Hubbry Logo
North American Industry Classification SystemNorth American Industry Classification SystemMain
Open search
North American Industry Classification System
Community hub
North American Industry Classification System
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
North American Industry Classification System
North American Industry Classification System
North American Industry Classification System
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The North American Industry Classification System or NAICS (/neɪks/)[1] is a classification of business establishments by type of economic activity (the process of production). It is used by governments and business in Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America. It has largely replaced the older Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system, except in some government agencies, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

An establishment is typically a single physical location, though administratively distinct operations at a single location may be treated as separate establishments. Each establishment is classified as an industry according to the primary business activity taking place there. NAICS does not offer guidance on organizing enterprises (companies) composed of multiple establishments.

Codes

[edit]

The NAICS numbering system employs a five or six-digit code at the most detailed industry level. The first five digits are generally (although not always strictly) the same in all three countries. The first two digits designate the largest business sector; the third digit represents the subsector; the fourth digit represents the industry group; the fifth digit designates the NAICS industries, and the sixth digit represents the national industries.[citation needed][2]

NAICS aggregation levels
Digit designation Aggregation level
1-2 Sector
3 Subsector
4 Industry group
5 Industry
6 National industry
Example of NAICS structure
Code Titles of categories
31 Bank Financial
51 Professional, scientific, and technical services
541 Professional, scientific, and technical services
5411 Legal services
54111 Offices of lawyers
541110 Offices of lawyers
2017 NAICS Sectors[3]
Sector # Description Note
11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
21 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
22 Utilities
23 Construction
31–33 Manufacturing
41–42 Wholesale Trade (41 in Canada,[4] 42 in the United States[3])
44–45 Retail Trade
48–49 Transportation and Warehousing
51 Information [notes 1]
52 Finance and Insurance
53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
55 Management of Companies and Enterprises
56 Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services
61 Educational Services
62 Health Care and Social Assistance
71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
72 Accommodation and Food Services
81 Other Services (except Public Administration)[3]
91–92 Public Administration (91 in Canada, 92 in the United States[5])

History

[edit]

NAICS is a collaborative effort by Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), Statistics Canada, NATIONAL A and the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), through its Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC), staffed by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), and the Census Bureau. The system is designed to be largely compatible with the United Nations Statistical Office's International Standard Industrial Classification system (ISIC). NAICS versions are released every five years.[citation needed]

With the first version, released in 1997, NAICS offered enhanced service sector coverage relative to the SIC. The 2002 revision accommodated significant changes in the Information Sector. The 2012 revision slightly reduced the number of industries and modified six sectors.[6] NAICS changes are done at intervals of five years; the latest NAICS updated in 2022.[7]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

North American Industry Classification System

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is a system used by the statistical agencies of the , , and to categorize business establishments based on their primary production-oriented economic activities, enabling consistent collection, analysis, and comparison of across the three countries. Developed jointly by the governments of the , , and under the framework of the (NAFTA), NAICS was created to address the limitations of earlier national systems, particularly the U.S. () system, which originated in the 1930s and struggled to accommodate the rise of service-oriented and technology-driven industries in the late . The development process began in 1991 at a conference in , leading to the formation of the Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC) in 1992, which coordinated international subcommittees to propose a unified supply-based framework through public consultations and notices from 1994 to 1996. Adopted by the U.S. (OMB) on April 9, 1997, NAICS replaced the for most federal statistical purposes starting in 1998, with full implementation across major surveys like the Economic Census by 2003. NAICS employs a six-digit coding structure that provides greater detail and flexibility than the four-digit SIC, organizing industries into 20 broad sectors (such as , retail trade, and ), further divided into subsectors, industry groups, NAICS industries, and national industries, resulting in 1,174 detailed industries in its initial version. This production-oriented approach classifies establishments by the type of goods or services they produce, rather than by demand or market end-use, ensuring compatibility with the (ISIC) at the two-digit level while prioritizing emerging sectors like and . The system is revised every five years to reflect economic changes, with notable updates in 2002, 2007, 2012, 2017, and 2022, the latter introducing changes to accommodate in retail trade and other economic shifts while maintaining where possible. The 2022 revision is the current version as of 2025, with the next update scheduled for 2027. Widely utilized by federal agencies such as the U.S. Census Bureau and for economic censuses, surveys, and , NAICS supports applications ranging from government contracting and tax administration to and academic research, fostering cross-border in . Despite its strengths, the system's periodic revisions can disrupt historical data comparability, requiring statistical agencies to develop concordance tables between versions.

Overview

Purpose and Objectives

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is a collaborative framework developed jointly by the statistical agencies of the , , and to standardize the classification of business establishments according to their primary economic activity. This system enables the consistent collection, analysis, and dissemination of across the three countries, replacing disparate national classifications that hindered cross-border comparability. The primary objectives of NAICS include facilitating the production of comparable , informing policy-making decisions, and supporting analyses of cross-border trade and investment under frameworks such as the (NAFTA) and its successor, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). By providing a unified structure, NAICS allows governments, researchers, and businesses to track industry trends, measure economic output, and evaluate the impacts of trade policies more effectively. NAICS emphasizes classifying individual business establishments—defined as single physical locations where economic activities occur—rather than entire companies, with classifications based on the production processes used rather than the specific products or services output. This approach ensures that establishments engaged in similar processes are grouped together, even if their final outputs differ, promoting accuracy in economic measurement. Historically, NAICS was introduced to modernize classifications for evolving economies, particularly by better accommodating the growing service sectors that older systems like the (SIC) inadequately addressed. In its hierarchical structure, NAICS organizes industries from broad sectors down to detailed sub-industries, aiding in granular yet standardized data aggregation.

Scope and Geographic Coverage

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) encompasses a broad range of economic activities within the market economy of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, including both goods-producing and services-providing sectors. It organizes these activities into 20 two-digit sectors, which are further subdivided into over 1,000 detailed six-digit industries, enabling precise categorization of production processes and business operations. While NAICS includes the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting sector (NAICS 11), certain agricultural activities, such as farms, are often classified separately in specific statistical programs like the Economic Census, where coverage is limited to support activities for crop and animal production starting in 2022. NAICS primarily classifies establishments that have paid employees, focusing on their principal activity as determined by the type of produced or services provided. Self-employed individuals and nonemployer es—those without paid employees—are excluded from this core classification and are instead tracked through separate programs, such as the U.S. Bureau's Nonemployer Statistics, which relies on IRS administrative records to cover millions of such entities annually. activities fall under Sector 92 () within NAICS but are frequently analyzed separately in due to their non-market nature. Additionally, non-market activities, such as unpaid work or volunteer services, are not included, as NAICS is designed solely for market-oriented economic production. Geographically, NAICS is mandatory for official statistical agencies in the , , and to ensure harmonized and comparability across these economies, with national versions (NAICS , NAICS , and SCIAN ) allowing for country-specific six-digit detail while maintaining alignment up to the five-digit level. Beyond , adoption is voluntary but widespread, influencing global industry classifications and facilitating analysis under frameworks like the USMCA.

Development and History

Pre-NAICS Classifications

Prior to the development of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), the relied on the (SIC) system, which was established in 1937 by the Central Statistical Board through an Interdepartmental Committee to standardize the collection and reporting of economic data across federal agencies. The SIC employed a hierarchical structure of four-digit codes to categorize industries based on their primary production activities, with the initial focus on sectors to facilitate consistent statistical analysis during the economic recovery efforts of the era. Over time, the system expanded to include nonmanufacturing industries, but its core framework remained oriented toward traditional goods production. Canada introduced its own equivalent in 1948 with the (), specifically designed as the Standard Industrial Classification for Establishments (SIC-E) to classify business establishments by their primary economic activities and support post-World War II and data comparability. This system underwent revisions in 1960, 1970, and 1980 to align with evolving and international standards, emphasizing establishment-level classification similar to the U.S. model. In Mexico, the precursor was the Clasificación Mexicana de Actividades y Productos (CMAP), implemented in 1994 by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) to organize economic activities and products for statistical purposes, building on earlier national systems but lacking full harmonization with North American counterparts. These pre-NAICS systems shared significant limitations that hindered effective cross-border economic analysis, particularly as North American trade expanded under the emerging (NAFTA). The , last majorly updated in 1987, provided insufficient granularity for the burgeoning services sector and emerging industries such as and advanced , leaving about 75% of its industry definitions unchanged and ill-suited to a knowledge-based . Moreover, the U.S. was incompatible with Canada's SIC-E and Mexico's CMAP, resulting in divergent categorizations that complicated the comparability of trade, employment, and production statistics across borders. These shortcomings underscored the need for a unified framework to reflect modern economic realities and support integrated regional data collection. In response, trilateral talks among the statistical agencies of the , , and commenced in 1992 under the auspices of NAFTA negotiations, forming a working group to harmonize industry classifications and address the incompatibilities of existing systems. This initiative marked the initial step toward creating a cohesive North American standard, driven by the imperative to produce comparable economic indicators for the integrated market.

Creation and Initial Adoption

The development of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) began in July 1992 when the U.S. established the Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC), chaired by the and including representatives from the U.S. Census Bureau, , , and Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). This committee was formed to revise the outdated system and create a unified framework for classifying industries across , addressing incompatibilities in national systems that hindered economic data comparability under agreements like the . From 1993 to 1997, the ECPC led an extensive collaborative process involving consultations with stakeholders, public reviews, and testing for cross-border comparability. Key phases included the OMB's announcement of revision plans on March 31, 1993, and the initiation of trilateral cooperation with and in July 1994, which facilitated joint working groups to align classifications on production-oriented criteria. These efforts emphasized input from business associations, economists, and international experts to ensure the system reflected evolving economies, culminating in the finalization of NAICS in 1997 after multiple iterations and notices soliciting feedback. The initial NAICS edition, known as NAICS 1997, was adopted by the OMB on April 9, 1997, and featured a hierarchical structure with 20 two-digit sectors, 1,170 six-digit industries, and a producer-based approach that grouped establishments by similar production processes rather than final products. Published in the United States in December 1997 and released in in March 1998, it introduced key innovations such as expanded coverage for service-oriented sectors, including new designations for (Sector 51) and , Scientific, and Technical Services (Sector 54), to better capture the growing role of knowledge-based and technology-driven industries. Adoption timelines varied slightly by country but aligned closely for statistical consistency. In the United States, NAICS became effective for the 1997 Economic and select surveys that year, with full implementation across federal programs by 2002. integrated NAICS into major surveys starting in 1998, achieving broad alignment by 2000, while adopted it concurrently with the 1997 release and completed national implementation by 2000 to support integrated economic reporting. This phased rollout ensured minimal disruption while enabling comparable data production across the region from the late 1990s onward.

Revisions and Updates

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) undergoes revisions every five years to incorporate evolving economic structures, technological advancements, and international comparability requirements, ensuring the classification remains relevant for statistical purposes. This cycle is managed collaboratively by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), , and Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, with input from the Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC), which reviews proposals for changes. The process includes solicitation of public comments, trilateral negotiations among the three countries, testing of proposed updates, and final approval by OMB, typically resulting in refinements to existing industries rather than wholesale restructuring. The first major revision in 2002 introduced the Information sector (51) to capture emerging digital economies, refined manufacturing classifications (31-33) by separating publishing from printing activities, and added detail to retail trade and arts, entertainment, and recreation (71), increasing the total number of detailed industries to 1,179. Subsequent updates in 2007 expanded coverage in arts, entertainment, and recreation (71) and finance and insurance (52), with refinements to mining (21) and further alignment to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), maintaining approximately 1,179 industries while enhancing subsector definitions for better data comparability. The 2012 revision focused on health care and social assistance (62) and mining (21), consolidating numerous manufacturing industries for clarity and adding specificity to data processing and cloud computing within the information sector (51). By 2017, publishing industries were more explicitly integrated into the information sector (51), with additions for biotechnology research and nanotechnology R&D, resulting in 1,189 detailed (6-digit) industries overall, with 1,057 at the 5-digit NAICS industry level. The 2022 revision, effective January 1, 2022, in the United States and aligned in and , featured 1,157 detailed (6-digit) industries overall, with 1,042 at the 5-digit NAICS industry level, and addressed modern economic shifts by eliminating the Nonstore Retailers subsector (former 454), redistributing its activities—such as electronic shopping—into product-based retail categories (44-45) to de-emphasize sales channels like . Key changes included merging publishing industries (511 and parts of 519) into a new Industries sector (513), regardless of delivery method, and updates to within information services (51); classifications saw minor refinements in utilities (22) and (21) to better reflect extraction and activities. These adjustments aimed to improve consistency for emerging sectors while minimizing disruptions to data. Implementation of revisions often involves challenges in maintaining data continuity, addressed through concordance tables or "crosswalks" that map old codes to new ones, enabling restatement of historical series for economic indicators like and output. For the 2022 update, the U.S. Census Bureau released bridge statistics tables showing components of changed industries, with full adoption across federal programs targeted by the end of 2027. Planning for the 2027 revision began with a notice soliciting public comments in December 2024, followed by ECPC review and trilateral negotiations from March to September 2025, OMB recommendations in October 2025, and final decisions in March 2026, per OMB Directive No. 8. As of November 2025, following the October 2025 OMB recommendations, the process proceeds to final decisions in March 2026. The updated manual is scheduled for submission to OMB in June 2026 and public release in January 2027, continuing the commitment to adaptive amid ongoing economic transformations.

Structure and Hierarchy

Classification Levels

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) features a six-level hierarchical structure that organizes economic activities into progressively detailed categories, enabling consistent statistical reporting across the , , and . This framework begins with the broadest category, the 2-digit sector, which identifies 20 major economic areas encompassing all establishments based on shared production characteristics. Subsequent levels refine this classification: the 3-digit subsector (approximately 100 total) groups similar sectors into more specific production groupings; the 4-digit industry group (approximately 300 total) further delineates processes within subsectors; the 5-digit NAICS industry (approximately 700 total) provides a standardized level of detail comparable across the three North American countries; and the 6-digit national industry (approximately 1,000 total) adds country-specific nuances while preserving international alignment. Each lower level is nested within the higher one, ensuring that classifications reflect increasing specificity in the similarity of goods or services produced. The core principle of this hierarchy is the production-oriented approach, where industries are aggregated based on the similarity of their transformation processes—such as the inputs, methods, and outputs involved—rather than solely on the end products or institutional structures. This method supports the system's objective of producing comparable economic data while accommodating the evolving nature of industries. To assign an establishment to a specific NAICS code, classifiers identify its primary activity as the one contributing the greatest share of to the overall output; for many service-based establishments, this is typically determined by the highest revenue generation. This rule ensures that multi-activity businesses are categorized accurately for statistical purposes, excluding auxiliary activities unless they dominate value creation.

Sector and Subsector Definitions

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) organizes economic activities into 20 top-level sectors, each identified by a two-digit (with some sectors spanning a range of codes), based on similarities in production processes, inputs, outputs, labor skills, and market structures. These sectors group establishments engaged in similar economic activities to facilitate comparable statistical data across the , , and . Subsectors, at the three-digit level, further refine these groupings by focusing on more specific industry characteristics within a sector. The following table outlines the 20 NAICS sectors, including their codes and brief definitions:
CodeSector NameDefinition
11Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and HuntingEstablishments primarily engaged in growing crops, raising animals, harvesting timber, and capturing fish and other wild animals.
21Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas ExtractionEstablishments primarily engaged in extracting minerals, ores, stone, sand, gravel, oil, and natural gas from the earth.
22UtilitiesEstablishments providing electric power generation, transmission, and distribution; natural gas distribution; water supply and irrigation systems; and sewage treatment facilities.
23ConstructionEstablishments primarily engaged in building, renovating, or repairing structures and infrastructure, including residential, commercial, and heavy civil engineering projects.
31-33ManufacturingEstablishments transforming materials into new products, including food, chemicals, machinery, and electronics, through processes like assembly and chemical reactions.
42Wholesale TradeEstablishments engaged in selling goods to other businesses or retailers, typically without significant transformation of the products.
44-45Retail TradeEstablishments selling merchandise directly to consumers, including stores for food, clothing, electronics, and general merchandise.
48-49Transportation and WarehousingEstablishments providing transportation of passengers and cargo by air, rail, water, road, and pipeline, as well as warehousing and storage services.
51InformationEstablishments creating, distributing, and managing information and cultural products, including publishing, motion pictures, broadcasting, telecommunications, and data processing.
52Finance and InsuranceEstablishments providing financial services such as banking, lending, investment advice, insurance underwriting, and pension fund management.
53Real Estate and Rental and LeasingEstablishments involved in managing, buying, selling, renting, or leasing real estate, as well as equipment and consumer goods rental.
54Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesEstablishments offering specialized expertise in legal, accounting, architectural, engineering, consulting, and scientific research services.
55Management of Companies and EnterprisesEstablishments holding securities of other companies for investment purposes or managing subsidiaries and affiliates.
56Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesEstablishments providing office administration, facilities support, employment services, waste collection, and environmental remediation.
61Educational ServicesEstablishments providing instruction and training, including schools, colleges, and professional development programs, excluding government-operated ones.
62Health Care and Social AssistanceEstablishments offering medical care, social assistance, and related services, such as hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, and community support programs.
71Arts, Entertainment, and RecreationEstablishments providing performing arts, spectator sports, museums, amusement parks, and gambling services.
72Accommodation and Food ServicesEstablishments operating hotels, motels, restaurants, and other food service providers for travelers and the public.
81Other Services (except Public Administration)Establishments offering repair and maintenance for personal and household goods, personal care services, and religious, grantmaking, and civic organizations.
92Public AdministrationEstablishments of federal, state, and local governments providing public services, regulation, and administration.
Subsectors within these sectors provide more granular classifications; for example, in the Manufacturing sector (31-33), subsector 311 encompasses Food Manufacturing, which includes establishments producing items like dairy products, meat, and baked goods through processes involving raw agricultural inputs. The 2022 NAICS revision introduced refinements to sector structures, such as the creation of subsector 513 (Publishing Industries) within the Information sector (51), relocating newspaper, periodical, book, and software publishing from previous groupings to better reflect evolving digital production processes.

Codes and Classification Process

Code Format and Composition

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) employs a standardized six-digit numerical to classify establishments according to their primary economic activities. The first two digits represent the economic sector, such as 31-33 for or 44-45 for Retail Trade. The third digit designates the subsector within that sector, the fourth digit identifies the industry group, the fifth digit specifies the NAICS industry, and the sixth digit denotes the national industry, which may include country-specific details. This coding structure facilitates harmonization across the , , and , with the first five digits identical in all three countries to enable comparable statistical data at the industry level. The sixth digit, however, permits national variations to reflect unique economic activities or detailed classifications in each country, ensuring flexibility while maintaining broad consistency. NAICS codes adhere to specific rules for assignment and formatting. No leading zeros are used in the codes, and they are assigned sequentially within each sector, though not necessarily consecutively across the entire system. For multi-establishment firms, auxiliary establishments—such as central administrative offices (classified in 551114) or warehouses (classified in 493110)—are classified based on their own primary production activities rather than the parent company's. Establishments and businesses can determine appropriate NAICS codes using official resources, including the NAICS manual published by the U.S. Census Bureau and detailed search tools available on government websites. The U.S. Census Bureau provides an online NAICS for code lookup and reference files, while offers a search tool for NAICS Canada, both supporting accurate assignment based on production-oriented criteria.

Examples of Industry Codes

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) employs a hierarchical structure where codes illustrate the progression from broad sectors to specific industries, enabling precise categorization of business activities. For instance, in Sector 51 (Information), which encompasses establishments primarily engaged in creating, disseminating, or providing access to information and entertainment content, the 3-digit subsector 513 represents Publishing Industries. In the 2022 revision, this subsector was updated from 511 to 513 to better reflect digital publishing trends. This subsector includes activities such as producing and distributing printed or electronic publications, with a representative 6-digit code being 513110 for Newspaper Publishers. Establishments classified under 513110 are those primarily involved in carrying out the operations necessary for publishing newspapers, including gathering news; writing articles; and preparing, combining, and selling advertisements, as well as printing, trimming, and distributing the final product, whether print or online editions. NAICS codes also span diverse sectors to capture varied economic activities, demonstrating the system's applicability across industries. In the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector (54), the 6-digit code 541511 designates Custom Computer Programming Services, covering establishments that primarily write, modify, test, and support custom software programming to meet client specifications, excluding mass-produced software development. Similarly, within the same sector, code 541714 applies to Research and Development in Biotechnology, except Nanobiotechnology, which includes establishments primarily engaged in conducting biotechnology (except nanobiotechnology) research and experimental development. Within the Accommodation and Food Services sector (72), code 722513 applies to Limited-Service Restaurants, which include operations providing food services where patrons order or select items and pay before eating, such as fast-food outlets, take-out eateries, and delicatessens, but excluding snack or nonalcoholic beverage bars. These examples highlight how NAICS codes at the 6-digit level refine classifications to reflect specialized business functions within broader sectors. For establishments engaged in multiple activities, NAICS classification relies on the primary activity that generates the greatest or value of shipments, ensuring a single code assignment based on economic predominance. A firm conducting both retail and wholesale , for example, would be classified under the code corresponding to whichever activity—retail (Sector 44-45) or wholesale (Sector )—contributes the majority of its , with secondary activities not altering the primary designation unless they exceed this threshold. This approach, detailed in the official NAICS manual, prioritizes measurable output like sales value to maintain consistent statistical grouping, though exceptions apply in sectors like where a 50% production threshold may trigger a general combination category. The 2022 NAICS revision introduced new codes to address emerging economic trends, such as the growth in for secondhand goods. A notable is 459510, Used Merchandise Retailers, under Sector 45 (Retail Trade), which classifies establishments primarily retailing used merchandise, antiques, and secondhand goods (except motor vehicles and parts) through physical stores, platforms, or auctions. This code accommodates businesses like online thrift platforms that previously fell under broader categories such as 459999 (All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers), reflecting adaptations to digital retail models and ensuring better alignment with contemporary patterns.

Applications and Uses

Statistical and Economic Analysis

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) serves as the foundational framework for major statistical surveys in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, enabling consistent data collection and aggregation for economic analysis. In the United States, the Economic Census—conducted every five years by the U.S. Census Bureau—uses NAICS to classify business establishments by their primary economic activity, gathering detailed information on operations across sectors. This quinquennial survey provides benchmark data that underpins national economic accounts, including the calculation of gross domestic product (GDP) by industry, by aggregating responses at national, state, and substate levels according to NAICS hierarchies. In Canada, Statistics Canada integrates NAICS into the Business Register, a comprehensive database of enterprises that frames business surveys and administrative records, facilitating the production of GDP estimates broken down by industry aggregates. For instance, annual GDP at basic prices is tabulated using NAICS sectors to measure value added across the economy. In Mexico, the National Survey of Occupation and Employment (ENOE), carried out quarterly by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), employs the Sistema de Clasificación Industrial de América del Norte (SCIAN)—the Mexican adaptation of NAICS—to classify the economic activities of the workforce, supporting labor force statistics and contributing to GDP computations by branch of economic activity. These surveys yield key outputs such as employment counts, payroll totals, and value of output, all aggregated by NAICS codes to reveal industry-level trends and economic contributions. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), for example, applies NAICS classifications in its Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) program to generate annual estimates of employment and wages for approximately 830 occupations within detailed industries, aiding analyses of labor distribution and compensation patterns. Such data aggregation allows policymakers and researchers to track shifts in workforce allocation, such as the concentration of software developers in the information sector (NAICS 51), without delving into exhaustive listings. Similarly, output metrics from NAICS-based collections inform benchmarks for broader economic reporting, emphasizing conceptual shifts like the growth in service-oriented industries over goods production. NAICS further enables the derivation of critical economic indicators, including input-output tables and productivity measures, by linking industry data to macroeconomic models. The U.S. (BEA) organizes its input-output accounts around NAICS industries, producing supply-use and requirements tables that quantify intersectoral flows—such as how inputs support retail output—to assess and multipliers. For productivity, the BLS computes labor productivity (output per hour) and multifactor productivity for over 80 NAICS industries, using time-series to evaluate efficiency gains; for representative scale, manufacturing sectors (NAICS 31-33) showed a 2.1% average annual productivity increase from 1987 to 2023, highlighting technological advancements. These indicators prioritize understanding structural changes, like rising productivity in (NAICS 54), over granular benchmarks. Cross-border comparability is maintained through ongoing trilateral coordination among statistical agencies from the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with annual meetings integrated into work programs to review and harmonize NAICS implementations. This process ensures alignment for trade statistics under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), allowing consistent tracking of cross-border economic activity, such as automotive trade flows classified under NAICS 336, to support integrated North American supply chain analysis.

Regulatory and Business Applications

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) plays a critical role in federal procurement by enabling the U.S. (SBA) to define size standards for small businesses seeking government contracts. Businesses must register in the (SAM) and select appropriate NAICS codes to determine eligibility for set-aside contracts, which reserve opportunities for small, disadvantaged, women-owned, or veteran-owned firms based on industry-specific criteria such as employee count or annual receipts. Additionally, NAICS codes are associated with Product Service Codes (PSC) in federal procurement to categorize the specific products and services being procured. For example, NAICS code 541714, Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology), corresponds to PSC AN11, Health R&D Services; Health Care Services; Basic Research. For instance, NAICS codes under sector 31-33 often have size standards of 500 to 1,500 employees, allowing qualifying firms to compete for sole-source or set-aside awards without larger competitors. Regulatory agencies rely on NAICS for compliance tracking and permitting processes. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses NAICS codes, particularly for sectors 31-33 (), to identify facilities subject to environmental regulations, such as those under the (RCRA) for hazardous waste management or the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements. Similarly, the (OSHA) adopted NAICS in 2003 to classify establishments in its enforcement data, enabling targeted inspections and injury reporting for high-risk industries like (NAICS 23) or , where establishments with 20-249 employees in certain codes must submit electronic injury summaries. These codes ensure precise allocation of regulatory oversight, such as environmental permits for emissions in chemical manufacturing (NAICS 325). In business operations, NAICS facilitates tax reporting and administrative functions. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requires sole proprietors to enter a six-digit NAICS-based principal activity code on Schedule C () to categorize and expenses, aiding in selection and statistical compilation; for example, code 541211 applies to certified public accountants. Market research firms like incorporate NAICS into their databases to segment industries for client analysis, credit reporting, and sales prospecting, as seen in tools like D&B Hoovers where codes help evaluate business risks and opportunities. providers also utilize NAICS to classify policyholders by industry for and premium calculations, with sector 52 ( and ) encompassing carriers and agencies that assess risks in areas like or retail. For , NAICS links to processes through data integration with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). U.S. exporters and importers report via the Automated Export System (AES) or Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), where NAICS codes classify the reporting entity's industry alongside HTS codes for products, supporting tariff assessments and trade statistics compilation by the Census Bureau. This concordance enables agencies to analyze industry-level trade flows and apply tariffs accurately, such as linking NAICS to HTS chapters for imported subject to duties.

Comparisons and International Context

Differences from SIC

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) represents a significant departure from the (SIC) system, which was established in to standardize industry during an era dominated by . While SIC used a four-digit coding structure that primarily grouped industries based on their end products or outputs, NAICS introduced a six-digit hierarchical code designed to classify establishments according to the processes and activities involved in production, enabling more precise and consistent economic analysis across . This shift addressed longstanding limitations in SIC, such as its inconsistent logic and inability to accommodate the post-industrial economy's emphasis on services and technology. A key difference lies in coverage and sectoral balance. The SIC system allocated substantial detail to manufacturing—reflecting its economic prominence at the time—with less granularity for the service sector, which was then a minor component of the U.S. economy. NAICS, by contrast, restructured the into 20 broad sectors, including five goods-producing sectors (, , utilities, , and ) and 15 service-producing sectors (such as , , , , and administrative support), thereby recognizing hundreds of additional industries, especially in fast-growing areas like and . This balanced approach better captures the service-oriented nature of contemporary economies, where services now constitute the majority of GDP. Illustrative of these structural changes are specific reclassifications. For instance, SIC major group 737, which broadly covered computer programming, data processing, and related services, was fragmented in NAICS into multiple codes within sector 54 (Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services), including 541511 (Custom Computer Programming Services), 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services), and 541519 (Other Computer Related Services), allowing for finer distinctions based on production activities. Similarly, internet publishing and broadcasting—now classified under NAICS 519130 in the information sector—lacked a direct SIC equivalent, as the older system did not account for digital media innovations that emerged after its last major revision in 1987. (Note: This is a representative official crosswalk file from Census; specific mappings confirmed via BLS industry overviews.) The transition from SIC to NAICS was managed through official concordance tables developed by the U.S. Census Bureau, which map approximately 66% of 1987 SIC industries to single NAICS equivalents while splitting or combining others to maintain data comparability for time-series analysis. Federal agencies fully adopted NAICS starting in 1997, with SIC phased out by 2003, after which no new SIC-based data were produced or published. These crosswalks, such as the Census SIC-to-NAICS tables, remain essential for researchers bridging pre- and post-1997 datasets. Overall, NAICS offers advantages for analyzing a globalized, service-driven by providing greater detail and international harmonization—particularly with and —compared to the product-focused, U.S.-centric SIC. However, its expanded six-digit structure demands more granular reporting from businesses, increasing the complexity of and efforts.

Alignment with ISIC and Other Systems

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is designed to maintain compatibility with the of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Revision 4, adopted by the in 2008, to facilitate international comparability of . This alignment is primarily achieved at the two-digit sector level across NAICS's 20 sectors, with enhanced correspondence at the three- and four-digit subsector and group levels in many cases. For instance, NAICS sectors 31–33 () broadly correspond to ISIC Section C (divisions 10–33), encompassing activities from food product manufacturing to other transport equipment production. As of 2025, NAICS remains aligned with ISIC Revision 4, though Revision 5—endorsed in 2023 and finalizing its structure—may influence future updates to enhance comparability with emerging sectors like digital services. Official correspondence tables mapping NAICS to ISIC are published by national statistical agencies and the , enabling data translation for cross-border analysis. These tables detail relationships at varying granularities, such as six-digit NAICS to four-digit ISIC, often indicating partial overlaps where a single NAICS industry may span multiple ISIC classes or vice versa. The tables achieve a high degree of concordance, particularly in goods-producing sectors, though exact matching varies by industry due to structural differences. Notable differences arise in the services sector, where NAICS adopts a production-oriented approach that provides greater detail tailored to North American economies, often splitting broader ISIC categories. For example, ISIC's Division 74 (Other professional, scientific, and technical activities) is more fragmented in NAICS into specialized subsectors like and 5416 (Management, scientific, and technical consulting services), reflecting regional emphases on and consulting industries. This results in challenges for perfect one-to-one mappings in service-oriented . NAICS also aligns with other regional systems that derive from or parallel ISIC, such as the European Union's Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE), which mirrors ISIC Revision 4 at the division level and thus shares similar correspondences with NAICS. The Australian and Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) incorporates elements of both ISIC and NAICS, featuring a comparable hierarchical structure with 19 divisions that facilitate partial harmonization for trade and investment data between and . Full harmonization across these systems remains challenging due to variations in regional economic priorities, such as North America's focus on advanced manufacturing and services versus Europe's emphasis on integrated supply chains. Despite these hurdles, NAICS has influenced ISIC revisions, with its development providing key inputs to ISIC Revision 4's structure and concepts. Additionally, NAICS codes are employed in economic analyses of World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes to categorize affected industries, supporting evidence-based resolutions in international trade cases.

Criticisms and Future Developments

Limitations and Challenges

One key limitation of the NAICS is its rigidity due to the fixed five-year revision cycle, which struggles to accommodate rapid economic shifts and emerging industries. Although revisions aim to incorporate changes, such as the addition of codes for research and development in 2022 (NAICS 541715), the process often lags behind innovations like AI integration in traditional sectors or the explosive growth of the . For example, platform-based gig work is primarily classified under broad categories like taxi and limousine services (NAICS 485310) or , failing to capture its unique on-demand nature and leading to incomplete labor market statistics. This delay disrupts time series data continuity and hinders timely policy responses to technological disruptions. Granularity issues further compound these challenges, as many NAICS sectors are overly broad, encompassing diverse activities that obscure nuanced economic analysis. The professional, scientific, and technical services sector (NAICS 54), for instance, aggregates varied operations from consulting to , complicating classification for multi-activity firms where the primary activity rule may not reflect overall business scope. This structure heightens miscoding risks, particularly for diversified enterprises, where self-reported codes can lead to inaccuracies in economic censuses and eligibility determinations for federal programs. Such misclassifications distort aggregate data and amplify errors in or metrics. Equity concerns arise from NAICS's focus on formal economies, resulting in underrepresentation of informal sectors, especially in Mexico where informal employment comprised about 56% of the workforce as of 2018. These activities, often unregistered and outside standard classification, are inadequately captured, biasing North American economic comparisons and undervaluing contributions from marginalized workers. Additionally, data biases affect small businesses, which face incomplete coverage in administrative datasets due to nonresponse and underreporting, leading to skewed estimates of their role in GDP and employment—small firms account for roughly 99.9% of U.S. businesses but only 47.1% of private employment. This can perpetuate inequities in resource allocation and policy targeting. Implementation hurdles include substantial training costs for businesses adapting to code changes, particularly during quinquennial updates that require system overhauls and staff to ensure accurate self-classification. Small and medium-sized enterprises bear disproportionate burdens, as misassignment can disqualify them from contracts or surveys. privacy issues also emerge in detailed NAICS-based reporting, where granular disclosures to agencies like the Census Bureau raise confidentiality risks, necessitating robust suppression rules to prevent individual firm identification while maintaining statistical utility. Stakeholder criticisms of the 2022 revision highlight insufficient granularity for , as the consolidation of and brick-and-mortar retail (e.g., merging NAICS 454110 electronic shopping with 459510 general merchandise stores) diminishes the ability to isolate digital growth trends amid surging sales. This change, intended to reflect integrated retail models, has been faulted for reducing analytical precision in tracking e-commerce's economic footprint.

Planned Revisions

The revision process for the 2027 edition of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) was initiated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) through Statistical Policy Directive No. 8, published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2024, which solicits public comments on potential updates to ensure the system's relevance to evolving economic activities. The Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC), comprising representatives from the U.S. Census Bureau, Statistics Canada, Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, and other statistical agencies, is responsible for reviewing these comments and developing recommendations during 2025 and 2026. Potential changes under consideration include enhanced coverage for emerging sectors such as (in line with bioeconomy measurement per 14081) and other new industries, as well as minor structural revisions to address evolving economic activities. Public consultations solicit input on these areas to capture innovations across the economy. As of November 2025, the U.S. comment period closed on February 18, 2025, and Statistics Canada's period ended June 30, 2025, with trilateral negotiations completed in September 2025 and a of proposals expected in November 2025. occurs through formal channels, such as the U.S. docket at regulations.gov and Statistics Canada's email submissions, inviting detailed proposals from data users, producers, and industry experts on specific economic activities and their scale. The anticipated timeline includes ECPC final recommendations to OMB by late 2026, followed by publication of the 2027 NAICS in 2026 and its effective implementation starting January 1, 2027, with crosswalk tables provided to map changes from the 2022 version and maintain data continuity across statistical programs. Broader objectives encompass improving alignment with the ' (ISIC) Revision 5 at the two-digit level and enhancing the accuracy of trade data under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) by better harmonizing North American economic classifications.

References

  1. https://www.census.gov/naics
  2. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1998/07/rpt1full.pdf
  3. https://www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm
  4. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/naics/2022/v1/introduction
  5. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2024/11/naics-changes.html
  6. https://www.census.gov/naics/reference_files_tools/NAICS_Update_Process_Fact_Sheet.pdf
  7. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/year/2022/guidance/understanding-naics.html
  8. https://www.bls.gov/ces/naics/
  9. https://www.census.gov/naics/
  10. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/concepts/industry
  11. https://www.inegi.org.mx/scian/
  12. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/02/2021-14249/north-american-industry-classification-system-naics-updates-for-2022-update-of-statistical-policy
  13. https://www2.census.gov/about/history/agency-history/innovations/data-collection/classifying-businesses/history-of-standard-industrial-classification.pdf
  14. https://www.ibisworld.com/classifications/resources/history-of-naics/
  15. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1993/03/31/58-16990/revision-of-standard-industrial-classification
  16. https://www2.census.gov/library/reference/naics/publications/2017-NAICS-Manual.pdf
  17. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-501-x/12-501-x-2022001-eng.pdf
  18. https://www.census.gov/library/reference/code-lists/naics/2022/implementation-timeline.html
  19. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/year/2012/about/new.html
  20. https://www.census.gov/naics/federal_register_notices/notices/fr17au11.pdf
  21. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/29/2022-20513/small-business-size-standards-adoption-of-2022-north-american-industry-classification-system-for
  22. https://www.census.gov/naics/concordances/2022_to_2017_NAICS.xlsx
  23. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025/economic-census-comparative-tables.html
  24. https://www.census.gov/naics/federal_register_notices/notices/OMB_FRDOC_0001-0388.pdf
  25. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/20/2024-30060/statistical-policy-directive-no-8-north-american-industry-classification-system-naics-request-for
  26. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2017/econ/2017-naics-manual.html
  27. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/naics/2012/introduction
  28. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/naics/1997/introduction
  29. https://www.bls.gov/respondents/ars/2022-naics.htm
  30. https://www.naics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022_NAICS_Manual.pdf
  31. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/concepts/searchclasscod
  32. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=513110&year=2022&details=513110
  33. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=541511&year=2022&details=541511
  34. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=541714&year=2022&details=541714
  35. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=722513&year=2022&details=722513
  36. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=459510&year=2022&details=459510
  37. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
  38. https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gdp-industry
  39. https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3VD.pl?Function=getVD&TVD=1369825
  40. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3610043403
  41. https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enoe/15ymas/
  42. https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/programas/pibact/2013/
  43. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrci.htm
  44. https://www.bea.gov/industry/input-output-accounts-data
  45. https://www.bls.gov/productivity/
  46. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MFGOPH
  47. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Sprint/Webinar2/Session3_Pres1_Canada.pdf
  48. https://www.fedconnect.net/FedConnect/PublicPages/PublicSearch/Public_OpportunityDescription.aspx?id=147247
  49. https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-guide/size-standards
  50. https://www.epa.gov/regulatory-information-sector/naics-sectors-31-33-manufacturing
  51. https://www.osha.gov/data/naics-manual
  52. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1040sc
  53. https://www.dnb.com/en-us/resources/sales/sic-naics-industry-codes.html
  54. https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag524.htm
  55. https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/
  56. https://oui.doleta.gov/dmstree/ib/ib96/ib_19-96.htm
  57. https://www.census.gov/topics/employment/industry-occupation/guidance/code-lists.html
  58. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
  59. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Family/Detail/2095
  60. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/naics/2012/concordanc_tabl3
  61. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-industrial-classification-anzsic/2006-revision-2-0/introduction
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199616301490
  63. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=541715&year=2022&details=541715
  64. https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2024/adrm/ces/CES-WP-24-42.pdf
  65. https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OCE-Measuring-the-Bioeconomy.pdf
  66. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-18-76
  67. https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/BEA-WP2020-4_0.pdf
  68. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/abs/technical-documentation/methodology/2021/abs_nonresponse_analysis.pdf
  69. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/technical-documentation/methodology.html
  70. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2023/article/the-naics-2022-update-and-its-effect-on-bls-employment-estimates-in-the-retail-trade-sector.htm
  71. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/consultation/2023/naics
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.