Hubbry Logo
LapsusLapsusMain
Open search
Lapsus
Community hub
Lapsus
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lapsus
Lapsus
Lapsus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In philology, a lapsus (Latin for "lapse, slip, error") is an involuntary mistake made while writing or speaking.[1]

Investigations

[edit]

In 1895 an investigation into verbal slips was undertaken by a philologist and a psychologist, Rudolf Meringer and Karl Mayer, who collected many examples and divided them into separate types.[2]

Psychoanalysis

[edit]

Freud was to become interested in such mistakes from 1897 onwards, developing an interpretation of slips in terms of their unconscious meaning.[3] Subsequently, followers of his like Ernest Jones developed the theme of lapsus in connection with writing, typing, and misprints.[4]

According to Freud's early psychoanalytic theory, a lapsus represents a bungled act that hides an unconscious desire: “the phenomena can be traced back to incompletely suppressed psychical material...pushed away by consciousness”.[5]

Jacques Lacan would thoroughly endorse the Freudian interpretation of unconscious motivation in the slip, arguing that “in the lapsus it is...clear that every unsuccessful act is a successful, not to say 'well-turned', discourse”.[6]

In the seventies Sebastiano Timpanaro would controversially take up the question again, by offering a mechanistic explanation of all such slips, in opposition to Freud's theories.[7]

Types of lapsus

[edit]

In literature, a number of different types of lapsus are named depending on context:[8]

Types of slips of the tongue

[edit]

Slips of the tongue can happen on any level:

Each of these five types of error may take various forms:

  • Anticipation: An early item is corrupted by an element belonging to a later one,[10] thus "reading list" — "leading list"
  • Perseveration or post-sonance: A later item is corrupted by an element belonging to an earlier one[11] Thus "waking rabbits" — "waking wabbits".
  • Deletion: An element is lost, thus "same state" — "same sate"
  • Shift or spoonerism: Moving a letter, thus "black foxes" — "back floxes"
  • Haplology[12] or fusion: Half one word and half the other, thus "stummy" instead of "stomach or tummy"[13]
  • Pun[14]

Motivation

[edit]

Meringer and Mayer highlighted the role of familiar associations and similarities of words and sounds in producing the lapsus. Freud objected that such factors did not cause but only "favour slips of the tongue...in the immense majority of cases my speech is not disturbed by the circumstance that the words I am using recall others with a similar sound...or that familiar associations branch off from them (emphasis copied from original)".[15]

Timpanaro later reignited the debate,[16] by maintaining that any given slip can always be explained mechanically without a need for deeper motivation.[17]

J. L. Austin had independently seen slips not as revealing a particular complex, but as an ineluctable feature of the human condition, necessitating a continual preparation for excuses and remedial work.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lapsus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A (Latin for "a slip") is an involuntary mistake made while writing or speaking, such as a or pen. These errors, also known as parapraxes, occur in and are often attributed to momentary lapses in attention, memory, or cognitive processing. In , the concept gained prominence through , who interpreted lapsus as manifestations of unconscious thoughts, desires, or conflicts suppressed from conscious awareness. Freud detailed these ideas in his 1901 book , arguing that seemingly trivial slips reveal deeper psychological processes. The term encompasses various forms, including lapsus linguae (verbal slips), lapsus calami (writing errors), and lapsus memoriae (forgetfulness), which have been studied in , , and .

Etymology and Definition

Origins of the Term

The term "lapsus" derives from Latin, serving as the past participle of the verb labi, which means "to slip," "glide," or "fall." This etymological root evokes imagery of an unintended deviation or descent, a present in its earliest attestations within literature. In classical texts from the BCE, such as the , "lapsus" denoted both physical slips and moral or rhetorical lapses, marking accidental or faulty actions in discourse and behavior. The phrase lapsus linguae, specifically referring to a , emerged as a standardized expression in this era to capture inadvertent verbal errors, influencing subsequent linguistic traditions. During the medieval period, scholars adopted "lapsus" in theological and philological contexts, extending its classical sense to describe accidental deviations in manuscript copying and scriptural interpretation, often alongside moral connotations like the fall of humanity. This usage persisted and evolved in scholarship, where humanists revived classical terminology to analyze errors in speech, writing, and textual transmission, emphasizing precision in oratory and amid the era's focus on antiquity. The introduction of "lapsus" into modern psychological discourse occurred in the 19th century through German translations and adaptations of classical philological concepts, culminating in Sigmund Freud's 1901 work The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, where he incorporated the term to denote unintentional slips in everyday actions.

Core Concepts and Scope

A , also known as a parapraxis, refers to an unintentional error in , writing, , or action that arises from normal cognitive processes and may reveal underlying influences. These errors occur when intended outputs are disrupted by competing mental elements, such as similar-sounding words or fleeting associations, without external causes. In and , the term encompasses slips like substituting one word for another during (lapsus linguae) or misplacing an item due to momentary inattention. Unlike physical accidents, which involve unintended environmental interactions, or deliberate mistakes, a stems from internal cognitive lapses in healthy individuals. It differs from neurological disorders, where persistent impairments disrupt or motor functions; for instance, slips in normal speakers are transient and self-correctable, reflecting routine activity rather than damage. Research on demonstrates that such errors provide insights into how the mind organizes , with detection mechanisms operating effectively in unimpaired . The scope of lapsus is confined to non-pathological occurrences, excluding conditions like , which involves injury-induced deficits, or , a developmental reading disorder. These errors are universal in everyday , highlighting the 's vulnerability to interference without indicating clinical abnormality. Thus, lapsus serves as a window into typical mental operations, distinct from therapeutic or diagnostic contexts.

Types of Lapsus

Verbal Errors (Lapsus Linguae)

Lapsus linguae, commonly known as a slip of the tongue, refers to unintended errors in spoken language production, including substitutions, blends, or omissions that deviate from the speaker's intended utterance. These errors occur during the rapid process of speech formulation and articulation, often revealing the underlying mechanisms of language processing. Common subtypes of lapsus linguae include anticipations, perseverations, and exchanges. In anticipations, a phonological element intended for a later position in the utterance appears prematurely, such as saying "noman numeral" instead of "roman numeral," where the /n/ from "numeral" anticipates forward. Perseverations involve the persistence of an earlier sound into a subsequent position, for example, producing "black bloxes" rather than "black boxes," with the /l/ from "black" carrying over. Exchanges, often exemplified by spoonerisms, entail the transposition of sounds between words, as in the classic "you hissed my mystery lecture" for "you missed my history lecture," where initial consonants swap places. Linguistic factors contributing to these errors primarily involve phonological similarities, where sounds with shared features (such as place or ) are more prone to misplacement, and syntactic influences, which can lead to disruptions aligned with grammatical structures. For instance, errors frequently occur between words in similar syntactic roles, highlighting how sentence structure guides the of speech output. In psychoanalytic views, such slips may occasionally reveal unconscious wishes, though this interpretation remains secondary to linguistic explanations.

Written and Memory Errors

Lapsus calami, or slips of the pen, refer to unintended in writing, such as substitutions, omissions, or misspellings that occur during the composition process. These mistakes often involve replacing one word or name with another that shares phonetic or semantic similarities, revealing momentary lapses in or interference from related thoughts. A classic example is substituting "Buckrhard" for "Burckhard" in a letter, where the error stemmed from an association with another individual whose name began with "B." Another instance involves writing "438 crowns" instead of the intended "300 crowns" when requesting a withdrawal, influenced by a recent involving a 10% discount on a bookseller's bill. Such highlight how writing, despite its deliberate pace, can still be disrupted by extraneous mental associations. Lapsus memoriae, or slips of memory, encompass failures in recall, including the temporary inability to retrieve proper names, facts, or intentions despite a sense of familiarity. This phenomenon frequently manifests as the tip-of-the-tongue state, where an individual knows a word exists in their vocabulary but cannot access it, often retrieving partial information like the initial sound or syllable length. For instance, forgetting the name "Signorelli," the artist known for the Orvieto frescoes, while substituting similar names like "Botticelli" or "Boltraffio," illustrates how memory lapses can involve intrusive but incorrect recollections. These slips differ from complete amnesia by preserving the awareness that the information is known, typically resolving spontaneously or with cues. Unlike verbal slips (lapsus linguae), which occur in real-time speech and are often irreversible once uttered, written and errors benefit from the slower production rate of writing or the reflective nature of , enabling greater potential for self-correction before finalization. However, both types share the capacity to expose influences through unintended substitutions or omissions.

Psychoanalytic Perspectives

Freud's Theory of Parapraxes

Sigmund Freud introduced the concept of parapraxis—Latin for "faulty action"—in his 1901 book The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, where he argued that seemingly trivial errors in speech, memory, or action are not accidental but meaningful manifestations of unconscious processes. Freud posited that these parapraxes occur as failures in the psyche's censorship mechanism, allowing repressed desires, thoughts, or conflicts to emerge into conscious awareness despite efforts to suppress them. In this framework, everyday slips serve as a pathway to understanding the unconscious, bridging normal mental functioning and pathological symptoms like neuroses. The core mechanism of parapraxis, according to Freud, involves interference from unconscious wishes that disrupt the execution of a conscious , resulting in a compromise formation where the repressed content partially influences the error. He emphasized that there are no true "accidents" in mental life; instead, these disturbances arise from motivational conflicts, often rooted in sexual or aggressive impulses that or the ego deems unacceptable. Processes akin to those in dream-work—such as (merging of ideas) and displacement (shifting emphasis)—facilitate this intrusion, enabling the unconscious to express itself indirectly through slips, forgettings, or bungled actions. Freud illustrated this theory with personal and clinical examples, including his own slips of the tongue that revealed hidden attractions. For instance, he described a case where a patient erroneously substituted one name for another during speech, betraying an unconscious romantic interest in a colleague through the associative link between the names. Another example involved confusing "Marbach" with "Marburg," which Freud traced to repressed family associations tied to business and paternal figures, demonstrating how such errors expose forbidden thoughts. These instances underscore Freud's view that verbal, written, and memory errors alike act as vehicles for unconscious revelations.

Clinical Applications and Examples

In psychoanalytic therapy, —commonly known as slips of the tongue or parapraxes—hold significant value as they emerge during free association and provide direct access to unconscious conflicts. Free association, a core technique introduced by Freud, involves patients expressing thoughts spontaneously without , during which verbal errors often reveal repressed material that would otherwise remain hidden. These slips are interpreted by the analyst as meaningful disruptions driven by unconscious motives, serving as therapeutic entry points to explore and resolve neuroses rooted in or familial dynamics. Freud emphasized that such errors are not accidental but determined by latent thoughts, allowing the therapist to trace associations back to their infantile origins. A prominent example appears in Freud's analysis of the patient known as Dora, where verbal slips and misassociations during sessions uncovered repressed sexual desires and Oedipal tensions. For instance, Dora's misreading of "vermögende Mann" (wealthy man) as "unvermögende Mann" (impotent man) in free association led Freud to interpret it as a displacement of her unconscious hostility toward her father and conflicted feelings about male authority figures, linking to broader themes of involving her family and Herr K. This interpretation highlighted how lapsus facilitated the revelation of Oedipal conflicts, though Dora's abrupt termination of therapy underscored the challenges in applying such insights. In Freud's view, these moments exemplified how slips could illuminate the patient's neurotic symptoms, such as , by connecting surface errors to deeper unconscious wishes. Another illustrative case is that of the "," where multiple parapraxes during free association exposed the patient's repressed aggressive and sexual impulses toward his father, central to his obsessional . These interpretations helped dismantle the patient's compulsive rituals by bringing forbidden infantile conflicts into conscious awareness, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of to alleviate . Freud noted that such analyses required careful handling to avoid overwhelming , reflecting early ethical considerations in interpretation to ensure the process promoted rather than resistance. The therapeutic value of interpreting lapsus lies in their ability to bypass conscious defenses, enabling the resolution of neuroses by integrating unconscious material into the ego. However, Freud cautioned that analysts must navigate ethical boundaries, as overly insistent interpretations could provoke reactions or patient dropout, as seen in the Dora case, emphasizing the need for tact and timing in clinical practice. Freud's applications of parapraxis interpretation have faced significant criticism, particularly in the Dora case, where later analysts and feminists, such as , argued that Freud's emphasis on overlooked issues of patient agency, gender power dynamics, and the potential for analyst bias in imposing Oedipal narratives. These debates highlight ongoing questions about the empirical validity and ethical implications of Freudian techniques in modern .

Modern Interpretations

Cognitive and Linguistic Models

Linguistic models of speech errors emerged prominently in the 1970s through Victoria Fromkin's analysis of a corpus comprising over 600 naturally occurring slips of the tongue, which demonstrated that errors systematically arise during the planning stages of utterance production and conform to underlying . Fromkin's findings indicated that slips, such as sound exchanges or word anticipations, typically involve elements within the same —for example, adjectives substituting for other adjectives—providing empirical support for the psychological reality of linguistic hierarchies in speech planning. A key observation from this corpus was the lexical effect, where erroneous forms more frequently result in real words than nonwords, suggesting that lexical access influences phonological encoding and constrains error outcomes. In , Gary Dell's model () offers a mechanistic explanation for lapsus production, positing a parallel processing network where semantic, lexical, and phonological representations interact via activation spread. According to the model, speech errors like word substitutions occur when noise or similarity causes competing lexical nodes to gain activation, leading to the selection of an unintended item during retrieval; this accounts for the prevalence of form-based errors while respecting grammatical constraints observed in error corpora. Dell's framework highlights how temporary activation imbalances in the network simulate the parallel nature of speech planning, producing slips without requiring sequential bottlenecks. Empirical support for these cognitive and linguistic accounts comes from laboratory experiments that induce predictable speech errors, illustrating their basis in processing mechanisms rather than unconscious drives. tasks, which exploit phonological similarity to create interference (e.g., repeating "she sells seashells" to elicit sound swaps), reliably generate slips at rates up to 10-20% higher than baseline speech, with error patterns mirroring those in natural corpora and varying systematically with phonetic proximity. Such studies, including SLIP technique paradigms, demonstrate that errors follow probabilistic rules of activation competition, as predicted by models like Dell's, and occur independently of motivational intent. Unlike Freudian interpretations emphasizing hidden wishes, these findings underscore as artifacts of routine cognitive-linguistic processing.

Psychological Research Findings

Empirical studies in have established that speech errors, or lapsus linguae, occur at a low but consistent rate in typical adult , approximately 1 to 2 times per 1,000 words spoken. This frequency underscores the efficiency of normal language processing, where errors are rare despite rapid articulation rates of 120–150 . Factors such as , stress, and anxiety can increase the incidence of these slips. In experiments conducted in the 1980s, psychologist Michael T. Motley and colleagues induced slips of the tongue by priming participants with anxiety-provoking scenarios, such as sexual or aggressive themes, resulting in a higher rate of semantically related errors compared to neutral conditions. For instance, participants primed for sexual anxiety produced more slips involving sexual connotations, suggesting that heightened emotional states disrupt phonetic planning and monitoring processes. Modern has largely moved beyond Freudian interpretations of as manifestations of repressed unconscious conflicts, instead attributing most slips to cognitive mechanisms like overload and attentional lapses. Reviews and experimental analyses from the late , including those synthesizing data on error patterns, indicate that linguistic factors—such as word similarity and syntactic complexity—predict slip occurrence far better than motivational or repressive theories, though emotional can modulate error types in specific contexts. A brief reference to linguistic models highlights how such cognitive explanations align with observed patterns, like anticipatory exchanges in multi-word phrases. Neuroimaging studies using (fMRI) since the 2000s have provided neural evidence for these cognitive accounts, revealing activation in the during speech error monitoring. Specifically, the , including , engages in pre-articulatory error detection to suppress inappropriate utterances, with reduced activity linked to increased slips under . The medial frontal cortex also shows heightened response to self-generated errors, supporting a role in internal feedback loops that prevent overt mistakes. These findings emphasize error monitoring as a distributed prefrontal function rather than a singular unconscious process.

Cultural Impact

Historical and Literary Instances

During the , lapsus linguae were frequently discussed in treatises on and language as unintentional errors that could reveal hidden truths or serve as deliberate literary devices to circumvent . Authors and orators employed feigned slips to express transgressive ideas, such as or , while pretending ignorance, a strategy highlighted in early 17th-century French comedy by figures like Bruscambille, who used "false lapsus" to play with meaning and evade moral strictures imposed by conduct books and religious authorities. This period marked a shift influenced by the spread of , which amplified the risks of verbal errors by fixing them in widely circulated texts, turning lapsus into tools for both accidental revelation and calculated ambiguity in historical discourse. In , incorporated slips of the tongue to symbolize madness and psychological depth, particularly in , where the protagonist's erratic wordplay and verbal missteps—such as ambiguous puns during his feigned —betray inner conflict and underscore themes of and self-revelation. For instance, Hamlet's banter with in Act III, Scene II, features layered, slippery language that blurs intent, reflecting his tormented mind and providing audiences with insight into his character's fractured psyche. Similar devices appear across Shakespeare's oeuvre, where verbal lapses heighten dramatic tension and expose subconscious motivations, prefiguring later psychoanalytic readings without explicit theory. The saw lapsus integrated into novels as mechanisms for character insight, often revealing social or repressed emotions amid Victorian propriety. In works like those of , characters' verbal slips expose class tensions or moral failings, such as inadvertent revelations during dialogue that advance plot and psychological realism. This literary use evolved the concept from rhetorical experiments into a staple of subtlety, influencing 20th-century Freud-inspired where lapsus explicitly signified unconscious drives, as seen in modernist novels employing slips to probe the human mind.

Contemporary Usage and Media

In contemporary , verbal slips have become high-profile events, often dissected by media for potential revelations of subconscious biases. For instance, during a 2023 speech on the , U.S. President referred to New Zealand's rugby team as the "Black and Tans" instead of the "All Blacks," a phrase historically associated with British forces during the , prompting analysis that it may reflect unconscious associations tied to his Irish heritage. Similar incidents, such as Biden confusing former Presidents and in 2021 or referring to Vice President as "the " in 2022, have been interpreted through the lens of Freudian slips, where unintended utterances project hidden thoughts or anxieties, though experts note they often arise from associative priming rather than deep repression. These moments, occurring amid the high-stakes political climate, frequently go viral on , amplifying scrutiny and shaping narratives around cognitive fitness. Media outlets have extensively covered such gaffes, with analyses highlighting how they influence public discourse post-2010, especially as digital platforms accelerate their spread. In entertainment, television series like (U.S. version) employ lapsus linguae for comedic effect, as seen in Season 3, Episode 22 (""), where character Dwight Schrute's unintended "" slip during a scene underscores awkward humor derived from verbal errors. These portrayals normalize slips as relatable human flaws, while internet memes extend this into broader culture, transforming minor political errors into enduring symbols of fallibility. More recently, as of 2025, similar scrutiny has applied to President , whose verbal slips during speeches have fueled discussions on mental acuity. For example, in a November 13, 2025, speech, Trump experienced a slip that reportedly revealed an ongoing preoccupation with former President Obama, drawing widespread media analysis and memes akin to those surrounding prior administrations. The societal repercussions of these incidents are significant, particularly in altering public perception and prompting apologies that can mitigate or exacerbate damage. Research indicates that political apologies following gaffes boost approval ratings in affected foreign audiences but often provoke domestic backlash among nationalist or conservative groups, creating a strategic for leaders. In Biden's case, slips like his 2023 Kennedy Center Honors reference to Queen Latifah as "the first lady" led to swift clarifications and humorous memes, yet they intensified debates on transparency and competence, with media critiques accusing outlets of underreporting early signs. Post-2020, heightened awareness of stress-related verbal errors has emerged amid global anxiety surges from the , which increased depression and stress prevalence by 25%, potentially linking to cognitive lapses in high-pressure public roles and fostering discussions on accommodations for leaders. Cognitive studies briefly note that such error frequency rises under stress, underscoring as indicators of broader societal pressures rather than isolated failings.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lapsus
  2. https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Lapsus
  3. https://www.etymonline.com/word/lapse
  4. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lapsus
  5. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/lapsus_n
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26618836
  7. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lapsus_linguae
  8. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Freud/Psycho/chap6.htm
  9. https://dictionary.apa.org/parapraxis
  10. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/03/secrets
  11. https://www.thoughtco.com/slip-of-the-tongue-sot-1692106
  12. https://ahn.mnsu.edu/services-and-centers/center-for-communication-sciences-and-disorders/services/stuttering/information-about-stuttering/serious-information/types-of-fluency-disorders/cluttering/spoonerisms/
  13. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Freud/Psycho/chap1.htm
  14. https://www.verywellmind.com/lethologica-tip-of-the-tongue-phenomenon-4154947
  15. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100305721
  16. https://www.simplypsychology.org/freudian-slip.html
  17. https://ia801904.us.archive.org/18/items/SigmundFreud/Sigmund%20Freud%20%5B1901%5D%20The%20Psychopathology%20of%20Everyday%20Life%20%28A.%20A.%20Brill%20translation%2C%201914%29.pdf
  18. https://nosubject.com/Parapraxis
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3208654
  20. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Non-Anomalous-Nature-of-Anomalous-Utterances-Fromkin/605a9f68f392e942b1552552f157f64de485568a
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2435259/
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3749399/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010027776900032
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231807800_Experimentally_eliciting_phonetic_and_sentential_speech_errors_Methods_implications_and_work_in_progress
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4534828/
  26. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00145/full
  27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/502504/
  28. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160706-what-freudian-slips-really-reveal-about-your-mind
  29. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201203/slips-the-tongue
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01076736
  31. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00703/full
  32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-08519-0
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8528269/
  34. https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/interventions/shakespearean-slips
  35. https://theconversation.com/joe-biden-slips-of-the-tongue-can-project-our-own-hidden-thoughts-fears-and-anxieties-203869
  36. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/07/29/watch-biden-blames-freudian-slip-confusing-trump-obama-latest/
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/05/joe-biden-verbal-decline-warning-signs
  38. https://www.dictionary.com/e/s/words-and-quotes-from-the-office/
  39. https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2012/10/24/163552936/political-memes-fast-cheap-and-out-of-control
  40. https://www.facebook.com/ATLBlackStar/posts/trump-lost-it-mid-speech-when-obama-called-him-out-and-his-own-slip-revealed-hes/1196420785684089/
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/impact-of-political-apologies-on-public-opinion/7B4BBB7F4E9790229E0C5E36B8A5B35A
  42. https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-speech-gaffe-queen-latifah-kennedy-center-1849174
  43. https://www.who.int/news/item/02-03-2022-covid-19-pandemic-triggers-25-increase-in-prevalence-of-anxiety-and-depression-worldwide
  44. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/10/managing-political-stress
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.