficient, suggesting it offered "little to commend" beyond spectacle for the unscrupulous. In contrast, Irish-American and labor circles in passed resolutions praising his defense of the and Union cause, with orator Jeremiah Carroll delivering an "eloquent " on his contributions. Southern sentiments remained bitterly hostile, rooted in his wartime administration of New Orleans, where some unreconstructed voices expressed unrepentant glee at his demise, viewing it as . These divided reactions underscored Butler's enduring image as a figure of fierce partisanship rather than consensus.

Legacy and Historiographical Debates

Military Reputation: Incompetence Claims vs. Administrative Effectiveness

Benjamin Butler's military reputation during the remains deeply divided, with contemporaries and historians contrasting persistent accusations of tactical incompetence against acknowledgments of his administrative prowess in occupation duties. Critics, including Confederate leaders and some Union observers, lambasted Butler for battlefield failures that highlighted deficiencies in and execution, while supporters credited him with innovative policies that advanced Union war aims beyond direct combat. This duality stems from Butler's prewar background as a and Democrat-turned-Republican, which fueled perceptions of him as a political general thrust into command despite limited military experience. Claims of incompetence peaked around key engagements where Butler's forces suffered setbacks attributable to poor coordination and hesitation. At the on June 10, 1861, Butler's division of approximately 3,500 Union troops into uncoordinated columns led to incidents and a rout by fewer than 1,500 Confederates under , resulting in 79 Union casualties including deaths from self-inflicted wounds and 16 Confederate losses; this debacle prompted his temporary relief from field command. Similarly, during the in May 1864, Butler's , numbering over 30,000 men, failed to capitalize on its position to threaten Richmond, instead entrenching passively and allowing Confederate forces under to contain him with inferior numbers, a performance derided as evidence of paralysis in aggressive operations. The December 1864 assault on further tarnished his record, as Butler's premature withdrawal after a token probe—despite landing 6,500 troops—allowed the Confederates to reinforce, necessitating a subsequent successful operation under ; cited this as grounds for Butler's removal, reinforcing views of him as tactically inept. These episodes, documented in postwar accounts and military analyses, contributed to Butler's nickname "Beast Butler" among Southerners, though Union critics like historian echoed charges of incompetence hampering the war effort. In contrast, Butler demonstrated administrative effectiveness in non-combat roles, particularly in managing occupied territories and pioneering policies on enslaved labor. At from May 1861, he issued the "contraband of war" declaration on May 27, classifying escaped slaves as property confiscated from disloyal owners rather than fugitives, which sheltered over 500 fugitives by July and laid groundwork for federal emancipation by circumventing the Fugitive Slave Act without direct confrontation over abolition. This policy facilitated labor for Union fortifications and presaged broader recruitment of Black troops, with Butler organizing early units. In New Orleans, assuming command on May 1, 1862, after David Farragut's capture, Butler administered a city of 140,000 amid resistance, enforcing order through General Order No. 28 (May 15, 1862)—infamously declaring women insulting Union officers would be treated as prostitutes—which quelled , restored sanitation by cleaning streets and reducing risks, revived trade generating $500,000 monthly in customs by October, and confiscated rebel property worth millions to fund Union efforts. Though these measures provoked outrage—prompting to declare Butler an outlaw on , 1862—historians note their success in stabilizing the occupation and extracting resources, with Butler's recruitment of the Louisiana Native Guard as the first official Black regiment underscoring his pragmatic adaptation to manpower needs. Historiographical assessments reflect this tension, with traditional narratives emphasizing Butler's field failures and political opportunism—exacerbated by his Democratic ties and Radical Republican shifts—while modern reevaluations highlight his administrative innovations as vital to Union logistics and . Southern sources amplified incompetence tropes amid resentment over occupation rigor, yet even Union records, including Grant's memoirs, concede Butler's value in departmental commands over frontline roles. Recent scholarship, such as Elizabeth D. Leonard's biography, argues Butler's "noisy, fearless" approach yielded tangible gains in policy and resources, challenging outright dismissal as merely inept and positioning him as a flawed but effective administrator whose contributions outweighed tactical shortcomings in the war's broader causal dynamics.

Contributions to Emancipation and Civil Rights

In May 1861, while commanding Union forces at , , Butler encountered three escaped enslaved men—Shepard Mallory, Frank Baker, and James Townsend—who had been forced to build fortifications for Confederate forces. Rather than returning them to their owners under the Fugitive Slave Law, Butler declared them "contrabands of war," arguing that since had seceded, enslaved people were property of the enemy and subject to like other rebel assets. This decision, formalized in correspondence with Union authorities on May 27, 1861, circumvented federal policy against by treating fugitives as military resources, allowing them to be sheltered, employed by the Union Army for wages, food, and protection, and thereby weakening the Confederate economy. subsequently became known as "Freedom's Fortress," with thousands of self-emancipating people seeking refuge there by war's end, establishing a precedent that influenced the First Confiscation Act of August 1861 and President Lincoln's . During his occupation of New Orleans in 1862, Butler further advanced emancipation efforts by authorizing the organization of the first regiments of Black soldiers in the Union Army, including the 1st Louisiana Native Guard composed of free men of color. These units, initially numbering around 1,000 men, provided labor and later combat support, demonstrating Black military capability despite initial skepticism from regular army officers. In 1863–1864, commanding the Department of Virginia and North Carolina, Butler oversaw recruitment into United States Colored Troops regiments, and following their valor at the Battle of New Market Heights on September 29, 1864—where 14 Black soldiers earned the Medal of Honor—he publicly affirmed their fighting prowess in a speech to Congress, countering doubts about their reliability and bolstering federal policy for arming Black troops. As a Radical Republican congressman from (1867–1875, 1877–1879), Butler championed post-war civil rights measures, serving as a House manager in the 1868 impeachment trial of President , whose policies obstructed Reconstruction and Black enfranchisement. He supported the of 1870–1871, which used federal authority to suppress Ku Klux Klan violence and protect Black voting rights under the 15th Amendment. Alongside Senator , Butler co-sponsored the , which prohibited racial discrimination in public accommodations, transportation, and service—though later struck down by the in 1883 as exceeding congressional power. These efforts reflected Butler's shift toward advocating equal legal protections, grounded in his wartime experiences rather than prior abolitionist ideology.

Criticisms of Opportunism and Political Radicalism

Critics frequently accused Benjamin Butler of political opportunism, portraying him as a "political " who shifted affiliations to pursue personal power rather than principle. Initially a Democrat who opposed of the in 1861, Butler accepted a Union commission from and aligned with during Reconstruction to secure influence in Congress from 1867 to 1875. Later, facing electoral defeats, he ran as the Greenback Party's in 1884, advocating inflationary fiat currency, before winning the Massachusetts governorship in 1882 on the Democratic ticket by courting labor and Irish voters disillusioned with party orthodoxy. Contemporaries, including opponents in , dismissed these maneuvers as self-serving, arguing that Butler exploited sectional tensions and economic grievances without consistent ideology, as evidenced by his sponsorship of the controversial Salary Grab Act of 1873, which retroactively raised congressional pay amid public outrage over perceived corruption. Butler faced sharp rebukes for political radicalism, particularly from moderate Republicans and conservatives who viewed his advocacy for punitive Reconstruction measures and economic as demagogic excess. As a leading House manager in Andrew Johnson's 1868 impeachment trial, Butler pushed aggressive articles alleging usurpation of congressional authority, which critics like Senator Edmund Ross decried as partisan overreach that prioritized Radical vengeance over constitutional stability. His post-war support for , , and harsh penalties on ex-Confederates—coupled with wartime edicts like General Order No. 28 in New Orleans, treating women disrespecting Union soldiers as prostitutes—earned him the moniker "Beast Butler" from Southerners and fueled Northern accusations of authoritarianism. Journalist George Alfred Townsend labeled Butler a whose "skillful, unscrupulous" rhetoric inflamed class and racial divides for electoral gain, a charge echoed in where elites branded his Greenback-era labor appeals as incendiary threats to property rights. These criticisms persisted in assessments of Butler's legacy, with historians noting that while his radicalism advanced causes like equal pay for troops (via the 1864 policy treating them as property ), it often alienated allies and invited charges of inconsistency, as his earlier sympathies clashed with later abolitionist fervor. Opponents argued this evolution reflected calculated adaptation rather than genuine conviction, undermining his credibility amid scandals like alleged from confiscated during the New Orleans occupation, where he amassed over $1 million in family wealth. Such views, prominent in 19th-century periodicals and political cartoons, framed Butler as a disruptive force whose amplified radical impulses, prioritizing spectacle over .

Modern Reassessments and Balanced Perspectives

In recent decades, historians have increasingly reassessed Benjamin Butler's legacy, moving beyond 19th-century caricatures of him as "Beast" Butler to recognize his substantive contributions to Union war efforts and postwar reforms, particularly in civil rights and labor advocacy. Elizabeth D. Leonard's 2022 biography portrays Butler as a progressive figure who championed by declaring escaped slaves as " of war" in May 1861, a policy that effectively undermined and paved the way for , while also organizing the first Black regiments in New Orleans in 1862, influencing national policy under Lincoln. This view counters earlier dismissals of his military role, emphasizing how his administrative control of New Orleans from May 1862 to December 1862 secured the city's economy for the Union, generated revenue through trade regulations, and protected vulnerable populations amid occupation challenges. Balanced perspectives acknowledge Butler's military shortcomings, such as the Union defeat at Big Bethel on June 10, 1861, and the stalled in 1864 due to logistical and tactical errors, which fueled contemporary criticisms of incompetence. Yet, reassessments highlight causal factors like inadequate resources and political interference, arguing his overall strategic value—securing Maryland's loyalty in 1861 and capturing New Orleans with minimal losses—outweighed battlefield failures, as evidenced by his promotion to and Lincoln's repeated assignments despite elite opposition. Postwar, Butler's advocacy for the 14th and 15th Amendments, , and , including fair wages during his governorship of from 1883 to 1884, reflects a consistent radicalism rooted in anti-elite rather than mere , though allegations of personal persisted without conclusive evidence of systemic graft. Historiographical debates underscore source biases in traditional narratives, often amplified by Confederate sympathizers and Northern conservatives who resented Butler's class warfare rhetoric and enforcement of Union policies, such as No. 28 in New Orleans on May 15, 1862, which deterred civilian sabotage but drew exaggerated outrage. Modern scholars, drawing on primary documents like Butler's correspondence and congressional records, advocate a nuanced appraisal: while not a tactical genius, his pragmatic realism advanced and Reconstruction ideals, influencing long-term causal shifts toward federal authority and equality, even as his flamboyant style alienated contemporaries. This reevaluation positions Butler as a flawed but pivotal whose actions, empirically tied to Union victories and social progress, merit consideration beyond partisan vitriol.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.