Hubbry Logo
Tangent modulusTangent modulusMain
Open search
Tangent modulus
Community hub
Tangent modulus
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tangent modulus
Tangent modulus
Tangent modulus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In solid mechanics, the tangent modulus is the slope of the stress–strain curve at any specified stress or strain. Below the proportional limit (the limit of the linear elastic regime) the tangent modulus is equivalent to Young's modulus. Above the proportional limit the tangent modulus varies with strain and is most accurately found from test data. The Ramberg–Osgood equation relates Young's modulus to the tangent modulus and is another method for obtaining the tangent modulus.

The tangent modulus is useful in describing the behavior of materials that have been stressed beyond the elastic region. When a material is plastically deformed there is no longer a linear relationship between stress and strain as there is for elastic deformations. The tangent modulus quantifies the "softening" or "hardening" of material that generally occurs when it begins to yield.

Although the material softens it is still generally able to sustain more load before ultimate failure. Therefore, more weight efficient structure can be designed when plastic behavior is considered. For example, a structural analyst may use the tangent modulus to quantify the buckling failure of columns and flat plates.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tangent modulus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The tangent modulus, denoted as EtE_t, is a fundamental concept in and that quantifies the instantaneous rate of change of stress with respect to strain at a specific point on a material's stress-strain curve, defined as the slope of the line to the at that location, Et=dσdϵE_t = \frac{d\sigma}{d\epsilon}. This measure captures the local of a , particularly in nonlinear regimes where behavior deviates from ideal elasticity, such as during deformation or strain hardening. Unlike the constant , which applies only in the linear elastic region, the tangent modulus varies with the point of evaluation and is generally lower in the post-yield region, reflecting reduced resistance to further deformation. Introduced by Friedrich Engesser in 1889 as a refinement to Euler's , the tangent modulus addresses the limitations of elastic assumptions in predicting the stability of structures under high loads, where materials exhibit semielastic or inelastic responses. In analysis, it replaces in formulas like the critical stress equation σcr=π2Et(L/r)2\sigma_{cr} = \frac{\pi^2 E_t}{(L/r)^2}, enabling more accurate predictions for columns undergoing inelastic , typically at intermediate slenderness ratios (e.g., 50-150), where elastic overestimates strength. This approach has been validated through extensive testing, such as U.S. Bureau of Standards experiments on over 200 steel columns, showing average errors in strength estimates of 620 to 2,100 lbs/in² depending on slenderness. Beyond buckling, the tangent modulus finds applications in nonlinear finite element analysis, creep deformation studies, and material characterization for engineering designs involving metals, polymers, and composites. For instance, in high-temperature environments, it accounts for time-dependent strain in creep buckling of steel structures, integrating with models like Perry's formula for enhanced precision. In testing protocols, it is determined by plotting incremental load versus strain data, providing insights into strain hardening rates and aiding in the assessment of ultimate tensile strength and failure strains for advanced materials like decellularized scaffolds. Its relation to other moduli, such as the secant modulus (which uses a chord from the origin), underscores its role in distinguishing local versus average in complex loading scenarios.

Fundamentals

Definition

The tangent modulus represents the instantaneous stiffness of a at a specific point on its stress-strain , defined as the of the line to that at any given stress or strain level. It applies to both elastic and deformation regions, providing a local measure of how stress increments relate to strain increments beyond initial linear behavior. This concept originated in during the late , particularly through Friedrich Engesser's work on inelastic , to describe nonlinear material responses that occur after the proportional limit is exceeded. It evolved from Euler's elastic theory to account for semielastic actions under excessive loads, influencing later developments in plasticity theory. In metals, the tangent modulus is particularly useful for capturing the transition from elastic to deformation, where the material's progressively decreases as permanent strains accumulate. A typical stress-strain curve for such materials begins with a straight linear portion, representing elastic behavior, followed by a nonlinear curving region indicative of yielding and hardening; the tangent modulus quantifies the changing along this entire path, reflecting the material's evolving resistance to further deformation. For context, this contrasts with , which captures only the initial linear .

Mathematical formulation

The tangent modulus EtE_t is mathematically defined as the instantaneous rate of change of stress with respect to strain at a specific point on the stress-strain curve, expressed as the first derivative: Et=dσdϵE_t = \frac{d\sigma}{d\epsilon} where σ\sigma denotes the stress and ϵ\epsilon the strain. This formulation arises directly from the geometry of the stress-strain curve, where EtE_t represents the slope of the line to the at the point of interest, capturing the local of the under incremental loading. In the of one-dimensional plasticity, it can be derived from the total strain decomposition into elastic and components, ϵ˙=ϵ˙e+ϵ˙p\dot{\epsilon} = \dot{\epsilon}^e + \dot{\epsilon}^p, leading to σ˙=E(ϵ˙−ϵ˙p)\dot{\sigma} = E (\dot{\epsilon} - \dot{\epsilon}^p), where EE is the and the plastic follows the flow rule; the resulting elasto-plastic modulus EtE_t simplifies to Et=EHE+HE_t = \frac{E H}{E + H} for linear isotropic hardening with modulus HH, though the general differential form holds across behaviors. The units of the tangent modulus are the same as those of other elastic moduli, typically expressed in pascals (Pa) in the International System of Units, reflecting its dimension of stress per unit strain. In special cases, the tangent modulus remains constant and equals the Young's modulus EE within linear elastic regions of the stress-strain curve, where the material response is Hookean and the slope is uniform. Conversely, in nonlinear regions such as post-yield plastic deformation, EtE_t varies with strain, often decreasing to reflect material softening or hardening.

Comparisons with Other Moduli

Relation to Young's modulus

Young's modulus, denoted as EE, is defined as the ratio of stress to strain in the linear elastic region of a material's stress-strain curve, given by E=σϵE = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}, where σ\sigma is the axial stress and ϵ\epsilon is the axial strain. This modulus characterizes the material's under small deformations where the response is reversible and proportional, serving as a fundamental property for isotropic materials in the initial loading phase. The tangent modulus, Et=dσdϵE_t = \frac{d\sigma}{d\epsilon}, represents the instantaneous of the stress-strain curve at any point. Within the linear elastic region, up to the proportional limit, the tangent modulus equals because the curve is a straight line with constant . However, beyond the proportional limit in nonlinear regimes, such as during strain hardening, the tangent modulus diverges from and typically decreases, reflecting the material's reduced incremental stiffness as plastic deformation occurs. For example, in structural steels like AISI 304 stainless steel, Young's modulus is approximately 210 GPa in the elastic region, but the tangent modulus in the plastic range drops to around 2 GPa, illustrating the significant softening in hardening materials. This range of 1-10 GPa for tangent modulus in the plastic regime is common for various steels depending on strain levels and temperature. In engineering practice, Young's modulus is primarily used for initial elastic design to predict overall deformations and stability under service loads, while the tangent modulus is essential for incremental loading analyses in plastic deformation scenarios, enabling accurate assessment of progressive failure and load-carrying capacity.

Relation to secant modulus

The secant modulus, denoted EsE_s, is defined as the ratio of stress to strain at a specific point on the stress-strain curve, calculated as Es=σϵE_s = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}, where the line is drawn from the origin to that point, providing an average measure of stiffness over the entire deformation range up to that point. In contrast, the tangent modulus represents the local derivative of stress with respect to strain at a given point, capturing the instantaneous stiffness, whereas the secant modulus acts as a chord average that can overestimate the material's stiffness in regions where the stress-strain curve is concave down, such as during initial nonlinear softening. Young's modulus serves as a special case of the secant modulus within the linear elastic regime. For example, in polymers exhibiting nonlinear behavior, the secant modulus is often employed to evaluate overall ductility by assessing average stiffness up to significant strain levels, while the tangent modulus is used to identify local yielding points where the material's response changes abruptly. The secant modulus is particularly useful for determining total deformation limits in design scenarios involving large strains, whereas the tangent modulus is preferred for analyzing incremental stability under small perturbations in loading.

Applications

In plasticity and hardening

In plasticity, the tangent modulus represents the post-yield stiffness of materials, serving as the slope of the stress-strain curve in the plastic regime for bilinear and multilinear models that approximate the transition from elastic to plastic deformation. This modulus captures the material's resistance to further deformation after yielding, where the stiffness is significantly lower than the initial elastic modulus, enabling accurate simulation of irreversible straining in engineering analyses. Hardening behaviors in plasticity are classified as isotropic or kinematic, with the tangent modulus quantifying the rate of yield strength evolution per unit plastic strain in both cases. Isotropic hardening involves a uniform expansion of the , leading to increased resistance to plastic flow in all directions without directional bias. In contrast, kinematic hardening translates the to model phenomena like the , where reverse yielding occurs at lower stresses, and the tangent modulus describes the directional shift in hardening rate. A key application of the tangent modulus arises in the Ramberg-Osgood equation, a widely adopted model for fitting nonlinear stress-strain responses in the transition to plasticity, where the modulus is derived from the curve's local to represent progressive hardening. This equation, originally developed for aluminum and alloys, allows for parametric description of the entire elastoplastic curve, facilitating predictions of deformation capacity without piecewise linear approximations.

In structural engineering and design

In structural engineering, the tangent modulus plays a crucial role in analyzing the stability of columns and other compressive members under loads that induce inelastic behavior. In buckling analysis, particularly for inelastic buckling, the tangent modulus replaces the Young's modulus in Euler's critical load formula to account for the reduced stiffness due to partial plastification of the material. This approach, known as the tangent modulus theory or Engesser theory, provides a more accurate prediction of the buckling load by reflecting the slope of the stress-strain curve at the stress level near buckling, preventing overestimation of capacity in structures where elastic assumptions fail. Design standards such as those from the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) incorporate the tangent modulus concept into column strength formulas for structures subjected to high compressive loads. The AISC specifications derive their critical stress equations, such as those in Section E3 for flexural-torsional , from tangent modulus-based models calibrated against experimental data, ensuring reliable load-bearing capacity assessments for intermediate-length columns in building frames and bridges. This integration allows engineers to evaluate stability under service loads where residual stresses and initial imperfections contribute to inelastic effects. For instance, in the design of a H-section column supporting a multi-story building, the tangent modulus is used to compute the reduced load when the average stress approaches the yield point, accounting for partial yielding on the compression and web. By applying the tangent modulus iteratively based on the anticipated stress, designers can determine a safe effective length factor and , avoiding unsafe overpredictions that might occur with purely elastic methods and ensuring the column's factored resistance meets code requirements without excessive conservatism. Despite its utility, the tangent modulus approach has limitations, as it assumes quasi-static loading conditions and uniform stress distribution at the onset of buckling, making it unsuitable for dynamic impacts or fatigue-prone scenarios where cyclic loading alters the response. Additionally, the underpredicts the actual buckling load in some cases because it applies the reduced modulus uniformly across the cross-section, whereas parts of the member may retain higher elastic stiffness during initial deformation.

Measurement and Analysis

Experimental determination

The experimental determination of the involves conducting uniaxial tensile tests on material specimens to generate stress-strain data, from which the instantaneous slope of the is calculated at specific points. This process follows standardized protocols, such as ASTM E8 for preparing and testing metallic specimens, where a cylindrical or rectangular sample is subjected to increasing tensile load until or a predetermined strain limit is reached. The test is typically performed at and a constant speed to ensure quasi-static conditions, with stress (σ\sigma) computed as divided by the initial cross-sectional area and strain (ϵ\epsilon) measured directly along the gauge length. After , the stress-strain curve is plotted, and tangent lines are fitted at points of interest, such as within the plastic region, to quantify local stiffness. Universal testing machines, such as screw-driven or servo-hydraulic systems, provide the controlled loading, while clip-on or non-contact extensometers ensure precise axial strain measurement with resolutions down to 0.1% or better to capture nonlinear behavior accurately. These instruments comply with ASTM E111 requirements for apparatus precision, including minimal misalignment and grip slippage, which could otherwise distort the strain data. software integrated with the machine records and displacement at high sampling rates, often 100 Hz or more, to produce a detailed for subsequent . In , the tangent modulus Et=dσdϵE_t = \frac{d\sigma}{d\epsilon} is computed at desired strain levels using of the discrete stress-strain points or by fitting a local curve and taking its . Curve-fitting software, such as least-squares regression in tools like or dedicated testing programs, facilitates this by modeling the curve segment and evaluating the , ensuring the result reflects the material's instantaneous response. Challenges in this determination include noise from sensor vibrations or electrical interference in the raw data, which necessitates smoothing techniques like or low-pass filtering to preserve the curve's true shape without introducing artifacts. Additionally, in viscoelastic materials, strain rate variations during testing can alter the apparent tangent modulus due to time-dependent relaxation, requiring controlled speeds (e.g., 0.5–5 mm/min) to minimize rate sensitivity.

Computational evaluation

In , the tangent modulus is evaluated numerically within finite element (FE) frameworks to ensure efficient convergence of nonlinear solvers, particularly in simulations involving elastoplasticity or hyperelasticity. The consistent tangent operator, derived from the discretized constitutive equations, provides the derivative of the stress increment with respect to the strain increment, enabling quadratic convergence in Newton-Raphson iterations. This approach, introduced in seminal work on rate-independent elastoplasticity, contrasts with the continuum tangent by accounting for the specific integration algorithm used, such as backward Euler schemes for plasticity models. Analytical derivation of the tangent modulus requires explicit differentiation of the material model, which can be complex for advanced constitutive laws involving kinematic hardening or damage. For instance, in J2-plasticity with isotropic hardening, the consistent tangent is obtained by differentiating the radial return mapping algorithm, yielding a that maintains symmetry under certain conditions. However, for non-standard models like fiber-reinforced hyperelasticity, numerical approximations are often preferred to avoid lengthy derivations, using methods such as forward or central differences on the stress-strain response. These approximations perturb the strain input by a small parameter ε (typically 10^{-6} to 10^{-8}) and compute the modulus as Δσ/Δε, with central differences offering second-order accuracy but higher computational cost. Advanced numerical techniques further enhance evaluation efficiency and precision. The complex step derivative approximation (CSDA) employs a complex perturbation ih (h ≈ 10^{-20}) to eliminate subtractive cancellation errors inherent in real-valued differences, achieving near-machine precision for the tangent operator in viscoelastic or plastic simulations. In periodic homogenization for composites, techniques like the condensation method derive the macroscopic tangent modulus by reducing the global stiffness matrix, outperforming perturbation-based approaches by up to 13 times in CPU time for representative unit cells. Comparative studies show that while analytical methods ensure exactness, numerical approximations like CSDA offer comparable computation time to analytical methods in small-scale FE models (up to 10,000 degrees of freedom) without significant loss in accuracy, though benefits diminish in large-scale problems dominated by matrix factorization.

References

  1. https://www.ae.msstate.edu/vlsm/materials/strength_chars/tangent.htm
  2. https://www.princeton.edu/~maelabs/mae324/06/06mae_19.htm
  3. https://web.eng.fiu.edu/wangc/EGN3365-6.pdf
  4. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2016/10/OPTI_222_W4.pdf
  5. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/nbstechnologic/nbstechnologicpapert263.pdf
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/tangent-modulus-theory
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2724673/
  8. https://www.mecmesin.com/test-type/tangent-modulus
  9. https://web.mit.edu/course/3/3.11/www/modules/ss.pdf
  10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02533839.1991.9677310
  11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1011271517372
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/tangent-modulus
  13. https://www.ae.msstate.edu/vlsm/materials/strength_chars/
  14. https://gab.wallawalla.edu/~louie.yaw/plasticitypublications/1Dplasticity.pdf
  15. https://www.bu.edu/moss/mechanics-of-materials-strain/
  16. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/555611
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/youngs-modulus
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123693969002112
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_modulus_of_elasticity_be_calculated_using_a_stress-strain_Curve
  20. https://help.solidworks.com/2022/english/SolidWorks/Cworks/c_Plasticity_von_Mises_Model.htm
  21. https://web.mae.ufl.edu/nkim/egm6352/Chap4.pdf
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749641904001445
  23. https://gab.wallawalla.edu/~louie.yaw/plasticitypublications/1DplasticityIsoKin.pdf
  24. https://www.uni-ulm.de/fileadmin/website_uni_ulm/uzwr/mmsm/mmsm1-ws1314/mmsm1-handout-plasticity.pdf
  25. https://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/columns/inelastic.cfm
  26. https://ej.aisc.org/index.php/engj/article/download/267/266
  27. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/manual/15th-ed-ref-list/load-and-resistance-factor-design-specification-for-structural-steel-buildings.pdf
  28. https://pdhonline.com/courses/s216/s216content.pdf
  29. https://www.abbottaerospace.com/aa-sb-001/15-local-stability-isotropic-materials/15-3-column-buckling/15-3-4-tangent-modulus-approach-for-elastic-plastic-column-behavior/
  30. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/5784/bac5478.0001.001.pdf
  31. https://www.astm.org/e0111-17.html
  32. https://www.admet.com/blog/youngs-modulus-tangent-chord-modulus-testing-tips/
  33. https://www.instron.com/en/testing-solutions/astm-standards/the-definitive-guide-to-astm-e8-e8m/
  34. https://www.zwickroell.com/industries/metals/metals-standards/metals-tensile-test-astm-e8/
  35. https://www.eng-tips.com/threads/how-to-calculate-tangent-modulus.310254/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40000132_Effects_of_Strain_Rate_and_Temperature_on_Tangent_Modulus_Method
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_get_rid_of_noises_in_stress-strain_curves_obtained_by_tension-compresion_test
  38. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40789-022-00552-7
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045782511002660
  40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1118467
  41. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65441-2
  42. https://hal.science/hal-02925996/file/LEM3_EWC_2020_BEN-BETTAIEB.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.