Hubbry Logo
Hindu templeHindu templeMain
Open search
Hindu temple
Community hub
Hindu temple
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
from Wikipedia

Elements in a Hindu temple architecture

A Hindu temple, also known as Mandir, Devasthanam, Pura, Kshetram or Kovil, is a sacred place where Hindus worship and show their devotion to deities through worship, sacrifice, and prayers. It is considered the house of the god to whom it is dedicated.[1][2] Hindu temple architecture, which makes extensive use of squares and circles, has its roots in later Vedic traditions, which also influence the temples' construction and symbolism. Through astronomical numbers and particular alignments connected to the temple's location and the relationship between the deity and the worshipper, the temple's design also illustrates the idea of recursion and the equivalency of the macrocosm and the microcosm.[3][4][5] A temple incorporates all elements of the Hindu cosmos—presenting the good, the evil and the human, as well as the elements of the Hindu sense of cyclic time and the essence of life—symbolically presenting dharma, artha, kama, moksha, and karma.[6][7][8]

The spiritual principles symbolically represented in Hindu temples are detailed in the ancient later Vedic texts, while their structural rules are described in various ancient Sanskrit treatises on architecture (Bṛhat Saṃhitā, Vāstu Śāstras).[9][10] The layout, motifs, plan and the building process recite ancient rituals and geometric symbolism, and reflect beliefs and values innate within various schools of Hinduism.[3] A Hindu temple is a spiritual destination for many Hindus, as well as landmarks around which ancient arts, community celebrations and the economy have flourished.[11][12]

Hindu temple architecture are presented in many styles, are situated in diverse locations, deploy different construction methods, are adapted to different deities and regional beliefs, and share certain core ideas, symbolism and themes.[13] They are found in South Asia, particularly India and Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, in Southeast Asian countries such as Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia,[14][15] and countries such as Canada, Fiji, France, Guyana, Kenya, Mauritius, the Netherlands, South Africa, Suriname, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and other countries with a significant Hindu population.[16] The current state and outer appearance of Hindu temples reflect arts, materials and designs as they evolved over two millennia; they also reflect the effect of conflicts between Hinduism and Islam since the 12th century.[17] The Swaminarayanan Akshardham in Robbinsville, New Jersey, between the New York and Philadelphia metropolitan areas, was inaugurated in 2014 as one of the world's largest Hindu temples.[18]

Significance and meaning of a temple

[edit]

A Hindu temple reflects a synthesis of arts, the ideals of dharma, beliefs, values and the way of life cherished under Hinduism. It is a link between man, deities, and the Universal Puruṣa in a sacred space.[19] It represents the triple-knowledge (trayi-vidya) of the Vedic vision by mapping the relationships between the cosmos (brahmaṇḍa) and the cell (pinda) by a unique plan based on astronomical numbers.[20] Subhash Kak sees the temple form and its iconography to be a natural expansion of Vedic ideology related to recursion, change and equivalence.[21]

The 9x9 (81) grid "Parama Sayika" layout plan (above) found in large ceremonial Hindu Temples. It is one of many grids used to build Hindu temples. In this structure of symmetry, each concentric layer has significance. The outermost layer, Paisachika padas, signifies aspects of Asuras and evil; while the inner Devika padas layer signifies aspects of Devas and good. In between the good and evil is the concentric layer of Manusha padas, signifying human life. All these layers surround Brahma padas, which signifies creative energy and the site for a temple's primary murti for darsana. Finally at the very center of the Brahma padas is the Garbhagriha (Purusa Space), signifying the Universal Principle present in everything and everyone.[3]

In ancient Indian texts, a temple is a place of pilgrimage, known in India as a Tirtha.[3] It is a sacred site whose ambience and design attempts to symbolically condense the ideal tenets of the Hindu way of life.[19] In a Hindu temple, all the cosmic components that produce and maintain life are there, from fire to water, from depictions of the natural world to gods, from genders that are feminine or masculine to those that are everlasting and universal.

Susan Lewandowski states[9] that the underlying principle in a Hindu temple is the belief that all things are one, that everything is connected. The pilgrim is welcomed through 64-grid or 81-grid mathematically structured spaces, a network of art, pillars with carvings and statues that display and celebrate the four important and necessary principles of human life—the pursuit of artha (prosperity, wealth), of kama (pleasure, sex), of dharma (virtues, ethical life) and of moksha (release, self-knowledge).[22][23] At the centre of the temple, typically below and sometimes above or next to the deity, is mere hollow space with no decoration, symbolically representing Purusa, the Supreme Principle, the sacred Universal, one without form, which is omnipresent, connects everything, and is the essence of everyone. A Hindu temple is meant to encourage reflection, facilitate purification of one's mind, and trigger the process of inner realization within the devotee.[3] The specific process is left to the devotee's school of belief. The primary deity of different Hindu temples varies to reflect this spiritual spectrum.[24][25]

In Hindu tradition, there is no dividing line between the secular and the lonely sacred.[9] In the same spirit, Hindu temples are not just sacred spaces; they are also secular spaces. Their meaning and purpose have extended beyond spiritual life to social rituals and daily life, offering thus a social meaning. Some temples have served as a venue to mark festivals, to celebrate arts through dance and music, to get married or commemorate marriages,[26] the birth of a child, other significant life events or the death of a loved one. In political and economic life, Hindu temples have served as a venue for succession within dynasties and landmarks around which economic activity thrived.[27]

Forms and designs of Hindu temples

[edit]

Almost all Hindu temples take two forms: a house or a palace. A house-themed temple is a simple shelter that serves as a deity's home. The temple is a place where the devotee visits, just like he or she would visit a friend or relative. The use of moveable and immoveable images is mentioned by Pāṇini. In the Bhakti school of Hinduism, temples are venues for puja, which is a hospitality ritual, where the deity is honored, and where devotee calls upon, attends to and connects with the deity. In other schools of Hinduism, the person may simply perform japa, or meditation, or yoga, or introspection in his or her temple. Palace-themed temples often incorporate more elaborate and monumental architecture.[28]

Site

[edit]

The appropriate site for a temple, suggests ancient Sanskrit texts, is near water and gardens, where lotus and flowers bloom, where swans, ducks and other birds are heard, and where animals rest without fear of injury or harm.[3] These harmonious places were recommended in these texts with the explanation that such are the places where gods play, and thus the best site for Hindu temples.[3][9]

Hindu temple sites cover a wide range. The most common sites are those near water bodies, embedded in nature, such as the Bhutanatha temple complex at Badami, which is next to a waterfall.

The gods always play where lakes are,
where the sun's rays are warded off by umbrellas of lotus leaf clusters,
and where clear waterpaths are made by swans
whose breasts toss the white lotus hither and thither,
where swans, ducks, curleys and paddy birds are heard,
and animals rest nearby in the shade of Nicula trees on the river banks.

The gods always play where rivers have for their braclets
the sound of curleys and the voice of swans for their speech,
water as their garment, carps for their zone,
the flowering trees on their banks as earrings,
the confluence of rivers as their hips,
raised sand banks as breasts and plumage of swans their mantle.

The gods always play where groves are near, rivers, mountains and springs, and in towns with pleasure gardens.

— Varāhamihira, Brhat Samhita 1.60.4-8, 6th century CE[29]

While major Hindu temples are recommended at sangams (confluence of rivers), river banks, lakes and seashore, Brhat Samhita and Puranas suggest temples may also be built where a natural source of water is not present. Here too, they recommend that a pond be built preferably in front or to the left of the temple with water gardens. If water is neither present naturally nor by design, water is symbolically present at the consecration of the temple or the deity. Temples may also be built, suggests Visnudharmottara in Part III of Chapter 93,[30] inside caves and carved stones, on hill tops affording peaceful views, on mountain slopes overlooking beautiful valleys, inside forests and hermitages, next to gardens, or at the head of a town street.[citation needed]

Manuals

[edit]

Ancient builders of Hindu temples created manuals of architecture, called Vastu-Sastra (literally "science" of dwelling; vas-tu is a composite Sanskrit word; vas means "reside", tu means "you"); these contain Vastu-Vidya (literally, knowledge of dwelling)[31] and Sastra meaning system or knowledge in Sanskrit. There exist many Vastu-Sastras on the art of building temples, such as one by Thakkura Pheru, describing where and how temples should be built.[32][33] Sanskrit manuals have been found in India since the 6th century CE.[34] Vastu-Sastra manuals included chapters on home construction, town planning,[31] and how efficient villages, towns and kingdoms integrated temples, water bodies and gardens within them to achieve harmony with nature.[35][36] While it is unclear, states Barnett,[37] as to whether these temple and town planning texts were theoretical studies and if or when they were properly implemented in practice, the manuals suggest that town planning and Hindu temples were conceived as ideals of art and integral part of Hindu social and spiritual life.[31]

Ancient India produced many Sanskrit manuals for Hindu temple design and construction, covering arrangement of spaces (above) to every aspect of its completion. Yet, the Silpins were given wide latitude to experiment and express their creativity.[38]

The Silpa Prakasa of Odisha, authored by Ramacandra Bhattaraka Kaulacara in the 9th or 10th centuries CE, is another Sanskrit treatise on Temple Architecture.[39] Silpa Prakasa describes the geometric principles in every aspect of the temple and symbolism such as 16 emotions of human beings carved as 16 types of female figures. These styles were perfected in Hindu temples prevalent in the eastern states of India. Other ancient texts found expand these architectural principles, suggesting that different parts of India developed, invented and added their own interpretations. For example, in the Saurastra tradition of temple building found in western states of India, the feminine form, expressions and emotions are depicted in 32 types of Nataka-stri compared to 16 types described in Silpa Prakasa.[39] Silpa Prakasa provides a brief introduction to 12 types of Hindu temples. Other texts, such as Pancaratra Prasada Prasadhana compiled by Daniel Smith[40] and Silpa Ratnakara compiled by Narmada Sankara[41] provide a more extensive list of Hindu temple types.

Ancient Sanskrit manuals for temple construction discovered in Rajasthan, in northwestern region of India, include Sutradhara Mandana's Prasadamandana (literally, manual for planning and building a temple).[42] Manasara, a text of South Indian origin, estimated to be in circulation by the 7th century CE, is a guidebook on South Indian temple design and construction.[9][43] Isanasivagurudeva paddhati is another Sanskrit text from the 9th century describing the art of temple building in India in south and central India.[44][45] In north India, Brihat-samhita by Varāhamihira is the widely cited ancient Sanskrit manual from 6th century describing the design and construction of Nagara style of Hindu temples.[38][46][47]

Plan

[edit]
Plan
Elements of a Hindu temple in Kalinga style. There are many Hindu temple styles, but they almost universally share common geometric principles, symbolism of ideas, and expression of core beliefs.[3]
The 8x8 (64) grid Manduka Hindu Temple Floor Plan, according to Vastupurusamandala. The 64 grid is the most sacred and common Hindu temple template. The bright saffron center, where diagonals intersect above, represents the Purusha of Hindu philosophy.[3][38]

A Hindu temple design follows a geometrical design called vastu-purusha-mandala. The name is a composite Sanskrit word with three of the most important components of the plan. Mandala means circle, Purusha is universal essence at the core of Hindu tradition, while Vastu means the dwelling structure.[48] The Vastu-purusha-mandala is a yantra,[32] a design laying out a Hindu temple in a symmetrical, self-repeating structure derived from central beliefs, myths, cardinality and mathematical principles.

The four cardinal directions help create the axis of a Hindu temple, around which is formed a perfect square in the space available. The circle of the mandala circumscribes the square. The square is considered divine for its perfection and as a symbolic product of knowledge and human thought, while the circle is considered earthly, human and observed in everyday life (moon, sun, horizon, water drop, rainbow). Each supports the other.[3] The square is divided into perfect 64 (or in some cases 81) sub-squares called padas.[38][49] Each pada is conceptually assigned to a symbolic element, sometimes in the form of a deity. The central square(s) of the 64- or 81-grid is dedicated to Brahman (not to be confused with Brahmin, the scholarly and priestly class in India), and are called Brahma padas.

The 49-grid design is called Sthandila and is of great importance in creative expressions of Hindu temples in South India, particularly in Prakaras.[50] The symmetric Vastu-purusa-mandala grids are sometimes combined to form a temple superstructure with two or more attached squares.[51] The temples face sunrise, and the entrance for the devotee is typically this east side. The mandala pada facing sunrise is dedicated to Surya, the sun-god. The Surya pada is flanked by the padas of Satya, the deity of Truth, on one side and Indra, the king of the demigods, on other. The east and north faces of most temples feature a mix of gods and demigods; while the west and south feature demons and demigods related to the underworld.[52] This vastu-purusha-mandala plan and symbolism is systematically seen in ancient Hindu temples on the Indian subcontinent as well as those in southeast Asia, with regional creativity and variations.[53][54]

Beneath the mandala's central square(s) is the space for the all-pervasive, all-connecting Universal Spirit, the highest reality, the purusha.[55] This space is sometimes known as the garbha-griya (literally, "womb house")—a small, perfect square, windowless, enclosed space without ornamentation that represents universal essence.[48] In or near this space is typically a cult image—which, though many Indians may refer to casually as an idol, is more formally known as a murti, or the main worshippable deity, who varies with each temple. Often this murti gives the temple a local name, such as a Vishnu temple, Krishna temple, Rama temple, Narayana temple, Shiva temple, Lakshmi temple, Ganesha temple, Durga temple, Hanuman temple, Surya temple, etc.[19] It is this garbha-griya which devotees seek for darsana (literally, a sight of knowledge,[56] or vision[48]).

Above the vastu-purusha-mandala is a superstructure with a dome called Shikhara in north India, and Vimana in south India, that stretches towards the sky.[48] Sometimes, in makeshift temples, the dome may be replaced with symbolic bamboo with few leaves at the top. The vertical dimension's cupola or dome is designed as a pyramid, a cone or other mountain-like shape, once again using the principle of concentric circles and squares.[3] Scholars suggest that this shape is inspired by the cosmic mountain of Meru or Himalayan Kailasa, the abode of the gods, according to Vedic mythology.[48]

A Hindu temple has a Shikhara (Vimana or Spire) that rises symmetrically above the central core of the temple. These spires come in many designs and shapes, but they all have mathematical precision and geometric symbolism. One of the common principles found in Hindu temple spires is circles and turning-squares theme (left), and a concentric layering design (right) that flows from one to the other as it rises towards the sky.[3][57]

In larger temples, the central space typically is surrounded by an ambulatory for the devotee to walk around and ritually circumambulate the Purusa, the universal essence.[3] Often this space is visually decorated with carvings, paintings or images meant to inspire the devotee. In some temples, these images may be stories from Hindu Epics; in others, they may be Vedic tales about right and wrong or virtues and vice; in yet others, they may be murtis of locally worshipped deities. The pillars, walls and ceilings typically also have highly ornate carvings or images of the four just and necessary pursuits of life—kama, artha, dharma and moksa. This walk around is called pradakshina.[48]

Large temples also have pillared halls, called mandapa—one of which, on the east side, serves as the waiting room for pilgrims and devotees. The mandapa may be a separate structure in older temples, but in newer temples this space is integrated into the temple superstructure. Mega-temple sites have a main temple surrounded by smaller temples and shrines, but these are still arranged by principles of symmetry, grids and mathematical precision. An important principle found in the layout of Hindu temples is mirroring and repeating fractal-like design structure,[58] each unique yet also repeating the central common principle, one which Susan Lewandowski refers to as "an organism of repeating cells".[27]

An illustration of Hindu temple Spires (Shikhara, Vimana) built using concentric circles and the rotating-squares principle. The left one is from Vijayanagar in Karnataka, and the right one is from Pushkar in Rajasthan.

The ancient texts on Hindu temple design, the Vāstu-puruṣa-mandala and Vastu Śāstras, do not limit themselves to the design of a Hindu temple.[59] They describe the temple as a holistic part of its community, and lay out various principles and a diversity of alternate designs for home, village and city layout along with the temple, gardens, water bodies and nature.[3][35]

Exceptions to the square grid principle

A predominant number of Hindu temples exhibit the perfect-square grid principle.[60] However, there are some exceptions. For example, the Telika Mandir in Gwalior, built in the 8th century CE, is not a square but a rectangle in 2:3 proportion. Further, the temple explores a number of structures and shrines in 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:5, 3:5 and 4:5 ratios. These ratios are exact, suggesting that the architect intended to use these harmonic ratios, and the rectangle pattern was not a mistake, nor an arbitrary approximation. Other examples of non-square harmonic ratios are found at the Naresar temple site of Madhya Pradesh and at the Nakti-Mata temple near Jaipur, Rajasthan. Michael Meister suggests that these exceptions mean that the ancient Sanskrit manuals for temple building were guidelines, and Hinduism permitted its artisans flexibility in expression and aesthetic independence.[38]

Symbolism

[edit]
Chaturbhuj Temple at Orchha, is noted for having one of the tallest Vimana among Hindu temples standing at 344 feet.

A Hindu temple is a symbolic reconstruction of the universe and the universal principles that enable everything in it to function.[61][62] The temples reflect Hindu philosophy and its diverse views on the cosmos and on truth.[58][63]

Hinduism has no traditional ecclesiastical order, no centralized religious authorities, no governing body, no prophet nor any binding holy book save the Vedas; Hindus can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, monistic, or atheistic.[64] Within this diffuse and open structure, spirituality in Hindu philosophy is an individual experience, and referred to as kṣaitrajña (Sanskrit: क्षैत्रज्ञ)[65]). It defines spiritual practice as one's journey towards moksha, awareness of self, the discovery of higher truths, true nature of reality, and a consciousness that is liberated and content.[66][67] A Hindu temple reflects these core beliefs. The central core of almost all Hindu temples is not a large communal space; the temple is designed for the individual, a couple or a family—a small, private space to allow visitors to experience darsana.

Darsana is itself a symbolic word. In ancient Hindu scripts, darsana is the name of six methods or alternate viewpoints of understanding truth.[68] These are Nyaya, Vaisesika, Sankhya, Yoga, Mimamsa and Vedanta—which flowered into individual schools of Hinduism, each of which is considered a valid, alternate path to understanding truth and achieving self-realization in the Hindu way of life.

From names to forms, from images to stories carved into the walls of a temple, symbolism is everywhere in a Hindu temple. Life principles such as the pursuit of joy, connection and emotional pleasure (kama) are fused into mystical, erotic and architectural forms in Hindu temples. These motifs and principles of human life are part of the sacred texts of the Hindus, such as its Upanishads; the temples express these same principles in a different form, through art and spaces. For example, Brihadaranyaka Upanisad (4.3.21) recites:

In the embrace of the beloved, one forgets the whole world, everything both within and without;
in the same way, one who embraces the Self knows neither within nor without.

— Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, 7th century BCE[69]

The architecture of Hindu temples is also symbolic. The whole structure fuses the daily life and its surroundings with the divine concepts, through a structure that is open yet raised on a terrace, transitioning from the secular towards the sacred,[70] inviting the visitor inwards and upwards towards the Brahma pada, the temple's central core, a symbolic space marked by its spire (shikhara, vimana). The ancient temples had grand, intricately carved entrances but no doors, and they lacked a boundary wall. In most cultures, suggests Edmund Leach,[70] a boundary and gateway separates the secular and the sacred, and this gateway door is grand. In Hindu tradition, this is discarded in favor of an open and diffusive architecture, where the secular world was not separated from the sacred, but transitioned and flowed into the sacred.[71] The Hindu temple has structural walls, which were patterned usually within the 64-grid, or other geometric layouts. Yet the layout was open on all sides, except for the core space with a single opening for darsana. The temple space is laid out in a series of courts (mandapas). The outermost regions may incorporate the negative and suffering side of life with the symbolism of evil, asuras and rakshashas; but in small temples this layer is dispensed with. When present, this outer region diffuse into the next inner layer that bridges as human space, followed by another inner Devika padas space and symbolic arts incorporating the positive and joyful side of life about the good and the gods. This divine space then concentrically diffuses inwards and lifts the guest to the core of the temple, where resides the main murti, as well as the space for the Purusa, and ideas held to be most sacred principles in Hindu tradition. The symbolism in the arts and temples of Hinduism, suggests Edmund Leach, is similar to those in Christianity and other major religions of the world.[72]

Building teams

[edit]
The 6th-century Brihat samhita is a Sanskrit encyclopedia. Its chapters 57–60 discuss different styles and design of Hindu temples. Above: the text and commentary in Nepalaksara, Devanagari and Tamil Grantha scripts.

Indian texts call the craftsmen and builders of temples "Silpin" (Sanskrit: शिल्पिन्[73]), derived from "Silpa".[74] One of the earliest mentions of the Sanskrit word "Silpa" is in Atharvaveda, from about 1000 BCE; according to scholars, the word was used to denote any work of art.[75] Some scholars suggest that the word "Silpa" has no direct or one-word translation in English, nor does the word "Silpin". "Silpa", explains Stella Kramrisch,[44] is a multicolored word and incorporates art, skill, craft, ingenuity, imagination, form, expression and inventiveness of any art or craft. Similarly, "Shilpin", notes Kramrisch, is a complex Sanskrit word, describing any person who embodies art, science, culture, skill, and rhythm and employs creative principles to produce any divine form of expression. Silpins who built Hindu temples, as well as the artworks and sculptures within them, were considered by the ancient Sanskrit texts to deploy arts whose number are unlimited, Kala (techniques) that were 64 in number,[76] and Vidya (science) that were of 32 types.[44]

The Hindu manuals of temple construction describe the education, characteristics of good artists and architects. The general education of a Hindu Shilpin in ancient India included Lekha or Lipi (alphabet, reading and writing), Rupa (drawing and geometry), Ganana (arithmetic). These were imparted from age 5 to 12. The advanced students would continue in higher stages of Shilpa Sastra studies till the age of 25.[77][78] Apart from specialist technical competence, the manuals suggest that best Silpins for building a Hindu temple are those who know the essence of Vedas and Agamas, consider themselves as students, keep well verse with principles of traditional sciences and mathematics, painting and geography.[32] Further they are kind, free from jealousy, righteous, have their sense under control, of happy disposition, and ardent in everything they do.[44]

According to Silparatna, a Hindu temple project would start with a Yajamana (patron), and include a Sthapaka (guru, spiritual guide and architect-priest), a Sthapati (architect) who would design the building, a Sutragrahin (surveyor), and many Vardhakins (workers, masons, painters, plasterers, overseers) and Taksakas (sculptors).[32][46] While the temple is under construction, all those working on the temple were revered and considered sacerdotal by the patron as well as others witnessing the construction.[74] Further, it was a tradition that all tools and materials used in temple building and all creative work had the sanction of a sacrament.[32] For example, if a carpenter or sculptor needed to fell a tree or cut a rock from a hill, he would propitiate the tree or rock with prayers, seeking forgiveness for cutting it from its surroundings, and explaining his intent and purpose. The axe used to cut the tree would be anointed with butter to minimize the hurt to the tree.[44] Even in modern times, in some parts of India such as Odisha, Visvakarma Puja is a ritual festival every year where the craftsmen and artists worship their arts, tools and materials.[79]

Social functions of Hindu temples

[edit]
Hindu Shiva temple depicted in a coin from the 1st century BCE.
Example of a Hindu temple constructed in the same manner as the one depicted in the coin.

Hindu temples served as nuclei of important social, economic, artistic and intellectual functions in ancient and medieval India.[80][81] Burton Stein states that South Indian temples managed regional development function, such as irrigation projects, land reclamation, post-disaster relief and recovery. These activities were paid for by the donations (melvarum) they collected from devotees.[11] According to James Heitzman, these donations came from a wide spectrum of the Indian society, ranging from kings, queens, officials in the kingdom to merchants, priests and shepherds.[82] Temples also managed lands endowed to it by its devotees upon their death. They would provide employment to the poorest.[83] Some temples had large treasury, with gold and silver coins, and these temples served as banks.[84]

The Golden Temple at Vellore is gilded with 1500 kg of pure gold.

Hindu temples over time became wealthy from grants and donations from royal patrons as well as private individuals. Major temples became employers and patrons of economic activity. In Dharmanomics, economist Balasubramanian notes that many major temples were strategically located closer to coastlines including Somnath temple in Gujarat and Padmanabhaswamy temple in Thiruvananthapuram.[85] They served as crucial financial hubs for maritime trade and sponsored land reclamation and infrastructure improvements, states Michell. These built facilities such as water tanks, irrigation canals and new roads.[86] A very detailed early record from 1101 lists over 600 employees (excluding the priests) of the Brihadisvara Temple, Thanjavur, still one of the largest temples in Tamil Nadu. Most worked part-time and received the use of temple farmland as reward.[86] For those thus employed by the temple, according to Michell, "some gratuitous services were usually considered obligatory, such as dragging the temple chariots on festival occasions and helping when a large building project was undertaken".[86] Temples also acted as refuge during times of political unrest and danger.[86]

Historically, the Scheduled Castes or Dalits were prohibited from the entry into temples.[87][88][89]

In contemporary times, the process of building a Hindu temple by emigrants and diasporas from South Asia has also served as a process of building a community, a social venue to network, reduce prejudice and seek civil rights together.[90]

Library of manuscripts

[edit]

John Guy and Jorrit Britschgi state Hindu temples served as centers where ancient manuscripts were routinely used for learning and where the texts were copied when they wore out.[91] In South India, temples and associated mathas served custodial functions, and a large number of manuscripts on Hindu philosophy, poetry, grammar and other subjects were written, multiplied and preserved inside the temples.[92] Archaeological and epigraphical evidence indicates existence of libraries called Sarasvati-bhandara, dated possibly to early 12th-century and employing librarians, attached to Hindu temples.[93]

Palm-leaf manuscripts called lontar in dedicated stone libraries have been discovered by archaeologists at Hindu temples in Bali Indonesia and in 10th century Cambodian temples such as Angkor Wat and Banteay Srei.[94]

Temple schools

[edit]

Inscriptions from the 4th century CE suggest the existence of schools around Hindu temples, called Ghatikas or Mathas, where the Vedas were studied.[95] In south India, 9th century Vedic schools attached to Hindu temples were called Calai or Salai, and these provided free boarding and lodging to students and scholars.[96][97] The temples linked to Bhakti movement in the early 2nd millennium, were dominated by non-Brahmins.[98] These assumed many educational functions, including the exposition, recitation and public discourses of Sanskrit and Vedic texts.[98] Some temple schools offered wide range of studies, ranging from Hindu scriptures to Buddhist texts, grammar, philosophy, martial arts, music and painting.[80][99] By the 8th century, Hindu temples also served as the social venue for tests, debates, team competition and Vedic recitals called Anyonyam.[80][99]

Hospitals, community kitchen, monasteries

[edit]

According to Kenneth G. Zysk—a professor specializing in Indology and ancient medicine, Hindu mathas and temples had by the 10th-century attached medical care along with their religious and educational roles.[100] This is evidenced by various inscriptions found in Bengal, Andhra Pradesh and elsewhere. An inscription dated to about 930 CE states the provision of a physician to two matha to care for the sick and destitute. Another inscription dated to 1069 at a Vishnu temple in Tamil Nadu describes a hospital attached to the temple, listing the nurses, physicians, medicines and beds for patients. Similarly, a stone inscription in Andhra Pradesh dated to about 1262 mentions the provision of a prasutishala (maternity house), vaidya (physician), an arogyashala (health house) and a viprasattra (hospice, kitchen) with the religious center where people from all social backgrounds could be fed and cared for.[100][101] According to Zysk, both Buddhist monasteries and Hindu religious centers provided facilities to care for the sick and needy in the 1st millennium, but with the destruction of Buddhist centers after the 12th century, the Hindu religious institutions assumed these social responsibilities.[100] According to George Michell, Hindu temples in South India were active charity centers and they provided free meal for wayfarers, pilgrims and devotees, as well as boarding facilities for students and hospitals for the sick.[102]

The 15th and 16th century Hindu temples at Hampi featured storage spaces (temple granary, kottara), water tanks and kitchens.[103][104][105] Many major pilgrimage sites have featured dharmashalas since early times. These were attached to Hindu temples, particularly in South India, providing a bed and meal to pilgrims. They relied on any voluntary donation the visitor may leave and to land grants from local rulers.[106] Some temples have operated their kitchens on a daily basis to serve the visitor and the needy, while others during major community gatherings or festivals. Examples include the major kitchens run by Hindu temples in Udupi (Karnataka), Puri (Odisha) and Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh). The tradition of sharing food in smaller temple is typically called prasada.[106][107]

Styles

[edit]

Hindu temples are found in diverse locations each incorporating different methods of construction and styles:

Step well temples

In arid western parts of India, such as Rajasthan and Gujarat, Hindu communities built large walk-in wells that served as the only source of water in dry months but also served as social meeting places and carried religious significance. These monuments went down into the earth towards subterranean water, up to seven storeys, and were part of a temple complex.[112] These vav (literally, stepwells) had intricate art reliefs on the walls, with numerous murtis and images of Hindu deities, water spirits and erotic symbolism. The step wells were named after Hindu deities; for example, Mata Bhavani's Stepwell, Ankol Mata Vav, Sikotari Vav and others.[112] The temple ranged from being small single pada (cell) structure to large nearby complexes. These stepwells and their temple compounds have been variously dated from late 1st millennium BCE through 11th century CE. Of these, Rani ki vav, with hundreds of art reliefs including many of Vishnu deity avatars, has been declared a UNESCO World Heritage site.[113]

Cave temples

The Indian rock-cut architecture evolved in Maharashtran temple style in the 1st millennium CE. The temples are carved from a single piece of rock as a complete temple or carved in a cave to look like the interior of a temple. Ellora Temple is an example of the former, while The Elephanta Caves are representative of the latter style.[114][citation needed] The Elephanta Caves consist of two groups of caves—the first is a large group of five Hindu caves and the second is a smaller group of two Buddhist caves. The Hindu caves contain rock-cut stone sculptures, representing the Shaiva Hindu sect, dedicated to the god Shiva.[114]

Arts inside Hindu temples

[edit]
Dancing Ganesha sculpture at Hoysaleswara Temple, intricate designs of Hoysala architecture are seen.

A typical, ancient Hindu temple has a profusion of arts—from paintings to sculpture, from symbolic icons to engravings, from thoughtful layout of space to fusion of mathematical principles with Hindu sense of time and cardinality.

Ancient Sanskrit texts classify murtis and images in a number of ways. For example, one method of classification is the dimensionality of completion:[115]

  • Chitra: images that are three-dimensional and completely formed
  • Chitrardha: images that are engraved in half relief
  • Chitrabhasa: images that are two-dimensional, such as paintings on walls and cloth
Images and murtis inside Hindu temples vary widely in their expression. Raudra or ugra images express destruction, fear and violence, such as the Kali image at left. Shanta or saumya images express joy, knowledge and harmony, such as the Saraswati image at right.

Another way of classification is by the expressive state of the image:

  • Raudra or Dugra: are images that were meant to terrify, induce fear. These typically have wide, circular eyes, carry weapons, have skulls and bones as adornment. These murtis were worshiped by soldiers before going to war, or by people in times of distress or terrors. Raudra deity temples were not set up inside villages or towns, but invariably outside and in remote areas of a kingdom.[115]
  • Shanta and saumya: are images that were pacific, peaceful and expressive of love, compassion, kindness and other virtues in Hindu pantheon. These images would carry symbolic icons of peace, knowledge, music, wealth, flowers, sensuality among other things. In ancient India, these temples were predominant inside villages and towns.[115]

A Hindu temple may or may not include a murti or images, but larger temples usually do. Personal Hindu temples at home or a hermitage may have a pada for yoga or meditation, but be devoid of anthropomorphic representations of god. Nature or others arts may surround him or her. To a Hindu yogin, states Gopinath Rao,[115] one who has realised the Self and the Universal Principle within himself, there is no need for any temple or divine image for worship. However, for those who have yet to reach this height of realization, various symbolic manifestations through images, murtis and icons as well as mental modes of worship are offered as one of the spiritual paths in the Hindu way of life. Some ancient Hindu scriptures like the Jabaladarshana Upanishad appear to endorse this idea[115]

शिवमात्मनि पश्यन्ति प्रतिमासु न योगिनः ।
अज्ञानं भावनार्थाय प्रतिमाः परिकल्पिताः ॥५९॥
- जाबालदर्शनोपनिषत्

A yogin perceives god (Siva) within himself; images are for those who have not reached this knowledge.

— Jabaladarsana Upanishad, verse 59[116]

However, devotees aspiring to a personal relationship with the Supreme Lord, whom they worship variously as Krishna or Shiva, for example, tend to reverse such hierarchical views of self-realization, holding that the personal form of the deity, as the source of the Brahma-jyoti, or the light into which impersonalists, according to their ideals, propose to merge themselves and their individual identities, will benevolently accept worship through an arca vigraha, an authorized form constructed not according to imagination but in pursuit of scriptural directives.

Historical development and destruction

[edit]

A number of ancient Indian texts suggest the prevalence of murtis, temples and shrines in Indian subcontinent for thousands of years. For example, the temples of the Koshala kingdom are mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana[117] (various recent scholars' estimates for the earliest stage of the text range from the 7th to 4th centuries BCE, with later stages extending up to the 3rd century CE)[118] The 5th century BCE text, Astadhyayi, mentions male deity arcas or murtis of Agni, Indra, Varuna, Rudra, Mrda, Pusa, Surya, and Soma being worshipped, as well as the worship of arcas of female goddesses such as Indrani, Varunani, Usa, Bhavani, Prthivi and Vrsakapayi.[119] The 2nd century BCE "Mahabhasya" of Patanjali extensively describes temples of Dhanapati (deity of wealth and finance, Kubera), as well as temples of Rama and Kesava, wherein the worship included dance, music and extensive rituals. The Mahabhasya also describes the rituals for Krsna, Visnu and Siva. An image recovered from Mathura in north India has been dated to the 2nd century BCE.[119] Kautilya's Arthashastra from 4th century BCE describes a city of temples, each enshrining various Vedic and Puranic deities. All three of these sources have common names, describe common rituals, symbolism and significance possibly suggesting that the idea of murtis, temples and shrines passed from one generation to next, in ancient India, at least from the 4th century BCE.[119] The oldest temples, suggest scholars, were built of brick and wood. Stone became the preferred material of construction later.[120][121]

Early Jain and Buddhist literature, along with Kautilya's Arthashastra, describe structures, embellishments and designs of these temples—all with motifs and deities currently prevalent in Hinduism. Bas-reliefs and murtis have been found from 2nd to 3rd century, but none of the temple structures have survived. Scholars[119] theorize that those ancient temples of India, later referred to as Hindu temples, were modeled after domestic structure—a house or a palace. Beyond shrines, nature was revered, in forms such as trees, rivers, and stupas, before the time of Buddha and Vardhamana Mahavira. As Jainism and Buddhism branched off from the religious tradition later to be called Hinduism, the ideas, designs and plans of ancient Vedic and Upanishad era shrines were adopted and evolved, likely from the competitive development of temples and arts in Jainism and Buddhism. Ancient reliefs found so far, states Michael Meister,[119] suggest five basic shrine designs and combinations thereof in 1st millennium BCE:

  1. A raised platform with or without a symbol
  2. A raised platform under an umbrella
  3. A raised platform under a tree
  4. A raised platform enclosed with a railing
  5. A raised platform inside a pillared pavilion

Many of these ancient shrines were roofless, some had toranas and roof.

From the 1st century BCE through 3rd century CE, the evidence and details about ancient temples increases. The ancient literature refers to these temples as Pasada (or Prasada), stana, mahasthana, devalaya, devagrha, devakula, devakulika, ayatana and harmya.[119] The entrance of the temple is referred to as dvarakosthaka in these ancient texts notes Meister,[119] the temple hall is described as sabha or ayagasabha, pillars were called kumbhaka, while vedika referred to the structures at the boundary of a temple.

Ancient Hindu temples outside the Indian subcontinent
Ateshgah temple, used for Hindu, Sikh, and Zoroastrian worship, Azerbaijan

With the start of Gupta dynasty in the 4th century, Hindu temples flourished in innovation, design, scope, form, use of stone and new materials as well as symbolic synthesis of culture and dharmic principles with artistic expression.[124][125] It is this period that is credited with the ideas of garbhagrha for Purusa, mandapa for sheltering the devotees and rituals in progress, as well as symbolic motifs relating to dharma, karma, kama, artha and moksha. Temple superstructures were built from stone, brick and wide range of materials. Entrance ways, walls and pillars were intricately carved, while parts of temple were decorated with gold, silver and jewels. Visnu, Siva and other deities were placed in Hindu temples, while Buddhists and Jains built their own temples, often side by side with Hindus.[126]

The 4th through 6th century marked the flowering of Vidharbha style, whose accomplishments survive in central India as Ajanta caves, Pavnar, Mandhal and Mahesvar. In the Malaprabha river basin, South India, this period is credited with some of the earliest stone temples of the region: the Badami Chalukya temples are dated to the 5th century by some scholars,[127] and the 6th by some others.[128]

Over 6th and 7th centuries, temple designs were further refined during Maurya dynasty, evidence of which survives today at Ellora and in the Elephanta cave temples.

It is the 5th through 7th century CE when outer design and appearances of Hindu temples in north India and south India began to widely diverge.[129] Nevertheless, the forms, theme, symbolism and central ideas in the grid design remained same, before and after, pan-India as innovations were adopted to give distinctly different visual expressions.

The Western Chalukya architecture of the 11th- and 12th-century Tungabhadra region of modern central Karnataka includes many temples. Step-wells are consist of a shaft dug to the water table, with steps descending to the water; while they were built for secular purposes, some are also decorated as temples, or serve as a temple tank.

During the 5th to 11th century, Hindu temples flourished outside Indian subcontinent, such as in Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. In Cambodia, Khmer architecture favoured the Temple mountain style famously used in Angkor Wat, with a prang spire over the sanctum cell. Indonesian candi developed regional forms. In what is modern south and central Vietnam, Champa architecture built brick temples.

Destruction, conversion, and rebuilding Many Hindu temples have been destroyed, some, after rebuilding, several times. Deliberate temple destruction usually had religious motives. Richard Eaton has listed 80 campaigns of Hindu temple site destruction stretching over centuries, particularly from the 12th through the 18th century.[130] Others temples have served as non-Hindu places of worship, either after conversion or simultaneously with Hindu use.

In the 12th–16th century, during Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent and South Asia, Hindu temples, along with the temples of Buddhists and Jains, intermittently became targets of armies from Persian, Central Asian, and Indian sultanates. Imagined by these foreign zealots to be mere idols, sacred Forms of various deities were broken, spires and pillars were torn down, and temples were looted of their treasury. Some temples were converted into mosques, or parts used to build mosques.[131] There exist both Indian and Muslim traditions of religious toleration. Muslim rulers led campaigns of temple destruction and forbade repairs to damaged temples, following the Muslim traditions. The Delhi Sultanate destroyed a large number of temples; Sikandar the Iconoclast, Sultan of Kashmir, was also known for his intolerance.[132]

The 16th- and 19th-century Goa Inquisition destroyed hundreds of Hindu temples. All Hindu temples in Portuguese colonies in India were destroyed, according to a 1569 letter in the Portuguese royal archives.[133] Temples were not converted into churches.[citation needed] Religious conflict and desecrations of places of worship continued during the British colonial era.[134] Historian Sita Ram Goel's book "What happened to Hindu Temples" lists over 2000 sites where temples have been destroyed and mosques have been built over them. Some historians suggest that around 30,000 temples were destroyed by Islamic rulers between 1200 and 1800 CE. Destruction of Hindu temple sites was comparatively less in the southern parts of India, such as in Tamil Nadu. Cave-style Hindu temples that were carved inside a rock, hidden and rediscovered centuries later, such as the Kailasa Temple, have also preferentially survived. Many are now UNESCO world heritage sites.[135][better source needed]

In India, the Place of Worship (Special Provisions) Act was enacted in 1991 which prohibited the conversion of any religious site from the religion to which it was dedicated on 15 August 1947.[136][137][138]

Customs and etiquette

[edit]
Jagannath Temple at Puri, one of the Char Dham: the four main spiritual centers of Hinduism

In Hinduism, temples are considered sacred spaces where the divine is believed to manifest, and devotees visit these places to experience the presence and blessings of the deity. The customs and etiquette for visiting temples varies across India. Devotees in major temples may bring in symbolic offerings for the puja. This includes fruits, flowers, sweets and other symbols of the bounty of the natural world. Temples in India are usually surrounded with small shops selling these offerings.[143]

When inside the temple, devotees keep both hands folded (namaste mudra). The inner sanctuary, where the murtis reside, is known as the garbhagriha. It symbolizes the birthplace of the universe, the meeting place of the gods and humankind, and the threshold between the transcendental and the phenomenal worlds.[144] It is in this inner shrine that devotees seek darśana (seeing and being seen by the auspicious sight of the divine)[145] and offer prayers. Devotees may or may not be able to personally present their offerings at the feet of the deity. In most large Indian temples, only the pujaris (priest) are allowed to enter the main sanctum.[146]

Temple management staff typically announce the hours of operation, including timings for special pujas. These timings and nature of special puja vary from temple to temple. Additionally, there may be specially allotted times for devotees to perform pradakshina (circumambulations) around the temple.[146]

Visitors and worshipers to large Hindu temples may be required to deposit their shoes and other footwear before entering. Where this is expected, the temples provide an area and help staff to store footwear. Dress codes vary. It is customary in temples in Kerala, for men to remove shirts and to cover pants and shorts with a traditional cloth known as a Mundu.[147] In Java and Bali (Indonesia), before one enters the most sacred parts of a Hindu temple, shirts are required as well as a sarong around one's waist.[148] At many other locations, this formality is unnecessary.

Regional variations in Hindu temples

[edit]

Nagara Architecture of North Indian temples

[edit]

North Indian temples are referred to as Nagara style of temple architecture.[149] They have sanctum sanctorum where the deity is present, open on one side from where the devotee obtains darśana. There may or may not be many more surrounding corridors, halls, etc. However, there will be space for devotees to go around the temple in clockwise fashion circumambulation. In North Indian temples, the tallest towers are built over the sanctum sanctorum in which the deity is installed.[150]

The north India Nagara style of temple designs often deploy fractal-theme, where smaller parts of the temple are themselves images or geometric re-arrangement of the large temple, a concept that later inspired French and Russian architecture such as the matryoshka principle. One difference is the scope and cardinality, where Hindu temple structures deploy this principle in every dimension with garbhgriya as the primary locus, and each pada as well as zones serving as additional centers of loci. This makes a Nagara Hindu temple architecture symbolically a perennial expression of movement and time, of centrifugal growth fused with the idea of unity in everything.[149]

Temples in West Bengal

[edit]
Dakshineswar Kali Temple, Kolkata

In West Bengal, the Bengali terra cotta temple architecture is found. Due to lack of suitable stone in the alluvial soil locally available, the temple makers had to resort to other materials instead of stone. This gave rise to using terracotta as a medium for temple construction. Terracotta exteriors with rich carvings are a unique feature of Bengali temples. The town of Bishnupur in West Bengal is renowned for this type of architecture. There is also a popular style of building known as Naba-ratna (nine-towered) or Pancha-ratna (five-towered). An example of Navaratna style is the Dakshineswar Kali Temple.[151]

Temples in Odisha

[edit]

Odisha temple architecture is known as Kalinga architecture,[152] classifies the spire into three parts, the Bāḍa (lower limb), the Ganḍi (body) and the Cuḷa/Mastaka (head). Each part is decorated in a different manner. Kalinga architecture is a style which flourished in Kalinga, the name for kingdom that included ancient Odisha. It includes three styles: Rekha Deula, Pidha Deula and Khakhara Deula.[153] The former two are associated with Vishnu, Surya and Shiva temples while the third is mainly associated with Chamunda and Durga temples. The Rekha Deula and Khakhara Deula houses the sanctum sanctorum while the Pidha Deula style includes space for outer dancing and offering halls.

Temples of Goa and Konkani

[edit]
Saptakoteshwar Temple, Goa

The temple architecture of Goa is quite unique. As Portuguese colonial hegemony increased, Goan Hindu temples became the rallying point to local resistance.[154] Many these temples are not more than 500 years old, and are a unique blend of original Goan temple architecture, Dravidian, Nagar and Hemadpanthi temple styles with some British and Portuguese architectural influences. Goan temples were built using sedimentary rocks, wood, limestone and clay tiles, and copper sheets were used for the roofs. These temples were decorated with mural art called as Kavi kala or ocher art. The interiors have murals and wood carvings depicting scenes from the Hindu mythology.

South Indian and Sri Lankan temples

[edit]

South Indian temples have a large gopuram, a monumental tower, usually ornate, at the entrance of the temple. This forms a prominent feature of Koils, Hindu temples of the Dravidian style.[155] They are topped by the kalasam, a bulbous stone finial. They function as gateways through the walls that surround the temple complex.[156] The gopuram's origins can be traced back to early structures of the Tamil kings Pallavas; and by the twelfth century, under the Pandya rulers, these gateways became a dominant feature of a temple's outer appearance, eventually overshadowing the inner sanctuary which became obscured from view by the gopuram's colossal size.[157] It also dominated the inner sanctum in amount of ornamentation. Often a shrine has more than one gopuram.[158] They also appear in architecture outside India, especially Khmer architecture, as at Angkor Wat. A koil may have multiple gopurams, typically constructed into multiple walls in tiers around the main shrine. The temple's walls are typically square with the outer most wall having gopuras. The sanctum sanctorum and its towering roof (the central deity's shrine) are also called the vimanam.[159] The inner sanctum has restricted access with only priests allowed beyond a certain point.

Temples in Kerala

[edit]
Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

Temples in Kerala have a different architectural style (keeping the same essence of Vastu), especially due to climatic differences Kerala have with other parts of India with larger rainfall. The temple roof is mostly tiled and is sloped and the walls are often square, the innermost shrine being entirely enclosed in another four walls to which only the pujari (priest) enters. The walls are decorated with either mural paintings or rock sculptures which many times are emphasised on Dwarapalakas.

Temples in Tamil Nadu

[edit]
An aerial view of the Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangam in Srirangam, often known as Bhuloka Vaikuntham and First among the 108 Vaishnavate Divya Desams

The Srirangam Ranganathaswamy temple is the worlds largest functioning Hindu temple.[160] The temple is present in Tamil Nadu, the temple was first built by the Chola ruler, Dharmavarma. The Kaveri river flood destroyed the temple and vimanam submerged in the island, and later, the early Cholas King Killivalavan rebuilt the temple complex as is present today. Beyond the ancient textual history, archaeological evidence such as inscriptions refer to this temple, and these stone inscriptions are from late 100 BCE to 100 CE.[161] Hence, making it one of the Oldest surviving active temple complexes in South India. Later, the temple constructions reached its peak during the Pallavas era. They built various temples around Kancheepuram, and Narasimhavarman II built the Thirukadalmallai and Shore Temple in Mamallapuram, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The Pandyas rule created temples such as the Koodal Azhagar temple and Meenakshi Amman Temple at Madurai and Srivilliputhur Andal Temple at Srivilliputhur.[162] The Cholas were prolific temple builders right from the times of the first medieval king Vijayalaya Chola. The Chola temples include Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple at Srirangam, the Brihadeeshwarar temple at Tanjore, Brihadeeshwarar temple at Gangaikonda Cholapuram and the Airavatesvarar Temple of Darasuram which are among the UNESCO World Heritage Sites. The Nayaks of Madurai reconstructed some of the well-known temples in Tamil Nadu such as the Meenakshi Temple.[9] One of the southernmost famous temples in South India, the Ramanathaswamy Temple was built in the 17th century on the island of Rameshwaram in Tamil Nadu.[163]

Temples in Nepal

[edit]

The Pashupatinath temple in Kathmandu, Nepal is an important temple in Hinduism.[164] It is built in a pagoda style and is surrounded by hundreds of temples and buildings built by kings. The temples top is made from pure gold.

Pashupatinath Temple from the other bank of Bagmati river, Kathmandu, Nepal

Khmer Temples

[edit]
Art relief at the Hindu temple Banteay Srei in Cambodia

Angkor Wat was built as a Hindu temple by King Suryavarman II in the early 12th century in Yasodharapura (Khmer, present-day Angkor), the capital of the Khmer Empire, as his state temple and eventual mausoleum. Breaking from the Shaiva tradition of previous kings, Angkor Wat was instead dedicated to Vishnu. The Spire in Khmer Hindu temple is called Giri (mountain) and symbolizes the residence of gods just like Meru does in Bali Hindu mythology and Ku (Guha) does in Burmese Hindu mythology.[165]

Angkor Wat is just one of numerous Hindu temples in Cambodia, most of them in ruins. Hundreds of Hindu temples are scattered from Siem Reap to Sambor Prei Kuk in central Cambodian region.[166]

Temples in Indonesia

[edit]
Besakih Temple in Bali, Indonesia

Ancient Hindu temples in Indonesia are called Candi (read: chandi). Prior to the rise of Islam, between the 5th to 15th century Dharmic faiths (Hinduism and Buddhism) were the majority in Indonesian archipelago, especially in Java and Sumatra. As the result numerous Hindu temples, locally known as candi, constructed and dominated the landscape of Java. According to local beliefs, Java valley had thousands of Hindu temples which co-existed with Buddhist temples, most of which were buried in massive eruption of Mount Merapi in 1006 CE.[167][168]

Pura Ulun Danu Bratan, Bali, Indonesia

Between 1,100 and 1,500 additional Hindu temples were built, but abandoned by Hindus and Buddhists as Islam spread in Java circa 15th to 16th century.

In last 200 years, some of these have been rediscovered mostly by farmers while preparing their lands for crops. Most of these ancient temples were rediscovered and reconstructed between 19th to 20th century, and treated as the important archaeological findings and also as tourist attraction,[169] but not as the house of worship. Hindu temples of ancient Java bear resemblances with temples of South Indian style. The largest of these is the 9th century Javanese Hindu temple, Prambanan in Yogyakarta, now a UNESCO world heritage site. It was designed as three concentric squares and has 224 temples. The inner square contains 16 temples dedicated to major Hindu deities, of which Shiva temple is the largest.[170] The temple has extensive wall reliefs and carvings illustrating the stories from the Hindu epic Ramayana.[171]

Prambanan temple complex in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

In Bali, the Hindu temple is known as "Pura", which is designed as an open-air worship place in a walled compound. The compound walls have a series of intricately decorated gates without doors for the devotee to enter. The design, plan and layout of the holy pura follows a square layout.[172][173]

The majority of Hindu temples in Java were dedicated to Shiva, who Javanese Hindus considered as the God who commands the energy to destroy, recombine and recreate the cycle of life. Small temples were often dedicated to Shiva and his family (wife Durga, son Ganesha). Larger temple complexes include temples for Vishnu and Brahma, but the most majestic, sophisticated and central temple was dedicated to Shiva. The 732 CE Canggal inscription found in Southern Central Java, written in Indonesian Sanskrit script, eulogizes Shiva, calling him God par-excellence.[citation needed]

Temples in Vietnam

[edit]
Partially ruined Mỹ Sơn Hindu temple complex, Vietnam

There are a number of Hindu temple clusters built by the Champa Kingdoms along the coast of Vietnam, with some on UNESCO world heritage site list.[174] Examples include Mỹ Sơn—a cluster of 70 temples with earliest dated to be from the 4th century CE and dedicated to Siva, while others are dedicated to Hindu deities Krishna, Vishnu and others. These temples, internally and with respect to each other, are also built on the Hindu perfect square grid concept. Other sites in Vietnam with Hindu temples include Phan Rang with the Cham temple Po Klong Garai.[175]

Temples in Thailand

[edit]
Sri Mariamman Temple, Bangkok

Thailand has many notable Hindu temples including: the Sri Mariammam temple in Bangkok, the Devasathan, the Erawan Shrine, Prasat Muang Tam, Sdok Kok Thom and Phanom Rung. Most of the newer Hindu temples are of South Indian origin and were built by Tamil migrant communities. However, Thailand has many historic indigenous Hindu temples such as Phanom Rung. Although most indigenous Hindu temples are ruins, a few such as Devasathan in Bangkok are actively used.

Temples outside Asia

[edit]

Many members of the diaspora from the Indian subcontinent have established Hindu temples outside India as a means of preserving and celebrating cultural and spiritual heritage abroad. Describing the hundreds of temples that can be found throughout the United States, scholar Gail M. Harley observes, "The temples serve as central locations where Hindus can come together to worship during holy festivals and socialize with other Hindus. Temples in America reflect the colorful kaleidoscopic aspects contained in Hinduism while unifying people who are disbursed throughout the American landscape."[176] Numerous temples in North America and Europe have gained particular prominence and acclaim, many of which were built by the Bochasanwasi Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha. New Jersey and New York City have developed an exceptional variety of Hindu temples. The Ganesh temple of Hindu Temple Society of North America, in Flushing, Queens, New York City, is the oldest Hindu temple in the Western Hemisphere, and its canteen feeds 4,000 people a week, with as many as 10,000 during the Diwali (Deepavali) festival.[177] Meanwhile, the Om Sri Sai Balaji Temple in Monroe Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey, hosts the largest indoor Hanuman statue in the Western Hemisphere, embellished by a laser lighting display portraying the Ramayana and Hanuman's heroic accomplishments in this epic Hindu story.[178]

New York/New Jersey

[edit]

Outside New York/New Jersey

[edit]

Temple management

[edit]

The Archaeological Survey of India has control of most ancient temples of archaeological importance in India. In India, day-to-day activities of a temple is managed by a temple board committee that administers its finances, management, and events. Since independence, the autonomy of individual Hindu religious denominations to manage their own affairs with respect to temples of their own denomination has been severely eroded and the state governments have taken control of major Hindu temples in some countries; however, in others, such as the United States, private temple management autonomy has been preserved.

Etymology and nomenclature

[edit]
Hindu temple is located in India
Somnath
Somnath
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Rameshwaram
Rameshwaram
Hindu temple
Varanasi
Varanasi
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Badrinath
Badrinath
Puri
Puri
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Amarnath
Amarnath
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Hindu temple
Tirupati
Tirupati
" Ramappa Temple"
" Ramappa Temple"
Major Hindu temple sites for Tirtha and general tourism in India. Orange markers are UNESCO world heritage sites.

In Sanskrit, the liturgical language of Hinduism, the word mandira means "house" (Sanskrit: मन्दिर). Ancient Sanskrit texts use many words for temple, such as matha, vayuna, kirti, kesapaksha, devavasatha, vihara, suravasa, surakula, devatayatana, amaragara, devakula, devagrha, devabhavana, devakulika, and niketana.[180] Regionally, they are also known as prasada, vimana, kshetra, gudi, ambalam, punyakshetram, deval, deula, devasthanam, kovil, candi, pura, and wat.

The following are the other names by which a Hindu temple is referred to in India:

  • Devasthana (ದೇವಸ್ಥಾನ) in Kannada
  • Deul/Doul/Dewaaloy in Assamese and in Bengali
  • Deval/Raul/Mandir (मंदिर) in Marathi
  • Devro/Mindar in Rajasthani
  • Devala( 𑂠𑂵𑂫𑂪 ), Devalaya( 𑂠𑂵𑂫𑂰𑂪𑂨 ), Math(𑂧𑂘), Devaghar( 𑂠𑂵𑂫𑂐𑂩 ) or Mandira(𑂧𑂢𑂹𑂠𑂱𑂩) in Bhojpuri. Thakurbari(𑂘𑂍𑂳𑂩𑂥𑂰𑂚𑂲) and sivala(𑂮𑂱𑂫𑂰𑂪𑂰) are specially use of Krishna temple and Shiva temple respectively.
  • Deula (ଦେଉଳ) or Mandira(ମନ୍ଦିର) in Odia and Gudi in Kosali Odia
  • Gudi (గుడి), Devalayam (దేవాలయం), Devasthanam (దేవస్థానము), Kovela (కోవెల), Kshetralayam (క్షేత్రాలయం), Punyakshetram (పుణ్యక్షేత్రం), or Punyakshetralayam (పుణ్యక్షేత్రాలయం), Mandiramu (మందిరము) in Telugu
  • Kovil or kō-vill (கோவில்) and occasionally Aalayam (ஆலயம்) in Tamil; the Tamil word Kovil means "residence of God"[181]
  • Kshetram (ക്ഷേത്രം), Ambalam (അമ്പലം), Kovil (കോവിൽ), Devasthanam (ദേവസ്ഥാനം) or Devalayam (ദേവാലയം) in Malayalam
  • Mandir (मंदिर) in Hindi, Nepali, Kashmiri, Marathi, Punjabi (ਮੰਦਰ), Gujarati (મંદિર), and Urdu (مندر)[182]
  • Mondir (মন্দির) in Bengali

In Southeast Asia temples known as:

Temple sites

Some lands, including Varanasi, Puri, Kanchipuram, Dwarka, Amarnath, Kedarnath, Somnath, Mathura and Rameswara, are considered holy in Hinduism. They are called kṣétra (Sanskrit: क्षेत्र[183]). A kṣétra has many temples, including one or more major ones. These temples and its location attracts pilgrimage called tirtha (or tirthayatra).[184]

Konark Sun Temple panoramic view

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

A Hindu temple, referred to as a mandir in or devalaya in , is a sacred architectural complex dedicated to the ritual worship of one or more through the installation and veneration of a (consecrated idol) embodying divine presence. These structures function primarily as venues for puja (devotional offerings), darshan (visual communion with the ), and periodic festivals, while also serving as economic and social hubs that integrate cosmology, art, and community life. Constructed according to —an ancient Indian treatise on design harmonizing built form with natural forces and —temples feature hierarchical layouts symbolizing the universe, with the innermost sanctum () representing the cosmic womb housing the .
Hindu temple architecture manifests in distinct regional styles, such as the curvilinear Nagara towers of northern India, the pyramidal Dravida vimanas of the south, and hybrid Vesara forms, evolving from rudimentary shrines around the 5th century CE into monumental expressions of patronage by dynasties like the Cholas and Pallavas. This evolution reflects not only technological advancements in stone carving and structural engineering but also theological shifts emphasizing bhakti (devotional) traditions over Vedic fire altars, with temples acting as assertions of royal authority and cultural continuity amid historical invasions and reconstructions. Beyond India, Hindu temples proliferated in Southeast Asia, adapting local motifs while preserving core Vastu principles, as seen in complexes like Angkor Wat, underscoring the tradition's adaptability and enduring ritual efficacy. Notable modern examples, such as the BAPS Swaminarayan Akshardham in New Delhi, demonstrate contemporary adherence to classical canons using advanced materials, attracting millions for pilgrimage and highlighting the temple's role in sustaining Hindu identity globally.

Etymology and nomenclature

Linguistic origins

The Sanskrit term mandira (मन्दिर), commonly rendered in English as "mandir" or "temple," derives from roots connoting an enclosed or dwelling space, literally signifying a "house," especially the abode of a deity. This etymology aligns with its usage in ancient Hindu texts to denote a structure housing divine icons, emphasizing containment and sanctity over mere architectural form. Another foundational term, devalaya (देवालय), compounds deva ("deity" or "divine being," from the root div meaning "to shine" or "heavenly") with ālaya ("abode" or "residence," derived from the root implying adherence or clinging). This construction underscores the temple as the settled dwelling of gods, a concept rooted in Vedic notions of divine habitation traceable to texts like the Puranas, where it denotes permanent ritual sites. Terms like prasāda (प्रसाद) originate from the root sad ("to sit" or "dwell") prefixed with pra- ("forward" or "down"), yielding "settling" or "abode," often evoking multi-storied palaces in early literature such as the , where it implies elevated, divine residences. Similarly, āyatana (आयतन) stems from ā- ("towards") and yat ("going" or "striving"), connoting a "refuge" or foundational support for divine presence, as referenced in texts like the Viṣṇu Purāṇa for ritual bases. Vimāna (विमान), denoting the temple's tower or superstructure, derives from vi- ("apart" or "special") and māna ("measure"), signifying a "well-proportioned" or measured edifice, a term formalized in architectural shastras like the Mānasāra to prescribe geometric precision in construction. Less common designations such as harmya (हर्म्य), linked to elevated terraces or mansions in Vedic usage, reflect Indo-European cognates for lofty enclosures, adapting to temple contexts in epics to describe ornate, god-enclosing edifices. These terms collectively originate in (circa 1500–500 BCE), evolving through classical layers to encapsulate cosmological and ritual functions without direct borrowing from non-Indo-European sources.

Regional and scriptural terms

In ancient Hindu scriptures such as the and Agamas, temples are denoted by Sanskrit terms emphasizing their role as divine abodes. The term devalaya literally means "abode of the deity" and signifies the sacred enclosure housing the (idol) of the god, as described in texts outlining ritual and architectural prescriptions. Similarly, prasada refers to the temple structure as a "divine palace" or "seat of the god," symbolizing a pleasing edifice that manifests the deity's presence and adheres to cosmic proportions in Vastu principles. Other scriptural nomenclature includes devayatana (place of the god), devagṛha (house of the god), and (residence), which appear in Agamic governing Shaiva, Vaishnava, and Shakta temple rituals and construction from at least the early medieval period. These terms underscore the temple's function as a microcosmic replica of the universe, with the vimāna specifically denoting the crowning tower over the sanctum sanctorum in northern styles, as per Vastu treatises like the of (c. 6th century CE). Regional terminology for Hindu temples reflects linguistic diversity across India, adapting Sanskrit roots to local vernaculars while retaining theological essence. In Tamil Nadu, temples are commonly called kōvil or kovil, derived from dēvakōvil meaning "god's house," a usage prevalent in Dravidian Shaiva and Vaishnava sites since the Chola era (9th-13th centuries CE). Northern Hindi-speaking regions employ mandir, from Sanskrit mandira (pavilion or hall), emphasizing communal worship spaces, as seen in widespread usage for structures like those in and . In Kerala, kṣētram denotes a temple complex, often linked to sacred fields or pilgrimage centers, while Kannada regions use dēvasthāna (place of the gods) for sites in . Eastern variants include deul in Odia and Bengali for the curvilinear tower style, and Assamese dewalay mirroring Sanskrit forms. Beyond mainland , Balinese Hindu temples are termed pura, signifying an enclosed sacred precinct, distinct in Austronesian-influenced but rooted in Agamic traditions imported around the 8th century CE. These variations arise from historical migrations, dynastic patronage, and scriptural interpretations, with no single term dominating universally due to Hinduism's decentralized evolution.

Theological and symbolic foundations

Role in Hindu cosmology and worship

Hindu temples embody a cosmological framework wherein the structure replicates the universe's order, with the Vastu Purusha Mandala—a geometric grid derived from Vastu Shastra—serving as the foundational plan that pins down the cosmic being (Vastu Purusha) to the earthly site. This mandala divides the temple's square layout into precise modules aligned with cardinal directions, symbolizing the integration of supernatural forces and celestial movements into the built environment. The central sanctum (garbhagriha) corresponds to the cosmic core, akin to the primordial womb or the peak of Mount Meru, the mythical axis mundi in Hindu lore that links the mortal plane to divine realms. The temple's vertical elements, such as the towering (in northern styles) or (in southern), further manifest this cosmology by evoking as a conduit for cosmic energy, facilitating the descent of through ritual consecration. Priests perform , a ceremony infusing the deity's (idol) with vital breath, transforming the temple into a living axis for universal harmony. Encircling ambulatory paths and outer walls depict hierarchical cosmic layers, from earthly chaos to ordered divinity, ensuring the temple functions as a microcosm where human actions align with eternal principles. In worship, temples centralize practices, particularly puja, a sequence of offerings including (avahana), purification of the with water and scents, presentation of flowers, , lamps, and food (naivedya), culminating in (pradakshina). Darshan, the devotional gaze upon the deity, forms the experiential core, enabling a reciprocal visual exchange where the worshipper receives the deity's benevolent sight, believed to confer grace and dispel impurities. Daily aarti rituals, involving waved lamps before the amid chants, heighten this communion, drawing pilgrims to experience the temple as a vibrant nexus of cosmic and personal devotion. These practices underscore the temple's role not merely as a site but as an active participant in sustaining through structured, sensory engagement with the divine.

Symbolic elements and mandala principles

Hindu temples embody symbolic elements that reflect cosmological and metaphysical concepts from Vastu Shastra, functioning as a microcosm of the universe where the divine intersects the material world. The garbhagriha, the innermost sanctum housing the deity's image, symbolizes the cosmic womb or Brahmanda, the primordial egg encompassing creation, positioned as the generative core from which spiritual energy radiates. The vimana or shikhara, the curved tower above the sanctum, represents Mount Meru, the mythical axis mundi at the universe's center, bridging terrestrial and celestial realms while its repetitive motifs evoke fractal patterns mirroring natural order and infinite recursion. Mandala principles underpin temple layout through the Vastu Purusha , a square grid derived from ancient texts that maps cosmic energies onto the physical site. This depicts Vastu Purusha, a primordial giant subdued by deities and immobilized face-down on earth—head in the northeast, feet in the southwest—dividing the plane into 32, 64, or 81 squares (padams), each ruled by directional guardians or devatas to ensure harmonic alignment with natural forces. The central Brahmasthana square, often left open or housing the garbha, anchors the deity at the 's bindu or energetic nucleus, with peripheral zones prohibiting certain functions to avoid disrupting the Purusha's repose and cosmic balance. Common configurations include the 64-pad for larger temples, emphasizing even divisions for ritual precision, and the 81-pad Parama Sayika for complex plans, both adhering to cardinal orientations that integrate solar paths, winds, and stellar influences as prescribed in texts like the Mayamata and Manasara. These grids not only dictate spatial —elevating the sanctum while expanding paths—but also encode numerological symbolism, where square counts reflect progressive cosmic unfolding from unity to multiplicity.

Architectural designs and construction

Guiding texts: Vastu Shastra and Agamas

constitutes the core architectural canon for Hindu temples, prescribing guidelines for , orientation, proportions, and spatial with natural and cosmic forces. Rooted in Vedic references such as the Rig Veda's invocation of Vastospati as a protective and the Atharva Veda's association with Shilpa traditions, its principles emphasize the Vastu Purusha Mandala—a diagrammatic grid symbolizing the cosmic being laid upon the earth—to determine the temple's layout and sanctum placement. Key treatises like the Brihat Samhita, authored by Varahamihira in the CE, elaborate on these elements, drawing from earlier authorities including Maya and Visvakarma to specify measurements, materials, and directional alignments for sacred structures. Later texts such as the Mayamata and Manasara further detail regional variations, particularly for Dravida-style southern temples, ensuring the edifice serves as a microcosmic replica of the . Agamas, distinct yet complementary to , are post-Vedic theological scriptures that integrate temple construction with ritual practices, focusing on deity-specific worship in the Kriya pada, which covers building techniques, idol carving, and consecration ceremonies. Classified into Shaiva, Vaishnava, and Shakta lineages, these texts tailor architectural directives to sectarian needs—Shaiva Agamas for Shiva-centric designs emphasizing esoteric symbolism, and Vaishnava traditions like for temples with structured processional paths and iconographic precision. Unlike the more universal , which prioritizes geometric and environmental alignment, Agamas derive authority from tantric revelations and flourished alongside the from the 10th-11th centuries CE, mandating rituals that infuse the physical temple with spiritual potency. This synthesis ensures temples function not merely as buildings but as living conduits for divine presence, with Agamic prescriptions overriding general Vastu rules where ritual exigencies demand.

Core structural elements and layouts

The , or , forms the nucleus of every Hindu temple, housing the primary (idol) of the deity and representing the temple's spiritual core. This chamber is typically square in plan, aligned with cardinal directions, and accessible only to priests for rituals, emphasizing its role as the deity's abode. Surrounding the are paths (pradakshina) for , allowing devotees to perform without entering the sanctum. Adjoining the garbhagriha is the mandapa, a pillared hall serving as an assembly space for worshippers during rituals, dances, or discourses. In northern Nagara-style temples, the superstructure above the garbhagriha culminates in a curvilinear shikhara (tower), symbolizing and often adorned with amalaka (disc-shaped capstone) and kalasha (pinnacle). Southern Dravida-style temples feature a stepped pyramidal vimana over the sanctum, distinct from the taller, ornate gopurams (gateway towers) marking enclosure entrances. Vesara temples, prevalent in the Deccan, blend these with star-shaped plans and hybrid superstructures. Temple layouts derive from the Vastu , a metaphysical grid superimposing the cosmic (universal being) onto the site, dictating spatial hierarchy and proportions. Common configurations include the 64-pada (8x8) for modest temples, where the garbha griha occupies the central four padas, and the 81-pada (9x9) Parama Sayika for larger complexes, enabling expansion via offset projections (). These grids ensure , with the deity at the brahmasthana (navel center), and peripheral zones for subordinate shrines or enclosures, harmonizing microcosmic with macrocosmic order. Structural offsets and projections, such as ardhamandapa (antechamber) and mahamandapa (main hall), extend from the core, with walls featuring (pot), pada (base), and (entablature) moldings for elevation rhythm. Site-specific adaptations, like terraced bases in hilly regions or water-adjacent placements, maintain Vastu alignment while accommodating , as seen in early examples adhering to 32 prescribed variants.

Building materials, teams, and site selection

Site selection for Hindu temples follows principles outlined in ancient texts like the , emphasizing auspicious topography, orientation, and environmental features to align with cosmic harmony. Preferred locations include elevated grounds near rivers, lakes, or seashores, which are believed to enhance spiritual potency through natural water sources symbolizing purity and life force. Plots should ideally be square or rectangular, with alignments parallel to magnetic north-south axes to ensure directional stability, and temples oriented eastward to receive sunrise energies. Soil testing via auguring or animal behavior observation determines fertility and stability, avoiding marshy, barren, or haunted lands that could invite misfortune. Building materials prioritize durable, locally sourced stone for permanence, reflecting the temple's role as an eternal abode for the divine; prevails in southern for its hardness and resistance to weathering, as seen in the 1.3 tons used for structures like the , transported via elephants from distant quarries. and serve northern and central regions, carved precisely for intricate reliefs, while lime-based mortars—made from burnt shells or mixed with herbal additives—bind stones without modern , ensuring seismic resilience as evidenced in structures enduring over 1,000 years. Wood and appear in ancillary structures or earlier phases, but stone dominates core edifices to symbolize unyielding devotion, with avoidance of iron to prevent ritual impurity. Construction teams operate under a guild system rooted in Shilpa Shastra, led by the sthapati—the master architect akin to Visvakarma, responsible for overall design, site consecration, and scriptural adherence. Supporting them are shilpins (sculptors and masons) trained in familial lineages, handling carving and assembly, often numbering in hundreds for major projects; for instance, teams of 300 shilpis collaborate under a lead sthapati for global builds. Sutradharas oversee measurements and quality, while laborers manage quarrying and transport, with the process spanning decades and involving ritual initiations to infuse sanctity. These specialized villages, such as those in Tamil Nadu, preserve oral and textual knowledge, ensuring precision without mechanization.

Historical evolution

Ancient origins and early examples (pre-500 CE)

The practice of enshrining deities in dedicated structures emerged gradually in ancient , coinciding with the shift from Vedic aniconic fire rituals to iconographic worship influenced by traditions in the post-Mauryan era. However, verifiable archaeological remains of Hindu temples prior to the Gupta dynasty (c. 320–550 CE) are absent, with earlier references in texts like the or Mahabharana describing shrine-like pavilions likely constructed from perishable materials such as wood or thatch, which have not survived. Relief depictions on 2nd-century BCE Buddhist stupa railings at and Sanchi suggest proto-temple forms with curved roofs ( precursors), but these represent artistic motifs rather than confirmed Hindu structures. The Gupta period marks the advent of durable Hindu temple architecture, beginning with rock-cut caves that adapted natural sandstone formations into shrines for Vaishnava, Shaiva, and Shakta deities. The near , , excavated circa 400 CE under (r. 375–415 CE), exemplify this early phase, comprising 20 caves with Hindu sanctuaries featuring sculptures like the monumental (boar incarnation of ) relief in Cave 5, symbolizing cosmic rescue, and a lingam in Cave 7. An inscription in Cave 6, dated explicitly to 401 CE and recording a donation by official Virasena, confirms the site's patronage and places it among the earliest datable Hindu religious complexes. Concurrent developments included experimental and stone structural temples, transitioning from cave models to freestanding forms with simple square (sanctum) plans. Excavations at Pawaya (ancient Padmavati) reveal terraced shrines dedicated to Brahmanical worship, datable to the early CE via Gupta-era artifacts, while rudimentary flat-roofed shrines at sites like Nachna-Kuthara indicate nascent Nagara-style elements like pillared mandapas. These pre-500 CE examples, limited in scale and primarily royal-sponsored, reflect the Guptas' promotion of orthodox amid competition with , laying foundational typologies for later expansions. No evidence supports widespread temple construction before this era, underscoring a causal link between imperial consolidation and institutionalized worship.

Medieval expansions and Islamic-era destructions (500-1800 CE)

During the early medieval period, Hindu temple architecture flourished under regional dynasties in South and , with innovations in Dravidian and Nagara styles emphasizing towering gopurams, intricate carvings, and expansive complexes. The Pallavas (c. 600–900 CE) pioneered structural temples, exemplified by the at Mahabalipuram, constructed around 700 CE as a twin shrine to and , marking a shift from rock-cut to freestanding edifices. The Cholas (c. 850–1279 CE) elevated Dravidian grandeur, with completing the Brihadeeswarar Temple in in 1010 CE, featuring a 66-meter built with a single massive granite block atop, symbolizing imperial piety and engineering prowess; his son followed with the Temple around 1030 CE, incorporating advanced water management and bronze iconography. In the Deccan and elsewhere, Chalukyas (c. 543–753 CE) blended styles at sites like , where the Virupaksha Temple (c. 734 CE) showcased hybrid Nagara-Dravidian elements under . The Hoysalas (c. 1026–1343 CE) refined sculpting in star-shaped plans, as in the Chennakesava Temple at Belur (1117 CE) and Hoysaleswara at (1121 CE), with profuse friezes depicting epics and daily life. Northern Chandela kings erected the temples (c. 900–1130 CE), peaking with the Kandariya Mahadeva (c. 1030 CE), a Nagara exemplar with 84 miniature spires and explicit erotic motifs integrated into Shaivite devotion. Kakatiyas contributed the (1213 CE) in , known for floating brick construction resistant to earthquakes, while Eastern Ganga rulers built the (c. 1250 CE) in , a chariot-shaped marvel later partially ruined. The (1336–1646 CE) synthesized prior traditions in its capital , erecting over 1,000 monuments including the Virupaksha Temple (14th century, expanded continuously) and Vitthala Temple (15th–16th centuries) with musical pillars and rathas, fostering a amid northern threats. These expansions persisted in southern strongholds, supported by royal patronage, agrarian surplus, and devotional movements like , yielding thousands of temples that embodied cosmological mandalas and ritual functionality. From the , Arab incursions in escalated into sustained Turkic and Afghan invasions, leading to targeted temple destructions as acts of , loot, and political subjugation, documented in perpetrator chronicles like those of Utbi and Ferishta. raided northwestern 17 times (1001–1026 CE), culminating in the 1025 CE sack of in , where his forces looted 20 million dirhams in gold and jewels, smashed the , and massacred 50,000 defenders, as recorded by contemporary Persian historian Al-Utbi; the temple, a pilgrimage hub, was razed and its remnants repurposed. Successors like (1175–1206 CE) demolished temples in and , converting sites into mosques, such as the Quwwat-ul-Islam over 27 Jain and Hindu shrines (1193 CE). Under the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE), rulers like Iltutmish, Alauddin Khilji, and the Tughlaqs desecrated over 80 documented major temples, often in response to rebellion or to finance wars, per epigraphic records analyzed by historian Richard Eaton, though this figure likely understates total losses given unrecorded rural sites and archaeological biases in secular historiography. Bahmani and Deccan sultans targeted southern temples, destroying the Srirangam Temple's outer walls (14th century) and Idar fortifications. Mughal emperors varied: Akbar protected some, but Shah Jahan demolished parts of Kashi Vishwanath (1632 CE), and Aurangzeb systematically ordered demolitions, issuing a farman on April 9, 1669, for the full razing of Kashi Vishwanath Temple to build the Gyanvapi Mosque, completed by September 1669 per Maasir-i-Alamgiri; he followed with the Keshav Dev Temple in Mathura (February 1670), erecting the Shahi Idgah atop its ruins, actions corroborated by court bulletins and European traveler accounts like François Bernier. These iconoclastic campaigns, motivated by theological injunctions against idolatry in Islamic jurisprudence (e.g., hadith on breaking idols) and economic imperatives, affected an estimated hundreds to thousands of temples, with primary evidence from Islamic texts celebrating such acts—e.g., Ferishta on Ghazni's "jihad"—contrasting apologetic modern narratives that frame them solely as political reprisals. Northern India saw greater devastation, disrupting patronage and urban economies, yet southern dynasties like Vijayanagara rebuilt and innovated defensively, reclaiming sites like Somnath (rebuilt 14 times by 1951). Archaeological remnants, such as lingam fragments under mosques, and Persian records affirm the scale, underscoring causal links between conquest doctrines and material destruction beyond mere warfare.

Colonial interventions and declines (1800-1947)

The British East India Company's initial non-interference policy in religious matters evolved into administrative interventions as colonial courts adjudicated disputes over temple endowments, often citing embezzlement by priests and trustees. In the , Regulation VII of 1817 empowered district collectors to oversee endowments for major temples, appointing agents to manage revenues amid reports of local mismanagement following the decline of princely patronage. Similar oversight extended to through regulations on debutter properties in the , where courts invalidated hereditary rights deemed inefficient, leading to under government control. The Religious Endowments Act of 1863 marked a pivotal shift, authorizing the formation of secular committees to administer Hindu and Jain temples, ostensibly devolving authority from direct colonial oversight to local bodies while retaining judicial supervision. In practice, this entrenched bureaucratic interference, with committees often dominated by British officials or aligned elites, resulting in complaints of corruption, fund misallocation, and neglect of rituals; for example, temple revenues were redirected to secular uses or siphoned amid inadequate audits. Economic strains intensified under land revenue policies like the and zamindari systems, which imposed fixed assessments on temple-held estates—comprising up to 20% of in some South Indian districts—eroding maintenance funds as collections prioritized colonial treasuries over repairs. The founding of the in 1861 introduced conservation efforts that treated ancient Hindu temples as historical monuments, restricting modifications or active worship to prevent "vandalism" by devotees, as seen in sites like those in the Deccan where structural preservation clashed with traditional expansions. This custodial approach, coupled with the loss of sovereign grants post-annexations (e.g., after the 1857 uprising), contributed to widespread disrepair; surveys noted dilapidated gopurams and shrines across by the 1880s, attributable to revenue shortfalls rather than deliberate . Pilgrim taxes, such as the 1-2 anna levy at from the 1820s, further burdened operations, yielding colonial revenue but deterring visitors and underscoring temples' transformation into fiscal assets. By the , provincial acts like the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act of 1925 formalized boards with taxing powers over temple incomes, ostensibly for accountability but criticized for enabling political and diverting assets—e.g., Tirupati's endowments faced audits revealing discrepancies. These measures, while curbing some abuses, eroded traditional , fostering dependency on state mechanisms that persisted beyond 1947, amid a broader decline in temple-centered economies as and critiques diminished endowments.

Post-independence revivals and reclamations

The reconstruction of the in marked the first major post-independence revival of a historically desecrated Hindu site. Initiated by on November 13, 1947, shortly after India's independence, the project aimed to restore the temple destroyed multiple times, most notably by in 1026 CE. Construction progressed under the oversight of K.M. Munshi, with the temple's pran pratishtha (consecration) performed on May 11, 1951, by President , despite opposition from Prime Minister who preferred state funding be avoided for religious sites. This effort symbolized national resolve to reclaim , funded primarily through public donations exceeding 1 rupees by 1951. Subsequent decades saw sporadic restorations of ancient temples managed by the (ASI), with over 1,500 Hindu temples under its control receiving maintenance, though critics note inadequate funding and delays in reviving full ritual functions. Legal reclamations gained momentum in the 2010s, exemplified by the Supreme Court's November 9, 2019, verdict in the , which allocated 2.77 acres of disputed land to a trust for constructing the , based on archaeological evidence of a pre-existing 12th-century temple structure beneath the demolished in 1992. The temple's construction, overseen by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, culminated in its inauguration on , 2024, drawing over 100,000 devotees initially and boosting local economy through pilgrimage infrastructure. This ruling acknowledged Hindu continuous possession claims while directing alternative land for a mosque, balancing evidentiary findings against the 1991 Places of Worship Act's intent to maintain 1947 status quo, though the Act faces ongoing constitutional challenges. In , the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor project, launched March 2019 by Prime Minister , expanded the temple complex from 2,700 square feet to over 500,000 square feet, connecting it directly to the ghats via demolition of intervening structures and restoration of 40+ heritage temples. Costing approximately 800 rupees and inaugurated December 13, 2021, the initiative enhanced pilgrim access and preserved artifacts like ancient idols unearthed during works, reflecting a broader governmental push for dharmic site revitalization amid disputes over adjacent where court-ordered surveys since 2022 have revealed temple remnants. These efforts contrast with stalled reclamations at sites like Mathura's Krishna Janmabhoomi, where over 110 petitions seek surveys but face delays under the 1991 Act, highlighting judicial caution despite ASI reports confirming historical temple foundations in multiple cases.

Social, economic, and cultural roles

Preservation of knowledge and education

Hindu temples, often integrated with mathas (monastic institutions), functioned as key repositories for preserving ancient through manuscript collections and as hubs for in Vedic texts, , astronomy, , and . These institutions maintained libraries where scribes copied and safeguarded palm-leaf , ensuring the transmission of Shastras, Itihasas, and across generations despite invasions and environmental threats. In , temples under the (9th–13th centuries CE) exemplified this role, with structures like those in the Cauvery Delta incorporating lecture halls for expositions on Vedangas and higher learning, supported by royal endowments that provided free scholarships, boarding, and lodging for students. Mathas attached to temples extended this educational mandate, evolving from ancient ashramas into formalized centers where acharyas instructed disciples in Mimamsa, , Tarka, and even Buddhist literature for comparative study. In medieval (late 11th–early 12th centuries CE under the Kalyana Chalukyas), Saraswathi mathas—predominantly linked to Shaiva temples and positioned on their southern sides—operated as residential gurukulas open to students of all castes, with examples including the Trikuteshwara temple at Gadag and a Belur inscription recording donations sustaining 500 pupils. These mathas emphasized oral and written transmission of knowledge, fostering scholars who composed commentaries and stotrams while integrating practical training in music, , and . Archaeological and epigraphic evidence underscores temples' custodial function, with collections in and temples yielding over 50,000 digitized pages from 15th–17th century manuscripts on diverse subjects, including texts and sciences. Ghatikas and agraharas ( settlements endowed by temples) complemented this, resembling proto-universities that disseminated ethical and dharmic to communities, thereby sustaining cultural continuity amid historical disruptions. This system prioritized empirical transmission over rote memorization, with traveling acharyas extending temple-based learning to remote areas.

Community welfare: Hospitals, kitchens, and monasteries

![Shri Jagannatha Temple, site of extensive communal kitchens][float-right] Hindu temples have long functioned as centers for community welfare, extending beyond worship to include medical care, food distribution, and monastic support. Inscriptions from the reveal organized attached to temples, providing treatment based on Ayurvedic principles. For instance, an inscription dated 1067 CE at the Venkateshwar Temple in Tirumakudal, commissioned by King Veera Rajendra Deva, describes a 15-bed staffed by a physician, surgeon, herb gatherers, and attendants, funded by temple endowments with salaries paid in paddy and provisions for 20 medicines, rice, lamps, and even a . Similar facilities, known as vaidyasalai, were maintained by temple revenues to serve devotees, scholars, and the local populace, reflecting a tradition where temples integrated healing as a religious duty. Communal kitchens, embodying the principle of annadanam (food donation), operate in many temples to provide free meals irrespective of caste or creed, drawing from dedicated endowments and donations. The (TTD) kitchen, one of the largest in , serves 35,000 to 45,000 pilgrims daily with vegetarian fare prepared from 10 to 12 tons of rice, expanding to over 200,000 on auspicious days since its formal start in 1985. At the Jagannath Temple in , the rosha ghara kitchen produces up to 56 dishes of mahaprasad daily, with capacity for 100,000 servings using traditional wood-fired methods, ensuring no waste through sacred distribution. These operations sustain pilgrims and the needy, funded by temple income and viewed as paramount charity in . Monasteries or mathas, often integrated with temple complexes, serve as hubs for ascetic residence, , and welfare, hosting scholars, sannyasis, and students while providing , shelter, and instruction in scriptures. Established prominently by in the 8th century CE, mathas like those at and Kanchi function as socio-economic units tied to temples, running schools, hostels, and relief efforts for famines or disasters, with farmlands supporting communal feeding. They preserve knowledge through teaching and Shastras, offer aid to the poor and elderly, and maintain goshalas, reinforcing temples' role in holistic community support.

Economic functions and temple economies

Hindu temples historically functioned as multifaceted economic institutions, managing vast land endowments granted by rulers and devotees, which supported agricultural production and generated revenue through crop yields and taxation of tenants. In medieval during the Chola period (c. 850–1279 CE), temples like those in administered extensive estates, employing laborers for farming and , while overseeing the collection of produce such as paddy and gold equivalents for exchanges. These operations not only sustained temple rituals but also stimulated local economies by fostering in commodities linked to temple demands, including textiles, spices, and metals. Temples also served as proto-banks, securely storing devotees' , jewelry, and other valuables donated over centuries, and extending loans to merchants, guilds, and farmers against collateral, thereby facilitating across ancient networks. This financial intermediation, rooted in the temples' perceived sanctity and organizational stability, predated formal banking systems and supported long-distance by guilds, with temples acting as trusted depositories for movable wealth during travel or political instability. In regions like under Chola patronage, temple assemblies resolved disputes over loans and deposits, integrating economic oversight with religious authority. Employment generation formed another core economic pillar, with temples sustaining thousands through roles in priesthood, craftsmanship, , , and maintenance, often funded by fixed shares of agricultural output or pilgrimage fees. Surrounding temple complexes developed into market hubs, drawing pilgrims who boosted demand for lodging, food, and artisanal goods, thus catalyzing and ancillary businesses in ancient and . In contemporary , temple economies persist and expand, with aggregate contributions estimated at ₹6 annually, driven by donations, offerings, and . The (TTD), managing the Temple, exemplifies this scale, reporting a of ₹5,145 in FY25 from sources including ₹1,400 in yearly collections and gold holdings exceeding 11,000 kg valued at over ₹8,000 . These revenues fund not only temple operations but also , , and healthcare initiatives, underscoring temples' enduring role as self-sustaining economic entities amid modern governance.

Rituals, customs, and practices

Daily and periodic worship rituals

Daily worship in Hindu temples, termed nitya puja, follows prescriptions from Agama Shastras, which outline rituals treating the as a royal sovereign requiring scheduled ministrations. (pujaris) perform these services multiple times daily, typically four to six sessions aligning with the 's "daily routine," commencing at dawn with the sanctum's opening and chants to rouse the idol from repose. The core sequence incorporates abhishekam, a ritual ablution pouring consecrated liquids like milk, curd, honey, ghee, and water over the murti (idol) to signify purification and vitality infusion, often accompanied by mantra recitations. This precedes alankaram, adorning the deity with fresh attire, garlands, sacred ash or sandal paste (vibhuti or chandanam), and jewelry, followed by naivedyam, presentation of prepared vegetarian foods as offerings, which are later distributed as prasadam to devotees. Culminating each session is aarti, waving camphor or ghee lamps before the murti while ringing bells, blowing conches, and chanting hymns, enabling participants to absorb divine energy via the flame's tejas. Schedules vary by sect and locale—Shaiva temples emphasize Rudra-centric ablutions, while Vaishnava ones incorporate sahasranama recitations—but common timings include morning (circa 6-9 AM), midday (noon), evening (6-8 PM), and night (8-10 PM) aartis, with temples like those in Tirupati conducting over 100,000 daily ritual acts collectively. Periodic rituals, classified as naimittika puja in Agamic texts, occur on calendrical markers like lunar tithis, weekdays, or stellar nakshatras to harness cosmic auspiciousness, distinct from ad hoc kamya rites for personal aims. Weekly observances include enhanced pujas on planetary weekdays, such as Somavara (Mondays) for Shiva with prolonged abhishekams using bilva leaves, or Ravivara (Sundays) for Surya with fire offerings. Monthly cycles feature Pradosham (13th-14th lunar days, twice per cycle) in Shaiva traditions for twilight Rudra worship involving mass chanting of Rudram, and Ekadashi (11th day) in Vaishnava temples for Vishnu-focused fasting, processions, and vishnu sahasranamam recitations, drawing lakhs of pilgrims to sites like Tirupati where attendance surges 20-50% on these dates. New moon (amavasya) and full moon (purnima) entail tarpana (ancestral libations) integrated into temple proceedings, while annual escalations tie into broader festivals, ensuring rituals sync with sidereal and lunisolar almanacs for maximal efficacy per Vedic-astrological causality.

Festival observances and pilgrimages

Hindu temples serve as central venues for major festivals, where devotees engage in collective rituals emphasizing devotion, purification, and communal feasting. During , the festival of lights observed in October or November according to the , temples illuminate with rows of oil lamps and host to invoke prosperity, accompanied by and recitations from scriptures like the . , celebrated in February or March, features all-night vigils in Shiva temples, with offerings of milk and bilva leaves to the , fasting, and meditative chants to honor 's cosmic dance of creation and destruction. Navratri, spanning nine nights in September-October, centers on Devi temples with elaborate dances like garba and processions depicting Durga's victory over , culminating in Dussehra rituals involving effigy burnings symbolizing good's triumph over evil. Specific temple festivals draw millions, such as the Rath Yatra at in , , held annually in June or July, where deities , , and are paraded on massive wooden chariots pulled by devotees over a 3-kilometer route, reenacting a mythical journey to . The 2025 event occurred on June 27, involving rituals like (ceremonial bathing) beforehand and attracting over 10 million participants, underscoring the festival's role in fostering through physical labor and darshan. Pilgrimages, or yatras, involve arduous journeys to temple clusters believed to confer spiritual merit and moksha. The Char Dham Yatra in Uttarakhand encompasses four Himalayan shrines—Yamunotri, Gangotri, Kedarnath, and Badrinath—visited sequentially from May to November, with pilgrims trekking or using helicopters to access sites at altitudes exceeding 3,000 meters, drawing approximately 3-4 million annually for ablutions and deity worship. The Kumbh Mela, held every three years at rotating sites like Prayagraj and Haridwar, peaks in a 12-year Maha Kumbh cycle and integrates temple akharas (monastic orders) in river immersions at triveni sangams, with the 2025 Prayagraj event recording over 15 million on the first bathing day alone and totaling around 400 million visitors for sadhus' discourses and ritual baths linked to amrita myths. These gatherings emphasize ritual purity through snana (bathing) and yagna near sacred temples, though logistical challenges like crowd management persist.

Etiquette for devotees and visitors

Devotees and visitors to Hindu temples are expected to observe rituals of purity and respect, beginning with personal cleanliness and modest attire. Prior to entry, individuals should bathe and wear clothing that covers the shoulders, torso, and legs, avoiding shorts, tank tops, or revealing garments; traditional Indian attire such as sarees or dhotis is preferred for devotees, while elegant conservative dress suffices for visitors. Leather items, including belts and bags, are typically prohibited due to the sanctity of cows in Hinduism. Upon arrival, must be removed at the entrance to maintain the sanctity of the inner spaces, a practice rooted in preserving ritual purity. Hands and feet may be washed at provided facilities, especially for devotees intending to participate in . Mobile phones should be silenced or turned off, and is often restricted in core areas to avoid disturbance during rituals. No food, drinks, or external offerings are permitted in the main halls, though prasad (sanctified food) distributed by priests may be accepted with the right hand. Inside the temple, silence is maintained to honor the deities and ongoing pujas, with devotees and visitors refraining from loud conversation or running. Physical contact with murtis (deity idols) or entry into the garbha griha () is forbidden for non-priests, as these spaces are reserved for ritual sanctity. , or pradakshina, around shrines proceeds clockwise as a mark of reverence, symbolizing the cosmic path. Devotees may ring bells, offer flowers or via priests, bow with folded hands (), or engage in silent recitation, while visitors observe respectfully without interference. Pointing feet toward deities is avoided, as it connotes disrespect. Certain restrictions apply based on temple traditions; for instance, some orthodox sites bar women during menstruation to uphold purity norms derived from ancient texts like the Manusmriti, though this varies and is not universally enforced in modern or diaspora temples. Non-Hindus may face limitations in inner sanctums at select pilgrimage sites, prioritizing devotee access during peak rituals. Smoking, alcohol, and non-vegetarian items are prohibited on premises to align with ahimsa (non-violence) principles. These guidelines, drawn from temple managements and Hindu organizations, ensure communal harmony and spiritual focus.

Regional variations in India

Northern Nagara style

The Northern Nagara style constitutes the predominant form of in northern and , distinguished by its curvilinear tower or rising vertically above the (), symbolizing , the cosmic axis in . This style adheres to principles outlined in ancient texts like the Vishnudharmottara Purana and Brihat Samhita, emphasizing geometric precision derived from the Vastu Purusha Mandala, a grid system representing the cosmic man (). Temples typically feature a square with an ambulatory path (pradakshina), a pillared assembly hall (), and often an antechamber (ardhamandapa), constructed primarily from or for durability and sculptural detail. Key structural elements include the shikhara, which evolves from a simple curved form to clustered replicas (urushringa) in mature examples, capped by an amalaka (cogged disc) and kalasha (pinnacle pot). The elevation incorporates rhythmic offsets (rathas)—projections and recesses on the facade—creating a cruciform plan that enhances visual ascent and accommodates intricate iconography depicting deities, mythical scenes, and celestial motifs. Interior spaces prioritize axial alignment toward the deity's image, with minimal natural light to foster a contemplative atmosphere, contrasting with the more open enclosures of southern styles. The style's origins trace to the Gupta period (c. 5th century CE), where early prototypes like the Temple at Deogarh (c. 500 CE) introduced the proto- over a flat-roofed , marking a shift from rock-cut caves to free-standing structures. By the post-Gupta era (6th-8th centuries CE), regional dynasties refined the form, as seen in the brick temples of and the structural innovations under the Maukharis and Gurjaras-Pratiharas. The medieval phase (9th-13th centuries CE) witnessed peak elaboration under patrons like the Chandelas of , who erected over 20 surviving temples at between 950 and 1050 CE, including the (c. 1030 CE), the largest with 84 miniature shikharas symbolizing abundance. These exemplify clustered towers and profuse erotic and narrative carvings, reflecting Tantric influences without deviating from orthodox Shaiva or Vaishnava . Further variants emerged in western regions, such as the Paramara temples of (e.g., Udayapur Temple, c. 1050 CE) with stepped bases (jagati) and enhanced mandapas, and in under the Chauhans, featuring lattice screens (jalis) for ventilation. The style's adaptability is evident in its adherence to grid-based planning: smaller shrines on 16- or 32-square Vastu grids, while grander ones employ 64-square (manduka) or 81-square (parama sayika) mandalas to align with ritual function. Despite invasions and decline post-13th century, the Nagara idiom persists in modern reconstructions, underscoring its enduring cosmological framework.

Eastern and central styles (Odisha, Bengal)

The Kalinga style of temple architecture in emerged as a prominent Eastern Indian variant, characterized by the use of khondalite stone and featuring a sanctum (deul or ) paired with a rectangular pillared hall (jagamohana). This style flourished from the 6th to 13th centuries under dynasties such as the Somavamshis and Eastern Gangas, with temples emphasizing verticality through curvilinear rekha deulas for sanctums dedicated to deities like , , and . Three primary subtypes include the tall, smooth rekha deula for the main tower, the stepped pidha deula for assembly halls, and the barrel-vaulted khakhara deula often for worship. Prominent examples include the 11th-century Lingaraj Temple in , a temple complex spanning over 250,000 square feet with intricate carvings of deities and mythical scenes, and the 13th-century , constructed around 1250 CE by King Narasimhadeva I of the as a chariot-shaped monument with 24 wheels and seven horses symbolizing the sun's movement. The Jagannath Temple in , rebuilt in the 12th century under Anantavarman Chodaganga Deva, exemplifies the style's integration of Vaishnava devotion with pyramidal roofs and multidirectional entrances, drawing millions for the annual Rath Yatra festival. These structures prioritize structural stability through deep foundations and precise stone interlocking, reflecting empirical adaptations to seismic activity in the region. In , temple architecture diverged toward brick-and-terracotta construction, influenced by local alluvial soils and Islamic restrictions on stone use during medieval periods, resulting in low-rising edifices with curved, thatch-inspired roofs rather than towering spires. The style evolved from Pala-Sena eras (9th-13th centuries), featuring do-chala (single ridged roof), char-chala (four-roofed), and jor-bangla (twin-roofed) forms, often adorned with narrative terracotta plaques depicting , , and daily life scenes. Unlike Odisha's stone monoliths, Bengali temples emphasize horizontal expanse and ornamental facades, with ekkaratna (single-towered) and (nine-towered) variants emerging in later Sultanate and Mughal times. Key Bengal examples include the 16th-century Rasmancha in Bishnupur, a terracotta-clad pyramid-roofed structure built by the Malla kings for Vaishnava rituals, and the 17th-century Shyam Rai Temple, showcasing curved cornices and densely carved panels exceeding 2,000 individual motifs. The 19th-century near , designed by Rammohan Roy's disciple, adopts a nine-spired layout on the , blending Bengali vernacular with radial symmetry for Tantric worship. These adaptations prioritized flood-resistant elevated platforms and for durability, causally linked to the deltaic environment's high humidity and monsoons. While sharing Eastern roots in Nagara influences, Odisha's emphasis on vertical symbolism contrasts Bengal's narrative horizontality, with the latter's terracotta medium enabling mass-produced, regionally specific over Odisha's carved stone precision.

Western and Goan variants

Hindu temples in , primarily in and , represent adaptations of the Nagara style with regional innovations suited to local materials and patronage. In , the Māru-Gurjara or Solanki style predominates, characterized by intricate stone carvings on walls (mandovara), ornate entrances (kirti-torana), and often accompanying temple tanks (kunda). These temples feature clustered spires, lathe-turned pillars, and profuse sculptural decoration depicting mythological scenes, with examples like the 11th-century Sun Temple built by King Bhimdev I in 1026 CE, showcasing a stepped podium and elaborate water features integrated into the complex. The style evolved under Solanki rulers from the 10th to 13th centuries, emphasizing geometric precision and symbolic cosmology aligned with Vastu principles. In , the Hemadpanti style, named after minister Hemadpant (c. 1250–1300 CE), employs locally abundant or for construction, resulting in simpler, less ornate structures compared to Gujarati counterparts. Temples like the Temple (c. ) exhibit compact Nagara forms with a single shikhara, minimal curvilinear tower embellishments, and functional designs prioritizing durability over elaboration, reflecting the Deccan plateau's geological constraints and political instability during rule. This variant avoids extravagant iconography, focusing on core ritual spaces such as the garbhagriha and mandapa, with construction techniques involving dry masonry for earthquake-prone regions. Goan Hindu temples, shaped by over four centuries of Portuguese colonial rule (1510–1961), diverge from mainland styles through subdued aesthetics and hybrid elements, often built with laterite stone for modesty to evade inquisitorial scrutiny. Key features include spacious sabhamandapa assembly halls with wooden carved pillars, antarala transitional spaces, and distinctive deepastambha lamp towers—octagonal structures 5–7 stories high adorned with niches for oil lamps, symbolizing illumination and devotion. Roofing varies from pitched saddle shapes influenced by vernacular Konkan architecture to occasional domed compositions, as seen in the 18th-century Shantadurga Temple at Kavlem, which integrates a large chowk courtyard with explicit wooden carvings on pillars depicting floral and mythical motifs. These temples prioritize community functions, with expansive halls for festivals, reflecting adaptations to persecution that favored interior ritual over exterior grandeur, while preserving core Hindu iconography in the garbhagriha.

Southern Dravida and Vesara styles (Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka)

The Dravida style dominant in Tamil Nadu employs a stepped pyramidal vimana over the sanctum sanctorum, distinguishing it from northern curvilinear towers, alongside towering gopurams at enclosure entrances, protective dvarapalas flanking the garbhagriha, and integrated temple tanks for ritual purification. This architecture originated with Pallava rock-cut shrines in the 7th century CE, such as the Shore Temple at Mahabalipuram constructed under Narasimhavarman II around 700–725 CE, marking a transition to structural stone temples. Under Chola rule from the 9th to 13th centuries CE, the style attained monumental scale, exemplified by the Brihadisvara Temple in Thanjavur, initiated in 1003 CE and completed in 1010 CE by Rajaraja I, with its 66-meter vimana supported by a single granite block capstone weighing 80 tons. In , the style emerged as a hybrid fusing Dravida base plans with Nagara verticality, featuring stellate or star-shaped layouts, profusely carved pillars depicting mythological narratives, and modified towers blending pyramidal and curvilinear profiles. It began under the Chalukyas of in the 6th–8th centuries CE, with early experiments at sites like and , and matured during Hoysala rule from the 11th to 14th centuries CE. Notable examples include the Chennakesava Temple at Belur, commissioned in 1117 CE by Hoysala king to commemorate a victory over the Cholas, showcasing over 1,000 intricate friezes of dancers, musicians, and deities across its walls. Kerala's temple architecture, while rooted in Dravida traditions, diverges through adaptation to tropical climate with low rectangular s, sloping timber roofs clad in copper or tiles for rain shedding, and emphasis on horizontal wood-carved elements over vertical stone towers. Structures prioritize perishable materials like for intricate interiors, as seen in the in , whose core sanctum dates to the 8th century CE with later expansions featuring a 30-meter granite . This style maintains rectangular plans and subsidiary shrines but avoids the grand vimanas of , favoring enclosed corridors for .

International and diaspora temples

Southeast Asian adaptations (Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand)

Southeast Asian Hindu temples represent adaptations of Indian architectural principles, particularly the Dravida style from South India, transformed through local innovations such as the temple-mountain form symbolizing Mount Meru, extensive bas-reliefs, and use of sandstone with corbelled vaults. These structures emerged from the 7th to 15th centuries under Hindu kingdoms influenced by trade, migration, and royal patronage from India, blending cosmic symbolism with regional cosmology and engineering suited to tropical climates and available materials. In Cambodia, adapted Indian towers into massive, stepped pyramids forming temple-mountains, as seen in , constructed between 1113 and 1150 CE under King as a temple. The complex spans 162.6 hectares with a central tower rising 65 meters, surrounded by galleries depicting the and , reflecting (god-king) cult where the ruler was divinized akin to the deity housed within. Unlike Indian enclosures, Khmer designs emphasized axial symmetry and moats mimicking the cosmic ocean, with galleries serving narrative functions over mere . Earlier sites like (881 CE) introduced the quincunx layout of five towers, evolving from simpler Indian prototypes to incorporate for reservoirs integral to ritual and agriculture. Indonesia's Hindu temples, termed candi, fused Nagara verticality with Dravida horizontality, featuring stone construction and linga sanctums for worship, as exemplified by , built in the mid-9th century CE during the Mataram Kingdom. This temple compound includes 244 structures, with the main shrines (, , ) aligned on a terrace, adorned with 2,000 square meters of reliefs interpreted through Javanese lenses, such as local flora and attire. Adaptations included steeper roof profiles for seismic stability and open pavilions for dance rituals, diverging from enclosed Indian mandapas. In Bali, ongoing Hindu practice sustains pura temples like Besakih, with multi-tiered meru roofs signifying divine abodes, scaled by roof count (3 for , 9 for ) and thatched with ijuk palm, reflecting agrarian ecology absent in Indian stone vimanas. Thailand's adaptations, primarily in the Khorat Plateau under Khmer suzerainty, replicated Cambodian temple-mountains in sites like Phimai (11th-12th centuries CE), a temple with lintels and pediments showing Indian epics alongside local motifs, featuring a 32-meter prang tower and layout for processional rites. While dominated from the 13th century, residual Hindu elements persist in royal rituals and structures like Phanom Rung (10th-13th centuries CE), a mountaintop complex with naga balustrades and corbelled arches, adapting Khmer hydrology to rain-fed terraces. Modern Thai Hindu temples, such as Bangkok's Sri (built 1879 CE), import South Indian gateways, serving but minimally altering core wat forms.

Temples in Nepal, Vietnam, and other Asian regions

![Pashupatinath Temple, Kathmandu][float-right] In Nepal, Hindu temples exhibit a distinctive pagoda-style architecture influenced by both Hindu and Buddhist traditions, with Pashupatinath Temple in Kathmandu serving as the paramount site dedicated to Shiva as Pashupatinath, the lord of all animals. Situated on the western bank of the Bagmati River, this complex encompasses 518 smaller temples, shrines, and monuments, making it one of the largest Hindu temple precincts in the world. The site's religious significance dates to at least the 5th century CE, with the earliest documented evidence of the temple's existence from 400 CE, though the current main structure was rebuilt in the late 15th century following earlier destructions. Pashupatinath attracts millions of pilgrims annually, particularly during Maha Shivaratri, when over a million devotees gather for rituals, underscoring its status as Nepal's most sacred Hindu pilgrimage center despite the country's secular constitution since 2008. Vietnam preserves Hindu temple heritage primarily through the remnants of the Kingdom, an Indianized Hindu-Buddhist civilization that dominated central and southern regions from the 2nd to the 19th centuries CE. The My Son Sanctuary, a in Quang Nam Province, features 71 brick tower temples constructed between the 4th and 13th centuries, dedicated mainly to and exemplifying early Cham Hindu with corbelled vaults and intricate carvings of deities and mythical motifs. Similarly, the Po Klong Garai towers near Phan Rang, built in the 13th-14th centuries, honor the Cham king Po Klong Garai as a deified figure associated with , incorporating elements and serving as centers for ancestor worship blended with Hindu rites. These sites, though largely ruins due to wars and natural decay, reflect Vietnam's historical adoption of from Indian traders and missionaries starting around the 2nd century CE, with active Cham Hindu communities maintaining limited rituals at restored structures. ![Po Klong Garai Towers, Vietnam][center] In other Asian regions, Hindu temples persist amid diverse cultural contexts, such as in , where sites like the Kerung Lhakhang integrate into Buddhist practices, reflecting the syncretic worship common among the Hindu minority. hosts over 400 Hindu temples, predominantly in the Northern and Eastern Provinces, following the tradition of ; notable examples include the in , rebuilt in the and drawing pilgrims for its annual attended by tens of thousands. In , Hindu temples number around 500 active sites despite demographic shifts, with the in , established in the and designated a national temple in 1996, exemplifying ongoing worship amid challenges from minority status. These temples highlight Hinduism's adaptability and endurance in regions with Buddhist, Islamic, or Christian majorities, often featuring localized architectural fusions while preserving core Vedic rituals.

Modern diaspora temples outside Asia

Modern Hindu diaspora temples outside Asia have proliferated since the mid-20th century, driven by waves of immigration from and other Hindu-majority regions to countries such as the , , , , and . These structures, often built by community organizations like the (), replicate traditional Indian architectural elements using imported materials and local labor, while serving as hubs for religious rituals, cultural education, and social cohesion among expatriate populations estimated at over 2.5 million in alone by recent censuses. In the United States, the Akshardham in Robbinsville, , represents a pinnacle of temple construction, covering 183 acres with a central mandir rising 191 feet, crafted from 1.9 million cubic feet of Bulgarian and Turkish without modern reinforcements like or concrete. Completed after four years of intensive work involving 12,500 volunteers following 12 years of planning, it opened to the public on October 8, 2023, drawing parallels to ancient Vedic building techniques. Earlier examples include the Sri Temple in , , dedicated to in 1976 and modeled after the original, marking one of the first permanent Hindu sites in amid post-1965 reforms. The hosts over 300 Hindu mandirs under the umbrella of the National Council of Hindu Temples, with the BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir in , —inaugurated in 1995—standing as a landmark for its hand-carved pink sandstone facade and capacity to accommodate 3,000 devotees, reflecting the influx of Gujarati and Punjabi migrants since the 1950s. This temple complex, spanning multiple buildings for worship, exhibitions, and vegetarian dining, has hosted dignitaries and annual festivals, underscoring its role in maintaining dharmic practices amid a Hindu population exceeding 1 million. In Australia, where Hindus number around 700,000 primarily from Indian and Fijian backgrounds, approximately 50 temples dot urban centers like and , including the Sri Karphaga Vinayakar Temple, which supports Tamil-language preservation and community events for over 150,000 members. Similarly, South Africa's Hindu community, rooted in 19th-century indentured labor from , sustains over 200 temples, with recent additions like the BAPS Mandir in —opened in February 2025—featuring expansive grounds and traditional gopurams to serve the 1 million-strong population in and provinces. These diaspora temples, funded through donations and volunteer labor, adapt Vastu principles to non-Asian climates while fostering intergenerational transmission of Hindu traditions against assimilation pressures.

Modern challenges, management, and controversies

Government oversight and criticisms of state control

In , state governments exercise significant oversight over numerous Hindu temples through legislative frameworks such as the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HRCE) Acts, enacted in states including (1959), (1987), , and others, which originated from British-era regulations like the Madras Religious Endowments Act of 1925. These acts empower state departments to appoint executive officers, trustees, and committees for temple administration, audit finances, manage properties, and regulate rituals, ostensibly to prevent mismanagement and ensure transparency. In alone, the HRCE department oversees approximately 38,000 temples and religious institutions, collecting revenues from donations, land leases, and offerings that totaled over ₹1,500 (about $180 million USD) in recent fiscal years. Unlike mosques, churches, or gurdwaras, which operate with greater autonomy under their respective trusts or boards, Hindu temples lack equivalent religious self-governance, leading critics to argue this constitutes discriminatory state intervention violating Article 26 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to manage religious affairs. Criticisms of this state control center on financial mismanagement, , and diversion of temple revenues for non-religious purposes, undermining the duty to the as the legal owner of assets. Courts have repeatedly ruled against such practices; for instance, the in August 2025 declared that temple funds belong exclusively to the and cannot fund secular projects like halls, quashing a order permitting their use for community facilities. Similarly, the in October 2025 prohibited the diversion of temple revenues to welfare schemes, , or private works, emphasizing that such misuse amounts to criminal breach of trust and that funds must remain dedicated to temple maintenance and religious activities. Allegations persist of funds being rerouted; in July 2025, opposition leaders in accused the state of using HRCE revenues to construct colleges, while faced scrutiny leading to public disclosure of reports for major temples in November 2024 amid fund misuse claims. Reports indicate that while temples generate substantial income, many smaller shrines suffer neglect, with revenues allegedly subsidizing administrative salaries, non-Hindu welfare, or even political events, fostering perceptions of against Hindu institutions. Proponents of , including Hindu organizations and legal petitioners, contend that state control erodes religious and invites political interference, such as appointing non-devotees or bureaucrats to key roles, which disrupts traditional priestly authority and rituals. High-profile cases, like the Siddhivinayak Temple scam in involving alleged embezzlement of crores, underscore corruption risks under government oversight. Despite dismissals of broad challenges, such as a July 2024 petition against Tamil Nadu's HRCE Act, ongoing litigation and demands for "de-notification" seek to restore community or denominational management, arguing that empirical evidence of fund siphoning and poor upkeep—evident in dilapidated structures despite revenues—outweighs claims of preventive benefits. This selective regulatory asymmetry, absent for other faiths, is viewed by critics as a legacy of colonial-era policies perpetuated without commensurate , prompting calls for constitutional amendments or uniform to align with principles of religious equality.

Recent constructions and reclamations (e.g., Ram Mandir)

The Ram Mandir exemplifies a major reclamation effort, restoring a Hindu temple on a site long contested as the birthplace of Lord Rama. Historical records indicate that a , known as , was built in 1528 by Mir Baqi under Mughal emperor Babur's orders, atop what archaeological evidence later confirmed as remnants of a pre-existing non-Islamic structure dating to the or earlier, including temple pillars and artifacts. On December 6, 1992, the structure was demolished by Hindu kar sevaks amid escalating communal tensions, prompting legal and political battles that spanned decades. The , in its November 9, 2019, verdict, awarded the 2.77-acre disputed land to a Hindu trust for temple construction based on evidence of continuous Hindu worship and ASI findings of underlying temple foundations, while allocating 5 acres of alternative land for a new . Construction commenced after Prime Minister laid the on August 5, 2020, with the project managed by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust using traditional Nagara-style architecture in pink sandstone. The temple complex spans 7 acres, features 366 carved pillars, 44 doors, and a 51-meter-high sanctum the idol of Ram Lalla, completed at a cost of approximately $217 million funded by private donations. The pran pratishtha (consecration) ceremony occurred on January 22, 2024, marking the temple's partial opening, with full completion projected by 2025; this event drew millions of pilgrims and symbolized a resolution to centuries-old claims of religious site usurpation during medieval invasions. Emboldened by the Ayodhya outcome, similar reclamations have advanced elsewhere, notably the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor in . Launched by Modi in March 2019, this ₹800 crore ($100 million) project expanded the Kashi Vishwanath Temple's footprint from 3,000 square feet to over 500,000 square feet by acquiring and redeveloping 297 properties, including structures abutting the temple believed to encroach on its original 16th-century layout destroyed under . The corridor facilitates direct access from the ghats to the sanctum, incorporating museums and restored artifacts, and has boosted pilgrim footfall to over 100 million annually by 2023; adjacent surveys by the in 2022-2023 uncovered substantial Hindu temple remains, including a Shivling, fueling parallel court petitions for site restoration. In , the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute persists, with asserting the 17th-century was erected by after demolishing a temple at Krishna's birthplace. As of October 2025, the is hearing consolidated suits from 18 petitions seeking removal and , following survey approvals and evidentiary arguments mirroring Ayodhya's ASI validations; hearings were adjourned to October 9, 2025, amid claims of historical desecration patterns documented in Persian chronicles. These efforts reflect broader post-Ayodhya momentum, with over 100 sites under litigation invoking pre-1991 status quo challenges, driven by archaeological corroboration of temple destructions during Islamic rule—estimated at thousands by historians analyzing contemporary accounts—contrasting narratives that downplay such evidence due to institutional biases in secular .

Ongoing disputes over historical sites and Places of Worship Act

The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, mandates that the religious character of places of worship in as of August 15, 1947—the date of 's independence—cannot be altered through legal suits, barring the exception of the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site in . Enacted following the 1992 to curb communal tensions, the law has faced constitutional challenges from Hindu petitioners arguing it violates Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), 25 (), and 26 (religious denominations' rights) of the Indian Constitution by perpetuating historical conversions of temples into mosques without redress. Critics, including advocates like Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, contend the Act discriminates against Hindus by freezing a status quo that ignores pre-1947 destructions, such as those documented in historical records of invasions, while the has upheld its validity in past rulings like the 2019 judgment but is now examining its broader constitutionality amid petitions filed since 2020. Disputes center on sites where archaeological surveys have uncovered evidence of underlying Hindu temple structures beneath mosques, fueling claims of 16th-17th century constructions over demolished temples during Mughal rule. In Varanasi's complex, adjacent to the , a 2022 court-ordered survey by the (ASI) identified a Shivling-like structure and temple remnants, leading a district court on January 31, 2024, to permit Hindu worship in the southern basement, a decision upheld by the . Ongoing litigation includes pleas for further ASI excavation of the wazukhana (ablution) area, with the adjourning hearings to November 10, 2025, amid agreements between parties to maintain site seals. Similarly, in , the Shahi Idgah adjacent to the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple faces suits asserting it was built in 1669-70 over a temple site; courts have ordered surveys, and the scheduled hearings for October 9, 2025, after rejecting pleas to declare the mosque a disputed structure outright but allowing representative suits on behalf of devotees. At least 11 such cases persist nationwide, predominantly in , involving sites like 's Badi Masjid and others where petitioners cite historical texts and ASI findings of pillars, idols, and foundations indicative of prior temple use, though Muslim sides argue these do not alter the 1947 character protected by the Act. The intervened on December 12, 2024, staying all fresh suits, surveys, or proceedings under the Act following violence in , effectively pausing reclamations until its constitutionality is resolved, with hearings deferred to 2025 and the Centre yet to respond fully. This has intensified debates, with proponents of the Act viewing it as essential for secular stability and opponents decrying it as an unconstitutional bar to historical justice, evidenced by pre-independence records of over 1,000 temple destructions not addressed post-1947.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.