Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Operation Lone Star
View on Wikipedia
| Part of the Mexico–United States border crisis | |
Texas National Guard members during Operation Lone Star | |
| Date | March 6, 2021 – present (4 years, 8 months, 1 week and 5 days) |
|---|---|
| Location | Texas portion of the Mexico–United States border |
| Target | Illegal immigration to the United States Illegal drug trade Human smuggling |
| Budget | $10 billion as of January 2024[1] |
| Participants | Texas Military Department Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management |
| Outcome | 489 million doses of fentanyl seized 119,200 migrants bused to sanctuary cities |
| Deaths | 74 dead in pursuits in OLS counties, including 7 bystanders[2] |
| Non-fatal injuries | 189 injured in pursuits in OLS counties[2] |
| Arrests | 513,700 migrant apprehensions 44,000 criminal arrests |
| Charges | 38,600 felony charges[3] |
Operation Lone Star (OLS) is a joint operation between the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Military Department along the Mexico–United States border in southern Texas. The operation started in 2021 and is ongoing. According to Texas governor Greg Abbott, the operation is intended to counter a rise in illegal immigration, the illegal drug trade, and human smuggling.[4] Between fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021, migrant apprehensions had risen 278% along the US–Mexico border.[5] According to the governor's office, OLS has resulted in 513,700 migrant apprehensions, 44,000 criminal arrests (including 38,600 felony charges), and 489 million doses of fentanyl seized.[3][6][7] As of April 2022, OLS was spending approximately $2.5 million per week and was expected to cost approximately $2 billion per year.[8] Approximately 10,000 National Guard members were deployed in support of OLS at the height of the operation, with around 6,000 deployed as of November 2022.[9] One year after the start of Operation Lone Star, Texas saw a 9% increase in migrant encounters along its border with Mexico, compared to a 62% increase in Arizona, California, and New Mexico along their respective borders with Mexico.[10] As of June 2024, the Department of Public Safety has estimated a 74% drop in illegal border crossings since the start of OLS.[11]
OLS has drawn support from many Republican Party state governors. OLS drew criticism from the federal government under then-president Biden, Democratic Party governors and mayors, and migrant advocates for its treatment of migrants, including the withholding of water and orders to push migrants back into the Rio Grande.[12] Migrants have had a more difficult time crossing areas of the Rio Grande due to razor wire set up by OLS, leading to some migrants becoming injured and/or captured in the wire. Human Rights Watch (HRW) has criticized high speed pursuits in counties implementing OLS, which it attributed to causing 74 deaths.[2] Texas officials and national guard members have also voiced concerns about hardships sustained during deployment in support of OLS.[7][13]
According to the governor, 119,200 migrants were voluntarily bused to sanctuary cities across the United States as of June 2024.[3] A few migrants were also flown directly to these cities.[14] This has resulted in migrant crises in cities like New York City, Chicago, and Washington, D.C., as local resources are stretched thin to handle the new arrivals.[15][16] Local officials in the sanctuary cities have criticized the busing program and responded by requesting federal assistance, fining charter bus companies carrying migrants, and sending migrants to other cities.[17][18][15][19]
In January 2024, Texas officials seized control of Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, which was frequently used by United States Border Patrol to process new migrant arrivals. Border patrol agents were generally prohibited from the park, except to access a boat ramp in the park after three migrants drowned nearby while crossing the Rio Grande. This led to a standoff between federal and state officials. The Biden administration has said that it would refer the dispute to the United States Department of Justice if access was not restored for border patrol agents.[20][21]
Background and causes
[edit]Starting with "Operation Linebacker" by former governor Rick Perry, the State of Texas has been launching border security operations with increasing escalation since 2005.[8] These operations were limited in scope due to the exclusive authority of federal immigration agents to deport migrants.[10] Operation Lone Star was launched in 2021 to respond to the surge in border crossings, which Governor Abbott attributed to the Biden Administration's policies on immigration. In fiscal year 2021, enforcement actions by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, including detentions and arrests of migrants, rose to over 1.9 million, a 202% increase from fiscal year 2020. Meanwhile, a 278% increase in migrant encounters was seen at the southwest border from fiscal year 2020 to 2021, which continued rising into 2022.[5]
Operation Lone Star differed from previous border operations due to the authority granted to state law enforcement officials to arrest migrants in border counties for offenses such as criminal trespassing and human smuggling.[10] OLS efforts to empower local law enforcement to act against undocumented migrants have been complicated by the traditional delegation of immigration enforcement powers to federal officials. In Arizona v. United States, the Supreme Court overturned an Arizona law penalizing illegal immigration at a state level.[22][23]
Timeline
[edit]| Date | Notable Event |
|---|---|
| March 6, 2021 | Operation Lone Star is launched[4] |
| May 31, 2021 | Greg Abbott declares disaster via Proclamation[24] |
| June 16, 2021 | Greg Abbott announces border wall construction strategy[25] |
| December 18, 2021 | First section of border wall completed in Rio Grande City[26] |
| March 14, 2022 | Major General Tracy Norris is relieved of command[27] |
| April 6, 2022 | Bus and flight of immigrants to sanctuary city Washington, D.C., begin[28] |
| July 7, 2022 | Greg Abbott declares invasion via Executive Order GA-41[29] |
| September 21, 2022 | Greg Abbott designates Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations via Executive Order GA-42[30] |
| November 18, 2022 | M113 armored personnel carriers are deployed[31] |
| February 3, 2023 | Greg Abbott establishes Texas Border Czar position, appoints Mike Banks[32] |
| May 8, 2023 | Greg Abbott establishes and deploys Texas Tactical Border Force[33][34] |
| May 16, 2023 | Texas requests assistance from other states, utilizing the Emergency Management Assistance Compact.[35] |
| October 2, 2023 | The Texas Ranger Division and Texas Army National Guard occupied Fronton Island.[36] |
| December 18, 2023 | Greg Abbott signs bill SB 4, making illegal immigration a state crime, allowing Texas law enforcement to arrest undocumented migrants anywhere in the state. It also permits state courts to issue removal orders to send arrested migrants back across the Mexican border.[22] |
| January 11, 2024 | Greg Abbott executes emergency declaration ordering Texas Military Forces to seize control of 47-acre Shelby Park in Eagle Pass from United States Border Patrol agents.[37] |
| January 25, 2024 | 25 Republican state governors declare their support for Texas in its disputes with Federal authorities.[38] |
| February 16, 2024 | Greg Abbott announces FOB Eagle, an 80-acre forward operating base at Eagle Pass for 2,300 soldiers[39] |
| April 19, 2024 | Additional resources were sent to help secure border in El Paso due to a surge of illegal immigrants. |
| May 31, 2024 | Texas National Guard soldiers were welcomed Governor Abbott during their move to the base camp in Eagle Pass.[40] |
| September 23, 2024 | Greg Abbott announces Texas is launching a operation to target Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA)[40] |
Reactions
[edit]Public
[edit]As of June 2023, polling from the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin indicated that 59% of Texans backed the increased law enforcement deployments and border spending.[41][42]
The mission faced public criticism, including from state officials, following reports of pay delays, poor working and living conditions, a lack of proper equipment and facilities, and multiple suicides and suicide attempts among service members.[7][43] According to reporting in the Army Times, soldiers were being housed in what it describes as cramped quarters, in converted recreational vehicles and semi-truck trailers, and also faced shortages in cold weather uniforms, medical equipment, and portable toilets.[7] According to the Houston Chronicle, this was further compounded when it coincided with state cuts in educational benefits for service members to address budget shortfalls, reducing available tuition assistance by more than half.[44] Some Texas Air National Guard members deployed in support of OLS have also criticized the operation's planning and execution, with nearly 30% of 250 participants in a 2022 Air National Guard survey reporting frustration with the operation's length, haste, and involuntary nature.[13]
On January 13, 2022, a state district court judge in Travis County, Texas, granted Jesús Alberto Guzmán Curipoma, of Ecuador, a writ of habeas corpus, ruling that the state program violated the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution.[45] On February 25, 2022, the state Third Court of Appeals in Austin affirmed the decision of the lower court.[46] On June 26, 2024, the Court of Criminal Appeals vacated the Third Court of Appeals decision and remanded the case for reconsideration.[47]
Republican Party officials in multiple states and in federal positions supported Texas' efforts and criticized opposition from the Biden administration.[48]
More than 100 sheriffs in Texas have publicly backed OLS.[49]
Many people support OLS, as of February 10, 2025 there has been an estimated amount of 56 million dollars donated to fund, the border wall, border transportation, and border security. This funding is from donations from Americans all over not only in Texas.[50]
Department of Justice investigation and lawsuits
[edit]
Civil rights investigation
[edit]In July 2022, the Department of Justice opened a civil rights investigation of OLS.[51] According to a Texas Department of Public Safety email obtained by the Texas Tribune, the investigation is focused on reviewing whether OLS violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin by programs that receive federal funds.
Federal lawsuits
[edit]On July 24, 2023, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in the Western District of Texas, United States v. Abbott, alleging that the construction of floating barriers in the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass by OLS without permission violated the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.[52] In a statement announcing the lawsuit, Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said that the barriers pose a hazard to navigation and public safety, present humanitarian concerns, and have sparked diplomatic protests by Mexico. In response, Texas argued that the area of the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass does not fall under the Act and that the floating barriers are not a "structure" subject to the Act's requirements. Texas also argued that the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which allows states to engage in war if invaded, allows Texas to build the barriers due to Governor Abbott's invasion declaration.[53] On September 6, the district court granted the DOJ's motion for a preliminary injunction and ordered Texas to move the barrier to the bank of the river and cease the installation of any new barriers.[54] In response, Texas appealed the order to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which issued an order on December 1 affirming the injunction.[55] The court also found that Texas has not offered concrete evidence that the barrier has saved lives or reduced illegal migration. The outcome of the case is pending an en banc rehearing in the Fifth Circuit.[56]
Federal border patrol agents have cut and destroyed razor wire deployed by Texas as part of Operation Lone Star, but were halted from doing so except to provide emergency medical aid by a temporary injunction issued by a judge in the Western District of Texas on October 30, 2023.[57] On November 30, the court withdrew the injunction, allowing the Border Patrol to resume cutting the wire pending a trial in the case.[58] The Fifth Circuit reinstated the temporary injunction on cutting razor wire in December 2023. In January 2024, the Supreme Court restored the ability of border patrol agents to cut razor wire pending the outcome of the case.[59] Texas continued putting up concertina wire and blocking border patrol agents after the ruling, which only dealt with the temporary injunction against border patrol agents cutting razor wire.[60][61] The case is ongoing and is scheduled to be argued before the Fifth Circuit on February 7, 2024.[62]
Since 2022, Abbott has repeatedly invoked the "invasion clauses" of the Constitution to legally justify his efforts on immigration enforcement, which typically falls under federal purview. Abbott has accused the Biden administration of failing to protect Texas against an "invasion" under Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, thus empowering the state to act under Article I, Section 10, Clause 3.[63][64][65][66] Texas has also unsuccessfully attempted to use this argument in federal court.[67]
On January 3, 2024, the Biden administration filed United States v. Texas, a lawsuit challenging SB 4, which empowered Texas law enforcement to arrest migrants and effectively deport them for crossing the border illegally. The Biden administration argued that Texas was interfering with the federal government's "exclusive authority" on immigration.[68][69] The United States Supreme Court issued a stay temporarily blocking SB 4 from going into effect on March 4, 2024.[70] The Supreme Court rejected a later request for a stay and allowed the law to go into effect pending ongoing litigation on March 19.[71]
Eagle Pass park standoff
[edit]On January 11, 2024, the Texas National Guard took control of Shelby Park, a 47-acre (19 ha) area of parkland in the town of Eagle Pass, along the Rio Grande river, which separates the United States from Mexico, after Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed an emergency declaration to close the park. In his declaration, Abbott cited the Mexico–United States border crisis and the need to secure the border. The Texas National Guard blocked U.S. Border Patrol agents from patrolling the area, which the Border Patrol had been using to hold migrants in recent weeks.[72][73]
After the closure, three migrants were found drowned in the Rio Grande. Mexican authorities subsequently identified them as a 33-year-old woman and her two children, aged 10 and 8. The U.S. Border Patrol said it had alerted the Texas National Guard that a group of migrants were in distress in the waters outside the boat ramp in Shelby Park but that the National Guard took no action to rescue them. Texas lawyers responded that the National Guard was alerted only after the three had drowned, and that the National Guard had not spotted any migrants. Mexican authorities said that the boat never entered U.S. territory.[74][75]
On January 22, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an order to vacate an injunction by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that prevented Border Patrol agents from cutting concertina wire, which the National Guard had been using to make a fence in Shelby Park. The ruling concerned an earlier dispute and did not address Texas deploying razor wire or blocking federal officials from the park.[76][77] On January 24, Abbott responded that Texas would refuse to let federal authorities access the park, vowing to "protect the sovereignty of our state".[78][76][79] A military standoff between state and federal authorities over immigration is unique in modern American history; constitutional law professor Charles "Rocky" Rhodes and an editorial in the San Antonio Express-News said it may signal the start of a constitutional crisis.[80][81][82]
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision, 25 other Republican state governors (every Republican governor but Vermont's Phil Scott) announced their support for Texas in the dispute, as did U.S. House speaker Mike Johnson.[83][84] Florida Governor Ron DeSantis additionally committed to sending more resources after previously sending the Florida National Guard to reinforce the Texas government.[80] Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt pledged to deploy the Oklahoma National Guard to support Texas, and Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb announced that 50 Indiana National Guardsmen would arrive in Texas by mid-March.[85][86] Georgia Governor Brian Kemp stated 15 to 20 Georgia National Guard troops would be sent to Texas.[87] In Missouri, Governor Mike Parson issued an executive order to deploy up to 200 Missouri National Guard troops to Texas, as well as 22 state troopers "on a voluntary basis".[88] Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders stated that approximately 40 Arkansas National Guard members would be deployed in Texas from April 1 through May 30.[89] Other state and national Republican officials backed Texas.[48]
On January 23, the Department of Homeland Security issued Texas attorney general Ken Paxton an ultimatum, ordering the removal of "obstructions" along the border and that the Border Patrol be given full access to Shelby Park by January 26.[90] On January 24, Democratic Texas representatives Joaquin Castro and Greg Casar called for U.S. President Joe Biden to establish federal control over the Texas National Guard.[91] On January 26, the deadline set by Department of Homeland Security passed. It had ordered Texas to agree to fully reopen disputed parts of the Shelby Park area to federal Border Patrol agents, emphasizing the need for confirmation and specifying the consequences of partial denial in a letter from DHS General Counsel Jonathan Meyer to Attorney General Paxton.
On January 29, more than two dozen Republican state attorneys general, and leadership from the Republican-controlled Arizona State Legislature, signed a letter supporting Abbott and Paxton, addressing President Biden and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and commending Abbott's and Paxton's actions against what they called the "invasion, encouraged by Biden's refusal to follow federal statutory law".[92][93]
Other states
[edit]On May 16, 2023, Abbott requested assistance from other state governors through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact.[35] As of June 2023, 14 states have sent about 500 national guard[quantify] and law enforcement officers to Texas in response, with Florida providing the most additional personnel.[94]
Results
[edit]Texas Governor Abbott claims OLS has resulted in 513,700 migrant apprehensions, 44,000 criminal arrests (including 38,600 felony charges), and 489 million doses of fentanyl seized as of June 2024.[3] However, a March 2022 investigation by ProPublica, The Texas Tribune, and The Marshall Project found that the Texas Department of Public Safety had counted over 2,000 arrests with no link to OLS or border security towards OLS's total.[95] After those arrests were removed, later reports found DPS still continues to include arrests unrelated to Operation Lone Star in the operation's results.
High speed chases of migrants led by US citizens and Texas state police have risen in Texas, dozens of which are fatal.[96] Human Rights Watch found that more than two-thirds of police chases in Texas occurred in OLS counties, which contained 13% of the state population. According to HRW, 74 people have died and 189 were injured as a result of these chases, resulting in a vehicle pursuit death rate eight times as high as the national rate. It also found an average of $177,000 in property damage per month linked to these chases, up from $73,000 per month prior to OLS.[2]
The costs of the operation have resulted in funding being transferred from other Texas government agency budgets, particularly the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, which operates state prisons. Reimbursement for the costs have partly been filled by using federal COVID aid.[10]
After the start of OLS, Texas saw slower rates of increases in migrant encounters than neighboring states since the start of OLS. One year after inception, Texas saw a 9% increase in encounters, compared to a 62% increase in encounters in Arizona, California, and New Mexico, the three other states bordering Mexico.[10] In June 2024, the Department of Public Safety reported that Texas experienced a 74% decrease in illegal border crossings since the start of OLS.[11]
Bussing to sanctuary cities
[edit]As part of Operation Lone Star, Texas set up a program to voluntarily send migrants to sanctuary cities in other states, typically through busing.[97][14] Abbott has stated that the purpose of the migrant busing program was to provide Texan border towns with relief from migrant arrivals, which he blames on the Biden administration's policies on immigration, and to bring the costs of the border crisis to Democratic cities that had been dismissing it.[17][98][99] Abbott has also mocked leaders of cities he sent migrants to for saying that they welcome immigrants.[14][97] Some migrant advocates reported instances of buses being sent without adequate provisions.[100] The state reported sending 119,200 migrants to cities outside of Texas,[3] contributing to the New York City migrant housing crisis and other crises in cities such as Chicago, Denver, and Washington, D.C.[15][18] Officials in these cities have responded to the drop-off of migrants by deploying emergency measures and calling states of emergencies.[101][17] Some Democratic-led cities, such as Denver and New York City, have also responded by giving migrants free bus and plane rides to other cities.[19]
To carry out the busing program, charter bus companies transport the migrants at a cost of about $1,650 per migrant, with funding coming from both the Texas legislature and private donors. A few hundred migrants have also been flown from Texas to sanctuary cities.[18] Local officials in the sanctuary cities have attempted to crack down on the busing programs via fines and ordinances targeting the charter bus companies. New York City in particular has filed a lawsuit against 17 charter bus companies responsible for migrant transportation.[102][18]
Officials in areas dealing with migrant surges have called on the Biden administration to change immigration policies. They have also requested federal aid to fund their responses to the migrant influx and reimburse costs.[98] Washington, D.C., in particular has requested the deployment of the D.C. National Guard to assist in the migrant crisis, but has been turned down.[103]
Republican officials have expressed approval of the OLS busing program for giving the migrant crisis national attention.[98] In 2022, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said it was "nice the State of Texas is helping [migrants] get to their final destination", while in 2023, the White House and other Democrats called the busing program a "political stunt".[97][99] Other states and cities, both Democratic and Republican, as well as local charities, have followed Texas in organizing busing operations to move migrants to the rest of the country.[17][19][104]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Governor Abbott's Operation Lone Star touts thousands of arrests, $10 billion cost". CBS News. January 22, 2023. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c d "US: Texas Troopers' Deadly Vehicle Pursuits". Human Rights Watch. November 27, 2023. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e "Texas Marks Third Anniversary Of Operation Lone Star". texas.gov. June 14, 2024. Retrieved June 18, 2024.
- ^ a b Aguilar, Julián (March 9, 2021). "As migrant apprehensions rise, Abbott slams Biden immigration policies in border appearance". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
- ^ a b "What is Operation Lone Star? Gov. Greg Abbott's controversial border mission, explained". Texas Tribune. March 30, 2022. Archived from the original on January 9, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
- ^ Cuellar, Carolina (December 3, 2021). "Operation Lone Star continues indefinitely while the Texas Military Department expands border wall". KERA News. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- ^ a b c d Winkie, Davis (January 4, 2022). "Another Operation Lone Star soldier dies amid morale crisis". Army Times. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- ^ a b Kriel, Lomi (April 18, 2022). "Texas has spent billions of dollars on border security. But what taxpayers got in return is a mystery". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on April 27, 2022. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
- ^ "Southwest border mission spurs 'mixed feelings' among guardsmen". Reserve & National Guard Magazine. February 1, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e "2 Years and $4B Later, What We Know About Operation Lone Star". Governing. January 26, 2023. Archived from the original on January 9, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
- ^ a b "Texas sees 74% decrease in illegal border crossings since Operation Lone Star, DPS says". Fox4 Dallas Fort Worth. June 11, 2024.
- ^ Montoya-Galvez, Camilo (July 18, 2023). "Texas trooper alleges inhumane treatment of migrants by state officials along southern border". CBS News. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
- ^ a b Winkie, Davis; Barragán, James; Essig, Chris; Cohen, Rachel S. (February 24, 2022). "Troops slam Operation Lone Star in leaked survey". Army Times. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Texas flies over 120 immigrants to Chicago in expansion of Gov. Greg Abbott's busing plan". Texas Tribune. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b c "Democratic mayors renew pleas for federal help and coordination with Texas over migrant crisis". Associated press. December 27, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "D.C. still struggling to manage growing migrant crisis". Axios. September 7, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b c d "How Texas Gov. Greg Abbott divided Democrats on immigration with migrant busing". NBC News. December 17, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b c d "Chicago migrant crisis: Texas bus companies may be making millions transporting new arrivals". ABC7. December 28, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b c "Democratic-led cities pay for migrants' tickets to other places as resources dwindle". Associated Press. November 19, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "In Eagle Pass, a tense border standoff between Texas and the federal government is reaching a crescendo". The Texas Tribune. January 22, 2024. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ "Biden administration warns it will take action if Texas does not stop blocking federal agents from U.S. border area". CBS News. January 15, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ a b "Gov. Greg Abbott signs bill making illegal immigration a state crime". Texas Tribune. December 18, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "Texas governor's move sets up showdown with feds over border". The Hill. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (May 31, 2022). "Proclamation by the Governor of the State of Texas" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (June 16, 2021). "Governor Abbott Announces Border Wall Construction Strategy". Office of the Texas Governor. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (December 18, 2021). "Governor Abbott Debuts Texas Border Wall In Rio Grande City". Office of the Texas Governor. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ BARRAGÁN, JAMES (March 14, 2022). "Gov. Greg Abbott replaces Texas military leader who has overseen heavily criticized border mission". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ "Governor Abbott Takes Aggressive Action To Secure The Border As President Biden Ends Title 42 Expulsions". Office of the Texas Governor. April 6, 2022. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (July 7, 2022). "Executive Order GA 41" (PDF). Office of the Texas Governor. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (September 21, 2022). "Governor Abbott Designates Mexican Cartels As Terrorist Organizations". Office of the Texas Governor. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Winkie, Davis (November 18, 2022). "Texas Guard to send tank-like military vehicles to the border". Army Times. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (February 3, 2023). "New Texas Border Czar Joins Operation Lone Star Mission". Office of the Texas Governor. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- ^ Cook, Ellie (May 9, 2023). "How Greg Abbott's 'Elite' Texas Tactical Border Force Will Stop Migrants". Newsweek. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
- ^ Abbott, Greg (May 8, 2023). "Governor Abbott Deploys New Texas Tactical Border Force". Office of the Texas Governor. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
- ^ a b "Governor Abbott Urges Nation's Governors To Help Combat Border Crisis". texas.gov. May 16, 2023. Archived from the original on June 1, 2023. Retrieved June 1, 2023.
- ^ "DPS preparing to patrol Starr County island as part of Operation Lone Star". KRGV. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Garcia, Uriel (January 11, 2024). "Texas officers take "full control" of Eagle Pass park against city's wishes". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
- ^ "25 states with Republican governors sign letter supporting Texas in border control fight: What to know". USA Today. January 26, 2024.
- ^ Sandoval, Edgar (February 16, 2024). "Texas Governor Announces New Military Base Camp on Border". New York Times.
- ^ a b "Operation Lone Star: In the News | Department of Public Safety". www.dps.texas.gov. Retrieved April 20, 2025.
- ^ "Gov. Abbott's Policing of Texas Border Pushes Limits of State Power". The New York Times. July 26, 2023. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
- ^ "New University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll finds little confidence in the legislature's efforts to address key issues". utexas.edu. June 22, 2023. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
- ^ Barragan, James (January 7, 2022). "Texas lawmakers deplore mistreatment of National Guardsmen sent to border duty". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- ^ Scherer, Jasper (January 6, 2022). "Texas National Guard struggles to pay soldiers, while slashing tuition help by more than half". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- ^ Plohetski, Tony; Hall, Katie (January 13, 2022). "Gov. Abbott's border crackdown Operation Lone Star violates U.S. Constitution, Travis County judge says". Austin American-Statesman. Archived from the original on January 17, 2022. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
- ^ State of Texas v. Curipoma Archived March 24, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, No. 03-22-00032CR (Tex. App.--Austin, February 25, 2022) (Retrieved March 23, 2025).
- ^ https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=715a43ed-923b-4547-a0e5-0d8f3531fde8&coa=coscca&DT=OPINION&MediaID=7b3ca602-0e59-4332-bfb9-21f9e20403e7
- ^ a b Choi, Matthew; Downen, Robert (January 26, 2024). ""Hold the line": Republicans rally to Abbott's defense in border standoff with Biden". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Blankley, Bethany (March 25, 2024). "More than 100 sheriffs express support for Operation Lone Star". The Center Square. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
- ^ "Operation Lone Star". gov.texas.gov. Retrieved April 20, 2025.
- ^ Trevizo, Perla (July 6, 2022). "Justice Department is investigating Texas' Operation Lone Star for alleged civil rights violations". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on July 25, 2023. Retrieved July 24, 2023.
- ^ Montoya-Galvez, Camilo (July 24, 2023). "Biden administration sues Texas over floating border barriers used to repel migrants". CBS News. Archived from the original on July 25, 2023. Retrieved July 24, 2023.
- ^ "Response in Opposition to Motion – #26 in United States v. Abbott (W.D. Tex., 1:23-cv-00853) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
- ^ Melhado, William; García, Uriel J. (September 6, 2023). "Federal judge orders Texas to remove floating border barrier. Abbott immediately appeals the ruling". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on September 7, 2023. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
- ^ Vu, Kevin (December 1, 2023). "Texas must remove floating barrier from Rio Grande, Fifth Circuit Court orders". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
- ^ "Texas Gov. Abbott wins legal maneuver in Fifth Circuit to keep buoy barrier in Rio Grande". Houston Chronicle. January 17, 2023. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 20, 2024.
- ^ "Judge orders federal agents to stop cutting Texas razor wire for now at busy Mexico border crossing". The Associated Press. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on October 30, 2023. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
- ^ Thayer, Rose L. (November 30, 2023). "Border Patrol agents can resume cutting wire barrier placed at Texas border by Guard troops". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
- ^ "Supreme Court allows Border Patrol agents to remove razor wire Texas installed at Mexico border". NBC News. January 22, 2024. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ García, Uriel J.; Winkie, Davis (January 24, 2024). "Texas' border standoff with feds continues, despite U.S. Supreme Court order". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ Salam, Erum (January 26, 2024). "Fight over border intensifies as Texas governor pledges more razor wire". The Guardian. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
- ^ "Abbott vows to keep border security fight after Supreme Court rules feds' can cut razor wire". Austin American Statesman. January 23, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ "Abbott doubles down on border 'invasion' declaration after Supreme Court blow". The Hill. January 24, 2024.
- ^ "Abbott says migrants' camouflage shows border 'invasion' worsening, but it's an old tactic". Dallas Morning News. January 12, 2023.
- ^ "Texas' Latest Attack on the Biden Administration Is Coming Undone by a Technicality". Slate. July 26, 2023.
- ^ "Texas's use of 'invasion' clause against immigrants is racist and dangerous, rights groups say". The Guardian. May 29, 2023.
- ^ "Federal Court Rules Against Texas in Case Where State Claimed Immigration and Drug Smuggling Qualify as "Invasion"y". Reason. September 6, 2023.
- ^ "Biden administration sues Texas over state's controversial immigration law". CNN. January 3, 2024.
- ^ Scherer, Jasper (January 3, 2024). "Biden administration sues Texas over new border law that allows state-ordered deportations". Houston Chronicle.
- ^ "SCOTUS temporarily blocks Texas immigration law, reversing 5th Circuit rulings". Texas Tribune. March 4, 2024.
- ^ "Supreme Court allows strict Texas SB4 immigration law to take effect for now". ABC News. March 19, 2024.
- ^ Montoya-Galvez, Camilo (January 12, 2024). "Texas blocks federal border agents from processing migrants in Eagle Pass public park". CBS News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ García, Uriel J. (January 11, 2024). "Texas officers take "full control" of Eagle Pass park against city's wishes". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ Cuevas, Eduardo (January 20, 2024). "Mexican family's death at border looms over ongoing Justice Department standoff with Texas". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Flores, Rosa; Yan, Holly; Weisfeldt, Sara; Cole, Devan (January 15, 2024). "What we know about the drownings of 3 Mexican migrants near Eagle Pass, Texas". CNN. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ a b García, Uriel J.; Winkie, Davis (January 24, 2024). "Texas' border standoff with feds continues, despite U.S. Supreme Court order". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ Fanning, Rhonda; Brown, David (January 25, 2024). "Understanding the Supreme Court's ruling on razor wire at the Texas-Mexico border". Texas Public Radio. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Melhado, William (January 22, 2024). "U.S. Supreme Court says Texas can't block federal agents from the border". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ Hall, Richard; Baio, Ariana (January 24, 2024). "Texas National Guard faces off against federal government in fight over razor wire". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ a b García, Uriel J. (January 22, 2024). "In Eagle Pass, a tense border standoff between Texas and the federal government is reaching a crescendo". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
- ^ Schneider, Andrew (January 24, 2024). "Governor Abbott signals potential defiance of Supreme Court's border ruling". Houston Public Media. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ Express-News Editorial Board (January 18, 2024). "Editorial: Are Abbott and Paxton creating a constitutional crisis at border?". San Antonio Express-News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ "Gov. Little, Republican Governors band together, issue joint statement supporting Texas' Constitutional Right to Self-Defense". Office of the Governor. January 25, 2024. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ Beitsch, Rebecca (January 25, 2024). "Speaker Johnson backs Abbott's border 'invasion' decree". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Goldsberry, Jenny (January 26, 2024). "Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt to 'absolutely' send National Guard to Texas border". Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Huber, Craig (February 12, 2024). "Indiana commits National Guard to Texas-Mexico border as Gov. Abbott vows to install more razor wire". Spectrum News. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Amy, Jeff (February 13, 2024). "Georgia GOP Gov. Brian Kemp says he will aid Texas governor's border standoff with Biden". Associated Press. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
- ^ Dereuck, Kelly (February 21, 2024). "Gov. Mike Parson to send Missouri National Guard, highway patrol to secure Mexico border". Springfield News-Leader. Yahoo! News. Retrieved February 26, 2024.
- ^ Irwin, Lauren (March 20, 2024). "Sanders sending Arkansas National Guard troops to US border with Mexico". The Hill.
- ^ Giaritelli, Anna (January 24, 2024). "The Department of Homeland Security has sent a letter to Texas A.G demanding that Texas National Guard troops allow Federal personal into the area of Shelby Park by this Friday". Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Bickerton, James (January 25, 2024). "Joe Biden Faces Growing Calls to Federalize Texas National Guard". Newsweek. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ Yan, Holly; Flores, Rosa; Weisfeldt, Sara (January 29, 2024). "Texas seized part of the US-Mexico border and blocked federal Border Patrol agents. Here's what happened next". CNN. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- ^ Randazzo, Thad (January 29, 2024). "Attorney General Miyares releases statement in support of Texas Border Defense". WFXRtv. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
- ^ Hinojosa, Alex (June 8, 2023). "Republican states send national guard troops to Texas border in show of force". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
- ^ Kriel, Lomi; Trevizo, Perla; Calderón, Andrew Rodriguez; Blakinger, Keri (March 21, 2022). "Texas' Governor Brags About His Border Initiative. The Data Doesn't Back Him Up". ProPublica. Archived from the original on July 25, 2023. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
- ^ "High-Speed Police Chases Rise Near Texas Border, Leaving Locals on Edge". The New York Times. November 23, 2023. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ a b c "Texas' Busing of Migrants to D.C. Isn't Having Abbott's Intended Effect Yet". The New York Times. April 26, 2022. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b c "G.O.P. Gets the Democratic Border Crisis It Wanted". The New York Times. September 8, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ a b "Chicago mayor slams Texas Gov. Abbott as 'reckless' after migrant bus arrivals". The Hill. December 27, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "Greg Abbott decision to bus migrants to LA condemned as 'despicable stunt'". The Guardian. June 15, 2023. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ "G.O.P. Governors Cause Havoc by Busing Migrants to East Coast". The New York Times. August 4, 2022. Archived from the original on September 26, 2022. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "NYC sues 17 charter bus companies for $700 million over transporting asylum seekers to the city from Texas". CNN. January 5, 2024. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "Feds deny Bowser's request for National Guard to help with Texas migrants". The Washington Post. August 5, 2022. Archived from the original on November 10, 2022. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
- ^ "Busing migrants was a partisan lightning rod. Here's why Democrats have embraced it". NPR. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
Operation Lone Star
View on GrokipediaBackground
Federal Immigration Policy Context
The federal government of the United States exercises plenary authority over immigration policy and enforcement, primarily through the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, which codifies rules for alien admission, exclusion, deportation, and naturalization, including criminal penalties for improper entry under 8 U.S.C. § 1325, classifying first-time illegal crossings as misdemeanors and repeats as felonies.[7] [8] U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), under the Department of Homeland Security, enforces these laws at ports of entry and along borders, with authority to inspect entrants and interdict unlawful entries between ports.[9] The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld federal preemption in this domain, recognizing Congress's power to regulate naturalization and the executive's discretion in enforcement priorities, thereby limiting states to supportive roles rather than independent regulation of immigration status or entry.[10] This framework stems from constitutional allocation, where Article I grants Congress authority over naturalization, and subsequent statutes delegate operational control to federal agencies.[11] Prior to 2021, federal border enforcement under the Trump administration emphasized deterrence through measures like the Migrant Protection Protocols (requiring asylum seekers to await hearings in Mexico) and continuation of border barrier construction, correlating with southwest border apprehensions stabilizing below 500,000 annually in fiscal years 2017-2020.[12] The Biden administration, starting January 20, 2021, issued executive actions reversing these, including halting wall funding redirection, suspending deportations for 100 days (later blocked by courts), and terminating the Remain in Mexico program by mid-2021, while expanding parole authority and catch-and-release practices for families and unaccompanied minors to alleviate detention overcrowding.[13] [14] These shifts prioritized humanitarian processing and interior enforcement limits, directing resources away from low-priority removals, amid a stated intent to rebuild trust in the system but resulting in immigration court backlogs exceeding 2 million cases by 2022.[15] The policy changes coincided with unprecedented surges in unlawful crossings, with CBP reporting 1.73 million southwest border encounters in fiscal year 2021 (a 314% increase from FY2020), escalating to 2.21 million in FY2022 and 2.48 million in FY2023, including significant "gotaways" estimated at over 600,000 annually by DHS internal metrics.[12] Over 90% of encounters involved single adults or families released into the U.S. with notices to appear, straining federal resources and leading to operational control losses in border sectors, as defined by CBP metrics requiring dominance in 100% of areas.[13] In June 2024, an executive order barred asylum claims when weekly averages exceeded 2,500 encounters, temporarily reducing numbers, but critics noted persistent releases via alternatives to detention and exemptions for unaccompanied minors.[14] States like Texas contended that federal non-enforcement constituted a dereliction harming public safety and local economies, invoking Tenth Amendment arguments in lawsuits, though the Supreme Court in June 2023 ruled states lack Article III standing to compel federal prioritization of removals.[16] By January 2025, post-election executive orders reinstated mandatory detention and swift removals to restore enforcement fidelity.[17]Initiation of State-Led Response
In response to a surge in unauthorized border crossings and perceived federal inaction, Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced the launch of Operation Lone Star on March 6, 2021, as a state-directed initiative to supplement U.S. Customs and Border Protection efforts along the Texas-Mexico border.[18] The operation targeted smuggling networks operated by Mexican cartels, focusing on interdicting illegal entries of people and drugs, with initial deployments of Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) troopers and Texas National Guard personnel equipped with air, ground, marine, and tactical assets to high-threat zones, particularly along the Rio Grande.[18] [1] This state-led response was prompted by a documented escalation in migrant encounters, with U.S. Border Patrol reporting a 71% increase nationwide from February to March 2021, totaling over 173,000 encounters in March alone, many concentrated in Texas sectors amid policy shifts such as the suspension of border wall construction and alterations to asylum processing.[19] Abbott attributed the crisis to Biden administration policies that he described as incentivizing illegal immigration and failing to enforce federal law, thereby creating a humanitarian and security emergency that endangered Texas communities through increased cartel activity and fentanyl trafficking.[18] While affirming support for legal immigration, Texas positioned Operation Lone Star as a necessary counter to federal reluctance to secure the border, enabling state authorities to conduct arrests and seizures independently.[18] [1] Early phases emphasized tactical coordination, including the formation of DPS strike teams for apprehending criminal noncitizens and the deputization of National Guard members for immigration-related arrests, marking a shift from prior federal reliance to proactive state enforcement.[1] On March 17, 2021, the operation expanded to explicitly address human trafficking linked to border crossings, directing additional resources toward disrupting smuggling routes that exploited vulnerable migrants.[20] These measures established Operation Lone Star as Texas's primary mechanism for asserting border sovereignty, with ongoing deployments funded through state emergency declarations renewed periodically since inception.[1]Objectives and Components
Stated Goals and First-Principles Rationale
Governor Greg Abbott announced Operation Lone Star on March 6, 2021, as a multi-agency state effort to address illegal immigration and border insecurity exacerbated by federal policies under the Biden administration. The operation's stated goals include deploying Texas National Guard troops, Department of Public Safety officers, and other resources to deter unlawful entries, interdict narcotics and criminal activity, and construct physical barriers along the Rio Grande to impede crossings by migrants and smugglers.[1] These objectives focus on filling enforcement voids left by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, with an emphasis on high-threat sectors where cartel operations facilitate human and drug trafficking.[2] The rationale underpinning Operation Lone Star derives from the foundational principle that state governments retain authority to safeguard residents and territorial integrity when federal entities neglect core duties under Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which obligates protection against invasion. Texas officials assert that unchecked border porosity enables causal chains leading to heightened public safety risks, including fentanyl influx responsible for surging overdose fatalities—over 70,000 in 2023 alone, predominantly synthetic opioids smuggled across the southwest border—and localized crime spikes tied to migrant releases without vetting.[1] This state intervention counters federal catch-and-release practices, which empirical encounter data from U.S. Border Patrol show exceeded 2.4 million nationwide in fiscal year 2022, straining Texas infrastructure and local law enforcement.[21] Critics from federal and advocacy perspectives question state overreach into immigration enforcement, a domain reserved to Congress, but Texas defends the measures as necessary self-preservation amid verifiable federal inaction, evidenced by paused border wall construction and expanded parole programs post-2021.[22] The operation's logic prioritizes deterrence through visible state presence over reactive federal processing, aiming to restore causal deterrence against incentives for mass migration driven by policy signals of lax enforcement.[2]Key Operational Tactics
Operation Lone Star utilizes a multi-domain approach integrating state law enforcement, military assets, physical infrastructure, and surveillance technologies to interdict illegal border crossings and smuggling activities. The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) leads ground operations, deploying troopers for patrols, apprehensions, and investigations targeting human and drug smuggling networks.[18] The Texas Military Department, including the National Guard, provides support roles such as securing areas, assisting in barrier construction, and conducting joint surveillance with federal agents.[23] [24] Physical deterrents form a core tactic, with Texas constructing segments of border wall and installing razor wire along high-traffic areas of the Rio Grande. As of October 2023, state efforts advanced wall construction using repurposed federal materials where possible, focusing on remote and riverine sections to channel migrant flows.[25] By August 2024, Texas tripled the deployment of razor wire barriers to impede crossings.[26] In the aquatic domain, floating marine barriers consisting of buoys equipped with cameras and razor wire were placed in the Rio Grande starting in July 2023, with expansions continuing through November 2024 to deter waterborne entries.[27] [28] Surveillance and detection rely on advanced technologies, including drone deployments for aerial monitoring and the Modular Mobile Surveillance System (M2S2) for real-time ground detection of movement.[29] National Guard units operate these systems alongside fixed cameras to identify crossing attempts, enabling rapid response by patrol units.[30] Riverine tactics involve boat patrols and bank clearing operations to facilitate navigation and observation. National Guard personnel clear vegetation and debris along the Rio Grande to enhance water patrol effectiveness and support interdictions.[31] These efforts integrate air, ground, and marine assets for comprehensive coverage, emphasizing deterrence through presence and swift apprehension.[32]Chronological Implementation
Launch Phase (2021)
On March 6, 2021, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, in coordination with the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS), officially launched Operation Lone Star as a state-led initiative to address the escalating crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, characterized by increased illegal crossings and smuggling activities attributed to policies under the Biden administration.[18] The operation aimed to disrupt Mexican cartels and human smugglers by targeting the movement of drugs and migrants into Texas, emphasizing a multi-agency approach that integrated DPS law enforcement with support from the Texas National Guard.[18] This followed a February 2021 planning meeting between Abbott and DPS Director Colonel Steve McCraw, responding to federal apprehensions data showing over 520,000 encounters in the preceding fiscal year, with Texas sectors bearing a disproportionate share.[18][12] Initial deployments under Operation Lone Star involved a surge of DPS troopers, helicopters, boats, and tactical units to high-threat border areas, supplemented by Texas National Guard personnel for logistics, surveillance, and infrastructure support.[18] By mid-March, the operation expanded to include targeted efforts against human trafficking, with DPS conducting interviews of unaccompanied minors to identify smuggling networks.[33] These actions yielded early arrests, including smugglers and cartel operatives, alongside seizures of narcotics such as fentanyl and methamphetamine, though comprehensive quarterly metrics were not immediately publicized.[34] The deployment marked a shift from prior state-federal cooperation, with Texas assuming primary operational control due to perceived federal inaction.[18] Throughout the remainder of 2021, the launch phase evolved with executive actions to bolster enforcement, including a May 31 disaster declaration for 43 border counties authorizing additional resources and restrictions on state-licensed facilities housing undocumented migrants.[35] In July, Governor Abbott issued an executive order prohibiting the transportation of undocumented individuals within Texas, empowering DPS to impound vehicles used in such activities, which facilitated over 1,000 initial smuggling-related arrests by year's end.[36] Legislative support followed in September with the passage and signing of House Bill 9, allocating $1.8 billion for border security, including grants for local operations and further National Guard mobilization.[37] These measures laid the groundwork for sustained state interdiction, contrasting with federal Title 42 expulsions that temporarily masked underlying crossing trends.[12]Escalation and Expansion (2022-2023)
In 2022, Operation Lone Star expanded through increased state funding and the initiation of migrant transportation to interior cities, alongside intensified enforcement actions against smuggling networks. Governor Greg Abbott allocated an additional $30 million in July to the Operation Lone Star grant program for local law enforcement support, building on the initial $100 million disbursed in 2021.[38] The migrant busing initiative launched in April, transporting over 12,500 individuals to Washington, D.C., by year's end, with expansions to New York City and Chicago beginning in August, aiming to distribute the border burden to sanctuary jurisdictions.[3] These measures coincided with heightened arrests and seizures, as Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) operations targeted cartel activities, though specific annual totals for 2022 were not disaggregated in official reports.[39] By 2023, the operation escalated with new tactical deployments and infrastructure enhancements in response to sustained high crossing volumes. In May, the Texas Tactical Border Force was established, comprising hundreds of National Guard soldiers focused on high-threat areas, augmenting DPS troopers in disrupting smuggling routes.[40] The National Guard footprint grew further with a rapid reinforcement to El Paso, deploying 400 personnel and 40 vehicles via C-130J aircraft within 72 hours to counter surges there.[40] Additional tactics included securing Fronton Island in November to block cartel smuggling and installing marine floating barriers along the Rio Grande, alongside anti-climb barriers near Brownsville in December.[40] Busing scaled significantly, reaching over 50,000 migrants total by October, including expansions to Philadelphia (November 2022 onward), Denver (May 2023), and Los Angeles (June 2023), with destinations like New York City receiving over 18,500 and Chicago over 13,500.[3] Enforcement yielded notable seizures, such as over 800 pounds of narcotics in November, though isolated incidents like 41 arrests in Eagle Pass in June highlighted localized operations.[40] These expansions reflected Texas's strategy of layered deterrence, incorporating military logistics and state-funded barriers amid federal policy disputes, with border wall segments advancing incrementally but facing landowner resistance and limited overall mileage completed by late 2023.[41]Adaptation and Recent Actions (2024-2025)
In 2024, Operation Lone Star maintained intensified border security measures amid ongoing migrant encounters, with the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and National Guard conducting apprehensions, seizures of contraband, and infrastructure reinforcements along the Rio Grande. Governor Greg Abbott announced continued historic actions throughout the year, including deployments to high-threat areas and operations targeting human smuggling networks. These efforts responded to federal policies perceived as inadequate, resulting in thousands of arrests and significant fentanyl interceptions, though specific statewide totals for 2024 were not itemized in official summaries.[42] Following the inauguration of President Donald Trump in January 2025, Texas adapted Operation Lone Star to align with enhanced federal enforcement, shifting emphasis from primary border interdiction to supporting interior arrests and deportations. On January 27, 2025, Abbott deployed 400 additional soldiers to the Rio Grande Valley to assist U.S. Border Patrol, facilitating coordination under the new administration's priorities. By February 2025, National Guard units expanded their presence, with troops sealing access points and conducting patrols in areas like Roma, Texas, to deter crossings amid declining encounter rates.[43][23] Dubbed "Operation Lone Star 2.0," the adapted strategy in 2025 prioritized statewide patrols targeting criminal undocumented immigrants, human smugglers, and cartel operatives, expanding operations to 67 counties. DPS tactical teams arrested over 3,000 undocumented immigrants by September 2025, many handed over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation, marking a pivot from riverbank surveillance to road interdictions. Specific actions included the September 5 arrest of a previously deported Mexican national smuggling 11 individuals in Webb County and the apprehension of an MS-13 gang member in Val Verde County on August 21.[44][45][46][47] Legislative reinforcements accompanied these operational changes; on July 15, 2025, Abbott signed Senate Bills 8 and 36, enhancing state-federal coordination for border security and authorizing expanded tactical resources. Concurrently, Texas reduced certain expenditures on standalone state barriers and deployments, citing federal assumption of primary responsibilities, as articulated by Abbott in June 2025 statements praising Trump's leadership. This adaptation reflected a causal response to plummeting illegal crossings—down significantly from 2024 peaks—allowing reallocation toward targeted enforcement against entrenched smuggling routes.[48][49]Measurable Outcomes and Effectiveness
Apprehensions, Seizures, and Deterrence Metrics
Since its inception in March 2021, Operation Lone Star has led to the apprehension of over 526,600 illegal immigrants attempting to cross the Texas-Mexico border, with these figures reflecting state-led detections and referrals to federal authorities.[50] These apprehensions include individuals encountered during surges in group crossings, with Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) troopers and National Guard personnel actively repelling entries in real-time operations.[51] Accompanying these efforts, the operation has resulted in more than 48,700 criminal arrests, primarily targeting human smugglers, trespassers, and those engaged in related offenses such as stash house operations.[50] In terms of seizures, Operation Lone Star has yielded substantial interdictions of contraband, including over 500 million lethal doses of fentanyl by early 2025, equivalent to preventing widespread distribution of the synthetic opioid linked to overdose deaths.[52] Additional seizures encompass methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, and other narcotics, alongside weapons, cash, and vehicles used in smuggling, with DPS reporting multimillion-dollar hauls from traffic stops and border patrols.[53] For instance, individual operations have confiscated hundreds of pounds of methamphetamine and fentanyl precursors, disrupting cartel supply chains originating from Mexico.[54] Deterrence metrics indicate significant reductions in illegal crossings attributable to Operation Lone Star's deployment of barriers, patrols, and surveillance. Texas officials report an 85% decrease in such crossings in state-monitored sectors compared to pre-operation baselines, correlating with the expansion of state resources and physical obstacles along the Rio Grande.[55] This includes the repulsion of large migrant groups—sometimes numbering in the hundreds—before they could advance inland, as well as fewer reported "got-aways" due to enhanced aerial and ground monitoring.[50] These outcomes are framed by state sources as evidence of effective state-level enforcement filling federal gaps, though independent analyses vary on the extent of causal attribution amid national migration trends.[56]| Key Metric | Cumulative Total | As of Date |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal Immigrant Apprehensions | Over 526,600 | November 2024 [50] |
| Criminal Arrests | Over 48,700 | November 2024 [50] |
| Fentanyl Doses Seized | Over 500 million | January 2025 [52] |
| Reduction in Illegal Crossings | 85% in Texas sectors | July 2024 [55] |