Bob
Have a question related to this hub?
Alice
Got something to say related to this hub?
Share it here.
![]() An RL10A-4 engine in London's Science Museum | |
Country of origin | United States |
---|---|
First flight | 1962 | (RL10A-1)
Manufacturer | Aerojet Rocketdyne |
Application | Upper stage engine |
Associated LV | Atlas · Delta III · Delta IV · Saturn I · SLS · Titan IIIE · Titan IV · Vulcan Centaur Canceled: DC-X · OmegA · Shuttle-Centaur |
Status | In production |
Liquid-fuel engine | |
Propellant | LOX / LH2 |
Mixture ratio | 5.88:1 |
Cycle | Expander cycle[1] |
Configuration | |
Nozzle ratio | 84:1 or 280:1 |
Performance | |
Thrust, vacuum | 110.1 kN (24,800 lbf) |
Specific impulse, vacuum | 465.5 s (4.565 km/s) |
Dimensions | |
Length | 4.15 m (13.6 ft) w/ nozzle extended |
Diameter | 2.15 m (7 ft 1 in) |
Dry mass | 301 kg (664 lb) |
Used in | |
Centaur, DCSS, S-IV | |
References | |
References | [2] |
Notes | Performance values and dimensions are for RL10B-2. |
The RL10 is a liquid-fuel cryogenic rocket engine built in the United States by Aerojet Rocketdyne that burns cryogenic liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants. Modern versions produce up to 110 kN (24,729 lbf) of thrust per engine in vacuum. RL10 versions were produced for the Centaur upper stage of the Atlas V and the DCSS of the Delta IV. More versions are in development or in use for the Exploration Upper Stage of the Space Launch System and the Centaur V of the Vulcan rocket.[3]
The expander cycle that the engine uses drives the turbopump with waste heat absorbed by the engine combustion chamber, throat, and nozzle. This, combined with the hydrogen fuel, leads to very high specific impulses (Isp) in the range of 373 to 470 s (3.66–4.61 km/s) in a vacuum. Mass ranges from 131 to 317 kg (289–699 lb) depending on the version of the engine.[4][5]
The RL10 was the first liquid hydrogen rocket engine to be built in the United States, with development of the engine by Marshall Space Flight Center and Pratt & Whitney beginning in the 1950s. The RL10 was originally developed as a throttleable engine for the USAF Lunex lunar lander.[6] The engine was electric spark ignited.[7]
The RL10 was first tested on the ground in 1959, at Pratt & Whitney's Florida Research and Development Center in West Palm Beach, Florida.[8][9] The first successful flight took place on November 27, 1963.[10][11] For that launch, two RL10A-3 engines powered the Centaur upper stage of an Atlas launch vehicle. The launch was used to conduct a heavily instrumented performance and structural integrity test of the vehicle.[12]
Multiple versions of this engine have been flown. The S-IV of the Saturn I used a cluster of six RL10A-3S, a version which was modified for installation on the Saturn[13] and the Titan program included Centaur D-1T upper stages powered by two RL10A-3-3 Engines.[13][14]
Four modified RL10A-5 engines were used in the McDonnell Douglas DC-X.[15]
A flaw in the brazing of an RL10B-2 combustion chamber was identified as the cause of failure for the 4 May 1999 Delta III launch carrying the Orion-3 communications satellite.[16]
The DIRECT version 3.0 proposal to replace Ares I and Ares V with a family of rockets sharing a common core stage recommended the RL10 for the second stage of the J-246 and J-247 launch vehicles.[17] Up to seven RL10 engines would have been used in the proposed Jupiter Upper Stage, serving an equivalent role to the Space Launch System Exploration Upper Stage.
In the early 2000s, NASA contracted with Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne to develop the Common Extensible Cryogenic Engine (CECE) demonstrator. CECE was intended to lead to RL10 engines capable of deep throttling.[18] In 2007, its operability (with some "chugging") was demonstrated at 11:1 throttle ratios.[19] In 2009, NASA reported successfully throttling from 104 percent thrust to eight percent thrust, a record for an expander cycle engine of this type. Chugging was eliminated by injector and propellant feed system modifications that control the pressure, temperature and flow of propellants.[20] In 2010, the throttling range was expanded further to a 17.6:1 ratio, throttling from 104% to 5.9% power.[21]
In 2012 NASA joined with the US Air Force (USAF) to study next-generation upper stage propulsion, formalizing the agencies' joint interests in a new upper stage engine to replace the Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10.
"We know the list price on an RL10. If you look at cost over time, a very large portion of the unit cost of the EELVs is attributable to the propulsion systems, and the RL10 is a very old engine, and there's a lot of craftwork associated with its manufacture. ... That's what this study will figure out, is it worthwhile to build an RL10 replacement?"
— Dale Thomas, Associated Director Technical, Marshall Space Flight Center[22]
From the study, NASA hoped to find a less expensive RL10-class engine for the upper stage of the Space Launch System (SLS).[22][23]
USAF hoped to replace the Rocketdyne RL10 engines used on the upper stages of the Lockheed Martin Atlas V and the Boeing Delta IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles (EELV) that were the primary methods of putting US government satellites into space.[22] A related requirements study was conducted at the same time under the Affordable Upper Stage Engine Program (AUSEP).[23]
The RL10 has undergone multiple upgrades over the decades. The RL10B-2, used on the DCSS, incorporated an extendable nozzle made from carbon–carbon, electro-mechanical gimbaling to reduce weight and increase reliability, and achieved a specific impulse of 465.5 seconds (4.565 km/s).[24][25]
Beginning in the 2000s, Aerojet Rocketdyne introduced 3D printing (additive manufacturing) into RL10 production. The RL10C-1-1 was the first engine to include a 3D-printed component, featuring a nickel superalloy main injector.[26] Building on that experience, in 2015 the company began developing a more extensive upgrade that employed an additively manufactured copper thrust chamber. According to the company, the new process reduced chamber fabrication time from approximately 20 months to 4–6 months compared with earlier hand-fabricated stainless steel chambers, enabling production of up to one engine per week rather than one per month. This variant, designated RL10C-X during development, entered production as the RL10E-1 and is planned for use on United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur rocket, scheduled for its first flight in 2025.[27][28]
Version | Status | First flight | Dry mass | Thrust | Specific impulse (ve), vac. | Length | Nozzle diameter | T:W | O:F | Expansion ratio | Burn time | Associated stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL10A-1 | Retired | 1962 | 131 kg (289 lb) | 67 kN (15,000 lbf) | 425 s (4.17 km/s) | 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in) | 1.53 m (5 ft 0 in) | 52:1 | 5:1 | 40:1 | 430 s | Centaur A | Prototype [13][29][39][40] |
RL10A-3C | Retired | 1963 | 131 kg (289 lb) | 65.6 kN (14,700 lbf) | 444 s (4.35 km/s) | 2.49 m (8 ft 2 in) | 1.53 m (5 ft 0 in) | 51:1 | 5:1 | 57:1 | 470 s | Centaur B/C/D/E | [41] |
RL10A-3S | Retired | 1964 | 134 kg (296 lb) | 67 kN (15,000 lbf) | 427 s (4.19 km/s) | 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in) | 0.99 m (3 ft 3 in) | 51:1 | 5:1 | 40:1 | 482 s | S-IV | [13][10] |
RL10A-4 | Retired | 1992 | 168 kg (370 lb) | 92.5 kN (20,800 lbf) | 449 s (4.40 km/s) | 2.29 m (7 ft 6 in) | 1.17 m (3 ft 10 in) | 56:1 | 5.5:1 | 84:1 | 392 s | Centaur IIA | [13][42] |
RL10A-5 | Retired | 1993 | 143 kg (315 lb) | 64.7 kN (14,500 lbf) | 373 s (3.66 km/s) | 1.07 m (3 ft 6 in) | 1.02 m (3 ft 4 in) | 46:1 | 6:1 | 4:1 | 127 s | DC-X | [13][43] |
RL10B-2 | Retired | 1998 | 301 kg (664 lb) | 110.1 kN (24,750 lbf) | 465.5 s (4.565 km/s) | Stowed: 2.2 m (7 ft 2.5 in) Deployed: 4.15 m (13 ft 7.5 in) |
2.15 m (7 ft 0.5 in) | 40:1 | 5.88:1 | 280:1 | 5m: 1,125 s 4m: 700 s |
DCSS ICPS |
Succeeded by RL10C-2.[2][44][25] |
RL10A-4-1 | Retired | 2000 | 167 kg (368 lb) | 99.1 kN (22,300 lbf) | 451 s (4.42 km/s) | 1.78 m (5 ft 10 in) | 1.53 m (5 ft 0 in) | 61:1 | 84:1 | 740 s | Centaur IIIA | [13][45] | |
RL10A-4-2 | Active | 2002 | 170 kg (370 lb) | 99 kN (22,300 lbf) | 451 s (4.42 km/s) | 2.29 m (7 ft 6 in) | 1.17 m (3 ft 10 in) | 61:1 | 84:1 | 740 s | Centaur IIIB Centaur SEC Centaur DEC |
Used for Starliner launches.[13][46][47] | |
RL10B-X | Cancelled | — | 317 kg (699 lb) | 93.4 kN (21,000 lbf) | 470 s (4.6 km/s) | 1.53 m (5 ft 0 in) | 30:1 | 250:1 | 408 s | Centaur B-X | [48] | ||
CECE | Demonstrator project | — | 160 kg (350 lb) | 67 kN (15,000 lbf), throttle to 5–10% | >445 s (4.36 km/s) | 1.53 m (5 ft 0 in) | 43:1 | — | [49][50] | ||||
RL10C-1 | Retired | 2014 | 190 kg (420 lb) | 101.5 kN (22,820 lbf) | 449.7 s (4.410 km/s) | 2.18 m (7 ft 2 in) | 1.45 m (4 ft 9 in) | 57:1 | 5.5:1 | 130:1 | Centaur SEC Centaur DEC |
Succeeded by RL-10C-1-1.[51][52][53][47] | |
RL10C-1-1 | Active | 2021 | 188 kg (415 lb) | 105.98 kN (23,825 lbf) | 453.8 s (4.450 km/s) | 2.46 m (8 ft 0.7 in) | 1.57 m (5 ft 2 in) | 57:1 | 5.5:1 | 155:1 | Atlas: 842 s Vulcan: 1,077 s |
Centaur SEC Centaur V |
Current standard engine for Atlas V and Vulcan Centaur.[13][3] |
RL10C-2-1 | Retired | 2022 | 301 kg (664 lb) | 110.1 kN (24,750 lbf) | 465.5 s (4.565 km/s) | Stowed: 2.2 m (7 ft 2.5 in) Deployed: 4.15 m (13 ft 7.5 in) |
2.15 m (7 ft 0.5 in) | 37:1 | 5.88:1 | 280:1 | DCSS | [54][55] | |
RL10C-2 | Delivered, not yet flown | 2026 (expected) | 110.1 kN (24,750 lbf) | 465.5 s (4.565 km/s) | Stowed: 2.2 m (7 ft 2.5 in) Deployed: 4.15 m (13 ft 7.5 in) |
2.15 m (7 ft 1 in) | 37:1 | 5.88:1 | 280:1 | ICPS | Conversion of C-3[56] | ||
RL10C-3 | Delivered, not yet flown | 2028 (expected) | 230 kg (508 lb) | 108.3 kN (24,340 lbf) | 460.1 s (4.512 km/s) | 3.16 m (10 ft 4.3 in) | 1.85 m (6 ft 1 in) | 48:1 | 5.7:1 | 215:1 | EUS | [13][3][56] | |
RL10C-5-1 | Cancelled | — | 188 kg (414 lb) | 105.98 kN (23,825 lbf) | 453.8 s (4.450 km/s) | 2.46 m (8 ft 0.7 in) | 1.57 m (4 ft 9 in) | 57:1 | 5.5:1 | OmegA | [3][36] | ||
RL10E-1 | Delivered, not yet flown | 2025 (expected) | 231 kg (509 lb) | 107.29 kN (24,120 lbf) | 460.9 s (4.520 km/s) | 3.31 m (10 ft 10 in) | 1.87 m (6 ft 2 in) | 47.29:1 | 5.5:1 | Centaur V | Additive manufacturing[57][58] |
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
ACES design conceptualization has been underway at ULA for many years. It leverages design features of both the Centaur and Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS) upper stages and intends to supplement and perhaps replace these stages in the future. ...