Hubbry Logo
Ugandan kobUgandan kobMain
Open search
Ugandan kob
Community hub
Ugandan kob
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ugandan kob
Ugandan kob
Ugandan kob
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ugandan kob
Male
Female and calf
both at Semliki Wildlife Reserve, Uganda
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Bovidae
Genus: Kobus
Species:
K. kob
Subspecies:
K. k. thomasi
Trinomial name
Kobus kob thomasi
(Sclater, 1864)

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) is a subspecies of the kob, a type of antelope. It is found in sub-Saharan Africa in South Sudan, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Ugandan kob is normally reddish-brown, differentiating it from other kob subspecies.

A Ugandan kob appears on the coat of arms of Uganda, along with a grey crowned crane (Balearica regulorum gibbericeps), representing the abundant wildlife present in the country.[2]

Description

[edit]

The Ugandan kob is similar in appearance to the impala but it is more sturdily built. Only the males have horns, which are lyre-shaped, strongly ridged and divergent. Males are slightly larger than females, being 90 to 100 cm (3.0 to 3.3 ft) at the shoulder, with an average weight of 94 kg (207 lb), while females are 82 to 92 cm (2.7 to 3.0 ft) at the shoulder and on average weigh about 63 kg (139 lb). Apart from the throat patch, muzzle, eye ring and inner ear, which are white, the coat is golden to reddish-brown, the colour differentiating it from other kob subspecies. The belly and inside of the legs are white, and the front of the forelegs are black.[3][4]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

This subspecies is native to East Africa. It occurs in South Sudan, to the west of the Nile, Uganda and the north-eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Its range used to extend into northwestern Tanzania, where it grazed the grasslands margining Lake Victoria, and into southwestern Kenya, but it has been extirpated from these countries. It is typically found in open or wooded savanna, within a reasonable distance of water, and it also occurs in grasslands near rivers and lakes. Its habit of lying out in open grassland make it an accessible target for poachers, and 98% of the present population are found in national parks and other protected areas.[1]

Naming

[edit]

Traditionally, Uganda kob is named differently according to tribes and ethnical backgrounds. In Acholi, its called "Till," the Bugisu people call is "Ishisi," Baganda people call it "Ensiima" and other tribes have their respective naming. Ugandan Kob local name "Til" was derived and used in Uganda's oil industry called the Tilenga project in western Uganda .[5][6][7]

Ecology

[edit]
Ugandan kobs mating at Queen Elizabeth National Park.

Ugandan kobs are herbivores and feed largely on grasses and reeds. The females and young males form loose groups of varying size which range according to food availability, often moving along watercourses and grazing in valley bottoms. One group in South Sudan was recorded as travelling 150 to 200 km (93 to 124 mi) during the dry season. Sometimes non-breeding males form their own groups. Females become sexually mature in their second year, but males do not start breeding until they are older.[8]

Male Ugandan kob trying to seduce a female at Queen Elizabeth National Park
Male Ugandan kob trying to seduce a female at Queen Elizabeth National Park

Larger populations of kob tend to have a lek mating system, the females living in loose groups and only visiting the traditional breeding grounds in order to mate. For this purpose, males hold small territories of up to 200 m (660 ft) in diameter, the smallest territories being in the centre of crowded leks. Calving takes place at the end of the rainy season; a single calf is born in November or December, after a gestation period of about nine months.[8]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ugandan kob

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) is a subspecies of the kob antelope characterized by its reddish-brown coat, white underparts, throat patch, eye rings, and black foreleg stripes, with males bearing short, thick, ringed, lyre-shaped horns up to 70 cm long. Standing approximately 92 cm at the shoulder and weighing 40–92 kg depending on sex, it inhabits open grasslands, floodplains, and woodland edges near permanent water in southwestern Uganda, northeastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, and western South Sudan west of the Nile River. As a grazer feeding primarily on medium to short grasses, it forms herds and employs a lekking system for mating, wherein males defend territories on communal display grounds to attract females, favoring high-visibility sites with short grass. The subspecies has been extirpated from parts of northwestern Tanzania and southwestern Kenya but persists in significant numbers within protected areas like national parks, supporting the second-largest antelope population in Africa at Boma National Park. Classified as Least Concern overall under the parent species by the IUCN due to stable populations in reserves, it faces threats from habitat fragmentation, poaching, and predation by lions and hyenas, though conservation efforts in Uganda maintain its abundance.

Taxonomy and nomenclature

Classification and subspecies

The Ugandan kob is classified within the genus , species , and subspecies (described by P. L. Sclater in 1896), belonging to the family in the order Artiodactyla. This placement reflects its position as one of several recognized subspecies of the kob antelope (), which collectively exhibit morphological and genetic distinctions across their range in . Taxonomic treatments vary, with some authorities, such as Groves and Grubb (2011), proposing elevation of certain kob subspecies—including thomasi—to full species status based on skull morphology and other traits, though as a polytypic species encompassing thomasi remains the prevailing view in databases like the Mammal Diversity Database. The subspecies K. kob thomasi is distinguished from others, such as the white-eared kob (K. k. leucotis), primarily by morphological features including horn curvature and pelage patterning, which align with geographic isolation in eastern and . Genetic analyses, including control region sequencing from populations representing thomasi and other , reveal substantial sequence divergence (up to levels indicating differentiation) while supporting overall conspecificity within K. kob, consistent with phylogeographic patterns shaped by Pleistocene refugia and limited . Chromosomal studies across Kobus , including K. kob samples, further corroborate the karyotypic uniformity that underpins validity without evidence of hybrid zones disrupting thomasi's integrity. Historically, the kob complex underwent revisions in the , with early lumping of forms into a broad K. kob giving way to recognition of at least 10 by the 1970s, driven by regional collections emphasizing discrete phenotypic clusters; thomasi was formalized to capture variants from and adjacent areas previously subsumed under nominate kob. Recent syntheses, incorporating both morphology and molecular , affirm thomasi's status amid debates over splitting, prioritizing empirical over arbitrary species thresholds.

Etymology and common names

The genus name Kobus is a Neo-Latin derivation from "koba," a term in Niger-Congo languages denoting antelopes akin to waterbucks and related species, incorporated into European scientific classification during early explorations of African fauna. The specific epithet kob stems from the same linguistic roots, particularly Wolof koba, adapted by 20th-century naturalists to describe the reddish antelope prevalent in West and Central African savannas, as documented in colonial-era accounts of the species' range. The subspecies designation thomasi commemorates British mammalogist Michael Rogers Oldfield Thomas (1858–1929), a key figure in taxonomy who analyzed Ugandan specimens; it was formally established by Philip Lutley Sclater in 1896 under the binomial Cobus thomasi, later synonymized within Kobus kob as taxonomic understanding refined. Vernacular names such as "" emerged concurrently with the subspecies description, emphasizing its restricted East African distribution—primarily , southern , and northeastern —contrasting with the broader K. k. kob of western ranges; early English usage appears in 1896 literature by Rowland Ward, avoiding redundant qualifiers like "" in modern nomenclature.

Physical characteristics

Morphology and size

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) possesses a robust yet gracile build, with relatively long legs adapted for open locomotion, distinguishing it as the largest subspecies of . Adult shoulder height ranges from 82 to 100 cm, with males typically taller at 90-100 cm and females smaller at 82-92 cm. Body length extends to 125-180 cm, and the short tail measures 20-40 cm. Males exhibit greater mass, averaging 94 kg with a range of 85-121 kg, compared to females at an average of 63 kg (60-77 kg range), reflecting sexual size dimorphism observed in field measurements from Ugandan populations. Juveniles are proportionally smaller and lack horns, with growth stabilizing by adulthood; empirical data from specimens indicate minimal regional variation within Uganda's savannas, such as . Males bear lyre-shaped horns that are heavily ringed, divergent, and curve upward at the tips, with typical lengths of 50-62 cm, though exceptional individuals reach up to 90 cm. The pelage is predominantly light reddish-brown, uniform across the body except for white underparts, a distinctive white throat patch or chevron, white eye rings, and black stripes along the front of the forelegs; this coloration intensifies in males during maturity. Females and young share similar patterning but lack horns and display less pronounced sexual dichromatism.

Sexual dimorphism and coloration

The Ugandan kob displays marked in body size and cranial appendages. Adult males average 94 kg in weight (range: 85–121 kg), approximately 50% heavier than s at 63 kg (60–77 kg), and feature prominently muscular necks suited to combative displays. Only males possess horns, which are lyre-shaped with a sigmoid profile, stout at the base with transverse ridges, and measure 50–61.6 cm along the front curve. This horn dimorphism arises from pressures, as males engage in intense rivalry over leks to secure mating access, evidenced by observational data from territorial aggregations. Pelage coloration in both sexes consists of a smooth reddish-brown coat accented with golden tones, white ventral regions including the belly and inner legs, and black stripes on the anterior forelegs. A white throat bib is more conspicuous in males, alongside pale to white ear coloration developing with age, while females retain tawny ears. Sexual dichromatism is moderate, with territorial breeding males adopting richer, slightly darker hues to signal readiness, though overall seasonal shifts are subdued relative to subspecies like the . Field observations confirm these traits enhance male conspicuousness during , aligning with evolutionary drivers of and competitor deterrence.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic range

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi), a of the kob antelope, is native to southwestern west of the River, , and extreme northeastern . Its distribution centers on and regions within these countries, with verified records confirming presence across a fragmented area spanning these borders. Core populations persist in protected areas of Uganda, including , , and Kidepo Valley National Park, where the subspecies forms stable leks and herds based on ground and aerial surveys. In , sightings are recorded in Badingilo National Park and adjacent floodplains, while northeastern DRC hosts smaller groups near . The overall range shows no major contraction from mid-20th-century records, though fragmentation has increased due to agricultural expansion outside reserves, maintaining viability primarily within conserved zones.

Habitat preferences and adaptations

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) primarily occupies moist savannas, alluvial floodplains, and woodland margins characterized by short grasses and reliable access to surface water, such as rivers, swamps, and lakeshores. These habitats provide the tender, nutrient-rich vegetation essential for their grazing lifestyle, with populations rarely extending more than a few kilometers from permanent water sources due to daily drinking requirements. In regions like Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda, they favor open grasslands over denser vegetation, avoiding arid scrublands or closed-canopy forests that limit visibility and forage quality. Empirical observations from tracking studies on kob subspecies show that individuals allocate 49-70% of their activity to grassland zones, particularly during wet seasons when open savannas dominate sightings. Physiological and behavioral adaptations align with these floodplain niches, including a high dependence on hydric environments that sustain green forage amid seasonal rainfall variability. Ugandan kobs tolerate periodic inundation by exploiting seasonally flooded plains, where receding waters expose fresh grasses, though they concentrate herds and leks on slightly elevated, short-grass flats to evade deep flooding and enhance anti-predator vigilance through unobstructed sightlines. This for arenas—often on raised amid grasslands—reflects an adaptive for in water-influenced ecosystems, supporting densities up to 124 individuals per km² in optimal conditions.

Ecology and behavior

Diet and foraging habits

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) is primarily graminivorous, selectively grazing on short, tender green grasses that constitute the bulk of its diet, including species such as Chloris spp., Cynodon dactylon, Panicum spp., Setaria spp., and Sporobolus pyramidalis. Sedges and herbs supplement the diet occasionally, while browsing on woody vegetation remains minimal under normal conditions. Stable carbon isotope analyses of East African bovids, including kob, classify it as a grazer with diets dominated by C4 grasses, typically comprising 70–95% of intake based on δ13C values near 0‰. Foraging occurs diurnally, with individuals prioritizing fresh regrowth in open grasslands and areas, often necessitating daily access to sources to meet hydration needs alongside metabolic from . partitioning is evident, as Ugandan kobs favor sward heights of 10–25 cm, avoiding taller grasses dominated by species like Hyparrhenia unless fresh shoots are available post-fire or rain. Seasonal variations influence composition, with wet-season diets emphasizing monocots like grasses (up to 60% in some analyses) and dry-season shifts toward increased intake for nutritional quality when grass quality declines, though dominance persists overall. and fecal studies confirm high selectivity for nutrient-rich plants, supporting efficient digestion via adapted to fibrous .

Social structure and territoriality

Ugandan kob exhibit a social organization characterized by fluid, fission-fusion herds primarily composed of females and their calves, typically ranging from 10 to 100 individuals, with group sizes varying based on resource availability and population density in Ugandan reserves such as . These herds show loose associations with rare long-term bonds between individuals, allowing subgroups to split and reform dynamically in response to needs. Non-breeding males form groups or remain solitary, segregating from herds outside of periods, which contributes to the overall dispersed at moderate densities. Territorial adult males, in contrast, establish and defend small, clustered territories within leks, typically 15 to 200 meters in diameter (approximately 0.02 to 1.3 hectares), using vocalizations such as and postural displays to signal dominance. Aggression among territorial males is largely ritualized, involving horn clashes and threats that minimize physical , promoting stability within leks where 20 to males may compete for central positions preferred by females. Field observations in Ugandan populations demonstrate high lek fidelity, with males often returning to and maintaining the same territories over multiple breeding seasons, supported by empirical counts of consistent in protected areas. This territorial system fosters low inter-male mortality despite competition, as ritualized conflicts resolve disputes without escalating to severe harm.

Mating system, lekking, and reproduction

The Ugandan kob employs a lek-based polygynous mating system, where males congregate in leks—communal arenas of small, adjacent territories—to display for females. These leks form in open, high-visibility grasslands, often near female foraging areas but separated from resources, consistent with predictions of female preference models for predation avoidance and male quality assessment. Within leks, males defend territories averaging 10-15 meters in diameter through ritualized displays, including erect posture, neck extension, and low-frequency calls, without physical combat in most cases. Females enter leks briefly, typically for 1-2 hours, to select mates based on display vigor, body size, and ; heavier, older males secure more copulations, with successful individuals up to nine times per estrus cycle across multiple females. This explosive lekking is aseasonal overall, enabling opportunistic breeding, though conception peaks coincide with the (March-May in ), when improved quality enhances female fertility and synchronizes births to the subsequent dry season's end for calf . Gestation averages 240 days, yielding a single precocial calf per female; births cluster from to following wet-season conceptions. Newborns conceal in tall grass for 4-6 weeks to evade predators, then integrate into mixed-sex herds. completes by 6 months, with attained at 15-18 months for females and 21-24 months for males, reflecting deferred male maturity tied to lek competition. Longitudinal observations in indicate robust reproductive output in protected habitats, though precise annual fawn production varies with rainfall and predation pressure.

Conservation and threats

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi), a subspecies of the kob, is classified as Least Concern (LC) on the IUCN Red List, reflecting its relatively secure status despite localized pressures. The broader kob species (K. kob) has an estimated population of 500,000 to 1,000,000 mature individuals across its range, with the Ugandan subspecies comprising a substantial portion, primarily in Uganda, northeastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan. Precise global estimates for K. kob thomasi remain unquantified by IUCN, but empirical data from Uganda indicate robust numbers concentrated in protected areas. Aerial surveys provide key quantitative insights into population sizes. In Conservation Area, a 2020 oblique camera count (OCC) survey estimated over 118,000 Ugandan kobs, more than doubling the 58,000 from a 2014 roadside observer (RSO) survey, highlighting improvements in detection via high-resolution imaging. Similar camera-assisted methods in Queen Elizabeth Protected Area (QEPA) confirm large populations, though exact figures vary by survey intensity. These metrics, derived from systematic transects and AI-enhanced processing, underscore densities up to 124 individuals per km² in optimal habitats. Population trends for the Ugandan kob are stable or slightly increasing within protected areas, supported by resilience under adequate protection and enhanced survey accuracy that reveals previously underestimated abundances. While the species overall shows a decreasing trajectory due to regional threats, no data indicate rapid declines for thomasi sufficient to elevate its risk category; instead, park-specific growth, such as in , suggests positive dynamics where habitat connectivity and monitoring persist. Local surveys, including ground counts at sites like Ziwa Rhino and Wildlife Ranch (density 13.4/km² in 2022), further affirm viability without evidencing collapse.

Major threats including poaching and habitat loss

The primary anthropogenic threat to Ugandan kob populations is habitat loss driven by , growth, and livestock grazing, which fragment floodplains and savannas essential for their grazing and lekking behaviors. In , overall wildlife habitats have experienced significant degradation, with reports indicating unprecedented levels of , , and conversion to farmland amid high human rates exceeding 3% annually. Encroaching in areas adjacent to reserves cause and , altering vegetation structure and reducing grass quality, as observed in Toro Game Reserve where such pressures contributed to shifts toward thicker cover unsuitable for kob visibility needs.84[97:CSOUKK]2.0.CO;2) Poaching represents a direct and severe threat, primarily through subsistence for and hides using snares, spears, rifles, and dogs, exploiting the species' occurrence in open habitats that facilitate detection and access. In unprotected or weakly patrolled areas like Toro Game Reserve, intensity led to a 97% from approximately 3,800 individuals in 1982 to around 100 by 1991, with ranger reports documenting frequent snare encounters and organized poacher incursions from neighboring regions. Opportunistic snaring in parks such as targets kob alongside other ungulates, with elevated episodes during periods of economic stress, including a doubling of incidents to 367 between February and May 2020 amid pandemic-related hardships. Historically, civil conflicts in and neighboring countries amplified by disrupting enforcement, though rates have moderated with improved stability.84[97:CSOUKK]2.0.CO;2) Secondary risks include transmission from domestic sharing habitats and occasional human-wildlife conflicts via damage in fringe areas, though kob's preference for natural grasslands limits raiding incidence compared to more versatile browsers. Natural predation by lions and exerts minimal pressure, with low predator densities in kob strongholds contributing less than routine sources of mortality like or floods. Poachers' use of fire to flush game or promote regrowth further exacerbates degradation, compounding loss through altered fire regimes.84[97:CSOUKK]2.0.CO;2)

Conservation measures and management

The Ugandan kob population is predominantly safeguarded within Uganda's protected areas, which encompass national parks and wildlife reserves managed by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), accounting for approximately 97% of the species' total numbers. Key habitats include , , and Kidepo Valley National Park, where habitat protection and regulated access have supported demographic stability. Anti-poaching patrols conducted by UWA and partners, such as the , focus on surveillance and rapid response in these zones, contributing to reduced illegal harvesting through deterrence and arrests, though quantitative reductions specific to kob remain context-dependent on enforcement intensity. Translocation initiatives represent targeted management actions to bolster populations in understocked reserves; for instance, UWA translocated 200 from Conservation Area to Kidepo Valley National Park starting in March 2023, building on a prior 2017 effort that increased Kidepo's kob numbers to 350–400 individuals by natural recruitment. Community-based programs, including those by the African Wildlife Foundation, promote sustainable resource use around protected areas by integrating pastoralist livelihoods with wildlife corridors, aiming to mitigate from human expansion while fostering local stewardship. Empirical data indicate conservation efficacy, with national kob estimates rising from around 40,000 in the early post-conflict period to approximately 170,000 by 2023, reflecting rebounds in park populations following intensified protections since the amid recovering governance. Persistent challenges, including subsistence and occasional ranger-poacher conflicts linked to enforcement gaps, underscore the need for sustained investment, yet these measures have maintained the ' Least Concern status under IUCN criteria through habitat security and demographic gains.

Cultural and symbolic significance

Role in Ugandan identity and symbolism

The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi) appears on Uganda's , where it supports the central shield on the dexter side alongside the , symbolizing the nation's abundant wildlife and natural resources. This emblem was officially adopted on 9 October 1963, following Uganda's independence, to represent the country's fertile lands and . The kob's inclusion underscores its role as a emblem of Uganda's ecosystems and wildlife heritage. Recognized as Uganda's national animal, the kob embodies the grace and vitality of the country's , particularly in and habitats central to Ugandan landscapes. Early European explorers, including during his 1860s expeditions tracing the Nile's source through Ugandan territories, documented encounters with antelopes, contributing to historical accounts of the region's diversity. In modern symbolism, the Ugandan kob promotes through campaigns emphasizing Uganda's protected areas, such as , where viewing leks and herds attracts visitors and highlights conservation. This portrayal reinforces the species' status as an icon of ecological richness without direct economic quantification in official records.

Interactions with human populations

Local communities in engage in subsistence bushmeat hunting of , targeting the species opportunistically for meat consumption near protected areas, though such activities remain clandestine and small-scale rather than commercially organized. This practice persists due to limited alternative protein sources in rural areas, with kob valued for their accessibility in habitats overlapping human settlements. Human-wildlife conflicts involving Ugandan kob are infrequent compared to larger species like , primarily manifesting as for lowland lands with expanding herds and . Incursions into farmlands occasionally prompt retaliatory killings, but documented cases remain rare, with kob's preference for open grasslands limiting crop damage relative to more destructive ungulates. Ecotourism provides tangible benefits, as Ugandan kob in national parks such as Queen Elizabeth and draw safari visitors to observe herds and mating leks, generating revenue that supports and reduces reliance on through job creation in guiding and park operations. Historical overhunting intensified during Uganda's political instability from 1971 to 1986, when decimated populations outside protected zones, but enforcement in parks post-1986 facilitated recoveries, fostering coexistence via economic incentives from wildlife viewing.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Kobus_kob/
  2. https://ugandawildlife.org/animals/uganda-kob/
  3. https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id33689/
  4. https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxon/1006246/
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11123612/
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12204465_Large_sequence_divergence_of_mitochondrial_DNA_genotypes_of_the_control_region_within_populations_of_the_African_antelope_kob_Kobus_kob
  7. https://karger.com/cgr/article/91/1-4/128/340731/Chromosomes-of-the-antelope-genus-Kobus
  8. https://www.academia.edu/871872/Phylogeography_Hybridization_and_Pleistocene_Refugia_of_the_Kob_Antelope_Kobus_Kob_
  9. https://www.ultimateungulate.com/Artiodactyla/Kobus_leche.html
  10. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/kob
  11. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/uganda_n
  12. https://treatment.plazi.org/GgServer/html/03F507139977FFCD0647F99EF9B5F79E/8
  13. https://seaworld.org/animals/facts/mammals/uganda-kob/
  14. https://www.ultimateungulate.com/Artiodactyla/Kobus_kob.html
  15. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5302324de4b07a6f6407cbb5/t/65fde6cc48a7d43263a2355e/1711138508492/AZA%2BReduncinae%2BHusbandry%2BManual%2B1999.pdf
  16. https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F50713-9977-FFCD-0647-F99EF9B5F79E
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3881980
  18. https://sudanarchive.net/?a=d&d=UNEP19850000-01.1.127
  19. https://animalia.bio/ugandan-kob
  20. https://pamojasafarisuganda.com/the-ugandan-kob/
  21. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6636825
  22. https://animalia.bio/index.php/kob
  23. https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-east-african-natural-history/volume-84/issue-2/0012-8317_1995_84_97_CSOUKK_2.0.CO_2/Current-Status-of-Uganda-Kob-Kobus-kob-thomasi-Neumann-in/10.2982/0012-8317%281995%2984%5B97:CSOUKK%5D2.0.CO%3B2.pdf
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367052788_Journal_of_Ecology_and_Natural_Resources_Committed_to_Create_Value_for_Researchers_The_Role_of_a_Rich_Landscape_Vegetation_on_kob_Antelope_Kobus_kob_Group_Feeding_Activity_in_Bouba_Ndjidda_National_Pa
  25. https://www.gbif.org/species/5220161
  26. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/84/2/456/2373227
  27. https://www.awf.org/wildlife-conservation/kob
  28. https://medcraveonline.com/BIJ/BIJ-05-00198.pdf
  29. https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-east-african-natural-history/volume-84/issue-2/0012-8317_1995_84_97_CSOUKK_2.0.CO_2/Current-Status-of-Uganda-Kob-Kobus-kob-thomasi-Neumann-in/10.2982/0012-8317%281995%2984%5B97:CSOUKK%5D2.0.CO%3B2.full
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2401795
  31. https://www.arcadiasafaris.com/ugandan-kob-kobus-kob-thomasi/
  32. https://repository.si.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b0105984-b1bf-4022-8cb2-6b67bfe42611/content
  33. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-abstract/3/3/223/221838
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.2307/4533158.pdf
  35. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Lek-System-in-Uganda-Kob-Antelope-Buechner-Roth/c636f9fb1e990a021c99525bb0dd09e93c7ca269
  36. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/3.3.223
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4535007
  38. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/3.2.112
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230013830_Uganda_kob_reproductive_seasonality_Optimal_calving_seasons_or_condition-dependent_oestrus
  40. https://www.savetheelephants.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2020-Lamprey-et-al-Cameras-Replace-Observers-in-Aerial-Surveys.pdf
  41. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.06.525067v1
  42. https://ziwarhinoandwildliferanch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ground-counts-for-mammals-at-ziwa-2022-03-02.pdf
  43. https://ugandawildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/State_of_Wildlife_Resources_in_Uganda_2018.pdf
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320723002483
  45. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/covid19-behind-uganda-poaching
  46. https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/8460/uganda_wildlife_assessment.pdf
  47. https://miramahillssafaris.com/the-uganda-kob-the-ugandas-national-animal/
  48. https://uganda.wcs.org/strengthing-anti-poaching-techniques-and-countering-wildlife-trafficking.aspx
  49. https://ugandawildlife.org/news/translocation-of-200-kobs-to-kidepo-commences/
  50. https://www.independent.co.ug/why-frontline-communities-have-been-central-to-ugandas-growing-wildlife-populations/
  51. https://washington.mofa.go.ug/basic-page/national-symbols
  52. https://www.ugandamission.net/aboutug/symbols.html
  53. https://loverowan.org/ugandas-national-animal-uganda-kob/
  54. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/kob-shores-of-lake-malawi-uganda-from-journal-of-the-news-photo/931909428
  55. https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/audio/exploring-uganda-s-national-symbol-the-kob-4717078
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771421000410
  57. https://sowcapi.alu.app/download/file/4615deee-b5e7-4862-8d14-866e126f8757.pdf
  58. https://www.primeugandasafaris.com/the-kob-antelope/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.