Hubbry Logo
SnapdealSnapdealMain
Open search
Snapdeal
Community hub
Snapdeal
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Snapdeal
Snapdeal
Snapdeal
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Snapdeal is an Indian e-commerce company, based in New Delhi, India. It was founded in February 2010 by Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal.[4]

Key Information

Snapdeal is one of the top 5 online marketplaces in India.[5] Snapdeal targets the value e-commerce segment, which Bahl estimated to be three times larger than the branded goods market.[6]

Fashion, home and general merchandise account for a majority of the products sold by over 500,000 sellers on Snapdeal.[7] Buyers from more than 3,700 towns in India shop on Snapdeal.[8]

History

[edit]

Establishment

[edit]

Snapdeal was founded on 4 February 2010 as a daily deals platform, before expanding to become an online marketplace in October 2011.[9]

Unsuccessful merger with Flipkart

[edit]

Reports emerged in Q2 2016 that SoftBank Group planned to engineer a merger between Snapdeal and Flipkart.[10][11] Discussions took place for months, but concluded in July 2017 after the deal fell through due to lack of consensus among Snapdeal's board members. Disagreements over valuation and proposed special payouts to early investors, Nexus Venture Partners and Kalaari Capital, were among the reasons cited.[12][13]

Snapdeal 2.0

[edit]

Following the unsuccessful plan to merge with Flipkart, Snapdeal pursued a new strategy it called Snapdeal 2.0. The initiative saw the sale of non-core businesses, Freecharge and Vulcan Express, to dedicate more resources to Snapdeal's e-commerce marketplace, which is its core business.[14][15]

The strategy yielded strong results. From 2017 to 2021, Snapdeal's revenue grew by 74%[16] at its peak, while losses were cut by nearly 95%.[17] Between the financial years in 2018 and 2020, the number of unique customers on Snapdeal's platform also tripled to 27 million. More than 90% of Snapdeal's orders came from non-metro users.[6][18]

Under Snapdeal 2.0, the company built an asset-light operating model designed specifically to serve the value e-commerce segment, including decentralised logistics and minimal inventory, keeping operating costs low.[19]

Part of the strategy's success is derived from recreating the bustling and diverse experiences of India's bazaars online. To sell products to non-metro buyers, Snapdeal identified a need to engage and entertain, just like in physical bricks-and-mortar settings. In February 2021, Bahl shared in an interview with KrASIA that "Snapdeal's engagement with this new and a large part of our existing user base is built on three key themes of video, voice, and vernacular. All these initiatives are built around the central idea of how we can help our users discover and transact better, rather than a traditional approach of how we can sell better."[8]

Snapdeal's focus on the value e-commerce segment has led Indian FMCG companies such as Godrej and Himalaya to use its platform to sell their brand products. The companies have made arrangements to sell their products directly on the platform through authorised dealers. Other brands such as The Man Company, Mamaearth, and Ustraa have also partnered with Snapdeal to reach customers from non-metro regions.[20]

In 2021, Snapdeal also announced that it intends to enter the offline retail space in smaller Indian cities.[21]

In July 2022, the company introduced a formalized group structure under the name AceVector Group, consolidating all three ventures: Snapdeal, Unicommerce and Stellaro Brands.[22]

Miscellaneous

[edit]

Diwali campaign with Aamir Khan

[edit]

In March 2015, Snapdeal engaged actor Aamir Khan to promote its website in India with its Diwali campaign, "Dil Ki Deal.[23] Towards the end, the year-long campaign stirred controversy due to comments made by Khan in his personal capacity.[24]

Reported sales of counterfeit products

[edit]

In January 2021, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released a 2020 report that identified Snapdeal as a marketplace where counterfeit products are sold. Snapdeal also sent a notice to the USTR asking for the statements made in the report to be retracted, and for a corrigendum to be issued.[25] It was subsequently dropped from the 2021 USTR notorious markets report, released in 2022.[26] Snapdeal is a member of the International Trademark Association (INTA), which has over 7200 members from 187 countries that pledge to protect intellectual property on online marketplaces.[27]

Open Network for Digital Commerce

[edit]

In March 2023, Fortune India reported on Snapdeal's integration with the government-led Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), focusing on India's non-metro regions. The company generates over 86% of its business from these areas.

Funding and acquisitions

[edit]

Fundraising

[edit]

Snapdeal has completed multiple rounds of funding.

It received its first investment in January 2011, amounting to US$12 million from Nexus Venture Partners and Indo-US Venture Partners. Another round was done in July 2011 for funds amounting to US$45 million, from Bessemer Venture Partners and existing investors. A third round of funding worth US$50 million was completed the same year, from eBay and existing investors.[28]

In February 2014, Snapdeal raised US$133 million in a round led by eBay together with Kalaari Capital, Nexus Venture Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners, Intel Capital and Saama Capital.[29] The following month, it raised an additional US$105 million from BlackRock, Temasek Holdings, PremjiInvest and others.[30] SoftBank also invested US$647 million in October 2014, making it the largest shareholder in Snapdeal.[31]

In August 2015, Alibaba Group, Foxconn and SoftBank invested US$500 million in Snapdeal.[32] In February of the following year, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan and Brother Fortune Apparel injected US$200 million in funds into Snapdeal at a valuation of US$6.5 billion.[33]

In May 2017, Snapdeal raised funding worth ₹113 crore from Nexus Venture Partners.[34][35]

In December 2022, Reuters reported that Snapdeal had cancelled its $152 million IPO due to unfavourable market conditions. The decision followed challenges in the tech stock market, influencing Snapdeal's reassessment and potential deferral of its IPO plans amidst a broader trend of declining valuations in the tech sector.[36]

Acquisitions

[edit]

In June 2010, Snapdeal's holding company Jasper Infotech acquired Bengaluru-based group buying website Grabbon.com for an undisclosed amount.[37]

In April 2012, Delhi-based online sports goods retailer eSportsBuy.com was acquired.[38] This was followed by the acquisition of Shopo.in in 2013, which is a customer-to-customer (C2C) e-commerce platform.[39]

In 2014, Snapdeal acquired Doozton, a fashion product discovery technology platform, and Wishpicker, a technology platform that uses machine learning to deliver recommendations for gift purchases.[40] Both deals were completed for undisclosed amounts.[41][42]

Snapdeal made multiple acquisitions in 2015, acquiring a stake in product comparison website Smartprix in January, before acquiring a discovery site for luxury fashion products, Exclusively.in.[43] Two months later, it acquired a 20% stake in logistics service company GoJavas as well as e-commerce solution provider Unicommerce, and financial transaction platform RupeePower.[44][45][46] In April 2015, mobile payments company Freecharge was acquired by Snapdeal.[47] Programmatic display advertising platform Reduce Data was also acquired in September of the same year.[48]

In August 2016, logistics firm Pigeon Express acquired a 51% stake in GoJavas with Snapdeal holding 49% stake in the firm.[49] In March 2017, Snapdeal sold its stake in GoJavas to Pigeon Express.[50]

Collaborations

[edit]
  • In Sep 14, Croma entered into strategic partnership with Snapdeal to sell electronic goods online.[51]
  • In Mar 16, JLL India's residential services collaborated with Snapdeal to provide brokerage-free buyer services in primary property sales.[52]
  • In Jan 18, Pantaloons partners Snapdeal to enhance online portfolio.[53]
  • In Feb 22, Snapdeal partners with GoKwik to enhance shopping experience.[54]
  • In Sep 23, Snapdeal partnered with Agoda to give consumers travel choices.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Snapdeal

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Snapdeal is an Indian e-commerce company founded on February 4, 2010, by Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal in New Delhi. It initially operated as a group-buying daily deals platform modeled after Groupon but pivoted within two years to a broader online marketplace connecting buyers and sellers of affordable consumer goods, emphasizing value-for-money products for mass-market consumers. The company experienced rapid early growth, raising over $1.8 billion in funding from prominent investors including SoftBank and achieving unicorn status with peak valuations reaching $6.5 billion during acquisition discussions. However, Snapdeal encountered significant challenges amid fierce competition from Amazon and , including rejected buyout offers such as an $850 million bid from and a stalled deal with Alibaba over valuation disputes exceeding $6 billion. Notable missteps included the acquisition of , which contributed to operational strains and a sharp decline in market position, alongside broader issues like funding constraints and suboptimal customer experiences. As of 2025, Snapdeal continues to operate as a resilient value-focused platform, prioritizing affordable and products in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities while awaiting regulatory clearance for an to fuel expansion. The firm has invested in backend technologies like for and to enhance efficiency, positioning itself within India's burgeoning sector projected to reach 350 million shoppers by year's end.

Founding and Early Development

Establishment and Initial Business Model

Snapdeal was established on February 10, 2010, in New Delhi, India, by Kunal Bahl, who serves as co-founder and chief executive officer, and Rohit Bansal, co-founder and executive chairman. Both founders, alumni of the Wharton School and Delhi Public School, had prior professional experience at Microsoft Corporation in product management roles, which informed their entry into the digital consumer space. The venture emerged amid India's early e-commerce landscape, where internet users numbered around 60 million, prompting the duo to leverage emerging online discount models observed globally. The company's initial business model centered on a group-buying platform akin to Groupon, focusing on time-sensitive daily deals for products, services, and experiences from local merchants and brands. Users accessed discounted vouchers or coupons via the website, with purchases activated only upon reaching a threshold number of participants to ensure viability for sellers, thereby aggregating demand for bulk pricing. This approach targeted urban consumers seeking value on items like restaurant meals, spa services, and electronics, capitalizing on low penetration of organized retail and rising smartphone adoption in tier-1 and tier-2 cities. Early operations emphasized partnerships with small businesses, generating revenue through commissions on redeemed deals, and the platform achieved rapid user acquisition, reaching over 1 million registered users within its first year.

Early Growth and Market Expansion

Snapdeal transitioned from a daily deals platform to a comprehensive in , enabling broader product listings and seller onboarding that accelerated its user acquisition. By late 2011, the platform had amassed 10 million registered members, with monthly additions of 1.5 million, primarily driven by urban consumers seeking discounted and apparel. This shift capitalized on India's burgeoning penetration, which stood at around 12% nationally by , allowing Snapdeal to differentiate from pure deal sites by offering direct merchant sales. Revenue growth reflected this momentum, with the company achieving approximately 400% year-on-year increases in the two years leading to fiscal , culminating in projected sales surpassing ₹2,000 for FY14. By early 2014, Snapdeal's customer base expanded to 20 million , supported by a seller network exceeding 50,000 merchants and brands, which diversified inventory to over 3 million products across categories like , goods, and mobiles. Investments in mobile optimization further boosted , as adoption in rose from 20 million users in 2012 to over 100 million by 2014, aligning with Snapdeal's app launches and targeted marketing in metro areas. Market expansion emphasized logistical infrastructure to penetrate beyond Tier-1 cities, with the launch of 40 fulfillment centers across 15 cities in May 2014 to enable faster delivery and reduce cart abandonment. Seller tools, such as a four-hour product listing service introduced in June 2014, empowered over 1,000 high-volume vendors to achieve monthly sales exceeding ₹1 each, fostering ecosystem growth in semi-urban regions. This infrastructure push extended reach to hundreds of towns, leveraging partnerships with local providers amid India's costs, which averaged 10-15% of order value at the time.

Competitive Pressures and Strategic Shifts

Peak Valuation and Intensifying Competition

Snapdeal reached its peak valuation of approximately $6.5 billion in February 2016, buoyed by a series of high-profile funding rounds that had injected over $1.4 billion into the company since October 2014, leaving it with around $500 million in cash reserves by mid-2016. This valuation reflected investor optimism amid India's booming sector, where Snapdeal positioned itself as a emphasizing daily deals and a wide seller network. However, this period coincided with escalating competitive pressures from dominant players and Amazon India, which intensified a characterized by aggressive discounting, investments, and spends. maintained leadership with up to 44% market share in 2015, while Amazon, entering in 2013, rapidly expanded through initiatives like Prime and seller incentives, eroding Snapdeal's position. By October 2016, Snapdeal's market share had declined to 14% from 19% the previous year, as Amazon's share surged to 24%, driven by superior capabilities and customer acquisition strategies that Snapdeal struggled to match. The rivalry fueled unsustainable cash burn across the sector, with Flipkart, Snapdeal, and Amazon collectively projecting losses nearing ₹6,500 crore in fiscal 2016, as firms vied for user loyalty in a market fragmented by smaller e-tailers also capturing share through niche offerings. Snapdeal's losses more than doubled to ₹3,316 in the fiscal year ending March 2016, up 150% from the prior year, despite revenue growth of 56% to ₹1,457 , underscoring the toll of competing on discounts without equivalent scale advantages. This environment highlighted structural challenges for Snapdeal, including slower adaptation to premium segments and reliance on deal-driven traffic, which proved vulnerable against rivals' broader assortments and faster delivery.

Failed Merger Negotiations with

In early 2017, Snapdeal engaged in acquisition discussions with , primarily driven by SoftBank, Snapdeal's largest investor, amid mounting competitive pressures from Amazon and in the Indian e-commerce market. proposed an acquisition valued at approximately $900–950 million, a significant discount from Snapdeal's prior peak valuation of around $6.5 billion in 2016, reflecting Snapdeal's operational challenges including cash burn and slowing growth. Negotiations extended over several months, marked by disagreements on key terms such as shareholder payouts, employee integration, and asset handling, with investors like Kalaari Capital and Nexus Venture Partners seeking higher compensation than offered. The complexity of unwinding Snapdeal's operations, including its seller ecosystem and liabilities from prior acquisitions like , further stalled progress, as aimed to avoid inheriting unprofitable elements. On July 31, 2017, Snapdeal terminated the talks, stating it would pursue an independent strategy focused on operational efficiency rather than a sale, a decision attributed to unresolved valuation gaps and strategic misalignment. Following the collapse, SoftBank redirected its capital, investing $2.5 billion in through its Vision Fund, bolstering the acquirer's position while Snapdeal faced intensified funding constraints. This outcome underscored the high-stakes consolidation dynamics in India's sector, where merger failures often amplified vulnerabilities for the acquired target.

Restructuring and Operational Pivot

Launch of Snapdeal 2.0

In July 2017, following the collapse of acquisition talks with , Snapdeal's board terminated negotiations and opted for an independent trajectory, marking the inception of Snapdeal 2.0 as a restructured, profitability-oriented platform. This pivot was preceded by internal preparations, including cost reductions and a shift away from aggressive expansion, with co-founder noting that groundwork had begun months earlier to streamline operations. The strategy emphasized a "stripped-down" model, prioritizing operational efficiency over scale to achieve . Snapdeal 2.0 targeted the value segment, focusing on affordable merchandise for price-sensitive consumers in tier-2 and smaller cities, while divesting non-core assets to reduce . Bahl projected that this approach could generate ₹150 in gross profit within 12 months, building on a reported gross profit in the preceding month post-restructuring. Key operational shifts included significant layoffs—reducing headcount by over 50% from peak levels—and the sale of subsidiaries like Unicommerce eSolutions to , aligning with a mandate to concentrate on core consumer-facing . This refocus deliberately narrowed the product assortment to value-oriented categories, accepting short-term customer attrition in favor of long-term viability amid competition from Amazon and . The relaunch positioned Snapdeal to serve non-urban, budget-conscious buyers, with Bahl articulating a commitment to "value commerce" as distinct from premium or quick-commerce models dominating the market. By August 2017, the platform had begun implementing a leaner tech stack and seller tailored to low-cost , aiming for positive unit economics without reliance on external . Initial metrics indicated stabilization, with the company reporting improved margins and a pivot toward sustainable growth in underserved segments.

Focus on Value E-Commerce Segment

Snapdeal's pivot to the value e-commerce segment emphasized serving price-sensitive consumers in non-metro areas with affordable, functional products, distinguishing itself from premium platforms by prioritizing unit economics over aggressive discounting. This strategy, integral to Snapdeal 2.0 launched in July 2017, targeted buyers in tier 2 and tier 3 cities who seek value-for-money goods rather than luxury or heavily branded items, capturing a market estimated to be three times larger than premium segments. By focusing on lifestyle essentials like apparel, home goods, and under ₹500-₹1,000, the platform addressed underserved demand in regions with rising internet penetration but limited disposable incomes. Operational changes supported this segment focus, including decentralized logistics to cut fulfillment costs and a shift toward sellers offering unbranded or regional products with reliable quality, enabling sustainable margins. Approximately 85% of orders originated from outside India's top 10 cities, reflecting deep penetration into smaller urban and semi-urban markets. During festive in 2025, 83% of orders came from tier II and III cities, driven by for budget entertainment and daily essentials amid growing local incomes. This approach attracted FMCG brands like Godrej and Himalaya for sales in value formats, expanding product variety while maintaining low prices. The value segment's growth potential underpinned Snapdeal's revival, with the Indian value e-commerce market in lifestyle retail valued at $4 billion in and projected to reach $20 billion by subsequent years, fueled by digital adoption in Bharat. Snapdeal's emphasis on accessible interfaces, local language support, and hyper-local seller ecosystems enhanced buyer retention, positioning it as a leader in this niche amid competition from generalists like . Metrics indicated improved financial health, with reduced losses and paths to profitability through disciplined inventory management and customer-centric curation.

Business Model and Core Operations

Marketplace Structure and Seller Ecosystem

Snapdeal functions as an inventory-agnostic platform, facilitating connections between third-party sellers and buyers without holding itself. Sellers list products on the platform, manage their own , and handle fulfillment, while Snapdeal provides visibility, payment processing, and optional logistics partnerships. This model emphasizes , targeting small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in India's value segment, where over 95% of listed products are priced below ₹1,000. Seller onboarding requires free registration via the Snapdeal Seller portal, involving submission of business details, GST registration, and bank information, after which sellers gain access to a for product uploads and order management. Commissions are charged only on successful sales, ranging from 4% to 20% based on , alongside fixed collection fees for payments and variable shipping costs typically borne by sellers unless subsidized through platform programs. Snapdeal does not impose upfront listing or registration fees, enabling rapid scaling for unorganized retailers transitioning online. The seller ecosystem supports over 500,000 registered vendors, with a core group of approximately 1,000 suppliers accounting for 80% of sales volume, reflecting a concentrated reliance on reliable partners amid broader fragmentation. Tools include for trending products, automated order tracking, and marketing assistance to enhance discoverability, particularly in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where 80% of orders originate. Logistics integration allows sellers to use Snapdeal-affiliated couriers or third-party providers like Shiprocket, with backend handling payments—disbursed within 7-15 days post-delivery—to streamline operations for sellers lacking in-house capabilities. This structure fosters growth for SMEs, as evidenced by seller testimonials reporting 200-500% year-on-year increases through platform-driven customer acquisition and simplified backend management, though it demands sellers maintain product quality and timely shipping to sustain ratings and eligibility for promotions. Snapdeal's focus on value-driven sellers differentiates it from premium platforms, prioritizing volume from affordable, localized inventory over branded exclusivity.

Buyer Experience and Value Proposition

Snapdeal's targets price-sensitive consumers in India's non-metro markets, particularly those in Tier 2 and smaller cities, offering affordable products tailored to value-conscious lifestyles. The platform serves buyers with monthly incomes typically up to ₹40,000, with over 70% of its customer base originating from towns beyond Tier 2 cities, emphasizing accessibility for first-time or occasional online shoppers in underserved regions. Central to this proposition are competitive pricing on everyday items, frequent deals on products under ₹1,000, and free delivery without minimum order requirements, which lowers barriers for low-value transactions prevalent among its demographic. Snapdeal integrates AI and to personalize recommendations and streamline the , aiming to deliver a seamless experience beyond mere discounts. Buyer safeguards include a 7-day easy returns policy, enabling replacements or refunds for eligible items within seven days of delivery, provided packaging and tags remain intact. However, practical experiences often diverge from these promises, with frequent complaints about delivery delays, counterfeit goods, and unresponsive support, contributing to low aggregate ratings such as 2.3/5 on and 1.9/5 on MouthShut from thousands of reviews.

Funding, Valuation, and Financial Trajectory

Fundraising Rounds and Investor Dynamics

Snapdeal secured its initial funding in July 2011 with a $40 million Series B round led by investors including Venture Partners and Kalaari Capital. Subsequent early-stage rounds included a $50 million Series C in April 2013 and a $75 million Series D in August 2013, primarily from existing backers and new participants like , supporting platform expansion amid India's nascent e-commerce growth. By May 2014, the company raised an additional $100 million, followed by a landmark $627.8 million investment from SoftBank in October 2014, which propelled aggressive scaling and positioned Snapdeal as a rival. The most significant infusion came in August 2015 with a $500 million round from a including , SoftBank, and , valuing Snapdeal at approximately $5 billion and reflecting international confidence in its marketplace model. A $200 million extension in February 2016, backed by existing investors, elevated the to $6.5 billion, inventory buildup and marketing amid intensifying competition. tapered post-2016; attempts to raise over $100 million in 2017 faltered as SoftBank withdrew support amid valuation disputes and merger explorations, with no major rounds thereafter until a minor undisclosed venture investment from Anand Piramal on July 23, 2019. Across 14 rounds since 2010, Snapdeal amassed approximately $1.78 billion in total . Investor dynamics shifted from growth-oriented backing to pressure for consolidation as losses mounted. SoftBank, holding a 33% stake as the dominant investor, initially drove hyper-growth strategies but by 2017 advocated for a merger with at a $1 billion valuation—down sharply from the 2016 peak—leading to tensions with founders and , as well as early investors like and Kalaari who rejected the terms. This impasse, coupled with SoftBank's halt on further capital amid operational exceeding $1 million daily, forced Snapdeal's pivot to cost-cutting without additional infusions, highlighting how expectations for rapid dominance clashed with market realities dominated by Amazon and . Alibaba and Foxconn's 2015 entry aimed at countering Western entrants but yielded limited influence post-investment, as strategic alignments frayed under competitive pressures.

Valuation Peaks, Declines, and Recovery Metrics

Snapdeal achieved its peak of $6.5 billion in February 2016 following a $200 million funding round led by investors including the . This marked the height of investor enthusiasm for Indian e-commerce during a period of aggressive expansion and competition with rivals like and Amazon India. By May 2017, Snapdeal's valuation had declined sharply to approximately $1 billion, reflecting failed acquisition talks with at a much lower price point and broader market pressures including intensified competition and unsustainable burn rates. The drop represented an over 85% reduction from the peak, driven by operational challenges such as high cash outflows for customer acquisition and inventory management amid a funding winter in the sector. Post-2017 under "" emphasized cost-cutting and a pivot to value-oriented , leading to operational recovery metrics rather than a full valuation rebound. Total funding raised across 16 rounds reached about $1.8 billion by 2019, but no subsequent rounds significantly lifted the valuation beyond the $1 billion mark. Financially, net losses narrowed from ₹282.20 in FY23 to ₹160.38 in FY24, with EBITDA losses reduced by 88%, signaling improved margins through reduced operating expenses and a focus on profitability over growth. As of 2025 estimates, the company's valuation remains around $1 billion, with no confirmed IPO or major equity infusion to drive further uplift, though gross merchandise value and order volumes have stabilized in the value segment.

Acquisitions, Partnerships, and Ecosystem Integration

Key Acquisitions

Snapdeal engaged in a series of acquisitions primarily during 2015 to bolster its ecosystem in payments, enablement, , and data analytics, though many were later divested amid financial pressures. The most prominent acquisition was , a mobile recharge and digital payments platform, purchased on April 8, 2015, for approximately $400 million in cash and stock, marking one of the largest deals in India's consumer internet sector at the time. had previously raised $120 million in funding and served millions of users for bill payments and recharges, with a significant portion of transactions occurring via mobile devices. Snapdeal aimed to integrate to enhance its wallet services and user acquisition, but the unit underperformed amid regulatory changes in digital payments; it was sold to on July 27, 2017, for Rs 385 crore (about $58 million), representing a substantial loss. In March 2015, Snapdeal acquired Unicommerce, a SaaS-based enablement platform for order, inventory, and warehouse management, with an initial of Rs 25 into its holding entity; the deal involved merging Unicommerce with Snapdeal's promoter company Infotech. This move targeted backend operational efficiencies for sellers on its . Unicommerce was later partially divested, with a 30% stake sold to SoftBank in 2021, though Snapdeal retained involvement until broader restructuring. Other notable 2015 acquisitions included MartMobi in May, a enablement platform to strengthen app-based shopping tools, and Reduce Data in September, a firm specializing in and to optimize data. Snapdeal also took a stake in Smartprix, a product comparison site, in January 2015, to aid consumer decision-making on its platform. Earlier deals encompassed Grabbon in 2010 for deals expansion and esportsbuy.com in April 2012 for sports goods , while a 49% stake in provider GoJavas followed in July 2016. These efforts reflected Snapdeal's pivot toward and value-driven growth but contributed to integration challenges and valuation erosion post-2016.

Strategic Collaborations and Initiatives

Snapdeal has pursued strategic collaborations to bolster its value ecosystem, particularly targeting support and digital inclusion. In June 2024, the company signed a (MoU) with Bhashini, an AI-powered initiative under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, to integrate interfaces on its platform, enabling users in non-English speaking regions to navigate and shop more effectively. This partnership leverages Bhashini's tools to address India's linguistic diversity, aiming to expand Snapdeal's reach in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where regional languages predominate. Integration with government-backed networks forms another pillar of Snapdeal's initiatives. In March 2023, Snapdeal joined the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), a government-led protocol to democratize by enabling among platforms, with a focus on serving non-metro markets. This move allows Snapdeal to receive orders through ONDC's decentralized framework, utilizing providers for inter- and intra-city deliveries, thereby enhancing efficiency without heavy capital investment in proprietary infrastructure. Brand-specific alliances have supported Snapdeal's seller ecosystem. In an exclusive partnership with Shoppers Stop, customers can access the retailer's brand store on Snapdeal for orders with options for pickup or home delivery, streamlining inventory access for premium yet value-oriented products. Similarly, a September 2023 tie-up with Agoda expanded Snapdeal's offerings into travel bookings, combining e-commerce inventory with hotel reservations to cater to budget-conscious consumers seeking bundled deals. Logistics enhancements underscore operational initiatives. Snapdeal established 130 new distribution hubs across by the end of 2021 to improve last-mile delivery speeds, particularly in underserved areas. Earlier, in 2016, it mandated technology platform integration for all partners to optimize tracking and , reducing delivery times through data-driven . A partnership with dPronto that year further targeted last-mile services, starting in Delhi-NCR and scaling nationally. These efforts reflect a shift toward partnerships over in-house expansion, prioritizing cost efficiency amid competitive pressures.

Controversies, Criticisms, and Lessons

Product Quality Issues and Counterfeits

Snapdeal's model, reliant on third-party sellers, has been plagued by persistent issues with and low-quality products, leading to dissatisfaction and legal scrutiny. In July 2019, Snapdeal's co-founders, and , were booked by under Section 420 of the for cheating after a involving the delivery of goods, highlighting enforcement gaps in seller oversight. Similar incidents prompted brands to pursue litigation; for instance, obtained interim relief from the in September 2019 against Snapdeal and sellers for infringing on its watch trademarks through fake listings. High-profile brand disputes escalated in 2019, with filing suit against Snapdeal in July for the sale of watches and calculators by platform sellers, resulting in a district court order restraining such listings. also pursued action, leading to a December 2019 Delhi High Court summons for the founders in a case over fake sold via the platform. These cases reflect broader patterns, as evidenced by the U.S. Trade Representative's 2020 Review of Notorious Markets, which flagged Snapdeal for facilitating counterfeiting, citing the 2019 founder accusations and ongoing right-holder lawsuits. Regulatory interventions have targeted quality lapses beyond counterfeits. In January 2023, India's Central Consumer Protection Authority issued notices to Snapdeal for allegedly selling toys lacking mandatory Bureau of Indian Standards certification, part of a pan-India crackdown seizing over 18,500 non-compliant items from e-commerce platforms. Earlier complaints, dating to 2014, involved brands like JBL reporting counterfeit audio products on Snapdeal, underscoring early systemic vulnerabilities in seller verification. In response, Snapdeal implemented measures like the Brand Shield program to detect and delist listings, alongside strict policies prohibiting fake sales and requiring sellers to adhere to MRP norms. The company has denied systemic fake product distribution, asserting rigorous complaint handling and quality checks for returns, though critics argue these steps lag behind competitors' inventory controls. Customer grievances, including a reported 27% rise in complaints from to 2013, often cite mismatched quality and fakes, amplifying reputational damage in a competitive market.

Execution Failures and Strategic Missteps

Snapdeal's co-founders, and , publicly acknowledged execution errors in a February 23, 2017, internal , admitting that the company had made several wrong decisions over the prior two to three years, including over-expansion amid abundant that led to operational strain. These errors manifested in frequent strategic pivots, such as shifting from a daily deals model to a broad marketplace without establishing category leadership or a , unlike competitors Flipkart's focus on electronics and fashion or Amazon's emphasis on reliable delivery. One notable misstep was the failed implementation of an strategy launched in October 2015, intended to integrate retail but undermined by inadequate execution, failing to deliver seamless customer access to products across channels. A critical strategic occurred in 2017 when Snapdeal's board rejected a takeover offer from valued at approximately $850 million (around ₹5,500 crore), a figure far below the company's peak valuation of $6.5 billion during earlier acquisition discussions, exacerbating investor confidence loss and accelerating decline. This decision, coupled with experiments like the "SD Gold" premium tier and the acquisition of , reflected over-diversification and a lack of focus, as the founders later noted in 2016-2017 communications that the company had "tried too many things." Revenue stagnation from November 2015 to April 2016 and a drop in from 26% to 4% underscored these pivots' dilution of in a hypercompetitive market. Operationally, Snapdeal suffered from high cash burn rates driven by aggressive cashback offers and spends exceeding ₹1,000 , which prioritized short-term growth over sustainable customer loyalty or infrastructure, leading to losses doubling to ₹3,316 in 2015-2016. Despite raising over $1.8 billion from investors including SoftBank and Alibaba, the company failed to build robust , resulting in persistent issues like delayed deliveries, products, and inadequate , which eroded customer trust and strained seller relationships through high commissions and payment disputes. These execution lapses, including poor support responsiveness, contrasted with competitors' investments in ecosystems, contributing to Snapdeal's inability to retain market position.

Marketing and Public Relations Challenges

Snapdeal encountered significant public relations setbacks stemming from its reliance on high-profile celebrity endorsements, particularly the 2015 controversy involving brand ambassador Aamir Khan. On November 23, 2015, Khan publicly stated that his wife had suggested leaving India due to perceived growing intolerance, prompting widespread backlash and calls for boycotts against brands associated with him, including Snapdeal. Customers expressed dissent by flooding Snapdeal's mobile app with one-star reviews on Google Play Store, with over 10,000 negative ratings posted within days, accusing the platform of indirect endorsement of Khan's views; this led to a temporary dip in app downloads and sales, exacerbating perceptions of misalignment between the brand and national sentiment. Snapdeal's management responded by emphasizing operational continuity but faced criticism for not swiftly distancing from the endorsement, highlighting the risks of celebrity-driven marketing in a politically charged environment. In 2017, Snapdeal suffered collateral PR damage from mistaken public association with Snapchat amid the latter's CEO Evan Spiegel's controversial remarks dismissing India as "incredibly poor" and unprofitable. The phonetic similarity between "Snapdeal" and "" fueled outrage, with boycott campaigns targeting both entities interchangeably, resulting in Snapdeal's mentions trending negatively on platforms like and a short-term erosion of consumer trust despite clarifications that the companies were unrelated. This incident underscored vulnerabilities in brand naming and digital perception management, as Snapdeal's PR team struggled to counter the viral , amplifying existing competitive pressures from global players like Amazon. The company's aggressive expenditures drew internal and external , particularly around 2016 when founders' communications on cost-cutting revealed prior over-investment in without commensurate profitability. Snapdeal allocated substantial funds—estimated at hundreds of crores annually—to promotions and discounts, which fueled rapid user growth but invited criticism for unsustainable burn rates and lack of strategic focus, as evidenced by public founder emails acknowledging the need for fiscal restraint amid layoffs. This approach, while effective in Tier-2 and Tier-3 city penetration, eroded long-term when the firm attempted a pivot to premium offerings in 2016-2017, leading to consumer confusion over inconsistent messaging between deep discounts and curated selections. Further PR hurdles arose from legal disputes over marketing practices, such as a 2017 summons to founders and by for allegedly misappropriating a complainant's under the pretext of discussions. The complainant, Gaurav Dua, accused Snapdeal of cheating by replicating his promotional concept without compensation, tarnishing the company's image as innovative and ethical; although the case highlighted operational opacity, it reinforced narratives of internal mismanagement during a period of valuation decline. These episodes collectively strained Snapdeal's ability to maintain a cohesive public narrative amid rivals' more disciplined branding.

Current Status, Impact, and Future Outlook

Path to Profitability and Recent Financials

In fiscal year 2024 (FY24, ending March 31, 2024), Snapdeal's parent company, Ace Vector Limited, reported revenue from operations of ₹379.76 crore, marking a 2.1% increase from ₹371.96 crore in FY23. Total revenue stood at approximately ₹384 crore, reflecting ongoing contraction from higher levels of ₹563 crore in FY22 amid a strategic pivot away from aggressive expansion. The company narrowed its net loss to ₹160 crore, a 43% reduction from ₹282 crore in FY23, driven primarily by cost discipline rather than revenue acceleration. Adjusted EBITDA loss improved dramatically to ₹16 crore in FY24, an 88% decline from ₹144 crore the prior year, underscoring operational efficiencies such as reduced and expenditures. Operating cash flows also turned positive, signaling better management in a competitive landscape dominated by larger players like Amazon and . However, EBITDA margins remained negative at approximately -37.9%, with expense ratios rising due to persistent high costs of sales and overheads. Snapdeal's trajectory toward profitability has centered on a post-2016 refocus on "value commerce" targeting price-sensitive consumers in Tier 2-3 cities and rural , eschewing the deep discounts that fueled earlier losses. This involved streamlining operations, cutting unprofitable categories, and emphasizing private labels and seller partnerships to boost margins without heavy subsidies. By FY24, these measures had stabilized unit economics, with leadership indicating proximity to amid 's e-commerce user base projected to exceed 300 million by FY26. As of mid-2025, no full FY25 results are available, but the FY24 trends suggest continued emphasis on over scale in a market where smaller platforms face existential pressures.

Market Position in Indian E-Commerce and IPO Plans

Snapdeal operates as a niche player in 's value segment, focusing on affordable products for price-sensitive consumers in tier-2 and smaller cities, but it holds a marginal overall market position compared to dominant platforms like and Amazon . In FY24, Snapdeal's parent company AceVector reported of Rs 379.76 , reflecting modest 2.1% year-over-year growth from Rs 371.96 in FY23, while industry leaders achieved Rs 20,493 in (up 14.4%) and Amazon Rs 30,139 (up 18.6%). This positions Snapdeal far behind the top players, which collectively command over 70% of the market, amid 's sector projected to reach USD 136.43 billion in 2025 with a 19.13% CAGR through 2030. Snapdeal's emphasis on value and small-town penetration has sustained operations but failed to reverse contraction trends seen earlier, from Rs 563 in FY22. The company's adjusted EBITDA losses narrowed by 88% in FY24, signaling cost discipline and a path toward sustainability in a competitive landscape where quick-commerce and premium segments erode value players' share. However, Snapdeal faces structural challenges, including limited scale against Flipkart's 48% in key categories like smartphones and Amazon's advantages, resulting in its classification among struggling mid-tier marketplaces rather than core market drivers. Regarding IPO plans, AceVector confidentially filed draft papers with SEBI in July 2025 for an , marking a revival effort over two years after withdrawing a Rs 1,250 crore proposal. The filing aims to capitalize on improved financials, with potential proceeds supporting expansion in value amid festival season momentum in and small-town demand. As of October 2025, the IPO awaits regulatory clearance, with expectations for a book-built issue potentially valued around Rs 3,000 crore, though execution depends on market conditions and Snapdeal's ability to demonstrate growth in a consolidating sector. Snapdeal has appointed independent directors to bolster governance ahead of listing, reflecting preparations for public scrutiny.

References

  1. https://canvasbusinessmodel.com/blogs/brief-history/snapdeal-brief-history
  2. https://startuptalky.com/snapdeal-success-story/
  3. https://orangeowl.marketing/unicorn-chronicles/snapdeal-success-story/
  4. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/podcast/knowledge-at-wharton-podcast/how-snapdeal-is-connecting-dots-between-supply-and-demand-in-india/
  5. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vineet-patawari_startup-fundraise-activity-7326224815864848387-301t
  6. https://etedge-insights.com/featured-insights/snapdeal-india-from-zero-to-hero-a-triumph/
  7. https://qz.com/india/364876/the-stalled-alibaba-snapdeal-deal-is-proof-indias-e-commerce-valuations-are-insane
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdtaxUkY-Vk
  9. https://ingrade.io/explanation-of-snapdeal-a-deep-analysis-on-its-genesis-and-downfall/
  10. https://www.storyboard18.com/brand-marketing/the-great-e-commerce-divide-market-leaders-thrive-snapdeal-tata-cliq-struggle-to-survive-81105.htm
  11. https://www.livemint.com/companies/will-focus-on-value-fashion-help-ipo-bound-snapdeal-catch-up-in-the-e-commerce-race-11758017502899.html
  12. https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaBusiness/comments/1mbk8ve/was_today_years_old_when_i_realized_snapdeal/
  13. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2024/12/20/the-role-of-e-commerce-in-indias-future-kunal-bahls-vision-for-the-next-decade/
  14. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/5x15ljWHtC2UUtK7W0nZ0N/The-next-Infosys--Connecting-buyers-sellersSnapdeal.html
  15. https://yourstory.com/companies/snapdeal
  16. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/snapdeal-co-founder-kunal-bahl-a-rising-star-of-indias-e-commerce-space/articleshow/31125419.cms
  17. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/VH36sYyY6Y3x520yQ23VdI/Snapdeal-Connecting-the-dots-between-demand-and-supply-in-I.html
  18. https://yourstory.com/2021/01/snapdeal-kunal-bahl-entrepreneur-investor-challenges-failures
  19. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/e-commerce/e-tailing/kunal-bahl-cofounder-snapdeal/50231321
  20. https://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/features/story/snapdeal-flipkart-alibabacom-kunal-bahl-rohit-bansal-137451-2014-08-05
  21. https://digitamizer.com/snapdeal-story-of-rise-and-fall/
  22. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/snapdeal-3-old-startup-india-135844526.html
  23. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/30-under-30/the-evolution-of-snapdeal/37223/1
  24. https://m.economictimes.com/tech/internet/snapdeal-expects-its-online-sales-to-cross-rs-2000-cr-in-fy14/articleshow/19303245.cms
  25. https://yourstory.com/2015/02/snapdeal-turns-5
  26. https://www.indiaretailing.com/2014/05/27/snapdeal-opens-40-fulfillment-centers-in-15-cities
  27. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/8bzgpgNg8jeDM22YVydk5I/Snapdeal-Rise-and-fall-of-an-Indian-unicorn.html
  28. https://archive.factordaily.com/snapdeal-flipkart-merger-kunal-bahl-rohit-bansal/
  29. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/snapdeal-calls-off-flipkart-merger-to-pursue-independent-path/articleshow/59844408.cms
  30. https://phys.org/news/2015-08-india-multi-billion-dollar-e-commerce.html
  31. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/startups/trend-tracking/snapdeal-slips-against-its-two-main-rivals-flipkart-amp-amazon-can-it-get-its-mojo-back/articleshow/54716995.cms
  32. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/ecommerce-flipkart-snapdeal-amazon-facing-fierce-competition/250952/
  33. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/Qt7vyAZ1ywO0y9e3P1MjcI/Snapdeal-losses-more-than-doubled-in-201516.html
  34. https://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/retail/etail-giants-like-snapdeal-amazon-lose-market-share-in-2015-small-etailers-emerge-as-real-winners/articleshow/51146778.cms
  35. https://www.indiaretailing.com/2017/08/14/real-reason-flipkart-snapdeal-merger-not-materialize
  36. https://www.thehindu.com/business/complexity-of-deal-derailed-flipkart-snapdeal-talks-sources/article19475620.ece
  37. https://www.forbes.com/sites/leezamangaldas/2017/08/01/merger-between-indian-e-commerce-heavyweights-flipkart-and-snapdeal-called-off/
  38. https://archive.factordaily.com/news/flipkart-acquires-snapdeal/
  39. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/vgm34cfkiKQ63bzzOv3P0N/Flipkart-Snapdeal-merger-talks-fell-apart-on-complexity-of-d.html
  40. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/the-inside-story-of-snapdeal-flipkart-merger-breakdown-117080101765_1.html
  41. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/economy/what-the-failed-snapdeal-flipkart-merger-teaches-us-deal-with-human-capital-first-2357711.html
  42. https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/31/flipkart-flipdeal-snapdeal-snapdead/
  43. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/so-how-things-now-snapdeal-kunal-bahl
  44. https://m.economictimes.com/small-biz/startups/how-kunal-bahl-sold-the-idea-of-snapdeal-2-0-and-whats-in-store/articleshow/59852818.cms
  45. https://qz.com/india/1418996/can-snapdeal-take-on-flipkart-amazon-and-paytm-in-india
  46. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/snapdeal-2-0-can-log-rs-150-cr-gross-profit-in-12-mths-bahl/articleshow/59875103.cms
  47. https://qz.com/india/1272186/snapdeal-2-0-after-failed-merger-with-flipkart-e-commerce-firm-sells-unicommerce-to-infibeam
  48. https://qz.com/india/1733893/snapdeals-comeback-strategy-seems-to-be-paying-off
  49. https://thestrategystory.com/2021/02/09/snapdeal-2-0-building-value-commerce/
  50. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vedanti-kohli-03225b199_snapdeal-ecommerceindia-startupsuccess-activity-7310226543052562434-S3NZ
  51. https://www.kearney.com/industry/consumer-retail/article/value-ecommerce-the-next-big-leap-in-india-retail-market
  52. https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20240730121328_E-23-184.1.pdf
  53. https://www.indianretailer.com/news/snapdeal-posts-strong-festive-growth-83-pc-orders-tier-ii-and-tier-iii-markets
  54. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2024/12/16/snapdeal-edge-in-value-e-commerce-sector/
  55. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2024/12/16/the-evolution-of-snapdeal-in-2025/
  56. https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2021/Dec/24/value-buying-focus-on-tier-ii-markets-key-to-snapdeals-revival-2399184.html
  57. https://vizologi.com/business-strategy-canvas/snapdeal-business-model-canvas/
  58. https://cedcommerce.com/blog/how-to-sell-on-snapdeal/
  59. https://godamwale.com/snapdeal-seller/
  60. https://www.registerkaro.in/guides/how-to-register-on-snapdeal-as-seller
  61. https://resources.merchantspring.io/blog/india-ecommerce-marketplaces-social-quick-commerce-2025
  62. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2021/12/16/but-who-buys-from-snapdeal-by-kunal-bahl/
  63. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2019/02/01/snapdeal-seller-review-2019/
  64. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2024/12/20/how-snapdeal-empowers-sellers-simplifying-online-selling-with-success-stories/
  65. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2019/11/14/my-business-has-grown-500-growth-year-on-year-with-snapdeal/
  66. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2020/01/03/our-business-has-been-growing-200-year-on-year-with-snapdeal/
  67. https://canvasbusinessmodel.com/blogs/target-market/snapdeal-target-market
  68. https://www.indianretailer.com/article/retail-business/marvels/snapdeals-value-first-journey-connecting-bharat-sellers-bharat
  69. https://www.snapdeal.com/helpcenter/query/category/returnorreplacement/question/How_can_I_returnreplace_an_item/uExp/false?redirectFrom=searchBarHelpCenter
  70. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/snapdeal.com
  71. https://www.mouthshut.com/product-reviews/snapdeal-reviews-925602969
  72. https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/snapdeal.com
  73. https://www.affluense.ai/company/snapdeal-financials-a72571
  74. https://o.parsers.vc/startup/snapdeal.com/
  75. https://techcrunch.com/2015/08/18/snapdeal-alibaba-softbank-foxconn/
  76. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/india/snapdeal-raises-200-million-giving-it-65-billion-market-value-idUSKCN0VO0DA/
  77. https://m.economictimes.com/small-biz/startups/softbank-opts-out-of-snapdeal-funding-deal/articleshow/57980400.cms
  78. https://inc42.com/company/snapdeal/funding/
  79. https://www.deccanherald.com/business/softbank-pushes-snapdeal-stake-sale-1998364
  80. https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/at-1-bn-valuation-softbank-readies-snapdeal-for-merger-with-flipkart-117040500910_1.html
  81. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/startups/companies/what-led-to-the-softbank-snapdeal-fallout/articleshow/58451984.cms
  82. https://inc42.com/buzz/snapdeal-valuation-falls-to-1-bn/
  83. https://www.cbinsights.com/company/snapdeal/financials
  84. https://www.indianretailer.com/news/retail-india-news-snapdeal-improves-margins-88-pc-ebitda-loss-reduction-fy24
  85. https://compworth.com/company/snapdeal
  86. https://yourstory.com/2015/06/snapdeal-acquisition-journey
  87. https://inc42.com/company/snapdeal/acquisitions/
  88. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/snapdeal-buys-freecharge-for-400m/articleshow/46857876.cms
  89. https://inc42.com/features/snapdeal-sold-freecharge-for-companys-survival-reveals-kunal-bahl/
  90. https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/08/snapdeal-freecharge/
  91. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/8cZBSyVgBrYpGMKf68dp1M/Axis-Bank-acquires-Freecharge-for-Rs385-crore.html
  92. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/55xDQzzGjGEJv0vkKZgD7M/Snapdeal-buys-ecommerce-management-firm-Unicommerce.html
  93. https://inc42.com/buzz/snapdeal-acquires-unicommerce/
  94. https://yourstory.com/2024/08/softbank-snapdeal-to-gain-massive-returns-from-unicommerce-ipo
  95. https://yourstory.com/2015/09/snapdeal-acquires-reduce-data
  96. https://inc42.com/buzz/snapdeal-grabs-stake-online-product-comparison-startup-smartprix/
  97. https://qz.com/india/981587/timeline-from-unsold-discount-coupons-to-unicorn-to-snapdeal-2-0
  98. https://www.zippia.com/snapdeal-careers-2244198/history/
  99. https://business2business.co.in/article/976/how-snapdeal-went-from-deal-to-no-deal-a-timeline
  100. https://inc42.com/buzz/snapdeal-partners-ai-powered-bhashini-to-drive-digital-inclusion/
  101. https://thestartupspectrum.com/snapdeal-partners-with-bhashini-to-enhance-digital-inclusion-across-india/
  102. https://www.fortuneindia.com/enterprise/snapdeal-joins-ondc-network-to-focus-on-non-metro-cities/111974
  103. https://www.siasat.com/snapdeal-to-go-live-on-govts-ondc-network-next-month-2372771/
  104. https://www.businessworld.in/article/snapdeal-and-shoppers-stop-enter-exclusive-partnership--84520
  105. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/snapdeal-and-agoda-goes-in-a-strategic-partnership/
  106. https://www.indianretailer.com/news/snapdeal-establishes-130-new-logistics-hubs-in-2021.n11529
  107. https://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/retail/snapdeal-to-make-it-mandatory-for-logistics-partners-to-integrate-with-its-technology-platform/articleshow/51986483.cms
  108. https://www.entrepreneur.com/en-in/growth-strategies/dpronto-partners-with-snapdeal-to-provide-last-mile/271996
  109. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/e-commerce/e-tailing/snapdeal-delivers-fake-products-company-founders-booked/70388947
  110. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/titan-company-gets-relief-from-delhi-hc-against-sale-of-counterfeit-watches-on-snapdeal/articleshow/71067706.cms
  111. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/casio-sues-snapdeal-e-sellers-over-fake-products/articleshow/70184500.cms
  112. https://m.economictimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/snapdeal-founders-summoned-in-fake-hul-products-case/articleshow/72878585.cms
  113. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2020%2520Review%2520of%2520Notorious%2520Markets%2520for%2520Counterfeiting%2520and%2520Piracy%2520%28final%29.pdf
  114. https://m.economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/retail/ccpa-issues-notices-to-amazon-flipkart-snapdeal-for-alleged-sale-of-toys-without-bis-quality-mark/articleshow/96935598.cms
  115. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/retail/brands-cry-foul-over-counterfeit-products-on-e-commerce-sites-like-flipkart-snapdeal-amazon-others/articleshow/45354348.cms
  116. https://scgbsolutions.com/snapdeal-crackdowns-on-counterfeits-with-brand-shield/
  117. https://blog.snapdeal.com/index.php/2021/03/16/does-snapdeal-sell-fake-products/
  118. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/e-commerce/e-tailing/e-commerce-market-place-model-leads-to-deluge-buyer-complaints/24566824
  119. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/amid-layoffs-snapdeal-founders-admit-to-wrong-decisions/articleshow/57301698.cms
  120. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/gaAaSkxWZE4Ri45GiuBHkN/Snapdeals-Kunal-Bahl-admits-to-mistakes-to-take-100-salar.html
  121. https://www.quora.com/What-went-wrong-at-Snapdeal
  122. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aarya-dighe-512626234_learningfromfailures-marketing-strategy-activity-7375510616465096704-6bwv
  123. https://yourstory.com/2017/05/snapdeal-sins
  124. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/snapdeal-board-rejects-850-million-offer-from-flipkart/articleshow/59445336.cms
  125. https://www.reddit.com/r/sharktankindia/comments/1jcp14o/why_exactly_do_you_think_snapdeal_failed/
  126. https://www.vccircle.com/the-fall-and-fall-of-snapdeal-why-its-market-share-slipped-from-26-to-4
  127. https://ijsart.com/public/storage/paper/pdf/IJSARTV5I933289.pdf
  128. https://qz.com/india/704813/snapdeal-may-die-a-slow-and-painful-death-unless-it-gets-its-act-together
  129. https://dlanes.com/why-snapdeal/
  130. https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/snapdeal-is-under-fire-because-aamir-khan-said-something-274220-2015-11-24
  131. https://www.aiplexdigital.com/blog/brand-crisis-management-examples-how-to-say
  132. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/04/17/collateral-damage-snapdeal-suffers-due-mistaken-association-with-indian-boycott
  133. https://bestmediainfo.com/mediainfo/mediainfo-marketing/ceo-pr-legal-or-marketing-in-crisis-is-india-inc-still-asking-whos-handling-this-9605004
  134. https://academic.oup.com/book/44474/chapter/376454492
  135. https://brandequity.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/business-of-brands/snapdeal-founders-summoned-for-illegally-taking-marketing-concept/58219532
  136. https://brandequity.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/business-of-brands/snapdeals-loss-narrows-to-rs-160-crore-in-fy24/116792920
  137. https://entrackr.com/fintrackr/snapdeal-records-rs-384-cr-revenue-in-fy24-adjusted-ebitda-loss-drops-by-88-8574973
  138. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/e-commerce/e-tailing/snapdeals-loss-narrows-to-rs-160-crore-in-fy24/116793389
  139. https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-snapdeal-cuts-losses-by-43-per-cent-to-rs-160-crore-in-fy24-3705207/
  140. https://www.bwdisrupt.com/article/snapdeal-slashes-losses-by-88-in-fy24-edges-closer-to-profitability-543362
  141. https://m.economictimes.com/small-biz/sme-sector/with-eye-on-bharat-snapdeal-says-its-close-to-profitability/articleshow/103921406.cms
  142. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/india-ecommerce-market
  143. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/startup/snapdeal-parent-acevector-confidentially-files-draft-ipo-papers-with-sebi-13298282.html
  144. https://retail-preprod.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tag/snapdeal%2Bipo
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.