Hubbry Logo
TurbojetTurbojetMain
Open search
Turbojet
Community hub
Turbojet
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Turbojet
Turbojet
from Wikipedia
Junkers Jumo 004, the first production turbojet in operational use. Note the starter pull-start handle housed in the center of the intake nose bullet.
Diagram of a typical gas turbine jet engine
Frank Whittle
Hans von Ohain

The turbojet is an airbreathing jet engine which is typically used in aircraft. It consists of a gas turbine with a propelling nozzle. The gas turbine has an air inlet which includes inlet guide vanes, a compressor, a combustion chamber, and a turbine (that drives the compressor). The compressed air from the compressor is heated by burning fuel in the combustion chamber and then allowed to expand through the turbine. The turbine exhaust is then expanded in the propelling nozzle where it is accelerated to high speed to provide thrust.[1] Two engineers, Frank Whittle in the United Kingdom and Hans von Ohain in Germany, developed the concept independently into practical engines during the late 1930s.[citation needed]

Turbojets have poor efficiency at low vehicle speeds, which limits their usefulness in vehicles other than aircraft. Turbojet engines have been used in isolated cases to power vehicles other than aircraft, typically for attempts on land speed records. Where vehicles are "turbine-powered", this is more commonly by use of a turboshaft engine, a development of the gas turbine engine where an additional turbine is used to drive a rotating output shaft. These are common in helicopters and hovercraft.

Turbojets were widely used for early supersonic fighters, up to and including many third generation fighters, with the MiG-25 being the latest turbojet-powered fighter developed. As most fighters spend little time traveling supersonically, fourth-generation fighters (as well as some late third-generation fighters like the F-111 and Hawker Siddeley Harrier) and subsequent designs are powered by the more efficient low-bypass turbofans and use afterburners to raise exhaust speed for bursts of supersonic travel. Turbojets were used on the Concorde and the longer-range versions of the Tu-144 which were required to spend a long period travelling supersonically. Turbojets are still common in medium range cruise missiles, due to their high exhaust speed, small frontal area, and relative simplicity.

History

[edit]
Heinkel He 178, the world's first aircraft to fly purely on turbojet power, using an HeS 3 engine

The first patent for using a gas turbine to power an aircraft was filed in 1921 by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume.[2] His engine was to be an axial-flow turbojet, but was never constructed, as it would have required considerable advances over the state of the art in compressors.[3]

The Whittle W.2/700 engine flew in the Gloster E.28/39, the first British aircraft to fly with a turbojet engine, and the Gloster Meteor

In 1928, British RAF College Cranwell cadet[4] Frank Whittle formally submitted his ideas for a turbojet to his superiors. In October 1929 he developed his ideas further.[5] On 16 January 1930 in England, Whittle submitted his first patent (granted in 1932).[6] The patent showed a two-stage axial compressor feeding a single-sided centrifugal compressor. Practical axial compressors were made possible by ideas from A.A. Griffith in a seminal paper in 1926 ("An Aerodynamic Theory of Turbine Design"). Whittle later concentrated on the simpler centrifugal compressor only, for a variety of practical reasons. A Whittle engine was the first turbojet to run, the Power Jets WU, on 12 April 1937. It was liquid-fuelled. Whittle's team experienced near-panic during the first start attempts when the engine accelerated out of control to a relatively high speed despite the fuel supply being cut off. It was subsequently found that fuel had leaked into the combustion chamber during pre-start motoring checks and accumulated in pools, so the engine would not stop accelerating until all the leaked fuel had burned off. Whittle was unable to interest the government in his invention, and development continued at a slow pace.

In Germany, Hans von Ohain patented a similar engine in 1935. His design, an axial-flow engine, as opposed to Whittle's centrifugal flow engine, was eventually adopted by most manufacturers by the 1950s.[7][8]

On 27 August 1939 the Heinkel He 178, powered by von Ohain's design, became the world's first aircraft to fly using the thrust from a turbojet engine. It was flown by test pilot Erich Warsitz.[9] The Gloster E.28/39, (also referred to as the "Gloster Whittle", "Gloster Pioneer", or "Gloster G.40") made the first British jet-engined flight in 1941. It was designed to test the Whittle jet engine in flight, and led to the development of the Gloster Meteor.[10]

The first two operational turbojet aircraft, the Messerschmitt Me 262 and then the Gloster Meteor, entered service in 1944, towards the end of World War II, the Me 262 in April and the Gloster Meteor in July. Only about 15 Meteor saw WW2 action but up to 1400 Me 262s were produced, with 300 entering combat, delivering the first ground attacks and air combat victories of jet planes.[11][12][13]

Air is drawn into the rotating compressor via the intake and is compressed to a higher pressure before entering the combustion chamber. Fuel is mixed with the compressed air and burns in the combustor. The combustion products leave the combustor and expand through the turbine where power is extracted to drive the compressor. The turbine exit gases still contain considerable energy that is converted in the propelling nozzle to a high speed jet.

The first turbojets, used either a centrifugal compressor (as in the Heinkel HeS 3), or an axial compressor (as in the Junkers Jumo 004) which gave a smaller diameter, although longer, engine. By replacing the propeller used on piston engines with a high speed jet of exhaust, higher aircraft speeds were attainable.

One of the last applications for a turbojet engine was Concorde which used the Olympus 593 engine. However, joint studies by Rolls-Royce and Snecma for a second generation SST engine using the 593 core were done more than three years before Concorde entered service. They evaluated bypass engines with bypass ratios between 0.1 and 1.0 to give improved take-off and cruising performance.[14] Nevertheless, the 593 met all the requirements of the Concorde programme.[15] Estimates made in 1964 for the Concorde design at Mach 2.2 showed the penalty in range for the supersonic airliner, in terms of miles per gallon, compared to subsonic airliners at Mach 0.85 (Boeing 707, DC-8) was relatively small. This is because the large increase in drag is largely compensated by an increase in powerplant efficiency (the engine efficiency is increased by the ram pressure rise which adds to the compressor pressure rise, the higher aircraft speed approaches the exhaust jet speed increasing propulsive efficiency).[16]

Turbojet engines had a significant impact on commercial aviation. Aside from giving faster flight speeds turbojets had greater reliability than piston engines, with some models demonstrating dispatch reliability rating in excess of 99.9%. Pre-jet commercial aircraft were designed with as many as four engines in part because of concerns over in-flight failures. Overseas flight paths were plotted to keep planes within an hour of a landing field, lengthening flights. The increase in reliability that came with the turbojet enabled three- and two-engine designs, and more direct long-distance flights.[17]

High-temperature alloys were a reverse salient, a key technology that dragged progress on jet engines. Non-UK jet engines built in the 1930s and 1940s had to be overhauled every 10 or 20 hours due to creep failure and other types of damage to blades. British engines, however, utilised Nimonic alloys which allowed extended use without overhaul, engines such as the Rolls-Royce Welland and Rolls-Royce Derwent,[18] and by 1949 the de Havilland Goblin, being type tested for 500 hours without maintenance.[19] It was not until the 1950s that superalloy technology allowed other countries to produce economically practical engines.[20]

Early designs

[edit]

Early German turbojets had severe limitations on the amount of running they could do due to the lack of suitable high temperature materials for the turbines.[citation needed] British engines such as the Rolls-Royce Welland used better materials giving improved durability. The Welland was type-certified for 80 hours initially, later extended to 150 hours between overhauls, as a result of an extended 500-hour run being achieved in tests.[21]

J85-GE-17A turbojet engine from General Electric (1970)

General Electric in the United States was in a good position to enter the jet engine business due to its experience with the high-temperature materials used in their turbosuperchargers during World War II.[22]

Water injection was a common method used to increase thrust, usually during takeoff, in early turbojets that were thrust-limited by their allowable turbine entry temperature. The water increased thrust at the temperature limit, but prevented complete combustion, often leaving a very visible smoke trail.

Allowable turbine entry temperatures have increased steadily over time both with the introduction of superior alloys and coatings, and with the introduction and progressive effectiveness of blade cooling designs. On early engines, the turbine temperature limit had to be monitored, and avoided, by the pilot, typically during starting and at maximum thrust settings. Automatic temperature limiting was introduced to reduce pilot workload and reduce the likelihood of turbine damage due to over-temperature.

Components

[edit]
An animation of an axial compressor.
Schematic diagram showing the operation of a centrifugal flow turbojet engine. The compressor is driven by the turbine stage and throws the air outwards, requiring it to be redirected parallel to the axis of thrust.
Schematic diagram showing the operation of an axial flow turbojet engine. Here, the compressor is again driven by the turbine, but the air flow remains parallel to the axis of thrust.

Nose bullet

[edit]

A nose bullet is a component of a turbojet used to divert air into the intake, in front of the accessory drive and to house the starter motor.

Air intake

[edit]

An intake, or tube, is needed in front of the compressor to help direct the incoming air smoothly into the rotating compressor blades. Older engines had stationary vanes in front of the moving blades. These vanes also helped to direct the air onto the blades. The air flowing into a turbojet engine is always subsonic, regardless of the speed of the aircraft itself.

The intake has to supply air to the engine with an acceptably small variation in pressure (known as distortion) and having lost as little energy as possible on the way (known as pressure recovery). The ram pressure rise in the intake is the inlet's contribution to the propulsion system's overall pressure ratio and thermal efficiency.

The intake gains prominence at high speeds when it generates more compression than the compressor stage. Well-known examples are the Concorde and Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird propulsion systems where the intake and engine contributions to the total compression were 63%/8%[23] at Mach 2 and 54%/17%[24] at Mach 3+. Intakes have ranged from "zero-length"[25] on the Pratt & Whitney TF33 turbofan installation in the Lockheed C-141 Starlifter, to the twin 65 feet (20 m) long, intakes on the North American XB-70 Valkyrie, each feeding three engines with an intake airflow of about 800 pounds per second (360 kg/s).

Compressor

[edit]

The turbine rotates the compressor at high speed, adding energy to the airflow while squeezing (compressing) it into a smaller space. Compressing the air increases its pressure and temperature. The smaller the compressor, the faster it turns. The (large) GE90-115B fan rotates at about 2,500 RPM, while a small helicopter engine compressor rotates around 50,000 RPM.

Turbojets supply bleed air from the compressor to the aircraft for the operation of various sub-systems. Examples include the environmental control system, anti-icing, and fuel tank pressurization. The engine itself needs air at various pressures and flow rates to keep it running. This air comes from the compressor, and without it, the turbines would overheat, the lubricating oil would leak from the bearing cavities, the rotor thrust bearings would skid or be overloaded, and ice would form on the nose cone. The air from the compressor, called secondary air, is used for turbine cooling, bearing cavity sealing, anti-icing, and ensuring that the rotor axial load on its thrust bearing will not wear it out prematurely. Supplying bleed air to the aircraft decreases the efficiency of the engine because it has been compressed, but then does not contribute to producing thrust.

Compressor types used in turbojets were typically axial or centrifugal. Early turbojet compressors had low pressure ratios up to about 5:1. Aerodynamic improvements including splitting the compressor into two separately rotating parts, incorporating variable blade angles for entry guide vanes and stators, and bleeding air from the compressor enabled later turbojets to have overall pressure ratios of 15:1 or more. After leaving the compressor, the air enters the combustion chamber.

Combustion chamber

[edit]

The burning process in the combustor is significantly different from that in a piston engine. In a piston engine, the burning gases are confined to a small volume, and as the fuel burns, the pressure increases. In a turbojet, the air and fuel mixture burn in the combustor and pass through to the turbine in a continuous flowing process with no pressure build-up. Instead, a small pressure loss occurs in the combustor.

The fuel-air mixture can only burn in slow-moving air, so an area of reverse flow is maintained by the fuel nozzles for the approximately stoichiometric burning in the primary zone. Further compressed air is introduced which completes the combustion process and reduces the temperature of the combustion products to a level which the turbine can accept. Less than 25% of the air is typically used for combustion, as an overall lean mixture is required to keep within the turbine temperature limits.

Turbine

[edit]

Hot gases leaving the combustor expand through the turbine. Typical materials for turbines include inconel and Nimonic.[26] The hottest turbine vanes and blades in an engine have internal cooling passages. Air from the compressor is passed through these to keep the metal temperature within limits. The remaining stages do not need cooling.

In the first stage, the turbine is largely an impulse turbine (similar to a pelton wheel) and rotates because of the impact of the hot gas stream. Later stages are convergent ducts that accelerate the gas. Energy is transferred into the shaft through momentum exchange in the opposite way to energy transfer in the compressor. The power developed by the turbine drives the compressor and accessories, like fuel, oil, and hydraulic pumps that are driven by the accessory gearbox.

Nozzle

[edit]

After the turbine, the gases expand through the exhaust nozzle producing a high velocity jet. In a convergent nozzle, the ducting narrows progressively to a throat. The nozzle pressure ratio on a turbojet is high enough at higher thrust settings to cause the nozzle to choke.

If, however, a convergent-divergent de Laval nozzle is fitted, the divergent (increasing flow area) section allows the gases to reach supersonic velocity within the divergent section. Additional thrust is generated by the higher resulting exhaust velocity.

Afterburner

[edit]

An afterburner or "reheat jetpipe" is a combustion chamber added to reheat the turbine exhaust gases. The fuel consumption is very high, typically four times that of the main engine. Afterburners are used almost exclusively on supersonic aircraft, most being military aircraft. Two supersonic airliners, Concorde and the Tu-144, also used afterburners as does Scaled Composites White Knight, a carrier aircraft for the experimental SpaceShipOne suborbital spacecraft, and Boom XB-1, an experimental supersonic aircraft.

Reheat was flight-trialled in 1944 on the W.2/700 engines in a Gloster Meteor I.[27]

Thrust

[edit]

Thrust augmentation

[edit]

Thrust was most commonly increased in turbojets with water/methanol injection or afterburning. Some engines used both methods.

Liquid injection was tested on the Power Jets W.1 in 1941 initially using ammonia before changing to water and then water-methanol. A system to trial the technique in the Gloster E.28/39 was devised but never fitted.[28]

Net thrust

[edit]

The net thrust of a turbojet is given by:[29][30]

where:

is the rate of flow of air through the engine
is the rate of flow of fuel entering the engine
is the speed of the jet (the exhaust plume) and is assumed to be less than sonic velocity
is the true airspeed of the aircraft
represents the nozzle gross thrust
represents the ram drag of the intake

If the speed of the jet is equal to sonic velocity the nozzle is said to be "choked". If the nozzle is choked, the pressure at the nozzle exit plane is greater than atmospheric pressure, and extra terms must be added to the above equation to account for the pressure thrust.[31]

The rate of flow of fuel entering the engine is very small compared with the rate of flow of air.[29] If the contribution of fuel to the nozzle gross thrust is ignored, the net thrust is:

The speed of the jet must exceed the true airspeed of the aircraft if there is to be a net forward thrust on the airframe. The speed can be calculated thermodynamically based on adiabatic expansion.[32]

Cycle improvements

[edit]

The operation of a turbojet is modelled approximately by the Brayton cycle.

The efficiency of a gas turbine is increased by raising the overall pressure ratio, requiring higher-temperature compressor materials, and raising the turbine entry temperature, requiring better turbine materials and/or improved vane/blade cooling. It is also increased by reducing the losses as the flow progresses from the intake to the propelling nozzle. These losses are quantified by compressor and turbine efficiencies and ducting pressure losses. When used in a turbojet application, where the output from the gas turbine is used in a propelling nozzle, raising the turbine temperature increases the jet velocity. At normal subsonic speeds this reduces the propulsive efficiency, giving an overall loss, as reflected by the higher fuel consumption, or SFC.[33] However, for supersonic aircraft this can be beneficial, and is part of the reason why the Concorde employed turbojets. Turbojet systems are complex systems therefore to secure optimal function of such system, there is a call for the newer models being developed to advance its control systems to implement the newest knowledge from the areas of automation, so increase its safety and effectiveness.[34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A turbojet is a type of internal combustion gas turbine engine that produces for by drawing in and compressing ambient air, mixing it with fuel for , and expelling the resulting high-velocity exhaust gases through a , thereby accelerating a mass of air rearward in accordance with Newton's third law of motion. The engine operates on the Brayton thermodynamic cycle, involving isentropic compression, constant-pressure heat addition, isentropic expansion, and constant-pressure heat rejection, which enables efficient conversion of from fuel into for . The core components of a turbojet include an air inlet for capturing and slowing incoming air, a multi-stage axial or centrifugal compressor to increase air pressure (typically to 3–12 times atmospheric pressure), a combustor or combustion chamber where fuel is injected and ignited to heat the compressed air, a turbine that extracts energy from the hot gases to drive the compressor via a connecting shaft, and a converging-diverging exhaust nozzle that accelerates the gases to supersonic speeds for maximum thrust. This continuous-flow process allows turbojets to generate high thrust at high speeds and altitudes, making them suitable for supersonic military aircraft, though they are less fuel-efficient at subsonic speeds compared to later derivatives like turbofans. The turbojet's development began in the early 1930s, with British officer patenting the first practical design in 1930, leading to the successful flight of the powered by his W.1 engine on May 15, 1941. Independently, German engineer developed a similar engine, achieving the world's first turbojet-powered aircraft flight with the on August 27, 1939, using his HeS 3b design. These parallel inventions during the and spurred rapid advancements, with turbojets powering landmark aircraft like the German Messerschmitt Me 262 (the first operational jet fighter in 1944) and British , fundamentally transforming by enabling speeds exceeding 500 mph (800 km/h). While turbojets offered simplicity, high power-to-weight ratios, and excellent performance at Mach numbers above 0.8, their drawbacks—such as high fuel consumption, excessive , and poor efficiency at low speeds—led to their gradual replacement by engines starting in the for most commercial and subsonic applications. Today, turbojets remain in use for specialized roles, including high-speed cruise missiles, target drones, and auxiliary power units, underscoring their enduring legacy in propulsion technology.

History and Development

Origins and Early Experiments

The concept of the turbojet engine originated in the late 1920s with British Royal Air Force officer , who, as a at RAF College Cranwell, envisioned a gas turbine engine for aircraft propulsion in his 1928 thesis on future developments. Whittle formalized this idea in a filed on January 16, 1930 (British Patent No. 347206), describing a design that , combusted it with fuel, and expelled the hot gases through a to drive the while generating . Despite initial skepticism from authorities, Whittle founded Ltd. in 1936 to pursue development, leading to the construction of his first experimental engine, the W.U., which achieved its initial run on April 12, 1937, though it suffered from unstable combustion and acceleration issues. Independently in , physicist conceived a similar turbojet principle in 1935 and secured a patent in 1936 for a reaction propulsion system using a gas turbine. Partnering with aircraft company, von Ohain developed the HeS 1 prototype, a hydrogen-fueled test engine that ran successfully in March 1937, demonstrating continuous operation for brief periods. This progress culminated in the refined HeS 3B engine, which produced approximately 1,100 lbf of thrust and powered the on the world's first turbojet-powered aircraft flight on August 27, 1939, lasting about 7 minutes. Early turbojet experiments encountered formidable technical hurdles, particularly material limitations that prevented components from enduring the extreme temperatures—exceeding 1,000°C—in the chambers and turbines, often resulting in failures and reduced life. Compressor inefficiencies further compounded issues, yielding low pressure ratios and specific fuel consumption rates that translated to unfavorable thrust-to-weight ratios, making the engines impractical for sustained flight without significant redesigns. Both Whittle and von Ohain relied on rudimentary alloys and cooling techniques, with von Ohain's early use of fuel serving as a to mitigate heat until kerosene-compatible systems matured. A pivotal experiment in Whittle's program was the testing of the W.1 engine in 1941, which delivered 850 lbf of static at 16,500 rpm after overcoming bearing and vibration problems during ground runs. Installed in the prototype, the W.1 enabled the aircraft's maiden jet-powered flight on May 15, 1941, covering 17 minutes and reaching 370 mph, validating the turbojet's potential despite ongoing reliability concerns. These pre-war prototypes laid the groundwork for wartime advancements, though initial efforts remained confined to experimental stages.

World War II Advancements

The advent of operational turbojet aircraft during World War II marked a pivotal shift in aviation technology, driven by the urgency of military needs. Germany led the way with the Messerschmitt Me 262, which became the first combat-ready turbojet-powered fighter in July 1944, achieving speeds up to 540 mph and entering service with Luftwaffe units for air superiority and bomber interception roles. This aircraft was propelled by two Junkers Jumo 004 engines, each delivering approximately 1,980 pounds of thrust, representing the world's first mass-produced axial-flow turbojet and enabling superior high-altitude performance over piston-engine contemporaries. The Jumo 004's eight-stage axial compressor provided higher compression ratios and efficiency compared to earlier centrifugal designs, allowing for a more streamlined engine that fit the Me 262's airframe while generating sustained thrust. In response to German advancements, Britain deployed the in July 1944 as the Royal Air Force's first operational jet fighter, primarily tasked with intercepting V-1 flying bombs over . Powered by two centrifugal-flow turbojets producing about 2,000 pounds of thrust each, the Meteor achieved speeds of around 410 mph and saw limited but significant combat use, downing several V-1s through tip-tactics without firing its guns, thus becoming the only Allied jet to engage in WWII operations. Its straight-wing design and twin-engine configuration offered reliable performance for defensive patrols, though it was not deployed to the European mainland to preserve technological secrecy. Meanwhile, the accelerated its turbojet program, resulting in the , which made its maiden flight in October 1942 as the nation's first jet-powered . Equipped with two engines—derived from British Whittle designs and each providing 1,600 pounds of thrust—the P-59 reached speeds of about 413 mph but was deemed underpowered for frontline combat, serving instead for pilot training and experimental evaluations by mid-1943. Wartime innovations extended beyond to engine production, where axial-flow compressors like the Jumo 004 demonstrated potential for greater efficiency through multi-stage air compression, though scaling output proved challenging due to Allied bombing and raw material shortages, limiting German production to around 6,000 units with engine lifespans often under 25 hours. These constraints highlighted the trade-offs between rapid deployment and durability in high-stress environments.

Post-War Evolution

Following , turbojet technology rapidly matured, transitioning from wartime prototypes to operational engines in both military and civilian applications. The marked a pivotal advancement in , achieving its first scheduled passenger flight on May 2, 1952, from to , powered by four turbojet engines that provided efficient high-altitude performance for transatlantic routes. This introduction of turbojets to civilian airliners reduced flight times dramatically, with the Comet capable of cruising at 460 mph (740 km/h) and altitudes up to 40,000 feet (12,000 m), ushering in the for commercial travel. In the United States, military developments emphasized power and reliability for strategic bombers. The , an axial-flow turbojet first run in January 1950, became a cornerstone of post-war , delivering up to 10,000 lbf (44 kN) of in early variants. Integrated into the , the J57 powered the bomber's prototype during its maiden flight on April 15, 1952, enabling intercontinental range and high-speed capabilities that defined deterrence. Later J57 models, such as the J57-P-1W, equipped production B-52s with eight engines for enhanced exceeding 13,000 lbf (58 kN) each with water injection, sustaining the turbojet's role in fleets through the . As efficiency demands grew, engineers began exploring higher bypass ratios in the , evolving turbojets into turbofans for better fuel economy and quieter operation, particularly in commercial designs like the 707. However, pure turbojets persisted in military applications requiring supersonic speeds and compact design, avoiding the added weight of fan stages. This endurance is exemplified by the , a supersonic all-weather interceptor that entered U.S. service in June 1959, propelled by a single J75-P-17 turbojet producing 24,500 lbf (109 kN) with . The F-106 achieved Mach 2.3 (1,525 mph or 2,455 km/h) in the , serving as the primary defender against Soviet bombers until the 1980s and highlighting turbojets' specialized high-performance niche.

Principles of Operation

Thermodynamic Cycle

The turbojet engine operates on the open , a that models the conversion of from into of the exhaust gases through a continuous . In the ideal cycle, air undergoes isentropic compression in the , raising its and without increase; this is followed by constant-pressure addition in the , where is burned to elevate the gas ; the hot gases then expand isentropically through the , producing work to drive the ; finally, constant-pressure rejection occurs as the exhaust gases are expelled to the atmosphere, completing the cycle. This cycle assumes reversible processes with no friction or heat losses, providing a foundational analysis for turbojet performance. Unlike reciprocating piston engines, which rely on intermittent combustion cycles such as the within discrete strokes, the in turbojets maintains a steady, continuous flow of , allowing for compact design and high-power density suitable for applications. The of the ideal is expressed as η=11r(γ1)/γ,\eta = 1 - \frac{1}{r^{(\gamma-1)/\gamma}}, where rr is the pressure ratio across the compressor and γ\gamma is the specific heat ratio of the gas (approximately 1.4 for air). This formula demonstrates that efficiency increases with higher compressor pressure ratios, as the cycle extracts more work from the expanded gases relative to the heat input. However, practical limits arise from the maximum allowable turbine inlet temperature, constrained by material properties to avoid turbine blade failure; early turbojets operated around 1000–1200 K, while advancements have pushed this to over 1700 K in modern designs, balancing efficiency gains against structural integrity.

Airflow and Compression Process

In a turbojet engine, airflow initiates at the inlet, where ambient air is captured and conditioned for entry into the compressor. For subsonic operations, typical of commercial and low-speed military aircraft, the inlet features a divergent duct with a rounded lip to smoothly decelerate incoming air via diffusion, maintaining subsonic flow velocities around Mach 0.4 to 0.5 at the compressor face while avoiding boundary layer separation. In supersonic flight, such as in high-performance fighters, the inlet employs variable geometry elements like ramps or spikes to produce a series of oblique shock waves that progressively slow the air to subsonic speeds, minimizing total pressure losses that would occur from a single strong normal shock; this shock management can recover up to 90% of the ram pressure while preventing excessive drag and heat buildup. Following the inlet, the subsonic airflow enters the multi-stage , consisting of alternating rows of rotating (rotor) and stationary () blades, often 10 to 16 stages, to achieve pressure ratios of 8:1 to 15:1 suitable for efficient . Each stage incrementally compresses the air by accelerating it through the rotor blades and diffusing it in the stator vanes, raising while converting ; however, progressive boundary layer thickening on blade surfaces and endwalls generates adverse pressure gradients that promote and three-dimensional secondary flows, potentially reducing stage efficiency by 5-10%. To manage these boundary layer effects, engineers employ tapered blade geometries, tip clearance optimization, and periodic air bleeding from inter-stage ducts to reinvigorate the flow and suppress , ensuring stable operation across the engine's speed range. In high-speed flight above Mach 0.8, the ram compression effect—arising from the of the aircraft's forward motion—provides an initial pressure rise in the , providing a ram total of approximately 7.8:1 (isentropic) at Mach 2, which can achieve up to 90% recovery in efficient supersonic inlets, which integrates seamlessly with the mechanical compression by offloading work from the stages and allowing variable vanes to adjust incidence angles for optimal performance. This synergy enhances overall engine efficiency, as the ram effect reduces the compressor's required from around 12:1 at low speeds to as low as 4:1 at supersonic cruise, while maintaining airflow stability. The core airflow mass flow rate, fundamental to thrust generation, is determined by the continuity equation m˙=ρAV\dot{m} = \rho A V, where ρ\rho is the inlet air density, AA is the engine's capture area, and VV is the flight velocity; within the core flow path, adjustments in duct area and velocity ensure choked conditions at the compressor throat for maximum throughput, typically 50-100 kg/s in turbojets. This equation underscores how higher flight speeds naturally boost m˙\dot{m} via increased ρ\rho from ram compression, directly scaling the engine's propulsive potential.

Major Components

Inlet and Diffuser

The and diffuser form the initial stages of a , responsible for capturing ambient air and decelerating it to provide a , high-pressure flow to the . The captures free-stream air, while the diffuser converts the of this high-velocity airflow into rise, minimizing losses to ensure efficient operation. This is critical for maintaining overall performance, as poor pressure recovery can reduce by up to 20-30% in high-speed applications. For subsonic flight regimes ( < 1), the pitot inlet is the most common design, featuring a straightforward, rounded lip that allows air to enter perpendicular to the engine axis with minimal diffusion. This type relies on a normal shock wave at the entrance to slow the flow, achieving near-isentropic compression with recoveries typically exceeding 0.98. In contrast, supersonic inlets (Mach > 1) often employ divergent channel designs, such as external compression ramps or internal divergent sections following oblique shocks, to decelerate the flow gradually and avoid excessive total losses from strong normal shocks. These configurations can include mixed-compression layouts, where initial external shocks compress the air before internal diffusion. Variable geometry inlets address the challenges of and varying speed operations, using movable ramps, cones, or bleed slots to adjust the inlet throat area and shock positioning dynamically. For instance, in aircraft like the , variable ramps optimize shock-on-lip conditions across Mach 0.9 to 2.0, improving pressure recovery by 5-10% compared to fixed designs during off-design conditions. This adaptability is essential for fighters transitioning between subsonic cruise and supersonic dash. The diffuser's primary role is to further slow the subsonic flow exiting the , converting to with minimal separation or flow distortion. Efficient diffusers maintain a of 7-10 degrees to prevent stall, achieving recoveries of 0.8-0.9 in well-designed systems. Excessive losses here can lead to , underscoring the need for smooth area transitions and anti-separation features. Design considerations for are integral to and diffuser performance, as the low-energy can cause separation and reduce pressure recovery by 10-15%. Techniques such as bleed slots or vortex generators remove or energize the , particularly in curved or diffusers, ensuring uniform flow to the face. Active flow control methods, like synthetic jets, have been explored to mitigate distortion in boundary-layer-ingesting designs. Preventing foreign object damage (FOD) is a key design priority, as ingested debris can erode blades and reduce engine life by factors of 2-5. lips are elevated and contoured to deflect debris, while auxiliary features like inlet screens or vortex dissipation systems use engine to create low-pressure vortices that sweep particles away from the core flow. These measures comply with standards, limiting FOD ingestion risks without significant drag penalties. The effectiveness of these components is quantified by the total pressure recovery, defined as πd=Pt2Pt1\pi_d = \frac{P_{t2}}{P_{t1}}, where Pt2P_{t2} is the total pressure at the diffuser exit and Pt1P_{t1} is the total pressure; values approaching 1 indicate ideal conversion with negligible losses. For the diffuser specifically, the static pressure recovery coefficient is Cp=Ps2Ps1Pt1Ps1C_p = \frac{P_{s2} - P_{s1}}{P_{t1} - P_{s1}}. This metric guides optimization, balancing aerodynamic efficiency against structural constraints.

Compressor Stages

The compressor in a turbojet engine is responsible for increasing the pressure of incoming air prior to combustion, typically through multi-stage designs that achieve the necessary compression for efficient engine operation. Two primary types are used: axial-flow and centrifugal-flow compressors. In axial-flow compressors, air passes parallel to the engine's axis of rotation, interacting with alternating rows of rotating blades (rotors) and stationary vanes (stators) that progressively accelerate and diffuse the flow to raise pressure. These designs dominate high-performance turbojets due to their higher aerodynamic efficiency, compact diameter, and ability to achieve substantial overall pressure ratios via multiple stages. In contrast, centrifugal-flow compressors impart energy by accelerating air radially outward from a rotating impeller, converting kinetic energy to pressure in a diffuser; while simpler and capable of higher pressure rise per stage (typically 4:1), they are less efficient for large-scale applications and produce bulkier engines, limiting their use in modern high-thrust turbojets. Axial compressors in turbojets often consist of 8 to 17 stages, with each stage contributing a modest pressure increase of about 1.1 to 1.25 for optimal efficiency. The overall compressor pressure ratio r\totalr_{\total}, defined as the total pressure at the compressor exit divided by the inlet total pressure, is the product of individual stage ratios: r\total=r\stager_{\total} = \prod r_{\stage} Typical overall values for turbojet compressors range from 4:1 to 10:1, as exemplified by the General Electric J85 engine's eight-stage axial compressor achieving 6.5:1. Higher ratios enhance thermodynamic efficiency but demand precise design to avoid instabilities. Stage matching is critical in multi-stage axial compressors to ensure uniform efficiency and stable operation across varying engine speeds and flight conditions. This involves aerodynamic coordination between consecutive rotor and rows, optimizing incidence angles, flow deflection, and factors to minimize losses while maintaining consistent pressure rise per stage. Poor matching can lead to mismatched flow velocities, reducing overall efficiency or inducing instabilities; designers use computational tools and testing to align stage characteristics for broad operational envelopes. Compressor performance is visualized through compressor maps, which plot nondimensional parameters such as corrected against pressure ratio for different rotational speeds, overlaid with efficiency islands. These maps delineate operational boundaries, including the surge line—marking the onset of system-wide flow reversal due to excessive backpressure—and stall lines, where local occurs on blade surfaces, potentially propagating as rotating stall. Surge and stall limit the compressor's stable range, necessitating design margins like variable stator vanes in advanced turbojets to extend usability.

Combustion Chamber

The combustion chamber, also known as the , is the section of a engine where fuel is injected into the compressed from the stages and ignited to produce high-temperature, high- gases that drive the . This process occurs at nearly constant pressure, adding to the while maintaining a stable under high-velocity conditions. Approximately 20-25% of the compressed enters the for , with the remainder used for cooling and dilution to protect downstream components. Turbojet combustors are designed in three primary configurations: can-type, annular, and can-annular. The can-type consists of multiple individual cylindrical chambers arranged in parallel around the axis, each with its own injector and flame tube, offering simplicity in and testing but requiring more space. Annular combustors feature a single, continuous ring-shaped chamber encircling the , which reduces weight, improves uniformity, and achieves higher , making them prevalent in modern designs. Can-annular designs combine elements of both, using multiple cans housed within an outer annular casing, which balances ease of maintenance with compact packaging and is commonly used in larger s. Fuel is introduced through injection systems, primarily pressure atomizers, which rely on high fuel pressure to break the liquid into fine droplets for efficient mixing with air. These atomizers operate by forcing fuel through small orifices, creating a spray cone that promotes rapid vaporization and combustion in the high-velocity airstream. Ignition is initiated by electrical systems, typically high-energy spark dischargers or glow plugs positioned near the fuel nozzles, which generate arcs or hot surfaces to light the fuel-air mixture during engine startup. Once established, the flame becomes self-sustaining due to continuous fuel supply and airflow, with igniters deactivating after a few seconds. Flame stability within the combustor is maintained by swirl vanes, which impart rotational motion to the incoming air, creating low-pressure recirculation zones that anchor the front against the high axial velocities. These vanes, often integrated upstream of the injectors, enhance mixing and prevent blowout by trapping hot products in vortex structures. The profile in the features peak values of 1500-2000 in the primary zone near the nozzles, where burns stoichiometrically with a small portion of air. To manage these extremes and achieve turbine inlet suitable for material limits (typically around 1200-1600 ), additional cooling air is injected through dilution holes in the liner, mixing with the hot gases to lower the overall . Combustion efficiency, denoted as ηcomb\eta_{comb}, quantifies the fraction of fuel's chemical energy converted to thermal energy in the airflow and is defined as: ηcomb=(actual heat releaseideal heat release)×100%\eta_{comb} = \left( \frac{\text{actual heat release}}{\text{ideal heat release}} \right) \times 100\% where actual heat release is measured from the temperature rise across the combustor, and ideal heat release assumes complete combustion based on fuel heating value. In turbojets, ηcomb\eta_{comb} typically exceeds 98%, reflecting near-complete fuel burnout due to optimized mixing and residence times.

Turbine Assembly

The turbine assembly in a features one or more axial flow stages, typically a single high-pressure stage or occasionally two stages, precisely matched to the compressor's power demands to ensure efficient energy extraction from the hot gases. These stages consist of stationary vanes that direct the gas flow onto rotating blades attached to a shaft connected to the , converting into mechanical work to sustain the 's operation. The prioritizes aerodynamic and structural under extreme conditions, with blade profiles optimized for the flow and pressure ratio of the . A fundamental aspect of the turbine assembly is the power balance, where the work output from the turbine exactly equals the work input required by the compressor, maintaining steady-state operation without external power sources. This relationship is expressed by the equation for ideal compressor work per unit mass wc=cpT01(rγ1γ1)w_c = c_p T_{01} \left( r^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}} - 1 \right), where cpc_p is the specific heat at constant pressure, T01T_{01} is the total temperature at the compressor inlet, rr is the compressor pressure ratio, and γ\gamma is the specific heat ratio; the turbine work matches this value based on the temperature drop across its stages. To withstand the high temperatures from the combustor, typically reaching turbine inlet temperatures (TIT) of up to 1644 K (2500°F) in early designs and higher in advanced systems, turbine blades incorporate sophisticated cooling techniques that prevent melting, oxidation, and creep deformation. Film cooling involves bleeding compressed air through small holes in the blade surface to create a thin protective layer of cooler air that insulates the metal from the hot gas path, reducing the effective gas temperature seen by the blade. Internal convection cooling circulates compressor bleed air through serpentine passages and impingement jets within the blade core, enhancing heat transfer via forced convection to maintain metal temperatures below critical thresholds. Additionally, ceramic thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), often yttria-stabilized zirconia applied over a metallic bond coat, provide an insulating layer that lowers surface heat flux by up to 200–300 K, further extending blade life by improving creep resistance—the ability to resist slow, time-dependent deformation under sustained high stress and temperature. These methods collectively allow TITs to approach material limits while ensuring the turbine's durability over thousands of operating hours.

Exhaust Nozzle

The exhaust in a serves to accelerate the high-temperature, high- exhaust gases exiting the assembly, converting their and into to generate propulsive . This component is critical for achieving efficient transfer, as the shapes the flow to maximize exhaust relative to the incoming . In typical designs, the receives exhaust from the at velocities around 300-400 m/s and total temperatures exceeding 1000 K, directing it rearward to produce net according to the basic equation. For subsonic turbojet operations, where exhaust Mach numbers remain below 1, a simple convergent is commonly employed, featuring a tapering duct that accelerates the flow to sonic conditions at the exit while minimizing weight and complexity. In contrast, supersonic turbojets utilize convergent-divergent (Laval) , which include a converging section to reach sonic velocity at the throat, followed by a diverging section that further expands and accelerates the flow to supersonic speeds (Mach >1), enabling higher thrust at elevated flight speeds. This design, first theorized by in the late and adapted for , ensures isentropic expansion when properly matched to ambient conditions, though mismatches can lead to shocks and efficiency losses. Variable-area nozzles enhance performance across varying operating conditions, such as differing altitudes or requirements, by adjusting the and exit areas to optimize expansion and maintain . These nozzles can incorporate mechanisms for , allowing deflection of the exhaust jet to improve maneuverability, or for altitude compensation, where area modulation counters decreasing to sustain levels during climb. Studies on turbojet configurations demonstrate that variable nozzles can augment by up to 10-15% through precise area control, particularly in high-pressure-ratio environments. The nozzle's contribution to overall depends on its , which accounts for non-ideal effects like and boundary layers (typically 0.95-0.99 in well-designed units), and the (A_e / A_t), which influences both exhaust and recovery at the exit. Higher expansion ratios increase exit but risk overexpansion at low altitudes, reducing net due to adverse forces; optimal ratios balance these for specific mission profiles. The ideal exit for isentropic expansion is given by: Ve=2CpTt(1(PePt)γ1γ)V_e = \sqrt{2 C_p T_t \left(1 - \left(\frac{P_e}{P_t}\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}\right)}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.