Hubbry Logo
Night schoolNight schoolMain
Open search
Night school
Community hub
Night school
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Night school
Night school
from Wikipedia

A night school is an adult learning school that holds classes in the evening or at night to accommodate people who work during the day. A community college or university may hold night school classes that admit undergraduates.[1]

Italy

[edit]

The scuola serale (evening school) is a structured institution for the education and training of professional adults in Italy.

The first evening schools opened in the first half of the nineteenth century under the pressure of the first civil strike organised by labor movements, with the main aim of reducing illiteracy. Major philanthropic actions contributed to the continued spread of scuola serale.

Beginning with elementary education, the first evening schools employed the educational process of "mutual education" (or mutual teaching) originated by British educators Andrew Bell and Joseph Lancaster, despite the scarcity of teachers. Initially, classes operated during the afternoon and evening. They were mainly frequented by peasants, workers and child laborers.

At the end of the century, provoked by a growing need to provide a complete technical and vocational training, evening classes spread in large industrial cities. Port technical schools helped initiate "Festive Sundays", a complement to the workshops that were only open on Sundays. Subsequently, these Sunday courses moved to the evening.

United States

[edit]

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, some elementary and high schools in the United States provided evening classes for children from poor families who were engaged in farm work. By 1910, the main focus had changed to teaching English to non-English-speaking immigrant children.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Night school refers to educational programs conducted during evening hours, typically at facilities, designed for adults pursuing personal enrichment, vocational skills, or academic credentials alongside daytime , as well as for high school students seeking recovery or accelerated completion. These classes often include subjects such as language arts, , ESL instruction, and recreational pursuits like arts or fitness, enabling participants to balance work obligations with learning opportunities unavailable during standard daytime schedules. The concept originated in English usage by at least 1529, as evidenced in writings of , reflecting early recognition of the need for after-hours instruction. In the United States, night schools expanded significantly from 1870 to 1910, established in urban areas to provide to laborers and immigrant populations, thereby supporting workforce assimilation and amid industrial demands. Such programs addressed causal gaps in daytime access, fostering empirical gains in and civic integration without displacing primary schooling for youth. Participants in evening classes have demonstrated measurable improvements in mental and physical health metrics, alongside heightened , underscoring the causal links between structured and broader outcomes.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Concept and Purpose

Night school encompasses educational institutions or programs that deliver instruction during evening or nighttime hours, specifically tailored for individuals occupied with daytime employment or other commitments. This format contrasts with conventional daytime schooling by prioritizing accessibility for adult learners, allowing them to acquire academic credentials, vocational skills, or specialized without relinquishing income sources. The primary purpose of night school lies in bridging the gap between work obligations and educational aspirations, thereby promoting self-improvement and economic productivity among non-traditional students. By scheduling classes post-standard work hours—typically from late afternoon through evening—night schools facilitate continued , such as obtaining high school equivalency diplomas or certifications in fields like healthcare and . This structure supports workforce upskilling, enabling participants to enhance employability while sustaining daily livelihoods, as demonstrated by vocational programs that align curricula with immediate career needs. At its essence, night school embodies a pragmatic response to the temporal constraints of modern labor, emphasizing practical outcomes over rigid attendance models. It serves not merely as an alternative venue but as a mechanism for equitable opportunity, historically extending and foundational to underserved groups, though contemporary iterations focus on for career transitions in dynamic economies.

Key Features and Formats

Night school programs primarily feature evening scheduling, with classes typically held after daytime work or school hours to accommodate employed adults and students with conflicting daytime obligations. This timing enables participants to pursue without disrupting primary , often structuring sessions to meet one or two evenings per week over periods ranging from single-day workshops to multi-week courses. Formats vary by institution and purpose, encompassing in-person gatherings at middle, high school, or campuses, alongside online and hybrid delivery modes for greater flexibility. Noncredit variants emphasize short-term durations of up to eight weeks, open enrollment with no registration fees, and repeatable access, allowing working learners aged 18 and older to enter or exit programs as needed without academic penalties. Alternative night school models, such as those for credit recovery or behavioral support, incorporate low teacher-pupil ratios, small-group instruction, and individualized assistance, often in off-campus or after-school settings four days per week. These programs support diverse structures, including cohort-based sequences for degree progression among peers and standalone modules focused on vocational skills, high equivalency (e.g., GED ), English as a , or recreational pursuits like and fitness. Emphasis on practical applicability prevails, with curricula tailored to adult learners' needs for career advancement or personal enrichment rather than traditional full-day immersion.

Historical Development

Origins in the 19th Century

The emergence of night schools in the coincided with the Industrial Revolution's expansion of work, which restricted daytime education for laborers and created demand for evening instruction in , technical skills, and improvement. In Britain, precursors included adult schools established to serve operatives; the first such school opened in in 1798, initially targeting young women in lace and industries with basic reading and held after work hours. These efforts expanded through mechanics' institutes, voluntary associations formed from the onward to provide working men with lectures, libraries, and classes in mechanics, , and during evenings and weekends, emphasizing self-improvement without disrupting . By the mid-19th century, mechanics' institutes proliferated, with approximately 610 in , 55 in , and others in Ireland and by the , often funded by subscriptions from artisans and philanthropists seeking to counter perceived vices of urban industrialization through rational recreation and practical knowledge. Evening classes focused on applied subjects like and chemistry, reflecting employers' needs for skilled labor amid technological advances such as steam power, though attendance was limited by long workdays and fees, primarily attracting more skilled tradesmen rather than the poorest laborers. In the United States, night schools developed similarly from the , influenced by British models and urban , offering and vocational training to factory workers and newcomers; early examples included evening sessions in cities like New York and for . The first dedicated evening high schools appeared in in 1856 and in 1866, catering to employed youth with curricula in arithmetic, , and trades to support economic assimilation and child labor regulations. By 1890, such schools numbered 808 across 165 cities, enrolling over 100,000 students annually, driven by Progressive-era concerns over uneducated immigrant labor forces in expanding industries.

Expansion in the Early 20th Century

The early marked a period of rapid expansion for night schools, particularly in the United States, fueled by waves of and industrialization that heightened demand for basic , English proficiency, and vocational skills among working adults. Between 1900 and 1920, approximately 14 million immigrants arrived, many lacking English and facing barriers to daytime due to ; evening programs emerged as key venues for "" efforts, teaching language, , and cultural assimilation to facilitate integration into the workforce and society. By the , urban centers like and , saw substantial enrollments, with evening schools serving one-sixth of Gary's adult population—over 12,000 students across 19 buildings—and accounting for 17-24% of total school enrollment in select industrial cities like Passaic and Harrison. Legislative measures accelerated this growth, notably the Smith-Hughes Act of 1917, which allocated federal funds to states for , explicitly including evening and part-time classes tailored to employed youth and adults in trades, , and . This act built on pre-existing urban initiatives but spurred nationwide infrastructure, enabling schools to offer practical training aligned with industrial needs, such as and , amid rising factory employment. Between 1917 and 1922, over 30 states enacted laws mandating attendance at public evening schools for non-English speakers, further embedding night education in assimilation policies. Vocational enrollment surged as a result, reflecting a shift from remedial literacy to skill-building for economic productivity, though critics noted uneven quality and limited long-term outcomes. By the mid-1920s, annual new enrollments in U.S. evening schools reached about 1.5 million, encompassing both immigrants and native workers seeking advancement, with classes extending into the 1930s despite economic downturns. Programs diversified to include citizenship preparation—spurred by patriotism—and professional skills like , but retention remained challenged by work demands and variable funding. This era's expansion laid groundwork for formalized , prioritizing empirical needs over broader academic pursuits, though systemic biases in reporting from progressive-era sources often overstated universal success without rigorous outcome data.

Post-World War II Evolution

Following , night schools in the United States underwent significant expansion driven by the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, known as the , which provided educational benefits to returning veterans. This legislation supported up to 52 weeks of full-time study or equivalent part-time enrollment, enabling over 2.2 million veterans to enroll in colleges and universities by 1947, with many opting for evening classes to balance work and education. Institutions responded by increasing offerings in vocational training, such as and courses, to meet the demand for skilled labor in the economic boom; for instance, enrollment in adult extension programs at grew by more than 50% between 1946 and 1948 in states like and New York. The GI Bill's impact extended beyond immediate veteran readjustment, fostering long-term institutional changes that professionalized night schools as hubs for . By 1950, programs, including evening sessions, had enrolled nearly 1 million participants annually across the U.S., shifting focus from basic —prevalent in prewar immigrant-focused classes—to advanced workforce skills like technical drafting and management, aligning with industrial reconstruction needs. Federal involvement grew, culminating in the 1966 Adult Basic Education Act, which allocated funds for state-administered programs that built on postwar momentum, though initial growth was uneven due to varying state capacities and economic pressures. Internationally, postwar night schools evolved similarly amid reconstruction efforts, emphasizing vocational upskilling for demobilized workers and displaced populations. In the , the 1944 Education Act expanded county colleges and institutes, leading to a tripling of evening class enrollments by 1950 for apprenticeships in trades like mechanics and welding, supported by government grants. UNESCO's 1949-1950s fundamental education campaigns promoted evening literacy and technical programs in and developing regions, enrolling millions in worker-accessible formats; for example, Greece's night high schools for working youth surged in the , serving over 10,000 students by 1960 amid political and cultural shifts. These developments reflected a causal link between wartime labor shortages, technological demands, and policy-driven access, though participation often lagged in rural areas due to logistical barriers.

Objectives and Benefits

Enabling Access for Working Populations

Night schools provide a critical mechanism for employed individuals to access without relinquishing daytime occupations, as classes are scheduled after typical work hours, often from late afternoon through evening. This arrangement addresses the temporal constraints faced by full-time workers, enabling them to pursue , vocational skills, or amid industrial or service-based labor demands. Historically, this model emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to accommodate factory operatives and laborers, with evening institutes in regions like the explicitly designed to meet part-time needs of the adult populace. In the United States, such programs gained traction post-Civil War, focusing on the "night school" concept to deliver basic instruction to working adults until expansions in the . Empirical evidence underscores the role of evening formats in broadening participation among working populations. Between 1870 and 1910, U.S. evening schools diffused rapidly, particularly in urban areas with high concentrations of wage earners, as documented through records and annual reports, which linked attendance to improved for manual laborers transitioning from child work or low-skill roles. By the mid-20th century, local authorities and community institutions formalized night classes to serve post-war workers, with examples like Sterling High School initiating community evening programs in 1920 to extend schooling to non-traditional learners. Contemporary implementations, such as those in the Unified School District's division, enroll nearly 50,000 students yearly, predominantly working adults seeking high school equivalency or career alongside . This access model yields causal benefits in workforce continuity, as participants avoid income disruption while upgrading competencies, a pattern evident in surveys where 40% of U.S. adults engaged in such activities reported sustained job holding during study. However, reliance on self-motivation and variable program quality can limit outcomes, though the core enabling function persists in bridging daytime economic imperatives with evening intellectual advancement. Recent upticks, like a 24% enrollment rise in Michigan's adult programs amid labor market shifts, highlight ongoing demand among employed demographics for these flexible pathways.

Contributions to Social Mobility and Workforce Skills

Night school programs have demonstrably supported by providing accessible pathways for working adults, particularly those from lower- backgrounds, to obtain credentials that enhance earning potential and occupational status. Longitudinal data from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Learning (1998–2007) indicate that participants in adult basic skills programs, many of which operate in evening formats, achieved a 53% mean increase over 10 years (in constant 1997 dollars), contrasting with a 2% decline for non-participants; those accumulating over 100 hours of instruction averaged $10,000 more in annual . Similarly, attainment of high school equivalency credentials through such programs correlates with $10,000 higher annual compared to non-credentialed peers, facilitating upward transitions from manual or low-skill roles to supervisory or technical positions. In terms of workforce skills, night school emphasizes practical upskilling and vocational tailored to employed learners, yielding measurable improvements in and productivity. Evening postsecondary programs aligned with industry needs have produced graduates earning 33% more than non-participants, alongside twice as many promotions, by integrating and credit for prior work . These formats accommodate daytime workers, with flexible scheduling—such as hybrid evening classes—enabling completion rates boosted by mechanisms like credit for prior learning, which shortens degree timelines by an average of 6.6 months and increases retention by up to 47%. Empirical tracking shows elevated postsecondary credit accumulation (31% for intensive participants) and gains, directly enhancing job-specific competencies demanded in evolving labor markets. While benefits accrue unevenly— with stronger outcomes for those committing substantial hours—causal evidence from cohort comparisons underscores night school's role in countering skill obsolescence and enabling occupational shifts, as evidenced by doubled likelihoods of high school equivalency and further education among engaged learners. This aligns with broader returns where adult education investments generate economic multipliers, though program efficacy depends on alignment with local job demands rather than generalized credentialing.

Challenges and Criticisms

Limitations in Learning Outcomes

Studies indicate that participants in night school programs, often working adults attending evening classes after full-day employment, experience heightened fatigue and sleepiness, which impair cognitive functions essential for learning. Excessive sleepiness during evening sessions has been linked to partial sleep deprivation, exacerbated by late-night activities such as internet use, leading to reduced attention and memory consolidation. Shorter sleep durations and later bedtimes associated with evening schedules detrimentally affect educational learning outcomes, even if the timing of classes itself does not directly cause harm. Empirical data reveal lower persistence and completion rates in evening or part-time compared to full-time daytime programs. learners exhibit postsecondary completion rates significantly below those of traditional students, with factors like responsibilities further widening the gap—for instance, only 37% completion within six years for students with children versus 60% for those without. Full-time enrollment correlates with higher completion (83.6%) than part-time or mixed schedules, reflecting time constraints from concurrent work that reduce dedicated academic effort. Additionally, the part-time nature of night school often involves instructors with divided commitments, contributing to suboptimal long-term outcomes. Students taught by part-time faculty, prevalent in evening programs, receive higher contemporaneous grades but face negative impacts on subsequent course persistence and performance. Balancing daytime work demands with evening study further diminishes time for and review, hindering and skill acquisition. These limitations underscore that while night school expands access, it yields inferior mastery and credential attainment relative to immersive daytime formats.

Practical Barriers to Participation and Retention

Working adults pursuing night school education frequently encounter scheduling conflicts, as full-time employment during daylight hours leaves limited energy and time for evening coursework, often overlapping with family responsibilities such as childcare or eldercare. A 2023 OECD report identifies lack of time—primarily due to work or family commitments—as the most significant barrier to adult learning participation across OECD countries, with 40-50% of non-participants citing it as a deterrent. This challenge is exacerbated in night school formats, where participants must transition directly from labor-intensive jobs, leading to diminished focus and higher absenteeism rates documented in adult education studies. Financial costs represent another substantial hurdle, including tuition fees, materials, and forgone wages from or second shifts sacrificed for classes, despite night programs often being designed for affordability. U.S. data from 2024 indicates that cost and insufficient financial aid are the top barriers to higher education enrollment for adults who have stopped out or never enrolled, affecting over 36 million working-age individuals. Retention suffers as cumulative expenses strain household budgets, contributing to dropout rates in adult programs that exceed 50% within the first year, per analyses of federally funded adult basic education enrollments declining 65.8% since 2000-2001 due to persistent economic pressures. Transportation and accessibility issues further impede participation, particularly for those in suburban or rural areas without reliable public transit to urban campuses hosting night classes. on urban adult learners highlights logistical barriers like after long workdays, which correlate with lower enrollment and higher attrition in evening programs. from daytime exertion compounds these problems, as shift workers or those in physically demanding roles experience reduced and cognitive , impairing retention; studies on nonstandard work schedules show night-time learning sessions yield poorer outcomes due to disruptions affecting 20-30% of adult participants. Employer inflexibility and lack of support, such as inflexible leave policies or absence of tuition reimbursement, deter sustained involvement, with work constraints identified as a key factor in 25-35% of non-participation cases among employed adults. For retention, intrapersonal strains like waning motivation amid balancing roles lead to high discontinuation, evidenced by adult postsecondary programs reporting institutional barriers such as rigid schedules contributing to 40%+ dropout in working learner cohorts as of 2023. These practical obstacles underscore the need for adaptive program designs, though empirical data confirms their role in limiting night school's reach to only a fraction of potential beneficiaries.

Shift Toward Hybrid and Online Models

The transition from traditional in-person evening classes to hybrid and formats in night school programs has been driven by technological advancements and the need for greater scheduling flexibility among working adults, with significant acceleration during the . Prior to 2020, enrollment in higher education was growing steadily, but the pandemic forced widespread adoption, enabling institutions to maintain continuity for non-traditional learners who rely on evening and part-time options. By fall , 61% of undergraduate students—many of whom are adult learners in —were enrolled in at least one course, reflecting a rapid pivot that preserved access for night school participants unable to attend physically. Post-pandemic, hybrid models, which combine synchronous online sessions with occasional in-person meetings, have become prevalent in colleges and universities offering night school equivalents, catering to employed students' demands for reduced and asynchronous access. Enrollment data indicate sustained hybrid uptake: in the 2022–23 academic year, 53% of U.S. higher education students took at least one online course, with hybrid options allowing 50–74% of to occur digitally in many programs. Surveys show 82% of students preferring hybrid environments over fully traditional ones for their balance of interaction and convenience, particularly beneficial for night school demographics facing or shift-work constraints. This shift has expanded night school reach, with platforms enabling global participation and modular course delivery that aligns with irregular work hours, though retention challenges persist due to self-motivation requirements. Industry projections estimate the online learning sector, including adult , will grow at 9.1% annually through 2026, underscoring hybrid formats' role in modernizing night schools beyond fixed evening schedules. Community colleges, key providers of such programs, now routinely offer hybrid night classes to boost , as evidenced by widespread implementation in flexible learning modalities post-2020.

Recent Policy and Enrollment Data

In the European Union, adult participation in education and training for those aged 25-64 rose to 47% in 2022, marking an increase from 40% over the prior decade, though this figure encompasses both formal and informal activities with informal learning comprising the majority. Participation rates varied widely by country, with Sweden at approximately 70% and Greece at 15%, reflecting differences in national priorities for lifelong learning. In the United States, enrollment in federally funded programs declined sharply from over 2.6 million participants in 2000—representing about 1.5% of the population—to under 900,000 by 2021, or less than 0.4%. This downturn has been attributed to factors including rising program costs, shifts in provider landscapes, and federal measures, with no comprehensive recovery evident in subsequent years amid the broader pivot to online modalities. A significant U.S. policy shift occurred in August 2025, when the Department of Education directed that federally funded programs restrict enrollment to individuals with legal status, excluding those without documentation and potentially reducing access for immigrant-heavy cohorts previously comprising a substantial share of participants. This guidance, issued under the Trump administration, applies to programs under the , aiming to prioritize citizens and legal residents but raising concerns over enrollment drops in urban areas with high undocumented populations. Globally, traditional evening-based night school programs have experienced enrollment pressures from the accelerated adoption of digital alternatives post-2020, though aggregate learning participation remains stable or modestly growing in nations, with modes increasingly favoring flexible online formats over fixed in-person schedules.

Regional Implementations

United States

Evening schools in the originated in the late primarily to provide to child laborers, working youth, and immigrants unable to attend daytime classes. By 1890, there were 808 such schools operating in 165 cities, focusing on , instruction, and vocational skills to support assimilation and economic participation. In , evening schools dated back to 1825 and expanded significantly by the early 20th century, evolving from compensatory for school dropouts into broader learning institutions by 1935. Regional initiatives, such as Kentucky's " schools" launched in 1911 by Cora Wilson Stewart, targeted illiteracy in rural areas, enrolling over 1,200 students in one-room houses lit by or lanterns during winter evenings. Federal involvement in , including evening programs, began in earnest with the , which allocated funds for literacy and basic skills training amid the . These efforts expanded access for low-income workers and non-English speakers, with public schools and emerging community colleges playing central roles. Community colleges, which proliferated after the GI Bill's influence post-World War II, became key providers of night classes, offering flexible scheduling—one or two evenings per week combined with online components—to accommodate full-time employees seeking associate degrees or certifications. By design, these institutions prioritize workforce development, with evening programs enabling participants to balance employment and skill-building in fields like manufacturing, healthcare, and . Enrollment in federally funded adult basic education programs, often delivered via evening formats, peaked at over 2.6 million students in 2000 but declined sharply to under 900,000 by 2021, reflecting broader trends in reduced participation amid economic shifts and competition from online alternatives. In fall 2023, approximately 3.9 million undergraduates aged 25 and older were enrolled nationwide, many in evening or part-time courses tailored for working adults. Urban public school districts, such as those in , continue to offer tuition-free evening high school equivalency programs for adults over 21, emphasizing GED preparation and English acquisition. Despite declines, these programs persist as vital pathways for , particularly for immigrant populations and those without daytime availability, though retention challenges arise from work demands and transportation barriers.

Italy

In Italy, evening schools known as scuole serali offer structured pathways for adults, including workers and immigrants, to fulfill requirements or earn upper secondary diplomas, with classes typically held after standard working hours to accommodate employment schedules. These programs form part of the broader system managed by the Centri Provinciali per l'Istruzione degli Adulti (CPIA), state institutions established under Presidential Decree No. 263 of October 29, 2012, which replaced earlier centers for territorial adult education (CTP). CPIA operate in all provinces, numbering around 130 nationwide, and deliver both first-level instruction (equivalent to lower secondary completion, with 400 hours per cycle) and second-level paths (upper secondary equivalents, spanning three to five years at 70% of daytime curriculum hours). Eligibility for first-level courses includes adults over 16, including non-Italians without prior fulfillment, while second-level enrollment requires lower secondary completion and targets those aged 18 or older, though younger participants may qualify under specific conditions. Enrollment occurs annually via online platforms or CPIA offices, with recent directives for the 2025/2026 school year emphasizing streamlined procedures and support for diverse learners, including those with special educational needs. In the 2020/21 , CPIA enrolled approximately 197,000 students, reflecting a focus on , acquisition for foreigners, and vocational integration, with notable growth among immigrant populations. The origins of Italian evening schools trace to the mid-19th century, with early initiatives like those in in 1841 providing instruction for apprentices, later bolstered by the 1877 Coppino Law, which mandated evening and holiday classes to combat illiteracy among laborers. Post-World War II reforms, including the 1970 Workers' Statute, expanded access through dedicated worker education hours, evolving into the 150-hour annual leave provisions for study until the late 1990s. By 2017, enrollments had surged 25% to 229,400 "individual training pacts," driven by economic pressures and , though national figures have stabilized amid challenges like uneven regional distribution and retention rates. Recent data indicate ongoing increases, particularly in and basic skills tracks, with 2023/2024 reports from select CPIA showing rises in inscriptions for alfabetizzazione () courses, underscoring their role in addressing skill gaps for non-traditional learners.

Other Countries and Global Perspectives

In , dedicated night high schools, known as teijisei kōkō, serve students who work during the day or face barriers to daytime attendance, offering a pathway to complete upper . These institutions, which began expanding post-World War II to support reconstruction-era workers, numbered 53 public facilities across 18 prefectures and 13 government-designated cities as of April 2024. Night junior high schools (yakan chūgakkō), established for individuals over 15 who have not finished compulsory lower , have seen recent policy-driven growth, including two new public schools in set to open in spring 2025 targeting foreign residents and locals with incomplete schooling; classes run five evenings weekly, free of charge, under certified teachers covering core subjects. Enrollment trends indicate rising demand, as evidenced by a night junior high school where student numbers nearly doubled to 51 within six months of its November 2023 opening, reflecting efforts to address dropout rates among working youth and immigrants. In European nations such as the , , and , structured night schools akin to those in or the are rare, with adult evening education instead embedded in broader further or continuing education systems offering flexible, part-time courses in vocational skills, languages, and . For instance, further education colleges provide evening sessions through historically rooted institutions like working men's colleges, emphasizing accessibility for employed adults, though participation has declined amid funding shifts toward apprenticeships. Germany's Volkshochschulen (adult education centers) deliver low-cost evening programs in over 900 locations nationwide, focusing on integration and upskilling, with 2023 enrollment exceeding 7 million participants across non-formal offerings. France's éducation nationale supports evening classes (cours du soir) via local centers for basic competencies and professional retraining, often subsidized for low-income workers. These models prioritize modular, demand-driven formats over full-time night curricula. Australia integrates evening adult education primarily through Technical and Further Education (TAFE) institutes, which offer vocational certificates and diplomas in fields like trades and business during non-daylight hours to accommodate shift workers, with state-level enrollment data showing steady uptake; for example, TAFE New South Wales reported over 400,000 annual enrollments in 2023, a portion via evening modes amid workforce reskilling needs. Globally, UNESCO's Global Report on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE 4, 2020 data updated through 2023) documents varying participation rates in non-formal adult programs, including evening formats, with higher engagement in (e.g., 40-60% in select East Asian countries) versus lower averages in (around 10-20%), underscoring night school's role in addressing skill gaps but highlighting challenges like low completion rates (under 50% in many systems) due to work-life conflicts. OECD analyses confirm a broader trend of formal adult learning participation stagnating at 8-12% across member states in 2024, with evening and hybrid delivery comprising a shrinking share as online alternatives rise, yet emphasizing evening classes' persistence in labor-intensive economies for .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.