Hubbry Logo
Poka-yokePoka-yokeMain
Open search
Poka-yoke
Community hub
Poka-yoke
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Poka-yoke
Poka-yoke
Poka-yoke
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Poka-yoke (ポカヨケ; [poka joke]) is any mechanism in a process that helps an equipment operator to avoid mistakes and defects by preventing, correcting, or drawing attention to human errors as they occur.[1][2] It is a Japanese term that means "mistake-proofing" or "error prevention", and is also sometimes referred to as a forcing function or a behavior-shaping constraint.

The concept was formalized, and the term adopted, by Shigeo Shingo as part of the Toyota Production System.[3][4]

Etymology

[edit]

Poka-yoke was originally baka-yoke, but as this means "fool-proofing" (or "idiot-proofing") the name was changed to the milder poka-yoke.[5] Poka-yoke is derived from poka o yokeru (ポカを避ける), a term in shogi that means avoiding an unthinkably bad move.

Usage and examples

[edit]

More broadly, the term can refer to any behavior-shaping constraint designed into a process to prevent incorrect operation by the user.

A simple poka-yoke example is demonstrated when a driver of the car equipped with a manual gearbox must press on the clutch pedal (a process step, therefore a poka-yoke) prior to starting an automobile.[6] The interlock serves to prevent unintended movement of the car. Another example of poka-yoke would be the car equipped with an automatic transmission, which has a switch that requires the car to be in "Park" or "Neutral" before the car can be started (some automatic transmissions require the brake pedal to be depressed as well). These serve as behavior-shaping constraints as the action of "car in Park (or Neutral)" or "foot depressing the clutch/brake pedal" must be performed before the car is allowed to start. The requirement of a depressed brake pedal to shift most of the cars with an automatic transmission from "Park" to any other gear is yet another example of a poka-yoke application. Over time, the driver's behavior is conformed with the requirements by repetition and habit.

When automobiles first started shipping with on-board GPS systems, it was not uncommon to use a forcing function which prevented the user from interacting with the GPS (such as entering in a destination) while the car was in motion. This ensures that the driver's attention is not distracted by the GPS. However, many drivers found this feature irksome, and the forcing function has largely been abandoned. This reinforces the idea that forcing functions are not always the best approach to shaping behavior.

A microwave oven cannot be started while its door is open

The microwave oven provides another example of a forcing function.[7] In all modern microwave ovens, it is impossible to start the microwave while the door is still open. Likewise, the microwave will shut off automatically if the door is opened by the user. By forcing the user to close the microwave door while it is in use, it becomes impossible for the user to err by leaving the door open. Forcing functions are very effective in safety critical situations such as this, but can cause confusion in more complex systems that do not inform the user of the error that has been made.

These forcing functions are being used in the service industry as well. Call centers concerned with credit card fraud and friendly fraud are using agent-assisted automation to prevent the agent from seeing or hearing the credit card information so that it cannot be stolen. The customer punches the information into their phone keypad, the tones are masked to the agent and are not visible in the customer relationship management software.[8]

History

[edit]

The term poka-yoke was applied by Shigeo Shingo in the 1960s to industrial processes designed to prevent human errors.[1] Shingo redesigned a process in which factory workers, while assembling a small switch, would often forget to insert the required spring under one of the switch buttons. In the redesigned process, the worker would perform the task in two steps, first preparing the two required springs and placing them in a placeholder, then inserting the springs from the placeholder into the switch. When a spring remained in the placeholder, the workers knew that they had forgotten to insert it and could correct the mistake effortlessly.[9]

Shingo distinguished between the concepts of inevitable human mistakes and defects in the production. Defects occur when the mistakes are allowed to reach the customer. The aim of poka-yoke is to design the process so that mistakes can be detected and corrected immediately, eliminating defects at the source.

Implementation in manufacturing

[edit]

Poka-yoke can be implemented at any step of a manufacturing process where something can go wrong or an error can be made.[10]For example, a fixture that holds pieces for processing might be modified to only allow pieces to be held in the correct orientation,[11] or a digital counter might track the number of spot welds on each piece to ensure that the worker executes the correct number of welds.[11]

Shingo recognized three types of poka-yoke for detecting and preventing errors in a mass production system:[3][10]

  1. The contact method identifies product defects by testing the product's shape, size, color, or other physical attributes.
  2. The fixed-value (or constant number) method alerts the operator if a certain number of movements are not made.
  3. The motion-step (or sequence) method determines whether the prescribed steps of the process have been followed.

Either the operator is alerted when a mistake is about to be made, or the poka-yoke device actually prevents the mistake from being made. In Shingo's lexicon, the former implementation would be called a warning poka-yoke, while the latter would be referred to as a control poka-yoke.[3]

Shingo argued that errors are inevitable in any manufacturing process, but that if appropriate poka-yokes are implemented, then mistakes can be caught quickly and prevented from resulting in defects. By eliminating defects at the source, the cost of mistakes within a company is reduced.[citation needed]

Benefits of poka-yoke implementation

[edit]

A typical feature of poka-yoke solutions is that they don't let an error in a process happen. Other advantages include:[12]

  • Less time spent on training workers;
  • Elimination of many operations related to quality control;
  • Unburdening of operators from repetitive operations;
  • Promotion of the work improvement-oriented approach and actions;
  • A reduced number of rejects;
  • Immediate action when a problem occurs;
  • 100% built-in quality control;
  • Preventing bad products from reaching customers;
  • Detecting mistakes as they occur;
  • Eliminating defects before they occur.

See also

[edit]
Look up poka-yoke in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Poka-yoke

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Poka-yoke, a Japanese term literally meaning "mistake-proofing," refers to mechanisms or methods designed to prevent human errors in processes or to detect them immediately so they do not result in defects. Developed by industrial engineer in the while working with the , it originated as a more respectful alternative to the earlier concept of "baka-yoke" (fool-proofing), which Shingo renamed to avoid offending workers, emphasizing that "mistakes are inevitable, but the defects that arise from them are not." The approach integrates seamlessly into principles by focusing on error prevention at the source, rather than relying on post-process inspection. At its core, poka-yoke operates through two primary functions: control methods, which physically prevent errors from occurring (such as mismatched connectors that cannot be inserted incorrectly), and warning methods, which alert operators to potential mistakes via signals like lights or sounds before they propagate. Shingo further classified detection techniques into categories like contact-based (using physical touch to verify), fixed-value (ensuring consistent quantities or positions), and motion-step (sequencing operations correctly), all aimed at achieving in production. These strategies have been formalized in Shingo's seminal works, including Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke , which advocate for simple, low-cost devices that empower workers to maintain without complex training. Beyond manufacturing, poka-yoke principles have influenced broader systems, such as and ISO standards, by reducing variability and waste while fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Notable examples include automotive assembly lines where fixtures ensure parts are oriented correctly, or healthcare protocols using color-coded medications to avoid dosing errors, demonstrating its versatility across industries. By prioritizing human factors and systemic safeguards, poka-yoke remains a cornerstone of modern error-proofing, contributing to enhanced safety, efficiency, and .

Origins

Etymology

The term "poka-yoke" is a Japanese compound word, with "poka" referring to an inadvertent mistake or that anyone can make due to inattention or oversight, and "yoke" derived from the verb "yokeru," meaning to avoid, prevent, or repel. This etymological structure emphasizes proactive safeguards against human fallibility in processes. Originally coined as "baka-yoke," translating to "fool-proofing" or "idiot-proofing" where "baka" means fool or , the term was revised to "poka-yoke" to eliminate connotations of worker incompetence and foster a more respectful, system-focused approach to management. The change, attributed to industrial engineer , occurred after feedback highlighted the original phrasing's potential to demean employees. Emerging in the Japanese lexicon amid post-World War II industrial reforms, "poka-yoke" encapsulates a cultural and philosophical pivot in toward inherent prevention rather than post-defect remediation, aligning with resource-scarce Japan's emphasis on and quality. This linguistic innovation underscores the broader philosophy's core tenet of eliminating waste through anticipatory design.

Historical Development

Poka-yoke was invented by Japanese industrial engineer Shigeo Shingo in 1960 while he was consulting for Toyota Motor Corporation, as a key component of the Toyota Production System (TPS) aimed at preventing human errors in manufacturing processes. Shingo, who collaborated closely with Taiichi Ohno—the chief engineer credited with developing TPS—integrated poka-yoke into the broader kaizen philosophy of continuous improvement, emphasizing error prevention at the source to achieve zero defects. This approach aligned with Ohno's just-in-time production principles, where stopping the line (jidoka) upon detecting errors complemented poka-yoke's proactive mistake-proofing mechanisms. The first practical implementation of a poka-yoke device occurred in at the Yamada Electric factory, where Shingo addressed a recurring assembly error in electrical switches: workers frequently omitted inserting two small springs, resulting in a defect rate of approximately 1.38%. Shingo redesigned the fixture to include a simple plate that only allowed assembly if both springs were present, immediately reducing defects to zero and demonstrating the technique's effectiveness in real-world production. This early success at and its suppliers highlighted poka-yoke's role in enhancing quality without relying on extensive worker training or inspection. During the 1970s and 1980s, poka-yoke became integral to the evolution of lean manufacturing and Total Quality Management (TQM) methodologies, as TPS principles spread beyond Japan. Shingo's consulting work and publications further embedded the concept in global quality practices, with its adoption accelerating through TQM frameworks that prioritized defect prevention over correction. A pivotal milestone was the 1986 publication of Shingo's book Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System, which detailed the method's theoretical foundations and case studies, facilitating its widespread dissemination to Western industries and solidifying poka-yoke as a cornerstone of modern quality control.

Core Principles

Fundamental Concepts

Poka-yoke is a mechanism within processes designed to prevent or render errors immediately apparent upon occurrence. Developed by , this approach emphasizes source inspection to eliminate defects before they propagate. The core goals of poka-yoke center on defect prevention at the source and the pursuit of through automation and process simplicity. By integrating foolproof elements into workflows, it aims to minimize variability introduced by human factors, thereby enhancing overall quality without relying on extensive rework. Poka-yoke differs from traditional inspection methods, which identify errors only after they have occurred in the process, by proactively averting mistakes through design interventions. In contrast to jidoka, which incorporates with a human element to detect and halt production upon error identification, poka-yoke prioritizes inherent foolproofing to make errors physically or procedurally impossible. Key principles of poka-yoke include the application of sensory feedback mechanisms—such as visual indicators, auditory alarms, or tactile sensations—to alert operators to deviations in real time. Additionally, it promotes process standardization to reduce variability, ensuring consistent execution that inherently safeguards against common errors. Poka-yoke is closely related to and often used interchangeably with terms such as "mistake-proofing," "error-proofing," and "foolproofing" (or "baka-yoke"). These concepts all aim to design processes and devices that prevent human errors from occurring or ensure they are immediately detected.

Types of Poka-Yoke Devices

Poka-yoke devices are primarily classified into three main categories based on their detection and prevention mechanisms: contact methods, fixed-value methods, and motion-step methods. These classifications, developed by as part of his Zero Quality Control system, focus on preventing errors at the source by making defects impossible or immediately detectable. The contact method relies on physical or sensory interaction to verify the correct placement, presence, or orientation of parts or actions. It uses devices such as switches, guides, or barriers that make direct contact with the workpiece to detect deviations, preventing incorrect assembly or operation. For instance, a shaped electrical plug that only fits into its matching socket exemplifies this method, as mismatched plugs cannot be inserted due to physical incompatibility. A subset of the contact method is the non-contact method, which employs sensors like photoelectric cells or proximity detectors to identify errors without physical touch, such as a light beam that interrupts if a required component is missing from an assembly line. This approach is particularly useful in high-speed processes where direct contact could slow operations or cause wear. The fixed-value method ensures that a specific , position, or count is maintained by alerting or stopping the process if the predetermined value is not met. Devices like counters, checklists, or limiters monitor for exact repetitions or placements, such as a counter that signals completion only after precisely five identical parts have been installed in an assembly. This method is ideal for repetitive tasks requiring consistency, reducing over- or under-production errors. While primarily focused on fixed parameters, adaptations can accommodate minor variations through adjustable thresholds, though the core principle emphasizes standardized values. The motion-step method, also known as the sequence method, enforces the correct by interlocks or sensors that halt the process if steps are skipped, out of , or incomplete. For example, an interlock prevents the next stage from activating until a previous fastening step is confirmed, or a that refuses to start without a guard in place. This category addresses procedural errors in dynamic workflows, ensuring and accuracy through step-by-step verification. A practical is a car's requiring the key to be inserted and turned in a specific before the starts. These categories often overlap in implementation, with devices combining elements for robust error-proofing, such as a oven's switch that uses contact detection (fixed-value) to prevent operation unless the is securely closed. Overall, selecting the appropriate type depends on the process's nature, prioritizing and reliability to align with poka-yoke's goal of effortless defect prevention.

Applications

In Manufacturing

In manufacturing, poka-yoke plays a pivotal role in enhancing process reliability and reducing defects during production assembly and operations. Originating from lean principles, it integrates error-prevention mechanisms directly into equipment and workflows to ensure consistent quality output. Poka-yoke is most commonly employed in Japanese companies, especially in manufacturing and business improvement contexts, owing to its development within the Toyota Production System and integration into lean methodologies, though it has seen widespread global adoption. In the automotive industry, Toyota and other automakers extensively employ poka-yoke in assembly processes to prevent errors and achieve high quality. Similarly, Ford has adopted poka-yoke in engine assembly lines to avoid errors such as incorrect sensor installation, where specialized fixtures ensure only compatible parts are used, minimizing rework and supporting high-volume production. Electronics manufacturing benefits from poka-yoke through vision systems that detect and reject upside-down component placements, preventing assembly failures in lines. These contact-based methods, like physical guides, align with broader device types by providing immediate feedback during insertion. In pharmaceutical , blister designs incorporate poka-yoke features to guarantee correct pill orientation, utilizing shaped cavities and automated sensors that stop the line if deviations occur, ensuring compliance with dosage specifications and reducing risks. Poka-yoke integrates seamlessly with methodologies, particularly through the framework, where it is applied in the Improve and Control phases to develop error-proof tooling for high-volume production, enabling defect elimination and sustained process capability. This combination has been shown to enhance in environments by addressing root causes of variability.

In Non-Manufacturing Sectors

In healthcare, poka-yoke principles are applied through specialized connectors for intravenous (IV) access, such as the Non-Injectable Arterial Connector (NIC), which features unique designs to prevent accidental injection into arterial lines instead of venous, reducing risks of incompatible fluid mixing. Similarly, (EHR) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems incorporate automated alerts to flag potential medication errors, including drug interactions and dosage issues based on patient data, reducing adverse events by up to 55%. These adaptations draw from core prevention principles by making errors physically or procedurally impossible or immediately detectable. In , poka-yoke manifests in form validation techniques that enforce specific input formats, such as checks for valid addresses, to prevent submission of malformed data that could lead to processing failures. Service industries leverage poka-yoke via visual cues in operational workflows to minimize errors. Consumer products integrate poka-yoke for everyday and , as seen in the reversible design of USB Type-C plugs, which eliminates orientation errors by allowing insertion from either side without damaging ports or devices. Childproof medicine bottle caps employ push-and-turn mechanisms that demand deliberate adult dexterity while resisting accidental child access, significantly lowering ingestion risks for hazardous substances. Post-2000 advancements have extended poka-yoke into modern expansions like AI-assisted systems for autonomous operations. In drone technology, AI algorithms perform real-time flight path checks to detect and avert collisions or deviations, enabling safer in dynamic environments such as urban airspace or disaster zones. These intelligent safeguards enhance reliability by predicting and mitigating errors beyond human oversight.

Implementation Strategies

Design and Integration Methods

The design process for poka-yoke begins with identifying potential error modes in a process, often through the use of (FMEA), which systematically evaluates risks and their impacts to prioritize areas for intervention. This step involves analyzing the sequence of operations to pinpoint where human errors, such as incorrect assembly or omission, are likely to occur, drawing from Shigeo Shingo's foundational principles in Zero Quality Control, where defect prevention is emphasized over detection. Once error modes are identified, designers prototype simple, low-cost solutions, such as physical guides or sensory alerts, ensuring they are intuitive and require minimal resources to develop and test. Integration of poka-yoke into existing processes follows a structured approach, starting with layering devices at key entry points to enable , where errors are caught before they propagate downstream, as outlined in Shingo's system. This involves mapping the to insert poka-yoke elements, such as sequential controls that prevent advancement until prior steps are verified, while ensuring the additions do not disrupt overall efficiency. workers on device operation is essential, focusing on quick adoption through hands-on demonstrations to maintain smooth workflows without introducing complexity. Practical tools and techniques facilitate the creation and application of poka-yoke, including checklists to verify sequential compliance, simulations to test device effectiveness in virtual environments before physical , and dedicated poka-yoke worksheets to and solution brainstorming. For retrofitting existing machinery, techniques like adding limit switches or visual indicators can be applied to older equipment, allowing error-proofing without full system overhauls, as these modifications leverage simple mechanical or electronic additions. Cost considerations in poka-yoke design emphasize balancing initial investments, which are typically low due to the preference for inexpensive materials and off-the-shelf components, against substantial long-term savings from reduced defects, rework, and needs. These solutions scale effectively from manual operations, where basic fixtures suffice, to automated systems incorporating sensors, yielding returns through minimized waste and enhanced reliability across varying process complexities.

Evaluation and Continuous Improvement

The effectiveness of poka-yoke systems is assessed through performance metrics that highlight their role in error prevention and reliability. Defect rate reduction, commonly measured in parts per million (PPM), serves as a primary indicator, with implementations often achieving substantial declines; for example, an event tree analysis incorporating poka-yoke reduced predicted defect rates from 500 PPM to 223 PPM in a . Another application in a production environment yielded a 62% reduction in PPM defects alongside a 54% decrease in scrap over three years. Uptime improvements result from fewer error-induced interruptions, while enhanced error detection speed facilitates quicker interventions, minimizing propagation of issues downstream. Monitoring poka-yoke devices employs techniques such as periodic audits to confirm operational integrity, data logging via embedded sensors to record error events and patterns, and feedback loops integrated into events for team-based reviews and adjustments. These methods ensure ongoing vigilance, capturing on device performance and process deviations to inform timely refinements. Continuous improvement cycles for poka-yoke align closely with the (Plan-Do-Check-Act) framework, where the plan phase identifies error-prone areas, do implements preventive mechanisms, check verifies outcomes against metrics like defect rates, and act incorporates lessons for iteration. This cyclical approach supports adaptation to evolving processes, such as integrating new technologies, by systematically evaluating and updating devices to maintain efficacy. In the evolution toward Industry 4.0, poka-yoke systems are enhanced through IoT integration, enabling real-time alerts from sensors that detect anomalies like assembly deviations and trigger immediate notifications for correction. This advancement leverages and to anticipate errors, fostering proactive refinements and aligning with broader continuous improvement objectives in environments.

Impacts and Considerations

Benefits

Poka-yoke implementations lead to significant improvements by preventing errors at the source, resulting in reduced defect rates and enhanced product reliability. In reported manufacturing cases, significant defect reductions have been achieved through targeted poka-yoke devices, including up to 100% in automotive component production where dimensional errors were nearly eliminated. At , the integration of poka-yoke within the has contributed to exceptionally low defect levels, approaching zero in many assembly processes, thereby ensuring higher reliability and customer satisfaction. Efficiency gains from poka-yoke include decreased rework time, minimized , and accelerated production cycles due to the elimination of errors before they propagate. By automating error detection or prevention, processes become more streamlined, reducing needs and allowing workers to focus on value-adding activities; for instance, source inspection techniques developed by have cut non-value-adding time in assembly lines by integrating immediate feedback mechanisms. Economically, poka-yoke yields substantial savings, with high returns on by averting downstream defects and associated costs. These savings stem from lower rates, reduced claims, and optimized use, often outweighing initial implementation expenses. Additionally, improved worker morale arises from fewer frustrating error corrections, fostering a more engaged and productive workforce, as evidenced in studies where error-proofing correlated with higher employee satisfaction and retention. Recent advancements as of 2024-2025 include AI-enhanced poka-yoke systems, which can reduce defects by up to 90% or more while improving detection accuracy in real-time. On a broader scale, poka-yoke contributes to cultivating zero-defect cultures by embedding mistake-proofing into organizational practices, aligning with high-reliability principles in industries like automotive. It also supports compliance with standards such as ISO 9001, where preventive measures against nonconformities are required to maintain systems.

Challenges and Limitations

While poka-yoke systems effectively prevent inadvertent errors, over-reliance on these mechanisms can foster complacency among workers, potentially diminishing vigilance and the adoption of broader quality practices. This risk arises when employees view poka-yoke as a complete safeguard, leading to reduced attention to process fundamentals and neglect of complementary error-detection methods. High initial and costs represent another significant challenge, particularly for complex processes or small-scale operations where the in custom devices, sensors, or software may outweigh short-term benefits. In smaller setups, scalability issues exacerbate this, as standardized poka-yoke solutions may not adapt easily to low-volume or variable production without substantial customization, straining limited resources. Poka-yoke devices exhibit limitations in addressing intentional errors or , as they are primarily engineered to counter unintentional human slips rather than deliberate actions. Similarly, they may prove ineffective against highly variable human behaviors, such as those influenced by , stress, or unpredictable environmental factors, where error patterns do not follow predictable patterns amenable to fixed prevention mechanisms. Adoption barriers frequently include worker resistance stemming from fears of job displacement or workflow disruption, as well as the necessity for cross-functional to ensure proper use and maintenance of devices. In sectors like and , lack of familiarity with poka-yoke concepts can compound this, with studies identifying insufficient as a primary obstacle to integration. To mitigate these challenges, organizations can balance poka-yoke with human-centered design principles that prioritize user involvement in device development, ensuring intuitive interfaces that reduce resistance and enhance adoption. Additionally, combining poka-yoke with other lean tools, such as 5S methodology for workplace organization, helps address complacency and scalability by fostering a holistic quality culture that reinforces ongoing vigilance without sole dependence on error-proofing.

References

  1. https://asq.org/quality-resources/quality-glossary
  2. https://shingo.org/mistake-proofing-mistakes/
  3. https://kanbanzone.com/resources/lean/toyota-production-system/poka-yoke/
  4. https://www.lean.org/lexicon-terms/poka-yoke/
  5. https://www.rnaautomation.com/insight/poka-yoke-in-manufacturing/
  6. https://www.routledge.com/Zero-Quality-Control-Source-Inspection-and-the-Poka-Yoke-System/Shingo/p/book/9780915299072
  7. https://www.6sigma.us/lean-tools/poka-yoke-six-sigma/
  8. https://asq.org/quality-resources/poka-yoke
  9. https://www.theleansixsigmacompany.ca/wiki/poka-yoke/
  10. https://elsmar.com/pdf_files/Poka_yoke_B.pdf
  11. https://www.leaneast.com/poka-yoke-mistake-proofing
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273366876_Using_Poka-yoke_methods_to_improve_employment_potential_of_intellectually_disabled_workers
  13. https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/84703-improve-productivity-with-poka-yoke
  14. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/ompeople/chapter/shigeo-shingo/
  15. https://goleansixsigma.com/shigeo-shingo-grand-daddy-quality/
  16. https://www.opexity.com/blog/poka-yoke/
  17. https://www.academicstar.us/UploadFile/Picture/2021-11/2021112141257749.pdf
  18. https://www.sixsigmadaily.com/shigeo-shingo-zero-quality-control/
  19. https://asq.org/quality-resources/mistake-proofing
  20. https://www.toolshero.com/quality-management/poka-yoke/
  21. https://leanmanufacturingtools.org/494/poka-yoke/
  22. https://status.net/articles/poka-yoke-principles-methods-examples/
  23. https://www.leanmanufacture.net/leanterms/pokayoke/
  24. https://www.lean.org/lexicon-terms/error-proofing/
  25. https://www.emsstrategies.com/dd110104article1.html
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274289910_Quality_improvement_through_Poka-Yoke_From_engineering_design_to_information_system_design
  27. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol23-issue9/Ser-4/A2309040104.pdf
  28. https://tervene.com/blog/poka-yoke-manufacturing/
  29. https://www.theijbmt.com/archive/0923/1129673523.pdf
  30. https://apparelresources.com/business-news/manufacturing/error-proofing-poka-yoke-designed-conform/
  31. https://www.sv-jme.eu/?ns_articles_pdf=/ns_articles/files/ojs/6056/public/6056-33251-1-PB.pdf
  32. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijme/article/download/3735/4756/9738
  33. https://www.unleashedsoftware.com/blog/poka-yoke-in-manufacturing-methods-pros-cons-examples/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257119220_A_framework_for_assessing_poka-yoke_devices
  35. http://assets.balluff.com/WebBinary1/237914_Error_Proofing_en-US.pdf
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-015-7217-9
  37. https://qualityhubindia.com/pokayoke-enhancing-perfection/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276514314_Six_Sigma_through_Poka-Yoke_a_navigation_through_literature_arena
  39. https://www.healthinnowest.net/wp-content/uploads/Non-injectable-Arterial-Connector-EAHSN-Final-Report-QEHKL-NHS-Trust-2015.pdf
  40. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-HE20_6500-PURL-gpo3107/pdf/GOVPUB-HE20_6500-PURL-gpo3107.pdf
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11056219/
  42. https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/poka-yoke/
  43. https://neurotechhub.wustl.edu/constraint-based-design-a-practical-guide-for-engineers-and-creators/
  44. https://www.reliableplant.com/poka-yoke-31862
  45. https://hub.jhu.edu/2023/10/09/artificial-intelligence-safer-skies/
  46. https://news.mit.edu/2025/ai-enabled-control-system-helps-autonomous-drones-uncertain-environments-0609
  47. https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajassp.2014.1332.1342
  48. https://nulab.com/learn/project-management/what-is-poka-yoke-technique-how-to-do-it/
  49. https://www.dmaic.com/faq/zero-quality-control-zqc/
  50. https://safetyculture.com/topics/poka-yoke
  51. https://flowdit.com/poka-yoke/
  52. https://retrocausal.ai/blog/poka-yoke-in-manufacturing/
  53. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1274784/m2/1/high_res_d/10120374.pdf
  54. https://www.smacna.org/docs/default-source/resource-documents/thinkinglean.pdf?sfvrsn=b5c7527b_1
  55. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2209506.pdf
  56. https://ctl.mit.edu/sites/default/files/Mac_TPS_thesis.pdf
  57. https://www.academia.edu/53235338/Quality_Improvement_Technique_Through_Poka_Yoke_Concepts
  58. https://researchportal.plymouth.ac.uk/files/49395498/WOODWARD_CD_2002.pdf
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8808277/
  60. https://retrocausal.ai/blog/reducing-errors-with-poka-yoke-and-ai/
  61. https://www.aiag.org/training-and-resources/training-catalog/details/PYMP
  62. https://www.cleverence.com/articles/business-blogs/poka-yoke-in-manufacturing-methods-advantages-disadvantages-and-examples/
  63. https://aiiem.org/the-impact-of-poka-yoke-error-proofing-in-industrial-engineering/
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372146501_Benefits_and_barriers_for_poka-yoke_implementation_to_minimise_variations_in_construction_projects
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.