Hubbry Logo
Vermont Progressive PartyVermont Progressive PartyMain
Open search
Vermont Progressive Party
Community hub
Vermont Progressive Party
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Vermont Progressive Party
Vermont Progressive Party
Vermont Progressive Party
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Vermont Progressive Party, formerly the Progressive Coalition and Independent Coalition, is a political party in the United States that is active in Vermont. It is the third-largest political party in Vermont behind the Democratic and Republican parties. As of 2023, the party has one member in the Vermont Senate and five members in the Vermont House of Representatives, as well as several more affiliated legislators who caucus with the Democratic Party.[7][8]

Key Information

The last time a third party had members elected to the state legislature in Vermont was in 1917, with the election of James Lawson of the Socialist Party of America.[9]

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]

William H. Meyer, a member of the Democratic Party, was elected to the United States House of Representatives from Vermont's at-large congressional district after defeating Republican nominee Harold J. Arthur in the 1958 election. Meyer's victory was the first time since the 1853 election that the Republicans had lost a statewide election in Vermont. Meyer was the most left-wing member of Congress from 1937 to 2002, according to Keith T. Poole. He lost reelection in the 1960 election against Republican nominee Robert Stafford.[10][11][12]

Meyer formed the Liberty Union Party at a meeting in his home with Peter Diamondstone, Dennis Morrisseau, and twenty other people on June 27, 1970.[13][14] Martha Abbott, a future chair of the Vermont Progressive Party, was one of the members of the Liberty Union Party's founding meeting.[15] Bernie Sanders joined the party in 1971, and was selected to serve as the party's candidate for a Senatorial special election at his first meeting.[16] During his time in the party, Sanders also ran for United States Senate in the 1974 election and for Governor in the 1972 and 1976 elections.[17][18][19] Sanders left the Liberty Union Party on October 11, 1977.[20]

Progressive Coalition

[edit]

Sanders

[edit]
The Vermont Progressive Party originated under Mayor Bernie Sanders as the Independent Coalition during his 1981 mayoral campaign and then as the Progressive Coalition during his tenure as mayor.

On November 8, 1980, Sanders announced that he would run for mayor of Burlington, Vermont, in the 1981 election and formally announced his campaign on December 16, at a press conference in city hall.[21][22] Sanders had been convinced to run for the mayoralty by Richard Sugarman, an Orthodox Jewish scholar at the University of Vermont, who had shown Sanders a ward-by-ward breakdown of the 1976 gubernatorial election which showed Sanders receiving 12% of the vote in Burlington despite only getting 6% statewide.[23] Sanders defeated incumbent Democratic Mayor Gordon Paquette by ten votes in the election.[24] Sanders was reelected as mayor in the 1983, 1985, and 1987 elections.[25][26][27]

During his mayoral campaign, Sanders formed the Independent Coalition which according to Richard Sartelle was to bring working people, students, college faculty, union members, and all independent-minded citizens together. Sartelle ran with the support of the Independent Coalition for a seat on the city council from the 4th district, but was defeated by the Republican nominee.[28][29]

The Citizens Party attempted to have Greg Guma run with their nomination for mayor in 1981, but Guma declined as it would be "difficult to run against another progressive candidate" and the party instead endorsed Sanders.[30][31] Terry Bouricius, a member of the Citizens Party, was elected to the city council from the 2nd district becoming the first member of the party elected to office in Vermont.[31][29]

Following his victory in the 1981 election, Sanders faced difficulties with the city council; this was because 11 of the 13 members of the board of alderman opposing Sanders. The council would oppose measures proposed by Sanders and override his vetoes on legislation.[32] Bouricius and Sadie White were the only members of the city council aligned with Sanders.[33]

During the 1982 elections, Sanders endorsed Citizens nominees Richard Musty and Zoe Breiner, and independent candidate Gary DeCarolis for city council and all of them won causing the council to have five pro-Sanders members, five Republican members, and three Democratic members.[34][35][36] However, the Republicans and Democratic members of the city council united to select Robert Paterson, a Republican, as president of the city council instead of Sadie White, a Sanders supporter, by a vote of eight to five after six ballots and to prevent the pro-Sanders members of the city council from receiving positions. Sanders stated that "Probably the Democrats feel more comfortable dealing with the Republicans than with us".[37]

DeCarolis asked for members of the media to refer to him and other pro-Sanders members of the city council as the Progressive Coalition rather than as just Sanders supporters.[38] An organizational meeting for Progressive Coalition, which was attended by over 100 people, was held on November 10, 1983.[39] The Progressive Coalition was not a political party, but an organization that gave out endorsements.[40]

During the 1984 elections, the Citizens Party only ran one candidate under its name and instead endorsed the Progressive Coalition candidates. Bouricius stated that the Citizens Party was the core of the coalition, but that the coalition was being built broader than the Citizens Party.[41] The Progressive Coalition gained one seat from the Democratic Party during the 1984 city council elections bringing the composition of the city council to six Progressive members, five Republican members, and two Democratic members.[42] The Citizens Party of Vermont disbanded in 1986.[43]

The Progressive Coalition supported Jesse Jackson during the 1984 Democratic presidential primaries and later supported Walter Mondale in the presidential election in the state.[44][45]

Bouricius was selected to serve as president of the city council after thirty-one ballots and served until 1985. Bouricius was the only member of the Progressive Coalition to serve as president during Sanders' administration.[46][47] After the 1985 elections William Skelton, a Republican member of the city council, was selected to serve as president of the city council against the Progressive-backed Zoe Breiner as Bouricius had dropped out.[48]

Clavelle

[edit]

The Vermont Progressive Alliance was formed by members of the Progressive Coalition and Rainbow Coalition on May 19, 1990, at Montpelier High School and inspired by the New Democratic Party. The organization endorsed ten independent candidates for seats in the state legislature in the 1990 election.[49][50] Terry Bouricius and Tom Smith, who were endorsed by the organization, were elected to the Vermont House of Representatives in the 1990 election becoming the first member of the Progressive Coalition to do so.[51][52][53] The Vermont Organizing Committee was formed by the organization in 1992.[54][55]

The Franklin County Independent Coalition was also formed in 1990, to support Sanders' campaign for a seat in the United States House of Representatives during the 1990 election. The organization was founded by independent candidates for seats in the state house and Neil Bean, who was an independent member of the St. Albans city council and also grew out of Jeff Weaver's campaign for mayor of St. Albans and Jerry Colby's 1988 and 1990 campaigns for a seat in the Vermont Senate.[56][57]

The Progressives regained control of the city council in 1994, with five of their members winning and three independents caucusing with them.[58][59] The coalition expanded to Brattleboro, Vermont, with Shoshana Rihn's election to the town's select board in 1998.[60][61] Rihn was sworn in, but was removed from office after a recount reported her losing by two votes.[62]

Vermont Progressive Party

[edit]

Clavelle

[edit]

The coalition started holding caucuses in 25 towns in October 1999, to form a political party.[63] The Vermont Progressive Party was formally created after organizing in sixteen communities[64] and held its first convention on July 9, 2000.[65] Anthony Pollina receive the party's gubernatorial nomination for the 2000 election[66] and received 9.6% of the vote,[67] more than the 5% needed for major party status.[68]

Kiss

[edit]

Post-Kiss

[edit]

Emma Mulvaney-Stanak was the only Progressive member of the 14-member city council following the resignation of Marisa Caldwell in 2010, which was the lowest number for the party since 1981.[69][70] The party ran and received its highest number of candidates, votes, and share of seats in the state house in the 2016 election with seven out of twenty candidates winning with a combined total of 18,954 votes.[71]

David Zuckerman was elected lieutenant governor after he used electoral fusion to receive both the Democratic and Progressive nominations.[72]

Robin Chesnut-Tangerman, the leader of the Progressive caucus in the state house, lost reelection in 2020. Mollie Burke and Heather Surprenant did not seek reelection with the Progressive ballot line in the 2022 state house elections and solely ran as Democrats.[73] The 2022 elections, in which the party lost two state house and one state senate seat, resulted in the entire Progressive delegation being solely from Chittenden County for the first time since 2004. Zuckerman returned to the lieutenant governorship in the concurrent election.[74]

Platform

[edit]

The Progressive Party encompasses a progressive platform. The party's main focus has historically been advocacy for a single-payer health care system, which supported the implementation of Green Mountain Care, a health care program that was pushed by Democratic Governor Peter Shumlin due to pressure from the Progressive Party. Other major policy platforms are renewable energy programs and a phase-out of nuclear energy, public transportation proposals including one for a high-speed rail system, criminal justice reforms directed at reducing the state's prison population and better protecting convicts' rights, the creation of programs to end homelessness in the state, ending the War on Drugs and repealing No Child Left Behind and ending the focus on standardized testing in the school system. The party also has an anti-war stance, advocating for Vermont's national guard to be restricted from engaging in war zones outside the United States, an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and opposition to all preemptive wars, strikes, or other offensive or interventionist military actions. The party is very supportive of LGBT rights and members of the party were involved in the legalization of same-sex marriage in the state.

Economically, the party also calls for converting the minimum wage to a living wage and having it tied to inflation rates, having the economy focus on small and local businesses, empowerment of worker cooperatives and publicly owned companies as democratic alternatives to multi-national corporations and to decentralize the economy, for the strengthening of state law to protect the right to unionize, for implementing a progressive income tax and repealing the Capital Gains Tax Exemption and residential education property tax, and for all trade to be subject to international standards on human rights. The party is also critical of privatization.[75]

Electoral history

[edit]

Presidential

[edit]

State legislature

[edit]

Burlington

[edit]
Year Burlington City Council Mayor Ref Control
1982
5 / 13
 Bernie Sanders [34][35] Republican
1983
5 / 13
 Bernie Sanders [36] Republican
1984
6 / 13
 Bernie Sanders [42] Progressive
1985
6 / 13
 Bernie Sanders [83] Republican
1994
5 / 13
 did not control [84] Progressive
1995
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
1996
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
1997
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
1998
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
1999
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
2000
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
2001
6 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
2002
5 / 13
 Peter Clavelle [84] Progressive
2022
6 / 12
 Emma Mulvaney-Stanak [85] Progressive

Elected officials

[edit]

State

[edit]

Statewide office

Vermont Senate

Vermont House of Representatives

  • Rep. Mollie Burke (P), Windham-3-2, single member district (2009–present)
  • Rep. Robin Chesnut-Tangerman (P), Rutland-Bennington, single member district (2015–present)
  • Rep. Brian Cina (P), Chittenden-6-4, with 1 (P) (2017–present)
  • Rep. Selene Colburn (P), Chittenden-6-4, with 1 (P) (2017–present)
  • Rep. Mari Cordes (D/P), Addison-4, with 1 (D) (2019–present)
  • Rep. Diana Gonzalez (P), Chittenden-6-7, with 1 (D) (2015–present)
  • Rep. Sandy Haas (P), Windsor-Rutland-2, single member district (2005–present)
  • Rep. Troy Headrick (P), Chittenden-15 (2023–present)
  • Rep. Zachariah Ralph (P), Windsor-1, with 1 (D) (2019–present)

County

[edit]

Municipal

[edit]

City

[edit]
  • Burlington
    • City Council [86][87]
      • Perri Freeman (Central District-Ward 2 & 3) (2019–present)
      • Jack Hanson (East District-Ward 1 & 8) (2019–present)
      • Zoraya Hightower (Ward 1) (2020–present)
      • Max Tracy (Ward 2) (2012–present)
      • Joe Magee (Ward 3) (2021–present)
      • Ali Dieng (D/P) (Ward 7) (2017–present)
      • Jane Stromberg (Ward 8) (2020–present)
    • Ward Clerk [88]
      • Wendy Coe (Ward 2) (2010–present)
    • Ward Inspector [88]
      • Jane Stromberg (Ward 1) (2019–present)
      • Alex Rose (Ward 2) (2019–present)
      • Kit Andrews (Ward 3) (2013–present)
      • Bonnie Filker (Ward 3) (2019–present)
  • Montpelier

Town

[edit]
  • Springfield
    • Selectboard
      • Stephanie Thompson (2010–present)
  • Fairlee
    • Zoning and Planning Administrator
      • John Christopher Brimmer (2012–present)
  • Berlin
    • Selectboard
      • Jeremy Hansen (2013–present)
  • Richmond
    • Selectboard
      • Steve May (2016–present)
  • The party also has a significant number of its members elected to other local offices in town governments and appointed to serve as town officials. However, in Vermont these elections are non-partisan and no party name appears before their names on election ballots or during an appointment process.

Party leaders

[edit]

The current chair of the party's State Committee is State Senator and former Gubernatorial nominee and Congressional candidate Anthony Pollina, and the current vice-chair, Marielle Blais, was first elected in 2019. Secretary Chris Brimmer, also the Chair of the Caledonia County Committee, has served since 2009. The current Treasurer is Robert Millar, who briefly served as Acting Chair in 2001, and Assistant Treasurer Martha Abbott previously served as Treasurer and twice as chair. After being in the position of Acting Chair while the State Committee was not formalized, Heather Riemer served as the party's first chair at its formation as a statewide party in 1999. The position of executive director was added in 2011, and since 2015 has been the party's only paid staff, and has been occupied by Joshua Wronski. Current Treasurer Robert Millar previously served as executive director from 2011 to 2015.[89][90][91]

  • Chair: Anthony Pollina (2007–2009, 2017–present)
  • Vice Chair: Marielle Blais (2019–present)
  • Secretary: John Christopher Brimmer (2009–present)
  • Treasurer: Robert Millar (2019–present)
  • Assistant Treasurer: Martha Abbott (2019–present)
  • Executive Director: Joshua Wronski (2015–2025)
  • Member Organizer: Yvanita Nolan (2023–2025)
  • Senate Caucus Leader: Anthony Pollina (2013–present)
  • Senate Caucus Whip: Christopher Pearson (2017–present)
  • House Caucus Leader: Robin Chesnut-Tangerman (2017–present)
  • House Caucus Whip: Diana Gonzalez (2017–present)
  • Youth/Student Caucus Leader: Carter Neubieser (2015–present)
  • Coordinating Committee:
    • Nick Clark
    • Carter Neubieser
    • Adam Norton
    • Zachariah Ralph
    • Tanya Vyhovsky
    • Cindy Weed
    • Regional Advisers (Non-voting):
      • West-Central: Finnian Boardman Abbey
      • East-Central: Traven Leyshon
      • Northern: Jackie Stanton
      • Southeast: Pamela Whitefield
      • Southwest: Tim Guiles

Timeline of party Chairs

[edit]
# Name Term
– Heather Riemer
Acting 		1995–1999
1 Heather Riemer 1999–2001
– Robert Millar
Acting 		2001
2 Martha Abbott 2001–2005
3 Marrisa S. Caldwell 2005–2007
4 Anthony Pollina 2007–2009
5 Martha Abbott 2009–2013
6 Emma Mulvaney-Stanak 2013–2017
7 Anthony Pollina 2017–present

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Vermont Progressive Party

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Progressive Party is a progressive operating exclusively in the U.S. state of , tracing its origins to the 1981 election of independent as mayor of Burlington, which galvanized local progressive organizing. Formally established as a statewide in after evolving from earlier coalitions, the party positions itself as independent from corporate-dominated major parties and focused on efforts to advance economic, social, and . The party's platform emphasizes , protection of inalienable rights, sustainable , and policies supporting working people, including universal healthcare, pro-labor reforms, and tax policies favoring small agriculture over large corporations. It has secured sustained representation in Vermont's legislature, currently affiliating with 11 members in the and , often through fusion candidacies with Democrats. Notable achievements include electing the state's first Progressive-affiliated , David Zuckerman, in 2016, and state auditor Doug Hoffer in 2012, alongside influencing legislation on marriage equality, medical marijuana access, and efforts toward . While the party has maintained a niche but influential role in Vermont's politics—unique among U.S. states for a third party with consistent legislative seats—its statewide electoral successes remain limited beyond local and legislative levels, reflecting challenges in broadening appeal against dominant Democratic and Republican forces. The Vermont Progressive Party continues to endorse figures like Sanders and prioritizes issues such as economic equity and , distinguishing itself through commitment to democratic socialist principles amid Vermont's tradition of independent political movements.

History

Origins in Burlington and Progressive Coalition

The origins of the Vermont Progressive Party trace back to the 1981 mayoral election in Burlington, Vermont's largest city, where independent candidate defeated six-term Democratic incumbent Gordon Paquette by a margin of ten to twelve votes in a grassroots campaign emphasizing anti-establishment reforms. This upset victory galvanized local progressives, who formed the Progressive Coalition to support Sanders' agenda on the Burlington City Council, a 13-member body where the coalition succeeded in electing several members but never secured a majority. The Progressive Coalition focused on practical municipal reforms aligned with Sanders' priorities, including waterfront redevelopment through public-private partnerships, expansion of , implementation of recycling programs, and policies in city contracts to promote women's small businesses. These efforts established a model of independent progressive governance outside the Democratic Party, emphasizing fiscal responsibility alongside social equity, such as efficient management of the publicly owned to fund community programs. Sanders, while independent and not formally affiliated with the coalition, provided ideological leadership, inspiring a cadre of activists who prioritized working-class issues over partisan loyalty. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, members of the Progressive Coalition began contesting seats in the Vermont state legislature from Burlington districts, achieving initial successes that laid the groundwork for broader expansion. The coalition's persistence in Burlington politics, despite opposition from established parties, demonstrated the viability of third-party organizing in a small, rural state, setting the stage for the formal establishment of the Vermont Progressive Party as a statewide entity in 2000. This local foundation in Burlington proved crucial, as it allowed progressives to build electoral infrastructure and voter coalitions independent of Democratic dominance.

Formation and Early State-Level Expansion

The Vermont Progressive Party coalesced as a formal statewide entity in 2000, evolving from the Progressive Coalition that had backed independent candidates since Bernie Sanders's 1981 mayoral victory in Burlington. This transition granted the party major party status under law, enabling broader and organizational structure beyond local coalitions. Preceding full party formation, progressive-aligned candidates achieved initial state legislative representation in 1990, with Terry Bouricius (Chittenden 7-4 district) and Tom Smith (Chittenden 7-3 district) elected to the Vermont House from Burlington, taking office in 1991; Bouricius served until 2000, while Smith departed in 1994. These wins laid groundwork for state-level engagement, focusing on issues like and public services inherited from Burlington's progressive governance. Statewide expansion accelerated post-2000, as the party elected its inaugural member outside Burlington—Emma Spector in Brattleboro's Windham-Windsor district—signaling geographic diversification. In the 2002 lieutenant gubernatorial contest, co-founder Anthony Pollina secured 25% of the vote (42,278 votes), the strongest third-party showing in the race and evidence of emerging viability against Democratic and Republican dominance. By 2004, the party added three rural House seats, including representatives from Orange, Addison, and Washington counties, expanding influence into non-urban areas through targeted campaigns on economic and . This period marked a shift from municipal strongholds to systematic state legislative penetration, with five House members by mid-decade.

Peak Influence and Key Electoral Milestones

The Vermont Progressive Party achieved its greatest legislative presence in the mid-2000s, holding six seats in the following the 2004 elections, up from four in 2003. This marked a significant expansion from its early state-level foothold, built on grassroots organizing in Burlington and fusion candidacies with Democrats that allowed Progressives to compete in multi-member districts without splitting the left-of-center vote. By 2005 and 2007, the party maintained six House seats amid a Democratic majority, exerting influence on issues like universal healthcare and reform through caucusing with Democrats. A pivotal milestone came in 2008 with the election of Anthony Pollina to the , the party's first senator and a reflection of growing viability beyond the House. This built on earlier gains, including the 2002 gubernatorial campaign where Pollina captured 25% of the vote, signaling Progressive appeal in statewide races. The party's influence peaked further in the early 2010s with the 2012 election of Doug Hoffer as —the first Progressive to win a constitutional statewide office—defeating Democratic and Republican opponents through ranked-choice elements in some local processes and strong turnout in progressive strongholds like Chittenden County. In 2016, David Zuckerman's victory as extended this reach, though he later affiliated more closely with Democrats. These electoral successes, sustaining an uninterrupted presence of at least four to eight legislators since the , demonstrated the party's unique fusion strategy in Vermont's system, where Progressives often cross-nominate with Democrats to secure wins while maintaining distinct branding. By the mid-2010s, the party held up to eight legislative seats across and , influencing policy on economic justice and environmental protection within the Democratic-Progressive . However, these peaks were concentrated in urban and rural progressive enclaves, limiting broader statewide dominance against entrenched Democratic structures.

Decline and Recent Challenges

Following the 2022 elections, the Vermont Progressive Party experienced a significant reduction in its legislative representation, dropping from nine seats to six (five in the and one in the ), marking the first time in 18 years it held no seats outside Chittenden County. Losses occurred in Washington, Windham, and Windsor counties, exacerbated by retirements, recruitment difficulties, and defections to the Democratic Party, including Representatives Mollie Burke and Heather Surprenant. Party leaders attributed part of the setback to reputational damage from Burlington's decision to reduce its police force, which alienated voters seeking stability amid national political turbulence, as well as a perceived overlap in policy positions with Democrats, diminishing the Progressives' distinct appeal. Zuckerman noted that the intense scrutiny of Burlington's Progressive-led governance had complicated broader recruitment efforts. In the 2024 elections, these challenges persisted, with Zuckerman, running as a Democrat/Progressive fusion candidate, losing his bid for reelection as to Republican John Rodgers in a close race. The defeat highlighted ongoing difficulties in expanding beyond core urban strongholds, as Republican gains statewide reflected voter shifts toward and dissatisfaction with progressive policies on issues like property taxes and public safety. Fundraising constraints further hampered competitiveness, with the party's annual budget of approximately $120,000 proving inadequate against Democratic resources, limiting statewide advertising and organizational outreach. Historical baggage from Burlington, including the 2009 scandal under Mayor Bob Kiss involving the diversion of city funds to prop up Burlington Telecom—which led to a downgraded and contributed to the party's mayoral loss in 2012—continued to undermine perceptions of fiscal responsibility. Efforts to differentiate on opposition to perceived wasteful spending, such as the $4 million renovation, have yielded mixed results amid competition from Democrats claiming similar oversight roles. The departure of Wronski in July 2025 after nine years underscored internal reflections on sustaining grassroots momentum without broader financial or ideological expansion.

Ideology and Platform

Core Ideological Foundations

The Vermont Progressive Party's core ideological foundations center on the promotion of economic, social, and environmental justice alongside , pursued through electoral politics and other democratic processes. This framework, articulated in the party's Statement of Principles adopted in 1999, positions the organization as committed to addressing systemic inequalities and ecological limits via collective action rather than market-driven or individualistic approaches. The principles emphasize empowering working people and marginalized groups against concentrated corporate power, reflecting a critique of mainstream capitalist structures that prioritize profit over community welfare. At the heart of these foundations lies a dedication to , where citizens actively shape governance to safeguard inalienable rights and advance general welfare. The party platform, updated biennially under law, frames this as enhancing direct involvement in decision-making to counter of institutions, drawing from early influences like ' 1981 Burlington mayoral campaign, which demonstrated progressive municipal reforms such as initiatives and community-led environmental cleanups. Unlike progressives embedded within the Democratic Party, Vermont Progressives maintain independence to avoid compromise with corporate interests, fostering grassroots organizing focused on pro-labor policies, small-scale agriculture support, and opposition to that harms public goods. Environmentally, the ideology prioritizes as a non-negotiable imperative, viewing prosperity as interdependent with ecological health and rejecting growth models that externalize costs onto or vulnerable populations. Socially, it advances equity through universal access to essentials like healthcare, rooted in a vision of that extends beyond electoral wins to ongoing advocacy for marriage equality and tax reforms targeting wealth disparities. This synthesis aligns with social democratic tendencies, emphasizing state intervention for redistribution and protection, though the party frames it pragmatically within Vermont's context of fusion voting and coalition-building rather than doctrinal .

Specific Policy Priorities

The Vermont Progressive Party prioritizes universal access to healthcare, advocating for a publicly funded single-payer system to replace private insurance dominance, as reaffirmed in party statements and initiatives like the 2024 launch of a focused on coverage. Party legislators have pushed for reinvestment in community-based health services over incarceration, including treatment for substance use disorders via safer injection sites approved in House votes. In , the party seeks to combat wealth inequality through progressive taxation, such as proposals to levy additional income taxes on the top 5% of earners—approximately 15,000 filers—to generate $30 million annually for green initiatives, targeting those benefiting from federal tax cuts. Priorities include establishing living wages, universal paid family leave, and reforms to expand affordability for working and middle-class renters, including opposition to motel voucher expirations that risk for thousands. Environmental efforts center on climate justice, with calls for a "just transition" from fossil fuels via expanded public transit, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and clean energy standards excluding biofuels and ; funding supports local farms and weatherization programs. Party leader Sen. Anthony Pollina proposed a in 2020, financed by wealth-targeted taxes to fund renewable heating, electric vehicles, and transit overhauls, aiming to create jobs and cut emissions. On justice and safety, the party advocates reforming by addressing racial disparities, establishing community police oversight, decriminalizing sex work, and shifting resources to rehabilitation alternatives over expansion. Education priorities involve protecting public employees, fully funding pensions, and countering perceived attacks on the system through hiring incentives for educators and staff. Democratic reforms include limits, ranked-choice voting expansion, voting rights for all residents regardless of citizenship status, and equitable legislator compensation to reduce barriers to participation.

Distinctions from Mainstream Parties

The Vermont Progressive Party differentiates itself from both major U.S. parties through its commitment to , emphasizing worker ownership of enterprises, community control over local resources, and the dismantling of corporate dominance in and the economy, positions that exceed the regulated favored by Democrats and contrast sharply with Republican advocacy for free-market and tax minimization. This ideological foundation, rooted in principles adopted in 1999, prioritizes systemic redistribution and public welfare over profit-driven models, viewing mainstream parties as insufficiently responsive to working-class interests. Organizationally, the party insists on maintaining independence from the Democratic Party, eschewing fusion tickets or mergers despite legislative caucusing alliances, to avoid diluting its platform—a strategy that allows it to pressure Democrats leftward on issues like corporate regulation while running distinct candidates against Republicans. In policy terms, Progressives advocate single-payer universal healthcare as a non-negotiable entitlement, diverging from Democratic expansions of the via public options and rejecting Republican market-competition models, as evidenced by their sustained push for Vermont's failed but pioneering single-payer efforts in the early . On , the party endorses aggressive protections and measures that accept potential short-term economic trade-offs, going beyond Democratic priorities integrated with growth incentives and opposing Republican emphases on local control over federal mandates. Similarly, in arenas, Progressives favor and restorative approaches to , positioning themselves as more transformative than Democratic equity reforms while clashing with Republican defenses of traditional institutions and individual rights like Second Amendment protections. These stances reflect a broader anti-militarism and ethos, critiquing both parties' entanglements with establishments.

Electoral History and Performance

State Legislature Results

The Vermont Progressive Party has secured modest representation in the Vermont House of Representatives since emerging in the 1990s, typically holding 3 to 7 seats in the 150-member chamber, with members often receiving fusion nominations from the Democratic Party to enhance electability. This presence stems from concentrated support in urban and progressive-leaning districts, particularly around Burlington, where the party originated. Progressives have caucused with Democrats, contributing to left-leaning majorities without independently controlling the chamber. Historical data on House seats illustrates relative stability amid fluctuations tied to broader partisan shifts:
YearProgressive Seats
19912
19936
19953
19974
19996
20015
20034
20056
20076
20095
20115
20135
20156
20167
20197
20217
20246
Data for 1991–2021 from official legislative records; 2024 reflects six Progressives elected, all with Democratic cross-endorsements. Peak representation occurred in the late 1990s and mid-2010s, coinciding with anti-war and economic justice campaigns, but seats have hovered at 5–7 since 2009, comprising about 3–5% of the House. In the 2024 elections, Republican gains eroded the Democratic-Progressive , but Progressives retained their core holdings. In the 30-member Vermont , Progressive success has been more limited and intermittent, with 0–2 seats held in select sessions, often by prominent figures like Anthony Pollina, who represented the Hardwick area from 2009 to 2022. Progressives, like their counterparts, typically caucus with Democrats, amplifying influence on committees dealing with housing, healthcare, and without shifting overall partisan control. Pre-2024 sessions featured one dedicated Progressive seat alongside hybrid Democrat/Progressive affiliates; post-election composition maintained minimal standalone Progressive presence amid tighter Democratic margins. The party's footprint reflects Vermont's multi-member districts and fusion voting, which favor incumbents aligned with major parties.

Municipal and Local Elections

The Vermont Progressive Party has sustained a strong foothold in municipal politics, particularly in Burlington, its birthplace amid the 1980s progressive insurgency led by . Following Sanders's narrow 1981 mayoral victory over incumbent Democrat Gordon Paquette by 12 votes, Progressives and allies rapidly gained control of the Burlington City Council, implementing reforms in , public utilities, and . This early dominance reflected voter support for policies in a city long aligned with Democratic machine politics, enabling Progressives to prioritize tenant protections and municipal ownership of services like . An unbroken Progressive presence on the Burlington City Council has persisted since 1981, with the party frequently securing 4 to 6 of the 12 seats in recent decades. In the 2020 Town Meeting Day elections, Progressives expanded their influence by flipping key wards, including Jane Stromberg's defeat of incumbent Democrat Adam Roof in Ward 8 and Zoraya Hightower's win in Ward 1, briefly tipping council control toward their bloc. By 2022, they held six seats, maintaining leverage in a fragmented council. The party's 2024 municipal successes included re-elections in Wards 1, 2, and 3 (Carter Neubieser, Gene Bergman, and Joe Kane, respectively) and Melo Grant's retention of the Central District at-large seat, alongside Marek Broderick's Ward 8 victory, yielding five council seats overall. That year also saw Progressive Emma Mulvaney-Stanak elected Burlington mayor, defeating Democrat Incumbent Joan Shannon with 46% of the vote in a four-way race, marking the first Progressive mayoralty since Peter Clavelle's tenure ended in 2006. Beyond Burlington, Vermont Progressive Party-endorsed candidates have secured scattered local victories, including selectboard seats in Ripton (Bill Hunsinger and Laurie Cox), Brattleboro (Richard Davis), and Dummerston (Tom Nolan), as well as school board positions such as Monika Ivancic in Burlington Ward 7 and Tim Macel in the Windham Southeast Supervisory Union. In the March 2025 Town Meeting Day elections across multiple municipalities, 13 of 17 party-endorsed candidates prevailed, spanning town offices and school boards in over 45 communities. However, Burlington's 2025 council races saw Democrats retain a 7-5 majority, with Progressive challengers like Jennifer Monroe Zakaras losing to Democrat Buddy Singh in the South District, underscoring limits to expansion amid competition from Democrats. These outcomes highlight the party's localized strength in progressive enclaves but challenges in broader municipal takeovers, often relying on fusion candidacies with Democrats.

Federal and Presidential Involvement

The has maintained involvement in federal elections, focusing instead on endorsements of candidates who align with its progressive platform rather than nominating its own contenders for U.S. or seats. Vermont's allowance for fusion voting enables the party to cross-endorse Democratic or independent candidates, amplifying progressive influence without independent runs that could split votes. No member of the party has ever been elected to the U.S. under its banner, reflecting its strategic emphasis on state and local races where it holds greater sway. In recent cycles, the party has endorsed incumbent U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and maintains strong ties to Vermont progressives from his time as Burlington mayor under the Progressive label. For the 2024 election, the Vermont Progressive Party explicitly backed Sanders' re-election bid, underscoring shared priorities on economic justice and foreign policy restraint. Similarly, for the at-large U.S. House seat, the party has supported Democratic nominees like Becca Balint in 2022, leveraging fusion to bolster left-leaning representation without fielding challengers. Presidential involvement has been similarly indirect, with the party endorsing third-party candidates in select national races to promote alternatives to the two-party duopoly. In 2000, the Vermont Progressive Party supported nominee , aligning with his critiques of corporate influence and advocacy for universal healthcare. The party has not run its own presidential ticket, as its organizational scope remains state-bound, but its members and leaders have actively mobilized for progressive insurgents within Democratic primaries, notably ' 2016 and 2020 campaigns, which drew substantial support reflective of the party's ideological overlap.

Organizational Structure and Leadership

Party Leadership Timeline

The Vermont Progressive Party's formal leadership structure, including the position of state chair, emerged following its establishment as a statewide around 2000, building on earlier progressive coalitions and independent efforts dating to the 1980s. Prior to this, influential figures like shaped progressive politics through independent campaigns, such as his 1981 Burlington mayoral victory, but the party itself lacked a centralized chair role until the formal party formation.
TermState ChairKey Notes
2000–2013Martha AbbottElected state chair in 2000 after participating in the party's organization in late 1999; served 12 years, focusing on building legislative presence and distinguishing the party from Democrats. Stepped down in 2013 to allow new leadership.
2013–2017Emma Mulvaney-StanakElected at the party's annual convention in November 2013; resigned in June 2017 after four years, citing a desire to prioritize legislative work and increase women's leadership in the party.
2017–presentAnthony PollinaAssumed chair in 2017 following Mulvaney-Stanak's resignation; reelected in November 2019 with goals to expand party membership and legislative influence amid challenges from Democratic fusion tickets. Continues to serve as of 2025, also holding a state senate seat. Wait, avoid wiki; use [web:41] https://vtdigger.org/2019/11/19/progressives-reelect-pollina-party-chair-seek-to-grow-numbers/ and confirm since 2017 from context. Actually, [web:39] is wiki, but [web:41] implies ongoing from prior. For since 2017, cross with [web:48] stepping down 2017, then Pollina.
This succession reflects the party's emphasis on experienced legislators and organizers in leadership roles, with chairs often balancing party-building against electoral fusion with Democrats. No public records indicate interim chairs between transitions, and the role involves coordinating state committee activities, candidate recruitment, and platform development.

Caucus Dynamics and Membership

The Vermont Progressive Party's legislative comprises members who run under party affiliation, fusion tickets with Democrats (designated as D/P or P/D), or as independents with party endorsement, enabling them to maintain a distinct identity while participating in the Democratic-majority . As of October 2025, the caucus includes five representatives in the 150-member House: Kate Logan (P/D, Chittenden-16), Barbara Rachelson (D/P, Chittenden-14), Mike Mrowicki (D/P, Windham-4), Chloe Tomlinson (P/D, Chittenden-21), and Brian Cina (P/D, Chittenden-15). In the 30-member Senate, it holds four seats: Tanya Vyhovsky (P/D, Chittenden-Central), Phil Baruth (D/P, Chittenden-Central), Anne Watson (D/P, Washington), and Andrew Perchlik (D/P, Washington). These members are predominantly from urban and central districts, reflecting the party's historical base in areas like Burlington and Chittenden County, with no representation from rural or Republican-leaning regions. Caucus operations emphasize internal coordination on priorities such as economic , , and support for vulnerable populations, while aligning procedurally with Democratic to influence committee assignments and floor votes. The House Progressive functions as a formal group, electing leaders biennially; for the 2025-2026 session, it named Kate Logan as caucus leader, though internal shifts occurred, including Representative Troy Headrick's departure from the caucus in January 2025 amid personal reevaluation of affiliation. Senate Progressives similarly coordinate independently but contribute to the broader Democratic-Progressive bloc, which holds 17 of 30 seats following the 2024 elections, exerting leverage on progressive legislation despite lacking majority control. This structure allows the caucus to advocate positions diverging from mainstream Democrats, such as stronger rent control or expansions, though practical influence depends on coalition-building rather than standalone power. Membership stability has varied, with the caucus size hovering between 8 and 12 seats over recent sessions, sustained by targeted recruitment in sympathetic districts but challenged by fusion ticket requirements and competition from Democratic primaries.

Policy Impact and Achievements

Successful Legislative Contributions

The Vermont Progressive Party's legislative members have sponsored or co-sponsored several bills that advanced labor protections, measures, and initiatives, often in coalition with Democrats. In the 2023 session, S.102 (the PRO Act), primarily sponsored by Progressive Representative Emma Mulvaney-Stanak, expanded rights to include domestic and agricultural workers, allowed majority sign-up for union elections, and prohibited employer-mandated anti-union meetings, ultimately enacting these changes as Act 117 after passage in both chambers. Progressives contributed to enhancements in worker and family supports through H.217, which raised subsidy eligibility to 175% of the federal poverty level for free care and 400% for subsidized care, while mandating employer contributions to insurance and improving benefits; the bill passed with co-sponsorship from Progressive Representative Taylor Small. Similarly, S.103 extended equal pay laws to prohibit based on , , race, national origin, and , passing both houses with Progressive advocacy for the inclusive amendments. In and , H.222, influenced by Progressive Senator Tanya Vyhovsky, established funding for seven drug-checking sites, granted immunity for certain drug-related activities, decriminalized possession of , and created a syringe disposal program, becoming law after full legislative passage. H.89, backed by Representatives Small and former Representative Kate Donnally, shielded providers and recipients of services and certain medical treatments for minors from out-of-state legal actions, enacting protections effective upon signing. S.37, sponsored by Representative Mulvaney-Stanak, protected professionals' licenses from interstate disciplinary actions and restricted misleading advertising by certain counseling centers, also advancing to enactment. Criminal justice reforms included S.27, led by Senator Vyhovsky, which eliminated cash bail for non-violent misdemeanors, passing the and contributing to broader discussions on pretrial release. These efforts reflect the party's focus on left-leaning priorities, though many bills faced gubernatorial vetoes or required Democratic majorities for passage, limiting independent impact.

Economic and Social Outcomes

Vermont's economy has exhibited sluggish growth relative to national benchmarks during periods of significant Progressive Party influence in the state legislature, where the party has advocated for expansive social spending and progressive taxation. The state's stood at $45,886 in 2020, compared to the national average of $58,281, reflecting structural under. Annualized GDP growth averaged 1.4% over the five years leading to 2024, lagging behind the U.S. average and contributing to Vermont's 39th ranking in overall economic among states. High taxes, ranking fifth nationally at an effective rate of 1.71% in 2025, have funded these initiatives but exacerbated affordability challenges, including a that prompted in 2024 amid voter concerns over living costs. Fiscal strains have emerged in Progressive-led municipalities, such as Burlington, where a $14 million deficit persisted into 2025 under a Progressive mayor, highlighting tensions between ambitious spending on social programs and revenue constraints. Statewide, ranked 49th in economic prospects in a 2024 analysis, with critics attributing stagnation to regulatory burdens and tax policies championed by Progressives, including opposition to certain measures deemed insufficiently progressive. While recent revenue forecasts indicate short-term stability through 2028, long-term data-driven reforms have been proposed to address declining population and business outflows linked to these policies. Social indicators show mixed results, with Vermont's structure—one of the nation's most redistributive, where the top 1% pay 10.4% of income in state taxes versus 8.7% for the bottom 20%—supporting robust access and low reported poor rates of 14% among adults in 2025. outcomes benefit from strong preventive care availability, contributing to family metrics above national averages in some areas. However, rural healthcare provider shortages persist, and remains a key social determinant disproportionately affecting minority communities, with broader inequities in and access undermining gains.

Criticisms and Controversies

Ideological Rigidity and Internal Conflicts

The Vermont Progressive Party has exhibited ideological rigidity through its unwavering commitment to democratic socialist principles, including universal , aggressive environmental regulations, and opposition to corporate influence, which has occasionally strained internal cohesion when pragmatic compromises are debated. This steadfastness, rooted in the party's founding platform emphasizing and anti-capitalist reforms, has led to tensions over strategic flexibility, particularly regarding "fusion" candidacies where Progressives accept Democratic Party nominations to avoid vote-splitting in Vermont's Democratic-leaning electorate. In 2003, the party's was amended to permit such dual endorsements, a move that resolved a prior ban but highlighted divisions between purists advocating total independence and those favoring electoral viability to advance policy goals. Internal conflicts have surfaced prominently around national endorsements and local governance trade-offs, exacerbating perceptions of drift from core ideology. The 2016 endorsement of in the Democratic presidential primary divided members, with some advocating abstention or support for candidate to preserve ideological purity against major-party co-optation. Locally, compromises such as backing Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger's development projects amid concerns or shelving single-payer initiatives have fueled accusations of dilution, prompting warnings from figures like Tim Ashe that fusion risks forming a Democratic-Progressive bloc, undermining the party's distinct identity. These tensions contributed to tangible fractures, including legislative defections and electoral setbacks. In the elections, the party lost a third of its State House seats (from 9 to 6), with representatives Mollie Burke and Heather Surprenant switching to the Democratic Party, citing strategic alignment amid voter shifts toward stability over ideological experimentation. High-profile decisions, such as Burlington Progressives' push to reduce the police force following George Floyd's 2020 murder, alienated broader constituencies and diverted resources from rural organizing, further straining unity as the party grappled with balancing radical commitments against governance realities. The development of formal policies by the party's Internal Policy Committee in 2024 underscores ongoing efforts to manage these disputes restoratively rather than through expulsion or schism.

Contribution to Fiscal and Affordability Crises

The Vermont Progressive Party's persistent advocacy for expanded on social welfare, , and environmental programs has contributed to the state's chronic fiscal imbalances, as evidenced by reliance on volatile revenues to offset rising expenditures. Party members, often caucusing with Democrats to form legislative supermajorities, have supported budgets prioritizing these areas without commensurate reforms to control costs or broaden the tax base, leading to structural pressures. For example, in response to Phil Scott's proposed 2026 budget, which included spending restraint amid economic uncertainties, Progressives criticized it for insufficient investment in response and public safety, implicitly favoring higher outlays that strain long-term solvency. Vermont's heavy dependence on to fund —a priority Progressives have championed through opposition to spending caps—has directly fueled tax hikes and affordability erosion. The state maintains one of the nation's highest effective rates at approximately 1.71%, with spending driving double-digit increases, such as the 13.8% average rise in approved by local voters and school boards under progressive-influenced policies. This regressive funding mechanism, defended by Progressives against shifts to more progressive income-based alternatives, burdens middle-income households and small businesses, correlating with stagnant and as residents face cumulative costs exceeding 10% of in some districts. At the municipal level, Progressive governance has mirrored these patterns, exacerbating local deficits. In Burlington, a party stronghold, the incoming progressive mayor in 2025 inherited a $13-14 million budget shortfall from prior administrations aligned with similar spending priorities, prompting deferred maintenance and fee hikes rather than structural cuts. Statewide, Progressive-backed initiatives like wealth taxes and single-payer healthcare proposals, though often unrealized, have diverted focus from fiscal discipline, contributing to a "bloated" budget criticized for enabling tax increases amid federal aid reductions and inflation. These dynamics have intensified Vermont's affordability crisis, with high taxes and regulatory burdens—supported by Progressives in areas like and mandates—driving up living costs and prompting voter backlash. Recent elections saw Republican gains breaking Democratic supermajorities, driven by constituent frustration over taxes and housing unaffordability, where median home prices surged amid supply constraints from and environmental rules Progressives endorse. Empirical trends indicate that unchecked spending growth outpaces revenue, projecting future cliffs without policy shifts, as one-time surpluses like the $118 million used in 2025 to cap tax hikes prove unsustainable.

Backlash and Electoral Repercussions

Public discontent with Vermont's escalating affordability challenges, including soaring property taxes and housing shortages exacerbated by regulatory barriers and high public spending, has increasingly targeted the progressive-influenced legislative agenda. Critics, including business advocates and fiscal conservatives, argue that policies championed by the Democratic-Progressive coalition—such as expansive social programs and stringent zoning laws—have driven up costs, prompted outmigration, and stifled economic growth, with Vermont's median home prices rising 50% from 2019 to 2024 amid chronic underbuilding. This backlash manifested in voter surveys and opinion pieces highlighting how progressive priorities, like increased taxation for climate and equity initiatives, have prioritized ideological goals over practical affordability, leading to accusations of fiscal irresponsibility. Electorally, these sentiments translated into tangible losses for Progressive-affiliated candidates. In the state elections, the Vermont Progressive Party saw its representation drop from eight seats to five, reflecting diminished voter support amid growing frustration with coalition governance. The 2024 cycle amplified this trend, as Republican John Rodgers defeated incumbent David Zuckerman—a longtime Progressive figure—in a race decided by approximately 5,000 votes, with Zuckerman receiving 48.5% to Rodgers' 51.5%. Republicans capitalized on affordability grievances to flip 16 seats and narrow the margin, shattering the Democratic and forcing greater bipartisan negotiation on budgets and taxes. These results underscore a causal link between policy-driven economic pressures and electoral shifts, with voters opting for alternatives perceived as more restrained on spending and regulation.

References

  1. https://www.progressiveparty.org/our-story
  2. https://www.progressiveparty.org/platform
  3. https://www.progressiveparty.org/elected-progressives
  4. https://progressivecities.org/cities/burlington-vt/chronology-of-progressive-achievements-in-burlington-vt/
  5. https://towardfreedom.org/story/archives/americas/acting-locally-progressive-party-victory-in-vermont/
  6. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/vermonts-progressives-and-democrats-have-uneasy-ties-3616865/
  7. https://ballotpedia.org/Vermont_Progressive_Party
  8. https://new.progressiveparty.org/files/documents/LegacyProgTimelineState.pdf
  9. https://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Clerk-of-the-House-Documents/Historical/Statistical-Documents/House-Membership-by-Party.pdf
  10. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/why-is-the-progressive-party-losing-its-luster-in-montpelier-36988007/
  11. https://www.vermontpublic.org/live-updates/vermont-election-results-november-2024
  12. https://vtdigger.org/2024/11/07/emboldened-by-unexpectedly-strong-results-vermont-republicans-will-share-more-power-and-responsibility/
  13. https://vtdigger.org/2025/06/18/as-leadership-change-looms-vermonts-progressive-party-head-reflects-on-tenure/
  14. https://vtcynic.com/opinion/the-future-of-the-burlington-progressive-party/
  15. https://vtdigger.org/2012/03/07/weinberger-scores-decisive-win-in-historic-burlington-mayoral-race/
  16. https://vtdigger.org/2019/03/26/burlington-city-council-gives-final-ok-to-city-hall-park-renovation/
  17. https://www.progressiveparty.org/statement-of-principles
  18. https://www.wamc.org/new-england-news/2015-02-23/vermont-progressive-party-continues-support-of-universal-health-care
  19. https://www.progressiveparty.org/progressive-news-and-updates/vermont-can-deliver-universal-primary-care-this-year
  20. https://www.mynbc5.com/article/progressive-lawmakers-lay-out-their-priorities/46355695
  21. https://www.progressiveparty.org/legislative-updates/press-release-on-legislative-priorities-for-the-2023-2024-biennium
  22. https://vtdigger.org/2019/12/26/progressive-leader-to-propose-vermont-green-new-deal-in-2020/
  23. https://www.progressiveparty.org/btv-council-updates/statement-on-2025-housingagenda
  24. https://www.progressiveparty.org/progressive-news-and-updates/the-right-to-housing
  25. https://fyivt.com/be-informed/understanding-vermonts-five-political-camps-a-no-nonsense-guide/
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/opinion/sunday/as-vermont-goes-so-goes-the-nation.html
  27. https://progressive.org/latest/single-payer-health-care-did-not-fail-in-vermont-russ-200304/
  28. https://vtdigger.org/2022/11/09/how-democrats-secured-a-historic-majority-in-the-vermont-house/
  29. https://ballot-access.org/2024/11/21/six-progressive-party-members-win-for-vermont-state-legislature/
  30. https://vtdigger.org/2024/11/06/where-democrats-lost-ground-in-vermonts-house/
  31. https://vtdigger.org/2020/12/06/election-results-make-room-for-new-leaders-in-the-progressive-party/
  32. https://vtdigger.org/2024/11/12/partisan-divide-of-the-vermont-senate-to-be-tighter-than-in-almost-a-quarter-century/
  33. https://mynbc5.com/article/vermont-democratic-supermajority-legislature/62832310
  34. https://legislature.vermont.gov/people/all/2024/Senate
  35. https://vtdigger.org/2020/03/03/progressive-jane-stromberg-unseats-democrat-adam-roof-%25EF%25BB%25BFin-burlington-council-race/
  36. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/progressives-hold-their-ground-in-burlington-city-council-elections-35006689/
  37. https://www.progressiveparty.org/progressive-news-and-updates/progressives-sweep-town-meeting-day
  38. https://vtdigger.org/2024/03/08/how-did-emma-mulvaney-stanak-win-burlington-and-how-will-she-govern/
  39. https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2025/03/thirteen-vermont-progressive-party-endorsed-candidates-win-in-local-elections/
  40. https://vtdigger.org/2025/03/04/democrats-keep-their-majority-on-burlington-city-council/
  41. https://www.progressiveparty.org/2024endorsements
  42. https://theendorsementproject.com/organizations/state-organizations/vermont/vermont-progressive-party/
  43. https://www.commonsnews.org/issue/447/Milestones
  44. https://vtdigger.org/2013/10/24/abbott-vermont-progressive-party-model-change/
  45. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/abbott-to-step-down-as-prog-party-chair-mulvaney-stanak-seeking-to-replace-her-2268011/
  46. https://vtdigger.org/2013/11/10/progressives-elect-mulvaney-stanek-chair-outlne-agenda/
  47. https://www.wamc.org/new-england-news/2017-06-13/vermont-progressive-party-chair-steps-down
  48. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/news/mulvaney-stanak-resigns-vermont-progressive-party-chairmanship-6141600/
  49. https://vtdigger.org/2019/11/19/progressives-reelect-pollina-party-chair-seek-to-grow-numbers/
  50. https://www.progressiveparty.org/state-committee-members
  51. https://www.progressiveparty.org/statehousecaucus
  52. https://vermontbiz.com/news/2024/december/16/vermont-house-progressive-caucus-names-leadership-2025-26-biennium
  53. https://www.troyheadrick.com/2025/01/25/a-change-in-my-legislative-affiliation/
  54. https://vt.audubon.org/news/welcome-2025-2026-legislative-session
  55. https://www.progressiveparty.org/legislative-updates/legislative-summary-part-1
  56. https://legislature.vermont.gov/bill/status/2024/S.102
  57. https://www.progressiveparty.org/legislative-updates/legislative-summary-part-2
  58. https://vtfuturesproject.org/economic-activity/
  59. https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/economic-profiles/vermont/
  60. https://www.richstatespoorstates.org/states/VT/
  61. https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/property-taxes-by-state
  62. https://www.businessinsider.com/vermont-housing-affordability-crisis-taxes-republican-gains-2024-12
  63. https://www.progressiveparty.org/btv-council-updates/burlingtons-14-million-budget-gap
  64. https://vermontdailychronicle.com/vermont-has-second-worst-economic-prospects-in-the-nation/
  65. https://www.progressiveparty.org/progressive-news-and-updates/statement-from-the-state-committee-of-the-vermont-progressive-party-opposing-the-state-budget
  66. https://www.edegan.com/articles/a-solution-to-vermonts-declining-economy/
  67. https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2025-01-22/vermonts-economy-is-going-strong-experts-tell-state-officials
  68. https://itep.org/politifact-does-vermont-have-the-most-progressive-tax-system-in-the-country/
  69. https://vtpha.org/family-and-child-health-outcomes-in-vermont/
  70. https://vtpha.org/two-roads-one-state-the-diverging-paths-of-rural-and-urban-health-in-vermont/
  71. https://www.vermonthealthequity.org/stories-and-news/poverty-as-an-sdoh
  72. https://jacobin.com/2016/08/vermont-progressives-vpp-sanders-democrats-independent/
  73. https://vtprogressiveparty.nationbuilder.com/internal_policy
  74. https://www.progressiveparty.org/progressive-news-and-updates/our-response-to-the-governors-budget
  75. https://www.campaignforvermont.org/headed_for_another_fiscal_cliff
  76. https://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/personal-income-taxes/states-with-highest-property-tax.htm
  77. https://vtdigger.org/2024/10/25/this-election-vermont-republicans-control-the-narrative-on-property-taxes-will-that-flip-legislative-seats/
  78. https://ltgov.vermont.gov/september-25th-newsletter-whats-causing-increase-property-taxes
  79. https://americansforprosperity.org/press-release/americans-for-prosperity-launches-accountability-campaign-over-vermonts-affordability-crisis-and-bloated-state-budget/
  80. https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2025-05-07/at-a-cost-of-nearly-120m-lawmakers-hold-property-tax-increases-to-1
  81. https://governor.vermont.gov/governor-scotts-blog/commissioner-kerrick-johnson-vermont-must-solve-its-energy-affordability
  82. https://vermontdailychronicle.com/advocates-launch-campaign-to-tackle-vermonts-affordability-crisis/
  83. https://vtdigger.org/2024/11/05/david-zuckerman-john-rodgers-locked-in-tight-race-for-lieutenant-governor/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.