Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Yaogan
View on Wikipedia| 遥感卫星 Yáogǎn Wèixīng | |
VRSS-1 satellite based on the Jianbing-6 class of Yaogan satellites | |
| Program overview | |
|---|---|
| Country | |
| Organization | SAST CAST |
| Purpose | Reconnaissance |
| Status | Active |
| Program history | |
| First flight | 26 April 2006 |
| Successes | 149 |
| Failures | 1 |
| Launch sites | |
| Vehicle information | |
| Launch vehicles | |
Yaogan (simplified Chinese: 遥感卫星; traditional Chinese: 遙感衞星; pinyin: Yáogǎn Wèixīng; lit. 'Remote Sensing Satellite') is the designation used by the People's Republic of China to refer to its military reconnaissance satellites.[1][2] Yaogan satellites are largely known to primarily support the People's Liberation Army's Strategic Support Force (PLASSF), formerly the Aerospace Reconnaissance Bureau of the Second Department of the General Staff.[3][4][5] The Yaogan program is the successor to the Fanhui Shi Weixing (FSW) recoverable reconnaissance satellite program but, unlike its predecessor, includes a variety of classes utilizing various means of remote sensing such as optical reconnaissance, synthetic-aperture radar (SAR), and electronic intelligence (ELINT) for maritime surveillance. Yaogan satellites have been launched from the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center (TSLC) in Shanxi province, the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center (JSLC) in Inner Mongolia, Xichang Satellite Launch Center (XSLC) in Sichuan province and the Wenchang Space Launch Site (WSLS) in Hainan province.[6]
Although individual Yaogan satellites are often referred to by their number (e.g. Yaogan-18), Chinese military reconnaissance satellites are typically categorized by their military Jianbing designation. Jianbing (尖兵) translates to "point soldier", "vanguard", or "pioneer" and entered use in satellite designations with China's first series of reconnaissance satellites, FSW-0, as the Jianbing-1 series. The first Yaogan satellite, Yaogan 1, is one of three Jianbing-5 (JB-5) series satellites following the final FSW-3 satellites of the Jianbing-4 (JB-4) series. Because Jianbing designations are secret and only Yaogan numbers are officially used, the Jianbing designations for later classes still remains unknown to the public.
Classes
[edit]Synthetic-aperture radar
[edit]Chinese synthetic-aperture radar (SAR, Chinese: 合成孔径雷达; pinyin: héchéng kǒngjìng léidá) sensor development began in the late 1970s under the Electronic Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) resulting in the testing of the first airborne X-band mono-polarization SAR collection in 1981. By 1994, CAS had introduced its first operational, real-time airborne SAR system to monitor flooding and transmit collected data to ground stations.[7] Preliminary research and development of China's first-generation, space-based SAR system began sometime in the 1980s with development beginning in full in 1991. High-resolution, space-based SAR collection has been ambitiously pursued by the PLA for its potential contributions to all-weather targeting of naval forces in the Taiwan Strait.[7]
Jianbing-5 series satellites (abbreviated "JB-5") are China's first space-based SAR satellites and the first satellites in the Yaogan program. The development and production of the Jianbing-5 series of satellites have been entirely funded by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) as the ability to penetrate the seemingly constant cloud cover present in the southern provinces of Tibet, Sichuan, Yunnan, Guangxi, Guandgong, and Hainan challenges traditional optical collection in those regions.[8] The PLA also believes that in a potential war SAR collection capabilities will be vital to information dominance by mapping terrain, identifying targets through cloud cover, rain, fog, and dust, and potentially monitoring enemy submarines in shallow waters or targets in subterranean facilities.[7] In May 1995, the finalized designs were approved and development began in earnest with the approval of the State Science & Technology Committee (SSTC) and Commission for Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense (COSTIND).[7] The CAS Institute of Electronics built the SAR instruments onboard Jianbing-5 satellites, the craft itself designed by the Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST) which also develops the Long March 4B launch vehicle. Other developers involved in the project are the China Academy of Space Technology (CAST or 5th Space Academy) 501st and 504th Institutes, the China Electronics Technology Group's (CETC) Nanjing Research Institute of Electronic Technology (known also as the 14th Institute), the Southwest Institute of Electronic Equipment (SWIEE or 29th Institute), and the Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics (BUAA).[7] SAST is also the developer of the Feng Yun series of weather satellites.[7]
Jianbing-5 satellites are built by SAST and launched from the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center (TSLC) and provide military analysts synthetic-radar imagery purportedly at a spatial resolution as sharp as 5 meters over the L-band (1–2 GHz).[9] JB-5 satellites have been confirmed to have an electronic motor-powered solar panel which can be expanded and contracted by the ground control station. Jianbing-5 class satellites have a reported mass of 2,700 kilograms, orbital inclination of approximately 97° in Sun-synchronous orbit, and with two operational satellites enjoys a twice daily revisit rate at a 45° viewing angle.[8][10] Between April 2006 and August 2010, China launched three Jianbing-5 SAR satellites, the last two of which remain in operation from TSLC. Yaogan 1, launched in April 2006, reportedly broke up around 4 February 2010 almost four years after its launch.[9] Due to the small number of pieces and low orbital speeds, the breakup was likely due to an internal explosion, not a high-speed collision.[11]
Yaogan 29, launched in November 2015 into a similar orbit, appears to be the modernized successor to the Jianbing-5 series of SAR satellites.[8]
The Jianbing-7 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-7", are Chinese military radar reconnaissance satellites built by SAST with an orbital period of 97 minutes and a side-looking radar system designed by the CAS's Institute of Electronics. As of July 2022, China has launched four Jianbing-7 radar satellites with the first launched in April 2009 and the latest in November 2014 with a mass of 1,200 kilograms (2,600 pounds) from TSLC.[10][12] The third satellite of the Jianbing-7 class, launched in October 2013, had its orbit lowered from April to July 2020 and consequently underwent an uncontrolled decay reentering the atmosphere in 2021.[13]
Although the Jianbing designation is still unknown for latest class of SAR reconnaissance satellites, China has launched three satellites of a modernized successor class to the Jianbing-5 and Jianbing-7 classes of SAR reconnaissance satellites. This class uses the same orbit as the Jianbing-5 class but likely has a different design according to published illustrations.[14] The second satellite of this class, Yaogan 33, failed to reach orbit in May 2019. Its likely replacement, Yaogan 33R, was launched a year and a half later but used different launch site (Jiuquan instead of Taiyuan) and into a higher orbit (682 km × 686 km).[14]
Electro-optical
[edit]The Jianbing-6 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-6", provides the Chinese military optical imaging capabilities to complement the Jianbing-5 class's SAR reconnaissance capabilities.[15] It has been reported that satellites of the Jianbing-6 class have a resolution of 0.8 meters.[9] Jianbing-6 satellites were developed by CAST based on the CAST2000 satellites bus originally developed by the China SpaceSat Company Ltd. Jianbing-6 satellites image the Earth with a spatial resolution of approximately 1.5 meters and transmit them via X-band receiving telemetry, tracking, and command signals over the S-band. As of July 2022, China individually launched six Yaogan satellites of the Jianbing-6 class into low Earth orbit (LEO) with the first satellite launched in May 2006 and the latest in May 2016.[10] The Bolivarian Agency for Space Activities signed a US$140 million deal with China Great Wall Industries Co. Ltd. to launch the Venezuelan Remote-Sensing Satellite 1 (VRSS-1) in May 2011 marking China's first export of a reconnaissance satellite. VRSS-1 was based on the design of Jianbing-6 satellites and was launched on 29 September 2012 from JSLC.[10]
The Jianbing-9 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-9" provides the Chinese military with optical imaging capabilities, likely as a successor to the Jianbing-6 class, though it orbits at a much higher altitude of 1,200 km, indicating that satellites of this class are lower-resolution mapping and area surveillance satellites.[10][16][17] The optical payload of Yaogan satellites in the Jianbing-9 class was developed by the Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics, and Physics.[17][18] China has launched five individual Yaogan satellites of the Jianbing-9 class with the first launched in December 2009 and the latest in August 2015 from TSLC.[10]
The Jianbing-10 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-10" provides the Chinese military with optical imaging capabilities.[19] Believed to also be based on the CAST2000 satellite bus, like those of the Jianbing-6 class, three Jianbing-10-class satellites built by CAST and carrying an optical imaging system from the Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics have been individually launched with the first launched in December 2008 and the reported last of the class in September 2014 from TSLC.[19][20]
The Jianbing-11 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-11" provides the Chinese military with optical imaging capabilities.[21] As of May 2022, China has launched two individually launched Yaogan satellites of the Jianbing-11 class with the first launched in May 2012 and the latest in November 2015.[21]
The Jianbing-12 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-12", are military optical reconnaissance satellites.[22]

Electronic intelligence
[edit]In response to Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui's visit to the United States in 1995, the PRC initiated the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis conducting high-profile missile tests, amphibious landing drills, and troop staging in Fujian Province, across the strait from the island of Taiwan.[23] The United States government responded to the PRC's escalation by deploying the largest American show of force since the Vietnam War including sending two American carrier battle groups which effectively forced the PRC to deescalate.[24][25][26][27] Since then, the PLA has committed to design and field advanced anti-ship missile systems including the Dong Feng 21 and has deployed nearly sixty maritime surveillance satellites using electronic intelligence (ELINT) to locate, identify, and track adversarial vessels to support targeting.[28][29]
The Jianbing-8 class of Yaogan satellites, with military designations beginning with "JB-8", consist of one primary satellite and two sub-satellites launched in triplets. These satellites reportedly perform an ocean or naval surveillance mission similar to those of the United States' Naval Ocean Surveillance System (NOSS or PARCAE) despite the Chinese state-media's insistence they were designed to "conduct electromagnetic environmental monitoring and related technology tests".[29][30] The triplet groups likely fly in a loose formation to locate radio emitters using the difference in time of arrival of radio signals at the different satellites. Jianbing-8 satellites are based on the CAST2000 satellites bus and have a mass of 200 kilograms (440 pounds) and an orbital period of 107.10 minutes in LEO.[9][31][32] As of May 2022, there have been nine launches of Jianbing-8 triplets (twenty-seven total satellites) from JSLC with the first triplet launching in March 2010 and the latest in March 2021.
The CX-5 or Chuangxin-5 (simplified Chinese: 创新; traditional Chinese: 創新; pinyin: Chuàngxīn; lit. 'Innovation') class of satellites, the only known Yaogan satellites to have been launched at Xichang SLC, are still largely shrouded in secrecy and their purpose is only speculated to be ELINT by nature of their triplet launches, similar to satellites of the Jianbing-8 class.
Satellites
[edit]| Name | Military designation |
Launch | Function | Orbit | Orbital Apsis | Inclination | SCN | COSPARID | Contractor | Launcher | Launch site | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaogan 1 | JB-5-1 | 26 April 2006 | SAR | SSO | 635 km × 637 km | 97.9° | 29092 | 2006-015A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Decayed |
| Yaogan 2 | JB-6-1 | 25 May 2007 | EO | SSO | 639 km × 663 km | 97.9° | 31490 | 2007-019A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 3 | JB-5-2 | 11 November 2007 | SAR | SSO | 635 km × 637 km | 97.8° | 32289 | 2007-055A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 4 | JB-6-2 | 1 December 2008 | EO | SSO | 642 km × 660 km | 97.9° | 33446 | 2008-061A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 5 | JB-10-1 | 15 December 2008 | EO | SSO | 494 km × 501 km | 97.3° | 33456 | 2008-064A | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Decayed |
| Yaogan 6 | JB-7-1 | 22 April 2009 | SAR | SSO | 518 km × 519 km | 97.6° | 34839 | 2009-021A | SAST | Long March 2C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 7 | JB-6-3 | 9 December 2009 | EO | SSO | 630 km × 666 km | 97.8° | 36110 | 2009-069A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 8 | JB-9-1 | 15 December 2009 | EO | SSO | 1200 km × 1212 km | 100.5° | 36121 | 2009-072A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 9A | JB-8-1A | 5 March 2010 | ELINT | LEO | 781.2 km × 1412.8 km | 63.4° | 36413 | 2010-009A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 9B | JB-8-1B | LEO | 781.2 km × 1412.6 km | 63.4° | 36414 | 2010-009B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 9C | JB-8-1C | LEO | 780.6 km × 1413.2 km | 63.4° | 36415 | 2010-009C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 10 | JB-5-3 | 9 August 2010 | SAR | SSO | 629 km × 627 km | 97.8° | 36834 | 2010-038A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 11 | JB-6-4 | 22 September 2010 | EO | SSO | 670 km × 625 km | 98.0° | 37165 | 2010-047A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 12 | JB-10-2 | 9 November 2011 | EO | SSO | 479 km × 495 km | 97.3° | 37875 | 2011-066B | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 13 | JB-7-2 | 29 November 2011 | SAR | SSO | 502 km × 504 km | 97.4° | 37941 | 2011-072A | SAST | Long March 2C | TSLC | Decayed |
| Yaogan 14 | JB-11-1 | 10 May 2012 | EO | SSO | 471 km × 474 km | 97.3° | 38257 | 2012-021A | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 15 | JB-9-2 | 29 May 2012 | EO | SSO | 1198 km × 1204 km | 100.2° | 38354 | 2012-029A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 16A | JB-8-2A | 25 November 2012 | ELINT | LEO | 855.0 km × 1338.9 Km | 63.4° | 39011 | 2012-066A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 16B | JB-8-2B | LEO | 855.1 km × 1338.9 km | 63.4° | 39012 | 2012-066B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 16C | JB-8-2C | LEO | 855.1 km × 1338.9 km | 63.4° | 39013 | 2012-066C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 17A | JB-8-3A | 1 September 2013 | ELINT | LEO | 867.2 km × 1326.8 km | 63.4° | 39239 | 2013-046A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 17B | JB-8-3B | LEO | 867.3 km × 1326.9 km | 63.4° | 39240 | 2013-046B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 17C | JB-8-3C | LEO | 866.6 km × 63.4 km | 63.4° | 39241 | 2013-046C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 18 | JB-7-3 | 29 October 2013 | SAR | SSO | 509 km × 514 km | 97.5° | 39363 | 2013-059A | SAST | Long March 2C | TSLC | Decayed |
| Yaogan 19 | JB-9-3 | 20 November 2013 | EO | SSO | 1119 km × 1204 km | 100.4° | 39410 | 2013-065A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 20A | JB-8-4A | 9 August 2014 | ELINT | LEO | 893.5 km × 1300.5 km | 63.4° | 40109 | 2014-047A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 20B | JB-8-4B | LEO | 893.5 km × 1300.5 km | 63.4° | 40110 | 2014-047B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 20C | JB-8-4C | LEO | 893.4 km × 1300.6 km | 63.4° | 40111 | 2014-047C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 21 | JB-10-3 | 8 September 2014 | EO | SSO | 481 km × 492 km | 97.4° | 40143 | 2014-053A | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 22 | JB-9-4 | 20 October 2014 | EO | SSO | 1198 km × 1207 km | 100.3° | 40275 | 2014-063A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 23 | JB-7-4 | 14 November 2014 | SAR | SSO | 511 km × 513 km | 97.3° | 40305 | 014-071A | SAST | Long March 2C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 24 | JB 6-5 | 20 November 2014 | EO | SSO | 629 km × 654 km | 97.9° | 40310 | 2014-072A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 25A | JB-8-5A | 10 December 2014 | ELINT | LEO | 912.0 km × 1282.0 km | 63.4° | 40338 | 2014-080A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 25B | JB-8-5B | LEO | 912.0 km × 1282.0 km | 63.4° | 40339 | 2014-080B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 25C | JB-8-5C | LEO | 912.0 km × 1282.1 km | 63.4° | 40340 | 2014-080C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 26 | JB-12-1 | 27 December 2014 | EO | SSO | 482 km × 488 km | 97.4° | 40362 | 2014-088A | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 27 | JB-9-5 | 27 August 2015 | EO | SSO | 1201 km × 1214 km | 100.4° | 40878 | 2015-040A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 28 | JB-11-2 | 8 November 2015 | EO | SSO | 476 km × 490 km | 97.3° | 41026 | 2015-064A | CAST | Long March 4B | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 29 | JB-?-1 | 26 November 2015 | SAR | SSO | 635 km × 636 km | 97.9° | 41038 | 2015-069A | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30 | JB-6-6 | 15 May 2016 | EO | SSO | 634 km × 664 km | 98.0° | 41473 | 2016-029A | CAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-1A | CX-5 | 29 September 2017 | ELINT | LEO | 600.9 km × 603.7 km | 35.0° | 42945 | 2017-058A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-1B | CX-5 | LEO | 599.8 km × 604.8 km | 35.0° | 42946 | 2017-058B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-1C | CX-5 | LEO | 598.0 km × 606.4 km | 35.0° | 42947 | 2017-058C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-2A | CX-5 | 24 November 2017 | ELINT | LEO | 600.3 km × 604.2 km | 35.0° | 43028 | 2017-075A | IAMCAS | Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-2B | CX-5 | LEO | 598.9 km × 605.6 km | 35.0° | 43029 | 2017-075B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-2C | CX-5 | LEO | 599.8 km × 604.9 km | 35.0° | 43030 | 2017-075C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-3A | CX-5 | 25 December 2017 | ELINT | LEO | 599.4 km × 605.1 km | 35.0° | 43081 | 2017-085A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-3B | CX-5 | LEO | 598.2 km × 606.0 km | 35.0° | 43082 | 2017-085B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-3C | CX-5 | LEO | 598.6 km × 605.9 km | 35.0° | 43083 | 2017-085C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-4A | CX-5 | 25 January 2018 | ELINT | LEO | 597.7 km × 606.9 km | 35.0° | 43170 | 2018-011A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-4B | CX-5 | LEO | 600.3 km × 604.3 km | 35.0° | 43171 | 2018-011B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-4C | CX-5 | LEO | 600.3 km × 604.3 km | 35.0° | 43172 | 2018-011C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-5A | CX-5 | 25 July 2019 | ELINT | LEO | 598.7 km × 606.0 km | 35.0° | 44449 | 2019-045A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-5B | CX-5 | LEO | 595.8 km × 608.7 km | 35.0° | 44450 | 2019-045B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-5C | CX-5 | LEO | 601.5 km × 603.1 km | 35.0° | 44451 | 2019-045C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-6A | CX-5 | 24 March 2020 | ELINT | LEO | 598.7 km × 605.7 km | 35.0° | 45460 | 2020-021A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-6B | CX-5 | LEO | 600.0 km × 604.6 | 35.0° | 45461 | 2020-021B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-6C | CX-5 | LEO | 601.0 km × 603.5 km | 35.0° | 45462 | 2020-021C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-7A | CX-5 | 26 October 2020 | ELINT | LEO | 602.0 km × 602.6 km | 35.0° | 46807 | 2020-076A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-7B | CX-5 | LEO | 600.2 km × 604.3 km | 35.0° | 46808 | 2020-076B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-7C | CX-5 | LEO | 597.9 km × 606.6 km | 35.0° | 46809 | 2020-076C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-8A | CX-5 | 6 May 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 599.1 km × 605.5 km | 35.0° | 48423 | 2021-039A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-8B | CX-5 | LEO | 598.9 km × 605.7 km | 35.0° | 48424 | 2021-039B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-8C | CX-5 | LEO | 600.8 km × 603.8 km | 35.0° | 48425 | 2021-039C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-9A | CX-5 | 18 June 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 598.9 km × 605.6 km | 35.0° | 48860 | 2021-055A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-9B | CX-5 | LEO | 599.0 km × 605.5 km | 35.0° | 48861 | 2021-055B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-9C | CX-5 | LEO | 598.6 km × 605.9 km | 35.0° | 48863 | 2021-055D | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-10A | CX-5 | 19 July 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 598.7 km × 606.0 km | 35.0° | 49026 | 2021-065A | IAMCAS | Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 30-10B | CX-5 | LEO | 591.8 km × 604.1 km | 35.0° | 49027 | 2021-065B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 30-10C | CX-5 | LEO | 601.7 km × 603.0 km | 35.0° | 49028 | 2021-065C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31A | JB-8 6A | 10 April 2018 | ELINT | LEO | 980.4 km × 1213.5 km | 63.4° | 43275 | 2018-034A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 31B | JB-8 6B | LEO | 980.4 km × 1213.5 km | 63.4° | 43276 | 2018-034B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31C | JB-8 6C | LEO | 980.4 km × 1213.5 km | 63.4° | 43277 | 2018-034C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31D | JB-8 6D | 29 January 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 1054.6 km × 1139.3 km | 63.4° | 47532 | 2021-007A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 31E | JB-8 6E | LEO | 1054.4 km × 1139.6 km | 63.4° | 47533 | 2021-007B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31F | JB-8 6F | LEO | 1058.4 km × 1142.6 km | 63.4° | 47536 | 2021-007C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31G | JB-8 6G | 24 February 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 1053.9 km × 1140.1 km | 63.4° | 47691 | 2021-014A | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 31H | JB-8 6H | LEO | 1063.3 km | 63.4° | 47692 | 2021-014B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31J | JB-8 6J | LEO | 1053.7 km × 1140.2 km | 63.4° | 47695 | 2021-014C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31K | JB-8 6K | 13 March 2021 | ELINT | LEO | 1063.2 km × 1140.9 km | 63.4° | 47855 | 2021-020B | CAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 31L | JB-8 6L | LEO | 1063.2 km × 1140.9 km | 63.4° | 47855 | 2021-020C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 31M | JB-8 6M | LEO | 1055.5 km × 1138.4 km | 63.4° | 47857 | 2021-020D | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 32A | Unknown | 9 October 2018 | EO | SSO | 700.2 km × 702.3 km | 98.1° | 43642 | 2018-077A | CAST | Long March 2C/YZ-1S | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 32B | Unknown | SSO | 700.3 km × 702.1 km | 98.1° | 43643 | 2018-077B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 32-2A | Unknown | 3 November 2021 | SIGINT | SSO | 700.6 km × 702.8 km | 98.1° | 49383 | 2021-099A | Unknown | Long March 2C/YZ-1S | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 32-2B | Unknown | SSO | 700.8 km × 702.7 km | 98.1° | 49384 | 2021-099B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 33 | JB-?-2 | 22 May 2019 | SAR | (Launch Failure) | SAST | Long March 4C | TSLC | Failed | ||||
| Yaogan 33R | JB-?-3 | 27 December 2020 | SAR | SSO | 683 km × 686 km | 98.3° | 47302 | 2020-103A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 33-02 | Unknown | 2 September 2022 | SAR | SSO | 688 km × 680 km | 98.18° | 53698 | 2022-106A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 33-03 | Unknown | 6 September 2023 | SAR | SSO | 703.2km×701.9km | 98.2° | 57797 | 2023-136A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 33-04 | Unknown | 26 September 2023 | SAR | SSO | 695.6km×692.3km | 98.1° | 57958 | 2023-149A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 34 | Unknown | 30 April 2021 | EO | LEO | 1083 km × 1105 km | 63.4° | 48340 | 2021-037A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 34-2 | Unknown | 17 March 2022 | EO | LEO | 1083 km × 1105 km | 63.38° | 52084 | 2022-027A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 34-3 | Unknown | 15 November 2022 | Unknown | LEO | 1,080.2 km × 1,103.6 km | 63.4° | 54249 | 2022-154A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 34-4 | Unknown | 31 March 2023 | Unknown | LEO | 1088.4 km × 105.3 km | 63.4° | 56157 | 2023-048A | SAST | Long March 4C | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35A | Unknown | 6 November 2021 | Unknown | LEO | 501.2 km × 506.4 km | 35.0° | 49390 | 2021-101A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35B | Unknown | LEO | 499.8 km × 507.8 km | 35.0° | 49391 | 2021-101B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35C | Unknown | LEO | 459.3 km × 463.5 km | 35.0° | 49392 | 2021-101C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 02-A | Unknown | 23 June 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 499 km × 508 km | 35.0° | 52907 | 2022-068A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35 02-B | Unknown | LEO | 498 km × 509 km | 35.0° | 52908 | 2022-068B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 02-C | Unknown | LEO | 496 km × 506 km | 35.0° | 52909 | 2022-068C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 03-A | Unknown | 29 July 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 499 km × 508.6 km | 35.0° | 53316 | 2022-088A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35 03-B | Unknown | LEO | 496.6 km × 511.2 km | 35.0° | 53317 | 2022-088B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 03-C | Unknown | LEO | 497.5 km × 510.4 km | 35.0° | 53318 | 2022-088C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 04-A | Unknown | 19 August 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 491 km × 502 km | 35.0° | 53522 | 2022-100A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35 04-B | Unknown | LEO | 490 km × 502 km | 35.0° | 53523 | 2022-100B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 04-C | Unknown | LEO | 488 km × 500 km | 35.0° | 53524 | 2022-100C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 05-A | Unknown | 6 September 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 502 km × 491 km | 35.0° | 53760 | 2022-109A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 35 05-B | Unknown | LEO | 501 km × 488 km | 35.0° | 53761 | 2022-109B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 35 05-C | Unknown | LEO | 501 km × 489 km | 35.0° | 53762 | 2022-109C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36A | Unknown | 26 September 2022 | Unknown | LEO | 499 km × 486 km | 35.0° | 53943 | 2022-120A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 36B | Unknown | LEO | 499 km × 488 km | 35.0° | 53946 | 2022-120B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36C | Unknown | LEO | 498 km × 485 km | 35.0° | 53947 | 2022-120C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 02-A | Unknown | 14 October 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 499 km × 487 km | 35.0° | 54042 | 2022-133A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 36 02-B | Unknown | LEO | 498 km × 486 km | 35.0° | 54043 | 2022-133B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 02-C | Unknown | LEO | 498 km × 485 km | 35.0° | 54044 | 2022-133C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 03-A | Unknown | 27 November 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 501.3 km 511.2 km | 35.0° | 54372 | 2022-160A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 36 03-B | Unknown | LEO | 493.6 km × 505.5 km | 35.0° | 54373 | 2022-160B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 03-C | Unknown | LEO | 500.9 km 509.7 km | 35.0° | 54374 | 2022-160C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 04-A | Unknown | 14 December 2022 | ELINT | LEO | 500.3 km × 511.2 km | 35.0° | 54746 | 2022-171A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 36 04-B | Unknown | LEO | 495.8 km × 507.0 km | 35.0° | 54747 | 2022-171B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 04-C | Unknown | LEO | 502.2 km × 510.3 km | 35.0° | 54748 | 2022-171C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 05-A | Unknown | 26 July 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 508.7 km × 498.6 km | 35.0° | 57452 | 2023-106A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 36 05-B | Unknown | LEO | 508.2 km × 498.0 km | 35.0° | 57454 | 2023-106C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 36 05-C | Unknown | LEO | 507.2 km × 495.0 km | 35.0° | 57456 | 2023-106E | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 37 | Unknown | 13 January 2023 | Unknown | LEO | 518.6 km × 526.3 km | 43.2° | 55244 | 2023-006C | SAST | Long March 2D | JSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-01A | Unknown | 31 August 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 496.4km×510.3km | 35.0 ° | 57727 | 2023-130A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-01B | Unknown | LEO | 496.5km×508.8km | 35.0 ° | 57728 | 2023-130B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-01C | Unknown | LEO | 491.2km×512.4km | 35.0 ° | 57731 | 2023-130E | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-02A | Unknown | 17 September 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 500km×491km | 35.0° | 57886 | 2023-145A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-02B | Unknown | LEO | 497km×485km | 35.0° | 57887 | 2023-145B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-02C | Unknown | LEO | 496km×483km | 35.0° | 57888 | 2023-145C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-03A | Unknown | 5 October 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 501km×491km | 35.0° | 57986 | 2023-152A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-03B | Unknown | LEO | 502km×489km | 35.0° | 57987 | 2023-152B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-03C | Unknown | LEO | 501km×490km | 35.0° | 57988 | 2023-152C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-04A | Unknown | 23 October 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 502km×491km | 35.0° | 58141 | 2023-163A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-04B | Unknown | LEO | 502km×489km | 35.0° | 58143 | 2023-163C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-04C | Unknown | LEO | 501km×489km | 35.0° | 58145 | 2023-163E | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-05A | Unknown | 10 December 2023 | ELINT | LEO | 502km×491km | 35.0° | 58557 | 2023-194A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 39-05B | Unknown | LEO | 500km×489km | 35.0° | 58558 | 2023-194B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 39-05C | Unknown | LEO | 501km×489km | 35.0° | 58559 | 2023-194C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 40-01A | Unknown | 10 September 2023 | Unknown | LEO | 803.1km×818.1km | 86.0° | 57830 | 2023-139A | CAST | Long March 6A | TSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 40-01B | Unknown | LEO | 801.9km×821.2km | 86.0° | 57832 | 2023-139C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 40-01C | Unknown | LEO | 774.9km×813.2km | 86.0° | 57833 | 2023-139D | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 40-02A | Unknown | 11 May 2025 | Unknown | LEO | CAST | Long March 6A | TSLC | Operational | ||||
| Yaogan 40-02B | Unknown | LEO | Operational | |||||||||
| Yaogan 40-02C | Unknown | LEO | Operational | |||||||||
| Yaogan 40-03A | Unknown | 6 September 2025 | Unknown | LEO | CAST | Long March 6A | TSLC | Operational | ||||
| Yaogan 40-03B | Unknown | LEO | Operational | |||||||||
| Yaogan 40-03C | Unknown | LEO | Operational | |||||||||
| Yaogan 41 | Unknown | 15 December 2023 | EO | GSO | 35839 km × 35732 km | 4.97° | 58582 | 2023-197A | CAST | Long March 5 | WSLS | Operational |
| Yaogan 42-01 | Unknown | 2 April 2024 | Unknown | LEO | 502km×491km | 35.0° | 59395 | 2024-063A | SAST | Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 42-02 | Unknown | 20 April 2024 | Unknown | LEO | 502km×490km | 35.0° | 59557 | 2024-075A | SAST | Long March 2D | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 43-01A | Unknown | 16 August 2024 | Unknown | LEO | 500km×493km | 35.0° | 60458 | 2024-148A | CAST SAST IAMCAS et al. |
Long March 4B | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 43-01B | Unknown | LEO | 501km×492km | 35.01° | 60459 | 2024-148B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01C | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60460 | 2024-148C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01D | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60461 | 2024-148D | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01E | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60462 | 2024-148E | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01F | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60463 | 2024-148F | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01G | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60464 | 2024-148G | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01H | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60465 | 2024-148H | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-01J | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60466 | 2024-148J | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-02A | Unknown | 3 September 2024 | Unknown | LEO | 502km×490km (median) | 35.0° | 60945 | 2024-156A - | SAST IAMCAS et al. |
Long March 4B | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 43-02B | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60946 | 2024-156B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-02C | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60947 | 2024-156C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-02D | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60948 | 2024-156D | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-02E | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60949 | 2024-156E | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-02F | Unknown | LEO | 500km×494km | 35.01° | 60950 | 2024-156F | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-03A | Unknown | 23 October 2024[33] | ELINT | LEO | 501km×493km | 35.0° | 61617 | 2024-190A | CAST SAST |
Long March 2C | XSLC | Operational |
| Yaogan 43-03B | Unknown | LEO | 502km×490km | 35.0° | 61618 | 2024-190B | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 43-03C | Unknown | LEO | 501km×491km | 35.0° | 61619 | 2024-190C | Operational | |||||
| Yaogan 45 | Unknown | 9 September 2025 | Unknown | MEO | 203km×7468km | 20.0° | 65563 | 2025-201M | SAST | Long March 7A | WSLS | Operational |
| Yaogan 46 | Unknown | 3 November 2025 | Unknown | MEO | TBA | Long March 7A | WSLS | Operational | ||||
| Table data sourced from previously cited references, "CalSky". calsky.com. CalSky. Retrieved 9 November 2016. and "Real Time Satellite Tracking". n2yo.com. N2YO. Retrieved 9 November 2016."Yaogan 30-01, ..., 30-07 (CX 5)". Gunter's Space Page. 30 May 2020. Retrieved 14 October 2020. | ||||||||||||
See also
[edit]- USSR / Russia - Kosmos (satellite)
- United States - NOSS
- France - CERES (satellite)
References
[edit]- ^ Clark, Stephen (29 January 2021). "China launches military spy satellite trio into orbit". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022.
- ^ Jonathan McDowell [@planet4589] (7 April 2021). "The Jianbing-7 03 radar satellite, cover name Yaogan 18, reentered at 0035 UTC Apr 7 over the South Atlantic. It was launched in Oct 2013, operated until Feb 2019, and had its orbit lowered from Apr-Jul 2020; it underwent uncontrolled decay since 2020 Jul 7" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 3 July 2022 – via Twitter.
- ^ Costello, John; McReynolds, Joe (October 2018). "China's Strategic Support Force: A Force for a New Era" (PDF). China Strategic Perspectives. 13: 20. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2022 – via National Defense University.
- ^ Barbosa, Rui C. (22 April 2009). "Chinese launch again with YaoGan Weixing-6 remote sensing satellite". nasaspaceflight.com. Archived from the original on 5 February 2022. Retrieved 23 April 2009.
- ^ "2006年4月27日 "遥感卫星一号"成功发射". www.xinhuanet.com. Xinhuanet. 27 April 2006. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
- ^ "China Launches Yaogan-4 Satellite". Asian Surveying and Mapping magazine. 2 December 2008. Archived from the original on 17 April 2009. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
- ^ a b c d e f "JianBing 5 (YaoGan WeiXing 1/3) Synthetic Aperture Radar". Sino Defense. 12 November 2007. Archived from the original on 21 April 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
- ^ a b c Krebs, Gunter (11 December 2017). "Yaogan 1, 3, 10 (JB-5 1, 2, 3)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 27 September 2022. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
- ^ a b c d Cliff, Roger (2011). Ready for takeoff : China's advancing aerospace industry. Chad J. R. Ohlandt, David Yang, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Rand Corporation. National Security Research Division. Santa Monica, CA: Rand National Security Research Division. ISBN 978-0-8330-5208-7. OCLC 727359166.
- ^ a b c d e f "Yaogan Weixing (Remote Sensing Satellite)". China Space Report. 11 June 2016. Archived from the original on 20 June 2021.
- ^ "Yaogan 1 Erupts". Arms Control Wonk. 11 February 2010. Archived from the original on 22 August 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2010.
- ^ Wade, Mark (2019). "JB-7". Astronautix. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022.
- ^ McDowell, Jonathan [@planet4589] (7 April 2021). "Jianbing-7 03 Decay" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 3 July 2022 – via Twitter.
- ^ a b Krebs, Gunter. "Yaogan 29, 33, 33R". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 22 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter (14 September 2020). "Yaogan 2, 4, 7, 11, 24, 30 (JB-6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter. "Yaogan 8, 15, 19, 22, 27 (JB-9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
- ^ a b Wade, Mark (2019). "JB-9". Astronautix. Archived from the original on 2 March 2022.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter. "Yaogan 8, 15, 19, 22, 27 (JB-9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 20 May 2022.
- ^ a b Krebs, Gunter (21 July 2019). "Yaogan 5, 12, 21 (JB-10 1, 2, 3)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 25 September 2022. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
- ^ Wade, Mark (2019). "JB-10". Astronautix. Archived from the original on 3 July 2022.
- ^ a b Krebs, Gunter (21 July 2019). "Yaogan 14, 28 (JB-11 1, 2)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 27 September 2022. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
- ^ Krebs, Gunter (21 July 2019). "Yaogan 26 (JB-12 1)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
- ^ "Taiwan's President Speaks at Cornell Reunion Weekend". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 10 July 2012. Retrieved 20 July 2010.
- ^ "U.S. aircraft carrier in Asia 'routine'". UPI. Archived from the original on 8 January 2022. Retrieved 8 January 2022.
- ^ Lin, Jennifer (21 March 1996). "U.S. Considers Risking China's Wrath On Taiwan The Nimitz Could Sail Through The Taiwan Strait. China Is Calling That "brazen."". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 28 March 2015.Su, Chi (2008). Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs. Routledge. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-134-04043-8.
- ^ Sullivan, Dan (11 May 2015). "'Rebalance' to Asia calls for 3-pronged strategy". The Hill. Archived from the original on 22 January 2020. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
- ^ "Could China seize and occupy Taiwan militarily?". ChinaPower. Center for Strategic and International Studies. 17 May 2016. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
- ^ "The Chinese Maritime Surveillance System". SatelliteObservation.net. 20 September 2016. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022.
- ^ a b Blizzard, Timothy J. (2016). "The PLA, A2/AD and the ADF: Lessons for Future Maritime Strategy". Security Challenges. 12 (3): 69–70. JSTOR 26465599.
- ^ Tate, Andrew (15 March 2021). "China Deploys More Surveillance Satellites". Janes Defense. Archived from the original on 24 July 2022.
- ^ "JB-8". Astronautix. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022.
- ^ "Yaogan 9, 16, 17, 20, 25, 31 (JB-8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)". Gunter's Space Page. 24 March 2021. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
- ^ "China launches new remote-sensing satellite group". Xinhua 新華社. 23 October 2024. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
Yaogan
View on GrokipediaHistory and Development
Inception and Early Launches (2006–2010)
The Yaogan satellite series originated as China's inaugural dedicated effort to deploy a constellation of military reconnaissance platforms under the cover of civilian remote sensing missions. The inaugural launch occurred on April 27, 2006, when Yaogan-1 (also designated Jianbing-5 or JB-5) was placed into a sun-synchronous orbit of approximately 630 km altitude and 97.8° inclination using a Long March 4B rocket from the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center. Equipped with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for high-resolution, all-weather imaging, the satellite was officially tasked with conducting scientific experiments, surveying land resources, estimating crop yields, and aiding disaster relief efforts. However, assessments by U.S. defense analysts classify Yaogan-1 as China's first operational SAR reconnaissance satellite, primarily intended to gather military intelligence on terrain and mobile targets, addressing prior limitations in China's space-based imaging capabilities.[12][13] Early missions rapidly diversified payload types to build complementary intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) functions, including electronic intelligence (ELINT) collection and electro-optical (EO) imaging. Yaogan-2 launched on November 6, 2006, via Long March 4C from Jiuquan, operating in a similar polar orbit and assessed as an ELINT platform for intercepting radar and communication signals from naval and ground targets. Yaogan-3 followed on May 27, 2007, again with Long March 4B from Taiyuan, featuring SAR for continued radar imaging refinement. By December 2008, Yaogan-5 introduced EO capabilities for daylight visible-light photography, launched on Long March 4B to a 630 km orbit, enabling higher-resolution target identification than SAR alone. These initial deployments demonstrated China's intent to integrate multiple sensor modalities, with launches averaging one to two per year, leveraging existing Long March variants for cost-effective access to space.[13][10] The period culminated in more complex configurations by 2009–2010, reflecting maturing orbital maneuvering and formation-flying technologies. Yaogan-6 (February 23, 2009) and Yaogan-4 (January 18, 2008) focused on ELINT in mid-inclination orbits for regional signals intelligence, while Yaogan-7 (July 5, 2009) added EO imaging. A milestone came with Yaogan-9, a triplet launched March 5, 2010, on Long March 4C from Taiyuan into a 1,100 km orbit for stereoscopic EO mapping, allowing three-dimensional terrain reconstruction for military planning. Yaogan-10 (August 11, 2010) returned to SAR with enhanced resolution. Overall, the 2006–2010 phase saw 10 satellites orbited, establishing a foundational network for persistent monitoring, though operational lifespans varied, with Yaogan-1 decaying in early 2010 after debris generation. U.S. Department of Defense reports highlight this buildup as part of China's broader military modernization, prioritizing space-based assets over purely terrestrial reconnaissance.[14][15][13]| Satellite | Launch Date | Vehicle/Site | Primary Capability | Orbit Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaogan-1 | April 27, 2006 | Long March 4B/Taiyuan | SAR imaging | 630 km, 97.8° SSO[13][12] |
| Yaogan-2 | November 6, 2006 | Long March 4C/Jiuquan | ELINT | Polar, ~630 km[13] |
| Yaogan-3 | May 27, 2007 | Long March 4B/Taiyuan | SAR imaging | SSO, ~630 km[13] |
| Yaogan-4 | January 18, 2008 | Long March 2D/Xichang | ELINT | Mid-inclination[16] |
| Yaogan-5 | December 15, 2008 | Long March 4B/Taiyuan | EO imaging | 630 km SSO[10] |
| Yaogan-6 | February 23, 2009 | Long March 4C/Jiuquan | ELINT | Polar[14] |
| Yaogan-7 | July 5, 2009 | Long March 2D/Xichang | EO imaging | SSO[10] |
| Yaogan-8 | December 15, 2009 | Long March 4C/Taiyuan | SAR imaging | SSO[13] |
| Yaogan-9 (triplet) | March 5, 2010 | Long March 4C/Taiyuan | EO stereo imaging | 1,100 km, 63°[15] |
| Yaogan-10 | August 11, 2010 | Long March 4C/Taiyuan | SAR imaging | ~610 km, 98°[13] |
Expansion and Technological Maturation (2011–2020)
From 2011 to 2020, the Yaogan program expanded markedly, with China executing over 25 launches that deployed dozens of satellites, transitioning from sporadic missions to routine deployments that bolstered the constellation's scale and diversity.[17] This period saw the introduction of multi-satellite groupings, particularly triplets for electronic intelligence (ELINT) and electromagnetic environment detection, such as Yaogan-16 launched on November 25, 2011, via Long March 4C from Jiuquan, mimicking U.S. NOSS configurations for ocean surveillance.[17] Subsequent ELINT missions, including Yaogan-17 in 2013 and Yaogan-20 in 2014, further populated inclined orbits to enhance geolocation of surface emitters.[17] Technological maturation manifested in refined sensor payloads and orbital architectures, enabling persistent monitoring. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellites like Yaogan-13, launched November 29, 2011, from Taiyuan on a Long March 2C, provided all-weather imaging for resource assessment and military reconnaissance.[18][17] Electro-optical (EO) systems advanced in the Yaogan-30 series, initiated May 15, 2016, with launches from Jiuquan and Xichang using Long March 2D and 2C vehicles, focusing on naval target detection including U.S. aircraft carriers; by October 2019, at least 15 Yaogan-30 satellites achieved near-continuous global coverage.[18][17] These incorporated automated target recognition for ship identification, supporting anti-ship ballistic and cruise missile guidance.[18] Launch cadence intensified mid-decade, with six missions in 2014 alone utilizing varied vehicles like Long March 4B and 4C from Taiyuan and Jiuquan, deploying both single and triplet payloads in sun-synchronous orbits for electro-optical and SAR imaging.[17] By 2017–2020, Yaogan-30 extensions and Yaogan-31/32 groups emphasized electromagnetic surveys, with multiple triplet launches from Xichang, demonstrating improved reliability and integration for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) applications.[17][18] This maturation reduced revisit intervals and enhanced resolution, though exact sensor specifications remain classified, with assessments derived from orbital analysis and mission profiles.[18]Recent Deployments and Advancements (2021–Present)
Since 2021, China has accelerated deployments in the Yaogan series, launching multiple groups of satellites assessed as reconnaissance platforms for electro-optical, radar, and signals intelligence missions, despite official designations for civilian remote sensing applications such as land surveying and disaster monitoring. In November 2021, three Yaogan-35 satellites were deployed into low Earth orbit using a Long March 2D rocket from Xichang, forming a triplet configuration likely for electronic intelligence collection through coordinated orbital positioning. Subsequent Yaogan-36 missions in 2022 and 2023 introduced paired or triplet satellites with varied designs, including components built by DFH Satellite Co., orbiting at approximately 500 km altitude to enhance real-time surveillance capabilities.[19] In 2023, the Yaogan-39 group saw its fifth triplet launch in December via Long March 2D from Xichang, continuing the pattern of distributed aperture systems for improved electronic reconnaissance coverage.[20] By 2024, the program advanced with the Yaogan-43 series, deploying batches including nine satellites in August using a Long March 4B from Xichang, signaling expanded constellation density for persistent monitoring.[21] These developments reflect refinements in satellite clustering and sensor integration, enabling better resolution and revisit times over target areas.| Launch Date | Satellite Group | Number of Satellites | Launch Vehicle | Orbit/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 7, 2025 | Yaogan-40 (third trio) | 3 | Long March 4C | Polar orbit; remote sensing with enhanced polar coverage[6] |
| September 9, 2025 | Yaogan-45 | 1 | Long March 7A | Medium Earth orbit; strategic surveillance from higher altitude[4] |
Technical Specifications
Orbital Parameters and Configurations
The Yaogan satellite series primarily operates in low Earth orbit (LEO), with typical altitudes between 480 and 700 km for remote sensing missions, enabling high-resolution imaging and signals collection. Some electronic intelligence (ELINT) variants, such as early Yaogan-3 triads, deploy at approximately 1200 km altitude to facilitate wide-area surveillance. Orbital inclinations vary widely to support diverse mission profiles: sun-synchronous orbits (SSO) near 97–98° are common for electro-optical and synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) satellites to ensure consistent solar illumination, while lower inclinations like 35°, 43°, or 63.4° suit naval or regional monitoring. For instance, Yaogan-1, launched in 2006, entered a 607 × 621 km orbit at 98.7° inclination.[13] Satellite configurations often involve formations rather than isolated units, particularly for ELINT tasks requiring geolocation via time-difference-of-arrival methods. Triplets, such as those in the Yaogan-9/16/17 series, are launched into near-circular SSO at around 630 km and 98° inclination, with satellites phased approximately 120° apart in the same orbital plane for continuous coverage and triangulation accuracy. Similar setups appear in Yaogan-35 (2021), placed in a circular orbit of nearly 600 km at polar inclination. Single or paired deployments, like Yaogan-37 (2023) at 515 km and 43.2° inclination, support targeted reconnaissance.[15][23][24]| Satellite Example | Altitude (km) | Inclination (°) | Configuration | Launch Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaogan-1 | 607 × 621 | 98.7 | Single | 2006 |
| Yaogan-11 | 640 | 98.4 | Single | 2010 |
| Yaogan-28 | 493–497 | 97.3 | Single | 2018 |
| Yaogan-3 series | ~1200 | 63.4 | Triad (120° phase) | 2008–2010 |
| Yaogan-9 series | ~630 | 98 | Triad | 2010–2018 |
Payload Technologies and Sensors
The Yaogan satellite series employs a variety of payload technologies tailored for military reconnaissance, including synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for all-weather imaging, electro-optical (EO) systems for high-resolution visible and infrared sensing, and electronic intelligence (ELINT) collectors for signals interception. These payloads are distributed across different orbital configurations and mission profiles, with SAR and EO often achieving resolutions sufficient for tactical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) applications. ELINT systems, typically deployed in multi-satellite formations, enable geolocation of emitters through time-difference-of-arrival techniques.[28][8][29] SAR sensors in Yaogan satellites, such as those on Yaogan-1, Yaogan-3, Yaogan-6, Yaogan-10, Yaogan-13, and Yaogan-18, utilize active microwave transmission to penetrate clouds and operate in darkness, with reported spatial resolutions better than 1.5 meters in models like Yaogan-29 operating at 615 km altitude. These systems likely operate in X-band or S-band frequencies to balance resolution and swath width, supporting applications from maritime surveillance to terrain mapping. Later variants, including Yaogan-42 launched in 2024, integrate SAR with other sensors for hybrid all-weather capability.[30][23][29] Electro-optical payloads, featured in satellites like Yaogan-2, Yaogan-4, Yaogan-7, and Yaogan-8 (military designation JB-6 series), deliver panchromatic imagery with resolutions of approximately 0.8 meters or finer from low Earth orbits around 600-700 km. The Yaogan-8 optical system, developed by the Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, supports multispectral imaging for enhanced target discrimination, while Yaogan-15 represents an evolution with improved revisit rates. These sensors are sunlight-dependent but provide detailed visible-spectrum data critical for identifying military assets and infrastructure.[3][31] ELINT payloads focus on passive collection of radar, communication, and telemetry signals, with Yaogan-9, Yaogan-16, and Yaogan-23 triplets forming baseline networks for trilateration-based localization over wide areas. Yaogan-29 incorporates ELINT alongside EO and SAR for comprehensive environmental probing, as do experimental groups like Yaogan-43. These systems feature directional antennas and wideband receivers to catalog electromagnetic signatures, aiding in electronic order-of-battle analysis.[30][32][33]Satellite Classes and Types
Synthetic-Aperture Radar (SAR) Capabilities
The Yaogan series incorporates synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) systems in several missions, classified under the Jianbing (JB) subclasses, to deliver all-weather and nighttime imaging for military reconnaissance. These active microwave sensors synthesize high-resolution images by leveraging the satellite's motion to simulate a large aperture, enabling detection of ground features through clouds, vegetation, and darkness. Early iterations focused on L-band operations for penetration depth, while later models emphasize finer detail for strategic intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).[23] Yaogan-1, designated Jianbing-5 (JB-5) and launched on 27 April 2006 via Long March 4C from Taiyuan, marked China's first space-based SAR satellite, with a mass of 2,700 kg and an initial orbit of 601 × 621 km at 97.8° inclination, later adjusted to 628 × 629 km. Its L-band SAR provided resolutions of approximately 5 m (high-resolution mode) and 20 m (wide-swath mode), supporting basic terrain mapping and target detection. Follow-on JB-5 missions included Yaogan-3, launched 11 November 2007 into a 613 × 623 km orbit at 97.9° inclination, and Yaogan-10, launched 9 August 2010 into 607 × 621 km at 98.7° inclination, maintaining comparable L-band capabilities for persistent polar coverage.[13][23] The Jianbing-7 (JB-7) series, introduced from 2009 with four launches, advanced resolution to about 1.5 m through refined SAR processing and lower orbital altitudes of roughly 510 km at 97.4° inclination, enhancing utility for identifying vehicles, structures, and coastal assets. These second-generation systems, built by Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST), prioritized weather-independent maritime and land surveillance. Subsequent developments, such as Yaogan-29 (launched November 2015 into 615 × 619 km at 97.8°), reportedly exceed 1.5 m resolution, possibly via improved JB-5 derivatives or hybrid modes. Newer efforts like Yaogan-33R (launched 2020 into 682 km at 98.7°), associated with Jianbing-X, indicate ongoing refinements in radar architecture for higher fidelity and multi-mode imaging.[23][34][35] These SAR assets operate in sun-synchronous orbits for repeatable passes, typically revisiting targets every few days, and integrate with ground stations for real-time data relay via L-band links. While official specifications remain classified, analyst assessments highlight progressive resolution gains from 5 m to sub-2 m, driven by antenna size increases and signal processing algorithms, bolstering People's Liberation Army applications in contested environments.[23][8]Electro-Optical (EO) Imaging Systems
The Yaogan series incorporates electro-optical (EO) imaging satellites designed to capture visible-light and near-infrared imagery for reconnaissance, with resolutions estimated at sub-meter to 2 meters based on orbital analysis and comparisons to known platforms. These systems, often classified under military designations like Jianbing-6 and Jianbing-10, feature three-axis stabilized buses with maneuvering capabilities for precise pointing and track adjustment during imaging passes. Early examples, such as Yaogan-2 (launched May 25, 2007, on a Long March 2D from Jiuquan), operated in a 630 km sun-synchronous orbit at 97.8° inclination, enabling panchromatic imagery with an estimated ground resolution of approximately 1.5 meters.[2][3] Subsequent EO satellites, including Yaogan-4 (launched December 1, 2008) and Yaogan-7, expanded this capability with similar orbital parameters and improved sensors inferred from launch configurations and mission durations, achieving resolutions potentially as fine as 0.8 meters or better for identifying vehicles and infrastructure.[3] The Jianbing-10 class, encompassing Yaogan-5 (launched December 15, 2008, via Long March 4B from Taiyuan), Yaogan-10 (launched December 26, 2010), Yaogan-12, and Yaogan-21, represents a maturation in optical reconnaissance, with payloads supporting both high-resolution panchromatic and multispectral imaging for target discrimination in military contexts.[10][36] These satellites maintain LEO altitudes around 500-700 km, prioritizing revisit rates over wide-area coverage to support tactical intelligence needs. Recent advancements include hybrid and persistent EO variants, such as Yaogan-34 (launched May 2021), described officially for land surveys but assessed for high-resolution optical remote sensing in inclined orbits up to 1,100 km.[7] Yaogan-41, deployed December 2023 via Long March 5 into geosynchronous orbit, introduces stationary EO surveillance with continuous monitoring potential over specific regions, marking a shift toward persistent wide-area observation.[5] Yaogan-45, launched September 2025 on a Long March 7A from Wenchang, further exemplifies ongoing EO deployments in sun-synchronous paths for enhanced resolution imaging.[37] Assessments of these systems' performance derive from open-source tracking data and launch telemetry, as Chinese state media emphasizes dual-use applications like disaster relief while Western analysts highlight primary ISR roles.[3][28]Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) Collection
The Yaogan satellite series incorporates electronic intelligence (ELINT) capabilities to detect and geolocate non-communicative radio frequency emissions, such as radar signals from naval vessels and ground-based systems, primarily for maritime surveillance. These missions enable triangulation through multi-satellite formations, providing coarse positional data that cues electro-optical or synthetic-aperture radar satellites for refined targeting, particularly in support of anti-access/area-denial strategies. Orbits for ELINT Yaogans often feature low Earth orbits with inclinations optimized for regional coverage, such as over the South China Sea or Western Pacific.[26][28] Yaogan-9, launched on March 5, 2010, from Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center aboard a Long March 4C rocket, represents China's inaugural ELINT triad, consisting of three satellites deployed in a 1,080–1,100 km circular orbit at 63.4° inclination, spaced approximately 120° apart in the same orbital plane. This configuration mirrors historical U.S. Naval Ocean Surveillance System (NOSS) designs, facilitating interferometric processing to locate radar emitters with sufficient accuracy for real-time tracking of surface ships. Assessments indicate its role in enhancing precision for anti-ship ballistic missiles by identifying carrier strike group emissions.[28][26] Subsequent ELINT missions evolved toward denser constellations for improved revisit rates and coverage. The Yaogan-30 series, beginning with Yaogan-30-01A/B/C launched in September 2017, operates in a lower 600 km orbit at 35° inclination, employing a six-satellite "spot" formation within the orbital plane to scan targeted areas like the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea with approximately 30-minute revisit intervals. These satellites detect RF signals over broad swaths, prioritizing emitter characterization over high-resolution imaging.[26][38] More recent examples include Yaogan-35 triplets, such as Yaogan-35-01 launched in November 2021, which Western analyses attribute to ELINT or signals intelligence functions due to their formation flying and sensor profiles, potentially integrating with hybrid payloads for emitter geolocation in contested maritime domains. Similarly, Yaogan-40 satellites, deployed in polar orbits starting around 2023–2024, extend global ELINT reach by monitoring high-latitude and oceanic radar activities. These developments reflect iterative advancements in sensor miniaturization and orbital mechanics, though exact payload specifications remain classified, with attributions derived from launch parameters, orbital behaviors, and parallels to known ELINT architectures.[39][6][40]Specialized and Hybrid Variants
Specialized variants of the Yaogan series deviate from standard low Earth orbit configurations to address niche operational requirements, such as persistent geosynchronous monitoring or medium Earth orbit deployments for extended coverage. For instance, Yaogan-41, launched on December 15, 2023, via a Long March 5 rocket from Wenchang, represents a geosynchronous optical reconnaissance satellite capable of near-continuous surveillance over specific regions, including potential maritime areas of interest like the South China Sea.[5] This variant's large payload, estimated at over 4,500 kg, enables higher-resolution imaging from GEO altitudes, contrasting with the typical sun-synchronous orbits of earlier Yaogan models, though Chinese state media described it generically for "remote sensing." Hybrid variants incorporate multi-function payloads or formation-flying architectures to fuse data types, enhancing geolocation accuracy for dynamic targets. The Yaogan-31 series, exemplified by the February 24, 2021, launch of a triplet (Yaogan-31 05A/B/C) on a Long March 4C from Jiuquan, operates as a naval ocean surveillance system analogous to the U.S. Naval Ocean Surveillance System (NOSS).[41] These satellites maintain a tight formation—typically one primary bus with two smaller sub-satellites—to triangulate radio frequency emissions from ships and submarines, combining electronic intelligence collection with potential synthetic aperture radar for surface vessel detection.[42] Western analyses, drawing from orbital parameters and historical precedents, assess this setup as optimized for anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) scenarios, enabling real-time tracking of adversary naval assets despite official claims of civilian environmental monitoring.[30] Emerging specialized designs include higher-altitude deployments like Yaogan-45, orbited on September 7, 2025, via Long March 7A to a medium Earth orbit of approximately 20,000 km, marking the second such Yaogan beyond LEO after Yaogan-41.[43] This configuration sacrifices some imaging resolution for wider revisit times and reduced vulnerability to low-orbit threats, supporting strategic surveillance over large theaters.[4] Hybrid elements may involve integrated electro-optical and signals intelligence sensors, as inferred from payload mass and mission profiles in similar series, though exact capabilities remain classified and unconfirmed beyond orbital telemetry.[26] These variants underscore the People's Liberation Army's push toward resilient, multi-domain ISR architectures, with empirical evidence from launch cadences and international tracking data indicating prioritization of contested maritime domains over purely terrestrial focus.[8]Launch Operations
Primary Launch Vehicles and Sites
The Yaogan satellite series primarily utilizes variants of the Long March (Chang Zheng) expendable launch vehicles, produced by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, to deploy payloads into low Earth orbit configurations suitable for reconnaissance missions. Key vehicles include the Long March 2C (CZ-2C), which supports payloads up to approximately 2,200 kg to sun-synchronous orbit and has been used for multiple triplet deployments; the Long March 2D (CZ-2D), an enhanced version capable of similar orbits with improved reliability; the Long March 4B (CZ-4B), employed for heavier payloads or formation flying satellites; and the Long March 4C (CZ-4C), optimized for polar sun-synchronous orbits with a capacity of about 4,000 kg to 700 km altitude.[44][13][3] These selections align with mission-specific requirements, such as orbital inclination and satellite mass, with over 50 Yaogan launches documented using these rockets since the series inception in 2006.[17] Launches are conducted from China's three major satellite launch centers: Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center (JSLC) in Gansu Province, which handles the majority of Yaogan missions into sun-synchronous or low-inclination orbits due to its northern location and eastward trajectory over the Yellow Sea; Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center (TSLC) in Shanxi Province, preferred for polar sun-synchronous orbits essential for global coverage in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and electronic intelligence (ELINT) variants, leveraging its higher latitude for direct polar access; and Xichang Satellite Launch Center (XSLC) in Sichuan Province, used for missions requiring southeastern trajectories, including some electro-optical imaging satellites.[17][6][45] Jiuquan has hosted launches like Yaogan-30 Group-05 on a CZ-2C on July 25, 2019, while Taiyuan supported Yaogan-40 (03) via Long March 6A on September 7, 2025, and Xichang facilitated Yaogan-35 on a CZ-2D on November 6, 2021.[44][6][45]| Launch Vehicle | Primary Site Usage | Example Yaogan Mission |
|---|---|---|
| Long March 2C | Jiuquan (JSLC) | Yaogan-30 Group-05 (2019)[44] |
| Long March 2D | Xichang (XSLC), Jiuquan | Yaogan-35 (2021)[45] |
| Long March 4C | Taiyuan (TSLC), Jiuquan | Yaogan-9 series[15] |
| Long March 4B | Taiyuan (TSLC) | Yaogan-26 (2014)[3] |