Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Pratt & Whitney PW4000
View on Wikipedia
| PW4000 | |
|---|---|
The 112-inch (2.8 m) fan diameter PW4098 used on the Boeing 777 | |
| Type | Turbofan |
| National origin | United States |
| Manufacturer | Pratt & Whitney |
| First run | April 1984[1] |
| Major applications | |
| Manufactured | 1984–present |
| Number built | 2,500 (June 2017)[2][needs update] |
| Developed from | Pratt & Whitney JT9D |
| Developed into | Engine Alliance GP7000 |
The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 is a family of dual-spool, axial-flow, high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines produced by Pratt & Whitney as the successor to the JT9D. It was first run in April 1984, was FAA certified in July 1986, and was introduced in June 1987. With thrust ranging from 50,000 to 99,040 lbf (222 to 441 kN), it is used on many wide-body aircraft.
Development
[edit]The 52,000–62,000 lbf (230–275 kN), 94 in (2.4 m) -fan PW4000 made its first run in April 1984, was FAA certified in July 1986, and was introduced in June 1987. It powers the Airbus A300-600 and Airbus A310-300, Boeing 747-400 and 767-200/300, and McDonnell Douglas MD-11 widebodies.[1]
Development of the 64,000–68,000 lbf (280–300 kN), 100 in (2.5 m)-fan version began in December 1991 for the Airbus A330, was FAA certified in August 1993, and made its first flight two months later. It received 90min Extended-range Twin-engine Operations (ETOPS) approval at introduction in December 1994, and 180min ETOPS approval in July 1995. In January 2000, it was the A330 market leader with more than half of the installed base and one million hours, more than twice that of each competitor.[1] The Advantage 70 upgrade package for the PW4168A, which powered around one-third of the active Airbus A330 fleet, was launched at the 2006 Farnborough Airshow, increasing thrust to 70,000 lbf (311 kN), and reducing fuel burn by about 1.2% as well as overall operating costs by as much as 20%.[3]

For the Boeing 777, the 84,000–98,000 lbf (370–440 kN), 112 in (2.8 m)-fan version development began in October 1990, achieved 100,000 lbf (440 kN) in May 1993, and was approved for 180min ETOPS at service entry in June 1995.The 777 launch engine, it entered service on 7 June 1995, with United Airlines. The 90,000 lbf (400 kN) PW4090 entered service in March 1997. The 98,000 lbf (440 kN) PW4098 received FAA certification in July 1998 and was introduced on the Boeing 777-300 in September 1999 but was a few years later discontinued due to core temperature problems and fuel burn that was not appealing to airlines.[1]
In 2000, over 2,000 PW4000 engines had accumulated over 40 million hours of service with 75 operators.[1] In 30 years between June 1987 and 2017, more than 2,500 engines have been delivered, logging more than 135 million flight hours.[2]
Design
[edit]
The PW4000 has a dispatch reliability rate of 99.96% and is approved for ETOPS 180. The average engine stays on wing 13,500 flight hours before a shop visit (a Shop Visit Rate of 0.073 per thousand hours). It is claimed to be cumulatively 3.4 dB quieter than other engines in its class.[1]
Like other modern aircraft power plants, it has a Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC), for better fuel economy and reliability.[4] Furthermore, single-crystal alloys allows higher temperature capability and PW's Floatwall combustor liners improve durability and maintainability.[1] Also, the Talon ("Technology for Affordable Low NOx") single-row combustor improves fuel-air mixing, for over 10% better NOx, CO, and HC emissions.[1]
Variants and applications
[edit]The PW4000 series engine family uses a numbering systematic with the last three digits (PW 4XYZ) as identification of the application and thrust power:
- X describes the aircraft manufacturer for which the engine is approved. A "0" stands for Boeing; "1" for Airbus; and "4" for the McDonnell Douglas MD-11.
- YZ denotes the certified thrust in US pounds (lbf) in pro-mile fraction.
Example: A PW4090 identifies a PW4000 series engine certified for Boeing (777-200ER) and has a certified thrust of 90,000 lbf.

PW4000-94
[edit]Variants: PW4052, PW4056, PW4060, PW4062, PW4062A, PW4152, PW4156A, PW4156, PW4158, PW4460 and PW4462.
Thrust range: 231–276 kN (52,000 lbf – 62,000 lbf)[5]
Applications:
- Airbus A300-600R
- Airbus A310-300
- Boeing 747-400, Boeing Dreamlifter (and Scaled Composites Stratolaunch)
- Boeing 767-200/-300 (Including ER Version and Boeing Converted Freighter version except -300F), -400 (never entered service), -2C/Boeing KC-46A
- McDonnell Douglas MD-11

PW4000-100
[edit]Variants: PW4164, PW4168, PW4168A and PW4170.
Thrust range: 287–311 kN (64,500 lbf – 70,000 lbf)[6]
Applications: the engine variants are designed exclusively for Airbus A330-200 and -300 (the first generation A330 or A330ceo) (Note that this does not include the A330neo: -800 or -900, which are powered exclusively by Trent 7000, nor the BelugaXL: A330-700, which are powered exclusively by Trent 700).

PW4000-112
[edit]Variants: PW4074/74D, PW4077/77D, PW4084/84D, PW4090 and PW4098.
Thrust range: 329–436 kN (74,000 lbf – 98,000 lbf)[7]
Applications: the engine variants are designed exclusively for Boeing 777-200, -200ER, -300 (the first generation 777 or 777 Classics). (Note that this does not include the second generation 777: -200LR, -300ER or F which are powered exclusively by the GE90, nor the 777X: -8, -8F, or -9, which are powered exclusively by GE9X).
Accidents and incidents
[edit]

Involving PW4000-112 series
[edit]- 17 March 2003, United Airlines Flight 842
- A PW4090 failed bearing caused the engine loss and the diversion to Kona, Hawaii, of a Boeing 777-200ER bound from Auckland, New Zealand, to Los Angeles. At 190 minutes this was the longest single-engine diversion on record at the time. [8][9][10]
- 27 May 2016, Korean Air Flight 2708
- A PW4090 uncontained turbine failure caused an aborted take-off,[11][12] on a Boeing 777-300 at Tokyo-Haneda Airport.[13]
- 13 February 2018, United Airlines Flight 1175
- A PW4077 fan blade failure caused significant engine damage to a Boeing 777-200 on descent into Honolulu from San Francisco.[14] Routine fan blade inspection in 2005 and 2010 had shown a crack in the blade's metal structure but insufficiently trained inspectors had confused it for a defect in the paint. [15][16] In 2019, an airworthiness directive mandated recurring engine inspections based on usage cycles.[17]
- 4 December 2020, Japan Airlines Flight 904
- A PW4074 engine had a fan blade failure and associated engine cowl damage as the Boeing 777-200 was climbing out of Okinawa.[18] As of March 2021 the investigation is ongoing.
- 20 February 2021, United Airlines Flight 328
- Boeing 777-200's right hand PW4077-112 had a blade failure shortly after taking off from Denver, causing significant engine damage.[19][20] Two fan blades had broken off: one had suffered metal fatigue and possibly chipped another blade which also broke off.[21] The failed blade was compliant with the inspection interval set by the FAA following the 2018 incident. The FAA grounded the affected 777s and issued an emergency Airworthiness Directive on 23 February, requiring a Thermal Acoustic Inspection (TAI) of the -112 fan blades before next flight.[22][23] Japanese authorities and the UK's CAA followed suit,[19] grounding 69 in-service and 59 in-storage Boeing 777s.[24][25] Most carriers had voluntarily grounded the aircraft before, except South Korea's Jin Air's four aircraft.[citation needed] As of March 2021 the investigation is ongoing.[citation needed]
Involving PW4000-100 series
[edit]- 6 May 2014, Vietnam Airlines VN-A371
- Uncontained failure of a PW4168A low-pressure turbine's stage four causing an Airbus A330 rejected take-off at Melbourne Airport in Australia.[26]
- 13 February 2018, Delta Air Lines Flight 55
- PW4168 fire in an Airbus A330-200 climbing from Lagos (Nigeria) at 2000 feet.[27]
- 18 April 2018, Delta Air Lines Flight 30
- Airbus A330-323's PW4168A fire after takeoff from Atlanta,[28][29] investigated by the NTSB and the French BEA.[30]
Involving PW4000-94 series
[edit]- 7 June 2017, Delta Air Lines flight 276
- Metallic debris in a PW4056 tailpipe and a 360-degree crack in the LP turbine case just forward of the rear flange caused a Boeing 747-400 cruising at FL320 to return to Tokyo Narita.[31] All of the HPC airfoils from the 5th to the 15th stage were damaged with nicks, dents, and tears to the leading and trailing edges and/or were broken off at various lengths above the blade root platforms. The HPT and LPT also had extensive damage, and the LPT case had a 360° split in line with the 6th stage turbine rotor.[31] The NTSB reports 38 airfoil fractures of the 5th stage compressor blade before the part was updated.[31]
- 20 February 2021, Longtail Aviation Flight 5504
- Boeing 747-412BCF PW4056 failure shortly after taking off from Maastricht Aachen Airport : falling turbine blades slightly injured two persons on the ground, the airplane was able to land safely at Liège Airport.[32][33][34][35]
- 28 March 2022, United Airlines Flight 134
- Boeing 767 powered by Pratt & Whitney PW4060 engines experienced fan blade separation on the right-side (number 2) engine during a flight from New York to Zürich. The incident occurred over the Atlantic Ocean. The aircraft diverted to Shannon, Ireland, and landed safely with 123 persons on board.[36]
Specifications
[edit]The PW4000 is produced in three distinct models, with differing LP systems to address different thrust needs.
| Variant | -94[37] | -100[38] | -112[39] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two spool high bypass ratio Turbofan | |||
| Length | 153.6 in (390 cm) | 167.2 in (425 cm) | 190.4 in (484 cm) | |
| Weight | 9,420 lb 4,273 kg |
12,900 lb 5,851 kg |
15,095–15,741 lb 6,847–7,140 kg |
16,260 lb 7,375 kg |
| Compressor | 1 fan, 4 LP, 11 HP | 1 fan, 5 LP, 11 HP | 1 fan, 6 LP, 11 HP | 1 fan, 7 LP, 11 HP |
| Combustor | Annular | |||
| Turbine | 2 HP, 4 LP | 2 HP, 5 LP | 2 HP, 7 LP | |
| Thrust | 50,000–62,000 lbf 222–276 kN |
64,500–70,000 lbf 287–311 kN |
77,440–91,790 lbf 344–408 kN |
91,790–99,040 lbf 408–441 kN |
| Variant | -94[40] | -100[41] | -112[42] | |
| Fan | 94 in (239 cm) | 100 in (254 cm) | 112 in (284 cm) | |
| Bypass ratio | 4.8–5:1 | 4.9:1 | 5.8–6.4:1 | |
| Overall pressure ratio | 27.5–32.3 | 32.0–34.1 | 34.2–42.8 | |
| Fan pressure ratio | 1.65–1.80 | 1.75–1.76 | 1.70–1.80 | |
| Applications | B747-400, B767, MD-11 A300-600, A310 |
A330 | B777 | |
See also
[edit]Related development
Comparable engines
- Aviadvigatel PS-90
- General Electric CF6
- General Electric GE90
- Pratt & Whitney PW2000
- Progress D-18T
- Rolls-Royce RB211
- Rolls-Royce Trent 700
- Rolls-Royce Trent 800
Related lists
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h "PW4000 derivatives continue to drive engine success story". Flight Daily News. 23 February 2000.
- ^ a b "Pratt & Whitney Commemorates 30 Years of PW4000-94 Engine Power" (Press release). Pratt & Whitney. 21 June 2017.
- ^ "P&W reveals 'Advantage 70'". Flight Daily News. 14 March 2006.
- ^ Jeff Schweitzer, Pratt & Whitney (14–17 July 2003). "Propulsion Technology Readiness for Next Generation Transport Systems". AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years. doi:10.2514/6.2003-2787. ISBN 978-1-62410-165-6.
{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help) - ^ Pratt & Whitney. "PW4000-94". Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
- ^ Pratt & Whitney. "PW4000-100". Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
- ^ Pratt & Whitney. "PW4000-112". Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
- ^ Ott, James (24 March 2003). "Record Diversion". Aviation Week. Aviation Week Network. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
United Airlines' Boeing 777 carrying 255 passengers flew over the mid-Pacific Ocean against strong headwinds for 192 min. under single-engine power Mar. 17 to land without incident at Kona on the western coast of the big island of Hawaii. Boeing confirmed that it was the longest single-engine diversion during Extended Twin Operations (ETOPS) since the advent of transoceanic twin-engine flights 20 years ago...
- ^ Leonardo, David (25 March 2003). "Engine-failure 777 busts ETOPS limit : Pacific incident was longest ever single-engine diversion". Flight Global. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
A United Airlines Boeing 777-200ER was forced to fly a 190min diversion on one engine over the Pacific Ocean when it had been dispatched on a 180min limitation, according to the US Federal Aviation Administration. Boeing confirms that this is the longest ever single-engine diversion under extended-range twin-engine operations (ETOPS) rules.
- ^ DeSantis, J. Angelo (2013). "Engines Turn or Passengers Swim: A Case Study of How ETOPS Improved Safety and Economics in Aviation". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 77 (4): 6.
For 177 minutes, Flight 842 flew against headwinds on a single engine."At the top of the descent into Kona, the crew informed passengers of the situation, and shortly thereafter Flight 842 landed safely." A failed No. 3 bearing in the right engine had caused the engine loss.
- ^ "BREAKING Korean Air Boeing 777-300 #KE2708 evacuated at Haneda Airport in Tokyo after engine fire". Air Live Net. 27 May 2016.
- ^ "Accident: Korean B773 at Tokyo on May 27th 2016, rejected takeoff due to engine fire". The Aviation Herald. Archived from the original on 16 November 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2016.
- ^ "KE2708 Flight, Korean Air, Tokyo to Seoul". www.flightr.net. Archived from the original on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
- ^ "Incident: United B772 over Pacific on Feb 13th 2018, fan blade, engine cowl and inlet separated in flight, blade debris impacted fuselage".
- ^ NTSB Report PDF https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/ReportGeneratorFile.ashx?EventID=20180213X95634&AKey=1&RType=Final&IType=IA
- ^ Alan Levin, Julie Johnsson (22 February 2021). "Boeing 777 Engine Blast Spurs Grounding of Some Older Jets". Bloomberg. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
- ^ "FAA orders fan blade inspections after pattern of engine-related failures". Seattle Times. 23 February 2021.
- ^ Hradecky, Simon (4 December 2020). "Incident: JAL B772 at Okinawa on Dec 4th 2020, engine shut down in flight after uncontained failure, parts of engine cowl dropped". The Aviation Herald. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- ^ a b "Incident: United B772 at Denver on Feb 20th 2021, engine inlet separates from engine, engine fire".
- ^ "Incident: United B772 at Denver on Feb 20th 2021, engine inlet separates from engine, engine fire". avherald.com. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
- ^ "Boeing 777: Signs of 'metal fatigue' found on Denver plane engine". BBC News. 23 February 2021.
- ^ Josephs, Leslie (22 February 2021). "United takes 24 Boeing 777s out of service as the FAA orders inspections following engine failure". CNBC. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
- ^ Airworthiness Directive, Emergency (23 February 2021). "AD". FAA. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 24 February 2021.
- ^ "Boeing 777: Dozens grounded after Denver engine failure". BBC News. 22 February 2021.
- ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (22 February 2021). "UK bans operations with PW4000-powered 777s". Flight Global. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
- ^ "Engine failure involving Airbus A330, VN-A371" (PDF). Australian Transport Safety Bureau. 6 May 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
- ^ "Accident: Delta A332 at Lagos on Feb 13th 2018, engine fire". Aviation Herald. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
- ^ "National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report". National Transportation Safety Board. DCA18LA163. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
- ^ Ranter, Harro. "ASN Aircraft accident Airbus A330-302 N806NW Atlanta-William B. Hartsfield International Airport, GA (ATL)". aviation-safety.net. Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
- ^ "Accident to the Airbus A330 registered N806NW and operated by Delta Air Lines on 18/04/2018 at Atlanta, Georgia [Investigation led by NTSB / United States]". bea.aero. Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
- ^ a b c "Incident: Delta B744 over Pacific on Jun 7th 2017, engine shut down in flight". The Aviation Herald. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
- ^ "Investigation started as cargo plane showers metal parts on Limburg village". Dutch News. 21 February 2021.
- ^ "ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 248036". Aviation Safety Network (published 21 February 2021). 20 February 2021.
- ^ "Dutch authorities investigate Boeing 747 after engine parts drop after takeoff". The Guardian. Amsterdam. Reuters. 22 February 2021.
- ^ "Accident: Longtail B744 at Maastricht on Feb 20th 2021, rain of engine parts". avherald. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
- ^ Aviation Weekly News
- ^ "TCDS E24NE" (PDF). FAA. 23 November 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 24 December 2017.
- ^ "TCDS E36NE" (PDF). FAA. 28 May 2014.
- ^ "TCDS E46NE" (PDF). FAA. 23 January 2012.
- ^ "PW4000 94-inch-fan" (PDF). Pratt & Whitney.
- ^ "PW4170 Engine for the A330" (PDF). Pratt & Whitney.
- ^ "PW4000 112-inch-fan" (PDF). Pratt & Whitney.
Further reading
[edit]- PW4000-94 Product Page
- PW4000-100 Product Page
- PW4000-112 Product Page
- Gunston, Bill (2006). World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines, 5th Edition. Phoenix Mill, Gloucestershire, England, UK: Sutton Publishing Limited. ISBN 0-7509-4479-X.
Pratt & Whitney PW4000
View on GrokipediaDevelopment and History
Early Development
The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 was conceived in the early 1980s as the direct successor to the JT9D, the pioneering high-bypass turbofan that had powered wide-body airliners since the late 1960s. Launched in December 1982, the PW4000 family aimed to advance high-bypass efficiency for next-generation wide-body aircraft, incorporating a dual-spool, axial-flow design to deliver improved performance in the competitive market for large commercial jets.[6][7] Development focused on a thrust range of 50,000 to 99,000 lbf to rival the General Electric CF6 and Rolls-Royce RB211 engines, which dominated the segment for aircraft like the Boeing 747 and 767. Key initial design goals emphasized reductions in fuel burn by approximately 7% compared to the JT9D, alongside lower noise and emissions to meet evolving regulatory standards and airline demands for more efficient operations.[2][3][8][9][10] The program achieved its first ground run in April 1984, marking the start of extensive testing. This was followed by the inaugural flight test in August 1985 on a Boeing 747SP flying testbed, validating the engine's core technologies under real-world conditions ahead of further refinement.[7]Certification and Entry into Service
The PW4000-94 variant received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) type certification in July 1986, marking the culmination of extensive testing and validation to meet rigorous safety and performance standards for high-bypass turbofan engines.[11] This certification enabled the engine's commercial deployment, positioning it as a competitive option against rivals like the General Electric CF6 and Rolls-Royce RB211 in the widebody market.[11] The PW4000 entered revenue service in June 1987 with Pan Am on the Airbus A310; Korean Air was one of the engine's earliest adopters on the A300-600, helping demonstrate its reliability in demanding long-haul operations.[12][13] Initial applications expanded to other widebody platforms, including the Boeing 747-400 and 767, with first deliveries occurring in 1989—such as to United Airlines for its 747-400 fleet.[5] These integrations underscored the PW4000's versatility across twin- and four-engine configurations, supporting efficient transoceanic routes.[5] In its first year of operation, the PW4000 demonstrated strong early performance, achieving a dispatch reliability rate exceeding 99%, which reflected its robust design and minimal unscheduled removals during initial fleet integrations.[11] This high reliability was later refined to 99.96% across broader service.[11]Production and Upgrades
Production of the Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engine family began following its entry into service in 1987, with manufacturing primarily conducted at the company's headquarters and main facility in East Hartford, Connecticut.[14][15] By 2017, more than 2,500 engines had been delivered to operators worldwide, and production has continued without interruption into 2025 to support ongoing demand from commercial and military applications.[5][12] A key upgrade program for the PW4000 series is the Advantage70 initiative, launched in 2006, which incorporates enhancements to the high-pressure compressor and turbine components for improved efficiency.[16] This program delivers a 2% increase in thrust and more than 1% reduction in fuel burn compared to baseline models, along with greater durability to extend time on wing.[3][17] Offered as both new engines and retrofit kits, Advantage70 has been adopted by operators seeking to lower operating costs without major redesigns. No significant performance upgrade programs have been introduced since 2020, though Pratt & Whitney continues to implement maintenance and safety enhancements, including fan blade inspections and redesigns mandated by regulatory authorities.[18] The PW4000 family had accumulated over 135 million flight hours by 2017, demonstrating its reliability across diverse fleets. By late 2022, the PW4000-94 variant alone exceeded 150 million flight hours, with the overall series continuing to log substantial additional hours through 2025.[5]Design
Architecture
The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 is a dual-spool, high-bypass ratio turbofan engine designed for widebody commercial aircraft.[19] In this configuration, the engine features two independent coaxial spools that rotate at different speeds to optimize performance and efficiency. The low-pressure spool comprises the single-stage fan, the low-pressure compressor (also known as the booster), and the low-pressure turbine, which together handle the majority of the airflow and power the fan to generate thrust.[20] The high-pressure spool includes the high-pressure compressor, the annular combustor, and the high-pressure turbine, which compresses core air, adds fuel for combustion, and extracts energy to drive the compressor.[20] The PW4000 family's fan diameters vary by variant at 94 inches, 100 inches, or 112 inches to accommodate different aircraft requirements while maintaining aerodynamic efficiency.[2][3][8] This high-bypass design achieves a bypass ratio of approximately 5:1 to 6:1, directing a significant portion of airflow around the core to enhance fuel efficiency and reduce noise.[3][20] Physically, the engine measures approximately 11 to 16 feet (3.3 to 4.9 meters) in overall length from flange to flange and has a dry weight ranging from approximately 9,400 to 15,700 pounds (4,270 to 7,140 kg), depending on the specific model and configuration.[3][4][21][22] Across the family, thrust output spans roughly 50,000 to 100,000 pounds to power various twin- and trijet airliners.[2]Technologies and Features
The PW4000 series incorporates a Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system, which optimizes engine operation by precisely managing fuel flow, variable geometry, and thrust settings for improved fuel efficiency and reliability across all variants.[2][13] Advanced materials, including single-crystal superalloys in the high-pressure turbine blades, enable the engine to withstand extreme temperatures while enhancing durability and overall performance.[23][13] The Talon annular combustor, featuring segmented liner panels and air-blast fuel nozzles for superior fuel atomization and mixing, reduces NOx emissions compared to earlier designs, helping the PW4000 meet stringent environmental standards.[2][13] Noise levels are mitigated through design elements such as high-bypass ratios and optimized fan blades, achieving significant reduction relative to predecessors like the JT9D and complying with early Stage 3 noise regulations.[2] The engine demonstrates exceptional reliability, with a dispatch rate of 99.96% and an average on-wing time of 13,500 flight hours before requiring a shop visit (as of 2000).[11]Variants
PW4000-94
The PW4000-94 is the inaugural variant of the Pratt & Whitney PW4000 high-bypass turbofan engine family, featuring a 94-inch (2.39 m) fan diameter.[2] Developed as the first model in the series, it received FAA certification in 1986 and entered revenue service in June 1987, powering its initial application on an Airbus A310-300 delivered to Pan Am.[1] Over 2,500 units have been produced since its introduction, accumulating more than 150 million flight hours across a global fleet serving over 70 operators.[5] This variant delivers a thrust range of 52,000 to 62,000 lbf (231 to 276 kN), making it suitable for widebody aircraft requiring reliable power for transoceanic routes.[2] It powers five primary aircraft types: the Boeing 747-400, Boeing 767-200/-300/-400, Airbus A300-600, Airbus A310-300, and McDonnell Douglas MD-11.[7] These applications span passenger and freighter configurations, with the engine certified for 180-minute Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards (ETOPS) on twinjets like the 767 and A310.[2] Optimized for medium- to long-haul operations on twin- and four-engine widebodies, the PW4000-94 emphasizes efficiency and durability in both commercial and cargo roles. Like other PW4000 models, it employs Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) for enhanced performance management and reduced pilot workload.[2]PW4000-100
The PW4000-100 is the 100-inch fan variant of the PW4000 high-bypass turbofan engine family, designed exclusively for powering the Airbus A330 twin-engine widebody airliner.[3] It provides a thrust range of 64,500 to 70,000 lbf (287 to 311 kN), enabling efficient performance on medium- to long-haul routes with an emphasis on fuel economy and reliability for the A330's operational profile.[3] This variant incorporates advanced aerodynamic features and materials to optimize efficiency for the A330's medium-haul missions, distinguishing it from higher-thrust siblings suited to larger aircraft like the Boeing 777.[1] Development of the PW4000-100 began in December 1991 as part of Pratt & Whitney's effort to secure a competitive position on the Airbus A330 against the General Electric CF6-80E1.[11] The engine achieved FAA certification in August 1993, followed by its first flight in October 1993, and entered revenue service in December 1994 with Airbus and operators like Cathay Pacific.[11] A key focus during development was enhancing suitability for extended twin-engine operations (ETOPS), with initial 90-minute ETOPS approval at entry into service—the first for a turbofan on a twin-engine widebody—and subsequent upgrade to 180-minute ETOPS in July 1995.[24][25] The primary applications for the PW4000-100 are the Airbus A330-200 and A330-300 current engine option (ceo) variants, where it has powered hundreds of aircraft for airlines worldwide, supporting routes up to 7,500 nautical miles.[3] Within this thrust class, the PW4168A model represents a significant upgrade, delivering up to 68,000 lbf with a 4.5% thrust increase for hot-and-high conditions while maintaining compatibility with existing A330 fleets through retrofit kits.[26] This upgrade, part of the broader Advantage70 program, further improves time-on-wing and reduces maintenance costs for operators.[3] The engine's design, including its wide-chord fan and advanced combustor technologies, contributes to its ETOPS enhancements, ensuring safe and reliable transoceanic operations on twin-engine platforms.[3]PW4000-112
The PW4000-112 is the highest-thrust variant in the PW4000 family, featuring a 112-inch (2.84 m) fan diameter designed specifically for the Boeing 777's long-range requirements. It delivers thrust in the range of 74,000 to 99,040 lbf (329 to 441 kN), enabling efficient performance on ultra-long-haul routes.[8] This variant includes the PW4098 model, rated at 98,000 lbf (436 kN), which was discontinued after entering service.[27] Development of the PW4000-112 began in the early 1990s as part of the engine competition for the Boeing 777 launch, with Pratt & Whitney selected alongside GE and Rolls-Royce to provide options for the aircraft. The PW4084, the initial -112 model rated at 84,000 lbf (374 kN), achieved its first flight in November 1993 and received FAA certification in April 1994, entering service in May 1995 on a United Airlines Boeing 777-200.[28][29] Despite its selection for the 777 program, the variant encountered initial reliability challenges, particularly with the higher-thrust PW4098 certified in July 1998 and introduced in September 1999, which faced operational issues leading to its phase-out.[20][30] The PW4000-112 powers the Boeing 777-200, 777-200ER, and 777-300 "Classic" variants, providing the necessary thrust for extended-range operations while supporting 180-minute ETOPS certification from entry into service.[8][28] As the largest fan variant in the PW4000 series, it incorporates advanced materials such as single-crystal superalloy blades for enhanced durability in high-thrust environments.[8] Its design emphasizes modularity, with a separable fan case for easier transport and maintenance, making it suitable for the demanding ultra-long-haul missions of the 777 fleet.[8]Operational History
Aircraft Applications
The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engine family powers a diverse range of widebody aircraft, including the Boeing 747-400, Boeing 767 (including the military KC-46 tanker variant), Boeing 777-200/-200ER/-300, McDonnell Douglas MD-11, Airbus A300-600, Airbus A310-300, and Airbus A330-200/-300.[2][3][8] The PW4000-94 variant equips the Boeing 747-400, 767, MD-11, A300-600, and A310-300; the PW4000-100 serves the A330; and the PW4000-112 is used on the 777 models.[31] As of 2023, the PW4000 powers over 1,000 aircraft in commercial service worldwide, with more than 2,500 engines delivered since 1987 and approximately 1,500 remaining active, serving over 70 operators across 30 countries.[5][32] These include legacy Boeing 747-400 freighters still operating in cargo roles.[31] Major operators include United Airlines, which maintains a fleet of 52 Boeing 777s equipped with the PW4000-112.[18] Cargo carriers such as UPS and FedEx rely heavily on the PW4000-94 for their fleets, with UPS operating 52 Airbus A300s, 94 Boeing 767s, and 25 MD-11s (many PW-powered) and FedEx managing 58 A300s, approximately 160 767s, and 26 MD-11s (similarly equipped) as of late 2025.[31] Delta Air Lines is the largest passenger operator of PW4000-equipped Boeing 767s, with 58 aircraft in service as of September 2025.[31] The engines support diverse applications, from passenger transport on Boeing 777s and 767s to cargo operations on MD-11 freighters and converted 747-400s, as well as experimental platforms like the Stratolaunch Roc carrier aircraft, which uses six PW4056 engines.[31] In November 2025, following a fatal MD-11 crash in Louisville, UPS and FedEx temporarily grounded their PW4000-powered MD-11 fleets for safety inspections.[33] Retirement trends show phasing out on older Boeing 747-400s due to fleet modernization, while use remains sustained on Boeing 777 Classics for long-haul routes.[31]In-Service Performance
The PW4000 series has demonstrated exceptional reliability in operational use, achieving a dispatch reliability rate of 99.96%.[11] This high rate reflects the engine's robust design and has contributed to its accumulation of over 150 million flight hours since entering service in 1987, with the PW4000-94 alone surpassing 150 million as of 2022.[5] The average time on wing before a shop visit is approximately 13,500 flight hours, corresponding to a shop visit rate of 0.073 per thousand hours.[11] In terms of fuel efficiency, the PW4000 has provided 1-2% improvement over contemporary competitors like the GE CF6 and Rolls-Royce RB211 in its initial service years, owing to its advanced high-bypass ratio architecture.[34] Subsequent upgrades, such as the Advantage 70 package, have further enhanced performance by delivering more than 1% reduction in specific fuel consumption through optimized compressor staging and reduced tip clearances.[3] Maintenance costs for the PW4000 have been favorably impacted by post-upgrade improvements, achieving a shop visit rate of 0.076 per thousand hours—the lowest in its history among similar engines—leading to extended intervals between overhauls and lower overall lifecycle expenses. The segmented liner design of the TALON combustor further supports cost efficiency by enabling easier replacement of components during shop visits.[2] Environmentally, the PW4000 complies with ICAO Stage 4 noise standards, with noise levels reduced by 5-8 EPNdB through advanced acoustic liners and fan blade technologies. Emissions are minimized via the TALON combustor, which incorporates air-blast fuel nozzles to achieve lower NOx levels while meeting CAEP/6 regulatory limits, contributing to reduced overall environmental footprint in service.[2][35]Safety and Incidents
Notable Incidents
The PW4000-94 variant experienced several uncontained engine failures in the 1990s, primarily attributed to fractures in the low-pressure turbine S3 and S4 vanes as well as 5th-stage compressor blades, leading to case punctures and in-flight shutdowns.[36][37] These incidents prompted early inspections after cracks were discovered in multiple engines during routine checks.[38] On February 20, 2021, a Longtail Aviation Boeing 747-400BCF (Flight 5504) suffered a contained failure of its No. 1 PW4056 engine shortly after takeoff from Maastricht Aachen Airport, Netherlands, with blade fragments and other parts detaching and falling to the ground near Meerssen, injuring two people and damaging property.[39][40] The aircraft diverted safely to Liège Airport, Belgium, with no further damage to the plane.[41] The PW4000-100 series saw a fan blade separation on March 28, 2022, aboard United Airlines Flight 134, a Boeing 767-300ER en route from Newark to Zurich, when the right PW4060 engine failed over the Atlantic Ocean, causing damage to the right elevator.[42][43] The crew diverted to Shannon, Ireland, landing safely with all 195 passengers and crew uninjured.[44] For the PW4000-112 variant, a fan blade fractured on February 13, 2018, on United Airlines Flight 1175, a Boeing 777-200 en route from San Francisco to Honolulu, resulting in the loss of the inlet cowl and fan blades during climb. The aircraft returned safely to San Francisco with 378 people aboard.[45] On December 4, 2020, Japan Airlines Flight 904, a Boeing 777-200 departing Naha Airport, Okinawa, experienced a left PW4077 engine malfunction at around 16,000 feet, involving blade damage and loss of the engine panel, leading to a safe return.[46] The most severe incident occurred on February 20, 2021, when United Airlines Flight 328, a Boeing 777-200, suffered a right PW4077 fan blade separation shortly after takeoff from Denver, causing an engine fire and debris fallout over a neighborhood.[47] The plane returned safely to Denver with 241 people on board.[48] These events, including the 2018 and 2021 United incidents, involved blade material fatigue as a contributing factor. No major PW4000 incidents were reported from 2023 through 2025.[49][50]Investigations and Regulatory Actions
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued its final report in September 2023 on the 2021 uncontained failure of a PW4000-112 fan blade during United Airlines Flight 328, attributing the event to metal fatigue that initiated a crack in the blade and propagated undetected over multiple flight cycles. The report highlighted inadequate inspection methods and insufficient frequency of checks, which failed to identify low-level cracking in the blade's midspan region, marking this as the fourth such PW4000-112 fan blade separation incident investigated by the NTSB since 1991. Contributing factors included the engine's design limitations in containing debris and fire propagation, as the failure of the "K" flange allowed hot combustion gases to breach the nacelle. In response to the incident, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an emergency airworthiness directive on February 21, 2021, mandating the immediate grounding of all Boeing 777 aircraft equipped with PW4000-112 engines worldwide until ultrasonic and other inspections could verify blade integrity. This action affected approximately 130 aircraft operated by airlines including United, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways, with return-to-service requirements including enhanced fluorescent penetrant and ultrasonic inspections for all fan blades. By late 2021, the FAA approved temporary exemptions allowing phased returns to service, contingent on ongoing fleet-wide inspections that subsequently identified additional cracked blades. Recent regulatory developments include Pratt & Whitney and Boeing's August 2025 requests to the FAA for exemptions from certain blade-out certification testing requirements and an extension of the March 4, 2028, deadline for implementing redesigned fan blades and related hardware modifications to 2033, citing technical complexities in validation and supply chain issues.[18] These redesigns aim to strengthen blade materials against fatigue and improve containment features, with phased implementation beginning in 2023 through service bulletins.[18] Enhanced ultrasonic inspection techniques, developed post-incident, now target flowpath surfaces and midspan areas with greater sensitivity to detect subsurface cracks earlier. A 2025 disagreement emerged between the FAA and Dutch investigators regarding the risk assessment of PW4000 failure scenarios tied to the 2021 event, with the FAA reaffirming that potential collateral damage from uncontained failures does not necessitate immediate mandatory redesigns beyond existing directives.[51] The Dutch Safety Board, building on its 2023 recommendations, expressed concerns that regulators may undervalue ground safety risks from debris dispersion, urging more stringent evaluations of failure propagation.[51] This discord highlights ongoing international scrutiny of PW4000 maintenance protocols.Specifications
PW4000-94 Specifications
The PW4000-94 is a dual-spool, high-bypass turbofan engine designed for widebody commercial aircraft, featuring advanced materials and full-authority digital engine control (FADEC) for optimized performance and reliability. It incorporates a single-stage fan with a diameter of 94 inches (2.39 m), enabling efficient airflow in high-thrust applications.[2] The engine delivers takeoff thrust ranging from 52,000 to 62,000 lbf (231 to 276 kN), supporting operations on aircraft such as the Boeing 747-400 and 767-300.[2] The compressor configuration consists of a 1-stage fan, followed by a 4-stage low-pressure compressor (LPC) and an 11-stage high-pressure compressor (HPC), which together achieve an overall pressure ratio of approximately 27.5 to 32.3. This axial-flow arrangement enhances compression efficiency while maintaining a bypass ratio of 4.8 to 5.1, contributing to the engine's fuel economy and low noise profile.[52] The turbine section features a 2-stage high-pressure turbine (HPT) driving the HPC and a 4-stage low-pressure turbine (LPT) powering the fan and LPC, utilizing single-crystal superalloy blades for high-temperature durability. The annular combustor employs TALON low-NOx technology to reduce emissions.[2]| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | Dual-spool high-bypass turbofan |
| Length (flange to flange) | 132.7 in (3.37 m) |
| Fan Diameter | 94 in (2.39 m) |
| Dry Weight | 9,420 lb (4,273 kg) |
| Thrust Range | 52,000–62,000 lbf (231–276 kN) |
| Compressor Stages | 1-stage fan, 4-stage LPC, 11-stage HPC |
| Turbine Stages | 2-stage HPT, 4-stage LPT |
| Bypass Ratio | 4.8–5.1 |
| Overall Pressure Ratio | 27.5–32.3 |
PW4000-100 Specifications
The PW4000-100 is a dual-spool, high-bypass turbofan engine designed specifically for widebody aircraft such as the Airbus A330.[3] It features a large-diameter fan to optimize bypass airflow, contributing to its efficiency in the 64,500–70,000 lbf (287–311 kN) thrust class.[3] Introduced in 1994, this variant emphasizes reliability and ETOPS-180 certification for extended twin-engine operations.[3] Key architectural elements include a 100 in (2.54 m) fan diameter, which supports the engine's high-bypass ratio of approximately 5:1.[3] The compressor configuration comprises a 1-stage fan, 5-stage low-pressure compressor, and 11-stage high-pressure compressor, enabling efficient air compression across varying flight conditions.[23] Downstream, the turbine assembly consists of a 2-stage high-pressure turbine and 5-stage low-pressure turbine, driving the spools while managing thermal loads.[23] The engine's dry weight is approximately 12,900 lb (5,851 kg), balancing performance with installation requirements.[22][54]| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Type | Dual-spool high-bypass turbofan |
| Length (flange to flange) | 163.1 in (4.14 m) |
| Fan Diameter | 100 in (2.54 m) |
| Dry Weight | 12,900 lb (5,851 kg) |
| Thrust (Takeoff) | 64,500–70,000 lbf (287–311 kN) |
| Compressor | 1-stage fan, 5-stage LP, 11-stage HP |
| Turbine | 2-stage HP, 5-stage LP |
| Bypass Ratio | 4.9–5.1 |
PW4000-112 Specifications
The PW4000-112 is a dual-spool, high-bypass ratio turbofan engine designed for ultra-high-thrust applications, primarily powering widebody aircraft such as the Boeing 777 series.[23] It features advanced aerodynamic and materials technologies to achieve high efficiency and reliability in long-haul operations.[8] Key specifications for the PW4000-112 variant include the following:| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | Dual-spool high-bypass turbofan |
| Fan diameter | 112 in (2.84 m) |
| Thrust range | 74,000–98,000 lbf (330–436 kN) |
| Compressor | 1-stage fan, 6-stage low-pressure (7-stage for PW4098 model), 11-stage high-pressure |
| Turbine | 2-stage high-pressure, 7-stage low-pressure |
| Length (flange to flange) | 191.7 in (4.87 m; ~16 ft) |
| Dry weight | 15,584 lb (7,070 kg) |
| Bypass Ratio | 5.8:1 to 6.4:1 |