Hubbry Logo
PrimelephasPrimelephasMain
Open search
Primelephas
Community hub
Primelephas
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Primelephas
Primelephas
Primelephas
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Primelephas
Temporal range: Late Miocene - Pliocene
Reconstruction of Primelephas
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Proboscidea
Family: Elephantidae
Subfamily: Elephantinae
Genus: †Primelephas
Maglio, 1970
Type species
†Primelephas gomphotheroides
Maglio, 1970
Species
  • †Primelephas gomphotheroides Maglio, 1970
  • †Primelephas korotorensis (Coppens, 1965)

Primelephas is a genus of Elephantinae[1] that existed during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs. The name of the genus suggests 'first elephant'. These primitive elephantids are thought to be the common ancestor of Mammuthus, the mammoths, and the closely allied genera Elephas and Loxodonta, the Asian and African elephants, diverging some 4-6 million years ago.[2] It had four tusks, which is a trait not shared with its descendants, but common in earlier proboscideans. The type species, Primelephas gomphotheroides, was described by Vincent Maglio in 1970, with the specific epithet indicating the fossil specimens were gomphothere-like. Primelephas korotorensis is the only other species to be assigned to the genus. All fossils found of the Primelephas have been found in Africa, primarily in modern day Chad, Tanzania, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Uganda.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Primelephas

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Primelephas is an extinct genus of primitive elephant in the subfamily Elephantinae, known from Africa during the late Miocene to early Pliocene epochs, approximately 7 to 4 million years ago. It represents the earliest recognized member of Elephantinae and is regarded as the stem taxon from which all later elephants, including modern African and Asian species as well as extinct mammoths, evolved. The genus is currently considered monospecific, comprising only Primelephas korotorensis, with the previously recognized type species P. gomphotheroides now treated as a junior synonym based on re-examination of dental morphology and new fossil material. Fossils of Primelephas have been recovered from multiple sites across eastern and , including , , , , and notably the Djurab region of northern , indicating a wide continental distribution during its existence. The genus is primarily documented through dental remains, such as upper and lower molars, which exhibit primitive features including low crowns (hypsodonty index around 1.5–2), moderate enamel thickness (3–6.5 mm), and a laminar frequency of 3–4 per centimeter, with V-shaped interloph valleys and abundant . These molars show mesiodistal compression and a typical Elephantinae formula, such as 7–9 lamellae in M3, marking a transitional morphology between earlier proboscideans like gomphotheres and more derived elephantids. Limited mandibular evidence suggests a short lacking tusks or tusk alveoli in the lower . Originally described from specimens in , Primelephas was named by Vincent J. Maglio in , with P. gomphotheroides based on fossils resembling gomphotheres in structure, reflecting its basal position in elephant . Subsequent discoveries, particularly from the Toros-Menalla locality in dated to about 7 million years ago, have expanded the known sample size and confirmed its primitive status through detailed morphometric analyses, supporting its role as a foundational in the radiation of . This genus highlights the diversification of proboscideans in during the , a period of significant climatic shifts that influenced the of and adaptations in elephants.

Taxonomy

Etymology and discovery

The genus name Primelephas derives from the Greek roots primos (πρῶμος, meaning "first") and elephas (ἐλέφας, meaning "" or ""), reflecting its identification as an early representative of the true within the Elephantinae . Maglio formally described the Primelephas in 1970, originally establishing Primelephas gomphotheroides as the based on evidence from East African sites such as Kanapoi and in . These dental remains, dating to the early (approximately 4 million years ago), exhibited primitive features intermediate between earlier gomphotheres and later elephantids, prompting Maglio to propose Primelephas as a foundational lineage in . Subsequent discoveries, including new material from the late Miocene Toros-Menalla locality in Chad (~7 million years ago), led to a 2008 taxonomic revision that synonymized P. gomphotheroides as a junior synonym of the earlier-named P. korotorensis (Coppens, 1965), rendering the genus monospecific. The recognition of Primelephas emerged amid a surge in proboscidean paleontology during the mid-20th century, driven by systematic excavations in East Africa's rift valleys that yielded rich hominid and mammalian faunas. Efforts by researchers like Louis Leakey and his collaborators in the 1950s and 1960s at sites including Olduvai Gorge and Lake Turkana provided the contextual framework for interpreting these early elephantid fossils, highlighting the diversification of Elephantidae in Africa during the late Miocene to Pliocene transition.

Classification and species

Primelephas belongs to the kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Mammalia, order , family , subfamily Elephantinae, and genus Primelephas. The genus is monospecific, comprising only Primelephas korotorensis from the to early of (approximately 7–4 million years ago). Originally, two species were recognized: P. gomphotheroides from , characterized by molars with gomphothere-like features such as relatively low-crowned structure and moderate plate compression, and P. korotorensis from , distinguished by more primitive dental morphology including thicker enamel and fewer accessory conules on premolars. However, re-examination has established P. gomphotheroides as a junior synonym of P. korotorensis based on overlapping morphological variability. Genus-level diagnosis relies on dental traits, notably a molar ridge (plate) count of 7–9 on third molars (M3), which exceeds that of contemporaneous gomphotheres while remaining lower than in later Elephantinae, alongside low hypsodonty (index ~50–75) and lamellar frequency of 3–4 plates per cm. Isolated fossils from extralimital sites, such as potential early Elephantinae material from Greek Plio-Pleistocene deposits, have prompted discussions on broader taxonomic assignments or regional variants, but the core African material supports the monospecific status of Primelephas korotorensis.

Description

Overall morphology

Primelephas displayed a generalized characteristic of early members of the Elephantinae, with robust skeletal features supporting a large terrestrial lifestyle. Postcranial fossils are limited, but limb elements such as the calcaneum, astragalus, and from East African sites indicate proportions similar to those of modern elephants, suggesting a graviportal posture with columnar limbs designed to bear substantial weight. Estimates derived from these fragmentary postcranial remains place the shoulder height at approximately 2.5–3 meters and body length at 4–5 meters, yielding a body mass of 4–6 tons, comparable to smaller modern elephant species but scaled for the genus's primitive morphology. The , though incompletely known, featured an elevated nasal opening consistent with support for a flexible trunk, a defining trait of advanced proboscideans. Postcranial adaptations included sturdy limb bones that facilitated movement through varied terrains, with the overall build reflecting the transition to fully weight-bearing locomotion in . Inferred trunk morphology points to a prehensile structure akin to that in extant forms, enabling manipulation of food and environmental interaction.

Dentition and tusks

Primelephas exhibited a dentition transitional to that of modern elephants, featuring molars with an increased number of transverse ridges compared to earlier proboscideans like gomphotheres. The third upper molar (M3) typically possessed 7 plates (x7x formula), with pyramidal plates in lateral view, widely spaced by V-shaped valleys, and 4–8 apical digitations per plate; enamel was thick and unfolded, while coated the plates but did not fill the valleys completely. These molars displayed unilateral hypsodonty, in which successive teeth migrated horizontally into the grinding plane, pushing out worn predecessors. The tusks of Primelephas consisted of enlarged upper incisors, with narrow and weakly divergent alveoli (approximately 80 mm wide) suggesting straight or slightly curved forms that could reach lengths of up to 2 meters, though direct measurements are limited; these were composed mainly of dentine overlain by thin enamel caps at the tips. No lower tusks are present, consistent with its position as an early member of Elephantinae; this absence distinguishes it from more basal proboscideans that retained lower incisors as tusks, a trait lost in derived elephantids. In terms of and evolution, Primelephas retained permanent (e.g., dp4 with 5–6 plates, m3 with 7–8 plates) as primitive features, with vertical replacement of by permanents in some cases, unlike the fully horizontal succession in modern . The structure included an elongated projecting as a spout-like feature without alveoli in known specimens, broader than in extant to support the primitive dental arrangement. The crown height index for M3 was low (HI = 70), indicating brachyodont to mesodont development relative to later forms.

Paleoecology

Habitat and distribution

Primelephas inhabited regions of during the late to early , spanning approximately 7.5 to 4 million years ago. This temporal range encompasses the Nawata Formation at Lothagam in northern , dated to about 7.5–5.0 Ma, where P. korotorensis is recorded, as well as early deposits around 4.0 Ma. Fossils indicate that the genus persisted through environmental shifts, including the expansion of C4 grasslands in the late . The geographic distribution of Primelephas was centered in , with key occurrences in modern-day , , , , and , reflecting a primarily sub-Saharan range. Major fossil sites include the Toros-Menalla locality in (~7 Ma), which has yielded mandibular and dental remains of P. korotorensis associated with hominoid-bearing sediments. In , the Lothagam site (, ~7.5–4.3 Ma) produced type specimens, including molars and tusks, while the Lemudong'o locality (~6.1 Ma) in the has provided additional proboscidean material tentatively linked to the genus. Further east, beds in the Turkana Basin contain remains of P. korotorensis, marking some of the youngest records. At these localities, Primelephas co-occurred with early bovids such as Tragoportax and primitive hippopotamids like Kenyapotamus, signaling ecological transitions from closed woodlands to more open savanna-woodland mosaics during the late Miocene and Pliocene. For instance, the Lothagam fauna includes over 100 mammalian taxa, dominated by ungulates adapted to mixed browsing-grazing habitats, consistent with stable carbon isotope data indicating increasing grass cover. Similarly, assemblages from Toros-Menalla feature bovids and suids in fluvial-lacustrine settings, underscoring riparian woodland-savanna environments. These associations highlight Primelephas as part of diverse proboscidean communities amid expanding aridification and faunal turnover in eastern Africa.

Diet and behavior

Primelephas exhibited a mixed-feeding diet, with significant consumption of C4 grasses indicating a component, as evidenced by dental mesowear and carbon isotope values from enamel (δ¹³C around -1‰) at sites like Lothagam in . Despite this behavioral shift toward grass-dominated foraging between 7 and 5 million years ago, its molars remained relatively low-crowned (hypsodonty index around 1.5–2) with 6–9 lophs and thinner enamel, better suited for processing softer browse like leaves and twigs in wooded habitats. This dietary flexibility highlights Primelephas as an early experimenter with in response to expanding C4 grasslands, bridging earlier browsing gomphotheres and later specialized grazers within Elephantinae. Foraging behavior involved the use of a prehensile trunk for grasping and manipulating vegetation, enabling efficient access to both ground-level grasses and higher browse, as inferred from the shortened and advanced trunk evolution in early . Upper and lower tusks likely aided in stripping bark, digging for roots, or clearing paths, based on their morphology and the functional roles observed in related proboscideans transitioning to open environments. Tusk wear patterns on fossils suggest occasional use in foraging tasks, complementing the trunk's primary role in a grazing-oriented lifestyle. Social structure is inferred to have included herd living, with evidence from contemporaneous early trackways (e.g., Stegotetrabelodon at 6–8 Ma) showing groups of at least 13 individuals, including adults and juveniles, traveling together over distances exceeding 260 meters. This matriarchal grouping, analogous to modern Elephantinae, likely facilitated protection and resource sharing in mixed woodland-grassland ecosystems of Miocene-Pliocene . In its , Primelephas occupied intermediate roles in African paleoecosystems, exploiting varied habitats from dense forests to emerging savannas, where it contributed to dynamics as a influencing woodland structure through and selective .

Evolutionary history

Phylogenetic position

Primelephas is recognized as a basal member of the subfamily Elephantinae within the family , representing an early diversification of true elephants during the to early in . In Vincent J. Maglio's foundational 1973 monograph, Primelephas is positioned as the ancestral from which the three principal elephantid lineages—Loxodonta, , and Mammuthus—diverged around 6 million years ago, based on morphological assessments of cranial and dental features from African fossil deposits. This cladistic framework emphasizes Primelephas's role as a stem elephantid, bridging primitive proboscideans and more derived forms. Subsequent morphological analyses have refined this placement, portraying Primelephas as the sister taxon to a comprising Loxodonta and the tribe Elephantini (including and Mammuthus), supported by parsimony-based phylogenetic trees derived from 95 cranial-dental characters. For instance, Kalb et al.'s 2010 study, using an expanded of cranial and dental morphology, identifies Primelephas as the direct precursor to the Loxodonta and lineages, with Mammuthus branching separately from Stegotetrabelodon, highlighting parallel in dental traits across elephantid groups. Key synapomorphies uniting Primelephas with Elephantinae include advanced dental progression characterized by horizontal tooth displacement and the reduction or loss of multi-cusped permanent premolars, which facilitated the evolution of high-crowned, plate-like molars for abrasive diets; these traits distinguish it from contemporaneous genera like , which retained more primitive, multi-lobed premolars, and Anancus, a with less specialized . Phylogenetic debates persist regarding the of Primelephas, with some analyses suggesting potential if additional species (such as P. korotorensis) are incorporated, potentially requiring taxonomic revision. Furthermore, the inclusion of related genera like —often treated as a of —complicates trees, as morphological evidence links it closely to Elephas lineages derived from Primelephas, raising questions about in Elephas if Palaeoloxodon is excluded. These uncertainties underscore the challenges of in elephantid cranial-dental evolution, where convergent adaptations in molar structure obscure precise branching patterns.

Relation to modern elephants

Primelephas is widely regarded as the last common ancestor of the three principal lineages within the Elephantidae subfamily: Loxodonta (African elephants), Elephas (Asian elephants), and Mammuthus (mammoths). This genus, originating in Africa during the late Miocene to early Pliocene, diverged into these groups approximately 5–7 million years ago, marking a pivotal transition in proboscidean evolution. Several key morphological traits of Primelephas were retained and refined in modern elephants, underscoring its foundational role. The large body size, enabling efficient across diverse landscapes, persists in all extant species, with adult masses exceeding 2,000 kg. The prehensile trunk structure, adapted for manipulation and sensory functions, evolved further but remains a hallmark of elephantid . Upper tusks, used for defense, digging, and display, continue to characterize Loxodonta, , and the extinct Mammuthus, though their size and curvature vary by lineage. In contrast, certain primitive features of Primelephas were lost or significantly modified in descendant lineages, reflecting adaptations to changing environments. Notably, the presence of lower tusks—short, tusk-like incisors in the mandible—disappeared entirely in modern elephants, simplifying the dentition to upper tusks only. Additionally, the low molar ridge counts in Primelephas (7–9 lamellae in M3), suited to a transitional diet, were significantly increased; for instance, Loxodonta developed ridges numbering typically 18–21 in the third molar, while Elephas and Mammuthus increased to 21–24 and up to 26, respectively. The divergence of Primelephas into African and Eurasian lineages occurred amid climatic shifts toward drier, more open savannas around 5–3 million years ago, driving and dietary specialization. Loxodonta remained in , adapting to forested and mosaics, while ancestral Elephas and Mammuthus migrated northward, contributing to the global distribution and eventual biodiversity of before the of Mammuthus. These events, concurrent with expanding C4 grasslands, shaped the ecological niches of modern elephants.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068308000407
  2. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/mesaxonia/elephantinae.php
  3. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/mesaxonia/elephantidae.php
  4. https://www.academia.edu/25157500/Early_Elephant_Remains_from_NW_Greece
  5. https://zenodo.org/records/16556669/files/bhlpart30041.pdf
  6. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app61/app001362014.pdf
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S163106830800136X
  8. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/billsanders/wp-content/uploads/sites/382/2016/04/Werdelin_ch15.pdf
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315466904_Horizontal_tooth_displacement_and_premolar_occurrence_in_elephants_and_other_elephantiform_proboscideans
  10. https://uchytel.com/Primelephas
  11. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7312/leak11870-014/html
  12. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/billsanders/wp-content/uploads/sites/382/2016/04/AP-SANDERS-REVISED.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240953964_Taxonomic_review_of_fossil_Proboscidea_Mammalia_from_Langebaanweg_South_Africa
  14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1996.10011339
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257591940_A_New_Assemblage_of_Mid-Pliocene_Proboscideans_from_the_Woranso-Mille_Area_Afar_Region_Ethiopia_Taxonomic_Evolutionary_and_Paleoecological_Considerations
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10482678/
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225533815_Browsing_and_grazing_in_elephants_The_isotope_record_of_modern_and_fossil_proboscideans
  18. https://elifesciences.org/articles/90908
  19. https://www.elephant.se/primelephas.php
  20. https://rcin.org.pl/Content/12829/BI002_2613_Cz-40-2_Acta-T42-Supp5-89-122_o.pdf
  21. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.21010
  22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21010
  23. https://www.pennpress.org/9781422375433/origin-and-evolution-of-the-elephantidae/
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22260276/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.