Hubbry Logo
Secret serviceSecret serviceMain
Open search
Secret service
Community hub
Secret service
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Secret service
Secret service
Secret service
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A secret service is a government security agency or intelligence agency concerned with clandestine gathering of intelligence data and conducting covert operations related to national security. The tasks and powers of a secret service can vary greatly from one country to another. For instance, a country may establish a secret service which has some high policing powers (such as surveillance) but not others. The powers and duties of a government organization may be partly secret and partly not. The person may be said to operate openly at home and secretly abroad, or vice versa. Authoritarian and totalitarian regimes usually operate as police states where a secret service may assume the role of a secret police. In the USA, government agencies usually considered secret services include the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Agency, the United States Secret Service and the Drug Enforcement Administration.[1]

Various states and regimes, at different times and places, established bodies that could be described as a secret service or secret police – for example, the agentes in rebus of the late Roman Empire were sometimes defined as such. In modern times, the French police officer Joseph Fouché is sometimes regarded as a pioneer of secret intelligence; among other things, he is alleged to have prevented several murder attempts on Napoleon during his time as First Consul (1799–1804) through a large and tight net of various informants. William Wickham is also credited with establishing one of the earliest intelligence services that would be recognized as such today and a pioneer of basic concepts of the profession, such as the "intelligence cycle".[2][3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Secret service

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a federal law enforcement agency under the with dual mandates of protecting designated U.S. and foreign officials, their families, and national special security events from harm, while investigating threats to the integrity of the nation's and financial systems through counterfeiting suppression, disruption, and related financial offenses. Founded on July 5, 1865, within the Treasury Department to combat rampant post-Civil War counterfeiting—where nearly one-third of circulating was estimated to be fake—the agency initially focused on investigative work before Congress authorized permanent presidential protection in 1901 following the , marking the start of its expanded security role under President . The Secret Service's protective operations encompass advance threat assessments, counter-assault teams, and coordination with local to secure protectees including the , former presidents, major-party candidates within 120 days of elections, and visiting heads of state, alongside safeguarding venues like the complex via its Uniformed Division. In investigations, it employs forensic expertise and international task forces to seize counterfeit operations and prosecute digital financial frauds, contributing to a sustained decline in U.S. counterfeiting rates since its inception through training programs for global banks and . Despite these accomplishments, the agency has encountered significant scrutiny for lapses in perimeter , intelligence sharing, and operational planning, most notably in the July 13, 2024, attempted assassination of then-candidate in , where independent and congressional reviews identified systemic failures in communication protocols, drone surveillance deployment, and reliance on local resources as root causes of the breach. These incidents prompted internal reforms, including enhanced training and technology integration, underscoring ongoing challenges in balancing resource constraints with a zero-failure imperative.

History

Establishment and Early Focus on Counterfeiting

The was established on July 5, 1865, as a bureau within the Department of the Treasury to suppress widespread counterfeiting of national . Legislation authorizing its creation was signed by President on April 14, 1865—the same day he was assassinated—amid post-Civil War economic instability exacerbated by the recent introduction of paper money, which had been unfamiliar to the public and easier to replicate than coins. By that era, estimates indicated that between one-third and one-half of circulating U.S. was counterfeit, undermining public confidence and economic recovery. William P. Wood, a Civil War veteran noted for his ingenuity in constructing the Old Capitol Prison, was appointed the agency's first chief and sworn in by Secretary . Wood's initial operations prioritized infiltrating counterfeiting networks, raiding illicit printing operations, and prosecuting offenders, achieving notable success by dismantling over 200 counterfeit plants in the agency's debut year. This focus stemmed from the causal link between unchecked and threats to fiscal integrity, as the federal government sought to restore trust in its without relying on fragmented state-level enforcement. Early Secret Service agents operated with limited resources, often undercover in urban centers like New York and where counterfeiting hubs proliferated, employing rudimentary forensic techniques such as analysis and ink composition testing to distinguish fakes. The agency's mandate remained narrowly tailored to Treasury-related financial crimes, excluding broader until later expansions, reflecting a pragmatic prioritization of protection as the foundational mechanism for national economic stability. By the late , these efforts had begun reducing the prevalence of bogus notes, though counterfeiters adapted with innovations like photographic reproduction methods, necessitating ongoing vigilance.

Expansion into Protective Duties

The , originally tasked with combating counterfeiting under the Treasury Department, began assuming informal protective responsibilities in the mid-1890s during President Grover Cleveland's second term, when agents uncovered an assassination plot against him while investigating gamblers. This involvement marked an early departure from its investigative mandate, driven by emerging threats rather than formal directive. However, the agency's protective role crystallized following the assassination of President on September 6, 1901, by anarchist at the in ; McKinley succumbed to his wounds on September 14, prompting Congress to informally request that provide presidential protection. In 1902, the Secret Service formally assumed full-time responsibility for protecting the sitting president, , initially assigning just two agents to the detail—a reflection of the agency's limited resources and primary focus on financial crimes, with a total workforce of around 30 special agents nationwide. This expansion was not yet statutorily mandated, relying instead on executive and congressional expectation amid rising anarchist threats in the early , which had already claimed leaders in and the U.S. By 1906, protective duties received explicit statutory backing through congressional appropriation, solidifying the mission despite internal resistance from Treasury officials who viewed it as a diversion from counterfeiting enforcement. The protective function grew incrementally in response to specific vulnerabilities. In 1913, extended statutory protection to the president-elect, addressing gaps exposed during transitions, such as Woodrow Wilson's election amid domestic unrest. Protection for the president's family was authorized in 1917, coinciding with legislation criminalizing threats against the chief executive (39 Stat. 919), as heightened concerns over and . These developments shifted personnel allocation, with agents increasingly trained in advance scouting of travel routes and venues, though the detail remained small—typically under a dozen for routine duties—prioritizing deterrence through presence over comprehensive surveillance, given technological limitations of the era. By the interwar period, the protective mission had evolved to encompass vice presidents on an as-needed basis, formalized after the 1940s, but early expansions underscored causal links between high-profile attacks and policy responses: each or attempt, from McKinley to later events, empirically drove resource reallocation, even as the Secret Service balanced dual mandates without dedicated funding until later reorganizations. This phase established the agency's expertise in threat assessment, drawing on investigative skills to preempt risks, though critiques from contemporaneous reports noted overreliance on reactive measures due to understaffing.

Post-World War II Developments and Cold War Era

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the U.S. Secret Service's protective responsibilities, which had expanded during wartime to include safeguards against potential and threats, transitioned toward peacetime formalization amid emerging tensions. On November 1, 1950, Puerto Rican nationalists and attempted to assassinate President at [Blair House](/page/Blair House), resulting in the death of Secret Service agent and injuries to other agents; this incident exposed vulnerabilities in residential security protocols, prompting internal reviews of advance planning and perimeter defense. In response, enacted Public Law 82-79 on October 12, 1951, permanently authorizing Secret Service protection for the president, his family, the president-elect, and the vice president, shifting from prior reliance on executive discretion to statutory mandate. The 1960s marked accelerated expansion of the protective mission, driven by high-profile assassinations amid domestic unrest and ideological conflicts characteristic of the . President John F. Kennedy's assassination on November 22, , in revealed deficiencies in security, agent coordination, and threat intelligence sharing, leading to immediate operational reforms including enhanced advance surveys, bulletproof vehicle modifications, and interagency liaison improvements as recommended by the . responded with 88-195, extending protection to Jacqueline Kennedy and her minor children for two years post-assassination, while 89-186 in authorized lifelong coverage for former presidents and their spouses (until remarriage), alongside making assassination attempts federal crimes under 89-141. Agent numbers surged from approximately 350 in to over 1,100 by decade's end, with new emphasis on protective intelligence divisions to preempt threats from lone actors and organized groups. Further legislative and structural adaptations occurred in the late period as political violence persisted. The assassinations of Senator and civil rights leader in 1968 prompted 90-331, extending protection to major presidential and vice-presidential candidates during election cycles. 87-829 in 1962 had already broadened vice-presidential safeguards, but 1970s expansions included 93-552 in 1974 for the vice president's immediate family and 94-408 in 1976 for candidates' spouses. Assassination attempts on President in September 1975 and President on March 30, 1981, underscored ongoing risks, catalyzing advancements in medical response protocols, armored transport, and counter-sniper training; the 1981 incident, involving , also influenced the of 1993, though immediate Secret Service changes focused on perimeter screening and behavioral threat assessment. Concurrently, the agency's investigative counterfeiting mission adapted to economic warfare, with increased focus on foreign-forged currency operations linked to adversarial states, though protective duties consumed growing resources—by 1981, protection accounted for over 60% of personnel. These developments reflected causal pressures from escalating threats in a bipolar global order, where domestic extremists and potential foreign proxies exploited U.S. , necessitating a shift from reactive to proactive security paradigms without compromising the agency's Department roots.

Reorganization After 9/11 and Modern Challenges

In response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the transferred the from the Department of the to the newly created Department of (DHS), aiming to consolidate federal efforts against domestic and international by integrating protective and investigations into a unified apparatus. The transfer became effective on March 1, 2003, when DHS commenced operations, placing the Secret Service alongside agencies focused on border security, immigration enforcement, and to facilitate better sharing and resource allocation for threats targeting national leadership. This shift marked a departure from the agency's roots, which had emphasized economic protection since its 1865 founding, toward prioritizing imperatives in an era of heightened asymmetric threats. The reorganization expanded the Secret Service's mandate to include enhanced collaboration with DHS components on , such as joint operations against potential attacks on protected principals and infrastructure, while retaining core duties in financial investigations. Post-transfer, the agency grew its workforce and adopted advanced technologies for threat detection, including improved perimeter and advance team protocols, though integration challenges persisted due to differing agency cultures and bureaucratic silos within DHS. By the mid-2000s, these changes contributed to a more proactive posture, exemplified by bolstered advance planning for presidential travel amid persistent al-Qaeda-inspired plots, but also exposed strains on personnel amid expanding protectee lists and global operations. Modern challenges for encompass evolving terrorist tactics, including domestic and lone-actor attacks, which demand adaptive intelligence-driven beyond traditional foreign state threats. Cyber threats pose additional risks, as adversaries increasingly target protectees' digital footprints for doxxing, , or coordinated physical assaults, necessitating integration of cybersecurity expertise into protective details despite the agency's primary focus on . Insider threats have intensified scrutiny on and , with reports of agent and shortages exacerbating vulnerabilities in an of fiscal constraints and difficulties. These issues culminated in high-profile security lapses during the July 13, 2024, attempted assassination of then-former President at a rally in , where failures in communication between local and Secret Service personnel, inadequate site line-of-sight assessments, and delayed threat neutralization allowed the shooter to fire from an unsecured rooftop 130 yards away. An internal Secret Service review identified "unacceptable" breakdowns in and resource deployment, leading to the resignation of Director and the appointment of Ronald L. Rowe Jr. as acting director. A subsequent DHS Independent Review Panel and report detailed systemic deficiencies, including overreliance on local partners without sufficient oversight and complacency in threat assessment, prompting reforms such as enhanced training mandates, increased use of counter-drone technology, and disciplinary actions against 10 personnel involved. A second attempt on September 15, 2024, at Trump's golf course further underscored persistent perimeter vulnerabilities, reinforcing calls for structural overhauls to address chronic understaffing— with agent shortages reaching 15% in some field offices—and evolving lone-wolf threats amid polarized domestic environments.

Roles and Responsibilities

Protective Mission

The protective mission of the centers on safeguarding designated principals and facilities to preserve and national security. Established informally after the assassination of President on September 6, 1901, this mandate was formalized by in 1906, expanding from the agency's original counterfeiting focus. The mission encompasses round-the-clock operations, including advance site surveys, counter-assault teams, protective intelligence, and coordination with interagency partners to mitigate threats ranging from physical assaults to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) risks. Statutory authority for protections derives from 18 U.S.C. § 3056, which mandates coverage for the President, , President-elect, Vice President-elect, and their immediate families; former presidents and their spouses for life (with spousal protection terminating upon remarriage); children of former presidents until age 16; major presidential and vice presidential candidates and spouses within 120 days of a ; former vice presidents, spouses, and minor children for up to six months post-term (extendable by the Secretary of ); and visiting heads of foreign states or governments, as well as other distinguished foreign visitors or U.S. officials on special missions at presidential direction. The Secretary of may authorize temporary protections for additional individuals at the president's request. In 2022, the Service managed protections for 35 such principals across domestic and international operations. Beyond personnel, the mission includes securing fixed assets like the Complex, vice presidential residence, and foreign diplomatic missions in the National Capital Region, as well as screening incoming mail—processing 2.5 million pieces in 2022—and conducting airspace security for protectee movements. The Service also designates and secures National Special Security Events (NSSEs), such as presidential inaugurations and addresses, providing federal coordination, intelligence, and tactical resources while reimbursing local partners. Operations extend globally, with protectees conducting 1,756 foreign visits in 2022, supported by specialized units employing magnetometers, canine teams, and response capabilities. This mission draws on approximately 3,200 special agents, many dedicated to protective details, within an agency workforce exceeding 8,000 personnel as of fiscal year 2024. Funding for protective operations forms a core component of the Service's $3.2 billion fiscal year 2025 budget, prioritizing zero-fail execution amid rising threats from lone actors and coordinated attacks.

Investigative Mission

The investigative mission of the focuses on safeguarding the nation's financial systems by detecting, investigating, and preventing crimes that undermine the integrity of U.S. , payment mechanisms, and related infrastructure. This mission originated with the agency's establishment on , 1865, under the Treasury Department, specifically to combat rampant counterfeiting in the post-Civil War era, when fraudulent notes threatened . Today, it encompasses proactive enforcement against evolving threats, including those facilitated by digital technologies, with investigations often leading to arrests, seizures, and disruptions of criminal networks. Core investigative priorities include counterfeiting of U.S. and obligations, access device such as unauthorized use of and debit cards, and that erodes trust in financial transactions. The agency also targets cyber-enabled schemes like business email compromise (BEC), where criminals impersonate executives to divert funds—resulting in global losses exceeding $43 billion from 2016 to 2021 according to estimates—and botnets used for large-scale . Additional focus areas encompass , wire , and attacks on financial entities, with investigations frequently involving international cooperation to dismantle transnational operations. To support these efforts, deploys specialized forensic capabilities, including analysis of questioned documents, from network intrusions, and currency examination by chemists and forensic accountants. Agents operate through field offices and cyber fraud task forces, partnering with entities like the Department of Justice and stakeholders to trace illicit proceeds and recover assets. This mission remains distinct from protective duties, emphasizing prevention of economic harm over , though overlaps occur in cases involving threats to protected financial institutions.

Organizational Structure

Leadership and Headquarters

The United States Secret Service is headed by a Director appointed by the President, who holds ultimate responsibility for the agency's dual missions of protection and financial crime investigations, as well as its operational oversight of approximately 7,800 personnel. The Director manages strategic direction, resource allocation, and coordination with other federal entities, reporting directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security since the agency's transfer to the Department of Homeland Security in March 2003. This structure emphasizes centralized command to ensure rapid response capabilities for high-threat environments. As of October 2025, Sean M. Curran serves as the 28th Director, having been nominated by President Donald Trump on January 22, 2025, and sworn in shortly thereafter without requiring Senate confirmation, a designation reflecting the position's executive appointment nature. Curran, a career Secret Service special agent with prior roles including special agent in charge, succeeded interim leadership following the resignation of former Director Kimberly Cheatle amid scrutiny over security lapses. Supporting the Director is Deputy Director Matthew C. Quinn, who oversees tactical operations and administrative functions, alongside key executives such as the Chief of Staff, Chief Counsel, Chief Operating Officer, and Assistant Directors for field operations, protective operations, and investigations. This executive team, drawn from senior special agents and career professionals, maintains continuity through a hierarchical chain that prioritizes expertise in threat assessment and law enforcement. The agency's headquarters is situated at 245 Murray Lane SW, Building T-5, 20223, within the federal complex near the Department, facilitating interagency collaboration on matters. This secure facility houses core administrative, , and policy development units, including the of Investigations and the Protective Operations divisions, while supporting classified briefings and coordination for protectee movements. Unlike field offices or the separate James J. Rowley Training Center in —which handles agent training—the headquarters focuses on high-level decision-making and houses specialized resources like forensic laboratories for analysis, underscoring the agency's origins in enforcement. Access is strictly controlled, with no public tours, to preserve operational security.

Field Offices and Uniformed Division

The U.S. Secret Service operates a network of field offices and resident posts throughout the and in several foreign countries to execute its investigative and protective missions at regional levels. These offices primarily support the criminal investigations function by probing financial crimes, including counterfeiting, access device , , and cyber-enabled financial , often in coordination with local, state, and federal law enforcement partners. Field offices also contribute to protective operations by conducting advance work, threat assessments, and logistical support for protectees traveling outside , ensuring seamless security coverage across jurisdictions. Each office is typically led by a in charge (SAC) or assistant in charge (ASAC), with staffing models designed to allocate resources based on case volume, threat levels, and geographic demands. Field offices maintain specialized teams for electronic crimes task forces (ECTFs), which target transnational cyber threats to the financial system, and collaborate on initiatives like electronic benefits transfer (EBT) fraud prevention. Examples include offices in major hubs such as New York, , , , and , alongside resident posts in smaller locales like , and , enabling responsive enforcement nationwide. Overseas attachments, embedded in U.S. embassies, extend investigative reach to international networks. The Uniformed Division (UD) constitutes the uniformed component of the Secret Service, distinct from plainclothes special agents, and focuses on fixed-site security in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3056, UD officers—numbering approximately 1,300—provide physical protection for the Complex, the at the Naval Observatory, the Treasury Annex, and foreign diplomatic missions within the District of Columbia and nearby jurisdictions. Their duties encompass patrol, , , and , with mandatory authority to safeguard venues secured for Secret Service protectees during events. UD is organized into branches tailored to specific security domains, including the White House Police Branch for complex perimeter defense, the Foreign Missions Branch for embassy protection, and specialized units under the Special Operations Branch. The latter encompasses five dedicated teams: the Emergency Response Team (ERT) for tactical crisis intervention and hostage rescue; the Canine Explosives Detection Unit (K-9) for bomb detection sweeps; the Counter Sniper Team for overwatch and precision engagement; the Magnetometer Support Team for screening; and the Hazardous Agent Mitigation Medical Emergency Response (HAMMER) Team for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats. Led by a chief appointed by the Secret Service Director, UD personnel undergo rigorous training in firearms, defensive tactics, and emergency response to maintain 24/7 operational readiness.

Support and Specialized Units

The Special Operations Division (SOD) comprises specialized tactical units that provide direct support to the Secret Service's protective operations worldwide, including rapid response capabilities for high-risk scenarios involving protectees such as the President and . Established to enhance counter-assault and response, SOD units undergo rigorous selection and training to operate in dynamic threat environments. The Counter Assault Team (CAT), a core SOD component, delivers full-time tactical intervention, including assault planning, execution, and neutralization of threats during protective details. operators, drawn from special agents, are equipped for global deployment and focus on close-quarters combat and vehicle-based extractions, with training emphasizing marksmanship, breaching, and medical response. Complementing CAT, the Emergency Response Team (ERT) within the Uniformed Division offers tactical support for facility security and venue , specializing in hostage rescue, barricade operations, and explosive ordnance disposal. ERT personnel, selected from uniformed officers, maintain readiness through scenario-based drills and integrate with for layered defense. The Counter Sniper Team provides overwatch and precision engagement capabilities, positioning marksmen to detect and counter long-range threats during protectee movements. This unit employs advanced and expertise to secure perimeters, often coordinating with monitoring. Support extends to detection assets via the Canine Explosive Detection Unit, which deploys trained dogs for sniffing out improvised explosives and narcotics at secured sites, enhancing preemptive threat mitigation. The Airspace Security Branch and Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems team address aerial vulnerabilities, using , jamming, and intercept technologies to safeguard no-fly zones over protectee locations. Technical Law Enforcement (TLE) specialists furnish operational support through cyber forensics, audio-visual analysis, and electronic surveillance, aiding both investigations and real-time protective . TLE roles include recovery and network intrusion detection, bolstering the agency's capacity against technologically sophisticated threats. The Forensic Services Division (FSD) operates an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited laboratory, delivering multi-disciplinary analysis such as questioned documents, ink sequencing, and to support criminal investigations and threat assessments. FSD maintains the world's largest ink library for detection and collaborates with protective units on from suspicious packages or mail. These capabilities have evolved with advancements in automated and processing since the division's expansions in the post-9/11 era.

Training and Personnel

Recruitment and Selection Process

The recruits special agents primarily through an online application process via , targeting candidates with diverse backgrounds in fields such as criminal investigations, , military service, or business. Applicants must meet basic eligibility criteria, including citizenship, being at least 21 years old and under 37 years old at the time of application (with exceptions for veterans' preference allowing up to age 40 upon conditional offer), possession of a valid , uncorrected vision not worse than 20/100, correctable to 20/20, passing a hearing exam, and having no visible body markings. A from an accredited institution is required, along with at least one year of experience in criminal investigations, or a combination of and experience deemed equivalent by the agency. The selection process is divided into two phases following initial application review. Phase I assesses competencies through a written multiple-choice test covering logic-based reasoning and situational judgment, a structured behavioral , and the Applicant Physical Abilities Test (APAT), which evaluates via tasks simulating operational demands such as sprinting, obstacle navigation, and strength exercises. Successful Phase I candidates advance to Phase II, which includes a personnel , examination, medical examination, drug screening, and fingerprinting to verify integrity and suitability for handling . A comprehensive background investigation follows, typically lasting 6 to 9 months, involving checks of financial history, criminal records, employment verification, references, and personal associations to mitigate risks of compromise in protective and investigative roles. The agency also operates targeted programs like the Talent & Achievement (STAR) for recent college graduates, emphasizing early identification of high-potential candidates through campus events and expedited processing. For Uniformed Division officers, recruitment mirrors special agent basics but prioritizes physical standards and includes a separate entrance and fitness battery, while administrative and technical roles focus on specialized skills with streamlined vetting. The overall process prioritizes candidates demonstrating , judgment, and resilience, given the agency's mandate to protect national leaders and investigate financial crimes.

Training Programs and Facilities

The James J. Rowley Training Center (JJRTC) in , functions as the Secret Service's principal facility for advanced instruction, occupying approximately 500 acres with 31 buildings and six miles of roadways. It accommodates core curricula in protective operations, investigative techniques, tactical skills, and for special agents, Uniformed Division officers, special officers, and physical security specialists, training hundreds of recruits annually. Specialized infrastructure supports firearms marksmanship, use-of-force and control tactics, medical response, financial crimes detection, site and event protection planning, water survival, obstacle courses, firing ranges, and crisis simulation environments. Special agent candidates initiate training with the multi-week Criminal Investigator Training Program (CITP) at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Glynco, Georgia, emphasizing foundational investigative skills, prior to advancing to the 18-week Training Course (SATC) at the JJRTC. The SATC integrates classroom modules on agency policies, procedures, counterfeiting, , and protective ; rigorous physical conditioning evaluated via push-ups, sit-ups, chin-ups, and a 1.5-mile run; defensive firearms proficiency with mandatory requalification; and immersive scenario-based drills replicating real-world threats and emergencies. Trainees must maintain peak physical readiness upon arrival at the JJRTC, where the program culminates in practical application of protective and investigative missions. Uniformed Division officer recruits complete a 29-week regimen, beginning with the 13-week Basic Police Training Course at FLETC in Glynco, Georgia, or , followed by 16 weeks of agency-specific training at the JJRTC. Instruction encompasses , police procedures, criminal and arrest laws, firearms handling, , tactical control methods, driver operations, protocols, , and repeated physical fitness testing aligned with standards. Both special agents and Uniformed Division personnel engage in lifelong professional enhancement, including quarterly fitness evaluations for those authorized to carry weapons and periodic refreshers in advanced tactics and emergency response. In September 2025, announced imminent groundbreaking for a new Specialized Mission Training Facility at the JJRTC, aimed at bolstering capabilities in complex operational scenarios. Technical roles, such as digital forensics specialists, undergo 13 weeks at FLETC succeeded by a 10-week program at the JJRTC focusing on cyber investigations and handling. These protocols ensure operational efficacy amid evolving threats, drawing on empirical performance metrics from simulations and field requalifications.

Notable Operations and Incidents

Successful Protective Actions

The United States Secret Service has demonstrated effectiveness in protective actions through rapid intervention during active threats and proactive threat mitigation via intelligence-led arrests. These efforts have prevented harm to presidents in multiple high-profile incidents, underscoring the agency's layered approach combining physical security, advance planning, and immediate response tactics. On September 5, 1975, in , Secret Service agents swiftly tackled Lynette "Squeaky" after she pointed a loaded .45-caliber at President from a distance of about 2 feet but failed to chamber a round, resulting in no shots fired and Ford unharmed. Seventeen days later, on September 22, 1975, in , agents shielded Ford and tackled Sara Jane after she fired one shot that missed Ford by inches, with a bystander credited for jostling her arm but Secret Service positioning minimizing vulnerability. During the March 30, 1981, assassination attempt on President outside the Hotel, Secret Service Agent shoved Reagan into the presidential limousine, using his body to shield the president from John Hinckley Jr.'s gunfire, which had already struck Reagan in the chest. Parr's on-the-spot decision to divert to —rather than returning to the —enabled life-saving surgery within 15 minutes, with Reagan's survival attributed to this rapid medical evacuation. On May 10, 2005, while President addressed a crowd in , Georgia, Secret Service agents tackled assailant within seconds of him hurling a live that landed 100 feet away but failed to fully detonate due to a cloth wrapping; no injuries occurred, and the protective detail's vigilance neutralized the threat without or attendees aware at the time. More recently, on September 15, 2024, at Trump National Golf Club in , Secret Service counter-sniper teams detected Ryan Wesley Routh concealed in shrubbery with a SKS-style aimed toward former President Trump's location on the course; agents fired multiple rounds, forcing Routh to flee without discharging his or endangering Trump, who remained uninjured. Beyond immediate responses, the Secret Service's Protective Intelligence Division routinely averts attacks by investigating and disrupting plots prior to execution, though operational details remain classified to preserve methods. The agency processes thousands of protectee-related threats annually, leading to proactive interventions that have contributed to no successful presidential assassinations since despite persistent high-volume risks.

Assassination Attempts and Security Breaches

The United States Secret Service has protected presidents and other dignitaries from numerous assassination attempts since assuming full-time presidential protection duties in 1902 following the assassination of William McKinley. Early incidents included the 1950 attempt on President Harry Truman at Blair House, where two gunmen were killed by Secret Service agents and White House police after exchanging fire, preventing harm to Truman. On September 5, 1975, in Sacramento, California, Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme, a follower of Charles Manson, pointed a pistol at President Gerald Ford but failed to fire due to a jammed mechanism; Secret Service Agent Larry Buendorf immediately tackled and disarmed her. Just 17 days later, on September 22, 1975, in San Francisco, Sara Jane Moore fired a shot at Ford from about 40 feet away, but Secret Service Agent Oliver Sipple and others deflected her arm, and the bullet missed; Ford credited the agents' rapid response for his safety. The most notable mid-20th-century attempt occurred on March 30, 1981, when fired six shots at President outside the Hotel, wounding Reagan in the lung, press secretary fatally, a Secret Service agent, and a police officer. Secret Service Agent swiftly pushed Reagan into the presidential limousine, while Agent positioned himself to shield the president and absorbed a bullet in the chest; an internal Secret Service investigation later identified procedural lapses in agent positioning but praised the overall response that enabled Reagan's rapid medical evacuation and survival. These incidents underscored vulnerabilities in public-facing events, prompting enhancements in advance site surveys and agent training, though no fatalities to protectees occurred. Security breaches at protected sites, particularly the , have exposed systemic gaps in perimeter defense and response protocols. Between April 2005 and April 2015, Secret Service data recorded 104 breaches or attempted breaches of grounds. A prominent failure happened on September 19, 2014, when veteran Omar J. Gonzalez scaled the north fence, sprinted 70 yards across the lawn, and entered the through an unlocked door, reaching the before being tackled by agents; he possessed a knife and stated intentions to alert President to threats, highlighting delays in alarm activation, dog deployment, and agent pursuit that allowed 16 minutes of unimpeded access. A subsequent Department of inspector general report cited inadequate training, poor communication among shifts, and complacency as causal factors, leading to disciplinary actions against multiple personnel. In 2024, two attempts targeted former President Donald Trump, revealing persistent challenges in resource allocation and threat assessment for campaign events. On July 13, 2024, at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired eight shots from an AR-15-style rifle positioned on a nearby rooftop approximately 400 feet from the stage, grazing Trump's ear, killing attendee Corey Comperatore, and wounding two others before a Secret Service counter-sniper neutralized Crooks. Multiple investigations, including a Senate report and bipartisan House task force findings, documented Secret Service shortcomings such as denied requests for additional personnel and drones, failure to secure the rooftop despite prior warnings from local law enforcement about a suspicious individual, siloed communications, and inadequate line-of-sight protocols, constituting what the agency itself described as an "operational failure." Six agents faced suspensions without pay for these lapses. By contrast, on September 15, 2024, at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, a Secret Service agent spotted Ryan Wesley Routh aiming a rifle through the fence line from about 400 yards away and fired at him, causing Routh to flee without discharging at Trump; the suspect was apprehended nearby with weapons, and official statements affirmed the perimeter security held effectively due to vigilant patrolling. These events prompted congressional scrutiny and agency vows for reforms in threat-sharing and operational rigor.

Controversies and Criticisms

Historical Scandals and Misconduct

The has faced recurring allegations of employee misconduct, particularly involving and sexual impropriety, dating back decades but intensifying in the 2000s and 2010s. Official investigations, including those by the Department of Office of (OIG), have documented cases of agents engaging in unethical behavior that compromised professional standards, though some reports concluded such incidents were not indicative of agency-wide patterns. A 2015 bipartisan House Oversight Committee described these issues as stemming from a "deeply rooted cultural problem," with failures exacerbating risks to the agency's protective mission. The most prominent scandal occurred in April 2012 during advance preparations for President Barack Obama's attendance at the in , where at least 11 Secret Service personnel, including supervisory agents, were implicated in hiring prostitutes and engaging in excessive drinking. The incident involved up to 21 women, with disputes over payments escalating to involve local police after one woman reported non-payment at the Hotel Caribe Royal, leading to the discovery of additional agents' involvement. Eight agents were suspended, five resigned or retired, and one was fired; a separate OIG probe substantiated by nine agents and two supervisors but found no direct threat to the president's security. The prompted congressional hearings and revelations of prior similar behavior, including admissions by one agent of hiring prostitutes in and years earlier. Preceding the incident, a September 2011 traffic accident in , involved a Secret Service agent , resulting in the death of a ; the agent pleaded guilty to involuntary and was sentenced to three years' . In March 2013, ahead of Obama's trip to the , agents were found intoxicated in a hallway, with one urinating on an ; the involved personnel were suspended or removed from the trip. Earlier cases from 2004 included agents drinking on duty during protective assignments, contributing to a pattern noted in OIG summaries of ethics violations and administrative actions between 2011 and 2014. Investigations into these events highlighted systemic issues, such as inadequate enforcement of conduct policies and a tolerance for off-duty excesses that blurred into operational risks. The 2015 House report cited over 50 security breaches and cases since 2003, attributing them partly to rapid agency expansion without proportional oversight, though a 2013 OIG review of the Colombia scandal asserted no evidence of "widespread" problems. These incidents led to mandatory ethics training and policy reforms, but critics, including congressional overseers, argued they reflected deeper cultural deficiencies rather than isolated lapses. In January 2026, Secret Service agent Tomas Escotto, assigned to Vice President JD Vance's protective detail, disclosed sensitive security information—including protective formations, shift schedules, travel plans, and real-time locations—to an undercover journalist from O'Keefe Media Group posing as a romantic interest via Tinder. The agency responded by placing Escotto on administrative leave, suspending his security clearance, revoking access to facilities and systems, and issuing an apology to the Vance family; Deputy Director Matthew Quinn ordered all personnel to retake anti-espionage training.

2024 Election Cycle Failures and Investigations

On July 13, 2024, during a campaign rally in , 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired eight rounds from an AR-15-style rifle from a rooftop approximately 400 feet from the stage, grazing former President Donald Trump's right ear, killing attendee Corey Comperatore, and critically injuring two others before being neutralized by a Secret Service counter-sniper. The incident exposed multiple operational lapses by the U.S. Secret Service (USSS), including failure to secure the rooftop despite prior identification of it as a vulnerability, inadequate integration with local , and unaddressed requests for additional personnel and equipment. Investigations revealed a pattern of denied or unfulfilled resource requests for Trump's July events, including counter-drone systems and more agents, which USSS leadership attributed to competing demands but congressional reviews deemed indicative of insufficient prioritization. Communication breakdowns were central, with USSS personnel relying on incompatible radio systems that hindered real-time threat sharing with state and local partners; for instance, local spotters observed Crooks with a and on the but faced delays in relaying this to protectees. The Independent Review Panel, commissioned by the Department of , cited "lack of clarity in practice" on command authority and a "complacency" among some agents, while the USSS's internal Mission Assurance review highlighted "gaps in diligence" and poor advance planning that allowed Crooks an unimpeded line of sight. Congressional probes amplified these findings: the bipartisan House Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, in its December 2024 final report, detailed "significant failures in planning, execution, and leadership," including USSS denial of extra magnetometers and failure to act on pre-rally intelligence about Crooks as a . A July 2025 Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee report by Chairman documented "stunning failures," such as unheeded warnings minutes before shots fired and systemic understaffing, based on interviews and documents showing USSS awareness of vulnerabilities as early as the rally's planning phase. No criminal charges resulted against USSS personnel, but six were suspended without pay in July 2025 for lapses including inadequate site reconnaissance and protocol violations. A second attempt occurred on September 15, , at Trump International Golf Club in , where Ryan Wesley Routh was spotted with a by a Secret Service agent and fled without firing; internal reviews found proactive detection mitigated risks, though it underscored ongoing perimeter security challenges during the campaign. USSS Director resigned on July 23, , amid bipartisan congressional pressure following testimony where she acknowledged accountability gaps but avoided specifics on disciplinary actions. These events prompted interim reforms, including enhanced drone and protocols, though reports noted persistent implementation hurdles into 2025.

Allegations of Political Bias and Resource Allocation

The U.S. Secret Service faced allegations of political bias in resource allocation following repeated denials of requests for additional personnel and equipment from former President Donald Trump's between 2022 and . Trump's campaign, which conducted over 100 public events in the lead-up to the , sought enhanced federal resources due to elevated levels and strains, but senior agency officials rejected these overtures, opting instead for alternatives such as local support or modified security protocols like hand-held magnetometers in place of specialized screening units. The agency attributed denials to chronic shortages—exacerbated by a decade-long shortfall of approximately 300 agents—and adherence to historical precedents for candidate protection, which did not mandate full federal assets for non-sitting presidents. Critics, including Republican lawmakers and Trump's personnel, contended that these decisions reflected inadequate prioritization or implicit bias against a political opponent of the Democratic administration, particularly given Trump's status as both a former president and leading Republican candidate facing documented high-threat environments. A July 2025 report commissioned by Sen. (R-IA) highlighted the agency's failure to share classified threat about Iranian plots against Trump with his , despite senior officials' awareness, and noted denials of requests for enhanced counter-drone due to resource limitations. These lapses contributed to perceptions of uneven protection, as sitting President Joe and received permanent, full-time details without similar reported constraints, though direct comparative data on resource approvals for Democratic protectees remains limited in public records. Agency leadership, under Director (appointed in 2022 by Biden with prior experience protecting Democratic figures including Biden and Rep. Dan Walz), denied any politicization, emphasizing operational decisions based on threat assessments rather than affiliations. However, isolated incidents fueled skepticism, such as a Secret Service agent's September 2025 placement on leave for a social media post disparaging conservative figure , prompting questions about internal ideological leanings. In response to the controversies, passed legislation in September 2024 mandating equivalent Secret Service protection for major-party presidential and vice-presidential nominees, effectively standardizing resource allocation irrespective of incumbency or party. Independent reviews, including a report, attributed broader failures to systemic issues like communication breakdowns and planning negligence rather than proven partisan intent, though they underscored the need for depoliticized threat prioritization.

Reforms and Accountability

Responses to Specific Incidents

Following the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt on former President at a campaign rally in , where shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks fired from an unsecured rooftop 130 yards away, killing one attendee and injuring two others, U.S. Secret Service Director resigned on July 23, 2024. Cheatle's departure came after a July 22 congressional hearing where she acknowledged an "operational failure" but faced bipartisan criticism for inadequate explanations on security lapses, including poor coordination with local and failure to secure the rooftop despite prior warnings. In response, the Secret Service conducted an internal Mission Assurance Inquiry, which identified deficiencies such as agents' lack of detailed knowledge about local law enforcement positioning and inadequate advance site surveys. Acting Director Ronald Rowe, who assumed leadership post-resignation, publicly admitted these failures in a September 20, 2024, statement, emphasizing breakdowns in communication and planning that allowed the shooter to access the vantage point. By July 2025, six agents involved in the Butler protection detail received unpaid suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days for conduct failures, with appeals rights granted; these disciplinary actions stemmed from the inquiry's findings on negligence in perimeter security and resource allocation. For the September 15, 2024, apparent assassination attempt at Trump International Golf Club in , where Ryan Wesley Routh was spotted with a rifle barrel protruding from bushes 300-500 yards from Trump, the responded by firing on the and securing his without injury to the protectee. An internal review revealed the agency had not fully searched the perimeter or conducted drone surveillance in advance, relying instead on observation posts; officials attributed the prevention to a counter-sniper's vigilance but conceded procedural shortcomings similar to . No immediate personnel suspensions were publicly detailed for this incident, though it prompted expedited reviews under the acting director to address recurring advance planning gaps. External probes, including a Department of Homeland Security Independent Review Panel released October 15, 2024, corroborated agency self-assessments by pinpointing specific breakdowns like delayed dissemination and siloed , leading to recommendations for disciplinary that influenced the suspensions. A House Task Force final in December 2024 further documented coordination failures from July 8-13, urging stricter internal enforcement, while a in 2024 highlighted leadership voids absent clear command authority during the event. These responses emphasized through personnel measures over systemic overhauls at the incident level, though critics noted delays in full implementation.

Systemic Changes and Ongoing Evaluations

Following the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt on then-former President in , U.S. Secret Service Director resigned on July 23, 2024, amid bipartisan congressional criticism of operational failures, including inadequate site security and communication breakdowns. In response, the agency adopted a new protective model emphasizing enhanced threat assessment and coordination with local , as outlined in December 2024 testimony before a congressional . By July 10, 2025, the Secret Service reported implementing 21 of over 40 recommendations from internal and external reviews, including upgrades to drone detection technology, expanded use of counter-unmanned aircraft systems, and improved radio interoperability for field agents. Systemic reforms extended to personnel accountability, with six agents involved in the Butler incident suspended without pay as of July 10, 2025, following investigations into lapses such as failure to secure the rooftop from which the shooter fired. The agency also prioritized investments in training and , including mandatory behavioral threat assessment protocols and expanded counter- team staffing, prompted by a Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General audit released August 29, 2025, which identified deficiencies in sniper readiness and recommended formalized recruitment and evaluation processes. These changes were integrated into the Secret Service's 2025 Strategic Plan, which structures reforms around five pillars: operations, , resources and physical assets, training, and technology, aiming to address chronic understaffing and resource constraints exacerbated by competing protective duties. Ongoing evaluations include congressional oversight, such as Senator Rand Paul's July 13, 2025, final report documenting persistent communication silos and recommending decentralized command structures to prevent single-point failures, and Senator Chuck Grassley's July 12, 2025, analysis highlighting the agency's pre-event withholding of Iranian threat intelligence from protectees. An October 18, 2024, bipartisan panel report called for "fundamental reform" in advance planning and accountability metrics, influencing subsequent Government Accountability Office audits extending into 2025. The Secret Service has committed to continuous operational reviews, with a July 10, 2025, update affirming that reforms represent an initial phase, subject to iterative assessments amid heightened threats from nonstate actors and foreign adversaries. These evaluations underscore causal factors like overreliance on local partnerships without sufficient federal oversight, as evidenced in post-incident analyses, while prioritizing empirical metrics such as response times and threat detection rates over prior qualitative assurances.

References

  1. https://www.secretservice.gov/about/overview
  2. https://www.secretservice.gov/about/history/150-years
  3. https://www.whitehousehistory.org/questions/which-president-was-assigned-the-first-full-time-secret-service-detail
  4. https://www.secretservice.gov/protection
  5. https://www.secretservice.gov/investigations/counterfeit
  6. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_1017_opa-Independent-Review-Panel-Final-Report-and-Accompanying-Materials.pdf
  7. https://fallon.house.gov/uploadedfiles/tf.finalreport.pdf
  8. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2025/07/us-secret-service-one-year-update-following-july-13-2024-attempted
  9. https://www.secretservice.gov/about/history
  10. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/160th-anniversary-of-the-united-states-secret-service-2025/
  11. https://time.com/3774327/lincoln-history-secret-service/
  12. https://www.secretservice.gov/about/history/timeline
  13. https://clintonwhitehouse5.archives.gov/WH/kids/inside/html/spring98-2.html
  14. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/07/05/united-states-secret-service-celebrates-160th-birthday
  15. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48138
  16. https://www.itestcash.com/pages/the-history-of-counterfeiting-and-the-secret-service
  17. https://explorethearchive.com/secret-service-history
  18. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/homesec/R48138.pdf
  19. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/HTML/IF11732.web.html
  20. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2024-11-26_R48138_81a7a778a741a76bb36fd74660a0e16c7785600d.pdf
  21. https://www.cnn.com/2013/11/23/politics/jfk-secret-service
  22. https://www.kiiitv.com/article/news/jfk-assassination-changed-secret-service/503-274024854
  23. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/11/19/how-secret-service-has-changed-50-years-lafter-jfk
  24. https://www.dhs.gov/creation-department-homeland-security
  25. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL34603
  26. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a236721.html
  27. https://www.dhs.gov/implementing-911-commission-recommendations
  28. https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/ntac
  29. https://www.dhs.gov/topics/cybersecurity
  30. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a255664.html
  31. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/12/written-testimony-task-force-attempted-assassination-donald-j-trump
  32. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/reps/chairman-rand-paul-releases-final-report-detailing-secret-service-failures-in-attempted-assassination-of-president-donald-j-trump/
  33. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/secret-service-trump-assassination-attempt-july-13/
  34. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3056
  35. https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/agency-crisis-secret-service-decade-old-staffing-shortfall-rcna162698
  36. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/2024_0309_us_secret_service.pdf
  37. https://www.govexec.com/management/2024/07/long-been-case-stretched-too-thin-secret-service-says/398115/
  38. https://www.secretservice.gov/investigations
  39. https://www.secretservice.gov/investigations/financial
  40. https://www.secretservice.gov/investigations/cyber
  41. https://www.secretservice.gov/investigations/forensic
  42. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-239
  43. https://www.secretservice.gov/about/leadership
  44. https://www.axios.com/2025/01/23/sean-curran-trump-secret-service-director
  45. https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2020-09/USSS-Office-Org-Chart-2020.pdf
  46. https://www.secretservice.gov/contact
  47. https://www.usa.gov/agencies/secret-service
  48. https://www.voanews.com/a/the-secret-washington-museum-that-tourists-can-t-visit-/6866426.html
  49. https://www.secretservice.gov/contact/field-offices
  50. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/10/us-secret-service-partners-hold-two-day-ebt-fraud-and-card-skimming
  51. https://www.secretservice.gov/contact/field-offices1
  52. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/uniformed-division-officer/role
  53. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/254894.pdf
  54. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/uniformed-division/ERT
  55. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/uniformed-division/K9
  56. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2025/05/macauley-appointed-new-us-secret-service-uniformed-division-chief
  57. https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/specialoperations
  58. https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/specialoperations/path
  59. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/CAT
  60. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2025-09/OIG-25-37-Aug25-Redacted.pdf
  61. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/technical-law-enforcement/role
  62. https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/8-2022-FSD-Capabilities-Flyer.pdf
  63. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/behind-the-shades/2025/02/youve-been-gone-fsd-forensics-advancements
  64. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/application-process
  65. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/qualifications
  66. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/faq
  67. https://www.usajobs.gov/job/847106700
  68. https://und.edu/blog/how-to-become-a-secret-service-agent.html
  69. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/STAR
  70. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/technical-law-enforcement/application-process
  71. https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2022-05/TAD%2520Special%2520Agent%2520Brochure_Print%2520safe.pdf
  72. https://www.fleta.gov/accreditation/academy/us-secret-service-james-j-rowley-training-center-usss-jjrtc
  73. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/training
  74. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/uniformed-division-officer/training
  75. https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/technical-law-enforcement/training
  76. http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0330.html
  77. https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-butler-pennsylvania-rally-secret-service-2024-7
  78. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-service-handles-threats-president-analysis/story?id=62701250
  79. https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/american-presidency/online/life-and-death/death-mourning/secret-service
  80. https://fox40.com/news/local-news/sacramento/agent-recalls-the-moment-he-saved-president-fords-life-in-sacramento/
  81. https://www.history.com/articles/gerald-ford-assassination-attempts-1975-lessons
  82. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/behind-the-shades/2025/07/us-secret-service-helps-commemorate-former-president-gerald
  83. https://www.secretservice.gov/reagan40thanniversary
  84. https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2020-05/Reagan_Assassination_Attempt_Interview_Reports.pdf
  85. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/behind-the-shades/2025/03/retired-special-agent-mccarthy-recalls-infamous-march-day
  86. https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/white-house-security-breaches-fast-facts
  87. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/Mgmt/2016/OIG-16-64-Apr16.pdf
  88. http://taskforce-kelly.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/final-report-task-force-concludes-its-investigation-releases-report
  89. https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-service-agents-suspended-conduct-attempted-trump-assassination/story?id=123628351
  90. https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/09/secret-service-statement-regarding-september-15-2024-security-incident
  91. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/grassley-report-concludes-secret-service-failure-to-share-threat-information-allowed-for-preventable-tragedy-in-butler-identifies-path-forward-for-agency-improvements
  92. https://www.governmentattic.org/15docs/DHS-OIG_USSS-OIGinvsClosed_2011-2014.pdf
  93. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ig-no-evidence-of-widespread-secret-service-misconduct/
  94. https://oversight.house.gov/report/united-states-secret-service-an-agency-in-crisis/
  95. https://www.hstoday.us/federal-pages/dhs/secret-service-misconduct-a-deeply-rooted-cultural-problem/
  96. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-17747793
  97. https://www.cnn.com/2012/10/19/us/secret-service-prostitution-scandal
  98. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf
  99. https://www.washingtonian.com/2013/03/25/secret-service-prostitution-scandal-one-year-later/
  100. https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/timeline-secret-service-misconduct
  101. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/15/us-secret-service-scandals-revealed
  102. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44197.html
  103. https://okeefemediagroup.com/u-s-secret-service-agent-reveals-vice-president-jd-vances-location-and-security-details-to-undercover-journalist/
  104. https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-secret-service-agent-from-biden-era-hates-trump-policies-leaks-sensitive-info-about-vp-to-omg-undercover-reporter
  105. https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2024-09/FOR-RELEASE-U.S-Secret-Service-July-13-Mission-Assurance-Report-Summary.pdf
  106. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/USSS-Chairman-Report-Final-July-20254.pdf
  107. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-assassination-attempt-butler-secret-service-suspension/
  108. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/07/20/trump-secret-service-security-attempted-assassination/
  109. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/21/politics/secret-service-trump-security-requests
  110. https://www.npr.org/2024/07/21/nx-s1-5047837/secret-service-donald-trump-assassination-attempt
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/21/us-secret-service-rejected-previous-trump-team-requests-for-more-resources-reports
  112. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/09/13/us-secret-service-agent-put-leave-anti-charlie-kirk-post/86136440007/
  113. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/09/24/congress/presidential-security-boost-00180822
  114. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/14/inexcusable-us-senate-report-faults-secret-service-for-trump-shooting
  115. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/23/politics/secret-service-director-kimberly-cheatle
  116. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/07/23/secret-service-director-cheatle-scrutiny/
  117. https://www.npr.org/2024/07/23/nx-s1-5049729/secret-service-director-resigns-after-getting-grilled-by-congress
  118. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c724wqpy4qnt
  119. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/nx-s1-5120519/secret-service-trump-failures-butler-shooting
  120. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/10/trump-assassination-attempt-secret-service
  121. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/17/secret-service-golf-course-trump-assassination-attempt
  122. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/21/us-secret-service-admits-failures-in-review-of-shooting-at-trump-rally
  123. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/g-s1-23618/secret-service-trump-shooting-gunman-problems
  124. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/25/politics/trump-shooting-butler-senate-report-secret-service
  125. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-service-report-outlines-attempted-trump-assassination/story?id=123648964
  126. https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2025-07/2025-Strategic-Plan-FINAL.pdf
  127. https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2024/10/donald-trump-assassination-secret-service-reform-report/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.