Hubbry Logo
PreondactylusPreondactylusMain
Open search
Preondactylus
Community hub
Preondactylus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Preondactylus
Preondactylus
Preondactylus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Preondactylus
Temporal range: Late Triassic, Carnian or Norian
Fossil cast
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: †Pterosauria
Clade: †Preondactylia
Genus: †Preondactylus
Wild, 1984
Species:
†P. buffarinii
Binomial name
†Preondactylus buffarinii
Wild, 1984

Preondactylus is a genus of long-tailed pterosaurs from the Late Triassic (Carnian-Norian[1] or late Norian,[2] about 217-214 million years ago)[3] that inhabited what is now Italy. It contains a single known species, Preondactylus buffarinii, which was discovered by Nando Buffarini in 1982 at the Forni Dolostone near Udine in the Preone valley of the Italian Alps.[4]

Discovery

[edit]
Fossil wing bones

When Buffarini first discovered Preondactylus, the thin slab of bituminous, dolomitic limestone containing the fossil was accidentally broken into pieces while being extracted. After reassembly the rock was cleaned with water by him and his wife and the marl and in it the bone was washed away and lost. All that was left was a negative imprint on the stone, of which a silicon rubber cast was made to allow for subsequent study of the otherwise lost remains. Most of the skeleton is known, but the posterior portions of the skull have not been preserved.[4] This first specimen is the holotype: MFSN-1770.

Cast of a Preondactylus buffarinii

A second, disarticulated specimen, MFSN-1891, was found at the same locale in 1984 about 150–200 meters (490–660 ft) deeper into the strata than the original find. The second specimen appears to have been preserved in the gastric pellet of a predatory fish, which had consumed the pterosaur and vomited up the indigestible pieces that would later fossilize.[4] More detailed knowledge of the variability of Triassic pterosaurs has made the identification of this specimen as Preondactylus uncertain, and it may even be that the remains are not those of a pterosaur at all.[5]

A third specimen is MFSN 25161, a partial skull, lacking the lower jaws.

Description

[edit]
Restoration

Preondactylus had single cusp teeth, meaning they had one point on each tooth.[4] Because its teeth were monocuspid, pointed, and widely spaced apart, they did not occlude; tooth wear was thus absent in Preondactylus.[6] Its diet either consisted of fish, insects or both, but there is still debate going on as the tooth structure could indicate either diet (or both). The holotype had a wingspan of 45 cm (1.48 ft), while a larger referred specimen is estimated to have a wingspan of 1.5 m (4.9 ft).[7] The short wings are considered a "primitive" feature for pterosaurs, but Preondactylus was a fully developed flier.

Phylogeny

[edit]

The species was described and named by Rupert Wild in 1984. The genus name refers to Preone, the specific name honours Buffarini. Rupert classified the new species within Rhamphorhynchidae, of which group very old species are known such as Dorygnathus, but soon it was understood the form was much more basal. A cladistic analysis by David Unwin found Preondactylus as the most basal pterosaur, and the species was accordingly used by him for a node clade definition of the clade Pterosauria. Other analyses however, have found a somewhat more derived position for Preondactylus.

Skeletal restoration

The following phylogenetic analysis follows the topology of Upchurch et al. (2015).[8]

Eopterosauria

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Literature

[edit]
  • Wild, R (1984). "A new pterosaur (Reptilia, Pterosauria) from the Upper Triassic (Norian) of Friuli, Italy". Gortiana — Atti Museo Friuliano di Storia Naturale. 5: 45–62.
  • Dalla Vecchia, F.M.; Muscio, G.; Wild, R. (1988). "Pterosaur remains in a gastric pellet from the Upper Triassic (Norian) of Rio Seazza Valley (Udine, Italy)". Gortiana — Atti Museo Friuliano di Storia Naturale. 10: 121–132.
  • Dalla Vecchia F.M., 1998, "New observations on the osteology and taxonomic status of Preondactylus buffarinii Wild, 1984 (Reptilia, Pterosauria)", Boll. Soc. Paleont. It., 36(3, 1997): 355-366
  • Dalla Vecchia, Fabio M. (2003). "A Review of the Triassic Pterosaur Record". Riv. Mus. Civ. Sc. Nat. "E. Caffi" Bergamo. 22: 13–29.
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Preondactylus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Preondactylus buffarinii is a genus and species of basal pterosaur, representing one of the earliest known flying reptiles, characterized by a small size with a wingspan of approximately 45 cm in its holotype specimen, a long tail, relatively short wings, and long legs. The holotype (MFSN 1770), a nearly complete but partially impression-based skeleton, was discovered in the late middle Norian (Late Triassic) deposits of the Dolomia di Forni Formation in the Seazza Creek valley near Preone, in the province of Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, northeastern Italy, dating to approximately 215–210 million years ago. Named and described by paleontologist Rupert Wild in 1984, the genus name derives from the locality of Preone, while the specific epithet honors collector Nando Buffarini. Morphologically, Preondactylus exhibits primitive features for pterosaurs, including a low and narrow with a large positioned posterior to the naris, single-cusped teeth (some serrated and enlarged in the below the ascending process), and a suggesting an insectivorous or piscivorous diet. The postcranial includes unfused carpal elements, a short metacarpal relative to later pterosaurs, and elongated caudal vertebrae without the bundled processes seen in some contemporaries, indicating it was a fully capable flier despite its "primitive" proportions. The specimen is likely from a juvenile , as suggested by the disarticulated elements. Systematically, Preondactylus buffarinii is placed among the most basal members of Pterosauria, defined cladistically as the of Preondactylus buffarinii and northropi and all descendants, highlighting its key role in understanding the origins of pterosaur flight. It shares similarities with other early Italian pterosaurs like Peteinosaurus zambellii and Austriadactylus cristatus, potentially forming an early diverging clade, though its exact position remains debated due to limited overlapping material and ongoing taxonomic revisions. Its discovery supports evidence that pterosaurs originated in the European region during the , contributing to broader insights into the evolutionary radiation of archosaurs.

Discovery and Specimens

Geological Context

Preondactylus fossils were discovered in the Forni Dolostone Formation (also known as Dolomia di Forni), a geological unit within the Italian Dolomites characterized by dark, well-bedded, bituminous dolostones often interlaminated with chert layers and occasional slumped beds, reaching thicknesses of 700–850 meters. This formation represents an anoxic to dysoxic, quiet, low-energy marine basin depositional environment with a maximum water depth of about 400 m, developed within an intra-platform setting, conducive to the preservation of delicate skeletal structures through rapid burial in fine-grained sediments. The Forni Dolostone is dated to the stage, specifically the late middle to early late (late Alaunian to early Sevatian substage), approximately 215–210 million years ago, based on and stratigraphic correlations with other Alpine units. The precise age assignment relies on the presence of index fossils such as of the Mockina genus, which indicate a position above the Carnian- boundary but within the early interval. Taphonomic features, including the exceptional articulation of specimens and minimal , point to deposition in quiet, possibly dysoxic waters that limited scavenging and bioturbation. The fossils occur near Preone in the province of , northeastern , specifically along Seazza Creek in the Carnic Prealps, where outcrops expose the formation's lower to middle sections. This locality's paleoenvironment reflects a tropical coastal setting along the western margin of the , with the dolostones forming in restricted basins influenced by periodic fluctuations. Associated fauna includes early marine reptiles such as the protorosaurian hydroides, diverse actinopterygian fish genera (e.g., Saurichthys and Pteronisculus), drepanosaurid lizards like Megalancosaurus preonensis, and abundant decapod crustaceans, collectively suggesting a productive, nearshore ecosystem supporting both aquatic and aerial vertebrates.

Known Fossils

The of Preondactylus buffarinii, cataloged as MFSN 1770, was discovered in 1982 by amateur collector Nando Buffarini in the Seazza Valley near Preone, in the , northeastern . This partial skeleton is preserved primarily as a negative imprint after the nodule containing it was treated with acid to dissolve the bones, revealing details of the , most vertebrae, , , , portions of the forelimbs and hindlimbs, and ; the and much of the wing finger phalanges are absent. A second specimen, MFSN 1891, was found in 1984 approximately 150–200 meters deeper in the stratigraphic section at the same locality as the . It comprises a small, articulated cluster of bones measuring about 52 mm long and 33 mm wide, interpreted as the contents of a gastric pellet due to its compressed, chaotic arrangement lacking clear articulation in places; the pellet contains disarticulated bones from at least three small individuals, likely juveniles, and was probably regurgitated by a large such as Saurichthys. It is not referable to Preondactylus or any ; reanalyses using micro-CT scans indicate protorosaurian affinity, similar to Langobardisaurus from the same formation, based on features such as procoelous vertebrae and limb bone morphology. A third specimen, MFSN 25161, consists of a partial lacking the lower jaws and was discovered subsequent to the in the same formation. It supports attribution to Preondactylus buffarinii through shared cranial features like but provides minimal additional postcranial information. The was formally described in 1984 by Rupert Wild, establishing Preondactylus as one of the earliest known pterosaurs. Subsequent studies, including reexaminations by Fabio M. Dalla Vecchia in 2003 and Bernardo Holgado and colleagues in 2015, have refined interpretations of the specimens, particularly confirming the non-pterosaurian nature of MFSN 1891 due to preservation challenges and comparative analyses.

Description

Cranial Anatomy

The skull of Preondactylus buffarinii is small and triangular in shape, measuring approximately 5–7 cm in length in the holotype specimen (MFSN 1770), though preserved only as faint impressions in the matrix, limiting detailed reconstruction. It exhibits a narrow rostrum terminating in a pointed tip, consistent with adaptations for precise feeding maneuvers, and a prominent antorbital fenestra that occupies more than half the skull's overall length, a characteristic feature emphasizing the lightweight cranial construction typical of early pterosaurs. More detailed cranial features, including dentition, are known from the referred partial skull specimen MFSN 25161. The posterior portion of the skull is somewhat crushed, limiting precise reconstruction of its exact proportions, but it appears relatively shallow overall compared to later taxa. Dentition in Preondactylus comprises 20–25 single-cusped, conical teeth per jaw, arranged evenly along the (approximately 15 teeth) and dentary (approximately 18–20 teeth), with the anterior premaxillary teeth slightly enlarged and recurved. Tooth size gradually decreases toward the posterior jaw margin, and the teeth lack multicuspation, distinguishing this genus from contemporaneous forms like Eudimorphodon or Peteinosaurus that possess more complex, multi-pointed . This homodont, recurved arrangement is interpreted as suited for grasping soft-bodied prey, supporting a presumed piscivorous or insectivorous diet. Sensory adaptations are highlighted by the large orbits, which occupy a significant portion of the lateral skull surface and indicate enhanced visual acuity, likely aiding in aerial or aquatic prey detection. In comparison to later pterosaurs, Preondactylus lacks an elongated premaxilla or specialized crests, reflecting its basal position with a more generalized cranial architecture.

Postcranial Anatomy

The postcranial skeleton of Preondactylus buffarinii is known primarily from the holotype (MFSN 1770), a nearly complete but disarticulated specimen with the skull preserved as impressions, including elements of the axial column, girdles, and limbs. The axial skeleton includes an estimated eight cervical vertebrae that are elongate and contribute to a flexible, bird-like neck; approximately 14 thoracic vertebrae without evidence of fusion into a notarium; fewer than four sacral vertebrae; and more than 25 caudal vertebrae forming a long tail without elongated zygapophyses or haemapophyses. Ribs are preserved but poorly detailed, with gastralia present in the abdominal region. The pectoral girdle consists of robust scapulae and coracoids that articulate closely but remain unfused, supporting the . The is adapted for flight, with a short measuring 42 mm in length, featuring a concave anterior margin and a large deltopectoral crest. The and are subequal, with the ulna reaching 58.2 mm; the carpus includes a pteroid and syncarpals. The metacarpus features elongate metacarpal IV as the primary support, with the manual digits showing a phalangeal formula of 2-3-4-4-? (the fourth digit with four hyperphalangic phalanges supporting the flight membrane). The is estimated at 45 cm, though referred material suggests larger individuals up to 1.5 m. The pelvic girdle is small and primitive, with the puboischiadic plates thin and the ilia short, articulating with the sacrals to form a compact unit. The hindlimbs are reduced relative to the forelimbs, with a of 47 mm and a longer of 65 mm (forming a tibiotarsus via fusion with proximal tarsals); the is slender, and the pes is ectaxonic with non-spreading metatarsals and a phalangeal formula of 2-3-3-3-2. This configuration indicates a quadrupedal stance on the ground, with hindlimbs positioned laterally. Overall skeletal proportions reflect a basal build, with a low of approximately 6.6 suited to slow-speed flight and maneuvering, and a forelimb-to-hindlimb emphasizing elongation over terrestrial mobility. Body mass estimates for the , based on volumetric modeling of the skeleton, range around 44 g, scaling to 100-200 g for larger specimens.

Classification

Etymology and Taxonomy

The genus name Preondactylus combines "," referring to the Preone Valley locality in , where the was discovered, with "dactylus," word for finger, alluding to the elongated fourth digit that forms the primary wing support in pterosaurs. The specific epithet buffarinii honors Nando Buffarini, the amateur paleontologist who found the type specimen in 1982. Preondactylus was formally established by Rupert Wild in 1984 as the of the monotypic Preondactylidae, originally placed within the Rhamphorhynchidae, based on the specimen MFSN 1770, a nearly complete but partially impression-only from the late Dolomia di Forni Formation. The description appeared in Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie B 80:1-27, satisfying (ICZN) requirements for availability and validity through its publication in a peer-reviewed serial work with Latin diagnosis. Preondactylidae is now regarded as obsolete, with subsequent analyses reclassifying Preondactylus as a basal member of Pterosauria outside more derived long-tailed groups. The is considered valid with only one recognized , P. buffarinii, and no formal synonyms have been proposed. A second, disarticulated and poorly preserved specimen (MFSN 1891) from the same formation but slightly deeper stratigraphically was tentatively referred to cf. P. buffarinii in the original description, though its attribution has been questioned due to limited comparable material and potential differences in proportions; no additional are accepted.

Phylogenetic Position

Preondactylus is consistently recovered as one of the earliest diverging members of Pterosauria, positioned basal to more derived groups such as Campylognathoididae and other long-tailed pterosaurs of the . This placement reflects its Late Triassic age and retention of plesiomorphic traits, including a relatively short wing metacarpus compared to later taxa and conical, single-cusped teeth suited for grasping small prey, which contrast with the elongated metacarpals and often multicuspid dentition seen in advanced rhamphorhynchoids. Early cladistic analyses, such as that of Unwin (2003), positioned Preondactylus as the sister to all other pterosaurs in a strict consensus tree, emphasizing its primitive morphology and underscoring its role as a foundational member of the . Subsequent studies, including Kellner (2003), refined this view by placing it slightly more derived than the basal anurognathid but still outside major lineages, based on shared synapomorphies like the fused nasoantorbital . More recent matrices, such as those in Upchurch et al. (2015), recover Preondactylus as the sister to Austriadactylus within a basal grouping, supported by characters including similar cranial proportions and postcranial proportions indicative of early flight adaptations. Phylogenetic uncertainty persists due to the of known specimens, which limits character scoring and leads to instability in basal branches across analyses. For instance, debates center on its exact affinities among other early taxa like , with reexaminations (e.g., Dalla Vecchia, 2003) affirming its ian identity through detailed osteological comparisons despite preservational biases. Recent work on pterosaur precursors, such as Müller et al. (2023), reinforces the diverse archosauromorph context of pterosaurs like Preondactylus, though without altering its core placement.

Paleobiology

Locomotion and Flight

Preondactylus buffarinii exhibited flight adaptations typical of basal pterosaurs, including elongated forelimbs forming wings supported by four elongate phalanges of the manual digit IV, with the flight membrane () spanning from the sides of the body to the ankles, creating a broad brachiopatagium. The wings were fully developed even in small individuals, enabling powered flight from an early ontogenetic stage. With an estimated of approximately 0.45 m and an of 6.6, its wings were relatively broad and suited for a combination of sustained and , supported by low values around 20–25 N/m² that minimized energy demands during flight. Launch into flight likely occurred from a quadrupedal posture, leveraging the robust s and s to generate thrust in a coordinated leap, similar to the mechanism inferred for other non-pterodactyloid pterosaurs; an alternative "" posture with extended limbs may have been used for initial jumps from elevated positions. On the ground, Preondactylus was adapted for quadrupedal locomotion, with robust s and relatively reduced s (forelimb length exceeding hindlimb by over 2.5 times) facilitating a stable, erect ; subcursorial features such as long, stout limb elements and reduced fibulae suggest competence in walking and potentially short bursts of bipedal running, contrasting with the more specialized terrestrial limitations of later pterodactyloids. A second specimen (MPUM 14951), if validly attributable to Preondactylus as a juvenile, indicates ontogenetic development of flight capabilities early in , with proportionally complete structures at a small body size (estimated mass ~10–15 g), differing from many later pterosaurs that exhibited prolonged post-hatching growth before achieving aerial proficiency. Biomechanical analyses reveal microstructure dominated by fibrolamellar tissue with high and minimal lines of arrested growth, signifying rapid somatic growth rates that enabled quick attainment of flight-ready skeletal maturity, akin to the accelerated development seen in modern bats for early aerial independence.

Diet and Ecology

The diet of Preondactylus is inferred to have been primarily insectivorous, based on its small, conical, and slightly recurved teeth adapted for grasping soft-bodied rather than piercing scales or crushing harder prey. The elongated rostrum and tooth arrangement further support this, resembling that of modern insectivorous vertebrates, though some researchers propose a mixed piscivorous-insectivorous habit given the coastal setting and potential for opportunistic feeding on small . Dental microwear texture analysis of basal pterosaurs, including taxa close to Preondactylus, indicates an ancestral diet dominated by , with later pterosaurs shifting toward piscivory and carnivory; scavenging may have supplemented the diet during periods of prey scarcity. In its , Preondactylus occupied coastal marine habitats along the western Tethys Sea, characterized by lagoonal environments with abundant and , as evidenced by associated in the deposits. This setting likely supported a generalist role, given the low diversity of early pterosaurs, allowing Preondactylus to exploit both aerial and surface-water prey without intense specialization. Potential competition existed with sympatric tanystropheids, long-necked archosauromorphs that were piscivorous and shared similar nearshore niches, though Preondactylus' smaller size and flight capability may have reduced overlap by enabling access to terrestrial or low-flying resources. Bone histology of early pterosaurs reveals rapid somatic growth rates, with fibrolamellar bone tissue indicating continuous deposition without frequent interruptions, consistent with a determinate growth strategy reaching maturity quickly. Lifespan estimates for basal taxa like Preondactylus range from 5 to 10 years, based on growth mark counts in related pterosaur long bones, allowing for high reproductive output in a predator-rich environment. Reproductive strategies remain unknown, but as an , it was likely oviparous, with eggs laid in coastal nesting sites. Taphonomic evidence from the lagoonal deposits of the Preone Valley points to death by in calm waters or predation, as fine-grained sediments preserved articulated skeletons without significant or transport. A gastric pellet (MFSN 1891) from the same formation, initially described as containing remains but reidentified in 2015 as protorosaurian (possibly akin to Langobardisaurus), underscores predation events in the local ecosystem, possibly by larger marine reptiles, while the lack of bone beds or clustered fossils indicates solitary or low-density rather than gregariousness.

References

  1. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/140405-pterosaur-flying-reptile-museum-exhibit-paleontology-science
  2. https://www.mindat.org/taxon-4965612.html
  3. https://dipbsf.uninsubria.it/paleo/dvecchia.htm
  4. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3871531/9781862394650_ch03.pdf
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256087186_New_observations_on_the_osteology_and_taxonomic_status_of_Preondactylus_buffarinii_WILD_1984_Reptilia_Pterosauria
  6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19022-2
  7. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2306164120
  8. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-58/issue-2/app.2011.0132/A-Triassic-Spider-from-Italy/10.4202/app.2011.0132.full
  9. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app58/app20110132.pdf
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256456346_The_tetrapod_fossil_record_from_the_Norian-Rhaetian_of_Friuli_northeastern_Italy
  11. https://www.academia.edu/1091619/A_review_of_the_Triassic_pterosaur_record
  12. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141275
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249551429_New_morphological_observations_on_Triassic_pterosaurs
  14. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/books/edited-volume/1745/chapter/107605296/Triassic-pterosaurs
  15. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12005/1/zitteliana_2008_b28_03.pdf
  16. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Zitteliana-B_28_0143-0158.pdf
  17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724631003758334
  18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06359-z
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279618696_A_new_approach_to_determining_pterosaur_body_mass_and_its_implications_for_pterosaur_flight
  20. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12007/1/zitteliana_2008_b28_05.pdf
  21. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1018
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49185729_Were_pterosaur_ancestors_bipedal_or_quadrupedal_Morphometric_functional_and_phylogenetic_considerations
  23. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Zitteliana-B_28_0109-0125.pdf
  24. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92499-z
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7595196/
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49185732_The_paleohistology_of_pterosaur_bone_An_overview
  27. https://doc.rero.ch/record/15191/files/PAL_E2467.pdf
  28. https://dinodata.de/bibliothek/pdf_a/2009/6377-19075-1-PB_dd.pdf
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4641592/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.