Hubbry Logo
Mike BarnicleMike BarnicleMain
Open search
Mike Barnicle
Community hub
Mike Barnicle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mike Barnicle
Mike Barnicle
Mike Barnicle
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Michael Barnicle (born October 13, 1943)[1] is an American journalist and commentator who has worked in print, radio, and television. He is a senior contributor and the veteran columnist on MSNBC's Morning Joe. He is also seen on NBC's Today Show with news/feature segments. He was a regular contributor to the local Boston television news magazine, Chronicle on WCVB-TV, since 1986. Barnicle has also appeared on PBS's Charlie Rose, the PBS NewsHour, CBS's 60 Minutes, MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, ESPN, and HBO sports programming.

Key Information

Several of Barnicle's columns are featured in the anthologies published by Abrams Books: Deadline Artists: America's Greatest Newspaper Columns and Deadline Artists—Scandals, Tragedies and Triumphs: More of America's Greatest Newspaper Columns with the description: "Barnicle is to Boston what Royko was to Chicago and Breslin is to New York—an authentic voice who comes to symbolize a great city. Almost a generation younger than Breslin & Co., Barnicle also serves as the keeper of the flame of the reported column."[2] Barnicle is also interviewed in the HBO documentary Breslin and Hamill: Deadline Artists as well as many documentaries on baseball, including Ken Burns' Baseball: The Tenth Inning. David Barron of the Houston Chronicle writes that Barnicle's contributions to the film are among the most valuable, citing specifically that Barnicle "provokes simultaneous laughter and tears on the burden of passing his love of the Red Sox to a second generation."

Barnicle, a Massachusetts native, has written more than 4,000 columns[3] collectively for the New York Daily News (1999–2005), Boston Herald (2004–2005 and occasionally contributing from 2006 to 2010), and The Boston Globe, where he rose to prominence with columns about Boston's working and middle classes. He also has written articles and commentary for Time magazine, Newsweek, The Huffington Post, The Daily Beast, ESPN Magazine, and Esquire, among others.

Early career

[edit]

Barnicle was born in Worcester, Massachusetts, grew up in Fitchburg, Massachusetts, and graduated from Boston University in 1965. Barnicle worked as a volunteer for the Robert F. Kennedy 1968 presidential campaign in various states. After Kennedy's assassination, Barnicle attended the Requiem Mass for Kennedy at St. Patrick's Cathedral and later rode on the 21-car funeral train to Arlington National Cemetery.[4] He worked as a speechwriter on the U.S. Senate campaign of John V. Tunney and for Sen. Ed Muskie, when Muskie announced his intention to run in the Democratic Party presidential primaries. Barnicle appeared in a small part in the Robert Redford film The Candidate. Barnicle was asked to write a column while visiting Redford's "Sundance" home in Utah. As the New York Times reported, the Globe's political writer, Robert L. Healy, and Jack Driscoll, the editor of The Evening Globe, recruited Mr. Barnicle to write a column. He continued to write columns for The Evening Globe, then the Boston Globe, until 1998.[5]

The paper and its columnists won praise with their coverage of the political and social upheaval that roiled Boston after the city instituted a mandatory, court-ordered school desegregation plan in the mid-1970s. In his Pulitzer Prize-winning book Common Ground: A Turbulent Decade in the Lives of Three American Families (1986), J. Anthony Lukas wrote that Barnicle gave voice to the Boston residents who the policy had angered. Lukas singled out Barnicle's column ("Busing Puts Burden on Working Class, Black and White" published in The Boston Globe, October 15, 1974) and interview with Harvard psychiatrist and author Robert Coles as one of the defining moments in the coverage that helped earn the paper the 1975 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service.[6]

Over the next three decades, Barnicle became a prominent voice in New England. His columns mixed pointed criticism of government and bureaucratic failure with personal stories that exemplified people's everyday struggles to make a living and raise a family. Tapping into a rich knowledge of local and national politics, Barnicle had unique takes on the ups and downs of figures including Sen. Ted Kennedy, Sen. John Kerry, and longtime Congressional Speaker of the House Thomas Tip O'Neill, as well as Boston mayors Kevin White, Ray Flynn, and Tom Menino. In subsequent years, Barnicle's coverage expanded as he reported from Northern Ireland on the conflict and resolution there to the beaches of Normandy, from where he wrote about the commemorations of World War II veterans.[7]

Barnicle has won local and national awards for his print and broadcast work. In addition to contributing to the Boston Globe's submission and awarding him the 1974 Pulitzer Prize for public service, he received recognition for his contributions. Additionally he's received awards and honors from the Associated Press (1984), United Press International (1978, 1982, 1984, 1989), National Headliners (1982), and duPont-Columbia University (1991–92), and most recently the Pete Hamill Award for Journalistic Excellence from the Glucksman Ireland House at New York University (2022).[1]. He holds honorary degrees from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Colby College.[8][9]

Boston Globe resignation

[edit]

In 1998, Barnicle resigned from The Boston Globe due to controversy over two columns, written three years apart. The first column, published on August 2, 1998, consisted of more than 80 humorous observations and included "a series of one-liners that had been lifted from... George Carlin's best-selling 1997 book, Brain Droppings."[10] Barnicle first received a one-month suspension; he denied that he had ever read the book and claimed that the jokes were told to him by a bartender.[10] However, it was subsequently found that he had recommended Brain Droppings during a television appearance earlier that year.[10] He was then asked to resign from the paper, though he initially refused to do so.[10] Carlin later discussed the incident in a speech to the National Press Club, saying, "Someone changed each of the jokes just enough, they thought, to disguise them – that part didn't work – and what they did was make them all worse. As an example, one of them was just an observation where I said: 'Someday I'd like to see the Pope come out on that balcony and give the football score'. And they changed it to baseball! Which is not as funny! For whatever reason, 'football' is funnier than 'baseball' in that sentence."[11]

A subsequent review of Barnicle's work found a single column from October 8, 1995, which recounted the story of two sets of parents with cancer-stricken children. Barnicle said that after one of the children died, the parents of the other child, who had begun to recover, sent the dead child's parents a check for $10,000. When The Boston Globe could not locate the people who had not been publicly identified because they had died as well, Barnicle continued to insist the story was true but obtained indirectly from a nurse. Mrs. Patricia Shairs later contacted The Boston Globe to indicate that the story Barnicle wrote was about her family, although she said some of the facts were incorrect. An article about the column stated that "[...] there are more differences between the column and Shairs' story than similarities".[12] After the emergence of this second controversy, Barnicle resigned from the paper on August 19, 1998.[13]

The Boston Phoenix published a column by Dan Kennedy on August 20, 1998, reporting that Barnicle had plagiarized journalist A. J. Liebling in a previous article, but Kennedy also quoted in the same column The Boston Globe ombudsman Robert Kierstead as saying, "In the nine years that I did it [worked as ombudsman], I received calls complaining about Barnicle, but I never once received a call complaining that Mike Barnicle had plagiarized."[14] The magazine Boston began a 'Barnicle Watch' in the early 1990s to try to track down other dubious Barnicle sources to which Globe Editor John Driscoll responded: "He's visible, he's on the street, he's talking to real people. He doesn't need to make things up."[13]

Barnicle's resignation spurred reanalysis of his reporting on the 1989 murder of Carol Stuart and "most of the reporting proved solid," according to The New York Times.[15] He and Kevin Cullen had reported that Prudential Financial had issued a check for $480,000 as the life insurance payout for his wife's policy, offering a potential motive for her husband's decision to kill her. The Boston Globe, according to a column by Adrian Walker on December 11, 2023, "stood by its reporting."[16] The New York Times later confirmed that Carol Stuart did not have an insurance policy with Prudential but that there were other policies, including one that yielded a payout of $82,000 from the firm where she worked as a lawyer.[17] The Boston Globe came under criticism in the 2023 documentary about the case, Murder in Boston, for the paper's reporting on Willie Bennett, the ultimately innocent man who was accused of the crime. The Boston Globe published Bennett's grade school report cards, his IQ, and the fact that he did not finish the seventh grade in a column by Barnicle. After the release of the documentary, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu issued a formal apology to the Bennett family on behalf of the city.[18]

Post-Globe career

[edit]

Six months after he resigned from the Globe, the New York Daily News recruited Barnicle to write for them, and later the Boston Herald.[19] Barnicle told reporters that he had nothing but "fond feelings for 25 years at the Globe".[19] Barnicle hosted a radio show three times a week called Barnicle's View.[citation needed]

Barnicle has since become a staple on MSNBC,[20] including on Morning Joe as well as on specials on breaking news topics and presidential elections. Barnicle interviewed all of the candidates in the 2016 presidential race.[21] He interviewed the 2020 presidential candidates through his work on Morning Joe.[22]

Barnicle is a devoted baseball fan and was interviewed in Ken Burns's film Baseball in The Tenth Inning movie, where he mostly commented on the 2003–2004 Boston Red Sox.[23] He has also been featured in TV documentaries and programs, including Fabulous Fenway: America's Legendary Ballpark (2000); City of Champions: The Best of Boston Sports (2005); ESPN 25: Who's #1 (2005); Reverse of the Curse of the Bambino (2004); The Curse of the Bambino (2003); ESPN Sports Century (2000); Baseball (1994); and in the TV series Prime 9 (2010–2011) for MLB Network.

Barnicle has received many honors for his work, including the Pete Hamill Award for Journalistic Excellence from the Glucksman Ireland House at New York University.[2]

In a 2022 Editor & Publisher feature article, Barnicle warned of the 'destruction of democracy' and talked about the plight and promise of newspapers. He mourned the "disappearance of local newspapers", suggesting that even though most states have at least one or two major metro papers, large swaths of the nation are without a reliable source of local news, and voiced his concern about the treasure trove of talent the industry has lost in recent years and all the institutional and community knowledge that left with them.[24]

Personal life

[edit]

Barnicle is married to the former vice chair of Bank of America, Anne Finucane;[25] the couple have adult children and live in Lincoln, Massachusetts.

Notes and references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mike Barnicle

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mike Barnicle (born October 13, 1943) is an American print and broadcast journalist whose career spans columns on urban life in Boston and political commentary on national television. He wrote for The Boston Globe from 1973 until 1998, when he resigned amid revelations of plagiarism in a recent column—lifting unattributed jokes from George Carlin's book Brain Droppings—and fabrication in a 1995 piece depicting an unverified anecdote about two young boys sharing a hospital room, one dying of cancer. These ethical lapses, including initial denials followed by admissions, prompted the newspaper to demand his departure after an initial suspension. Following his exit from print journalism, Barnicle hosted a morning radio program on WTKK-FM in Boston and later became a regular contributor to MSNBC's Morning Joe, where he offers commentary on current events, leveraging his experience despite the prior professional discredit. His persistence in broadcast media highlights variances in accountability standards between print and television outlets, particularly those aligned with liberal viewpoints.

Early Life and Background

Childhood and Family Origins

Mike Barnicle was born on October 13, 1943, in , a declining industrial city in north-central Massachusetts that had been shaped by textile mills, railroads, and manufacturing since the , with its economy battered by the and World War II-era shifts. He grew up in this working-class environment amid a community of Irish-American descent, where family and neighborhood ties were central to daily life. Barnicle was the son of Michael Barnicle, a local city councilor who served on Fitchburg's municipal bodies, and Hanna Barnicle; his family resided on Holt Street in the city. His paternal grandmother, Hannah Fitzgerald Barnicle, had emigrated from , , in 1916, reflecting the broader pattern of Irish immigration to mill towns that brought Catholic traditions, communal solidarity, and a wariness toward distant authorities. The family's Catholic faith was evident in connections to local institutions like St. Bernard's Elementary School, where a relative taught, instilling values of loyalty and resilience in a setting marked by economic hardship and grassroots political engagement. As a in pre-teen years, Barnicle experienced Fitchburg's street-level dynamics, including informal and ward politics influenced by his father's council role, which exposed him to the mechanics of local governance and community disputes in an era when the city grappled with post-war recovery and labor tensions. This upbringing in a tight-knit, ethnically homogeneous enclave fostered an early appreciation for narratives over abstractions, though Barnicle later faced for romanticizing such roots in his professional persona.

Education and Formative Influences

Barnicle attended , a Jesuit institution in , , graduating in the early . The school's , rooted in Ignatian pedagogy, stressed ethical reasoning, rhetorical skills, and a commitment to informed by Catholic doctrine, providing a foundation in moral inquiry and persuasive expression that later characterized his anecdotal, character-driven reporting style. He then enrolled at , earning a in 1965. During this period, amid Boston's entrenched machine politics dominated by Irish-American networks and the national upheavals of the , Barnicle developed an affinity for street-level narratives over abstract analysis, drawing from local ethnic wards and observed social tensions to shape his focus on ordinary individuals' struggles. This era's blend of parochial loyalty and broader reform impulses, observed firsthand in a city rife with patronage and racial friction, honed his journalistic voice toward empathetic, vignette-based commentary rather than detached policy dissection.

Early Journalistic Career

Initial Roles in Print and Local Media

Barnicle entered in the late as a freelancer based in , contributing to publications amid the city's vibrant political and social scene. Concurrently, he served as a speechwriter and aide to several prominent Democratic politicians, including Senator John Tunney of , Maine Senator —who ran as the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in 1968—and Senator during his 1968 presidential campaign. These roles immersed him in national and political networks, particularly 's influential Irish-American political establishment, where he gained firsthand insights into campaign strategies and grassroots organizing. His early print work focused on entry-level reporting for small Massachusetts outlets, emphasizing community-level narratives in an era marked by urban unrest and opposition to the . This foundational experience sharpened Barnicle's narrative style, blending observational detail with pointed commentary on and public dissent, though specific bylines from this period remain sparsely documented in public records. By the early , these efforts positioned him for larger platforms, while his political aideships provided a conduit for understanding power dynamics in Democratic circles. Barnicle also made initial forays into local broadcast media, appearing on Boston-area radio stations to discuss political events and social issues, which helped cultivate his distinctive, conversational delivery suited to oral formats. These appearances, often tied to his speechwriting contacts, allowed him to engage audiences directly during the turbulent transition from the to the 1970s economic challenges, foreshadowing his later emphasis on street-level perspectives over abstract analysis.

Entry into Prominent Outlets

Mike Barnicle joined in 1973 as a , recruited by political columnist Bob Healy and editor Tom Winship with the intent to groom him as a successor to the paper's legendary figures. This hire capitalized on Barnicle's roots in Boston's working-class neighborhoods and his prior experience in local media, which provided him with insider access to the city's street-level stories and characters. His early assignments centered on urban challenges, including crime, neighborhood decline, and the contentious school busing crisis sparked by federal desegregation orders in 1974. Barnicle's columns depicted the perspectives of police officers, single mothers, and small-business owners navigating these upheavals, often highlighting the disconnect between policy mandates and on-the-ground realities. These pieces quickly gained traction for their narrative-driven style, combining gritty realism with sympathetic portrayals of ordinary residents resistant to elite-driven reforms, resonating with readers wary of detached journalistic . By emphasizing from Boston's blue-collar enclaves, Barnicle differentiated himself from more conventional reporters, fostering early acclaim within the Globe's pages despite the era's polarized debates.

Boston Globe Period (1973–1998)

Rise to Prominence and Key Contributions

During his time at from 1973 to 1998, Mike Barnicle established himself as a leading columnist by producing over 3,500 pieces that delved into Boston's social fabric, local politics, and sports, often drawing on the city's working-class neighborhoods and everyday residents to illustrate broader tensions. His columns resonated with readers through a distinctive style that emphasized vivid and accessible prose, akin to the urban chroniclers of other cities, fostering a dedicated local following amid the paper's competitive media environment. Barnicle's reporting offered grounded perspectives on pivotal events shaping Boston's underbelly, including the lingering political fallout from Ted Kennedy's 1969 , where he linked Kennedy's actions to patterns of elite privilege and sycophancy that perpetuated institutional recklessness. Similarly, his coverage of during James "Whitey" Bulger's dominance in the 1980s and early 1990s highlighted insider views of corruption intertwined with city governance, framing Bulger's operations within the context of entrenched power dynamics. While Barnicle earned acclaim for elevating the voices of ordinary citizens navigating elite-driven failures—such as economic disparities and political patronage—his work occasionally drew criticism for idealizing resilient yet corrupt systems like Boston's long-dominant Democratic political apparatus, which he portrayed through sympathetic lenses on its community ties despite evident graft. This approach amplified his influence on public discourse, positioning him as a chronicler of the city's raw against systemic flaws, though it reflected a selective realism that prioritized narrative appeal over unvarnished institutional critique.

Notable Columns, Reporting, and Public Impact

Barnicle's reporting on the 1989 Charles Stuart case, where Charles Stuart claimed a assailant had shot him and his pregnant wife Carol in Boston's Roxbury neighborhood, played a prominent role in amplifying the initial narrative through multiple columns that detailed the unfolding investigation and community reactions. His coverage, which included assertions of Stuart's potential financial motive tied to a $482,000 policy, contributed to public focus on racial dynamics as police targeted suspects like Willie Bennett based on Stuart's description, exacerbating tensions in minority communities. Barnicle specifically critiqued leaders' outrage over Bennett's selection, deeming it logical given the eyewitness account, a stance that reflected his tendency to prioritize street-level sourcing over broader . When Stuart's fabrication emerged—he had murdered his wife and staged the attack—the case exposed flaws in media handling of unverified claims, with Barnicle's pieces illustrating how rapid narrative-building from initial reports can drive premature public judgments on and race, influencing Boston's discourse on urban violence and policing for years afterward. Verifiable details in his Stuart coverage, such as the insurance motive, proved partially inaccurate, as Carol Stuart lacked the cited Prudential policy despite other coverage existing, underscoring limitations in anecdotal verification. Beyond specific events, Barnicle's columns shaped Boston's cultural and political narrative by fusing factual beats with vivid anecdotes from working-class life, fostering a populist-left lens that critiqued elite detachment and resonated with readers seeking unfiltered takes on local and national politics. This approach elevated his work to a civic staple, engaging broad audiences in public debate on issues like economic disparity and , though analyses of his output reveal inconsistent predictive accuracy, with some forecasts on impacts diverging from subsequent data. His emphasis on causal chains—from to street-level effects—spurred discourse challenging institutional narratives, even as it prioritized narrative drive over exhaustive .

Accumulating Ethical Concerns and Early Criticisms

In the early , Barnicle faced legal repercussions for attributing a racial slur to a Jewish in a column, with the merchant denying the statement and prevailing in a that resulted in a $40,000 settlement from the Globe. This incident highlighted concerns over Barnicle's accuracy in quoting sources on sensitive racial matters, as courts found the attribution unsubstantiated. During Boston's busing debates in the 1970s and lingering into the 1980s, Barnicle's columns defending working-class Irish-American communities in were criticized for perpetuating and insufficiently scrutinizing racial tensions, with detractors viewing his portrayals as insensitive to affected neighborhoods amid forced desegregation efforts. Such writings drew internal discussions on balance, though no formal retractions occurred at the time. In 1990, Harvard Law professor publicly accused Barnicle of fabricating a racist and sexist quote attributing to him admiration for Asian women as "submissive," which Dershowitz denied ever uttering or thinking. The neither retracted the column nor disciplined Barnicle publicly, opting instead for a confidential settlement paying Dershowitz an undisclosed sum, later reported as $75,000, amid claims of a pattern in Barnicle's handling of racially charged quotes. Barnicle's reporting on the 1989 Charles Stuart murder case, where Stuart falsely implicated a man in killing his pregnant wife, included a 1990 column asserting a $482,000 motive and later suggestions of prior connections between Stuart and suspect Willie Bennett despite Bennett's after Stuart's . These elements were later critiqued as speculative and partially inaccurate, with aspects of the scheme reporting exposed as overstated or unverified, contributing to perceptions that Barnicle undermined narratives of racial framing in the case. Independent scrutiny, including by Magazine's early 1990s "Barnicle Watch," flagged recurring doubts about his sourcing reliability in high-profile stories.

1998 Resignation and Journalistic Scandals

Specific Instances of Fabrication and Plagiarism

In August 1998, Barnicle published a column in The Boston Globe consisting of purportedly original jokes, several of which were directly lifted from comedian George Carlin's 1997 book Brain Droppings, including quips presented as dialogue from a cancer-stricken child such as "I'm 95. I was this close to buying one" regarding a hospital Jell-O purchase and references to infomercials and petulant attitudes. The Globe identified at least ten striking similarities between Barnicle's piece and Carlin's work after a reader alerted editors on August 3, prompting Barnicle to initially claim the material came from friends who compiled it as a diversionary list, though he later acknowledged the unattributed borrowing without crediting the source. A separate incident involved a October 8, 1995, column describing two young cancer patients—one , one white—at Boston's who bonded over fandom while sharing a room in the oncology ward, with details including their banter about and a shared Red Sox affinity amid . When sought to reprint the in 1998, its fact-checkers could locate no matching records or verification despite exhaustive searches, deeming the tale fabricated; editors' subsequent investigation confirmed the absence of any corroborating evidence for the described individuals or events. Earlier patterns included unattributed elements in Barnicle's columns echoing the style and phrasing of Jimmy Cannon, such as a Christmas Eve piece that adopted the "concept, tone, and several phrases" from Cannon's 1954 column on urban alienation and holiday disconnection, presented without acknowledgment. Barnicle initially denied sourcing issues in these cases before partial admissions, highlighting reliance on anecdotal narratives that lacked verifiable origins and contributed to doubts about the authenticity of his personal-sourced reporting.

Discovery, Investigation, and Resignation Process

In early August 1998, a reader alerted to unattributed material in Mike Barnicle's August 2 column resembling jokes from George Carlin's book Brain Droppings, prompting an internal review that identified at least ten similarities. On August 5, executive editor Matthew Storin suspended Barnicle without pay and demanded his resignation, citing the and Barnicle's initial denial of familiarity with the book despite the matches. Barnicle refused to resign voluntarily, leading to a standoff, but the Globe rescinded the demand by August 11, opting instead for a two-month unpaid suspension while acknowledging the ethical breach. Mid-month, further scrutiny arose when Reader's Digest sought to verify Barnicle's October 8, 1995 column about two hospitalized cancer patients—one white, one —for a planned reprint, but could not corroborate the details, alerting the . The newspaper's investigation failed to locate any evidence of the individuals or events described, including or witnesses; Barnicle claimed the story came from an unnamed nurse but admitted he had never contacted the families. This revelation, amid the prior suspension, exposed inconsistencies in Barnicle's account, prompting Storin to renew the request on August 19. Barnicle resigned the following day, August 20, after the Globe determined the 1995 piece likely involved fabrication, issuing a public statement admitting oversight lapses in editorial verification processes that allowed earlier unaddressed reader complaints and ethical red flags to persist unchecked. The episode highlighted systemic gaps in at the paper, exacerbated by the recent of columnist Patricia Smith for similar fabrications in June, which had intensified internal and external monitoring but failed to preempt Barnicle's issues through rigorous prior scrutiny.

Immediate Repercussions and Media Industry Response

Following his resignation from on August 20, 1998, Barnicle lost his long-standing column, which had run for 25 years and reached a wide readership in . The newspaper's editors concluded that he had fabricated elements of a 1995 column about two young cancer patients, including unverifiable details about their and circumstances, after an internal investigation found no supporting evidence. This came shortly after a one-month unpaid suspension for , where Barnicle admitted to unattributed use of material from George Carlin's 1997 book Brain Droppings in a July 1998 column. The scandal prompted immediate scrutiny of Globe practices, highlighted by the parallel resignation of columnist Patricia Smith in June 1998, who admitted to inventing characters and quotes in multiple pieces. Smith's swift dismissal contrasted with Barnicle's initial retention after the plagiarism admission—framed by supporters as a "lapse in judgment" rather than intent—drawing accusations of uneven accountability, including claims of racial double standards from the Boston branch, as Smith was Black and Barnicle white. Critics argued this reflected broader 1990s patterns of fabrication in journalism, with outlets like (Stephen Glass) and (Jayson Blair precursor incidents) exposing lax verification norms. Public and industry reactions divided along lines of defense versus condemnation, with Barnicle allies like publisher Richard Gottlieb describing infractions as "stupid mistakes" not warranting termination, while detractors, including media watchdogs, labeled them serial dishonesty undermining factual reporting. Gallup and surveys from the late documented a correlating erosion in public trust for media, with confidence in newspapers dropping from 51% in to around 37% by , attributed in part to high-profile ethical breaches amplifying perceptions of sloppiness in opinion-driven formats like columns. These events contributed to calls for stricter protocols across print media, though implementation varied, revealing accountability gaps in star-driven newsrooms.

Post-Resignation Career Trajectory

Attempts at Print and Radio Revival

In February 1999, approximately six months after his resignation from , Mike Barnicle was hired as a by the , marking an initial effort to reestablish his presence in print journalism. He contributed over 4,000 columns collectively across outlets including the Daily News, focusing on political and social commentary rooted in his perspective. This stint lasted until 2005, during which Barnicle aimed to leverage his established voice despite prior scrutiny over reporting practices. Barnicle extended his print endeavors to the in 2004, writing columns there through 2005 amid attempts to regain local readership in a market familiar with his work. These contributions emphasized street-level observations and political analysis, though they occurred against a backdrop of industry wariness following the 1998 scandals. Parallel to print, Barnicle pursued radio revival by hosting a morning drive-time talk program on WTKK-FM (96.9) in Boston starting in 1999, initially as a guest on the syndicated before launching his own daily show, Barnicle's View. Broadcast three times weekly, the program featured discussions on issues, , and current events, positioning Barnicle as "The Voice of New England" until around 2006. A November 8, 2000, simulcast on highlighted election-related segments with guest and audience interaction, underscoring the show's engagement format. These radio efforts sought to capitalize on Barnicle's oral storytelling style but faced inherent challenges from the Globe-era stigma, limiting broader national syndication.

Shift to Broadcast and MSNBC Affiliation

Following his 1998 resignation from The Boston Globe, Barnicle reentered broadcast media through local television, resuming his role as a commentator and contributor on WCVB-TV's Chronicle program starting January 18, 1999. This opportunity capitalized on his prior familiarity with the format, having contributed to the show since the 1980s before the Globe controversies. Barnicle expanded into radio, hosting a morning drive-time on WTKK-FM in from 1999 to 2006, where his anecdotal, street-wise delivery resonated with audiences in a medium less reliant on documented sourcing than print. In early , he transitioned to national cable news with MSNBC, launching Barnicle, a short-lived program that debuted in January but ended by June due to elevated production expenses. The brief MSNBC venture marked Barnicle's entry into major broadcast networks, which proved more accommodating to figures with prior ethical lapses in print compared to rigorous standards. Television's emphasis on on-air persona and extemporaneous commentary aligned with his strengths, diminishing the emphasis on verifiable attribution that had ensnared him in earlier scandals. By the mid-2000s, he had secured recurring contributor roles at MSNBC, including on programs like following its 2007 launch, reflecting the network's willingness to rehabilitate established voices despite historical scrutiny.

Contemporary Role, Criticisms, and Legacy

Current Contributions on MSNBC and Political Commentary

As of October 2025, Mike Barnicle serves as a senior contributor to MSNBC's Morning Joe, delivering frequent political commentary that draws on personal anecdotes and long-standing Washington connections. His appearances, often multiple times weekly, focus on dissecting Democratic strategies, critiquing Republican figures like Donald Trump, and analyzing election outcomes from a centrist-Democratic perspective. For example, on September 19, 2025, Barnicle joined a panel discussing Trump's influence on cultural and political shifts, emphasizing narrative contrasts between candidates. Barnicle's style prioritizes storytelling rooted in his Boston upbringing and journalistic tenure, such as reflections on or urban challenges, over quantitative data or policy specifics. In a November 14, 2024, segment, he attributed 2024 election results primarily to economic pressures like persistent rather than ideological divides, influencing viewer interpretations of voter priorities. Similarly, his October 21, 2025, commentary questioned the handling of President Biden's public gaffes, highlighting perceived lapses in advisory oversight without citing empirical polling or internal documents. This approach amplifies insider access to Democratic circles on , shaping narratives around issues like post-election transitions and policy continuity, though segments reveal a pattern of unverified personal assertions that parallel earlier reporting critiques. Reception among audiences includes appreciation for his relatable, veteran voice but notes from media observers on the anecdotal emphasis, which can prioritize emotional resonance over verifiable evidence in fast-paced broadcast formats.

Enduring Debates on Professional Integrity and Media Rehabilitation

Supporters of Barnicle's continued media presence maintain that his 1998 ethical lapses at —involving of George Carlin's jokes in a July 1998 column and fabrication of details in a 1995 story about two boys with cancer—constituted isolated errors overshadowed by his broader analytical insights and storytelling prowess. They point to his retention as a senior contributor on MSNBC's since 2007 as evidence of merit-based rehabilitation, arguing that his verbal commentary format mitigates risks of unattributed sourcing inherent in print. In contrast, critics contend these were not anomalies but part of a serial pattern, including initial denials of wrongdoing and failure to verify facts, which violate core journalistic codes such as the ' prohibitions on fabrication and . Such breaches, they argue, erode public trust in reporting, rendering permanent disqualification appropriate regardless of subsequent platform shifts. Empirical patterns in Barnicle's case highlight disparities in media accountability, where his post-scandal ascent to a prominent MSNBC role—featuring regular political analysis aligned with liberal viewpoints—diverges from outcomes for peers in similar ethics violations. For instance, fellow Globe columnist Patricia Smith, who resigned weeks earlier in June 1998 for fabricating characters and quotes in multiple columns, did not secure a comparable high-profile broadcast rehabilitation. Similarly, New York Times reporter , dismissed in May 2003 for fabricating and plagiarizing in over two dozen stories, faced career-ending ostracism without elite network reinstatement. Critics from outlets scrutinizing media practices attribute Barnicle's recovery to ideological congruence with prevailing narratives in left-leaning broadcast environments, where proximity to institutional power facilitates leniency not extended to ideologically divergent figures. Analyses from media oversight perspectives underscore how Barnicle exemplifies in journalistic networks, where alignment with dominant elite consensus often supersedes historical ethical infractions. Publications tracking press , such as those referencing Brill's Content's contemporaneous coverage, noted the scandals' severity yet observed Barnicle's evasion of lasting professional exile, contrasting with stricter repercussions for non-aligned offenders. This dynamic reveals causal factors in rehabilitation: empirical data on sustained MSNBC employment despite documented deceit suggests that narrative utility and network loyalty outweigh codified standards, fostering debates on whether such forgiveness patterns compromise overall media credibility or reflect pragmatic adaptation to opinion-driven formats.

Broader Implications for Journalistic Standards

Fabrication and plagiarism in journalism fundamentally undermine the epistemic foundation of public discourse by prioritizing narrative coherence over verifiable evidence, leading to measurable erosion of audience confidence. Gallup polls indicate that U.S. public trust in mass media, which stood at a high of 55% in 1998-1999, had declined to 44% by 2004 amid a series of high-profile scandals, with majorities expressing little or no confidence thereafter. This trend persisted, reaching a record low of 28% by 2025, correlating with repeated ethical lapses that prioritized anecdotal storytelling over rigorous fact-checking. Such practices not only distort causal understanding of events but also incentivize further deviations, as audiences increasingly discern between empirical reporting and opinion-driven fabrication, fostering skepticism toward institutions claiming authority on truth. Systemic incentives within media ecosystems exacerbate these issues, particularly where ideological alignment shields practitioners from proportionate accountability. Analyses of journalistic scandals reveal that lapses by figures aligned with prevailing institutional biases—often left-leaning in mainstream outlets—face rarer and milder repercussions compared to those diverging from such norms, debunking narratives of uniform ethical advancement. This asymmetry arises from causal pressures like peer validation and audience retention, where charismatic delivery trumps sourcing rigor, as evidenced by studies showing accusations of left-wing bias in coverage far outnumbering right-wing counterparts, yet with diminished punitive follow-through. Consequently, the normalization of such lapses perpetuates a cycle wherein truth-seeking is subordinated to narrative utility, eroding the profession's role as a neutral arbiter. Empirical parallels, such as the Jayson Blair case at , illustrate the recurring necessity of institutional mechanisms enforcing verifiable sourcing over reliance on individual charisma. Blair's fabrication of details and across dozens of stories prompted a comprehensive internal review, highlighting how unchecked storytelling can inflict profound damage to outlet credibility, described as one of the most severe blows to U.S. journalism's public standing. These incidents underscore that ethical standards must prioritize causal verification—through primary documents, multiple attestations, and transparent methodologies—rather than post-hoc rationalizations, as failures here cascade into broader distrust, compelling reforms like enhanced protocols to restore foundational integrity.

Personal Life

Family and Relationships

Mike Barnicle has been married to since September 25, 1982. The couple has four children together. Among their children are sons and Colin Barnicle, who have collaborated on documentary projects. Barnicle resides in , a suburb of where he purchased a home by the late 1990s. As an Irish American born in , he has maintained longstanding personal connections to Boston's Irish community, reflecting his upbringing in the region's working-class neighborhoods. Barnicle's family life has been kept largely private, with limited public details beyond basic marital and parental information, and no reported major family controversies.

Health and Later Years

Born on October 13, 1943, Mike Barnicle reached the age of 82 in 2025 and has maintained an active professional presence without any publicly documented major health impediments. He continues to contribute regularly to MSNBC's , delivering commentary on political and cultural topics, including appearances as late as September 2025 discussing media and electoral issues. This ongoing broadcast work, spanning over two decades at the network, underscores his sustained engagement in public discourse into his early eighties. Barnicle's later years reflect a prioritization of verbal and traditions, shaped by his transition from print journalism to amid evolving media landscapes, though he has not detailed personal health challenges in available interviews. No verified reports indicate retirements, medical conditions, or reduced capacities affecting his output, with recent segments confirming his vitality in live discussions on events like the 2024 U.S. and developments.

References

  1. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0056082/
  2. https://muckrack.com/mikebarnicle/bio
  3. http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/19/barnicle/
  4. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/20/us/boston-globe-columnist-resigns-over-authenticity-of-1995-story.html
  5. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/08/20/mike-barnicle-forced-out-at-boston-globe/8efb380a-8c1a-48a6-8b16-1f76878a494c/
  6. https://www.mikebarnicle.com/biography/
  7. https://www.mikebarnicle.com/
  8. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0056082/bio/
  9. https://bostonphoenix.com/archive/features/98/08/13/MIKE_BARNICLE.html
  10. https://www.myheritage.com/names/michael_barnicle
  11. https://michaelbarnicle.substack.com/p/memorial-day
  12. https://www.facebook.com/groups/217264328419099/posts/2865870920225080/
  13. https://newspapers.bc.edu/?a=d&d=bcheights19920413.1.3
  14. https://www.jfklibrary.org/events-and-awards/kennedy-library-forums/past-forums/transcripts/a-conversation-with-ken-burns
  15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/08/25/as-the-globe-turns/a46e865a-cea7-44eb-91d6-eee1f0aa6aab/
  16. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1998/06/28/harvards-dershowitz-vs-globes-barnicle-is-more-than-personal/
  17. https://cis.org/Kammer/Call-Mike-Barnicle-Come-Back-Where-You-Once-Belonged
  18. https://www.kibin.com/essay-examples/an-analysis-of-the-ethics-code-and-the-case-of-the-boston-globe-with-mike-barnicle-and-patricia-smith-I67Jyhpz
  19. https://transparencynow.com/globe2.htm
  20. https://www.mikebarnicle.com/2011/mikes-columns-in-new-anthology-deadline-artists-available-today/
  21. https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Press-and-Edward-Kennedy-Neal-Gabler.pdf
  22. https://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/whitey_bulger_barnicle/
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/07/us/standoff-between-boston-globe-its-star-columnist-provokes-turmoil-newsroom.html
  24. https://apps.bostonglobe.com/metro/investigations/2023/12/charles-stuart/epilogue/
  25. https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2014/10/22/the-charles-stuart-murders-and-the-racist-branding-boston-just-cant-seem-to-shake/
  26. https://dankennedy.net/2023/12/11/was-the-stuart-case-a-wake-up-call-for-the-media-the-globes-answer-yes-but-not-enough/
  27. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/08/12/under-pressure-boston-globe-keeps-barnicle/d345f6c3-fd5b-4f8d-803d-a26b4c37080b
  28. https://transparencynow.com/globe3.htm
  29. https://dankennedy.net/tag/mike-barnicle/
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/21/us/globe-verifies-sources-of-a-2d-columnist.html
  31. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1990/12/10/barnicle-is-a-mendacious-misreporter-pbto/
  32. https://www.citybeat.com/news/check-it-out-12220208/
  33. https://baystatebanner.com/2023/12/06/the-black-press-and-the-stuart-case/
  34. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-aug-20-mn-14946-story.html
  35. https://variety.com/1998/biz/news/barnicle-exits-boston-globe-1117479683/
  36. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1998/08/06/boston-globes-mike-barnicle-told-to-resign/85068d8c-0876-460a-a221-4a27ee7cbaf9/
  37. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1998/08/11/in-defense-of-mike-barnicle/0e4c11b0-7519-48b0-b20d-185e91466087/
  38. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-aug-06-mn-10633-story.html
  39. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/globe-columnist-keeps-his-job/
  40. https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/state/1998/08/12/boston-globe-suspends-barnicle/50552416007/
  41. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1998/08/20/columnist-barnicle-quits-as-new-allegations-surface/
  42. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/926578/mike-barnicles-demise/
  43. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1998/08/13/boston-globe-under-fire-for-keeping-white-columnist/
  44. https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/opinion/1998/08/23/have-columnists-lost-control/50559403007/
  45. https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/state/1998/08/21/critics-question-globe-s-timeliness/50555803007/
  46. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/1990s-how-corporate-takeover-altered-american-media-michael-ey5ee
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/mike-barnicle
  48. https://www.bostonherald.com/author/mike-barnicle/
  49. https://www.mikebarnicleon2020.com/about-mike-barnicle/
  50. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikebarnicle
  51. https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/mike-barnicle-show/132741
  52. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/12/business/ex-boston-columnist-to-resume-his-tv-job.html
  53. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1999/01/18/the-full-retort/1fa43acd-83b9-415f-a7bd-09a036b1f788/
  54. https://www.nydailynews.com/2001/01/24/news-barnicle-gets-msnbc-show/
  55. https://nypost.com/2001/06/26/starr-report-23/
  56. https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/rs/date/2008-07-20/segment/01
  57. https://www.facebook.com/mikebarnicleofficial/videos/tune-in-to-this-morning-joe-conversation-with-mika-brzezinski-willie-geist-jeffr/766262532709940/
  58. https://www.facebook.com/mikebarnicleofficial/videos/i-think-all-of-the-things-that-impacted-the-election-inflation-still-remains-and/1083336340175479/
  59. https://www.mikebarnicle.com/2025/bidens-blunder-why-wasnt-it-prevented/
  60. https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/trump-wants-to-change-the-philosophy-of-the-u-s-mike-barnicle-reacts-to-kimmel-suspension-247844933635
  61. https://www.youtube.com/user/mikebarnicle
  62. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2010/10/mike-barnicle-fraud-and-plagiarist-helps-guide-america-through-baseball-s-era-of-shame.html
  63. https://www.factualamerica.com/byline-blunders/mike-barnicle-boston-globes-plagiarism-scandal-rocks-journalism-world
  64. https://alison-bass.com/does-mike-barnicle-deserve-a-second-chance-as-a-msnbc-contributor/
  65. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.don-imus/c/cBj0us808ns
  66. https://www.cnn.com/US/9808/19/barnicle/
  67. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/the-evolutionand-devolutionof-journalistic-ethics/
  68. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Volume010_Issue003.pdf?x85095
  69. https://www.universalhub.com/2008/rehabilitation-mike-barnicle
  70. https://news.gallup.com/poll/185927/americans-trust-media-remains-historical-low.aspx
  71. https://news.gallup.com/poll/695762/trust-media-new-low.aspx
  72. https://niemanreports.org/the-public-isnt-buying-press-credibility/
  73. https://www.hoover.org/research/brief-history-media-bias
  74. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2024.2435574
  75. https://www.spj.org/ethics-case-studies-the-times-and-jayson-blair/
  76. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/public-editor/repairing-the-credibility-cracks-after-jayson-blair.html
  77. https://www.n-magazine.com/stealing-the-show
  78. https://decider.com/2021/04/13/this-is-a-robbery-netflix-colin-nick-barnicle-father/
  79. https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/1998/08/08/barnicle-in-limbo-until-globe/51041231007/
  80. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/09/03/archives/an-irish-family-on-beacon-hill-cbs-terms-it-poetic-license.html
  81. https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2008/12/23/mike-barnicle/
  82. https://www.mikebarnicle.com/2008/mike-talks-to-boston-magazine/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.