Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to User requirements document.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
User requirements document
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2015) |
The user requirement(s) document (URD) or user requirement(s) specification (URS) is a document usually used in software engineering that specifies what the user expects the software to be able to do.
Once the required information is completely gathered it is documented in a URD, which is meant to spell out exactly what the software must do and becomes part of the contractual agreement. A customer cannot demand features not in the URD, while the developer cannot claim the product is ready if it does not meet an item of the URD.
The URD can be used as a guide for planning cost, timetables, milestones, testing, etc. The explicit nature of the URD allows customers to show it to various stakeholders to make sure all necessary features are described.
Formulating a URD requires negotiation to determine what is technically and economically feasible. Preparing a URD is one of those skills that lies between a science and an art, requiring both software technical skills and interpersonal skills.[1]
Pharmaceutical Industry Use
[edit]User Requirement Specifications (URS) are important in the pharmaceutical industry for regulatory and business purposes. URS support regulatory and business considerations for processes, equipment, and systems. For example, a business consideration could be the foot print of equipment prior to installation to ensure there is enough room. Likewise, a regulatory consideration could be the ability for the system to provide an audit trail to ensure the system meets regulatory requirements.
URS writing pitfalls
[edit]Commonly, when companies are purchasing systems, processes, and equipment - not everything is considered. URS ensure everything is considered and the supplier provides the components, features, and design required to meet the company needs. By considering more and having the components, features, and design required, the system, process, or equipment can be aligned with company interests and easily integrated.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Robertson, Suzanne; James Robertson. Mastering the Requirements Process (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN 0321815742.
External links
[edit]
 | This software-engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
User requirements document
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Definition and Overview
Definition
A user requirements specification (URS), also known as a user requirements document, is the formal documentation of a set of user requirements that provides the basis for the design and evaluation of systems and products to meet identified user needs.[8] These requirements focus on what users need to achieve their goals and tasks through interaction with the system, without prescribing technical implementation details.[8] Key characteristics of a URS include its user-centric perspective, deriving from user needs, capabilities, and operational contexts, with qualities such as completeness, consistency, verifiability, and traceability as outlined in ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018.[8] The language is typically non-technical and accessible to stakeholders, prioritizing the "what" of user expectations—such as desired outcomes and constraints—over the "how" of system development.[8] This approach ensures the document serves as a bridge between end-users and development teams, capturing expectations without delving into engineering solutions. A URS is distinct from related documents like functional specifications (FS) or design specifications, which detail the technical mechanisms and behaviors of the system to fulfill the user needs outlined in the URS.[8] While an FS specifies how functions will be implemented, the URS remains at a higher level, focusing solely on user interactions and quality criteria rather than system capabilities.[8] Examples of URS scope include defining operational needs for manufacturing equipment, such as the ability for operators to monitor production rates in real-time without specialized training, or specifying software interfaces that allow healthcare users to access patient data securely and intuitively to support clinical decisions.[9]Historical Development
The concept of the user requirements document (URS) emerged in the mid-20th century within systems engineering, particularly in response to the complexities of post-World War II aerospace and defense projects, where clear specification of stakeholder needs became essential for managing large-scale systems.[10] Early practices drew from hierarchical structuring principles outlined by Herbert A. Simon in 1962, which emphasized breaking down complex systems to incorporate user needs effectively.[11] By the 1970s, the "software crisis" highlighted in Frederick P. Brooks' 1975 work The Mythical Man-Month further underscored the need for user-focused requirements to mitigate project failures, marking a shift from machine-centric to stakeholder-centric documentation in software development.[11] Military standards significantly influenced the formalization of URS in the late 20th century, with the U.S. Department of Defense's MIL-STD-498, released in 1994, establishing uniform requirements for software development documentation, including detailed user and system requirements specifications to ensure traceability and compliance in defense projects.[12] This standard built on earlier precedents like DOD-STD-2167A from 1988, promoting structured approaches to elicit and document user needs amid growing software complexity.[13] Similarly, the IEEE Std 830-1998 provided a foundational recommended practice for software requirements specifications, outlining qualities like completeness, consistency, and verifiability for user-derived requirements, which became widely adopted in engineering disciplines.[14] In regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals, URS evolved through the adoption of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with initial regulations in 1963 expanding in the 1970s to emphasize equipment and process validation based on defined user needs.[15] By the 1980s, URS became a core document for ensuring GMP compliance in system procurement and testing, as manufacturers utilized it to specify critical operational requirements for facilities, equipment, and computerized systems.[16] This integration supported validation frameworks, including the V-model, where URS served as the basis for design qualification and performance testing.[17] The 2000s brought a shift toward agile methodologies, adapting traditional URS principles for iterative processes following the 2001 Agile Manifesto, which prioritized customer collaboration and responsive change over rigid upfront documentation.[18] In agile environments, URS concepts evolved into lightweight tools like user stories and product backlogs, maintaining core tenets of traceability and user validation while enabling continuous refinement through sprints and feedback loops.[19] This adaptation addressed the limitations of heavy documentation in dynamic projects, fostering flexibility without abandoning foundational user-centric requirements engineering.[20]Purpose and Importance
Role in Project Development
The User Requirements Document (URS), also known as User Requirements Specification, is developed during the requirements engineering phase of the project lifecycle, which precedes subsequent stages such as system design, implementation, and testing.[21] This early placement ensures that user needs are clearly defined before technical work begins, providing a structured foundation for all downstream activities in software, systems, or regulated projects.[22] As a key artifact in requirements engineering, the URS functions as a bridge between stakeholders—including end-users and clients—and technical teams, translating high-level user expectations into a shared reference that promotes alignment from project inception.[22] By documenting requirements in accessible, non-technical language, it facilitates effective communication and reduces misinterpretations that could arise later in development.[23] The URS integrates seamlessly with validation and verification processes by serving as the baseline for activities like user acceptance testing (UAT), where the system's compliance with user needs is confirmed through practical evaluation.[21] In UAT, test cases are derived directly from URS elements to verify functionality and usability against original specifications.[24] Furthermore, by identifying and prioritizing user needs early, the URS contributes to risk management in project development, helping to mitigate scope creep through established change control mechanisms that prevent uncontrolled expansions.[22] This proactive approach minimizes deviations from the intended project scope throughout the lifecycle.[25]Key Benefits
A User Requirements Document (URS) significantly reduces project costs and delays by clarifying user needs upfront, thereby minimizing the need for costly rework later in the development cycle. Studies in software engineering indicate that addressing defects during the requirements phase can be up to 100 times less expensive than fixing them after delivery, as errors propagating to later stages amplify expenses exponentially.[26] In product development contexts, early incorporation of user requirements has been shown to yield substantial cost savings, with one analysis reporting reductions by a factor of up to 1000 when issues are identified during concept phases compared to testing or production.[27] This proactive approach prevents scope creep and aligns resources efficiently from the outset. The URS enhances stakeholder communication and satisfaction by providing an explicit, documented framework for expectations, fostering alignment among users, designers, and teams. By organizing requirements in a structured manner, it serves as a clear basis for discussions, reducing misunderstandings and promoting collaborative input throughout the project.[27] Surveys of project participants reveal that 96% hold favorable views on the impact of user requirements integration, attributing improved satisfaction to better-maintained specifications and human-centered design focus.[27] In regulated fields like pharmaceuticals, the URS bolsters compliance by enabling traceability from user needs to validation protocols, which is essential for audits and regulatory adherence. It ensures that system functions align with standards such as those from the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), where requirements must be uniquely cataloged, reviewed, and free of conflicts to support data integrity and verification.[28] Furthermore, a well-defined URS facilitates informed decision-making and supports scalability for future enhancements by establishing traceable, modular requirements that guide design choices and allow for iterative expansions without overhauling foundational elements. This traceability enhances product quality and adaptability, with empirical projects showing up to a 15% increase in system requirements coverage when user needs are systematically incorporated.[27]Structure and Components
Core Elements
A User Requirements Specification (URS) document typically follows a structured format to ensure clarity and completeness in articulating user needs for a system or product. The standard structure begins with an introduction that outlines the document's purpose, scope of the system, and any exclusions, providing a foundational context for all subsequent requirements. This is followed by sections on general requirements, which address high-level user needs such as usability and operational environment, and specific user needs, which detail precise functionalities and performance expectations without delving into technical implementation. Appendices often include glossaries, references to related documents, and supporting materials like diagrams to enhance understanding.[1][29] Essential elements within a URS include clearly defined objectives that align the system with business or regulatory goals, assumptions about the operating environment or user capabilities, and constraints such as budget, timeline, or compliance mandates that limit design options. Approval signatures from stakeholders, including users, project managers, and quality assurance personnel, are typically required at the document's end to formalize commitment and enable traceability throughout the project lifecycle. These elements ensure the URS serves as a verifiable baseline for validation and verification activities.[30] Formatting best practices emphasize numbered sections and subsections for logical organization, such as using hierarchical numbering (e.g., 1.1, 1.2) to facilitate cross-referencing. Tables are commonly employed for requirements traceability, listing each requirement with attributes like ID, description, priority, and verification method, while version control details— including revision history, author, and change log—are placed on the title page or a dedicated section to track document evolution. This approach promotes unambiguous communication and supports auditability, particularly in regulated environments.[29][30] An example template outline for a URS might include:| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Introduction | Purpose, scope, and system overview, defining the intended use and high-level objectives. |
| 2. General Requirements | Broad user needs, such as environmental conditions and user interface preferences. |
| 3. Specific Requirements | Detailed performance criteria, e.g., "The system shall process 1,000 units per hour with 99% accuracy," including types like functional requirements for core operations. |
| 4. Assumptions, Constraints, and Risks | Listed assumptions (e.g., stable network connectivity), constraints (e.g., regulatory compliance), and identified risks. |
| 5. Appendices | Glossary, references, and traceability matrix. |