Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Historyarrow-down
starMorearrow-down
Hubbry Logo
search
search button
Sign in
Woolungasaurus
Community hub for the Wikipedia article
logoWikipedian hub
Welcome to the community hub built on top of the Woolungasaurus Wikipedia article. Here, you can discuss, collect, and organize anything related to Woolungasaurus. The purpose of the hub is to connect people, foster deeper knowledge, and help improve the root Wikipedia article.
Add your contribution
Inside this hub
Woolungasaurus

Woolungasaurus
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous
Holotype paddle
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Superorder: Sauropterygia
Order: Plesiosauria
Superfamily: Plesiosauroidea
Family: Elasmosauridae
Genus: Woolungasaurus
Persson, 1960
Species
  • Woolungasaurus glendowerensis

Woolungasaurus ('Woolunga lizard', named after an Aboriginal mythical reptile, Persson 1960) is a dubious genus of plesiosaur, an extinct marine reptile, belonging to the Elasmosauridae.

History

[edit]
Life restoration

The type species, Woolungasaurus glendowerensis, was named after Glendower Station by Per Ove Persson in 1960,[1] is known from a partial skeleton, holotype QM F6890, (forty-six vertebrae, ribs, forearms, shoulder girdle and part of the rear limbs) unearthed from the Wallumbilla Formation (Albian, Lower Cretaceous) of the Richmond District, Queensland, Australia. Another find of undetermined species, consisting of twelve vertebrae, was unearthed from the Maree Formation (Cretaceous, of uncertain age) of Neales River, near Lake Eyre, South Australia. A skull formerly referred to this genus from Yambore Creek, near Maxwelton, Queensland, is now the holotype of Eromangasaurus.

Assigned paddle, Science Museum of Minnesota

However, because of the uninformative, flawed diagnosis of Persson (1960), Welles (1962) considered Woolungasaurus a nomen dubium.[2][3] In 2004, the genus was referred to Styxosaurus by Sven Sachs in 2004.[2] Kear (2005) disagreed with this view and followed the interpretation by Welles (1962), rendering the genus to be an indeterminate elasmosaurid.[3]


See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Add your contribution
Related Hubs