Hubbry Logo
Utkal CongressUtkal CongressMain
Open search
Utkal Congress
Community hub
Utkal Congress
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Utkal Congress
Utkal Congress
Utkal Congress
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Utkal Congress was a political party in the Indian state of Odisha. It was formed in 1969 when Biju Patnaik left Indian National Congress. After the 1971 Odisha elections UC took part in the Bishwanath Das ministry in the state. In 1974 Utkal Congress merged into Pragati Legislature Party which eventually merged into Bharatiya Lok Dal.

Key Information

Background

[edit]

Odisha was a stronghold of Congress in the immediate post-independence era. However factionalism was rife. A group of Congress dissidents led by Harekrushna Mahatab split in 1967 to form Jana Congress. In the 1967 general election, most of the leadership of Congress lost. In 1969 Congress split at national level forming Congress(O) and Congress(R). Biju Patnaik remained with Congress(R) which was led by Indira Gandhi. However, in 1970 Rajya sabha elections the state unit proposed a different candidate to that of the central leadership. However, in the election both candidates lost. This caused Biju Patnaik led group to sever all the ties from the central leadership. Initially named as Utkal Pradesh Congress, the group ultimately chose Utkal Congress as their name with Biju Patnaik, Rabi Ray along with securing support from two former Chief Ministers of Odisha - Harekrushna Mahtab, R.N.Singh Deo (Swatantra Party) & the Samyukta Socialist Party whose state unit merged into the Utkal Congress in 1972 following the SSP's dissolution.[1][2]

Electoral history

[edit]

Biju Patnaik resigned from Congress(R) on 6 April 1970. Following that he along with his colleagues Nilamani Routray formed the state based party in the model of DMK. This fledgling party Fought its first election soon after in 1971 General elections. It secured 24% votes and 32 seats.[3] It formed a coalition with Swatantra Party and formed a government under leadership Bishwanath Das. This government did not last for long and few of the Utkal Congress members wanted to go back to Congress(I) (Congress(R) had named itself Congress (I) at this point). So a Congress(I) government under the leadership of Nandini Satpathy formed. However this government did not last long either. There was an election in 1974 to Odisha legislature. Utkal Congress formed a coalition with Swatatantra party and a group of Congress (I) members led by Harekrushna Mahtab called Pragati Legislature party. In the election Utkal Congress slightly increased it tally to 35 seats. However Congress won the majority. At the end of 1974 all the constituents of Pragati Legislature party merged with Charan Singh led Bharatiya Lok Dal.[4]

References

[edit]

See also

[edit]


Stub icon

This article about an Indian political party is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Utkal Congress

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Utkal Congress was a regional in the Indian state of , founded in 1969 by Bijayananda Patnaik after his resignation from the amid disagreements with its central leadership. Led by Patnaik, a charismatic industrialist and aviator known for his developmental vision, the party positioned itself as an alternative to Congress dominance by emphasizing state-specific economic growth, infrastructure projects, and opposition to perceived over-centralization of power from . Active primarily in the early , Utkal contested assembly elections, secured legislative seats, and played a key role in non- coalition governments, including alliances with parties like Swatantra and Jana to challenge the ruling party's hold on . Its platform focused on pragmatic governance and regional empowerment, reflecting Patnaik's influence as a proponent of rapid industrialization, though it faced internal factionalism and electoral limitations against entrenched opponents. The party's independent run ended in 1974 when it merged into the Pragati Legislature Party, which subsequently integrated into the national as part of broader anti- opposition efforts ahead of the post-Emergency elections. This merger underscored Utkal 's transitional role in 's shifting political landscape, paving the way for Patnaik's later national alignments and enduring legacy in regional .

Origins and Formation

Political Context in Late 1960s Odisha

In the late 1960s, faced severe economic stagnation, marked by low per capita income growth and agricultural underperformance amid recurrent droughts in 1965–1966 and 1966–1967 that heightened risks for its predominantly rural population. Despite possessing abundant mineral resources such as , , and —accounting for a significant share of 's reserves—the state derived limited benefits due to underdeveloped and extractive practices that prioritized raw exports over local . The central government's freight equalization policy, implemented since 1952, equalized transportation costs for minerals across , effectively subsidizing industries in other regions at Odisha's expense and stifling incentives for beneficiation industries in the state. Central funding allocations remained inadequate for Odisha's developmental needs, with the 1968–1969 state budget noting shortfalls in support for critical projects like the Balimela Dam and expressways, despite appeals to . This fiscal neglect compounded perceptions of inequity, as the state's mineral royalties and contributions to national coffers failed to translate into proportionate investments in local , power, or industrialization, leaving Odisha's vulnerable to external shocks. Under Indira Gandhi's leadership following her ascension as prime minister in January 1966, the pursued greater centralization, exemplified by the 1967 Ten Point Programme that emphasized national-level economic controls and reduced state autonomy in policy execution. This shift amplified regional grievances in , where local elites and the emerging increasingly viewed the INC as prioritizing Delhi-centric agendas over Odia-specific priorities like linguistic-cultural preservation and equitable resource distribution. The 1967 state assembly elections underscored these INC vulnerabilities nationwide, including in , as anti-Congress coalitions capitalized on dissatisfaction with centralized governance and perceived indifference to subnational identities. Such sentiments fueled a nascent regionalism, manifesting in demands for greater state-level agency amid the INC's faltering hegemony.

Biju Patnaik's Departure from Indian National Congress

Biju Patnaik, a longtime member of the since the independence movement, demonstrated loyalty through roles such as Chief Minister of Odisha from June 1961 to October 1963 and subsequent parliamentary positions. Following the 1969 Congress split, Patnaik aligned with Indira Gandhi's faction, known as Congress(R), viewing it as more progressive amid the old guard's resistance. Tensions arose from Gandhi's increasing centralization of power, which Patnaik perceived as undermining regional autonomy in state , including interference in Odisha's internal affairs such as selections for elections. This was exemplified by conflicts during the 1970 Rajya Sabha polls in , where opposition to the central high command's official highlighted eroding federal principles and the prioritization of national dictates over local dynamics. On April 6, 1970, formally resigned from (R), citing grievances against Gandhi's authoritarian leadership style, described by contemporaries as "naked bossism" that alienated pragmatic regional leaders seeking greater state-level independence. This departure reflected broader causal pressures within the party, where Gandhi's post-split maneuvers, including policies like bank nationalization in 1969, shifted toward populist central control, prompting figures like —who favored industrial development and federal flexibility—to break away rather than acquiesce to diminishing regional influence. The high command responded by suspending and supporters on May 24, 1970, underscoring the irreconcilable rift over party autonomy.

Party Establishment in 1969

The Utkal Congress was formally established in 1969 by as a regional political outfit in , shortly after his rift with the over disagreements including the 1969 presidential election candidacy and opposition to central directives overriding state autonomy. Patnaik, a former Congress stalwart and Odisha's chief minister from 1961 to 1963, positioned the new party to challenge the national Congress's hegemony by channeling regional grievances into organized political action. The party's nomenclature drew from "Utkal," the ancient term denoting the glorious or exalted land historically associated with the core Odia-speaking territories that evolved into modern , thereby evoking cultural continuity and subnational identity as a counter to pan-Indian party structures. This naming underscored an intent to rally Odia elites around heritage-based assertions distinct from national narratives. Rapid organizational buildup ensued through enlisting approximately 20-30 initial defectors from ranks, alongside independents and minor party affiliates, targeting coastal notables frustrated by Delhi's micromanagement of state units and ticket allocations. These recruits formed the core cadre, enabling swift district-level committees by late to propagate against "rubber-stamp" provincial branches subservient to national high command. Foundational aims prioritized devolved governance for Odisha-specific advancement, including accelerated local industrialization via public-private ventures and agrarian enhancements suited to the state's , over centrally dictated socialist frameworks that critiqued for neglecting regional variances. 's emphasis on empirical, outcome-oriented policies—rooted in his prior administrative experience—sought to foster Odia and cultural assertion, as articulated in early party communications decrying uniform national planning's inefficiencies for peripheral states.

Leadership and Ideology

Prominent Leaders and Organizational Setup

founded the Utkal Congress in 1969 and functioned as its chief strategist and dominant figure, leveraging his industrialist ventures, aviation expertise, and prior national prominence—including terms as Odisha's from 1961 to 1963 and Union Minister of Steel and Mines—to direct party efforts. His leadership attracted defectors from the , particularly local politicians and legislators aligned with his faction, who provided grassroots backing but remained secondary to Patnaik's personal authority. The party's organizational structure was rudimentary and decentralized, lacking a robust bureaucratic framework and instead relying on Patnaik's informal networks of Odia regional loyalists and district-level coordination modeled loosely after patterns, prioritizing charismatic mobilization over institutionalized hierarchy. This setup facilitated opportunistic recruitment, assembling a cadre of supporters rapidly after formation through Patnaik's influence, though it underscored the absence of enduring institutional depth beyond his stature.

Core Ideological Positions and Policy Priorities

The Utkal Congress espoused a blend of and , prioritizing equitable resource distribution across Indian states while advocating for enhanced autonomy for to address its developmental disparities. Party founder critiqued the Indian National 's centralized approach, arguing in a letter to president that state units were reduced to "mere rubber stamps," undermining local decision-making in a diverse . This stance reflected a causal view that uniform national policies, including of key industries, failed to account for Odisha's mineral wealth—such as and deposits—resulting in revenue outflows without commensurate , leaving the state underdeveloped despite its resource endowments. The party's regionalism sought empowerment through decentralized governance, enabling tailored economic strategies rather than a one-size-fits-all model, though it risked fostering parochial interests over national cohesion. Policy priorities centered on pragmatic industrialization to leverage Odisha's natural assets, exemplified by commitments to establish steel plants and ancillary industries for job creation and value addition. Patnaik's vision, embodied in the party's platform, included laying foundations for a second facility immediately upon forming coalitions, aiming to integrate local minerals into hubs like for iron, , and refineries. Agricultural reforms emphasized productivity enhancements via and cooperative models, drawing from socialist principles but adapted to Odisha's agrarian base, contrasting with Congress's broader that prioritized central control over state-specific incentives. These positions underscored a first-principles emphasis on empirical outcomes—local control yielding faster growth in resource-dependent economies—over ideological uniformity, positioning Utkal Congress as a defender of federal equity against perceived central neglect.

Electoral Engagements

1971 Odisha Legislative Assembly Elections

The Utkal Congress made its electoral debut in the 1971 Odisha Legislative Assembly elections, held between 10 and 15 March following a brief period of President's rule imposed on 1 January 1971 due to the collapse of the prior coalition government. The party, led by Biju Patnaik, positioned itself as a regional alternative emphasizing Odisha's developmental needs amid dissatisfaction with the Indian National Congress (INC) administration, which had faced internal strife and governance critiques after the 1967 polls. Patnaik personally contested from four assembly constituencies—Choudwar, Cuttack City, Jajpur, and Kendrapara—along with the Cuttack Lok Sabha seat, aiming to leverage his stature as a former chief minister and industrialist to rally anti-INC sentiment. Despite Patnaik's losses in all five contests, the party's candidates demonstrated competitive vote shares in several areas, reflecting pockets of voter support for localized leadership over national party dominance. Utkal Congress secured 33 seats in the 140-member assembly, capturing a substantial share of votes primarily in coastal and central districts where Patnaik's influence was strongest. This performance, while falling short of a plurality, underscored emerging voter fatigue with INC rule, evidenced by the party's reduced tally to 51 seats from 68 in 1967, amid allegations of and policy stagnation under Biswanath Dash. The results fragmented the opposition, with the gaining 36 seats, preventing any single party from reaching the 71-seat majority threshold and resulting in a hung assembly. Utkal Congress's gains highlighted the viability of regional parties in channeling grievances against centralized INC control, particularly on issues like industrial growth and state autonomy, though its limited alliances with other non-Congress groups diluted the overall anti-INC consolidation. The election outcome validated Utkal Congress as a credible challenger to INC hegemony in , with its 33 seats representing a breakthrough for a nascent outfit formed just two years prior, drawing defectors and independents disillusioned by national infighting post-1969 split. However, the party's fragmented opposition strategy, lacking broader coordination with entities like Swatantra, allowed INC to retain influence despite its plurality shortfall, illustrating causal limits of localized campaigns without unified anti-incumbent fronts. Empirical data from constituency-level results showed Utkal candidates polling respectably—often 20-30% in contested seats—but personal setbacks for underscored the challenges of multi-seat bidding under India's then-permissive rules, later restricted by amendments. This debut affirmed regionalism's electoral appeal amid INC's perceived overreach, setting precedents for 's multipolar politics.

Post-1971 Coalitions and Further Contests

Following the 1971 Odisha Legislative Assembly elections, which produced a hung assembly with the winning 51 seats out of 140—short of the majority mark—Utkal Congress, securing 32 seats, entered a coalition with the (36 seats) and Jana Congress to oust Congress from power. This United Front government, led by Swatantra's Biswanath Das as , was sworn in on April 3, 1971, marking Utkal Congress's brief entry into executive power-sharing amid Odisha's pattern of unstable post-poll arrangements. The Das ministry endured until June 14, 1972, a tenure plagued by internal frictions within the and relentless opposition, ultimately collapsing without delivering a alternative to single-party rule. Utkal Congress's involvement exposed the Indian National 's vulnerabilities in commanding undivided legislative support, yet also revealed the 's limitations in governance cohesion, as no non- alliance mustered an absolute majority. During this interval, Utkal Congress leaders emphasized pragmatic policy implementation, including industrial revival pledges, while leveraging their ministerial roles to critique -era administrative lapses. In the intervening by-elections, Utkal Congress expanded its assembly strength to 36 seats by 1971, sustaining legislative relevance through targeted campaigns against and inefficiency in prior administrations. Approaching the 1974 polls amid escalating national political flux under Indira Gandhi's central leadership, Utkal Congress pursued tactical alignments with Swatantra and Socialist parties, prefiguring a unified opposition front, but these maneuvers yielded no decisive electoral breakthrough and highlighted regional outfits' dependence on fluid partnerships for viability. The party's anti-corruption stance resonated in local contests, yet broader suppression of dissent by authorities curtailed opposition momentum, reinforcing the structural barriers to regional dominance without national-scale coalitions.

Controversies and Challenges

Internal Divisions and Accusations of Opportunism

The 1971 coalition government in , comprising Utkal Congress, , and Jana Congress, faced instability due to defections and internal pressures within alliance partners. By early 1972, several Utkal Congress members defected to (R), contributing to the collapse of the coalition and enabling (R) to form a government with external support. These defections were driven by ambitions for ministerial positions and stability, highlighting rifts over loyalty to the regional party's anti- stance versus immediate access to power. Biju Patnaik's strategy of flexible alliances and periodic merger discussions, including pre-1977 talks toward a national opposition front, drew accusations of opportunism from both within the party and external critics. Detractors, particularly left-leaning factions within the , portrayed Utkal Congress as an elite-led diversion from socialist priorities, emphasizing Patnaik's industrial background and the party's focus on regional over class-based reforms. In response, proponents cited the party's empirical success in amplifying Odisha-specific grievances—such as neglect of state resources and over-centralization under Indira Gandhi's Congress—which national platforms had sidelined, evidenced by Utkal Congress securing 32 seats (23% vote share) in the 1971 assembly elections despite limited resources. Supporters underscored the party's cohesion during the 1975–1977 , when Patnaik's imprisonment failed to dismantle its organizational structure, allowing it to align with broader anti-authoritarian efforts culminating in the 1977 merger into the . Critics, however, pointed to the party's brief existence (1969–1977) and reliance on Patnaik's personal charisma as indicators of underlying ideological fragility, arguing that without a robust beyond regionalism, it succumbed to pragmatic dissolution rather than principled endurance. This debate reflects tensions between adaptability in a faction-prone political landscape and perceptions of power-driven expediency.

Conflicts with National Congress Leadership

Biju Patnaik's formation of the Utkal Congress stemmed from escalating tensions with the high command, particularly over perceived authoritarian control exerted by Prime Minister following the party's 1969 split. Patnaik, initially aligned with Gandhi's Congress(R) faction after supporting in the against the official Congress(O) nominee , soon criticized the leadership's centralizing tendencies, viewing them as undermining regional autonomy in candidate selection and policy implementation. This friction intensified during negotiations for Odisha's seats, where Patnaik accused the high command of dictatorial interference in state-level decisions, prompting his public defiance. On April 6, 1970, Patnaik formally resigned from Congress(R), citing "naked bossism" and the imposition of central directives that sidelined local leaders like himself, who had been denied a Rajya Sabha nomination despite his stature as a former chief minister. The high command responded by suspending Patnaik and several followers on May 24, 1970, a move that Patnaik framed as evidence of Gandhi's intolerance for dissent within state units, exacerbating clashes over federalism. These events highlighted causal dynamics of power centralization, where the national leadership prioritized loyalty to Gandhi over regional power bases, leading to purges of Patnaik-aligned figures in Odisha's Congress apparatus to consolidate control ahead of the 1971 elections. The Utkal Congress's emergence galvanized opposition to central overreach, drawing defectors and independents who shared Patnaik's advocacy for greater state fiscal and administrative autonomy, yet it also exposed vulnerabilities in challenging the INC's organizational machinery. While the split accelerated internal INC realignments in —evident in the high command's endorsement of compliant state leaders—it failed to translate into immediate electoral dominance for Utkal Congress, which secured only a fraction of seats in the March 1971 assembly polls amid INC's national wave. Patnaik's maneuvers, including alliances with non-Congress groups, underscored legal and political tactics like floor tests and no-confidence motions to contest central-backed governments, though these yielded limited success without broader defections. This period thus revealed the high command's strategy of weakening regional challengers through disciplinary actions, prioritizing national cohesion over federal pluralism.

Dissolution and Enduring Impact

Mergers and Dissolution in the Mid-1970s

In the wake of the mid-term , the Utkal Congress underwent a partial merger into the Pragati Legislature Party (PLP), a coalition entity led by that captured significant legislative representation and elevated him to the position of from March 19, , to March 24, 1977. This reorganization consolidated fragmented opposition elements amid escalating political fragmentation, enabling a unified front against the ruling (INC)'s entrenched dominance, which had repeatedly stifled regional challengers through superior organizational resources and electoral machinery. On December 10, 1974, the Pragati Legislature Party formally rebranded as the (BLD) Legislative Party, aligning Utkal Congress factions with Charan Singh's national agrarian-focused outfit to amplify anti-INC momentum. This step was precipitated by acute survival imperatives: standalone regional parties like Utkal Congress faced electoral marginalization against INC's statewide apparatus, necessitating broader alliances to pool voter bases and logistical support without diluting core regional advocacy entirely. from prior contests underscored this causal dynamic, as isolated opposition efforts had yielded , prompting pragmatic absorption over ideological isolation. The 1975 Emergency imposed by intensified these pressures, catalyzing nationwide opposition convergence under Jayaprakash Narayan's (JP) movement, in which participated as a key underground leader. Post-Emergency, on March 31, 1977, the BLD—incorporating Utkal Congress remnants—fully amalgamated into the alongside Congress (O) and socialist factions, forging an anti-INC bloc for the general elections. This dissolution averted outright extinction but entailed forfeiting independent regional identity, as the merger prioritized electoral viability through unified anti-authoritarian fronts over parochial purity, reflecting a calculated response to INC's systemic advantages in patronage and mobilization. By mid-1977, no autonomous Utkal Congress structure persisted, its cadre and infrastructure subsumed into the Janata framework.

Legacy in Odisha's Regional Politics

The Utkal Congress, through its emphasis on regional development and fiscal autonomy under Biju Patnaik's leadership, laid ideological groundwork for successor entities, including the (BJD) founded in 1997 by Patnaik's son . Patnaik prioritized infrastructure projects like the Paradip Port expansion and industrial growth, advocating greater state-level resource control to counter central dominance, a stance echoed in BJD's sustained focus on Odisha-specific economic policies. Following its 1977 merger into the , the party's regionalist ethos persisted through Patnaik's later affiliations, contributing to BJD's electoral framework that prioritized federal decentralization over national party hierarchies. By securing 33 seats in the 1971 Odisha Assembly elections and joining a coalition with Swatantra and parties, Utkal Congress empirically disrupted the Indian National 's post-independence monopoly, enabling non- administrations that alternated power through the 1970s and beyond. This shift manifested in 's political pattern of 23 chief ministers across 14 assembly elections from 1952 to 2014, with absolute majorities rare outside select years like 1977 and 1980. The party's coalitions normalized regional alternatives, debunking assumptions of inevitable dominance by demonstrating viable decentralized governance models tailored to local priorities such as industrial self-reliance. Critics attribute to Utkal Congress a contribution to short-term political instability, as its alliance-dependent model exacerbated hung assemblies and frequent government changes in the 1970s, with no single party achieving majority in most post-1971 polls until later stabilizations. However, this legacy proved causally formative for enduring regional success, as seen in BJD's 2000 coalition victory yielding 106 seats and subsequent solo dominance, reflecting effective policy execution under Patnaik heirs that prioritized development continuity over transient opportunism. While some analyses highlight risks of personality-driven regionalism, empirical outcomes under BJD—marked by prolonged tenure and infrastructure gains—underscore Utkal Congress's role in fostering resilient, non-nationalist power structures.

References

  1. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2015/feb-mar/engpdf/14-22.pdf
  2. https://m.thewire.in/article/politics/odisha-biju-janata-dal-naveen-patnaik-success
  3. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/2/15817.pdf
  4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41854972
  5. https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/download/9610/19023/47522
  6. https://ola.addsofttech.com/DocumentDetails/historicalbackground/historical-background.pdf
  7. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2016/December/engpdf/34-35.pdf
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3106588
  9. https://academic.oup.com/book/26017/chapter/193894364
  10. https://budget.odisha.gov.in/uploadDocuments/budget-speech-english/1968-69-English.pdf
  11. https://pubs.sciepub.com/jbms/2/3A/6/index.html
  12. https://lotusarise.com/indira-gandhi-ira-upsc/
  13. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1967/3/11/the-rout-of-the-congress-party/
  14. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907T17.pdf
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/21/world/biju-patnaik-81-daring-pilot-patriot-of-india.html
  16. https://www.kalingafoundationtrust.com/website/biju-patnaik-profile.htm
  17. https://ia801500.us.archive.org/14/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.121216/2015.121216.The-Congress-Splits_text.pdf
  18. https://www.dailypioneer.com/2021/state-editions/biju-patnaik-laid-blueprint-of-new-odisha.html
  19. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2011/Feb-Mar/engpdf/19-27.pdf
  20. https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30244700.ece
  21. https://nationaltoday.com/odisha-day/
  22. http://www.kalingafoundationtrust.com/website/biju-patnaik-profile.htm
  23. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/orissareview/Feb-March2006/engpdf/Biju_patnaik_the_unique.pdf
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41852104
  25. https://cess.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CESS-Working-Paper-No.127.pdf
  26. https://www.elections.in/orissa/assembly-constituencies/1971-election-results.html
  27. https://www.theindiaforum.in/politics/naveen-patnaiks-odisha-2000-2024
  28. https://assembly.odisha.gov.in/Details.aspx?page=ChiefMinister/Late%20Biswanath%20Das.HTML
  29. https://www.journalofpoliticalscience.com/uploads/archives/6-2-1-681.pdf
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41855700
  31. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2022/April/engpdf/page55-61.pdf
  32. https://assembly.odisha.gov.in/Details.aspx?page=LeaderOfOppositionHtmlPages/Late%20Biju%20Patnaik.HTML
  33. https://www.indiatoday.in/india-today-insight/story/from-the-india-today-archives-1993-why-biju-patnaik-was-called-the-bull-of-kalinga-2688718-2025-03-04
  34. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/dominance-of-regional-parties-in-orissa/story-e0OlYAR51lt0q06Rvbd9RL.html
  35. https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/view/9610
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.