Hubbry Logo
GonochorismGonochorismMain
Open search
Gonochorism
Community hub
Gonochorism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gonochorism
Gonochorism
Gonochorism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In biology, gonochorism is a sexual system where there are two sexes and each individual organism is either male or female.[1] The term gonochorism is usually applied in animal species, the vast majority of which are gonochoric.[2]: 212–222 

Gonochorism contrasts with simultaneous hermaphroditism but it may be hard to tell if a species is gonochoric or sequentially hermaphroditic e.g. parrotfish, Patella ferruginea.[3] However, in gonochoric species individuals remain either male or female throughout their lives.[4] Species that reproduce by thelytokous parthenogenesis and do not have males can still be classified as gonochoric.[5][clarification needed]

Terminology

[edit]
Look up gonochorism, gonochory, or unisexualism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

The term is derived from Greek gone 'generation' + chorizein 'to separate'.[6] The term gonochorism originally came from German Gonochorismus.[7]

Gonochorism is also referred to as unisexualism or gonochory.

Evolution

[edit]
Main article: Evolution of sexual reproduction
For evolution of dioecy in plants, see Dioecy § Evolution of dioecy.

Gonochorism has evolved independently multiple times.[8] It is very evolutionarily stable in animals.[9] Its stability and advantages have received little attention.[10]: 46  Gonochorism owes its origin to the evolution of anisogamy,[11] but it is unclear if the evolution of anisogamy first led to hermaphroditism or gonochorism.[2]: 213 

Gonochorism is thought to be the ancestral state in polychaetes,[9]: 126  Hexacorallia,[12]: 74  nematodes,[13]: 62  and hermaphroditic fishes. Gonochorism is thought to be ancestral in hermaphroditic fishes because it is widespread in basal clades of fish and other vertebrate lineages.[14]

Two papers from 2008 have suggested that transitions between hermaphroditism and gonochorism or vice versa have occurred in animals between 10 and 20 times.[15] In a 2017 study involving 165 taxon groups, more evolutionary transitions from gonochorism to hermaphroditism were found than the reverse.[16]

Use across species

[edit]

Animals

[edit]

The term gonochorism is most often used for animal species, an estimated 95% of which are gonochoric.[17] It is very common in vertebrate species, 99% of which are gonochoric.[18][19] Ninety-eight percent of fishes are gonochoric.[20] Mammals (including humans[21][22]) and birds are solely gonochoric.[23] Tardigrades are almost always gonochoric.[24] Seventy-five percent of snails are gonochoric.[25] Most arthropods including a majority of crustaceans are gonochoric.[26][27]

In animals, sex is most often genetically determined, but may be determined by other mechanisms. For example, alligators use temperature-dependent sex determination during egg incubation.

Plants

[edit]

The term gonochorism is not usually applied to plants. Vascular plants which have single-sex individuals are called dioecious,[28] while bryophytes with single-sex individuals are dioicous.[29] In flowering plants, individual flowers may be hermaphroditic (i.e., with both stamens and ovaries) or dioecious (unisexual), having either no stamens (i.e., no male parts) or no ovaries (i.e., no female parts). Among flowering plants with unisexual flowers, some also produce hermaphrodite flowers, and the three types may occur in different arrangements on the same or separate plants. Plant species can thus be hermaphrodite, monoecious, dioecious, trioecious, polygamomonoecious, polygamodioecious, andromonoecious, or gynomonoecious.

Unlike most flatworms, schistosomes are gonochoric. The narrow female can be seen emerging from the thicker male's gynecophoral canal below his ventral sucker.

Examples of species with gonochoric or dioecious pollination include hollies and kiwifruit. In these plants the male plant that supplies the pollen is referred to as the pollenizer.

Other reproductive strategies

[edit]

Gonochorism stands in contrast to other reproductive strategies such as asexual reproduction and hermaphroditism. Closely related taxa can have differing sexual strategies – for example, the genus Ophryotrocha contains species that are gonochoric and species that are hermaphrodites.[30]

The sex of an individual may also change during its lifetime – this sequential hermaphroditism can, for example, be found in parrotfish[31][32] and cockles.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gonochorism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gonochorism is a reproductive strategy in biology characterized by the presence of two distinct sexes, male and female, where each individual organism maintains a single sex throughout its lifetime, producing only one type of gamete—either sperm or eggs. This system contrasts with hermaphroditism, in which individuals possess both male and female reproductive organs, and is the predominant form of sexual reproduction across the animal kingdom. Gonochorism, also known as in some contexts, is the ancestral and most common sexual system in animals, occurring in approximately 95% of animal , while hermaphroditism is found in only about 5%. It is particularly dominant among s, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and most amphibians, as well as in many such as and crustaceans. In fishes, which represent over half of all vertebrate , gonochorism is the likely ancestral condition and remains evolutionarily stable in the majority of lineages. The term "gonochorism" derives from the Greek words gonos () and chorizein (to separate), reflecting the separation of reproductive roles into distinct individuals. Under gonochorism, often arises, with males and females exhibiting differences in morphology, , and adapted to their respective reproductive functions, such as larger body sizes in one sex or specialized mating structures. This system facilitates through , promoting diversity, but requires mechanisms for mate location and recognition to ensure successful reproduction. Evolutionarily, gonochorism is predicted to be favored when does not vary significantly with size or age between sexes, as per models like the size-advantage hypothesis, leading to fixed sex determination at an early developmental stage. Transitions to or from gonochorism occur in various taxa, such as in certain families like Labridae, where shifts to (e.g., protogyny) evolve under specific mating systems, but gonochorism often reemerges as a stable state. In some gonochoristic species, transient hermaphroditic phases may occur early in development, hinting at evolutionary plasticity.

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

Gonochorism refers to a in which individuals are either or female throughout their entire lives, with males producing small, motile gametes () and females producing large, non-motile gametes (ova). This obligate separation of sexes ensures that requires the union of gametes from distinct individuals, distinguishing gonochorism from other reproductive strategies. Key characteristics of gonochorism include the fixed nature of an individual's post-maturity, with no capacity for sex change, and the determination of either genetically—through mechanisms such as chromosomal heterogamety (e.g., XX/XY or ZZ/ZW systems)—or environmentally, via cues like temperature or in certain species. Genetic determination often occurs at fertilization, leading to stable sex ratios in populations, while environmental influences can vary phenotypic outcomes without altering underlying . Humans and most mammals exemplify gonochoric species, where sex is genetically determined by the presence of sex chromosomes, resulting in lifelong dimorphism and gamete specialization. Unlike sequential hermaphroditism, gonochorism precludes any post-maturity transition between sexes.

Historical and Etymological Background

The term gonochorism originates from the Greek roots gonos, meaning "seed" or "offspring," and chorizein, meaning "to separate," reflecting the separation of male and female reproductive roles into distinct individuals. This etymology underscores the concept's focus on the dichotomy of sexes in reproduction. The word was first coined in German as gonochorismus by Ernst Haeckel in his 1866 treatise Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, where it was used to describe the evolutionary development of separate sexes in organisms. The English adoption of gonochorism occurred a decade later, in 1876, through E. Ray Lankester's translation of Haeckel's Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte as The History of Creation, marking its initial formal appearance in biological . This introduction aligned with Haeckel's broader phylogenetic framework, distinguishing gonochorism from hermaphroditic forms as a derived state in metazoan . Prior to this, the notion of separate sexes had been discussed in botanical contexts under the term (or ), introduced by in the 18th as Dioecia in his sexual classification system for , emphasizing unisexual individuals akin to "two houses." Over time, gonochorism evolved as a more universal term applicable across taxa, preferred in zoological contexts to distinguish from the plant-specific and facilitate comparisons beyond , while gonochoristic emerged as the adjectival form to describe or individuals exhibiting this sexual strategy. This terminological shift facilitated cross-disciplinary comparisons, though persists in to denote the same principle in flowering plants.

Evolutionary Aspects

Origins and Hypotheses

The debate surrounding the ancestral state of gonochorism centers on its likely prevalence as the primitive in numerous lineages, particularly within Metazoa, where separate sexes producing gametes represent the basal condition. This system is thought to have evolved from , the condition of morphologically similar gametes, which is accepted as the ancestral mode of in early eukaryotes. Phylogenetic reconstructions indicate that , and by extension gonochorism, arose independently multiple times from isogamous ancestors, with gonochorism dominating in animal clades due to its stability once established. A foundational hypothesis explaining the origins of gonochorism is the theory, first formalized by Parker, Baker, and Smith in 1972, which argues that disruptive selection pressures on gamete size in isogamous populations favor the divergence into small, numerous gametes optimized for and large, provisioned female gametes focused on zygote survival. This gamete dimorphism directly leads to the separation of sexes, as individuals specialize in producing one gamete type to maximize fitness under competition and trade-offs. Complementing this, the advantage posits that gonochorism emerged to promote obligatory cross-fertilization, thereby reducing and enhancing in populations vulnerable to selfing-related costs. The timeline of gonochorism's origins aligns with the early of multicellularity, with the earliest inferred evidence from and genetic data pointing to its appearance around 1 billion years ago in eukaryotic lineages transitioning to complex life forms. analyses and paleontological records, such as red algal s exhibiting (e.g., Bangiomorpha pubescens), support this estimate, indicating that and separate sexes co-evolved with the rise of multicellular organisms during the era.

Selective Pressures and Evidence

Gonochorism evolves under selective pressures that favor specialization in reproductive roles, particularly in environments where mates are abundant and competition for mating opportunities is intense. Sexual selection, including male-male competition and female choice, drives the divergence of sex-specific traits, such as elaborate courtship displays or weaponry in males, enhancing mating success for individuals optimized for one sex. Resource allocation benefits from this specialization, allowing individuals to invest energy more efficiently in either gamete production or mate acquisition rather than dividing resources between both functions, which can improve overall fitness in high-density populations. However, gonochorism incurs disadvantages in low-density populations, where the costs of mate searching—such as time, energy, and predation risk—can reduce reproductive success, favoring transitions to hermaphroditism in such contexts. Empirical evidence for these pressures comes from genetic studies demonstrating sex chromosome evolution that enforces specialization. In Drosophila melanogaster, the XY sex determination system, with recombination suppressed on the Y chromosome, leads to degeneration and sex-specific gene expression, supporting gonochoric dimorphism by limiting genetic exchange and promoting adaptation to sex-specific selective demands. Fossil records provide ancient corroboration, with gonochorism inferred in early Cambrian metazoans around 535 Ma, including priapulid worms showing paired gonads indicative of separate sexes; by 518 Ma, arthropods like Chuandianella ovata exhibit egg-brooding behaviors consistent with sex-specific parental roles. Comparative phylogenetic analyses across clades further validate gonochorism's prevalence under these pressures. Reconstructions of sexual modes indicate gonochorism as the ancestral state in major lineages, with repeated stabilizations in diverse groups like fishes and nematodes, where strata (e.g., ZZ/ZW in flatworms, X0 in roundworms) correlate with environments favoring mate competition over self-fertilization. In nematodes, multiple independent evolutions of gonochoric , involving translocations and recombination suppression, highlight adaptive responses to varying population densities and selection intensities. Mathematical models underscore the stability of gonochorism through , which predicts a 1:1 as the in dioecious populations. Under this , any deviation from equal investment in offspring incurs a fitness cost, as rarer sex individuals gain a reproductive advantage, thereby maintaining balanced ratios that sustain gonochoric systems despite fluctuating pressures.

Distribution Across Taxa

In Animals

Gonochorism is the predominant reproductive strategy across the animal kingdom, occurring in approximately 95% of animal overall, with hermaphroditism limited to about 5% of known . In vertebrates, it is nearly ubiquitous, characterizing 99% of , including all mammals and birds, where no hermaphroditic forms are known. Among , gonochorism dominates in major groups such as , which are almost exclusively gonochoric, and many crustaceans, though hermaphroditism appears more frequently in certain phyla like mollusks and annelids. Sex determination in gonochoric animals varies between genetic and environmental mechanisms. Genetic systems predominate in many lineages, such as the XY system in mammals, where the presence of the triggers male development, and the XX/XY system in insects like fruit flies. Environmental factors, particularly temperature, influence sex determination in some reptiles; for instance, in many turtle species, eggs incubated at temperatures below 28°C develop into males, while those above 31°C produce females, with intermediate temperatures yielding mixed ratios. These variations allow to diverse ecological conditions, with genetic mechanisms providing stability in stable environments and environmental cues enabling flexibility in fluctuating ones. A well-studied example of genetic sex determination is found in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, where is governed by the of X chromosomes to autosomes (X:A ). Individuals with an X:A of 1.0 (XX:AA) develop as females, while those with 0.5 (XY:AA) develop as males; the itself does not determine but is essential for male fertility. This system highlights the precision of chromosomal control in gonochoric . In high-mobility species like and mammals, gonochorism facilitates efficient mate location and , as mobile individuals can actively search for opposite- partners across large areas, reducing the risks associated with mate scarcity in sessile or low-density populations.

In Plants

In botany, gonochorism is referred to as , characterized by the presence of distinct male individuals bearing only staminate (pollen-producing) flowers and female individuals bearing only pistillate (seed-producing) flowers. This sexual system ensures by preventing self-fertilization within the same plant, promoting in populations. Dioecy occurs in approximately 6% of angiosperm species, totaling around 15,000 species, and is represented in diverse families such as Salicaceae (e.g., willows, Salix spp.) and Aquifoliaceae (e.g., holly, Ilex spp.). In gymnosperms, the prevalence is significantly higher, affecting nearly 65% of species across eight of the twelve extant families, including notable examples like the ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba). This disparity highlights dioecy's evolutionary success in seed plants with simpler reproductive structures compared to the more complex flowers of angiosperms. A key adaptation in dioecious is the spatial separation of sexes, which facilitates efficient transfer, particularly in wind-pollinated where produce abundant lightweight to reach distant females. This arrangement reduces the risk of geitonogamy ( between flowers on the same ) and aligns with abiotic vectors common in open habitats. For instance, in the (Phoenix dactylifera), a commercially vital dioecious , this separation necessitates deliberate cultivation practices, such as manual or maintaining specific male-to-female ratios in orchards, to ensure fruit yield and support global production exceeding 8 million tons annually. Such strategies underscore the economic challenges and innovations driven by in .

In Other Organisms

In fungi, particularly basidiomycetes, gonochorism manifests through systems that enforce separate sexual roles analogous to distinct sexes, preventing self-fertilization and promoting . Bipolar mating systems, common in many basidiomycete species, feature two idiomorphs () at a single locus, where compatible hyphae fuse only if they differ, leading to dikaryotic mycelia that function like contributions in producing basidiospores. This configuration evolved from tetrapolar ancestors and is exemplified in genera like , where and receptor genes regulate recognition, ensuring . Tetrapolar systems, with multiple alleles at two unlinked loci, further amplify compatibility options but maintain the gonochoric principle of non-self mating. Among , gonochorism often emerges via the transition from —where gametes are morphologically identical—to oogamy, characterized by large, non-motile gametes (oogonials) and small, motile gametes (spermatia), establishing clear . In (), particularly volvocine lineages like and , this evolutionary shift occurred multiple times, driven by size differentiation and mating-type loci (MT genes) that designate plus (male-like) and minus (female-like) strains. For instance, the volvocine model traces oogamy's origins to disruptive selection on gamete investment, with Pleodorina species showing intermediate en route to full gonochorism. (Phaeophyceae), such as Ectocarpus, exhibit UV sex chromosomes determining gonochoric gametophytes, where and individuals produce dimorphic gametes, highlighting of sex determination. Protists display gonochoric-like systems through that segregate reproductive roles, though often with isogamous gametes, differing from the typical in multicellular taxa. In like Paramecium tetraurelia, multiple (up to eight) are controlled by a polyallelic locus, where compatible pairs undergo conjugation to exchange micronuclear genomes, effectively mimicking separate sexes for without morphological dimorphism. This system, inherited cytoplasmically in some species, ensures and is induced by environmental cues like starvation, as seen in Tetrahymena. Other protists, such as certain dinoflagellates, show rare gonochorism with distinct gametes, but these are less studied compared to models. Gonochorism appears sporadically in basal metazoans beyond core animals, remaining rare in sponges (Porifera) where hermaphroditism predominates ancestrally, though some species like Geodia exhibit strict separation of and individuals producing dimorphic gametes. In cnidarians, gonochorism is more prevalent in certain octocorals and hydrozoans, such as Astroides calycularis and Corallium rubrum, where colonies develop either or gonads, releasing separate gametes for . Knowledge gaps persist in microbial gonochorism, particularly among understudied extremophiles where mating systems may adapt to harsh conditions like deep-sea pressures or hypersaline environments, but comprehensive genomic surveys remain limited. For example, piezophilic protists and fungi in extreme habitats show potential for novel sex-determining mechanisms, yet few studies integrate these with broader eukaryotic patterns.

Comparisons to Alternative Strategies

Versus Hermaphroditism

Hermaphroditism refers to a sexual system in which individuals produce both male and female gametes, either simultaneously or sequentially, contrasting with gonochorism where individuals are strictly male or female throughout their lives. Simultaneous hermaphroditism occurs when an organism possesses both functional reproductive organs at the same time, allowing it to act as both male and female during a single breeding season, as seen in earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris), which exchange sperm reciprocally during copulation. Sequential hermaphroditism, by contrast, involves a change in sex over the lifespan, such as protandry (male to female) or protogyny (female to male), enabling individuals to optimize reproductive roles at different life stages. Gonochorism offers specialization in reproductive roles, where males and females invest energy distinctly in sperm or production, potentially enhancing efficiency in gamete quality and quantity compared to the divided resources in hermaphrodites. However, hermaphroditism provides flexibility in mate availability, particularly in sparse populations, as a single individual can fertilize others or self-fertilize if needed, reducing the risk of reproductive failure due to partner scarcity. In gonochoristic systems, is inherently promoted since separate sexes must pair, fostering without the potential for selfing that can occur in hermaphrodites, though many hermaphrodites preferentially outcross to avoid . A prominent example of as an alternative to gonochorism is found in clownfish (genus Amphiprion), which exhibit protandry: all individuals are born male, but the dominant individual in a transitions to upon the death of the breeding , maximizing lifetime in anemone-bound hierarchies. Hermaphroditism tends to prevail in sessile or low-mobility species, such as or many , where finding mates is challenging, whereas gonochorism dominates in mobile taxa like most vertebrates, facilitating sex-specific mate searching and competition.

Versus Asexual Reproduction

Gonochorism, as a form of involving distinct male and female individuals, contrasts sharply with asexual strategies such as , where develop from unfertilized eggs without genetic contribution from a second parent. In parthenogenetic species like the whiptail lizards (Aspidoscelis spp.), females produce diploid eggs through a modified that doubles chromosomes, resulting in clonal that are genetically identical to the mother. Similarly, in plants, observed in over 400 species across families like and , enables seed production without fertilization, yielding embryos that are exact genetic copies of the maternal plant via unreduced embryo sacs. These asexual methods allow rapid in stable environments by eliminating the need for mates, but they forgo the inherent in gonochoric mating, where and syngamy shuffle alleles to produce diverse progeny. The genetic implications of gonochorism versus highlight the long-term advantages of recombination in combating deleterious mutations. Asexual lineages, lacking , experience progressive homozygosity, which exposes recessive harmful alleles and accelerates the fixation of mutations—a process known as . In contrast, gonochoric purges mutations through recombination and selection, maintaining heterozygosity and adaptive potential, as evidenced by lower mutation loads in sexual populations compared to parthenogenetic relatives. For instance, facultative parthenogenesis in otherwise gonochoristic whiptail (Aspidoscelis spp.) produces offspring with genome-wide homozygosity, often leading to high embryonic mortality (~39%) and malformations (e.g., 62.5% of survivors affected), thereby increasing vulnerability to environmental changes, while gonochoric systems promote variability that enhances resilience. Transitions from gonochorism to are rare and often facultative in , such as in Timema stick insects, where multiple independent shifts to have occurred, typically involving modifications that bypass . These shifts incur evolutionary costs, including reduced adaptability due to lost and slower evolution of beneficial traits, as asexual clones cannot readily combine advantageous mutations from separate lineages. In apomictic , similar transitions fix hybrid vigor short-term but lead to mutation accumulation over generations, underscoring why gonochorism persists in diverse taxa despite the twofold cost of sex.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/gonochorism
  2. https://blogs.uakron.edu/weeks/wp-content/uploads/sites/1287/2016/01/Evolution-2012.pdf
  3. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10308516
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9151764/
  5. https://books.byui.edu/Invertebrate_Life/junxwdkpny
  6. https://fishlab.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/397/2020/05/Hodge-et-al-2020.pdf
  7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90691-9
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30578-z
  9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30419-z
  10. https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1866_Haeckel_A959.2.pdf
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dioecious
  12. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/gonochorism_n
  13. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-017-1071-3
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5031617/
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/isogamy
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7998237/
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/382143a0
  18. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_305-1
  19. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01040.x
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4932193/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12407042/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5717846/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6368679/
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6707228_Animals_mix_it_up_too_The_distribution_of_self-fertilization_among_hermaphroditic_animals
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/gonochorism
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17089966/
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982212002059
  28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9989/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279756770_Reproduction
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/dioecy
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947750/
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325384769_Sexual_systems_in_gymnosperms_A_review
  33. https://www.authorea.com/users/938161/articles/1308312-contrasting-global-distributions-of-gynodioecy-and-dioecy-in-seed-plants
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/dioecy
  35. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/50600000/Products-Reprints/2011/1579.pdf
  36. https://icarda.org/research/innovations/cost-effective-liquid-pollination-technology-date-palm-production
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4566278/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2901643/
  39. https://www.davidmoore.org.uk/21st_century_guidebook_to_fungi_platinum/Ch08_05.htm
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206024547
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24589311/
  42. https://core.ac.uk/download/46810998.pdf
  43. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210220/Scientists-describe-genetic-mechanisms-behind-mating-process-of-ciliates.aspx
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6380434/
  45. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zsc.12031
  46. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49713-w
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5383831/
  48. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/7/1629
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sequential-hermaphroditism
  50. https://academic.oup.com/book/41106/chapter/350407725
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6884393_Gonochorism_vs_hermaphroditism_Relationship_between_life_history_and_fitness_in_three_species_of_Ophryotrocha_Polychaeta_Dorvilleidae_with_different_forms_of_sexuality
  52. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/376584
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35461
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10664395_Reproductive_Uncertainty_and_the_Relative_Competitiveness_of_Simultaneous_Hermaphroditism_versus_Dioecy
  55. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/how-asexual-lizard-procreates-alone/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9437720/
  57. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-019-1495-z
  58. https://elifesciences.org/articles/97035
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8865771/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.