Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Rational root theorem
View on WikipediaIn algebra, the rational root theorem (or rational root test, rational zero theorem, rational zero test or p/q theorem) states a constraint on rational solutions of a polynomial equation with integer coefficients and . Solutions of the equation are also called roots or zeros of the polynomial on the left side.
The theorem states that each rational solution written in lowest terms (that is, p and q are relatively prime), satisfies:
- p is an integer factor of the constant term a0, and
- q is an integer factor of the leading coefficient an.
The rational root theorem is a special case (for a single linear factor) of Gauss's lemma on the factorization of polynomials. The integral root theorem is the special case of the rational root theorem when the leading coefficient is an = 1.
Application
[edit]The theorem is used to find all rational roots of a polynomial, if any. It gives a finite number of possible fractions which can be checked to see if they are roots. If a rational root x = r is found, a linear polynomial (x – r) can be factored out of the polynomial using polynomial long division, resulting in a polynomial of lower degree whose roots are also roots of the original polynomial.
Cubic equation
[edit]The general cubic equation with integer coefficients has three solutions in the complex plane. If the rational root test finds no rational solutions, then the only way to express the solutions algebraically uses cube roots. But if the test finds a rational solution r, then factoring out (x – r) leaves a quadratic polynomial whose two roots, found with the quadratic formula, are the remaining two roots of the cubic, avoiding cube roots.
Proofs
[edit]Elementary proof
[edit]Let with
Suppose P(p/q) = 0 for some coprime p, q ∈ ℤ:
To clear denominators, multiply both sides by qn:
Shifting the a0 term to the right side and factoring out p on the left side produces:
Thus, p divides a0qn. But p is coprime to q and therefore to qn, so by Euclid's lemma p must divide the remaining factor a0.
On the other hand, shifting the an term to the right side and factoring out q on the left side produces:
Reasoning as before, it follows that q divides an.[1]
Proof using Gauss's lemma
[edit]Should there be a nontrivial factor dividing all the coefficients of the polynomial, then one can divide by the greatest common divisor of the coefficients so as to obtain a primitive polynomial in the sense of Gauss's lemma; this does not alter the set of rational roots and only strengthens the divisibility conditions. That lemma says that if the polynomial factors in Q[X], then it also factors in Z[X] as a product of primitive polynomials. Now any rational root p/q corresponds to a factor of degree 1 in Q[X] of the polynomial, and its primitive representative is then qx − p, assuming that p and q are coprime. But any multiple in Z[X] of qx − p has leading term divisible by q and constant term divisible by p, which proves the statement. This argument shows that more generally, any irreducible factor of P can be supposed to have integer coefficients, and leading and constant coefficients dividing the corresponding coefficients of P.
Examples
[edit]First
[edit]In the polynomial any rational root fully reduced should have a numerator that divides 1 and a denominator that divides 2. Hence the only possible rational roots are ±1/2 and ±1; since neither of these equates the polynomial to zero, it has no rational roots.
Second
[edit]In the polynomial the only possible rational roots would have a numerator that divides 6 and a denominator that divides 1, limiting the possibilities to ±1, ±2, ±3, and ±6. Of these, 1, 2, and –3 equate the polynomial to zero, and hence are its rational roots (in fact these are its only roots since a cubic polynomial has only three roots).
Third
[edit]Every rational root of the polynomial must be one of the 8 numbers These 8 possible values for x can be tested by evaluating the polynomial. It turns out there is exactly one rational root, which is
However, these eight computations may be rather tedious, and some tricks allow to avoid some of them.
Firstly, if all terms of P become negative, and their sum cannot be 0; so, every root is positive, and a rational root must be one of the four values
One has So, 1 is not a root. Moreover, if one sets x = 1 + t, one gets without computation that is a polynomial in t with the same first coefficient 3 and constant term 1.[2] The rational root theorem implies thus that a rational root of Q must belong to and thus that the rational roots of P satisfy This shows again that any rational root of P is positive, and the only remaining candidates are 2 and 2/3.
To show that 2 is not a root, it suffices to remark that if then and are multiples of 8, while is not. So, their sum cannot be zero.
Finally, only needs to be computed to verify that it is a root of the polynomial.
Fourth
[edit]If and are integers (), then both and must be integer.
Consider the quadratic equation whose roots are and :
Simplify the coefficients:
- The coefficient of is
- The constant term is
Thus, the equation becomes: where:
- , obviously integer, as negation of an integer,
- , also integer, as the product of two integers.
Apply the rational root theorem:
given to be integers (), i.e. and are rational. If is a rational root of the equation, then is an integer factor of the coefficient, i.e. of . Thus, . Thus, the rational root is an integer. Thus, and are integers.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Arnold, D.; Arnold, G. (1993). Four unit mathematics. Edward Arnold. pp. 120–121. ISBN 0-340-54335-3.
- ^ King, Jeremy D. (November 2006). "Integer roots of polynomials". Mathematical Gazette. 90: 455–456. doi:10.1017/S0025557200180295.
References
[edit]- Miller, Charles D.; Lial, Margaret L.; Schneider, David I. (1990). Fundamentals of College Algebra (3rd ed.). Scott & Foresman/Little & Brown Higher Education. pp. 216–221. ISBN 0-673-38638-4.
- Jones, Phillip S.; Bedient, Jack D. (1998). The historical roots of elementary mathematics. Dover Courier Publications. pp. 116–117. ISBN 0-486-25563-8.
- Larson, Ron (2007). Calculus: An Applied Approach. Cengage Learning. pp. 23–24. ISBN 978-0-618-95825-2.
External links
[edit]- Weisstein, Eric W. "Rational Zero Theorem". MathWorld.
- Rational root theorem at PlanetMath.
- Another proof that nth roots of integers are irrational, except for perfect nth powers by Scott E. Brodie
- The Rational Roots Test at purplemath.com
Rational root theorem
View on GrokipediaStatement
Formal Statement
The rational root theorem, also known as the rational zero theorem, provides a method to identify possible rational roots of a polynomial equation with integer coefficients.[4] Consider a polynomial equation of the form , where the coefficients are integers, , and . The theorem asserts that if is a rational root of this equation, expressed in lowest terms with and integers such that and , then must be a factor of the constant term and must be a factor of the leading coefficient .[4]/10%3A_Roots_of_Polynomials/10.01%3A_Optional_section-_The_rational_root_theorem) Consequently, the complete list of possible rational roots consists of all fractions , where ranges over the positive and negative factors of , and ranges over the positive factors of . This set limits the candidates to test for actual roots, reducing the search space for solving the polynomial.[4]Assumptions and Scope
The Rational Root Theorem applies specifically to polynomials with integer coefficients, where the leading coefficient and the constant term are both non-zero integers.[5][6][7] This requirement ensures that the theorem's conclusions about possible rational roots hold, as the divisibility conditions rely on the integrality of these coefficients. Additionally, any potential rational root must be expressed in its lowest terms as a fraction , where and are coprime integers, with .[5][6] The theorem's scope encompasses both monic polynomials (where the leading coefficient is 1) and non-monic polynomials, provided the coefficients are integers.[5][7] It focuses exclusively on identifying possible rational roots and does not address irrational or complex roots, which may also be solutions to the polynomial equation but fall outside its predictive framework.[6][5] A key limitation is that the theorem does not guarantee the existence of any rational roots; it merely generates a finite list of candidate rational numbers to test.[7][5][6] These candidates are derived from the factors of the constant term over the factors of the leading coefficient, but verification through substitution or other methods is required to confirm actual roots.[6]Historical Background
Discovery and Attribution
The rational root theorem, which provides constraints on the possible rational roots of polynomials with integer coefficients, is attributed to the French mathematician and philosopher René Descartes. He formulated the theorem as part of his systematic treatment of algebraic equations in La Géométrie, published in 1637 as an appendix to his Discours de la méthode.[8] In this work, Descartes integrated algebraic symbolism with geometric constructions, establishing a framework where possible rational solutions could be identified by considering factors of the constant and leading coefficients.[9] Although Descartes is credited with its formal statement in modern terms, implicit applications of similar ideas appear in earlier works by 16th-century mathematicians. For instance, Gerolamo Cardano, in his Ars Magna (1545), employed trial divisions by potential rational factors when solving cubic equations, effectively testing candidates akin to those suggested by the theorem without explicitly generalizing it. Similarly, François Viète, in his algebraic treatises such as Zeteticorum libri quinque (1593), used symbolic methods to manipulate polynomials and identify rational roots through factorization, laying groundwork for Descartes' more comprehensive approach. These precursors reflect an emerging practice in Renaissance algebra but lacked the theorem's precise, general criterion. The theorem's development occurred amid the 17th-century rise of symbolic algebra, a transformative shift pioneered by Viète and advanced by Descartes. This era saw the transition from rhetorical descriptions of equations to operational notations using letters for unknowns and parameters, enabling more abstract and systematic analysis of polynomial roots. Descartes' contribution in La Géométrie exemplified this evolution, bridging algebra and geometry while providing tools for root identification that influenced subsequent mathematicians.[9]Relation to Earlier Works
The rational root theorem emerged from a rich tradition of Renaissance algebra, where mathematicians began systematically exploring the roots of polynomial equations. In the 16th century, Italian and French algebraists shifted focus from geometric constructions to symbolic manipulations, laying groundwork for identifying rational solutions to equations. This transition was pivotal, as it moved away from the predominantly geometric approaches of ancient Greek mathematics toward algebraic methods that could handle higher-degree polynomials more abstractly. François Viète, a key figure in this evolution, advanced the study of polynomial roots through his work on factoring and solving equations. In his 1593 treatise Zeteticorum libri quinque, Viète introduced symbolic notation for polynomials and emphasized the role of coefficients in determining roots, including rational ones, by expressing equations in terms of their factors. His methods for resolving cubic and quartic equations implicitly relied on testing possible rational factors derived from the constant and leading terms, foreshadowing the systematic approach later formalized. This innovation built on earlier Italian traditions, where Viète's algebraic symbolism facilitated the enumeration of potential rational roots without exhaustive trial. Earlier still, Gerolamo Cardano's 1545 Ars Magna provided a foundational connection through its solution to the cubic equation, where rational root testing was employed as a preliminary step. Cardano's formula for depressed cubics required first checking for rational roots to simplify the equation, a practice drawn from practical problem-solving in commerce and engineering that involved dividing polynomials by linear factors with rational coefficients. Although Cardano did not state a general theorem, his examples demonstrated the utility of assuming roots as ratios of the equation's integer coefficients, influencing subsequent algebraists in their pursuit of deterministic methods for root identification. These 16th-century developments collectively bridged medieval arithmetic and modern algebra, enabling Descartes to formalize the rational root theorem in 1637 by synthesizing these ideas into a concise criterion.Proofs
Elementary Proof
Consider a polynomial equation with integer coefficients and leading coefficient . Suppose there exists a rational root , where and are integers with no common factors (i.e., ) and .[3] Substitute into the polynomial to obtain Multiply through by to clear the denominators, yielding Rearrange the equation as The right-hand side is clearly divisible by , so divides the left-hand side . Since , it follows that must divide .[3] Now rearrange the equation as The right-hand side is divisible by , so divides the left-hand side . Since , it follows that must divide .[10] Thus, any rational root , expressed in lowest terms, has numerator dividing the constant term and denominator dividing the leading coefficient . This completes the elementary proof.[3]Proof via Gauss's Lemma
A polynomial is said to be primitive if the greatest common divisor of its coefficients is 1.[11] Gauss's lemma states that the product of two primitive polynomials in is primitive.[11] As a consequence, is a unique factorization domain, meaning that every non-constant primitive polynomial factors uniquely into irreducible factors in up to units and ordering.[11] To prove the rational root theorem using this framework, assume with , and without loss of generality, that is primitive (if not, factor out the content, which does not affect the roots). Suppose is a rational root in lowest terms, where , , and . Since is a root, has a linear factor over . Clearing the denominator gives the primitive linear polynomial (primitive because ), which divides in . Thus, there exists such that . Let be a positive integer such that , and assume is primitive (by dividing out its content if necessary). Then, . The left side has content , since is primitive. The right side is the product of two primitive polynomials, so by Gauss's lemma, its content is 1. Therefore, , implying . Hence, divides in . Comparing leading coefficients, divides . Comparing constant terms, divides , so divides . This establishes the rational root theorem.Applications
Identifying Possible Rational Roots
To identify possible rational roots of a polynomial with integer coefficients using the Rational Root Theorem, begin by arranging the polynomial in standard form, ensuring the coefficients are integers. The theorem states that any potential rational root, expressed as a fraction in lowest terms, has as a factor of the constant term and as a factor of the leading coefficient.[2] The step-by-step method proceeds as follows: First, identify all positive and negative factors of the constant term (the coefficient of the zero-degree term); these serve as possible numerators . Second, identify all positive and negative factors of the leading coefficient (the coefficient of the highest-degree term); these serve as possible denominators . Third, form all possible fractions , reducing duplicates and ensuring they are in lowest terms to generate the complete list of candidates. This process yields a finite set of possibilities, typically small for polynomials of moderate degree.[12][13] Once the list is compiled, test each candidate to determine if it is an actual root by evaluating the polynomial at that value—either through direct substitution into the polynomial equation or using synthetic division for efficiency. Substitution involves plugging the candidate into the polynomial and checking if the result is zero, while synthetic division performs the evaluation and simultaneously indicates if the candidate divides the polynomial evenly by producing a zero remainder. Only those candidates that satisfy the equation are confirmed as roots.[2][14] This approach enhances efficiency by constraining the search to a limited number of rational candidates, thereby minimizing exhaustive trial-and-error compared to testing arbitrary values, especially for higher-degree polynomials where irrational or complex roots may also exist.[12][13]Polynomial Factorization
The Rational Root Theorem aids in factoring polynomials with integer coefficients over the rationals by first identifying possible rational roots, which, if verified, correspond to linear factors via the Factor Theorem. Specifically, if is a rational root of a polynomial , then , where is a polynomial of degree one less than . This factorization is obtained through polynomial long division or synthetic division, reducing the degree and enabling further analysis of .[4][15][16] Applying this process iteratively allows for the complete factorization of the polynomial into irreducible components over the rationals. After factoring out one linear term, the Rational Root Theorem is reapplied to the quotient to test for additional rational roots, continuing until no more rational roots exist or the remaining factors are irreducible (such as quadratics with no rational roots). This systematic reduction yields a product of linear and quadratic factors, leveraging the theorem's list of candidates at each step.[16] Such factorization is particularly beneficial for solving polynomial equations, as it isolates rational solutions and simplifies the remaining irreducible factors for exact resolution using methods like the quadratic formula. It also streamlines algebraic manipulations, such as decomposing rational functions into partial fractions for integration or simplification.[16]Examples
Quadratic Polynomial
Consider the quadratic equation . According to the rational root theorem, any possible rational root, expressed in lowest terms , has as a factor of the constant term and as a factor of the leading coefficient .[4] The factors of are , and the factors of are , yielding the possible rational roots . To identify a rational root, substitute these values into the polynomial. For : Thus, is a root. By the factor theorem, is a factor of . Perform polynomial division or use synthetic division to factor: Using synthetic division with root : The quotient is , so . Setting each factor to zero gives the roots: implies , and implies . Verification confirms both roots satisfy the original equation. For : This example illustrates how the rational root theorem efficiently narrows candidates for root testing in quadratics, leading to complete factorization and solution.Cubic Polynomial
Consider the cubic equation . According to the rational root theorem, any possible rational root, expressed in lowest terms , has as a factor of the constant term and as a factor of the leading coefficient , yielding the candidates .[17] To identify rational roots, test these candidates systematically, often starting with the smallest integers and using synthetic division for efficiency. Begin with :| 1 | -6 | 11 | -6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5 | 6 | |
| 1 | -5 | 6 | 0 |
| 1 | 9 | -2 | 0 | -7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 7 | 7 | ||
| 1 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
