Hubbry Logo
Third railThird railMain
Open search
Third rail
Community hub
Third rail
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Third rail
Third rail
from Wikipedia

A British Rail Class 442 third-rail electric multiple unit in Battersea
The contact shoe of a New York City Subway car making contact with the third rail. In the foreground is the third rail for the adjacent track.

A third rail, also known as a live rail, electric rail or conductor rail, is a method of providing electric power to a railway locomotive or train, through a semi-continuous rigid conductor placed alongside or between the rails of a railway track. It is used typically in a mass transit or rapid transit system, which has alignments in its own corridors, fully or almost fully segregated from the outside environment. Third-rail systems are usually supplied with direct current.

Modern tram systems with street running avoid the electrical injury risk of the exposed electric rail by implementing a segmented ground-level power supply, where each segment is electrified only while covered by a vehicle which is using its power.[1]

The third-rail system of electrification is not related to the third rail used in dual-gauge railways.

The system is generally associated with a low voltage (rarely above 750 V) and is far less used for main lines than overhead line, which with a higher voltage permit more distance between the substations. Also, for safety reasons, third-rail systems are generally fully grade separated. Third rail found its niche in metro systems, where a smaller tunnel is more important than having fewer substations. However, some main lines use third rail, like lines in Southern England, Merseyrail, Long Island Rail Road, Hudson and Harlem lines of Metro North Railroad, and Mitre, Sarmiento, and Urquiza lines in Greater Buenos Aires.

Description

[edit]

Third-rail systems are a means of providing electric traction power to trains using an additional rail (called a "conductor rail") for the purpose. On most systems, the conductor rail is placed on the sleeper ends outside the running rails, but in some systems a central conductor rail is used. The conductor rail is supported on ceramic insulators (known as "pots"), at top contact or insulated brackets, at bottom contact, typically at intervals of around 10 feet (3.0 m).[clarification needed]

The trains have metal contact blocks called collector shoes (also known as contact shoes or pickup shoes) which make contact with the conductor rail. The traction current is returned to the generating station through the running rails. In North America, the conductor rail is usually made of high-conductivity steel or steel bolted to aluminium to increase the conductivity. Elsewhere in the world, extruded aluminium conductors with stainless steel contact surface or cap, is the preferred technology due to its lower electrical resistance, longer life, and lighter weight.[2] The running rails are electrically connected using wire bonds or other devices, to minimise resistance in the electric circuit. Contact shoes can be positioned below, above, or beside the third rail, depending on the type of third rail used: these third rails are referred to as bottom-contact, top-contact, or side-contact, respectively.

The conductor rails have to be interrupted at level crossings, crossovers, and substation gaps. Tapered rails are provided at the ends of each section to allow a smooth engagement of the train's contact shoes.

The position of contact between the train and the rail varies: some of the earliest systems used top contact, but later developments use side or bottom contact, which enabled the conductor rail to be covered, protecting track workers from accidental contact and protecting the conductor rail from frost, ice, snow and leaf-fall.[3]

[edit]

Advantages and disadvantages

[edit]

Structure gauge

[edit]

For the same vehicle size, third-rail electrification requires a smaller vertical structure gauge as compared to overhead line electrification.[4] This consideration becomes especially important for urban underground railways, where a smaller structure gauge allows for smaller tunnel cross sections and corresponding savings on construction cost.

Safety

[edit]
Entry ramp for side-contact third rail.

Because third-rail systems, which are located close to the ground, present electric shock hazards, high voltages (above 1500 V) are not considered safe. A very high current must therefore be used to transfer adequate power to the train, resulting in high resistive losses, and requiring relatively closely spaced feed points (electrical substations).

The electrified rail is a hazard to anyone on the tracks. The risk can be mitigated by using platform screen doors, or by placing the conductor rail on the side of the track away from the platform, when allowed by the station layout, or by covering the conductor rail with a coverboard, a plank supported by brackets. However, coverboards often cannot be used because they reduce the structure gauge near the top of rail and thereby also the loading gauge.

There is also a risk of pedestrians walking onto the tracks at level crossings and touching the third rail, unless grade separation is fully implemented. In the United States, a 1992 Supreme Court of Illinois decision affirmed a $1.5 million verdict against the Chicago Transit Authority for failing to stop an intoxicated person from walking onto the tracks at a level crossing at the Kedzie station in an apparent attempt to urinate.[5]

The end ramps of conductor rails (where they are interrupted, or change sides) present a practical limitation on speed due to the mechanical impact of the shoe, and 161 km/h (100 mph) is considered the upper limit of practical third-rail operation. The world speed record for a third-rail train is 175 km/h (109 mph) attained on 11 April 1988 by a British Class 442 EMU.[6]

In the event of a collision with a foreign object, the beveled end ramps of bottom-running systems can facilitate the hazard of having the third rail penetrate the interior of a passenger car. This is believed to have contributed to the death of five passengers in the Valhalla train crash of 2015.[7]

Modern systems, such as ground-level power supply (first used in the tramway of Bordeaux in 2003), avoid the safety problem by segmenting the powered rail, with each segment being powered only when fully covered by the vehicle which utilizes its power.[1]

Weather effects

[edit]

Third-rail systems using top contact are prone to accumulations of snow, or ice formed from refrozen snow, and this can interrupt operations. Some systems operate dedicated de-icing trains to deposit an oily fluid or antifreeze (such as propylene glycol) on the conductor rail to prevent the frozen build-up. The third rail can also be heated to alleviate the problem of ice.

Unlike overhead line equipment, third-rail systems are not susceptible to strong winds or freezing rain, which can bring down overhead wires and hence disable all trains. Thunderstorms can also disable the power with lightning strikes on systems with overhead wires, disabling trains if there is a power surge or a break in the wires.

Gaps

[edit]

Depending on train and track geometry, gaps in the conductor rail (e.g., at level crossings and junctions) could allow a train to stop in a position where all of its power pickup shoes are in gaps, so that no traction power is available. The train is then said to be "gapped". Another train must then be brought up behind the stranded train to push it on to the conductor rail, or a jumper cable may be used to supply enough power to the train to get one of its contact shoes back on the live rail. Avoiding this problem requires a minimum length of trains that can be run on a line. Locomotives have either had the backup of an on-board diesel engine system (e.g., British Rail Class 73), or have been connected to shoes on the rolling stock (e.g. Metropolitan Railway).

Running rails for power supply

[edit]

The first idea for feeding electricity to a train from an external source was by using both rails on which a train runs, whereby each rail is a conductor for each polarity, and is insulated by the sleepers. This method is used by most scale model trains; however, it does not work as well for large trains as the sleepers are not good insulators. Furthermore, the electric connection requires insulated wheels or insulated axles, but most insulation materials have poor mechanical properties compared with metals used for this purpose, leading to a less stable train vehicle. Nevertheless, it was sometimes used at the beginning of the development of electric trains. The oldest electric railway in the world, Volk's Railway in Brighton, England, was originally electrified at 50 volts DC using this system (it is now a three-rail system). Other railway systems that used it were the Gross-Lichterfelde Tramway and the Ungerer Tramway.

Shoe contact

[edit]

The third rail is usually located outside the two running rails, but on some systems it is mounted between them. The electricity is transmitted to the train by means of a sliding shoe, which is held in contact with the rail. On many systems, an insulating cover is provided above the third rail to protect employees working near the track; sometimes the shoe is designed to contact the side (called "side running") or bottom (called "bottom running" or "under-running") of the third rail, allowing the protective cover to be mounted directly to its top surface. When the shoe slides along the top surface, it is referred to as "top running". When the shoe slides along the bottom surface, it is less affected by the build-up of snow, ice, or leaves,[3] and reduces the chances of a person being electrocuted by coming in contact with the rail. Examples of systems using under-running third rail include Metro-North in the New York metropolitan area;[8] the SEPTA Market–Frankford Line in Philadelphia;[3] and London's Docklands Light Railway.[9]

[edit]

Electrical considerations and alternative technologies

[edit]

Electric traction trains (using electric power generated at a remote power station and transmitted to the trains) are considerably more cost-effective than diesel or steam units, where separate power units must be carried on each train. This advantage is especially marked in urban and rapid transit systems with a high traffic density.

Because of mechanical limitations on the contact to the third rail, trains that use this method of power supply achieve lower speeds than those using overhead electric wires and a pantograph. Nevertheless, they may be preferred inside cities as there is no need for very high speed and they cause less visual pollution.

The third rail is an alternative to overhead lines that transmit power to trains by means of pantographs attached to the trains. Whereas overhead-wire systems can operate at 25 kV or more, using alternating current (AC), the smaller clearance around a live rail imposes a maximum of about 1200 V, with some systems using 1500 V (Line 4, Guangzhou Metro, Line 5, Guangzhou Metro, Line 3, Shenzhen Metro), and direct current (DC) is used.[citation needed] Trains on some lines or networks use both power supply modes (see § Mixed systems below).

All third-rail systems throughout the world are energised with DC supplies. Some of the reasons for this are historical. Early traction engines were DC motors, and the then-available rectifying equipment was large, expensive and impractical to install onboard trains. Also, transmission of the relatively high currents required results in higher losses with AC than DC.[11] Substations for a DC system will have to be (typically) about 2 kilometres (1.2 miles) apart, though the actual spacing depends on the carrying capacity, maximum speed, and service frequency of the line.

One method for reducing current losses (and thus increase the spacing of feeder/substations, a major cost in third-rail electrification) is to use a composite conductor rail of a hybrid aluminium/steel design. The aluminium is a better conductor of electricity, and a running face of stainless steel gives better wear.

There are several ways of attaching the stainless steel to the aluminium. The oldest is a co-extruded method, where the stainless steel is extruded with the aluminium. This method has suffered, in isolated cases, from de-lamination (where the stainless steel separates from the aluminium); this is said to have been eliminated in the latest co-extruded rails. A second method is an aluminium core, upon which two stainless steel sections are fitted as a cap and linear welded along the centre line of the rail. Because aluminium has a higher coefficient of thermal expansion than steel, the aluminium and steel must be positively locked to provide a good current collection interface. A third method rivets aluminium bus strips to the web of the steel rail.

Return current mechanisms

[edit]

As with overhead wires, the return current usually flows through one or both running rails, and leakage to ground is not considered serious. Where trains run on rubber tyres, as on parts of the Lyon Metro, Paris Métro, Mexico City Metro, Santiago Metro, Sapporo Municipal Subway, and on all of the Montreal Metro and some automated guideway transit systems (e.g. the Astram Line), a live rail must be provided to feed the current. The return is effected through the rails of the conventional track between these guide bars (see rubber-tyred metro).

Another design, with a third rail (current feed, outside the running rails) and fourth rail (current return, midway between the running rails), is used by a few steel-wheel systems; see fourth rail. The London Underground is the largest of these (see railway electrification in Great Britain). The main reason for using the fourth rail to carry the return current is to avoid this current flowing through the original metal tunnel linings which were never intended to carry current, and which would suffer electrolytic corrosion should such currents flow in them.

Another four-rail system is line M1 of the Milan Metro, where current is drawn by a lateral, flat bar with side contact, with return via a central rail with top contact. Along some sections on the northern part of the line an overhead line is also in place, to allow line M2's trains (that use pantographs and higher voltage, and have no contact shoes) to access a depot located on line M1. In depots, line M1 trains use pantographs because of safety reasons, with transition made near the depots away from revenue tracks.

Aesthetic considerations

[edit]

Third-rail electrification is less visually obtrusive than overhead electrification.[12]

Mixed systems

[edit]

Several systems use a third rail for part of the route, and other motive power such as overhead catenary or diesel power for the remainder. These may exist because of the connection of separately owned railways using the different motive systems, local ordinances, or other historical reasons.

United Kingdom

[edit]

Several types of British trains have been able to operate on both overhead and third-rail systems, including British Rail Class 313, 319, 325, 350, 365, 375/6, 377/2, 377/5, 377/7, 378/2, 387, 373, 395, 700 and 717 EMUs, as well as Class 92 locomotives.

Network Rail claims to run the world's largest third-rail network.[13]

On the southern region of British Rail, freight yards had[when?] overhead wires to avoid the electrocution hazards of a third rail.[14] The locomotives were fitted with a pantograph as well as pick-up shoes.

Eurostar/High Speed 1

[edit]

The Class 373 used for international high-speed rail services operated by Eurostar through the Channel Tunnel runs on overhead wires at 25 kV AC for most of its journey, with sections of 3 kV DC on Belgian lines between the Belgian high-speed section and Brussels Midi station or 1.5 kV DC on the railway lines in the south of France for seasonal services. As originally delivered, the Class 373 units were additionally fitted with 750 V DC collection shoes, designed for the journey in London via the suburban commuter lines to Waterloo. A switch between third-rail and overhead collection was performed while running at speed, initially at Continental Junction near Folkestone, and later on at Fawkham Junction after the opening of the first section of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Between Kensington Olympia railway station and North Pole depot, further switchovers were necessary.

The dual-voltage system did cause some problems. Failure to retract the shoes when entering France caused severe damage to the trackside equipment, causing SNCF to install a pair of concrete blocks at the Calais end of both tunnels to break off the third rail shoes if they had not been retracted. An accident occurred in the UK when a Eurostar driver failed to retract the pantograph before entering the third-rail system, damaging a signal gantry and the pantograph.

On 14 November 2007, Eurostar's passenger operations were transferred to St Pancras railway station and maintenance operations to Temple Mills depot, making the 750 V DC third rail collection equipment redundant and the third rail shoes were removed. The trains themselves are no longer fitted with a speedometer capable of measuring the speed in miles per hour (the indication used to automatically change when the collector shoes were deployed).

In 2009, Southeastern began operating domestic services over High Speed 1 trackage from St Pancras using its new Class 395 EMUs. These services operate on the High Speed line as far as Ebbsfleet International or Ashford International, before transferring to the main lines to serve north and mid Kent. As a consequence, these trains are dual-voltage enabled, as the majority of the routes along which they travel are third-rail electrified.

North London Line

[edit]

In London, the North London Line changes from third rail to overhead electrification between Richmond and Stratford at Acton Central. The entire route originally used third rail, but several technical electrical earthing problems, plus the fact that there are already overhead electric wires on part of the route for freight and Regional Eurostar services, led to the change.[citation needed]

West London Line

[edit]

Also in London, the West London Line changes power supply between Shepherd's Bush and Willesden Junction, where it meets the North London Line. South of the changeover point, the WLL is third-rail electrified; north of there, it is overhead.

[edit]

The cross-city Thameslink service runs on the Southern Region third rail network from Farringdon southwards and on overhead line northwards to Bedford, Cambridge and Peterborough. The changeover is made whilst stationary at Farringdon when heading southbound, and at City Thameslink when heading northbound.

Northern City

[edit]

On the Moorgate to Hertford and Welwyn suburban service routes, the East Coast Main Line sections are 25 kV AC, with a changeover to third rail made at Drayton Park railway station. A third rail is still used in the tunnel section of the route, because the size of the tunnels leading to Moorgate station was too small to allow for overhead electrification.

North Downs Line

[edit]
Redhill with the diesel Class 166 service run by First Great Western to Reading as the North Downs Line only has third-rail electrification on shared sections.

The North Downs Line is not electrified on those parts of the line where the North Downs service has exclusive use.

The electrified portions of the line are:

  • Redhill to Reigate – Allows Southern Railway services to run to Reigate. This saves having to turn around terminating services at Redhill where due to the station layout, as the reversal would block nearly all the running lines.
  • Shalford Junction to Aldershot South Junction – line shared with South Western Railway electric Portsmouth and Aldershot services.
  • Wokingham to Reading – line shared with South Western Railway electric services from Waterloo.

France

[edit]

The new tramway in Bordeaux (France) uses a novel system with a third rail in the centre of the track. The third rail is separated into 10 m (32 ft 9+34 in) long conducting and 3 m (9 ft 10+18 in) long isolation segments. Each conducting segment is attached to an electronic circuit which will make the segment live once it lies fully beneath the tram (activated by a coded signal sent by the train) and switch it off before it becomes exposed again. This system (called Alimentation par Sol (APS), meaning 'current supply via ground') is used in various locations around the city but especially in the historic centre: elsewhere the trams use the conventional overhead lines (see also ground-level power supply). In summer 2006 it was announced that two new French tram systems would be using APS over part of their networks. These will be Angers and Reims, with both systems expected to open around 2009–2010.[needs update]

The French Culoz–Modane railway was electrified with 1500 V DC third rail, later converted to overhead wires at the same voltage. Stations had overhead wires from the beginning.

The French branch line which serves Chamonix and the Mont Blanc region (Saint-Gervais-le-Fayet to Vallorcine) is third rail (top contact) and metre gauge. It continues in Switzerland, partly with the same third-rail system, partly with an overhead line.

The 63 km (39 mi) long Train Jaune line in the Pyrenees also features a third rail.

Many suburban lines that ran out of the Paris Saint Lazare station used third-rail (bottom contact) feed.

Netherlands

[edit]

To mitigate investment costs, the Rotterdam Metro, basically a third-rail-powered system, has been given some outlying branches built on surface tracks as light rail (called sneltram [nl] in Dutch), with numerous level crossings protected with barriers and traffic lights. These branches have overhead wires. The RandstadRail project also requires Rotterdam Metro trains to run under wires along the former mainline railways to The Hague and Hook of Holland.

Similarly, in Amsterdam one sneltram route went on Metro tracks and passed to surface alignment in the suburbs, where it shared tracks with standard trams. In Amsterdam, the Sneltram lightrail uses a third rail and switches to overhead wires when it moves onto the traditional tramway shared with trams in Amsterdam. Line 51 to Amstelveen ran metro service between Amsterdam Centraal and Station Zuid. At Amsterdam Zuid it switched from third rail to pantograph and catenary wires. From there to Amstelveen Centrum it shared its tracks with tram line 5. The light rail vehicles on this line were capable of using both 600 V DC and 750 V DC. As of March 2019 this metro line has been decommissioned, partly because of issues regarding switching between third rail and overhead wires. Its line number 51 has been assigned to a new metro line running partly the same route from Amsterdam Central railway station to Station Zuid and then following the same route as metro line 50 to Amsterdam Sloterdijk railway station.

United States

[edit]
Third rail to overhead wire transition zone on the Skokie Swift

In New York City, the New Haven Line of Metro–North Railroad operates electric trains out of Grand Central Terminal that use third rail on the former New York Central Railroad but switch to overhead lines in Pelham to operate out onto the former New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad. The switch is made "on the fly" (at speed), and controlled from the engineer's position.

The main two stations in New York City – Grand Central and Pennsylvania Station – do not permit diesel locomotives to operate in their tunnels due to the health hazard from the exhaust. As such, diesel service on Metro-North, Long Island Rail Road, and Amtrak use dual-mode/electro-diesel locomotives (the P32AC-DM and the DM30AC) that are able to make use of the third-rail power in the stations and approaches. When under third rail operation, these locomotives are less powerful, so on open-air (non-tunnel) trackage the engines typically run in diesel mode, even where third-rail power is available.[citation needed] New Jersey Transit also makes use of ALP-45DP dual mode locomotives for operation into Penn Station alongside their normal electric fleet. However, their dual mode locomotives make use of the overhead power supply instead, as it is available elsewhere on much of their network.[15]

In New York City (on most of the island of Manhattan) and in Washington, D.C., local ordinances once required electrified street railways to draw current from a third rail and return the current to a fourth rail, both installed in a continuous vault underneath the street and accessed by means of a collector that passed through a slot between the running rails. When streetcars on such systems entered territory where overhead lines were allowed, they stopped over a pit where a man detached the collector (plow) and the motorman placed a trolley pole on the overhead. In the US, all these conduit-feed powered systems have been discontinued, and either replaced or abandoned altogether.[citation needed]

Some sections of the former London tram system also used the conduit current collection system, also with some tramcars that could collect power from both overhead and under-road sources.

The Blue Line of Boston's MBTA uses third-rail electrification from the start of the line downtown to Airport station, where it switches to overhead catenary for the remainder of the line to Wonderland station. The outermost section of the Blue Line runs very close to the Atlantic Ocean, and there were concerns about possible snow and ice buildup on a third rail so near to the water. Overhead catenary is not used in the underground section because of tight clearances in the 1904 tunnel under Boston Harbor. The MBTA Orange Line's Hawker Siddeley 01200 series rapid transit cars (essentially a longer version of the Blue Line's 0600s) recently[when?] had their pantograph mounting points removed during a maintenance program; these mounts would have been used for pantographs which would have been installed had the Orange Line been extended north of its current terminus.

Dual power supply method was also used on some US interurban railways that made use of newer third rail in suburban areas, and existing overhead streetcar (trolley) infrastructure to reach downtown. For example, the Chicago "L" Yellow Line (which uses tracks originally used by the North Shore Line) used overhead wires on the western half of the route, which transitioned into third rail for the eastern half of the route. The entire line was converted to third rail in 2004 in order to reduce maintenance costs and allow better compatibility with rolling stock.

Simultaneous use with overhead wire

[edit]

A railway can be electrified with an overhead wire and a third rail at the same time. This was the case, for example, on the Hamburg S-Bahn between 1940 and 1955. A modern example is Birkenwerder Railway Station near Berlin, which has third rails on both sides and overhead wires. Most of the Penn Station complex in New York City is also electrified with both systems.[citation needed]

Non-standard voltages

[edit]

Some high third rail voltages (1000 volts and more) include:

In Nazi Germany, a railway system with a 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+18 in) gauge width was planned. For this Breitspurbahn railway system, electrification with a voltage of 100 kV taken from a third rail was considered, in order to avoid damage to overhead wires from oversize rail-mounted anti-aircraft guns. However, such a power system would not have worked as it is not possible to insulate a third rail for such high voltages in close proximity to the rails. The whole project did not progress any further owing to the onset of World War II.

History

[edit]
The London Underground uses a four-rail system where both conductor rails are live relative to the running rails, and the positive rail has twice the voltage of the negative rail. Arcs like this are normal and occur when the electric power collection shoes of a train that is drawing power reach the end of a section of conductor rail.

Third-rail electrification systems are, apart from on-board batteries, the oldest means of supplying electric power to trains on railways using their own corridors, particularly in cities. Overhead power supply was initially almost exclusively used on tramway-like railways, though it also appeared slowly on mainline systems.

An experimental electric train using this method of power supply was developed by the German firm of Siemens & Halske and shown at the Berlin Industrial Exposition of 1879, with its third rail between the running rails. Some early electric railways used the running rails as the current conductor, as with the 1883-opened Volk's Electric Railway in Brighton. It was given an additional power rail in 1886, and is still operating. The Giant's Causeway Tramway followed, equipped with an elevated outside third rail in 1883, later converted to overhead wire. The first railway to use the central third rail was the Bessbrook and Newry Tramway in Ireland, opened in 1885 but now, like the Giant's Causeway line, closed.

Sapporo Subway with a centrally placed guiding/return rail

Also in the 1880s, third-rail systems began to be used in public urban transport. Trams were first to benefit from it: they used conductors in conduit below the road surface (see Conduit current collection), usually on selected parts of the networks. This was first tried in Cleveland (1884) and in Denver (1885) and later spread to many big tram networks (e.g. New York; Chicago; Washington, DC; London; Paris, all of which are closed) and Berlin (the third-rail system in the city was abandoned in the early 20th century after heavy snowfall.) The system was tried in the beachside resort of Blackpool, UK, but was soon abandoned as sand and saltwater were found to enter the conduit and cause breakdowns, and there was a problem with voltage drop. Some sections of tramway track still have the slot rails visible.

A third rail supplied power to the world's first electric underground railway, the City & South London Railway, which opened in 1890 (now part of the Northern line of the London Underground). In 1893, the world's second third-rail powered city railway opened in Britain, the Liverpool Overhead Railway (closed 1956 and dismantled). The first US third-rail powered city railway in revenue use was the 1895 Metropolitan West Side Elevated, which soon became part of the Chicago 'L'. In 1901, Granville Woods, a prominent African-American inventor, was granted a U.S. patent 687,098, covering various proposed improvements to third-rail systems. This has been cited to claim that he invented the third-rail system of current distribution. However, by that time there had been numerous other patents for electrified third-rail systems, including Thomas Edison's U.S. patent 263,132 of 1882, and third rails had been in successful use for over a decade, in installations including the rest of Chicago 'elevateds', as well as those used in Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company, not to mention the development outside the US.

In Paris, a third rail appeared in 1900 in the main-line tunnel connecting the Gare d'Orsay to the rest of the CF Paris-Orléans network. Main-line third-rail electrification was later expanded to some suburban services.

The Woodford haulage system was used on industrial tramways, specifically in quarries and strip mines in the early decades of the 20th century. This used a 250-volt center third rail to power remotely-controlled self-propelled side dump cars.[18][19] The remote control system was operated like a model railroad, with the third rail divided into multiple blocks that could be set to power, coast, or brake by switches in the control center.

Top contact or gravity type third rail seems to be the oldest form of power collection. Railways pioneering in using less hazardous types of third rail were the New York Central Railroad on the approach to New York's Grand Central Terminal (1907 – another case of a third-rail mainline electrification), Philadelphia's Market–Frankford Line (1907), and the Hochbahn in Hamburg (1912) each had bottom contact rail, also known as the Wilgus-Sprague system.[20] However, the Manchester-Bury Line of the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway tried side contact rail in 1917. These technologies appeared in wider use only at the turn of the 1920s and in the 1930s on, e.g., large-profile lines of the Berlin U-Bahn, the Berlin S-Bahn and the Moscow Metro. The Hamburg S-Bahn has used a side contact third rail at 1200 V DC since 1939.

In 1956, the world's first rubber-tyred railway line, Line 11 of Paris Metro, opened. The conductor rail evolved into a pair of guiding rails required to keep the bogie in proper position on the new type of track. This solution was modified on the 1971 Namboku Line of Sapporo Subway, where a centrally placed guiding/return rail was used plus one power rail placed laterally as on conventional railways.

In 2004, the third-rail technology at street tram lines was in the new system of Bordeaux (2004). This is a completely new technology (see below).

Third-rail systems are not considered obsolete.[citation needed] There are, however, countries (particularly Japan, South Korea, Spain) more eager to adopt overhead wiring for their urban railways. But at the same time, there were (and still are) many new third-rail systems built elsewhere, including technologically advanced countries (e.g. Copenhagen Metro, Taipei Metro, Wuhan Metro). Bottom-powered railways (it may be too specific to use the term third-rail) are also usually used with systems having rubber-tyred trains, whether it is a heavy metro (except two other lines of Sapporo Subway) or a small capacity people mover (PM). New electrified railway systems tend to use overhead for regional and long-distance systems. Third-rail systems using lower voltages than overhead systems still require many more supply points.

Model railways

[edit]

In 1906, the Lionel electric trains became the first model trains to use a third rail to power the locomotive. Lionel track uses a third rail in the center, while the two outer rails are electrically connected together. This solved the problem two-rail model trains have when the track is arranged to loop back on itself, as ordinarily this causes a short circuit. (Even if the loop was gapped, the locomotive would create a short and stop as it crossed the gaps.) Lionel electric trains also operate on alternating current. The use of alternating current means that a Lionel locomotive cannot be reversed by changing polarity; instead, the locomotive sequences among several states (forward, neutral, backward, for example) each time it is started.

Märklin three-rail trains use a short pulse at a higher voltage than is used for powering the train, to reverse a relay within the locomotive. Märklin's track does not have an actual third rail; instead, a series of short pins provide the current, taken up by a long "shoe" under the engine. This shoe is long enough to always be in contact with several pins. This is known as the stud contact system and has certain advantages when used on outdoor model railway systems. The ski collector rubs over the studs and thus inherently self cleans. When both track rails are used for the return in parallel there is much less chance of current interruption due to dirt on the line.

Many model train sets today use only two rails, usually associated with Z, N, HO, or G-Gauge systems. These are typically powered by direct current (DC) where the voltage and polarity of the current controls the speed and direction of the DC motor in the train. A growing exception is Digital Command Control (DCC), where bi-polar DC is delivered to the rails at a constant voltage, along with digital signals that are decoded within the locomotive. The bi-polar DC carries digital information to indicate the command and the locomotive that is being commanded, even when multiple locomotives are present on the same track. The aforementioned Lionel O-Gauge system remains popular today as well with its three rail track and AC power implementation.

Some model railroads realistically mimic the third rail configurations of their full-sized counterparts although nearly all do not draw power from the third rail.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The third rail is a method of supplying electric power to railway trains via a rigid conductor rail positioned alongside or between the two running rails of the track, from which the train collects current through a sliding metal contact known as a shoe. This system delivers direct current (DC) at common voltages of 600 V or 750 V, enabling efficient operation in constrained environments such as tunnels and urban areas. The term "third rail" originated in the 1860s amid the development of early subway systems, referring to the additional rail that powers trains alongside the two primary running rails. Commercial implementation began around 1900, initially for underground and metro railways, with mainline applications following shortly after, such as the Southern Region in the UK starting in 1915. Today, third rail systems power approximately one-third of the UK's weekday passenger services, particularly in the densely populated South East, supporting trains up to 12 carriages long and speeds of 100 mph (160 km/h). Globally, third rail electrification is prevalent in urban transit networks, including subways and commuter rails in cities like London, New York, and Buenos Aires, due to its compatibility with frequent stops and shorter distances between stations. Key advantages include lower installation and maintenance costs compared to overhead catenary systems, reduced visual impact in urban settings, and greater resilience to wind-related disruptions. However, notable drawbacks encompass significant safety hazards from the exposed high-voltage conductor, which can cause electrocution or severe injury upon contact; limitations on maximum speeds (generally below 100 mph due to mechanical wear and power gaps); vulnerability to snow, ice, or flooding; and less suitability for longer or heavier freight trains due to high current requirements, power losses, and infrastructure demands. Safety measures, such as protective covers, insulated sections, and public awareness campaigns, are essential to mitigate risks to trespassers and maintenance workers.

Description

Basic Principles

The third rail is an energized conductor rail positioned alongside the two running rails of a to supply (DC) power to electric trains. This system enables electric locomotives and multiple units to draw directly from the track without relying on overhead wires, facilitating operation in environments where systems may be impractical, such as tunnels or urban areas. Typically, the voltage supplied is in the range of 600-1200 V DC, with 750 V DC being common in many systems, which is converted on the train into motive power for traction motors. In a standard third rail setup, the track consists of two parallel running rails that support and guide the wheels, with the third rail mounted adjacent to one of them, often at a height of about 3-4 inches (76-100 mm) above the top of one of the running rails and insulated from the running rails. Power is collected by sliding contact shoes attached to the undercarriage of the , which maintain continuous electrical connection as the moves. This ground-level configuration simplifies installation in confined spaces compared to elevated overhead lines. Historically, the third rail emerged as a practical alternative to overhead catenary systems for delivering power at track level and was first implemented in urban subway networks around 1900, marking a key advancement in electric rail transit for dense city environments.

Key Components

The third rail, also known as the conductor rail, is typically constructed from high-strength steel to provide durability and structural integrity under the mechanical stresses of train passage. Many modern systems employ composite profiles, such as aluminum-stainless steel designs, where an aluminum core enhances electrical conductivity while a stainless steel outer layer offers superior wear resistance on the contact surface. These rails feature specific cross-sectional profiles, often rectangular or bar-shaped with a flat or slightly elevated top contact surface, differing from the bullhead or flat-bottom profiles used in running rails; common sections include weights around 100-150 lb/yd to balance conductivity and robustness. To maintain precise positioning and electrical isolation, the third rail is supported by insulators, typically made from cycloaliphatic resin for UV and resistance, preventing unintended contact with the ground or running rails. These insulators are mounted on brackets or stanchions attached to the track sleepers, spaced at regular intervals (e.g., every 3-5 meters) to accommodate and vertical loads. Electrical bonds, such as signal bonds or compression connectors, ensure continuity across rail joints and expansion gaps, minimizing voltage drops while avoiding short circuits. On the train side, power collection occurs via contact shoes, or shoegear, which are sliding assemblies mounted on the bogies and pressed against the third rail's top surface. These shoes are commonly made from carbon-based materials like for low and consistent conductivity, though metal options such as or are used in some designs for higher current capacity; a supporting carrier protects the contact element from impacts and deflection. Wear patterns on contact shoes manifest as gradual abrasion from sliding , often accelerated in high-speed or frequent-service operations, necessitating regular inspection and replacement to maintain intimate contact and prevent arcing. In third rail systems, the two running rails occasionally serve as return paths for the traction current, distributing it back to the substation alongside the third rail supply. To enable safe operation of track circuit signaling, impedance bonds are installed across the running rails at insulated joints, providing low impedance for DC traction currents (typically 750 V DC) to flow unimpeded while presenting high impedance to AC signaling frequencies, thus preventing interference with train detection.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Operational Benefits

Third rail systems provide a lower visual impact than overhead wire , blending more seamlessly into urban landscapes without prominent overhead structures. This aesthetic advantage is particularly beneficial in densely populated cities, where preserving the visual environment is a priority for community acceptance and . Additionally, third rail eliminates the need for overhead , enabling easier tunnel clearance and more straightforward construction in subterranean environments common to metro systems. These features make third rail ideal for urban railways, where space constraints and integration with existing demand compact solutions. Maintenance of third rail is simpler in enclosed spaces like tunnels, as the system lacks elevated components that require elevated access platforms or aerial work, allowing ground-level inspections and repairs with standard equipment. The design also avoids the complexities of maintenance associated with overhead systems, streamlining routine operations and reducing downtime in confined urban settings. Furthermore, the absence of overhead wires and pantographs minimizes aerodynamic drag on trains at higher speeds, contributing to improved energy efficiency during and sustained travel. Third rail offers cost savings in initial installation for and metros, particularly in dense urban areas, where overhead systems require additional structural supports and clearances that inflate expenses. These savings arise from simpler ground-level construction without the need for elevated infrastructure, making third rail a more economical choice for underground or low-clearance routes. The London Underground demonstrates the operational efficiency of third rail in high-frequency services, powering extensive networks with trains operating at intervals as short as 90 seconds during peak hours, supporting over 1.3 billion passenger journeys annually through reliable, uninterrupted power delivery. This setup enables high-capacity urban transit with capabilities that enhance overall system efficiency, particularly in stop-start operations.

Technical Limitations

Third rail systems are particularly susceptible to weather-related disruptions, especially in cold climates where snow and ice accumulation on the conductor rail can insulate it and reduce electrical conductivity, leading to power loss and service interruptions. To mitigate this, operators often employ measures such as sleet scrapers on train shoes, deicer fluid distribution from railcars, or trackside heating elements; for instance, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) equips its railcars with scrapers and deicers to clear accumulations on the third rail during winter operations. These interventions, while effective, add to maintenance costs and complexity, particularly in regions with frequent freeze-thaw cycles. Although third rail electrification avoids the visual clutter of overhead wires and poles, the exposed conductor rail itself can present aesthetic challenges in scenic or environmentally sensitive areas, where the metallic rail along the trackbed may detract from natural landscapes despite being less obtrusive overall. Operational speeds on third rail networks are generally limited to below 100 mph (160 km/h) for safety and performance reasons, as the sliding contact mechanism struggles with stability at higher velocities, and the typical DC voltages of 600–750 V constrain power delivery for acceleration and sustained high-speed running. Recent research explores enhancements like advanced collector shoes to support speeds up to 120 km/h (75 mph) in select applications. This voltage limitation also restricts the feasibility of third rail for very long-distance routes, necessitating more frequent substations to maintain adequate power supply and increasing infrastructure demands compared to overhead systems that support higher voltages over extended distances. Gaps in the third rail supply, often required at stations, level crossings, or transitions to other electrification types, force trains to coast unpowered or rely on onboard batteries, which can compromise reliability and schedule adherence if is insufficient to bridge longer interruptions. While batteries enable seamless operation across short gaps up to 300 meters, extended or unplanned discontinuities may still result in delays, highlighting a key constraint in system design for consistent performance.

Safety Considerations

The third rail, typically energized at 750 volts (DC) in systems like those in the , presents significant hazards due to its exposed position along the track, allowing unintended contact that can drive lethal currents through the . Currents exceeding 100 milliamperes can cause and death, and the high amperage available from the rail—often thousands of amperes—amplifies this risk even with relatively , as body resistance drops under wet or sweaty conditions. Historical incidents underscore these dangers; for instance, a 2016 case in the UK involved a man who fell onto a live third rail, suffering multiple cardiac arrests and severe burns requiring near-amputation of his legs. In the United States, a review of subway third rail contacts at 600 V DC identified 16 cases over several years, including seven among workers where unintentional tool or hand contact led to deep burns, amputations, and long-term cardiac complications. Trespassers face acute risks from accidental contact, with surveys indicating widespread underestimation of the threat—38% of respondents believed electrocution from rails would not cause serious injury—contributing to incidents like the 2025 electrocution of a young woman in Kent, UK, after she was drawn to the live rail. First responders and maintenance personnel are also vulnerable during emergencies or repairs, where proximity to the energized rail heightens exposure; in the US, such risks are addressed through mandatory training under Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) standards in 49 CFR Part 214, which require certification in hazard recognition, safe work practices, and emergency response near electrified tracks. Additionally, NFPA 130 provides life safety protocols for fixed guideway transit systems, emphasizing electrical isolation and personal protective equipment to protect workers and responders. Mitigation strategies focus on physical barriers and procedural safeguards to prevent contact. Rail covers and shields, often made of insulating materials, encase the third rail to reduce exposure during normal operations and , while platform edge doors or gates at stations fully separate passengers from the track area, preventing falls onto live rails. For , depowering is critical; in the UK, Network Rail's Safer Faster Isolation (SFI) programme, implemented progressively since the early 2000s, uses remote switches and negative short-circuiting devices to isolate sections of the conductor rail, minimizing the time workers spend in hazardous zones and reducing shock risks. Compared to overhead , third rail systems exhibit higher fatality rates due to the rail's ground-level accessibility, with data from the Office of Rail and Road indicating third rail accounts for eight times the equivalent fatalities of 25 kV overhead lines despite comprising only half the electrified mileage. Modern safeguards have lowered these risks; in the , post-2000 initiatives like SFI and enhanced trespasser education have contributed to a 20% reduction in rail-related incidents, including electrocutions, according to reports.

Technical Design

Power Delivery and Contact

The power delivery in third rail systems occurs through direct sliding contact between the train's collector shoes and the energized conductor rail, enabling continuous transfer of direct current (DC) to the train's traction motors. The collector shoes, mounted on the train's undercarriage, are designed to slide along the rail's surface while maintaining intimate electrical and mechanical contact. This contact is ensured by spring-loaded mechanisms, typically using coil springs that apply consistent downward pressure—often between 50 and 150 N depending on the system—to compensate for track irregularities, vibrations, and relative motion between the train and rail. Such designs prevent intermittent contact loss, which could disrupt power supply or cause arcing. Electrical considerations in power delivery are dominated by the inherent resistance of the conductor rail, which leads to voltage drops along its length according to Ohm's law, V=IRV = IR, where VV is the voltage drop, II is the traction current (often exceeding 5,000 A during acceleration), and RR is the rail's longitudinal resistance (typically 0.01–0.05 Ω/km for steel or aluminum rails). These drops can reduce available voltage at the train from nominal levels (e.g., 750 V DC) by 10–15% or more over extended distances, potentially limiting train performance and regenerative braking efficiency. To mitigate this, power supply segments between traction substations are limited to approximately 1–2 km, allowing substations to boost voltage and maintain a minimum of 500–550 V at the farthest point under full load. For high-speed applications exceeding 160 km/h, traditional flexible third rails face challenges with contact stability due to aerodynamic forces and vibrations, prompting the use of alternative rigid conductor technologies. Rigid conductors, often aluminum profiles fixed directly to the or walls, provide a stiffer structure that supports higher current densities and reduces wear at elevated speeds, as seen in certain urban extensions. These differ from conventional rails by eliminating joints and flexing, though they are more common in confined spaces like s rather than open high-speed lines. Insulation and arcing prevention are integral to safe shoe-rail interaction, as momentary contact losses can generate electric arcs that erode both the rail and shoe. The conductor rail is insulated from the ground and running rails using non-conductive covers made of fiberglass-reinforced plastic or , with creepage distances of at least 100 mm to prevent . Collector shoes employ low-friction materials like sintered carbon or copper-impregnated , which exhibit high electrical conductivity while minimizing sparking through self-lubricating properties and thermal resistance up to 1,500°C. Spring tension and shoe geometry further reduce arcing by limiting bounce, though residual arcing at rail joints or under high loads contributes to gradual material erosion, necessitating periodic inspections.

Return Current Mechanisms

In third rail systems, the return current from the traction motors flows back to the substations primarily through the running rails, which serve as the negative conductor in the DC circuit due to their economic advantages and existing integration. This setup completes the electrical circuit without requiring additional dedicated return conductors, allowing the power supplied via the third rail to be efficiently recycled at the substation. To balance the current distribution and minimize voltage drops, cross-bonding connects the running rails at regular intervals, enabling the traction current to be shared across multiple rails—typically forming parallel paths between up to four rails in a double-track configuration. These bonds, often implemented with welded or bolted connections, reduce the effective resistance of the return path and ensure even current loading, particularly in sections with high traction demand. Impedance bonds are employed at track circuit boundaries to separate the low-frequency DC traction return currents from the higher-frequency AC signaling currents, preventing that could disrupt train detection systems. These devices, consisting of center-tapped coils with to AC but low to DC, allow traction currents to pass through while blocking signaling currents, thereby maintaining across insulated rail joints. Substations connect directly to the running rails to collect the return currents, while grounding systems at these locations and along the track absorb stray currents that leak into the due to imperfect rail insulation, mitigating electrolytic of nearby metallic structures such as pipelines and building foundations. Effective grounding, often involving buried anodes or direct rail-to-earth connections, directs these stray currents back to the substation negative bus, reducing rates and ensuring system longevity. In long urban sections, the cumulative resistance of the running rails can lead to significant voltage drops and efficiency losses, with studies indicating approximately 16-21% of input power lost as line losses in 750V DC systems, with a portion dissipated as in densely loaded setups due to the rails' longitudinal impedance. This challenge is exacerbated by frequent stops and high currents in metropolitan networks, necessitating closer substation spacing to maintain acceptable power delivery.

Gaps and Transitions

In third rail systems, interruptions known as gaps occur at crossovers, depots, and voltage transition points to facilitate track switching, isolation, or electrical sectioning. These gaps typically range from short dead sections of about 3-15 meters at crossovers and insulators to longer breaks up to 100-200 meters in some configurations, requiring to maintain for coasting through the unpowered zone without stalling. Multiple collector shoes distributed along the length help bridge shorter gaps by ensuring continuous contact with adjacent powered segments, while for extended interruptions, modern may employ onboard batteries to sustain auxiliary systems or briefly. Transition zones between third rail and overhead electrification incorporate neutral sections to prevent arcing between differing voltage systems, often DC third rail and AC overhead lines. Trains in such zones use dual-mode equipment with collector shoes for third rail and pantographs for overhead, switching power sources via manual controls operated by the driver or automatic devices like vacuum circuit breakers triggered by trackside markers or position sensors. Manually operated hook switches isolate third rail sections during the handover, while automated systems employ computer vision to detect visual cues and execute seamless transitions without driver intervention. In UK third rail to overhead line transitions, dead sections are designed to minimize coasting requirements, typically around 50-100 meters. Design standards for third rail gaps emphasize safety and reliability, specifying minimum lengths to avoid unintended contact between sections and maximum bridgeable distances based on train performance. Warning systems include trackside , illuminated indicators, and in-cab alerts that notify drivers of approaching gaps, instructing them to accelerate beforehand or maintain specific speeds for safe passage. Historically, third rail transitions evolved from fully manual operations to increasingly automated processes, particularly in dense urban networks like the New York Subway. Early implementations in the 1904 IRT subway relied on motormen visually identifying gaps at crossovers or depots and manually coasting through using momentum, supported by basic semaphore signals. By the mid-20th century, the system incorporated with fixed wayside indicators to warn of power interruptions, reducing reliance on driver judgment and enabling smoother handling of section transitions without manual intervention beyond adjustments.

Variations and Implementations

Mixed Electrification Systems

Mixed electrification systems integrate third rail and power supplies along a single route, primarily to bridge urban sections favoring third rail for its compact design in confined spaces like tunnels and platforms with rural or high-speed segments benefiting from overhead lines' capacity for higher voltages and reduced visual impact. This approach allows seamless operation without full conversion of existing , enabling dual- or multi-voltage trains to handle transitions efficiently. In the , the (HS1) route, serving services, employs 25 kV AC overhead electrification for its main alignment but incorporates 750 V DC third rail at key connections, such as to the and Ashford domestic lines, to interface with the legacy southern network. Similarly, the core network utilizes dual-voltage capable of operating on 25 kV AC overhead north of Farringdon and switching to 750 V DC third rail southbound, supporting cross-London services without interruption. The exemplifies transitional mixed systems, having converted much of its original 750 V DC third rail to 25 kV AC overhead while maintaining compatibility at junctions for freight and passenger interchanges. In the , the included hybrid segments on lines such as route 51 (discontinued in 2019), where trains transitioned from 750 V DC third rail in tunnel sections to 600 V DC overhead wires on surface alignments, using specialized vehicles to maintain service continuity. These transitions occur at designated gaps, where pantographs raise or collector shoes engage, minimizing as explored further in the Gaps and Transitions section.

Non-Standard Voltages

While most third rail systems operate at 600-750 V DC to balance safety, efficiency, and infrastructure costs, several urban rail networks employ higher DC voltages to support greater power demands in dense or extended metro environments. For instance, the uses 1,200 V DC third rail, allowing for improved energy transmission and capacity in its regional network. These elevated voltages reduce current requirements and associated resistive losses, though they necessitate enhanced insulation on the rail and contact shoes to prevent arcing. Historical examples include the in , which operated at 1,200 V DC side-contact third rail until its conversion to overhead in 1991. Such configurations highlight adaptations for specific operational needs, but they increase engineering complexity, including reinforced creepage distances on insulators to mitigate risks under humid or contaminated conditions. Although (AC) third rail systems have been explored in early 20th-century experiments, such as preliminary trials around 660 V AC in British suburban railways, they did not achieve widespread adoption due to challenges with AC motor synchronization and higher insulation needs at the rail level. These historical efforts, often limited to short test sections, underscored the preference for DC in third rail designs for simpler traction control. In industrial applications, third rail voltages occasionally exceed 1,000 V DC, as seen in some private freight sidings, but examples remain scarce and typically customized for low-speed, controlled environments to address heightened safety protocols. Recent metro expansions in have considered voltage optimizations for third rail efficiency, though most post-2020 projects adhere to 750 V DC standards; for example, upgrades in India's incorporate advanced like aluminum third rails to reduce losses at conventional voltages, indirectly supporting potential future escalations. Challenges with non-standard voltages persist, particularly in retrofitting older systems, where equipment compatibility requires dual-voltage converters and rigorous testing to avoid disruptions. Overall, these variations demonstrate third rail's flexibility beyond the norm, prioritizing site-specific power delivery while adhering to international safety standards like those from the .

Simultaneous Use with Overhead Lines

Dual-contact systems enable trains to operate using both third rail collector shoes and pantographs, providing flexibility for routes with varying or redundancy in critical operations. Historical examples include the North Eastern Railway's ES1 class locomotives, built in 1905 by , which featured bow collectors for overhead wires in open yards and third rail shoes for sections on the Newcastle Quayside to address clearance constraints. Technical setups for concurrent supply demand synchronized DC voltages—typically 600-750 V for both systems—to minimize arcing or faults during transitions, with onboard controls or insulators preventing unintended dual contact. Both infrastructures run parallel along tracks in select areas, allowing trains to draw from one source while the other remains energized for adjacent operations, though simultaneous dual collection is prohibited to avoid electrical interference. The U.S. illustrates such configurations in transition zones, where overhead and third rail coexist to support mixed fleets without service interruptions. These arrangements offer redundancy against single-system failures, such as damage from weather or third rail icing, ensuring continuous power in maintenance yards where diverse requires versatile access. For example, U.S. rail facilities often employ parallel systems to test or service locomotives from third rail urban networks alongside overhead regional lines, enhancing operational resilience. Limitations stem from the added demands, including reinforced pantograph-shoe isolation and expanded substation capacity, which elevate costs by 20-30% over single-mode setups and complicate signaling integration. Consequently, simultaneous use remains rare in passenger service, confined mostly to yards or short heritage segments like preserved ES1 operations.

Global Applications

Europe

In Europe, third rail is predominantly utilized in dense urban metro and suburban networks, providing efficient power delivery for high-frequency services while minimizing overhead infrastructure in tunnels. The maintains the continent's most extensive third rail system, spanning over 2,500 km primarily in the South East, where it powers suburban commuter trains at 750 V DC. The London Underground exemplifies this dominance, employing a four-rail configuration at a nominal 630 V DC—comprising a positive outer rail at +420 V and a negative inner rail at -210 V relative to the running rails—for its 402 km network, enabling seamless operation across deep-level and sub-surface lines. Recent expansions, such as the Elizabeth Line's full opening in 2022, use 25 kV AC overhead lines throughout, with connecting suburban segments converted from third rail to support higher speeds up to 140 km/h. France's urban rail systems also heavily feature third rail, with the Paris Métro operating all 16 lines on 750 V DC third rail power, supporting over 1.5 billion annual passengers through its compact 226 km network. The (RER) employs hybrid configurations, blending metro-style third rail segments at 750 V DC in central with 25 kV AC overhead lines on peripheral commuter routes, facilitating integrated regional travel across 587 km. Post-2020 upgrades have focused on energy-efficient enhancements, including advanced power converters to optimize traction and reduce losses in these mixed setups. In the , third rail supports key metro operations, as seen in Amsterdam's 43 km network powered by 750 V DC bottom-contact third rail for its four lines, and Rotterdam's 100 km system, which uses similar 750 V DC third rail across most routes except short overhead sections on Line E. These implementations align with broader efforts under the Technical Specifications for (TSI), which promote standardized energy subsystems for cross-border compatibility, though third rail remains urban-focused without mandatory voltage unification for non-metro lines. Third rail systems in European cities contribute to environmental goals by enabling zero-emission urban , with electrified networks reducing CO2 output by up to 90% compared to diesel alternatives in high-density areas. Recent 2024-2025 retrofits, such as enhancements on systems like Barcelona's Metro (which recovers 33% of for grid reuse), are being adopted across third rail infrastructures to further cut emissions and integrate with urban sustainability initiatives.

North America

In , third rail electrification is predominantly utilized in urban systems, providing power to subway and elevated trains in dense metropolitan areas. This method supports high-frequency service in underground and street-level environments where overhead wires are impractical due to clearance issues or aesthetic concerns. Typical voltages range from 600 to 750 V , enabling efficient propulsion for heavy-rail vehicles while minimizing infrastructure complexity in constrained urban corridors. Prominent examples in the United States include the , which operates on a 625 V DC third rail system across its extensive network of over 800 miles of track, powering more than 6,000 subway cars daily. The Chicago 'L' elevated and subway system similarly employs a 600 V DC third rail to energize its fleet, facilitating service on 224 miles of track through the city's core. In the Northeast, the Trans-Hudson (PATH) system connects and , using a 650 V DC third rail for its 14-mile route, serving approximately 300,000 daily riders with automated train control integration. In , the Transit Commission's (TTC) subway network relies on a 600 V DC third rail for its Lines 1 and 2, spanning 68 km and using Toronto gauge track to deliver power to modern T-series cars. Vancouver's SkyTrain system incorporates hybrid electrification, with the Expo and Lines utilizing a 750 V DC third rail alongside linear induction motors for propulsion on 49 miles of guideway, while the employs overhead wires at 750 V DC. These configurations allow SkyTrain to achieve driverless operation and high capacity in a mix of elevated and underground segments. North American third rail systems face significant challenges from aging , particularly in legacy networks like 's, where century-old components contribute to frequent delays. Ongoing upgrades, such as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) signal modernization projects from 2023 to 2025, aim to replace mechanical block signals with (CBTC) on key lines like the G and 7, enhancing capacity and reliability amid a $51.5 billion capital plan. These efforts address voltage fluctuations and power distribution inefficiencies in high-demand corridors. Safety enhancements include the installation of or barriers in select stations post-2020, such as the MTA's pilot program at three locations (Times Square-42nd Street, Sutphin Boulevard-Archer Avenue-JFK Airport, and Jackson Heights-Roosevelt Avenue) initiated in 2022 and progressing through 2025, which aligns with broader safety standards to prevent track intrusions.

Other Regions

In Asia, the Mass Transit Railway (MTR) in employs a 1,500 V DC overhead catenary system for its urban lines, enabling efficient power delivery in densely populated areas. Similarly, select lines in and metros incorporate 600–750 V DC third rail electrification, though many routes blend it with overhead systems for flexibility in underground environments. Recent developments in Chinese have seen increased adoption of third rail systems in new metro lines opened after 2020, such as extensions in cities like and , where 750 V DC third rail facilitates compact infrastructure in high-density corridors. These implementations prioritize energy efficiency and reduced visual impact in urban settings. In , the operates primarily on a 750 V DC third rail system, powering its extensive 226 km network of 12 lines and serving over 1.5 million daily passengers. This setup, chosen for its reliability in the city's seismic conditions and underground routes, exemplifies third rail's role in large-scale urban transit. The Buenos Aires Underground, particularly Line B, uses a non-standard 600 V DC third rail electrification, which upgraded in 2017 to enhance power supply and tunnel safety. Third rail usage remains limited in Africa and Australia, with Sydney's light rail network featuring an innovative Alstom APS (Alimentation Par le Sol) ground-level third rail system that activates only under passing vehicles for pedestrian safety. Sydney's suburban heavy rail, however, relies on 1,500 V DC overhead lines rather than third rail. In South Africa, potential expansions of electrified commuter networks under PRASA do not currently emphasize third rail, focusing instead on overhead systems for broader freight and passenger integration. Emerging adoptions in highlight growing interest in third rail for metro systems, as seen in the 2024 project replacing steel third rails with lightweight versions between Road and Central stations to improve energy efficiency. This upgrade, part of broader network enhancements, underscores third rail's adaptability in cost-sensitive developing markets.

History

Early Development

The early development of third rail technology stemmed from innovations in electric traction during the late , building on experiments with powered rail systems to replace steam and horse-drawn transport. The first railway to use a central third rail was the Bessbrook and Newry Tramway in Ireland, which opened in 1885 as a 3 ft (914 mm) narrow-gauge hydro-electrically powered line transporting passengers and freight. Granville T. Woods, an African American inventor, contributed significantly by patenting improvements to the third rail system, including a safety-enhanced electric railway in 1901 (US Patent 684,413). Frank J. Sprague played a pivotal role through his 1890s demonstrations of electric streetcar systems, most notably the Richmond Union Passenger Railway in , which began operations in 1888 as the world's first large-scale successful electric street railway, spanning 12 miles over hilly terrain and proving the viability of multiple-unit control for electric vehicles. Although this system primarily utilized overhead trolley wires for power collection, Sprague's advancements in motor design and train control influenced the transition to rail-based electrification methods, including third rail configurations. A key milestone in third rail adoption came with the in , which opened on March 6, 1893, as the world's first mainline electric powered by a central third rail at 525 V DC, positioned between the running rails to supply current to lightweight electric multiple-unit trains. This 6.5-mile dockside line demonstrated the practicality of third rail for urban and industrial transport, using automatic signaling and to enhance efficiency and safety. The system's success highlighted third rail's advantages over overhead wires in enclosed or elevated structures, where wire sagging and maintenance were concerns. In the United States, third rail gained prominence with the Interborough Rapid Transit (IRT) subway in , which commenced service on October 27, 1904, employing a 600 V DC surface third rail along its 9-mile initial route from City Hall to 145th Street. Powered by contact shoes sliding along the rail, this setup enabled rapid underground transit for the growing metropolis, with trains achieving speeds up to 35 mph and carrying over 300,000 passengers on opening day. The IRT's implementation marked third rail's adaptation to subterranean environments, where overhead lines were impractical due to tunnel height constraints. The technology evolved from earlier conduit systems, which placed a protected conductor in a subsurface slot for streetcars, as pioneered in installations like Washington, D.C.'s Eckington and Railway in 1888 to comply with bans on overhead wires. These conduit setups, adapted from cable car infrastructure, allowed trolleys to draw power via a plow dipped into the slot but suffered from high construction costs, frequent breakdowns from debris and water ingress, and limited speed. By the early 1900s, engineers shifted to exposed surface third rail for dedicated rail lines, offering simpler installation, better accessibility for , and higher current capacity, though requiring to avoid street-level interference. Prior to 1920, safety challenges dominated third rail deployment, as the exposed high-voltage conductor posed risks to track workers, passengers falling onto rails, and even maintenance crews. These concerns led to innovations like wooden hood covers over the rail to insulate and shield it, as implemented in the IRT system where the third rail was mounted 7 inches above and protected by a 2-inch-thick wood sheath. Physical barriers, such as fenced platforms and rigid insulators, were also introduced to prevent accidental contact, with early regulations mandating insulated shoes and grounding for vehicles; despite these, incidents like shocks during wet weather underscored the need for ongoing refinements in enclosure and detection systems.

Modern Expansion

Following , third rail systems experienced significant expansion in urban metro networks, driven by postwar reconstruction and growing urban populations. In , the opened in stages starting in 1968, representing the first major new Underground line in decades and utilizing the standard 630 V DC fourth-rail configuration to extend connectivity from Walthamstow Central to Victoria. Similarly, the saw extensions to Line 13, with merging of segments from Line 14 in 1976 (planned in the 1960s) to improve north-south links, while maintaining its 750 V DC third rail supply across the growing network. In New York, the subway's third rail infrastructure (600 V DC) supported planned expansions under the 1968 , which aimed to add over 100 km of new lines, though many projects faced delays; ongoing upgrades included third rail replacements on the IRT lines in the 1970s to enhance reliability. In the , third rail systems have incorporated advancements in and energy efficiency. became prominent with the full driverless operation of in 2011, the oldest line to adopt Grade of Automation 4 using its existing third rail power, improving frequency and safety. technologies, such as DC-DC converters, emerged in the 2010s to capture energy in DC third rail networks, enabling up to 30% efficiency gains by storing or redistributing power back to the grid or other trains. By 2024-2025, efforts integrated renewable sources, exemplified by solar-assisted substations in rail systems; for instance, China's first renewable-integrated railway project on the AC overhead-electrified Baotou-Shenmu line featured a 6 MW at the Liujiagou substation as of October 2025, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, with similar principles applicable to DC third rail urban networks. While third rail use has declined on mainline railways due to speed and safety limitations favoring overhead AC systems, it persists in urban transit for its compactness in tunnels and . Hybrid approaches promote , as seen with trains equipped for 750 V DC third rail on approaches to the since 1994, allowing seamless cross-border operation. Recent Asian metro builds, such as Metro's upgrades with aluminum third rail segments in 2024, underscore ongoing urban adoption for high-density routes.

Model Railways

Implementation Techniques

In model railways, third rail systems are commonly implemented in O gauge using three-rail track, where the center rail serves as the conductive third rail to supply power to locomotives, and are standard in Märklin systems for HO, TT, and scales using a center stud contact. Track construction typically involves pre-manufactured sectional pieces made from tubular steel or more realistic tie-and-rail designs, with the center rail embedded or attached between the outer rails using plastic or wooden sleepers for stability and aesthetics. For custom or scale-accurate layouts replicating outside third rail, hobbyists often use thin strips or aluminum foil affixed under the sleepers with screws or , ensuring electrical continuity while mimicking prototype elevation and insulation. These conductive elements are powered by dedicated transformers delivering 12-18 volts AC or DC, depending on the system, to provide reliable low-voltage operation suitable for indoor layouts. Locomotives in third rail model setups employ wiper pickups mounted on sliding shoes that maintain with the center rail, replicating the sliding contact shoes of full-scale third rail . These pickups, often made from or spring-loaded metal, are positioned on the undercarriage to rub against the rail surface, ensuring uninterrupted power delivery even during curves or elevation changes; in more advanced models, multiple shoes per enhance reliability by distributing contact points. Layout designs incorporating third rail emphasize insulated sections to create electrical gaps, preventing short circuits at block boundaries or turnouts, achieved by inserting non-conductive insulators or gaps in the center rail while maintaining outer rail continuity. Compatibility with (DCC) is facilitated through specialized decoders installed in locomotives, such as those from QSI or ESU, which convert the AC track power to DC for precise speed and sound control across multiple units on the same layout. Historically, early 20th-century third rail models relied on construction, featuring stamped tracks with prominent tubular three-rail designs for durability and simple wiring, as seen in Lionel and Ives products from the to . In contrast, modern implementations adhere to National Model Railroad Association (NMRA) standards for scale accuracy, using finer-profile rails and realistic sleepers to achieve prototypical appearance while supporting advanced electronics like DCC.

Challenges and Adaptations

Modeling third rail in small scales such as HO and OO presents significant challenges due to the need for fine, realistic rail sections that can compromise electrical conductivity. The thin code 60 rail commonly used for the third rail in these scales, like Peco's IL-1, often requires additional feeders or joiners to mitigate voltage drops and ensure reliable power delivery to locomotives. To address this, modelers employ flexible wiring solutions, such as stranded wire connections between rail sections, to maintain consistent conductivity without rigid joints that could cause breaks on curves. Derailment risks arise from uneven rail height or poor alignment, particularly on curves or at transitions, where the third rail must be precisely positioned no more than 1mm above the running rails to avoid interference with flanges. Solutions include using IL-120 conductor rail chairs to secure the rail at consistent heights and drilling sleepers for secure mounting, allowing for smoother operation. In larger scales like O gauge, these issues are less pronounced due to the bigger components, enabling easier hand-laid track with extended ties for support, as described in techniques inspired by Frank Ellison's methods. For enhanced realism, adaptations such as lighted gaps simulate the visual effect of power collection, using LED modules like the Train Tech TTAL23 Spark Arc to flash at pickup points on third rail-equipped models. Sound effects for arcing are achieved through digital decoders, such as ESU LokSound V5, which include synchronized buzz functions triggered by function keys during operation. Post-2020 innovations include automatic lighting effects integrated with DCC systems for more dynamic power simulation, particularly in urban layouts. In large layouts, hybrid systems combine third rail with overhead lines for prototypical transitions, using insulated gaps and flexible wiring to switch power sources seamlessly. practices often involve from brands like for British-style outside third rail in HO/OO and Märklin's center-rail adaptations in HO for continental European models, with detailed installation tutorials promoting precise sleeper modifications.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.