Hubbry Logo
MenaechmiMenaechmiMain
Open search
Menaechmi
Community hub
Menaechmi
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Menaechmi
Menaechmi
Menaechmi
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Menaechmi
Scene from the Teatro Nacional Cervantes (1953), during a performance of Menaechmi
Written byPlautus
Characters
  • Peniculus (Menaechmus's parasite)
  • Menaechmus of Epidamnus
  • Erotium (Menaechmus's mistress)
  • Cylindrus (Erotium's cook)
  • Sosicles/Menaechmus of (Syracuse)
  • Messenio (slave)
  • Erotium's servant
  • Menaechmus's wife
  • Father-in-law of Menaechmus
  • a doctor
  • Decio (wife's servant)
Date premieredlate 3rd century BC
Place premieredRome?
Original languageLatin
GenreRoman comedy
Settinga street in Epidamnus, before the houses of Menaechmus and Erotium

Menaechmi, a Latin-language play, is often considered Plautus' greatest play. The title is sometimes translated as The Brothers Menaechmus or The Two Menaechmuses.

Menaechmi is a comedy about mistaken identity, involving a set of twins, Menaechmus of Epidamnus and Menaechmus of Syracuse. It incorporates various Roman stock characters including the parasite, the comic courtesan, the comic slave, the domineering wife, the doddering father-in-law and the quack doctor. As with most of Plautus' plays, much of the dialogue was sung.[1]

The play is set in a street in Epidamnus,[2] a city on the coast of what is now Albania. Facing the audience are two houses, that of Menaechmus I and that of Erotium, the prostitute he is courting.

Plot

[edit]

Prologue: Moschus has twin sons, Menaechmus and Sosicles. Moschus decides to take only one of the twins, Menaechmus, with him on a business trip, while the twins are still young. During the trip, Menaechmus is abducted and adopted by a businessman who lives in Epidamnus, separating the twins. Their father dies of sorrow and their grandfather changes Sosicles' name to Menaechmus (i.e., Menaechmus of Syracuse). When the twins are grown to manhood, Menaechmus of Syracuse sets out in search of his brother. He arrives in Epidamnus, unaware that his twin brother is there also.

Act 1: Here, the brother is first shown to be, with good cause, the despair of his jealous wife. He is seen leaving his house, berating his spouse as a shrew and a harpy, promising that she shall have good cause for her jealousy. He confides to Peniculus, a professional parasite, that he has stolen his wife's mantle and is going to give it to Erotium, a prostitute who lives next door.

The two go to Erotium's door, and the husband presents the mantle with many blandishments. He suggests that a fitting return would include a dinner for himself and Peniculus. Erotium agrees, and the two men go to the Forum for preliminary drinks while the meal is being prepared.

Act 2: Meanwhile, the twin from Syracuse has arrived with Messenio, his slave. The latter warns him of the depravity of Epidamnus, urging an end to the search for his missing brother since their money is nearly gone. His master gives his purse for safekeeping to the slave who continues his warning against the cunning people of Epidamnus "who think nothing of accosting a stranger" and bilking him of his money, when Erotium steps out of her house and endearingly accosts the Syracuse Menaechmus, thinking him to be his brother.

She asks why he hesitates to enter when dinner is ready, and the confused twin asks her, quite formally, what business he has with her. Why, the business of Venus, Erotium replies coyly. Messenio whispers to his master that the lady undoubtedly is a schemer for his money, and asks her if she knows his master. He is Menaechmus, of course, replies Erotium. This amazes the twin, but Messenio explains that spies of the city's thieves probably have learned his name.

Erotium, tiring of what she considers foolery, tells Menaechmus to come into dinner and bring Peniculus. Peniculus, he answers, is in his baggage—and what dinner is she talking about? The dinner he ordered when he presented his wife's mantle, she replies. He first protests vainly that he hasn't any wife and has just arrived in the city, then begins to realize the possibilities of a dinner and a pretty girl. He sends Messenio to the inn, giving him orders to return for his master at sunset.

Act 3: After the meal, he leaves his house with a garland on his head and the mantle over his arm; Erotium has told him to have it re-trimmed. He is chuckling over his luck—dinner, kisses and an expensive mantle—all for nothing, when the irate Peniculus, who has lost the Epidamnus twin in the Forum crowd, meets him and berates him for dining before he could arrive. Quite naturally treated as a stranger, Peniculus angrily rushes to tell the other twin's wife of the stolen mantle.

The Syracuse brother, further baffled because the unknown Peniculus addressed him by his name, is pinching his ear to make sure that he is awake when Erotium's maid comes out and hands him a bracelet to be taken to a goldsmith for repair. He suspects that something is amiss, and hurries off to the inn to tell Messenio of the happy shower of valuables that has been raining upon him.

Act 4: Now the furious wife, told by Peniculus of her man's trick, rushes out of her house just in time to meet her husband returning from the Forum, expecting Erotium's banquet. She tells him to return the mantle or stay out of her house, and the husband goes to Erotium to get it, resolving to buy his sweetheart a better one. He is stupefied when she declares him a liar and a cheat, and tells him that she has already given him both the mantle and her bracelet. So the Epidamnus twin finds the doors of both his wife and mistress slammed in his puzzled face, and goes off to get the counsel of his friends.

The Syracuse Menaechmus returns, the mantle still over his arm, in search of Messenio, who has left the inn. His brother's wife sees him, and assuming him to be her husband, demands that he confess his shame. He asks her of what he should be ashamed—and, furthermore, why she should address a total stranger so. He adds that he didn't steal her mantle, that a lady gave it to him. This is too much for the wife, who calls her father from the house. The father, also assuming that he is the husband, tells him that he must be crazy. This idea seems an excellent means of escape for Menaechmus: he feigns insanity so violently that the father rushes off for a physician, the wife seeks safety in the house, and Menaechmus goes off to resume his hunt for Messenio.

Act 5: As the father comes back with a doctor, the real husband returns. He flies into a rage when his wife and father-in-law add to his troubles by implying that he is quite mad. His anger convinces the doctor of his insanity, and he summons slaves to bind him and take him to an asylum. Just then, Messenio appears, and, thinking the struggling husband his master, overpowers the slave. As a reward he asks for his own freedom. The husband tells Messenio that he doesn't know him, but by all means to consider himself freed; then he begins to suspect he may really be a bit crazy when Messenio tells him that he will return shortly to give him the money he has been safeguarding. Husband Menaechmus is not too addled, however, to profess his ownership of the purse.

The husband goes to Erotium's house in further search of the mantle. The Syracuse twin returns, in his quest of Messenio, at the moment when the servant hurries back with his purse. His master upbraids him for having been gone so long, but the slave protests that he has just saved his owner from ruffians and has been set free. The master is pondering this new muddle when his twin appears from Erotium's house.

The two brothers rub their eyes in bewilderment on seeing each other, but explanations quickly bring recognition. They embrace. The happy master truly sets the slave free, and the brothers decide that the first Menaechmus shall go to live with his twin in Syracuse. Messenio announces an auction in the morning of the husband's goods, everything to go to the block—even the wife, if there be a buyer.

Metrical scheme

[edit]
Further information: Metres of Roman comedy

Plautus's plays are traditionally divided into five acts; these are referred to below for convenience, since many editions make use of them. However, it is not thought that they go back to Plautus's time, since no manuscript contains them before the 15th century.[3] Also, the acts themselves do not always match the structure of the plays, which is more clearly shown by the variation in metres.

In Plautus's plays the usual pattern is to begin each section with iambic senarii (which were spoken without music), then a scene of music in various metres, and finally a scene in trochaic septenarii, which were apparently recited to the accompaniment of tibiae (a pair of reed pipes). Moore calls this the "ABC succession", where A = iambic senarii, B = other metres, C = trochaic septenarii.[4] However, the ABC order is sometimes varied.

If the A passages (iambic senarii) are taken as starting a section, and the C passages (trochaic septenarii) are taken as ending it, in this play the order of the metrical sections is as follows:[5]

ABBC, ABC, ABC, ABC, ACBCBCBC

Alternatively, following Moore,[6] the sections could be taken as following the two brothers in turn as follows:

ABBC, ABCA, BC, ABCA, CBCBCBC

In first section there are two "B" passages, the first polymetric and the second in mixed iambo-trochaic metres.

Timothy Moore points out that each time Menaechmus I enters the stage, he is accompanied by music; but throughout almost the whole play each entrance of Menaechmus II coincides with iambic senarii, which were unaccompanied. This no doubt helped the audience to distinguish one brother from the other, if they were identically dressed.[7]

Prologue

[edit]
Prologue (lines 1–76): ia6 (76 lines)
An actor explains how a merchant in Syracuse in Sicily had twin sons. One of them, on a visit to Tarentum, became separated from his father and was abducted to Epidamnus by a rich childless man, who later drowned in a river, bequeathing his property to the boy. In memory of the lost boy, the grandfather meanwhile renamed the other twin by the same name as the lost one. This second twin has now come to Epidamnus to make enquiry about his brother.

Menaechmus I arranges dinner

[edit]
Act 1.1 (77–109): ia6 (33 lines)
A parasite, Peniculus (the name means a sponge used for wiping tables) is waiting outside Menaechmus's house in the hope of an invitation to dinner.
Act 1.2 (110–119): polymetric song (25 lines)
The young man Menaechmus emerges quarrelling with his wife through the door, threatening to divorce her if she continues nagging.
Act 1.2 (119–134): mixed iambic and trochaic metres (16 lines)
He says she is spoiled (tr8), and lists all the presents he buys her (ia4). He threatens to dine with a prostitute instead of her (tr7). Then he tells the audience that he has stolen his wife's cloak as a present for his girlfriend.
Act 1.2–1.4 (135–225): tr7 (87 lines)
The one-eyed Peniculus accosts Menaechmus and exchanges banter, still hoping to get a dinner. They approach the door of Erotium, the prostitute, and knock. Erotium comes out and there is more banter. Menaechmus gives her the cloak, and asks her to prepare dinner for all of them; meanwhile he and Peniculus will go to the market to get a drink. When they have gone, Erotium calls out her cook Cylindrus and orders him to go to buy some food for dinner.

Menaechmus II eats the dinner

[edit]
Act 2.1–2.2 (226–350): ia6 (124 lines)
Menaechmus II now enters the street, along with his prudent slave Messenio, who advises him that after six years searching for news of his brother all over the Mediterranean, their purse is almost empty. He warns him to watch his money since Epidamnus is full of voluptuaries, drinkers, tricksters, conmen, and the most charming prostitutes in the world. Menaechmus asks for the purse for safekeeping, which Messenio gives to him. – They now meet Cylindrus the cook, who addresses Menaechmus by name: each thinks the other is mad, but Messenio warns that he is probably a conman.
Act 2.3 (351–368): song
mostly anapaests and some iambs (18 lines)
The prostitute Erotium comes out from her house. She gives instructions to her staff, then welcomes Menaechmus II and invites him in.
Act 2.3–3.1 (369–465): tr7 (93 lines)
Menaechmus II is confused. He is surprised that Erotium knows his home city and father's name, but he denies knowing a Peniculus, or having brought a cloak, or having been in Epidamnus before. Nonetheless he decides to go in, against Messenio's advice that this is a trick. He hands over his money to Messenio for safekeeping and tells him to come back for him later. He goes inside with Erotium. Messenio and the porters depart.

Peniculus returns, having lost track of Menaechmus I in the forum. He is dismayed to see Menaechmus II exiting Erotium's house, wearing the garland customarily put on at a banquet.

Menaechmus II steals the cloak

[edit]
Act 3.2–4.1 (466–570): ia6 (102 lines)
Menaechmus II comes out with the cloak, which Erotium has lent him so that he can have it altered; when the door is shut, he congratulates himself on his good fortune and declares that he intends to keep it. Peniculus accosts him. When Menaechmus II denies knowing him, an altercation ensues and Menaechmus insults Peniculus. Peniculus says he will pay Menaechmus back for tricking him out of the meal.

A maid comes out and hands Menaechmus II a bracelet, saying that Erotium is asking him to have some gold added to it. Before going in, she cheekily requests him to buy her some gold earrings too. Menaechmus II goes off to find Messenio, throwing down his garland on the opposite side to confuse any pursuers.

Peniculus and Menaechmus I's wife emerge from his house: Peniculus has told her about the cloak. He sees the garland on the ground. Just then Menaechmus I arrives.

Act 4.2 (571–603): song: bacchiac, anapaestic, trochaic, iambic
Menaechmus I now enters from the forum side of the stage. He sings how he has been very annoyingly delayed by a court case in which he was obliged to represent an obviously guilty client. In a series of eleven rhyming iambic quaternarii he recounts his misfortunes. His wife and Peniculus overhear him and comment (an7).
Act 4.2 (cont.)–4.3 (604–700): tr7 (97 lines)
Realising he is too late for Erotium, Menaechmus I makes as if to enter his own house, but is stopped by his wife and Peniculus. There is a quarrel. The wife accuses him of stealing her cloak. He says he did not steal, only borrowed it. She tells him he may not come in until he brings it back. She goes inside without giving Peniculus any reward. Peniculus goes to the forum in annoyance.

Menaechmus I now knocks on Erotium's door. She is at first welcoming, but when he asks for the cloak back and denies having taken the bracelet she grows angry and refuses to admit him. She goes inside, and Menaechmus I goes off to consult his friends.

Menaechmus II is judged mad

[edit]
Act 5.1 (701–752): ia6 (52 lines)
Menaechmus II now returns. Mistaking him for her husband, Menaechmus I's wife quarrels with him for wearing her cloak. Growing angry, she sends a slave to fetch her father. Menaechmus II indignantly denies stealing her cloak or bracelet.
Act 5.2 (753–774): polymetric song (mostly bacchiacs) (22 lines)
The wife's father arrives, walking slowly. He asks himself what the problem can be.
Act 5.2 (775–871): tr7 (62 lines)
Menaechmus I's wife complains to her father about her husband's behaviour, but he is unsympathetic. He says that as long as he gives her food and maidservants, she has no right to rule him. When questioned, Menaechmus II denies having ever set foot in her house. The old man accuses him of being mad, and in response Menaechmus II starts raving as if he really is mad.

Menaechmus I is judged mad

[edit]
Act 5.2–5.4 (872–898): ia6 (26 lines)
The old man goes off in fear and Menaechmus II makes good his escape towards the port.

The old man hobbles back, saying he has summoned a doctor, who arrives shortly afterwards.

Act 5.5 (899–965): tr7 (62 lines)
Menaechmus I arrives complaining about the ungrateful behaviour of Peniculus and Erotium. The doctor questions him, and Menaechmus grows infuriated and begins talking like a madman. The doctor tells the old man to fetch four slaves to tie Menaechmus I up and bring him to his clinic. They go off, leaving Menaechmus I alone complaining of his troubles.

Menaechmus I is seized

[edit]
Act 5.6 (966–985): polymetric song
mixed bacchiacs, iambics and other metres (20 lines)
Messenio comes back from the inn to fetch his master from Erotium's house. Singing, he congratulates himself on being a trustworthy servant.
Act 5.6 (cont.)–5.7 (986–987): ia8 (2 lines)
Messenio prepares to knock on Erotium's door, hoping he has not come too late (ia8).
Act 5.6 (cont.)–5.7 (988–994): tr7 (7 lines)
Suddenly the old man comes out of the other house with four slaves. He orders them to seize Menaechmus I and carry him immediately to the doctor's surgery (tr7).

Menaechmus I is rescued

[edit]
Act 5.7 (cont.) (995–1007): ia8 (9 lines), ia4 (5 lines), tr8 (1 line)
Menaechmus I protests vigorously and calls for help (ia8). Messenio also calls for help (ia4). Menaechmus I begs for help again (tr8).
Act 5.7 (cont.)–5.8 (1008–1059): tr7 (53 lines)
Messenio gallantly rushes to his aid and together they beat off the slaves, who run away. Messenio then begs Menaechmus I for his freedom, which the puzzled Menaechmus grants. Messenio then departs to fetch the purse to give to Menaechmus.

Meanwhile Menaechmus I, declaring that he will be happy to steal Messenio's money if he is given the purse, goes into Erotium's house.

As soon as he has gone, Menaechmus II arrives. When Messenio tells him he has just rescued him, Menaechmus II vehemently denies that he has just given Messenio his freedom.

The brothers meet

[edit]
Act 5.9 (1060–1062): ia8 (3 lines)
Menaechmus I emerges from Erotium's house, strenuously denying that he took away her cloak.
Act 5.9 (cont.) (1063–1162): tr7 (97 lines)
The brothers meet, to their mutual astonishment. Messenio is unsure which of them is his master. Menaechmus II offers Messenio his freedom if he can prove that Menaechmus I is his twin brother. When Menaechmus II says that Menaechmus I was originally called Sosicles, the evidence is complete. Messenio is granted his freedom. Menaechmus I says he wishes to auction his property, including his wife, and return to Syracuse with his brother.

Adaptations and influences

[edit]

This play was the major source for William Shakespeare's The Comedy of Errors.[8] Shakespeare's work was in turn adapted for the musical theatre by Rodgers and Hart in The Boys from Syracuse and as the 1954 opera Double-Trouble by Richard Mohaupt (Libretto: Roger Maren).[9]

A similar line of influence was Carlo Goldoni's 1747 play I due gemelli veneziani ("The two Venetian twins") (also adapted as The Venetian Twins in 1979). Shakespeare's Twelfth Night also features mistaken twins, the sister dressed as a boy.

Translations

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Menaechmi

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Menaechmi (The Brothers Menaechmus) is a Latin written by the Roman playwright Titus Maccius Plautus (c. 254–184 BCE), likely composed in the late third or early second century BCE. The play revolves around identical twin brothers separated during childhood—one raised in Syracuse and the other in Epidamnus—who unwittingly cause a cascade of mistaken identities upon the traveler's arrival in his brother's city, driving a plot of farcical confusion and eventual reunion. Set in the Greek colony of Epidamnus (modern Durrës, Albania), the story unfolds through the misadventures of Menaechmus of Epidamnus, a prosperous but beleaguered merchant trapped in a contentious marriage, and his twin Sosicles (also called Menaechmus), who arrives from Syracuse with his slave Messenio in search of the lost brother. Key supporting characters include the shrewish wife Matrona, the courtesan Erotium (Menaechmus of Epidamnus's mistress), the gluttonous parasite Peniculus, Matrona's father Senex, and Messenio, whose clever interventions help unravel the chaos. The narrative builds on escalating errors: Sosicles is greeted as the local Menaechmus by Erotium, dines at her expense, receives gifts intended for his brother, and becomes entangled in domestic quarrels, while the real Menaechmus is deemed mad and nearly carted off by a doctor. The twins' recognition, facilitated by Messenio, leads to a joyful resolution where they sell off the Epidamnus household and depart together for Syracuse. Plautus, whose surviving twenty-one plays represent adaptations of lost Greek New Comedy originals, crafted Menaechmi with a focus on situational over deep , employing stock types like the clever slave and the freeloading parasite to heighten the humor of and . Performed in verse with musical interludes accompanied by the (), the play exemplifies Roman palliata , which transplanted Greek settings and costumes to Roman stages for satirical commentary on social norms. Its enduring legacy includes inspiring William Shakespeare's (c. 1594), which expands the twin motif to include servant doubles, and marking a milestone in revival as the first classical staged in a vernacular translation in 1486 at the Este court in .

Background

Authorship and Composition

Titus Maccius is universally attributed as the author of Menaechmi, a attribution supported by the consistent Roman literary tradition from antiquity and the play's inclusion in the surviving corpus of twenty-one Plautine comedies preserved in medieval manuscripts. These manuscripts, dating back to Carolingian-era copies, ascribe the work directly to Plautus without dispute among ancient critics such as and Varro, who cataloged his output as part of the early Roman dramatic canon. Scholars estimate the composition of Menaechmi to the late , around , drawing on linguistic features such as the play's archaic vocabulary and iambic-trochaic meter patterns, which align with Plautus's early stylistic phase, as well as historical allusions to Epidamnus—a Greek colony on the Adriatic known in Roman records for its commercial vibrancy and moral laxity during the period of expanding Roman influence in the region. This dating places the play among Plautus's initial works, produced shortly after his emergence as a in the 210s BC amid the Second Punic War, when Roman theater sought escapist entertainment. In contrast to most of Plautus's comedies, which freely adapt plots from Greek New Comedy playwrights like and Philemon, Menaechmi stands out for its apparent originality, with no surviving or attested Greek source identified despite the existence of several Hellenistic plays titled The Twins. The twin mistaken-identity motif may derive instead from native Italian or Sicilian folk traditions, as suggested by comparative analysis of oral narratives involving separated siblings and secret passages, elements echoed in the play's structure but absent from known Greek dramatic precedents. Plautus, active from approximately 205 to 184 BC, rose from humble origins—possibly as a performer or sceneworker in Tarentum—to become Rome's preeminent comic dramatist, authoring over 130 plays of which twenty survive complete. He innovated by Romanizing Greek models, infusing them with puns, , and allusions to local customs, , and military life to resonate with audiences at public festivals, thereby establishing fabula palliata as a distinctly Roman genre that blended Hellenic form with Italic vitality.

Genre and Historical Context

Menaechmi is classified as a fabula palliata, a genre of Roman comedy that adapts Greek New Comedy models while dressing characters in the Greek cloak to evoke a Hellenistic setting, incorporating stock comedic elements such as mistaken identities and farcical misunderstandings to generate humor. This form, prominent in the works of , emphasized lively dialogue, , and social satire tailored for Roman audiences, distinguishing it from the more domestic fabula togata genre. Composed during the late third to early second century BCE, amid the Second Punic War (218–201 BCE) and its aftermath, Menaechmi reflects Rome's expanding empire and increasing cultural interactions with the Greek world through military conquests in the . Plautus's adaptations of Greek originals during this era blended foreign dramatic traditions with Roman wit, capturing a society navigating post-war recovery and Hellenistic influences. In early Roman theater, plays like Menaechmi were staged at ludi scaenici festivals, public games honoring gods that evolved from religious rituals into elaborate performances featuring temporary wooden stages. Accompanied by music from tibicen players on double-reed flutes, these productions highlighted Plautus's innovations in infusing Greek plots with Roman humor, such as exaggerated and cultural allusions, to engage diverse crowds at events like the . The play's setting in Epidamnus, a Greek colony on the Adriatic coast (modern , ), served as a stereotypical "foreign" locale symbolizing exotic vice and chaos for Roman viewers, reinforcing the genre's convention of placing domestic farces in distant Hellenistic cities to heighten the . This choice underscored Rome's perception of Greek urban life as a site of moral looseness, contrasting with the audience's own societal norms.

Characters

Principal Characters

Menaechmus of Epidamnus, also referred to as Menaechmus I, is a central in Plautus's , depicted as a wealthy originally from Syracuse who was abducted as a child and adopted by an Epidamnian , inheriting substantial riches upon his adoptive father's death. Trapped in a strained to a local woman, he exhibits frustration and resentment toward her domineering nature, seeking escape through his relationship with his mistress, Erotium, which highlights his indulgence in extramarital pleasures as a means of asserting in a dysfunctional domestic life. His traits embody the Roman comedic of the henpecked husband, whose exasperation drives much of the play's . Menaechmus of Syracuse, known as Menaechmus II or originally Sosicles, serves as the other twin protagonist, a Syracusan adventurer who renamed himself after his lost brother during a years-long search to reunite the family. Accompanied by his loyal slave Messenio, he arrives in Epidamnus unaware of the confusions his identical appearance will unleash, portraying him as resourceful yet unwittingly disruptive to the local social order. His quest motivates the plot's resolution, underscoring themes of familial bonds amid comedic chaos. Matrona, the wife of Menaechmus of Epidamnus, represents the stereotypical jealous and nagging Roman matrona, whose possessive accusations of toward her husband escalate the misunderstandings central to the comedy. Her suspicions and confrontations portray her as a domineering figure who embodies societal critiques of restrictive marital expectations for women in Roman comedy. Erotium, the and mistress of Menaechmus of Epidamnus, functions as an alluring yet opportunistic figure who becomes entangled in the twin confusion through her involvement with dinners and a stolen cloak. She exemplifies the comic trope of the troublesome meretrix, whose affections and demands amplify the protagonist's domestic rebellions while highlighting power imbalances in romantic entanglements.

Supporting Characters

Peniculus serves as the parasite attached to Menaechmus I, functioning as a dinner companion whose primary motivation is securing meals through and companionship. His greedy nature and cynical wit provide , particularly in scenes where he complains bitterly upon being excluded from a promised feast at the Erotium's house, highlighting his role as a foil to the protagonist's domestic frustrations. This self-interested behavior underscores the farcical chaos, as Peniculus's departure in anger exacerbates Menaechmus I's isolation without deeper emotional involvement. Messenio, the slave belonging to Menaechmus II, stands out for his cleverness and resourcefulness, actively assisting in the search for the lost twin and orchestrating the play's resolution. Unlike the typically foolish or scheming slaves in Plautine , Messenio demonstrates loyalty and quick thinking, such as when he proposes a search strategy upon arriving in Epidamnus and later negotiates the twins' reunion by offering to purchase Menaechmus I's freedom. His proactive interventions propel the plot forward, contrasting sharply with passive supporting figures and enabling the disentanglement of the identity mix-ups. The Senex, identified as Menaechmus I's father-in-law, acts as a meddling relative who heightens family conflicts through his authoritative interventions and threats of legal action against his son-in-law. He employs mythological allusions to assert social dominance, mirroring the twins' linguistic strategies to control inferiors, which escalates tensions when he mistakes Menaechmus II for his son-in-law and demands restitution for perceived slights. This brief but disruptive presence amplifies the domestic strife without resolving it, serving primarily to intensify the comedic misunderstandings. The courtesan's maid, known as Ancilla, and the Doctor play minor yet pivotal roles in advancing the farce through physical comedy and pseudomedical elements. The maid facilitates confusion by delivering a bracelet to the wrong twin, prompting improvisations that deepen the identity errors and contribute to Menaechmus I's alienation from his household. The Doctor, portrayed as a quack practitioner, arrives to diagnose Menaechmus I's feigned madness as genuine insanity based on the Senex's report, ordering his binding and transport to a clinic in a scene rich with satirical humor on medical incompetence. Together, these figures enable slapstick sequences, such as the binding farce, without driving the emotional core of the narrative.

Plot Summary

Prologue and Exposition

The of ' Menaechmi is delivered by the parasite Peniculus, an unusual choice for the playwright, as prologues in his comedies are typically spoken by a god or a slave to invoke divine authority or comic reliability. This direct involvement of a human hanger-on underscores the play's earthy, human-centered humor from the outset. Spanning approximately 76 lines, the provides essential backstory on the identical twin brothers, originally named Menaechmus and Sosicles at birth in Syracuse to a father and his wife. When the boys were seven years old, the father took one twin, Menaechmus I, on a business trip to Tarentum for a ; there, the child was abducted by a wealthy Epidamnian who raised him as his own after the father's subsequent from . The remaining twin, originally Sosicles, was renamed Menaechmus II by his grandfather in honor of the lost brother and grew up in Syracuse, unaware of his sibling's fate until adulthood. The exposition then introduces the central : Menaechmus II's arrival in Epidamnus with his loyal slave Messenio, driven by a six-year quest to locate his missing twin. It emphasizes the brothers' indistinguishable physical appearances, noting that while names differ across cities—Menaechmus I is known locally without a —the visual similarity will fuel the impending confusions, as locals mistake one for the other. Through Peniculus's candid address to the audience, the prologue establishes a lively comic tone by outlining the twin premise and promising entertaining mix-ups without spoiling the action, thereby clarifying the identical traits despite renamed identities and priming spectators for the farce. This framework, delivered in a conversational iambic senarii meter, ensures the complex setup is accessible, allowing the comedy of errors to unfold smoothly.

Complications and Climax

Upon arriving in Epidamnus, Menaechmus of Syracuse (Menaechmus II) is immediately mistaken for his twin brother, Menaechmus of Epidamnus (Menaechmus I), by the Erotium, who warmly invites him to a dinner she has prepared, believing him to be her regular lover. Overwhelmed by the unexpected hospitality, Menaechmus II accepts the invitation and joins her at the feast, where Erotium presents him with a valuable Samian —previously gifted to her by Menaechmus I—as a token of affection, which he later attempts to pawn for money. This exchange sets off a chain of escalating confusions, as the becomes a central object of contention in the ensuing farces. As Menaechmus II exits Erotium's house, he encounters Menaechmus I's wife, who mistakes him for her husband and demands the return of the Samian cloak, accusing him of and squandering family resources on the . The confrontation intensifies when the wife's father and the parasite Peniculus intervene, with the father-in-law issuing a legal for Menaechmus II's on charges of and financial irresponsibility, while Peniculus, feeling slighted for being excluded from the dinner, piles on insults and threats. To evade the mounting accusations and the , Menaechmus II feigns madness, ranting incoherently and claiming divine possession, which temporarily bewilders his pursuers and allows him a narrow escape from the scene. Meanwhile, parallel confusions engulf Menaechmus I, who returns from a errand expecting to dine at Erotium's but finds himself barred from entry, as Erotium—still under the impression from her encounter with his twin—dismisses his advances and withholds the meal he anticipated. His wife, already enraged by reports of the cloak's transfer, scolds him vehemently upon his return home, amplifying his frustration and leading him to echo his brother's earlier tactic by pretending in a bid to deflect her fury. The pretense backfires when a doctor is summoned by the gathering crowd, who diagnose Menaechmus I as genuinely deranged based on his erratic behavior, prescribing harsh treatment and advising restraint. The climax builds through rapid scene shifts as the father-in-law, convinced of Menaechmus I's madness, orders his seizure and confinement to prevent further , while the parasite and onlookers contribute to the with mocking commentary. This peak of disorder, driven by the twins' unwitting replication of each other's actions, heightens the comedic tension as accusations of lunacy and theft proliferate unchecked among the household and passersby.

Recognition and Resolution

In the climactic moments of the play, Messenio intervenes decisively to rescue Menaechmus of Epidamnus (Menaechmus I) from a group of slaves attempting to seize him and take him to a doctor, believing him mad after the day's confusions. Messenio, a loyal slave accompanying Menaechmus of Syracuse (Menaechmus II, also known as Sosicles), beats off the attackers and brings the two men face-to-face outside the Erotium's house, where their striking resemblance prompts immediate suspicion of twinship. Through a series of questions about their shared childhood—recalling their father Moschus, their separation at age seven during a trip to Tarentum, and specific family details like the grandfather's name and the mother's death—the brothers confirm their identities, with Menaechmus II exclaiming, "My dear twin brother! I’m Sosicles!" With identities established, the brothers quickly explain the cascade of misunderstandings that ensued from their identical appearances: Menaechmus I had stolen a from his to give to Erotium as a gift, while Menaechmus II, mistaken for his twin, had dined with Erotium, received the as a token, and inadvertently taken it away, fueling the accusations of madness and . They also address the involvement of Menaechmus I's , who had pursued him aggressively, and the father-in-law, who sought to institutionalize him; these revelations clear the air, transforming the chaos into mutual understanding. The twins resolve to return together to Syracuse in , with Menaechmus I planning to sell his possessions in Epidamnus to facilitate the journey. The comic resolution unfolds with lighthearted practicality, as Menaechmus I decides to auction off his household items, pointedly including his "nagging wife" to imply and from her control, eliciting laughter at the expense of marital strife. Messenio is rewarded for his with immediate and appointed as the auctioneer, while the stolen cloak—central to earlier mix-ups—is restored without further issue. The play concludes on a joyful note of familial reunion, emphasizing the enduring bonds of brotherhood that triumph over the temporary disorder, as the brothers embrace their restored connection and the audience is invited to applaud the happy ending.

Form and Style

Structural Division

The Menaechmi of Plautus, like other Roman comedies, was not originally divided into formal acts but presented as a continuous sequence of scenes without structural breaks, a convention that aligns with the fluid performance style of Roman theater. Post-Renaissance editors imposed a five-act structure for analytical purposes, though this division is anachronistic to the original production around 200 BCE. The play comprises approximately 1,160 lines in total, delivered in a rapid succession that emphasizes comedic momentum over segmented pauses. The action unfolds across multiple scenes (typically divided into around 10-14 in modern editions), all set on a single street in the Greek city of Epidamnus, with no shifts in location to maintain focus on public interactions and confusions. Scene transitions occur primarily through character entrances and exits, which propel the plot forward without relying on intervening musical or choral elements, allowing for seamless overlaps in mistaken identities. This organization adheres to Plautine conventions, where the stage represents a unified urban space, facilitating the play's central motif of twin confusion in everyday encounters. To sustain the brisk pace, Plautus employs asides and direct addresses to the audience, enabling characters to comment on events or solicit sympathy without interrupting the onstage action, a technique that heightens immediacy and complicity. Unlike Greek New Comedy models such as those of , which included a chorus for commentary or transitions, Menaechmi features no such element, reflecting Roman adaptations that prioritized continuous dialogue and spectacle over lyric interludes. The overall dramatic arc begins with exposition in the , where the speaker outlines the twins' to orient the audience. Rising action builds through alternating encounters involving each twin, generating escalating misunderstandings in the central scenes. The falling action culminates in mutual , resolving the confusions in a unified denouement that restores family ties.

Metrical Scheme

The metrical scheme of Plautus's Menaechmi exemplifies the rhythmic versatility characteristic of Roman comedy, employing a mix of spoken and accompanied verses to drive the action and modulate emotional intensity. The dominant meters include iambic senarii, which consist of six iambic feet (short-long syllables) and are used for unaccompanied , allowing for natural conversational flow in everyday exchanges; examples appear in lines 1–109 and 226–350, such as the delivered in iambic senarii by an expository speaker. Trochaic septenarii, featuring seven trochaic feet (long-short syllables) with catalectic endings, serve as accompanied by the (a double-reed pipe), heightening liveliness and in transitional or animated scenes; these occur, for instance, in lines 604–700 during the arrangement of the dinner invitation. Polymetric sections, comprising irregular sequences of shorter cola like choriambs, cretics, glyconics, anapests, and bacchiacs, are reserved for solo songs or ensemble outbursts, conveying frenzy or emotional peaks; notable instances include lines 110–118 (mixing choriambic, cretic, and glyconic rhythms) and approximately 200 lines overall in anapests and bacchiacs for heightened dramatic effect. The play employs a scheme often following patterns like ABC (A: iambic senarii, B: polymetrics, C: trochaic septenarii) in early sections, with variations in later acts to accelerate the resolution. The opens in iambics (lines 1–76) to establish the exposition clearly without music, while madness scenes blend polymetrics to evoke chaotic energy, as in the feigned sequence (lines 835–841, shifting to in polymeters). This scheme aligns with the play's five-act division, briefly referencing structural segmentation for rhythmic emphasis on narrative turns. Musical integration via the underscores trochaic and polymetric passages, amplifying exuberance and signaling shifts from subdued conversation to boisterous revelry, thereby enhancing the 's performative dynamism. Overall, these meter changes purposefully delineate mood transitions, from rational discourse in iambics to euphoric or frenzied highs in accompanied forms, underscoring Plautus's adaptation of Greek New rhythms for Roman theatrical vigor.

Themes and Interpretation

Mistaken Identity

The central motif of Menaechmi revolves around the visual and nominal similarity of the identical twin brothers, both named Menaechmus, which generates pervasive confusion and swapped identities among the characters. This similarity critiques societal reliance on superficial perception and unexamined assumptions, as the locals in Epidamnus repeatedly mistake the visiting Menaechmus of Syracuse for their resident Menaechmus, leading to a cascade of erroneous interactions that expose the fragility of social recognition. The play's prologue explicitly introduces the twins' backstory to preempt similar confusion for the audience, framing the ensuing farce as a deliberate exploration of misperception. Key examples illustrate this theme's escalation: the Syracusan Menaechmus is accosted by the Erotium and the cook Cylindrus, who treat him as the familiar local, while the Epidamnian Menaechmus is later viewed as an impostor or madman by his own wife and father-in-law. This culminates in institutional responses, such as the father-in-law summoning a doctor to diagnose and "cure" the perceived of the "deranged" twin, satirizing how societal norms interpret deviation as when identity markers fail. These incidents highlight the theme's role in amplifying comedic tension through repeated, interlocking errors. Plautus innovates within Roman comedy by employing twins as the mechanism for identity swaps, a rarer device than the common disguise plots of Greek New Comedy, which intensifies the farce by making confusion inherent rather than contrived. This choice allows for deeper interpretive layers, questioning selfhood as socially contingent and recognition as a process vulnerable to external cues, ultimately resolving in the brothers' mutual affirmation of identity. The motif thus serves not only as comedic engine but as a metatheatrical commentary on the theater's power to manipulate and reveal perceptual illusions.

Family and Social Dynamics

In Menaechmi, satirizes Roman through the dysfunctional union of Menaechmus I and his wife, a classic uxor dotata whose substantial grants her , inverting traditional patriarchal control and fueling the husband's resentment toward domestic obligations. This portrayal reflects broader anxieties about dowry wives, depicted as shrewish matronae who prioritize material possessions—like the stolen mantle—over , leading Menaechmus I to seek escape via and threats of . The serves not as a sentimental bond but a arrangement, underscoring economic tensions in Roman family life where affection yields to financial leverage. Slavery and patronage further illuminate social hierarchies, with Messenio embodying loyal servitude as Menaechmus II's slave, motivated by hopes of manumission and mutual fides, in contrast to the parasitic Peniculus, who exploits Menaechmus I's hospitality without reciprocity. Messenio's proactive role in resolving the twins' separation—through negotiation and household liquidation—highlights slaves as integral to familial restoration, yet bound by threats of punishment that enforce obedience. Peniculus, as a client-like figure, satirizes dependency in Roman patronage systems, where flatterers drain resources from weakened masters, exposing the fragility of social bonds reliant on indulgence rather than authority. Gender roles emerge through courtesans like Erotium, who wield empowerment outside marriage by catering to male desires, offering Menaechmus I a compliant alternative to his domineering wife and poking fun at men's vulnerabilities to seduction. Erotium's household provides a illusory domestic haven, subverting expectations of female subservience while critiquing the double standard that elevates meretrices as liberating yet transient figures in contrast to the restrictive matrona. This dynamic underscores Plautus's mockery of rigid gender norms, where women navigate power through economic or sexual means amid patriarchal constraints. The play's resolution reinforces conservative , as the twins' reunion prioritizes fraternal and paternal bonds—evident in Menaechmus II's decision to reclaim his brother and dissolve the Epidamnian ties—restoring patriarchal order by rejecting the disordered marriage and dependencies. frees Menaechmus I from his wife's control, allowing a return to the original unit under the father's legacy, thus affirming Roman ideals of male lineage over individual pursuits.

Legacy

Influences and Adaptations

The Menaechmi exerted a profound influence on , particularly through its central motif of involving twins, which became a staple in comedic traditions. William Shakespeare's (1594) draws directly from Plautus's play as its for the twin-brother plot, adapting the confusion of identities in Epidamnus while expanding the narrative with a second pair of twins (Dromio servants), a more prominent role for the neglected wife , additional family members like a father and sister, and an who resolves the plot—elements absent in the original. These additions shift the tone toward a blend of and domestic reconciliation, contrasting Plautus's sharper focus on marital discord and social chaos. The play's legacy extended to later European drama, notably Carlo Goldoni's I due gemelli veneziani (1747), which relocates the twin confusion to 18th-century , incorporating local color and elements while retaining the core structure of separated brothers mistaken for one another. In the 20th century, this influence manifested in musical theater with Rodgers and Hart's (1938), a Broadway adaptation of Shakespeare's play that traces its roots to Menaechmi, featuring songs like "" to heighten the comedic errors amid Syracuse's bustling setting. Similarly, Richard Mohaupt's opera Double Trouble (1954), with by Roger Maren, directly adapts Plautus's text into a modern English-language work, emphasizing the twins' misadventures through operatic . Beyond direct derivations, the Menaechmi's twin motif echoes ancient precedents in Menander's fragmentary Dis Exapaton (on which likely drew) and permeates twin-based comedies into modern works, from imitations to contemporary films and plays exploring identity confusion. Scholarly recognition during the highlighted the play's role in humanist revival of classical comedy, with editions and translations by figures like promoting as a model for drama, elevating Menaechmi as a key text in the commedia erudita tradition.

Performance History

In , Plautus's Menaechmi was likely performed at public festivals such as the Ludi Megalenses (Megalesian Games), where comedies were staged as part of the ludi scaenici to entertain diverse audiences including citizens and slaves. Evidence for such productions comes from documenting Plautine plays in the 190s BCE, though no specific date for Menaechmi survives; visual depictions of Roman comedic performances, including masked in stock roles akin to those in the play, appear in mosaics from sites like Pompeii, illustrating the lively, music-accompanied stagings typical of the era. These performances emphasized through and role confusion, with all-male casts wearing masks to heighten the twins' identical appearances. The Renaissance marked a revival of Menaechmi, beginning with its first printed edition in Venice in 1472, which made the text widely accessible and spurred scholarly interest in classical comedy. The play's first modern staging occurred in 1486 at the Este court in Ferrara, Italy, in a vernacular Italian translation by Battista Guarino—marking Europe's inaugural public performance of a classical drama in the native tongue, complete with elaborate sets featuring wooden houses and a sailing ship. Further Italian productions followed, including a 1488 Latin version in Florence before Lorenzo de' Medici, for which Angelo Poliziano composed a prologue; these revivals highlighted the play's mistaken-identity plot through innovative use of masks for the twins, directly influencing commedia dell'arte's stock characters and improvisational style, as seen in later imitations like Bernardo Dovizi's Calandria (1513). In England, university stagings at Cambridge and Oxford in the late 16th century adapted Menaechmi for academic audiences, paving the way for its impact on Shakespeare's The Comedy of Errors (1594), though full professional productions remained limited to scholarly circles. Full productions of Menaechmi in the 19th and early 20th centuries were rare outside academic settings, largely due to the challenges of performing in Latin for non-specialist audiences and the play's reliance on rhythmic meter originally tied to musical accompaniment. Post-World War II, stagings proliferated in universities, such as Sergei Radlov's 1918 Russian production (revived in academic contexts) and various European and American college performances that stripped musical elements to focus on and identity swaps, often using minimal sets to underscore the play's chaotic energy. These efforts highlighted innovations like accelerated pacing to compensate for the loss of ancient metrics, making the farce accessible without . In the , English-language productions of Menaechmi have embraced adaptations that employ doubling for the twins to amplify and reduce needs, a technique optional in the original but effective for modern intimacy. Examples include the University of Michigan-Flint's 2012 staging of The Menaechmus Brothers, which used visual cues like identical costumes to drive the humor in a non-musical format, and University's 2021 Zoom performance, which leveraged digital filters for twin effects amid constraints. Challenges persist in non-musical revivals, where Plautus's iambic senarii and cretic meters—designed for musical delivery—are rendered as spoken , requiring directors to maintain rhythmic flow through and timing to preserve the original's energetic without diluting its verbal wit.

Text and Scholarship

Textual Transmission

The textual tradition of Plautus's Menaechmi derives from a late antique , likely a 4th-century CE containing all twenty-one authentic Plautine comedies, which gave rise to two main recensiones in the record. The older recensio, represented by the Ambrosian (, G 79 sup., 5th century CE), preserves abbreviated fragments of twelve plays but does not include Menaechmi. Instead, the play survives complete in the younger recensio (P family, late 10th century CE), with the earliest witness being the Palatinus Heidelbergensis latinus 1613, a Carolingian containing Menaechmi alongside eleven other comedies. This , along with descendants like the Latinus 3873 (15th century) and the Codex Parisinus Latinus 7931, forms the basis of the transmitted text, though minor issues have been addressed through editorial conjectures since the . The of Plautus's comedies, including Menaechmi, appeared in in 1472, edited by Giorgio Merula and based primarily on a transcript of a P-family , marking the play's entry into print and facilitating its dissemination during the . This was followed by the influential Aldine edition of 1522, prepared by Torresano d'Asola with input from , which collated multiple sources to standardize and resolve some obvious errors, establishing a benchmark text for subsequent scholarship. Nineteenth-century philology advanced the critical understanding of Menaechmi through systematic of the principal P-family manuscripts—designated B (Paris, BnF lat. 7932, 10th century), C (Paris, BnF lat. 7931, 9th/10th century), and D (Paris, BnF lat. 16206, 11th century)—by Friedrich Ritschl and his school in their multi-volume edition (1849–1865), which identified shared errors and interpolations. Friedrich Leo's edition (, 1895–1896) built on this foundation, offering a definitive that incorporated metrical analysis to emend rhythmic irregularities and clarified narrative inconsistencies. The text exhibits characteristic corruptions typical of Plautine transmission, including inconsistencies in proper names—such as the Syracusan brother's original name Sosicles, renamed Menaechmus in the to match his twin, as explained in the —and disruptions in the metrical scheme, particularly corrupted trochaic septenarii in scenes of rapid (e.g., lines 219–229). Despite these issues, no major portions of the play are lost, preserving its structural integrity from the original composition around 200 BCE. Today, scholars access Menaechmi via digital corpora like the , which hosts Leo's critical text with apparatus criticus, and the Packard Humanities Institute (PHI) Latin Texts database, enabling variant comparisons and facilitating ongoing emendations.

Translations and Editions

One of the earliest notable English translations of Menaechmi is the literal prose rendering by Henry Thomas Riley, published in 1874 as part of Bohn's Classical Library series, which emphasizes Victorian-era readability while preserving the play's dialogic structure. A mid-20th-century verse translation by E.F. Watling appeared in the volume Plautus: The Pot of Gold and Other Plays (1965), valued for its fidelity to 's rhythmic style and its ability to convey the comedic timing for general readers. In French, Pierre Lefèvre's 1910 translation provides a scholarly prose version that highlights the play's linguistic nuances for academic study. The German edition by Otto Dräger (1913) offers a facing-page format with commentary, aiding philological analysis of Plautus's metrics. Italian translations often appear in bilingual facing-page editions, such as those in the Mondadori series, which pair the Latin text with modern Italian to facilitate direct comparison and appreciation of the original wit. Critical editions form the backbone of scholarly work on Menaechmi. The edition, edited by W.M. Lindsay in 1907 (volume II of Comoediae), establishes a reliable Latin text based on principal manuscripts, serving as a standard reference for . The Teubner edition by J.D. Reeve (1983, volume I of Comoediae) includes an extensive apparatus criticus, documenting variants and emendations to support advanced philological research. Bilingual editions enhance accessibility, particularly those emphasizing the play's humor for non-specialists, such as the version translated by Wolfgang de Melo (2011), which pairs the Latin with facing English prose. Recent scholarship includes V. Sophie Klein's 2022 companion volume (), which analyzes Menaechmi's comedic conventions, cultural context, and influence in the . Recent open-access resources, like the Digital Library's edition with Riley's translation, make Menaechmi freely available online for educational purposes.

References

  1. https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/WP5kranjc.pdf
  2. https://wp.stolaf.edu/classics/st-olaf-ancient-plays/menaechmi/
  3. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plautus-two_menaechmuses/2011/pb_LCL061.423.xml
  4. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/cb1c85c8-4416-4c28-8677-b37df16252eb/download
  5. https://christed.faculty.arizona.edu/latin401/conte.pdf
  6. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0437.xml
  7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4348686
  8. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=hab
  9. https://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~jstarks/latlaughsback.html
  10. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28006/chapter/211767828
  11. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/menaechmi-plautus
  12. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004435124/BP000006.xml
  13. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0437.xml
  14. http://theatrehistory.pressbooks.sunycreate.cloud/chapter/__unknown__-6/
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-roman-comedy/fabric-of-roman-comedy/3B45AA23413EC0C1FC76920C69B51975
  16. https://u.arizona.edu/~christed/clas351/9-29a.html
  17. https://search.informit.org/doi/pdf/10.3316/ielapa.820910819
  18. https://www.academia.edu/7728018/A_CALCULATED_COMEDY_OF_ERRORS_THE_STRUCTURE_OF_PLAUTUS_MENAECHMI
  19. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plautus-two_menaechmuses/2011/pb_LCL061.427.xml
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256006174_Mythological_References_Power_and_Identity_in_Plautus%27_Menaechmi
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-quarterly/article/structure-of-plautus-menaechmi/613FCC761A954CF6E2F1C87FE1D72794
  22. https://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/1688
  23. https://www.bu.edu/cas/books/plautus-menaechmi/
  24. https://academic.oup.com/book/42098/chapter/356101180
  25. https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/plautus/menaechmi.shtml
  26. https://scaife.perseus.org/reader/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0119.phi010.perseus-eng2:2/
  27. https://brill.com/view/journals/mnem/76/2/article-p230_3.xml
  28. https://scaife.perseus.org/library/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0119.phi010.perseus-eng2/
  29. https://pages.pomona.edu/~cmc24747/sources/menaechmi.htm
  30. https://storage.lib.uchicago.edu/pres/2006/pres2006-0533.pdf
  31. https://archive.org/download/tmacciplavtimena00plau/tmacciplavtimena00plau.pdf
  32. https://www.academia.edu/44353857/_APPEARANCES_ARE_DECEPTIVE_IDENTITY_CRISIS_IN_PLAUTUS_MENAECHMI_AND_AMPHITRUO_Muditha_Dharmasiri
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339918734_Plays_of_Mistaken_Identity
  34. https://academic.oup.com/book/36306/chapter/318385972
  35. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/809/1/Post_viva_thesis_for_PDF.pdf?DDD3%2B
  36. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2001/2001.04.17/
  37. https://www.rsc.org.uk/the-comedy-of-errors/dates-and-sources
  38. https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/the-comedy-of-errors/the-comedy-of-errors-a-modern-perspective/
  39. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ClasDram/playreviews/section4/plautus.pdf
  40. https://academic.oup.com/book/27076/chapter/196409434
  41. https://rodgersandhammerstein.com/show/the-boys-from-syracuse/
  42. https://www.concordtheatricals.com/p/44978/the-boys-from-syracuse
  43. https://www.wisemusicclassical.com/work/30834/Double-Trouble--Richard-Mohaupt/
  44. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/c6dbdbe6-e002-4a12-9239-632c330db5fa/download
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renaissance-quarterly/article/encountering-plautus-in-the-renaissance-a-humanist-debate-on-comedy/3ABFE47B9C3FE9E83277D3A0CE311FB1
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41154194
  47. https://www.academia.edu/31606730/Encountering_Plautus_in_the_Renaissance_A_Humanist_Debate_on_Comedy
  48. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28006/chapter/211764922
  49. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollbook/title/20017.pdf
  50. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/compdr/vol37/iss4/1/
  51. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/417591/summary
  52. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1667007
  53. https://journals.uni-lj.si/keria/article/download/8192/8346/19157
  54. https://news.umflint.edu/2012/10/30/the-menaechmus-brothers-brings-double-the-laughs-to-um-flint/
  55. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5lCT_h6t60
  56. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118958018.ch27
  57. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-5127
  58. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-roman-comedy/manuscripts-and-illustration-of-plautus-and-terence/29247E26B57DD3768B7949154F403C9D
  59. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1995/1995.10.15/
  60. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL060/2011/pb_LCL060.cxiii.xml
  61. https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-aldine-press-plautus-titus-maccius-comoediae-venice-4043436/
  62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23054378
  63. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plautus-two_menaechmuses/2011/pb_LCL061.419.xml
  64. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0092
  65. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0093%3Acard%3D1
  66. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/plautus-menaechmi-9781350092747/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.