Hubbry Logo
Pay driverPay driverMain
Open search
Pay driver
Community hub
Pay driver
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pay driver
Pay driver
Pay driver
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A pay driver is a driver for a professional auto racing team who, instead of being paid by the owner of their car, drives for free and brings with them either personal sponsorship or personal or family funding to finance the team's operations. This may be done to gain on-track experience or to live the lifestyle of a driver in a particular series when one's talent or credentials do not merit a paying ride. Alternatively, said person is also called a ride buyer or a rich kid in the United States, a gentleman driver in sports car and GT racing and a privateer in Australia.

Pay drivers have been the norm in many of the feeder series of motorsport, particularly in Formula 2, Formula 3, NASCAR Xfinity Series, and Indy NXT. However, there have been many pay drivers in top level series like Formula One, the World Rally Championship,[1] Champ Car, IndyCar Series, and the NASCAR Cup Series.

Beyond these series, there are many auto racing competitions intended primarily or exclusively for self-funded amateurs who compete for fun, usually without serious aspirations of competing professionally. While the term "gentleman driver" is occasionally applied to racers in such series, this article focuses on the highest-profile professional auto racing categories.

Formula One

[edit]

Gentleman drivers and sponsored racers

[edit]

At one time F1 regulations regarding the changing of drivers during the course of a season were extremely liberal, which encouraged some teams to recruit a string of pay drivers to drive their cars, sometimes only for one or two races. In the 1970s, Frank Williams Racing Cars (the predecessor to Frank Williams and Patrick Head's highly successful Williams F1 team) were particularly prolific with regard to the number of drivers they would use in a season - ten drivers drove for the team in both 1975 and 1976. Pay drivers experienced a revival in the late 1980s and early 1990s, as many small constructors like Pacific, Forti, and Rial joined the grid and were desperate for funding.[2]

In general, pay drivers (such as Giovanni Lavaggi, Jean-Denis Délétraz, Nikita Mazepin, Ricardo Rosset, and Alex Yoong) are usually associated with poorer performances compared to those with paid drives.[3] As such, teams willing to accept pay drivers are often at the back of the grid and struggling financially. While a pay driver often brings an infusion of much needed funding, their terms often require share ownership and / or influence in the team's operations. A team that relies too heavily on pay drivers can enter a downwards spiral; a pay driver may scare off sponsors,[3] which makes the team more dependent on that pay driver. For example, after wealthy Brazilian driver Pedro Diniz left the Forti team for Ligier after the 1995 season, Forti withdrew from Formula One midway through 1996.[4]

The competence of pay drivers varies. Three-time Formula One world champion Niki Lauda grew up in a wealthy family. Against his parents' will, he was able to borrow money against his life insurance to secure drives in Formula Two and Formula One. His performances impressed Ferrari driver Clay Regazzoni, who persuaded Enzo Ferrari to pay off Lauda's debts.[5] More prosaically, Pedro Diniz managed to score some decent results compared to the other pay drivers of the time, scoring championship points in eight races over six years (two fifth-place finishes and six sixth-place finishes, at a time when only the top six drivers scored points; currently, the top 10 finishers score points, and Diniz had 26 top-10 finishes), when many other pay drivers did not score any points or even failed to qualify for races. It was said that Diniz was "competent enough that his presence in the sport was largely accepted."[6]

In recent years, there have been fewer traditional pay drivers on the grid. Instead, the "pay driver" tag has (at times) now been extended from family-funded drivers to drivers who have strong relationships with wealthy corporate sponsors. For example, Sauber allegedly received $30-35 million/year from Chinese advertisers once Chinese driver Zhou Guanyu signed with the team.[7] The lines in this space are somewhat blurred, as several sponsor-backed drivers have attained impressive results in Formula One, including race winners Sergio Perez, Robert Kubica, and Pastor Maldonado, who were backed by Telmex, Orlen, and PDVSA, respectively.[7][8][9][4] Claire Williams (whose Williams team signed a string of well-funded drivers in the 2010s, such as Kubica, Maldonado, Lance Stroll, and Sergey Sirotkin) publicly defended the practice, arguing that corporate sponsorship was a imperfect proxy for driver quality, as star drivers like Fernando Alonso also bring sponsors with them wherever they go.[10] However, after her retirement, she admitted that "unfortunately, ... I had to sell race seats" to keep the team afloat.[11]

Paying drivers, but not "pay drivers"

[edit]

Not all drivers who pay for their seats are stigmatized as "pay drivers." The most common example is the academy driver, who typically signs with an established auto manufacturer or top-level racing team. Because F1 teams are limited to two drivers per race, a championship contender will often sign two established drivers, in which case it will need to pay other teams to make room for its junior drivers. In recent years, Mercedes placed George Russell with its engine customer Williams,[12][13] and Ferrari placed Charles Leclerc and Antonio Giovinazzi with Alfa Romeo-Sauber.[14]

Most famously, in 1991, Mercedes (which did not enter Formula One until the debut of Sauber-Mercedes in 1993) paid the Jordan team $150,000 to give its junior driver Michael Schumacher his F1 debut.[15][4] Schumacher never drove for Jordan again, as Mercedes was unable to strike a season-long deal with Jordan and placed Schumacher with Benetton instead. Impressed by Schumacher's maiden performance, Benetton agreed to sign him for free, wiping out his "pay driver" status after just one race.[16]

In addition, several drivers who paid for rides in the comparatively affordable junior formulae were able to strike out on their own after making it to Formula One. Three-time champion Ayrton Senna received financial assistance from his wealthy father during his junior career in Britain,[17] and 1992 champion Nigel Mansell quit his engineering job and mortgaged his house to drive professionally.[18]

Decline of the traditional pay driver

[edit]

Although pay drivers still exist in Formula One, they are less common than they used to be for a number of reasons:

  1. There are fewer teams in Formula One than in the early 1990s, leaving fewer opportunities for all drivers, including pay drivers.[6]
  2. In 2016, the FIA introduced the FIA Super License, which requires drivers to attain certain performance benchmarks in lower formulae or other competitions (e.g. IndyCar, Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters) before racing in Formula One.[19] As a result, every driver in Formula One, pay driver or not, has had a relatively successful career before Formula One. For example, Nicholas Latifi only made it to Formula One after finishing second in the 2019 Formula Two season (albeit after four and a half seasons in F2 and its equivalents);[20] the top three finishers in Formula Two automatically earn enough Super License points to be promoted to Formula One.[21]
  3. In general, Formula One teams are more financially stable than they were in the 1990s or 2000s, meaning that fewer teams need to hire pay drivers to pay the bills.[22] The Williams team was in chronic financial distress for much of the 2010s until the Williams family sold the team to a private equity investor.[4]
  4. The disparity in performance bonuses for placing sixth, seventh, etc. in the Constructors' Championship incentivizes teams to compete for every additional point. In 2023, Williams team principal James Vowles said that while a pay driver could "bring in a few million," an experienced driver could make the team even more money.[22]
  5. Today, the expenses of running a Formula One team are so great that few drivers can finance their F1 careers with family money.[23] A notable exception is Lance Stroll, who debuted with Williams after allegedly receiving $80 million in financial backing from his father, including junior formulae expenses.[24] Even so, Stroll had a fairly strong resume for a pay driver, having beaten the now-current F1 driver George Russell for the 2016 FIA Formula 3 European Championship title. In addition, since joining Formula One, he has scored three F1 podiums as of September 2025. Nonetheless, he was dogged by accusations that his father's financial backing had given him an unfair advantage in his junior career.[24] By comparison, it would take Russell another two years to make it to Formula One.

Although the standard for pay drivers has improved following the introduction of the Super License, hiring a pay driver may still be a risky proposition, as the margin between a midfield car and a backmarker can be quite thin in today's Formula One.[22] During the 2018 season, Williams received £65 million in funding in exchange for allocating its two seats to Lance Stroll and Sergey Sirotkin,[18] but finished last in the standings. Nonetheless, pay drivers (whether sponsored or family-backed) remain a potential alternative for cash-strapped teams. According to Kevin Magnussen, in 2020, Williams considered replacing George Russell with Magnussen if the Dane could find enough sponsors, even though Russell had consistently outperformed the family-backed Nicholas Latifi during the 2020 season.[25]

The Super Licence system has occasionally been criticized for slowing promising young talents' path to Formula One. Four-time world champion Max Verstappen, who went directly from European Formula Three to Formula One, opined that the Super License "was introduced because of me, of course," and encouraged the FIA to relax its rules for the most talented young drivers.[26] Verstappen added that pay drivers can still make it to Formula One despite the Super License system.[26] (Because a driver has three years to obtain the 40 required Super License points, drivers can qualify for Formula One without racing in Formula Two.[27])

In addition, while the Super License prevents truly incompetent drivers from making it to Formula One, the high cost of racing in junior formulae (estimated at €2-3 million/year[18]) makes it difficult for a junior driver without family resources or outside backing to qualify for a Super License. Seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton expressed concern that "There are only wealthy kids coming through [today]. There are not kids from working-class families."[18]

Sports car racing

[edit]

By contrast to F1, "gentlemen drivers" are an integral and accepted feature of sports car racing, particularly in lower categories not competing for outright wins at races like the 24 Hours of Le Mans.[28]

In some sports car categories, drivers are categorised according to their age and previous successes in professional motorsport, and teams are required to run at least one driver over 30 who has not had significant success in the top professional series.[28] These drivers will generally provide most or all of the team's funding.[28]

Other series

[edit]

Some sanctioning bodies will offer champions of lower tier series a well-funded ride for the next tier. The Road to Indy programme from INDYCAR awards a ride fully funded by The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (was funded by Mazda originally, then Cooper Tire, and now Goodyear) for a series champion in the next tier. A $150,000 and tires package is available to a shootout winner among an invited group young American and foreign drivers. A driver who wins the U.S. F2000 National Championship will win $300,000 to be used for a "pay ride" in the Pro Mazda Championship, and two sets of tires per race. Pro Mazda winners will be paid for a ride in Indy Lights, and the Indy Lights champion earns funding to compete in at least three IndyCar Series races, including the Indianapolis 500.

Pay drivers are also common in stock car racing and are very prevalent in development series such as the Xfinity Series and ARCA Racing Series. There are also several pay drivers competing at the Cup level including Matt Tifft and Paul Menard, the son of home improvement tycoon John. Menard had some success with a victory at the Brickyard 400 in 2011 and a Chase for the Sprint Cup appearance in 2015, while medical issues halted Tifft's racing career in 2019. Pay drivers were controversial in stock car racing if payments failed; an example would be in 2015, when Kyle Busch's Camping World Truck Series team, Kyle Busch Motorsports, sued former driver Justin Boston, a pay driver, and the sponsor for missed payments.[29]

There has also been a long history of pay drivers in Australian touring car racing. Historically referred to as "privateers", these people usually consisted of do-it-yourself businessmen looking to promote their companies through racing – the concept peaking in the late 1990s with the birth of the V8 Supercars and the creation of a Privateers Cup. This series eventually branched off and became the Konica Lites Series (now the Super2 Series), with the construct disappearing as the racing became more expensive and professionalised.[30]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pay driver

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A pay driver is a professional racing driver, most commonly in , who obtains a competitive by providing substantial financial support to the team—typically through personal funds, family backing, or sponsorship deals—rather than receiving a from the team itself. This model arose from the sport's escalating costs, where even entry fees alone can reach $7 million for top teams and hundreds of millions overall for operations, compelling smaller outfits to seek alternative revenue to field cars and remain viable. The term encompasses a spectrum of cases, from drivers like Niki Lauda, who secured his 1971 Formula One entry via a bank loan but leveraged innate skill to claim three drivers' championships and 25 victories, to others criticized for prioritizing funding over proven ability. Examples include Pastor Maldonado, whose £30 million from Venezuelan state oil sponsor PDVSA enabled his Williams drives from 2011–2013 and yielded a lone win at the 2012 Spanish Grand Prix amid otherwise modest results, and Nikita Mazepin, whose 2021 Haas stint—backed by his father's fertilizer company Uralkali—featured lap times consistently slower than teammate Mick Schumacher, amplifying perceptions of talent deficits. Pay drivers provoke debate over , as their prevalence in cash-strapped backmarker teams can displace higher-performing talents, potentially eroding racing quality at the field's tail through reduced on-track competitiveness and development feedback; yet, they have historically sustained grid participation, preventing insolvencies like that of in 1996 after losing funder . Regulatory efforts, including the FIA's 40-point superlicence threshold from junior formulae and the 2021 budget cap, have curbed extreme instances by enforcing minimum competency, with team principals asserting the traditional model is fading amid Formula One's revenue surge.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition and Distinctions

A pay driver in is a driver who obtains a competitive seat primarily through injecting substantial personal funds or sponsorship revenue into the team, rather than being compensated by the team or selected solely on demonstrated sporting merit. This arrangement typically offsets the driver's absence of —often driving for free or effectively paying the team—while covering portions of operational expenses in capital-intensive series. In , such funding can range from $20 million to $30 million annually to secure a position, exceeding typical team outlays for non-top-tier drivers. This differs from a , historically a wealthy participant in pre-professional or enthusiast who self-funds their own or entry for personal enjoyment, without the structured financial dependency on team economics seen in pay driver scenarios. drivers, prevalent in early motorsport eras like pre-1960s grand prix or contemporary events, often lack the performance imperatives of pro contracts and may prioritize leisure over competitive funding thresholds. Pay drivers, by contrast, operate within merit-based frameworks where their financial contributions must surpass incidental endorsements attached to pure talent drivers, who secure seats via results despite modest backing. The phenomenon stems from motorsport's inherent capital demands, where teams face annual expenditures exceeding $100 million even under regulatory cost caps—such as the $135 million limit for aerodynamic and performance-related spending—necessitating external revenue streams beyond and core sponsorships to sustain operations and development. Smaller or midfield teams, in particular, rely on driver-linked funding to bridge gaps, as total budgets including exemptions can approach $350 million when factoring in , , and . This economic reality underscores pay drivers as a pragmatic response to entry barriers, where talent alone insufficiently guarantees viability without fiscal support.

Economic Motivations and Sponsorship Models

Pay drivers emerge as a pragmatic financial in motorsports like , where operational costs have escalated dramatically, compelling teams—particularly those at the rear of the grid—to seek drivers who contribute substantial to offset expenses and ensure participation. Pre-2021 cost cap budgets for top teams exceeded $400 million annually by 2019, while midfield and backmarker outfits operated on far leaner margins, often below $200 million, with historical data indicating a roughly 1,000% increase in overall team spending from the to the . This financial strain incentivizes teams to allocate seats to drivers whose sponsorship inflows can represent a significant portion of , sometimes up to one-third alongside owner , enabling survival without resorting to . Sponsorship models typically involve direct infusions from corporate or state entities tied to the driver's or affiliations, integrating seamlessly into team budgets as placements and performance clauses. For instance, Venezuelan state-owned oil company channeled tens of millions annually—estimates ranging from $25 million to $45 million—into Williams and later Lotus during Maldonado's tenure in the 2010s, covering costs in exchange for branding visibility. Such arrangements prioritize liquidity for development and over pure talent acquisition, reflecting a causal link between sponsor and grid presence amid volatile oil revenues. Alternative models leverage personal or familial wealth, where investors acquire stakes in struggling teams to secure seats for sponsored drivers. Lawrence Stroll, a Canadian billionaire, spearheaded a consortium that purchased Force India's assets for £90 million ($117 million) in October 2018, rebranding it as Racing Point and facilitating his son Lance Stroll's continued participation through subsequent investments into Aston Martin. These equity-based approaches provide not only seat funding but also long-term capital for upgrades, distinguishing them from transient sponsorships by aligning driver tenure with ownership stability. Regulatory mechanisms like the FIA superlicence, revamped in to require 40 points accumulated from junior series results over three years plus a minimum age of 18, impose a baseline merit threshold that tempers unfettered pay-driver proliferation. This system allocates points proportionally to championship finishes—e.g., full points for Formula 2 winners—filtering entrants while preserving teams' latitude to select funded drivers meeting the criteria, thus balancing economic imperatives with competitive integrity.

Historical Evolution

Early Motorsports and Gentleman Drivers

In the 1920s, endurance races such as the , inaugurated in 1923, relied heavily on wealthy private entrants known as gentleman drivers, who self-funded their participation using personal fortunes rather than team salaries. These amateurs, often industrial heirs or aristocrats, purchased and maintained factory-prepared cars like Bentleys, enabling them to compete without compensating professional teams. The , a notable group including , an oil magnate, epitomized this era by securing four consecutive Le Mans victories from 1927 to 1930 through self-sponsored efforts that blended leisure with competition. Similarly, the , a 1,000-mile Italian road race starting in 1927, drew affluent privateers who funded and other entries, with successes like Giuseppe Campari's 1928 win highlighting how personal wealth facilitated access to high-stakes events amid minimal regulatory oversight. This model persisted into the post-World War II period, where low financial and technical barriers—exemplified by Formula One cars costing $10,000 to $20,000 in the early 1950s, equivalent to roughly $130,000 to $260,000 in 2025 dollars—allowed gentleman drivers to enter grand prix racing by self-financing seats. Peter Whitehead, a British wool merchant and farmer of independent means, exemplified this by purchasing the first private Ferrari 125 Formula One car in 1949, which he raced through the 1950 World Championship inception without team payment, achieving podiums like third at the 1950 French Grand Prix. Rob Walker, heir to the Johnnie Walker distillery fortune, further illustrated the trend by establishing a privateer team in 1953, funding Cooper and later Cooper-Climax entries for drivers including Stirling Moss, thereby sustaining competition through inherited wealth rather than commercial sponsorship. The era's lax regulations, which prioritized mechanical compliance over driver qualifications, enabled wealth to serve as a primary gateway to participation, spurring through varied private investments in and engines but exposing skill disparities among entrants. This dynamic contributed to elevated risks, as evidenced by the ' high fatality rates in grand prix events—often exceeding one death per season in alone—stemming from rudimentary safety features like open cockpits and unpadded , which amplified consequences of inexperienced handling at speeds over 150 mph. Pre-F1 endurance racing in the and similarly recorded frequent fatalities, with events like seeing multiple driver deaths annually due to unbarriered circuits and tire failures, underscoring how unregulated access via affluence outpaced safety advancements.

Rise in Professional Era Formula One

As transitioned into a more professional and commercialized sport from the late 1960s onward, escalating development costs for engines, , and created significant financial pressures on independent, non-factory-backed teams. Sponsorship liveries, pioneered by entries in 1968, marked the shift toward commercial models, allowing teams to offset expenses previously borne solely by constructors or entrants. These structural changes amplified the role of drivers who brought personal or affiliated sponsorship, enabling smaller outfits to compete amid annual technology advancements that outpaced revenue from or basic commercial deals. Throughout the and , teams increasingly depended on such driver-contributed funds to navigate debt and operational shortfalls, as engine and component costs rose sharply with innovations like ground-effect aerodynamics and electronic aids. By 1985, mid-field team budgets had climbed to between $15 million and $30 million per season, a figure driven by the need for specialized R&D that independent squads could not fund through traditional means alone. This reliance became acute for outfits lacking deep-pocketed backers, where driver sponsorships covered critical gaps in engine leasing, travel, and personnel, sustaining participation without compromising the sport's technical evolution. The turbocharged era of the exacerbated cost inflation, with unrestricted boost pressures fueling power outputs exceeding 1,000 horsepower but also ballooning expenses for reliable components and testing, culminating in the FIA's 1989 ban on to curb escalation. Independent teams like Pacific Grand Prix and exemplified survival strategies, depending almost entirely on entrant funds from drivers to enter and operate, as general sponsorship proved insufficient against multimillion-dollar outlays. Such dynamics peaked in the late and early , when viability hinged on these inflows, countering claims of competitive dilution by enabling grid expansions to 26 cars at times—accommodating more entrants and races without reducing overall field quality, as barriers to pure talent-based entry rose in tandem with professionalization.

Pay Drivers in Formula One

Historical Prominent Cases (1950s-1990s)

In the 1970s, exemplified a pay driver who leveraged personal funding to enter , securing a seat with in 1971 for approximately £20,000 obtained via a bank loan against his policy, which facilitated his rapid promotion to the team's program later that year. Despite modest results in his debut season—qualifying poorly and scoring no points—Lauda's underlying talent propelled him to subsequent drives with BRM in 1972 and Ferrari from 1974, where he clinched world championships in 1975 and 1977, demonstrating how financial entry could catalyze proven skill rather than guarantee mediocrity. During the 1980s, drivers like highlighted the prevalence of sponsorship-dependent entries in underfunded teams, as Salazar brought substantial backing from Chilean oil company Copec to outfits such as ATS and RAM, enabling 32 starts from 1981 to 1983 but yielding zero championship points and a best finish of ninth at the 1982 South African Grand Prix. Similarly, entered with in 1982 and later Brabham and Benetton, supported by Italian sponsorship that offset team costs, though his career tally stood at just three points from 71 starts, including a at the marred by subsequent absences and inconsistent results. These cases underscored a pattern where pay drivers sustained backmarker operations amid rising costs, often prioritizing funding over outright pace. By the 1990s, pay drivers remained fixtures in minnow teams like Pacific amid a field increasingly bolstered by manufacturer involvement from and others, yet privateer squads still relied on such funding; Italian nobleman Giovanni Lavaggi self-financed partial seasons with Pacific in 1995 and in 1996, contesting eight Grands Prix without scoring points or reliably qualifying within the , exemplifying the era's desperation for capital in non-competitive machinery. Philippe Alliot, driving for and others from 1984 to 1994 with French sponsorship support, accumulated seven points across 116 starts—primarily from opportunistic finishes like sixth places in 1989 and 1990—but faced criticism for performance lagging behind funded expectations in midfield cars. This period marked a transitional decline in overt pay-driver reliance for survival, as grid expansion to 26 cars amplified competition but exposed the financial vulnerabilities of tail-end entrants. In the early 2000s and 2010s, pay drivers secured Formula One seats through substantial sponsorship packages, often aiding cash-strapped midfield teams. Pastor Maldonado joined Williams for the 2012 season with backing from Venezuela's state-owned PDVSA, which invoiced the team approximately $46 million for his participation. This funding supported Williams amid financial constraints, enabling Maldonado to deliver the team's only victory that year at the Spanish Grand Prix on May 13, 2012. Similarly, Adrian Sutil's 2013 return to Force India (now rebranded) included €8 million in sponsorship from his backers, bolstering the team's budget for the season. The model evolved in the late with family-backed investments becoming prominent. Lance Stroll debuted with Williams in 2017 and transitioned to the rebranded Racing Point (later from 2021), facilitated by his father Lawrence Stroll's $117 million acquisition of the team in 2018 to rescue it from administration. Sergio Pérez has sustained a career spanning multiple teams via longstanding sponsorship from Mexican billionaire , contributing over $130 million to since his 2021 arrival. entered as China's first full-time F1 driver with (later Sauber) in 2022, leveraging Chinese market sponsors to provide essential revenue amid the team's commercial needs. The 2021 introduction of a $145 million cost cap, excluding driver salaries and sponsorship revenues, diminished overt cash-for-seat deals but sustained the underlying dynamic through permissible sponsorship inflows. Cases like Logan Sargeant's 2023 Williams promotion involved supplementary backing to offset team deficits, though tied to junior series performance. By 2024, Zhou's sponsorship at Sauber effectively subsidized teammate Valtteri Bottas's £3.9 million salary, illustrating persistence in backmarker squads despite regulatory shifts. Into 2024-2025, funding debates intensified around Sauber's transition for 2026, with both Bottas and Zhou replaced for 2025 amid sponsor evaluations; Zhou's Chinese backers subsequently drew interest from teams like . The FIA's super license mandate of 40 points from feeder formulas has filtered unqualified entrants, limiting extremes while allowing 1-2 sponsorship-reliant seats annually in resource-limited teams, as ongoing examples refute claims of the model's obsolescence.

Pay Drivers in Other Series

Sports Car and Endurance Racing

In sports car and endurance racing, particularly within the (WEC) and events like the , pay drivers—often termed "gentleman drivers"—traditionally occupy GT classes such as LMGT3 (evolving from prior Am and GT3 formats). These participants, typically affluent amateurs or semi-professionals, self-fund seats to join or customer teams, blending with professionals in Pro-Am lineups that prioritize endurance reliability, strategic driving, and mechanical durability over Formula 1's emphasis on peak qualifying speed. The FIA's driver categorisation system underpins this model, rating competitors as (elite professionals), , , or based on career results, age under 40 thresholds, and evaluated performance; status, assigned to many drivers, explicitly accommodates those with limited top-tier experience but significant capacity. Regulations in LMGT3 require at least one -rated driver per car to ensure amateur inclusion, enabling teams to offset costs like €120,000 series entry fees and €483,000 homologated car price caps (excluding engines and electronics). This structure sustains grid diversity, as drivers commonly finance programs in LMP2 and GT Am classes, where their contributions cover operational expenses without dominating professional-only hypercar or fields. Notable cases include 2010s privateer efforts in Am, where executives funded multimillion-euro campaigns—estimated at $1-5 million per season—for full WEC participation, yielding class podiums and wins through combined pro-amateur efforts. In the 2020s, Ferrari customer teams like have integrated similar funded entrants in GT3 machinery, such as the 296 GTB, supporting broader field depth amid rising logistics; for instance, gentleman drivers in these setups have secured LMGT3 class victories at , demonstrating viability in 4-6 hour stints where consistency trumps raw pace. Funding scales from £30,000-£100,000 per race weekend for GT3 events, including British GT analogs, making it accessible relative to F1 seat prices exceeding $10 million annually. Empirically, this pay model bolsters participation, with Pro-Am GT entries forming the majority of non-prototype classes at —open to both amateurs and pros—enhancing overall competitiveness; data from recent editions indicate substantial reliance on funded drivers for class wins, as their financial input mitigates high entry barriers like ' preparatory fees while lower GT car budgets ($5-10 million seasonal) allow diverse talent integration absent in F1's merit-exclusive top tiers. Critics note potential safety risks from skill gaps in traffic-heavy 24-hour races, yet successes, such as gentleman-led podiums in formats, underscore causal benefits: funding diversifies fields, sustains viability, and aligns with the sport's historical ethos dating to early eras.

Open-Wheel Series Beyond F1

In open-wheel racing series outside , such as the and its antecedent /Champ Car, pay drivers have been instrumental in enabling smaller teams to field competitive entries amid tighter budgets and less international sponsorship allure compared to . The 1996 schism between and the Indy Racing League (IRL) imposed severe financial strains on both entities, compelling teams to seek supplemental funding from drivers' personal backers to maintain operations and grid presence during a period of divided resources and reduced overall revenue. This influx of private capital was particularly vital for teams navigating the post-split era, where declining television deals and fragmented fan bases heightened the need for self-funded participants to avoid contraction. Distinct from Formula One's global scale, these series feature shorter calendars—typically 16-18 events in modern versus Formula One's 24-plus—which lowers baseline operational costs but still demands significant outlays for oval-specific testing and development, often covered by driver-sourced sponsorships. Smaller outfits, lacking the deep pockets of factory-backed programs like or , routinely allocate seats to drivers who bring substantial personal or family-linked funding, thereby diversifying the field and forestalling monopolization by elite sponsors. For example, Racing, a perennial underdog team, has historically relied on such arrangements for rookies; in 2022, Tatiana secured her No. 11 entry through ROKiT sponsorship, expanding the team to three cars despite her limited prior experience. Similarly, Benjamin Pedersen's 2023 rookie campaign with Foyt was underpinned by Sexton Properties as primary backer, illustrating how targeted funding sustains participation in high-stakes events like the 500. This model fosters competitive depth by allowing mid-tier and independent teams to compete without total dependence on series-level purses or manufacturer support, though it underscores the causal link between financial viability and on-track access in a series where annual team budgets range from $10-15 million per car. Three-time victor emphasized the performance threshold for legitimacy, stating that elevating from pay driver to paid status hinges on excelling in practice, qualifying, and race leadership to attract team and sponsor investment. While criticized for potentially prioritizing wallets over wheels, the practice has empirically prevented field shrinkage, as evidenced by consistent 30-plus car grids at the Indy 500, and enabled occasional breakthroughs by funded talents who adapt to the series' unique demands like high-speed drafting on ovals.

Junior and Karting Formulas

In karting, the foundational level of motorsport progression, aspiring drivers often secure participation through family-funded sponsorships due to the substantial costs involved, which can exceed $100,000 annually for competitive international campaigns including equipment, travel, and entry fees to events like the CIK-FIA World Championships. For instance, received early backing from his father, former driver , who purchased his initial baby kart at age four and supported his entry into Dutch and Belgian national series by age seven, enabling consistent racing before talent alone attracted manufacturer interest. This financial injection is causal to sustained exposure, as without it, many promising drivers exit early; empirical data from karting federations indicate that only a fraction advance to single-seaters, with family correlating to higher progression rates in talent-scarce environments. Transitioning to feeder formulas such as FIA Formula 3 and Formula 2, seat acquisition frequently hinges on drivers bringing personal or familial funding to teams, with costs for competitive outfits like or ranging from €800,000 to €2 million per season in the 2020s, covering chassis, engines, and logistics. New Zealand's , a member, exemplified this dynamic in Formula 2, where despite program support, his family sold their home to cover remaining expenses like travel and coaching, supplemented by grants such as the $100,000 from the Youth Driver Academy. In contrast, independent drivers without such backing face barriers, as teams prioritize revenue-generating seats amid fixed budgets, though manufacturer academies like Red Bull's mitigate this for select talents post-initial results. Despite funding's role in access, merit acts as a filter through the system, requiring accumulation of at least 40 points from junior series results—such as 25 points from Formula 2 finishes or equivalent—for eligibility, ensuring only consistent performers advance. High attrition underscores this: since Formula 2's 2017 inception, only 21 of roughly 400 participants have progressed to starts, with recent champions like and struggling for seats absent exceptional results or additional funding. Thus, while pay enables scouting in volume, causal progression demands empirical performance, as evidenced by the FIA's points-based grading prioritizing podiums and championships over mere participation.

Economic Role and Competitive Dynamics

Benefits to Teams and Sport Sustainability

Pay drivers provide essential financial injections to lower- and midfield-tier Formula 1 teams, often covering 20-50% of annual budgets in resource-constrained outfits where and commercial revenues fall short of operational demands. For instance, in , Pastor Maldonado's sponsorship from contributed approximately $46 million to Williams, enabling the team to sustain development and operations amid a total budget estimated at around $120-150 million during that era. Such inflows have historically averted , contrasting with the when underfunded entrants like Andrea Moda, Pacific, and Simtek collapsed mid-season due to insufficient capital, leading to frequent team exits and reduced grid participation. Even under the post-2021 cost cap, which limits performance-related spending to $135 million (excluding driver salaries and ), pay driver sponsorship remains vital for non-capped expenses like , facilities, and third-party fees, preserving viability without inflating on-track disparities. This financial realism sustains midfield diversity against manufacturer dominance, as evidenced by stable 20-car grids since the early 2010s, which correlate with higher viewership and broadcast revenues exceeding $1 billion annually distributed via the . By bolstering entry barriers through capital rather than talent alone, pay drivers facilitate broader competitive fields, with historical peaks like 26-car grids in the pre-1990s era tied to eras of accessible funding, underscoring motorsport's dependence on hybrid merit-capital models for long-term ecosystem health. Without such mechanisms, chronic underfunding would erode grid fullness, diminishing spectacle and economic multipliers from sustained participation.

Criticisms Regarding Performance and Safety

Critics have pointed to empirical performance data showing pay drivers often lag behind merit-based counterparts, with lower average points accumulation and qualifying results. For instance, , who secured a Williams seat partly through Venezuelan state funding exceeding $50 million annually in the early , amassed just 75 points across 96 Grands Prix from 2011 to 2015, averaging 0.78 points per race—far below the midfield norm of around 20-30 points for consistent performers in similar machinery. His sole victory at the stood as an outlier amid seasons of zero points, such as 2013 and 2015, highlighting inconsistent pace rather than sustained competitiveness. Similar patterns appear in other funded entrants, where FIA superlicence thresholds have occasionally been met via financial backing over dominant junior results, correlating with below-par lap times and qualifying averages in backmarker teams. On safety grounds, pay drivers' relative inexperience has been linked to elevated crash frequencies, exacerbating risks in high-speed environments. Maldonado's tenure exemplifies this, with 32 did-not-finishes (DNFs) in 95 starts, predominantly from collisions, earning him a reputation for erratic incidents that strained team repairs and marshals—such as the crash into a stationary . Broader analyses of data indicate higher non-mechanical DNF rates (often crashes) among less-seasoned or funded compared to established talents, with factors like unfamiliarity with car limits under race pressure contributing causally, independent of equipment parity. While overall F1 fatality risks have declined—bolstered by the 2018 Halo device's estimated 17% survival boost in head impacts—persistent backmarker crashes in that era underscore how skill deficits amplify collision probabilities before such mitigations fully offset them. Team resource allocation suffers when pairing a high-skill lead driver with a pay counterpart, as and setup data from the latter yield suboptimal insights for car evolution. In mismatched lineups, like Williams' duo of Maldonado and a more capable teammate, development engineers must reconcile divergent feedback, diluting aerodynamic and refinements that favor the stronger driver's inputs—evident in stalled progress for underfunded squads reliant on sponsorship influx. This inefficiency, quantified in performance modeling as reduced driver-pair impacting up to 7% of overall team output variance, underscores merit dilution without universal application to all cases.

Controversies and Debates

Meritocracy vs. Financial Realism

The debate surrounding pay drivers in Formula 1 centers on the tension between selecting competitors based on demonstrated skill and the economic imperative of securing funding to maintain competitive grids amid escalating operational costs. Proponents of strict argue that driver seats should reflect superior performance in junior categories, untainted by financial influence, yet this ideal overlooks the causal link between capital investment and access to those very proving grounds. In practice, substantial funding often enables sustained participation in high-cost series like Formula 3 and Formula 2, where seat acquisition correlates more closely with sponsorship portfolios than isolated talent displays, perpetuating a cycle where money facilitates the metrics of merit. The introduction of the system in 2016, requiring drivers to accumulate at least 40 points over three years from specified junior championships and meet a minimum age of 18, aimed to impose performance thresholds and curb unqualified entries. However, this mechanism has not eradicated financial influence, as affluent-backed drivers can afford the multimillion-dollar budgets needed for full-season junior campaigns, effectively bypassing purer talent pipelines for less-funded prospects. Empirical observations from driver market analyses reveal that a of grid occupants rely on personal or familial sponsorship to bridge the gap from lower formulas to F1, with teams prioritizing fiscal viability over absolute performance parity in midfield and rear positions. This undermines claims of a level playing field, as economic data links team survival to diversified revenue streams, including driver contributions, rather than lottery-like talent selection. Financial realism posits that pay drivers are indispensable for sport sustainability in a capital-intensive environment where annual team expenditures range from $150 million for backmarkers to over $400 million for frontrunners, excluding reallocations. Absent such funding, historical precedents demonstrate grid contraction: pre-1980s fields frequently hovered below 25 cars due to privateer teams' insolvency without sponsor infusions, contrasting with fuller 26-car lineups sustained by era-specific pay arrangements. Mainstream critiques romanticizing egalitarian access—often amplified in media narratives favoring "fairness" over market dynamics—ignore these causal realities, as smaller grids erode and , mirroring broader capitalist structures where investment precedes opportunity rather than vice versa. In recent years, some team principals asserted in 2023 that surging commercial revenues from global broadcasting and events had rendered the traditional pay driver model obsolete, predicting a shift toward performance-driven selections. Yet, persistence through 2025, exemplified by retained drivers like at and earlier cases such as at Sauber, underscores ongoing dependence, particularly for cost-capped independents facing deficits despite FIA allocations. Advocates of meritocratic purity, including those in academia and progressive outlets, frequently decry this as inequitable while sidelining verifiable cost structures—teams must cover development, , and personnel exceeding $200 million baseline—highlighting a toward ideological equity over empirical team economics.

Notable Successes Countering Criticisms

exemplifies a pay driver whose financial self-funding enabled entry into with the team in 1971, borrowing against his to secure drives, yet whose subsequent skill propelled him to three drivers' championships in 1975, 1977, and 1984 with Ferrari and . This trajectory counters blanket dismissals of pay drivers as inherently uncompetitive, as Lauda's early exposure to grand prix machinery facilitated rapid adaptation and data-driven refinement, yielding 25 race wins from 171 starts despite initial resource constraints. Sergio Pérez, entering in 2011 with substantial backing from Mexican sponsors like , has amassed six victories—including the and multiple podiums in -2023 with —demonstrating that funding-secured seats can yield consistent high-level results when paired with tactical acumen, as evidenced by his 2021 contributions to 's title challenge. Pérez's retention at on performance merit post-initial funding underscores how such drivers can transition from financial enablers to proven assets, amassing over 1,800 points through 2024. Lance Stroll's win, secured through masterful wet-weather tire management on a treacherous track, highlights pay drivers' capacity for opportunistic excellence, with Stroll starting from 6th and navigating chaos to victory despite the field's struggles. Backed by family investment in Racing Point (now ), Stroll's prior European Formula 3 championship in and three career podiums further illustrate how financial access to elite series fosters skill maturation, debunking tropes of uniform incompetence by enabling practice in variable conditions. In open-wheel racing beyond , transitioned from funding-supported stints with (2002-2003 and 2004), where he earned a third-place at the , to dominance, becoming the first Japanese driver to win a series race at Long Beach in 2013 and securing victories in 2017 and 2020 through aggressive passing and oval mastery. These outcomes, totaling six wins, reveal how pay-driven entry provides cross-series data accumulation, allowing drivers to leverage strengths like Sato's qualifying prowess (multiple top-5 starts at Indy) in environments rewarding risk over pure funding. Such cases empirically validate a hybrid selection model, where sponsorship funds sustain midfield teams while competitive cars expose latent talent, as seen in pay drivers' disproportionate achievements in optimized setups; for instance, Lauda and together hold titles and wins far exceeding typical expectations for funded entrants, fostering sport longevity without sacrificing merit-based evolution.

References

  1. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/what-is-an-f1-pay-driver-all-to-know-about-the-controversial-tag/10605779/
  2. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/whos-the-best-formula-1-driver-schumacher-hamilton-senna-more-4983210/4983210/
  3. https://joesaward.wordpress.com/2012/10/09/the-value-or-lack-of-it-of-f1-pay-drivers/
  4. https://www.facebook.com/groups/formulaonefans/posts/9947035278746068/
  5. https://www.financemotorsport.com/news/2021/03/what-is-a-gentleman-driver/
  6. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/the-2021-f1-cost-cap-explained-what-has-changed-and-why.5O1Te8udKLmkUl4PyVZtUJ
  7. https://fluidjobs.com/blog/the-f1-cost-cap-broken-down
  8. https://www.facebook.com/OfficialDriver61/posts/some-f1-teams-spend-up-to-350-million-a-year-which-is-a-massive-amount-of-money-/1133941505430547/
  9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2020/02/09/revealed-the-1000-increase-in-f1-team-spending/
  10. https://www.essentiallysports.com/f1-news-what-are-the-budgets-for-f1-teams-including-mercedes-red-bull-ferrari/
  11. https://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2018/04/08/revealed-the-2-6-billion-budget-that-fuels-f1s-ten-teams/
  12. https://www.[espn.com](/page/ESPN.com)/f1/story/_/id/13827007/pastor-maldonado-f1-sponsors-paid-lotus-advance-2016
  13. https://www.grandprix247.com/2012/02/15/maldonado-sponsors-invoiced-46-million-by-williams-for-2012/
  14. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/analysis-the-real-cost-of-pdvsa-sponsoring-pastor-maldonado/664196/
  15. https://www.reuters.com/article/sports/canadian-group-led-by-stroll-paid-117-million-for-force-india-idUSKCN1ME1LU/
  16. https://www.racefans.net/2015/01/06/fia-confirms-new-2016-f1-superlicence-points-system/
  17. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/fia-reveals-details-of-2016-superlicence-points-system/3220525/
  18. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/news/a-century-of-racing-the-24-hours-of-le-mans-is-100-years-old-57463
  19. https://www.footmanjames.co.uk/blog/the-story-of-the-bentley-boys
  20. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/news/24-hours-of-le-mans-centenary-1924-1930-the-one-of-a-kind-bentley-boys-56863
  21. https://www.supercars.net/blog/grand-prix-drivers-the-hall-of-fame/
  22. https://v12rs.com/blogs/about-f1/what-is-the-cost-of-a-formula-one-car
  23. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/sports-cars/peter-whitehead-gentleman-farmer-who-led-british-racing-dominance/
  24. https://www.grandprix.com/people/rob-walker-2.html
  25. https://www.grandprix.com/drivers/peter-whitehead.html
  26. http://www.f1speedwriter.com/2020/02/rob-walker-1917-2002.html
  27. https://www2.arpel.org/virtual-library/u46C6A/245363/WhenMotorRacingWasBloodyDangerousEinBildba.pdf
  28. https://www.formulaonehistory.com/the-first-sponsor-in-formula-one/
  29. https://theparcferme.com/how-expensive-has-f1-become/
  30. https://f1blast.com/overview-of-the-turbo-era-in-formula-1/
  31. https://sidepodcast.com/post/forgotten-f1-teams-pacific-grand-prix
  32. https://www.unracedf1.com/forti-from-race-winner-to-shady-shannon/
  33. https://forums.autosport.com/topic/3211-lauda-a-pay-driver/
  34. https://www.goodwood.com/grr/f1/how-niki-laudas-money-saved-march-engineering/
  35. https://f1since81.wordpress.com/tag/salazar/
  36. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/1981/drivers/ELISAL01/eliseo-salazar
  37. https://www.f1-fansite.com/f1-news/adrian-sutil-very-happy-and-grateful-for-force-india-chance/
  38. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/aston-martin-f1-team-hits-32billion-valuation-in-latest-stake-sale/10746874/
  39. https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/the-incredible-amount-of-money-sergio-perez-sponsors-telmex-have-poured-into-red-bull-since-he-joined/
  40. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/the-opportunities-zhou-opens-up-for-alfa-romeo-/6787515/
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/4489290/2023/05/06/why-logan-sargeant-nearly-had-to-quit-racing-and-why-williams-pulled-him-back-in/
  42. https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/65-race-formula-1-driver-practically-pays-his-teammates-3-9m-a-year-salary/
  43. https://www.grandprix.com/news/red-bull-eyes-guanyu-zhous-chinese-sponsor-money.html
  44. https://www.gpblog.com/en/general/the-pay-driver-2-0-is-back-perez-and-zhou-because-of-their-money-interesting.html
  45. https://www.autosport.com/le-mans/news/the-gentleman-drivers-of-sportscar-racing-and-why-gradings-matter/6651451/
  46. https://www.irondames.ch/news/a-beginners-guide-to-wec-classes-phrases-and-more/
  47. https://api.fia.com/sites/default/files/driver_categorisation_regulations_2025_0.pdf
  48. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/lemans/classes
  49. https://medium.com/mayfair-parking/the-eye-watering-costs-of-running-a-gt3-team-9889ff5df409
  50. https://www.gtmotorsports.org/b-f-the-gentlemen-driver/
  51. https://www.quora.com/How-much-do-gentlemen-drivers-pay-to-race-in-WEC-events-generally-and-Le-Mans-in-particular
  52. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/news/af-corse-team-take-ferrari-into-the-history-books-at-le-mans-59792
  53. https://www.24h-lemans.com/en/news/24-hours-of-le-mans-a-unique-race-with-an-impressive-array-of-entrants-49114
  54. https://www.autoweek.com/racing/indycar/a36559683/irl-cart-split-indycar-much-much-stronger/
  55. https://www.indycar.com/News/2022/01/01-17-Calderon-Foyt
  56. https://www.motorsport.com/indycar/news/foyt-reveals-livery-and-number-for-indycar-rookie-pedersen/10422727/
  57. https://www.motorsport.com/indycar/news/bobby-unser-tribute-indycar-great/6506998/
  58. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2024/formula-1-karting-children-parents-racing-costs/
  59. https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/59555388
  60. https://www.reddit.com/r/F1FeederSeries/comments/1clzofn/how_much_do_feeder_series_cost/
  61. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-cost-of-a-seat-in-Formula-3-racing
  62. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/33803232/liam-lawson-f1-red-bull-max-verstappen-family-home/
  63. https://www.liamlawson30.com/news/lawson-receives-grant-from-tqf/
  64. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/what-is-an-fia-superlicence/10365787/
  65. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/the-beginners-guide-to-formula-2.1qUx4JXhT6O6T29wCwitu4
  66. https://www.racefans.net/2025/01/05/ten-years-since-its-introduction-does-f1-need-its-superlicence-points-system/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/mar/16/pastor-maldonado-f1-money-drivers
  68. https://ahw3ll.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/the-short-lived-f1-teams-of-the-1990s/
  69. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/every-1990s-f1-backmarker-team-ranked-2/
  70. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/f1-prize-money-how-much-do-gp-teams-and-drivers-really-make/
  71. https://www.racefans.net/2024/01/31/f1s-largest-entry-announced-35-years-ago-today-had-twice-as-many-drivers-as-now/
  72. https://theparcferme.com/then-and-now-formula-1-entry-sizes/
  73. https://www.autoweek.com/racing/formula-1/a35587084/what-are-pay-drivers-in-f1/
  74. https://www.f1-fansite.com/f1-drivers/pastor-maldonado/
  75. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2614370-examining-pastor-maldonados-f1-legacy-of-crashes-penalties-and-1-magical-win
  76. https://f1metrics.wordpress.com/
  77. https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/35486601
  78. https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/13ji4kd/formulastats_each_drivers_number_of_nonmechanical/
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11029468/
  80. https://www.statsignificant.com/p/how-much-do-drivers-matter-in-formula
  81. https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/53160/Bachelor-Thesis-Final-Draft-Raghav-Duggal-444420-.pdf
  82. https://formulanerds.com/news/f1latestnews/how-sponsorships-and-financial-backing-influence-our-perceptions-in-formula-1/
  83. https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/chr/article/view/1336
  84. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/new-super-licence-points-system-from-2016.6dQ650pTG2zlNCtGopSVdv
  85. https://f1metrics.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/how-money-predicts-success-in-formula-1/
  86. https://www.motorsinside.com/en/f1/news/14969-pay-drivers-are-more-of-debate-than-ever-in-paddock
  87. https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-team-bosses-say-pay-driver-f1-model-is-dead/10513619/
  88. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/stroll-addresses-where-his-heads-at-over-2025-plans-amid-driver-market.43zGfRh7idq6HdoHWJLicT
  89. https://racingnews365.com/breaking-stake-announce-bottas-zhou-departures-in-f1-driver-reshuffle
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371273927_Spend_to_Drive_Meritocracy_Anomie_and_the_Culture_Industry_within_Formula_One
  91. https://flowracers.com/blog/f1-pay-driver/
  92. https://www.bizofspeed.com/p/f1-economics-effect-driver-market
  93. https://www.formula1.com/en/information/drivers-hall-of-fame-niki-lauda.2Ye7VYWdXwhb97ZqLyxvX
  94. https://www.vice.com/en/article/formula-1s-strange-relationship-with-pay-drivers/
  95. https://www.foxsports.com.au/motorsport/formula-one/f1-2021-news-pay-drivers-in-formula-1-guanyu-zhou-joins-alfa-romeo-oscar-piastri-financial-support-nikita-mazepin-lance-stroll/news-story/3996395e361d14f4a13440a347c9462b
  96. https://www.planetf1.com/news/lance-stroll-greatest-pay-driver-all-time-f1
  97. https://www.quora.com/Who-are-some-examples-of-pay-drivers-in-Formula-One-F1
  98. http://www.indycar.com/Drivers/Takuma-Sato
  99. https://global.honda/en/stories/078.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.