Hubbry Logo
Addictive personalityAddictive personalityMain
Open search
Addictive personality
Community hub
Addictive personality
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Addictive personality
Addictive personality
Addictive personality
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The term "addictive personality" refers to a proposed set of personality traits that may increase an individual's risk of developing addictive behaviors.[1] While it is not formally recognized in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5, this concept suggests that traits such as impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and emotional dysregulation may contribute to the development or maintenance of addiction.[2] These behaviors extend beyond substance use to gambling, internet use, compulsive eating, and shopping.[3]

The validity of addictive personality as a construct remains controversial, with some researchers arguing that these traits may emerge as a consequence of addiction rather than serve as predictors, and that the term itself lacks a consistent definition.[4] Despite this controversial status, studies have found links between certain personality profiles and specific types of addiction, suggesting that a more nuanced relationship exists.[5] Genetic factors are also recognized as significant contributors to addiction vulnerability, with research estimating that 40% to 70% of individual variation in addiction risk is heritable.[6]

Etiology

[edit]

The following factors are believed to influence addiction susceptibility.

Psychological factors

[edit]

Some claim the existence of "addictive beliefs" in people more likely to develop addictions, such as "I cannot make an impact on my world" or "I am not good enough", which may lead to developing traits associated with addiction, such as depression and emotional insecurity.[8] People who strongly believe that they control their own lives and are mostly self-reliant in learning information (rather than relying on others) are less likely to become addicted.[9] However, it is unclear whether these traits are causes, results or merely associated coincidentally. For example, depression due to physical disease[10] can cause feelings of hopelessness that are mitigated after successful treatment of the underlying condition, and addiction can increase dependence on others. Certain psychological disorders such as panic attacks, depressive disorders, and generalized anxiety disorder have been related to addiction. The addicted person, who struggles with reality and feels negative feelings, such as anxiety and depression, will seek out ways to help them avoid such feelings.[3] A study based on social cognitive theories, included a personality-targeted intervention that was shown to help treat substance addiction. It is feasible that by changing certain elements of one's personality, one can gain a step in the right direction towards changing their addictive personality.[11]

Genetic and biological factors

[edit]

Research has explored possible biological and genetic contributions that are often linked to a vulnerability to addiction. Twin and adoption studies have shown that genetic factors may account for 40-60% of the risk for alcoholism and other substance-related disorders, with environmental influences playing a stronger role in early adolescence and diminishing over time.[12]

Certain personality traits associated with addictive behaviors such as impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and sensation-seeking have been linked to genes receptive of dopamine and nicotine, including DRD2 and CHRNA5. For example, the CHRNA5 gene has been associated with a reduced aversion to nicotine, possibly due to its impact on the brain's habenula region. This may reinforce the continued consumption of nicotine products by reducing the negative sensory experience of early use.[4]

Biological factors have also been found through experimentation on rats. Rats with higher locomotor responses to novel environments were found to be more likely to self-administer stimulant drugs in laboratory settings, indicating a possible genetic predisposition toward drug reinforcement behaviors.[13]

Recent research has further highlighted the role that genetic and biological factors play in traits such as impulsivity and reward sensitivity. A 2023 study by the National Institutes of Health identified shared genetic markers across a variety of substance use disorders, emphasizing how involved genes are in regulating dopamine signaling pathways.[14] Further studies have implicated the CADM2 gene in impulsivity and reward-related behaviors. Variants in this gene have been associated with increased risk-taking and sensation-seeking traits, which are considered potential risk factors for developing addictive behaviors.[15]

Environmental factors

[edit]

Studies have found numerous environmental factors that correlate with addiction. Exposure to sustained stress in childhood, such as physical or sexual abuse, especially accompanied by unpredictable parental behavior strongly correlates with drug addiction and overeating in adulthood.[16] Children who tend to react to distress in a more rash way have been linked to becoming more likely to drink and smoke in their adolescence. Results from this research found that this was because the reaction to distress affected psychosocial learning, which led to increased expectancy to drink or smoke.[17] A lack of social interaction has also been shown to correlate with addictive tendencies; rats reared in isolation were quicker to develop a pattern of cocaine self-administration than rats reared in groups.[13] There is a gene/environment connection in that individuals with particular personality traits may self-select into different environments, e.g., they may seek out work environments where addictive substances are more readily available.[18]

Description

[edit]

Addiction can be defined as an excessive amount of time and resources spent in engaging in an activity or an experience that somehow affects the person's quality of life.[1] An addictive personality is when those addictive behaviors progress and change as the individual seeks to produce the desired mood.[19]

People that face this issue are currently defined to have a brain disease as promoted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and other authorities.[20] People who experience addictive personality disorders typically act on impulses and cannot deal with delayed gratification.[21] At the same time, people with this type of personality tend to believe that they do not fit into societal norms and therefore, acting on impulses, deviate from conformity to rebel.[22] People with addictive personalities are very sensitive to emotional stress. They have trouble handling situations that they deem frustrating, even if the event is for a very short duration. The combination of low self-esteem, impulsivity and low tolerance for stress causes these individuals to have frequent mood swings and often suffer from some sort of depression.[21] A coping mechanism to deal with their conflicting personality becomes their addiction and the addiction acts as something that the person can control when they find it difficult to control their personality traits.[21]

People with addictive personalities typically switch from one addiction to the next.[1] These individuals may show impulsive behavior such as excessive caffeine consumption, Internet use, eating chocolate or other sugar-laden foods, television watching, or even running.[23]

Extraversion, self-monitoring, and loneliness are also common characteristics found in those who suffer from addiction.[24][25] Individuals who score high on self-monitoring are more prone to developing an addiction.[24][25] High self-monitors are sensitive to social situations;[24][25] they act how they think others expect them to act. They wish to fit in, hence they are very easily influenced by others. Likewise, those who have low self-esteem also seek peer approval; therefore, they participate in "attractive" activities such as smoking or drinking to try to fit in.[24][25]

People with addictive personalities find it difficult to manage their stress levels. In fact, lack of stress tolerance is a telltale sign of the disorder.[21] They find it difficult to face stressful situations and fight hard to get out of such conditions. Long-term goals prove difficult to achieve because people with addictive personalities usually focus on the stress that comes with getting through the short-term goals.[21] Such personalities will often switch to other enjoyable activities the moment that they are deprived of enjoyment in their previous addiction.[21]

Addictive individuals feel highly insecure when it comes to relationships. They may often find it difficult to make commitments in relationships or trust their beloved because of the difficulty they find in achieving long-term goals.[23] They constantly seek approval of others and as a result, these misunderstandings may contribute to the destruction of relationships. People suffering from addictive personality disorder usually undergo depression and anxiety, managing their emotions by developing addiction to alcohol, other types of drugs, or other pleasurable activities.[23]

An addict is more prone to depression, anxiety, and anger.[25] Both the addict's environment, genetics and biological tendency contribute to their addiction.[25] People with very severe personality disorders are more likely to become addicts. Addictive substances usually stop primary and secondary neuroses, meaning people with personality disorders like the relief from their pain.[25]

Personality traits and addiction

[edit]

Addiction is defined by scholars as "a biopsychosocial disorder characterized by persistent use of drugs (including alcohol) despite substantial harm and adverse consequences".[26] Substance-based addictions are those based upon the release of dopamine in the brain, upon which the range of sensations produced by the euphoric event in the brain changes the brain's immediate behavior, causing more susceptibility for future addictions. Behavior-based addictions, on the other hand, are those that are not linked to neurological behavior as much and are thus thought to be linked to personality traits; it is this type of addiction that combines a behavior with a mental state and the repeated routine is therefore associated with the mental state.[27]

Drug addiction

[edit]

A group of British forensic psychologists and data scientists analysed a new large database of users of psychoactive substances.[28] To analyse the predisposition to drug use, they utilized 7 psychological traits, the Five Factor Model supplemented by Impulsivity and Sensation seeking:

  • N Neuroticism is a long-term tendency to experience negative emotions such as nervousness, tension, anxiety and depression (associated adjectives: anxious, self-pitying, tense, touchy, unstable, and worrying);[29]
  • E Extraversion is manifested in outgoing, warm, active, assertive, talkative, cheerful characters, often in search of stimulation (associated adjectives: active, assertive, energetic, enthusiastic, outgoing, and talkative);[29]
  • O Openness to experience is a general appreciation for art, unusual ideas, and imaginative, creative, unconventional, and wide interests (associated adjectives: artistic, curious, imaginative, insightful, original, and wide interest);[29]
  • A Agreeableness is a dimension of interpersonal relations, characterized by altruism, trust, modesty, kindness, compassion and cooperativeness (associated adjectives: appreciative, forgiving, generous, kind, sympathetic, and trusting);[29]
  • C Conscientiousness is a tendency to be organized and dependable, strong-willed, persistent, reliable, and efficient (associated adjectives: efficient, organized, reliable, responsible, and thorough);[29]
  • Imp Impulsivity is defined as a tendency to act without adequate forethought;[29]
  • SS Sensation Seeking is defined by the search for experiences and feelings, that are varied, novel, complex and intense, and by the readiness to take risks for the sake of such experiences.[29]

These factors are not statistically independent but the condition number of the correlation matrix is less than 10 and the multicollinearity effects are not expected to be strong.[28]

The results of the detailed analysis of modern data support partially the hypothesis about psychological predisposition to addiction. The group of users of illicit drugs differs from the group of non-users for N, O, A, C, Imp, and SS. Symbolically, this difference can be illustrated as follows:

(N, O, Imp, and SS scores are higher for users; A and C scores are lower for users).

The hypothesis about importance of E for addiction was not supported by this aggregated analysis of use of all illicit drugs.

Analysis of consumption of different drugs separately demonstrated that predisposition to use of different drugs is different. For all illicit drugs groups of their users have the following common properties:

(O, Imp, and SS scores are higher for users and C score is lower for users).

Deviation of N, E, and A scores for users of different drugs can be different. For example, heroin users have average profile

whereas for LSD and Ecstasy (the latter being a so-called "Party drug") users N has no significant deviation from the population level and E can be higher.[28]

Several personality profiles of risky behaviour were identified by various researchers, for example (Insecures) and (Impulsives, Hedonists).[30] Various types of addictive personality have in common low C.

Internet addiction

[edit]

Internet addiction is associated with higher scores in neuroticism and lower scores in extraversion and conscientiousness.[3] One explanation for this association is that virtual environments may feel safer and more comfortable for individuals with lower self-esteem and increased emotional sensitivity compared to real-life environments. Similarly, individuals with low extraversion that desire social interaction but are averse to face-to-face interaction may find the opportunity for online communication attractive.[3] Research indicates that social media platforms utilize algorithmic designs such as infinite scrolling and personalized content recommendations to maximize user engagement, fostering an environment where compulsive usage patterns form among users.[31]

Social media addiction is currently not recognized as a formal psychiatric disorder; however, with over 5 billion people spending an average of 2 hours and 29 minutes a day on social media in 2024, there are many concerns about the impact that social media has on mental health and the daily lives of people.[32] Several mental health consequences have been linked to excessive social media usage, such as increased social media usage being linked to increased levels of stress, insomnia, and suicide-related outcomes.[32]

Traits associated with addictive personality, such as impulsivity and emotional dysregulation, have been proposed as potential risk factors for problematic internet use.[3][31] The compulsive nature of digital engagement, reinforced by algorithmic content delivery, is thought to contribute to patterns similar to those seen in substance-related addictions.[31]

Personality theories of addiction

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Personality theories of addiction.[edit]
Personality theories of addiction are psychological models that associate personality traits or modes of thinking (i.e., affective states) with an individual's proclivity for developing an addiction. Models of addiction risk that have been proposed in psychology literature include an affect dysregulation model of positive and negative psychological affects, the reinforcement sensitivity theory model of impulsiveness and behavioral inhibition, and an impulsivity model of reward sensitization and impulsiveness.[33][37][38]

Food addiction

[edit]

While food addiction is widely considered not to be a medical disorder, there is still controversy as to whether food can be addictive as it is necessary for survival. Research has shown that foods can have the same chemical reactions in the brain as addictive chemicals or drugs (e.g. brain reward pathways). Furthermore, certain foods that have a higher level of sweeteners or fats have been found to demonstrate a higher addictive potential. More research is needed to determine the relation between food and addiction. Recent studies have attempted to find correlations between humans and animals, but no general consensus has been reached.[39]

Cultural correlates of personality

[edit]

The concept of enduring personality traits that predispose individuals to addictive behaviors, which is often referred to as the "addictive personality", has been examined not only in clinical psychology but increasingly through a cross-cultural lens. Although not formally recognized in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5, traits such as impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and high neuroticism have consistently been associated with increased vulnerability to addiction.[40] Cross-cultural studies using the Five-Factor Model of personality have found that these traits, especially neuroticism and low conscientiousness, are predictive of substance use disorders across diverse populations.[41] This suggests a level of universality in the personality–addiction link, even as cultural norms and expressions of addiction vary widely.

Recent work in cultural psychology and behavioral genetics has further emphasized that while the core traits may be consistent, cultural factors shape how addictive behaviors manifest and are treated. For example, societal attitudes toward alcohol, coping mechanisms, and stress vary across countries, influencing how personality traits interact with environmental factors.[42] As research becomes more data-driven and global in scope, scholars are moving away from older psychoanalytic models toward integrated frameworks that consider both individual personality traits and cultural dimensions. These new approaches provide a richer understanding of addiction risk that respects both universal psychological patterns and culturally specific contexts.

Co-occurring disorders

[edit]

Traits commonly associated with addictive personality, such as high impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and sensation-seeking, have been proposed as underlying vulnerabilities contributing to both addictive behaviors and other psychiatric conditions.[43] Research has also linked these traits to increased risks for anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, and impulse control disorders.[44] Additionally, related neurobiological mechanisms, specifically pertaining to emotional regulation and impulsivity, have been noted across addictive behaviors and other forms of psychopathology.[45]

The National Institute of Mental Health highlights that co-occurring mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are common among those with substance use disorders, underscoring the need for integrated treatment approaches . Furthermore, the concept of "dual diagnosis" refers to the coexistence of substance use disorders and mental illnesses, emphasizing the complexity of treatment and the necessity for comprehensive care strategies.[46]

Treatments and intervention methods

[edit]

Individuals exhibiting traits associated with an "addictive personality," such as impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and emotional instability, can benefit from a range of evidence-based therapeutic approaches and prevention strategies. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is one of the most commonly used treatments, helping individuals recognize and change maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors related to addiction.[47] Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), which focuses on improving emotional regulation and interpersonal skills, has also shown effectiveness in treating individuals with high emotional dysregulation, often present in those with addictive behaviors.[48] Another approach, Motivational Interviewing (MI), targets uncertainty and enhances motivation to change, making it particularly useful in the early stages of treatment.[49]

Prevention strategies often focus on fostering resilience and emotional regulation skills to reduce the risk of developing addictive behaviors. Programs that teach coping mechanisms for stress, as well as the development of strong social support networks, have been shown to be effective in preventing substance use disorders.[50] Additionally, community-based programs like those focused on improving self-regulation and peer support have shown positive outcomes in reducing harmful behaviors related to addiction.[51]

These therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies collectively address the complex relationship between personality traits and addictive behaviors, supporting individuals in achieving recovery and maintaining long-term abstinence.

Criticism

[edit]

There is an ongoing debate about the question of whether an addictive personality really exists. The assumption that personality might be to blame for an addicted person, who is in need of rehabilitation due to drug and alcohol addictions, can have great negative impacts from its supporting a homogeneous answer to a heterogeneous issue in question. These people run the risk of being stigmatized and incorrectly marginalized, and these misjudgments of personality may then lead to poor mental, medical, and social health practices.[1] There are two sides of this argument, each with many levels and variations. One side believes that there are certain traits and dimensions of personality that, if existent in a person, cause the person to be more prone to developing addictions throughout their life. The other side argues that addiction is in chemistry, as in how the brain's synapses respond to neurotransmitters and is therefore not affected by personality. A major argument in favor of defining and labeling an addictive personality has to do with the human ability to make decisions and the notion of free will.[52] This argument suggests human beings are aware of their actions and what the consequences of their own actions are and many choose against certain things because of this. This can be seen in that people are not forced to drink excessively or smoke every day, but it is within the reach of their own free will that some may choose to do so.[52] Therefore, those with addictive personalities are high in neuroticism and hence choose to engage in riskier behaviors. The theory of addictive personalities agrees that there are two types of people: risk-takers and risk-averse. Risk-takers enjoy challenges, new experiences and want instant gratification. These people enjoy the excitement of danger and trying new things.[52] On the other hand, risk-averse are those who are by nature cautious in what they do and the activities they involve themselves in.[52] It is the personality traits of individuals that combine to create either a risk-taker or risk-averse person.

Another important concern is the lack of evidence supporting the addictive personality label and the possibility of stigma.[53] While there is a medical consensus surrounding the genetic components of addiction,[54] there is no such consensus supporting the idea that specific personality types have a tendency towards addictive behaviors.[53] In fact, continued use of this term in the absence of clear evidence could be damaging to the people who believe they have an addictive personality.[53]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Addictive personality

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The addictive personality is a colloquial in that describes a hypothesized set of innate traits predisposing individuals to multiple forms of , including substance use disorders and behavioral addictions such as or compulsive . Despite its widespread use in popular media and literature, the idea lacks robust scientific support as a distinct diagnostic category, with experts viewing it as an oversimplification of 's complex etiology. consistently shows that addiction arises from an interplay of genetic, environmental, neurobiological, and social factors rather than a singular . Key traits often associated with heightened addiction vulnerability include high impulsivity, which involves seeking immediate gratification and difficulty delaying rewards; elevated neuroticism, characterized by emotional instability and proneness to anxiety; and low conscientiousness, marked by disorganization and poor self-control. These traits appear more frequently among individuals with addictions compared to the general population, but they are not exclusive predictors and vary across addiction types—for instance, substance addictions like alcohol use disorders correlate with lower extraversion and agreeableness, while gambling disorders show personality profiles more akin to non-addicted individuals. Genetic factors contribute 40–60% to addiction risk, with specific variants like those in the CHRNA5 gene doubling susceptibility to nicotine dependence and others, such as ALDH2, reducing alcoholism risk by up to ninefold. Environmental influences, including childhood trauma—which doubles the likelihood of substance use disorders—and socioeconomic stressors, further modulate these risks. The notion of an addictive personality has faced criticism for potentially stigmatizing those with addictions by implying inherent flaws, while also discouraging preventive efforts that address modifiable factors like and treatment. Comorbidity is common, with individuals prone to one addiction often developing others, suggesting shared underlying vulnerabilities rather than a unified profile. Ongoing emphasizes personalized approaches to , integrating assessments with genetic and environmental data to improve intervention strategies.

Definition and Overview

Historical Development

The concept of an "addictive personality" originated in the 1930s within the foundational literature of , founded in 1935, where alcoholism was portrayed as arising from inherent defects of character that created a predisposition to compulsive drinking. In the AA "Big Book," published in 1939, these defects were seen as moral and psychological flaws requiring spiritual inventory and removal through the 12 Steps, shifting views from mere moral failing to a condition rooted in personal character vulnerabilities. Following , the notion gained traction in popular literature and media campaigns promoting as a treatable disease influenced by individual predispositions. , the first woman to achieve long-term sobriety in AA and founder of the National Committee for Education on Alcoholism in 1944, played a pivotal role in this popularization by advocating publicly that was a public issue driven by underlying personal and behavioral factors, rather than solely willful misconduct. During the and , academic began formalizing links between and progression, building on earlier typologies. E.M. Jellinek's seminal 1952 work outlined phases of alcohol and classified drinkers into types (, gamma, delta, and ), associating certain patterns with personality-driven vulnerabilities that escalated dependence. This framework influenced subsequent research, emphasizing how traits like anxiety or social inadequacy could propel individuals through stages of psychological and physical reliance on alcohol. In the , the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III, 1980) incorporated personality influences into substance use disorders by separating them from disorders while noting comorbid traits like antisocial patterns as risk amplifiers, though it rejected a singular "addictive " . This era also saw the rise of influential popular texts, such as Craig Nakken's 1988 book The Addictive , which synthesized clinical and recovery insights to describe as a compulsive process emerging from isolated, shame-based dynamics. By the late , while the persisted in recovery circles, increasingly critiqued it as oversimplified, favoring multifactorial models over a monolithic profile.

Core Concepts and Myths

The "addictive " refers to a colloquial, non-clinical label describing a supposed cluster of traits that purportedly heighten an individual's vulnerability to various addictions, such as substance use or compulsive behaviors. This suggests that certain inherent characteristics predispose people to addictive patterns, but it lacks a standardized or empirically validated definition in psychological literature. It is not recognized as a distinct disorder or diagnostic category in authoritative classification systems, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition () or the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision (), which instead address through specific criteria for substance use disorders and behavioral addictions without reference to a unifying profile. A prevalent surrounding the addictive personality is the notion of a singular "addictive type," often stereotyped as weak-willed, morally deficient, or inherently flawed, which oversimplifies as a personal failing rather than a multifaceted condition. In reality, no single profile exclusively predicts ; vulnerability emerges from an interplay of genetic, environmental, psychological, and social factors, with traits like or appearing across diverse populations but not forming a cohesive "type." This misconception ignores substantial debunking the idea, including reviews that find no empirical support for a specific set of traits unique to across substances or behaviors. Importantly, the addictive personality concept must be distinguished from itself: while certain traits may contribute to increased risk as vulnerability factors, they neither cause addictive behaviors nor serve as synonyms for them. is understood as a chronic disorder influenced by repeated exposure to rewarding stimuli, not an inevitable outcome of personality alone. There is no robust epidemiological evidence supporting a distinct "addictive personality" subtype in the general population; instead, studies indicate that overlapping traits associated with higher risk, such as elevated , occur in a notable but non-specific portion of individuals, often alongside other conditions. The persistence of these myths carries harmful implications, fostering stigma that attributes to personal weakness and promoting self-blame among affected individuals, which can exacerbate and hinder recovery efforts. By framing as an unchangeable character defect, the concept discourages help-seeking behaviors and delays access to evidence-based treatments like cognitive-behavioral therapy or medication-assisted interventions. This stigmatizing view has been critiqued for shifting responsibility away from systemic factors, such as access to addictive substances, and reinforcing barriers to care.

Etiology and Risk Factors

Genetic and Biological Factors

Genetic factors contribute substantially to the vulnerability for addictive behaviors, with twin and family studies estimating at 40-60% for substance use disorders (SUDs). This genetic influence extends to traits associated with addiction , such as , through shared pathways involving reward sensitivity. For instance, variants in the DRD2 , which encodes the D2 receptor, are linked to reduced signaling and heightened susceptibility to alcohol, , and dependence, as the A1 allele is more prevalent among individuals with these addictions. These genetic elements often overlap with traits like novelty-seeking, promoting initiation of substance use. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified shared polygenic risks across substance use disorders, with common genetic variants influencing addiction vulnerability regardless of the specific substance type. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying addictive personality traits center on dysregulation in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, which originates in the and projects to the , facilitating reward processing and motivation. Addictive substances preferentially elevate levels in this pathway, reinforcing reward-seeking behaviors and leading to compulsive patterns over time. Chronic exposure results in adaptations such as decreased release and reduced D2 receptor expression, diminishing sensitivity to natural rewards and amplifying the drive for drug-related cues, which aligns with impulsive and sensation-seeking tendencies. Twin studies, including those from the Minnesota Twin Family Study, demonstrate approximately 50% heritability for and heavy drinking, with genetic factors accounting for stability in these behaviors across and young adulthood. These findings reveal overlap between genetic risks for and personality , where shared genetic influences contribute to both substance use and traits like or low constraint. Epigenetic modifications further modulate addiction vulnerability by altering in response to environmental stressors, particularly affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which regulates stress responses. Early life stress can induce changes at promoters of stress-related genes like CRH, leading to HPA axis hyperactivity and increased susceptibility to SUDs through enhanced alterations in reward circuits. Biological markers such as reduced (MAOA) enzyme activity are associated with aggressive-impulsive personality traits that heighten addiction risk. Low-activity variants of the , which breaks down neurotransmitters like serotonin, correlate with increased and a propensity for substance use, especially when combined with early adversity. These variants contribute to dysregulated emotional control, indirectly elevating vulnerability to addictive behaviors.

Psychological Factors

Psychological factors play a pivotal role in the development of traits predisposing individuals to addictive behaviors, often stemming from early experiential disruptions that shape emotional and cognitive responses. , pioneered by , posits that insecure attachment styles formed in childhood—such as anxious, avoidant, or disorganized—arise from inconsistent or unresponsive caregiving, leading to difficulties in emotional regulation and a propensity for through substances or addictive activities to soothe distress. These insecure attachments foster a reliance on external means to manage internal turmoil, as individuals with such histories exhibit higher vulnerability to substance use disorders due to impaired trust and relational stability. Trauma and chronic stress further exacerbate these risks through maladaptive coping mechanisms, as evidenced by the () study conducted in 1998, which revealed a dose-response relationship between the number of adverse experiences (e.g., , , or household dysfunction) and later outcomes. Individuals with four or more ACEs had 7.4-fold increased odds of , 4.7-fold for ever using illicit drugs, and 10.3-fold for injection drug use compared to those with none, primarily because these experiences disrupt stress response systems and promote substance use as a form of emotional numbing or escape. This heightened risk persists through adulthood, with trauma-induced hyperarousal contributing to compulsive patterns that reinforce addictive cycles. Cognitive biases within the addictive personality framework amplify susceptibility by distorting and enabling continued engagement in harmful behaviors. , the tendency to overestimate positive outcomes and underestimate personal vulnerability to negative consequences, allows individuals to tolerate higher levels of experimentation with addictive substances, as they irrationally believe adverse effects will not affect them personally. Similarly, denial mechanisms serve as psychological defenses, minimizing the severity of addiction's impact and perpetuating use by rejecting evidence of harm, which is particularly pronounced in early stages of dependency. These biases collectively lower barriers to onset by fostering an and invulnerability. Adolescence represents a critical developmental window where psychological vulnerabilities like low significantly elevate the likelihood of initiation, as supported by longitudinal research tracking youth from early teens into adulthood. Low during this period correlates with poorer outcomes and higher substance use trajectories, with studies indicating that adolescents with diminished self-worth are at increased risk for early onset of addictive behaviors due to seeking validation or relief through substances. This phase's heightened sensitivity to self-perception amplifies the transition from experimentation to dependency when esteem deficits go unaddressed. Personality development models rooted in psychodynamic theory, influenced by Freud's concepts of unconscious drives, explain how unresolved internal conflicts from early life manifest as compulsive behaviors in . These conflicts, often arising from repressed instincts or ego defenses against anxiety, drive repetitive addictive actions as a substitute for direct confrontation with underlying psychic tension, leading to patterns of self-sabotage and loss of control. In this view, serves as a symptom of deeper, unintegrated psychosexual or relational struggles, where substances or behaviors temporarily alleviate the pressure of these unresolved dynamics.

Environmental Factors

Environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping susceptibility to , particularly for individuals with addictive personality traits, by providing external cues and pressures that encourage substance use or compulsive behaviors. Within and peer dynamics, exposure to substance misuse in the often leads to modeling of addictive patterns, where children observe and internalize normalized attitudes toward or alcohol. structures, characterized by parental substance use disorders, significantly elevate the risk; for instance, offspring of parents with alcohol use disorders are up to four times more likely to develop similar problems themselves. Peer influences compound this effect, as affiliation with substance-using friends during can double the odds of initiating drug use, fostering social of risky behaviors. Such dynamics create an environment where addictive tendencies are not only learned but also socially validated, increasing vulnerability over time. Socioeconomic stressors further interact with personality predispositions to heighten addiction risk, especially in impoverished or urban settings where daily hardships amplify stress and limit protective resources. exposure during childhood and correlates with elevated substance initiation, as economic deprivation often leads to coping mechanisms involving drugs or alcohol. In urban neighborhoods marked by social disorder—such as high or —adolescents face a 25% higher of starting substance use, reflecting how environmental chaos can push sensation-seeking individuals toward experimentation as an escape. These conditions not only facilitate access to substances through local networks but also perpetuate cycles of disadvantage that undermine resilience against addictive pulls. Media and cultural normalization exert subtle yet powerful influences, portraying substance use as desirable or mainstream, which can intensify sensation-seeking in youth with addictive personalities. Advertising campaigns for emerging products like e-cigarettes in the have targeted young audiences through appealing imagery of flavors and social scenes, reinforcing the idea that vaping satisfies adventurous impulses. Content analyses of such promotions reveal they heighten perceived benefits for high-sensation seekers, leading to increased experimentation rates among exposed teens. This cultural embedding normalizes addictive behaviors, making them seem like acceptable responses to or peer expectations. Policy-driven changes in accessibility and availability also modulate addiction susceptibility, particularly for impulsive individuals who respond readily to reduced barriers. Cannabis legalization in various U.S. states has been linked to a 5-6% rise in adolescent initiation rates, as easier procurement encourages trial among those prone to novelty-seeking. Such shifts lower perceived risks and increase environmental prompts, drawing in personality types vulnerable to opportunistic use without addressing underlying . Acute life events, such as job loss or , act as potent triggers for relapse in those with addictive personalities, disrupting stability and reigniting cravings. Research on formerly alcohol-dependent individuals shows that separation or markedly increases relapse probability, as emotional turmoil overwhelms strategies. These stressors heighten vulnerability by mimicking the chaos of early addictive environments, with epidemiological data indicating they contribute substantially to recurrence rates in recovery. These external pressures can exacerbate psychological vulnerabilities like low , further entrenching addictive cycles.

Associated Personality Traits

Impulsivity and Sensation-Seeking

Impulsivity refers to a multifaceted personality trait characterized by the tendency to act rashly, often without forethought or consideration of consequences, which contributes to vulnerability for addictive behaviors. One widely used measure is the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, developed by Lynam et al. (2006), which assesses five distinct facets: negative urgency (rash actions in response to negative emotions), positive urgency (rash actions in response to positive emotions), lack of premeditation (failure to consider consequences before acting), lack of perseverance (difficulty persisting on tasks), and (pursuit of novel and intense experiences). Meta-analytic reviews indicate that these UPPS-P facets account for significant variance in predicting addictive outcomes, such as substance use disorders, with effect sizes ranging from moderate (r ≈ 0.20–0.30) to strong for urgency dimensions in explaining alcohol and drug problems. Sensation seeking, closely intertwined with impulsivity, is defined as a trait involving the search for varied, novel, complex, and intense sensations and experiences, coupled with a willingness to take physical, social, financial, and legal risks to achieve such stimulation. This construct was formalized in Zuckerman's 1979 theory, which posits that high sensation seekers maintain an optimal level through external stimuli, often leading to thrill-seeking activities. Research, including meta-analyses, shows that individuals scoring high on sensation seeking are significantly more likely to initiate substance use—approximately 2 to 3 times the risk compared to low scorers—particularly as a means to experience excitement and novelty. Behaviorally, high and manifest in poor delay discounting, where individuals disproportionately prefer smaller, immediate rewards over larger, delayed ones, a pattern linked to vulnerability. Functional MRI (fMRI) studies reveal underactivity in the during delay discounting tasks among those prone to addictions, reflecting impaired executive control and heightened reward sensitivity. These traits typically peak during , a period of heightened reward sensitivity, but longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study demonstrate moderate stability in from to adulthood (r ≈ 0.33). The overlap between and is substantial, as both traits often co-occur and synergistically amplify risk. This co-occurrence is partly underpinned by that modulate reward processing and motivation. Recent studies as of 2025 continue to support these associations but emphasize gene-environment interactions that modulate trait effects on vulnerability.

Correlations with Big Five Traits

The —, extraversion, , , and —provide a framework for understanding individual differences in vulnerability to addictive behaviors. Research consistently shows that certain trait configurations elevate addiction risk by influencing emotional regulation, decision-making, and behavioral tendencies. Meta-analyses indicate that these traits collectively account for a modest but significant portion of variance in outcomes, with stronger associations observed in substance-related disorders compared to behavioral addictions. High levels of , characterized by emotional instability and proneness to negative affect, are among the strongest predictors of risk. Individuals high in neuroticism experience heightened stress and anxiety, which may drive the use of mood-altering substances as a mechanism. A of 175 studies found that neuroticism is positively associated with substance use disorders, conferring approximately 1.5- to 2-fold increased risk compared to low-neuroticism individuals. This association holds across various substances, though it is particularly pronounced for alcohol and illicit drugs. Low , reflecting poor self-discipline and impulse control, similarly heightens susceptibility to chronic addiction by undermining goal-directed behaviors and resistance to temptations. This trait impairs the ability to maintain long-term commitments, such as , leading to a 30% higher of developing persistent addictive patterns. Notably, serves as a key facet of low conscientiousness, further amplifying these risks in contexts involving immediate rewards. Extraversion and show positive links to initial experimentation with addictive substances, such as novel drug use, due to their associations with sociability and . However, these traits exhibit mixed relations to dependence, with extraversion sometimes protective against severe outcomes through networks. Low , marked by antagonism and disregard for social norms, correlates with antisocial behaviors that exacerbate relational conflicts and sustain addictive cycles. A 2022 study in Acta Psychologica on youth found significant predictive associations between Big Five traits and illegal drug use, underscoring their utility in early intervention.

Substance Use Disorders

Individuals exhibiting addictive personality traits, such as high and sensation-seeking, demonstrate elevated risks for alcohol use disorder (AUD), particularly in patterns of . Research indicates that impulsive sensation-seeking significantly predicts both episodes and associated alcohol-related consequences among adolescents and young adults. These traits contribute to impaired executive function, fostering compulsive behaviors that heighten vulnerability to heavy consumption and subsequent dependence. Furthermore, sensation-seeking is linked to a threefold increased risk of following treatment for AUD, as evidenced by studies from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), underscoring the role of these traits in perpetuating cycles of use and recovery challenges. In and addictions, low emerges as a key predictor of polysubstance abuse, often co-occurring with antisocial personality traits. For instance, among individuals with , reduced correlates with broader patterns of multiple drug involvement, including stimulants like . Approximately 40% of users exhibit antisocial traits, which exacerbate the severity and persistence of dependence by promoting disregard for consequences and heightened risk-taking. These associations highlight how low undermines self-regulatory mechanisms, facilitating the transition from experimental use to chronic polysubstance disorders. Nicotine dependence is similarly influenced by personality traits, with extraversion facilitating social smoking initiation and high neuroticism contributing to its long-term persistence. Extraverted individuals are more prone to starting smoking in social contexts, where the trait drives novelty-seeking behaviors that normalize tobacco use. In cases of high neuroticism, dependence endures in about 70% of affected smokers, as emotional instability amplifies withdrawal symptoms and cravings, making cessation particularly difficult. Gender differences further modulate these risks, with men displaying risk-taking traits showing higher rates of substance use disorders at a 2:1 ratio compared to women. This disparity arises from greater male propensity for and sensation-seeking, leading to elevated initiation and escalation of substance involvement across alcohol, opioids, and stimulants. Longitudinal from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), as analyzed by Grant et al. (2015), ties these personality traits to a 15-year progression from initial substance use to full-blown disorders, demonstrating stable predictive patterns over time.

Behavioral Addictions

Behavioral addictions, also known as process addictions, involve compulsive engagement in rewarding activities without the involvement of substances, and individuals with addictive personality traits such as high and sensation-seeking are particularly vulnerable to these disorders. These traits contribute to the pursuit of intense experiences and difficulty in delaying gratification, leading to patterns of behavior that mirror substance use disorders in terms of loss of control and negative consequences. In gambling disorder, sensation-seeking plays a central role, as individuals high in this trait are drawn to the thrill and risk of betting, which can escalate to pathological levels. The classifies gambling disorder as a requiring at least four of nine criteria, such as preoccupation with gambling and chasing losses, and research using the Pathological Gambling Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS) shows that sensation-seeking correlates strongly with symptom severity, distinguishing pathological gamblers from recreational ones. Studies indicate that sensation-seeking is elevated in a substantial proportion of pathological cases, often mediating the transition from problem to disordered . Internet and gaming addiction similarly engage addictive traits, where high neuroticism fosters escapism as a coping mechanism for negative emotions, leading to excessive use that impairs daily functioning. A 2024 Frontiers in Psychiatry review highlights how escapism motives, amplified by neuroticism, increase the risk of gaming disorder among highly engaged users, with correlations showing neuroticism positively predicting problematic play over time. Prevalence estimates for internet gaming disorder among youth range from 6% to 10%, underscoring its impact on adolescents vulnerable to these personality-driven patterns. Sex and love addiction, characterized by compulsive sexual behaviors or romantic attachments despite harm, is strongly linked to impulsivity, which propels individuals into repetitive cycles seeking immediate emotional or physical gratification. Clinical studies demonstrate that impulsivity predicts addictive sexual tendencies across varying severities, with overlap in approximately 20% of samples exhibiting co-occurring impulsive-compulsive features akin to other behavioral addictions. This manifests as poorly planned actions driven by urges, often resulting in relational and psychological distress. Neuroimaging research reveals parallels between behavioral and substance addictions, particularly in prefrontal cortex deficits that impair decision-making and impulse control, though in behavioral cases, these are often triggered by non-chemical rewards like digital notifications or wins. Functional MRI studies of internet addiction show reduced prefrontal activation during reward processing, similar to substance users, but elicited by virtual stimuli rather than drugs. These alterations contribute to sustained engagement despite awareness of consequences. The recognized gaming disorder as a in its 2018 classification, marking a in acknowledging these conditions' legitimacy alongside substance disorders. Personality traits account for 25-35% of the variance in the onset of such addictions, as evidenced by longitudinal analyses linking and to increased risk across multiple behavioral domains.

Compulsive Behaviors (e.g., Food and Shopping)

Compulsive behaviors such as and represent addiction-like patterns driven by personality traits, particularly those involving and . In , is strongly linked to episodes, where individuals use highly palatable s to cope with negative emotions, mirroring mechanisms. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), developed to assess addiction criteria for , indicates a prevalence of approximately 15% in obese populations, highlighting its role in sustaining overconsumption despite adverse consequences. Compulsive shopping, also known as , is similarly influenced by low and high , traits that impair and planning, leading to excessive purchases and financial distress. Lifetime prevalence rates stand at 5-8% in the general , often measured through self-reported monetary losses exceeding 10% of on non-essential items. These behaviors are exacerbated by immediate seeking, with predicting recurrent episodes in up to 80% of cases. Across both food and shopping compulsions, high is prevalent, observed in a majority of affected individuals and contributing to -driven reward cycles akin to those in gambling addiction. amplifies emotional vulnerability, fostering repetitive behaviors to achieve transient relief through release in the brain's reward pathways. This overlap underscores how personality traits perpetuate addiction-like loops, with correlating positively in over half of documented cases. The Gearhardt et al. (2011) model provides foundational evidence by validating criteria against DSM standards, explicitly tying personality factors like and to addictive eating patterns. These traits not only initiate but maintain compulsions, as seen in broader frameworks where reward sensitivity overrides long-term consequences. Health impacts are profound, with these personality-influenced compulsions contributing to the global , where over 1 billion adults are affected, and traits like high and predicting roughly double the risk of treatment resistance in programs. Individuals with these profiles exhibit poorer adherence to interventions, leading to higher rates and sustained metabolic complications.

Comorbidities

Mental Health Disorders

Individuals with addictive personality traits, such as high and , exhibit significant overlaps with various disorders, contributing to bidirectional risks for substance use and behavioral addictions. These traits often exacerbate vulnerability to and poor coping mechanisms, leading to higher rates in clinical populations. Depression and anxiety disorders frequently co-occur with addictive behaviors, where elevated plays a central role. Studies on dual-diagnosis patients indicate that high neuroticism-anxiety scores are prominent in those with substance use disorders (SUD) and (MDD), correlating positively with depressive symptom severity and increasing the likelihood of addictive coping strategies. Approximately 50% of individuals with cases show this neuroticism overlap, as evidenced by dual-diagnosis research highlighting shared pathways. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) shares strong ties with addictive personality through , with 20-25% of adults in SUD treatment meeting ADHD criteria. This overlap elevates substance use risk by 2-3 times compared to the general population, as drives early experimentation and poor , according to longitudinal studies by ADHD expert and others. Untreated ADHD symptoms further amplify these addictive tendencies via heightened reward-seeking behaviors. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) intersects with addictive traits like avoidance and hyperarousal, often leading to with substances to numb trauma responses. rates range from 30-50% in SUD populations, with trauma-related avoidance behaviors mirroring addictive personality patterns and increasing vulnerability. This link is supported by epidemiological data showing PTSD patients are up to 14 times more likely to develop SUD, driven by shared neurobiological pathways. In , sensation-seeking traits during manic phases align closely with addictive personality, promoting as a means to enhance euphoric states. indicates that bipolar patients with high sensation-seeking exhibit greater substance sensitivity and mood instability, correlating with polysubstance abuse patterns that worsen cycling and treatment resistance. These traits contribute to higher SUD prevalence in bipolar cohorts, emphasizing the role of reward dysregulation. Epidemiological surveys underscore these connections, with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health reporting that approximately 35% (34.5%) of adults with any mental illness also meet criteria for a , highlighting the scale of these addictive personality-linked comorbidities.

Personality Disorders

Cluster B personality disorders, as defined in the , encompass borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic s, all marked by dramatic, emotional, or erratic patterns that often intersect with addictive behaviors through shared traits like , , and sensation-seeking. These disorders exhibit high with substance use disorders (SUDs), with studies indicating that up to 50-92% of individuals with SUDs also meet criteria for a , particularly within Cluster B. The overlap arises from core features such as poor self-regulation and a propensity for risky behaviors, which can exacerbate or mimic addictive patterns, leading to dual diagnoses in clinical settings. In (BPD), emotional instability and impulsivity are central features that strongly correlate with , with approximately 78% of adults with BPD developing a at some point in their lives. This high rate is attributed to the use of substances as a maladaptive mechanism for intense affective dysregulation and fear of abandonment, often resulting in and treatment challenges. Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) involves sensation-seeking, deceitfulness, and disregard for others, which are linked to substantial SUD comorbidity, with lifetime rates of any SUD reaching 76.7% among those with ASPD. These traits drive engagement in high-risk activities, including substance misuse, to fulfill thrill-seeking needs or evade consequences, contributing to cycles of legal and social issues. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) features that often masks underlying low , propelling individuals toward addictive behaviors as a means of self-enhancement or escape, with 24-64% of those with NPD meeting criteria for any SUD. This comorbidity is particularly evident in alcohol and use, where substances bolster a fragile sense of superiority amid interpersonal conflicts. Histrionic personality disorder (HPD) is characterized by excessive attention-seeking and dramatic emotional expression, which can overlap with compulsive substance use as individuals seek validation or stimulation through addictive outlets. Although specific rates for HPD and SUDs are less frequently quantified than for other Cluster B disorders, the disorder's emphasis on superficial relationships and discomfort when not the center of attention aligns with patterns of behavioral addictions, including substance reliance for . The highlights diagnostic overlap between Cluster B disorders and addictive pathologies through shared criteria like impaired impulse control and emotional volatility, with dual prevalence estimates around 40-50% in clinical populations reflecting this convergence. This intersection underscores the need for integrated treatment approaches to address both enduring patterns and acute addictive episodes.

Cultural and Societal Aspects

Cross-Cultural Variations

Research indicates that links between addictive personality traits, such as and sensation-seeking, and s vary across cultural contexts, particularly between individualist and collectivist societies. In individualist cultures like the , where personal and self-expression are emphasized, is more strongly associated with higher risks of substance misuse, with past-year prevalence at 17.1% among those aged 12 and older as of 2023. In contrast, collectivist societies in , such as those in South-East Asia, exhibit lower rates, with alcohol use disorder prevalence around 2.5-3% as of recent WHO estimates. This difference is potentially due to stronger social norms prioritizing group harmony and restraint. Cross-cultural studies show that personality pathways, including low leading to enhancement motives for alcohol use, are consistent but more pronounced in Western samples. Stigma in collectivist Asian cultures often suppresses reporting of addictive behaviors, masking underlying traits like that may contribute to . High levels of and family-oriented values lead to underutilization of treatment, with showing SUD rates of 9.2% as of 2023 compared to the U.S. average of 17.1%, partly due to cultural reluctance to disclose issues. This underreporting can obscure the true prevalence of personality-linked risks, as social conformity discourages acknowledgment of impulsive or sensation-seeking tendencies. Among indigenous populations, such as Native Americans, historical trauma from elevates sensation-seeking and risks, with rates at 25.3% as of 2023, higher than the national average of 17.1%. This trauma, including and cultural loss, fosters intergenerational stress that amplifies impulsive behaviors as mechanisms, leading to elevated prevalence in some groups. Migration and stress further heighten risks among immigrant by exacerbating personality vulnerabilities like . Meta-analyses reveal that acculturation increases the odds of alcohol use among immigrant adolescents, with succeeding generations facing higher risks due to cultural pressures. This stress can intensify sensation-seeking as a response to identity conflicts, particularly in U.S.-bound from Latinx backgrounds. Recent reviews highlight how cultural norms shape expectations around substances, influencing how addictive personality traits manifest and are addressed globally.

Stigma and Societal Perceptions

The concept of an addictive personality has long been intertwined with the model of , which portrays addictive behaviors as stemming from inherent character weaknesses or lack of willpower rather than complex biopsychosocial factors. This perspective perpetuates stigma by framing individuals with such traits as morally deficient, leading to and self- that deter help-seeking. For instance, endorsement of moral weakness attributions is common, with surveys indicating that up to 41% of the public view as both a moral failing and an illness, contributing to broader societal . Consequently, this stigma acts as a significant barrier to treatment, with 22% to 40% of individuals with addictive disorders citing it as a primary reason for not pursuing care, resulting in substantially lower uptake rates compared to non-stigmatized conditions. Media portrayals in films and television often reinforce stereotypes of the addictive personality as a flawed, impulsive character archetype, depicting those with such traits as unreliable or ethically compromised, which entrenches public misconceptions. These representations, such as the "tragic addict" or "morally deviant" figure, not only normalize judgment but also influence policy responses, as seen in coverage of the early 2020s opioid crisis where stigmatizing narratives shifted blame toward individual failings rather than systemic issues like overprescription. Such depictions exacerbate public stigma, reducing support for harm reduction policies and perpetuating a cycle where affected individuals face heightened social exclusion. Gender biases amplify stigma for women exhibiting addictive personality traits, who encounter harsher societal judgment due to expectations of nurturing roles and moral purity. Studies show that women with substance use disorders experience greater overall stigma than men, including intensified and that discourages disclosure and treatment. highlights how this leads to women being viewed as more culpable, with fears of custody loss or social compounding barriers to recovery. In professional settings, traits associated with an addictive personality—such as or risk-taking—are frequently mislabeled as or unreliability, fostering and barriers. Individuals in recovery report hesitation to seek jobs due to anticipated stigma, with employers often wary of risks, leading to higher rates of hiring and job retention challenges. This manifests in decisions around hiring, promotions, and accommodations, disproportionately affecting those with histories of . Advocacy efforts in the , particularly through the adoption of the disease model, have aimed to counteract these stigmas by reframing as a chronic health condition rather than a personal lapse. Organizations like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) launched campaigns emphasizing empathetic language and education, such as the "Overcoming Stigma, Ending " initiative, which promoted contact-based interventions to humanize those affected. These strategies have shown promise in reducing public bias, with evidence indicating decreased endorsement of weakness views and improved willingness to support treatment access.

Assessment and Diagnosis

Screening Methods

Screening methods for addictive personality traits primarily involve self-report questionnaires, clinical interviews, and emerging digital tools designed to identify risk factors such as , low , and high that predispose individuals to vulnerability. These approaches aim to detect subtle indicators of personality-driven risk before full-blown addictive behaviors manifest, often integrating validated scales to profile traits associated with , poor , and emotional instability. While no single tool exclusively diagnoses an "addictive personality," combinations of these methods provide comprehensive risk assessments in clinical and settings. The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI), particularly the SASSI-3 version, is a widely used questionnaire that screens for substance use disorders by incorporating both face-valid and subtle items to detect denial and defensiveness in individuals exhibiting impulsive traits. Developed to identify high-risk profiles even among those who minimize their issues, the SASSI-3 includes 67 items that yield probability scores for substance abuse, with subtle scales capturing personality-related evasion tactics common in addictive personalities. Validation studies have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with overall classification accuracies of 93-97% in general populations when compared to diagnostic interviews. The Big Five Inventory (BFI), available in a short 10-item form (BFI-10), assesses core dimensions including and , which are inversely and positively linked, respectively, to risk. Low reflects poor impulse control and planning deficits, while high indicates emotional reactivity that heightens susceptibility to substance use as a mechanism. utilizing the BFI has shown that these traits predict illegal drug use and non-medical experimentation, with less conscientious and more neurotic individuals exhibiting higher odds of prior use in population samples. The tool's brevity makes it suitable for rapid risk profiling in preventive screenings. Impulsivity, a hallmark trait in addictive personalities, is specifically measured by the (BIS-11), a 30-item self-report instrument evaluating attentional, motor, and non-planning across three subscales. Validated extensively for its predictive utility in contexts, the BIS-11 correlates with substance use initiation and severity, with higher scores forecasting increased alcohol, , and in longitudinal studies. Its factor structure has been confirmed in clinical populations, demonstrating good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.70) and test-retest reliability, making it a standard for identifying -driven vulnerability. Complementary tools like the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale assess additional facets such as urgency and perseverance, enhancing comprehensive profiling in screening. Clinical interviews, such as the Structured Clinical Interview for (SCID-5), particularly the personality disorders module (SCID-5-PD), facilitate structured assessment of trait-disorder overlaps in addictive contexts by probing for enduring patterns like antisocial or borderline features that amplify addiction risk. Administered by trained clinicians, the SCID evaluates dimensional traits alongside categorical diagnoses, revealing comorbidities in 50-60% of patients. Its reliability in substance abuse settings has been established through inter-rater agreement studies (kappa ≈ 0.4-0.8), enabling nuanced identification of personality contributions to addictive behaviors. Emerging technologies, including AI-based mobile apps and chatbots, analyze response patterns from integrated questionnaires to screen for addiction risk factors including personality traits like and , offering automated risk stratification with reported accuracies of 75-85% in preliminary validations for substance use identification. These tools employ algorithms on data from scales like the BIS-11 or BFI to detect relevant signals, as demonstrated in 2024 pilot studies. Such apps enhance accessibility for early intervention, though they require oversight to mitigate false positives.

Diagnostic Challenges

The concept of an addictive personality lacks formal recognition as a standalone in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (), which contributes to challenges in systematic identification and assessment of individuals at risk for addictive behaviors. Without specific criteria, clinicians often rely on overlapping traits from other personality disorders or classifications, leading to under-identification of vulnerability in non-clinical populations where early intervention could be beneficial. This absence of standardized diagnostic protocols exacerbates inconsistencies across healthcare settings, as the term remains more colloquial than clinical. Heterogeneity among personality traits associated with addiction further complicates diagnosis, as no unified profile consistently predicts susceptibility across substance or behavioral addictions. Traits such as , sensation-seeking, and low may elevate risk for one type of addiction, like alcohol use disorder, but show weaker or variable links to others, such as or internet addiction, making generalized assessments unreliable. A 2023 analysis highlighted this variability, critiquing the addictive construct for oversimplifying diverse etiological factors and ignoring context-specific influences. Self-report measures, commonly used in personality assessments, introduce additional biases, particularly among impulsive individuals who may underreport problematic behaviors due to or social desirability, thereby reducing the overall reliability of evaluations. Cultural insensitivity in existing assessment tools poses another barrier, as many instruments are developed based on Western norms and fail to account for diverse expressions of addictive tendencies in non-Western or marginalized populations. For instance, collectivist cultures may frame through or communal lenses rather than individual traits, leading to misinterpretation or overlooked cases in diagnostics. Ethical concerns also arise from labeling individuals with an "addictive personality," as this can perpetuate stigmatization without evidence-based benefits for treatment outcomes, potentially deterring help-seeking and reinforcing societal biases against those with substance use issues. Such labeling risks pathologizing normal variability in personality without advancing clinical utility.

Treatment Approaches

Psychotherapeutic Interventions

(CBT) is a primary psychotherapeutic intervention for substance use disorders, helping individuals address risk factors such as by identifying and restructuring maladaptive thought patterns that contribute to compulsive behaviors. Through techniques such as and behavioral experiments, CBT targets cognitive distortions associated with poor decision-making and risk-taking. A of 30 randomized controlled trials involving 5,398 participants found that CBT yielded 15-26% better outcomes in substance use reduction compared to minimal treatment controls, with moderate effect sizes (Hedges' g = 0.44-0.58) persisting at long-term follow-up. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), adapted for substance use disorders, focuses on emotional regulation, particularly for cases with comorbid involving intense emotional reactivity and impulsivity. DBT incorporates skills training in , distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness to build resilience against urges. A of six studies with 278 participants demonstrated that DBT produced a medium-to-large (Hedges' g = 0.66) in increasing substance abstinence post-treatment compared to alternative treatments or waitlists, particularly effective for comorbid borderline cases. Motivational interviewing (MI) enhances self-efficacy and treatment engagement for individuals with addictions. By resolving ambivalence and eliciting intrinsic motivation through empathetic, non-confrontational dialogue, MI fosters commitment to change. Research indicates that MI, often combined with other therapies, significantly improves self-efficacy and motivation, leading to better treatment engagement and reduced substance use. Group therapy, including 12-step programs like Alcoholics Anonymous, provides structured peer support and shared narratives that offer social reward and accountability. These programs emphasize step-by-step progression toward sobriety and community involvement. Systematic reviews confirm that participation in 12-step mutual support groups is associated with sustained abstinence and improved psychosocial functioning, with frequent attendance linked to lower relapse rates over time. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP), developed in the , targets urges by cultivating awareness of triggers and automatic responses without judgment. This eight-session program integrates practices with cognitive-behavioral strategies to interrupt cycles of use. A of 13 studies from 2016-2020 reported significant reductions in cravings and substance use frequency, with improvements in related symptoms like depression.

Pharmacological and Supportive Strategies

Pharmacological strategies for addictions often target underlying neurobiological mechanisms, such as reward processing, to mitigate risks associated with alcohol and use. , an antagonist, reduces reward-seeking behaviors by blocking the euphoric effects of substances, thereby decreasing cue-induced cravings and self-administration. Clinical studies have demonstrated that can lead to approximately a 25-50% reduction in heavy drinking days among dependent individuals. This medication is FDA-approved for both alcohol use disorder and opioid dependence, with evidence suggesting it modulates neural reward networks to lessen the appeal of addictive stimuli. Stimulant medications, such as and amphetamines, prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), address core traits that heighten susceptibility. By enhancing regulation in prefrontal circuits, these agents improve executive function and reduce risky decision-making, thereby lowering the overall risk of substance use disorders. Longitudinal research indicates that ADHD treatment with stimulants is associated with 31% lower rates of substance abuse-related problems compared to untreated cases, highlighting their role in preventing escalation of addictive behaviors. Antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like sertraline or , are employed to alleviate anxiety that often co-occurs with addictive tendencies. These medications stabilize mood and reduce anxiety symptoms, which can otherwise propel substance use. In comorbid anxiety and cases, SSRIs have shown efficacy in improving outcomes, with meta-analyses reporting significant symptom reduction; for instance, response rates are approximately 10-20% higher than in anxiety management, indirectly supporting recovery by addressing . Supportive strategies complement pharmacological approaches by fostering community and behavioral self-regulation without relying on spiritual frameworks. , a secular alternative to , emphasizes self-management and recovery training techniques tailored to addictive behaviors, enabling participants to identify and modify risk factors like through cognitive tools and . This program promotes evidence-based methods for building coping skills, with studies showing long-term abstinence rates comparable to traditional mutual aid groups. Lifestyle interventions, such as structured exercise programs, provide non-pharmacological support by activating natural reward pathways. Regular aerobic activity releases and reduces stress, mitigating urges for substance-mediated highs. According to general health guidelines from the and WHO, incorporating at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise weekly can enhance mood regulation and lower addiction relapse risks, with meta-analyses confirming exercise increases the likelihood of ( 1.69) in treatment settings. Ongoing research as of 2025 emphasizes personalized approaches to addiction treatment, integrating assessments of personality risk factors with genetic and environmental data to tailor interventions.

Controversy and Future Research

Scientific Debates

The concept of an "addictive personality" has been widely critiqued as a myth, with reviews indicating no universal set of traits common to all individuals with addictions. Research consistently shows that no single personality profile predicts vulnerability across different forms of addiction, as traits like impulsivity or sensation-seeking appear in some cases but not others, lacking specificity to addictive behaviors alone. This absence of a unified trait structure challenges the notion that personality alone drives addiction, emphasizing instead a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and neurobiological factors. Critics argue that the addictive personality framework oversimplifies addiction by downplaying its multifactorial , where personality traits contribute only modestly to risk according to meta-analyses of longitudinal studies. Such traits, including high or low , correlate with increased odds of substance use but fail to explain the majority of cases, which involve interactions with stressors, social influences, and biological vulnerabilities. This reductive view ignores evidence that emerges from dynamic processes rather than static character flaws, potentially misleading prevention and intervention efforts. The persistence of the addictive personality idea has harmful consequences, fostering stigma that portrays individuals as inherently flawed and delaying access to recovery resources. By labeling people as predisposed to addiction due to character defects, it reinforces negative stereotypes, leading to self-blame and that can hinder treatment-seeking. Experts warn that this narrative creates a , where individuals internalize the belief of inevitable relapse, undermining motivation for change and perpetuating cycles of use. Decades of , spanning from the 1970s through the 2020s, have failed to identify a reliable predictive profile for based on . Early studies in the mid-20th century sought common traits among alcoholics and users but yielded inconsistent results, with subsequent large-scale reviews confirming no consistent pattern emerges across populations or types. Meta-analyses of twin and cohort studies reinforce this, showing that while certain traits elevate risk modestly, they do not form a diagnostic or prognostic tool for identifying at-risk individuals. In contrast, prevailing scientific models frame as a chronic disease driven by neuroadaptations in reward, stress, and circuits, rather than a personality defect. The emphasizes that repeated substance exposure alters structure and function, leading to independent of preexisting traits, which supports viewing as a treatable condition. This perspective shifts focus from blame to evidence-based interventions targeting neural changes.

Emerging Perspectives

Recent studies in the have increasingly focused on as a mechanism for modifying addictive personality traits, particularly through interventions. These approaches leverage real-time brain activity monitoring to train individuals in self-regulating neural patterns associated with and other risk factors for . For example, and protocols have demonstrated promising efficacy in reducing -related processes among those with addictive disorders. Such findings suggest that targeted can alter entrenched personality traits, offering a pathway to mitigate vulnerability by enhancing control over reward-seeking behaviors. Advancements in have introduced polygenic risk scores (PRS) that integrate genetic data with traits to enable personalized predictions of susceptibility. By aggregating variants from genome-wide association studies, PRS models aid in assessing risk for traits linked to substance use disorders. In 2025 developments, researchers have refined these scores to predict early-onset alcohol use in adolescents by combining genetic risk with profiles, revealing age-dependent interactions that strengthen over time. This integration supports tailored prevention strategies, such as early interventions for high-risk individuals exhibiting both elevated PRS and impulsive traits. The rise of digital addictions has prompted 2025 reviews examining personality traits in adolescent use, highlighting traits like low conscientiousness and high as predictors of problematic behaviors. A analysis underscores how these traits mediate the pathway to smartphone dependence. Such emphasizes the need for trait-specific programs to curb emerging addictive patterns in technology-saturated environments. Longitudinal analyses powered by AI are uncovering dynamic interactions between personality traits and trajectories across large cohorts. models applied to multi-decade datasets reveal how traits like sensation-seeking evolve in response to environmental triggers, predicting onset with improved accuracy over static assessments. These AI-driven insights highlight bidirectional influences, where early trait expressions amplify , informing adaptive intervention timing. Holistic models are gaining traction by integrating cultural and environmental factors with personality-addiction links, as outlined in NAADAC's 2024 resources for addiction professionals. These guidelines advocate for culturally responsive frameworks that consider how societal norms and environmental stressors modulate trait expression in diverse populations, promoting equitable treatment outcomes. By embedding such elements, emerging models aim to address the multifaceted nature of addictive personalities beyond individual traits alone.

References

  1. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230505-is-there-such-a-thing-as-an-addictive-personality
  2. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-excess/201605/the-myth-the-addictive-personality
  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/522S48a
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29547799/
  5. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/evolution-addiction-medicine-medical-specialty/2011-12
  6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/01/29/marty-mann-aa-alcoholism-disease/
  7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19184441/
  8. https://www.cpsp.pitt.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/1-IIB1-White-Ch.-15-16.pdf
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5039518/
  10. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Addictive_Personality.html?id=Sa4uxQEACAAJ
  11. https://psychcentral.com/addictions/addictive-personality
  12. https://www.healthline.com/health/addictive-personality-traits
  13. https://www.academia.edu/34320142/Griffiths_M_D_2017_The_myth_of_addictive_personality_Global_Journal_of_Addiction_and_Rehabilitation_Medicine_3_2_555610
  14. https://stjosephinstitute.com/blog/the-myth-of-the-addictive-personality/
  15. https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1756-0500-5-497
  16. https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/addiction/genes/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3506170/
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02547-z
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6890985/
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1920543/
  21. https://mctfr.psych.umn.edu/alcohol
  22. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.670
  23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12035-014-9040-y
  24. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/gene/maoa/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4865459/
  26. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-attachment-theory-2795337
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5912983/
  28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1533256X.2019.1637229
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9635069/
  30. https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(98)00017-8/fulltext
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8492482/
  32. https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/defense-mechanisms/the-psychology-of-denial-exploring-the-science-behind-this-defense-mechanism/
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29224217/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321717628_Longitudinal_Trajectory_of_the_Relationship_Between_Self-Esteem_and_Substance_Use_From_Adolescence_to_Young_Adulthood
  35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64952/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6359991/
  37. https://americanaddictioncenters.org/blog/family-history-of-substance-abuse
  38. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11906-2
  39. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10831
  40. https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e18943/
  41. https://www.nber.org/digest/oct14/consequences-legalizing-marijuana
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3808003/
  43. https://www.impulsivity.org/measurement/upps_p/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3732812/
  45. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0843
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3943930/
  47. https://dunedinstudy.otago.ac.nz/files/1610496520755.pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331587136_A_Systematic_Meta-Review_of_Impulsivity_and_Compulsivity_in_Addictive_Behaviors
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6450787/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20804236/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9091062/
  52. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-17510-004
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46094267_Linking_Big_Personality_Traits_to_Anxiety_Depressive_and_Substance_Use_Disorders_A_Meta-Analysis
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365205134_Big_Five_personality_traits_predict_illegal_drug_use_in_young_people
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10662253/
  56. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/health-professionals-communities/core-resource-on-alcohol/neuroscience-brain-addiction-and-recovery
  57. https://www.nature.com/articles/npp201392
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3388488/
  59. https://americanaddictioncenters.org/co-occurring-disorders/personality-disorders/antisocial
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4609271/
  61. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/482090
  62. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/substance-use-in-women/sex-differences-in-substance-use
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4618096/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3164585/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2897920/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5395088/
  67. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1443091/full
  68. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1257685/full
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5023737/
  70. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2018.0129
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8935197/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10779052/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4034340/
  74. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/addictive-behaviours-gaming-disorder
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273930771_The_relationship_between_behavioral_addictions_and_the_five-factor_model_of_personality
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5707746/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5644849/
  78. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1806
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886921001963
  80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29452044/
  81. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/obr.12235
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6336829/
  83. https://neurowellnessspa.com/dual-diagnosis-and-co-occurring-disorders/
  84. https://academic.oup.com/book/24517/chapter/187659144
  85. https://childmind.org/article/adhd-and-substance-abuse/
  86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2156857X.2025.2478846
  87. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jts.23002
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3811127/
  89. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00383.x
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9242092/
  91. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2024-nsduh-detailed-tables
  92. https://policycentermmh.org/the-overlapping-mental-health-and-substance-use-disorder-crises-impacting-maternal-mental-health/
  93. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542325/
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10798162/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221265701830093X
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4010862/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10786009/
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-024-03054-z
  99. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.focus.11.2.167
  100. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00662/full
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6145127/
  102. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH%25202023%2520Annual%2520Release/2023-nsduh-main-highlights.pdf
  103. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38356084/
  104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.004
  105. https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/addiction-statistics-demographics/asian-americans
  106. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/culture-and-substance-abuse-impact-culture-affects-approach-treatment
  107. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH%25202023%2520Annual%2520Release/2023-nsduh-race-eth-highlights.pdf
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8084991/
  109. https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(21)00480-8/fulltext
  110. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023119843017
  111. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240096745
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486515/
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11974440/
  114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31122614/
  115. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002969
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8168566/
  117. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/63
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12541974/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2885482/
  120. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/overcoming-stigma-ending-discrimination-resource-guide.pdf
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8168446/
  122. https://sassi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Estimates-of-the-Reliability-and-Criterion-Validity-of-the-Adolescent-SASSI-A3-9-1-20.pdf
  123. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01971/full
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691822003092
  125. http://homepages.se.edu/cvonbergen/files/2013/01/Fifty-Years-of-the-Barratt-Impulsivenss-Scale_An-Update-and-Review.pdf
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260015000538
  127. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729715/
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8119811/
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4509850/
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11572328/
  131. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/6/6/113
  132. https://www.smarmorecastle.ie/addiction-resources/addictive-personality-disorder/
  133. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-addictive-personality-isn-t-what-you-think-it-is/
  134. https://www.mentalhealthjournal.org/articles/personality-profiles-of-individuals-with-substance-use-disorders-historical-overview-and-current-directions.html
  135. https://substanceabusepolicy.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13011-021-00398-3
  136. https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/stigma-discrimination
  137. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ethical-imperatives-overcome-stigma-against-people-substance-use-disorders/2020-08
  138. https://addictions.psych.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/160/2020/01/JCCP-A-meta-analysis-of-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-for-alcohol-or-other-drug-use-disorders-Treatment-efficacy-by-contrast-condition.pdf
  139. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1601&context=edu_fac
  140. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1338
  141. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3753023/
  142. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/11/10/133
  143. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2811435
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4147667/
  145. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359036344_Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitors_in_the_treatment_of_depression_anxiety_and_post-traumatic_stress_disorder_in_substance_use_disorders_a_Bayesian_meta-analysis
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8528899/
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4199732/
  148. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/fitness/in-depth/exercise/art-20048389
  149. https://www.nature.com/articles/522S45a
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3996683/
  151. https://theconversation.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-an-addictive-personality-heres-why-55275
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527047/
  153. https://www.verywellmind.com/things-to-stop-doing-if-youre-an-addictive-personality-21942
  154. https://neurosciencenews.com/addictive-personality-21217/
  155. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/drugs-brain
  156. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/drug-misuse-addiction
  157. https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/addiction-science/drugs-brain-behavior-science-of-addiction
  158. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40429-023-00499-y
  159. https://neurohopepsych.com/2021/10/14/using-eeg-neurofeedback-training-to-lower-impulsivity-and-improve-wellbeing-in-individuals-with-history-of-drug-addiction/
  160. https://karger.com/cxp/article/11/1/113/933123/Development-of-the-Comprehensive-Addiction-Risk
  161. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-07-genetics-personality-traits-early-teen.html
  162. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1634387/full
  163. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1530212/full
  164. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-020-00865-8
  165. https://www.naadac.org/cultural-humility-resources
  166. https://www.naadac.org/assets/2416/aa&r_winter2021_cultural_considerations_in_addiction_treatment.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.