Hubbry Logo
Venous returnVenous returnMain
Open search
Venous return
Community hub
Venous return
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Venous return
Venous return
Venous return
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Venous return is the rate of blood flow back to the heart. It normally limits cardiac output.

Superposition of the cardiac function curve and venous return curve is used in one hemodynamic model.[1]

Physiology

[edit]

Venous return (VR) is the flow of blood back to the heart. Under steady-state conditions, venous return must equal cardiac output (Q), when averaged over time because the cardiovascular system is essentially a closed loop. Otherwise, blood would accumulate in either the systemic or pulmonary circulations. Although cardiac output and venous return are interdependent, each can be independently regulated.

The circulatory system is made up of two circulations (pulmonary and systemic) situated in series between the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV). Balance is achieved, in large part, by the Frank–Starling mechanism. For example, if systemic venous return is suddenly increased (e.g., changing from upright to supine position), right ventricular preload increases leading to an increase in stroke volume and pulmonary blood flow. The left ventricle experiences an increase in pulmonary venous return, which in turn increases left ventricular preload and stroke volume by the Frank–Starling mechanism. In this way, an increase in venous return can lead to a matched increase in cardiac output.

Venous return curve

[edit]
The horizontal axis of Guyton diagram represents right atrial pressure or central venous pressure, and the vertical axis represents cardiac output or venous return. The red curve sloping upward to the right is the cardiac output curve, and the blue curve sloping downward to the right is the venous return curve. A steady state is formed at the point where the two curves meet.
Trend of central venous pressure as a consequence of variations in cardiac output. The three functions indicate the trend in physiological conditions (in the centre), in those of decreased preload (e.g. in hemorrhage, bottom curve) and in those of increased preload (e.g. following transfusion, top curve).
The cardiac function curve expresses how systemic flow changes as a function of the central venous pressure; it represents the Frank-Starling mechanism. The vascular function curve expresses how "central venous pressure" changes as a function of "systemic flow". Note that, for cardiac function curve, "central venous pressure" is the independent variable and "systemic flow" is the dependent variable; for vascular function curve, the opposite is true.
Venous return curves showing the normal curve when the mean systemic filling pressure (Psf) is 7 mm Hg and the effect of altering the Psf to 3.5, 7, or 14 mm Hg.

Hemodynamically, venous return (VR) to the heart from the venous vascular beds is determined by a pressure gradient (venous pressure - right atrial pressure) and venous resistance (RV). Therefore, increases in venous pressure or decreases in right atrial pressure or venous resistance will lead to an increase in venous return, except when changes are brought about by altered body posture. Although the above relationship is true for the hemodynamic factors that determine the flow of blood from the veins back to the heart, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that blood flow through the entire systemic circulation represents both the cardiac output and the venous return, which are equal in the steady-state because the circulatory system is closed. Therefore, one could just as well say that venous return is determined by the mean aortic pressure minus the mean right atrial pressure, divided by the resistance of the entire systemic circulation (i.e., the systemic vascular resistance).[2]

It is often suggested that venous return dictates cardiac output, effected through the Frank Starling mechanism. However, as noted above it is clear that, equally, cardiac output must dictate venous return since over any period of time both must necessarily be equal. Similarly, the concept of mean systemic filling pressure, the hypothetical driving pressure for venous return, is difficult to localise and impossible to measure in the physiological state. Furthermore, the ohmic formulation used to describe venous return ignores the critical venous parameter of venous capacitance. It is confusion about these terms that has led some physiologists to suggest that the emphasis on 'venous return' be turned instead to more measurable and direct influences on cardiac output such as end diastolic pressure and volume which can be causally related to cardiac output and through which the influences of volume status, venous capacitance, ventricular compliance and venodilating therapies can be understood.[3]

Factors affecting venous return

[edit]
  1. Skeletal muscle pump: Contractions of skeletal musculature during physical activity compress capacitive vessels (including those of the abdominal cavity), promoting venous return.[4]
  2. Decreased venous capacitance: Sympathetic activation of veins decreases venous compliance, increases vasomotor tone, increases central venous pressure and promotes venous return indirectly by augmenting cardiac output through the Frank-Starling mechanism, which increases the total blood flow through the circulatory system.
  3. Intrathoracic pressure: Pressure outside the heart directly affects cardiac output. Cyclical decreases and increases in intrapleural pressure (about ±2 mm Hg during normal breathing, but significantly more in certain conditions) alternately promote and hamper venous return during inspiration and expiration, respectively. Breathing against a negative pressure promotes venous returns, and breathing against a positive pressure impairs it. Opening the thoracic cage and cardiac tamponade likewise impair it.[4]
  4. Respiratory pump: During inspiration, the intrathoracic pressure is negative (suction of air into the lungs), and abdominal pressure is positive (compression of abdominal organs by diaphragm). This makes a pressure gradient between the infra- and supradiaphragmatic parts of v. cava inferior, "pulling" the blood towards the right atrium and increasing venous return.
  5. Vena cava compression: An increase in the resistance of the vena cava, as occurs when the thoracic vena cava becomes compressed during a Valsalva maneuver or during late pregnancy, decreases return.
  6. Gravity: The effects of gravity on venous return seem paradoxical because when a person stands up, hydrostatic forces cause the right atrial pressure to decrease and the venous pressure in the dependent limbs to increase. This increases the pressure gradient for venous return from the dependent limbs to the right atrium; however, venous return actually decreases. The reason for this is when a person initially stands, cardiac output and arterial pressure decrease (because right atrial pressure falls). The flow through the entire systemic circulation falls because arterial pressure falls more than right atrial pressure; therefore, the pressure gradient driving flow throughout the entire circulatory system is decreased.
  7. Pumping action of the heart: During the cardiac cycle right atrial pressure changes alter central venous pressure (CVP), because there is no valve between the heart's atria and the large veins. CVP reflects right atrial pressure. Therefore, right atrial pressure also alters venous return.

Somewhat counterintuitively, during strenuous exercise, right atrial pressure barely changes in healthy individuals and in fact often decreases in athletic individuals who are well able to accommodate the increased throughput of the heart. Contrastingly, in individuals with impaired heart function, right atrial pressure may increase markedly even upon moderate exertion.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Venous return

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Venous return refers to the flow of from the systemic venous network back to the right atrium of the heart, which in steady state equals . This process is fundamental to , as it determines cardiac preload and directly influences the heart's ability to pump effectively via the Frank-Starling mechanism. Venous return is driven primarily by the between systemic filling —the average in the systemic circulation when the heart is stopped—and right atrial . Several key physiological mechanisms facilitate venous return to counteract the low pressure in veins and ensure efficient blood flow. The skeletal muscle pump involves contraction of muscles, particularly in the legs, which compresses veins and propels toward the heart, aided by one-way venous valves that prevent . The respiratory pump enhances return during inspiration by decreasing intrathoracic , which expands the thoracic veins and draws into the chest while increasing abdominal to squeeze abdominal veins. Additionally, venous tone, regulated by activity, constricts veins to reduce vascular capacitance and increase . Factors affecting venous return include , vascular compliance, gravitational effects (such as posture), and external influences like positive ventilation, which can impede flow by elevating right atrial . In clinical contexts, disruptions in venous return—such as from , , or —can lead to reduced and hemodynamic instability, underscoring its critical role in maintaining circulatory .

Fundamentals

Definition and Basic Concepts

Venous return refers to the volume of blood flowing back to the heart per unit time through the superior and inferior vena cavae, typically measured in liters per minute and equivalent to cardiac output under steady-state conditions. This process is essential for maintaining the balance of blood flow in the circulatory system, as any imbalance can impair cardiac filling and overall perfusion. In contrast to arterial flow, which is propelled by high-pressure ejection from the heart into a low-compliance arterial tree, venous return occurs in a low-pressure, high-compliance system where veins act as capacitance vessels, holding approximately 70% of total blood volume to buffer fluctuations in circulation. Venous blood, deoxygenated and nutrient-depleted from peripheral tissues, returns to the right atrium at pressures generally ranging from 0 to 8 mmHg, facilitating efficient drainage without requiring forceful propulsion. This mechanism closes the circulatory loop by linking the systemic circulation—where blood delivers oxygen and nutrients to tissues—with the pulmonary circulation, ensuring continuous blood renewal through the lungs. The foundational understanding of venous return originated in the 17th century with William Harvey's "Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus" (1628), which demonstrated that blood circulates unidirectionally, returning to the heart via veins rather than dissipating peripherally as previously thought. Quantitative assessment advanced in the 20th century through , first performed by in 1929, enabling direct measurements of venous pressures and flows to evaluate circulatory dynamics.

Physiological Role

Venous return plays a pivotal role in sustaining by ensuring that the volume of blood delivered to the heart equals the volume ejected in steady-state conditions. This equivalence is fundamental to cardiovascular function, as any imbalance would disrupt circulatory equilibrium. Through this mechanism, venous return determines preload—the that distends ventricular walls—thereby activating the Frank-Starling law, where increased preload enhances and to match venous inflow without excessive pressure buildup. The venous system's high compliance integrates seamlessly with the circulatory network, housing approximately 70% of total blood volume compared to the arteries' relative stiffness, which allows it to act as a reservoir while facilitating efficient return to the heart. This compliance prevents pathological venous pooling, especially in gravitational stress like upright posture, by promoting steady flow that avoids stagnation in capacitance vessels. Such integration maintains overall blood distribution, countering the arteries' role in pressure propagation and ensuring balanced perfusion across vascular beds. In terms of , venous return regulates systemic indirectly via its effect on , which detect as changes in arterial stretch to trigger reflexive adjustments in and tone. This loop stabilizes pressure fluctuations arising from activity or posture changes. Furthermore, by sustaining at 0 to 6 mmHg, venous return ensures sufficient right atrial filling for left ventricular output, thereby supporting consistent organ and preventing hypovolemia-induced compromise.

Mechanisms Promoting Venous Return

Skeletal Muscle Pump

The skeletal muscle pump serves as the primary active mechanism for enhancing venous return, particularly through contractions in the limbs and abdomen that compress embedded veins, thereby propelling blood centrally toward the heart. This compression generates localized pressure gradients that drive unidirectional flow, which is further supported by venous valves that close to prevent retrograde movement during muscle relaxation. The process is most pronounced in the lower extremities, where rhythmic contractions during locomotion or exercise efficiently displace venous blood volume. Anatomically, the pump relies on the deep venous system within the calf and muscles, with the calf often termed the "second heart" for its pivotal role in counteracting gravitational pooling of blood in the upright posture. Contractions of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, for instance, surround and squeeze the posterior tibial and peroneal veins, while and hamstrings act similarly on femoral veins, facilitating ascent of blood through the popliteal and iliac systems. Activation of the skeletal muscle pump during exercise markedly amplifies venous return compared to rest, with contractions capable of emptying over 40% of intramuscular venous blood volume per cycle, thereby sustaining cardiac preload amid heightened metabolic demands.

Respiratory Pump

The respiratory pump mechanism enhances venous return through cyclic changes in intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressures during breathing. During inspiration, the diaphragm descends and the chest wall expands, generating a negative intrathoracic pressure that typically decreases to approximately -10 mmHg, thereby lowering right atrial pressure and creating a suction effect that draws venous blood from the extrathoracic veins into the thoracic vasculature. This reduction in right atrial pressure by about 1 mmHg can increase venous return by roughly 10%, with further decreases amplifying the effect until limited by vein collapse around -4 mmHg. On expiration, intrathoracic pressure rises, which compresses the abdominal veins and propels blood toward the thorax, complementing the inspiratory phase. Anatomically, this pump relies on the pressure gradient between the abdominal and thoracic compartments, where intra-abdominal pressure remains positive (around 5-7 mmHg) while intrathoracic pressure swings negative during inspiration, establishing a gradient of 10-20 mmHg that favors blood flow from the periphery to the heart. The inferior vena cava (IVC), traversing the abdomen, is influenced by this gradient, while the superior vena cava (SVC) is primarily within the thorax. This effect is particularly relevant because the IVC carries a larger volume of systemic venous blood from the lower body. Physiologically, the respiratory pump contributes to venous return by 20-30% above baseline levels during respiratory efforts. This mechanism is especially relevant in the upright posture, where gravitational pooling in the lower extremities reduces venous return; the pump helps counteract this by facilitating upward flow through the IVC. Overall, it synergizes with other factors to maintain cardiac preload without excessive reliance on activity.

Venous Return Dynamics

Venous Return Curve

The venous return curve graphically illustrates the relationship between the rate of venous return to the heart and the right atrial pressure (RAP). In this model, venous return is plotted on the y-axis in liters per minute (L/min), while RAP is on the x-axis in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The curve takes the form of a straight line with a negative slope, descending from left to right and intersecting the x-axis at the mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), which represents the equilibrium pressure throughout the systemic circulation when there is no blood flow and is approximately 7 mmHg under normal physiological conditions. This graphical representation originates from the circulatory model developed by Arthur C. Guyton in the 1950s through extensive experimental studies on cardiac and vascular function. Guyton's framework quantifies venous return as a function of the pressure gradient driving blood flow back to the heart and the resistance opposing it, formalized in the equation: VR=MSFP−RAPRv\text{VR} = \frac{\text{MSFP} - \text{RAP}}{R_v} where VR denotes venous return (L/min), MSFP is the mean systemic filling pressure (mmHg), RAP is the right atrial pressure (mmHg), and RvR_v is the resistance to venous return (mmHg/L/min). This linear relationship implies that venous return increases as RAP decreases below MSFP, assuming constant resistance and filling pressure, thereby emphasizing the peripheral circulation's role in driving cardiac filling. In steady-state conditions, the venous return curve intersects with the cardiac function curve—which relates to RAP—to establish the of the cardiovascular system, where venous return equals . Changes in total alter the position of the venous return curve by shifting the x-intercept (MSFP), thereby modifying the equilibrium point and influencing overall circulatory performance. For instance, an increase in blood volume raises MSFP, causing the curve to shift rightward and upward, which can elevate at a given RAP.

Determinants of Venous Return

Venous return is primarily determined by three key physiological variables: mean systemic filling (MSFP), right atrial (RAP), and venous resistance (Rv). MSFP represents the average throughout the systemic circulation when the heart is stopped and blood flow is zero, serving as the driving force for venous return. It is influenced by and vascular tone, particularly in the venous system, where most blood is contained. MSFP can be expressed as the ratio of stressed to total vascular compliance, where stressed volume is the portion of total that distends the vascular walls to generate . In normal conditions, MSFP is approximately 7 mmHg. RAP acts as the backpressure opposing venous return at the right atrium, while Rv reflects the resistance to flow through the veins, largely determined by venous and the proportion of venous versus arterial resistance in the systemic circulation. Normal Rv values range from 1 to 2 mmHg/L/min. The interplay of these determinants is captured by the approximate relationship: VR≈MSFP−RAPRv\text{VR} \approx \frac{\text{MSFP} - \text{RAP}}{\text{Rv}} where VR denotes venous return. This equation illustrates how increases in MSFP or decreases in RAP or Rv enhance venous return, while the opposite reduces it. In steady-state conditions, venous return must equal to maintain circulatory balance, as the systemic venous and arterial systems operate in series. Transient deviations from this equality, such as sudden changes in or pressure, are corrected by the , which adjusts vascular tone and to restore equilibrium. These determinants form the foundation of the venous return curve, a graphical representation of their relationships.

Factors Modulating Venous Return

Intrinsic Factors

Intrinsic factors influencing venous return primarily involve internal physiological properties of the vascular system that modulate the driving pressure for blood flow back to the heart, particularly through effects on mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP). These factors include vascular compliance, total blood volume, and neurohormonal influences on venous tone, which collectively determine the upstream pressure gradient (MSFP minus right atrial pressure) that propels venous return. The venous system exhibits high compliance, serving as a reservoir that accommodates approximately 60-70% of total under normal conditions. This compliance allows veins to store blood with minimal changes, but alterations in venous distensibility directly impact MSFP and thus venous return. Reduced venous compliance, such as through venoconstriction, decreases and shifts more blood toward the central circulation, elevating MSFP and enhancing the venous return curve by increasing the for a given right atrial . For instance, sympathetic activation or hormonal vasoconstrictors can decrease venous compliance, thereby boosting venous return without altering total significantly. Total circulating , typically around 5 liters in adults, is another key intrinsic determinant, as it sets the baseline stressed volume that generates MSFP. increases the stressed blood volume, raising MSFP and thereby promoting greater venous return; conversely, lowers MSFP and impairs return. This effect underscores 's role in maintaining steady-state venous return equal to . Hormonal and neural influences further modulate venous return by altering venous tone and resistance. Vasopressin and angiotensin II act as potent venoconstrictors, reducing venous compliance and increasing MSFP to enhance return. Sympathetic activation via alpha-adrenergic receptors on venous smooth muscle similarly induces venoconstriction, which not only elevates MSFP but also reduces resistance to venous return (Rv), facilitating higher flow rates back to the heart. These mechanisms integrate to fine-tune venous return in response to internal homeostatic demands.

Extrinsic Factors

Extrinsic factors influencing venous return encompass external influences such as body position, , and environmental conditions that modulate blood flow dynamics without altering inherent vascular properties. Postural changes significantly impact venous return, with the transition to an upright position causing gravitational pooling of approximately 300 to 800 mL of blood in the lower extremities, thereby reducing and initially decreasing by 30-45%. This pooling diminishes preload to the heart via the Frank-Starling mechanism, leading to a transient reduction in until compensatory mechanisms activate. The pump in the legs helps counteract this effect by intermittently compressing veins during movement, facilitating upward blood propulsion against . Exercise and markedly enhance venous return by engaging extrinsic pumps. Rhythmic muscle contractions during activity activate the pump, squeezing veins and propelling blood centrally while one-way valves prevent reflux. In intense exercise, this can elevate venous return to as much as 25 L/min, matching the heightened demands to support increased oxygen delivery. Environmental temperatures also exert effects on venous return through thermoregulatory responses. Exposure to induces cutaneous and systemic venodilation to promote , increasing venous capacitance and thereby reducing venous return by expanding peripheral . Conversely, cold exposure triggers sympathetic-mediated venoconstriction, which decreases venous compliance, mobilizes pooled blood, and augments venous return to maintain core and cardiac filling.

Clinical Implications

Pathophysiological Disruptions

Venous insufficiency, exemplified by conditions such as varicose veins, impairs the unidirectional flow of blood in the lower extremities, leading to increased blood pooling and reduced venous return to the heart. This occurs primarily due to valvular incompetence in superficial or deep veins, which allows reflux and elevates hydrostatic pressure in the dependent limbs. In heart failure, particularly right ventricular dysfunction, elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) diminishes the pressure gradient driving venous return from the systemic circulation to the right atrium, thereby limiting preload and cardiac output. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) significantly increases resistance to venous return (Rv) through formation, venous wall thickening, and reduced vessel compliance, often resulting from thrombo-fibrotic changes that obstruct flow. , such as that induced by hemorrhage, decreases mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) by reducing stressed , which lowers the driving force for venous return and can shift the venous return curve to the left, impairing overall circulatory flow. These disruptions contribute to , where inadequate venous return upon assuming an upright posture fails to maintain cerebral , causing a drop in systolic of at least 20 mmHg or diastolic of 10 mmHg within three minutes. Additionally, chronic venous hypertension in the legs arises from persistent and obstruction, promoting capillary leakage, , and tissue damage in the lower extremities.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

Central (CVP) measurement via central catheterization serves as a key diagnostic tool for assessing , providing an estimate of right atrial and preload with normal values ranging from 2 to 6 mmHg. This invasive method involves inserting a into a large , typically the internal jugular or subclavian, to directly monitor fluctuations that reflect systemic adequacy. Echocardiography evaluates (IVC) and collapsibility to noninvasively estimate and venous return status, where IVC variations with respiration indicate volume responsiveness. For instance, an IVC less than 2.1 cm with greater than 50% collapse during inspiration suggests low CVP and potentially impaired venous return. Venous Doppler further assesses in peripheral and central veins, detecting reduced velocities or abnormal waveforms that signal congestion or diminished return in clinical settings like or . Therapeutic strategies for optimizing venous return often begin with volume expansion using intravenous fluids to elevate mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), thereby enhancing the for venous return in hypovolemic states. apply graduated external pressure to lower extremities, reducing venous pooling and promoting upward flow to mitigate orthostatic reductions in return. Vasodilators such as , at low doses, preferentially dilate capacitance vessels, increasing venous compliance and reducing preload by promoting peripheral pooling. This helps alleviate excessive preload in conditions like congestive , reducing pulmonary congestion and supporting . In severe cases of impaired venous return, veno-venous (VV-ECMO) provides advanced support by draining deoxygenated blood from the venous system, oxygenating it externally, and returning it to the venous circulation, bypassing pulmonary limitations. This intervention is particularly useful when native venous drainage is compromised, as seen in with hemodynamic instability. monitoring with catheters offers continuous assessment of venous return through measurements of CVP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and , guiding fluid and vasopressor management.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54476/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128096/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6186556/
  4. https://training.seer.cancer.gov/anatomy/cardiovascular/blood/physiology.html
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3516108/
  6. https://training.seer.cancer.gov/anatomy/cardiovascular/blood/classification.html
  7. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/multimedia/table/normal-pressures-in-the-heart-and-great-vessels
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2776239/
  9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16234881/
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470295/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5018186/
  12. https://books.byui.edu/bio_461_principles_o/blood_pressure_regul
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12283750/
  14. https://cvphysiology.com/cardiac-function/cf018
  15. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.5.H1502
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1665620/
  17. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2001-18526
  18. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/gradschool_theses/article/1449/&path_info=pkthesis.pdf
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/abdominal-pressure
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6607101/
  21. https://cvphysiology.com/cardiac-function/cf027
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3191500/
  23. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/physrev.1955.35.1.123
  24. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-022-04024-x
  25. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.180.3.463
  26. https://cvphysiology.com/cardiac-function/cf016
  27. https://www.pulmccm.org/p/icu-physiology-1000-words-mean-systemic-filling-pressure-part-1
  28. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-016-1438-7
  29. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.hyp.0000243799.84573.f8
  30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448192/
  31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10554-023-02820-2
  32. https://cvphysiology.com/cardiac-function/cf017
  33. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/81078
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10405766/
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/venoconstriction
  36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430975/
  37. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012030
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7675772/
  39. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2003/1215/p2393.html
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5574075/
  41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519493/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22271467/
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5198879/
  44. https://academic.oup.com/ckj/article/16/11/1861/7210550
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8613717/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37944860/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4081237/
  48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482382/
  49. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576426/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4557547/
  51. https://www.emra.org/emresident/article/critical-care-device-pac-part-2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.