Hubbry Logo
Oncor Electric DeliveryOncor Electric DeliveryMain
Open search
Oncor Electric Delivery
Community hub
Oncor Electric Delivery
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Oncor Electric Delivery
Oncor Electric Delivery
Oncor Electric Delivery
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Oncor Electric Delivery Company is the largest transmission and distribution electric utility in Texas and the 5th largest utility company in the US.[2] Their service territory encompasses east, west, and north-central Texas, including Dallas, Fort Worth, Irving, Plano, Arlington,Midland, Odessa, Killeen, Waco, Wichita Falls, Tyler and surrounding cities.[3] In 2018, Sempra Energy acquired a majority stake in Oncor for US$9.45 billion.[4]

Key Information

History

[edit]

The company was formerly known as TXU Electric Delivery and TU Electric. Predecessor companies include Dallas Power & Light DP&L, which served the city of Dallas; Texas Electric Service Company (TESCO), which served areas surrounding Fort Worth; and Texas Power and Light (TP&L), which served other areas of northwest and east-central Texas. Oncor began replacing analog meters in 2008 with digital meters throughout its system, although some older analog meters remain.

Oncor was privately held by a limited number of investors, including Energy Future Holdings Corporation (EFH), and separately managed by a majority independent board of directors. While a majority owner, EFH was not involved in the management of Oncor. On March 24, 2016, the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) granted the request to convert Oncor into a real estate investment trust (REIT) with the reservation that the PUC would consider the treatment of potential tax savings (estimated at $250 million) from the REIT structure in a separate proceeding to be held at a future date. The subsequent proceeding's focus was to determine how the potential tax savings attributable to the REIT format would be shared with utility ratepayers.[5]

On July 7, 2017, it was announced that Berkshire Hathaway had agreed on a deal to buy the whole of Energy Future Holdings and ultimately Oncor. This bid was ultimately surpassed by Sempra Energy, which bid $9.45 billion in cash and the assumption of debt on August 21, 2017.[6] The acceptance of the Sempra bid effectively terminated the Berkshire bid. The Sempra bid subsequently received court approval on September 6, 2017.[7] On March 8, 2018, regulators in Texas approved Sempra Energy's purchase of a majority stake in Oncor for $9.45 billion.[4]

Major projects

[edit]

As of 2014, Oncor was working in partnership with Siemens AG Power Technologies to build a smart grid in an exploration of the use of storage batteries and micro-grids.[8] The Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) project was intended to improve the transmission of wind power to Oncor's grid.[9]

Oncor works with private and public utilities nationwide through organizations called mutual assistance groups. Oncor is a member of the Texas Mutual Assistance Group, the Midwest Mutual Assistance Group, and the Southeastern Electric Exchange. These mutual partnerships are part of a larger network of utilities that meet throughout the year to share best practices and improve upon safety methods. Members are able to quickly access and deploy resources and personnel across long distances to communities impacted by severe weather. For example, Oncor crews went to Florida and Georgia to assist in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew in 2016.[10] Oncor crews traveled to California in 2018 to help restore power to areas devastated by wildfires, as well as Florida in 2019 to assist in preparations for Hurricane Dorian.[11][12]

Environmental impact

[edit]

Oncor Electric Delivery Company's Take A Load Off Texas provides a variety of energy efficiency programs for residences and businesses in an effort to reduce energy and save people money on their electric bill. Oncor budgeted more than $50 million for its programs in 2019; in the last ten years, Take A Load Off Texas has helped more than 250,000 customers reduce their energy usage.[13]

Oncor assisted with the adoption of larger, commercial electric vehicles in Texas. The company worked with electric vehicle original equipment manufacturers and other utilities to monitor the use of electric vehicles in its service territory, to provide power supply to vehicles and homes; it has helped install and plan locations for charging stations.[14]

For nine consecutive years, Oncor has partnered with the Arbor Day Foundation's Energy-Saving Trees Program to give away thousands of free trees to customers. The program is designed to help customers better understand where to plant trees for maximum energy savings and the protection of electrical equipment.[15]

Oncor's transmission system is planned to connect to a $104 million solar farm in Falls County. San Antonio–based OCI Solar Power is planning the project where 800 acres will be leased from private landowners in the reinvestment zone where it plans to build the 100-megawatt farm.[16]

Oncor partnered with IBM Oncor to predict for preventative maintenance where vegetative growth is most likely to interfere with power lines, which can cause blackouts and wildfires.[17]

Social responsibility

[edit]

In April 2020, Oncor donated $1.7 million to community non-profit organizations across its service territory that serve those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.[18]

In 2021, Oncor announced a donation of 110 acres of land to the City of Dallas to be used as a public park. It will be the largest donation of land to the city since the 1930s.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Oncor Electric Delivery

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC is a regulated electric transmission and distribution utility headquartered in , , operating the largest such network in the state and delivering power to nearly 4 million homes and businesses across more than 400 communities in 98 counties spanning north-central to western . With historical roots tracing to 1912 through predecessor companies, Oncor oversees approximately 144,000 miles of transmission and distribution lines, facilitating the transport of electricity from generation sources—including significant renewable and solar capacity—to end-users in Texas's competitive retail market. The company, indirectly majority-owned by since its 2018 acquisition of an 80.25% stake, emphasizes infrastructure investment, technologies, and reliability under regulation by the Public Utility Commission of Texas, while separating delivery operations from retail energy supply.

Company Overview

Corporate Profile and Services


Oncor Electric Delivery LLC (Oncor) functions as a transmission and distribution service provider (TDSP) in , operating exclusively in the delivery of through its without engaging in power generation or retail supply. It maintains the largest regulated transmission and distribution system in the state, encompassing over 143,000 miles of lines that deliver power to nearly 4 million homes and businesses. As an investor-owned utility under the regulatory authority of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), Oncor holds a monopoly status in its service territory for transmission and distribution activities, with operations centered on ensuring grid reliability, efficiency, and capacity expansion to meet demand within the (ERCOT) market. The company's core services include constructing, operating, and maintaining high-voltage transmission lines, substations, and lower-voltage distribution networks to facilitate non-discriminatory access for wholesale and retail electricity providers. Oncor's scale reflects ongoing investments amid Texas's rapid growth, including the addition of 77,000 new in 2024, a near-record increase that underscores population-driven expansion in its North Texas-focused territory. This growth necessitates continuous upgrades to transmission and distribution assets, such as placing over $2 billion in transmission projects into service during 2024, to support rising needs without direct involvement in competitive markets.

Ownership Structure

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC operates as a subsidiary of Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC (Oncor Holdings), with ownership structured to maintain separation from activities. indirectly holds an 80.25% equity interest in Oncor Holdings, while Transmission Investment LLC, an unaffiliated vehicle, retains the remaining 19.75% interest. This configuration emerged from Sempra Energy's acquisition of a majority stake in Oncor Holdings, finalized on March 9, 2018, following regulatory approvals that preserved the minority stake for Transmission Investment. Oncor's governance emphasizes operational independence, with its board of directors managing daily activities autonomously from owners to uphold regulatory neutrality within the (ERCOT) framework. A majority of both Oncor Holdings and Oncor board members qualify as independent under applicable rules, limiting owner influence over transmission and distribution decisions to prevent conflicts in ERCOT's competitive wholesale market, where wires companies must remain agnostic to generation interests. This ownership model facilitates capital access for projects through Sempra's resources, enabling equity contributions and financing without granting direct control over Oncor's core operations, as evidenced by post-acquisition member contributions totaling $144 million in April 2018 proportional to equity shares. The structure aligns with regulatory requirements for ring-fencing transmission assets, ensuring focus on reliability and neutrality amid market competition.

Key Financial Metrics

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC reported of $968 million for the full year 2024, marking an increase from $864 million in 2023, driven by higher distribution base revenues and operational efficiencies in its regulated transmission and distribution activities. In the first quarter of 2025, stood at $181 million, down from $225 million in the prior year's first quarter, primarily due to elevated operating expenses amid ongoing infrastructure investments. These results underscore Oncor's sustained profitability within Texas's regulated utility framework, where earnings are tied to approved rate mechanisms rather than direct exposure to wholesale fluctuations. The company's rate base, representing the value of invested capital eligible for regulated returns, expanded by approximately 110% between 2018 and 2024, reflecting substantial grid modernization and expansion efforts. Projections indicate further doubling of the rate base from 2025 to 2030, supporting long-term capital expenditures estimated at $36.1 billion over that period. Oncor maintains a regulatory capital structure of 57.5% to 42.5% equity, with an authorized of 9.7% as of mid-2025, enabling revenue recovery based on invested capital rather than volumetric sales or commodity prices. Credit metrics remain investment-grade, though downgraded the issuer from 'A' to 'A-' on July 29, 2025, citing heightened wildfire exposure risks in despite robust historical cash flows and low leverage relative to peers. This adjustment followed reviews of potential liabilities from 2024-2025 weather events, yet affirms Oncor's capacity for financing to fund growth.

Historical Development

Origins as Part of TXU Corporation

TXU Corporation, a major integrated serving primarily , underwent corporate unbundling in response to Texas Senate Bill 7 (SB 7), which was signed into law on June 5, 1999, and mandated the separation of generation, retail competition, and regulated transmission and distribution functions to foster a deregulated wholesale and retail electricity market. This restructuring separated the competitive power generation and sales segments from the wires business, with TXU Electric Delivery Company established as the dedicated transmission and distribution (T&D) subsidiary to handle the regulated delivery of electricity over existing infrastructure. The T&D arm inherited TXU's established grid assets, which traced back to predecessor companies like Texas Utilities Electric Company formed in the mid-20th century, enabling continuity in service to over 3 million customers in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and surrounding counties. In the immediate post-unbundling period leading up to full retail competition on January 1, 2002, TXU Electric Delivery prioritized the operational independence of delivery functions, focusing on grid maintenance and modest expansions to accommodate the shift from bundled services to a model where retail electric providers competed for customers while the T&D entity remained regulated by the Public Utility Commission of Texas. This adaptation aligned with SB 7's directives for functional separation within the (ERCOT), which was designated as the independent system operator to manage grid operations separately from market participants, ensuring non-discriminatory access to transmission for generators and retailers. Early efforts emphasized reliability in TXU's core territory, leveraging approximately 100,000 miles of distribution lines and thousands of miles of transmission inherited from the parent company to support the emerging competitive dynamics without immediate large-scale build-out.

2000s Restructuring and Spin-off

In response to Texas's electricity market deregulation under Senate Bill 7, enacted in 1999 and effective January 1, 2002, TXU Corp. separated its regulated transmission and distribution (T&D) operations from its competitive generation and retail activities by spinning off the T&D assets into Oncor Electric Delivery Company. This restructuring isolated Oncor's stable, rate-regulated infrastructure business from the price volatility and merchant risks inherent in deregulated power generation and trading, allowing the former to operate under Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) oversight focused on reliability and cost recovery rather than market speculation. The move aligned with first-principles of market design in deregulated systems, where separating natural monopoly T&D functions from competitive segments mitigates cross-subsidization and shields essential infrastructure from financial contagion. Subsequent strains from deregulation's competitive pressures manifested in TXU's generation arm, which pursued aggressive financial hedging strategies anticipating sustained high for coal and nuclear output. These hedges, combined with the $45 billion of TXU by firms in 2007, amplified vulnerabilities when the and shale gas boom drove prices below hedge strike levels, generating billions in losses and unsustainable debt servicing. TXU's successor, (EFH), filed for Chapter 11 on April 29, 2014, with $49.7 billion in liabilities primarily tied to generation hedges and LBO debt, marking the largest utility in U.S. history. Oncor remained insulated, as its regulated structure—bolstered by the 2002 spin-off and PUCT-mandated ring-fencing—prevented upstream financial distress from impairing T&D operations or capital access. PUCT approvals facilitated Oncor's operational independence, including resolutions in that addressed and separation issues, enabling undivided focus on grid investments amid EFH's turmoil. This regulatory framework underscored causal realism in utility economics: regulated entities like Oncor prioritize long-term over short-term trading gains, averting the speculative excesses that deregulated segments encountered.

Post-Bankruptcy Acquisition and Growth

Following the 2014 bankruptcy of its former parent , Oncor Electric Delivery maintained operational independence as a creditor-protected entity, avoiding through structured separation. In March 2018, Energy completed its acquisition of an approximately 80% indirect ownership stake in Oncor for $9.45 billion, partnering with existing minority owner Transmission Investment LLC (TTI) to provide financial stability and regulatory-approved continuity amid prior failed bids, such as NextEra Energy's rejected 2016-2017 proposal. In October 2018, Oncor announced the acquisition of InfraREIT, Inc., integrating Sharyland Utilities' transmission and distribution assets into its network, with the deal closing in May 2019 after Commission of Texas approval; Energy simultaneously acquired a 50% limited-partner in the remaining Sharyland operations to support this expansion. This move added circuit miles and aligned with 's population and economic growth, enabling Oncor to connect approximately 70,000 new premises in 2021 alone amid surging demand. From 2018 to 2024, Oncor's rate base expanded by roughly 110%, reflecting investments in to accommodate the state's economic boom, including and upgrades that positioned it as Texas's largest transmission and distribution system by end-use customers and line miles. Post-2021 Winter Storm Uri, Oncor shifted toward enhanced grid resilience, with capital expenditures reaching $2.5 billion in 2021—up from prior years—to fund weather-hardening measures and reliability upgrades, a trend continuing into multi-year plans emphasizing proactive .

Operational Infrastructure

Transmission and Distribution Network

Oncor Electric Delivery operates approximately 143,000 circuit miles of transmission and distribution lines, comprising the largest such network in Texas. Transmission lines total around 15,000 miles, primarily operating at voltages of 69 kV, 138 kV, and 345 kV, with emerging plans for 765 kV extra-high-voltage infrastructure to enhance bulk power transfer efficiency. Distribution lines, exceeding 100,000 miles, step down power from substations to end-users via lower-voltage feeders. The network includes over 1,000 substations, combining transmission switching stations and distribution transformers to manage voltage reduction and load balancing. This infrastructure supports peak demands exceeding 50 GW within Oncor's portion of the ERCOT grid, contributing to the region's overall system peak of 85 GW recorded in 2023. High-voltage transmission minimizes losses over distance through lower current flows, while distribution networks prioritize localized delivery, with causal factors like conductor material and line sag influencing under varying loads. Oncor's lines are predominantly overhead, leveraging cost-effective pole-and-wire for rapid deployment and accessible maintenance, though this exposes assets to weather-induced disruptions such as or accumulation that can cause cascading failures. Underground cabling, used selectively in dense urban zones, offers superior resistance to aerial hazards like storms—reducing outage frequency from external damage—but incurs higher installation costs (up to 10 times overhead equivalents) and prolonged repair times due to fault localization challenges in encased . Reliability data indicate overhead systems, when hardened with reinforced poles and surge protection, achieve comparable uptime to underground in non-extreme conditions, though the latter's insulation failures from moisture or overheating pose distinct vulnerabilities. Maintenance involves predictive protocols, including infrared thermography for hot-spot detection on conductors and routine patrols to assess pole integrity and encroachment, aimed at preempting failures from aging or overload. Oncor invests in asset hardening, such as upgraded crossarms and arrestors on overhead lines, to extend service life amid empirical trends of increasing load densities straining legacy built decades prior. These practices underscore trade-offs in capital allocation, where proactive management and conductor reconductoring mitigate risks more cost-effectively than wholesale underground conversion for broad-area reliability.

Service Territory and Customer Base

Oncor Electric Delivery's service territory spans north-central Texas, encompassing the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and extending westward to include areas such as , and surrounding communities. In Odessa, Texas, electricity delivery is handled by Oncor as the transmission and distribution utility (TDU) in the state's deregulated market, enabling residents and businesses to select from multiple retail electricity providers, such as Reliant Energy, Gexa Energy, Just Energy, and others. The City of Odessa does not provide electricity, instead managing water and wastewater services. This region covers over 400 communities, with a focus on major urban centers while incorporating transitional suburban and rural zones that present varying infrastructure demands due to population density differences. The company serves nearly 4 million metered customers as of , primarily residential users who constitute the majority of the load base, alongside commercial and industrial segments. Distribution revenues from residential customers are tied to monthly consumption volumes, reflecting steady demand from households in high-growth metro areas. Commercial and industrial customers, including expanding operations, have driven recent load growth, diversifying the base beyond traditional residential patterns and necessitating targeted grid reinforcements in urban-industrial corridors. In 2024, Oncor connected 77,000 new premises—a near-record figure compared to 73,000 in 2023—correlating with ' inbound migration and population surges that amplify urban expansion pressures while straining rural extension capabilities.

Integration with ERCOT and Grid Operations

Oncor Electric Delivery operates as both a transmission service provider (TSP) and distribution service provider (DSP) within the (ERCOT), the independent system operator managing approximately 90% of Texas's electric load in an isolated grid interconnection. As TSP, Oncor maintains over 20,000 miles of transmission lines and responds to ERCOT's real-time operational directives, including security-constrained economic dispatch (SCED) adjustments issued every five minutes to balance while respecting physical constraints. Congestion management involves Oncor monitoring line ratings and implementing remedial action schemes (RAS) or dynamic line ratings based on real-time parameters like ambient temperature and to alleviate bottlenecks without generation-type bias. These functions ensure efficient power flows across zones, with Oncor collaborating with ERCOT's transmission operations center to execute switching and voltage support as needed for system stability. In scarcity conditions, Oncor adheres to ERCOT's load shedding protocols, which prioritize under-frequency load shedding (UFLS) relays and manual operator-directed curtailments to prevent cascading failures, adapted from (NERC) Standard EOP-011 but tailored to Texas's deregulated market without federal oversight. ERCOT issues directives for controlled outages starting with interruptible loads, followed by firm load if reserves drop below thresholds, with Oncor as DSP implementing these via automated relays or systems across its 3.8 million customer connections. Restoration protocols emphasize sequential reconnection based on system frequency recovery and load acceptance tests to avoid re-energization overloads, ensuring gradual grid rebuilding while monitoring for voltage instability. These measures, grounded in empirical data, maintain compliance with NERC reliability criteria despite ERCOT's unique non-synchronous status. Oncor's infrastructure interconnects diverse generation sources, including approximately 25 GW of capacity in and emerging solar farms, alongside baseload and units, facilitating ERCOT's wholesale market dispatch. The causal of renewables—driven by meteorological variability—amplifies grid supply fluctuations, with output varying by up to 50% hourly and solar exhibiting sharp evening ramps, necessitating increased flexible dispatch from non-renewables to manage net load peaks. ERCOT data indicate this contributes to steeper ramp rates, with renewable penetration exceeding 40% of supply during high-output periods correlating to elevated variability indices and heightened balancing reserves requirements. Oncor mitigates these through transmission expansions that diversify inflow points, reducing localized congestion from variable feeds without favoring generation technologies in operational protocols.

Major Projects and Capital Investments

Long-Term Capital Plans

Oncor's five-year plan for 2025–2029 totals $36.1 billion, a 33% increase over the prior 2024–2028 plan, primarily to accommodate rapid load growth from industrial developments such as semiconductor fabs and centers while bolstering resilience against weather-related disruptions. The plan projects $7.1 billion in spending for 2025 alone, reflecting accelerated investments amid Texas's and empirical lessons from grid failures during extreme events. Within the plan, approximately 61% is allocated to distribution system upgrades, prioritizing localized reliability enhancements like line hardening and substation reinforcements to reduce outage durations from distributed failures. Transmission investments account for 27%, focused on expansions to serve high-demand industrial loads, with the remaining 8% directed toward other such as integrations for monitoring and control. This distribution underscores a causal emphasis on distribution-level interventions, where data from past storms indicate disproportionate vulnerability compared to high-voltage transmission. Capital spending trends have escalated post-2021, when annual expenditures reached $2.5 billion amid initial responses to Winter Storm Uri's exposures of underinvestment in weather-resilient infrastructure. Subsequent years saw progressive increases, culminating in the current plan's average of over $7 billion annually—a more than twofold rise—driven by regulatory mandates and load forecasts necessitating both maintenance backlogs and forward expansions to prevent recurrence of systemic gaps revealed in outage analyses.

Notable Transmission and Substation Projects

In 2024, Oncor completed the placement of over $2 billion in transmission projects into service, including substation expansions and line upgrades that bolstered grid capacity and reliability across its . These initiatives addressed identified bottlenecks, enabling higher transfer capabilities to support ERCOT's regional planning needs amid growing demand. The Forney 345/138-kV Switch Rebuild Project, submitted to ERCOT's Regional Planning Group in July 2024, involves replacing aging switch infrastructure to eliminate thermal violations on connected lines. Classified as a Tier 1 necessity, the $103.5 million effort enhances local transfer limits by mitigating overload risks during peak conditions, with completion targeted to align with ERCOT reliability standards. Southern Dallas County expansions include the Wilmer Switching Station rebuild, converting it to full 345/138-kV operation with new switchyards, two 345/138-kV transformers, and associated facilities to serve emerging economic hubs and loads. Part of the broader $1.219 billion Southern DFW Load Interconnection program, these works resolve thermal overloads and voltage issues on 345-kV lines, increasing import capacity into the zone by reconfiguring terminals and adding substation elements like the Miller Road 345/138-kV facility. Oncor acquired 121 acres in the area for a new substation site in 2025 to further accommodate hyperscale developments. Additional substation-focused efforts include the 2024 reconfiguration of the Ringo 138-kV substation into a 6-breaker ring bus as part of the Hartring to Upland 138-kV line project, which adds capacity at Benedum to relieve constraints in . These targeted reconductoring and switch additions collectively support ERCOT's modeling for up to several thousand MW of incremental zonal transfers, prioritizing completion by 2026.

Technological and Reliability Enhancements

Oncor has deployed advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), consisting of smart meters that record electricity consumption in 15-minute intervals, enabling enhanced outage detection and response through remote monitoring capabilities. This system supports real-time data collection, which facilitates quicker identification of service interruptions compared to traditional manual meter reading. By integrating AMI with supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) equivalents in distribution automation, Oncor achieves automated fault isolation, as evidenced by the deployment of devices like IntelliRupters that reduce average outage durations on unfaulted segments from 45 minutes to as little as 2 minutes. As of 2025, such automated devices cover 70% of Oncor's distribution system, with plans to expand to 90%, directly contributing to fewer customers affected per outage event by isolating faults without manual intervention. Vegetation management technologies, augmented by drone-based inspections, have been implemented to mitigate line faults caused by overgrowth encroaching on transmission and distribution infrastructure. Oncor utilizes drones flown 6-10 feet from lines to detect potential hazards, supplementing traditional aerial patrols and reducing the need for riskier ground or manned inspections. In collaboration with , Oncor developed a solution integrating , sensor data, and weather analytics to prioritize vegetation trimming, which has streamlined operations and empirically lowered outage incidents attributable to contact. These methods proactively address clearance violations, with routine drone and surveys identifying issues invisible from ground level, thereby decreasing fault rates from vegetation-related causes. Oncor maintains protocols for integrating distributed energy resources (DER), including solar installations, , and backup generation, through standardized interconnection applications that ensure grid stability without preferential treatment for intermittent sources over reliable baseload options. These protocols require detailed reviews and protective relaying to prevent reverse power flows that could exacerbate faults, as outlined in Oncor's Electric Service Guidelines and ERCOT-aligned processes. DER connections are limited to configurations that do not compromise overall system reliability, with applications mandating warning placards for alternate power sources to alert field crews during fault response. This approach supports causal outage reduction by enforcing visibility and control over DER injections, avoiding undue reliance on variable outputs that could introduce instability during or fault conditions.

Reliability and Outage Performance

Oncor's non-storm System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), which measures average outage minutes per customer excluding major weather events, stood at 74.7 minutes for 2023, reflecting operational performance under routine conditions. This figure excludes significant storm-related disruptions, allowing assessment of baseline reliability influenced by factors such as equipment maintenance and load management. Similarly, the non-storm System Average Interruption Index (SAIFI), tracking average interruptions per customer, aligns with industry standards for urban utilities, where higher customer amplifies frequency but enables rapid isolation and restoration. Pre-2021 non-event SAIDI for Oncor hovered around 200 minutes when including all interruptions, but adjusted for major events, trends indicated stability amid growing demand, with contributing to variances from statewide averages of approximately 273 minutes. Post-2021, excluding anomalous weather, SAIDI improved to sub-100 minute levels through targeted investments, contrasting with broader figures elevated by rural overhead lines prone to and weather faults. Urban areas like Oncor's Dallas-Fort Worth territory exhibit elevated due to concentrated loads and interconnection complexities, yet benefit from underground cabling prevalence, which reduces exposure compared to rural peers. Unplanned outage trends for Oncor correlate with surges, which rose alongside ERCOT-wide growth projecting increased loads from data centers and , yet frequency has moderated via re-conductoring over 3,200 miles in 2023 alone. Aging poses risks, as evidenced by national patterns of rising unplanned events tied to deferred , but Oncor's $36 billion 2025-2029 capital plan addresses this through substation upgrades and , stabilizing trends absent extremes. Comparatively, Oncor's metrics outperform Texas averages but lag national non-major event benchmarks of roughly 80-120 minutes SAIDI, underscoring 's efficiency in channeling investments toward high-growth urban grids while exposing systems to unbundled generation risks. ' model yields residential rates 12.1% below national averages, funding reliability enhancements without integrated generation subsidies, though amplifies outage propagation compared to less dense national utilities.

2021 Winter Storm Uri Events

During Winter Storm Uri, which struck from February 13 to 17, 2021, Oncor Electric Delivery customers in faced widespread power outages as the (ERCOT) initiated emergency load shedding to avert total grid collapse amid a rapid loss of approximately 40% of available generating capacity within hours on February 15. This capacity shortfall stemmed from frozen equipment and instrumentation failures across multiple fuel types, including compression and processing facilities, wind turbine blades and controls, coal plant pulverizers, and even nuclear reactor auxiliaries, rather than issues isolated to renewables. Oncor's transmission network experienced no outages that directly impaired service reliability, with disruptions primarily resulting from ERCOT's directives for rotating blackouts totaling up to 20,000 MW to balance supply deficits exceeding 34,000 MW at peak. The outages peaked statewide at over 4.5 million customers, with Oncor's territory—serving densely populated areas like Dallas-Fort Worth—bearing a significant share due to high demand from heating loads amid sub-freezing temperatures dipping below 0°F. Restoration progressed as generation units thawed and restarted, with Oncor crews addressing localized ice-induced damage to distribution lines and poles through manual interventions; by , the majority of service was restored as ERCOT canceled remaining controlled outages around 12:42 a.m. on , though some lingering disruptions persisted from weather-related tree falls and equipment inspections. ' interconnected yet isolated ERCOT grid, lacking substantial interties to neighboring systems, amplified vulnerabilities by preventing emergency imports, forcing reliance on intrastate resources inadequately prepared for prolonged cold snaps. Criticisms of Oncor and ERCOT centered on delayed declarations—ERCOT issued its first firm load shed order at 1:25 a.m. on February 15 despite forecasts—and coordination hiccups, including administrative paperwork errors that briefly disrupted compliance with rolling outage protocols, leading to uneven shedding intervals. These operational lapses, however, operated within ' deregulated , established in the late 1990s and early 2000s, which emphasized competitive pricing over prescriptive reliability mandates like comprehensive for generators or upstream infrastructure—recommendations from the 2011 cold weather event had not been enforced statewide. Empirical data from the event underscored systemic causal factors: , comprising over half of ERCOT's capacity, saw production drop 75% due to uninsulated wells and pipelines, while and each contributed to derates from icing and fuel handling issues, highlighting shared unpreparedness across dispatchable and intermittent sources.

Post-2021 Reforms and Criticisms

Following the 2021 Winter Storm Uri, Bill 3 mandated enhanced weatherization and emergency preparedness for transmission and distribution utilities, including requirements for hardening infrastructure against extreme cold. Oncor complied by integrating these standards into its operations, with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) adopting updated rules under 16 TAC §25.55 for weather emergency preparedness, emphasizing facility inspections and mitigation measures. In response, Oncor pursued targeted resiliency investments, culminating in PUC approval of a $3 billion System Resiliency Plan in November 2024, allocating funds over four years for distribution system upgrades like substation reinforcements and line hardening to mitigate outage risks from . These reforms yielded measurable improvements in reliability metrics. Oncor reported reductions in non-storm SAIDI, with customers experiencing an average of five fewer minutes of outage duration compared to prior benchmarks, attributed to proactive hardening. Winter seasons from 2022 to 2024 saw lower outage durations than Uri, as resiliency measures—such as enhanced weatherproofing and rapid restoration protocols—countered extreme conditions without widespread failures, supporting claims of enhanced grid durability despite persistent weather variability. PUC oversight confirmed that these investments substantially curtailed outage minutes during cold snaps, challenging narratives of systemic T&D unreliability. Criticisms persist regarding the financial implications and residual vulnerabilities. Oncor's recovery of capital expenditures through multiple rate adjustments since 2021—culminating in a June 2025 filing seeking $834 million in additional annual revenue—has drawn scrutiny for imposing burdens on ratepayers amid and storm-related cost escalations. ERCOT's issuance of voluntary conservation notices in 2023 and subsequent years, driven by tight supply-demand balances, has fueled debates over whether T&D operators like Oncor shoulder undue blame for grid strains primarily caused by generation shortfalls rather than distribution inadequacies. While data indicates T&D hardening has mitigated localized outages, advocates argue that capex-driven rate hikes overlook broader supply-side reforms, potentially shifting responsibility from underperforming generators.

Regulatory and Economic Aspects

Rate Cases and PUC Oversight

The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) oversees Oncor Electric Delivery as a transmission and distribution service provider (TDSP) under the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA), requiring periodic base rate cases to establish rates that allow recovery of prudently incurred costs plus an authorized (ROE). Rate cases involve filings with the PUCT and affected municipalities, where Oncor must demonstrate cost efficiency and justify capital expenditures, with the PUCT scrutinizing proposals for reasonableness before approving final rates. Delivery charges approved in these cases are passed through to retail customers via competitive providers, insulating Oncor from fuel or generation cost risks but exposing rate changes directly to consumer bills. On June 26, 2025, Oncor filed a comprehensive review (Docket No. 58306) seeking an approximately $834 million annual revenue increase to support a $7.1 billion plan for 2025, part of a broader $36 billion five-year investment strategy focused on grid expansion, maintenance, and resilience enhancements. The filing requests adjustments to the authorized to account for elevated interest rates and , alongside recovery of storm-related damages comprising about 45% of the proposed hike; if approved, it would raise average residential bills by roughly $7 monthly for 1,000 kWh usage, equating to a 4.7% increase in delivery charges. The PUCT process, expected to span six to nine months, includes Oncor's request for partial interim rates subject to refund, with interventions from stakeholders like municipalities and retailers challenging aspects such as cost allocation efficiency. Post-2021 Winter Storm Uri, the PUCT has approved Oncor rate cases allowing recovery of extraordinary storm restoration costs while imposing efficiency audits; for instance, a May 2022 filing led to a 2023 order authorizing an $80 million annual revenue increase effective May 1, 2023, to recoup investments in system hardening and Uri-related repairs exceeding prudent thresholds. These proceedings emphasized scrutiny of operational preparedness, with the PUCT rejecting certain expense claims deemed inefficient amid debates over whether formula-based rate mechanisms—common in federal transmission oversight—could better align incentives for Texas TDSPs versus traditional cost-of-service cases that risk delays in funding urgent . Oncor has relied on traditional rate cases, which provide detailed PUCT review but have drawn criticism for potentially underincentivizing proactive investments, as evidenced by consumer advocates arguing that pass-through delivery hikes post-storm amplified bill volatility without equivalent reliability guarantees.

Financial Performance and Revenue Model

Oncor Electric Delivery operates as a regulated transmission and distribution (T&D) utility in , deriving its revenue primarily from customer delivery charges for distribution services and wholesale transmission tariffs approved by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT). These charges include fixed monthly fees and per-kilowatt-hour rates for using Oncor's infrastructure to deliver from retail electric providers (REPs) to end-users, without exposure to costs or wholesale market volatility. As a non-competitive entity under Texas's deregulated , Oncor earns an authorized (ROE) applied to its rate base, which consists of invested capital in T&D assets net of and contributions in aid of construction. The company's profitability is driven by growth in its rate base through capital expenditures (capex) on grid expansions and upgrades, which are recovered via periodic rate cases. Distribution base revenues, a key proxy for rate base expansion, rose 17.1% in the first half of 2024 compared to the prior year, reflecting additions from ongoing investments. Full-year 2024 distribution base revenues increased 9.8% year-over-year, supporting sustained earnings growth amid customer load additions and deployment. This model insulates Oncor from ERCOT wholesale price fluctuations, as revenues are decoupled from risks and focused on cost recovery plus allowed returns. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, Oncor reported of $440 million, up from $476 million in the prior-year period despite seasonal variations, with second-quarter at $259 million, a $8 million increase year-over-year driven by higher distribution volumes and approved rate adjustments. Earnings reflect execution of a record $7.1 billion capex plan for 2025, funded partly through operational cash flows but heavily reliant on issuances to maintain for long-term investments. Oncor finances capex via a mix of retained earnings, cash from operations, and external debt, with long-term debt issuances supporting grid reliability projects while targeting investment-grade credit metrics. As of mid-2025, available liquidity stood at approximately $3.8 billion, including borrowings under credit facilities. Credit ratings, such as Fitch's 'BBB+' on senior secured notes with a positive watch, underscore leverage from elevated capex but affirm resilience due to regulated cash flows; however, sustained high debt levels relative to rate base growth pose risks if rate case outcomes limit ROE recovery.

Economic Contributions to Texas

Oncor's transmission and distribution network serves as a foundational enabler of economic expansion in , accommodating surging electricity demand from population influx and business relocations across its territory spanning 98 counties and over 400 communities. In 2024, the company added nearly 77,000 new premises, marking one of its highest annual increases and aligning with ' population-driven growth in key metropolitan areas such as Dallas-Fort Worth. This infrastructure scalability has directly facilitated the attraction of high-growth sectors, including and , by ensuring capacity for increased loads without systemic disruptions. A prominent example is Oncor's support for the post-2020 data center boom, which has positioned as a hub for investments. The utility has processed over 200 GW in interconnection requests as of mid-2025, with approximately 186 GW stemming from s alone, reflecting commitments from major operators to deploy facilities requiring massive, reliable power delivery. These projects correlate with broader economic multipliers, as developments draw ancillary industries and skilled labor, contributing to ' load growth projections that mirror statewide GDP expansion in technology-driven sectors. Industrial demand within Oncor's service area has expanded at an average annual rate exceeding 15% over the past five years, underpinning expansions in energy-intensive and that leverage the region's competitive power infrastructure. To sustain this trajectory, Oncor committed to a $36 billion capital investment plan spanning 2025-2029, prioritizing transmission upgrades to integrate new commercial and industrial loads while championing relocations that generate opportunities. Through its dedicated team, Oncor collaborates with state and local entities to provide data and post-relocation support, thereby smoothing barriers to business establishment and reinforcing ' appeal for inward investment.

Environmental and Sustainability Profile

Operational Impacts and Emissions

As a transmission and distribution utility without power generation assets, Oncor Electric Delivery produces minimal direct from operations, primarily limited to (SF6) leakage from high-voltage circuit breakers and switches. SF6, a potent with a over 23,000 times that of CO2, is used as an insulating medium in this equipment; Oncor has maintained annual SF6 emission rates at or below 1% of total gas inventory since 2016, in line with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) voluntary reduction targets. The company participates in the EPA's SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership for Electric Power Systems, submitting annual reports that track leakage as a fraction of net megawatt-hours delivered, though specific CO2-equivalent metrics remain low relative to generation-sector emissions. Oncor's extensive infrastructure, spanning approximately 143,000 miles of transmission and distribution lines across 98 counties, requires significant right-of-way (ROW) management, leading to land use impacts including and risks to avian species. Power line corridors facilitate vegetation clearing and maintenance activities that can disrupt local ecosystems, as evidenced by instances of ROW clearing at sites like in , where removal of undergrowth altered bird habitats and visibility for species observed during walks. and collision with lines pose direct mortality risks to birds, prompting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to issue Oncor a 30-year incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act in 2012 for unavoidable impacts during and , covering specified species and habitats. These operational footprints contribute to broader ecological pressures in ' diverse terrains, though quantitative avian mortality data specific to Oncor remains limited in public records. In delivering electricity within the ERCOT grid, Oncor facilitates integration of renewables, which accounted for about 37% of in 2024 (wind at 29%, solar at 7.7%), but transmission and distribution losses—typically 5-7% of delivered —necessitate overgeneration to meet end-user , indirectly amplifying reliance on backups for grid stability amid renewable . ERCOT's actual transmission loss factors, calculated hourly for settlement, reflect these inefficiencies, with losses rising under high renewable penetration due to curtailment and dispatch patterns that favor dispatchable (40% of 2024 mix) to cover variability and line constraints. This dynamic underscores how T&D , while enabling renewable flows, embeds systemic waste that sustains higher volumes than gross renewable output alone would imply.

Corporate Sustainability Initiatives

Oncor's 2024 Corporate Sustainability Report outlines commitments to enhancing grid resilience through its System Resiliency Plan, which allocates approximately $3 billion over four years to distribution system improvements, including vegetation management and distribution automation aimed at reducing outage durations. This plan incorporates expanded tree-trimming efforts, with $285 million dedicated to proactive vegetation management along power lines to mitigate risks from overgrowth, targeting the addition of 20,000 miles of non-mainline lines to the maintenance schedule. These initiatives tie directly to quantifiable reliability metrics, such as reductions in system average interruption duration index (SAIDI), where Oncor reported customers experiencing an average of ten fewer outage minutes in recent periods compared to prior benchmarks, reflecting a 13% improvement linked to capital expenditures. The company also advances energy efficiency via rebate programs for customers adopting technologies like LED lighting and high-efficiency appliances, integrated into its broader sustainable financing framework that supports projects reducing energy demand. In electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure, Oncor provides incentives for deploying at least five EV chargers or two medium-heavy duty fleet vehicles per site, alongside collaborations such as with to expand charging ecosystems, facilitating grid connections for growing EV adoption without specified emissions reduction targets. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) metrics are tracked by Oncor's board committee, which receives regular reports on workforce composition and inclusion practices as part of sustainability oversight, though specific quantifiable outcomes beyond reporting are not detailed in public disclosures. Overall, these programs emphasize capital-intensive investments in infrastructure hardening over aspirational environmental goals, with progress measured against operational reliability rather than independent verification of broader sustainability impacts.

Debates and Empirical Assessments

Critics of rapid expansion in contend that heavy reliance on intermittent sources like and solar imposes undue strain on transmission and distribution networks, particularly absent robust baseload , as variability necessitates frequent ramping and expanded to maintain stability. Analyses post-2021 Winter Storm Uri, which caused over 4.5 million outages and highlighted multi-fuel failures due to inadequate weatherization, emphasize that while all resources faltered—renewables from icing and lack of production, from frozen wells—renewable intermittency amplifies grid stress, increasing T&D upgrade costs without proportional reliability gains from fuel diversity. Empirical assessments of Oncor's T&D performance reveal , with the utility achieving top-quartile reliability metrics such as System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) values below industry medians, thereby minimizing delivery losses estimated at under 6% system-wide in program evaluations. This counters narratives attributing outsized to utilities, as Texas's intensity stands at 1.5 metric tons of CO2 per megawatt-hour, lower than coal-dominant or less gas-efficient states, reflecting effective T&D that reduces waste in power conveyance. Debates over carbon regulations highlight potential economic burdens, with modeling indicating that stringent emission caps could elevate Texas grid costs by billions through forced retirements of dispatchable capacity, undermining the state's 13% share of U.S. amid surging demand from data centers and industry. Proponents of empirical grid argue that post-Uri reforms—focusing on weatherization and capacity additions—have bolstered stability metrics, with ERCOT's reserve margins improving, favoring data-driven reliability over policies driven by exaggerated projections that overlook Texas's declining per-capita electricity emissions trajectory of 22% since pre-Uri baselines.

References

  1. https://www.oncor.com/investorrelations
  2. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us.html
  3. https://www.sempra.com/sempra-energy-completes-acquisition-majority-stake-oncor
  4. https://www.puc.texas.gov/agency/about/ope/inside_ercot/Default.aspx
  5. https://www.puc.texas.gov/industry/electric/rates/tdr/Default.aspx
  6. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-system-resiliency-plan-approved-by-puct-.html
  7. https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/oncor-reports-2024-results-announces-36-billion-2025-2029-capital-plan-2025-02-25
  8. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/fitch-affirms-sempra-subsidiaries-ratings-oncor-outlook-remains-negative-05-09-2024
  9. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/92108/000008652118000041/R12.htm
  10. https://static.texastribune.org/media/documents/Final_Regulatory_Commitments.pdf
  11. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/SRE/oncor-reports-2024-results-announces-36-billion-2025-2029-capital-wqcnwugt7nst.html
  12. https://www.rttnews.com/3537326/oncor-q1-profit-down-revenues-rise.aspx
  13. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/March%25202025%2520Slide%2520Presentation.pdf
  14. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-reports-2024-results--announces--36-billion-2025-2029-capi.html
  15. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1193311/000119312525147544/d947724d8k.htm
  16. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-reports-second-quarter-2025-results.html
  17. https://www.lrl.texas.gov/legis/billsearch/docs.cfm?legSession=76-0&billtypeDetail=SB&billNumberDetail=7&billSuffixDetail=
  18. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0117/ML011730446.pdf
  19. https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/61/Texas-Utilities-Company.html
  20. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/-electricity-restructuring_102315910190.pdf
  21. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/RM99-2-00K_1.pdf
  22. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/energy-business/policy-and-regulation/txu-creates-oncor-to-provide-regulated-energy-delivery-in-texas/
  23. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0412/ML041240220.pdf
  24. https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/oncor-and-the-oracle/
  25. https://bsic.it/vintage-private-equity-deals-txu-learnings-from-the-largest-lbo-bust-in-history/
  26. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/americas/texas-power-company-energy-future-files-for-bankruptcy-idUSBREA3S0CQ/
  27. https://www.cnbc.com/2014/04/29/texas-power-company-energy-future-files-for-bankruptcy.html
  28. https://www.reuters.com/article/legal/government/txu-s-oncor-agrees-to-resolve-regulatory-issues-idUSN05414890/
  29. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sempra-energy-announces-agreement-to-acquire-ownership-interest-in-oncor-300506912.html
  30. https://www.sempra.com/oncor-acquire-infrareit-sempra-energy-acquire-50-stake-sharyland-utilities
  31. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-reports-2021-results.html
  32. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/Q4%25202024%2520Earnings%2520Call%2520Announcement.pdf
  33. https://www.electricchoice.com/utilities/oncor/
  34. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/about-us/transmission-system/determining-the-need-for-new-lines/Retail%2520Customer%2520-%2520Oncor%2520Standard%2520520-106%2520%28formerly%2520500-251%29.pdf.coredownload.pdf
  35. https://bayliff.law/oncors-longshore-to-drill-hole-transmission-line/
  36. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/Oncor_Comments_CommsReqs.pdf
  37. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-reports-2023-results--announces-24-2-billion-2024-2028-cap.html
  38. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/Oncor-System-Resiliency-Plan.html
  39. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/power-grid/grid-modernization/oncor-settles-on-a-3-billion-resiliency-plan-heres-whats-in-it/
  40. https://co.my.xcelenergy.com/customersupport/s/article/How-do-overhead-and-underground-transmission-lines-differ-from-each-other
  41. https://pdi2.org/images/uploads/2021/03/130-SC-SCANA-Undergroundvs1.pdf
  42. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/April%25202024%2520Slide%2520Presentation.pdf
  43. https://www.choosetexaspower.org/electricity-rates/odessa/
  44. https://www.odessa-tx.gov/292/Utilities
  45. https://www.oncor.com/communityprofiles/index.html
  46. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/4Q-2024%2520Oncor%2520Earnings%2520Release.pdf
  47. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/oncor-reports-2024-results-announces-36-billion-2025-2029-capital-plan-302384028.html
  48. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/transmission-systems.html
  49. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2020/12/28/January_1_2021_Nodal_Operating_Guide.pdf
  50. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/transmission-grid-operations-support-engineer-thru-senior-engineer-at-oncor-electric-delivery-4299589490
  51. https://ftp.puc.texas.gov/public/puct-info/agency/resources/reports/leg/puc_load_shed_protocols_study.pdf
  52. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2021/01/29/February_1_2021_Nodal_Operating_Guide.pdf
  53. https://learn.gexaenergy.com/article/what-is-oncor-electric-delivery
  54. https://www.data-panda.com/post/exploring-the-impact-of-renewable-energy-integration-on-grid-stability-and-electricity-pricing-ercot-study
  55. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/686733
  56. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/08/29/DER-Operational-Data.pdf
  57. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/transmission-systems/determining-the-need-for-new-lines.html
  58. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/fitch-rates-oncor-senior-secured-notes-a-12-06-2025
  59. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3414689
  60. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/12/13/eir-oncor-forney-345_138-kv-switch-rebuild-project_december_rpg.pdf
  61. https://app.gridmonitor.com/news/articles/?id=10568
  62. https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/57918_3_1486956.PDF
  63. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/04/28/EIR_Scope_Oncor_Southern_DFW_Load_Interconnection_Project_-_RPG_April_2025.pdf
  64. https://www.aol.com/news/oncor-acquires-big-tract-land-153244979.html
  65. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/10/15/EIR_ONCOR_LCRA_Hartring_to_Upland_138kV_Line_and_Benedum_Autotransformer_Addition_Project_Scope_RPG_October_2024.pdf
  66. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/transmission-systems/current-transmission-line-projects.html
  67. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/advanced-metering-service.html
  68. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/01-03-2019_doe-voe-leveraging-ami-networks-and-data-report_508_0.pdf
  69. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/innovation/intellirupter-pinpoints-faults--trims-outage-time.html
  70. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/innovation/oncor-improves-system-with-automated-devices-to-boost-reliabilit.html
  71. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/Inspections.html
  72. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/oncor-teams-with-ibm-to-streamline-vegetation-management-and-reduce-outages/547856/
  73. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/powering-texas/oncor-s-people---power-system-primed-for-winter.html
  74. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/energy-system-developers.html
  75. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/electric-service-guidelines/Electric%2520Service%2520Guidelines%25202021.pdf
  76. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/smart-energy/energy-system-developers/Oncor%2520Interconnection%2520Application%2520for%2520DGR%2520and%2520DESR.PDF.coredownload.pdf
  77. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2020/05/26/1016NPRR-04_Oncor_Comments_042820.doc
  78. https://www.chooseenergy.com/news/article/what-are-the-most-and-least-reliable-electric-utilities/
  79. https://txses.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Cost-of-Grid-Interruptions-in-Texas-2022-Report.pdf
  80. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_11_01.html
  81. https://www.choosetexaspower.org/energy-resources/deregulation/
  82. https://limos.engin.umich.edu/deitabase/2024/12/27/2021-texas-power-grid-failure/
  83. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2021/04/28/ERCOT_Winter_Storm_Generator_Outages_By_Cause_Updated_Report_4.27.21.pdf
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621001997
  85. https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/fiscal-notes/archive/2021/oct/winter-storm-impact.php
  86. https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/final-report-february-2021-freeze-underscores-winterization-recommendations
  87. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/2021%2520Oncor%2520Corporate%2520Sustainability%2520Report.pdf
  88. https://www.nerc.com/pa/rrm/ea/Documents/February_2021_Cold_Weather_Report.pdf
  89. https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2021/03/03/Texas_Legislature_Hearings_2-25-2021.pdf
  90. https://www.texastribune.org/2021/03/18/texas-winter-storm-blackouts-paperwork/
  91. https://energy.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/UTAustin%2520%25282021%2529%2520EventsFebruary2021TexasBlackout%252020210714.pdf
  92. https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2021/0401
  93. https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2021/02/17/state-energy-winter-protections-lacking-reports-have-suggested/6780847002/
  94. https://www.texastribune.org/2022/02/15/texas-power-grid-winter-storm-2021/
  95. https://docs.txoga.org/files/2644-4-22-21-enverus_txoga_winter-storm-uri-natural-gas-analysis.pdf
  96. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thebakersinstitute/2021/02/19/winterization-and-the-texas-blackout-fail-to-prepare-prepare-to-fail/
  97. https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB3/id/2408361
  98. https://ftp.puc.texas.gov/public/puct-info/agency/rulesnlaws/subrules/electric/25.55/53401adt.pdf
  99. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/texas-puc-approves-3-billion-oncor-system-resiliency-plan/733165/
  100. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/2023%2520Oncor%2520Sustainability%2520Report.pdf
  101. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-s-first-system-resiliency-plan-well-underway-.html
  102. https://tccfui.org/major-rate-case-oncor-electric-seeks-834-million-in-added-annual-revenue/
  103. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/oncor-propose-rate-increase-capital-expenditures/751719/
  104. https://www.ercot.com/vcn
  105. https://www.tml.org/DocumentCenter/View/3031/Electricity-Regulation-Power-Grid--2021-11-PDF
  106. https://electricityplans.com/ercot-emergency-conservation-alerts/
  107. https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/2017/15-0005.html
  108. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/regulatory.html
  109. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/Rate-Case.html
  110. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-files-rate-review-to-further-support-critical-investments-.html
  111. https://www.tdworld.com/utility-business/news/55301728/oncor-files-rate-review-with-puct-and-municipal-authorities
  112. https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/search/filings/?UtilityType=A&ControlNumber=58306
  113. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-files-rate-case-to-recover-costs-of-significant-system-inv.html
  114. https://www.ferc.gov/formula-rates-electric-transmission-proceedings-key-concepts-and-how-participate
  115. https://energyandpolicy.org/oncor-tries-to-resurrect-dead-bill-to-justify-interim-rate-increase-in-texas/
  116. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/regulatory/tariffs-rate-schedules.html
  117. https://ftp.puc.texas.gov/public/puct-info/industry/electric/rates/Trans/Oncor.pdf
  118. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/Q2%25202024%2520Oncor%2520Earnings%2520Release.pdf
  119. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/oncor-reports-second-quarter-2025-results-302523759.html
  120. https://www.ainvest.com/news/oncor-reports-q2-net-income-259-mln-8-mln-yoy-2508/
  121. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/financial-news/Q1%25202025%2520Oncor%2520Earnings%2520Release.pdf
  122. https://www.fitchratings.com/entity/oncor-electric-delivery-company-80090747
  123. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/about-us/economic-development.html
  124. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/oncor-sempra-interconnection-texas-data-center-earnings/757262/
  125. https://gridstrategiesllc.com/wp-content/uploads/National-Load-Growth-Report-2024.pdf
  126. https://www.douglewin.com/p/both-supply-and-demand-are-booming
  127. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/2020%2520Corporate%2520Sustainability%2520Overview.pdf
  128. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/documents/sf6_2010_ann_report.pdf
  129. https://www.dmagazine.com/frontburner/2020/10/oncor-lays-waste-to-swath-of-land-at-white-rock-lake/
  130. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/01/20/2012-830/final-environmental-impact-statement-and-record-of-decision-on-oncor-electric-delivery-companys
  131. https://paylesspower.com/blog/renewable-revolution-2024-ercots-top-fuel-sources/
  132. https://www.ercot.com/mp/data-products/data-product-details?id=NP13-14-SG
  133. https://www.ercot.com/mktinfo/rtm/marginallosses
  134. https://emergencypreparednesspartnerships.com/oncor-finalizes-3-billion-resiliency-plan/
  135. https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/wire/en/home/newsroom/oncor-reports-second-quarter-2023-results-.html
  136. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/Oncor%2520Sustainable%2520Financing%2520Framework%2520Effective%25205.12.22.pdf
  137. https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-announces-collaboration-with-oncor-to-accelerate-ev-charging-ecosystem/
  138. https://www.dfwcleancities.org/getmedia/837142c6-01a3-4f8f-ae10-5f87a0d48fff/Oncor-EVolution.pdf
  139. https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/investorrelations/Oncor%25202024%2520Sustainability%2520Report.pdf
  140. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/import/ces-ercot-wp-020222_cnO6uiA.pdf
  141. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/weigh-pros-and-cons-texas-grid-integration
  142. https://www.dallasfed.org/-/media/documents/research/swe/2019/swe1903c.pdf
  143. https://texasefficiency.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/EEPR_Oncor_2018.pdf
  144. https://www.eia.gov/state/print.php?sid=TX
  145. https://environmentamerica.org/texas/center/media-center/new-analysis-texas-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-electricity-sector-drop-19/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.