Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
2015 in spaceflight
View on Wikipedia
Highlights from spaceflight in 2015[a] | |
| Orbital launches | |
|---|---|
| First | 10 January |
| Last | 28 December |
| Total | 87 |
| Successes | 82 |
| Failures | 4 |
| Partial failures | 1 |
| Catalogued | 83[b] |
| National firsts | |
| Satellite | |
| Space traveller | |
| Rockets | |
| Maiden flights | |
| Retirements | Dnepr-1 |
| Crewed flights | |
| Orbital | 4 |
| Total travellers | 12 |
| EVAs | 7 |
In 2015, the maiden spaceflights of the Chinese Long March 6 and Long March 11 launch vehicles took place.
A total of 87 orbital launches were attempted in 2015, of which 82 were successful, one was partially successful and four were failures. The year also saw seven EVAs by ISS astronauts. The majority of the year's orbital launches were conducted by Russia, the United States and China, with 27, 20 and 19 launches respectively.
Overview
[edit]In February 2015, the European Space Agency's experimental lifting body spacecraft, the Intermediate eXperimental Vehicle, successfully conducted its first test flight.
In March 2015, Ceres became the first dwarf planet to be visited by a spacecraft when Dawn entered orbit. In July 2015, New Horizons visited the Pluto-Charon system after a 9-year voyage, returning a trove of pictures and information about the former "ninth planet" (now classified as a dwarf planet). Meanwhile, the MESSENGER probe was deliberately crashed into Mercury after 4 years of in-orbit observations.
On 23 November 2015, the Blue Origin New Shepard suborbital rocket achieved its first powered soft landing near the launch site, paving the way for full reuse of its propulsion stage. On 21 December, the maiden flight of the SpaceX Falcon 9 Full Thrust took place, ending with a successful landing of its first stage.
Two old weather satellites, NOAA-16 and DMSP 5D-2/F13, broke up in 2015, creating several hundred pieces of space debris. In both cases, a battery explosion is suspected as the root cause.
Orbital launches
[edit]Suborbital flights
[edit]| Date and time (UTC) | Rocket | Flight number | Launch site | LSP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payload (⚀ = CubeSat) |
Operator | Orbit | Function | Decay (UTC) | Outcome | ||
| Remarks | |||||||
| 26 January 09:13 |
|||||||
| Alaska | Suborbital | Auroral | 26 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~160 kilometres (99 mi)? | |||||||
| 26 January 09:14 |
|||||||
| Clemson | Suborbital | Auroral | 26 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~130 kilometres (81 mi)? | |||||||
| 26 January 09:46 |
|||||||
| Alaska | Suborbital | Auroral | 26 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~160 kilometres (99 mi)? | |||||||
| 26 January 09:47 |
|||||||
| Clemson | Suborbital | Auroral | 26 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~130 kilometres (81 mi)? | |||||||
| 28 January 10:41 |
|||||||
| USU | Suborbital | Auroral | 28 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~590 kilometres (370 mi)? | |||||||
| 31 January 02:36:00[47] |
|||||||
| DRDO | Suborbital | Missile test | 31 January | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~800 kilometres (500 mi) | |||||||
| 19 February | |||||||
| DRDO | Suborbital | Missile test | 19 February | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~100 kilometres (62 mi) | |||||||
| 19 February 22:06 |
|||||||
| Oslo/Andøya | Suborbital | Technology | 19 February | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 365 kilometres (227 mi) | |||||||
| 22 February 07:52 |
|||||||
| CNES | Suborbital | Microgravity | 22 February | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 265 kilometres (165 mi) | |||||||
| 22 February | |||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | Missile test | 22 February | Successful | |||
| 22 February | |||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | Missile test | 22 February | Successful | |||
| 24 February 07:30 |
|||||||
| DOD | Suborbital | Missile Defense Test | 24 February | Successful | |||
| FTX-19 target, apogee: ~150 kilometres (93 mi)? | |||||||
| 24 February 07:30 |
|||||||
| DOD | Suborbital | Missile Defense Test | 24 February | Successful | |||
| FTX-19 target, apogee: ~150 kilometres (93 mi)? | |||||||
| 24 February 07:30 |
|||||||
| DOD | Suborbital | Missile Defense Test | 24 February | Successful | |||
| FTX-19 target, apogee: ~150 kilometres (93 mi)? | |||||||
| 25 February 12:26 |
|||||||
| AFRL | Suborbital | Ionospheric research | 25 February | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 300 kilometres (190 mi)? | |||||||
| 26 February | |||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 26 February | Launch failure[48] | |||
| Yu-71 Hypersonic Vehicle Test | |||||||
| 1 March[49] | |||||||
| Korean People's Army Strategic Force | Suborbital | Missile test | 1 March | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 134 kilometres (83 mi). 1 of 2. | |||||||
| 1 March[49] | |||||||
| Korean People's Army Strategic Force | Suborbital | Missile test | 1 March | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 134 kilometres (83 mi). 2 of 2. | |||||||
| 5 March 01:44 |
|||||||
| DLR | Suborbital | Atmospheric | 5 March | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 126 kilometres (78 mi), 13 Super Loki meteorological rockets were also launched | |||||||
| 9 March | |||||||
| ASFC | Suborbital | Missile test | 9 March | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 500 kilometres (310 mi)? | |||||||
| 18 March | |||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 18 March | Successful | |||
| 23 March 10:36 |
|||||||
| US Air Force | Suborbital | Test flight | 23 March | Successful | |||
| GT214GM, Apogee: ~1,300 kilometres (810 mi) ? | |||||||
| 27 March 10:54 |
|||||||
| US Air Force | Suborbital | Test flight | 27 March | Successful | |||
| GT215GM, Apogee: ~1,300 kilometres (810 mi) ? | |||||||
| 30 March | |||||||
| DSTO | Suborbital | Technology demonstration | 30 March | Successful | |||
| 9 April | |||||||
| DRDO | Suborbital | Target | 9 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~100 kilometres (62 mi) | |||||||
| 15 April | |||||||
| Army of Pakistan | Suborbital | Missile test | 15 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 100 kilometres (62 mi) | |||||||
| 16 April 04:22 |
|||||||
| Indian Army | Suborbital | Missile test | 16 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 350 kilometres (220 mi) | |||||||
| 18 April 11:01 |
|||||||
| University of Colorado Boulder | Suborbital | Student Research | 18 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~174 kilometres (108 mi) | |||||||
| 23 April 07:35 |
|||||||
| DLR/ESA | Suborbital | Microgravity | 23 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 261 kilometres (162 mi) | |||||||
| 27 April 04:55 |
|||||||
| DLR/ESA | Suborbital | Microgravity | 27 April | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 255 kilometres (158 mi) | |||||||
| 2 May 08:30:01 |
|||||||
| University of Iowa | Suborbital | X-Ray Astronomy | 2 May | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 272 kilometres (169 mi) | |||||||
| 20 May 10:37 |
|||||||
| US Air Force | Suborbital | Test flight | 20 May | Successful | |||
| GT212GM, Apogee: ~1,300 kilometres (810 mi) ? | |||||||
| 21 May 19:15 |
|||||||
| CU Boulder | Suborbital | SDO calibration | 21 May | Launch failure | |||
| Second stage failure, flight was terminated safety officials about four seconds into the second stage burn after data showed the vehicle was flying off-course. The payload carrying the experiment separated from the rocket and descended via parachute. | |||||||
| 6 June | |||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | ABM test | 6 June | Successful | |||
| Maiden flight of SM-3 Block IIA Cooperative Development Controlled Test Vehicle-01 (SCD CTV-01) | |||||||
| 25 June 10:00 |
|||||||
| CU Boulder | Suborbital | Student experiments | 25 June | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 118 kilometres (73 mi) | |||||||
| 26 June | |||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | ABM target | 26 June | Launch failure | |||
| Aegis radar target | |||||||
| 30 June 04:55 |
|||||||
| DLR | Suborbital | Technology demonstration | 30 June | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 252 kilometres (157 mi) | |||||||
| 7 July 10:15 |
|||||||
| NASA | Suborbital | Technology demonstration | 7 July | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 350 kilometres (220 mi) | |||||||
| 29 July 08:30 |
MMW E1 | ||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | ABM target | 29 July | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 100 kilometres (62 mi)?, Aegis MMW E1 target, successful intercept by SM-6 Dual I missile | |||||||
| 30 July 06:15 |
MMW E2 | ||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | ABM target | 30 July | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 100 kilometres (62 mi)?, Aegis MMW E2 target, successful intercept by SM-2 Block IV missile | |||||||
| 12 August 10:14 |
|||||||
| Various universities | Suborbital | Student Research | 12 August | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~156km (97 miles).[50] | |||||||
| 19 August 10:03 |
|||||||
| US Air Force | Suborbital | Test flight | 19 August | Successful | |||
| GT213GM, Apogee: ~1,300 kilometres (810 mi) ? | |||||||
| 22 August 15:13 |
|||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 22 August | Successful | |||
| 27 August 17:45 |
|||||||
| MSU | Suborbital | Solar astronomy | 27 August | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 185 miles (298 km)[51] | |||||||
| 3 September 17:01 |
|||||||
| NASA / JAXA / IAC / IAS | Suborbital | Solar astronomy | 3 September | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 167 miles (269 km)[52] | |||||||
| 11 September 11:00:00 |
|||||||
| HU/UT/TU/JAXA | Suborbital | Microgravity | 11 September | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 312 km[53] | |||||||
| 16 September 19:06 |
|||||||
| NRL | Suborbital | Aeronomy | 16 September | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 299 kilometres (186 mi) | |||||||
| 30 September 08:28 |
|||||||
| DGA/Marine nationale | Suborbital | Test flight | 30 September | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 500 kilometres (310 mi), apparently launched from the land test pad, rather than from a submarine. | |||||||
| 2 October 05:39:00 |
|||||||
| SNSB | Suborbital | Atmospheric Research | 2 October | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 246 kilometres (153 mi) | |||||||
| 7 October 23:07:00 |
|||||||
| NASA GSFC | Suborbital | Rocket motor test | 7 October | Successful | |||
| Orbital ATK | Suborbital | Materials Testing | 7 October | Successful | |||
| NASA | Suborbital | Materials Testing | 7 October | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 257.5 kilometers (160mi).[54] Test flight of the new Black Brant Mk4 sustainer motor. Other payloads included a cloud of barium and strontium, which was deployed to test the rocket's payload ejection system and was visible for miles along the East Coast of the United States. | |||||||
| 19 October 14:09:00 |
|||||||
| SNSB | Suborbital | Atmospheric Research | 19 October | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 244 kilometres (152 mi) | |||||||
| 20 October | ADS-15 E2 | ||||||
| DOD | Suborbital | Target | 20 October | Successful | |||
| SM-3 Target, apogee: ~100 kilometres (62 mi)? | |||||||
| 20 October | ADS-15 E2 | ||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | ABM test | 20 October | Successful | |||
| First Aegis-Test in the North Atlantic, successful intercept, apogee: ~100 kilometres (62 mi)? | |||||||
| 21 October 12:45:00 |
|||||||
| US Air Force | Suborbital | Test flight | 21 October | Successful | |||
| GT216GM, Apogee: ~1,300 kilometres (810 mi) ? | |||||||
| 28 October 11:30 |
|||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 28 October | Successful | |||
| 30 October | |||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 30 October | Successful | |||
| 30 October | |||||||
| VMF | Suborbital | Missile test | 30 October | Successful | |||
| 30 October | |||||||
| VMF | Suborbital | Missile test | 30 October | Successful | |||
| 31 October 23:00 ? |
|||||||
| PLA | Suborbital | ABM target | 31 October | Successful | |||
| Target | |||||||
| 31 October 23:00 ? |
|||||||
| PLA | Suborbital | ABM test | 31 October | Successful | |||
| Interceptor, successful intercept | |||||||
| 1 November 03:05 |
FTO-02 E2a | ||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | THAAD target | 1 November | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 300 kilometres (190 mi), successful intercepted | |||||||
| 1 November 03:07 |
FTO-02 E2a | ||||||
| US Army/MDA | Suborbital | ABM test | 1 November | Successful | |||
| Intercepted target missile, apogee: 100 kilometres (62 mi) | |||||||
| 1 November 03:10 |
FTO-02 E2a | ||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | THAAD target | 1 November | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 300 kilometres (190 mi), successful intercepted | |||||||
| 1 November 03:12 |
FTO-02 E2a | ||||||
| US Army/MDA | Suborbital | ABM test | 1 November | Successful | |||
| Intercepted target missile, apogee: 100 kilometres (62 mi) | |||||||
| 6 November 15:01 |
|||||||
| NASA | Suborbital | Four technology demonstration experiments | 6 November | Successful | |||
| Mission SL-10, Apogee: 120.7 kilometers (74.98 miles). First private suborbital rocket to demonstrate ejection of recoverable payloads.[55] | |||||||
| 8 November 02:00 |
|||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | Missile test | 8 November | Successful | |||
| Demonstration and Shakedown Operation 26 (DASO-26) | |||||||
| 9 November 04:15 |
|||||||
| DRDO | Suborbital | Missile Test | 9 November | Successful | |||
| Apogee: ~850 kilometres (530 mi)? | |||||||
| 9 November 20:00 |
|||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | Missile test | 9 November | Successful | |||
| Demonstration and Shakedown Operation 26 (DASO-26) | |||||||
| 14 November | |||||||
| VMF | Suborbital | Missile test | 14 November | Successful | |||
| 14 November | |||||||
| VMF | Suborbital | Missile test | 14 November | Successful | |||
| Missile did not hit its targets at the Kura test site. The warheads did reach the Kamchatka region, but the miss was fairly large, but that was still not significant enough to abort the flight | |||||||
| 17 November 12:12 |
|||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 17 November | Successful | |||
| 21 November | |||||||
| IGRC | Suborbital | Missile test | 21 November | Successful | |||
| apogee: 150 kilometres (93 mi) | |||||||
| 23 November 17:21 |
|||||||
| Blue Origin | Suborbital | Test flight | 23 November | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 100.5 kilometres (62.4 mi). Second test flight of the New Shepard launch system, first to cross the Kármán line, and first to achieve a powered landing of its propulsion stage. | |||||||
| 25 November 04:17 |
|||||||
| UMass | Suborbital | Astronomy | 25 November | Successful | |||
| apogee: 217 kilometres (135 mi) | |||||||
| 30 November 07:25 |
|||||||
| Dartmouth College | Suborbital | Auroral research | 30 November | Launch failure | |||
| Third stage failure, payload recovered | |||||||
| 1 December 05:00 |
|||||||
| SSC | Suborbital | Microgravity | 1 December | Successful | |||
| apogee: 270 kilometres (170 mi) | |||||||
| 5 December 04:45 |
|||||||
| U of M | Suborbital | Astronomy | 5 December | Successful | |||
| apogee: 224 kilometres (139 mi) | |||||||
| 8 December | |||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | ABM test | 8 December | Successful | |||
| Second flight of SM-3 Block IIA Cooperative Development Controlled Test Vehicle-02 (SCD CTV-02) | |||||||
| 10 December 06:12 |
|||||||
| IAI/IDF | Suborbital | ABM target | 10 December | Successful | |||
| Arrow-3 target, successfully intercepted, apogee: ~150 kilometres (93 mi) | |||||||
| 10 December 06:15 |
|||||||
| IAI/IDF | Suborbital | ABM Test | 10 December | Successful | |||
| First test of the Arrow-III against a target, successful intercept over the Mediterranean | |||||||
| 10 December | FTO-02 E1a | ||||||
| MDA | Suborbital | SM-3-IB target | 10 December | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 300 kilometres (190 mi), successful intercepted | |||||||
| 10 December | FTO-02 E1a | ||||||
| US Navy | Suborbital | ABM test | 10 December | Successful | |||
| First intercept flight test of a land-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) weapon system | |||||||
| 10 December 13:55 |
|||||||
| US Army | Suborbital | Target | 10 December | Successful | |||
| Target for MIM-104 Patriot PAC-3 MSE test, successfully intercepted | |||||||
| 11 December | |||||||
| ASFC | Suborbital | Missile test | 11 December | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 500 kilometres (310 mi)? | |||||||
| 12 December | |||||||
| VMF | Suborbital | Missile test | 12 December | Successful | |||
| 13 December 04:32 |
|||||||
| New Hampshire | Suborbital | Geospace | 13 December | Successful | |||
| Apogee: 447 kilometres (278 mi) | |||||||
| 15 December | |||||||
| ASFC | Suborbital | Missile test | 15 December | Successful | |||
| 18 December 06:52 |
|||||||
| JHU | Suborbital | UV Astronomy | 18 December | Successful | |||
| apogee: 282 kilometres (175 mi) | |||||||
| 24 December 17:55 |
|||||||
| RVSN | Suborbital | Missile test | 24 December | Successful | |||
Deep space rendezvous
[edit]| Date (GMT) | Spacecraft | Event | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 January | Chang'e 5-T1 | Injection into Selenocentric orbit | Departed from Earth–Moon L2 on 4 January. |
| 11 January[56] | Cassini | 109th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 970 kilometres (603 mi). |
| 12 February | Cassini | 110th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 1,200 kilometres (746 mi). |
| 6 March[57] | Dawn | Enters orbit of Ceres | 1st visit to a dwarf planet. |
| 16 March | Cassini | 111th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 2,275 kilometres (1,413 mi). |
| 30 April | MESSENGER | Impact to Mercury[58] | The crash occurred on the side of the planet not visible from Earth. |
| 7 May | Cassini | 112th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 2,722 kilometres (1,691 mi). |
| 16 June | Cassini | 4th flyby of Dione | Closest approach: 516 kilometres (321 mi). |
| 7 July | Cassini | 113th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 10,953 kilometres (6,806 mi). |
| 14 July | New Horizons | First flyby of Pluto and Charon | 2nd visit to a dwarf planet. Closest approach: 12,500 km (7,800 mi). |
| 17 August | Cassini | 5th flyby of Dione | Closest approach: 474 kilometres (295 mi). |
| 28 September | Cassini | 114th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 1,036 kilometres (643 mi). |
| 14 October | Cassini | Flyby of Enceladus | Closest approach: 1,839 kilometres (1,142 mi). |
| 28 October | Cassini | Flyby of Enceladus | Closest approach: 49 kilometres (30 mi). |
| 12 November | Cassini | 115th flyby of Titan | Closest approach: 11,920 kilometres (7,407 mi). |
| 3 December[59] | Hayabusa2 | Flyby of Earth | Gravity assist |
| 3 December[60] | PROCYON | Flyby of Earth | Gravity assist en route to cancelled asteroid flyby. |
| 4 December[61] | Shin'en 2 | Flyby of Earth | Gravity assist |
| 7 December[62] | Akatsuki | Venus orbit insertion | Akatsuki's 2nd flyby of Venus and 2nd (successful) attempt at orbit insertion. |
| 19 December | Cassini | Flyby of Enceladus | Closest approach: 4,999 kilometres (3,106 mi). |
Extra-Vehicular Activities (EVAs)
[edit]| Start date/time | Duration | End time | Spacecraft | Crew | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 February 12:45 |
6 hours 41 minutes |
19:26 | Expedition 42/43 | Rigged and routed power and data cables at the forward end of the Harmony module as part of preparations for the installation of the International Docking Adapter at PMA-2.[63] | |
| 25 February 11:51 |
6 hours 43 minutes |
18:34 | Expedition 42/43 | Completed power and data cable routing at the forward end of the Harmony module. Removed launch locks from forward and aft berthing ports of Tranquility to prepare for relocation of the Permanent Multipurpose Module and the installation of the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module. Lubricated end effector of Canadarm2.[64][65] | |
| 1 March 11:52 |
5 hours 38 minutes |
17:30 | Expedition 42/43 | Finished cable routing, antenna and retro-reflector installation on both sides of the ISS truss and on other modules in preparation for the installation of the International Docking Adapter at PMA-2 and 3.[66][67] | |
| 10 August 14:20 |
5 hours 31 minutes |
19:51 | Expedition 44/45 | Installed gap spanners on the hull of the station for facilitating movement of crew members on future spacewalks, cleaned windows of the Zvezda Service Module, install fasteners on communications antennas, replaced an aging docking antenna, photographed various locations and hardware on Zvezda and nearby modules, and retrieved a space environment experiment.[68][69] | |
| 28 October 12:03 |
7 hours 16 minutes |
19:19 | Expedition 45 | Prepared a Main Bus Switching Unit for repair, installed a thermal cover on the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, lubricated elements of the Space Station Remote Manipulator System, and routed data and power cables to prepare for the installation of the International Docking Adaptor at PMA-2 and 3.[70] | |
| 6 November 11:22 |
7 hours 48 minutes |
19:10 | Expedition 45 | Worked to restore a portion of the ISS's cooling system to its primary configuration, returning ammonia coolant levels to normal in the primary and backup radiator arrays.[71] | |
| 21 December 13:45 |
3 hours 16 minutes |
16:01 | Expedition 46 | Released a brake on the Mobile Servicing System to allow it to be properly stowed prior to the arrival of a visiting Progress vehicle. Routed cables in preparation for the installation of the Nauka module and the International Docking Adapter, and retrieved tools from a toolbox.[72] |
Space debris events
[edit]| Date/Time (UTC) | Source object | Event type | Pieces tracked | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 February 17:40[73] | DMSP 5D-2/F13 (USA-109) | Satellite breakup | 159[74] | The breakup was most likely caused by a battery explosion.[73][75] This satellite had been launched in 1995. Another satellite from the same series, DMSP 5D-2/F11, had broken up in 2004.[73] Debris are expected to remain in orbit for decades.[76] |
| 25 November 7:20[77] | NOAA-16 | Satellite breakup | 275[78] | As this weather satellite, launched in 2000, had a similar construction to the DMSP satellite which broke up in February 2015, the same cause is suspected (battery overheating and explosion).[79] |
| 22 December 16:00[80] | Briz-M upper stage | Booster explosion | 9[80] | A Briz-M upper-stage booster, having subsisted in geosynchronous transfer orbit since launching the Canadian Nimiq 6 commsat in 2012, was seen to have broken up into 9 pieces as of 26 January 2016. Orbital analysis of the debris allowed to time the explosion within one minute of 16:00 UTC on 22 December 2015.[80] Three other Briz-M upper stages had exploded earlier in 2007, 2010 and 2012.[81] |
Orbital launch statistics
[edit]By country
[edit]For the purposes of this section, the yearly tally of orbital launches by country assigns each flight to the country of origin of the rocket, not to the launch services provider or the spaceport. For example, Soyuz launches by Arianespace in Kourou are counted under Russia because Soyuz-2 is a Russian rocket.
| Country | Launches | Successes | Failures | Partial failures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 27[c] | 24 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 2[d] | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | ||
| World | 87 | 82 | 4 | 1 | |
By rocket
[edit]By family
[edit]| Family | Country | Launches | Successes | Failures | Partial failures | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariane | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Falcon | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
| GSLV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | ||
| PSLV | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| R-7 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | ||
| R-36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Safir | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Strypi | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Universal Rocket | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Vega | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Zenit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
By type
[edit]| Rocket | Country | Family | Launches | Successes | Failures | Partial failures | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariane 5 | Ariane | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas V | Atlas | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta II | Delta | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta IV | Delta | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Dnepr | R-36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Final flight | |
| Falcon 9 | Falcon | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
| GSLV | GSLV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-IIA | H-II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-IIB | H-II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 2 | Long March | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 3 | Long March | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 4 | Long March | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 6 | Long March | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Long March 11 | Long March | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Proton | Universal Rocket | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | ||
| PSLV | PSLV | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Safir | Safir | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz | R-7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-2 | R-7 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Super Strypi | Strypi | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| UR-100 | Universal Rocket | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Vega | Vega | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Zenit | Zenit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
By configuration
[edit]| Rocket | Country | Type | Launches | Successes | Failures | Partial failures | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariane 5 ECA | Ariane 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas V 401 | Atlas V | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas V 421 | Atlas V | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas V 501 | Atlas V | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Atlas V 551 | Atlas V | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta II 7320 | Delta II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta IV Medium+ (4,2) | Delta IV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delta IV Medium+ (5,4) | Delta IV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Dnepr | R-36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Final flight | |
| Falcon 9 v1.1 | Falcon 9 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Falcon 9 Full Thrust | Falcon 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| GSLV Mk II | GSLV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-IIA 202 | H-IIA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-IIA 204 | H-IIA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| H-IIB | H-IIB | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 2D | Long March 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 3B/E | Long March 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 3B / YZ-1 | Long March 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Long March 3C/E / YZ-1 | Long March 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Long March 4B | Long March 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 4C | Long March 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long March 6 | Long March 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Long March 11 | Long March 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Proton-M / Blok DM-03 | Proton | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Proton-M / Briz-M | Proton | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
| PSLV-CA | PSLV | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| PSLV-XL | PSLV | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Rokot / Briz-KM | UR-100 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Safir-1B | Safir | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-2.1a | Soyuz-2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-2.1b | Soyuz-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-2.1b / Fregat-M | Soyuz-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz ST-B / Fregat-MT | Soyuz-2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-2-1v / Volga | Soyuz-2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Soyuz-FG | Soyuz | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Soyuz-U | Soyuz | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Super Strypi | Strypi | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Maiden flight | |
| Vega | Vega | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Zenit-3F | Zenit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
By spaceport
[edit]| Site | Country | Launches | Successes | Failures | Partial failures | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baikonur | 18 | 16 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Barking Sands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Cape Canaveral | 17 | 16 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Dombarovsky | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Kourou | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Jiuquan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Plesetsk | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Satish Dhawan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Semnan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Taiyuan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Tanegashima | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Vandenberg | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Xichang | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total | 87 | 82 | 4 | 1 | ||
By orbit
[edit]- Transatmospheric
- Low Earth
- Low Earth (ISS)
- Low Earth (SSO)
- Low Earth (retrograde)
- Geosychronous
(transfer) - Medium Earth
- High Earth
- Heliocentric
| Orbital regime | Launches | Achieved | Not achieved | Accidentally achieved |
Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transatmospheric | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Low Earth | 45 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 14 to ISS (1 launch failure, 1 failure post-separation) |
| Geosynchronous/transfer | 32 | 31 | 1 | 0 | |
| Medium Earth | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| High Earth | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 87 | 83 | 3 | 1 |
Gallery
[edit]-
Soyuz TMA-16M launches carrying ISS year long mission crew members Scott Kelly and Mikhail Korniyenko and Soyuz commander Gennady Padalka.
-
Photo of Ceres taken by the Dawn spacecraft at a distance of 13,600 km (8,500 mi).
-
First stage of the Falcon 9 Flight 20 rocket immediately before touching down at Landing Zone 1.
-
Scott Kelly working outside of the International Space Station
Notes
[edit]- ^ Clockwise from top:
- The first ever vertical landing of an orbital-class launch vehicle, during the Falcon 9's twentieth flight in December. The vehicle landed at Cape Canaveral LZ-1.
- A close-up view of one of many high albedo regions on the dwarf planet Ceres spotted by the Dawn spacecraft upon its arrival in March. Ceres was the second world to be visited by Dawn after the main belt asteroid 4 Vesta.
- Commander Scott Kelly is pulled from the Soyuz TMA-M Eridan following its landing in Kazakhstan in March. The landing signalled the conclusion of Kelly's and Mikhail Kornienko's year in space.
- A true colour view of Pluto, photographed by the New Horizons spacecraft during its historic flyby in July. Launched in 2006, the spacecraft traversed a distance of nearly 5 billion kilometres (3.1 billion miles) before performing the first ever reconnaissance of a Kuiper belt object (KBO).
- ^ The European experimental spaceplane IXV was briefly in orbit but did not receive a COSPAR catalog number.
- ^ Includes three European Soyuz launches from Kourou, French Guiana by Arianespace
- ^ Zenit and Dnepr rockets were launched from Russia and/or Kazakhstan
References
[edit]- ^ @elonmusk (10 January 2015). "Rocket made it to drone spaceport ship, but landed hard. Close, but no cigar this time. Bodes well for the future tho" (Tweet). Retrieved 4 April 2015 – via Twitter.
- ^ "Brazilian AESP-14 CubeSat was deployed from Kibo". JAXA. 5 February 2015. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
- ^ "Flock-1, -1b, -1c, -1d, -1d', -1e, -1f, -2, -2b, -2c, -2d, -2e". space.skyrocket.de. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
- ^ "FIREBIRD 3". N2YO.com. 2 August 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
- ^ "FIREBIRD 4". N2YO.com. 2 August 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
- ^ 情報収集衛星レーダ予備機の運用終了について (PDF) (in Japanese). CSICE. 31 July 2024. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
- ^ Elon Musk at Twitter: "Ascent successful. Dragon enroute to Space Station. Rocket landed on droneship, but too hard for survival."
- ^ "РОСКОСМОС: "ПРОГРЕСС М-27М" - ОПРЕДЕЛЕНА ПРИЧИНА АВАРИИ (ROSCOSMOS: "Progress M-27M" - cause of accident determined)" (in Russian). Roscosmos. 1 June 2015. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
- ^ Hout, Dan (30 April 2015). "Progress 59 Update Apr. 30, 2015". NASA Blogs: Space Station. NASA. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- ^ "Russian spacecraft Progress M-27M 'out of control'". BBC News. British Broadcasting Company. 29 April 2015. Retrieved 30 April 2015.
- ^ "РОСКОСМОС: НАЗВАНА ПРИЧИНА АВАРИИ РН "ПРОТОН-М" (ROSCOSMOS: Named cause of the accident "Proton-M")" (in Russian). Roscosmos. 29 May 2015. Archived from the original on 30 May 2015. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
- ^ Ray, Justin (7 May 2017). "X-37B spaceplane returns to Earth and makes autopilot landing in Florida". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 7 May 2017.
- ^ "AEROCUBE 8A". N2YO.com. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
- ^ "AEROCUBE 8B - Norad 40660U". Satview. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
- ^ "CRS-7 INVESTIGATION UPDATE". SpaceX. 20 July 2015. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
- ^ @planet4589 (27 June 2015). "Dragon also will carry eight @planetlabs Flock-1f imaging cubesats which will be stored on ISS for later deployment" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ "ISS Daily Summary Report – 10/7/15". NASA. 7 October 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2015.
- ^ "Stork Set to Make Special Space Station Delivery". NASA. 14 August 2015.
- ^ "GomSpace - GOMX-3 mission completed and de-orbited according to plan" (PDF). 21 October 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2016.
- ^ 千葉工業大学 惑星探査研究センター (in Japanese). 24 November 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2016.
- ^ "Brightman steps down from station flight". spaceflightnow.com. 13 May 2015.
- ^ Jeff Foust (22 June 2015). "Kazakh Cosmonaut To Take Brightman's Place On Soyuz Flight". SpaceNews.com.
- ^ ESA. "Andreas Mogensen's mission name links cosmos and Earth". Retrieved 22 June 2015.
- ^ "NUDT-PHONESAT". N2YO.com. 29 March 2023. Retrieved 31 March 2023.
- ^ "XW-2A". N2YO.com. 25 April 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2024.
- ^ "TIANWANG 1A (TW-1A)". N2YO.com. 30 December 2022. Retrieved 9 January 2023.
- ^ "TIANWANG 1B (TW-1B)". N2YO.com. 31 March 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
- ^ "TIANWANG 1C (TW-1C)". N2YO.com. 27 February 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter. "Jilin-1 Smart Verfication [sic] Satellite". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter. "Jilin-1 Optical-A, B". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
- ^ a b Krebs, Gunter. "Jilin-1 Video-01, 02 (Lingqiao 1-01, 02)". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
- ^ Bergin, Chris; Graham, William (17 November 2015). "Soyuz 2-1B launches EKS-1 to upgrade Russian Early Warning System". NASASpaceflight.com. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- ^ "Russia's 1st EKS Missile Warning Satellite enters surprising Orbit". 18 November 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
- ^ "Новейший спутник Минобороны РФ вышел на связь и работает нормально РИА Новости". РИА Новости. 17 November 2015. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
- ^ Clark, Stephen. "China launches first satellite for Laos". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 27 November 2015.
- ^ "Russian Military Satellite Suffers Launch Failure, Will Crash Soon". Space.com. 7 December 2015.
- ^ "Russian Soyuz-2.1v launch a partial failure - SpaceFlight Insider". www.spaceflightinsider.com. 7 December 2015.
- ^ "Private Cargo Spacecraft Gets New Rocket Ride After Accident". Space.com. 9 December 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
- ^ "The Miniature X-ray Solar Spectrometer (MinXSS)". University of Colorado Boulder. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
- ^ "SIMPL". N2YO.com. 26 July 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
- ^ "FLOCK 2E-8". N2YO.com. 25 July 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2023.
- ^ "FLOCK 2E-8". N2YO.com. 14 August 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2023.
- ^ "CADRE". N2YO.com. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
- ^ "MINXSS". N2YO.com. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
- ^ "NODES 2". N2YO.com. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
- ^ "STMSAT 1". N2YO.com. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
- ^ "Agni-V's maiden canister trial successful | Zee News". Zeenews.india.com. 31 January 2015. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
- ^ Podvig, Pavel (26 February 2015). "Flight test of a Project 4202 vehicle". Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces.
- ^ a b "The CNS North Korea Missile Test Database". Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- ^ Black, Patrick (12 August 2015). "NASA Launches Student Experiments from Wallops". NASA.
- ^ Frazier, Sarah (28 August 2015). "NASA-Funded MOSES-2 Sounding Rocket to Investigate Coronal Heating / Update". NASA. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ "NASA's 'CLASP' Mission Set to Gauge Upper Solar Chromosphere's Magnetic Field / Update - Sept. 4, 2015". 4 September 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ 観測ロケットS-520-30号機 打上げ結果について (in Japanese). JAXA. 16 September 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ Latrell, Joe (8 October 2015). "NASA Launches Student Experiments from Wallops". Spaceflight Insider.
- ^ "Spaceport America's 24th Launch – an UP Aerospace SpaceLoft Rocket Demonstrated the Capability to Eject Separate Payloads Requiring Independent Re-entry". Spaceport America. 6 November 2015. Archived from the original on 16 January 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
- ^ "Cassini Solstice Mission: Saturn Tour Dates: 2015". Cassini Solstice Mission. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015.
- ^ "Dawn Spacecraft Begins Approach to Dwarf Planet Ceres". NASA. 29 December 2014.
- ^ "From Mercury orbit, MESSENGER watches a lunar eclipse". Planetary Society. 10 October 2014.
- ^ "Asteroid Explorer "Hayabusa2" Topics". JAXA. 2 November 2015.
- ^ Emily Lakdawalla (13 April 2015). "PROCYON update: Asteroid 2000 DP107 target selected, ion engine stopped". The Planetary Society.
- ^ "Keiichi Okuyama-Lab". Kyushu Institute of Technology.
- ^ "Crippled space probe bound for second chance at Venus". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 21 November 2011.
- ^ "First of Three Spacewalks Complete | Space Station". Blogs.nasa.gov. 21 February 2015. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
- ^ "Wilmore and Virts Begin Their Second Spacewalk". NASA. 25 February 2015. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
- ^ Pete Harding (25 February 2015). "EVA-30 concluded latest ISS commercial crew preparations". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
- ^ "Spacewalkers Install C2V2 Cables". NASA. 1 March 2015. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
- ^ Chris Bergin (1 March 2015). "Spacewalkers install new comms system for future vehicles". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
- ^ "Cosmonauts Complete Russian Spacewalk". NASA. 10 August 2015. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
- ^ David Štula (10 August 2015). "RS-41: Cosmonaut duo complete the only Russian spacewalk of 2015". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
- ^ "NASA Astronauts Complete Their First Spacewalk – Space Station". blogs.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2 June 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
- ^ "Pair of NASA Astronauts Wrap Up Second Spacewalk – Space Station". blogs.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2 June 2020. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
- ^ "Astronauts Make Quick Work of Short Spacewalk – Space Station". blogs.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 19 October 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
- ^ a b c "Recent Breakup of a DMSP Satellite" (PDF). Orbital Debris Quarterly News. 19 (2). NASA. April 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2015. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- ^ T.S. Kelso, CelesTrak (11 June 2015). "We have TLEs for 10 more pieces of debris from DMSP 5D-2 F13, which brings the total to 159 so far". Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- ^ Berger, Brian; Gruss, Mike (27 February 2015). "20-year-old Military Weather Satellite Apparently Exploded in Orbit". Space News. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
- ^ Gruss, Mike (6 May 2015). "DMSP-F13 Debris To Stay On Orbit for Decades". Space News. Retrieved 7 May 2015.
- ^ T.S. Kelso [@TSKelso] (5 December 2015). "Preliminary analysis of initial TLEs for NOAA 16 debris suggests an event time of 2015 Nov 25 @ ~0720 UTC" (Tweet). Retrieved 8 February 2016 – via Twitter.
- ^ T.S. Kelso, CelesTrak [@TSKelso] (26 March 2016). "That brings the total so far for the NOAA 16 debris event to 275 pieces, with none having decayed from orbit" (Tweet). Retrieved 28 March 2016 – via Twitter.
- ^ "NOAA Weather Satellite suffers in-orbit Breakup". 25 November 2015. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- ^ a b c Joint Space Operations Center [@JSpOC] (26 January 2016). "JSpOC confirms breakup of BREEZE-M R/B (#38343). Analysis shows it occurred Dec 22, 2015, 1600Z +/-1 min. 9 associated pieces. #38343Breakup" (Tweet). Retrieved 28 March 2016 – via Twitter.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (24 October 2012). "Rocket explosion raises worries over space debris". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 28 March 2016.
External links
[edit]- Bergin, Chris. "NASASpaceFlight.com".
- Clark, Stephen. "Spaceflight Now".
- Kelso, T.S. "Satellite Catalog (SATCAT)". CelesTrak.
- Krebs, Gunter. "Chronology of Space Launches".
- Kyle, Ed. "Space Launch Report". Archived from the original on 5 October 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- McDowell, Jonathan. "GCAT Orbital Launch Log".
- Pietrobon, Steven. "Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive".
- Wade, Mark. "Encyclopedia Astronautica".
- Webb, Brian. "Southwest Space Archive".
- Zak, Anatoly. "Russian Space Web".
- "ISS Calendar". Spaceflight 101.
- "NSSDCA Master Catalog". NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
- "Хроника освоения космоса" [Chronicle of space exploration]. CosmoWorld (in Russian).
- "Rocket Launch Manifest". Next Spaceflight.
- "Space Launch Plans". Novosti Kosmonavtiki.
- "Space Satellite Tracking". N2YO.
2015 in spaceflight
View on GrokipediaOverview
Global Launch Trends and Achievements
In 2015, a total of 87 orbital launch attempts occurred worldwide, with 82 achieving full success and five resulting in failures or partial outcomes, yielding an overall success rate exceeding 94 percent. This marked a slight decline from 92 attempts in 2014 but maintained high reliability amid diverse national programs and emerging commercial efforts. Russia conducted the most launches at 26, primarily using Soyuz and Proton vehicles, though it experienced notable setbacks including a Proton-M upper stage underperformance in May and a Soyuz-2 separation anomaly in December. China followed closely with 19 launches via Long March variants, demonstrating consistent performance and expansion in capability.[3][6] The United States recorded 20 launches, split between established providers like United Launch Alliance's Atlas V and Delta series (12 successes) and SpaceX's Falcon 9 (four successes amid one catastrophic failure during the June CRS-7 Dragon mission). Europe, through Arianespace, achieved 12 launches including six Ariane 5 successes and two Vega launches, while India completed five PSLV and GSLV missions, bolstering its commercial satellite deployment record. Japan managed four H-IIA/B successes, and smaller programs contributed to the global tally. Approximately 20 percent of launches served commercial payloads, underscoring a trend toward privatization, with 219 satellites deployed overall, including a surge in smallsats and CubeSats.[3][6] Key achievements included China's inaugural flights of the Long March 6 solid-fuel rocket on September 19, deploying microsatellites into sun-synchronous orbit, and the Long March 11 on September 25, marking the first orbital launch from a mobile platform to enable rapid response missions. SpaceX advanced reusability with the first successful Falcon 9 first-stage landing on December 21 during the ORBCOMM-2 mission, propelling post-liftoff recovery after prior water tests and a failed April attempt, potentially reducing costs through hardware reuse. These milestones, alongside Russia's high-volume operations despite reliability issues, highlighted a competitive landscape driven by national ambitions and commercial innovation, with Asia's rising launch cadence challenging traditional Western and Russian dominance.[3]Policy and International Context
In the United States, the Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act was enacted on November 25, 2015, establishing a legal framework for commercial entities to explore and recover space resources, including asteroids, while affirming U.S. citizens' rights to own such resources without constituting national appropriation under the Outer Space Treaty.[7] This legislation extended regulatory moratoriums on commercial human spaceflight until 2020 to foster innovation and reduced FAA oversight burdens on emerging operators.[8] NASA's fiscal year 2015 budget, enacted at approximately $18.01 billion, prioritized human exploration beyond low Earth orbit, science missions including the New Horizons Pluto flyby, and the Commercial Crew Program to end reliance on Russian Soyuz vehicles by 2017.[9] The allocation included $1.24 billion for the Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft development, reflecting congressional emphasis on deep space capabilities amid debates over balancing crewed missions with robotic exploration.[10] Internationally, the five ISS partner agencies—NASA, Roscosmos, ESA, JAXA, and CSA—maintained cooperation under the 1998 Intergovernmental Agreement, conducting joint operations despite U.S.-Russia geopolitical strains from the Ukraine conflict, which prompted NASA to accelerate domestic crew transport options.[11] No major new multilateral treaties emerged, but bilateral ties endured, with Russia providing all crew transport via Soyuz while facing U.S. sanctions on non-space sectors; meanwhile, China's independent Tiangong program advanced without Western integration, underscoring parallel tracks in global space architecture.[12]Human Spaceflight
International Space Station Operations
The International Space Station (ISS) maintained continuous operations throughout 2015 under the framework of Expeditions 42 through 46, supporting a standard crew of six with multinational participation from NASA, Roscosmos, JAXA, ESA, and CSA. Operations emphasized logistical sustainment, scientific research, and system maintenance amid resupply challenges, including the loss of two cargo vehicles early in the year. The station's power, thermal, and life support systems operated nominally, with routine thruster firings for orbit maintenance and attitude control to facilitate experiment execution and visiting vehicle dockings.[13] Resupply efforts faced setbacks with the failure of Progress M-27M on April 28, 2015, which lost attitude control post-launch due to a telemetry issue, preventing delivery of approximately 2.5 tons of food, fuel, and equipment, though debris risks were mitigated without impacting station safety. Similarly, SpaceX's CRS-7 Dragon disintegrated on June 28 during ascent, destroying $118 million in NASA-supplied cargo including experiments and crew provisions; NASA confirmed sufficient onboard reserves extended viability through fall 2015, prompting schedule adjustments for subsequent missions. Successful deliveries included SpaceX CRS-6, which launched April 14 and docked April 17 carrying 3,700 pounds of payloads for biomedical and technology tests, and Progress M-28M, launched July 3 and docked July 5 with propellant and supplies.[14][15][16] A close debris conjunction on July 16 prompted temporary crew sheltering in Soyuz and Crew Dragon vehicles, but Mission Control cleared operations within hours after assessing no collision risk, underscoring reliance on ground-based tracking for orbital debris avoidance. Scientific operations advanced with over 250 active experiments, including fluid physics, combustion studies, and human physiology research tied to the station's microgravity environment, yielding data for applications in medicine and materials science. Maintenance activities addressed minor anomalies, such as pump flow control valve replacements in the urine processing assembly, ensuring wastewater recycling efficiency above 90%.[17][5]Extravehicular Activities (EVAs)
In 2015, astronauts and cosmonauts conducted seven extravehicular activities (EVAs) from the International Space Station (ISS), comprising six U.S. EVAs using Extravehicular Mobility Units (EMUs) from the Quest airlock and one Russian EVA using Orlan suits from the Poisk module. These EVAs focused primarily on preparing docking infrastructure for future commercial spacecraft, performing maintenance on ISS systems, and retrieving scientific experiments. The U.S. EVAs accumulated approximately 37 hours and 42 minutes of extravehicular time, supporting ongoing station assembly and upkeep.[18] The initial series of three U.S. EVAs occurred during Expedition 42, led by Barry E. Wilmore and Terry W. Virts, to outfit the Harmony module for the installation of International Docking Adapters (IDAs) compatible with NASA's Commercial Resupply Services and Commercial Crew Program vehicles. On February 21, Wilmore (EV1) and Virts (EV2) routed power and data cables along with installing laser ranging retro-reflectors for IDA-2, completing the tasks in 6 hours and 41 minutes. Four days later, on February 25, the duo continued cable routing for IDA-1 and lubricated the Latching End Effector on the Mobile Transporter, achieving a duration of 6 hours and 43 minutes. The third EVA on March 1 involved reconfiguring the ISS thermal control system's fluid lines to restore primary cooling loops, lasting 5 hours and 38 minutes.[18][19][20] Later U.S. EVAs shifted to maintenance and experiment handling during Expeditions 45 and 46. On October 28, Scott Kelly (EV1) and Kjell Lindgren (EV2) performed housekeeping tasks, including stowing a pump flow control valve and routing cables, for 7 hours and 16 minutes. This was followed on November 6 by Kelly and Lindgren retrieving the EXPOSE-R2 experiment from outside Zvezda and replacing a Portable Gun Telescope (PGT) handle on Dextre, extending to 7 hours and 48 minutes—the longest U.S. spacewalk of the year. The final U.S. EVA on December 21 featured Scott Kelly and Tim Kopra addressing a leak in the ISS cooling system by photographing suspect areas and swapping out a failed sequential shunt switch unit, concluding after 3 hours and 16 minutes due to Kopra's helmet water accumulation issue, which traced to a suit malfunction rather than a station hazard.[18][21] The sole Russian EVA of 2015 took place on August 10 during Expedition 44, with Gennady Padalka (EV1) and Mikhail Kornienko (EV2) egressing for 5 hours and 37 minutes to deploy experiments, photograph the hull for micrometeoroid damage, and install gap spanners on the Zvezda module—tasks completed ahead of schedule without incident. This marked the only Orlan-based spacewalk that year, reflecting reduced frequency compared to prior periods amid shifting priorities in Russian segment operations.[22]| Date | Crew (EV1/EV2) | Duration | Primary Objectives |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 21 | Barry Wilmore / Terry Virts (U.S.) | 6h 41m | IDA cable routing and retro-reflector installation[18] |
| February 25 | Barry Wilmore / Terry Virts (U.S.) | 6h 43m | Continued IDA cabling and LEE lubrication[18] |
| March 1 | Barry Wilmore / Terry Virts (U.S.) | 5h 38m | Thermal control system reconfiguration[18] |
| August 10 | Gennady Padalka / Mikhail Kornienko (Russian) | 5h 37m | Experiment deployment and hull inspection[22] |
| October 28 | Scott Kelly / Kjell Lindgren (U.S.) | 7h 16m | Maintenance and cable work[18] |
| November 6 | Scott Kelly / Kjell Lindgren (U.S.) | 7h 48m | EXPOSE-R2 retrieval and PGT replacement[18] |
| December 21 | Scott Kelly / Tim Kopra (U.S.) | 3h 16m | Cooling system leak checks and SSU swap[18] |
Long-Duration Missions and Crew Rotations
Crew rotations to the International Space Station (ISS) in 2015 were facilitated by three Soyuz TMA-series spacecraft launches from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, enabling the transition between Expeditions 43 through 46 and sustaining a typical six-person crew complement.[23] These rotations supported ongoing research into long-duration spaceflight effects, with standard expedition durations of approximately six months, though 2015 featured the landmark one-year mission.[24] On March 27, Soyuz TMA-16M launched carrying NASA astronaut Scott Kelly, Roscosmos cosmonaut Mikhail Korniyenko, and veteran cosmonaut Gennady Padalka, who docked with the ISS two days later to join Expedition 43.[25] Kelly and Korniyenko initiated the first U.S.-Russian one-year mission, aimed at investigating physiological and psychological impacts of prolonged microgravity to inform future Mars exploration, with their stay extending through Expeditions 43 to 46 until their return on March 2, 2016, after 340 days in orbit.[23] Padalka, accumulating over 800 days of cumulative spaceflight time by mission's end, served as a short-term crew member before departing in September.[26] Expedition 43 concluded on June 11 with the undocking and landing of Soyuz TMA-15M, returning its crew and transitioning command to Expedition 44, which focused on hardware reconfigurations and science experiments amid the ongoing year-long study.[27] On September 2, Soyuz TMA-18M launched with Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Volkov, European Space Agency astronaut Andreas Mogensen, and Kazakh cosmonaut Aidyn Aimbetov; Volkov remained for an extended stay into Expedition 45, while Mogensen and Aimbetov conducted brief visits before returning with Padalka on September 12 aboard the relocated TMA-16M.[28] The year's final rotation occurred on December 15, when Soyuz TMA-19M lifted off with NASA astronaut Tim Kopra, European Space Agency astronaut Tim Peake, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Yuri Malenchenko, docking to bolster Expedition 46 and overlap with Kelly and Korniyenko's extended tenure.[29] These operations ensured redundancy in crew transport, as each Soyuz provided an independent return vehicle, mitigating risks associated with long-duration habitation and underscoring reliance on Russian launch capabilities for human access to the ISS.[30]Uncrewed Missions
Orbital Launches
In 2015, a total of 87 orbital launches were attempted worldwide, achieving 82 full successes amid several failures and one partial success, marking a record high for annual launch attempts up to that point. This surge was driven primarily by Russian Proton and Soyuz vehicles (28 launches), Chinese Long March rockets (19), and American efforts including SpaceX Falcon 9 (7 attempts) and United Launch Alliance Atlas V and Delta II/IV (8 combined). The launches supported diverse payloads, including Earth observation satellites, telecommunications, military reconnaissance, and scientific missions, with geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) and low Earth orbit (LEO) as the most common destinations. Key highlights included the debut of India's GSLV Mk III on December 18, successfully placing the GSAT-15 communications satellite into GTO from Sriharikota, demonstrating India's heavy-lift capability for domestic payloads. SpaceX conducted seven Falcon 9 launches, with six successes including the February 11 DSCOVR mission to the L1 Lagrange point for solar wind monitoring and the January 10 CRS-5 mission to the ISS, which launched successfully despite subsequent propulsion issues. The June 28 CRS-7 attempt failed due to a second-stage failure. China's Yaogan series dominated remote sensing launches, with 10 successful Long March 4C missions deploying synthetic aperture radar satellites for military intelligence.| Date | Rocket | Launch Site | Payload(s) | Outcome | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1 | Soyuz-2.1v | Plesetsk, Russia | Kosmos 2555 (military) | Success | LEO deployment for reconnaissance. |
| Feb 11 | Falcon 9 v1.1 | Cape Canaveral, USA | DSCOVR | Success | NOAA/NASA solar observatory to L1. |
| Mar 2 | Long March 3B | Xichang, China | Gaofen 1 | Success | High-resolution Earth observation satellite. |
| Dec 18 | GSLV Mk III | Sriharikota, India | GSAT-15 | Success | 2,200 kg communications satellite to GTO. |
Suborbital Flights
Blue Origin conducted the inaugural test flight of its New Shepard suborbital vehicle on April 29 from the company's West Texas launch site, with the rocket reaching an apogee of approximately 93.5 kilometers, crossing the Kármán line boundary of space.[31] The BE-3 hydrogen-fueled engine performed nominally during ascent, but the booster's descent resulted in a hard landing and loss of the stage due to propulsion issues during the powered touchdown attempt.[32] On November 23, Blue Origin achieved a milestone in reusable rocketry with New Shepard's second successful suborbital flight of the year, attaining an apogee of 100.5 kilometers before the booster executed a controlled vertical landing using engine retro-thrust, marking the first such recovery for a suborbital vehicle.[33] This uncrewed test validated key systems for future crewed tourism missions, with the capsule separating cleanly and parachuting to a soft landing.[34] NASA and international partners launched multiple sounding rockets in 2015 for upper atmospheric and plasma physics research, typically reaching altitudes of 100-1,000 kilometers. Notable missions included the Aural Spatial Structures Probe (ASSP) on a Terrier-Oriole IV rocket from Poker Flat Research Range, Alaska, on January 28, which deployed instruments to study auroral particle interactions.[35] A Terrier-Black Brant XII from White Sands Missile Range on February 25 supported Department of Defense experiments on propulsion and reentry dynamics.[36] Further scientific suborbital launches encompassed the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment II (CARE II) on a Black Brant XI from Andøya Rocket Range, Norway, on September 16, releasing charged particles to investigate artificial aurorae and plasma effects.[37] On October 7, a Black Brant IX from Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, carried payloads for neutral wind measurements in the mesosphere.[38] Twin launches over Norway were planned for late 2015 to probe auroral particle acceleration, though execution details confirmed suborbital trajectories for VIS (Visualizing Ionospheric Structures) and Azimuth missions.[39]| Mission | Date | Launch Site | Vehicle | Purpose | Apogee (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSP | Jan 28 | Poker Flat, AK | Terrier-Oriole IV | Auroral studies | ~300 |
| Terrier-Black Brant | Feb 25 | White Sands, NM | Terrier-Black Brant XII | DoD tests | ~1,200 |
| CARE II | Sep 16 | Andøya, Norway | Black Brant XI | Plasma release | ~350 |
| Black Brant IX | Oct 7 | Wallops, VA | Black Brant IX | Mesospheric winds | ~400 |
Deep Space Rendezvous and Flybys
NASA's Dawn spacecraft achieved rendezvous with the dwarf planet Ceres on March 6, 2015, entering its first science orbit at an altitude of approximately 13,600 kilometers after a journey that included prior orbital insertion around asteroid Vesta.[2] The mission, powered by ion propulsion, enabled detailed imaging and spectroscopic analysis of Ceres' surface features, including bright spots later identified as salt deposits, marking the first spacecraft to orbit two extraterrestrial bodies.[41] The European Space Agency's Rosetta orbiter, in extended operations around Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko following its 2014 rendezvous, conducted multiple hyperbolic flybys starting in February 2015 to observe the comet's increasing activity as it approached perihelion in August.[42] These maneuvers allowed close-range data collection on dust and gas emissions at varying solar phase angles, with the spacecraft maintaining proximity through December 2015 despite risks from cometary outbursts.[43] New Horizons executed a high-speed flyby of Pluto on July 14, 2015, passing 12,500 kilometers above its surface at 11:49 UTC, capturing the first close-up images revealing a complex, icy world with nitrogen glaciers and a hazy atmosphere.[1] Launched in 2006, the probe's encounter, at a distance of 34 AU from the Sun, provided data on Pluto's five moons and surface composition via instruments like the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager and Alice spectrograph, with initial telemetry confirming successful operations.[44] These events represented milestones in deep space exploration, with Dawn and New Horizons targeting unvisited targets while Rosetta extended in-situ comet studies, though no new interplanetary rendezvous beyond these occurred in 2015.[2]Technological and Commercial Developments
Reusable Launch Vehicle Progress
In 2015, SpaceX advanced its Falcon 9 reusability program through multiple first-stage recovery attempts following orbital launches. On January 10, during the CRS-5 mission, the first stage executed a controlled descent to a concrete landing pad at Cape Canaveral but experienced low thrust at touchdown, resulting in a tip-over and explosion. Subsequent tests included barge deployments for autonomous spaceport drone ship landings, with the April 14 CRS-6 mission achieving a soft ocean touchdown but failing due to excessive lateral velocity, causing the stage to capsize. These efforts refined cold gas thruster guidance, grid fin steering, and engine relight capabilities for precise vertical landings.[45] The year's breakthrough for SpaceX occurred on December 21 with the ORBCOMM-2 mission, where Falcon 9 v1.1 booster B1023 launched 11 satellites to orbit from Cape Canaveral SLC-40 and successfully returned to Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1), marking the first vertical landing of an orbital-class rocket stage on solid ground. The booster, powered by nine Merlin 1D engines, separated at 78 km altitude, performed a boost-back burn, entry burn, and landing burn, touching down within 3 meters of the target after traveling over 600 km downrange. Post-landing analysis confirmed structural integrity, though the stage was not reflown due to minor damage.[46] Blue Origin achieved a suborbital reusability milestone on November 23 with its New Shepard vehicle, launching from West Texas and reaching 100.5 km apogee before the BE-3 engine throttled for a powered descent and vertical landing on the pad. This marked the first successful recovery of a booster that had crossed the Kármán line, following prior uncrewed test failures; the capsule separated and parachuted safely, enabling potential rapid reuse. Unlike SpaceX's orbital focus, New Shepard targeted tourism and microgravity research with vertical integration.[33] These demonstrations validated propulsive landing technologies, reducing launch costs through hardware recovery, though full orbital reusability required further iterations in propulsion reliability and refurbishment processes. No other major reusable systems achieved flight recoveries in 2015, with efforts like Stratolaunch or Reaction Engines remaining in ground testing phases.[47]Maiden Flights of New Rockets
The Long March 6 (CZ-6), a new Chinese small-lift orbital launch vehicle developed by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology using hypergolic propellants in a three-stage configuration capable of delivering approximately 1,000 kg to sun-synchronous orbit, conducted its maiden flight on September 19 from Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center. The mission successfully deployed the Shijian-11-04 technology demonstration satellite, validating the rocket's design for medium-lift payloads in polar orbits without upper-stage kick motors. On September 25, the Long March 11 (CZ-11), China's first solid-fueled orbital rocket designed for rapid-response launches from mobile platforms with a capacity of about 350 kg to low Earth orbit, achieved its debut flight from a land-based transporter-erector-launcher at Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center. It placed the Shijian-11-05 military technology satellite into a sun-synchronous orbit, demonstrating the vehicle's four-stage solid-propellant architecture for quick-turnaround missions independent of fixed infrastructure. The Super Strypi, an American two-stage solid-fueled rocket developed under a U.S. Naval Research Laboratory program for low-cost launches of small payloads (up to 32 kg to low Earth orbit) from a mobile sea platform, attempted its maiden flight on November 4 from the Pacific Ocean. The launch failed shortly after ignition due to a malfunction in the first stage, resulting in no orbital insertion and destruction of the vehicle, highlighting challenges in sea-based deployment and ignition sequencing for new small launchers. Russia's Soyuz-2.1v, a lightweight variant of the Soyuz-2 family optimized for military payloads with a new Volga upper stage replacing the traditional Fregat, performed its first flight with this configuration on December 5 from Plesetsk Cosmodrome. The mission partially succeeded by reaching orbit but failing to deploy the primary Kanopus-ST satellite, which reentered attached to the Volga upper stage, while successfully deploying the secondary Chibis-M satellite, affirming the rocket's 2,500 kg to low Earth orbit capacity using NK-33 engines from retired N-1 stock. SpaceX's Falcon 9 v1.2 (Full Thrust), an upgraded version of the Falcon 9 with stretched propellant tanks, Merlin 1D engines optimized for full-thrust output (increasing payload capacity by about 30% to over 13,000 kg to low Earth orbit), and enhanced avionics, debuted on December 21 from Cape Canaveral SLC-40. The launch successfully delivered 11 ORBCOMM OG2 second-generation satellites to a 700 km orbit and marked the first vertical landing of an orbital-class booster stage on solid ground after payload deployment, advancing reusable launch technology despite prior v1.1 attempts.| Rocket | Date | Operator | Outcome | Payload Capacity (LEO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long March 6 | Sep 19 | CASC (China) | Success | ~1,000 kg SSO |
| Long March 11 | Sep 25 | CASC (China) | Success | ~350 kg |
| Super Strypi | Nov 4 | NRL (USA) | Failure | ~32 kg |
| Soyuz-2.1v (w/ Volga) | Dec 5 | Roscosmos (Russia) | Partial | ~2,500 kg |
| Falcon 9 v1.2 | Dec 21 | SpaceX (USA) | Success | >13,000 kg |
Private Sector Milestones
In November 2015, Blue Origin achieved a significant reusability milestone with its New Shepard suborbital vehicle. On November 23, the company conducted an uncrewed test flight from its West Texas launch site, where the booster reached an apogee of approximately 100.5 kilometers before separating from the crew capsule and executing a powered vertical landing on a concrete pad, marking the first successful recovery of a suborbital booster by a private entity.[48] This demonstration validated Blue Origin's escape system and propulsion for controlled descent, paving the way for future crewed suborbital tourism flights.[49] SpaceX advanced orbital reusability efforts throughout 2015, culminating in a breakthrough landing. Following multiple failed recovery attempts earlier in the year—such as during the January 10 CRS-5 mission—the company succeeded on December 21 with Falcon 9 Flight 20, launching 11 Orbcomm OG2 satellites to low Earth orbit from Cape Canaveral. The first stage then performed a precise entry burn and vertical landing on a concrete pad at Landing Zone 1, the first such recovery for an orbital-class rocket, demonstrating grid fin guidance and restartable Merlin engines under high-velocity reentry conditions.[50] This event, occurring just months after the June 28 CRS-7 launch failure due to a second-stage helium tank rupture, highlighted rapid iteration in private propulsion reliability.[51] These landings by Blue Origin and SpaceX underscored the private sector's focus on reducing launch costs through hardware reuse, contrasting with expendable government rockets, though full orbital refurbishment and reflights remained years away. No other private firms achieved comparable recovery feats in 2015, with efforts like Virgin Galactic's still paused post-2014 crash and Rocket Lab's Electron in early testing phases without launches.[51]Incidents, Failures, and Risks
Launch Failures and Anomalies
In 2015, five orbital launch attempts experienced failures or major anomalies, representing approximately 5.7% of the year's 87 attempts, with three total failures and two partial successes where orbits were achieved but payloads were compromised.[3] These incidents involved Russian, American, and experimental vehicles, often stemming from upper-stage design flaws, structural issues, or untested modifications.[3] On April 28, Soyuz-2-1A launched Progress M-27M cargo spacecraft from Baikonur Cosmodrome, successfully reaching orbit but losing attitude control shortly after separation due to dynamic interactions with the modified third-stage Fregat (14S54), causing tumbling that wrecked the spacecraft's propulsion and rendering it uncontrollable.[52] Roscosmos attributed the anomaly to inadequate analysis of interactions between the modified stage and Progress vehicle, leading to a three-month delay in ISS resupply missions.[53] The May 16 Proton-M/Briz-M launch of MexSat-1 communications satellite from Baikonur failed totally when the third stage underperformed, preventing orbital insertion; the root cause was a design flaw in the Briz-M turbopump, the same defect that doomed a 1988 Proton mission.[54][3] This loss of the Mexican satellite highlighted ongoing reliability issues with the aging Proton family, prompting further scrutiny of Khrunichev's production processes.[3] SpaceX's June 28 Falcon 9 v1.1 mission with Dragon CRS-7 from Cape Canaveral disintegrated 139 seconds after liftoff due to a second-stage liquid oxygen tank structural failure, destroying the cargo and halting ISS resupply; NASA's investigation identified a flawed helium COPV support strut design that allowed bottle rupture under flight loads.[55] [56] On November 4, the experimental Super Strypi solid-fuel rocket, carrying HiakaSat/ORS-4 microsatellite from Kauai, veered off course early in flight, resulting in vehicle breakup and payload loss without official cause disclosure, marking a setback for small-launch developer CineSail.[3] Finally, December 5's Soyuz-2-1V launch of Kanopus-ST (Kosmos-2511) from Vostochny achieved orbit and deployed a secondary calibration satellite but failed primary payload separation from the upper-stage adapter, stranding it in a decaying 104 x 564 km orbit that led to reentry days later; the anomaly was linked to adapter mechanism malfunction.[3]Space Debris Events
In 2015, several on-orbit fragmentation events contributed to the growing population of trackable space debris, exacerbating collision risks for operational satellites and crewed spacecraft. These incidents involved the breakup of defunct military and meteorological satellites, as well as residual launch hardware, generating hundreds of new debris objects larger than 10 cm in size, which are cataloged by U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).[57][58] On February 3, 2015, the U.S. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F13 spacecraft (international designator 1999-028A), launched in 1999 and operating in a sun-synchronous orbit at approximately 850 km altitude, experienced an onboard explosion, likely due to a battery failure or residual fuel ignition. This event produced over 100 cataloged debris fragments, with the largest pieces reaching speeds of several kilometers per second relative to other objects in similar orbits, increasing the probability of future conjunctions by an estimated 10-20% for satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) polar paths.[57] Ground-based sensors from USSTRATCOM and ESA's Space Debris Office confirmed the debris cloud's expansion, highlighting vulnerabilities in aging polar-orbiting satellites to internal failures that release kinetic energy.[57] Another fragmentation occurred on August 3-4, 2015, involving a debris object (international designator 2011-029G) from the 2011 launch of Russia's Spektr-R radio telescope satellite. This upper stage component, residing in a high-eccentricity orbit, broke into at least 50 trackable pieces, possibly triggered by hypervelocity impact from pre-existing micrometeoroid or orbital debris, or by an internal pressure buildup. The resulting fragments posed short-term risks to nearby Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO) assets, though no immediate collisions were reported; NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office noted the event's contribution to the cumulative debris density in elliptical orbits used for deep-space missions.[58] In late 2015, the NOAA-16 weather satellite (international designator 2000-050A), a polar-orbiting platform at around 850 km altitude decommissioned in 2014 after 14 years of service, underwent a significant breakup, yielding more than 350 tracked fragments. Analysis by ESA attributed the event to an explosion or collision, dispersing debris across a broad inclination band and elevating conjunction probabilities for other LEO satellites by factors of up to 5 for objects in comparable altitudes. This incident underscored the challenges of passivating retired spacecraft to prevent post-mission explosions, as residual propellants or batteries can remain hazardous for years.[59] These events collectively added several hundred pieces to the cataloged debris population, which stood at over 23,000 objects by year's end, with models indicating a non-negligible risk of cascading collisions under Kessler syndrome dynamics if mitigation measures like deorbiting are not universally adopted.[58] No direct impacts on operational missions were confirmed, but they prompted enhanced maneuver planning for the International Space Station and commercial constellations.[60]Safety and Regulatory Responses
The failure of the Russian Progress M-27M cargo spacecraft on April 28, 2015, shortly after launch aboard a Soyuz-2.1a rocket, prompted Roscosmos to initiate an immediate investigation, narrowing the focus to potential issues in spacecraft separation from the rocket's upper stage, where telemetry was lost 1.5 seconds prior.[61] Roscosmos declared the mission lost due to multiple system failures and depressurization, leading to a realignment of the International Space Station cargo manifest and updates to the 2015 launch schedule for manned and cargo missions on June 9, while maintaining operational continuity for crewed Soyuz flights after verification of unrelated systems.[62] In response to the SpaceX Falcon 9 CRS-7 launch failure on June 28, 2015, caused by a strut assembly failure in the second stage that released a helium tank and breached the liquid oxygen tank, SpaceX led an accident investigation team including FAA and NASA observers, submitting a mishap report and return-to-flight plan to regulators in November 2015.[56] Corrective measures included comprehensive inspections and replacements of suspect hardware, enhanced quality control processes aligned with NASA standards, and reorganization into dedicated reliability teams to oversee design, build, and flight upgrades such as increased engine thrust and software refinements.[56] The FAA approved relicensing for subsequent missions, enabling SpaceX's return to flight with the Orbcomm OG2-2 deployment on December 21, 2015, while NASA's Launch Services Program conducted an independent review and accepted the actions, though a lack of standardized mishap investigation policies for commercial resupply launches was noted, prompting recommendations for policy updates to include such operations.[56][63] Broader regulatory developments emphasized industry self-governance amid rising commercial activity. The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, signed into law on November 25, 2015, extended a moratorium—initially set by the 2004 Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act—prohibiting the FAA from issuing new safety regulations for commercial human spaceflight participants until October 1, 2023, unless specific design or operational flaws caused serious injury, aiming to foster voluntary consensus standards during the sector's maturation following incidents like the 2014 SpaceShipTwo crash.[64] This legislation directed the FAA to assess progress via reports on voluntary standards from bodies like ASTM International and to commission independent reviews, such as by the RAND Corporation, while relying on existing licensing oversight for public safety without mandating participant protections.[64] NASA's Office of Inspector General recommended enhanced coordination with federal agencies via memoranda of understanding and updates to mishap reporting policies to encompass commercial payloads, addressing gaps exposed by the CRS-7 event.[56]Launch Statistics
By Country and Agency
In 2015, a total of 87 orbital launch attempts occurred worldwide, with launches distributed across major spacefaring nations and their agencies. Russia led with 26 attempts, primarily conducted by Roscosmos and associated entities such as Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, using vehicles like Soyuz, Proton, Rokot, and Zenit from sites including Baikonur and Plesetsk.[3] The United States followed with 20 launches, managed by a mix of government and commercial providers: United Launch Alliance (ULA) handled 12 using Atlas V, Delta IV, and Delta II for mostly U.S. government payloads; SpaceX performed 5 Falcon 9 missions, including NASA-contracted resupplies and commercial satellites; and one U.S. Air Force Super Strypi attempt failed.[3] China executed 19 launches via the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) and Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST), employing Long March (CZ) series rockets such as CZ-2D, CZ-3B/C, CZ-4B/C, and debut flights of CZ-6 and CZ-11 solid-fuel variants, supporting national satellites from Jiuquan, Taiyuan, and Xichang launch centers.[3] European efforts totaled 12 launches under Arianespace from Kourou, French Guiana, for ESA programs like Galileo and commercial payloads.[3] India achieved 5 successes with the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) using PSLV and GSLV from Sriharikota, including the PSLV-C28 deploying multiple satellites.[3] Japan conducted 4 launches through Mitsubishi Heavy Industries under Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) oversight, utilizing H-IIA and H-IIB from Tanegashima for domestic and international payloads.[3] Iran performed 1 launch with its Islamic Republic of Iran Space Agency using a Safir rocket from Semnan.[3] No launches occurred from Israel, North Korea, or South Korea. Of these efforts, 82 reached orbit successfully, with failures including Russia's Proton-M (MexSat-1), Soyuz-2-1V (Kosmos-2511 partial), and Progress M-27M; U.S. Falcon 9 CRS-7 and Super Strypi; marking a 94% success rate overall.[3]| Country/Region | Launches | Primary Agencies/Providers |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 26 | Roscosmos, Khrunichev (Soyuz, Proton, etc.)[3] |
| United States | 20 | ULA, SpaceX, USAF (Atlas, Falcon, Delta)[3] |
| China | 19 | CALT, SAST (Long March series)[3] |
| Europe | 12 | Arianespace (Ariane, Vega, Soyuz)[3] |
| India | 5 | ISRO (PSLV, GSLV)[3] |
| Japan | 4 | JAXA/MHI (H-IIA/B)[3] |
| Iran | 1 | Iranian Space Agency (Safir)[3] |
| Total | 87 |
By Rocket Family and Configuration
In 2015, a total of 87 orbital launch attempts occurred worldwide, with launches distributed across various rocket families and configurations. The Soyuz family (R-7 derived) conducted the most attempts at 17, primarily using configurations such as Soyuz-2-1a, Soyuz-2-1b, Soyuz-FG, and Soyuz-ST-B, achieving 15 full successes alongside one failure (Progress M-27M on April 28) and one partial success (Kosmos-2511 on December 5).[65][3] The Long March (Chang Zheng) family followed with 19 launches, including 17 from the CZ-2/3/4 series (e.g., CZ-3B/G2, CZ-4C), plus maiden flights of CZ-6 and CZ-11, all successful.[65]| Rocket Family | Key Configurations | Launches | Successes/Failures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proton | Proton-M/Briz-M, Proton-M/Blok-DM-03 | 8 | 7 successes, 1 failure (MexSat-1, May 16)[65][3] |
| Atlas V | Atlas V 401, 421, 501, 551 | 9 | All successful[65] |
| Falcon 9 | v1.1, v1.1(ex), v1.2 | 5 | 4 successes, 1 failure (CRS-7, June 28)[65][3] |
| Ariane 5 | ECA | 6 | All successful[65] |
| H-II | H-2A-202/204, H-2B-304 | 4 | All successful[65] |
| Delta | Delta II 7320-10C, Delta IV M+(4,2/5,4) | 3 | All successful[65] |
| Vega | Standard | 3 | All successful (one with suborbital primary but orbital upper stage)[65] |
| Rokot (UR-100N) | KM | 2 | Both successful[65] |
| PSLV/GSLV | PSLV-XL/CA, GSLV Mk II | 5 | All successful[65] |
| Others (Dnepr, Zenit-3F, Safir-1B, Super Strypi) | Various | 5 | 3 successes, 1 failure (Super Strypi, November 4), 1 success (Zenit)[65][3] |
By Spaceport and Orbit
In 2015, a total of 87 orbital launch attempts occurred from 13 primary spaceports, with 82 fully successful in reaching intended orbits.[3] Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan led with 23 attempts, predominantly to low Earth orbit (LEO) for crewed missions and resupply vehicles, alongside several geosynchronous transfer orbits (GTO) for commercial communications satellites.[65] Cape Canaveral in Florida followed with 19 attempts, balancing LEO deployments for science and resupply with GTO missions for military and navigation payloads.[65] Kourou in French Guiana hosted 13 launches, heavily favoring GTO for heavy-lift Ariane 5 missions carrying geostationary satellites.[65] Chinese spaceports—Xichang (12 launches), Jiuquan (5), and Taiyuan (5)—collectively accounted for 22 attempts, with a focus on LEO and sun-synchronous orbits (SSO, a LEO subset) for remote sensing and navigation constellations like Gaofen and Yaogan, plus GTO for Beidou systems.[65] Plesetsk Cosmodrome in Russia managed 8 LEO-centric launches for military reconnaissance and communications.[65] Smaller sites included Sriharikota, India (5 launches, mostly LEO for Earth observation and one GTO), Tanegashima, Japan (4, split between LEO and GTO), and minor contributions from Vandenberg (2 LEO/polar), Dombarovskiy (1 LEO), Semnan, Iran (1 LEO), and Kauai, Hawaii (1 failed LEO attempt).[65] Overall orbit distribution emphasized LEO (54 attempts, including SSO for imaging satellites), GTO (22 for eventual geostationary insertion), with fewer to polar orbits (2) or other specialized paths like highly elliptical Molniya-types.[65] No interplanetary launches occurred from Earth-based sites.[3]| Spaceport | Total Attempts | LEO/SSO/Polar | GTO/GEO | Notes on Key Missions/Failures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baikonur | 23 | 15 | 8 | Progress resupply to ISS (LEO); Inmarsat-5 F2 (GTO); 1 partial failure (Soyuz-2-1V).[65][3] |
| Cape Canaveral | 19 | 11 | 8 | Dragon CRS missions (LEO); MUOS-3 (GTO); 1 Falcon 9 failure.[65][3] |
| Kourou | 13 | 3 | 10 | Galileo navigation (MEO/LEO-like); multiple Ariane 5 GTO telecomsats.[65] |
| Xichang | 12 | 2 | 10 | Beidou-3 GEO navigation; Gaofen-4 GEO imaging.[65] |
| Plesetsk | 8 | 8 | 0 | Kosmos reconnaissance (LEO); 1 Kanopus failure.[65][3] |
| Other Chinese | 10 | 9 | 1 | Yaogan SSO reconnaissance from Taiyuan/Jiuquan.[65] |
| Sriharikota | 5 | 4 | 1 | Astrosat (LEO); GSAT-6 (GTO).[65] |
| Tanegashima | 4 | 2 | 2 | IGS radar/optical (LEO); Telstar 12V (GTO).[65] |