Hubbry Logo
Muhammad bin Abdullah MasjidMuhammad bin Abdullah MasjidMain
Open search
Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid
Community hub
Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid
logo
9 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid
Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid
Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Ayodhya dispute
Organizations

The Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid, also known as the Ayodhya Mosque, is a planned Sunni mosque, not commenced, that is to be located in Dhannipur, in the Ayodhya district of the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. The site was designated by the Supreme Court of India following its verdict on the Ayodhya dispute case that allocated land previously used for a mosque to be used for a Hindu temple.[1][2]

The construction of the mosque and associated complex is managed by the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF) trust.[3][4] The proposed mosque is almost 22 kilometres (14 mi) away from the Ram Mandir, a Hindu temple,[5] the former site of its predecessor, the Babri Masjid. Dhannipur is a hamlet located in Sohawal tehsil.

As of September 2024, construction of the mosque had not commenced.

Construction

[edit]

The project was formally launched by the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board by hoisting the national flag and planting saplings on Republic Day of 2021. In addition to the mosque, the complex is planned to include a hospital, museum, library, a community kitchen which can feed a maximum of 2,000 people per day, and an Indo-Islamic cultural research centre and publication house.[6]

A groundbreaking ceremony for the planned mosque was held on 26 January 2021.[3] The planned mosque was officially named as Ahmadullah Shah Mosque, as an honour to the leader of Indian Independence war of 1857, Maulavi Ahmadullah Shah, but was later renamed in honour of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.[7]

An initial futuristic design by S. M. Akhtar, without domes or minarets,[8] was rejected in 2023,[9] and Imran Shaikh became the project architect. His design blended traditional Indo-Islamic architecture,[10] including a dome and five minarets,[11] with modern building styles. In September 2024 it was reported that construction had not commenced due to lack of funds and community antipathy towards the proposed mosque.[12] The IICF sought to have restrictions lifted so that it could receive donations from overseas, restricted by the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act.[13]

Construction of the mosque, 300-bed hospital, museum, library, and associated facilities is estimated to cost ₹300 crore.[14] Around 40% of the donations received by the Trust were given by Hindus, while Muslims contributed 30%. The remaining 30% are corporate donations. The Trust secretary, Athar Hussain, confirmed that as of November 2022 the Trust had received ₹40 lakhs in donations.[15]

Controversies

[edit]
Main article: Ayodhya dispute

Shariyat law disagreement

[edit]

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has stated that the construction of the mosque is against the Waqf Act and is illegal under Shariyat law.[16] AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi also claimed that donating money for construction and praying at the mosque is haram (forbidden) according to Islamic principles, to which the Mosque Trust replied that "serving humanity is not haram".[17]

Ownership dispute

[edit]

Two sisters from Delhi filed a petition in the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court, claiming ownership of the land allotted for the mosque along with 11 hectares (28 acres) of surrounding land, which they claim was given to their father at the time of partition.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid is a planned Sunni mosque complex situated in Dhannipur village, Ayodhya district, Uttar Pradesh, India, approximately 25 kilometers from the site of the former Babri Masjid and the newly constructed Ram Mandir. Named after the father of the Prophet Muhammad to symbolize reconciliation and avoid historical conqueror associations, it is intended to serve as a center for worship, healthcare, and education open to all faiths. The complex, developed on five acres of land allotted by the in November 2019 as alternative to the disputed site, with plans to acquire six additional acres, features a grand capable of accommodating 9,000 worshippers, five minarets representing the pillars of , marble architecture, gardens, fountains, and a large aquarium. Accompanying facilities include a 500-bed cancer offering free or subsidized services, two colleges, an old-age home, and an all-vegetarian kitchen to promote inclusivity. Construction, originally slated to begin after in 2024, has faced delays due to internal disagreements among stakeholder groups, with a foundation brick inscribed with Quranic verses prepared and ritually presented in and . The project underscores efforts toward communal harmony following the resolution, though progress remains pending as of 2025.

Ayodhya Land Dispute and Babri Masjid Demolition

The Babri Masjid was constructed between 1528 and 1529 by Mir Baqi, a commander under Mughal emperor Babur, at the site in Ayodhya now known as Ram Janmabhoomi. Hindu claimants asserted that the mosque was erected atop a pre-existing temple marking the birthplace of the deity Rama, a belief rooted in religious texts and local traditions dating back centuries. Archaeological excavations conducted by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 2003 uncovered evidence of a large structure beneath the mosque's foundations, dating to the 12th century, featuring elements such as pillar bases, terracotta figurines depicting Hindu deities, and inscriptions invoking Vishnu, which aligned with characteristics of North Indian temple architecture. The formalized dispute emerged in the amid British colonial administration, with Hindu petitioners in 1853 documenting claims of prior worship at the site and seeking access, though initial court rulings favored maintaining the to avoid unrest. In , a Hindu filed for permission to construct a temple adjacent to the , but the Faizabad district court rejected it, citing potential for communal friction. Post-independence, idols of were placed inside the on December 22, 1949, prompting its closure to Muslim prayers and the filing of suits by both Hindu and Muslim parties over possession and title, with courts attaching the property in 1950 and later directing maintenance. The 1980s saw escalation through the Vishva Hindu Parishad's (VHP) campaign for temple construction, including archaeological surveys and court interventions unlocking the site for Hindu worship in , intensifying legal and public contention over historical evidence of continuous Hindu possession versus Muslim claims. On December 6, 1992, approximately 150,000 kar sevaks—Hindu volunteers mobilized by VHP and allied groups—gathered for a rally at the site, which turned into the mosque's using tools like hammers and ropes, despite security deployments and assurances from political leaders against such action. The act, later deemed a criminal offense by 's , stemmed from assertions that the site held unparalleled religious significance for Hindus as Rama's birthplace, overriding legal possession debates unresolved in prior and proceedings. Immediate repercussions included widespread communal riots across , resulting in nearly 2,000 deaths, predominantly , with violence peaking in cities like and due to retaliatory attacks on Muslim properties and communities. These events prolonged title litigation, centering on evidentiary burdens of , archaeological precedence, and faith-based claims, without conclusive resolution until subsequent decades.

Supreme Court Verdict and Site Allocation

On November 9, 2019, a five-judge bench of the delivered a unanimous verdict in the land dispute case (M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das), awarding the entire 2.77-acre disputed site to a government-constituted trust for the construction of a Ram temple. The court relied on evidence from the (ASI) excavations, which demonstrated the existence of a pre-existing structure beneath the dating to the , consistent with , predating the mosque's construction in 1528–29. It further held that the Hindu parties established superior title through continuous worship and belief in the site's sanctity as Lord Ram's birthplace, while the Muslim parties could not prove exclusive possession prior to the British era or against Hindu rights. To promote resolution and equity, the court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution, directing the government to acquire and hand over a suitable alternative plot of five acres within the to the Sunni Central Board specifically for construction, separate from the disputed site. This allocation aimed to address the loss of the original mosque site demolished in , without altering the title determination in favor of the , and emphasized the state's role in facilitating harmonious implementation. The state government selected a five-acre plot in village, Sohawal , approximately 25 kilometers from the disputed site, and transferred it to the Sunni Central Board via a notification issued by the magistrate on August 3, 2020. In response, the Board accepted the land on February 24, 2020, and established the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation as a dedicated trust on July 29, 2020, to manage the site's development in accordance with the verdict's stipulations.

Location and Site Details

Dhannipur Village Allocation

The site for the Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid comprises five acres of land in village, located in the Sohawal of , . This plot lies approximately 25 kilometers from the site along the Lucknow-Gorakhpur highway, on land previously acquired by the state government. In compliance with the Supreme Court's November 9, 2019, verdict directing alternative land allocation to the Sunni Central Board, the state cabinet approved the transfer of this specific plot on February 5, 2020. Possession was formally handed over on August 3, 2020, by then Magistrate Anuj Kumar Jha to representatives of the Sunni Central Board. The land's highway adjacency facilitates access, while its prior agricultural use supports basic construction feasibility without noted topographic barriers. Administrative processes post-handover included initial site surveys and applications for layout approval to the Development Authority (ADA) on June 23, 2021, alongside pursuits of environmental clearances from bodies such as the state pollution control board. However, as of September 2025, required no-objection certificates (NOCs) from departments including and irrigation remain pending, leading the ADA to reject submitted construction plans for non-compliance. These delays highlight procedural hurdles in utilizing the allocated site, despite its transfer.

Planning and Design

Trust Formation and Governance

The Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF) was constituted in May 2020 by the Sunni Central Waqf Board to manage the construction of the mosque complex and ancillary facilities, including a , community kitchen, and cultural , on the allocated land in village. Zufar Farooqui, who serves as chairman of the Sunni Central Waqf Board, was appointed as chairman of the IICF, with the trust operating under the Waqf Board's oversight as the supervising authority. The IICF's governance structure comprises eight trustees, including as president and Athar Hussain as secretary, positioning the foundation as the operational entity responsible for project implementation while the Board retains ultimate authority over key decisions. , a Mumbai-based figure associated with promotional efforts, was appointed in December 2023 as chairman of the mosque development committee to advance preparatory activities. Among initial milestones, the IICF announced project planning in 2020 and explicitly rejected naming the mosque "" to eschew provocative historical references tied to the demolished structure, opting instead for "Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid" in reference to the Prophet Muhammad's father as a gesture toward broader inclusivity and . This decision aligned with early commitments to frame the initiative as a forward-looking endeavor rather than a direct replacement.

Architectural Features and Naming Symbolism

The proposed design of the Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid incorporates five minarets, a distinctive feature symbolizing the five pillars of Islam—Shahadah (profession of faith), Salat (prayer), Zakat (charity), Sawm (fasting), and Hajj (pilgrimage)—marking the first such configuration for a mosque in India. A central dome crowns the structure, complemented by a large prayer hall intended to accommodate thousands of worshippers, blending traditional Islamic architectural motifs like intricate calligraphy with contemporary elements such as eco-friendly materials and water-light shows. The foundation incorporates a sacred black soil brick from Mecca, inscribed with golden Quranic verses, intended to underscore spiritual significance amid the site's historical sensitivities. Promoters, including members of the mosque development committee, have described the overall aesthetic as surpassing the in grandeur and beauty, positioning it as one of India's largest and featuring the world's largest , measuring approximately 21 feet high and 36 feet wide. These ambitions reflect an intent to create a visually dominant visible from up to 11 kilometers, though the unbuilt status leaves such superlatives unverified against engineering and material constraints. The naming as "Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid" derives from the full name of the Prophet Muhammad—son of Abdullah—explicitly chosen by trust leaders to evoke the Prophet's paternal lineage rather than imperial figures like , whose association with the original evoked conquest narratives. This choice, articulated in statements from 2023 onward, aims to emphasize spiritual in the post-verdict context, distancing the project from historical animosities tied to Mughal-era nomenclature.

Construction Status and Challenges

Timeline of Efforts and Preparations

Following the of India's verdict on November 9, 2019, allocating five acres in village for a complex, the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation Trust was formed in May 2020 to manage preparations and construction. On January 18, 2021, trust officials announced intentions to initiate groundwork on , January 26, 2021, including site demarcation and initial surveys, though no physical construction followed. The trust submitted its detailed project approval application, encompassing blueprints and ancillary facilities, to the Development Authority on June 23, 2021, marking formal engagement with local planning bodies. Preparatory activities continued into 2023, with the trust finalizing initial architectural models featuring a modern Indo-Islamic design, including a central dome and minarets, while conducting community outreach events to garner support and donations for the project. Site evaluations and environmental assessments were reported as underway, contrasting with the site's foundation laying in August 2020 and pran pratishtha ceremony in January 2024. In January 2024, the trust publicly revealed the mosque's name as Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid on January 13, emphasizing symbolic ties to Islamic heritage, alongside unveilings of scaled models depicting the planned structure. A ceremonial foundation brick sourced from Mecca was transported to India, with arrival in Ayodhya targeted for mid-April 2024 during Ramadan, intended for the inaugural groundwork; however, no laying ceremony occurred. Announcements in early 2024 projected a construction start in May, later deferred to post-Eid in April, but these timelines lapsed without progress. As of September 23, 2025, the Development Authority rejected the submitted building plans due to incomplete no-objection certificates from required departments, prompting the trust to draft a revised proposal with a more traditional architectural style by year-end. No groundbreaking or substantive on-site work has commenced as of October 2025, despite these sequential preparatory steps.

Funding Shortfalls and Implementation Delays

Despite a five-year campaign launched by the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF) following the 2019 verdict, the trust had collected only approximately Rs 90 in domestic donations by 2024, far short of the estimated Rs 100 or more required for the mosque's construction alone, excluding ancillary facilities like a proposed . Although IICF officials referenced potential inflows from global Muslim donors, verifiable domestic contributions remained minimal, prompting efforts to obtain Foreign Contribution Act (FCRA) clearance in 2024 to access overseas funds. These resource constraints directly stalled groundwork, with no foundation or single laid at the site as of October 2025, over five years after land allocation. In September 2025, the Development Authority (ADA) rejected the submitted construction plan due to missing no-objection certificates (NOCs) from departments including and environment, leading to an auto-rejection under procedural rules and requiring resubmission. IICF attributed primary delays to shortages rather than solely bureaucratic issues, dissolving sub-committees in September 2024 to streamline . In empirical contrast, the Ram Temple trust mobilized over Rs 3,500 through structured national and international campaigns within a comparable timeframe post-verdict, enabling rapid site preparation and construction progress by 2025. This differential in donation volumes underscores varying levels of organized , though IICF emphasized internal priorities and procedural dependencies as key implementation barriers without external comparisons in official statements.

Controversies and Criticisms

Sharia Law Compliance Disputes

The primary dispute centers on whether the construction of the Muhammad bin Abdullah Masjid on court-allocated land in constitutes a violation of principles governing properties, which prohibit the exchange, sale, or barter of dedicated religious land. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a prominent body of Islamic scholars, has argued that accepting the five-acre plot as compensation for the site effectively barters assets, rendering the project illegitimate under rulings that deem such transactions impermissible. AIMPLB spokesperson Zafaryab Jilani emphasized in December 2020 that the proposed mosque "violates the t law as the land of mosques cannot be bartered," a stance rooted in classical interpretations of as inalienable endowment for perpetual religious use. In contrast, proponents within the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF) trust, formed under the Sunni Central Waqf Board's oversight per the Supreme Court's 2019 directive, maintain that the project aligns with pragmatic Islamic jurisprudence by prioritizing reconciliation and avoiding prolonged conflict, without directly challenging waqf inviolability through barter. This view posits the allocated land as a fresh dedication rather than a substitution, enabling construction while adhering to the court's mandate for harmonious resolution. Scholars aligned with the trust argue that fiqh allows flexibility in site selection when legal finality is achieved through adjudication, framing the endeavor as a means to uphold broader maqasid al-sharia (objectives of Islamic law), such as preserving community peace. These debates highlight factional divides among ulema, with orthodox groups like AIMPLB insisting on strict adherence to traditional waqf controls to prevent dilution of Islamic , while trust supporters emphasize adaptive compliance to secular judicial outcomes as a form of darura (necessity). No formal fatwas from major seminaries like specifically targeting the trust's legitimacy have been issued in recent years, though the underlying contention over authority between independent scholarly boards and waqf institutions persists, influencing donor hesitancy and project delays.

Ownership and Management Conflicts

The Sunni Central Board received the 5-acre plot in village from the state government in February 2020, pursuant to the Supreme Court's November 2019 verdict, which mandated alternate land for a to compensate for the site's allocation to . The Board, asserting perpetual ownership under principles as an inalienable religious endowment, established the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF) trust in May 2020 to handle operational aspects including planning, , and execution. This division positioned the Board as the legal custodian of the land, with IICF granted administrative autonomy to ensure efficient implementation, as affirmed by the Supreme Court's rejection of a December 2020 petition seeking direct government nominees on the trust to oversee management. Tensions arose from assertions by orthodox Muslim organizations, such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), that the IICF's role undermines 's indivisible nature under Islamic law, where properties like the original —claimed as perpetual —cannot be substituted with alternate sites without violating principles of endowment irrevocability. In December 2020, AIMPLB executive members publicly clashed with Waqf Board officials, labeling the project "illegal" under the Waqf Act, 1995, and demanding direct oversight to preserve religious legitimacy rather than delegating to a trust perceived as influenced by state-aligned entities. Critics within these groups argued that the Waqf Board's acceptance of the Supreme Court-mandated arrangement prioritized judicial compliance over doctrinal purity, potentially eroding community control. These disputes highlight a tension between the Waqf Board's statutory primacy—rooted in the 1995 Act's provisions for managing Muslim endowments—and the IICF's court-endorsed operational independence, intended to facilitate practical progress amid fundraising shortfalls. No formal lawsuits emerged between the Board and IICF by 2025, given overlapping (e.g., Waqf chairman Zufar Ahmad Faruqi as IICF chief trustee), but persistent AIMPLB-led opposition reflected broader sectarian fractures, with government-nominated waqf bodies viewed by some as compromised, exacerbating delays in permissions and donor confidence. Such infighting, attributed by observers to political alignments within Muslim , has stalled momentum without resolving core control ambiguities.

Allegations of Mismanagement and Broader Reception

The Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF), tasked with overseeing the project, has faced accusations of financial opacity, with critics pointing to undisclosed motives behind fundraising efforts and potential diversion of resources toward ancillary structures like museums rather than core . As of September 2025, despite repeated promises of progress, no has commenced five years after allocation, attributed partly to inaction amid stalled no-objection certificates (NOCs) from local authorities. Donations remain critically low, totaling just 90 over five years as of 2024, signaling limited financial mobilization despite appeals for contributions. The trust has sought Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) clearance to tap overseas funds, highlighting domestic shortfalls, while earlier reports noted only 25 collected in the first year post-formation. Within the Muslim community, reception has been marked by frustration and apparent disinterest, evidenced by subdued donation responses and public queries labeling the project as "forgotten." Litigant Iqbal Ansari expressed anger over the lack of advancement, questioning the site's utility for local Muslims and suggesting alternative uses like a hospital. Broader skepticism from right-leaning commentators questions the trust's commitment to reconciliation, contrasting the mosque's stagnation with the Ram Temple's swift Rs 3,500 crore fundraising and completion. While the project's naming after the Prophet Muhammad and his father has been praised as a gesture toward interfaith peace, persistent delays and internal disunity have eroded its narrative of post-verdict harmony, with community sources citing resentment over the distant location as a causal factor in apathy.

References

  1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/new-mosque-in-ayodhya-to-be-named-after-prophets-father-a-symbol-of-inclusivity-and-reconciliation/articleshow/107030995.cms
  2. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/foundation-brick-for-ayodhya-mosque-ready-2884377
  3. https://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay?newsID=1129808
  4. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/22/babri-mosque-to-ram-temple-a-timeline-from-1528-to-2024
  5. https://madainproject.com/babri_masjid
  6. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/saw-12-pillars-during-excavation-asi-ex-officer/articleshow/107038930.cms
  7. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-janmabhoomi-archaeological-survey-of-india-asi-excavations-report-court-br-mani-2494335-2024-01-27
  8. https://www.trtworld.com/article/16739801
  9. https://www.scobserver.in/journal/timeline-key-events-in-the-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-controversy/
  10. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/9/timeline-babri-mosque-ram-temple-case
  11. https://scroll.in/article/1062449/i-kept-smashing-the-dome-four-kar-sevaks-recall-babri-demolition-ahead-of-ram-temple-opening
  12. https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/religion-context/case-studies/violence-peace/destruction-ayodhya-mosque
  13. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/25/711412924/nearly-27-years-after-hindu-mob-destroyed-a-mosque-the-scars-in-india-remain-dee
  14. https://www.npr.org/2019/11/09/777907491/indian-supreme-court-rules-disputed-territory-belongs-to-hindus
  15. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/11/09/ayodhya-verdict-heres-why-the-5-judge-bench-unanimously-held-that-the-disputed-site-belongs-to-hindus-detailed-report/
  16. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-mosque-plan-rejected-rti-reply-reveals/articleshow/124058496.cms
  17. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/trust-constituted-to-build-mosque-in-ayodhya/article32222643.ece
  18. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/up-govt-allots-5-acres-for-mosque-in-ayodhya-25km-from-temple-site-near-lucknow-highway/articleshow/73971357.cms
  19. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/ayodhya-up-govt-allots-5-acres-for-mosque-in-dhannipur-village/article30741274.ece
  20. https://www.bhaskarenglish.in/local/uttar-pradesh/news/ayodhya-mosque-map-rejected-to-be-built-on-5-acres-babri-maszid-ram-temple-communal-riots-135993580.html
  21. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/Sep/23/ayodhya-mosque-plan-rejected-by-development-authority-in-absence-of-nocs
  22. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-verdict-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-mosque-6255125/
  23. https://www.indiatoday.in/india-today-insight/story/why-ayodhya-mosque-plan-is-stalled-funds-not-nocs-main-hurdle-says-trust-2792660-2025-09-24
  24. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/ayodhya-mosque-plan-rejected-by-development-authority-over-pending-nocs-rti-reply/article70083860.ece
  25. https://www.indiatvnews.com/uttar-pradesh/ayodhya-development-authority-rejects-mosque-construction-plan-in-dhannipur-over-missing-clearances-2025-09-23-1009591
  26. https://organiser.org/2025/09/24/317550/bharat/ayodhya-ada-rejects-mosque-construction-plan-in-dhannipur-due-to-missing-government-clearances/
  27. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/futuristic-design-out-ayodhya-mosque-to-have-a-traditional-look-10269812/
  28. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/now-ayodhya-mosque-trust-to-submit-design-based-on-awadhi-architecture/articleshow/124099274.cms
  29. https://www.opindia.com/2025/09/mismanagement-lack-of-nocs-hidden-fund-motives-ayodhya-mosque-trust-faces-criticism-as-work-fails-to-take-off/
  30. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/new-mosque-to-be-named-after-prophets-father-a-symbol-of-inclusivity-and-reconciliation/articleshow/107030995.cms
  31. https://swarajyamag.com/politics/up-sunni-board-appoints-bjp-leader-haji-arfat-to-lead-construction-of-babri-masjid-substitute-mosque-in-ayodhya
  32. https://www.opindia.com/2023/12/ayodhya-mosque-construction-likely-to-begin-in-may-2024-with-new-five-minaret-design-mosque-development-committee/
  33. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/ayodhyas-mosque-to-be-indias-biggest-more-beautiful-than-taj-meccas-imam-to-lay-foundation/articleshow/106019972.cms
  34. https://punemirror.com/pune-mirror-explore/ayodhya-mosque-pune-architect-unveils-unique-design-and-eco-friendly-elements/
  35. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/sacred-brick-from-mecca-foundation-of-ayodhya-mosque/articleshow/107530148.cms
  36. https://www.arabnews.com/node/2446876/world
  37. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/mosque-in-ayodhya-with-worlds-largest-quran-will-be-better-than-taj-mahal-2478758-2023-12-21
  38. https://www.awazthevoice.in/india-news/sufis-to-lay-foundation-stone-of-the-redesigned-dhanipur-mosque-26226.html
  39. https://www.daily-sun.com/post/717191
  40. https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/page/155/?sorSo%253A%252F%252F_
  41. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/india-dhannipur-mosque-project-to-start-jan-26/2113401
  42. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-mosque-to-be-better-than-the-taj-mahal/article67737843.ece
  43. http://www.indiablooms.com/phoenix/public/news/days-after-ram-temple-consecration-event-first-brick-for-construction-of-ayodhya-mosque-arrives-in-india/details
  44. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/ayodhya-mosque-project-shifts-to-traditional-design-new-plan-by-yearend-101759155954109.html
  45. https://theprint.in/india/just-rs-90-lakh-raised-in-5-years-why-not-a-single-brick-has-been-laid-for-ayodhya-mosque/2259763/
  46. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/uttar-pradesh/up-ayodhya-mosque-4-3199455
  47. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/facing-fund-crunch-ayodhya-mosque-to-now-focus-on-fcra-clearances/article68665390.ece
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/ayodhya-mosque-plan-was-auto-rejected-onus-on-trust-to-resubmit-it-ada/articleshow/124078307.cms
  49. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/hit-by-fund-crunch-ayodhya-mosque-trust-disbands-committees-eyes-fcra-clearances/articleshow/113523638.cms
  50. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-campaign-mosque-construction-delay-fund-raising-dhannipur-2489124-2024-01-16
  51. https://frontline.thehindu.com/news/ayodhya-mosque-india-work-delayed-due-to-fund-shortage-frustration-disappointment-among-muslim-community/article67761993.ece
  52. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/Dec/23/its-against-islam-muslim-law-board-says-ayodhya-mosque-cant-be-built-on-bartered-land-2240243.html
  53. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/india-news-ayodhya-mosque-illegal-under-shariat-law-aimplbs-zafaryab-jilani-news-368160
  54. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/foundation-stone-for-ayodhya-masjid-mohammad-bin-abdullah-mosque-likely-to-be-laid-next-year-bjp-leader-4680420
  55. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/ayodhya-mosque-thatll-replace-babri-will-be-named-after-prophet-muhammad/articleshow/104381644.cms
  56. https://www.coastaldigest.com/india-top-story/ayodhya-mosque-against-waqf-act-illegal-under-shariyat-aimplbs-zafaryab-jilani?page=13
  57. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/aimplb-members-sunni-central-waqf-board-officials-spat-over-legality-of-ayodhya-s-upcoming-mosque/story-3WPcOYzYmcvZOvolzheS6L.html
  58. https://m.thewire.in/article/communalism/ayodhya-mosque-babri-masjid-ram-temple-title-supreme-court
  59. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-dismisses-plea-seeking-appointment-of-govt-nominees-in-trust-for-building-mosque-in-ayodhya/article33247427.ece
  60. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-mosque-against-waqf-act-illegal-under-shariat-law-aimplbs-zafaryab-jilani/articleshow/79919724.cms
  61. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-mosque-against-waqf-act-illegal-under-shariyat-law-aimplbs-zafaryab-jilani-7116932/
  62. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/dhannipur-mosque-project-5-acre-site-not-enough-trust-scouts-for-more-land-101757707739393.html
  63. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/in-over-a-year-iicf-receives-just-rs-25-lakh-in-donations-for-building-ayodhya-mosque-7985567/
  64. https://www.reddit.com/r/indianmuslims/comments/1hh2v3e/what_happened_to_muhammad_bin_abdullah_mosque_of/
  65. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/no-need-for-dhannipur-mosque-says-ayodhya-case-litigant-iqbal-ansari/article68667624.ece
  66. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-mosque-project-hangs-in-a-limbo-due-to-lack-of-funds/article66862038.ece
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.