Hubbry Logo
MassingMassingMain
Open search
Massing
Community hub
Massing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Massing
Massing
Massing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Arts Tower in Sheffield, Britain, has a tall, lightweight, cuboid massing.

Massing is the architectural term for general shape, form and size of a structure. [1][2]

Characteristics

[edit]

Massing is three-dimensional, a matter of form, not just an outline from a single perspective, a shape.[1][3] Massing influences the sense of space which the building encloses, and helps to define both the interior space and the exterior shape of the building.[1] The creation of massing, and changes to it, may be additive (accumulating or repeating masses) or subtractive (creating spaces or voids in a mass by removing parts of it).[4] Massing can also be significantly altered by the materials used for the building's exterior, as transparent, reflective, or layered materials are perceived differently.[1]

It is generally held that architectural design begins by considering massing.[5] From a distance, massing, more than any architectural detail, is what creates the most impact on the eye.[6] Architectural details or ornaments may serve to reinforce or minimize massing.[7] Because it has a direct relation to the visual impact a building makes, massing is one of the most important architectural design considerations.[1]

Massing can be impacted by laws, codes, and regulations such as setback requirements and limits on height.

Massing also has an effect on building energy efficiency. A complex shape can present more opportunities for heat loss through the building envelope. Reducing the number of exterior walls, along with a low vertical surface area to floor area ratio (VFAR) decreases heat loss potential. [8]

Some architectural styles are closely associated with massing.[9][10] For example, the Prairie School is always low and horizontal, while the Gothic style emphasizes verticality, and Georgian architecture focuses on solidity and a sense of permanence.[9]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Massing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Massing in architecture refers to the unified three-dimensional configuration of a building's volumes, encompassing its overall shape, form, scale, and orientation to create a coherent external silhouette and internal spatial organization. This fundamental aspect of design determines the structure's visual presence, functional efficiency, and contextual integration, often explored through simplified representations in the initial conceptual phases. Historically, massing techniques have been used to evoke power, stability, and grandeur, as seen in ancient structures like the Roman Pantheon, where cylindrical bases and domed forms symbolized eternity and harmony with the cosmos. In , it has evolved with technological advancements, enabling complex, dynamic forms that prioritize —such as optimizing orientation for and ventilation to reduce —while ensuring aesthetic appeal and urban harmony. Key principles include additive and subtractive form manipulation, hierarchical composition of parts to wholes, and alignment with environmental factors like and site . Notable examples illustrate massing's impact: the (1974) in employs bundled tubular forms that step back progressively, enhancing structural stability and creating an iconic presence; Aqua Tower (2009) uses undulating layers for visual rhythm and shaded microclimates; and (1967) features cylindrical "corn cob" towers that maximize residential density while integrating mixed-use functions. Today, digital tools like Revit and facilitate iterative massing studies, supporting collaborative design and environmental analysis for more responsive and efficient buildings.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Concept

Massing in refers to the overall , shape, and configuration of a structure's solid forms in three dimensions, focusing on the three-dimensional arrangement of a building's volumes rather than its two-dimensional facade design. This approach emphasizes the building's volumetric composition, where individual elements are combined to form a unified whole that defines its physical presence. The term originates from the Latin massa, meaning "lump" or "bulk," which evolved in English to denote , and by the , it was applied in architectural treatises to describe the bulk and sculptural qualities of . In this context, massing establishes a building's presence by shaping perceptions of height, width, depth, and , thereby influencing how the interacts with its surroundings and occupants. Key characteristics of effective massing include the of volumes, where disparate forms are integrated to avoid fragmentation; rhythmic repetition or deliberate contrast in shapes to guide visual flow; and the overall creation of a cohesive architectural identity that conveys stability or dynamism. These elements, often informed by principles of scale and proportion, ensure the building's form resonates harmoniously within its environment.

Relation to Architectural Composition

Massing serves as the volumetric core of a building, distinct from the facade, which primarily involves surface treatments and ornamental details. While the facade addresses aesthetic and material expressions on the exterior skin, massing establishes the fundamental three-dimensional form that dictates the building's overall structure and spatial organization prior to any superficial embellishments. This foundational role ensures that subsequent facade designs align with the underlying , preventing conflicts in performance and coherence. In functional terms, massing plays a pivotal role in accommodating circulation paths, room layouts, and by shaping the internal . The arrangement of masses influences how occupants move through the building, optimizing flow and accessibility while defining zones for various room functions based on the enclosed volumes. Structurally, massing configurations affect load distribution, enhancing integrity against environmental forces such as wind and seismic activity, thereby supporting the building's stability from the outset. Within architectural composition, massing volumes contribute to creating , balance, and across the building . By varying mass sizes and positions, designers establish a that emphasizes key elements, such as primary entrances or focal spaces, guiding perceptual emphasis. Balance is achieved through symmetrical or asymmetrical mass arrangements, distributing visual weight to foster equilibrium, while rhythmic patterns emerge from repetitive or graduated mass forms that direct movement and cohesion. The concept of the massing further integrates these elements, acting as a derived from early performance analyses that constrains and guides detailed development, ensuring holistic alignment with site and programmatic needs.

Historical Development

Origins in Classical Architecture

In ancient Greek architecture, massing emerged as a fundamental concept through the use of columnar orders that emphasized and defined the volumetric form of temples. The , the earliest and sturdiest of the classical orders, featured plain capitals, fluted columns without bases, and a of triglyphs and metopes, creating a balanced, prismatic mass in structures like the (447–432 BCE) in . This design by architects Iktinos and Kallikrates achieved structural and visual harmony through consistent column proportions and spacing, with the temple's overall volume appearing as a unified, symmetrical block elevated on a . Roman architecture adapted these Greek principles, incorporating the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian orders into larger-scale temples and public buildings, where massing reinforced and monumental presence through repetitive columnar facades and solid podiums. A key milestone in conceptualizing massing is found in Vitruvius's (c. 30 BCE), which implicitly addresses it through the principle of firmitas (strength or durability), achieved via solid forms and materials that ensure structural permanence. Vitruvius stressed deep foundations on solid ground, wise selection of durable materials like lime-sand mixtures and squared stone, and proportional symmetry to distribute mass effectively, as seen in his discussions of temple and wall construction where form directly supports load-bearing stability. For instance, he advocated thicker bases for walls and arches with radiating voussoirs to manage building mass, linking geometric proportion to enduring solidity across diverse structures like theaters and basilicas. The revived classical massing with renewed emphasis on geometric solids for proportional harmony, as formalized by in (1452). Alberti prioritized massing and structure as the initial stages of design, advocating the use of simple geometric forms—such as cubes, spheres, and cylinders—derived from to achieve rhythmic concordance and beauty, influencing the volumetric composition of buildings before ornamental details. further advanced this in (1570), where he detailed the five orders and their proportional systems to create harmonious masses in villas, palaces, and temples, drawing from Roman precedents like the Pantheon to balance scale and spatial unity through modular dimensions. Baroque architecture adapted these foundations by introducing dynamic massing with curved forms and dramatic silhouettes, moving away from rigid symmetry toward expressive movement. exemplified this in , as in (1656–1667), where colonnades of free-standing columns form an embracing oval mass, creating spatial drama through undulating curves and theatrical . His design for (1678) further employed curved facades, marbles, and an ornate dome to produce fluid, volumetric tension, enhancing the emotional impact of architectural form.

Evolution in Modern and Contemporary Design

The advent of the in the marked a pivotal shift in architectural massing, as the of iron and enabled the of larger, more complex volumes that transcended the load-bearing limitations of traditional . This era saw the emergence of skeletal frameworks that emphasized verticality and lightness, contrasting with the solid, grounded masses of classical precedents. In Gothic Revival designs, for instance, iron reinforcements allowed for heightened spires and expansive interiors, amplifying the style's aspirational vertical emphasis while accommodating industrial-scale assemblies. The (1889), with its intricate iron lattice forming a towering, diaphanous mass, exemplified this transition, utilizing prefabricated elements to create a structure that symbolized industrial prowess through attenuated, non-monolithic forms. The modernist revolution of the early further transformed massing by prioritizing functional abstraction and horizontal extension over ornamental solidity, as articulated in Le Corbusier's "Five Points of Architecture" (1926). These principles— for elevated volumes, free plans unencumbered by structural walls, and ribbon windows—facilitated the liberation of mass from site-bound heaviness, enabling slab-like forms that emphasized purity and machine-like efficiency. This approach redefined massing as a dynamic interplay of light and volume, where buildings appeared to float or extend seamlessly, reflecting broader modernist ideals of universality and rationality. Postmodern and deconstructivist movements in the late challenged modernist uniformity by introducing fragmented and disrupted massing, embracing discontinuity to evoke cultural complexity and critique. Architects like employed irregular, interlocking volumes that rejected cohesive silhouettes, instead favoring explosive, asymmetrical compositions derived from digital sketching and material experimentation. The (1997) illustrated this shift, with its titanium-clad forms appearing to shatter traditional unity, prioritizing expressive distortion over harmonious proportion. This deconstructivist ethos, influenced by philosophical , proliferated in the , transforming massing into a tool for narrative disruption and contextual provocation. In contemporary design since the early , has redefined massing through computational tools that generate fluid, algorithmically optimized volumes responsive to site and environmental demands. Digital platforms like and Rhino enable architects to manipulate parameters for curvature and adaptability, yielding organic forms that integrate metrics such as solar orientation and material efficiency. This , often termed the "second digital turn," prioritizes performative massing—blending aesthetic with ecological imperatives—resulting in site-specific envelopes that minimize use while maximizing contextual harmony. Seminal works in this vein underscore parametric design's role in addressing climate challenges, with algorithms driving iterations that evolve beyond static geometries.

Design Principles

Scale and Proportion

In architectural massing, scale refers to the relative size of building volumes in relation to the figure and surrounding , which helps establish a sense of approachability and relational harmony. This perceptual framework ensures that masses do not appear domineering or inaccessible; for instance, elements like base plinths are often calibrated to ground-level scale, facilitating intuitive and interaction with the structure. Proportion, closely intertwined with scale, governs the ratios among massing elements to create visual equilibrium and structural coherence. A key principle in achieving proportional massing is the application of the , denoted as ϕ≈1.618\phi \approx 1.618, which divides volumes into harmonious segments where the ratio of the whole to the larger part equals the ratio of the larger part to the smaller. This ratio underpins modular systems in design, allowing architects to scale masses systematically for balanced compositions that resonate aesthetically and functionally. By integrating such proportions, massing avoids arbitrary sizing, promoting a unified volumetric across building components. Techniques for balancing scale in massing include additive and subtractive approaches, each modulating the perceived to prevent overwhelming or outcomes. Additive massing builds complex forms by combining discrete volumes, fostering a segmented appearance that aligns with human-scale and enhances approachability through articulated breaks. In contrast, subtractive massing carves away from a primary volume to refine contours, yielding monolithic effects that require careful modulation to maintain balance and avoid an imposing presence. These methods, rooted in formative ideas of architectural partis, ensure that massing achieves equilibrium by responding to contextual proportions. Disproportionate massing exerts profound psychological effects, with oversized scales evoking through a of vastness and transcendence, as seen in structures like Gothic cathedrals that expand spatial perception beyond the everyday. Conversely, proportional alignments to human dimensions cultivate intimacy, promoting feelings of security and engagement by mirroring bodily rhythms and environmental familiarity. Such impacts, informed by neuroarchitectural research, underscore how scale influences cognitive processing and emotional responses in built environments.

Form, Volume, and Spatial Relationships

In architectural massing, form types are categorized based on their geometric characteristics, influencing the overall perception and functionality of a building. Regular forms consist of consistent, orderly elements aligned symmetrically, creating stable configurations such as cubes or prisms that emphasize symmetry and modular repetition. Irregular forms, by contrast, feature asymmetrical and inconsistent parts that can evoke movement and adaptability, often integrating with natural contexts through organic expressions. Additive forms combine these approaches, merging subordinate elements to achieve dynamic yet structured compositions, allowing architects to balance order and expressiveness in complex urban settings. Volume manipulation in massing involves techniques to generate from basic , enhancing architectural depth and articulation. extends a two-dimensional profile along an axis to form a three-dimensional , such as elongating a rectangular base into a tower for vertical emphasis. retains only the overlapping portions of , producing refined shapes like the shared between crossing cylinders in vaulted ceilings. removes material from a primary using operations, creating voids or recesses, as in carving an archway by deducting a curved form from a . These operations, fundamental to , enable the evolution of simple prisms into intricate, layered forms that respond to functional and aesthetic needs. Spatial relationships among masses define the interplay between built and unbuilt environments, shaping experiential qualities. Adjacency positions masses side-by-side to form contiguous enclosures, such as aligned blocks framing a linear promenade. Overlap merges volumes partially, generating transitional zones that blur boundaries and foster interconnected interiors, like stacked forms creating atria. Setbacks introduce offsets from edges, modulating scale and carving out outdoor spaces; for instance, upper-level step-backs in high-rises define ground-level plazas or courtyards by providing and visual relief, while minimal street setbacks reinforce pedestrian-friendly enclosures. The gestalt concept in massing posits that the perceived whole of a composition surpasses the mere addition of individual elements, fostering a unified perceptual experience. This principle organizes disparate forms into coherent entities through visual continuity and closure, where proximity and similarity among masses reduce cognitive fragmentation and enhance aesthetic appeal, as evidenced in facade studies showing higher ratings for proximally grouped elements (M = 3.91). In practice, gestalt elevates massing from additive assembly to holistic expression, ensuring the building's conveys beyond isolated volumes.

Techniques and Methods

Massing Studies and Modeling

Massing studies in involve an iterative that begins with conceptual sketching to rapidly explore initial volumetric ideas and spatial configurations. These sketches allow architects to visualize basic forms and proportions without the constraints of detailed , facilitating quick adjustments to achieve conceptual clarity. As the design progresses, physical models constructed from materials such as or are employed to provide a tangible three-dimensional understanding of the massing, enabling evaluation of scale, balance, and interrelationships among building elements. Digital iterations follow, utilizing software like Revit or Rhino to refine these models through parametric adjustments and simulations, bridging traditional techniques with computational precision for more efficient exploration. Recent advancements as of 2025 include AI-driven tools that automate form optimization based on performance criteria such as energy efficiency and structural integrity, as well as (AR) systems for real-time on-site massing visualization and collaboration. Traditional methods, including parti diagrams and sectional drawings, play a crucial role in testing volumetric ideas during massing studies. Parti diagrams serve as schematic representations of the governing design concept, distilling complex ideas into simple diagrams that highlight organizational principles such as massing and spatial hierarchy. Sectional drawings, by revealing vertical cuts through the proposed form, allow architects to assess internal volumes, structural implications, and the interplay of spaces, ensuring the massing aligns with functional and aesthetic goals. Sunlight and shadow studies are integral to refining massing forms, particularly to optimize light penetration and enhance energy efficiency. These studies, often conducted using digital tools like software, simulate solar paths across the building's surface to identify areas of excessive or , guiding adjustments to massing for better daylight distribution. By integrating such analyses early, architects can reduce reliance on artificial and mechanical systems, thereby lowering operational energy demands while improving occupant comfort. A common pitfall in massing studies is over-complexity, which can lead to structural inefficiency by introducing unnecessary geometric intricacies that complicate load distribution and increase costs. For instance, irregular forms may demand custom solutions, elevating material waste and fabrication challenges without proportional benefits. To mitigate this, guidelines emphasize simplification through iterative of non-essential elements, prioritizing orthogonal geometries or modular assemblies that maintain conceptual intent while enhancing buildability and efficiency.

Integration with Site and Context

Site analysis forms the foundation of massing decisions, where grading, solar orientation, and wind patterns directly influence the placement and configuration of building volumes to optimize and with the natural environment. grading assesses and variations to determine how masses can be terraced or embedded, preventing and facilitating stable foundations while adapting forms to the site's contours. Solar orientation analysis evaluates the path of the sun across the site to position volumes for maximum daylight penetration and thermal regulation, as outlined in climatic design strategies that align building forms with seasonal solar angles to enhance energy efficiency. Wind pattern studies map prevailing directions and velocities to shape massing that mitigates turbulence or harnesses breezes for natural ventilation, ensuring volumes are clustered or setback to reduce aerodynamic loads on the structure. Contextual response in massing involves adapting building forms to the surrounding urban or scales, often through techniques like stepping masses to transition between heights and create visual continuity. Stepped massing gradually reduces scale from base to upper levels, matching the of adjacent structures and preserving street-level intimacy in dense settings. Alternatively, bold massing forms can establish landmarks by contrasting with the through singular, prominent volumes that anchor urban vistas without overwhelming the fabric. In urban strategies, massing aligns with street walls to maintain continuous facades and reinforce the spatial of public realms, ensuring new developments contribute to experience. Compliance with height limits guides vertical massing, where volumes are modulated to respect constraints while maximizing usable space through articulated setbacks. Environmental considerations shape massing for passive by orienting south-facing volumes to capture winter for ing, with compact forms minimizing loss in colder climates. In eco-design, massing preserves viewsheds through strategic height and placement that frame rather than obstruct distant landscapes, integrating building volumes with natural sightlines to support and aesthetic value.

Applications and Examples

Iconic Historical Structures

The , constructed between 447 and 432 BC on the in , exemplifies Doric massing through its pure rectangular form, measuring approximately 69.5 by 30.9 meters at the base, which conveys an unyielding sense of civic solidity and democratic strength dedicated to , the city's patron goddess. This monolithic volume, elevated on a stepped platform and surrounded by a peripteral of 46 Doric columns, creates a balanced, self-contained mass that dominates the landscape while harmonizing with the rocky outcrop, symbolizing ' imperial confidence in the aftermath of the Persian Wars. The Florence Cathedral, known as Santa Maria del Fiore, begun in 1296 and culminating with Filippo Brunelleschi's dome completed in 1436, demonstrates Renaissance massing by integrating a massive octagonal dome—spanning 45.5 meters internally—seamlessly with the cathedral's octagonal base drum, generating a profound vertical thrust that elevates the structure to 114.5 meters at the lantern. This composition transforms the earlier Gothic body's horizontal sprawl into a unified ascent, where the dome's double-shell form rests lightly yet imposingly on the drum's robust piers, fostering a sense of divine aspiration amid Florence's republican ambitions. The Palace of Versailles, expanded in the 1660s under with designs by and later , achieves massing through an expansive ensemble of rectangular volumes aligned along a grand east-west axis, culminating in the central flanked by mirrored wings and outbuildings that establish a hierarchical progression from intimate chambers to monumental facades over 680 meters in length. This orchestrated composition of stone masses, punctuated by classical pediments and colonnades, projects absolute monarchy's grandeur, drawing the eye outward to the gardens and inward to the king's domain, reinforcing spatial dominance without reliance on industrial frameworks. These structures illustrate classical massing principles—rooted in , proportional harmony, and volumetric clarity—achieved solely through cut stone and techniques, eschewing modern reinforcements like to emphasize inherent material stability and timeless endurance. The Parthenon's compact solidity, the Cathedral's integrated uplift, and Versailles' axial layering all prioritize contextual integration and symbolic weight, evolving from ancient civic ideals to revival and absolutist display.

Modern and Sustainable Approaches

In the 20th century, modern architectural massing began to prioritize innovation and site responsiveness, as seen in Wright's (1935), where cantilevered concrete terraces project dramatically over a Pennsylvania waterfall, blending the building's volumes with the rugged natural contours to create an illusion of organic emergence from the landscape. This approach not only defied traditional load-bearing conventions but also emphasized spatial continuity between interior and exterior, influencing subsequent designs that treat massing as a tool for environmental dialogue. The (1973), designed by , advanced expressive massing through its iconic white shell-like forms, composed of interlocking precast concrete segments derived from a , which fragment the overall volume into dynamic, sail-inspired elements rising from the harbor edge. This fragmented composition optimized acoustic performance within the shells while establishing a that redefines urban silhouettes through sculptural abstraction and material innovation. Contemporary sustainable massing is exemplified by the (2013) in , a net-zero energy office building with a compact, rectilinear six-story mass that maximizes roof area for photovoltaic panels and promotes passive strategies like cross-ventilation and deep daylighting. By minimizing the building's footprint on its urban site, the design achieves 100% on-site energy generation and water self-sufficiency, setting a benchmark for replicable high-performance structures that integrate massing efficiency with ecological goals. Broader trends in sustainable massing post-1930s have evolved toward bioclimatic principles, where building forms are configured to reduce loads through climate-responsive volumes, such as elongated profiles for or curved facades to capture , thereby significantly lowering energy demands in passive systems compared to conventional designs. Since 2020, has gained prominence, repurposing existing building masses—often from industrial eras—into multifunctional spaces with minimal structural alterations, conserving embodied carbon and aligning with global decarbonization efforts as seen in projects certified under frameworks like the .

References

  1. https://www.architecture.org/online-resources/architecture-encyclopedia/massing
  2. http://code.arc.cmu.edu/archive/upload/StatRepMassFINAL.0.pdf
  3. https://www.autodesk.com/solutions/massing-model-architecture
  4. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/rtf-architectural-reviews/a4124-theory-in-architecture-massing/
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/mass
  6. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/70079/70079-h/70079-h.htm
  7. https://www.qzymodels.com/what-is-architectural-massing-and-why-does-it-matter-in-building-design/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263522000164
  9. https://www.archisoup.com/architecture-composition
  10. https://journal-buildingscities.org/articles/10.5334/bc.48
  11. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ancient-art-civilizations/greek-art/beginners-guide-greece/a/greek-architectural-orders
  12. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/20239/20239-h/20239-h.htm
  13. https://www.academia.edu/4961176/From_texture_to_volume_an_investigation_in_quasi_crystalline_systems
  14. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262161626/the-four-books-on-architecture/
  15. https://boisestate.pressbooks.pub/arthistory/chapter/baroque-architecture/
  16. https://visionjournal.edu.mk/social/index.php/1/article/download/111/111
  17. https://www.toureiffel.paris/en/the-monument/history
  18. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Le-Corbusier
  19. http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/68da28a0d3d4c.pdf
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/9/2656
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6304
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368549076_The_Impact_of_Digital_Tools_on_Parametric_Architecture
  23. https://www.kitteryme.gov/planning-and-development/files/ii-architecture
  24. https://www.archdaily.com/1028277/the-power-of-scale-how-proportions-shape-human-experience
  25. https://illustrarch.com/articles/13472-golden-ratio-in-architecture.html
  26. https://book.leveldesignbook.com/process/blockout/massing
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263524000797
  28. https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/arch-1210-spring-2013/files/2011/06/Precedents-in-Architecture-Analytic-Diagrams-Formative-Ideas-and-Partis.pdf
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494416300378
  30. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1284556/full
  31. https://www.firstinarchitecture.co.uk/architecture-design-basics-form/
  32. https://web.arch.virginia.edu/arch544/docs/book2008/CH7/chapter7.html
  33. https://www.sa.gov/files/assets/main/ohp/documents/downtowndesignguide.pdf
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379339/
  35. https://neumannmonson.com/blog/physical-models-architecture-types-benefits
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10055-025-01142-z
  37. https://yenra.com/ai20/architectural-design-simulation/
  38. https://www.archisoup.com/architecture-parti-diagram
  39. http://dslociceroarchitect.com/2018/03/19/massing-studies/
  40. https://architizer.com/blog/practice/details/architecture-101-what-is-a-section/
  41. https://www.bowenstudios.com/how-daylight-shade-simulations-improve-building-performance/
  42. https://cove.inc/blog/7-ways-shadow-studies-impact-building-design
  43. https://www.bdcnetwork.com/home/blog/55150883/architecture-and-daylight-planning-strategies-for-energy-efficient-buildings
  44. https://worksaccounts.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Structure-and-Architecture.pdf
  45. https://www.firstinarchitecture.co.uk/architecture-site-analysis-guide-2/
  46. https://ww2.jacksonms.gov/browse/2MvtKi/273019/SunWindAndLightArchitecturalDesignStrategies.pdf
  47. https://www.steinbomer.com/importance-of-site-analysis-before-starting-a-project/
  48. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/architectural-community/a3664-strategic-use-of-representation-in-architectural-massing/
  49. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-01/toolkit1208-optimized_bkmrks.pdf
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361745646_Infill_Architecture_Contextualizing_Design_in_An_Urban_Setting
  51. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/passive-solar-homes
  52. https://planning-and-development.fo.uiowa.edu/vistas-and-viewsheds
  53. https://www.archdaily.com/803931/ad-classics-the-parthenon-ancient-greece-ictinus-callicrates
  54. https://smarthistory.org/the-parthenon-athens/
  55. https://duomo.firenze.it/en/discover/dome
  56. https://smarthistory.org/brunelleschi-dome-of-the-cathedral-of-florence/
  57. https://en.chateauversailles.fr/discover/estate/palace
  58. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/early-europe-and-colonial-americas/reformation-counter-reformation/a/chteau-de-versailles
  59. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/architecture-in-renaissance-italy
  60. https://bullittcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/living-proof-bullitt-center-case-study.pdf
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032115003652
  62. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11646
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.