Hubbry Logo
PlumagePlumageMain
Open search
Plumage
Community hub
Plumage
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Plumage
Plumage
Plumage
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Close-up view of the plumage on a house sparrow

Plumage (from Latin pluma 'feather') is a layer of feathers that covers a bird and the pattern, colour, and arrangement of those feathers. The pattern and colours of plumage differ between species and subspecies and may vary with sex and age classes. Within a few species, there can be different colour morphs. The placement of feathers on a bird is not haphazard but rather emerges in organised, overlapping rows and groups, and these feather tracts are known by standard names.[1][2]

Most birds moult twice a year, resulting in a breeding plumage and a non-breeding plumage; one of the moults, usually the one just after breeding, is a complete moult replacing all the feathers; the other, usually the one just before breeding, is often only a partial moult, with new small body feathers but not replacing the larger flight feathers in the wings and tail. Some very large birds, like eagles, replace their flight feathers slowly but continuously throughout the year, to minimise loss of flight efficiency. Many ducks and some other species such as the red junglefowl have males wearing a bright plumage while breeding and a drab eclipse plumage for some months afterward. Many passerine species have only one moult per year, with changes in plumage resulting from the wear of differently-coloured feather tips. Young birds have a juvenile plumage, which is replaced in the months after fledging by the first-winter plumage; in long-lived birds with slow maturation like gulls, this is followed by a succession of second, third, and sometimes fourth year immature plumages.[3]

Plumology (or plumage science) is the name for the science that is associated with the study of feathers.[4][5][6]

Eclipse plumage

[edit]
Mandarin duck (male) in eclipse plumage

Many male ducks in the family Anatidae have bright, colourful plumage, exhibiting strong sexual dimorphism. However, they moult into a dull plumage after breeding in mid-summer. This drab, female-like appearance is called eclipse plumage. They shed all their flight feathers simultaneously when in eclipse, becoming flightless for a short period. Some duck species remain in eclipse for one to three months in the late summer to early winter, while others retain the cryptic plumage until the next spring when they undergo another moult to return to their breeding plumage.

Although mainly found in the Anatidae, a few other species, including red junglefowl, most fairywrens[a] and some sunbirds also have an eclipse plumage. In the superb and splendid fairywrens, very old males (over about four years) may moult from one breeding plumage to another[7] whereas in the red-backed and white-winged fairywrens, males do not acquire breeding plumage until four years old,[8] well after they become sexually mature and indeed longer than the vast majority of individuals live.[9]

In contrast to the ducks, males of hummingbirds and most lek-mating passerines – like the Guianan cock-of-the-rock or birds of paradise – retain their exuberant plumage and sexual dimorphism at all times, moulting as ordinary birds do once annually.

Polymorphism

[edit]

In some birds, including many true owls (Strigidae), some nightjars (Caprimulgidae), some skuas (Stercorariidae), and a few cuckoos (Cuculus and relatives) being widely known examples, there is colour polymorphism in plumage. This means that two or more colour variants occur within their populations during all or at least most seasons and plumages; in the above-mentioned examples a brown (phaeomelanin) and grey (eumelanin) morph exist, termed "hepatic form" particularly in the cuckoos. Other cases of natural polymorphism are of various kinds; many are melanic/nonmelanic (some paradise-flycatchers, Terpsiphone, for example), but more unusual types of polymorphism exist – the face colour of the Gouldian finch (Erythrura[10][11] gouldiae) or the courtship types of male ruffs (Calidris pugnax).[12]

Humphrey–Parkes (H–P) moult and plumage terminology

[edit]
The differences in plumage of a blue grosbeak, from top to bottom, between a breeding male ("alternate" plumage), a non-breeding male ("basic" plumage), a female, and the related indigo bunting.

The Humphrey–Parkes terminology is a naming system developed by a small group of ornithologists in the USA, using its own specialist names for plumages. The annual moult after the breeding season, is known in it as the pre-basic moult. This resulting covering of feathers, which will last either until the next breeding season or until the next annual moult, is known as the basic plumage. Many species undertake another moult before the breeding season known as the pre-alternate moult, the resulting breeding plumage being known as the alternate or nuptial plumage. The alternate plumage is often brighter than the basic plumage, for sexual display, but may also be cryptic to hide incubating birds that might be vulnerable on the nest.[13]

The Humphrey–Parkes terminology requires attention to detail to name moults and plumages to its systems.[14] Compared to the traditional life-cycle-based terminology described above, it has been criticised for its use of obscure counterintuitive jargon and spellings, and as a result is little-known outside of a small circle of professional users in the United States, and effectively unknown elsewhere.[15]

Abnormal plumages

[edit]
An incomplete leucistic common blackbird.

Abnormal plumages include a variety of conditions. Albinism, total loss of colour, is rare, but partial loss of colours is more common. Some species are colour polymorphic, having two or more colour variants. A few species have special types of polymorphism, as in the male ruff which has an assortment of different colours around the head and neck in the breeding season only.

There are hereditary as well as non-hereditary variations in plumage that are rare and termed abnormal or aberrant plumages. Melanism refers to an excess of black or dark colours. Erythromelanism or erythrism is the result of excessive reddish-brown erythromelanin deposition in feathers that normally lack melanin. Melanin of different forms combine with xanthophylls to produce colour mixtures and when this combination is imbalanced it produces colour shifts that are termed schizochroisms, including xanthochromism (an overabundance of yellow), and axanthism (a lack of yellow), which are commonly bred in cagebirds such as budgerigars). A reduction in eumelanin leads to non-eumelanin schizochroism with an overall fawn plumage while a lack of phaeomelanin results in grey-coloured non-phaeomelanin schizochroism. Carotenism refers to the abnormal distribution of carotenoid pigments.

The term "dilution" is used for situations where the colour is of a lower intensity overall; it is caused by decreased deposition of pigment in the developing feather, and can thus not occur in structural coloration (i.e., "dilute blue" does not exist); pale structural colours are instead achieved by shifting the peak wavelength at which light is refracted.[16] Dilution regularly occurs in normal plumage (grey, buff, pink and cream colours are usually produced by this process), but may in addition occur as an aberration (e.g., all normally black plumage becoming grey).[17]

Albinism

[edit]

Albinism in birds is rare, occurring to any extent in perhaps one in 1800 individuals. It involves loss of colour in all parts including the iris of the eyes, bills, skin, legs, and feet. It is usually the result of a genetic mutation causing the absence of tyrosinase, an enzyme essential for melanin synthesis. Leucism (which includes what used to be termed as "partial albinism") refers to loss of pigments in some or all parts of feathers. A bird that is albino (from the Latin albus, "white") has white feathers in place of coloured ones on some portion of its body. A bird that is naturally white, such as a swan, goose, or egret, is not an albino, nor is a bird that has seasonally alternating white plumage.[18]

Four degrees of albinism have been described. The most common form is termed partial albinism, in which local areas of the bird's body, such as certain feathers, are lacking the pigment melanin. The white areas may be symmetrical, with both sides of the bird showing a similar pattern. In imperfect albinism, the pigment is partially inhibited in the skin, eyes, or feathers, but is not absent from any of them. Incomplete albinism is the complete absence of pigment from the skin, eyes, or feathers, but not all three.[18]

An albino juvenile house crow in Malacca, Malaysia, next to its normal-coloured parent

A completely albino bird is the most rare. The eyes in this case are pink or red, because blood shows through in the absence of pigment in the irises. The beak, legs, and feet are very pale or white. Albino adults are rare in the wild because their eyesight is poor resulting in greater risk of predation.[19] They are likely easier targets for predators because their colour distinguishes them from their environment. Falconers have observed that their trained birds are likely to attack a white pigeon in a flock because it is conspicuous. A complete albino often has weak eyesight and brittle wing and tail feathers, which may reduce its ability to fly. In flocks, albinos are often harassed by their own species. Such observations have been made among red-winged blackbirds, barn swallows, and African penguins. In a nesting colony of the latter, three unusual juveniles—one black-headed, one white-headed, and one full albino—were shunned and abused by companions.[18]

Albinism has been reported in all orders and in 54 families of North American birds. The American robin and house sparrow led bird species in the incidence of albinism. Albinistic white appears to replace brown pigments more often than red or yellow ones; records suggest a greater incidence in crows, ravens, and hawks than in goldfinches or orioles.[18]

Several kinds of albinism in chickens has been described: A complete albinism controlled by an autosomal recessive gene[20] and two different kinds of partial albinism. One of the partial albinisms is sex-linked[21] and the other is autosomal recessive.[22] A fourth kind of albinism severely reduce pigmentation in the eyes, but only dilutes the pigment in the plumage.[23]

Abnormally white feathers are not always due to albinism. Injury or disease may change their color, including dietary deficiencies or circulatory problems during feather development. Aging may also turn a bird's feathers white.[18]

Hen feathering in cocks

[edit]
Main article: Hen feathering

Hen feathering in cocks is an inherited genetically conditioned plumage character in domestic fowl (domesticated Gallus gallus) controlled by a single gene. Males with this condition develop a female-type plumage, although otherwise look and respond like virile males. In some breeds, one can see males that have a plumage completely similar in all aspects to that of females. The trait is controlled by a simple autosomic dominant gene, whose expression is limited to the male sex.[24][25][26] The condition is due to an enhanced activity of the aromatase complex of enzymes responsible for estrogen synthesis, with estrogen formation in the skin is as much as several hundred-fold higher than that of normal chickens.[27]

Abnormal pigmentation conditions

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Plumage

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Plumage is the collective term for the feathers that cover a 's body, forming a complex integumentary essential to avian biology. These feathers, numbering in the thousands per , vary widely in , shape, size, and coloration to support diverse functions such as flight, , , visual signaling, , sensory perception, and sound production. The composition of plumage arises from specialized feather types distributed across feather tracts, including contour feathers for body coverage, for , and down feathers for insulation. Colors in plumage derive from pigments like (producing , gray, brown, and orange hues) and (yielding reds, yellows, and oranges), as well as structural mechanisms involving light refraction through feather microstructures, which create iridescent or metallic effects. not only contributes to coloration but also strengthens feathers against wear and abrasion. Plumage exhibits significant variation influenced by factors such as age, sex, season, and environment, often through periodic molting cycles that replace worn feathers and alter appearance—for instance, many species possess a basic plumage for non-breeding periods and an alternate plumage for breeding displays. These patterns and colors play critical roles in mate attraction, territorial defense, social interactions, and predator avoidance, making plumage a key model for studying and evolutionary adaptation in birds.

Definition and Functions

Definition of Plumage

Plumage, derived from the Latin word plūma meaning "" or "down," refers to the collective layer of feathers that covers a bird's body. In , it encompasses thousands of individual feathers varying in structure, shape, and size, which together form a complex unique to avian species. These feathers are arranged in specific tracts across the body, creating patterns, colors, and configurations that are often species-specific and serve as key identifiers in and . While plumage provides comprehensive coverage, it excludes certain bare skin areas such as the legs, feet, bills, and sometimes facial regions, which remain unfeathered in most birds. Additionally, plumage is distinct from the natal down found on nestlings, which consists of softer, insulating down feathers that are typically replaced by true contour feathers during the bird's first post-natal molt; in some , nestlings hatch without down, proceeding directly to plumage development. The evolutionary origins of plumage trace back to ancestors, with feathers first appearing in theropod dinosaurs approximately 150 million years ago during the period, as evidenced by fossils like that display primitive feather structures. This development marked a pivotal within the theropod lineage, from which modern birds (Aves) ultimately descended, transforming simple filamentous integuments into the diverse, vaned feathers characteristic of plumage.

Biological Functions

Plumage serves as a primary insulator for birds, trapping air within its layered structure to minimize loss and maintain body temperature in varying environmental conditions. The interlocking barbs and barbules of create a barrier that reduces conductive and convective , enabling endothermic birds to conserve metabolic energy during cold exposure. For instance, studies using thermal imaging have demonstrated that insulation significantly lowers dissipation rates, with denser plumage correlating to improved in species like house sparrows. In hotter climates, birds can adjust plumage posture—fluffing to increase air trapping for cooling or compressing them to enhance radiative loss—further optimizing balance. Waterproofing is another critical function of plumage, achieved through the distribution of preen oil from the during grooming behaviors. Birds rub their beaks against the gland to collect waxy secretions, which they then spread across feathers via , forming a hydrophobic that repels and prevents saturation. This mechanism not only maintains feather integrity by reducing bacterial and fungal growth but also preserves insulation by keeping the plumage dry. Research indicates that preen oil enhances feather flexibility and strength, contributing to overall plumage condition without being essential for basic water repellency, as demonstrated in controlled experiments on waterfowl. Plumage enables flight through the aerodynamic properties of specialized contour and , which generate lift and minimize drag during wingbeats. Primary and secondary , with their asymmetric vanes, create shapes that produce efficient airflow, allowing sustained locomotion and maneuverability. The flexibility of feathers permits dynamic morphing of wing surfaces, adapting to different flight phases such as takeoff or , as evidenced by biomechanical analyses of avian wings. In flying birds, the constrained number and of these feathers optimize performance, with even slight damage reducing speed and agility. Plumage patterns facilitate for predator avoidance and conspicuous signaling for mate attraction and territorial defense, balancing survival and reproductive needs. Mottled or barred designs on dorsal surfaces disrupt outlines against backgrounds, enhancing in non-breeding contexts, while vibrant or patterned displays in breeding plumage signal genetic quality or species identity to potential mates. For example, in estrildid finches, complex plumage motifs have evolved under to convey fitness, independent of camouflage demands. Barred plumage often serves dual roles, providing for concealment and bold contrasts for intraspecific communication. Certain plumage structures contribute to sensory functions, such as the facial ruff in , where stiff, curved feathers amplify and direct sound waves toward the ears to improve auditory localization. This reflector-like arrangement increases sound sensitivity by up to 12 decibels in the 5-8 kHz range, aiding in prey detection under low-light conditions. The ruff's densely ramified feathers funnel high-frequency noises precisely to the ear openings, enhancing directional hearing without relying on external pinnae. Recent research has revealed that hidden achromatic layers beneath pigmented feathers enhance color signaling for species recognition and mate choice in songbirds. A 2025 study on and related species found that concealed layers boost and saturation of overlying pigments, while layers increase color contrast and purity, making plumage appear more vivid without altering visible patterns. These subsurface structures, present in diverse songbird lineages, likely evolved to intensify visual signals during , as confirmed through optical manipulations and spectral analyses.

Feather Structure and Types

Basic Components of Feathers

Feathers, the fundamental units of plumage, consist of a series of interconnected anatomical elements that provide structural integrity and functional versatility. The calamus, also known as the , forms the hollow, basal portion of the feather that embeds into the dermal follicle for anchorage, emerging from the epidermal collar during feather formation. This proximal structure lacks barbs and serves as the attachment point, distinguishing it from the distal, more elaborate regions of the feather. The central rachis, or shaft, extends distally from the calamus as a sturdy, tapered axis that supports the feather's overall form. Branching perpendicularly from the rachis are the barbs, which are elongated secondary structures composed of a central ramus with paired barbules extending from its edges. These barbules, the tertiary branches, exhibit proximal and distal distinctions: proximal barbules feature grooves or cilia, while distal barbules bear hooklets that interlock with the proximal barbules of adjacent barbs, creating a cohesive, Velcro-like mechanism. This interlocking arrangement forms the vane, a planar, webbed surface on either side of the rachis that enables feathers to overlap seamlessly in plumage, enhancing aerodynamic efficiency and barrier properties. Proximal regions near the calamus and rachis base are typically denser and more robust, while distal portions toward the feather tip become finer and more flexible, reflecting gradients in barb and barbule density. At the molecular level, feathers are primarily composed of proteins synthesized by , which form a durable, beta-sheet-rich matrix in the rachis, barbs, and barbules, supplemented by associated proteins for structural . These components collectively contribute to insulation by trapping air within the vane and barbule network.

Types of Feathers in Plumage

Plumage in birds is composed of several distinct types of feathers, each characterized by unique structural features that contribute to their specific roles in the overall assembly. These types are broadly classified based on their form, including vaned structures for external coverage and flight, as well as softer, unvaned forms for insulation and sensation. The primary categories encompass contour feathers, flight feathers, semiplumes, filoplumes, and down feathers, with their arrangement ensuring aerodynamic efficiency, thermal regulation, and sensory feedback. Contour feathers form the visible outer layer of plumage, providing a smooth, streamlined surface that covers the bird's body and enhances its contour. These feathers feature a central rachis with interlocking barbs forming vanes on both sides, including specialized coverts that overlap to shape the wings and tail for better . They are distributed across most of the body, overlapping in a scale-like to protect the skin and facilitate at the tips while allowing fluffiness at the bases for minor insulation. Flight feathers, also known as remiges and rectrices, are the largest and most rigid components of plumage, essential for powered flight and maneuverability. Remiges include primaries (attached to the hand bones of the for ) and secondaries (on the for lift), characterized by asymmetric vanes that create a uniform, wind-resistant surface. Rectrices, or tail feathers, are fan-shaped with interlocking microstructures, typically numbering six pairs per side and increasing in toward the outer edges to enable and balance. These feathers are concentrated in the alar () and caudal () tracts. Semiplumes possess a central rachis with a short, fluffy vane at the tip and loose, barbs at the base, lacking the interlocking hooks found in contour feathers. They primarily serve an insulatory function by trapping air in the spaces beneath the outer plumage. These feathers are situated under contour feathers on the body, contributing to thermal regulation without altering the external shape. Filoplumes are slender, hair-like feathers with a long, thin rachis and minimal barbs only at the tip, functioning as sensory structures to monitor the position and movement of overlying feathers. They provide proprioceptive feedback, helping birds adjust plumage for flight or display. Filoplumes are sparsely distributed throughout the body, often revealed only after removal of contour layers. Down feathers consist of loose, branching barbs with little or no central rachis, forming a soft, fluffy structure that excels at trapping air for insulation. In adult plumage, their role is limited, serving mainly as an underlayer beneath other feathers rather than a dominant component, unlike in nestlings where they provide primary warmth. They are positioned closest to the skin across the body. The distribution of these feather types follows specific patterns in feather tracts known as pterylae, which are defined regions of skin where follicles cluster, separated by bare patches called apteria. Major pterylae include the dorsal (back), ventral (belly), capital (head), alar (wings with and coverts), and (tail) tracts; for instance, the alar tract houses remiges and associated coverts for aerodynamic functions, while body tracts like the dorsal and ventral primarily feature contour and semiplume feathers for coverage and insulation. This tract arrangement optimizes feather growth and reduces weight, with passerines typically exhibiting around eight such tracts.

Development and Maintenance

Feather Growth Processes

Feather growth begins with the formation of the dermal papilla, a mesenchymal condensation in the that induces epidermal thickening and subsequent to create the feather follicle. The dermal papilla serves as an instructive center, providing signals that direct epidermal and differentiation throughout the feather's development and regeneration. The follicle, an epidermal surrounding the papilla, houses the growing feather and contains stem cells that enable cyclic regeneration. The process unfolds in distinct stages: initial dermal core induction, where the papilla organizes the underlying ; epidermal , forming the tubular follicle structure; and barb formation, where circumferential ridges in the collar region differentiate into the feather's barbule-bearing branches. These barb ridges emerge from the posterior collar and migrate upward, shaping the feather vane through patterned and differentiation. Signaling pathways such as Wnt promote and proliferation, and BMP modulates spacing and formation to prevent overcrowding. For instance, Wnt signaling activates epidermal placode formation, whereas BMP acts as an inhibitor to refine tract boundaries. Within feather tracts (pterylae), individual follicles exhibit asynchronous growth, where new s emerge in staggered sequences to maintain continuous plumage coverage and minimize exposure of the skin. This timing integrates with broader molt cycles to replace worn s without compromising insulation or flight capabilities. Healthy growth demands specific nutritional inputs, particularly high-quality protein for synthesis, as s comprise up to 90% protein by dry weight. Essential like and are critical, with deficiencies leading to poor vane quality. is vital for enzymatic processes in keratinization and follicle integrity, where supplementation at 60-120 mg/kg in diets has been shown to reduce feather fraying in .

Molt Cycles and Terminology

Molt cycles in birds refer to the periodic replacement of feathers, which occurs throughout their lives to maintain plumage integrity. In most passerines, or songbirds, these cycles typically include an annual prebasic molt, which replaces feathers after breeding and produces the basic plumage used for winter or non-breeding periods, and an optional prealternate molt, which occurs before breeding to generate alternate plumage for display or migration. These molts delineate the annual cycle, with the prebasic molt being universal across all birds and often complete, while the prealternate is more common in temperate species to adapt to seasonal demands. Birds employ different strategies for feather replacement during molt, primarily sequential or simultaneous approaches, which balance the need for renewal against maintaining essential functions like flight. In sequential molt, common among smaller birds such as passerines, feathers are replaced one or a few at a time, starting with the innermost primaries and progressing outward, allowing sustained flight capability throughout the process. Conversely, simultaneous molt, observed in larger species like waterfowl or raptors, involves replacing all at once, often resulting in temporary flightlessness but enabling faster overall renewal in environments where predation risk is lower during this vulnerable period. Molt cycles differ between juveniles and adults, with young birds undergoing a distinct post-juvenile molt shortly after fledging to replace their initial juvenile plumage, which is often of lower quality and adapted for rapid growth rather than durability. This first molt is typically partial, replacing head and body feathers while retaining some wing coverts, and transitions the bird toward adult-like appearance without fully achieving it. In contrast, adult cycles are more predictable and annual, focusing on complete replacement to sustain long-term functionality, though the extent of the post-juvenile molt varies by —partial in many passerines but complete in others like . Molt imposes significant costs and risks on birds, as production requires substantial protein and nutrients, often leading to reduced body and altered behaviors to conserve resources. During molt, particularly in sequential strategies, impaired from asymmetric loss can increase flight expenditure and heighten predation vulnerability, while simultaneous molt in species like sea ducks results in complete flightlessness for several weeks, during which the absence of flight saves equivalent to about 6% of the daily metabolic rate (or 14% of the ), helping to offset the costs of molt. These costs are compounded by environmental factors, such as migration timing, forcing birds to strategically schedule molts to minimize threats. Ongoing debates in highlight inconsistencies in molt terminology across regions and research traditions, complicating global comparisons of cycle patterns, as reported in a 2024 analysis of varying practices between North American and . These discussions build on refinements like the Humphrey–Parkes system, which standardizes terms based on evolutionary homology but remains subject to interpretive variations in application.

Humphrey–Parkes System

The Humphrey–Parkes (H–P) system, proposed in 1959 by Philip S. Humphrey and Kenneth C. Parkes, established a standardized framework for describing molt and plumage cycles in birds, initially focused on North American species to facilitate comparative studies across taxa. This plumage-based terminology emphasizes evolutionary homologies rather than seasonal or life-cycle timing, refining earlier basic molt cycles by classifying them according to the type of plumage they produce. Central to the system are the prebasic and prealternate molts: the prebasic molt, occurring post-breeding, replaces feathers for maintenance and produces basic plumage, while the prealternate molt, preceding breeding, often partial, yields alternate plumage for display or seasonal adaptation. In adult birds, these culminate in definitive basic plumage after the definitive prebasic molt and definitive alternate plumage after the definitive prealternate molt, representing stable, fully mature forms. The system also addresses irregular feather replacements through supplemental molts, which produce supplemental plumage outside standard cycles, such as additional partial molts in response to wear, and eccentric molts, which denote atypical or individual-specific patterns not fitting regular categories. These terms allow for precise documentation of variations, with supplemental molts often observed in species like ptarmigans for cryptic adaptation. Subsequent refinements, notably by Howell et al. in 2003, clarified applications by introducing concepts like formative plumage from preformative molts in first-cycle birds and outlining four primary strategies—simple basic, complex basic, simple alternate, and complex alternate—based on H–P principles. Despite its influence, the H–P system's global adoption has faced challenges due to its perceived complexity compared to simpler life-cycle terminologies, particularly in and among tropical bird researchers, leading to inconsistent usage across regions. Recent debates, including a by Pyle et al., advocate for broader unification under the evolutionary H–P framework to enhance cross-taxonomic comparisons, countering calls for simplification while highlighting its utility for studying diverse avian strategies. The system applies effectively to non-passerines, such as raptors (e.g., ), where prebasic molts may be suspended during migration or winter to conserve energy, allowing incomplete cycles that resume later without altering the homologous classification.

Normal Variations

Sexual Dimorphism

in bird plumage refers to the morphological differences in feather coloration, patterns, and structure between males and females, often evolving to support distinct reproductive strategies. In dichromatic species, such as the (Pavo cristatus), males display elaborate, iridescent plumage with a prominent featuring eyespots for visual signaling, while females exhibit more subdued, cryptic brown tones to blend with nesting environments. In contrast, monomorphic species like the (Passer domesticus) show minimal plumage differences between sexes, with both displaying similar streaked brown and gray patterns that prioritize over ornamentation. Hormonal factors, particularly testosterone, play a key role in driving male-specific plumage traits. Elevated testosterone levels during breeding seasons promote the development of brighter colors and structural ornaments in males, such as carotenoid-based reds in species like the (Haemorhous mexicanus), enhancing their attractiveness to mates. In females, can suppress similar ornamentation, maintaining duller plumage, though exogenous testosterone administration has been shown to induce male-typical pigmentation in some female birds. These plumage differences serve adaptive functions tied to reproductive roles: male ornamentation facilitates mate attraction and through conspicuous displays, signaling genetic and , as seen in polygynous species where brighter s achieve higher success. Conversely, female plumage often evolves for during incubation and brood care, reducing predation risk in ground-nesting habitats, with cryptic patterns providing effective background matching. The expression of plumage dimorphism arises from an interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Genetic mechanisms, including sex-linked genes and polymorphisms in pathways, underlie baseline differences, with multiple genes, including those in pathways, identified as influencing deposition. Environmental influences, such as diet availability for intake and light conditions, modulate these traits; for instance, components respond to both origin and ambient factors, while -based traits are more environment-dependent. Recent research highlights nuanced links between dimorphism and camouflage efficacy across habitats. A 2025 global analysis of avian plumage contrast revealed that while habitat openness and migratory behavior predict female plumage patterns for — with higher contrast in closed, darker environments— these correlations are weaker for males, suggesting often overrides habitat-driven in dimorphic expression.

Age and Seasonal Changes

Juvenile plumage in birds serves primarily as a form of , featuring downy textures or spotted, streaked, and mottled patterns that blend with nest and ground environments to protect fledglings from predators. This cryptic coloration differs markedly from adult patterns in most species, emphasizing vulnerability during the early post-fledging period. The transition from juvenile to more mature plumage occurs through the post-juvenile molt, which replaces body feathers and sometimes wing coverts, though the extent varies by species—partial in many passerines and more complete in raptors. Subadult plumage represents an intermediate stage between juvenile and definitive adult forms, often delaying the acquisition of full coloration and patterns for several years in long-lived . In bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), for instance, subadults progress through multiple molts over 4–5 years, gradually developing the iconic white head and tail while retaining brownish tones and mottling that provide during immaturity. This delayed plumage maturation is adaptive, allowing younger birds to avoid aggressive interactions with breeding adults until they are physically ready to compete or reproduce. Seasonal plumage shifts occur via the prealternate molt, transforming non-breeding (basic) plumage—typically duller and more subdued for concealment during winter or migration—into vibrant breeding (alternate) plumage that signals reproductive readiness. These changes are most pronounced in temperate-zone species, where discrete breeding seasons align with longer daylight and resource peaks, contrasting with tropical birds that often exhibit continuous or opportunistic breeding and subtler, less cyclic plumage variations due to year-round environmental stability. Climate change has disrupted these cycles since the , with warming temperatures prompting advances in molt timing; for example, migratory songbirds in have shifted fall molts earlier by about one day per year, potentially to align with altered breeding schedules or extended growing seasons. Such phenological mismatches could affect feather quality and overall fitness if molts desynchronize from food availability or migration needs. These age- and seasonal-related modifications are fundamentally driven by molt processes that renew structure periodically.

Eclipse Plumage

Eclipse plumage refers to the temporary, dull, and cryptic body feathers acquired by male birds in certain species following the breeding season, primarily as part of the post-nuptial molt. This phenomenon is most common in waterfowl such as and geese within the family , where males transition from their vibrant breeding plumage to a subdued appearance, and it also occurs in some shorebirds like certain that exhibit . The plumage typically resembles the more camouflaged feathers of females or juveniles, featuring mottled browns and grays that blend with environments. This phase lasts approximately 1-2 months, often from midsummer to early fall, and coincides with the simultaneous replacement of all , rendering the birds flightless and highly vulnerable for 20-40 days during the wing molt. Evolutionarily, eclipse plumage provides key advantages by enhancing predator avoidance through its cryptic coloration, which conceals flightless males in dense vegetation during this risky period, while also allowing energy reallocation toward the energetically demanding feather regrowth rather than maintaining elaborate breeding displays. In contrast, most passerines and many other groups lack a distinct , as they either do not exhibit strong in plumage or undergo staggered molts that avoid prolonged flightlessness.

Coloration Mechanisms

Pigment-Based Coloration

Pigment-based coloration in bird plumage arises from chemical pigments deposited within the feather structure during growth, producing a range of hues from black and brown to red and yellow without relying on light interference effects. These pigments include melanins, which are endogenously synthesized, and or their derivatives, which are primarily obtained from the diet. Unlike structural colors, pigment-based tones result from the absorption of specific wavelengths by molecular structures, with deposition occurring selectively in feather barbs and barbules to create patterns. Melanins form the foundation for dark and reddish base tones in plumage, consisting of two main forms: eumelanin, which imparts black, grey, or dark brown colors, and phaeomelanin, responsible for reddish-brown to yellow shades. Eumelanin is a derived from via the melanogenic pathway in melanocytes, providing robust pigmentation that dominates in like corvids and raptors for or display. Phaeomelanin, incorporating sulfur-containing compounds, produces warmer tones seen in the crowns of tits or breasts of thrushes, often co-occurring with eumelanin to modulate intensity. These pigments are synthesized internally and contribute to strength, averaging about 22% of feather mass in melanin-rich . Carotenoids provide vibrant reds, oranges, and yellows, acquired through diet from sources like plants and invertebrates, and deposited directly or after metabolic modification. Common dietary forms such as β-carotene and lutein yield yellow hues, but many birds convert these into red ketocarotenoids—like astaxanthin—through enzymatic oxidation at the C4 position, enabling intense displays in species such as flamingos and cardinals. This conversion enhances color saturation but requires nutritional investment, with ketocarotenoids comprising up to 90% of pigments in red-pigmented feathers. In parrots, a unique class called psittacofulvins replaces or supplements carotenoids, producing yellows, oranges, and reds endogenously via a specialized biosynthetic pathway, as seen in the vivid plumage of macaws; these pigments are not diet-derived and offer resistance to fading. Pigments are deposited during the growth phase in the follicular papilla, where melanocytes or carotenoid-laden cells migrate upward from the follicle base to infuse barbs and barbules as the feather elongates. Melanoblasts position themselves along the developing rachis, releasing melanosomes containing eumelanin or phaeomelanin granules that bind to , while are transported via lipoproteins and incorporated similarly. This process ensures patterned distribution, with pigments fixed post-growth and no further addition until the next molt. Over time, pigments exhibit high persistence, resisting UV degradation and abrasion to maintain color integrity for months, whereas carotenoids are biochemically unstable, fading by up to 27% in yellow forms over 150 days due to photo-oxidation and mechanical wear, leading to paler tones in exposed areas.

Structural Coloration

Structural coloration in bird plumage refers to the production of iridescent, metallic, or non-iridescent hues through physical interactions between light and feather microstructures, rather than chemical pigments. These colors emerge from phenomena such as and , where light waves reflect and interfere constructively or destructively at nanoscale layers within the feather's matrix. In , alternating layers of , air pockets, or granules create path length differences that selectively enhance certain wavelengths, resulting in vibrant, angle-dependent colors. Diffraction gratings, often formed by parallel ridges or periodic structures in the barbules, scatter light into spectra, producing shimmering effects visible from specific viewing angles. A prominent example is the iridescent of hummingbirds, where microscopic barbules feature stacked layers beneath a thin cortex, generating ruby-red to violet hues via that intensifies with direct sunlight. Similarly, the eyespots on peacock feathers display metallic blues and greens through photonic crystal-like arrangements of rod-shaped embedded in , acting as gratings to reflect in structured patterns. These mechanisms allow for dynamic color displays that change with movement, enhancing visual signaling. arrangements play a key role; for instance, hollow or toroidal-shaped melanosomes in certain iridescent structures reduce absorption and amplify , while quasi-ordered arrays in non-iridescent cases promote diffuse for stable, matte blues and greens, as detailed in analyses of diverse avian species. Many structural colors include ultraviolet (UV) reflectance, which is imperceptible to humans but crucial for avian vision, often produced by the same keratin-melanosome interfaces that generate visible hues. For example, UV peaks in the 300-400 nm range enhance the perceived and patterning in species like Eastern Bluebirds, aiding and species recognition. This UV component arises from broadband or interference in feather barbs, broadening the color gamut beyond human perception. One advantage of structural coloration is its durability; unlike pigment-based colors, which degrade via from UV exposure, structural hues resist fading because they rely on stable nanoscale architecture rather than molecular bonds. Studies show that iridescent and non-iridescent structural plumage maintains properties over time, even under prolonged light exposure, contributing to long-term signal reliability in birds.

Evolutionary Significance

Plumage evolution in birds has been shaped by multiple selective pressures, resulting in diverse coloration and patterns that enhance survival and reproduction. first proposed that elaborate plumage traits in males, such as bright colors and ornate displays, arise through , where females prefer mates with more striking appearances to pass on advantageous genetic qualities. This mechanism explains the observed in many species, where male plumage often serves as a signal of genetic fitness during . Natural selection has also influenced plumage for functions like , though global analyses indicate no strong overall between habitat type and plumage patterns across avian . For instance, a comprehensive study of over 8,600 bird found little evidence that plumage complexity or coloration directly matches environmental backgrounds for concealment, suggesting other factors like predation pressure or play more nuanced roles. Despite this, specific adaptations persist in certain lineages, such as mottled brown patterns in ground- that blend with leaf litter. Convergent evolution has led to similar plumage patterns in distantly related birds, driven by shared ecological demands rather than common ancestry. A 2016 analysis of within-feather patterns identified multiple evolutionary pathways—such as barring, spotting, or —that have independently arisen in over species, often linked to anti-predator strategies or signaling. Examples include the parallel development of wing bars in flycatchers and warblers from different families, highlighting how selection can produce analogous traits. Recent research emphasizes the role of viewing conditions in driving plumage diversity, as environments modulate how colors are perceived by birds and predators. A 2025 study modeling visual contrasts in over 1,000 revealed that structure, such as density, and migratory behaviors predict plumage elaboration, particularly in females, where higher contrast aids in mate recognition under varying illumination. This suggests that evolutionary diversification is tuned to perceptual , with open habitats favoring bolder patterns visible in bright . Fossil evidence provides insights into early plumage coloration, with melanosome structures preserved in 150-million-year-old feathers indicating iridescent black hues in Jurassic avialans like . Synchrotron imaging of these microstructures has confirmed eumelanin-based pigmentation, suggesting that structural and pigment-based mechanisms for color production were already present in the , predating modern bird diversification. Such findings underscore the ancient origins of plumage as a key evolutionary innovation in feathered dinosaurs.

Abnormalities and Anomalies

Albinism and Leucism

in birds is a genetic condition characterized by a complete absence of pigments in the plumage, , and eyes, resulting from a total deficiency in the tyrosinase, which is essential for synthesis. This leads to pure feathers and distinctive pink or eyes due to visible blood vessels in the . True affects all melanocytes and is distinct from other color anomalies, as it eliminates both eumelanin (/) and phaeomelanin (/) production. Leucism, in contrast, involves a partial or irregular loss of deposition in the plumage, producing white or pale patches while sparing other pigments and leaving eye, , and bill coloration normal. Unlike , leucistic birds can still produce but fail to distribute it evenly to follicles, often resulting in a pied or patchy appearance. This condition arises from disruptions in pigment cell migration or development during formation, rather than a complete enzymatic block. Both conditions stem from recessive genetic mutations, with commonly linked to mutations in the (TYR), which encodes the responsible for the initial steps of biosynthesis. In birds, these mutations are typically autosomal recessive, requiring inheritance from both parents for expression, and have been documented across species like chickens and . involves a broader array of genetic factors, including mutations affecting function or migration, though specific s vary by species and are less uniformly identified than TYR for albinism. These anomalies are rare in wild bird populations, occurring at an estimated rate of about 1 in 30,000 individuals for both combined, with being significantly more prevalent than true . Albinism is particularly uncommon due to its severe physiological impacts, while partial leucism may appear more frequently in certain families like passerines. Affected birds face substantial survival challenges, including reduced that increases predation risk and impaired vision from light sensitivity in albinos, leading to lower overall fitness and rarity in adulthood. Additionally, the absence of exposes skin and eyes to damage, weakening integrity and overall health. Leucistic individuals experience milder but still notable disadvantages, such as partial loss of during or . Representative examples include leucistic American robins (Turdus migratorius), which often display extensive white feathering on and head while retaining dark eyes, contrasting with true albino barn owls (Tyto alba), featuring entirely white plumage and pink eyes that severely compromise nocturnal hunting.

Melanism and Other Pigment Disorders

Melanism in birds refers to the overproduction of pigments, resulting in unusually dark or entirely black plumage that contrasts with typical coloration. This condition arises primarily from genetic , such as those in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene or signaling pathways, which regulate eumelanin deposition during development. Environmental factors can also contribute, including diets rich in oils that temporarily enhance melanin synthesis, as well as urban stressors like pollution that favor melanistic traits for adaptive survival. In normal plumage, melanin provides baseline dark tones for and UV protection, but melanism amplifies this to extremes. Notable examples include all-black variants of crows (Corvus corone) and ravens (Corvus corax), where genetic mutations lead to uniform dark feathers, though such cases remain rare in wild populations. Melanistic house sparrows (Passer domesticus) increased during the in polluted European cities, blending better with soot-darkened environments and reducing predation risk. Similarly, approximately 50–60% of vermilion flycatchers (Pyrocephalus rubinus) in the area exhibit , a stable genetic polymorphism that predates industrial pollution. In high-UV environments, such as open deserts or equatorial regions, offers enhanced protection against solar radiation by absorbing harmful wavelengths, as seen in darker morphs of species like the (Buteo jamaicensis). These adaptive benefits highlight 's role in , though it can sometimes impair in hot climates. Xanthinism involves an excess of yellow or pigments, often manifesting as unusually bright orange or yellow plumage where tones are expected. This disorder typically stems from genetic mutations that suppress phaeomelanin production while enhancing yellow , though dietary imbalances—such as insufficient —can exacerbate it in species reliant on specific foods for coloration. For instance, xanthinistic house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) display vivid yellow instead of , a trait linked to and occasionally amplified by seed-based diets low in pigments. In (Phoenicopterus spp.), environmental deficiencies in -rich lead to pale or yellowish plumage, reversible upon supplementation, illustrating diet's influence on expression. While less common than , xanthinism is rare and rarely provides adaptive advantages beyond potential signaling in mate selection.

Structural and Behavioral Anomalies

Polychromatism refers to the occurrence of multiple distinct color morphs within a bird population, often involving structural variations in form rather than purely pigmentary changes. In such as the reef (Egretta sacra), populations exhibit and dark morphs that coexist, with the form potentially aiding in stealth by reducing visibility to prey in certain aquatic environments. Studies on the eastern reef show that morphs preferentially occupy lighter substrates like beaches, while dark morphs are more widespread, suggesting partitioning that minimizes . These morphs maintain similar efficiencies, with capture success rates around 34-39% across variants, indicating that structural plumage differences may confer ecological flexibility without significant fitness costs. Hen feathering in cocks, or the development of female-like plumage in male birds, arises from hormonal imbalances that alter feather follicle development. This condition is estrogen-dependent, where elevated estrogen levels feminize the feather structure, resulting in rounded, less pigmented feathers typical of hens rather than the pointed, vibrant ones of males. In breeds like the Sebright bantam, a genetic mutation enhances aromatase activity in skin tissues, converting androgens to estrogens and thereby inducing persistent female plumage patterns in males, even post-castration. This anomaly disrupts normal sexual dimorphism, potentially affecting mate attraction and social hierarchy within flocks. Fault bars manifest as transverse bands of weakened structure, characterized by missing or disorganized barbules that create translucent, fragile zones perpendicular to the rachis. These defects form during growth when acute stress—such as handling, scarcity, or environmental disturbances—triggers muscle contractions that damage developing vane cells. In a study of 86 bird species, fault bar frequency averaged 5.9%, rising to 23.6% in prey vulnerable to raptors like goshawks, where weakened s increase breakage risk and predation susceptibility. Unlike nutritional deficiencies, which produce broader rachis malformations, fault bars are narrower (often <2 mm) and do not correlate strongly with alone, emphasizing their role as indicators of episodic physiological stress. Structural asymmetries, such as , compromise plumage alignment by impairing precise manipulation during grooming and feather positioning. In chickens, crossed beak deformity—where the upper and lower misalign by 1° to 61°—hinders effective , leading to uneven feather distribution and increased wear on flight surfaces. This condition, prevalent at 7% in breeds like the Appenzeller Barthuhn, often has a hereditary basis involving genes like LOC426217, resulting in secondary issues such as overgrowth of the unaffected mandible and brittle plumage from neglected maintenance. Affected birds exhibit reduced efficiency and insulation, as misaligned feathers fail to interlock properly, exacerbating vulnerability to environmental stressors. Behavioral factors, particularly inadequate , contribute to a ragged plumage appearance by allowing dirt, parasites, and structural damage to accumulate on . , an essential grooming behavior using the to distribute uropygial oils and align barbs, maintains feather integrity; its disruption due to stress, illness, or confinement leads to frayed, soiled vanes that reduce aerodynamic efficiency and . In captive birds, behavioral neglect of —often linked to anxiety or —manifests as patchy, deteriorated plumage, signaling underlying welfare issues that can compound during molt cycles.

References

  1. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/forensic-ornithology-lab-exercise.pdf
  2. https://prumlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/prum_n_dyck_2003.pdf
  3. https://faculty.weber.edu/jcavitt/feather1.pdf
  4. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/AllAboutBirds/studying/feathers/color/document_view
  5. https://web.colby.edu/mainebirds/2010/03/07/ornithological-reading-list/
  6. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/AllAboutBirds/studying/feathers/molting/document_view
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978446/
  8. https://repository.lsu.edu/biosci_pubs/5142/
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/plumage
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/plumage
  11. http://www.ofo.ca/site/page/view/articles.plumages
  12. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/what-are-evograms/the-origin-of-birds/
  13. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810055106
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32628174/
  15. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1792&context=srhonors_theses
  16. https://web.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Temperature_Regulation.html
  17. https://asknature.org/strategy/preening-waterproofs-feathers/
  18. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jav.03259
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1095643303003143
  20. https://academy.allaboutbirds.org/feathers-article/
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982222011083
  22. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2306639121
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5111890/
  24. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/29/3/676/4961327
  25. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02109.x
  26. https://web.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/How_Owls_Hunt.html
  27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16721575/
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3385664/
  29. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adw5857
  30. https://phys.org/news/2025-07-hidden-black-white-feather-layers.html
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4380223/
  32. https://www.ornithology.org/avian-anatomy/feathers/five-types-of-feathers
  33. https://www.fws.gov/lab/featheratlas/glossary.php
  34. https://avesbiology.com/feathers.html
  35. https://www.birdsoutsidemywindow.org/2011/02/25/anatomy-pterylae/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5662002/
  37. https://prumlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/prum_williamson_2001.pdf
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6171735/
  39. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2019.01609/full
  40. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000132
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6985464/
  42. https://www.allaboutfeed.net/specials/effects-of-nutrition-on-feathering/
  43. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/the-basics-feather-molt/
  44. https://calgarybirdbandingsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Molt-Definitions-from-Pyle-I-II-KENNEDY.pdf
  45. https://www.ofo.ca/site/page/view/articles.plumages
  46. http://slatermuseum.blogspot.com/2010/09/different-molt-strategies.html
  47. https://www.birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Pyle_2006_Staffelmauser_and_Other_Adaptive_Strategies_in_Larger_Birds.pdf
  48. https://www.lsu.edu/science/news_events/cos-news-events/2020/december/why-do-some-birds-lose-flight-more-readily-than-others.php
  49. https://avianhybrids.wordpress.com/2021/12/29/simultaneous-wing-molt-as-a-pre-adaptation-for-loss-of-flight/
  50. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/understanding-basics-bird-molts
  51. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13354
  52. https://ringersdigiguide.ottenby.se/moult-ageing/
  53. http://www.birdpop.org/docs/misc/CHATNO72_exerpt.pdf
  54. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/z97-136
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18051662/
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236935290_The_effects_of_molt_on_the_flight_performance_body_mass_and_behavior_of_European_starlings_Sturnus_vulgaris_An_experimental_approach
  57. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/its-one-biggest-events-birds-life-scientists-cant-agree-how-talk-about-it
  58. https://www.birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Howell_and_Pyle_2014_Use_of_Definitive_and_Other_Terms.pdf
  59. https://academic.oup.com/auk/article-pdf/76/1/1/28157649/auk0001.pdf
  60. https://www.birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Howell_et_al_2003_First_Basic_Problem_A_Review_of_Molt_Homologies.pdf
  61. https://birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Pyle_et_al_2024_Moult%20Terminology%20-%20Envisioning%20an%20Evolutionary%20Approach.pdf
  62. https://www.birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Pyle_et_al_2024_Moult%20Terminology%20-%20Envisioning%20an%20Evolutionary%20Approach.pdf
  63. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.1998.0308
  64. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036640
  65. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/31/5/1233/5897251
  66. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/219/19/3091/15563/Testosterone-activates-sexual-dimorphism-including
  67. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-025-02459-8
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259547419_The_elaboration_of_sexual_dimorphism_in_bird_plumage_patterns
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1084952113000712
  70. https://www.bto.org/learn/skills/bird-identification/young-birds
  71. https://www.facebook.com/WorldBirdSanctuary/posts/many-species-of-birds-have-different-plumage-between-juvenile-and-adult-ages-juv/1073657708133186/
  72. https://bioone.org/journals/ardea/volume-108/issue-1/arde.v108i1.a6/Post-Juvenile-and-Post-Breeding-Moult-of-the-Black-Wheatear/10.5253/arde.v108i1.a6.pdf
  73. https://www.hawkmountain.org/raptors/bald-eagle
  74. https://www.auburn.edu/cosam/faculty/biology/hill/lab/documents/192.pdf
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3139619/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7487240/
  77. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180307130038.htm
  78. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2021.2404
  79. https://www.biology.utah.edu/news/as-climate-warms-migratory-songbirds-fall-molt-advances-by-a-day-every-year/
  80. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/735848
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10452-1
  82. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/crows/domducks.htm
  83. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/14/5/724/187262
  84. https://ecos.fws.gov/ServCat/DownloadFile/58461?Reference=57616
  85. https://www.maine.gov/ifw/docs/species/birds/waterfowl/speciesassessment.pdf
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4848976/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365947/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630266/
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364563/
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5758789/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5125026/
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9588406/
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982216304018
  94. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15253871/
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3061162/
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10451703/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2904367/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4892796/
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1885357/
  100. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/209/2/380/16286/Iridescent-plumage-in-satin-bowerbirds-structure
  101. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-03518-2
  102. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Structural-characterization-of-peacock-tail-feathers-Color-photographs-Panels-a-c-e_fig1_274897752
  103. https://elifesciences.org/articles/71179
  104. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2003.2431
  105. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/205/14/2017/9041/Spectral-reflectance-and-directional-properties-of
  106. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00265-023-03404-9
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272310248_A_review_of_color-producing_mechanisms_in_feathers_and_their_influence_on_preventive_conservation_strategies
  108. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F937.2&viewtype=side
  109. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/commentary/evolution/sexual-selection
  110. https://peerj.com/articles/2658/
  111. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x
  112. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1642
  113. https://www.bto.org/learn/about-birds/behaviour/plumage-abnormalities
  114. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/what-can-cause-birds-to-show-weird-color-variations-such-as-being-all-or-partly-white-or-unusually-dark/
  115. https://feederwatch.org/color_variant/albinism-and-leucism/
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4093182/
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11338429/
  118. https://avianreport.com/how-rare-leucistic-albino-birds/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8888543/
  120. https://www.uaex.uada.edu/environment-nature/musings-on-nature-blog/posts/albino-birds.aspx
  121. https://www.birdsandblooms.com/birding/birding-basics/albinism-in-birds/
  122. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-british-ornithologists-club/volume-137/issue-1/bboc.v137i1.2017.a9/The-dark-side-of-birds-melanismfacts-and-fiction/10.25226/bboc.v137i1.2017.a9.full
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1559852/
  124. https://avianreport.com/bird-melanism/
  125. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/100/
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229023/
  127. https://avianreport.com/bird-xanthochromism/
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230328852_Colour_dimorphism_and_the_ecology_of_herons
  129. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368954
  130. https://poultry.extension.org/articles/poultry-anatomy/poultry-genetics-an-introduction/causes-of-hen-feathering-in-male-chickens/
  131. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7400309/
  132. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/z89-185
  133. http://www.birdresearch.dk/unilang/Moller_et_al_BJLS_2009.pdf
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5838925/
  135. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/alaska-science-center/science/effects-beak-deformities-birds
  136. https://opensanctuary.org/how-do-feathers-work/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.