Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fishing
View on Wikipedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2025) |
Fishing is the activity of trying to catch fish. Fish are often caught as wildlife from the natural environment (freshwater or marine), but may also be caught from stocked bodies of water such as ponds, canals, park wetlands and reservoirs. Fishing techniques include trawling, longlining, jigging, hand-gathering, spearing, netting, angling, shooting and trapping, as well as more destructive and often illegal techniques such as electrocution, blasting and poisoning.
The term fishing is also used more broadly to include catching aquatic animals other than fish, such as crustaceans (shrimp/lobsters/crabs), shellfish, cephalopods (octopus/squid) and echinoderms (starfish/sea urchins). The term is not normally applied to harvesting fish raised in controlled cultivations (fish farming). Nor is it normally applied to hunting aquatic mammals, where terms like whaling and sealing are used instead.
Fishing has been an important part of human culture since hunter-gatherer times. It is one of the few food production activities that has persisted from prehistory into the modern age, surviving both the Neolithic Revolution and successive Industrial Revolutions. In addition to fishing for food, people commonly fish as a recreational pastime. Fishing tournaments are held, and caught fish are sometimes kept long-term as preserved or living trophies. When BioBlitzes occur, fish are typically caught, identified, and then released.
According to the United Nations FAO statistics, the total number of commercial fishers and fish farmers is estimated to be 39.0 million.[1] Fishing industries and aquaculture provide direct and indirect employment to over 500 million people in developing countries.[2] In 2005, the worldwide per capita consumption of fish captured from wild fisheries was 14.4 kilograms (32 lb), with an additional 7.4 kilograms (16 lb) harvested from fish farms.[3]
History
[edit]
Fishing is an ancient practice that dates back to at least the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic period about 40,000 years ago.[4] Isotopic analysis of the remains of Tianyuan man, a 40,000-year-old modern human from eastern Asia, has shown that he regularly consumed freshwater fish.[5][6] Archaeology features such as shell middens,[7] discarded fish bones, and cave paintings show that seafood was important for survival and consumed in significant quantities. Fishing in Africa is evident very early on in human history. Neanderthals were fishing by about 200,000 BC.[8] People could have developed basketry for fish traps, using spinning and early forms of knitting to make fishing nets[8] able to catch more fish.[9]
During this period, most people lived a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and were, of necessity, constantly on the move. However, where there are early examples of permanent settlements (though not necessarily permanently occupied) such as those at Lepenski Vir, they are almost always associated with fishing as a major source of food.
Trawling
[edit]The British dogger was a very early type of sailing trawler from the 17th century, but the modern fishing trawler was developed in the 19th century, at the English fishing port of Brixham. By the early 19th century, the fishers at Brixham needed to expand their fishing area further than ever before due to the ongoing depletion of stocks that was occurring in the overfished waters of South Devon. The Brixham trawler that evolved there was of a sleek build and had a tall gaff rig, which gave the vessel sufficient speed to make long-distance trips out to the fishing grounds in the ocean. They were also sufficiently robust to be able to tow large trawls in deep water. The great trawling fleet that built up at Brixham earned the village the title of 'Mother of Deep-Sea Fisheries'.[10]

This revolutionary design made large-scale trawling in the ocean possible for the first time, resulting in a massive migration of fishers from the ports in the south of England, to villages further north, such as Scarborough, Hull, Grimsby, Harwich and Yarmouth, that were points of access to the large fishing grounds in the Atlantic Ocean.[10]
The small village of Grimsby grew to become the largest fishing port in the world[11] by the mid 19th century. An Act of Parliament was first obtained in 1796, which authorised the construction of new quays and dredging of the Haven to make it deeper.[12] It was only in 1846, with the tremendous expansion in the fishing industry, that the Grimsby Dock Company was formed. The foundation stone for the Royal Dock was laid by Albert the Prince consort in 1849. The dock covered 25 acres (10 ha) and was formally opened by Queen Victoria in 1854 as the first modern fishing port.
The elegant Brixham trawler spread across the world, influencing fishing fleets everywhere.[13] By the end of the 19th century, there were over 3,000 fishing trawlers in commission in Britain, with almost 1,000 at Grimsby. These trawlers were sold to fishers around Europe, including from the Netherlands and Scandinavia. Twelve trawlers went on to form the nucleus of the German fishing fleet.[14]
The earliest steam-powered fishing boats first appeared in the 1870s and used the trawl system of fishing as well as lines and drift nets. These were large boats, usually 80–90 feet (24–27 m) in length with a beam of around 20 feet (6 m). They weighed 40–50 tons and travelled at 9–11 knots (17–20 km/h; 10–13 mph). David Allen designed and made the earliest purpose-built fishing vessels in Leith, Scotland in March 1875, when he converted a drifter to steam power. In 1877, he built the first screw propelled steam trawler in the world.[15]
Steam trawlers were introduced at Grimsby and Hull in the 1880s. In 1890 it was estimated that there were 20,000 men on the North Sea. The steam drifter was not used in the herring fishery until 1897. The last sailing fishing trawler was built in 1925 in Grimsby. Trawler designs adapted as the way they were powered changed from sail to coal-fired steam by World War I to diesel and turbines by the end of World War II.
In 1931, the first powered drum was created by Laurie Jarelainen. The drum was a circular device that was set to the side of the boat and would draw in the nets. Since World War II, radio navigation aids and fish finders have been widely used. The first trawlers fished over the side, rather than over the stern. The first purpose-built stern trawler was Fairtry built in 1953 at Aberdeen, Scotland. The ship was much larger than any other trawlers then in operation and inaugurated the era of the 'super trawler'. As the ship pulled its nets over the stern, it could lift out a much greater haul of up to 60 tons.[16] The ship served as a basis for the expansion of 'super trawlers' around the world in the following decades.[16]
Recreational fishing
[edit]
Woodcut by Louis Rhead
The early evolution of fishing as recreation is not clear. For example, there is anecdotal evidence for fly fishing in Japan. However, fly fishing was likely to have been a means of survival, rather than recreation. The earliest English essay on recreational fishing was published in 1496, by Dame Juliana Berners, the prioress of the Benedictine Sopwell Nunnery. The essay was titled Treatyse of Fysshynge wyth an Angle,[17] and included detailed information on fishing waters, the construction of rods and lines, and the use of natural baits and artificial flies.[18]
Recreational fishing took a great leap forward after the English Civil War, where a newly found interest in the activity left its mark on the many books and treatises that were written on the subject at the time. Leonard Mascall in 1589 wrote A booke of Fishing with Hooke and Line along with many others he produced in his life on game and wildlife in England at the time. The Compleat Angler was written by Izaak Walton in 1653 (although Walton continued to add to it for a quarter of a century) and described the fishing in the Derbyshire Wye. It was a celebration of the art and spirit of fishing in prose and verse. A second part to the book was added by Walton's friend Charles Cotton.[19]
Charles Kirby designed an improved fishing hook in 1655 that remains relatively unchanged to this day. He went on to invent the Kirby bend, a distinctive hook with an offset point, still commonly used today.[20]

The 18th century was mainly an era of consolidation of the techniques developed in the previous century. Running rings began to appear along the fishing rods, which gave anglers greater control over the cast line. The rods themselves were also becoming increasingly sophisticated and specialised for different roles. Jointed rods became common from the middle of the century and bamboo came to be used for the top section of the rod, giving it much greater strength and flexibility.
The industry also became commercialised – rods and tackle were sold at the haberdashers store. After the Great Fire of London in 1666, artisans moved to Redditch which became a centre of production of fishing-related products from the 1730s. Onesimus Ustonson established his shop in 1761, and his establishment remained a market leader for the next century. He received a royal warrant from three successive monarchs starting with King George IV.[21] He also invented the multiplying winch. The commercialization of the industry came at a time of expanded interest in fishing as a recreational hobby for members of the aristocracy.[22]
The impact of the Industrial Revolution was first felt in the manufacture of fly lines. Instead of anglers twisting their lines – a laborious and time-consuming process – the new textile spinning machines allowed for a variety of tapered lines to be easily manufactured and marketed.
British fly fishing continued to develop in the 19th century, with the emergence of fly fishing clubs, along with the appearance of several books on the subject of fly tying and fly fishing techniques.
By the mid to late 19th century, expanding leisure opportunities for the middle and lower classes began to have an effect on fly fishing, which steadily grew in mass appeal. The expansion of the railway network in Britain allowed the less affluent for the first time to take weekend trips to the seaside or rivers for fishing. Richer hobbyists ventured further abroad.[23] The large rivers of Norway replete with large stocks of salmon began to attract fishers from England in large numbers in the middle of the century – Jones's guide to Norway, and salmon-fisher's pocket companion, published in 1848, was written by Frederic Tolfrey and was a popular guide to the country.[23]

Modern reel design had begun in England during the latter part of the 18th century, and the predominant model in use was known as the 'Nottingham reel'. The reel was a wide drum that spooled out freely and was ideal for allowing the bait to drift a long way out with the current. Geared multiplying reels never successfully caught on in Britain, but had more success in the United States, where George Snyder of Kentucky modified similar models into his bait-casting reel, the first American-made design in 1810.[24]
The material used for the rod itself changed from the heavy woods native to England to lighter and more elastic varieties imported from abroad, especially from South America and the West Indies. Bamboo rods became the generally favoured option from the mid-19th century, and several strips of the material were cut from the cane, milled into shape, and then glued together to form the light, strong, hexagonal rods with a solid core that were superior to anything that preceded them. George Cotton and his predecessors fished their flies with long rods, and light lines allowing the wind to do most of the work of getting the fly to the fish.[25]

Tackle design began to improve in the 1880s. The introduction of new woods to the manufacture of fly rods made it possible to cast flies into the wind on silk lines, instead of horse hair. These lines allowed for a much greater casting distance. However, these early fly lines proved troublesome as they had to be coated with various dressings to make them float and needed to be taken off the reel and dried every four hours or so to prevent them from becoming waterlogged. Another negative consequence was that it became easy for the much longer line to get into a tangle – this was called a 'tangle' in Britain, and a 'backlash' in the US. This problem spurred the invention of the regulator to evenly spool the line out and prevent tangling.[25]
The American, Charles F. Orvis, designed and distributed a novel reel and fly design in 1874, described by reel historian Jim Brown as the "benchmark of American reel design," and the first fully modern fly reel.[26][27]
Albert Illingworth, 1st Baron Illingworth a textiles magnate, patented the modern form of fixed-spool spinning reel in 1905. When casting Illingworth's reel design, the line was drawn off the leading edge of the spool but was restrained and rewound by a line pickup, a device which orbits around the stationary spool. Because the line did not have to pull against a rotating spool, much lighter lures could be cast than with conventional reels.[25]
The development of inexpensive fiberglass rods, synthetic fly lines, and monofilament leaders in the early 1950s revived the popularity of fly fishing.
Techniques
[edit]
There are many fishing techniques and tactics for catching fish. The term can also be applied to methods for catching other aquatic animals such as molluscs (shellfish, squid, octopus) and edible marine invertebrates.
Fishing techniques include hand gathering, spearfishing, netting, angling, bowfishing and trapping, as well as less common techniques such as gaffing, snagging, clubbing and the use of specially trained animals such as cormorants and otters. There are also destructive fishing techniques (such as electrocution, blasting and poisoning) that can do irreversible damage to the local ecosystems by killing/sterilizing entire fish stocks, habitat destruction and/or upsetting the equilibrium of interspecific competitions, and such practices are often deemed illegal and liable to criminal punishments.
Recreational, commercial and artisanal fishers use different techniques, and also, sometimes, the same techniques. Recreational fishers fish for pleasure, sport, or to provide food for themselves, while commercial fishers fish for profit. Artisanal fishers use traditional, low-tech methods, for survival in third-world countries, and as a cultural heritage in other countries. Usually, recreational fishers use angling methods and commercial fishers use netting methods. A modern development is to fish with the assistance of a drone.[28]
Why a fish bites a baited hook or lure involves several factors related to the sensory physiology, behaviour, feeding ecology, and biology of the fish as well as the environment and characteristics of the bait/hook/lure.[29] There is an intricate link between various fishing techniques and knowledge about the fish and their behaviour including migration, foraging and habitat. The effective use of fishing techniques often depends on this additional knowledge.[30] Some fishers follow fishing folklores which claim that fish feeding patterns are influenced by the position of the sun and the moon.
Tackle
[edit]
Fishing tackle is the equipment used by fishers when fishing. Almost any equipment or gear used for fishing can be called fishing tackle, although the term is most commonly associated with gear used in angling. Some examples are hooks, lines, sinkers, floats, rods, reels, baits, lures, spears, nets, gaffs, traps, waders, and tackle boxes. Fishing techniques refers to the ways the tackle is used when fishing.
Tackle that is attached to the end of a fishing line is collectively called terminal tackle. These include hooks, sinkers, floats, leader lines, swivels, split rings, and any wires, snaps, beads, spoons, blades, spinners and clevises used to attach spinner blades to fishing lures. People also tend to use dead or live bait fish as another form of bait.
Fishing vessels
[edit]
A fishing vessel is a boat or ship used to catch fish in the sea, or on a lake or river. Many different kinds of vessels are used in commercial, artisanal, and recreational fishing.
According to the FAO, in 2004 there were four million commercial fishing vessels.[31] About 1.3 million of these are decked vessels with enclosed areas. Nearly all of these decked vessels are mechanised, and 40,000 of them are over 100 tons. At the other extreme, two-thirds (1.8 million) of the undecked boats are traditional craft of various types, powered only by sail and oars.[31] These boats are used by artisan fishers.
It is difficult to estimate how many recreational fishing boats there are, although the number is high. The term is fluid since some recreational boats may also be used for fishing from time to time. Unlike most commercial fishing vessels, recreational fishing boats are often not dedicated just to fishing. Just about anything that will stay afloat can be called a recreational fishing boat, so long as a fisher periodically climbs aboard with the intent to catch a fish. Fish are caught for recreational purposes from boats which range from dugout canoes, float tubes, kayaks, rafts, stand up paddleboards, pontoon boats and small dinghies to runabouts, cabin cruisers and cruising yachts to large, hi-tech and luxurious big game rigs.[32] Larger boats, purpose-built with recreational fishing in mind, usually have large, open cockpits at the stern, designed for convenient fishing.
Traditional fishing
[edit]
Traditional fishing is any kind of small scale, commercial or subsistence fishing practices using traditional techniques such as rod and tackle, arrows and harpoons, throw nets and drag nets, etc.
Recreational fishing
[edit]

Recreational and sport fishing refer to fishing primarily for pleasure or competition. Recreational fishing has conventions, rules, licensing restrictions and laws that limit how fish may be caught; typically, these prohibit the use of nets and the catching of fish with hooks not in the mouth. The most common form of recreational fishing is done with a rod, reel, line, hooks and any one of a wide range of baits or lures such as artificial flies. The practice of catching or attempting to catch fish with a hook is generally known as angling. In angling, it is sometimes expected or required that fish be returned to the water (catch and release). Recreational or sport fishermen may log their catches or participate in fishing competitions.
The estimated global number of recreational fishers varies from 220 million to a maximum number of 700 million fishers globally,[33] which is thought to be double the number of individuals working as commercial fishers. In the United States alone it was estimated that 50.1 million people engaged in fishing activities in both saltwater and freshwater environments.[34]
Big-game fishing is fishing from boats to catch large open-water species such as swordfish, tuna, sharks, and marlin. Sportfishing (sometimes game fishing) is recreational fishing where the primary reward is the challenge of finding and catching the fish rather than the culinary or financial value of the fish's flesh. Fish sought after include tarpon, sailfish, mackerel, grouper and many others.
Fishing industry
[edit]-
Contribution of fish to animal protein supply, average 2013–2015
-
World capture fisheries and aquaculture production 1950 – 2015
-
A comparison of employment In agriculture, forestry and fishing by region

The fishing industry includes any industry or activity concerned with taking, culturing, processing, preserving, storing, transporting, marketing or selling fish or fish products. It is defined by the FAO as including recreational, subsistence and commercial fishing, and the harvesting, processing, and marketing sectors.[35] The commercial activity is aimed at the delivery of fish and other seafood products for human consumption or use as raw material in other industrial processes. In 2022 24% of fishers and fish farmers and 62% of workers in post-harvest sector were women.[36]
There are three principal industry sectors:[note 1]
- The commercial sector comprises enterprises and individuals associated with wild-catch or aquaculture resources and the various transformations of those resources into products for sale.
- The traditional sector comprises enterprises and individuals associated with fisheries resources from which aboriginal people derive products following their traditions.
- The recreational sector comprises enterprises and individuals associated with the purpose of recreation, sport or sustenance with fisheries resources from which products are derived that are not for sale.
Commercial fishing
[edit]

Commercial fishing is the capture of fish for commercial purposes. Those who practice it must often pursue fish far from the land under adverse conditions. Commercial fishermen harvest a wide range of aquatic species, from tuna, cod and salmon to shrimp, krill, lobster, clams, squid and crab, in various fisheries for these species. Commercial fishing methods have become very efficient using large nets and sea-going processing factories. Individual fishing quotas and international treaties seek to control the species and quantities caught.
A commercial fishing enterprise may vary from one person with a small boat with hand-casting nets or a few pot traps, to a huge fleet of trawlers processing tons of fish every day.
Commercial fishing gear includes weights, nets (e.g. purse seine), seine nets (e.g. beach seine), trawls (e.g. bottom trawl), dredges, hooks and line (e.g. long line and handline), lift nets, gillnets, entangling nets and traps.
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the total world capture fisheries production in 2000 was 86 million tons (FAO 2002). The top producing countries were, in order, the People's Republic of China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan), Peru, Japan, the United States, Chile, Indonesia, Russia, India, Thailand, Norway, and Iceland. Those countries accounted for more than half of the world's production; China alone accounted for a third of the world's production. Of that production, over 90% was marine and less than 10% was inland.
A small number of species support the majority of the world's fisheries. Some of these species are herring, cod, sardine, anchovy, tuna, flounder, mullet, squid, shrimp, salmon, crab, lobster, oyster and scallops. All except these last four provided a worldwide catch of well over a million tonnes in 1999, with herring and sardines together providing a catch of over 22 million metric tons in 1999. Many other species as well are fished in smaller numbers.
Fish farms
[edit]Fish farming is the principal form of aquaculture, while other methods may fall under mariculture. It involves raising fish commercially in tanks or enclosures, usually for food. A facility that releases juvenile fish into the wild for recreational fishing or to supplement a species' natural population is generally referred to as a fish hatchery. Fish species raised by fish farms include salmon, carp, tilapia, catfish, white seabass and trout.
Increased demands on wild fisheries by commercial fishing has caused widespread overfishing. Fish farming offers an alternative solution to the increasing market demand for fish.

Fish products
[edit]Fish and fish products are consumed as food all over the world. With other seafoods, it provides the world's prime source of high-quality protein: 14–16 percent of the animal protein consumed worldwide. Over one billion people rely on fish as their primary source of animal protein.[38]
Fish and other aquatic organisms are also processed into various food and non-food products, such as sharkskin leather, pigments made from the inky secretions of cuttlefish, isinglass used for the clarification of wine and beer, fish emulsion used as a fertiliser, fish glue, fish oil and fish meal.
Fish are also collected live for research and the aquarium trade.
Fish marketing
[edit]Fisheries management
[edit]
Fisheries management draws on fisheries science to find ways to protect fishery resources so sustainable exploitation is possible. Modern fisheries management is often referred to as a governmental system of management rules based on defined objectives and a mix of management means to implement the rules, which are put in place by a system of monitoring control and surveillance.
Fisheries science is the academic discipline of managing and understanding fisheries. It is a multidisciplinary science, which draws on the disciplines of oceanography, marine biology, marine conservation, ecology, population dynamics, economics and management in an attempt to provide an integrated picture of fisheries. In some cases new disciplines have emerged, such as bioeconomics.
Sustainability
[edit]Stocks fished within biologically sustainable levels decreased from 90% in 1974 to 62.3% in 2021.[36] Issues involved in the long term sustainability of fishing include overfishing, by-catch, marine pollution, environmental effects of fishing, ghost fishing, climate change, fisheries-induced evolution and fish farming.
Conservation issues are part of marine conservation, and are addressed in fisheries science programs. There is a growing gap between how many fish are available to be caught and humanity's desire to catch them, a problem that gets worse as the world population grows.
Similar to other environmental issues, there can be conflict between the fishermen who depend on fishing for their livelihoods and fishery scientists who realise that if future fish populations are to be sustainable then some fisheries must limit fishing or cease operations.
Animal welfare concerns
[edit]Historically, some doubted that fish could experience pain. Laboratory experiments have shown that fish do react to painful stimuli (e.g., injections of bee venom) in a similar way to mammals.[39][40] This is controversial and has been disputed.[further explanation needed][41] The expansion of fish farming as well as animal welfare concerns in society has led to research into more humane and faster ways of killing fish.[42]
In large-scale operations like fish farms, stunning fish with electricity or putting them into water saturated with nitrogen so that they cannot breathe, results in death more rapidly than just taking them out of the water. For sport fishing, it is recommended that fish be killed soon after catching them by hitting them on the head followed by bleeding out or by stabbing the brain with a sharp object[43] (called pithing or ike jime in Japanese). Some believe it is not cruel if you release the catch back to where it was caught however a study in 2018 states that the hook damages an important part of the feeding mechanism by which the fish sucks in food, ignoring the issue of pain.[44]
When fishing there are high chances of catching other marine wildlife in a fishing net. There are over 100 different fishing regulations on paper for reducing this bycatch.[45]
Plastic pollution
[edit]
Abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear includes netting, mono/multifilament lines, hooks, ropes, floats, buoys, sinkers, anchors, metallic materials and fish aggregating devices (FADs) made of non-biodegradable materials such as concrete, metal and polymers. It has been estimated that global fishing gear losses each year include 5.7% of all fishing nets, 8.6% of all traps and 29% of all lines used. Abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) can have serious impacts on marine organisms through entanglement and ingestion.[46] The potential for fishing gear to become ALDFG depends on a number of factors including:
- Environmental factors are mostly related to seafloor topography and obstructions, although tides, currents, waves, winds, and interaction with wildlife are also important.
- Operational losses and operator errors can occur even during normal fishing operations.
- Problems such as inadequate fisheries management and regulations that do not include adequate controls can hamper collection of ALDFG (e.g. there may be poor access to collection facilities).
- Gear loss resulting from conflicts primarily occurs (intentionally or unintentionally) in areas with high concentrations of fishing activities, leading to gear being towed away, fouled, sabotaged or vandalized. Passive and unattended gear such as pots, set gillnets and traps are particularly prone to conflict damage. In the Arctic, conflicts are the most common reason for lost gear.[46]
Cultural impact
[edit]

Community
[edit]For communities like fishing villages, fisheries provide not only a source of food and work but also a community and cultural identity.[47]
Economic
[edit]Some locations may be regarded as fishing destinations, which anglers visit on vacation or for competitions. The economic impact of fishing by visitors may be a significant, or even primary driver of tourism revenue for some destinations.
Semantic
[edit]A "fishing expedition" is a situation where an interviewer implies they know more than they do to trick their target into divulging more information than they wish to reveal. Other examples of fishing terms that carry a negative connotation are: "fishing for compliments", "to be fooled hook, line and sinker" (to be fooled beyond merely "taking the bait"), and the internet scam of phishing, in which a third party will duplicate a website where the user would put sensitive information (such as bank codes).
Religious
[edit]Fishing has had an effect on major religions,[48] including Christianity,[49][50] Hinduism, and the various new age[51] religions. Jesus was said to participate in fishing excursions, and a number of the miracles and many parables and stories reported in the Bible involve fish or fishing. Since the Apostle Peter[52] was a fisherman, the Catholic Church has adopted the use of the fishermans ring into the Pope's traditional vestments.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ FAO (2020). "The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action". The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: FAO: 7. doi:10.4060/ca9229en. hdl:10535/3776. ISBN 978-92-5-132692-3.
- ^ Fisheries and Aquaculture in our Changing Climate Archived 23 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine Policy brief of the FAO for the UNFCCC COP-15 in Copenhagen, December 2009.
- ^ "Fisheries and Aquaculture". FAO. Archived from the original on 13 May 2009. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
- ^ African Bone Tools Dispute Key Idea About Human Evolution National Geographic News article. (archived 17 January 2006)
- ^ Yaowu Hu, Y; Hong Shang, H; Haowen Tong, H; Olaf Nehlich, O; Wu Liu, W; Zhao, C; Yu, J; Wang, C; Trinkaus, E; Richards, M (2009). "Stable isotope dietary analysis of the Tianyuan 1 early modern human". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (27): 10971–74. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10610971H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904826106. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2706269. PMID 19581579.
- ^ First direct evidence of substantial fish consumption by early modern humans in China Archived 15 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine PhysOrg.com, 6 July 2009.
- ^ Coastal Shell Middens and Agricultural Origins in Atlantic Europe Archived 26 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ a b "History of fishing – fishing nets, shellfish, boats". quatr.us Study Guides. 12 June 2017. Archived from the original on 3 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018.
- ^ Alfaro Giner, Carmen (2010). "Fishing nets in the ancient world: the historical and archaeological evidence". Ancient nets and fishing gear: Proceedings of the international workshop on Nets and fishing gear in classical antiquity: A first approach: Cádiz, November 15–17, 2007. - ( Monographs of the Sagena project; 2): 55–81.
- ^ a b "History of a Brixham trawler". JKappeal.org. 2 March 2009. Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 13 September 2010.
- ^ Days out: "Gone fishing in Grimsby"[permanent dead link] The Independent, 8 September 2002 [dead link]
- ^ "A brief history of Grimsby". localhistories.org. 14 March 2021. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ "Pilgrim's restoration under full sail". BBC. Archived from the original on 17 November 2002. Retrieved 2 March 2009.
- ^ Sailing trawlers. issuu. 10 January 2014. Archived from the original on 26 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ "The Steam Trawler". Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ a b "HISTORY". Archived from the original on 21 August 2013. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ Berners, Dame Juliana (1496) A treatyse of fysshynge wyth an Angle Archived 29 June 2023 at the Wayback Machine (transcription by Risa S. Bear).
- ^ Berners, Dame Juliana. (2008). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 20 June 2008, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online
- ^ Andrew N. Herd. "Fly fishing techniques in the fifteenth century". Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
- ^ Stan L. Ulanski (2003). The Science of Fly-fishing. University of Virginia Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-8139-2210-2.
- ^ "Welcome To Great Fly Fishing Tips". December 2011. Archived from the original on 27 June 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ "Fishing Tackle Chapter 3" (PDF). CLAM PRODUCTIONS. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 September 2013. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ a b Andrew N. Herd. "Fly Fishing in the Years 1800–1850". Archived from the original on 3 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ Andrew N. Herd. "Fly Fishing in the Eighteenth Century". Archived from the original on 19 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
- ^ a b c "fishing". Encyclopedia Britannica. July 2023. Archived from the original on 4 May 2015. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
- ^ Brown, Jim. A Treasury of Reels: The Fishing Reel Collection of The American Museum of Fly Fishing. Manchester, Vermont: The American Museum of Fly Fishing, 1990.
- ^ Schullery, Paul. The Orvis Story: 150 Years of an American Sporting Tradition. Manchester, Vermont, The Orvis Company, Inc., 2006
- ^ Fishing with a drone Archived 12 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine Stuff, 15 December 2015.
- ^ Lennox, Robert J; Alós, Josep; Arlinghaus, Robert; Horodysky, Andrij; Klefoth, Thomas; Monk, Christopher T; Cooke, Steven J (2017). "What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants". Fish and Fisheries. 18 (5): 986–1010. Bibcode:2017AqFF...18..986L. doi:10.1111/faf.12219. ISSN 1467-2979.
- ^ Keegan, William F (1986) New Series, Volume. 88, No. 1., pp. 92–107.
- ^ a b FAO 2007
- ^ NOAA: Sport fishing boat Archived 6 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ FAO. "The role of Recreational Fisheries in the sustainable management of marine resources | GLOBEFISH | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations". www.fao.org. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ Lange, David. "Topic: Recreational Fishing in the U.S." Statista. Archived from the original on 9 February 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ FAO Fisheries Section: Glossary: Fishing industry. Archived 8 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 28 May 2008.
- ^ a b The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. FAO. 7 June 2024. doi:10.4060/cd0683en. ISBN 978-92-5-138763-4.
- ^ "Today's Fishing Industry". Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. 10 December 2007. Archived from the original on 14 June 2009. Retrieved 26 July 2012.
- ^ Tidwell, James H. and Allan, Geoff L.
- ^ Sneddon, LU (2009). "Pain perception in fish: indicators and endpoints". ILAR Journal. 50 (4): 38–42. doi:10.1093/ilar.50.4.338. PMID 19949250. Archived from the original on 20 June 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2024.
- ^ Oidtmann, B; Hoffman, RW (July–August 2001). "Pain and suffering in fish". Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift. 114 (7–8): 277–282. PMID 11505801.
- ^ "Do fish feel pain? Not as humans do, study suggests". ScienceDaily. 8 August 2013. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 2 August 2017.
- ^ Lund, V; Mejdell, CM; Röcklinsberg, H; Anthony, R; Håstein, T (4 May 2007). "Expanding the moral circle: farmed fish as objects of moral concern". Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 75 (2): 109–118. doi:10.3354/dao075109. PMID 17578250.
- ^ Davie, PS; Kopf, RK (August 2006). "Physiology, behaviour and welfare of fish during recreational fishing and after release". New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 54 (4): 161–172. doi:10.1080/00480169.2006.36690. PMID 16915337. S2CID 1636511.
- ^ "Anglers' catch-and-release method stops fish feeding properly, study finds". The Independent. 9 October 2018. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
- ^ "Facts | Seaspiracy Website". SEASPIRACY. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
- ^ a b "Drowning in Plastics – Marine Litter and Plastic Waste Vital Graphics". UNEP - UN Environment Programme. 21 October 2021. Archived from the original on 21 March 2022. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
- ^ "International Collective in Support of Fishworkers". ICSF. 2 March 2012. Archived from the original on 14 May 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
- ^ Regensteinn J.M. and Regensteinn C.E. (2000) "Religious food laws and the seafood industry" Archived 4 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine In: R.E. Martin, E.P. Carter, G.J. Flick Jr and L.M. Davis (Eds) (2000) Marine and freshwater products handbook, CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-56676-889-4.
- ^ A Misunderstood Analogy for Evangelism Archived 20 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine Bible Analysis Article
- ^ American Bible Society Article Archived 5 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine American Bible Society
- ^ About Pisces the Fish Archived 6 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine The Astrology Cafe Monitor
- ^ Peter: From Fisherman to Fisher of Men Profiles of Faith Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Sources
[edit]
This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under Cc BY-SA 3.0 IGO (license statement/permission). Text taken from Drowning in Plastics – Marine Litter and Plastic Waste Vital Graphics, United Nations Environment Programme.
Further reading
[edit]- Schultz, Ken (1999). Fishing Encyclopedia: Worldwide Angling Guide. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-02-862057-2.
- Gabriel, Otto; Andres von Brandt (2005). Fish catching methods of the world. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-85238-280-6.
- Sahrhage, Dietrich; Johannes Lundbeck (1992). A History of Fishing. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-55332-0.
External links
[edit]- "The sea without fish, a reality!". Pauly, Daniel (2009). University of British Columbia. Archived from the original on 7 January 2013..
- Map of world ocean fishing activity, 2016
Fishing
View on GrokipediaHistory
Prehistoric Origins
Evidence of fish exploitation by early hominins extends to the Early Paleolithic, with burned carp and barbel remains at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel, dated to approximately 780,000 years ago, suggesting capture and cooking near freshwater sources, though methods remain unspecified beyond proximity to aquatic environments.[9] Unequivocal fishing by Homo sapiens is documented around 70,000 years before present in South African sites, encompassing both marine and freshwater habitats through remains indicating targeted procurement.[10] These early instances likely involved rudimentary techniques such as hand-gathering, spearing, or gorges—straight bone or shell implements swallowed by fish—rather than advanced line fishing, as direct tool evidence for hooks appears later. The oldest known curved fishhooks, crafted from marine snail shells, originate from Laili rock shelter (formerly Jerimalai Cave) in East Timor, dating to 42,000–23,000 years ago, accompanied by over 38,000 fish bones from pelagic species like tuna, implying offshore voyages in watercraft for deep-sea angling with lines and sinkers.[11][12] In Japan, shell hooks from Sakitari Cave on Okinawa Island, aged 23,000 years, further attest to Paleolithic maritime adaptations in East Asia, targeting reef and open-water fish.[13] Bone hooks emerge prominently in the Epipaleolithic, as at Jordan River Dureijat, Israel (ca. 12,300–12,000 years ago), featuring inner/outer barbs, knobs, grooves for line attachment, and adhesives, alongside grooved stones as weights, indicating sophisticated line-and-hook systems possibly for fly-fishing or varied species.[14] Artistic depictions provide indirect evidence of techniques; slate plaques from Gönnersdorf, Germany, engraved around 15,800 years ago, illustrate net or trap configurations amid fish swarms, marking the earliest known representations of passive fishing methods in Europe and highlighting seasonal exploitation in riverine settings.[15] Fish remains at such Upper Paleolithic sites underscore dietary reliance on aquatic protein, with tools evolving from simple lithic points for spearfishing to composite gear, reflecting cognitive advances in tool-making and environmental adaptation amid post-glacial resource shifts.[16] These developments prefigure broader subsistence strategies, though prehistoric fishing remained opportunistic, varying by locale and constrained by mobility in hunter-gatherer societies.Ancient and Classical Developments
Archaeological evidence from ancient Mesopotamia indicates that fishing was integral to subsistence economies along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, with hooks, nets, and small skin boats employed as early as the third millennium BCE, as documented in cuneiform texts and artifact recoveries from sites like Ur.[17] Fish were stored in ponds for later consumption, reflecting organized resource management during the Ur III period (ca. 2112–2004 BCE), where administrative records detail fisheries contributing to state provisioning.[18] In ancient Egypt, fishing techniques advanced significantly by the Old Kingdom (ca. 2686–2181 BCE), incorporating seine nets and beam trawls for riverine and Nile Delta captures, as evidenced by tomb depictions and preserved gear from sites like Fayum.[19] Harpoons, spears, wicker traps, and lines supplemented these, with fishing camps dating back 20,000 years yielding substantial faunal remains of species like tilapia and catfish, underscoring fish as a dietary staple predating dynastic periods.[20] The Middle Kingdom (ca. 2050–1710 BCE) saw the emergence of the first documented fishing rods, enabling targeted angling, while evidence of pond-based fish farming around 1500 BCE marks the earliest verified aquaculture practices globally.[21] Early Chinese records from the Spring and Autumn period (ca. 770–476 BCE) describe pond polyculture of carp species, initiated by figures like Fan Li around 490 BCE, integrating fishing with agriculture in riverine systems like the Yangtze.[22] Techniques such as line fishing and traps appear in oracle bone inscriptions from the Shang dynasty (ca. 1600–1046 BCE), with later textual evidence of bird-assisted methods foreshadowing cormorant fishing traditions.[23] In classical Greece, textual sources from the Hellenistic era detail net-based sea fishing and shore weirs, with Aristotle's observations (ca. 384–322 BCE) on fish behaviors informing practical techniques like spearing and trapping in the Aegean.[24] The Roman period expanded these, employing diverse gear including tridents, hooks, and large-scale nets for Mediterranean fisheries, as preserved in villa mosaics and legal codes regulating catches.[25] Aelian's descriptions (ca. 175–235 CE) of Macedonian fly fishing with artificial lures on rods up to six feet long demonstrate specialized angling for trout, while coastal salting workshops processed vast quantities for trade, evidenced by vats at sites like Leptis Magna.[26] Roman aquaculture in coastal lagoons and piscinae supplied elite markets, with Pliny the Elder noting engineered ponds yielding thousands of fish annually by the first century CE.[27] Oppian's Halieutica (ca. 177–180 CE), a Greek poem dedicated to Marcus Aurelius, catalogs over 100 fish species and techniques like circular flax nets, drawing on empirical observations of marine ecology despite its didactic style.[28]Medieval Expansion and Techniques
During the early Middle Ages, fishing in Europe remained largely localized and subsistence-oriented, relying on rivers, lakes, and nearshore waters, but a significant expansion in marine fishing occurred around AD 1000, marking the onset of intensive commercial practices.[29] Zooarchaeological analyses of fish bones from sites across England and northern Europe indicate rapid increases in catches of gadids (such as cod) and clupeids (such as herring), with marine species comprising a larger proportion of assemblages by the 11th century.[29] [30] This shift coincided with broader socioeconomic changes, including population growth during the High Middle Ages and the Christian requirement for abstinence from meat on approximately 150 days per year, which elevated demand for preserved fish as a protein alternative.[31] Declining freshwater fish stocks, attributable to agricultural encroachment on rivers and overexploitation of inland fisheries, further incentivized marine sourcing.[32] The North Sea and Baltic herring fisheries exemplified this expansion, evolving into major commercial enterprises by the 12th century, facilitated by advancements in preservation that enabled inland distribution.[33] Dutch and Hanseatic fishers developed gibbing—a gutting technique removing the gills and gut while leaving the pancreas to ferment and preserve the flesh—allowing herring to remain edible for months when packed in barrels with salt.[33] This method supported exports to growing urban centers, with archaeological evidence from sites like Gdansk showing herring bones dominating refuse from the 11th century onward.[31] Similarly, cod fisheries off Norway and Iceland intensified, with dried and salted cod (stockfish) traded via the Hanseatic League, contributing to economic networks that linked coastal producers to continental markets by the 13th century.[34] Techniques advanced through vessel innovations and gear improvements suited to offshore operations. The cog, a clinker-built ship with a single square-rigged mast and capacities up to 200 tons, emerged in the 10th century and became prevalent for herring drift-netting in the North Sea, enabling fleets to venture farther from shore than earlier oar-powered boats.[35] Hulks, characterized by broader hulls and higher cargo holds, supplemented cogs for transporting bulk catches, often exceeding 100 tons and supporting seasonal fishing camps.[36] Nets, including large drift and trawl variants made from hemp or flax, were deployed from these vessels to target schooling herring, while handlines and early longlines captured demersal species like cod at depths up to 100 meters.[31] Fish weirs and traps constructed from wood and stone in estuaries supplemented open-sea efforts, as documented in monastic records from England and Iceland.[37] Signs of resource strain prompted early regulations; by the 13th century, English and French monarchs issued edicts limiting mesh sizes in nets to prevent juvenile fish capture and restricting access to rivers for migratory species like salmon and sturgeon, reflecting overexploitation driven by market pressures.[38] These measures underscore the causal link between technological scalability—such as salting infrastructure—and ecological limits, even as overall production rose to meet demand from an estimated European population doubling between 1000 and 1300.[39]Industrial Revolution and Modern Commercialization
![A Brixham trawler, representative of 19th-century beam trawling vessels from England][float-right] The Industrial Revolution marked a pivotal shift in commercial fishing, transitioning from localized, sail-dependent operations to mechanized, large-scale endeavors enabled by steam power and improved transportation. In Britain, beam trawling, which had origins in the 14th century but saw limited use, expanded significantly in the 19th century with the adoption of steam engines, allowing vessels to operate farther offshore and in adverse weather. By the 1870s, steam trawlers began replacing sailing smacks in the North Sea, increasing catch efficiency and enabling the supply of fresh fish to inland markets via expanding rail networks. This commercialization was exemplified by the Brixham fleet in Devon, England, where wooden sailing trawlers caught plaice and other demersal species, with landings rising from modest pre-industrial levels to support growing urban populations.[40][41] Preservation technologies further fueled this expansion; the invention of canning in the mid-19th century, such as the 1866 establishment of salmon canneries on the Columbia River, allowed for long-distance trade and reduced spoilage losses. Refrigeration advancements, including ice production from the 1870s and mechanical systems by the 1880s, extended vessel range and market reach, transforming perishable catches into viable commodities. In the United States, these innovations paralleled the growth of Great Lakes fisheries, where mid-19th-century industrial demand led to booms in whitefish and sturgeon harvests, though early signs of stock depletion emerged by the 1850s due to intensified effort. Globally, such developments laid the groundwork for overcapacity, as fishing effort outpaced natural replenishment rates in targeted stocks.[42][43][44] Into the 20th century, modernization accelerated with diesel engines supplanting steam by the 1920s, synthetic nets, and electronic aids like sonar post-World War II, culminating in factory trawlers that processed catches at sea. World capture fisheries production surged from approximately 20 million metric tons in 1950 to over 70 million by the late 20th century, driven by state-supported fleets in nations like the Soviet Union and Japan, which deployed massive distant-water operations. This era saw the rise of industrial fleets targeting high-value species such as cod and tuna, but also precipitated widespread overexploitation, with many stocks collapsing under sustained pressure from unbridled technological creep. Regulatory responses, including the 1970s extension of exclusive economic zones, aimed to curb excesses, yet commercialization persisted amid global demand for seafood protein.[45]Post-2000 Technological and Policy Shifts
In response to escalating overfishing pressures, post-2000 policies worldwide shifted toward science-based quotas, rebuilding mandates, and ecosystem approaches. The United States' 2006 reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act imposed annual catch limits and rebuilding plans, yielding the recovery of 50 depleted stocks and a 60% reduction in overfished determinations since 2000.[46] [47] Similarly, New Zealand implemented harvest control rules in 2008, while Chile enacted comprehensive reforms in 2013, both correlating with stabilized or improved target stocks in those jurisdictions.[48] Internationally, the 2023 World Trade Organization agreement prohibited subsidies for illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and overfished stocks, addressing incentives that had exacerbated global overcapacity.[49] Technological integrations complemented these policies by enhancing monitoring, selectivity, and efficiency. Vessel monitoring systems (VMS), mandated across major fleets by the early 2000s, used satellite GPS to track positions in real time, curbing IUU activities and enabling precise enforcement of closed areas.[50] [51] Electronic monitoring (EM) and reporting expanded from pilot programs in the 2010s, deploying cameras and sensors on vessels to verify catches against logs, with U.S. approvals for cellular-based units in 2020 improving accessibility.[52] [53] Advances in active acoustics, remote sensing, and uncrewed systems like drones facilitated non-invasive stock assessments and bycatch reduction through gear modifications, such as grid escapes in trawls.[54] Aquaculture policies incentivized expansion to offset wild capture declines, with production rising from 32 million metric tons in 2000 to over 114 million by 2018, driven by zoning reforms, biosecurity standards, and subsidies in Asia and Europe.[55] [56] FAO-endorsed frameworks promoted integrated multi-trophic systems to minimize environmental impacts, though challenges like disease outbreaks persisted.[57] Despite localized successes, global overfished stocks climbed to 35% by 2021, underscoring enforcement gaps in developing regions and persistent subsidies totaling $35 billion annually.[58] Regional fishery management organizations reformed performance reviews post-2010 to incorporate transparency metrics, yet illegal fishing evaded controls via vessel spoofing.[59]Fishing Techniques
Hand-Gathering and Spearfishing
Hand-gathering encompasses the manual collection of shellfish, crustaceans, and other sessile or slow-moving aquatic organisms from intertidal zones, beaches, or shallow seabeds without mechanical aids. This technique targets species such as clams, cockles, oysters, mussels, razor clams, and crabs, often involving wading, raking sediment to expose buried individuals, and selective picking by hand.[60][61] Practitioners typically operate during low tides or in accessible coastal areas, yielding low volumes but high selectivity that minimizes bycatch and habitat disruption compared to dredges or trawls.[62] In regions like Australia, hand collection of sea urchins and abalone via free-diving or snorkeling supports regulated quotas, with divers harvesting one organism at a time to ensure sustainability.[62] Globally, such methods fall under small-scale fisheries, which account for approximately 40% of capture fisheries production and sustain livelihoods for nearly 500 million people, though precise contributions from pure hand-gathering remain underreported due to informal practices.[63] Variations include noodling, where anglers insert hands into underwater cavities to grasp spawning catfish by the gills, a practice documented in U.S. freshwater systems like rivers in Oklahoma and Texas since at least the 19th century but regulated to prevent overexploitation during breeding seasons.[64] Hand-gathering's low technological barrier enables widespread use by subsistence communities, but it exposes participants to physical risks such as cuts from sharp shells, hypothermia in cold waters, or envenomation from species like cone snails. Environmental benefits include negligible discarded gear or fuel emissions, yet unregulated gathering can lead to localized depletion, as seen in overharvested clam beds prompting seasonal closures in parts of Europe.[65] Spearfishing entails propelling a barbed spear or shaft at fish underwater, relying on the fisher's accuracy, breath-holding ability, and stealth to approach targets within striking distance, typically 1-3 meters. Originating as one of humanity's earliest fishing methods, evidence from Paleolithic rock art and bone harpoons dates its use to at least 20,000 years ago in coastal hunter-gatherer societies.[66] Traditional implements were simple sharpened poles or tridents, evolving by the mid-20th century to include rubber-band-powered spearguns for greater range and pneumatic models using compressed air for reliability in deeper waters up to 30 meters.[67] Modern practitioners favor free-diving with masks, fins, and snorkels for mobility, as scuba-assisted spearfishing is prohibited in many jurisdictions—including the United States, European Union countries, and Australia—to curb overfishing of predatory species and ensure fair competition with natural ecosystems.[68] Techniques emphasize camouflage via wetsuits mimicking ocean hues, float lines to secure speared fish and prevent shark attraction, and species-specific targeting to avoid protected reef fish, with yields varying from 1-5 kg per dive session depending on visibility and currents.[69] In tropical regions like the Mediterranean or Indo-Pacific, spearfishers pursue pelagic species such as grouper or snapper, contributing to recreational harvests estimated at thousands of tons annually, though data gaps persist due to unlicensed activities. Safety hazards include shallow-water blackout from hyperventilation-induced hypoxia, affecting up to 10% of untrained freedivers, alongside marine predator encounters—sharks drawn to struggling prey—and entanglement in kelp or lines.[70] In New Zealand, breath-hold diving incidents, often linked to spearfishing or gathering, resulted in 38 fatalities from 2007-2016, primarily from drowning rather than trauma.[71] Regulations worldwide mandate minimum distances from swim zones and bans on lights or explosives to mitigate these risks and ecological strain.[68]Angling with Lines and Hooks
Angling refers to fishing methods that utilize a line attached to a hook or hooks to capture fish primarily by the mouth, distinguishing it from netting or trapping by targeting individual specimens. This technique encompasses both recreational pursuits with rods and reels and commercial handlining operations without rods. Hooks, often baited with natural or artificial lures, exploit fish predatory instincts, with line tension signaling bites for retrieval.[72] Recreational angling predominantly employs rod-based systems, where anglers cast or present lines to freshwater or saltwater environments. Common variants include bait fishing, involving stationary or bottom-presented baited hooks to attract bottom-feeders; fly fishing, which casts lightweight artificial flies mimicking insects via specialized rods to target surface-feeding species like trout; spinning, using fixed-spool reels for easy casting of lures or bait in varied conditions; bait casting, relying on revolving-spool reels for precise, long-distance lure presentations suited to larger predatory fish; and trolling, where baited lines trail behind a moving boat at speeds of 2 to 9 knots to provoke strikes from pelagic species. These methods allow selective targeting but require skill in reading water currents, fish behavior, and environmental cues for success.[73][74] Commercial handlining deploys vertical lines, typically 20 to 100 meters long with 1 to 10 baited hooks per drop, from anchored or drifting vessels to harvest mid-water species such as tuna and cod. Prevalent in artisanal fleets, this labor-intensive approach yields high-value catches with lower bycatch compared to trawling, though it demands physical endurance and precise timing to set hooks. In the Philippines, handlining accounts for substantial tuna production, with technical efficiency varying by fisher experience and gear quality, as measured in data envelopment analyses from General Santos City operations around 2018.[75][76] Globally, recreational angling contributes approximately 11.3 percent of total freshwater fish harvest, based on synthesized data from inland fisheries surveys averaging 2013-2022, underscoring its nutritional role in protein supply despite underreporting in some regions. Handlining, while sustainable due to minimal habitat disruption, faces overexploitation risks in concentrated fisheries without quotas, as evidenced by catch sustainability assessments in Brazilian artisanal operations.[77][78][79]Netting, Trawling, and Seining
Netting encompasses fishing methods that employ nets to capture fish by entanglement, enclosure, or impoundment, dating back thousands of years but industrialized in the modern era.[80] Common types include gillnets, which trap fish by their gills, and trammel nets, featuring multiple layers for greater entanglement efficiency.[81] These passive nets are deployed stationary in water columns or on seabeds, allowing fish to swim into them voluntarily, and are used globally for both small-scale and commercial operations targeting species like salmon and herring.[82] Trawling involves towing a conical net through the water, either along the seabed (bottom trawling) for demersal species such as cod and flatfish or in midwater (pelagic trawling) for schools like mackerel.[83] The net, equipped with otter boards to spread it open and doors to control width, is dragged by one or two vessels, herding fish into the cod end for collection.[84] Industrial otter trawling emerged in the early 20th century, with beam trawlers preceding it in the 19th century, and expanded rapidly post-World War II, particularly in regions like Southeast Asia from the 1960s.[85] Bottom trawling constitutes about 24% of global wild fish catches, providing significant protein but generating high fuel consumption and seabed disturbance.[86] Seining deploys a long net to encircle fish schools, then closes the bottom to trap them, distinguishing it from towed methods by relying on herding rather than dragging.[87] Purse seining, the dominant form, uses a net with floats on top and a pursing line at the bottom to form a "purse," targeting pelagic species like tuna and sardines in surface waters.[88] Variants include beach seining, operated from shore for nearshore fish, and Danish or Scottish seining, which uses weighted ropes to sweep the seabed and herd demersal fish into the net without constant towing, offering fuel efficiency over traditional trawling.[60] Together with bottom trawling, purse seining accounts for over 53% of global catches from industrial gears.[89] These methods, while productive, incur environmental costs: bottom trawling resuspends sediments, damages benthic habitats, and releases stored carbon, with studies indicating chronic biodiversity loss in intensively trawled areas.[90] Purse seining risks bycatch of non-target species like sea turtles, though selectivity improves with fish-aggregating devices.[88] Sustainable management, including gear modifications and quotas, can mitigate impacts, as evidenced by fisheries where trawling yields lower footprints than some land-based proteins when regulated.[91]Trapping, Longlining, and Passive Methods
Trapping employs baited enclosures, such as pots and traps, to capture target species by guiding them through funnel-like entrances that permit easy ingress but impede egress. These rigid structures, often constructed from wire mesh or netting over frames, are deployed on the seabed and connected via ropes to surface buoys for retrieval, either individually or in serial arrays known as trawls of traps. Commercial fisheries utilize this method extensively for crustaceans, including American lobsters (Homarus americanus) and crabs, with vessels typically ranging from 25 to 180 feet deploying hundreds of units per set. Modifications like escape vents and biodegradable panels mitigate bycatch of undersized individuals and reduce ghost fishing from lost gear.[92][93][94] Longlining deploys an elongated mainline, potentially spanning several kilometers, suspended with branch lines bearing baited hooks spaced at intervals to target pelagic species like tuna (Thunnus spp.) or demersal fish near the seafloor. Pelagic variants drift freely in surface or midwater layers, while bottom longlines are anchored; hooks are set using monofilament or wire leaders, with bait such as squid or fish chunks. This technique accounts for approximately 9% of global tuna catch but incurs bycatch rates exceeding 20%, affecting seabirds through hook ingestion, sharks via finning, and sea turtles by entanglement, necessitating interventions like bird-scaring lines, weighted sinkers, and circle hooks to enhance selectivity.[95][96][97][96] Passive methods encompass stationary gears that exploit fish behavior for capture without vessel propulsion or active herding, including traps, longlines, gillnets, and setlines such as trotlines—multi-hook arrays suspended from floats or stakes. These techniques operate by entanglement, enclosure, or voluntary approach to bait, remaining in place for hours to days before haul-back, which conserves fuel relative to mobile gears but risks prolonged stress to captured animals and derelict gear entangling marine life. Examples include juglines with submerged baited hooks buoyed for riverine or lacustrine use, and fyke nets funneling migratory fish into codends. Deployment selectivity depends on site-specific factors like currents and depth, with global application in both artisanal and industrial contexts.[98][99][100]Aquaculture and Cultured Methods
Aquaculture involves the controlled cultivation of aquatic organisms such as fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and aquatic plants under managed conditions to enhance production beyond natural reproduction.[101] In 2022, global aquaculture production reached 130.9 million tonnes, valued at approximately USD 313 billion, accounting for 59% of total fisheries and aquaculture output and surpassing wild capture fisheries for the first time in volume.[102] This growth reflects intensive farming practices that supplement declining wild stocks, with production concentrated in Asia, where China alone contributed over 60% of the world's farmed aquatic animals.[103] Major methods include land-based systems such as earthen ponds, concrete raceways, and recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which recycle water to minimize environmental discharge, and open-water approaches like net pens and cages suspended in coastal or offshore waters.[104] Ponds dominate freshwater finfish culture, particularly for species like carp and tilapia in extensive systems relying on natural productivity supplemented by feed, while intensive cage systems are prevalent for marine species such as salmon in Norway and Chile.[105] Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) combines fed species like fish with extractive organisms such as seaweed and shellfish to recycle nutrients and reduce waste impacts.[106] Leading cultured species encompass carps (over 20 million tonnes annually, primarily in China), tilapias, pangasius, and salmonids, alongside non-finfish like shrimp and oysters; in 2023 estimates, finfish production totaled about 59.4 million tonnes, with seaweeds adding 35.2 million tonnes for industrial and food uses.[107] Asia leads in volume for carps and shrimp, while Europe and the Americas focus on high-value salmon and trout through advanced RAS and offshore cages to mitigate disease risks.[108] Sustainability challenges persist, including effluent discharge from intensive farms leading to eutrophication, escapes of farmed fish interbreeding with wild populations, and reliance on fishmeal feeds that strain wild forage stocks, though innovations like alternative proteins and closed systems aim to address these.[109] Disease outbreaks, often exacerbated by high stocking densities, necessitate antibiotic use, raising resistance concerns, yet empirical data show aquaculture's net reduction in pressure on overfished wild populations when managed with site-specific controls.[110] Regulatory frameworks, such as those from the FAO, emphasize biosecurity and carrying capacity assessments to balance expansion with ecological limits.[111]Equipment and Tackle
Rods, Reels, and Lines
Fishing rods are elongated, flexible implements designed for casting baited lines and exerting leverage against hooked fish. Early European rods took the form of simple cane poles, often exceeding 10 feet in length, with line tied directly to the tip.[112] By the 1600s, wooden constructions using hickory or ash emerged, allowing greater durability and length up to 18 feet for dapping techniques.[112] Modern rods typically range from 4 to 14 feet, classified by action (fast, medium, slow) which denotes bend characteristics, and power (ultralight to heavy) matching target species and line strength.[113] Construction materials have evolved from solid wood to composites; present-day rods predominantly employ carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) for lightness and sensitivity or glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) for resilience, with bamboo split-cane retaining niche appeal for its parabolic flex.[114] Fishing reels store, dispense, and retrieve line while providing drag to tire fish. Originating in China around AD 300–400, early wooden or bamboo reels served primarily as line holders, with widespread adoption in Europe by the 17th century.[115] Key types include spinning reels, featuring a fixed spool and bail for tangle-free casting, patented in Europe during the 1930s and popularized post-World War II; and conventional (baitcasting) reels with revolving spools suited for precise lure control but prone to backlash.[116] Fly reels, originating in the 19th century, emphasize large-arbor designs for rapid line recovery in trout fishing, often with adjustable disc drags exerting up to 20 pounds of resistance.[117] Fishing lines transmit casts, connect hooks to rods, and absorb shocks from fish strikes. Historical lines derived from horsehair, silk, or linen, offering limited strength around 4–8 pounds test before synthetics.[118] Monofilament, extruded from nylon polymers since the 1930s and mass-produced post-1945, provides 5–50 pound test ratings with inherent stretch (20–30%) for shock absorption but greater visibility and memory causing coils.[118] Braided lines, woven from polyethylene fibers like Dyneema introduced in the 1970s, achieve diameters 1/3–1/4 that of equivalent monofilament strength (up to 100 pounds), minimal stretch (<5%), and superior abrasion resistance, though higher visibility and cost.[119] Fluorocarbon variants, developed in the 1970s, mimic refractive indices near water for invisibility and sink faster, often layered as leaders over braided mainlines.[120] Line selection integrates with rod power and reel capacity, typically spooling 100–300 yards calibrated to prevent overload during runs exceeding 1 pound per square inch drag.[113]Baits, Lures, and Artificials
Baits consist of natural organic materials, either live or preserved, employed to entice fish primarily through olfactory cues, natural movement, and texture. Live baits, such as earthworms, minnows, leeches, insects, crayfish, and shrimp, prove effective across various species due to their inherent scents and motions that replicate vulnerable prey.[121][122] Dead or cut baits, including strips of squid, fish chunks, or clams, emphasize scent dispersion in currents, making them suitable for bottom-dwelling or scent-oriented predators like catfish and snapper.[123] Dough or power baits, formulated from processed ingredients like cornmeal, flour, and attractants, adhere to hooks and release odors over time, particularly targeting stocked trout in freshwater systems.[121] Lures, often termed artificials, are manufactured devices that simulate prey via visual appeal, vibration, and erratic action rather than biological scents, enabling coverage of larger water volumes without constant rebaiting. Common hard-bodied lures include spoons, which flutter and flash to mimic dying baitfish; crankbaits or plugs, featuring diving lips to imitate swimming minnows at depths up to 20 feet; and spinners, whose rotating blades generate flash and thump to provoke reaction strikes.[124][125] Jigs, weighted hooks dressed with feathers, hair, or rubber skirts, sink rapidly and jiggle to attract species like bass and walleye in mid-water columns.[126] Soft plastic artificials, pioneered in the mid-20th century with materials like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and silicone, replicate worms, creatures, or swimbaits through flexible forms and scents infused during manufacturing; these endure multiple casts and target structure-oriented fish.[127] Surface lures such as poppers create explosive disturbances to trigger topwater strikes from predatory fish like largemouth bass. Artificial flies, tied from feathers, fur, thread, and hooks since at least the 15th century but refined in the 19th, drift on or subsurface to imitate insects for trout and salmon in fly fishing.[128] Early lures derived from bone, wood, and metal as early as prehistoric times, evolving to mass-produced wooden minnow imitations by firms like Creek Chub Bait Company, founded in 1916, which standardized designs for commercial viability.[129] Modern iterations incorporate lead for weighting, though alternatives like tungsten emerge to reduce environmental lead dispersion, with plastics dominating since the 1960s for durability and customization.[127] Effectiveness varies by context: natural baits excel in low-visibility or scent-driven scenarios, yielding higher catch rates in some passive setups, while lures often secure larger specimens through aggressive retrievals, as brighter variants correlate with bigger captures in clear waters without compromising overall rates.[130][125] Regulations in many regions, such as those from state wildlife departments, restrict live bait transport to curb invasive species spread, favoring artificials for biosecurity.[121]Nets, Traps, and Specialized Gear
Fishing nets consist of meshes formed by knotting relatively thin threads or cords, designed to entangle, enclose, or scoop aquatic organisms.[81] Historically crafted from natural fibers such as grasses, vines, or flax, modern nets predominantly use synthetic materials like nylon or polyethylene for durability, reduced weight, and resistance to rot, with production scaling significantly after nylon's commercialization in the 1930s.[131] Common types include gillnets, which are vertical walls of netting that catch fish by gilling (wedging in mesh) or tangling, deployed as set (anchored) or drift (free-floating) variants; trawl nets, conical bags towed behind vessels to herd and capture demersal or pelagic species; and seine nets, encircling curtains pulled through water or around schools to concentrate fish for retrieval.[132][133] [134] Traps and pots are rigid, three-dimensional enclosures, often constructed from wire mesh, wood, or rigid frames with funnel entrances that permit entry but impede escape, baited to attract target species.[92] Primarily deployed on seabeds for crustaceans like crabs and lobsters or finfish such as cod, these gears minimize bycatch compared to active methods when designed with escape vents for undersized individuals, though entanglement risks persist for non-target marine life.[93] In 2021, traps accounted for significant harvests in fisheries targeting Dungeness crab and spot prawns, with pots weighing up to several hundred pounds when baited and submerged via buoys and lines.[135] Specialized gear encompasses variants like pound nets or weirs, which feature leader fences guiding fish into impoundment areas for selective harvesting, historically used since antiquity in tidal or riverine settings; fyke nets, tubular traps with sequential hoops and wings for passive capture in freshwater; and lift nets or lampara nets, raised vertically to scoop surface schools, often in bait fisheries.[136][137] [138] These tools, refined over millennia from perishable natural materials to modern composites, prioritize species-specific selectivity but require regulatory oversight to mitigate ghost fishing from lost gear, estimated to contribute substantially to marine debris persistence.[139][140]Fishing Vessels and Infrastructure
Small-Scale and Traditional Craft
Small-scale and traditional fishing craft refer to vessels employed in artisanal fisheries, typically defined by dimensions under 12 meters in length, gross tonnage below 10, and reliance on rudimentary propulsion such as oars, sails, or small outboard engines, operating primarily in nearshore or inland environments.[141] These craft prioritize accessibility and low operational costs over scale, enabling subsistence and local market fishing in resource-limited settings.[142] Such vessels underpin small-scale fisheries that generate around 40% of global marine catches, equivalent to over 37 million metric tons annually, while providing protein and income to coastal communities serving 2.3 billion people.[143] [144] They employ roughly 90% of the world's 120 million capture fishers and contribute more than 46% of total catches, including inland production, highlighting their outsized role despite comprising the majority of the 3.7 million vessels in the global fleet as of 2015.[145] [146] Construction materials historically include wood for planked or carved hulls, with modern adaptations incorporating fiberglass for durability, though traditional designs persist due to local availability and craftsmanship.[147] Propulsion varies regionally: non-motorized dugouts in tropical rivers, sail-assisted pirogues in West Africa, or oar-powered dories in temperate zones, limiting range to tens of kilometers from shore but minimizing fuel dependency.[148] Prominent examples include dugout canoes, hollowed from single tree trunks and prevalent in Asia, Africa, and the Americas for their simplicity and stability in shallow waters; coracles, lightweight, bowl-shaped frames of reeds or wood covered in hides or tarpaulin, used on rivers in parts of India and historic Britain; and sampans, flat-bottomed skiffs of Southeast Asia suited to estuarine navigation.[148] [149] In Europe, traditional sailing trawlers like the Brixham type, with beam trawls and up to 20 meters, evolved for inshore demersal fishing before mechanization. These craft support diverse gears such as handlines, traps, and small seines, fostering resilience in variable conditions but exposing operators to higher risks from weather and equipment failure compared to industrial fleets.Commercial and Industrial Fleets
Commercial and industrial fishing fleets comprise large-scale vessels optimized for high-volume extraction from marine environments, often operating far from shore and equipped for onboard processing and preservation. These fleets target pelagic and demersal species using methods such as trawling, seining, and longlining, contributing the bulk of global wild capture production, which reached 91 million tonnes in 2022.[150] Vessel sizes vary widely, from mid-sized trawlers of 20-50 meters to factory ships exceeding 130 meters, capable of processing thousands of tonnes per voyage.[151] Major types include bottom trawlers, which drag cone-shaped nets along the seabed to harvest groundfish like cod and haddock; midwater trawlers for schooling fish such as herring; and purse seiners that encircle dense shoals of tuna or sardines with deployable nets. Longliners deploy arrays of baited hooks over vast distances, primarily for species like swordfish and tuna, while factory trawlers integrate harvesting with filleting, freezing, and packaging to maximize efficiency and reduce spoilage. These designs enable sustained operations in remote waters, but fleet capacities frequently exceed biologically sustainable harvest levels in overexploited stocks, as documented in regional assessments.[152] The global commercial fleet totaled approximately 4.9 million vessels in 2022, with two-thirds motorized and Asia accounting for 71 percent or 3.5 million units, predominantly in China, Indonesia, and India—though many are smaller coastal craft rather than industrial-scale. Industrial fleets, characterized by larger gross tonnage and distant-water capabilities, are dominated by China, which holds the largest share of global fishing vessel tonnage, followed by Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. These fleets underpin export-oriented industries, with China's distant-water operations alone harvesting millions of tonnes annually from international waters, often amid debates over compliance with international quotas. European Union fleets, including those from Spain and Denmark, focus on regulated Northeast Atlantic fisheries, while Russia's Pacific operations target pollock and crab. Overcapacity persists, with motorized vessels numbering 3.3 million globally, up from 2.4 million in 1995, straining resources in key basins like the Northwest Pacific.[153][154]Technological Integrations like Sonar and GPS
Sonar technology, adapted from military echo-sounding devices developed during World War II, was first commercialized for fishing by Furuno Electric in 1948 with a device that transmitted ultrasonic pulses to detect fish schools via underwater echoes.[155] This innovation allowed vessels to identify fish aggregations and bottom structures, transforming search-dependent operations into targeted deployments.[156] By the 1950s, companies like Lowrance introduced consumer-oriented sonar units in 1957, providing real-time depth and fish location data that reduced operational inefficiencies in both recreational and commercial contexts.[155] In commercial fishing fleets, sonar systems—often mounted as echo sounders or fish finders—emit sound waves at frequencies between 50 kHz and 200 kHz to map water columns, distinguishing fish echoes from seabed returns based on signal strength and return time.[157] These integrations have documented productivity gains, with vessels reporting up to 30-50% reductions in search time and fuel use by directing trawlers or seiners to verified fish concentrations.[156] Advancements like side-scan and forward-facing sonar, emerging in the 2000s, further enable wide-area scanning and real-time lure tracking, though their precision demands skilled interpretation to avoid false positives from non-target echoes such as baitfish or debris.[158] Global Positioning System (GPS) integration in fishing vessels accelerated post-1990s with the declassification of military signals, enabling accurate positioning to within 10 meters under differential enhancements.[159] Fishermen use GPS for waypoint marking of productive sites, route optimization, and vessel monitoring systems (VMS) that transmit location data via satellite for regulatory compliance and fleet coordination.[159] In practice, GPS reduces navigational errors in open seas, allowing repeated access to transient fish schools and cutting fuel costs by 10-20% through direct routing.[156] Combined sonar-GPS units, available since 1989, overlay bathymetric data with navigational charts, permitting fishermen to correlate fish detections with geographic features like drop-offs or currents.[160] This synergy boosts catch efficiency by enabling predictive modeling of fish behavior, as evidenced in offshore operations where integrated systems have increased harvest yields per trip while minimizing bycatch through selective positioning.[156] However, empirical assessments note that unchecked adoption can concentrate effort on vulnerable stocks, underscoring the need for quota enforcement via VMS to balance gains against depletion risks.[161]Traditional and Subsistence Fishing
Cultural and Regional Practices
Traditional and subsistence fishing incorporates diverse cultural practices adapted to local ecologies, often blending necessity with ritual and community governance. These methods, transmitted across generations, emphasize sustainability through empirical observations of fish behavior and seasonal patterns, though many face decline from modernization and environmental pressures. In southern Sri Lanka, stilt fishing—known locally as di ya laga—involves fishermen balancing on 4–5 meter poles driven into shallow surf to spear or hook fish, a technique devised during World War II food shortages when shorelines became overcrowded.[162] By 2024, fewer than 500 practitioners remained, primarily for cultural tourism rather than primary sustenance, underscoring its evolution from adaptive survival to symbolic heritage. Japan's ukai cormorant fishing, practiced for over 1,300 years since the Heian period (794–1185 CE), deploys trained great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) restrained by neck rings to catch ayu sweetfish (Plecoglossus altivelis) under torchlight on rivers like the Nagara.[163] This imperial tradition, preserved by the Japanese royal family, integrates seasonal rituals and master-apprentice training, yielding catches divided by fish size among participants.[164] At Lake Pátzcuaro in Michoacán, Mexico, Purépecha communities employ butterfly nets (red de mariposa) from hollowed-log canoes to harvest endemic whitefish (Chirostoma spp.), a delicacy central to local cuisine and state iconography.[165] While some techniques persist amid declining stocks from climate impacts, they sustain indigenous livelihoods tied to pre-colonial knowledge.[166] In Pacific Island societies, indigenous subsistence fishing relies on techniques like plant-based fish poisons (hutu reva) and tabu (temporary marine closures) to manage reefs, practices refined over millennia for ecological balance and food security.[167] These community-enforced systems prioritize long-term yields over immediate extraction, contrasting with external commercial pressures.[168] Around Lake Victoria in East Africa, artisanal fishers numbering over 54,000 as of early 2000s data use dugout canoes, gill nets, traps, and weirs for species like Nile perch and tilapia, methods rooted in pre-colonial routines adapted to the lake's 68,800 km² expanse.[169] Such practices support household nutrition amid fluctuating invasive species dynamics, with cultural norms governing gear and seasonal access.[170]Indigenous Knowledge Systems
Indigenous knowledge systems in fishing, often termed traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), consist of empirically derived understandings of aquatic ecosystems, fish migrations, behaviors, and habitat responses, accumulated and transmitted orally across generations within specific communities. These systems emphasize localized observations and adaptive practices, such as timing harvests to spawning cycles or selecting gear to minimize unintended catches, fostering long-term resource viability without reliance on written records or external metrics.[171][168] Among Pacific Northwest Native American tribes, TEK manifested in salmon harvesting techniques like reef netting and platform dip-netting, where fishers positioned stationary nets in tidal currents to intercept upstream migrations selectively, reducing bycatch through knowledge of run timing and water flows derived from centuries of monitoring riverine dynamics. These methods, centered on terminal fisheries near spawning grounds, preserved breeding stocks by avoiding ocean intercepts, contributing to sustained abundances prior to industrial exploitation.[172][173][174] In arid inland Australia, the Ngemba people's stone traps at Brewarrina on the Barwon River exemplify engineered TEK, with interlocking rock walls forming channels that directed fish into holding ponds during seasonal low flows, allowing escape of juveniles while capturing adults based on precise comprehension of hydrology, fish schooling, and flood-recession patterns. Local estimates place the traps' origins at up to 40,000 years old, indicating enduring functionality through iterative community maintenance and adaptation to variable river conditions.[175][176][177] Arctic Inuit TEK informs char and whitefish pursuits via ice-based jigging and hook-and-line methods, guided by indicators like ice thickness, current shifts, and faunal cues to pinpoint aggregations, enabling harvests calibrated to observed population fluctuations for intergenerational continuity. This approach has sustained small-scale yields amid environmental variability, with recent integrations revealing shifts in migration routes tied to warming waters.[178][179][180] Peer-reviewed analyses affirm TEK's empirical value in bolstering fisheries resilience, as traditional practices often embed precautionary limits—such as harvest taboos during low abundances—that align with causal ecosystem feedbacks, outperforming isolated Western models in localized contexts when hybridized for broader application.[181][168]Recreational Fishing
Methods, Locations, and Participant Demographics
Recreational fishing methods primarily involve angling with a rod, reel, line, and hook, often using natural bait such as worms or artificial lures to attract fish.[182] Basic setups include attaching sinkers above the hook to sink the bait and a bobber to indicate bites, suitable for beginners targeting species like panfish or trout.[182] Variations encompass spinning, where lightweight lures are cast and retrieved; bait casting for heavier lures in open water; fly fishing, which uses lightweight flies imitated by casting artificial flies with specialized rods; and trolling, involving towing lures behind a moving boat to cover larger areas.[183] These techniques apply to both freshwater and saltwater environments, with adaptations like vertical jigging from boats or horizontal casting from shore.[183] Locations for recreational fishing span freshwater systems like lakes, rivers, and ponds, as well as saltwater coastal areas, piers, and offshore waters. In the United States, participation is highest in the South due to abundant coastlines and inland waters, with 201 million saltwater fishing trips recorded in 2022 across the continental U.S. and Hawaii.[184] Freshwater sites dominate overall effort, supporting species such as bass and trout in reservoirs and streams, while popular saltwater destinations include Florida's Gulf Coast and the Atlantic seaboard for targeting snapper and billfish.[185] Globally, recreational angling occurs in diverse habitats from inland rivers to marine zones, with high concentrations in regions like North America and Europe where accessible public waters facilitate shore-based and boat fishing. Participant demographics in the United States reveal 39.9 million anglers aged 16 and older in 2022, representing 15% of that population, with an additional 9.5 million youth aged 6-15 participating.[186] Men comprise the majority, outnumbering women roughly twofold, though female participation reached 12.5 million adults (31% of anglers) and showed a 2% increase in recent trends.[186] Racial and ethnic breakdowns indicate 14% participation among Hispanics (6.5 million), 12% among African Americans (4.5 million), and 20% among Asian Americans (2.2 million), with youth mirroring these patterns but at lower absolute numbers.[186] Globally, an estimated 10% of the population—roughly 220 to 700 million people—engages in recreational fishing, driven by factors like proximity to water bodies and cultural traditions, though data precision varies by region.[187] [188] By 2024, U.S. figures rose to 57.9 million participants aged 6 and older, reflecting sustained growth amid post-pandemic outdoor activity surges.[189]Tournaments, Records, and Economic Contributions
Recreational fishing tournaments, often centered on species like bass, tuna, and marlin, feature competitive angling under regulated rules to promote skill and conservation. Major circuits include Major League Fishing's Bass Pro Tour, which in 2025 schedules multiple high-stakes events with live weigh-ins and substantial purses, such as the REDCREST Championship on Lake Guntersville from April 4-6.[190][191] The National Professional Fishing League hosts six qualifying tournaments in 2025, each offering $100,000 to winners and culminating in a no-entry-fee championship streamed live.[192] Offshore events like the Ocean City Tuna Tournament, entering its 38th year in 2025, draw hundreds of boats for bluefin and yellowfin pursuits, with payouts exceeding prior records due to escalating entry fees and sponsorships.[193] These tournaments enforce catch-and-release for many species and limit harvests to sustain stocks, though critics note potential localized overexertion during events.[194] The International Game Fish Association (IGFA) certifies world records based on verified weights, lengths, and tackle classes, emphasizing ethical angling to exclude dubious claims. Notable all-tackle records include a 1,496-pound (678.56 kg) bluefin tuna caught by Ken Fraser on October 26, 1979, off Aulds Cove, Nova Scotia, using rod and reel.[195] The heaviest verified great white shark, at 2,664 pounds (1,208 kg), was landed in 1959, highlighting the scale of apex predator captures historically permitted before modern protections.[196] Recent junior records, such as Kyle Kwak's 131-pound-6-ounce (59.59 kg) Pacific halibut on August 24, 2024, demonstrate ongoing pursuits across categories, with IGFA requiring witness affidavits and scale calibrations for validation.[197] Records incentivize technique refinement but face scrutiny over line strength equivalencies and environmental impacts from targeting trophy sizes. Recreational fishing generates substantial economic activity through angler expenditures on gear, boats, licenses, and travel. In the United States, the industry contributed over $230.5 billion annually to the economy as of 2025, supporting manufacturing, retail, and tourism sectors via direct sales and multiplier effects.[198] Anglers numbered around 52.4 million in recent surveys, driving $148 billion in output and 945,500 jobs nationwide, with conservation funding from excise taxes exceeding $1.8 billion.[199] Globally, participation involves 220-700 million individuals harvesting about 40 billion fish yearly, though quantified economic impacts remain fragmented, with U.S. data underscoring disproportionate contributions from developed markets where disposable income enables high spending.[200] These figures derive from input-output models accounting for indirect jobs in hospitality and equipment production, yet understate non-monetary values like ecosystem services.[201]Commercial Fishing Industry
Global Operations and Fleet Dynamics
The global commercial fishing fleet, comprising primarily industrial and semi-industrial vessels equipped for large-scale capture, operates across exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and high seas, with significant concentration in Asia and Europe. In 2020, the worldwide fishing fleet totaled an estimated 4.1 million vessels, though the commercial segment—defined by decked, engine-powered boats over 10 meters—represents a smaller but more impactful portion, with around 70,000 such vessels tracked via automatic identification systems (AIS).[202][203] Asia dominates fleet numbers, accounting for over 60% of vessels, led by China, which maintains the largest industrial fleet, including extensive distant-water operations targeting tuna and squid in the Pacific and Atlantic.[202][204] Fleet dynamics reveal a historical expansion followed by stabilization and reductions in some regions due to capacity management efforts. From 1950 to 2015, the global fleet doubled to approximately 3.7 million vessels, driven by post-war industrialization and subsidies, but overall numbers declined slightly by 2020 amid decommissioning programs in Europe and North America.[205] Overcapacity persists, with harvesting power exceeding sustainable yields in many fisheries, as evidenced by engine power metrics showing inefficiency where subsidies prop up unprofitable operations.[206][207] Major operators like China, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and Spain account for over half of tracked industrial fishing effort, often venturing beyond national waters, contributing to transboundary stock pressures.[204] Operations are characterized by seasonal migrations and gear-specific deployments, with trawlers and purse seiners comprising key vessel types for high-volume catches. Distant-water fleets, particularly from Asian nations, prosecute fisheries in international waters, where monitoring gaps exacerbate illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) activities, though satellite data has improved transparency since 2014.[208] In response to stock declines, some fleets have shifted to under-exploited areas or species, but empirical assessments indicate persistent overcapacity, with global vessel numbers dropping less than 10% from 2015 to 2020 despite calls for further reductions.[209] Regional variations persist: Europe's Union-mandated scrapping has curbed tonnage, while Asia's fleets continue expansion in smaller segments, underscoring uneven global regulatory enforcement.[210]Key Species, Regions, and Harvest Volumes
Global capture fisheries production totaled 92.3 million tonnes in 2022, consisting of 91.0 million tonnes of aquatic animals and 1.3 million tonnes of algae, with marine capture accounting for the majority at approximately 81 million tonnes.[211] [212] This volume has remained relatively stable over recent decades, reflecting limits in wild stock productivity despite technological advances, with much of the harvest directed toward reduction into fishmeal and oil for aquaculture feed and livestock.[211] Inland captures contributed 11.3 million tonnes, primarily from freshwater systems in Asia.[213] Asia dominates regional production, accounting for 50 percent of global marine captures in 2022, driven by high-output fisheries in countries like China, Indonesia, and India, where small pelagic species and demersal fish support large-scale operations.[211] Latin America and the Caribbean followed with 15.6 percent, largely from Peru's anchoveta fishery in the Southeast Pacific, which experiences annual fluctuations tied to El Niño cycles but remains a cornerstone of global volume.[211] Europe and North America contribute smaller shares, focusing on high-value species in the Northeast Atlantic and Pacific, while the Western Central Pacific yields significant tuna harvests.[211] These regions' outputs are influenced by exclusive economic zones, with high-seas fisheries adding variable volumes through international agreements.[214] Key species are predominantly small pelagic finfish suited for industrial processing, comprising the top ten captured groups—all finfish—which together represent a substantial portion of total volume.[211] Peruvian anchoveta (Engraulis ringens) leads in peak years from Peruvian waters, followed by Alaska pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) from the North Pacific fisheries of Russia and the United States, skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) from tropical oceans, and Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus).[215] [216] Other notables include yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus), and [chub mackerel](/page/chub mackerel) (Scomber japonicus), with recent increases in some tuna stocks reflecting variable recruitment.[211] These species' harvests emphasize volume over value, with low-trophic-level fish enabling efficient exploitation but raising concerns about ecosystem dependencies when redirected to feed higher-trophic aquaculture.[215]| Top Capture Species Groups (Examples) | Primary Regions | Notes on Volume Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Peruvian anchoveta | Southeast Pacific (Peru) | Fluctuates; major fishmeal source[215] |
| Alaska pollock | Northeast Pacific (Russia, USA) | Stable high-volume demersal fishery[215] |
| Skipjack tuna | Western Central Pacific | Increasing; purse seine dominant[211] |
| Atlantic herring | Northeast Atlantic | Key for direct consumption and bait[216] |
Processing, Products, and Market Chains
Commercial fish processing commences immediately after harvest to arrest microbial degradation and enzymatic autolysis, typically involving chilling on vessels with ice slurry or refrigerated seawater systems at 0–4°C to maintain quality.[217] Subsequent steps include sorting by size and species, followed by gutting, deheading, filleting via manual or automated band saws and water-jet cutters, skinning, and portioning, with mechanized lines processing up to 100 tonnes per hour in large facilities.[218] Preservation techniques encompass freezing (blast or plate freezers to -18°C or below), canning (sterilization at 121°C for retorted products like tuna), drying (solar or forced-air to 10–15% moisture), smoking (cold or hot for flavor and preservation), salting (brining to 20% salt content), and fermentation into products like fish sauce or silage using lactic acid bacteria or mineral acids for trash fish utilization.[219] These methods reduce post-harvest losses, which average 10–20% in developing regions without cold chains, and enable value addition through secondary processing like breading or mincing.[220] Global production from capture fisheries and aquaculture reached 223.2 million tonnes in 2022, with 185.4 million tonnes (83%) allocated for human consumption post-processing, primarily as frozen products comprising 63% of preserved volume, alongside canned (15–20%), cured/smoked (10%), and fresh/chilled forms.[214][221] The remaining 37.8 million tonnes served non-food uses, mainly reduction into 5–6 million tonnes of fishmeal and 1–1.5 million tonnes of fish oil annually for livestock feed and aquaculture diets.[222] Key products include frozen blocks and portions (e.g., Alaska pollock for surimi), canned species like skipjack tuna (over 3 million tonnes yearly), and premium items such as Norwegian salmon fillets, with processing adapting to species traits—e.g., shrimp deveining and shelling via automated tumblers yielding peeled tails for export.[221] Seafood market chains link processors to end-users through wholesalers, cold-chain logistics, exporters/importers, distributors, and retailers, often featuring 10–15 intermediaries that complicate traceability and contribute to price markups of 200–500% from dock to shelf.[223] In 2022, international trade volume hit 59 million tonnes (live weight equivalent), valued at $165 billion, with 38% of production traded cross-border, dominated by flows from Asia (China exporting $20 billion) to high-income markets in the EU and US, where frozen and value-added products command premiums.[224] Supply chain vulnerabilities include cold-chain disruptions (e.g., 2021 Suez Canal blockage delaying perishables) and regulatory hurdles like EU hygiene standards rejecting 5–10% of imports annually for contaminants.[225] Efforts to shorten chains via direct sales—adopted by 12% of US harvesters—bypass intermediaries, boosting producer revenues by 20–50% while enhancing freshness for consumers.[226][227]Fisheries Management
Core Principles: Quotas, Rights-Based Systems, and Monitoring
In fisheries management, quotas establish the total allowable catch (TAC), defined as the maximum biomass of a fish stock that may be harvested annually to ensure long-term sustainability, typically calculated from stock assessments incorporating biomass estimates, recruitment rates, and natural mortality.[228] TACs are derived from scientific models aiming to maintain spawning stock biomass above levels that produce maximum sustainable yield, with adjustments for environmental variability and uncertainty.[229] This principle addresses the tragedy of the commons by capping aggregate extraction, preventing open-access overexploitation where individual incentives lead to collective depletion.[230] Rights-based systems, such as individual transferable quotas (ITQs), allocate secure, proportional shares of the TAC to fishers or vessels, granting de facto property rights over fishery resources.[231] These shares are tradable, allowing efficient operators to consolidate quotas while compensating less efficient ones, thereby aligning private incentives with resource conservation: quota holders profit from higher future yields and bear the opportunity cost of premature depletion.[232] Unlike traditional input controls (e.g., vessel limits or seasonal closures), which provoke a "race to fish" and discard inefficiencies, ITQs reduce excess capacity and bycatch by decoupling harvest timing from regulatory deadlines.[233] Empirical outcomes from ITQ implementations demonstrate enhanced biological and economic performance. New Zealand's Quota Management System, introduced in 1986 for 26 key species covering most commercial catches, stabilized stocks and boosted profitability, with fish stocks generally holding at productive levels (30-45% of unfished biomass) and catches aligning closely with TACs after initial adjustments.[234][235] Similarly, Iceland's ITQ system, applied to demersal species since 1990 and expanded to 98% of landed value, halved fishing effort while sustaining cod stocks and achieving TAC adherence rates of 88% by 2017, though quota concentration among larger operators has occurred.[236][237] These systems have lowered safety risks by 79% in adverse conditions, as fishers avoid rushed harvests.[233] Effective monitoring enforces quotas and rights by verifying compliance through at-sea observers, logbooks, and increasingly electronic methods like video cameras, GPS tracking, and sensors that document catch composition, discards, and locations in real time.[238] Electronic monitoring (EM) scales coverage cost-effectively—reducing expenses relative to human observers while maintaining data accuracy for stock assessments—and has proven reliable in U.S. and international fisheries, enabling anomaly detection via AI and supporting bycatch quotas.[52][239] Integration of TACs, ITQs, and EM forms a feedback loop: monitoring data refines assessments for TAC setting, while rights incentivize accurate reporting to preserve quota value, yielding verifiable reductions in illegal unreported and unregulated fishing.[240]National and International Regulatory Frameworks
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), adopted in 1982 and entered into force in 1994, forms the foundational international legal framework for fisheries regulation by delineating maritime zones and assigning coastal states sovereign rights for exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing living resources, including fish stocks, within their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) up to 200 nautical miles from baselines.[241] UNCLOS mandates coastal states to determine allowable catches based on maximum sustainable yield as qualified by relevant environmental and economic factors, while requiring cooperation with other states on transboundary stocks and imposing conservation duties on high seas fishing, where freedom of fishing is subject to international law obligations.[242] Articles 61–68 specifically address fisheries management, emphasizing scientific evidence for stock assessments and non-discriminatory measures.[241] Building on UNCLOS, the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (UNFSA), adopted in 1995 and effective from 2001, targets shared stocks by requiring flag states, coastal states, and others to adopt compatible conservation measures, conduct stock assessments, and enforce compliance through port state controls and boarding inspections.[243] UNFSA promotes regional cooperation via fisheries management organizations or arrangements, with 91 parties as of 2023.[243] The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, adopted in 1995, serves as a non-binding but influential global standard outlining principles for sustainable practices, including ecosystem approaches, precaution in data-limited scenarios, and integration of fisheries with broader environmental policies.[244] It guides states in developing national policies and supports international instruments like voluntary guidelines on bycatch reduction and vessel marking.[245] Regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) operationalize these treaties by setting binding quotas, gear restrictions, and monitoring for specific oceanic regions and stocks; examples include the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), established in 1969 with 50 members covering tunas and swordfish, and the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), formed in 2004 to manage highly migratory species comprising over 60% of global tuna catch.[246][247] RFMOs mandate data reporting, observer programs, and compliance committees, though enforcement varies by treaty adherence.[246] Nationally, the United States Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), enacted in 1976 and reauthorized in 2006, asserts federal authority over fisheries from 3 to 200 nautical miles offshore, requiring annual catch limits derived from scientific stock assessments to end overfishing and rebuild depleted stocks within defined timelines, implemented via eight regional councils' fishery management plans.[248] The MSA emphasizes national standards for habitat protection, bycatch minimization, and limited access privileges like individual fishing quotas (IFQs) in select fisheries.[249] The European Union's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), codified in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 following the 2013 reform, harmonizes member state rules by annually setting total allowable catches (TACs) based on multiannual management plans aiming for maximum sustainable yield by 2020 where possible, alongside effort controls, vessel decommissioning, and ecosystem-based measures.[250] The CFP enforces traceability through the vessel monitoring system (VMS) and catch documentation, applying to EU fleets globally under flag state jurisdiction.[250] Other major fishing nations align national laws with these international norms; for instance, Australia's Fisheries Management Act 1991 establishes output controls like individual transferable quotas (ITQs) for southern bluefin tuna, informed by stock modeling, while Canada's Fisheries Act prioritizes precautionary approaches and integrated management plans for Atlantic groundfish. National frameworks often incorporate RFMO obligations and bilateral access agreements to balance domestic harvest with transboundary responsibilities.[251]Enforcement Challenges Including IUU Fishing
Enforcing fisheries regulations faces inherent difficulties due to the expansive nature of marine environments, where high seas constitute approximately 50% of the Earth's ocean surface and fall under limited national jurisdiction, complicating coordinated patrols and prosecutions.[252] Monitoring compliance is further challenged by incomplete catch data, reliance on imprecise statistical models for stock assessments, and high operational costs for surveillance technologies like vessel monitoring systems (VMS) and electronic reporting, which many fleets evade or falsify.[252] [253] Resource constraints in enforcement agencies, such as insufficient vessels and personnel, exacerbate these issues, with agencies like the U.S. Coast Guard allocating $687 million in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 specifically to IUU-related operations yet reporting missed interdiction opportunities due to intelligence gaps and prioritization conflicts.[254] Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing represents a core enforcement failure, accounting for an estimated 11-26% of global marine catch, with values reaching up to $36.4 billion annually in lost revenue to legitimate fisheries.[255] [256] In developing nations, IUU inflicts $2-15 billion in yearly economic damages, undermining food security and legal markets, while U.S. imports of IUU-derived seafood totaled $2.4 billion in 2019 alone.[257] [258] The 2023 IUU Fishing Risk Index scored global risk at 2.28 out of 5 (higher indicating greater risk), a slight deterioration from 2.24 in 2021, driven by persistent gaps in vessel tracking—Global Fishing Watch data from 2024 reveals 75% of industrial fishing vessels evade public monitoring.[259] [260] Combating IUU is hindered by flag state deficiencies, where vessels register under lax jurisdictions to avoid scrutiny, and by transnational networks linking IUU to ancillary crimes like human trafficking, drug smuggling, and piracy.[261] [262] Corruption in port states and weak catch documentation schemes enable laundering of illegal catches, while technological countermeasures—such as AIS spoofing and dark pool operations—outpace regulatory adaptations.[263] International frameworks like Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) struggle with non-binding compliance and enforcement disparities, as evidenced by NOAA's 2023 identification of seven nations for inadequate IUU controls.[264] Effective deterrence requires enhanced satellite surveillance, bilateral interdictions, and market measures like the EU's IUU Regulation, though implementation varies, with successes in reducing tuna IUU by 50% in some Western and Central Pacific areas post-2010 but ongoing failures in high-risk zones like the South China Sea.[265]Sustainability and Resource Debates
Empirical Data on Fish Stock Status
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), assessments of marine capture fisheries stocks—covering those for which adequate data exist—indicate that 62.3 percent were fished within biologically sustainable levels in 2021, with the remaining 37.7 percent classified as overfished.[266] These figures derive from evaluations of fishing mortality and biomass relative to levels producing maximum sustainable yield, applied to approximately 10-20 percent of global stocks but representing over 80 percent of reported landings by volume.[8] A comprehensive FAO assessment released in June 2025, incorporating data from 2,570 stocks contributed by over 650 experts across 90 countries, refined this to 64.5 percent of stocks exploited sustainably and 35.5 percent overfished, marking the most detailed global evaluation to date.[267] Overfished status varies regionally, with higher rates in the Eastern Central Atlantic (75 percent overfished) and Southeast Atlantic (80 percent), contrasted by lower rates in areas like the Northwest Pacific (below 30 percent).[6] Such disparities correlate with differences in management enforcement and monitoring capacity, as data-poor regions often rely on indirect indicators like catch-per-unit-effort trends.[266] Temporal trends show the proportion of overfished stocks stabilizing around 35 percent since the early 2000s, following a rise from approximately 10 percent in the 1970s, though annual fluctuations occur due to improved assessment methodologies and variable reporting.[8] For instance, the sustainable fishing rate dipped slightly from 64 percent in prior reports to 62 percent by 2021, attributed partly to expanded assessments of previously unmonitored high-pressure fisheries.[268] Inland fisheries, less comprehensively assessed, exhibit similar pressures, with over 20 percent of evaluated stocks overexploited as of 2022.[269] Limitations in these data include underrepresentation of small-scale or artisanal fisheries, which comprise 40 percent of capture production but often lack stock-specific modeling, potentially biasing global aggregates toward industrial fleets.[270] Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that while overfishing persists, empirical biomass recoveries in well-managed stocks—such as U.S. Northeast groundfish—demonstrate responsiveness to reduced effort, underscoring the role of targeted interventions over aggregate decline narratives.[271]Evidence of Recovery and Overfishing Extent
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization's (FAO) 2024 State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture report, 64.5 percent of assessed global marine fish stocks are fished at biologically sustainable levels, meaning their biomass supports maximum sustainable yield, while 35.5 percent are overfished, defined as stocks with abundance below levels producing maximum sustainable yield.[267] This overfished proportion, when weighted by catch volume rather than stock number, drops to 22.8 percent, indicating that overexploitation disproportionately affects lower-production stocks.[6] The report notes a slight uptick in overfishing from 35.4 percent in 2019 to 37.7 percent in 2021, but stabilization around 35-37 percent in recent assessments, with regional variations: for instance, the Mediterranean and Black Sea exhibit only 35.1 percent sustainable stocks but show declining fishing pressure suggestive of potential rebound.[266][6] Empirical evidence of stock recovery emerges where targeted management interventions—such as quotas, rights-based fishing, and monitoring—have reduced exploitation rates below sustainable thresholds. In the United States, federal fisheries management under the Magnuson-Stevens Act has rebuilt 47 stocks since 2000, with over 90 percent of assessed stocks not experiencing overfishing as of 2021 and 80 percent maintaining populations above sustainable biomass levels.[272][273] For example, Northeast Atlantic groundfish stocks, depleted in the 1990s, have shown biomass increases following strict catch limits and sector-based allocations, with species like haddock exceeding target levels by 2023. In the European Union, overfished stocks in Atlantic waters declined from 75 percent in 2004 to 51 percent in 2022 due to multi-annual management plans under the Common Fisheries Policy, though biomass recovery lags behind pressure reductions.[274] Specific high-value species illustrate recovery potential under science-based controls. Global tuna stocks, comprising 87 percent of catch from healthy abundance levels as of 2023, have benefited from international agreements like those by the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, with Pacific bluefin tuna rebounding from critically low levels (2 percent of unfished biomass in 2009) to over 10 percent by 2022 following harvest reductions.[275][58] These cases demonstrate that lowering fishing mortality—often through enforceable total allowable catches—enables biomass accumulation, as modeled in peer-reviewed analyses showing 19 percent of depleted stocks poised for recovery when pressure eases.[48] However, global trends remain mixed, with a 2021 PNAS study finding recent biomass recovery rates near zero across assessed stocks, underscoring that while localized successes occur, broader reversal of overfishing requires consistent enforcement absent in many developing regions.[276]| Region/Species Group | Overfished Stocks (%) | Recovery Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Global (FAO 2024) | 35.5 | Stabilized pressure in Mediterranean; 77.2% sustainable by production weight[267][6] |
| US (NOAA 2021) | <10 (targeted stocks) | 47 rebuilt since 2000; >80% above sustainable biomass[272] |
| EU Atlantic (2022) | 51 | Decline from 75% in 2004 via management plans[274] |
| Global Tuna (2023) | <13 (by catch share) | Pacific bluefin from 2% to >10% biomass[275][58] |