Hubbry Logo
A MaggotA MaggotMain
Open search
A Maggot
Community hub
A Maggot
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
A Maggot
A Maggot
from Wikipedia

A Maggot (1985) is a novel by British author John Fowles. It is Fowles' sixth major novel, following The Collector, The Magus, The French Lieutenant's Woman, Daniel Martin and Mantissa. Its title, as the author explains in the prologue, is taken from the archaic sense of the word that means "whim", "quirk", "obsession", or even a snatch of music (see earworm). Another meaning of the word "maggot" becomes apparent later in the novel, used by a character to describe a white, oblong machine that appears to be a spacecraft. Though the author denied that A Maggot is a historical novel, it does take place during a precise historical timeframe, April 1736 to March 1737, in England. It might be variously classified as historical fiction, mystery, or science fiction. Because of the narrative style and various metafictional devices, most critics classify it as a postmodern novel.

Key Information

Plot summary

[edit]

The book opens with an objective narration about a group of five travellers travelling through Exmoor in rural England. They arrive at an inn in a small village, and soon it becomes clear that they are not who they seem to be. The "maid" Louise casually rebuffs the sexual advances of the servant, Dick Thurlow, but then goes to his master's room and undresses before them both. Bartholomew calls his supposed uncle "Lacy" and they discuss Bartholomew's refusal to disclose his journey's secret purpose, as well as fate versus free will. Eventually the narration stops and is followed by letters, interview transcripts, and snatches of more third-person narration, interspersed with facsimile pages from contemporary issues of The Gentleman's Magazine. We learn from a fictional news story that a man has been found hanged near the place where the travellers were staying.

The subsequent interviews are conducted by Henry Ayscough, a lawyer employed by Bartholomew's father, who is a Duke. The interviews reveal that Bartholomew had hired the party to travel with him but deceived them about the purpose of his journey. Variations of his story are (1) he was on his way to elope against the wishes of family; (2) he was visiting a wealthy, aged aunt to secure an inheritance from her; (3) he was seeking a cure for impotence; (4) he was pursuing some scientific or occult knowledge, possibly concerning knowledge of the future. He takes Rebecca and Dick to a cave in a remote area. Rebecca's initial tale, retold by Jones, is that he there performed a satanic ritual, and Rebecca herself was raped by Satan and forced to view a panorama of human suffering and cruelty. Rebecca's own testimony admits this was a deception to quiet Jones. She says that she actually saw Bartholomew meet a noble lady who took them all inside a strange floating craft (which she calls "the maggot"). In this craft she sees what she describes as a divine revelation of heaven ("June Eternal") and the Shaker Trinity (Father, Son, and female Holy Spirit or "Mother Wisdom"). She also sees a vision of human suffering and cruelty in this version of her story. Modern readers may interpret her visions as films and her overall experience as a contact with time travellers or extraterrestrials. Rebecca then loses consciousness; she wakes, finds Jones outside the cave, and they leave together. She then tells Jones the satanic version of her experience. Meanwhile, Jones has seen Dick leave the cave in terror, presumably to go and hang himself.

Rebecca later finds herself pregnant. She returns to her Quaker parents but then converts to Shakerism, marries a blacksmith named John Lee, and gives birth to Ann Lee, the future leader of the American Shakers. The mystery of Bartholomew's disappearance is never solved, and Ayscough surmises that he committed suicide out of guilt from his disobedience to his father in the matter of an arranged marriage.

Main characters

[edit]
  • "Mr. Bartholomew" (real name unknown; son of the Duke): Bartholomew is the instigator of the action (the journey from London to Dolling's Cave) and primary actor in the mysterious event at the core of the plot; his disappearance drives an investigation, the documentation of which makes up the majority of the novel.
  • Rebecca Lee (née Hocknell; aliases Fanny, Louise): A former Quaker forced by circumstances into prostitution. Hired by Bartholomew to accompany him on his journey, she is the only living witness of the mysterious event in the cave, and the fictional mother of the real Shaker leader Ann Lee.
  • Dick Thurlow: Bartholomew's childhood companion and servant, he is deaf and mute. His apparent suicide following the event in the cave complicates the mystery of Bartholomew's disappearance.
  • Francis Lacy (alias Mr. Brown): An actor hired by Bartholomew to play his uncle during the journey. His testimony adds little to the mystery of the disappearance, though it includes several important conversations with Bartholomew about the nature of God, fate, free will, and social justice.
  • David Jones (alias Sergeant Farthing): An actor/loafer and acquaintance of Lacy, hired by Bartholomew to play a soldier who protects the travellers. Provides important testimony from the outside of the cave as well as his retelling of the "demonic" version of Rebecca's story.
  • Henry Ayscough: A lawyer hired by the Duke to investigate Bartholomew's disappearance. His letters to the Duke which report his progress, as well as the transcripts of his interrogations of various witnesses, make up the majority of the novel.
  • The Duke (father of "Bartholomew"): Though he appears in the story only once (briefly), he initiates the investigation, and Ayscough's letters and transcripts are all sent to him. Some critics argue that readers are implicitly identified with the Duke, leading them to examine their assumptions and interpretations critically. It is widely assumed he is gay.[citation needed]

Technique and themes

[edit]

The novel's narrative technique of using letters, interviews, a fictional news story (see false document), and real historical documents harks back to, and to some extent satirises, the conventions in place early in the history of the novel, when the epistolary novel was the most common form. (Fowles' book is set in 1736, just a few decades after the first novels in English, and just a few years before Samuel Richardson's landmark Pamela.) Originally, these strategies were intended to strengthen the illusion of reality and mitigate the fictionality of fiction; Fowles uses them ironically to highlight the disconnect between fiction and reality. At several points in the novel, the characters or narrator foreground their existence as characters in a story, further highlighting the book's fictionality. Moreover, the novel resists many conventions of fiction, such as the omniscient narrator (Fowles' narrator seems omniscient but divulges little of importance) and the drive for climax and resolution. In particular, the novel resists the convention of detective fiction which satisfies the desire for a final solution.

The novel also examines the nature of history, historiography, and criminal justice, as Ayscough represents the historian/judge trying to create a coherent narrative out of problematic testimonies. The "maggot" itself, as a possible time machine, represents historians as intruders in the past who alter it according to their own desires and needs. The power struggle between Ayscough and Rebecca to create the narrative of the past problematises the objectivity of history, making it subordinate to interests of social class and gender. In the end, Fowles uses Rebecca and Ayscough as representatives of two classes of people, one subjective, intuitive, mystical, artistic (i.e., "right-brained"); the other objective, analytical, and judgmental (i.e., "left-brained"). See cerebral hemisphere.

Finally, Fowles explicitly positions A Maggot in an era which, he claims, saw the beginning of modern selfhood (see self (psychology), self (philosophy), individual). Rebecca is a prototypical modern individual experiencing the difficulty of breaking free from the restraints of society and convention to be radically self-realized. In this we can see Fowles' residual existentialism, though the novel as a whole represents a move beyond existentialism. His postscript both praises the struggle for modern selfhood and criticises it for having been co-opted by capitalism to create excessive consumerism.

Selected criticism

[edit]
  • Brax, Klaus. The Poetics of Mystery: Genre, Representation, and Narrative Ethics in John Fowles's Historical Fiction. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2003. ISBN 952-91-5777-0 http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN Archived 19 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine 952-10-1013-4
  • Brigg, Peter. "Maggots, Tropes, and Metafictional Challenge: John Fowles' A Maggot." In Imaginative Futures: Proceedings of the 1993 Science Fiction Research Association Conference. Ed. Milton T. Wolf. San Bernardino: SFRAP, 1996. 293–305. ISBN 0-913960-34-9
  • Harding, Brian. "Comparative Metafictions of History: E.L. Doctorow and John Fowles." Chap. 13 in Forked Tongues? Comparing Twentieth-Century British and American Literature. Ed. Ann Massa and Alistair Stead. New York: Longman, 1994. ISBN 0-582-07554-8
  • Holmes, Frederick M. "History, Fiction, and Dialogic Imagination: John Fowles' A Maggot." Contemporary Literature 32.2 (1991): 229–43.
  • Horstkotte, Martin. The Postmodern Fantastic in Contemporary British Fiction. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2004. ISBN 3-88476-679-1
  • Monnin, Pierre E. "Cumulative Strangeness Without and Within A Maggot by J. Fowles." In On Strangeness. Ed. Margaret Bridges. Tuebingen: Narr, 1990. 151–162. ISBN 3-8233-4680-6
  • Onega, Susana. Form and Meaning in the Novels of John Fowles. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1989. ISBN 0-8357-1949-9
  • O'Sullivan, Jane. "'Loquacious with an Obstinate Silence': Sexual and Textual Subversions in Freud's Dora and Fowles' A Maggot." Law and Literature 15.2 (2003): 209–29.
  • Roessner, Jeffrey. "Unsolved Mysteries: Agents of Historical Change in John Fowles' A Maggot." Papers on Language and Literature 36.3 (2000): 302–24.
  • Carreira, Shirley. "[A Maggot: o século XVIII revisitado][1]". In: Revista da Anpoll, v.1, n.23,2007.
  • Salami, Mahmoud. John Fowles's Fiction and the Poetics of Postmodernism (London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1992). ISBN 978-0838634462.
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
is a by British author , published in September 1985 by in the United States and in the . It represents Fowles's sixth major work of fiction and his final , conceived from a personal vision of five enigmatic travelers journeying through remote 18th-century English countryside with undisclosed purpose. The book employs an experimental postmodern structure, primarily comprising depositions, letters, diaries, and official inquiries into the mysterious disappearance and presumed death of a dissolute young aristocrat, Edward Constantine, amid a quest involving religious , practices, and potential or extraterrestrial phenomena. Set against the historical backdrop of 1736, it explores themes of empirical inquiry versus faith, sexual liberation, and the limits of rational explanation, drawing on real 18th-century linguistic and cultural details while challenging readers with ambiguous resolutions that invite interpretations ranging from to speculative . Critics noted its ambitious risks and intellectual depth, though its unconventional form and unresolved mysteries divided opinions, cementing its status as a demanding culmination of Fowles's career known for metafictional innovations.

Publication and Background

Authorship and Inspiration

was authored by John Ernest Fowles (1926–2005), an English novelist whose works often explored existential themes and narrative innovation. Fowles began conceiving the novel in the early 1980s, following the publication of Mantissa in 1982, and it appeared as his eighth and final novel on May 30, 1985, issued by in . The book was released in the United States by later that year. Fowles described the work's origin as a personal "maggot"—employing the term's obsolete 18th-century sense denoting a whimsical obsession or quirk of fancy—that prompted him to investigate early Enlightenment-era nonconformity without producing a traditional historical novel. In a 1985 interview, he recounted the impulse arising spontaneously from his aversion to standard historical fiction, leading him to frame the story as a fictional inquiry into a 1736 disappearance amid England's second wave of Protestant Dissent. This approach allowed Fowles to interweave documentary-style elements, such as simulated depositions and letters, with speculative narrative, drawing on his broader interests in archaeology and religious history evident in prior non-fiction like The Enigma of Stonehenge (1980). A key artifact influencing the was a watercolor of an anonymous young woman, acquired by Fowles years earlier, which he selected for the to evoke the era's Quaker and inspired aspects of the female protagonist's portrayal. Fowles emphasized the project's experimental nature, aiming to probe transitions in cultural and spiritual history just prior to seismic shifts like the Methodist revival, while avoiding didacticism.

Publication History

, John Fowles's seventh novel, was first published in the United Kingdom by Jonathan Cape in 1985. A limited edition of 500 copies preceded the standard trade hardcover edition. The book spans 467 pages and follows Fowles's experimental style seen in prior works. In the United States, released the first edition simultaneously in 1985. Contemporary reviews appeared in major outlets shortly after release, with publishing on September 8, 1985, and TIME on September 9, 1985, confirming the timing of its market entry. Subsequent editions include a Picador paperback issued in 1991 by Pan Books in the UK. No major revisions or alternate versions have been noted in primary publisher records, preserving the original text across reprints.

Narrative and Form

Plot Summary

A Maggot is structured as a series of , including letters, diaries, and legal depositions from 1736, investigating the mysterious disappearance of a young English gentleman, Edward Constantine (disguised as Bartholomew), during a secretive journey in southwest . The narrative opens with a group of five travelers—Constantine, his supposed uncle (a hired named Mr. Brown), a servant Dick, another manservant (Timothy Farthing, alias Jones), and a who is actually a prostitute named Fanny (later Rebecca Lee)—riding through remote countryside toward an undisclosed destination known only to the leader. The plot advances through the inquiry led by barrister Henry Ayscough, commissioned by Constantine's father, a duke, to uncover the fate of his son after Dick's body is discovered hanged from a tree with violets in his mouth, suggesting possible suicide or foul play, and the other travelers scatter or vanish. Depositions reveal the group's deceptions: the "uncle-nephew" relation as a masquerade for Constantine's debauched pursuits, including voyeuristic arrangements involving the prostitute and Dick, and their involvement in esoteric activities hinting at astrology, witchcraft, or pagan rituals near sites like Stonehenge. The journey culminates in a remote cave where a paranormal event—described in Rebecca's testimony as a blinding light, levitation, and divine intercourse—leads to Constantine's apparent ascension or disappearance, transforming Rebecca from a worldly figure into a mystic visionary who flees to join Protestant dissenters. Her account positions the events as the origin of a new religious impulse, with Rebecca revealed as the mother of Ann Lee, founder of the Shakers, though Ayscough dismisses much as delusion or heresy. The novel frames these revelations within authorial asides, leaving the central mystery ambiguously resolved between rational explanation and supernatural possibility.

Narrative Techniques

A Maggot employs a hybrid narrative structure that begins with third-person omniscient descriptions of five travelers in 1736 , establishing a conventional historical framework before transitioning into a documentary-style investigation. This shift occurs as the Henry Ayscough collects depositions in question-and-answer format, spanning several months and comprising the novel's core, which presents the story through eyewitness accounts of the protagonist Bartholomew's disappearance. The technique draws on epistolary and pseudo-historical elements, incorporating letters, brief interludes, and simulated documents such as a of a 'Historical ' and a fictional newspaper article reporting a , to mimic archival and heighten . Multiple perspectives emerge from these depositions, offering conflicting viewpoints that underscore unreliability and leave the central mystery—Bartholomew's fate—intentionally ambiguous, compelling readers to engage actively in piecing together the events. Non-linearity arises from this fragmented assembly, prioritizing testimonial reconstruction over chronological progression, which fragments the fabula (underlying events) from the sjuzet ( presentation). Metafictional devices frame the text, with Fowles intervening in a to define "maggot" in its obsolete sense as a "whim or quirk of the fancy" and to disclose his personal obsession with the opening image of riders, positioning the work as an experimental departure from standard . An further reflects on the narrative's purpose, interjecting a twentieth-century that comments on eighteenth-century mindsets, such as "A twentieth-century mind, could it have journeyed back...," to blur temporal boundaries and highlight the constructed nature of historical truth. These intrusions foster reader alliance through self-reflexivity, blending genres like mystery, historical realism, and (including hints of extraterrestrial intervention and Shaker origins) to challenge Enlightenment rationalism with postmodern ambiguity.

Characters and Development

Principal Figures

Henry Ayscough serves as the primary investigator in A Maggot, a dispatched in 1736 by the family of a disappeared young nobleman to gather depositions from witnesses in southwest . Representing rational , Ayscough interviews survivors of the enigmatic traveling party, methodically probing for explanations of the youth's fate amid reports of unusual events. Mr. Bartholomew emerges as the cryptic leader of the five-person expedition hired by the missing youth for a secretive journey to an underground site near . Portrayed as a philosopher or mystic, Bartholomew orchestrates the group's activities, culminating in claims of transcendent experiences, including impotence symbolizing spiritual redirection and possible extraterrestrial or divine intervention. Rebecca (née Hocknell; also known as Fanny or Louise), a disowned Quaker servant girl, accompanies the travelers as a supposed but provides the novel's pivotal . Her account details a visionary encounter involving Bartholomew's "transportation" via a "maggot"—an archaic term for whim or supernatural agency—leading to the conception of a and the fictional genesis of Shakerism, with Lee as a matriarchal figure challenging patriarchal norms. Supporting the core trio are peripheral yet essential group members: Mr. Brown, an actor impersonating Bartholomew's uncle to lend respectability; Jones (alias Timothy Farthing), Brown's ostensible servant; and Dick Thurlow, a deaf-mute youth whose apparent in a barn heightens the inquiry's urgency. These figures underscore the narrative's themes of and hidden identities.

Character Motivations and Symbolism

Edward Constantine, the enigmatic central figure also known by aliases such as Mr. Bartholomew and Robert Fowler, is driven by an obsessive quest for transcendent knowledge and personal liberation from the constraints of 18th-century aristocratic society. Disguised and traveling incognito with a small party including a servant and a prostitute, he seeks a clandestine meeting in a remote Devonshire cave, motivated by heretical philosophical inquiries into existence, divinity, and the limits of empirical reality. His actions reflect a deliberate rejection of inherited privilege and rational orthodoxy in favor of imaginative risk, culminating in his unexplained disappearance, which depositions portray variably as suicide, abduction, or mystical ascension. Symbolically, Constantine embodies the "maggot" as an irrational whim propelling radical self-transformation, akin to a larval stage toward enlightenment or annihilation, challenging the era's neoclassical emphasis on order. Fanny Adams, later Rebecca Lee, joins Constantine's party as a hired companion, initially motivated by economic desperation and survival in London's underclass, but undergoes a profound visionary experience in the that reshapes her purpose. Witnessing what she interprets as a divine or otherworldly intervention—described in her testimony as a "maggot-shaped" vessel conveying her to eternal realms—she emerges committed to evangelical prophecy, eventually inspiring the Shaker movement through her daughter . This shift symbolizes the emergence of intuitive, feminine spirituality as a counterforce to patriarchal , representing rebirth from material degradation to communal utopianism, with the cave serving as a metaphorical womb for her ideological . Henry Ayscough, the lawyer commissioned by Constantine's father to investigate the disappearance, is propelled by a commitment to forensic and legal , interrogating witnesses to construct a coherent of or amid contradictory accounts. His persistence underscores Enlightenment-era faith in evidence and hierarchy, yet his failure to resolve the enigma highlights the inadequacy of such methods against subjective truths. Ayscough symbolizes entrenched symbolic authority and resistance to existential , contrasting the protagonists' embrace of imaginative . Minor figures, such as the mute servant symbolizing unquestioning loyalty unto and the dwarf evoking folkloric otherness, reinforce the novel's exploration of marginalized perspectives challenging dominant epistemologies. Overall, the characters' motivations delineate a dialectic between rational containment and mystical release, with symbolism drawn from natural and ancient sites like to evoke timeless quests beyond verifiable history.

Themes and Philosophical Elements

Core Themes

The core themes of A Maggot revolve around the quest for self-knowledge and existential freedom amid conflicting interpretations of reality. John Fowles structures the narrative as an eighteenth-century investigation into the disappearance of the enigmatic traveler Edward Constantine, revealing through depositions the transformative encounter of the servant Rebecca Lee, who experiences a mystical vision leading to her spiritual awakening. This event underscores the novel's exploration of subjective truth versus , as the rational Henry Ayscough fails to reconcile witness accounts with verifiable facts, highlighting the limits of Enlightenment . A central tension lies in the opposition between reason and , portrayed through the characters' divergent responses to the unexplained. Ayscough embodies the era's skeptical , demanding material proof, while Rebecca's in a divine or otherworldly intervention—described as a journey to "June Eternal"—propels her toward liberation from societal constraints, including her past as a prostitute. Fowles uses this to probe philosophical questions of 's power to effect personal and , even absent rational corroboration. The novel also examines the origins of religious dissent and communal ideals, paying homage to Shakerism's philosophical foundations. Rebecca's daughter, , emerges as the historical founder of the , symbolizing the birth of a new spiritual order blending , communalism, and fervent . This theme frames A Maggot as a on historical transitions, where individual visions challenge rigid hierarchies and herald broader societal shifts toward and emotional authenticity. Ambiguity and the nature of whims—termed "maggots" in the archaic sense—permeate the work, inviting readers to interpret the pivotal cave scene as demonic , holy epiphany, or extraterrestrial contact. Fowles, an avowed atheist, employs these indeterminacies to explore and the collective psyche, emphasizing dual truths and the human capacity for myth-making over dogmatic certainty. Such elements critique both superstitious excess and reductive skepticism, advocating an openness to mystery as essential for .

Religious and Existential Inquiry

In A Maggot, examines religious dissent as a catalyst for personal and societal transformation in 18th-century , portraying sects such as the proto-Shakers as challengers to the Church of England's doctrinal rigidity. The narrative centers on the enigmatic disappearance of Edward Constant in 1736, whose investigation uncovers a clandestine group's rituals and experiences, culminating in the spiritual rebirth of the character Sarah/Rebecca from prostitute to prophetic figure—depicted as the mother of , historical founder of Shakerism. This fictional highlights Shaker principles of , , and communal simplicity as radical responses to Enlightenment , with Fowles expressing sympathy for their egalitarian despite his . Existentially, the novel probes the tension between individual authenticity and imposed structures, echoing Fowles' longstanding existentialist concerns with and . Characters like the investigator Henry Ayscough grapple with versus mystical , illustrating how religious inquiry forces confrontations with personal voids and the limits of reason—Constant's quest, for instance, embodies a search for transcendent meaning beyond societal norms, potentially involving otherworldly encounters that defy causal explanation. Fowles critiques as stifling, favoring a Christ-figure untainted by institutional , while endorsing freethinking and experiential enlightenment as paths to existential liberation. The work's philosophical undercurrents draw on Fowles' aversion to deterministic worldviews, positioning —whether Shaker or —as a means to assert agency amid . Yet, this remains ambiguous, prioritizing open-ended questions over resolution, as destinies hinge on interpretive choices that reflect broader human struggles with faith's role in forging identity. Fowles' informs a detached yet empathetic lens, viewing such inquiries not as endorsements of the but as vehicles for exploring causal realism in human motivation and formation.

Rationalism Versus Mysticism

In A Maggot, John Fowles juxtaposes the ascendant rationalism of the early Enlightenment with persistent currents of mysticism, portraying the former as a methodical but ultimately limited framework for understanding human experience. The investigator Henry Ayscough embodies empirical rationalism through his relentless interrogation of witnesses and documents following the disappearance of the nobleman Edward of Larke in 1736, employing logic and evidence to reconstruct events in a manner akin to proto-scientific inquiry. This approach reflects the era's shift toward reason, as seen in contemporary advancements like Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica (1687), which prioritized observable laws over speculative theology. Yet Fowles illustrates rationalism's inadequacy in probing transcendent phenomena, as Ayscough's deductions falter against accounts of unexplained lights, visionary encounters, and communal rituals that evade causal explanation. The novel's mystical dimension emerges through Edward's secretive with a diverse group—including the musician Bartholymy and the enigmatic "she" figure—seeking gnostic revelation beyond orthodox Christianity. These pursuits draw on historical nonconformist movements, such as early Quakerism and proto-Shakerism, where direct divine communion supplanted doctrinal authority, echoing antinomian beliefs in inner light over external reason. Fowles depicts not as irrational delusion but as a valid response to 's existential voids, culminating in the virgin birth of Ann Lee (historical founder of Shakerism, born 1736), interpreted as a miraculous defying biological and probabilistic norms. Scholarly analyses note this as Fowles' critique of Enlightenment hubris, suggesting that while excels in material domains—evidenced by the period's scientific instruments like the —it remains "powerless" against ineffable spiritual realities. The narrative's fragmented form, blending depositions, diaries, and authorial intrusions, mirrors this , undermining linear rational narrative with mythic interruptions. Fowles avoids resolving the tension in favor of one side, instead affirming mysticism's role in catalyzing historical innovation, as Edward's "maggot" (whim-turned-quest) precipitates Shaker and doctrines by 1774. This contrasts with Ayscough's static , rooted in class-bound propriety and Deist , highlighting rationalism's potential to suppress disruptive truths. Critics interpret this as Fowles' evolved , departing from earlier atheistic leanings toward acknowledging non-empirical dimensions of reality, though grounded in verifiable historical contexts like the 1730s religious revivals. The novel thus engages causal realism by tracing mysticism's societal impacts—Shaker persisted until the 20th century—while questioning whether such outcomes stem from genuine transcendence or collective , unresolvable by empirical means alone.

Historical and Cultural Context

Eighteenth-Century Setting

A Maggot is set primarily in 1736, during the reign of King George II, a period of relative political stability following the of 1688–1689, which had secured Protestant succession and limited monarchical power through parliamentary authority. The novel's events unfold amid the Hanoverian dynasty's consolidation, with the Act of Union (1707) integrating into and suppressing earlier Jacobite unrest from the 1715 rising, though latent sympathies for the exiled Stuart claimants persisted in rural and Catholic-leaning areas. Fowles positions 1736 in his preface as a midpoint between the revolutionary upheavals of 1689 and the late , highlighting a transitional era where empirical began challenging residual medieval . Geographically, the narrative centers on rural southwest England, particularly the rugged landscapes of Exmoor and surrounding Devon and Somerset counties, depicted as isolated moorlands traversed by horseback amid poor roads and rudimentary inns. This region, characterized by small-scale agriculture, emerging tin mining, and sparse population, reflected broader 18th-century English social stratification, with rigid class distinctions between gentry like the vanished squire Nicholas Lacy, his servants, and local laborers or informants. Travel was arduous and perilous, reliant on post-horses and carriers, underscoring the era's logistical constraints and vulnerability to highwaymen or unexplained disappearances, as investigated through period-specific legal depositions to magistrates. Religiously, 1736 marked a ferment of dissent against the established , with Quaker meetings, early evangelical stirrings, and millenarian sects seeking direct spiritual revelation amid the Enlightenment's growing emphasis on reason—exemplified by the lingering influence of Newton's physics post-1727. The novel evokes proto-dissident movements, including imagined roots of Shakerism, coinciding with the February 1736 birth of in , whose later visions of celibate communalism and ecstatic worship Fowles retroactively ties to the characters' mystical quest for in underground caverns. This backdrop contrasts rational inquiry, as in the coroner's empirical examination, with supernatural claims dismissed as delusion or heresy, mirroring tensions between deism's ascendance and folk beliefs in apparitions or divine transport.

Relation to Shakerism and Enlightenment

A Maggot is set in 1736 and centers on the early experiences of , the historical figure who later founded the Shaker movement in the 1770s after emigrating to America, portraying her involvement in a secretive group pursuing mystical visions and spiritual rebirth that anticipate core Shaker doctrines such as , communal equality, and rejection of material excess. The novel's depiction of Lee's transformative encounters, including ecstatic rituals and claims of divine revelation, reflects the proto-Shaker emphasis on direct spiritual experience over institutionalized religion, drawing from the broader context of 18th-century English dissenting sects like the , from which Shakerism emerged. Fowles presents these elements as a to societal norms, highlighting the radicalism that would define ' ascetic practices and . In relation to the Enlightenment, the narrative juxtaposes Shaker-like with emerging paradigms, as exemplified by the character Henry Ayscough, a whose empirical investigation into the group's disappearance embodies the era's preference for reason, , and toward the . Events such as alleged levitations and prophetic utterances challenge Enlightenment , underscoring tensions between causal realism grounded in observable phenomena and subjective spiritual claims that prioritize inner conviction. Fowles, an avowed atheist, nonetheless extends sympathy to these mystical undercurrents, framing them as a vital, if marginalized, response to the Enlightenment's reductionist tendencies, which privileged scientific progress over existential and communal alternatives. This homage to Shaker critiques the limitations of by suggesting that true transformation arises from disruptive, non-rational "maggots" of obsession and .

Reception and Analysis

Initial Critical Response

Upon its publication in May 1985 in the United Kingdom and September 1985 in the United States, A Maggot elicited a divided critical response, with reviewers commending Fowles's mastery of 18th-century prose and investigative format while frequently decrying the novel's experimental structure, unresolved ambiguities, and intrusive authorial commentary as impediments to narrative coherence. Critics noted the opening sections' compelling mimicry of period documents, such as depositions and journals, which evoked Defoe's moral narratives and sustained suspense through a detective-like inquiry into the disappearance of the protagonist, Robert Fowler. However, many faulted the shift to overt mysticism and science-fiction elements, particularly the cave episode and revelations involving the character Rebecca, as contrived or inadequately grounded, leading to accusations of "foggy nonsense" in blending theology, black magic, and speculative history. In The Guardian, Robert Nye praised the novel's initial two-thirds as "brilliant and compelling," highlighting Fowles's "seductive storyline" and authentic voices that recalled the intrigue of The Magus and , but lambasted the epilogue and didactic insertions on , , and Shakerism as "rubbish" and a "serious failure of artistic nerve," rendering the conclusion "tawdry born-again Christian nonsense." Similarly, reviewers, including Herbert Mitgang, described the work as "strewn with obstacles," lacking narrative thrust and burdened by repetitious indeterminacy about events like the protagonist's fate, which tested readers' tolerance for teasing ambiguity over resolution. acknowledged the "impressive eloquence" of the question-and-answer depositions and their dramatic tension but critiqued Fowles's modern glosses as unremarkable, diminishing the impact of the period ideas and risking alienation through "dogged antiqueness." British critics in offered a more tempered view, with D.A.N. Jones appreciating the "pleasure" derived from the slow, tantalizing unmasking of deceptions and the Q&A format's fidelity to historical inquiry, yet warning that the archaeological digressions and lack of a neat solution might frustrate audiences or appear as contrived "bullshit." American outlets like echoed disappointment in the unresolved mystery and self-indulgent design, viewing it as a lesser effort despite inventive energy. Despite these reservations, the novel's commercial success was evident, reaching the New York Times best-seller list by November 1985, suggesting broader reader appeal beyond critical consensus. Overall, initial assessments positioned A Maggot as an ambitious but flawed culmination of Fowles's postmodern techniques, prioritizing philosophical inquiry over conventional storytelling.

Scholarly Interpretations and Debates

Scholars have debated the ontological status of the novel's central enigma—the disappearance of Robert Bartholomew following his subterranean quest—interpreting it variably as a literal extraterrestrial encounter, a induced by , or a metafictional device underscoring the limits of historical reconstruction. hinted at a science-fictional reading in interviews, suggesting the event could represent an alien intervention akin to a modern UFO abduction, yet he emphasized its ambiguity to provoke reader speculation rather than dogmatic resolution. This openness has fueled contention, with critics like those in analyses arguing that Fowles employs the 18th-century setting to critique Enlightenment , blending verifiable historical elements (such as Shaker origins) with invented testimony to expose the constructed nature of "truth" in archives. A key interpretive divide concerns Fowles' evolving worldview, with John M. Neary positing a transition from the of earlier works like The Magus to a qualified spiritualism in , where Bartholomew's "" (an obsolescent term for a whimsical notion) symbolizes a gnostic pursuit of existential authenticity beyond materialist . Opposing views, however, frame the novel's as ironic postmodern play, dismissing elements as feints that reinforce toward absolute knowledge, as seen in analyses of its structure where conflicting depositions undermine authority. Feminist scholars highlight dynamics in these debates, examining how female characters like Lillth achieve social transformation via —disrupting patriarchal symbolic orders through bodily and spiritual excess—contrasting with male quests that end in dissolution, thus questioning whether Fowles endorses or subverts emancipatory for women. Further contention arises over the novel's utopian impulses, with some readings positing Bartholomew's vision as a proto-postmodern Arcadia, "Et in Arcadia Ego," where death-in-life awareness enables radical freedom, yet others critique this as Fowles' unresolved nostalgia for pre-modern wholeness amid 20th-century disillusionment. These interpretations, drawn predominantly from literary journals and theses post-1985, underscore a consensus on the text's resistance to closure, prioritizing imaginative reader over exegetical , though debates persist on whether this reflects authorial or structural opacity that alienates systematic analysis.

Achievements and Shortcomings

Critics have praised A Maggot for its experimental narrative structure, which incorporates interrogations, depositions, and excerpts from period publications like , creating an immersive archival effect that mimics 18th-century investigative reports. This approach, combined with Fowles' adept of Daniel Defoe's prose style, effectively evokes the era's moral and journalistic conventions while building a tantalizing mystery around disappearance and dissent. The novel's thematic achievements lie in its probing of religious enthusiasm, rational skepticism, and , particularly through proto-Shaker figures, positioning it as a homage to historical narratives of faith and quirkish whimsy. Reviewers have noted the compelling early sections and Fowles' seductive unraveling of deception, marking it as among his most inventive works. Shortcomings identified include an overreliance on enigmatic buildup at the expense of narrative momentum, with some finding the plot's avoidance of resolution—leaving central mysteries like the protagonist's fate ambiguous—unsatisfying for readers seeking closure. Later sections, particularly authorial interventions and the epilogue, have been criticized as didactic impositions of Fowles' views on feminism, agnosticism, and Shakerism, representing a "serious failure of artistic nerve" that shifts from mystery to "tawdry born-again Christian nonsense." The archaic prose and requirement for familiarity with historical contexts, such as Shaker origins, can render parts doggedly antiquated and potentially confusing, diminishing dramatic impact in modern interpretive glosses. Fowles anticipated resistance from British critics favoring conventional storytelling, contributing to mixed reviews despite broader acclaim.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.