Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Marsh tit
View on Wikipedia
| Marsh tit | |
|---|---|
| Song recorded in Russia | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Order: | Passeriformes |
| Family: | Paridae |
| Genus: | Poecile |
| Species: | P. palustris
|
| Binomial name | |
| Poecile palustris | |
| Range of Poecile palustris Resident
| |
| Synonyms | |
|
Parus palustris Linnaeus, 1758 | |
The marsh tit (Poecile palustris)[2] is a Eurasian passerine bird in the tit family Paridae and genus Poecile, closely related to the willow tit, Père David's and Songar tits. It is a small bird, around 12 cm (4.7 in) long and weighing 12 g (0.42 oz), with a black crown and nape, pale cheeks, brown back and greyish-brown wings and tail. Between 8 and 11 subspecies are recognised. Its close resemblance to the willow tit can cause identification problems, especially in the United Kingdom where the local subspecies of the two are very similar: they were not recognised as separate species until 1897.
Globally, the marsh tit is classified as Least Concern, although there is evidence of a decline in numbers (in the UK, numbers have dropped by more than 50% since the 1970s, for example). It can be found throughout temperate Europe and northern Asia and, despite its name, it occurs in a range of habitats including dry woodland. The marsh tit is omnivorous; its food includes caterpillars, spiders and seeds. It nests in tree holes, choosing existing hollows to enlarge, rather than excavating its own. A clutch of 5–9 eggs is laid.
Taxonomy and systematics
[edit]The marsh tit was formally described by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758 in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae under the binomial name Parus palustris.[3] It is now placed in the genus Poecile that was erected by the German naturalist Johann Jakob Kaup in 1829.[4] The genus name, Poecile, is the Ancient Greek name for a now unidentifiable small bird, and is perhaps derived from poikolos, meaning "spotted"; the specific palustris is Latin for "marshy".[5][6]
An analysis of mitochrondrial DNA sequences has shown that the marsh tit belongs to a group of Eurasian 'typical chickadees' that includes the willow tit, Père David's tit, the black-bibbed tit, and the Songar tit.[7][8]
Ten subspecies are recognised:[9]
- P. p. dresseri (Stejneger, 1886) – central and southern England, Wales] and west France. Still present in the far south-east of Scotland but in small numbers.[10] Slightly smaller than palustris and more brown or olive-coloured on upperparts and dirtier below. Pale brown tertial fringes can sometimes cause confusion with willow tit
- P. p. palustris (Linnaeus, 1758) – north and central Europe, from south Scandinavia south to north Iberia, east to central Poland, west Balkans and Greece
- P. p. italicus (Tschusi & Hellmayr, 1900) – French Alps, Italy and Sicily. As dresseri, but more rufous on upperparts and paler on underparts[11] In Sicily, it was described the subspecies siculus (De Burg, 1925) considered synonymic with italicus by Vaurie (1959), and subsequently forgotten by most authors. However, in a typical cline pale-dark/north-south all over Europe, and along the Italian peninsula too, where darkest birds are in the Alpine area and palest (as pale as nominate subsp.) in Calabria, the Sicilian very isolated and relict population is composed by the smallest and darkest birds in Europe, therefore rather out of the clinal gradient/intergrade populations. It should deserve better and in depth study before being in synonymized (Priolo, 1969; Corso, 2005; A.Corso, pers. obs.)
- P. p. stagnatilis (Brehm, CL, 1855) – east Europe east to south Urals and northwest Turkey
- P. p. kabardensis (Buturlin, 1929) – Caucasus and northeast Turkey
- P. p. brevirostris Taczanowski, 1872 – south central & southeast Siberia, north Mongolia, northeast China and North Korea
- P. p. ernsti (Yamashina, 1933) – Sakhalin Island
- P. p. hensoni (Stejneger, 1892) – south Kuril Islands and Hokkaido, Japan
- P. p. jeholicus (Kleinschmidt, O & Weigold, 1922) – northeast China and North Korea
- P. p. hellmayri Bianchi, 1903 – east China and South Korea
Description
[edit]
The nominate race has a black cap and nape with a blue sheen visible at close quarters. The black 'bib' below the bill is rather small; the cheeks are white, turning dusky brown on the ear coverts. The upperparts, tail and wings are greyish-brown, with slightly paler fringes to the tertials. The underparts are off-white with a buff or brown tinge strongest on the flanks and undertail coverts. The bill is black and the legs dark grey. Juveniles are very similar to adults, but with a duller black cap and bib, more greyish upperparts and paler underparts; they moult into adult plumage by September.[11]
The marsh tit weighs 12 g (0.42 oz), has a length of 11.5 to 12 cm (4.5 to 4.7 in) (from bill to tail) and a wingspan of 19 cm (7.5 in). The wing length ranges from 60–70 mm (2.4–2.8 in). The oldest recorded marsh tit in Europe reached the age of 11 years, 11 months.[6]
Like other tits it has a large range of call notes; most typical is the explosive "pitchou" note, given when agitated, often leading into "pitchou-bee-bee-bee", which can sound like willow tit when not heard clearly.[11] Unlike many other tits, however, the marsh tit has a well-defined song and a wide song repertoire. Individual birds can have more than five songs, which they use interchangeably. Some of the more common songs include a typical tit-like, ringing, "schip-schip-schip-schip-ship", a more liquid "tu-tu-tu-tu-tu" and sometimes a sweet "tyeu-tyeu-tyeu-tyeu-tyeu". The old Staffordshire name for the species, 'Saw Whetter', refers to the bird's scolding call.[12]

Marsh and willow tits are difficult to distinguish on appearance alone; the races occurring in the UK (P. p. dresseri and P. m. kleinschmidti respectively) are especially hard to separate. When caught for ringing, the pale 'cutting edge' of the marsh tit's bill is a reliable criterion;[13] otherwise, the best way to tell apart the two species is by voice. Plumage characteristics include the lack of a pale wing panel (formed by pale edges to the secondary feathers in the willow tit), the marsh tit's glossier black cap and smaller black 'bib',[14] although none of these is 'completely reliable';[13] for example, juvenile marsh tits can show a pale wing panel.[15] The marsh tit has a noticeably smaller and shorter head than the willow tit and overall the markings are crisp and neat, with the head in proportion to the rest of the bird (willow tit gives the impression of being 'bull-necked').[11]
A measure of the difficulty in identification is given by the fact that, in the UK, the willow tit was not identified as distinct from marsh tit until 1897. Two German ornithologists, Ernst Hartert and Otto Kleinschmidt, were studying marsh tit skins at the British Museum and found two wrongly-labelled willow tits amongst them (two willow tit specimens were then collected at Coalfall Wood in Finchley, north London, and that species was added to the British list in 1900).[16]
Distribution and habitat
[edit]
The marsh tit has a worldwide Extent of Occurrence of around 10 million square kilometres. The global population includes between 6.1 million and 12 million birds in Europe alone. The species is classified as Least Concern, though there is some evidence of a decline in numbers.[17] For example, between the 1970s and 2007, marsh tit numbers declined in the United Kingdom by more than 50% and consequently it is on the Red List of species compiled by the UK's Joint Nature Conservation Committee.[18] Research suggests that the cause may be low survival rates from year to year, though the nest failure rate has fallen during the decline. Other studies have shown that reduced diversity of woodland structure and plant species, partly because of the impact of deer browsing, is the cause of the bird's decline.[19]
Data from 157 woodlands covered by the RSPB/BTO Repeat Woodland Bird Survey showed that the abundance of marsh tits in 2003–2004 corresponded with the vegetation present 2–4 metres above the ground, the shrub layer. Data from the 1980s did not show the same results, but marsh tit numbers had increased by 2003–2004 in woods with the most shrub cover. The study concluded that damage to the shrub layer, caused by overgrazing by deer, for example, may make woodland less suitable for marsh tits.[20]
It is a widespread and common resident breeder throughout temperate Europe and northern Asia. It occurs from northern Spain north to south-eastern Scotland and east to western Russia, with a broad gap in western Asia and present again in eastern Asia from the Altai Mountains east to northern Japan and northern and western China.
This species is sedentary, making short post-breeding movements in most of its range, but in northern Europe some move southward in winter. However, marsh tits seem not to perform the occasional irruptions that other members of the tit family do. Most marsh tits stay in their breeding territories year-round; presumably this is related to their food-storing strategy. Analysis of UK ringing data showed that of 108 recoveries (when a ringed bird is found dead or caught by another ringer), 85% were less than 5 km from where the bird was originally caught, and only 1% further than 20 km.[21] Young birds join mixed roaming flocks; adults also join the flocks when they pass through, but do not stray from their territory.[11]
Marsh tits breed mostly in lowland areas, but can reach altitudes of up to 1,300 m. They prefer large areas of moist, broadleaved woodland, often oak or beech, though they can occupy wet alder woodland, riverside trees, parks and gardens or orchards. A study at Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire, England, found that marsh tits required mature trees with a shrub layer below the canopy, but that they avoided parts of the wood with many young trees.[22] Another study in the United Kingdom found that during winter and while foraging, marsh tits spent more time than blue tits in the wood's understorey, and more time lower in the woodland canopy and understorey. Trees and shrubs in 10 breeding territories were also compared. The trees varied significantly between territories, but the shrub characteristics did not, suggesting that the shrubs were more important to the birds. In Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, marsh tits were "largely absent" from parts of the wood with a dense canopy but poor shrub cover.[20]
Behaviour and ecology
[edit]In mixed winter tit flocks, seldom more than one or two marsh tits are present, and parties of this species alone are infrequent. Its performances in the bushes and branches are just as neat and agile as those of other tits; it often hangs upside down by one leg.
Breeding
[edit]Marsh tits are monogamous and often pair for life; one pair stayed together for six years. In Europe, hybridisation with the willow tit has been recorded twice.[11]
The nest site is in a hole, usually in a tree but sometimes in a wall or in the ground. Nestboxes may be used.[21] Old willow tit holes may be used and enlarged further. Marsh tits do not usually excavate their own nest holes, though they may enlarge the hollow, carrying the chips to a distance before dropping them. The hole may be within a centimetres or two of the ground or high as 10 m (33 ft). Inside the hole, a nest of moss is made and lined with hair and sometimes a few feathers; 20 cm (7.9 in) of moss is used in damp holes, but much less in dry ones.[11]
Between five and nine white and red-speckled eggs are laid late in April or in May, measuring 16 mm × 12 mm (0.63 in × 0.47 in) and weighing 1.2 g (0.042 oz) each, of which 6% is shell. The eggs are incubated by the female for 14–16 days; incubation begins before the clutch is complete, meaning that the chicks hatch over a period of around two days. She sits closely and gives a typical tit "hissing display" if disturbed. The male helps to feed and care for the young and brings nearly all the food for the first four days after hatching. The altricial, downy chicks fledge after 18–21 days.[6] The fledglings are fed by their parents for a week and become independent after a further 1–7 days. The family stays together for between 11 and 15 days after the first flights of the juveniles.[11] Second broods have been recorded, though they are extremely rare in Britain; most are replacement clutches.
A study of marsh tits in Białowieża Forest, Poland, looked at which factors affected birds' choice to re-occupy a nest hole used the previous year. It found that 35.5% of available holes were used again the following year, and that holes where a brood had failed were less likely to be re-used.[23] A study in Bourton Woods, Gloucestershire, England, found that nestboxes were used by marsh tits in successive years in only 20% of cases.[21]
Food and feeding
[edit]Mostly spiders and insects are eaten in spring and summer, but seeds – including those of the thistle – nuts and berries are taken in autumn and winter. Beechmast is the preferred food when it can be found. Marsh tits often take seeds and fruit from the plant before taking them to eat elsewhere.
Marsh tits collect and store large numbers of seeds. For a study in Norway, birds were watched for two hours 15 minutes. They ate 43 and cached 83 seeds per hour. In Sweden, storing food is most frequent between September and late February, with the peak in this behaviour occurring from September to October. Hiding places for the seeds include on and in the ground, in leaf litter, in tree stumps, and under moss and lichen in trees. The hidden seeds are prone to being stolen, by other marsh tits or other species, so birds often fly from one site to another before deciding on a hiding place. They tend to retrieve the oldest items first, and memorise their location rather than searching randomly or checking systematically.[11] The marsh tit's hippocampus is 31% bigger than that of the great tit, despite the great tit's larger overall size and larger forebrain; the relative volume of this part of the brain is greater in birds that cache food.[24]
References
[edit]- ^ BirdLife International (2017). "Poecile palustris". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017 e.T22735995A118837418. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T22735995A118837418.en. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ International), BirdLife International (BirdLife (2016-10-01). "IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Marsh Tit". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
- ^ Linnaeus, Carl (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin). Vol. 1 (10th ed.). Holmiae:Laurentii Salvii. p. 190.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - ^ Kaup, Johann Jakob (1829). Skizzirte Entwickelungs-Geschichte und natürliches System der europäischen Thierwelt (in German). Vol. c. 1. Darmstadt: Carl Wilhelm Leske. p. 114.
- ^ Jobling, James A (2010). The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. pp. 290, 311. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4.
- ^ a b c Robinson, R. A. "Marsh Tit". BirdFacts. British Trust for Ornithology. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ Gill, F. B.; Slikas, B.; Sheldon, F. H. (2005). "Phylogeny of titmice (Paridae): II. Species relationships based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene". Auk. 122: 121–143. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0121:POTPIS]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 86067032.
- ^ del Hoyo, J.; Elliot, A.; Christie, D., eds. (2007). Handbook of the Birds of the World Volume 12: Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees. Lynx Edicions. ISBN 978-84-96553-42-2.
- ^ Gill, Frank; Donsker, David, eds. (2018). "Waxwings and allies, tits, penduline tits". World Bird List Version 8.1. International Ornithologists' Union. Retrieved 31 May 2018.
- ^ "The SOC: Scottish Bird Report". www.the-soc.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2012-03-04.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i BWPi: The Birds of the Western Palearctic on interactive DVD-ROM. London: BirdGuides Ltd. and Oxford University Press. 2004. ISBN 978-1-898110-39-2.
- ^ Greenoak, Francesca (1979). All The Birds Of The Air. London: Book Club Association. p. 237.
- ^ a b Broughton, R. K.; Hinsley, S. A.; Bellamy, P. E. (2008). "Separation of Marsh Tit Poecile palustris from Willow Tit Poecile montana using a bill criterion" (PDF). Ringing & Migration. 24 (2): 101–103. doi:10.1080/03078698.2008.9674382. S2CID 53665683.
- ^ Mullarney, Killian; Svensson, Lars; Zetterstrom, Dan; Grant, Peter (1999). Collins Bird Guide. London: HarperCollins. p. 318. ISBN 978-0-00-219728-1.
- ^ Jonsson, Lars (1996). Birds of Europe. London: Helm. p. 464. ISBN 978-0-7136-4422-7.
- ^ Cocker, Mark; Mabey, Richard (2005). Birds Britannica. London: Chatto & Windus. p. 387. ISBN 978-0-7011-6907-7.
- ^ "Species factsheet: Parus palustris". BirdLife International. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ "Conservation Listings". jncc.gov.uk. Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ "Marsh Tit". Breeding Birds of the Wider Countryside. British Trust for Ornithology. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- ^ a b Hinsley, S. A.; Carpenter, J. E.; Broughton, R. K.; Bellamy, P. E.; Rothery, P.; Arjun, A.; Hewson, C.; Gosler, A. G. (2007). "Habitat selection by Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in the UK" (PDF). Ibis. 149: 224–233. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00691.x.
- ^ a b c Wernham, C. V.; Toms, M. P.; Marchant, J. H.; Clark, J. A.; Siriwardena, G. M.; Baillie, S. R., eds. (2002). The Migration Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland. London: T. & A.D. Poyser. pp. 592–593. ISBN 978-0-7136-6514-7.
- ^ Broughton, R. K.; Hinsley, S. A.; Bellamy, P. E.; Hill, R. A.; Rothery, P. (2006). "Marsh Tit Poecile palustris territories in a British broad-leaved wood". Ibis. 148 (4): 744–752. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00583.x. Retrieved 25 January 2009
- ^ Wesołowski, T.; Greenwood, P. J. (2006). "Nest-site re-use: Marsh Tit Poecile palustris decisions in a primeval forest". Bird Study. 53 (3): 199–204. Bibcode:2006BirdS..53..199W. doi:10.1080/00063650609461434.
- ^ Anderson, P.; Morris, R.; Amaral, D.; O'Keefe, J. (2007). The Hippocampus Book. Oxford University Press. p. 640. ISBN 978-0-19-510027-3.
External links
[edit]- Blasco-Zumeta, Javier; Heinze, Gerd-Michael. "Marsh tit" (PDF). Identification Atlas of Aragon's Birds.
- Xeno-canto: audio recordings of the marsh tit
Marsh tit
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy
Etymology and classification
The common name "marsh tit" derives from the Old English word "titte" or "tit," a diminutive term denoting something small, applied to various petite birds in the Paridae family, with "marsh" likely a historical misnomer reflecting early confusion with wetland-associated species rather than the bird's actual preference for deciduous woodlands.[5][6] The scientific name Poecile palustris breaks down into the genus Poecile, derived from the Ancient Greek "poikilos" meaning varied or spotted, alluding to the plumage patterns observed across species in this group, and the specific epithet "palustris," from Latin "paluster" meaning marshy, based on an initial association with wetland habitats.[7][8] The marsh tit was first classified by Carl Linnaeus in 1758 as Parus palustris within the broad genus Parus, which encompassed most tits and chickadees at the time.[9] Molecular studies in the late 1990s, including DNA-DNA hybridization and sequence analyses, revealed distinct phylogenetic lineages within Parus, leading to its subdivision; the marsh tit was reclassified into the revived genus Poecile around 1998, reflecting its closer affinity to North American chickadees than to other Eurasian Parus species like the great tit (Parus major).[10][11] Within the Paridae family, the marsh tit occupies a basal position in the Poecile clade, showing particularly close phylogenetic relations to the willow tit (Poecile montanus), with genetic divergence estimated at approximately 3.5 million years ago during the late Pliocene to early Pleistocene, supported by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses indicating shared ancestry and occasional hybridization.[12][13]Subspecies
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) is recognized as comprising up to 10 subspecies, primarily distinguished by allopatric distributions across Eurasia, with subtle morphological variations that follow a clinal pattern.[14] These subspecies are defined based on geographic isolation, with limited gene flow between them due to habitat preferences and barriers. The nominate subspecies, P. p. palustris, occupies central and northern Europe, ranging from southern Scandinavia and northern Iberia eastward to central Poland, the western Balkans, and Greece.[14] In the United Kingdom and adjacent western Europe, P. p. dresseri is found, extending to southern Scotland. Further east, P. p. stagnatilis inhabits eastern Europe from the southern Urals to northwestern Turkey.[14] In eastern Asia, P. p. brevirostris occurs from south-central and southeast Siberia through northern Mongolia, northeastern China, and northern Korea.[14] Other recognized subspecies include P. p. kabardensis in the Caucasus and northeastern Turkey, P. p. italicus in the French Alps and Italy, P. p. ernsti on Sakhalin Island, P. p. hensoni in the southern Kuril Islands and northern Japan (Hokkaido), and P. p. hellmayri in eastern China and southern Korea.[14] Morphological differences among subspecies are minor and primarily involve size metrics and plumage tones, exhibiting a clinal gradient with body size decreasing from east to west and upperpart coloration becoming more intensely brown in western populations.[14] For instance, P. p. dresseri is the smallest, with adult wing lengths averaging 64 mm and tail-to-wing ratios of 0.82–0.83, compared to the larger nominate P. p. palustris with wings 2–3 mm longer and ratios around 0.87; bill length also varies slightly, with eastern forms like brevirostris (meaning "short-billed") showing proportionally shorter bills. Plumage in eastern subspecies tends to be duller and less saturated, particularly on the upperparts and flanks, while western forms display richer brown tones.[14] Overall species length is 11–12 cm, with no pronounced sexual dimorphism beyond minor wing length differences. Subspecies boundaries are maintained by allopatric ranges, though limited hybridization occurs with the closely related willow tit (Poecile montanus) in narrow overlap zones, such as southern Norway, Belgium, and southern Germany; such events are rare, with only a handful of records, including the first genetically confirmed hybrid in 2020 via mitochondrial DNA and SNP analysis showing mixed parentage.[12] Isolated populations, particularly in western Europe, emphasize the need for habitat connectivity to prevent further fragmentation.Description
Physical characteristics
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) is a small passerine bird measuring 11–12 cm in length, with a wingspan of 18–21 cm and a body mass ranging from 8.9–15 g, averaging around 11 g.[4][1] The species exhibits sexual monomorphism in both size and plumage coloration, with males and females indistinguishable externally except for minor differences in wing length that are not reliably diagnostic in the field.[4][15] Adults possess distinctive plumage featuring a glossy black cap extending from the forehead to the nape, a small black bib on the throat, and contrasting white cheeks that meet at the nape.[4] The upperparts are warm brown, including the back, wings, and tail, while the underparts are off-white with a buff wash on the flanks and undertail coverts.[4] Juveniles resemble adults but display duller plumage, with a sooty-black or brownish crown lacking gloss, paler greyish upperparts, and less distinct facial markings, including a browner throat patch.[4] Anatomically, the Marsh tit has a short, stout black bill adapted for cracking seeds and extracting invertebrates from crevices.[4] Its strong, bluish-grey legs enable agile climbing and perching on tree trunks and branches.[16] The wings, with 10 primaries measuring 54.5–62.5 mm, support maneuverable flight suited to navigating dense woodland environments.[17] The species undergoes a complete post-breeding molt in summer, typically from July to September, replacing all feathers including primaries and secondaries.[4]Identification and similar species
The marsh tit (Poecile palustris) is a small, compact bird measuring about 11.5–12.5 cm in length, characterized by a glossy black cap extending to the nape, a small neat black bib, white cheeks often with a dusky brown patch on the ear coverts, a uniform unstreaked warm brown back and flanks, and plain greyish-brown wings and tail lacking a prominent pale panel. A key diagnostic feature is the pale whitish spot at the base of the upper mandible, present in nearly all individuals and absent in close relatives. The underparts are off-white with a pale buff wash on the flanks, and the legs are dark grey.[18][19][20] The marsh tit's closest visual mimic is the willow tit (Poecile montanus), with which it shares overlapping ranges in northern and central Europe, leading to frequent field misidentifications. The willow tit differs in having a duller, matt black cap, a larger and less tidy black bib that often extends further onto the cheeks, more uniformly white cheeks without a dusky ear patch, brighter buff flanks, and a conspicuous pale panel on the greater coverts of the wing. The willow tit also lacks the pale bill spot and appears bull-necked with looser plumage overall. In areas of sympatry, such as mature woodlands in the UK and Scandinavia, careful scrutiny of these subtle plumage traits is essential, though vocalizations provide a more reliable separator: the marsh tit's call is a high-pitched, sneezing "pitchou," while the willow tit's is a harsher, nasal "zee-zee-zree."[21][22][23] Other potentially confusable species include the great tit (Parus major), which is noticeably larger (14 cm) with bright yellow underparts, a bold black stripe down the belly, and greenish wings; the coal tit (Periparus ater), distinguished by its white nape patch and double white wingbars; and the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), identifiable by its bright blue crown, wings, and tail along with azure wingbars. Juvenile marsh tits pose seasonal identification challenges from July to September, as their caps and bibs are duller and less glossy, with buffier underparts and reduced contrast on the cheeks, often requiring closer views or audio cues for confirmation. In the non-breeding season, when birds form mixed flocks, the marsh tit is best identified by its distinctive call rather than plumage alone; high-quality optics are recommended to detect fine details like the bill spot and wing pattern in dense woodland habitats.[18]Distribution and habitat
Geographic range
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) occupies a broad Palearctic distribution, ranging from western Europe across to eastern Asia. In Europe, it occurs from the United Kingdom and France eastward to central Poland, the western Balkans, and Greece, with the northern limit in southern Scandinavia and the southern extent reaching northern Italy and Turkey. Asian populations extend from southeastern Siberia and northern Mongolia through northeastern China and North Korea to Sakhalin Island, the southern Kuril Islands, Hokkaido in Japan, and eastern China (from Hebei to Shandong, Jiangsu, and South Korea).[4][3] The species is absent from Iceland, Ireland, most of the Iberian Peninsula (except the northern Cantabrian range, from which it has recently disappeared in the western extremity of Galicia), and much of northern Fennoscandia. Within the United Kingdom, its distribution is fragmented, concentrated mainly in England and Wales with significant gaps, and largely absent from most of Scotland. In Asia, populations achieve higher densities in the taiga forests of Siberia and associated regions.[2][4][24] Europe holds approximately 55% of the global range, supporting an estimated 7.5–13.3 million mature individuals as of 2021, while the overall global population is preliminarily estimated at 14–24 million mature individuals. Global population trends indicate a slow decline over the past decade, linked to habitat loss (as of 2022). In the UK, the breeding population stood at about 28,500 territories in 2016 but has since continued to decline, with an 81% population decrease and approximately 22.5% distribution contraction since 1967 (as of 2023). The Marsh tit is largely resident with minimal migration across its range.[3][25][2] Following post-glacial recolonization after the last Ice Age, the species expanded into much of its current European distribution, including broader coverage in regions like Scotland. More recently, contractions have occurred due to habitat loss, with the UK range shrinking by about 20% and the population declining by 81% since 1967.[26][27][2]Habitat preferences
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) primarily inhabits mature deciduous or mixed woodlands, favoring broadleaf species such as oak (Quercus spp.), beech (Fagus sylvatica), and alder (Alnus spp.), where it requires a dense understorey for foraging and natural tree holes or cavities in dead or rotting wood for nesting.[3][2] It generally avoids coniferous forests during the breeding season but may use them opportunistically outside breeding periods.[3] These preferences extend to moist broadleaf woods, riverine alder carr, and occasionally wooded edges of cultivation, with a need for open undergrowth to support insect-rich environments.[3][28] At the microhabitat level, the species selects territories averaging 4–6 ha within larger woodland patches exceeding 5 ha—preferably over 10 ha—to ensure connectivity and reduce isolation, often in copses, parks, or gardens featuring mature trees with well-developed shrub layers (2–4 m height).[29][30] Habitat quality is critically influenced by the presence of dead wood for nesting cavities and dense, insect-abundant undergrowth, with territories showing higher reproductive success in areas of greater shrub cover.[2][30] The Marsh tit exhibits sensitivity to fragmentation, as isolated patches hinder recolonization and limit access to suitable microhabitats.[3] Seasonally, the species remains largely resident in woodlands year-round but expands winter home ranges to 30–40 ha, incorporating gardens and bird feeders near deciduous stands, particularly those with English oak (Quercus robur) for foraging.[28][2] In Europe, it occurs from sea level to about 1,300 m (up to 2,200 m in Greece), while in Asian montane regions it reaches up to 2,100 m (overall to 3,000 m).[4][3]Behavior and ecology
Vocalizations and communication
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) employs a diverse vocal repertoire essential for social cohesion, territorial defense, and predator avoidance. The species' most distinctive call is a sharp, explosive "pitchoo" or "pitchu," often rendered phonetically as a bold, scolding note that functions in contact maintenance between individuals and agitation responses.[2][31] This call contrasts markedly with the Willow tit's softer, nasal "zee-zee" or "zi-zi-zi" calls, enabling reliable species recognition in overlapping ranges.[31] Additional calls include a rapid "tsee-tsee" or "tsiptsip" series, used similarly for intra-group communication.[18] The Marsh tit's song is simpler and less elaborate than those of many congeners, comprising repetitive phrases delivered primarily by males during the breeding season to advertise territory ownership. Typical renditions feature short, accelerating series of "chi-chi-chi" or "chew-it" notes, forming a slow, rhythmic trill that may include up to 20 variations across individuals or populations, with occasional switches between phrase types.[18][4] Regional dialects occur, reflecting local acoustic adaptations, though the core structure remains consistent across the species' range.[4] Females contribute softer versions of the song, sometimes in coordinated bursts with males, particularly at territory boundaries where countersinging reinforces pair and territorial bonds. Vocalizations also mediate anti-predator responses and social learning. Alarm calls, such as harsh scolds or broadband hissing displays from incubating adults, deter nest predators by mimicking threatening sounds and eliciting avoidance behaviors.[32] Pairs may duet through alternating calls or songs to synchronize defense or maintain proximity, enhancing coordination during threats. Juveniles acquire their vocal repertoire via acoustic learning, imitating adult models to refine calls and songs for effective communication in family groups.[33] Sonographic analyses of these vocalizations reveal dominant frequencies in the 4–7 kHz range, aiding studies on acoustic divergence from close relatives like the Willow tit.[32]Foraging and diet
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) forages mainly in the understorey and lower canopy layers of mature deciduous woodlands, employing techniques such as gleaning prey from branches, twigs, and leaves, as well as probing into bark fissures to extract hidden invertebrates.[30] These birds spend a significant portion of their foraging time—around 32%—on branches and twigs, with probing or searching accounting for about 22% of observations, though they hang to feed less frequently than related species like the blue tit.[30] This understorey preference aligns with their habitat use, enabling access to diverse prey in dense vegetation.[2] The diet is heavily invertebrate-dominated during summer and the breeding period, comprising primarily small arthropods such as caterpillars, aphids, spiders, and insects from orders including Diptera (flies), Hemiptera (bugs), Plecoptera (stoneflies), Trichoptera (caddisflies), Hymenoptera (bees and wasps), Coleoptera (beetles), and lepidopteran larvae.[4] Plant material, including seeds, nuts, berries, and sap, supplements the diet year-round but becomes predominant in winter, with items like beech mast and sunflower seeds forming key components.[4] Berries provide occasional supplemental nutrition, particularly when other resources are limited.[34] During breeding, the emphasis shifts toward protein-rich insects to meet heightened nutritional demands. In winter, Marsh tits increasingly rely on seeds and cached stores, often joining mixed-species flocks to enhance foraging efficiency and reduce predation risk while exploiting shared resources.[35] They exhibit scatter-hoarding behavior, wedging or burying food items like seeds into bark crevices, loose soil, or other cryptic sites, with individuals potentially caching several hundred items per day during peak periods.[36][37] This caching strategy, observed in about 5% of foraging records, is essential for surviving food shortages in harsh temperate winters by allowing deferred consumption and buffering energy deficits.[30]Breeding biology
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) breeds from late March to June, forming monogamous pairs that often last for life.[3][38] Pairs typically produce a single brood per season, though double-brooding occurs rarely in southern parts of the range.[4] Clutches consist of 6–9 eggs on average, laid in a single layer within the nest cup.[38] The female alone incubates the eggs for 13–16 days, during which the male provides food to her at the nest entrance.[39][38] Nesting occurs in natural tree cavities or those excavated by the birds themselves, often in mature broadleaved trees such as oak (Quercus) or beech (Fagus), typically at heights of 2–4 m above ground.[4][40] The nest is constructed primarily by the female as a foundation of moss topped with a cup lined with animal hair, feathers, and sometimes plant fibers, providing insulation and camouflage within the damp woodland environment.[3][40] Both parents feed the nestlings, prioritizing protein-rich insects to support rapid growth, with the young fledging after 16–21 days in the nest.[39][41] Fledging success varies but typically ranges from 50–70% of hatched young, influenced primarily by nest predation from mammals and birds, as well as seasonal food availability that affects provisioning rates.[40][42] Overall nest failure rates are around 16–18%, with predation accounting for over half of losses in monitored populations.[39]Conservation
Population status
The Marsh tit (Poecile palustris) is classified as Least Concern on the global IUCN Red List (2025 assessment), with an estimated population of 13.6–24.2 million mature individuals as of 2021.[3] The global population trend is decreasing slowly, primarily driven by regional declines in Europe, while populations remain stable across much of its extensive range in Asia.[3] In Europe, which holds approximately 55% of the global population (estimated at 7.5–13.3 million mature individuals), the species is also assessed as Least Concern but has experienced a slight overall decline over the past decade according to Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PECBMS) data (2024).[3] Declines have been more pronounced in western Europe, with population reductions of 20–40% recorded in several countries between 1970 and 2020; for instance, long-term trends show decreases of around 30% in Belgium and up to 70% in Sweden over similar periods.[43] In the United Kingdom, the Marsh tit is Red-listed due to severe declines exceeding 50% since the 1980s, with British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) monitoring indicating an 81% reduction in breeding abundance from 1967 to 2023.[2] The current UK breeding population is estimated at 29,000–41,000 territories (as of 2021).[2] Population monitoring relies on standardized surveys such as the BTO/Joint Nature Conservation Committee/RSPB Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) in the UK, which documents a 10-year decline of 25% (approximately 3% annually) from 2013 to 2023, with a non-significant +6% change in the most recent year (2022–2023) per BBS 2024, and broader European efforts by BirdLife International and PECBMS that track trends across the continent.[2][3][44] Habitat loss is identified as the primary driver of these declines globally, though specific causal factors are analyzed separately.[3]Threats and conservation efforts
The Marsh tit faces several major threats across its range, primarily from habitat loss and fragmentation due to urbanisation, agricultural intensification, and the replacement of deciduous woodlands with coniferous plantations.[3] These changes reduce the availability of mature trees and dead wood essential for nesting and foraging, while woodland fragmentation isolates populations, limiting dispersal and increasing vulnerability to local extinctions.[2] Climate change exacerbates these issues by altering insect availability through shifting seasonal patterns and by causing higher mortality during severe winters, particularly in small, isolated groups.[3] Additionally, competition with other parid species, such as the great tit and potentially the willow tit, can intensify resource pressures in degraded habitats.[3] In the United Kingdom, where the species has experienced an 81% population decline since 1967, intensive forestry practices have further reduced dead wood and understorey vegetation, critical for the bird's survival.[2] This has led to ongoing range contraction of 22.5% and placement on the UK Red List since 2022, with recent monitoring indicating persistent declines in the 2020s.[2] Low colonization rates in suitable but fragmented habitats hinder natural recovery, compounded by increased predation pressures.[3] Conservation efforts for the Marsh tit are guided by legal protections under the EU Birds Directive, which safeguards all wild bird species and their habitats, and the Bern Convention Appendix II, promoting international cooperation.[3] In the UK, organizations like the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) implement targeted projects, including nestbox schemes designed to mimic natural tree holes and boost breeding success in woodlands; however, these should avoid excessive provision to prevent increased predation and competition.[2][3] Woodland restoration initiatives focus on enhancing understorey density, controlling deer browsing, and retaining dead wood, while agri-environment schemes encourage hedgerow planting and landscape connectivity to link fragmented sites.[2] These measures have yielded localized recoveries through improved habitat management, with some populations stabilizing in restored woodlands.[2] Ongoing research into morphological variation and subspecies genetics informs preservation strategies, aiming to maintain genetic diversity amid declines.[45] Proposals for broader actions, such as expanding deciduous woodland cover and potential translocations, continue to address fragmentation at a landscape scale.[3]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Poecile
