Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Line of force
View on WikipediaIn the history of physics, a line of force in Michael Faraday's extended sense is synonymous with James Clerk Maxwell's line of induction.[1] According to J.J. Thomson, Faraday usually discusses lines of force as chains of polarized particles in a dielectric, yet sometimes Faraday discusses them as having an existence all their own as in stretching across a vacuum.[2] In addition to lines of force, J.J. Thomson—similar to Maxwell—also calls them tubes of electrostatic inductance, or simply Faraday tubes.[2] From the 20th century perspective, lines of force are energy linkages embedded in a 19th-century field theory that led to more mathematically and experimentally sophisticated concepts and theories, including Maxwell's equations and Albert Einstein's theory of relativity.
Lines of force originated with Michael Faraday, whose theory holds that all of reality is made up of force itself. His theory predicts that electricity, light, and gravity have finite propagation delays. The theories and experimental data of later scientific figures such as Maxwell, Heinrich Hertz, Einstein, and others are in agreement with the ramifications of Faraday's theory. Nevertheless, Faraday's theory remains distinct. Unlike Faraday, Maxwell and others (e.g., J.J. Thomson) thought that light and electricity must propagate through an ether. In Einstein's relativity, there is no ether, yet the physical reality of force is much weaker than in the theories of Faraday.[3][4]
Historian Nancy J. Nersessian in her paper "Faraday's Field Concept" distinguishes between the ideas of Maxwell and Faraday:[5]
The specific features of Faraday's field concept, in its 'favourite' and most complete form, are that force is a substance, that it is the only substance and that all forces are interconvertible through various motions of the lines of force. These features of Faraday's 'favourite notion' were not carried on. Maxwell, in his approach to the problem of finding a mathematical representation for the continuous transmission of electric and magnetic forces, considered these to be states of stress and strain in a mechanical aether. This was part of the quite different network of beliefs and problems with which Maxwell was working.
Views of Faraday
[edit]At first Michael Faraday considered the physical reality of the lines of force as a possibility, yet several scholars agree that for Faraday their physical reality became a conviction. One scholar dates this change in the year 1838.[6] Another scholar dates this final strengthening of his belief in 1852.[7] Faraday experimentally studied lines of magnetic force and electrostatic force, showing them not to fit action at a distance models. In 1852 Faraday wrote the paper "On the Physical Character of the Lines of Magnetic Force"[8] which examined gravity, radiation, and electricity, and their possible relationships with the transmission medium, transmission propagation, and the receiving entity.
Views of Maxwell
[edit]Initially, James Clerk Maxwell took an agnostic approach in his mathematization of Faraday's theories. This is seen in Maxwell's 1855 and 1856 papers: "On Faraday's Lines of Force" and "On Faraday's Electrotontic State". In the 1864 paper "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" Maxwell gives scientific priority of the electromagnetic theory of light to Faraday and his 1846 paper "Thoughts on Ray Vibrations".[9] Maxwell wrote:
Faraday discovered that when a plane polarized ray traverses a transparent diamagnetic medium in the direction of the lines of magnetic force produced by magnets or currents in the neighborhood, the plane of polarization is caused to rotate.
The conception of the propagation of transverse magnetic disturbances to the exclusion of normal ones is distinctly set forth by Professor Faraday in his "Thoughts on Ray Vibrations." The electromagnetic theory of light, as proposed by him, is the same in substance as that which I have begun to develop in this paper, except that in 1846 there was no data to calculate the velocity of propagation.
Tube of force
[edit]Maxwell changed Faraday's phrase lines of force to tubes of force, when expressing his fluidic assumptions involved in his mathematization of Faraday's theories.[6] A tube of force, also called a tube of electrostatic induction or field tube, are the lines of electric force which moves so that its beginning traces a closed curve on a positive surface, its end will trace a corresponding closed curve on the negative surface, and the line of force itself will generate an inductive tubular surface. Such a tube is called a "solenoid". There is a pressure at right angles to a tube of force of one half the product of the dielectric and magnetic density. If through the growth of a field the tubes of force are spread sideways or in width there is a magnetic reaction to that growth in intensity of electric current. However, if a tube of force is caused to move endwise there is little or no drag to limit velocity. Tubes of force are absorbed by bodies imparting momentum and gravitational mass. Tubes of force are a group of electric lines of force.
Magnetic curves
[edit]Early on in his research (circa 1831), Faraday calls the patterns of apparently continuous curves traced out in metallic filings near a magnet magnetic curves. Later on he refers to them as just an instance of magnetic lines of force or simply lines of force.[10] Eventually Faraday would also begin to use the phrase "magnetic field".[11]
See also
[edit]Other relevant papers
[edit]- Faraday, Michael, "Thoughts on Ray Vibrations", Philosophical Magazine, May 1846, or Experimental Researches, iii, p. 447
- Faraday, Michael, Experimental Researches, Series 19.
Notes
[edit]- ^ 1907 Encyclopædia Britannica, page 64
- ^ a b Notes on Recent Researches in Electricity and Magnetism, Joseph John Thomson, James Clerk Maxwell, 1883
- ^ Fields of Force, William Berkson, 1974
- ^ Forces and Fields, Mary B. Hesse, 1961
- ^ Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867, David Gooding, Frank A. J. L. James, Stockton Press, 1985, ISBN 0-943818-91-5, ISBN 978-0-943818-91-7, 258 pages, page 183-
- ^ a b The Origins of Field Theory, L. Pearce Williams (Cornell University), 1966, Random House, p. 88 (a), p.124 (b)
- ^ Energy, Force, and Matter, P.M. Harman, 1982, Cambridge University Press, p. 80
- ^ Faraday, Michael (1855). Experimental Researches in Electricity: Series 19-29 [Phil. trans., 1846-52. Other electrical papers from Roy. inst. proc., and Phil. mag.] 1855. B. Quaritch.
- ^ A.T. Williams. "Sneaking Up On Einstein". Retrieved 2008-10-29.
- ^ Faraday's Experimental Researches in Electricity: The First Series, Howard J. Fisher, 2004, Green Lion Press, p. 22 et al.
- ^ Colin A. Russell, Michael Faraday: Physics and Faith, 2000, Oxford University Press, pp. 99-100 Chapter 9 "Electromagnetism: 'At Play in the Fields of the Lord'
Line of force
View on GrokipediaFundamental Concepts
Definition
Lines of force are imaginary lines whose direction at any point is tangent to the direction of the force acting on a test particle in a force field, serving as a visualization tool for the orientation of fields in physics. This concept originated with Michael Faraday's 19th-century investigations into electromagnetism, where he employed it to depict the spatial distribution of forces without relying on action-at-a-distance mechanisms.[6] Faraday first sketched lines of force in his laboratory diary in 1831 to represent magnetic influences around magnets and currents.[6] By 1845, in his published experimental researches, he broadened the application to encompass electric and other force fields, treating them as integral to understanding induction phenomena.[6] In electric fields, lines of force point in the direction that a positive test charge would experience a force, originating from positive charges and terminating at negative charges. Conversely, in magnetic fields, these lines indicate the direction in which the north pole of a compass needle would align, emerging from north magnetic poles and entering south poles to form closed loops.[7] This distinction highlights how lines of force adapt to the nature of the underlying force, whether electrostatic repulsion/attraction or magnetic orientation. The density of lines of force varies with field strength, becoming more concentrated in regions of higher intensity to qualitatively convey the magnitude of the force per unit area perpendicular to the lines. Faraday interpreted these lines not merely as aids for visualization but as manifestations of real physical tensions within the surrounding medium.[6]Properties
Lines of force exhibit several fundamental geometric properties that define their behavior within electric and magnetic fields. These lines never intersect or cross one another, as such an intersection would imply a unique direction for the field at that point, which contradicts the vector nature of the field. They originate from positive charges or extend to infinity in electrostatic fields and terminate on negative charges or at infinity, while in source-free regions, they remain continuous without abrupt starts or ends. In magnetostatic fields, lines of force form closed loops, reflecting the absence of magnetic monopoles.[8][9][10] The intensity of the field is represented by the density of lines of force, where the number of lines passing through a unit area perpendicular to the field direction is proportional to the field's strength. Greater density indicates stronger fields, providing a visual measure of field magnitude without requiring quantitative computation. This property holds for both electric and magnetic lines of force, allowing qualitative assessment of field variations.[8] In uniform fields, lines of force appear as straight, parallel paths, maintaining constant spacing and direction, as seen in the electric field between parallel charged plates. In non-uniform fields, however, the lines curve and may converge or diverge, with spacing adjusting to reflect local field strength—denser near sources and sparser farther away. This curvature arises from the spatial variation in field direction and magnitude.[8][11] Specifically, in electrostatics, lines of force emanate from positive charges and terminate on negative charges, directing the path a positive test charge would follow. In magnetostatics, they form continuous closed loops that emerge from the north pole of a magnet and enter the south pole, encircling current-carrying conductors or magnetic materials.[9][10]Historical Development
Faraday's Introduction
Michael Faraday first conceptualized the idea of lines of force during his electromagnetic induction experiments in 1831, referring to them in his laboratory diary as "magnetic curves." In a diary entry dated November 4, 1831, he described these as "lines of magnetic forces which would be depicted by iron filings," using the patterns formed by iron filings around a magnet to visualize the direction and intensity of magnetic influence.[12] This intuitive approach stemmed from his observations that magnetic effects could be represented by continuous curves emanating from poles, providing a physical picture rather than abstract mathematical constructs. Faraday formalized the concept of lines of force in his Experimental Researches in Electricity, particularly in the nineteenth series published in 1845, titled "On the Magnetization of Light, and the Illumination of Magnetic Lines of Force." In this work, he reported his discovery of the rotation of the plane of polarization of light in the presence of a magnetic field—now known as the Faraday effect—interpreting it as evidence that light interacts directly with these magnetic lines, effectively "illuminating" them. To reveal the patterns of these lines, Faraday employed the classic experiment of sprinkling iron filings on a sheet of paper over a magnet, observing how the filings aligned into curved paths that traced the lines from one pole to the other, demonstrating their continuity and directional properties. Philosophically, Faraday viewed lines of force not as mere calculational aids but as real physical entities— "lines of power" or streams of a subtle substance conveying force through space. In his 1852 paper "On the Physical Character of the Lines of Magnetic Force," he argued for their substantial nature, suggesting that forces like magnetism, electricity, gravity, and light could interconvert through the motion or tension of these lines, unifying natural phenomena under a common framework.[13] This perspective influenced later theorists, such as James Clerk Maxwell, who in 1856 described Faraday's lines as "the unit tubes of fluid motion" to model electromagnetic interactions mathematically. Faraday's emphasis on the physical reality of these lines laid the groundwork for a qualitative understanding of field-like behaviors in electromagnetism.Maxwell's Formalization
James Clerk Maxwell transformed Michael Faraday's qualitative concept of lines of force into a rigorous mathematical framework through his seminal 1861 paper, "On Physical Lines of Force," where he modeled these lines as rotating molecular vortices embedded in the luminiferous ether. In this mechanical analogy, Maxwell envisioned the ether as a continuous medium filled with tiny, spinning vortices whose axes aligned parallel to the magnetic lines of force, producing centrifugal forces that accounted for magnetic attraction and repulsion. The direction of rotation was specified such that, when viewed in the direction from south to north along the line, the vortices rotated clockwise, with intervening spherical particles representing electric currents rolling without slipping between adjacent vortices to transmit motion. This vortex model provided a physical interpretation of Faraday's experimental observations on induction, positing that electromagnetic inductive effects were carried through these etherial structures.[14] Maxwell's mathematical contributions in the 1861 paper included the introduction of the vector potential, termed the "electrotonic state," whose components () described the potential from which magnetic intensity derived, and the explicit use of curl operations to quantify the relationship between magnetic field lines and electric currents. For instance, the strength of an electric current was expressed as the curl component , linking the rotational nature of field lines directly to observable currents and emphasizing that lines of force indicate the direction of magnetic action without crossing, much like streamlines in fluid flow. These formulations built on Faraday's 1845–1846 experiments suggesting a connection between light and magnetism, to which Maxwell accorded priority for the electromagnetic theory of light.[14] In his 1864 paper, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Maxwell further formalized lines of force as states of stress and strain within the ether, where magnetic tubes of force served as conduits for inductive effects, with the total electromagnetic momentum proportional to the number of lines passing through a closed circuit. He viewed these lines not merely as geometric constructs but as manifestations of the ether's elastic properties, capable of transmitting transverse disturbances akin to waves. This led to the prediction of electromagnetic waves propagating at a finite speed , calculated from independent experiments on electric currents as approximately 310,000,000 meters per second, matching the known speed of light and unifying optics with electromagnetism. Maxwell highlighted Faraday's discovery of polarization rotation, stating that "when a plane polarized ray traverses a transparent diamagnetic medium in the direction of the magnetic force... the plane of polarization is caused to rotate," interpreting this as evidence that light consists of electromagnetic vibrations in the ether.[15]Related Constructs
Tube of Force
In electromagnetism, a tube of force refers to a bundle of lines of force that forms a continuous tubular surface, analogous to a solenoid, where the cross-sectional area of the tube is proportional to the total flux enclosed within it.[16] This structure provides a volumetric representation of field intensity, extending the directional paths of individual lines into three-dimensional conduits that guide electromagnetic action. James Clerk Maxwell, in his 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force," reframed Michael Faraday's lines of force as tubes to emphasize their physical reality within a mechanical model of the ether, attributing a longitudinal tension along the tube's axis—resembling the pull of a taut rope—and a lateral pressure across the tube's surface due to centrifugal forces in rotating molecular vortices.[16] These mechanical stresses explain the attraction between magnetic poles and the repulsion in equatorial regions, with the tension promoting contraction along the tube and the pressure causing expansion perpendicular to it. Tubes of force possess dynamic properties, including the capacity to carry momentum through the angular motion of ether vortices, which influences both magnetic permeability and electric phenomena.[16] The inductive capacity of a medium is quantified by the volume occupied by these tubes, reflecting the density of vortices and the medium's ability to support magnetic induction. This framework elucidates electromagnetic induction, where an electromotive force arises in a conductor as it crosses tubes of force, proportional to the rate at which flux-linked tubes are intersected.[16] In dielectrics, tubes of force represent electric displacement, arising from the polarization of molecules that align with the field, effectively shifting the positions of positive and negative charges within the medium.[16] In his 1852 paper "On the Physical Character of the Lines of Magnetic Force," Faraday discussed the physical nature of magnetic lines of force and speculated on their possible relation to other forces including gravity, though the tube model was later developed by Maxwell to unify electromagnetic and potentially other phenomena.[13] These tubes can be visualized in magnetic fields through patterns formed by iron filings, which align to outline the bundled paths.Magnetic Curves
In 1831, Michael Faraday introduced the term "magnetic curves" in his laboratory diary to describe the patterns formed by the distribution of magnetic forces around a magnet or current-carrying wire. These curves represented the paths along which magnetic influence acted, first observed through simple experiments where fine iron filings were scattered on a sheet of paper placed over a bar magnet or electromagnet. When the paper was gently tapped, the filings aligned into smooth, continuous curves that revealed the symmetry and directionality of the magnetic field, with the patterns emerging as elongated loops emerging from one pole and converging at the other. This experimental method, inspired by earlier demonstrations but refined by Faraday, highlighted key observations about magnetic behavior. The curves formed closed loops encircling electric currents, building on Hans Christian Ørsted's 1820 discovery that a current produces a circular magnetic effect around a wire. Additionally, the density of these curves was greater near the poles of a magnet, indicating stronger magnetic intensity in those regions, a phenomenon linked to André-Marie Ampère's contemporaneous investigations into the forces exerted by currents on each other and on magnets. Faraday's diary entries from late 1831, such as around November 4, introduce "magnetic curves" in the context of his induction experiments, linking to forces between currents as described by Ampère. Over time, particularly by his 1832 publications, Faraday shifted to preferring "lines of force" over "magnetic curves," emphasizing their role as tangible representatives of magnetic action rather than mere geometric patterns. In a note in his Experimental Researches, he clarified that "by magnetic curves I mean lines of magnetic forces which would be depicted by iron filings."[17] This evolution culminated in the broader adoption of "magnetic field" in later scientific discourse, reflecting a more formalized understanding of these phenomena. Faraday briefly extended similar concepts to electric cases, visualizing electrostatic forces through analogous patterns.Modern Perspectives
Relation to Field Lines
Lines of force, as conceptualized by Michael Faraday, serve as historical precursors to the modern notion of field lines in vector fields, particularly the electric field and magnetic field , where the direction tangent to the line at any point coincides with the direction of the field vector.[11] This equivalence allows lines of force to represent the local orientation of the field, providing a continuous curve that traces the path a test charge or pole would follow under the field's influence./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/11%3A_Magnetic_Forces_and_Fields/11.03%3A_Magnetic_Fields_and_Lines) Mathematically, the direction of these lines is determined by the field vector itself, such that the tangent vector satisfies or at each point along the curve. The density of the lines, or the number of lines per unit area perpendicular to the field, is proportional to the field's magnitude or , offering a visual measure of field strength.[18] This density-based representation directly ties into integral forms of Maxwell's equations, notably Gauss's law for electricity, which states that the total electric flux through a closed surface is given by where the flux corresponds to the net number of field lines emanating from or terminating on the enclosed charge , with as the vacuum permittivity.[19] Similarly, for magnetism, Gauss's law implies that magnetic field lines form closed loops with no sources or sinks./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/06%3A_Gauss's_Law/6.03%3A_Explaining_Gausss_Law) After James Clerk Maxwell's mathematical unification of electromagnetism in the 1860s, lines of force transitioned from entities with purported physical reality—such as tensions within the luminiferous ether—to mere graphical aids for illustrating field configurations without implying substantive existence.[20] The ether, central to Maxwell's medium for field propagation, was ultimately disproved by Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity in 1905, which demonstrated that electromagnetic phenomena are frame-invariant without requiring a preferred rest frame.[21] In this post-ether paradigm, field lines persist as heuristic tools for conceptualizing complex vector distributions, emphasizing their role in qualitative analysis rather than literal physical structures.[22] Under special relativity, electromagnetic fields are unified into the rank-2 antisymmetric Faraday tensor , which encompasses both electric and magnetic components in a Lorentz-covariant manner, transforming between frames via Lorentz boosts.[23] Despite this tensorial description, field lines retain practical utility for visualization, as they approximate the field's direction in a given observer's frame and aid in interpreting phenomena like field transformations, though they do not exhibit the instantaneous propagation delays Faraday had envisioned for physical lines.[24] This enduring representational value underscores their evolution from a 19th-century physical hypothesis to a cornerstone of modern pedagogical and analytical tools in electromagnetism.[25]Applications
In electrostatics, lines of force provide a visual framework for mapping the electric field, where they are always perpendicular to equipotential surfaces, aiding in the analysis of charge distributions and field uniformity. This property is particularly useful in capacitor design, where the pattern of electric field lines between plates helps engineers optimize spacing and geometry to minimize fringing effects and maximize capacitance. For instance, in parallel-plate capacitors, the lines originate from positive charges and terminate on negative ones, with denser lines indicating stronger fields near the plates./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/08%3A_Capacitance/8.02%3A_Capacitors_and_Capacitance)[26] In magnetostatics, lines of force, or magnetic flux paths, are essential for designing electric motors and generators, where they guide the interaction between magnetic fields and current-carrying conductors to produce torque or induced voltage. In motors, the alignment of rotor and stator field lines determines efficiency, with simulations ensuring closed flux paths to avoid leakage. Similarly, in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the homogeneity of magnetic field lines within the bore is critical for uniform signal generation, achieved through superconducting magnets that produce stable, parallel lines of force.[11][27][28] For electromagnetic waves, the Poynting vector, which represents energy flux, is aligned perpendicular to both electric and magnetic field lines, illustrating how crossed lines propagate energy in radiation patterns. This concept informs antenna design, where field line configurations predict radiation lobes and efficiency. In advanced applications, such as solar physics, magnetic flux tubes—bundles of tightly packed field lines—model sunspots, where twisted tubes emerge from the convection zone to suppress convection and form dark umbrae. In particle accelerators, charged particles follow helical trajectories around magnetic field lines generated by bending magnets, enabling precise beam guidance and collision./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/16%3A_Electromagnetic_Waves/16.04%3A_Energy_Carried_by_Electromagnetic_Waves)[29]/21%3A_Magnetism/21.4%3A_Motion_of_a_Charged_Particle_in_a_Magnetic_Field) Iron filings remain a standard tool for classroom demonstrations of magnetic lines of force, aligning along field directions when sprinkled near a magnet to reveal patterns invisible to the eye. Modern computational simulations using the finite element method (FEM) generate detailed line plots for complex geometries, allowing engineers to visualize and optimize fields in devices like transformers and accelerators without physical prototypes.[30][31]References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Physical_Lines_of_Force
