Hubbry Logo
Mobile User Objective SystemMobile User Objective SystemMain
Open search
Mobile User Objective System
Community hub
Mobile User Objective System
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mobile User Objective System
Mobile User Objective System
Mobile User Objective System
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Artist's concept of a MUOS satellite
U. S. Navy's Mobile User Objective System logo at the Vertical Integration Facility of Cape Canaveral's Space Launch Complex-41 on August 19, 2015

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) is a United States Space Force narrowband military communications satellite system that supports a worldwide, multi-service population of users in the ultra high frequency (UHF) band. The system provides increased communications capabilities to newer, smaller terminals while still supporting interoperability with legacy terminals. MUOS is designed to support users who require greater mobility, higher bit rates and improved operational availability. The MUOS was declared fully operational for use in 2019.[1]

Overview

[edit]
Installing a MUOS satellite dish in Hawaii

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS), through a constellation of five satellites (four operational satellites and one on-orbit spare), provides global narrowband connectivity to terminals, platforms, tactical operators and operations centers. The system replaces the slower and less mobile 1990s-era Ultra High Frequency Follow-On (UFO) satellite communication system. MUOS primarily serves the United States Department of Defense (DoD); although, international allies' use has been declined in the past.[2] Primarily for mobile users (e.g. aerial and maritime platforms, ground vehicles, and dismounted soldiers), MUOS extend users' voice, data, and video communications beyond their lines-of-sight at data rates up to 384 kbit/s.[3]

The U.S. Navy's Communications Satellite Program Office (PMW 146) of the Program Executive Office (PEO) for Space Systems in San Diego, is lead developer for the MUOS program.[4] Lockheed Martin Space is the prime system contractor and satellite designer for MUOS under U.S. Navy Contract N00039-04-C-2009, which was announced on 24 September 2004.[5][6] Key subcontractors include General Dynamics Mission Systems (Ground Transport architecture), Boeing (Legacy UFO and portions of the WCDMA payload) and Harris (deployable mesh reflectors). The program delivered five satellites, four ground stations, and a terrestrial transport network at a cost of US$7.34 billion.[7]

Each satellite in the MUOS constellation carries two payloads: a legacy communications payload to maintain Department of Defense narrowband communications during the transition to MUOS, and the advanced MUOS Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) capability, according to Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR).

WCDMA system

[edit]

MUOS WCDMA radios can transmit simultaneous voice, video and mission data on an Internet Protocol-based system connected to military networks. MUOS radios operate from anywhere around the world at speeds comparable to 3G smartphones. MUOS radios can also work under dense cover, such as jungle canopies and urban settings. The MUOS operates as a global cellular service provider to support the warfighter with modern cell phone-like capabilities, such as multimedia. It converts a commercial third generation (3G) Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) cellular phone system to a military UHF SATCOM radio system using geosynchronous satellites in place of cell towers. By operating in the Ultra high frequency (UHF) frequency band, a lower frequency band than that used by conventional terrestrial cellular networks, the MUOS provides warfighters with the tactical ability to communicate in "disadvantaged" environments, such as heavily forested regions where higher frequency signals would be unacceptably attenuated by the forest canopy. Connections may be set up on demand by users in the field, within seconds, and then released just as easily, freeing resources for other users. In alignment with more traditional military communications methods, pre-planned networks can also be established either permanently or per specific schedule using the MUOS' ground-based Network Management Center.

Legacy payload

[edit]

In addition to the cellular MUOS WCDMA payload, a fully capable and separate UFO legacy payload is incorporated into each satellite. The "legacy" payload extends the useful life of legacy UHF SATCOM terminals and enables a smoother transition to MUOS.

Launches

[edit]

MUOS-1, after several weather delays, was launched into space successfully on 24 February 2012, at 22:15:00 UTC, carried by an Atlas V launch vehicle flying in its 551 configuration.[8]

MUOS-2 was launched on schedule on 19 July 2013, at 13:00:00 UTC aboard an Atlas V 551 (AV-040).[9]

MUOS-3 was launched on board a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V launch vehicle on 20 January 2015, from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida.[10][11]

MUOS-4 arrived at Cape Canaveral on 31 July 2015.[12] Weather conditions pushed back the launch, which was originally scheduled for on 31 August 2015, at 10:07 UTC.[13][14] The launch took place on 2 September 2015, at 10:18:00 UTC.[15]

MUOS-5 arrived at Cape Canaveral on 9 March 2016.[16] Launch was originally scheduled for on 5 May 2016, but due to an internal investigation into an Atlas V fuel system problem during the Cygnus OA-6 launch on 22 March 2016, the scheduled date was pushed back.[17] The launch took place on 24 June 2016, at 14:30:00 UTC.[18] An "anomaly" aboard the satellite occurred a few days later, however, when it was still in a Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO), leaving it "Reconfigured into Safe Intermediate Orbit", or stranded in GTO.[19][20] Amateur observers tracked it in an orbit of approximately 15,240 × 35,700 km (9,470 × 22,180 mi) since 3 July 2016.[21] On 3 November 2016, the Navy announced that the satellite has finally reached operational orbit.

MUOS operational positions

[edit]

The four currently operational MUOS satellites are stationed at longitude 100° West (MUOS-1); 177° West (MUOS-2); 16° West (MUOS-3); and 75° East (MUOS-4).[22] MUOS-5 is a spare satellite now orbiting over the Continental US. They have a 5° orbital inclination. In the first few months after launch, the satellites were temporarily parked in a check-out position at longitude 172° West.[23]

MUOS ground stations

[edit]
MUOS ground station in Wahiawa, Hawaii

The MUOS includes four ground station facilities.[3] Site selections were completed in 2007 with the signing of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the U.S. Navy and the Australian Department of Defence. The four ground stations, each of which serves one of the four active satellites of the MUOS constellation will be located at: the Australian Defence Satellite Communications Station at Kojarena, Western Australia about 30 km east of Geraldton, Western Australia; Naval Radio Transmitter Facility (NRTF) Niscemi about 60 km from Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily, Italy; Naval SATCOM Facility, Northwest Chesapeake, Southeast Virginia at 36°33′52″N 76°16′14″W / 36.564393°N 76.270477°W / 36.564393; -76.270477; and the Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific, Hawaii.

Controversy

[edit]

Construction of the ground station in Italy was halted for nearly half of 2012 by protesters concerned with health risks and environmental damage by radio waves. One scientific study "point[s] to serious risks to people and the environment, such as to prevent its realization in densely populated areas, like the one adjacent to the town of Niscemi".[24] In spite of the controversy, the site at Niscemi was completed in anticipation of the launch of MUOS-4.

Radio terminals

[edit]

The MUOS waveform with complete red/black operational capability was released in 2012. Until the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) program cancellation in 2011, the JTRS program would provide the DoD terminals that can communicate with the MUOS WCDMA waveform with a series of form-factor models. The JTRS Handheld, Manpack and Small Form Fit (HMS) AN/PRC-155 manpack built by General Dynamics Mission Systems survived the wider JTRS program cancellation and has shipped several low rate of initial production (LRIP) units. Rockwell Collins AN/ARC-210[25][26] airborne terminal and Harris Corporation AN/PRC-117G.[27][28] Manpack have also been certified for operation on the MUOS system.

Arctic and Antarctic capabilities

[edit]

Lockheed Martin and an industry team of radio vendors demonstrated extensive Arctic communications reach near the North Pole, believed to be the most northerly successful call to a geosynchronous satellite.[29] WCDMA calls to the far north will be increasingly important where there has been an increase in shipping, resource exploration and tourism without much improvement in secure satellite communications access. Based on these and continued tests, full coverage of the Northwest Passage and Northeast Passage shipping lanes is expected. Several follow-on tests with high quality voice and data including streaming video have occurred in both the Arctic and Antarctic, including a 2015 demonstration from McMurdo Station.[30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mobile User Objective System

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) is a communications constellation developed for the to deliver secure, beyond-line-of-sight ultra-high frequency (UHF) voice, video, and data services to mobile military forces worldwide, employing a wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) waveform derived from commercial cellular technology. Launched between 2012 and 2016, the system comprises five geosynchronous satellites built by , supported by four global ground relay stations, enabling simultaneous communications for over 67,000 user terminals across aircraft, ships, submarines, ground vehicles, and personnel in austere environments. MUOS achieves approximately tenfold increases in user capacity and data throughput compared to legacy UHF systems, while maintaining through dual operational modes. Initially facing developmental delays and technical challenges, including waveform integration issues, the constellation attained full operational capability by 2019 following successful demonstrations and expanded use approvals. Current efforts focus on extension programs to sustain capabilities beyond the original design life, addressing potential cyber vulnerabilities identified in operational testing.

Development and Program History

Origins and Strategic Requirements

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) originated as a U.S. Navy-led initiative to address the limitations of the legacy (UHF) Follow-On (UFO) , which had been providing communications since the late 1990s but was nearing end-of-life and struggling with capacity constraints for expanding mobile user demands. Strategic requirements were driven by the Department of Defense's shift toward joint-service operations emphasizing mobile tactical forces, necessitating beyond-line-of-sight, secure communications capable of supporting higher data rates, greater user mobility, and improved operational availability in contested environments. These needs arose from operational experiences requiring reliable penetration of foliage, urban terrain, and adverse weather, while integrating with IP-based networks for voice, video, and data transmission to tens of thousands of terminals. Early development traced to an analysis of alternatives completed in 2001 by the Applied Physics Laboratory, which informed the adoption of Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) technology to achieve over tenfold capacity increases compared to UFO satellites, with data rates ranging from 2.4 kbps to 384 kbps. The program's core objectives included global coverage from 65° N to 65° S , support for a worldwide multi-service of mobile users, and jam-resistant SATCOM to sustain tactical operations without reliance on terrestrial infrastructure. This addressed the UFO's single-channel-per-carrier limitations, which could not scale to the projected growth in user endpoints exceeding 200,000. Formal program advancement followed with a $2 billion contract award to Lockheed Martin on September 24, 2004, establishing MUOS as the next-generation system to ensure continuity of critical communications for U.S. forces in humanitarian, disaster response, and combat scenarios. The design incorporated dual payloads per —legacy UHF for and modern WCDMA for enhanced throughput—reflecting requirements for seamless transition while prioritizing survivability and against interference.

Key Contracts and Contractors

Systems Company, based in , serves as the prime contractor and lead system integrator for the Mobile User Objective System (MUOS), responsible for designing and building the leveraging its A2100 platform. In September 2004, the U.S. awarded a $2 billion fixed-price-incentive contract (N00039-04-C-2009) to develop the MUOS, covering the initial two satellites with options for up to five, emphasizing integration of wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) technology for enhanced narrowband communications. Subsequent modifications included a $92.8 million increase in March 2019 for engineering and logistics support on the ground segment, raising the contract ceiling to sustain operations amid deployment challenges. General Dynamics Mission Systems acts as a key subcontractor for the MUOS ground infrastructure, including development and sustainment of the radio access facilities and systems. In November 2019, the U.S. Navy granted a $731.8 million cost-plus-award-fee and firm-fixed-price indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract over 10 years for post-deployment sustainment, ensuring operational readiness of the end-to-end system for secure voice and data services. This sole-source award built on ' prior role in ground terminal integration, addressing compatibility with legacy ultra-high frequency (UHF) payloads. Other notable subcontractors include (now Technologies), contributing to waveform development and terminal equipment for between MUOS and legacy systems. The program's structure relied on a model, with coordinating these partners to mitigate risks in adopting commercial cellular-derived technology for military needs, though integration complexities contributed to later cost overruns exceeding initial estimates by billions.
ContractorRoleKey Contract Value and Date
SystemsPrime contractor; satellite design, build, and integration$2 billion (September 2004); $92.8 million modification (March 2019)
Ground segment development and 10-year sustainment$731.8 million (November 2019)
Harris CorporationWaveform and terminal interoperability supportIntegrated within prime (2004 onward)

Program Delays, Costs, and Management Challenges

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) program experienced significant schedule delays stemming from technical complexities in spacecraft development and integration. The launch of the first slipped from March 2010 to February 2012, a two-year delay attributed to budget reallocations for operations in and subsequent engineering challenges. Further delays affected subsequent , including a six-month postponement for MUOS-3 due to a defect discovered in 2014, pushing its launch to January 2015. Operational testing was deferred by 17 months to November 2015, while fielding of compatible radios shifted from 2014 to 2016, largely due to persistent issues with the wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) software reliability. Additional setbacks included legal challenges rendering the Niscemi, , radio access facility non-operational and ongoing deferrals of geolocation capabilities to 2018 follow-on testing. Program costs saw substantial growth early in development, with satellite-related issues driving a 48 percent increase over initial estimates as reported by the U.S. Government Accountability Office in 2009. The original total program acquisition cost stood at approximately $8.2 billion, though later revisions brought the current estimate down to $7.6 billion through scope adjustments and efficiencies, avoiding net overruns relative to the revised baseline. Terminal development and ground system upgrades contributed to elevated expenses, including high depot support demands—averaging 90 visits over 20 test days—and cessation of funding for performance modeling in 2014 as a cost-avoidance step. Replenishment satellites for the constellation are projected at $1.4 billion each in then-year dollars, reflecting parts obsolescence and needs. Management challenges exacerbated these issues, including poor inter-stakeholder communications that hindered progress on satellite programs like MUOS, as noted by Lockheed Martin executives. Integration of the MUOS waveform proved particularly problematic, leaving satellites underutilized and reliant on legacy systems for over 90 percent of capabilities during early operations. Ground system software accumulated over 900 unresolved problem change requests by 2016, with high-priority items averaging 526 days old, compounded by inadequate training, documentation gaps affecting 38 percent of trouble tickets, and ineffective fault management leading to cryptic alerts and prolonged repair times—median network management system repairs took 89 hours against a 45-minute threshold. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities exceeded 1,000, with half rated Category II or higher, while limited user engagement in software-intensive phases delayed synchronization of radios, ground stations, and satellites. These factors, alongside contractor turnover and restricted access to operational controls, underscored systemic difficulties in prioritizing and resolving issues across the Department of Defense acquisition process.

Technical Architecture

Satellite Constellation Design

The MUOS satellite constellation consists of five satellites in geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO): four operational satellites and one on-orbit spare. These satellites are positioned in the near-equatorial plane with low inclinations, typically around 5 degrees or less, to optimize visibility over the primary coverage zone extending from 65° N to 65° S latitudes. This configuration provides near-continuous coverage across more than 70% of the Earth's surface pertinent to global military operations, with dual satellite visibility in equatorial and mid-latitude regions to support load sharing and redundancy. The operational satellites are longitudinally spaced to ensure overlapping footprints, generally separated by approximately 90 degrees to achieve global non-polar coverage without gaps in service. Specific slots have included positions such as 75° E for certain satellites during operational phases, with adjustments made post-launch to refine coverage based on mission requirements and interference avoidance. The on-orbit spare is maintained in a compatible GEO slot, enabling rapid repositioning if an active satellite fails, thereby preserving system availability. This resilient architecture addresses the limitations of legacy systems like the UHF Follow-On constellation by distributing capacity more efficiently across the operational envelope. Each in the constellation is engineered for a minimum 15-year , with the design incorporating propulsion systems for station-keeping and orbit maintenance against GEO perturbations. The constellation's overall capacity is enhanced such that a single MUOS delivers four times the throughput of the entire preceding eight-satellite legacy UHF fleet, underscoring the efficiency gains from the optimized spatial arrangement and payload advancements. As of February 2025, the five-satellite setup continues to form the backbone of MUOS operations, with ongoing extension efforts targeting additional units to extend capabilities into the .

WCDMA-Based Communication System

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) implements a Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) communication architecture adapted from commercial third-generation (3G) cellular standards, enabling high-capacity narrowband satellite communications in the ultra-high frequency (UHF) band. This waveform, known as spectrally adaptive WCDMA (SA-WCDMA), operates within a 20 MHz allocation, utilizing 5 MHz channels to support data rates from 2.4 kbps up to 384 kbps for voice, video, and data services. The system relays user signals via geosynchronous satellites to one of four ground stations—located in ; ; Niscemi, ; and —before routing through an IP-based core network. Developed by General Dynamics Mission Systems, the MUOS WCDMA waveform incorporates power control and spread-spectrum techniques to coexist with legacy UHF frequency-division multiple access (FDMA) and time-division multiple access (TDMA) users in the shared 225–400 MHz UHF SATCOM spectrum, minimizing interference and performance degradation for both. Each MUOS satellite carries a dedicated WCDMA payload alongside a legacy UHF payload, allowing seamless backward compatibility; the WCDMA subsystem processes signals using baseband processing for dynamic resource allocation, prioritization of critical traffic, and quality-of-service management akin to terrestrial cellular networks. This design supports thousands of simultaneous users per satellite, representing a capacity increase of approximately 10- to 16-fold over prior UHF constellations, with a single MUOS satellite providing four times the throughput of the entire legacy eight-satellite UFO/UHFS network. The WCDMA implementation adheres to standards but includes satellite-specific adaptations, such as half-duplex constraints and resilience features to handle propagation delays and across global coverage areas. Operational testing has demonstrated superior message accuracy and service quality compared to legacy UHF under nominal conditions, though the lacks proactive failure monitoring for WCDMA links, potentially leading to extended outages without user notification. User terminals, including (JTRS) variants like the AN/PRC-155 manpack, interface via the WCDMA waveform to enable mobile, on-the-move communications with cellular-like features such as between satellite beams.

Legacy UHF Payload Integration

Each Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) satellite integrates a separate legacy (UHF) payload designed to replicate the capabilities of a single UHF Follow-On (UFO) satellite, ensuring with existing legacy UHF satellite communications (SATCOM) terminals and infrastructure. This payload operates independently from the primary Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) payload, without interconnection between the two, to maintain isolation between modern network-centric communications and traditional UHF services. The inclusion of this legacy component addresses the need to sustain UHF SATCOM capacity as the aging UFO constellation approaches end-of-life, preventing service gaps for users reliant on legacy systems. The legacy UHF payload supports standard 5 kHz and 25 kHz channelized voice, , and services compatible with deployed terminals, enabling MUOS to function as a direct supplement to UFO satellites during the transition period. Boeing's Integrated Defense Systems provided the legacy UHF s for the MUOS constellation, integrating them onto the Lockheed Martin-built satellite bus alongside the WCDMA system developed by . Pre-launch testing, including end-to-end demonstrations in 2009 and 2011, verified seamless with legacy UHF ground terminals, confirming that MUOS satellites could handle both payload types simultaneously without disrupting established UHF operations. This dual-payload architecture facilitates a phased migration to MUOS capabilities, as military services upgrade select terminals for WCDMA access while preserving full support for unmodified legacy equipment, thereby extending the operational lifespan of thousands of existing UHF assets across U.S. Department of Defense platforms. The legacy payload's capacity equates to that of one UFO satellite per MUOS unit, contributing to overall constellation redundancy and reliability for narrowband SATCOM demands in contested environments.

Launches and Orbital Deployment

Satellite Launch Timeline

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) constellation consists of five satellites launched between 2012 and 2016 aboard rockets from Space Launch Complex 41 at Air Force Station, . Each launch followed a rigorous pre-flight preparation process, including integration and environmental testing at the Astrotech Space Operations facility. The first satellite, MUOS-1, lifted off on February 24, 2012, at 22:15 UTC, marking the initial deployment of the next-generation narrowband satellite communications system designed to replace the legacy UHF Follow-on (UFO) constellation. MUOS-2 followed on July 19, 2013, at 07:52 UTC, providing redundancy and expanding coverage capabilities. MUOS-3 launched on January 20, 2015, at 20:43 UTC, after weather-related delays, and entered service after on-orbit checkout. MUOS-4 was launched on September 2, 2015, at 10:18 UTC, following a two-day postponement due to tropical weather conditions, and completed initial testing before operational acceptance by the U.S. Navy in November 2015. The final , MUOS-5, deployed as an on-orbit spare on June 24, 2016, at 14:30 UTC, completing the five-satellite network intended for global, high-capacity communications.
SatelliteLaunch DateLaunch VehicleNORAD IDStatus Post-Launch
MUOS-1February 24, 20122012-009AOperational after checkout
MUOS-2July 19, 20132013-036AOperational
MUOS-3January 20, 20152015-002AOperational
MUOS-4September 2, 20152015-044AOperational
MUOS-5June 24, 20162016-041AOn-orbit spare, propulsion anomaly during orbit raising

MUOS-5 Anomaly and Mitigation

The MUOS-5 satellite, launched on June 24, 2016, aboard an rocket from Air Force Station, encountered an anomaly during its initial orbit-raising sequence on or around June 29, 2016. The , intended to achieve a approximately 35,786 km above Earth's equator over , experienced a in its primary bipropellant orbit-raising propulsion system after completing several planned burns. This left MUOS-5 in a highly elliptical intermediate orbit of roughly 35,703 km by 15,242 km with an inclination of 9.8 degrees, preventing further use of the main thruster for efficient apogee raises. Joint investigations by the U.S. Navy's Program Executive Office for Space Systems and , the satellite's prime contractor, pinpointed the issue to a failure within the orbit-raising subsystem, though the exact cause—potentially involving a thruster or flow anomaly—remained unpublicized in detail for security reasons. The satellite was placed in a safe-hold mode and maintained positive control, with auxiliary systems including solar arrays and antennas deploying successfully. External support from units, such as the 1st Space Operations Squadron, aided in tracking and anomaly analysis using ground-based observations. Mitigation involved repurposing the satellite's redundant monopropellant thrusters—originally intended for station-keeping and fine adjustments—for extended orbit-raising operations, a process that required over 100 burns and consumed significantly more fuel than planned, extending the timeline by four months. By early November 2016, MUOS-5 achieved a near-geosynchronous orbit of approximately 35,000 km by 36,600 km at an inclination of 9.7 degrees, enabling on-orbit checkouts and pre-operational testing of its wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) and UHF payloads. This workaround preserved the satellite's core functionality despite the suboptimal inclination, which slightly reduced equatorial coverage efficiency but maintained viability as a high-latitude spare asset in the five-satellite constellation. Full operational acceptance followed in April 2017, with MUOS-5 providing UHF communications and contributing to the system's global and wideband capabilities, albeit with adjusted coverage patterns to account for its orbit. The incident underscored propulsion system vulnerabilities in designs but demonstrated effective fault isolation and adaptive recovery, avoiding total mission loss without additional hardware. No further anomalies were reported post-mitigation, and the satellite integrated into the MUOS network without compromising overall constellation performance.

Ground and Network Infrastructure

Ground Station Network

The MUOS ground station network, formally known as the Radio Access Facilities (RAFs), comprises four primary stations strategically positioned for global coverage and redundancy in relaying satellite signals to terrestrial networks. These facilities connect the satellite constellation to the MUOS core network, functioning as cellular base stations by receiving uplink/downlink communications via wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) waveforms and interfacing with switching facilities for voice, video, and data routing. Each RAF is equipped with three freestanding antennas designed to handle high-capacity traffic, supporting over 67,000 user terminals worldwide as of 2025. The stations are located at in (36.564393°N 76.270477°W); Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station Pacific in ; near , ; and Niscemi, Sicily, . The U.S. Navy accepted the Virginia, , and Australian stations from in , with the Italian facility achieving operational status later amid local environmental disputes. These sites were selected for their geographic distribution to minimize latency and ensure continuous connectivity, with the network management segment (NMS) overseeing and precedence-based traffic prioritization across the infrastructure. Integration with two core switching facilities enables seamless handoff between RAFs, providing fault-tolerant operations and dynamic load balancing for beyond-line-of-sight communications. By October 2019, the full ground system had been validated for initial operational capability, demonstrating reliable 10x capacity improvements over legacy UHF systems in field tests. The infrastructure supports encrypted, narrowband services primarily for U.S. Department of Defense users, with ongoing upgrades focused on cybersecurity and waveform compatibility.

Core Network and Operations Centers

The MUOS core network operates as an IP-based system that emulates a , enabling simultaneous voice, video, and data transmission with Type 1 integrated at terminals via High Assurance IP Encryptors or secure gateways. It comprises two switching facilities (SFs) responsible for routing encrypted traffic between the , radio access facilities, and external networks such as the Defense Information Systems Network (DISN). These SFs, located in Wahiawa, , and northwest , interconnect via high-speed fiber-optic terrestrial links to ensure low-latency global transport and resource allocation for priority-based communications. Supporting the core network are four radio access facilities (RAFs), which serve as ground gateways interfacing with the satellites' Ka-band feeder links and UHF payloads. Each RAF, equipped with three freestanding 60-foot antennas, functions analogously to cellular base stations by receiving relayed signals from the satellites, processing WCDMA waveforms, and uplinking/downlinking approximately half the constellation's capacity to maintain redundancy and load balancing. The RAFs are sited at Wahiawa, ; northwest ; Niscemi, ; and Geraldton, , providing distributed coverage and resilience against single-point failures. constructed and integrated these facilities, which were progressively accepted by the U.S. between 2014 and later operational validations. Operations centers for MUOS encompass the satellite control segment, primarily managed by the Naval Satellite Operations Center (NAVSOC) headquarters at , , with a detachment at , . These centers handle , tracking, and commanding (TT&C) functions using existing adapted for MUOS, including real-time monitoring of satellite health, orbit maintenance, and payload reconfiguration. A network management facility (NMF) at Wahiawa, , integrates with the local RAF and SF to oversee service provisioning, fault isolation, and dynamic bandwidth allocation across the ground transport segment. This distributed architecture achieved full operational capability validation by 2019, supporting beyond-line-of-sight communications for U.S. forces with enhanced availability over legacy UHF systems.

Operational Capabilities and Performance

Global Coverage and Throughput Advantages

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) constellation consists of five geosynchronous satellites—four operational and one on-orbit spare—positioned to deliver near-continuous coverage from 65° north latitude to 65° south latitude, encompassing approximately 100% of the required operational area with a minimum of one satellite visible. This configuration ensures reliable beyond-line-of-sight connectivity for mobile users worldwide, including naval, ground, and air forces, by maintaining multiple satellite overlaps in high-demand regions, where over 70% of the coverage area receives service from at least two satellites simultaneously, enhancing redundancy against jamming or failure. MUOS achieves significant throughput advantages over legacy Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Satellite Communications (SATCOM) systems through its Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) waveform, which supports up to 10 times the capacity of prior narrowband systems, enabling simultaneous handling of voice, data, and video for thousands of users. A single MUOS delivers four times the aggregate capacity of the entire legacy UHF constellation of eight satellites, leveraging cellular-like networking to provide higher —typically up to 64 kbps per channel—and improved for tactical operations. This upgrade addresses legacy limitations in demand-assigned multiple access (DAMA) protocols, which constrained throughput to low data rates and , by enabling IP-routed, always-on connections that prioritize mission-critical traffic. These capabilities yield operational advantages in contested environments, where the system's global footprint and enhanced allow for scalable bandwidth allocation, reducing latency and supporting net-centric warfare without the bottlenecks of older UHF payloads. Full operational capability, declared in following testing, has demonstrated sustained performance in delivering these metrics across diverse theaters, though polar regions beyond 65° latitude remain unsupported by the GEO architecture.

User Terminals and Interoperability

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) supports a variety of user terminals designed for tactical environments, including manpack radios such as the AN/PRC-117G, which integrates MUOS-specific software to enable secure beyond-line-of-sight communications using the WCDMA waveform. These terminals facilitate smartphone-like services, including simultaneous voice, video, and data transmission, for mobile forces across ground, airborne, maritime, and dismounted platforms. Terminal designs incorporate features like signal notching to avoid interference with host nation spectrum allocations or adjacent systems, ensuring operational compliance in contested environments. MUOS achieves interoperability with legacy Ultra High Frequency (UHF) satellite communications through dual payloads on each : a modern WCDMA payload for upgraded terminals and a legacy UHF compatible with existing equipment from systems like the UHF Follow-On (UFO). This design allows non-MUOS terminals to maintain access to narrowband SATCOM without immediate upgrades, supporting line-of-sight and beyond-line-of-sight links for voice and low-data-rate services. A key advancement in occurred on January 11, 2023, when the U.S. demonstrated cross-banding, successfully bridging legacy 5 kHz UHF SATCOM channels with MUOS capacity, thereby extending enhanced throughput—up to ten times that of prior systems—to unmodified legacy terminals. This capability reduces latency and improves signal reliability compared to legacy systems. Internationally, became the first partner to achieve full MUOS on October 24, 2024, enabling joint operations with shared access to the constellation's global coverage. Such integrations preserve while prioritizing secure, high-capacity links for forces.

Enhanced Support in Polar Regions

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) provides significantly improved ultra-high frequency (UHF) communications coverage in polar regions compared to the legacy UHF Follow-On (UFO) constellation, enabling reliable voice, data, and tactical messaging for U.S. naval forces operating at high latitudes. Originally designed to meet a minimum coverage requirement of 65 degrees latitude north and south, MUOS exceeded these specifications through its advanced wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) waveform, higher-gain antennas, and increased effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP), which allow signals to propagate to greater distances with sufficient elevation angles for terminal connectivity. In 2013 and 2014, and U.S. tests demonstrated MUOS's polar reach, with voice and data signals successfully connecting terminals at latitudes up to approximately 89.5 degrees north—merely 30 miles and 0.5 degrees short of the —far surpassing practical UFO coverage, which often degraded beyond 70-75 degrees due to lower power and narrower beam widths. These demonstrations marked the first reliable communications in the for mobile users, including submarines, surface ships, and aircraft, supporting operations in environments previously reliant on intermittent high-frequency radio or ad hoc relays. This enhanced polar support aligns with U.S. military strategies for operations, where increasing geopolitical tensions necessitate secure, narrowband tactical links for amid challenging terrain and weather. However, full polar cap coverage remains limited by the geometry of the five-satellite MUOS constellation, prompting supplementary efforts like the 2018 ICE-Cap nanosatellite mission to relay MUOS and UFO signals into the highest latitudes. MUOS terminals, compatible with both the new and legacy UFO modes, ensure backward while delivering up to 10 times the capacity of prior systems in accessible polar zones.

Controversies and Criticisms

The MUOS ground station in Niscemi, , one of four global facilities essential for the system's communications, has faced significant opposition since construction began in 2009, primarily over alleged and risks from high-power radiofrequency emissions. Local activists, organized under the No MUOS committee, argued that the installation of five parabolic antennas, each 18.4 meters in diameter, within the Sughereta di Niscemi —a protected cork oak woodland—violated Italian environmental laws and threatened , including endemic species. Protests peaked in March 2013 with over demonstrators marching against the project, citing potential electromagnetic that could harm residents and in the surrounding area. Health concerns centered on from the antennas, with opponents linking it to increased cancer rates in Niscemi, where historical data showed elevated incidences of tumors potentially exacerbated by existing military facilities. The U.S. maintained that emissions would remain below International Commission on Protection limits, supported by environmental impact assessments indicating no significant risk to human health or the environment when operated at reduced power. Critics, including the World Wildlife Fund and local groups, challenged these findings, alleging inadequate independent verification and opacity in bilateral U.S.-Italian agreements under frameworks. Legally, the Sicilian Regional revoked construction authorization on March 29, 2013, halting work pending a health and environmental impact study, amid claims of procedural irregularities in permitting. A regional administrative court ordered suspension in 2015, citing violations of regional landscape protection laws, which temporarily idled the station and risked degrading MUOS coverage over , , and the . However, higher Italian courts progressively overturned these blocks: the ruled in favor of the project in 2014 on grounds, and by August 2016, a court lifted the impoundment, allowing activation after radiation monitoring confirmed compliance with safety thresholds. Despite operational resumption, disputes persisted into the 2020s, with ongoing lawsuits questioning the station's legal status under secret U.S.- pacts and environmental sensitivities in a seismically active zone prone to wildfires. Italian analyses highlighted legislative ambiguities in extraterritorial military basing, where national defense overrides regional vetoes, though public opposition reflected broader anti-militarization sentiments rather than substantiated causal links to harm. The U.S. activated the site at limited capacity to mitigate coverage gaps, underscoring tensions between commitments and local autonomy.

Fiscal and Technical Program Critiques

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) program has faced significant fiscal scrutiny from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which reported that the Department of Defense invested $7.4 billion through fiscal year 2021 to develop, build, and begin delivering the system, including satellites and ground infrastructure. This expenditure exceeded initial projections, with research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) funding for related components rising from $116.25 million to $267.09 million by December 2009, reflecting adjustments for escalating costs and program expansions. GAO analyses of broader Department of Defense space acquisitions, including MUOS, highlighted overruns reaching up to three times original estimates across similar programs, attributing these to optimistic baselines, disruptions, and inadequate in early planning phases. Critics, including GAO, noted that such fiscal pressures diminished anticipated savings from enhanced capacity, as delays eroded the economic benefits of transitioning from legacy UHF systems. Technical critiques center on persistent integration challenges and hardware failures that prolonged development and limited operational readiness. The program encountered waveform integration issues between MUOS satellites and ground systems, delaying final certification testing as announced by the U.S. Navy in December 2014, due to radio frequency waveform incompatibilities that required extensive software revisions. A soldering defect in MUOS-3's construction pushed its launch from an earlier schedule to January 20, 2015, exemplifying manufacturing quality control lapses that GAO linked to broader risks in complex satellite assembly. Furthermore, MUOS-5, launched on June 24, 2016, suffered an anomaly by August 3, 2016, confining it to a safe intermediate orbit rather than geostationary, which compromised its full coverage contribution and underscored vulnerabilities in propulsion and orbit-raising mechanisms. GAO evaluations criticized disjointed management across services, resulting in delayed fielding of compatible user terminals and over-reliance on legacy narrowband systems, with operational testing milestones slipping years behind schedule due to unresolved technical hurdles in wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) implementation. These issues, per GAO, stemmed from initiating development in 2004 without fully maturing key technologies, amplifying risks in a high-stakes acquisition environment.

Strategic Impact and Future Developments

Contributions to U.S. Military Superiority

The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) enhances U.S. military superiority by providing next-generation communications that deliver tenfold greater capacity over the legacy UHF constellation, enabling secure, simultaneous voice, video, and data services for mobile warfighters across global theaters. This upgrade supports up to 16 times more channels than prior systems, facilitating real-time information sharing essential for joint operations and , where rapid decisions confer asymmetric advantages against adversaries with inferior communications infrastructure. MUOS's wideband code division multiple access waveform emulates performance, offering crystal-clear voice quality and higher data rates resilient to jamming, weather disruptions, and mobility challenges, thereby sustaining connectivity in denied or contested environments where peer competitors' systems falter. Full operational capability, declared on October 21, 2019, has integrated with tactical terminals like the AN/PRC-155 radios, extending the reach of forces such as Marine Air-Ground Task Forces and enabling seamless that amplifies operational tempo and lethality. By underpinning information dominance—a doctrinal pillar of U.S. strategy—MUOS equips forces to compete, deter, and prevail in high-end conflicts, as demonstrated in demonstrations like the 2023 Joint Digital Interoperability Exercise, where it provided beyond-line-of-sight secure links outperforming legacy UHF alternatives. This capability edge, rooted in proprietary UHF payloads and ground infrastructure, maintains U.S. lead in tactical SATCOM, though vulnerabilities to advanced anti-satellite threats underscore the need for complementary resilient architectures.

Planned Extensions and Long-Term Sustainability

The U.S. Space Force has initiated the Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) Service Life Extension (SLE) program to prolong the constellation's operational lifespan into the mid-2030s by procuring two additional satellites, designated MUOS-6 and MUOS-7, for geostationary orbit deployment. This extension addresses the aging of the existing five-satellite network, originally comprising four operational units and one on-orbit spare, ensuring sustained narrowband communications capacity for mobile users. Lockheed Martin and Boeing were awarded contracts in 2024 to compete for the SLE Phase 1 design and risk reduction efforts, with Lockheed completing its Early Design Review in February 2025, incorporating advanced processing from subsidiary SEAKR Engineering. Launch timelines for the new satellites have been deferred to 2031 due to budgetary constraints, delaying from the initial fiscal 2030 target and reflecting broader challenges in Department of Defense satellite acquisition cycles, which average 10 years. The SLE focuses on maintaining four fully operational satellites post-extension, mitigating risks from potential failures in the current fleet while preserving MUOS's advantages in secure, weather-resistant voice and data services. For long-term sustainability beyond the 2030s, the is reevaluating architectures, including potential shifts to medium-Earth orbit (MEO) constellations for enhanced resilience against jamming and improved global coverage compared to geostationary systems. This strategic review, initiated in early 2024, aims to integrate commercial technologies and reduce acquisition timelines amid proliferating threats from adversaries like and , though no firm commitments have been made for post-MUOS replacements as of 2025. Such adaptations prioritize with while sustaining legacy UHF compatibility for existing terminals.

References

  1. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/muos.html
  2. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2249912/navy-satellite-system-receives-green-light-for-expanded-operational-use/
  3. https://spaceproject.govexec.com/defense/2025/02/muos-revival-satellites-6-7-horizon/402983/
  4. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/muos-sle-lockheed-martin-completes-edr
  5. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1011965.pdf
  6. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-105283.pdf
  7. https://www.doncio.navy.mil/Chips/ArticleDetails.aspx?ID=7019
  8. https://secwww.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/content/techdigest/pdf/V30-N02/30-02-Oetting.pdf
  9. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2004-09-24-U-S-Navy-Awards-Lockheed-Martin-Team-2-Billion-Contract-to-Build-Mobile-User-Objective-System
  10. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2016/navy/2016muos.pdf?ver=2019-08-22-105304-743
  11. https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/mobile-user-objective-system-muos/
  12. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1019522.pdf
  13. https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/contracting/navy-contract-mod-lockheed-supports-muos-narrowband-military-satcom
  14. https://gdmissionsystems.com/articles/2019/11/27/gd-receives-10-year-sustainment-contract-for-next-generation-satellite-communications-system
  15. https://gdmissionsystems.com/articles/2019/10/21/news-release-muos-satellite-communications-system-ready-for-full-operational-use
  16. https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/muos-1.htm
  17. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-15-492t.pdf
  18. https://spacenews.com/39833bad-soldering-pushes-3rd-muos-satellite-toward-end-of-the-launch-queue/
  19. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2015/6/1/2015june-trouble-integrating-waveform-leaves-new-muos-satellites-with-little-to-do
  20. https://spacenews.com/lockheed-exec-faults-management-pentagon-space-projects/
  21. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-136.pdf
  22. https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=38093
  23. https://www.satnow.com/community/mobile-user-objective-system-muos-overview-and-update
  24. http://www.milsatmagazine.com/cgi-bin/display_article.cgi?number=850348051
  25. https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2015/09/muos-4-at-its-172-w-check-out-location.html
  26. https://gdmissionsystems.com/satellite-ground-systems/mobile-user-objective-system
  27. https://www.navysbir.com/n21_2/N212-119.htm
  28. https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/west-22/satellite-system-adds-capabilities-menu
  29. https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2013/02/dod-builds-foundation-for-future-satcom/190193/
  30. https://secwww.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/content/techdigest/pdf/V33-N01/33-01-Gunduzhan.pdf
  31. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2010/navy/2010muos.pdf?ver=2019-08-22-112820-693
  32. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5680271
  33. http://www.milsatmagazine.com/cgi-bin/display_article.cgi?number=1753219562
  34. https://spacenews.com/lockheed-test-verifies-muos-compatibility/
  35. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2011-10-12-Lockheed-Martin-Successfully-Completes-End-to-End-System-Test-of-First-MUOS-Satellite
  36. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2017-04-24-U-S-Navys-Fifth-Lockheed-Martin-Built-MUOS-Satellite-Now-Supporting-Troops-with-Ultra-High-Frequency-Communications
  37. https://www.patrick.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/733036/45th-sw-launches-3rd-mobile-user-objective-system-satellite/
  38. https://spacenews.com/u-s-navy-launches-4th-muos-telecom-satellite/
  39. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2259924/muos-5-anomaly-identified-satellite-remains-in-safe-intermediate-orbit/
  40. https://spacenews.com/u-s-navy-narrows-muos-5-problem-to-orbit-raising-propulsion-system/
  41. https://spaceflightnow.com/2016/08/02/navy-looks-for-plan-b-to-salvage-its-newest-communications-satellite/
  42. https://www.seradata.com/stranded-muos-5-military-comsat-finally-rescues-itself-to-usable-geosynchronous-orbit/
  43. https://spaceflightnow.com/2016/11/03/navy-satellite-claws-its-way-to-usable-orbit-after-propulsion-system-problem/
  44. https://www.satellitetoday.com/government-military/2016/08/03/navy-ids-propulsion-failure-cause-muos-5-stall/
  45. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/2257403/muos-5-transfer-maneuver-temporarily-halted-satellite-reconfigured-into-safe-in/
  46. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2016-11-04-MUOS-5-Secure-Communications-Satellite-Reaches-Orbit-Begins-Pre-Operational-Testing
  47. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/919247/neighborhood-watch-helps-navy-investigate-satellite-out-of-target-orbit/
  48. https://www.militaryembedded.com/comms/satellites/navys-muos-5-satellite-begins-testing-after-experiencing-anomaly-in-initial-launch
  49. https://news.usni.org/2016/11/03/final-muos-satellite-place-italian-ground/
  50. https://aerospace.csis.org/muos-5-highlights-critical-u-s-vulnerability-space/
  51. https://news.usni.org/2017/04/24/fifth-muos-satellite-now-delivering-uhf-communications
  52. https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2016/08/engine-glitch-stalls-navys-muos-5-satellite/188715/
  53. https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/lockheed-ussfs-muos-sle/
  54. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2014/01/23/us-navy-accepts-general-dynamics-built-muos-ground-stations
  55. https://dbmcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/5C-091.pdf
  56. https://velosteam.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Line-57_1203109SF_Narrowband-Satellite-Communication.pdf
  57. https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2019/navy/2019muos.pdf?ver=2020-01-30-115519-503
  58. https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2239897/navy-satellite-communications-system-successfully-completes-key-test-and-evalua/
  59. https://news.usni.org/2019/10/17/muos-passes-final-tests-before-full-operational-capability-declaration
  60. https://www.l3harris.com/sites/default/files/2023-12/l3harris-muos-satcom-connectivity-brochure-cs-tcom.pdf
  61. https://www.ssc.spaceforce.mil/Newsroom/Article-Display/Article/3265362/cross-banding-successfully-connects-communications-between-dods-modern-muos-com
  62. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/562149/45th-sw-launches-3rd-mobile-user-objective-system-satellite/
  63. https://www.marcorsyscom.marines.mil/News/News-Article-Display/Article/1358734/tech-support-will-aid-battlefield-communication/
  64. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2014-01-31-Lockheed-Martin-MUOS-Satellite-Tests-Show-Extensive-Reach-In-Polar-Communications-Capability
  65. https://idstch.com/space/u-s-dod-deploys-global-mobile-communications-for-mountains-jungles-canyons-urban-areas-and-the-arctic/
  66. https://gdmissionsystems.com/articles/2014/07/18/new-satellite-systems-to-boost-communication-in-arctic
  67. https://spacenews.com/muos-gives-navy-first-reliable-military-satellite-connection-in-the-arctic-2/
  68. https://www.navy.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=1&ModuleId=523&Article=2248853
  69. https://militaryembedded.com/comms/satellites/nanosatellites-will-extend-communications-reach-for-military-forces
  70. http://www.milsatmagazine.com/cgi-bin/display_article.cgi?number=2146742124
  71. https://libcom.org/article/ten-thousand-demonstrate-against-muos-sicily
  72. https://ejatlas.org/print/usa-mobile-user-objective-system-muos-in-niscemi-italy
  73. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2013/10/2/idyllic-italian-town-protests-us-army-base
  74. https://spacenews.com/34099us-navy-tries-to-allay-fears-over-sicilian-muos-site/
  75. https://qz.com/662844/how-the-us-navys-most-advanced-communications-system-got-stuck-in-a-kafkaesque-circle-of-italian-justice
  76. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/science/sicily-revokes-permission-for-military-satellite-station-idUSBRE92S0G1/
  77. https://news.usni.org/2016/05/12/ongoing-italian-legal-spat-over-muos-network-puts-africa-middle-east-coverage-at-risk
  78. https://news.usni.org/2016/11/03/final-muos-satellite-place-italian-ground
  79. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaicom2259.pdf
  80. https://www.courthousenews.com/no-muos-sicilian-protesters-expose-rift-over-us-militarism/
  81. https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/c05/muos-ground-station-niscemi
  82. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-136-highlights.pdf
  83. https://spacenews.com/42888technical-issues-prompt-us-navy-to-delay-certification-of-muos/
  84. https://spacenews.com/gao-continues-to-criticize-dods-management-of-narrowband-satellite-communications/
  85. https://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/3605293/enhancing-tactical-communications-joint-digital-interoperability-showcased-by-u/
  86. https://www.doncio.navy.mil/mobile/ContentView.aspx?ID=4916&TypeID=21
  87. https://www.ssc.spaceforce.mil/Newsroom/Article-Display/Article/3602459/muos-satcom-system-completes-successful-demonstration-in-canada
  88. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2017/1/9/navy-satellites-program-navigating-obstacles
  89. https://news.lockheedmartin.com/lockheed-selected-muos-service-life-extension-phase-1
  90. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/space-force-orbits-future-narrowband-satcom/
  91. https://spacenews.com/lockheed-martin-boeing-compete-for-military-satellite-contract-amid-commercial-disruption/
  92. https://www.defensenews.com/battlefield-tech/space/2024/04/03/budget-constraints-delay-space-forces-narrowband-satellite-efforts/
  93. https://news.usni.org/2025/03/05/gao-report-on-dod-satellite-communications
  94. https://sam.gov/opp/557091be9cee4cfe9b1189e7ccddd090/view
  95. https://breakingdefense.com/2024/01/space-force-reexamining-acquisition-strategy-for-secure-narrow-band-communications/
  96. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/space/2023/03/31/space-force-seeking-more-narrowband-communication-satellites/
  97. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/space/2024/01/26/space-force-picks-boeing-lockheed-for-narrowband-satcom-program/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.