Hubbry Logo
Shaker communitiesShaker communitiesMain
Open search
Shaker communities
Community hub
Shaker communities
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Shaker communities
Shaker communities
Shaker communities
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Shakers
Topics
Notable people
Founders

Other members

South Family Building, Harvard Shaker Village, Massachusetts
James E. Irving (1818-1901), Photograph of a group of Shakers - single image
Trustees Office, Shakertown, Pleasant Hill, Kentucky

The Shakers are a sect of Christianity which practices celibacy, communal living, confession of sin, egalitarianism, and pacifism. After starting in England, it is thought that these communities spread into the cotton towns of North West England, with the football team of Bury taking on the Shaker name to acknowledge the Shaker community of Bury. The Shakers left England for the English colonies in North America in 1774. As they gained converts, the Shakers established numerous communities in the late-18th century through the entire 19th century. The first villages organized in Upstate New York and the New England states, and, through Shaker missionary efforts, Shaker communities appeared in the Midwestern states. Communities of Shakers were governed by area bishoprics and within the communities individuals were grouped into "family" units and worked together to manage daily activities. By 1836 eighteen major, long-term societies were founded, comprising some sixty families, along with a failed commune in Indiana. Many smaller, short-lived communities were established over the course of the 19th century, including two failed ventures into the Southeastern United States and an urban community in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Shakers peaked in population by the 1840s and early 1850s, with a membership between 4,000 and 9,000. Growth in membership began to stagnate by the mid 1850s. In the turmoil of the American Civil War and subsequent Industrial Revolution, Shakerism went into severe decline. As the number of living Shakers diminished, Shaker communes were disbanded or otherwise ceased to exist. Some of their buildings and sites have become museums, and many are historic districts under the National Register of Historic Places. The only active community is Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village in Maine, which is composed of at least three active members.

The first Shaker societies

[edit]
The Great Stone Dwelling, Enfield Shaker Village, New Hampshire[1]

The first Shaker community was established north of Albany, and was first called "Niskayuna", a rendering of the Indian name for the land. Later the town they were in was officially named Watervliet. That part of the town of Watervliet is now in the town of Colonie (since 1895), and the name Watervliet is now limited to the city of Watervliet (1896). In addition, Niskayuna is now the name of a town to the northwest. This has led to some confusion, because many historical accounts refer to them as the Niskayuna Shakers, while others refer to them as Watervliet Shakers. The Watervliet Shaker Historic District is where Mother Ann Lee was buried.[2]

By 1780, the missionary work of the Shakers had attracted many new converts. An extensive series of trips throughout New England from 1781 through 1783 brought in followers across the entire region. Converts began appearing in New Lebanon and Canaan, New York; Hancock, Pittsfield, Richmond, Ashfield, Harvard, and Shirley, Massachusetts; and the states of Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Maine (then part of Massachusetts), among other locations.

In 1784, Ann Lee and her brother both died, leaving James Whittaker to lead the faith. By 1787, he too had died, and Joseph Meacham assumed the role as leader. Meacham appointed Lucy Wright of Pittsfield to co-lead, and under their auspices they organized a central village in New Lebanon, as well as organizing the original settlement of Watervliet. By 1790, the Hancock Village was also organized. After the formation of the New Lebanon, Watervliet, and Hancock communities, within three years nine more communities would organize in Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Maine.

Settlement growth

[edit]

The Shakers built more than 20 settlements that attracted at least 20,000 converts over the next century.[3] Strict believers in celibacy, Shakers acquired their members through conversion, indenturing children, and adoption of orphans. Some children, such as Isaac N. Youngs, came to the Shakers when their parents joined, then grew up to become faithful members as adults.[4]

As their communities grew, women and men shared leadership of the Shaker communities. Women preached and received revelations as the Spirit fell upon them. Thriving on the religious enthusiasm of the first and second Great Awakenings, the Shakers declared their messianic, communitarian message with significant response. One early convert observed: "The wisdom of their instructions, the purity of their doctrine, their Christ-like deportment, and the simplicity of their manners, all appeared truly apostolical." The Shakers represent a small but important Utopian response to the gospel. Preaching in their communities knew no boundaries of gender, social class, or education.[5]

Village organization

[edit]

Bishoprics

[edit]

Shaker communities were grouped into bishoprics, which were governing units. The leadership team, called a ministry, resided in the bishopric's primary community. This ministry consisted of two men known as Elders and two women known as Eldresses. The New Lebanon Bishopric, the primary bishopric unit, was located in New York and included the Mount Lebanon and Watervliet Shaker Villages,[6] as well as, after 1859, Groveland Shaker Village. In addition to its own member communities, the ministry of New Lebanon Bishopric oversaw all other Shaker bishoprics and communes. After New Lebanon closed in 1947, this central Ministry relocated to Hancock Shaker Village, and after the closure of that community in 1960, to Canterbury Shaker Village. When Canterbury closed in 1992, Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village remained as the last extant Shaker commune.

Family groups

[edit]

A Shaker village was divided into groups or "families." The leading group in each village was the Church Family, and it was surrounded by satellite families that were often named for points on the compass rose. Managing each family was a leadership team consisting of two Elders and two Eldresses. Shakers lived together as brothers and sisters. Each house was divided so that men and women did most things separately. They used different staircases and doors. They sat on opposite sides of the room in worship, at meals, and in "union meetings" held to provide supervised socialization between the sexes. However, the daily business of a Shaker village required the brethren and sisters to interact, as did the dancing and other vigorous activity of their worship services. Though there was a division of labor between men and women, they also cooperated in carrying out many tasks, such as harvesting apples, food production, laundry, and gathering firewood.[7] Every family was designed to be self-supporting with its own farm and businesses, but in times of hardship, other parts of the village, or even other Shaker villages, pitched in to help the afflicted.

Communities

[edit]
Image Site Spiritual name[8] Bishopric[9] City State Dates Historic designation
Alfred Shaker Village Holy Land Alfred[nb 1] Alfred Maine 1793–1931[10] NRHP[11]
Canterbury Shaker Village Holy Ground Canterbury Canterbury New Hampshire 1792–1992[12] NRHP[11]
New Enfield Shaker Village Chosen Vale Canterbury Enfield New Hampshire 1793–1923[13] NRHP[11]
Old Enfield Shaker Village City of Union Hancock Enfield Connecticut 1792–1917[14] NRHP[11]
Gorham Shaker Village Union Branch Alfred Gorham Maine 1808–1819[15]
Groveland Shaker Village Union Branch Groveland[nb 2] Groveland New York 1836–1892[16]
Hancock Shaker Village City of Peace Hancock Hancock and Pittsfield[nb 3] Massachusetts 1790–1960[17] NRHP[11]
Harvard Shaker Village Lovely Vineyard Harvard Harvard Massachusetts 1792–1918[18] NRHP[11]
Mount Lebanon Shaker Village Holy Mount New Lebanon New Lebanon New York 1785–1917[19] NRHP[11]
Narcoosee Shaker Village Olive Branch Union Village Narcoosee Florida 1895–1924[20][nb 4]
New Canaan Shaker Village None New Lebanon New Canaan Connecticut 1810–1812[21]
North Union Shaker Village Holy Grove North Union[nb 5] Cleveland Ohio 1822–1899[22] NRHP[11]
Philadelphia Shakers None Watervliet[nb 6] Philadelphia[nb 7] Pennsylvania 1858–c.1910[23]
Pleasant Hill Shaker Village None Pleasant Hill[nb 5] Harrodsburg Kentucky 1806–1910[24] NRHP[11]
Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village Chosen Land Alfred[nb 1] New Gloucester Maine 1794–present[25] NRHP[11]
Savoy Shaker Village None New Lebanon Savoy Massachusetts 1817–1821[nb 8][26]
Shirley Shaker Village Pleasant Garden Harvard Shirley Massachusetts 1793–1908[27] NRHP[11]
Sodus Bay Shaker Village None New Lebanon Sodus and Huron New York 1826–1836[28]
South Union Shaker Village Jasper Valley South Union[nb 5] South Union Kentucky 1807–1922[29] NRHP[11]
Tyringham Shaker Village City of Love Hancock Tyringham Massachusetts 1792–1875[30] NRHP[11]
Union Village Shaker Village Wisdom's Paradise Union Village[nb 5] Turtlecreek Township Ohio 1805–1912[31]
Watervliet Shaker Village Wisdom's Valley New Lebanon Albany New York 1776–1926[32] NRHP[11]
Watervliet Shaker Village (Ohio) Vale of Peace Union Village[nb 5] Kettering Ohio 1806–1900[33] Marker #6-57[34]
West Union Shaker Village (Busro) None Union Village Busro Indiana 1807–1827[9]
White Oak Shaker Village None Union Village White Oak Georgia 1898–1902[35]
Whitewater Shaker Village Lonely Plain of Tribulation Whitewater[nb 5] New Haven Ohio 1822–1916[36] NRHP[11]

Out-families, short-lived settlements, and missions

[edit]

Some organized In addition to the organized communities, other small and very short-lived communities emerged during the history of the Shakers, as well as various missions. These included:

Shaker village tourism

[edit]

In the 19th century, hundreds of tourists visited Shaker villages, and many of them later wrote about their experiences there. Outsiders were invariably impressed by Shaker cleanliness, prosperity, and agriculture. Shaker food was delicious, and they were hospitable to outsiders. Shakers had a reputation for honesty and their products were the best of their kind.[43]

Museums

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Great Stone Dwelling". Enfield Shaker Museum. Retrieved 2022-03-14.
  2. ^ Stein 1992, pp. 10–37.
  3. ^ Brewer 1986, p. xx; Stein 1992, p. 114
  4. ^ Wergland 2006, Chapter 2.
  5. ^ Duduit 1992, pp. 32–33.
  6. ^ a b c d Paterwic 2008, p. 18.
  7. ^ Stein 1992, p. 94.
  8. ^ Stein 1992, p. 181.
  9. ^ a b Paterwic 2008, p. 235.
  10. ^ Alfred Shaker Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 2
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o National Register of Historic Places.
  12. ^ Canterbury Shaker Village; Paterwic 2008, p. 29
  13. ^ Enfield Shaker Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 65
  14. ^ Enfield Shakers Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 63
  15. ^ Murray 1994, p. 35.
  16. ^ Paterwic 2008, p. 96.
  17. ^ Paterwic 2008, p. 101.
  18. ^ Harvard Shaker Village Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 104
  19. ^ Mount Lebanon Shaker Society.
  20. ^ Murray 1994, p. 235.
  21. ^ Murray 1994, p. 125.
  22. ^ North Union Shaker Site.
  23. ^ National Women's History Museum; Danker 2005, p. 121; Smith 2013, p. 603; Paterwic 2008, p. 171
  24. ^ Shakertown at Pleasant Hill Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 174
  25. ^ Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village; Paterwic 2008, p. xx
  26. ^ Murray 1994, p. 95.
  27. ^ Shirley Shaker Village; Paterwic 2008, p. 191
  28. ^ Paterwic 2008, p. 197.
  29. ^ South Union Shakertown Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 201
  30. ^ Tyringham Shaker Settlement Historic District; Paterwic 2008, p. 218
  31. ^ Murray 1994, p. 185; Whitewater Shaker Settlement; Paterwic 2008, p. xxi
  32. ^ Watervliet Shaker Historic District.
  33. ^ Ohio Historical Society; Paterwic 2008, p. 229
  34. ^ Ohio Historical Society.
  35. ^ Murray 1994, p. 229.
  36. ^ Whitewater Shaker Settlement; Paterwic 2008, pp. xxi, xxiii
  37. ^ Andrews 1963, pp. 291–293; Stein 1992, p. 19; Paterwic 2008, p. 141; Merchant 2010, p. 248
  38. ^ a b c d Andrews 1963, pp. 291–293.
  39. ^ Paterwic 2008, p. 202.
  40. ^ The San Francisco Call 1895, p. 10; Stein 1992, p. 331; Dowe 1983, pp. 341–342; Powers 1894, p. 110; Anstatt 1894, p. 117
  41. ^ Whitson 1983, p. 24-25.
  42. ^ Stein 1992, p. 502, n. 176; The San Francisco Call 1895, p. 10; Powers 1894, p. 110; Anstatt 1894, p. 117
  43. ^ Wergland 2007; Wergland 2010

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Shaker communities

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing, known as the Shakers, was a millenarian Christian sect that originated in 18th-century England and developed into self-sustaining communal villages across the northeastern and midwestern United States from the late 1700s onward. Shaker doctrine emphasized celibacy as essential to spiritual purity, communal ownership of goods, oral confession of sins, and equality between men and women in governance and labor, with worship featuring ecstatic physical movements interpreted as shaking off worldly sins. These communities, organized into "families" of believers living apart from non-members, adhered to principles of simplicity, hard work viewed as divine service, and non-violence, establishing over a dozen major settlements such as those at Hancock, Massachusetts, and Pleasant Hill, Kentucky, where members innovated in , , and to achieve economic independence. Despite early growth fueled by converts during religious revivals, the Shakers faced for their unconventional practices and internal challenges from , leading to a peak membership before stagnation set in amid the Industrial Revolution's societal shifts. The practice of , while central to their as a means to transcend fleshly distractions and emulate Christ's dual male-female incarnation through leaders and her successors, causally precluded natural , rendering the societies dependent on adult that dwindled as external opportunities expanded and alternative spiritual movements competed for adherents. By the early , most villages had dissolved or converted to public historic sites, with only isolated remnants persisting into the , their legacy enduring in aesthetics and preserved examples of communal rather than ongoing membership.

Origins and Early Development

Founding Principles and Migration to America

The Shaker movement, formally known as the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing, emerged in , , during the as a radical offshoot of under the of Jane Wardley and her husband James. The group emphasized direct spiritual revelation, ecstatic worship involving physical shaking and dancing to expel sin, and rejection of formal sacraments, earning them the pejorative label "Shaking Quakers" from contemporaries. Ann Lee, born February 29, 1736, to a blacksmith father, joined the Wardleys around 1758 after experiencing personal hardships, including multiple miscarriages and the deaths of her four children; these events shaped her conviction that was the of human sinfulness, leading her to advocate as essential for spiritual purity. By the 1770s, Lee had assumed , positioning herself as the female embodiment of Christ's second appearing, with core principles coalescing around , communal ownership of property, oral of sins to achieve ongoing , equality between men and women in spiritual , and separation from worldly institutions and practices. These beliefs, derived from Lee's visions and the group's emphasis on inner light over external rituals, clashed with established Anglican and Quaker norms, resulting in repeated imprisonments for Lee and her followers between 1770 and 1774 for alleged disturbances during and refusal to swear oaths. Facing escalating , including mob violence and legal restrictions on their assemblies, Lee experienced a revelation directing her to transplant the movement to America, viewed as a land of greater religious liberty amid the impending millennial kingdom. On May 19, 1774, Lee departed with eight companions—four men and four women, including her brother William—aboard the ship Maria; they arrived in on August 6, 1774, after a voyage marked by illness and , with the group possessing minimal funds and relying on manual labor such as chair caning for sustenance. Initial settlement occurred in the wilderness near Albany, where the group purchased 6 acres in Niskayuna (present-day ) in 1776, establishing a rudimentary farmstead that served as the nucleus for the first American Shaker society. Despite Revolutionary War disruptions, including brief imprisonment of Lee in 1779–1780 on suspicion of British sympathies, the principles took root through converts drawn to the communal and Lee's itinerant preaching from 1776 to 1783, which emphasized sin's eradication via celibate living and labor. By her death on September 8, 1784, the movement had gained about 20 American adherents, laying the groundwork for organized communities while maintaining strict adherence to and , refusing during the war.

Establishment of Initial Societies

Ann Lee and seven followers arrived in New York City from England on August 6, 1774, seeking refuge from persecution and prompted by Lee's vision to establish the Shaker church in America. After initial residence in the city, where members supported themselves through manual labor, the group leased about 700 acres in Niskayuna (renamed Watervliet in 1800) northwest of Albany in 1776, forming the first Shaker settlement. This site became the cradle of Shaker communalism, with early structures including a log dwelling and later a meetinghouse completed in 1784. The Watervliet society endured severe trials during the Revolutionary War, including imprisonment and property seizures due to suspected Loyalist ties and conscientious objection to violence, yet gained its first native converts in 1778. Ann Lee's subsequent missionary journeys from 1778 to 1783 extended Shaker influence, yielding gatherings in Massachusetts and Connecticut. In 1781, converts in Harvard, Massachusetts, organized the second Shaker society, formalized through Lee's direct involvement and local accessions dissatisfied with established churches. Following Lee's death on September 8, 1784, at Watervliet, leadership transitioned to James Whittaker and then Joseph Meacham, who in 1787 directed the covenanting of members into formal communal "families" at New Lebanon, New York—where converts had begun assembling as early as 1782—with a meetinghouse erected in 1785. New Lebanon emerged as the administrative and spiritual hub, institutionalizing practices like shared property and dual male-female leadership across the nascent societies. These initial establishments, totaling around a dozen by 1793 in New York and New England, laid the groundwork for Shaker expansion through disciplined labor and proselytism.

Expansion and Organizational Maturity

Periods of Rapid Growth and Peak Membership

Following Ann Lee's death in 1784, the Shakers underwent rapid organizational development under Joseph Meacham and Lucy Wright, who formalized communal orders and directed members into settlements, spurring conversions amid post-Revolutionary religious fervor. This period saw the Watervliet grow from 15 members in 1778 to 87 by 1800, while twelve settlements emerged across New York and by 1793. Expansion accelerated in the early during a prolonged "great ingathering" from 1790 to 1850, fueled by evangelical revivals and missionary efforts, resulting in nineteen major self-sustaining communities by 1836 spanning , New York, , , and . Individual sites exemplified this surge; for instance, Pleasant Hill in expanded rapidly after its 1805 founding, acquiring 4,500 acres and peaking at 491 residents by 1823. Overall membership reached its zenith in the 1840s, with estimates of 3,500 to 5,000 believers across these societies before stagnation set in amid broader societal shifts. Hancock, Massachusetts, hosted over 300 at its height, reflecting the scale of mature communities during this era.

Key Communities and Geographic Spread

The Shaker communities originated in (later known as Watervliet), where the first American settlement formed around 1776 following Ann Lee's arrival in 1774. From this base, the movement expanded rapidly in the late , establishing 12 settlements across New York and by 1793. , New York, founded in 1785, became the central administrative and spiritual hub, coordinating further growth through organized bishoprics. New England saw the development of several enduring communities, including Hancock, Massachusetts (1790), which thrived until 1960; Canterbury, New Hampshire (1792); and Enfield, New Hampshire (1793), the ninth major establishment. Additional eastern sites encompassed Harvard and Shirley in , Alfred in Maine, and Sabbathday Lake in Maine, reflecting a dense concentration in the Northeast where the majority of the approximately 6,000 peak members resided by the mid-19th century. Westward expansion commenced in the early 1800s, driven by migration to areas suitable for , resulting in 19 principal communities across eight states by 1830. Key western settlements included Union Village, (1805); Pleasant Hill, (1805); South Union, (1807); and North Union, (1822). These outlying villages, often in the Valley, adapted to local conditions while maintaining communal structures, though some like West Union, Indiana, disbanded after brief operation due to internal and external pressures. The overall geographic footprint extended from southward to , emphasizing self-sufficient agrarian locales away from urban influences.

Internal Structure and Governance

Hierarchical Bishoprics and Leadership

The Shaker , formalized in the late 1780s under the leadership of Joseph Meacham and Lucy Wright following Ann Lee's death in 1784, divided communities into bishoprics as administrative districts encompassing multiple societies or local gatherings. Each bishopric was governed by a central Ministry consisting of two male Elders and two female Eldresses, who held primary responsibility for spiritual direction, doctrinal purity, and oversight of member conduct across the affiliated societies. This dual-gender leadership model reflected the Shakers' emphasis on equality between sexes, with men and women exercising parallel authority in spiritual matters, a practice rooted in their interpretation of biblical dualism and Ann Lee's teachings. The paramount bishopric was centered at , New York, established around 1787, which supervised all other bishoprics and coordinated inter-community affairs, including the appointment of leaders, resolution of disputes, and dissemination of revelations or directives. Subordinate bishoprics, such as the Hancock Bishopric (formed by 1790, overseeing societies in Hancock, Massachusetts; Tyringham, Massachusetts; and ), operated semi-autonomously but deferred to Mount Lebanon on major theological or administrative decisions. Within each bishopric, the Ministry typically resided in the principal society, serving terms that could extend for decades—Elders and Eldresses were selected for their perceived spiritual maturity and were expected to model , simplicity, and communal devotion, with rotations every few years to prevent entrenchment of power. Local leadership beneath the bishopric level included Elders and Eldresses for individual "families" (sub-units like Gathering, Second, or Church Families within a society), who managed daily spiritual guidance and discipline, while deacons handled temporal duties and trustees managed external economic relations. This tiered hierarchy ensured centralized spiritual authority amid decentralized operations, adapting to geographic expansion that peaked with 19 major communities by 1830, though it also contributed to tensions during periods of apostasy or internal reform, as bishopric leaders enforced covenantal commitments through confession and labor assignments. Leadership transitions occurred via communal discernment, often involving fasting and prayer, underscoring the Shakers' reliance on ongoing divine inspiration over hereditary or electoral succession.

Family Units and Division of Labor

Shaker communities subdivided their populations into semi-autonomous "family" units, typically numbering two to six per village and ranging in size from 50 to 100 members each, to facilitate communal living and efficient . These units included distinct groups such as the Church Family, comprising committed core believers who resided near the central ; the Gathering or Second Family, designated for novitiates, recent converts, and those in probationary status; and sometimes additional East, West, North, or South Families for expanded membership or specialized functions. Each family operated from its own dwelling house, workshops, and barns, maintaining internal independence while sharing overall village resources and gathering for collective worship. Within each family, leadership balanced spiritual and temporal responsibilities, with two Elders and two Eldresses appointed to oversee spiritual instruction, exhortation, moral guidance, and the overall well-being of members, reflecting the Shakers' commitment to dual-gender authority. Deacons and Deaconesses handled practical affairs: male Deacons supervised brothers in , woodworking, blacksmithing, , mill operations, and structural maintenance, while female Deaconesses directed sisters in cooking, , laundry, , , spinning, dyeing, and kitchen gardening to ensure self-sufficiency. Trustees, often termed office Deacons, managed external economic interactions, legal matters, and trade with non-Shakers, insulating the families from worldly influences. Division of labor adhered to strict gender separation, mirroring contemporary societal norms but adapted to celibacy and communalism, with men assigned physically demanding outdoor and trade tasks and women focused on indoor domestic production to minimize inter-sex contact and promote efficiency. This structure supported the Shakers' principle of labor as worship, where assigned roles contributed to the collective's productivity and spiritual discipline, enabling villages to sustain industries like farming and crafts without reliance on external labor. Despite equality in leadership positions, the gendered task allocation persisted, as evidenced in surviving records from communities like Hancock, , where deacons coordinated seasonal workloads such as wood-cutting in winter and crop tending in summer.

Core Beliefs and Practices Shaping Communities

Celibacy, Gender Roles, and Social Discipline

formed a foundational of the United Society of Believers, originating with Ann Lee's teachings in the 1770s, which viewed physical union as the root of human sinfulness and advocated spiritual union with the divine instead. Members vowed lifelong from and sexual activity upon full covenant, with recruitment relying solely on adult converts, indentured children, or orphans rather than biological reproduction. Violations, such as , resulted in expulsion, as documented in community records from the early . To uphold , Shakers enforced rigorous separation of the sexes in daily life, prohibiting Brothers and Sisters from conversing on non-essential topics, passing each other on stairs, or working jointly without elder approval. "Union Meetings" permitted limited supervised interactions, with participants seated at least five feet apart, forbidden from whispering or using perfume to avoid "lustful temptations." Children raised in communities attended sex-segregated schooling on alternating schedules and performed divided labors, reinforcing these boundaries from youth. These practices, codified in the Millennial Laws of 1821 and expanded to approximately 400 rules by the 1845 edition, aimed to eliminate occasions for temptation. Gender roles emphasized equality rooted in the belief of a dual-natured , embodying both and aspects, which extended to parallel structures for men and women. Each "" unit within a featured male Elders and female Eldresses who shared , providing joint spiritual and practical guidance; this duality mirrored Ann Lee's role as the "first spiritual in Christ" following her death in 1784. While labors were divided—Brothers handling and , Sisters managing domestic tasks— remained balanced, with eldresses holding power in their domains, as organized by Joseph Meacham in the . Social discipline maintained communal purity through mandatory oral confessions of to Elders or Eldresses, conducted regularly and privately, as a means of and spiritual renewal. The Millennial Laws prescribed uniform dress, forbade "worldly titles" like "Mr." or "Miss," banned pets, and restricted leisure such as theater visits or museum attendance, all requiring elder permission for travel or deviations. Eating rules, like prohibiting raw fruit before breakfast, promoted health and order, while and self-sufficiency measures underscored ; enforcement varied by community, with eastern sites like adhering more strictly than western ones. These regulations, intended to foster a sin-free environment, persisted as core even amid later relaxations in peripheral customs.

Communal Worship, Labor as Worship, and Spiritual Crises

Shaker communal worship centered on Sunday gatherings in dedicated meeting houses, where participants engaged in singing hymns, offering testimonials, delivering short homilies, observing periods of silence, and performing dances. Early practices featured spontaneous ecstatic movements, including shaking and whirling, which contributed to the derogatory nickname "Shaking Quakers" applied by outsiders. By the early 1800s, these evolved into structured, choreographed dances to maintain order, though spontaneous expressions briefly resurged in the 1840s before fading by the late 19th century. The Shakers elevated manual labor to a sacred act, embodying the principle that diligent work constituted a form of devotion equivalent to . This ethos, encapsulated in the "Hands to work, hearts to ," attributed to founder , permeated their communal economy, where all members contributed to , crafts, and maintenance without personal profit, viewing productivity as evidence of spiritual purity and rejection of idleness as . Shaker communities experienced spiritual crises during intense revival periods, notably the Era of Manifestations from to the mid-1850s, characterized by widespread visions, spirit communications, ecstatic dances, and the production of "gift drawings" and songs purportedly inspired by divine or ancestral entities. These events, while invigorating faith for some, provoked internal tensions over authenticity, physical exhaustion from prolonged rituals, and fears of doctrinal deviation, as leaders grappled with integrating the phenomena amid accusations of excess or external spiritualist influences.

Economic and Innovative Achievements

Self-Sufficient Industries and Craftsmanship

Shaker communities achieved self-sufficiency by establishing workshops and industries that produced essential goods for internal consumption while generating revenue through external sales. These efforts began early, with the first major commercial venture in garden seeds initiated around 1790 at communities like , where seeds were packaged, labeled, and distributed widely across the Northeast. By 1820, nearly all Shaker societies engaged in seed production, leveraging meticulous horticultural practices to supply varieties such as leeks, herbs, and vegetables, often sold via catalogs and local agents. This industry not only ensured but also exemplified Shaker ingenuity in and marketing, with emerging as a primary hub. Craftsmanship in woodworking defined much of Shaker manufacturing, producing durable items like furniture, oval boxes, and woodenware that adhered to principles of simplicity, functionality, and quality. Shaker furniture, crafted from native woods such as cherry and maple, featured tapered legs, minimal ornamentation, and innovative joinery techniques, with production peaking in the 19th century at sites including Hancock, Massachusetts, and Mount Lebanon. Oval boxes, a distinctive Shaker form using bentwood splints and dovetailed maple bands, were manufactured starting in the early 1800s, with detailed records from Mount Lebanon in 1850 documenting assembly processes involving carving, steaming, and kerfing for precise fits. These items, alongside pails, tubs, measures, and rakes, were initially made for communal use but later commercialized, reflecting mechanical skill honed through daily labor. Other industries included broom-making, where Shakers refined techniques for flat, efficient brooms using and wire handles, enhancing household utility and export value by the mid-19th century. and shops further supported , producing woolen goods, spinning wheels, and tools, while grist mills like the stone structure at North Union, , processed grains into for community sustenance. Overall, these operations embodied the Shaker ethos of "hands to work, hearts to ," prioritizing efficiency and excellence, with products gaining acclaim for reliability amid 19th-century market demands.

Agricultural Innovations and Architectural Adaptations

Shaker communities achieved self-sufficiency through agricultural innovations that emphasized efficiency and scientific application to farming. Members at , began cultivating and packaging garden s for commercial sale as early as 1789, establishing one of the earliest organized seed industries in the United States. This practice expanded to medicinal herbs and produced reliable varieties through and testing, contributing to higher crop yields and market viability. Shakers also adapted machinery for and processing, applying emerging scientific knowledge to traditional methods, which enhanced productivity on communal lands often exceeding 2,000 acres per village. Livestock management innovations included the development of specialized barns to minimize labor. The design, exemplified by the 1824 Round Stone Barn at [Hancock Shaker Village](/page/Hancock_Shaker Village) in , featured a central with ramps for wagons, allowing feed to be dropped directly to animals below via , reducing manual handling. Manure was collected efficiently from stanchions spaced approximately every 4 feet around the perimeter, facilitating composting and soil enrichment to support and fertility. This circular layout maximized space utilization and workflow, accommodating large herds—up to 100 cows—while aligning with Shaker principles of order and economy in labor as worship. Architectural adaptations reflected communal needs for segregation, , and . Dwelling houses were constructed as large, rectangular multi-story buildings, often housing 100 or more members, with separate entrances and wings for men and women to enforce and discipline. Interiors incorporated built-in cabinets, drawers, and wall pegboards for storage, optimizing space in shared living areas and workshops without reliance on external furnishings. Structures used local materials like stone and timber, with innovations in water systems and ventilation to support hygienic communal life, adapting forms to utopian ideals of and collective subordination. These designs prioritized functionality over ornamentation, influencing later modernist principles through their emphasis on and .

Criticisms, Controversies, and Internal Challenges

Strict Discipline, Apostasy, and Treatment of Converts

Shaker communities maintained rigorous discipline through the Millennial Laws, first codified in 1821 and revised in 1845 and 1860, comprising nearly 400 regulations governing daily conduct, dress, diet, and interactions to ensure uniformity and separation from worldly influences. These laws prohibited leaving settlements without elder permission, attending theaters or museums, using titles like "Mr." or "Miss," and consuming raw fruit before breakfast or after 6 p.m.; they also mandated green-painted beds, no pets with Christian names, and restricted opposite-sex interactions, such as passing on stairs or sending unapproved private letters. Enforcement relied on elder oversight, with violations requiring confession of sins—often public or private—to superiors, followed by penalties like temporary exclusion from worship, increased labor assignments, or isolation until compliance. Serious breaches, including moral lapses or repeated infractions, could result in expulsion, though enforcement varied by location, proving stricter in eastern settlements like those under Mount Lebanon's central authority than in western outposts. Labor formed a core disciplinary element, with mandatory communal work viewed as spiritual devotion, structured by precise schedules that left little room for idleness and reinforced collective accountability. Apostasy rates remained high throughout Shaker history, with substantial membership turnover undermining growth despite periodic recruitment surges; for instance, between 1780 and 1880, urban-born entrants showed markedly lower retention as lifelong members compared to rural adherents, reflecting challenges in adapting to communal isolation. Primary causes included the unyielding demands of , exhaustive labor, and familial separation, which prompted many—particularly short-term joiners—to depart after testing the lifestyle, contributing to a pattern of constant influx and efflux rather than stable expansion. Consequences for covenanted were severe under the binding agreements signed by full members: upon leaving, individuals forfeited all , past labor contributions, and any temporal interests to the , with no provision for reclamation or division, as stipulated in covenants like the revision. This forfeiture clause, intended to deter and affirm communal commitment, sparked numerous legal disputes, including lawsuits from ex-members alleging undue retention of assets, though courts often upheld the voluntary nature of the covenants while occasionally intervening in cases involving minors or unresolved debts. Treatment of converts emphasized gradual integration to assess commitment, beginning in the Gathering or Novitiate Order—peripheral units for newcomers—where probationary members, often numbering in the dozens per village, underwent a roughly one-year period of instruction in Shaker practices, rules, and labor without full privileges. Transition to full membership in the Church Order required signing a covenant, entailing of all sins, settlement of external debts, and irrevocable consecration of property and future labor to the society, a process that barred reclamation upon later . While many converts originated from religious revivals or economic hardship, rising occasionally to like Joseph Meacham, controversies arose over perceived , particularly regarding indentured children or family separations, fueling anti-Shaker campaigns and litigation where apostates claimed manipulation or withheld assets; however, historical records indicate covenants were presented as voluntary, with pre-joining requirements to discharge worldly obligations ensuring informed entry. Such disputes highlighted tensions between Shaker communalism and external legal norms, yet did not alter the structured , which prioritized proven adherence over rapid inclusion.

Demographic Realities of Celibacy and Recruitment Failures

The Shakers' doctrine of , instituted as a core tenet from the sect's founding, precluded all biological and thus required perpetual external to maintain or expand membership. Without offspring, communities depended on adult converts who surrendered prior and on "gathered" children—often orphans or indigent placed under Shaker care—for replenishment. This model yielded rapid growth during early 19th-century revivals, reaching a peak of approximately 5,000 members across 19 communities by the 1840s. Yet it embedded a structural fragility: net had to consistently exceed deaths and departures to avoid contraction, a threshold unmet as external appeal waned. Membership stagnation set in by the mid-1850s, followed by sharp decline; by 1874, the total stood at 2,415 across 18 surviving colonies, dropping to 855 by 1900 amid an aging populace. rates, particularly among , eroded gains from ; a study of from 1787 to 1900 found overall male defection at 38.9%—escalating to 45.5% for males admitted before age 16—and female rates at 25.3%. Juveniles formed the bulk of young entrants (62.5% of males and 64% of females under 16), but retention faltered as maturing members rejected perpetual , labor demands, and isolation from broader society, with urban-born recruits showing disproportionately high exit rates (nearly one-third of apostates versus 6% of lifelong members). Late-19th-century recruitment faltered further as industrialization expanded secular opportunities, diminishing the allure of Shaker communalism and celibate rigor for potential adult adherents. Fewer orphans entered care with rising state and familial alternatives, while converts balked at dissolving marriages or forgoing procreation, limiting inflows to those already marginalized. These dynamics yielded negative demographic momentum: deaths outpaced additions, skewing communities toward elderly members unable to sustain operations, and precipitating closures of villages like those at Enfield, Connecticut (by 1917) and Hancock, Massachusetts (1960) due to insufficient personnel. The celibate framework, while ideologically consistent, thus exposed the Shakers to causal extinction risks inherent in zero endogenous growth coupled with recruitment volatility.

Decline, Dissolution, and Causal Analysis

Post-Civil War Economic and Social Pressures

Following the , Shaker communities encountered intensified economic from the burgeoning , which favored mass-produced goods over their labor-intensive, handcrafted products. Industries such as broom-making, herbal medicinals, and seed packaging, which had previously generated significant revenue—exceeding $150,000 annually per colony in some cases during the early —faced erosion as mechanized factories and railroads enabled cheaper alternatives from external producers, including former Shakers who established rival operations. For instance, the Shakers' seed trade, a post-war peak performer sold in packets to support self-sufficiency, declined sharply due to this , with operations like Alfred Colony's ceasing by around 1860 and broader market share lost thereafter. Financial strains compounded these challenges, including speculative debts from ventures like grain trading, which resulted in losses of $14,000 at communities such as Pleasant Hill by 1886, amid a that impeded recovery. While some villages like Pleasant Hill initially maintained stable populations over 300 and modest economic gains immediately , the shift to an industrialized economy ultimately undermined their self-sufficient model, as waning prosperity reduced the appeal of Shaker goods in national markets. Socially, post-war societal transformations—driven by urbanization, increased individual prosperity, and evolving religious norms—deterred potential converts, who increasingly viewed Shaker celibacy and communal isolation as incompatible with modern opportunities. Membership, which had peaked at an estimated 5,000 nationwide in the mid-19th century, fell to nearly 2,000 by 1880 and entered freefall thereafter, with recruits often limited to aging widows with children or transient men seeking shelter rather than committed believers. This recruitment shortfall, exacerbated by an aging demographic devoid of natural replenishment, led to skewed community compositions favoring the very young and elderly, hastening the vitality drain in villages like Pleasant Hill, which closed as an active society by 1910. The closure of individual Shaker villages proceeded unevenly but inexorably from the late 19th century onward, driven primarily by insufficient membership to sustain communal labor, maintenance, and economic viability. Communities with fewer than a dozen active members could no longer operate their farms, workshops, and dwellings effectively, leading to decisions by central ministries or surviving elders to disband and redistribute assets or relocate remnants. For example, the Pleasant Hill Shaker Village in ended active operations in 1910, when its 12 remaining members deeded approximately 1,800 acres and remaining properties to a local merchant, marking the cessation of communal life there after nearly a century. Subsequent closures followed a similar pattern, with villages liquidating holdings and transferring any surviving Shakers to larger or more stable settlements. The Enfield Shaker Village in , established in 1793, closed in 1923 after 130 years, as declining numbers made continued agricultural and manufacturing activities untenable; its properties were sold at auction to cover debts and support departing members. , New York—the mother community and longstanding headquarters—effectively dissolved in 1947 when the last residents departed, with much of the site subsequently sold, reducing it to scattered buildings on diminished acreage. Earlier, in the mid-19th century, the North Union settlement near , , closed around 1849 as its handful of remaining members relocated to southwestern Ohio communities, abandoning the site due to low recruitment and internal attrition. Membership trends reflected this contraction, with total Shakers numbering roughly 6,000 across more than 20 villages in the early but falling to about 2,000 by 1880 and under 1,000 by 1900, as , aging without replacement, and failed recruitment compounded the effects of . By the 1930s, numbers had shrunk further to a few hundred scattered across a handful of villages, prompting consolidations such as the 1948 transfer of New Lebanon survivors to Hancock, , where the last male member died in 1958 amid ongoing diminishment. These patterns culminated in the mid-20th century with most villages shuttered, leaving only isolated pockets viable through asset sales, external aid, or mergers, though even these hovered at unsustainable levels of 10–20 members per site.

Modern Status and Enduring Legacy

Surviving Community at Sabbathday Lake

The Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village in New Gloucester, Maine, represents the last active community of the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing, commonly known as Shakers. Established in 1782 by early settlers influenced by Shaker teachings, the community was formally organized in 1794 with the construction of its Meetinghouse, serving as a center for worship and communal life. Unlike other Shaker villages that closed due to declining membership, Sabbathday Lake has persisted through adherence to core principles of celibacy, communal property, confession of sin, and equality between sexes, while adapting to modern challenges. As of August 2025, the community consists of three members: Brother Arnold Hadd, who serves as leader and oversees farming, gardening, and printing operations; Sister Carpenter; and Sister Baxter, who joined earlier that year, increasing the number from two. Hadd, in his late 50s, embodies the Shaker ethic of labor as , managing the village's working farm and herbal operations, while the group maintains 18 historic buildings on the site. Daily life revolves around structured routines of , work, and simple meals, with services featuring hymns and silent reflection, diverging from the original ecstatic shaking but preserving spiritual discipline. The community sustains itself through agriculture, craft production, and tourism, selling Shaker herbs, seeds, and preserves while offering guided tours of the grounds and museum exhibits on Shaker history and innovations. Recent renovations, such as those to herbal facilities funded by grants, support preservation efforts and educational outreach. Prospective members are welcomed but must demonstrate commitment to Shaker covenants, including lifelong celibacy and renunciation of personal property, a requirement that has historically limited recruitment success amid broader societal shifts away from such ascetic lifestyles. Despite its small size, the Sabbathday Lake community upholds the Shaker legacy of self-sufficiency and spiritual purity, with no immediate plans for dissolution as long as viable adherence persists.

Tourism, Museums, and Preservation Initiatives

Following the decline of active Shaker communities in the mid-20th century, many former villages transitioned into public historic sites, museums, and tourist attractions to sustain their preservation and educate visitors on Shaker history, architecture, and innovations. This shift began notably in the 1950s and 1960s, with sites opening for guided tours, craft demonstrations, and exhibits that interpret Shaker communal life, celibacy, and self-sufficiency. Tourism revenue from admissions, accommodations, and events has since supported ongoing maintenance, though some sites, like Hancock Shaker Village, reported significant visitor declines in the early 2010s despite broader interest in Shaker design aesthetics. Prominent examples include the Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill in , the largest restored Shaker community spanning 3,000 acres with 34 original buildings, offering self-guided tours, hiking trails, farm activities, dining, and overnight stays at an inn housed in a 1809 structure. Established in 1806, it attracts visitors through historical programming and river excursions, emphasizing Shaker agricultural and architectural legacies. Similarly, Hancock Shaker Village in operates as a with 20 preserved buildings and a working farm, providing seasonal access from April to December for demonstrations of Shaker crafts and talks on their industrial practices. Canterbury Shaker Village in , designated a , features 25 original and four reconstructed buildings across 700 acres, with nonprofit-led guided tours and exhibits focused on Shaker heritage since its founding as a in 1969. Other sites, such as the Enfield Shaker Museum in and South Union Shaker Village in , offer specialized programming on regional Shaker history and . Preservation initiatives are spearheaded by nonprofit organizations like the Shaker Heritage Society, which maintains the Watervliet site—America's first Shaker settlement—and has undertaken projects such as the 2005 restoration of the 1848 and 2015 stabilization of a barn complex with $405,000 in funding. In 2023, the Society secured $1 million for additional building stabilizations in partnership with Albany County. Hancock Shaker Village plans groundbreaking in June 2025 for a new Visitor Center and Center for Shaker Studies to house over 22,000 artifacts and enhance interpretive facilities. Pleasant Hill emphasizes ongoing restoration of its structures, integrating modern infrastructure upgrades with historical accuracy to ensure long-term viability. These efforts, often funded through donations, memberships, and public-private collaborations, prioritize structural integrity, habitat preservation, and educational outreach while adapting sites for without altering core historical features.

Broader Cultural and Historical Impact

The Shakers' emphasis on , utility, and craftsmanship profoundly shaped American design principles, particularly in furniture and , where their unadorned forms prioritized function over ornamentation. Shaker furniture featured clean lines, tapered legs, and durable construction using labor-saving tools like circular saws and mortising machines, reflecting a that viewed honest work as worship. This aesthetic influenced subsequent movements, including the tradition and 20th-century , with designers citing Shaker objects for their rejection of stylistic excess in favor of practical perfection. Shaker buildings, such as meetinghouses and barns, embodied order and efficiency through symmetrical layouts, round barns for streamlined operations, and materials chosen for longevity, setting precedents for functional . In and , pioneered innovations like standardized seed packaging through the , a collaborative effort among communities that marketed high-quality, labeled packets nationwide starting in the early , boosting rural economies and seed industry standards. Their systematic , production, and mechanized farming tools enhanced productivity in isolated villages, with outputs like brooms, oval boxes, and textiles sold externally to fund self-sufficiency. Shaker music and contributed to American folk traditions, with over 10,000 surviving hymns and dances—performed vigorously during —preserving a unique corpus of sacred songs that emphasized and communal participation, later transcribed and influencing choral and folk revivals. Artistic expressions, such as "gift drawings" by figures like Hannah Cohoon, depicted symbolic trees of life in bold, folk-inspired styles that blended with vernacular , gaining appreciation in 20th-century circles. Socially, Shaker practices of —evident in dual male-female leadership hierarchies and shared labor divisions—prefigured certain egalitarian ideals, though rooted in celibate communalism rather than family structures, and their and rituals modeled alternative ethics amid 19th-century revivals. Their "culture of cleanliness," codified in the Millennial Laws with mandates for and , demonstrably mitigated epidemics like in the 1830s by reducing contamination risks through rigorous protocols. These elements, disseminated via sold goods and public perceptions shifting from marginal to exemplary by the mid-20th century, embedded Shaker values of and into broader narratives of American utopianism and .

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/articles/history-of-the-shakers.htm
  2. https://hancockshakervillage.org/shakers/shaker-history-faqs/
  3. https://shakermuseum.org/learn/shaker-studies/who-are-the-shakers/
  4. https://shakervillageky.org/history-and-restoration/
  5. https://hancockshakervillage.org/home/history/
  6. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/religious/the-shakers-a-utopian-community-founded-in-u-s-1776/
  7. https://home.shakerheritage.org/history-shakers/
  8. https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-shakers/about-the-shakers
  9. https://www.nps.gov/places/watervliet-shaker-historic-district.htm
  10. https://harvardhistory.org/shakers-south-family-stone-barn/
  11. https://freedomsway.org/place/harvard-shaker-village-historic-district/
  12. https://www.shakermuseum.us/history
  13. https://www.nps.gov/places/mount-lebanon-shaker-society.htm
  14. https://hancockshakervillage.org/shakers/history/
  15. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/travelshaker/visit.htm
  16. https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsset/NHLS/66000511_text
  17. https://journalofantiques.com/digital-publications/joac-magazine/features/tour-of-five-shaker-village-sites/
  18. https://shakermuseum.org/learn/school-programs/teacher-resources/
  19. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/travelshaker/index.htm
  20. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1753/
  21. https://case.edu/ech/articles/n/north-union-shaker-community
  22. https://shakermuseum.org/discover/village-walking-tour/ministry-house/
  23. https://divided.coplacdigital.org/mcla-2018/equality-in-leadership/
  24. https://hancockshakervillage.org/shakers/shaker-government/
  25. https://www.shakermuseum.us/collection/shakers-community-opens-july-17/family
  26. https://hancockshakervillage.org/online-exhibitions/law-and-order-rules-for-living-a-shaker-life/
  27. https://hancockshakervillage.org/online-exhibitions/living-apart-differentiation-and-equality-among-the-shaker-ministry/
  28. https://ohiomemory.ohiohistory.org/archives/6196
  29. https://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/collection-areas/the-american-wing/period-rooms/shaker-room
  30. https://home.shakerheritage.org/beautiful-important-wonders-shakers-spiritualism/
  31. https://exhibitions.nysm.nysed.gov/shakers/industry.html
  32. https://davesgarden.com/guides/articles/view/4122
  33. https://www.shakermuseum.us/shaker-garden-seed-business/?nocache=1
  34. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/shaker-furniture
  35. https://www.shakermuseum.us/2783-2/?nocache=1
  36. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/60732/60732-h/60732-h.htm
  37. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/t-magazine/broom-making-craft.html
  38. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=mainehistoryjournal
  39. https://blog.library.si.edu/blog/2015/04/22/tis-a-gift-to-be-simple-but-to-have-a-splendid-garden-buy-shaker-seeds/
  40. https://www.nps.gov/crps/CRMJournal/Winter2006/article2.pdf
  41. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_christian_denominations_and_sects/6/
  42. https://journalofantiques.com/digital-publications/joac-magazine/features/a-simple-gift-the-shakers-crafted-an-agricultural-archetype-with-the-round-stone-barn/
  43. https://shakermuseum.org/discover/village-walking-tour/cow-barn/
  44. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/context/ias_pub/article/1023/viewcontent/Nicoletta_62.3.352.pdf
  45. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780190922467/obo-9780190922467-0007.xml
  46. https://www.acsarchitect.com/post/shaker-design-and-modernism
  47. https://www.hamilton.edu/offices/lits/special-collections/couperpress/shaker-studies-only/p/articles/11
  48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1386521
  49. https://journals.ku.edu/amsj/article/download/2728/2687/3058
  50. https://www.shakerpedia.com/wiki/1830_Shaker_Covenant
  51. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1215&context=lawfaculty
  52. https://wrldrels.org/2019/08/21/the-shakers/
  53. https://www.bible.ca/cr-shakers.htm
  54. https://www.nysl.nysed.gov/msscfa/sc20330
  55. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1243/
  56. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/shakerism-in-america/
  57. https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/last-shakers
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1385524
  59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/203593
  60. https://connecticuthistory.org/enfields-shaker-legacy/
  61. https://shakermuseum.org/learn/shaker-studies/enfield-shaker-portraits/elder-henry-cummings/
  62. https://www.nps.gov/articles/shakerism-in-america.htm
  63. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0319.xml
  64. https://theconversation.com/why-the-legacy-of-shakers-will-endure-71063
  65. https://shakermuseum.org/learn/enfield-history/
  66. https://www.wmf.org/projects/mount-lebanon-shaker-village
  67. https://clevelandhistorical.org/items/show/674
  68. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/hancock-shaker-village
  69. https://www.nps.gov/places/sabbathday-lake-shaker-community.htm
  70. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/05/magazine/shakers-utopia.html
  71. https://www.bangordailynews.com/2025/08/25/portland/portland-culture/new-gloucester-maine-sabbathday-lake-shaker-village-sister-april-baxter/
  72. https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/08/25/maine-shaker-village-population-member-new-gloucester
  73. https://www.courthousenews.com/shaker-faith-endures-in-rural-maine/
  74. https://www.mainepublic.org/show/maine-calling/2025-05-06/shakers-in-maine
  75. https://www.shakerworkshops.com/sabbathday-lake-shaker-village.html
  76. https://www.neh.gov/blog/herbal-heritage-renovation-project-sabbathday-lake-shakers
  77. https://www.pressherald.com/2025/09/17/how-a-third-shaker-came-to-join-the-religious-groups-last-active-community/
  78. https://downeast.com/arts-leisure/last-shakers/
  79. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/31/arts/a-shaker-village-finds-enterprise-is-not-so-simple.html
  80. https://shakervillageky.org/
  81. https://hancockshakervillage.org/home/about-hancock-shaker-village/
  82. https://www.shakers.org/
  83. https://savingplaces.org/places/south-union-shaker-village
  84. https://home.shakerheritage.org/preservation-projects/
  85. https://hancockshakervillage.org/support/new-visitors-center/
  86. https://blog.shakervillageky.org/preserving-the-past-planning-for-the-future/
  87. https://hancockshakervillage.org/farm/sustainability/
  88. https://home.shakerheritage.org/about/
  89. https://www.invaluable.com/blog/shaker-design/
  90. https://www.nps.gov/articles/shaker-style.htm
  91. https://religionnews.com/2017/01/18/why-the-legacy-of-shakers-will-endure/
  92. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/this-radical-religious-sect-had-an-outsize-impact-on-american-culture
  93. https://www.gen-us.net/the-shaker-culture-of-cleanliness/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.