Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
List of pterosaur genera
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the List of pterosaur genera Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to List of pterosaur genera. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
List of pterosaur genera

This list of pterosaurs is a comprehensive listing of all genera that have ever been included in the order Pterosauria, excluding purely vernacular terms. The list includes all commonly accepted genera, but also genera that are now considered invalid, doubtful (nomen dubium), or were not formally published (nomen nudum), as well as junior synonyms of more established names, and genera that are no longer considered pterosaurian. The list currently includes 281 genera.

Scope and terminology

[edit]

There is no official, canonical list of pterosaur genera, but the most thorough attempts can be found at the Pterosauria section of Mikko Haaramo's Phylogeny Archive,[1] the Genus Index at Mike Hanson's The Pterosauria,[2] supplemented by the Pterosaur Species List,[3] and in the fourth supplement of Donald F. Glut's Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia series.[4]

Authors and year

[edit]

The authors column lists the authors of the formal description responsible for the erection of the genus listed. They are not necessarily the same as the authors of the type species as sometimes a species from one genus is determined sufficiently distinct to warrant the erection of a new genus to house it. If this is the case, only the latter authors will be listed. The year column notes the year the description was published.

Status

[edit]

Naming conventions and terminology follow the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Technical terms used include:

  • Junior synonym: A name which describes the same taxon as a previously published name. If two or more genera are formally designated and the type specimens are later assigned to the same genus, the first to be published (in chronological order) is the senior synonym, and all other instances are junior synonyms. Senior synonyms are generally used, except by special decision of the ICZN, but junior synonyms cannot be used again, even if deprecated. Junior synonymy is often subjective, unless the genera described were both based on the same type specimen.
  • Nomen nudum (Latin for "naked name"): A name that has appeared in print but has not yet been formally published by the standards of the ICZN. Nomina nuda (the plural form) are invalid, and are therefore not italicized as a proper generic name would be. If the name is later formally published, that name is no longer a nomen nudum and will be italicized on this list. Often, the formally published name will differ from any nomina nuda that describe the same specimen.
  • Preoccupied name: A name that is formally published, but which has already been used for another taxon. This second use is invalid (as are all subsequent uses) and the name must be replaced. As preoccupied names are not valid generic names, they will also go unitalicized on this list.
  • Nomen dubium (Latin for "dubious name"): A name describing a fossil with no unique diagnostic features. As this can be an extremely subjective and controversial designation, this term is not used on this list.

Age

[edit]

The age column denotes the epoch of geologic time to which the fossils date. Genera that are invalid, misidentified, or otherwise do not represent a valid pterosaur are listed as age N/A because there was never a time in which a pterosaur by that generic name actually lived.

Location and notes

[edit]

The location column designates the geographic region where remains of the relevant genus have been found. The regions used are continents except in the case of smaller landmasses (e.g. Cuba.) Political bodies, being non-existent in the Mesozoic are not used to indicate genera locations. Genera that are invalid, misidentified, or otherwise do not represent a valid pterosaur are listed as location N/A because there was never a place in which a pterosaur by that generic name actually lived. The notes column is a collection of annotations on the scientific significance and taxonomic history of listed genera, as well as elaborations on the information presented in other columns.

The list

[edit]

Genera

[edit]
Angustinaripterus
Anhanguera
Anurognathus
Aurorazhdarcho
Bakonydraco
Campylognathoides
Cearadactylus
Coloborhynchus
Ctenochasma
Dimorphodon
Dorygnathus
Dsungaripterus and Noripterus
Eotephradactylus
Eudimorphodon
Feilongus
Germanodactylus
Haopterus
Hatzegopteryx
Istiodactylus
Jeholopterus
Liaoningopterus
Lonchodectes
Meilifeilong
Melkamter
Nemicolopterus
Ningchengopterus
Nurhachius
Nyctosaurus
Ornithocheirus
Preondactylus
Propterodactylus
Pteranodon
Pterodactylus
Pterodaustro
Quetzalcoatlus
Rhamphorhynchus
Scaphognathus
Sordes
Tapejara
Thalassodromeus
Tupandactylus
Tupuxuara
Zhejiangopterus

Ichnogenera

[edit]
Genus Authors Year Status Age Location Notes

Agadirichnus

Ambroggi
Lapparent

1954

Valid

uK

Africa

Haenamichnus[230]

Hwang
Huh
et al.

2002

Valid

uK[230]

Asia.[230]

More than 5 times as large as Pteraichnus, these tracks were probably made by azhdarchids.[230]

Kouphichnium

Nopcsa

1923

Misidentification

N/A

N/A

The trackmaker was probably a limulid.

Pteraichnus

Stokes

1957

Valid

uJ

Asia[231]
Europe
N. America

Some tracks attributed to Pteraichnus have been considered crocodilian in origin by some scientists (Padian, 1984) however, recent studies in the past decade have overturned Padian's thoughts.

Purbeckopus

Delair

1963

Nomen dubium

lK

Europe.

Haenamichnus

Oogenera

[edit]

Although pterosaur eggs are known, some with complete embryos, no oogenera have been erected to house them. The holotype of the oospecies Oolithes sphaericus was briefly considered by Harry Govier Seeley to be pterosaurian in origin, although this attribution was dismissed before the formal erection of that oogenus.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs