Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
U.S. Sugar Program
View on WikipediaThis article needs to be updated. (November 2023) |
The U.S. Sugar program is the federal commodity support program that maintains a minimum price for sugar, authorized by the 2002 farm bill (P.L. 107–171, Sec. 1401–1403) to cover the 2002-2007 crops of sugar beets and sugarcane.[1]
Originally designed to protect the incomes of the sugar industry-growers of sugarcane and sugar beets, and firms that process each crop into sugar - the program now prevents them from competing with producers of corn syrup sweetener. It supports domestic sugar prices by:
- (1) making available nonrecourse loans to processors (not less than 18¢/lb. for raw cane sugar, or 22.9¢/lb. for refined beet sugar);
- (2) restricting sugar imports using a tariff-rate quota, and
- (3) limiting the amount of sugar that processors can sell domestically (under marketing allotments) when imports are below 1.532 million short tons.
Import restrictions are intended to meet U.S. commitments under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. Processor and refiner marketing allotments are set by USDA according to statutory requirements. Marketing allotments and new payment-in-kind authority are designed to help the USDA meet the no-cost-requirements to the federal government by avoiding the forfeiture of sugar put under loan. Other parts of the new program can include a storage loan program for sugar processors, and reduced (by 1%) the USDA interest rate charged on sugar loans.[1]
Results
[edit]The U.S. Sugar program has led to two main outcomes: Higher sugar prices and higher profits for farmers. According to USDA data, in FY2025, sugar prices in the United States were 36.90¢/pound. The world price was 18.58¢/pound.[2] Multiple analyses by trade experts have attributed higher prices to the Sugar Program.[3][4][5][6][7][8] The impact of this, according to the American Enterprise Institute, is that "US sugar program has been shown to cost consumers $2.4–$4 billion a year and induce losses of 17,000 to 20,000 jobs in the food processing and confectionery industries."[6] An October 2023 research review by the Government Accountability Office suggests that "the U.S. sugar program results in an increase in domestic sugar production and higher profits for farmers, totaling an estimated $1.4 billion to $2.7 billion in additional benefits annually." However, these benefits are offset by substantial costs to downstream industries. A 2006 analysis by the International Trade Administration concluded that "The existing literature on the economic effects of liberalization of U.S. sugar prices suggests that eliminating sugar quotas and tariff rate quotas and allowing sugar to enter the United States duty free would result in economic gains in the form of increased domestic food manufacturing production and U.S. exports, gains for consumers, taxpayer savings, and a net positive effect on U.S. employment."[9]
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Sugar and Sweeteners - Policy | Economic Research Service". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2026-02-01.
- ^ "Sugar and Sweeteners Yearbook Tables | Economic Research Service". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 2026-02-01.
- ^ "Cronyism In the Sugar Industry: Comparing U.S. to World Prices | Mercatus Center". www.mercatus.org. 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2026-02-01.
- ^ Grabow, Colin (November 8, 2023). "New GAO Report Details Sugar Program Dysfunction".
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Grabow, Colin (April 10, 2018). "Candy-Coated Cartel: Time to Kill the U.S. Sugar Program".
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b "Recapping the Effects of the US Sugar Program". American Enterprise Institute - AEI. Archived from the original on 2025-12-16. Retrieved 2026-02-01.
- ^ "Breaux Amendment Is Sweet, And Very Expensive". Brookings. Retrieved 2026-02-01.
- ^ "Sugar Subsidies Are a Bitter Deal for American Consumers". Manhattan Institute. Retrieved 2026-02-03.
- ^ "Employment Changes in U.S. Food Manufacturing: The Impact of Sugar Prices" (PDF). 2006.
This article incorporates public domain material from Jasper Womach. Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition (PDF). Congressional Research Service.
