Hubbry Logo
Weight transferWeight transferMain
Open search
Weight transfer
Community hub
Weight transfer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Weight transfer
Weight transfer
Weight transfer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Chevrolet Camaro performing a wheelie during drag racing.
A motorcyclist performing a stoppie.
A Toyota MR2 leaning to the outside of a turn.

Weight transfer and load transfer are two expressions used somewhat confusingly to describe two distinct effects in the context of automobile and motorcycle dynamics:[1]

  • the change in load borne by different wheels of even perfectly rigid vehicles during acceleration
  • the change in center of mass (CoM) location relative to the wheels because of suspension compliance or cargo shifting or sloshing

In the automobile industry, weight transfer customarily refers to the change in load borne by different wheels during acceleration.[2] This would be more properly referred to as load transfer,[1][3] and that is the expression used in the motorcycle industry,[4][5] while weight transfer on motorcycles, to a lesser extent on automobiles, and cargo movement on either is due to a change in the CoM location relative to the wheels. This article uses this latter pair of definitions.

Load transfer

[edit]

In wheeled vehicles, load transfer is the measurable change of load borne by different wheels during acceleration (both longitudinal and lateral).[3] This includes braking, and deceleration (which is an acceleration at a negative rate).[6] No motion of the center of mass relative to the wheels is necessary, and so load transfer may be experienced by vehicles with no suspension at all. Load transfer is a crucial concept in understanding vehicle dynamics. The same is true in bikes, though only longitudinally.[4]

Cause

[edit]

The major forces that accelerate a vehicle occur at the tires' contact patches. Since these forces are not directed through the vehicle's CoM, one or more moments are generated whose forces are the tires' traction forces at pavement level, the other one (equal but opposed) is the mass inertia located at the CoM and the moment arm is the distance from pavement surface to CoM. It is these moments that cause variation in the load distributed between the tires. Often this is interpreted by the casual observer as a pitching or rolling motion of the vehicles body. A perfectly rigid vehicle, without suspension that would not exhibit pitching or rolling of the body, still undergoes load transfer. However, the pitching and rolling of the body of a non-rigid vehicle adds some (small) weight transfer due to the (small) CoM horizontal displacement with respect to the wheel's axis suspension vertical travel and also due to deformation of the tires i.e. contact patch displacement relative to wheel.

Lowering the CoM towards the ground is one method of reducing load transfer. As a result load transfer is reduced in both the longitudinal and lateral directions. Another method of reducing load transfer is by increasing the wheel spacings. Increasing the vehicle's wheelbase (length) reduces longitudinal load transfer while increasing the vehicle's track (width) reduces lateral load transfer. Most high performance automobiles are designed to sit as low as possible and usually have an extended wheelbase and track.

One way to calculate the effect of load transfer, keeping in mind that this article uses "load transfer" to mean the phenomenon commonly referred to as "weight transfer" in the automotive world, is with the so-called "weight transfer equation":

or

where is the change in load borne by the front wheels, is the longitudinal acceleration, is the acceleration of gravity, is the center of mass height, is the wheelbase, is the total vehicle mass, and is the total vehicle weight.[7][8]

Weight transfer involves the actual (relatively small) movement of the vehicle CoM relative to the wheel axes due to displacement of the chassis as the suspension complies, or of cargo or liquids within the vehicle, which results in a redistribution of the total vehicle load between the individual tires.

Center of mass

[edit]

Weight transfer occurs as the vehicle's CoM shifts during automotive maneuvers. Acceleration causes the sprung mass to rotate about a geometric axis resulting in relocation of the CoM. Front-back weight transfer is proportional to the change in the longitudinal location of the CoM to the vehicle's wheelbase, and side-to-side weight transfer (summed over front and rear) is proportional to the ratio of the change in the CoM's lateral location to the vehicle's track.

Liquids, such as fuel, readily flow within their containers, causing changes in the vehicle's CoM. As fuel is consumed, not only does the position of the CoM change, but the total weight of the vehicle is also reduced.

By way of example, when a vehicle accelerates, a weight transfer toward the rear wheels can occur. An outside observer might witness this as the vehicle visibly leans to the back, or squats. Conversely, under braking, weight transfer toward the front of the car can occur. Under hard braking it might be clearly visible even from inside the vehicle as the nose dives toward the ground (most of this will be due to load transfer). Similarly, during changes in direction (lateral acceleration), weight transfer to the outside of the direction of the turn can occur.

Weight transfer is generally of far less practical importance than load transfer, for cars and SUVs at least. For instance in a 0.9g turn, a car with a track of 1650 mm and a CoM height of 550 mm will see a load transfer of 30% of the vehicle weight, that is the outer wheels will see 60% more load than before, and the inners 60% less. Total available grip will drop by around 6% as a result of this load transfer. At the same time, the CoM of the vehicle will typically move laterally and vertically, relative to the contact patch by no more than 30 mm, leading to a weight transfer of less than 2%, and a corresponding reduction in grip of 0.01%.

Traction

[edit]

Load transfer causes the available traction at all four wheels to vary as the car brakes, accelerates, or turns. This bias to one pair of tires doing more "work" than the other pair results in a net loss of total available traction. The net loss can be attributed to the phenomenon known as tire load sensitivity.

An exception is during positive acceleration when the engine power is driving two or fewer wheels. In this situation where all the tires are not being utilized load transfer can be advantageous. As such, the most powerful cars are almost never front wheel drive, as the acceleration itself causes the front wheels' traction to decrease. This is why sports cars usually have either rear wheel drive or all wheel drive (and in the all wheel drive case, the power tends to be biased toward the rear wheels under normal conditions).

Rollover

[edit]

If (lateral) load transfer reaches the tire loading on one end of a vehicle, the inside wheel on that end will lift, causing a change in handling characteristic. If it reaches half the weight of the vehicle it will start to roll over. Some large trucks will roll over before skidding, while passenger vehicles and small trucks usually roll over only when they leave the road. Fitting racing tires to a tall or narrow vehicle and then driving it hard may lead to rollover.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Weight transfer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Weight transfer in refers to the redistribution of a vehicle's normal forces on its tires, caused by inertial forces acting at the center of gravity during maneuvers such as , braking, and cornering, which alters traction, stability, and handling characteristics. This phenomenon divides into longitudinal transfer, which shifts load between front and rear axles, and lateral transfer, which shifts load between left and right sides. The magnitude of transfer depends on factors including the height of the center of gravity, , track width, and the intensity of or deceleration. Longitudinal weight transfer occurs primarily during acceleration and braking, where deceleration pitches the vehicle forward, increasing front axle load while decreasing rear axle load, and vice versa for acceleration. The dynamic normal force on one front wheel can be calculated as Fz1=12mg(a2l−hl⋅axg)F_{z1} = \frac{1}{2} mg \left( \frac{a_2}{l} - \frac{h}{l} \cdot \frac{a_x}{g} \right), where mm is vehicle mass, gg is gravitational acceleration, a2a_2 is the distance from the center of gravity to the rear axle, ll is wheelbase, hh is center of gravity height, and axa_x is longitudinal acceleration (positive for acceleration). For example, during braking with retardation a=6 m/s2a = 6 \, \mathrm{m/s^2} and h=0.4 mh = 0.4 \, \mathrm{m}, approximately 12% of total weight may transfer forward in a small vehicle with 2 m wheelbase (using g=9.81 m/s2g = 9.81 \, \mathrm{m/s^2}). This transfer enhances front tire traction under braking but can reduce rear stability if excessive. Lateral weight transfer arises during cornering due to centrifugal forces, loading the outer tires more heavily and unloading the inner ones, which influences cornering grip and vehicle balance. The transfer per axle is given by ΔFz=mayh2t\Delta F_z = \frac{m a_y h}{2 t}, where mm is vehicle mass, aya_y is lateral acceleration, hh is center of gravity height, and tt is track width, often resulting in nonlinear tire behavior as friction coefficients decrease with higher normal loads. Optimal distribution of this transfer between front and rear axles, known as total lateral load transfer distribution (typically around 0.55 for balanced handling), minimizes understeer or oversteer by maximizing overall lateral force capacity. Suspension elements like springs, anti-roll bars, and roll centers are tuned to manage these effects, as uncontrolled transfer can limit maximum cornering speeds. In engineering practice, minimizing unnecessary weight transfer through low center of gravity placement and wide track designs improves performance, particularly in high-speed or racing applications, while maintaining ride comfort requires balancing transfer with suspension compliance. Front-wheel-drive vehicles, with about 63% static weight on the front, exhibit more pronounced understeer from longitudinal transfer compared to rear-wheel-drive configurations. Overall, understanding and controlling weight transfer is essential for vehicle design, safety analysis, and driver training in dynamic conditions.

Core Concepts

Definition and Overview

Weight transfer is the redistribution of a 's weight among its wheels or axles due to inertial forces acting on the center of during , braking, or cornering. This dynamic shift alters the normal forces at each contact patch, fundamentally affecting behavior. Weight transfer plays a crucial role in handling, stability, and , as it determines traction availability and balance under various operating conditions; it manifests in all ground , irrespective of suspension design or configuration. In contrast, static —prevalent during straight-line travel at constant speed—remains fixed based on the vehicle's location relative to the axles, without inertial influences.

Load Transfer

Load transfer is frequently employed as a for weight transfer in the field of , both describing the redistribution of vertical forces across tires or axles in response to inertial effects during , braking, or cornering. This interchangeability arises because the phenomena involve the same underlying shift in normal loads, with "load transfer" often preferred in technical discussions to underscore that no actual mass relocation occurs—rather, it is a dynamic variation in force distribution. While largely synonymous, subtle distinctions exist in engineering literature: "load transfer" tends to emphasize the mechanical forces acting on suspension components and their transmission to the contact patches, whereas "weight transfer" more broadly focuses on the inertial effects of the vehicle's overall mass redistribution. Both terminologies appear in authoritative standards, such as SAE J670, which explicitly defines concepts like tire lateral load transfer as the change in vertical forces due to lateral . These nuances help clarify analyses in contexts where suspension behavior influences paths. In practical applications, the nature of load transfer varies by suspension design. For rigid-axle vehicles, where wheels on an are connected via a beam, load transfer directly alters the aggregate loading on the entire , simplifying force distribution but potentially amplifying uneven wear under maneuvers. Conversely, in systems, load transfer occurs through separate control arms and linkages for each wheel, incorporating compliance effects from bushings and springs that can modulate the force application and improve isolation between sides. The term "load transfer" has broader applicability beyond , notably in the design and analysis of landing gear, where it describes the transmission of impact and ground reaction forces to the structure during and .

Physical Principles

Causes of Weight Transfer

Weight transfer in vehicles primarily arises from inertial forces generated during dynamic maneuvers, which create moments that redistribute the vehicle's across its axles or wheels. During , the forward propulsive force applied at the contact patches, below the center of , produces a moment (viewed from the left side) that shifts weight rearward, increasing the normal load on the rear wheels. Conversely, during braking, the decelerative forces at the contact patches generate a counterclockwise moment, transferring weight forward to the front wheels. In cornering, lateral inertial forces acting through the center of cause a rolling moment about the vehicle's longitudinal axis, shifting weight from the inner wheels to the outer wheels. Geometric factors further influence the magnitude of weight transfer by altering the effective moment arms involved in these dynamics. A higher center of mass height increases the vertical distance between the inertial forces at the ground and the vehicle's mass center, thereby amplifying the rotational moments and resulting transfer. Similarly, a shorter wheelbase exacerbates longitudinal transfer during acceleration and braking by reducing the horizontal lever arm over which forces are distributed, while a narrower track width intensifies lateral transfer in corners by decreasing the base resisting roll. Tire contact patch forces, acting as the points of application for these inertial loads, also contribute overturning moments that drive the weight shift. This phenomenon occurs independently of suspension systems, as it stems fundamentally from the inertia of the vehicle's body in response to applied forces, even in unsuspended or rigid-body configurations. Visible manifestations include "squatting," where the rear of the vehicle lowers under due to the rearward shift compressing the rear suspension, and "diving," where the front dips during braking from forward transfer. These geometric and inertial influences, particularly through height as a key multiplier, ultimately alter normal loads and traction distribution.

Role of Center of Mass

The (CoM) of a is defined as the single point where the vehicle's total mass can be considered concentrated for analyzing translational and rotational dynamics, including weight transfer under external forces. The height of the CoM above the road surface (denoted as hh) and its longitudinal and lateral positions relative to the and track width critically influence the magnitude and direction of weight transfer, as these parameters determine the moment arms for inertial torques during maneuvers. A higher CoM height amplifies weight transfer by increasing the lever arm for lateral or longitudinal accelerations, leading to greater load shifts between axles or wheels. Dynamic shifts in the CoM position can occur during vehicle operation, further modulating weight transfer. For instance, rapid acceleration induces a rearward migration of the effective CoM due to inertial loading, concentrating more mass over the rear axle. Additionally, sloshing of liquids such as fuel in partially filled tanks can cause unpredictable lateral or longitudinal displacements of the CoM, potentially destabilizing handling by altering the instantaneous mass distribution. Geometrically, vehicles with elevated CoM heights, such as sport utility vehicles (SUVs) that typically have CoM heights around 0.62-0.71 m compared to 0.4-0.5 m in sports cars, experience proportionally larger weight transfers, increasing susceptibility to instability. Lowering the CoM has been a key design priority in since the , driven by evolving safety standards aimed at enhancing rollover resistance and overall stability without compromising functionality. In multi-body vehicles like those trailers, interactions between the CoMs of the primary and attached components can induce complex transfers, manifesting as pitching (longitudinal oscillations) or yawing (rotational) motions that amplify load variations across .

Calculation Methods

Longitudinal Transfer

Longitudinal transfer describes the redistribution of a 's between the front and rear resulting from longitudinal forces, such as those encountered during or braking. This phenomenon arises from the inertial response of the vehicle's (CoM) to forward or backward , causing a shift in normal loads on the axles. During braking, shifts forward, increasing the load on the front axle and decreasing it on the rear; conversely, during , shifts rearward. The magnitude of longitudinal weight transfer can be calculated using established vehicle dynamics principles. For braking, the increase in front axle load, ΔWf\Delta W_f, is given by: ΔWf=ag⋅hb⋅W\Delta W_f = \frac{a}{g} \cdot \frac{h}{b} \cdot W where aa is the deceleration, gg is the acceleration due to gravity, hh is the height of the CoM above the ground, bb is the wheelbase, and WW is the total vehicle weight. The corresponding decrease on the rear axle is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. This formula derives from a moment balance about the rear axle contact patch: the inertial force mam a acting at the CoM height hh produces a moment mahm a h, which is countered by the shift in normal forces across the wheelbase bb, yielding the load change ΔWf=(mah)/b\Delta W_f = (m a h)/b. Accounting for static weight distribution—where the front axle static load fraction is lr/bl_r / b (with lrl_r as the horizontal distance from CoM to rear axle)—the total front load becomes the static front load plus ΔWf\Delta W_f. For illustration, consider a 2000 kg vehicle with CoM height h=0.5h = 0.5 m and wheelbase b=2.5b = 2.5 m undergoing 1g braking (a=ga = g). The forward load transfer is ΔWf=1⋅(0.5/2.5)⋅2000=400\Delta W_f = 1 \cdot (0.5 / 2.5) \cdot 2000 = 400 kg, significantly increasing front axle loading and potentially enhancing front braking traction while risking rear wheel lockup. Drive type influences utilization: in rear-wheel-drive vehicles, acceleration-induced rearward transfer boosts rear traction, whereas in front-wheel-drive setups, the forward axle unloading can reduce maximum accelerative grip. Suspension designs incorporating anti-dive (for braking) and anti-squat (for ) mitigate the effects of this transfer on suspension deflection. These geometries redirect a portion of the inertial forces through control arms rather than solely through springs and dampers, reducing the dynamic load seen by the suspension by 20-50% in typical implementations.

Lateral Transfer

Lateral weight transfer refers to the redistribution of a vehicle's weight from the inner wheels to the outer wheels during cornering maneuvers, resulting from centrifugal forces acting laterally on the center of . The key formula for calculating the magnitude of this transfer is ΔW=v2rg⋅ht⋅W,\Delta W = \frac{v^2}{r g} \cdot \frac{h}{t} \cdot W, where ΔW\Delta W is the transferred weight, vv is the vehicle speed, rr is the of the turn, gg is the acceleration due to gravity, hh is the height of the center of mass above the ground, tt is the track width (distance between the centers of the contact patches of the left and right tires), and WW is the total . This equation quantifies the increase in vertical load on the outer wheels and the corresponding decrease on the inner wheels. The derivation of this formula stems from the balance of moments on the vehicle: the overturning moment generated by the mv2rm \frac{v^2}{r} applied at the center of height hh is resisted by the stabilizing moment from the uneven vertical loads across the track width tt. Setting these moments equal gives mv2rh=ΔW⋅tm \frac{v^2}{r} h = \Delta W \cdot t, which simplifies to the formula above upon substituting W=mgW = m g. In more detailed analyses, the total lateral load transfer incorporates the distribution of roll stiffness between the front and rear suspensions, which determines how the overall transfer is allocated across axles to influence handling balance. The height of the roll center plays a critical role in the load path during cornering, as it defines the point where lateral forces act without inducing body roll; transfers below this height are geometric, while those above involve elastic deformation of the suspension. Independent suspension designs allow partial mitigation of lateral transfer by permitting the inner and outer wheels to move independently, reducing the effective roll moment compared to rigid axles. For instance, in a passenger with a track width of 1.5 m and height of 0.5 m cornering at 0.8 g lateral , roughly 27% of the total shifts to the outer side. This effect is more pronounced in tall vehicles like SUVs, where a higher relative to track width can double the percentage transfer under similar conditions, increasing the risk of handling instability.

Vehicle Impacts

Effects on Traction

Traction in vehicles relies on the frictional interaction between tires and surface, where the normal load on each directly influences the available grip. While increasing the normal load on a tire generally produces more total frictional force, the (μ) decreases nonlinearly with higher loads due to tire deformation and characteristics, resulting in a load-transfer that diminishes overall grip efficiency. During longitudinal maneuvers, weight transfer significantly alters traction distribution. In acceleration, weight shifts rearward, increasing the normal load on rear tires and enhancing their traction, which benefits rear-wheel-drive (RWD) vehicles by improving power delivery to the loaded drive wheels. Conversely, in front-wheel-drive (FWD) vehicles, this rearward transfer unloads the front drive tires, reducing their traction and increasing the risk of wheelspin, particularly under high torque. For braking, forward weight transfer loads the front tires, boosting their braking traction across both RWD and FWD configurations, though improper brake bias in FWD can lead to front wheel lockup if the increased load is not balanced with adequate ABS intervention. In lateral maneuvers such as cornering, weight transfer shifts load from inner to outer tires, enhancing grip on the outer wheels while reducing it on the inner ones. However, due to the tire's load sensitivity—where μ declines with load—the total available lateral traction across the is lower than if loads were evenly distributed, limiting the vehicle's cornering capability. All-wheel-drive systems mitigate this effect by dynamically distributing to the outer wheels with higher grip potential, thereby better utilizing available traction. Pacejka's Magic Formula provides an empirical model for forces, incorporating load sensitivity parameters to predict how vertical load variations affect peak and , enabling accurate of these traction losses. For instance, significant load transfer during high lateral or longitudinal accelerations can reduce total available traction compared to even loading, as the non-proportional grip response limits overall vehicle performance. Vehicle design can counteract these traction penalties; for example, increasing track width reduces the magnitude of lateral load transfer for a given cornering , minimizing the uneven loading and preserving more total grip.

Rollover Thresholds

Rollover occurs when lateral weight transfer during cornering or evasive maneuvers exceeds the vehicle's geometric stability limits, causing the inner wheels to lift off the ground and potentially leading to a full tip-over. This mechanism is driven by the generating a moment about the outer wheel ; as the vertical load on the outer wheels approaches the total , the inner wheels unload completely, marking the rollover threshold. The static stability factor (SSF) provides a key metric for assessing this threshold under quasi-static conditions, defined as SSF=t2h\text{SSF} = \frac{t}{2h} where tt is the track width and hh is the height of the center of mass above the ground. Values greater than 1.0 indicate a low risk of rollover in steady-state maneuvers, as the threshold lateral in g approximates the SSF; typical passenger cars exhibit SSF values of 1.30 to 1.50, while sport utility vehicles (SUVs) range from 1.00 to 1.30. Dynamic factors such as vehicle speed, suspension roll stiffness, and tire sidewall stiffness can lower the effective rollover threshold below the static value by amplifying body roll and delaying load redistribution. Higher speeds increase the required lateral for a given turn radius, exacerbating transfer; softer suspension or tire compliance permits greater roll angles before wheel lift. (ESC) systems, introduced in the late 1990s, mitigate these risks by selectively braking wheels to reduce yaw and lateral acceleration, thereby limiting weight transfer and preventing rollover in up to 70% of potential cases. Since 2001, the (NHTSA) has incorporated SSF into its (NCAP) rollover resistance ratings, emphasizing values above 1.0 for favorable assessments, though no federal mandate enforces this minimum; earlier tall vehicles, such as some pre-2000 SUV models, often had SSF values corresponding to rollover thresholds as low as 0.8 g of lateral . Prior to 2010, rollover crashes accounted for approximately 30% of fatal incidents, a rate significantly higher than for passenger cars, but design improvements including wider tracks, lower centers of mass, and ESC integration have since reduced these occurrences by enhancing overall stability. As of 2023, rollover crashes accounted for 24% of occupant deaths in s.

References

  1. https://geumotorsports.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/vehicle-dynamics-theory-and-applications.pdf
  2. https://vehicledynamics.weebly.com/uploads/8/3/4/6/83468088/pdf_file.pdf
  3. https://optimumg.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OptimumG-August-2021.pdf
  4. https://access.gpstc.org/studentmanuals/MC1403-54866602.pdf
  5. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/139209/gaither-gaither-sb-2-2021-thesis.pdf
  6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHbw6dOev2I
  7. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/suspension-mythbusting-solid-axle-vs-irs/
  8. http://racingcardynamics.com/weight-transfer/
  9. https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJMET/VOLUME_11_ISSUE_7/IJMET_11_07_002.pdf
  10. https://dynref.engr.illinois.edu/ava.html
  11. https://bndtechsource.ucoz.com/BND_Docs/Vehicle_Load_Transfer_PartI_III_OCT14.pdf
  12. https://udel.edu/~pgeneva/downloads/fsae/2017_FSAE_chassis.pdf
  13. https://cloud.wikis.utexas.edu/wiki/spaces/LHRSOLAR/pages/89298939/Lateral%2BLoad%2BTransfer%2BCalculations
  14. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/3/682
  15. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/913/80554.0001.001.pdf?sequence=2
  16. https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-cup-cars/805151-cg-height.html
  17. https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl-60449.pdf
  18. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/811467.pdf
  19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/36615/Chapter2a.pdf
  20. https://suspensionsecrets.co.uk/lateral-and-longitudinal-load-transfer/
  21. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2022-01-1172/
  22. https://www.racecar-engineering.com/tech-explained/tyre-dynamics/
  23. https://www.total-car-control.co.uk/performance-driving/weight-transfer-in-driving/
  24. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18422
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457501000100
  26. https://www.nhtsa.gov/document/notice-proposed-rulemaking-federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standards-rollover-resistance
  27. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/809868
  28. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/01/12/01-973/consumer-information-regulations-federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standards-rollover-resistance
  29. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/fmvss/ESC_FRIA_%25252003_2007.pdf
  30. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/112/Lambert_Kenneth_57.pdf
  31. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Publication/809438
  32. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811630
  33. https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/passenger-vehicle-occupants
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.